51293_NC DOT_20090529

7 -Z D 'F
❑ CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL Y N'? 51293
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
1:1 New ❑Modification Ll Complete Reissue ❑Parti eissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
Applicant Name Project Location: County
❑ Rules attached.
Address Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City_ State _ ZIP
Phone # () Fax # (�) Subdivision
Authorized Agent City ZIP
Affected ❑ CW L- EW ❑ PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS Phone # ( ) River Basin
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn�
❑ PWS: ❑ FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
i r dy y
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure yes no
Sandbags: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes no
Photos: yes no
Waiver Attached: yes no
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
Application Fee(s) Check #
(Scale: ) I
l... i ..,
0 See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Permit Officer's Signature
Issuing Date
Local Planning Jurisdiction
Expiration Date
Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythatthis project is consistentwith the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office
Mailing Address:
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Location:
2728 Capital Blvd,
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax:[phone]
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/ 1-888-4RCOAST
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
June 1, 2009
NCDOT
c/o Jay Johnson
P.O. Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835
Dear Jay,
Enclosed are General Permits #51292, 51293, 51294, 51295, and 51296 to construct bridges on
existing location to replace existing bridge #31, #35, #40, #42, and #44 respectively on NC304 in
Pamlico County, N.C.
In order to validate these permits, please sign the permits as indicated. Retain the white copy
for your files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-
addressed envelope. If the signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation
of development, you will be working without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of
Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
Enclosures
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
q0®AI!) PP949JOW
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
March 6, 2009
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Field Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
ATTENTION: Mr. Stephen Lane
NCDOT Coordinator
60OZ L 9 HO
A
pNF.�
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
APR 2 7 2009
Morehead City DCM
Subject: Application for CAMA General Permit for the proposed replacement of Five
Bridges on NC304 in Pamlico County, State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP): Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek (B -5129B); Bridge
No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek (B -5129C); Bridge No. 40 over Bear
Creek (B -5129D); Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek (B -5129E); and Bridge No.
44 over UT to Jones Bay (B-4594), Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-0304(3), State
Project No. WBS 42287.1.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace five
bridges on NC304 in Pamlico County (Figure 1). Please accept this letter as a request for a
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) General Permit for the above referenced projects.
NCDOT plans to replace these bridges using staged construction and roadway approach work
will be kept to a minimum so that one lane of traffic can be maintained on site during
construction.
The five bridges are being replaced because they have been deemed structurally deficient.
The new bridges will be built to match existing alignments and parameters on current locations.
Each of the existing bridges has a superstructure composed of a reinforced concrete deck on
timber joists. End bents and interior bents are timber caps on timber piles. The existing bridges
will be removed in accordance with the NCDOT Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal (BMP BDR). The timber and steel components will be removed
without dropping any components into Waters of the U.S.
MAILING ADDRESS:
113 AIRPORT DRIVE
SUITE 100
EDENTON, NC 27932
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWM!DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
113 Airport Drive
Suite 100.
Edenton, NC 27932

Page 2
March 6, 2009
The recommended replacement structure for each bridge is a concrete cored slab deck
with a clear roadway width of 33 feet. Table 1 shows the existing bridge length and the proposed
bridge length for the five bridge replacements.
Table 1. Existing and Proposed Bridge Lengths
Bridge Site
Existing Bridge
Length
Proposed Bridge
Length
13-512913, Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
87 feet
120 feet
B -5129C, Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
52 feet 7 inches
85 feet
B -5129D, Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
52 feet 3 inches
90 feet
B -5129E, Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
101 feet 6 inches
120 feet
B-4594, Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
52 feet
80 feet
The approach roadway will hold the existing horizontal alignment and roadway width. It
will also be at approximately the same elevation as the existing roadway. Deck and roadway
drainage will be maintained at approximately the same slopes as the existing structure and
roadway approaches. No deck drains are included in the project.
The bridges are all located within the Neuse River Basin and US Geological Survey
hydrologic unit 03020105. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) has
designated a best usage classification for each stream and its unnamed tributaries (UT) as shown
in Table 2.
Table 2. NCDWQ Index Number and Best Usage Classification
Stream Name
DWQ Index Number
Best Usage Classification
Vandemere Creek
27-150-15
SC Sw — NSW
Little Vandemere Creek
27-150-15-1
SC Sw — NSW HQW
Bear Creek
27-150-28
SA HQW - NSW
Gale Creek
27-150-31
SA HQW - NSW
UT to Jones Bay
27-152
SA HQW - NSW
There are currently no outstanding resource waters (ORW) or drinking water supply
waters (WS -I and WS -II) within a one mile radius of the project study area. The 2008 Draft
303(d) list (dated January 10, 2008) or the 2006 Final 303(d) list (dated June 19, 2007) indicates
impaired waters located within one mile upstream or downstream of Vandemere Creek, Bear
Creek, and Gale Creek are due to fecal coliform contamination.
Jurisdictional wetlands are located immediately adjacent to the existing bridges.
Avoidance and minimization measures have been incorporated to the extent possible; however,
impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur. Permanent impacts to coastal wetlands include fill
materials required for widening approach roadways at new end bent locations, which is necessary
to conform to current design standards and to accommodate guardrail installation. Permanent
surface water impacts include placement of interior bent bridge supports in the channel and rip -
rap for fill slope stabilization at new end bent locations.

Page 3
March 6, 2009
Existing relic wood pilings located in the water at the bridge locations will be pulled out of
the channel because they pose a safety hazard. Sediment curtains will be used to ensure that
sediment releases from this activity will be contained to the immediate location of the pile removal
operation. Construction equipment will be operated from the existing road surface and/or upland
areas and will not enter wetland areas.
As of January 31, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of protected
species includes six federally protected species for Pamlico County (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally protected species listed for Pamlico County.
Appropriate habitat for shortnose sturgeon is available within waters of the five bridge
replacement sites. According to NCNHP Virtual Workroom records, updated on September 23,
2008, shortnose sturgeon has been observed in waters of the Neuse River and Pamlico Sound
south of Pamlico County. Shortnose sturgeon is a mobile species that is expected to relocate to
avoid construction activities; therefore, project construction may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect, this species.
There are no viable options for use of an off-site detour and existing traffic must be
maintained on one lane during bridge construction. NCDOT requests relief from moratoriums on
in -water work to allow completion of this project concurrent with the four adjacent bridge sites
along NC 304. Work can be completed in one construction season which will cause minimal
disruption to public school bus traffic.
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Present
Conclusion
Alligator
American alligator
T(S/A)
Yes
Not Required
mississippiensis
Lepidochelys kempii
Kemp's ridley sea
E
No
No Effect
turtle
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded
E
No
No Effect
woodpecker
Acipenser
Shortnose sturgeon
E
Yes
MA-NLAA
brevirostrum
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E *
No
No Effect
Lysimachia
Rough -leaved
E
No
No Effect
as erulae olia
loosestrife
E — Endangered
MA — NLAA — May Affect -Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
T(S/A) — Threatened due to similarity of
appearance
* - Historic record (the species was last
observed in the county more than 50 years ago)
Appropriate habitat for shortnose sturgeon is available within waters of the five bridge
replacement sites. According to NCNHP Virtual Workroom records, updated on September 23,
2008, shortnose sturgeon has been observed in waters of the Neuse River and Pamlico Sound
south of Pamlico County. Shortnose sturgeon is a mobile species that is expected to relocate to
avoid construction activities; therefore, project construction may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect, this species.
There are no viable options for use of an off-site detour and existing traffic must be
maintained on one lane during bridge construction. NCDOT requests relief from moratoriums on
in -water work to allow completion of this project concurrent with the four adjacent bridge sites
along NC 304. Work can be completed in one construction season which will cause minimal
disruption to public school bus traffic.

Page 4
March 6, 2009
Please find attached a copy of the U.S. Coast Guard letter dated February 19, 2009
granting advance permit approval for these bridge replacements. The following information is
provided for each of the bridge replacement projects: CAMA permit forms MP -1, MP -2, and
MP -5; U.S. Postal Service Return Receipt certification cards from adjacent landowner notification
packages; Pre -Construction Notification Form; permit drawings; and Figures 1 and 2 which
identify the project sites.
We are requesting that the proposed work be authorized under a CAMA General Permit.
By copy of this letter we are also requesting issuance of a US Army Corps of Engineers
Nationwide Permit 14 and the corresponding 401 General Certification 3704. In compliance with
Condition 1 of this certification we request written concurrence from the NC Division of Water
Quality.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the project, please contact me at
[phone]. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Jay B. Johnson
Division Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 2
Attachments (set included for each bridge)
Adjacent Landowner Notification Return Receipts
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 Project Topography
CAMA Permit Forms MP -1, MP -2, MP -5
PCN Application Form
U.S. Coast Guard Advance Permit Approval letter
Permit Drawings (8.5 x 11 and 11 x 17)
w/attachments
Mr. William Westcott, USACE (1 copy, CD)
Mr. Garcy Ward, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ 401 Permit Unit (5 copies, CD)
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
w/o attachments
Mr. Kevin Austin, P.E., Mulkey Inc.

Commander 431 Crawford Street
U.S. Department o/Aff United States Coast Guard Portsmouth, Va. 23704-5004
Homeland SecuritFifth Coast Guard District Staff Symbol: dpb
Phone: [phone]
United States Fax: [phone]
Unite Guard Email: [e-mail]
Coas
16591
19 FEB 09
Ms. Cindy Simpson Carr
Senior Scientist
Mulkey, Inc.
PO Box 33127
Raleigh, NC 27636
Dear Ms. Carr:
I apologize for our late response to your letter of November 6, 2008, requesting for Advance
Permit Approval for the following North Carolina Department of Transportation Bridge
Replacement Projects in Pamlico County, NC:
1) B -5129B, Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek;
2) B -5129C, Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek;
3) B -5129D, Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek;
4) B -5129E, Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek; and
5) B-4594, Bridge No. 44 over Jones Bay
Our examination and historical data indicate that there is sufficient factual support for
concluding that these waterways are navigable waters of the United States. However, the
waterways also meet the criteria for advanced approval waterways outlined in Title 33, Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 115.70. Advance approval waterways are those that are navigable
in law, but not actually navigated by other than small boats. The Commandant of the Coast
Guard has given his advance approval to the construction and rehabilitation of bridges across
such waterways. Therefore, a Coast Guard Bridge permit will not be required for these proposed
bridge replacement projects.
These projects will be placed in our Advance Approval category for the locations and
replacement of the Abovementioned Bridge projects and is valid for five years from the date of
this letter. If the construction does not commence within this time period, you must contact this
office for reaffirmation of this authorization. Future bridge projects along the same waterways
will have to be independently evaluated before they may be considered for Advance Approval.
The fact that a Coast Guard bridge permit is not required does not relieve you of the
responsibility for compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency
who may have jurisdiction over any aspect of these projects.
Although these projects will not require a bridge permit, other areas of Coast Guard jurisdiction
apply. The following must be met:

w From: 7573986334 Page: 3/3� Date: 2/19/2009 3:46:20 PM
16591
19 FEB 09
a. The lowest portion of the superstructure of the bridge across the waterway should clear the
100 -year flood height elevation, if feasible.
b. The National Ocean Service (NOS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAH) is responsible for maintaining the charts of U.S. waters; therefore they must be notified
of these proposed bridge projects. You must notify our office and the NOS upon completion of
the activities approved in this letter. Your notification of completion mast include as -built
drawings, which certifies the location and clearances of the each bridge that was constructed.
This information will be sent to the following address:
Ken Forster
National Ocean Service (NOS)
N/CS26, Room 7317
1315 Last -West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
Please contact me at the above address or telephone number for any further assistance
Sincerely,
r
WAVI;RLY G RY, J
Chief, Bridge Administrati Bran
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
Copy, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Waterways Management
Mr. Ken Forster, NOS
This fax was received by GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http:ftwww.gfi.com

x
Bavvir.W Re: I' ♦
\ 1 '94
n z
\
ern anon, -•�' tT
ds
lourtk':d—, uU'ri -. _
.` S
J}` /
{ �2 Oo t Lo.ti-,I 3rom/wn
`
'Aurora �
� ■�.. Rnyal � -
�
., Auro-n roast
Mu.num
�•� 50�
;-
i 3 t A ♦ `r
��
•�
i
.,. —'
� Hollyville
Me c ' Uoy
X361 • %
��
'
Xash Corner 11
' � z ua aemere ecru
��•, 1 r1z�'-SL
ea b,, o ,;', 307 \
Y Ola Gra nlsborc Z Y -"
7 P Si4newa{ �F�tenG
55 � Project Vicinity
AH, 11
�i `
'
PI A L 1 G
_. e i,FCC M Mt Whgrtonsville •�'
f
Z
DNAL
r rr ,01
5b6 -Pamkw
.' 1;ental�•
tr rwx .;-'.
,SAID j
-. CEUAR 4�1' CCv2jj.
�E
31SLAVD(
esbtt S,
£
'off
) ;
—
��•, 1 r1z�'-SL
i
f
4^
st.c Sealsve"
v
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
B-5129 B through E, B-4594
Bridge Replacement Projects on NC 304
Pamlico County, North Carolina
B -5129B Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
B -5129C Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
B -5129D Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
B -5129E Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
B-4594 Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
' �Noarr, f9�i
y North Carolina
x sz Department of Transportation
'1��♦G 1n1.Hsn�
-v
-low-
.a- ufort County
gea -- _ J
--
-
• -• "" �► ; 3Ut': Gibb
Pam p,County"" .. wy" .r7, "! .+► _ $ — k Pant
304
�-
•� Legend
'0
----- County Boundary
z
n+c sa /,'— Roads
+++v+"...rr�.+r+,,,,,,,��,....,,�..�.--•q,„�,`'� C� deo. PO ! Bridge Locations
O tl
C\I
hCorner 0 0.5 1 2Miles
__. 30v
1f° USGS 1:24K Maps: Vandemere, Jones Bay
����. South Creek and Lowland
$� 1 r Point

Prepared For:
PROJECT LOCATION
B-5129C
Figure
�)
I'-
Replace Bridge No. 35 on NC 304 over Little Vandemere Creek
Pamlico County, North Carolina
2
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles
1:24,000
USGS 7.5- Minute Topographic Vandemere and Jones Bay (Contour Interval 5 Feet)

a
a -
RID 9 #35 U • ; a-
u_— y `\' • Mc Olive
.P0�Mesie.
Ar
01
- 1 �
J 4' 6
- (ligator
Point
� C -� • " jjjj��-. �jj�
NCDO 1l
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
TOP® IAP PROJECT:B-5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE 435
SCALE: 1" = 1500' ON NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET 2 OF 9 4/15/05

NORTH CAROLINA
l
BRIDGE 35
\ \ , % MESIC ' r
POP. 253 r
'Uanden�� O
♦ r
�9
♦ Bear
(CASH CORNERL'
POP. ]00 is
�
Point
\ m 30
VANDEMERE N�
�1216� POP. 287 f
1215\r\ 1218 a` 1217
J
VICINITY
MAPS
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PfIMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE 935
ON NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET 1 OF 9 4/15/05

DCM MP -1
APPLICHION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant Landowner Information
Business Name
North Carolina Department Of Transportation, Division 2
Project Name (if applicable)
B -5129C, Replace Bridge No.35 over Little Vandemere Creek
Applicant 1: First Name
Jay
MI
B.
Last Name
Johnson
Mulkey, Inc.
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
105 Pactolus Highway (NC 33)
PO Box
1587
City
Greenville
S.
State
NC
ZIP
27835
Country
Pitt County, NC
Phone No.
252 — 830
---[FAX
- 3490 ext.
No.
252 - 830 - 3341
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
City
State
2. AgentContractor Information
Business Name
Mulkey, Inc.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Cindy
S.
Carr
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
33127
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27636 3127
919-858-1871
ext.
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
919 851 1918
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
6750 Tryon Road
Cary
NC
27518 -
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Pamlico
Bridge No. 35 on NC 304 over Little Vandemere Creek
NC 304
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
n/a
Mesic
NC
28537 -
Phone No.
Lot No. (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
n/a - - ext.
n/a, I , ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse River
Little Vandemere Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Little Vandemere Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes NNo
work falls within.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
n/a
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
approx. 100 linear feet
approx. 21,550
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
n/a, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
2.3 feet ❑NHW or NNWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Approximately 1.75 acres of maintained/disturbed areas; approx. 0.31 acre of tidal freshwater marsh with dominant
vegetation of black needlerush, arrowleaf tearthumb, foxtail grass, seaside goldenrod, silverling, and marsh elder; and
approx. 0.10 acre of mesic pine flatwood with dominant vegetation of loblolly pine, wax myrtle, red maple, and Eastern
redcedar.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
NC 304 roadway and bridge spanning Little Vandemere Creek.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Privately owned undeveloped and rural residential property is located in each quadrant of the bridge.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
No zoning indicated by County
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No NNA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes NNo
k.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ❑No ENA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ❑No NNA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n/a
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
n/a
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
Existing bridge structure has open scuppers draining stormwater into surface waters.
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Replace the deficient structure Bridge No. 35 with with a new safer structure. The new bridge will be constructed in-place
using top-down and staged construction methods. The new structure will be 85 feet long and 33 feet wide (clear roadway
width). Roadway approaches will require minimal widening for guard rail at new end bent locations.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Top-down construction and on-site detour will be utilized to reduce environmental impacts. All construction equipment will
operate from the existing road and no equipment will be placed in wetlands or open waters. Typical roadway construction
equipment such as excavators, crane, backhoes, dump trucks, and paving machines will be used.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Demolition and removal of existing bridge, removal of relic wood piles in the water at the bridge, and construction of new
bridge on existing alignment. Relic wood piles will be pulled completely out of the water using a cable; sediment curtains will
be installed to capture any sediment created by pile removal.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Replace the existing structure with a
new structure.
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 11,400 ®Sq.Ft or ❑Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
The existing bridge has open scupper drains that discharge stormwater directly over the stream channel. The new bridge
will not have deck drains located over surface waters. Stormwater will be drained to modified concrete flumes and
discharged to Class II rip -rap on upland areas at end bent locations.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name SEE ATTACHED LIST Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date March 6, 2009 Print Name Jay B. Johnson
W BS 42287. 1.1
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information

Form DCM MP -2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh d.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ® This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
C. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, where?
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
252-808-2808 :. 1-888-4RCOAST :- www nccoastairnanagement.ne revised: 12/26/06
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization)
Length
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Width
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg. Existing
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
Final Project
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh d.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ® This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
C. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, where?
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
252-808-2808 :. 1-888-4RCOAST :- www nccoastairnanagement.ne revised: 12/26/06

Form QCtlii9 MP -2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 3}
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ❑This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP -4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
b. Length:
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brouqht to the site? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
(iii) Dimensions of fill area ❑CW _ ❑SAV ❑SB
(iv) Purpose of fill OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Erosion control methods for sensitive waters, including use of Standard roadway construction equipment
sediment curtains for work in water,silt ditches, special silt fence
with filter fabric for stone removal in Coastal wetland areas
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project? d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
❑Yes ®No ❑NA site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented. (ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
March 6, 2009 WBS 42287.1.1 - Debit $400
Date Jay B. Johnson, NCDOT Div. 2 Environmental Officer
B -5129C, Replace Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
Applicant Name 9
Project Name
Applicant Signature
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :. www.nccoastaltl a a'��£'riYent.net revised. 12126106

Form OCM MP -5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES El This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
3 -Span concrete cored slab bridge on precast substructure
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 52 feet 7 inches
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 28.1 feet (clear roadway)
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 2.3 feet
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) All of the existing structure will be removed.
In addition, relic pylons in water from previous
structures will be removed by pulling them
completely out.
9- Length of proposed bridge: 85 feet
b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
Little Vandemere Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
Approximately 3 to 4 feet
f. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h• Width of proposed bridge: 33 feet, clear roadway width
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes ®No j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 4.6 feet
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable
waters? ®Yes [:]No
If yes, explain: Fill material at existing end bents will be
excavated and removed to match elevations of adjacent
wetlands. Approximately 980 sq.ft. will be restored The
new bridge structure will span wetland restoration areas.
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Advanced approval received from Chief,
USCG Bridge Administration Branch in a letter dated
February 19, 2009 (copy attached).
n• Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: 3 feet.
252-8038-2808 :: 1.888.4RCOAST :: ww-w.nccoasta[manage ment.ne_t revised: 1012WO6

i�orm QCMP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes [:]No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f• Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9• Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL E] This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www nccoastaimanagement.net revised: 10/26/06

• Forte' DCC MP -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 15 feet approx.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 52 feet approx.
(iv) Avg, depth of area to be excavated: 3 feet approx.
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 195
.� l�
MAY 2
Wre 1eaci ,Cita, DGM
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Upland area to be determined by contractor
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by contractor
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? []Yes ®No (If no, attach a lettergranting permission from the owner)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑WL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 28 feet
(iii) Avg, width of area to be filled: 3 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: At Bridge No. 35 (TIP B -5129C)
264 sq.ft. of open and surface water impacts for interior
bridge support piers. See impact summary tables
(sheets 6 and 7 of permit drawings).
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 185 feet
(iii) Avg, width of area to be filled: 15 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: Approximately 473 cu. yds of fill will be
placed in uplands for roadway approach to new bridge.
See fill slope boundaries on stream and wetland impact
permit drawing (sheet 9 of permit drawings).
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Telephone and water line utilities will be
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
®WL 7 soft. ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Fill placed at toe of slope at new bridge end bents to
allow for guardrail placement.
b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCO ST :: wwW.ncaaastatmanagement,net r vised:1Et126! 6

If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
C. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. Strict enforcement of NCDOT's Best Management
Practices, including Sediment and Erosion Control in
Sensitive Watersheds
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
❑Yes ®No
Typical roadway construction equipment such as backhoe, If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
crane, dump truck, crane, paving machine as determined environmental impacts.
by contractor
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
March 6, 2009 WBS 42287.1.1 -Debit $400
Date
B -5129C, Replace Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
Project Name
Jay B. Johnson, DEO NCDOT Division 2
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
252-808-28W3 1-888-4RCOA T ;: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 10/26/06

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
REFERENCE NO. NAMES
1 JAMES B. JONES
ADDRESSES
10237 NC HWY 304
BAYBORO, NC 28515
2 14T.OLIVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST 1012 BAY STREET
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
3 RUSSEL L. JONES 89,40 NC HWY 304
BAYBORO, NC 28515
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PADILICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B-51290
REPLACE BRIDGE #35
ON NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET 3 OF 9,/15/;,05-

03 0500 0000 0852 4400
4----MUUKEY SF
[IJ G INi Et R 21
MULKEY, INC.
' ROX �"i127
i_EIG I-'
Q o2v�F
FNOFH UyCFMp FOING OOApO
t _ NOS4O�pFR RFSS
O UCy kt, FXpj
O,NS� sFFc�NTM FO RFF�S�� RFp
AppRFSS
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Russell L. Jones
8940 NC 304 Hwy
Bayboro, NC 28515
� III III II Illi II II III
UNITED STArES
C-1 III III II IIII II II III
III III II IIII II II III
0000
28515
S
4)�#
��r�,;171- Yrr
Sdi
COMPLETE THIS DELIVERY
A. Signature
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail
❑ Registered
❑ Insured Mail
❑ Express Mail
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ C.O.D.
4, Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(transfer from service label) .7003 0500 0000 0852 4400
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
RALEIGH.NC
27636
FEB 27,'09
AMOUNT
$6.75I`•

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
James B. Jones
10237 NC 304 H-,vy
Bayboro, NC 28515
A.
�{ ❑ Ager'
❑Addr
B. Received by ( Printed 14ame) I C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7003 0500 0000 2852 4295
(Transfer from servit
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
r

ISI!Illlllillllllllllll!Ilii11'I1IIII7003 0500 0000 0852 4417�
RAU.S.
IIIIII�IIIIII�III�I LI
���� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FEB'
A
ODUO ?R5ti7
-�-MULKEY
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS
MULKEY, INC.
PO Boa 33127
RALEIGt-i, NC 27636-3127
Mt. Olive Missionary Baptist Church
1012 Bay Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Mt. Olive Missionary Baptist Church
1012 Bay street
Morehead City, NC 28557
t) -kir
*e4zl., tS4
4
�o
A. Signature
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7003 0500 0000 0852 441,7
(Transfer from service lat ____
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

M Total Postage & Fees
m
MM senrro ve assionary aptist UM
lti Sheet. Api. No.j---------------40.1 i-Ba'TSt rcet-----------------------------
orPOBoxNo. NDY�ad-City NC -2&57 -------------------
City, S1efe, ZIP+4
U.S. Postal ServiceTM
CERTIFIED MAILTh1 RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance ru
Coverage Provided)
'For delivery information visit our website at www:usps:com®
ro
ED Postage
Postage
©C:3 Cenftd FeeED Return Reciept _
ED Postmark
Fee Here
(Endorsement Required)
Restricted De
Ln
Total postage & Fees $
1 ' •
.S i� err
PS Form 3800, June 2002 See Reverse for Instructions
U.S. Postal ServiceTM
Ln
CERTIFIED
MAILTM RECEIPT
Ir
Provided)
ru
(Domestic Mail Only;
No Insurance Coverage
Focdelivery information
visit aur website at www.usps.corr�'
Ln
COrij
0
postage
Cartified Fee
Postmark
M
Return Reclept Fee
Here
(Endorsement Required)
Restricted Delivery
C3
(Endorsement Required)
Ln
C3i
• nes
�.
or Lnt:y•
iss im
3800, June 2002
See Reverse for Instructions'
U.S. Postal ServiceTM
CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT
Provided)
{Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage
M Total Postage & Fees
m
MM senrro ve assionary aptist UM
lti Sheet. Api. No.j---------------40.1 i-Ba'TSt rcet-----------------------------
orPOBoxNo. NDY�ad-City NC -2&57 -------------------
City, S1efe, ZIP+4
U.S. Postal ServiceTM
CERTIFIED MAILTh1 RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance ru
Coverage Provided)
'For delivery information visit our website at www:usps:com®
ro
ED Postage
Postage
©C:3 Cenftd FeeED Return Reciept _
ED Postmark
Fee Here
(Endorsement Required)
Restricted De
Ln
Total postage & Fees $
1 ' •
.S i� err
PS Form 3800, June 2002 See Reverse for Instructions

DENOTES AREA TO BE EXCAVATED
SHEET 5 OF 9 4115/05
LEGEND
-V,'LB
WETLAND BOUNDARY
PROPOSED BRIDGE
WETLAND
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
®
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12"-48"
FILL IN
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54° PIPES
i
& ABOVE
DENOTES FILL
1
SURFACE WATER
tPONO)
SINGLE TREE
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
WOODS LINE
EXCAVATION
w,ADENOTES
iN WETLAND
DRAINAGE INLET
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
-`--`� ROOTIIAD
WATER
DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
ES NIZED
ODENOTCLEARI
RIP RAP
G
FLOW DIRECTION
ADJACENT OWNER
TB
5 OR PARCEL NUMBER
-_-
TOP OF BANK
IF AVAILABLE
WE
EDGE OF WATER
® PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
C
PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
F
PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
PROP. RIGHT OF (JAY
11 NG
NATURAL GROUND
DITCH /
�
GRASS SWALE
PL -
PROPERTY LINE
- TDE -
TEMP. DRAINAGE
® DENOTES IMPACTS TO
EASEMENT
BUFFER ZONE 1
-POE-
PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
® BUFFER ZONE 2
-EAB-
EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
---EPB-
EXIST. ENDANGERED
i
PLANT BOUNDARY
-�- - --
WATER SURFACE
NCD® ,L
xxx x z
LIVE STAKES
DIVISIOI�T OF HIGHWAYS
xx
PAMLICO COUNTY
(w �;
BOULDER
PROJECT: B -5129C
3
j ---
CORE FIBER ROLLS
REPLACE BRIDGE R35
ON NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VAATDEAIERE CREEK
DENOTES AREA TO BE EXCAVATED
SHEET 5 OF 9 4115/05

IMPACT SUMMARY
404 WETLANDS
CAMA WETLANDS
SURFACE WATERS
BUFFERS
STRUCTURE
TEMP. HAND
FILL FILL EXCAVATION CLEARING
FILL
TEMP.
FILL
HAND
EXCAVATION CLEARING
FILL TEMP. FILL
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
TOTAL FILL REMOVAL FILL REMOVAL
(ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2)
(ft2)
(ft2)
(ft2) (ft2)
(ft2) (ft2)
(ft2)
(ft2)
(ft) (ft2) (ft2)
1 @20'
1 @45'
1 @20'
CORED
SLAB
B1
556
403
959
B2
403
338
741
B3
533
202
735
B4
406
1 150
556
01
100
02
100
W1
7
Fill Removal
430
TOTAL
0 0 0 0
7
0
0 0
200 0
1 1898
1093
2991 430 0
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE #35 ON NC 304
OVER LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET 6 OF 9 4/15/04

VVC I L IYU d& JUHrAUL VVH I
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
Site Station
No. (From/To)
(meters)
Structure
Size / Type
(English Units)
WETLAND IMPACTS
Fill In Temp. Fill Excavation
Wetlands In Wetlands In Wetlands
(acres) (acres) (acres)
Mechanized
Clearing Fill In SW
(Method III) (Natural)
(acres) (acres)
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Existing
Fill In SW Temp. Fill Channel
(Pond) In SW Impacted
(acres) (acres) (ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
S1
Interior Pier
32
S2
Interior Pier
32
Totals
64
VVC I L IYU d& JUHrAUL VVH I

PROFILE
SCALE: I"= 50'(HORIZONTAL)
I"= 10, (VERTICAL)
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -51.29C
REPLACE BRIDGE P35
ON NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREED
SHEET 4 OF 9 4/15405

PROJECT Na MA•2004
DATE: 7.21•2005
ROAD: NC 304
ROAD NAME: NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VANDE'MERE CREEK
COUNTY: PAMLICO
CROSS
SECTION
OF
BRIDGE
NO.
EXISTING
BRIDGE
1 @
17' -
1B"
1 @
16'-10"
28.1'
CLEAR
ROADWAY
i 52'-7• -1
35
NOT TO SCALE
304
PROPOSED 21" CONCRETE CORED SLA
PROPOSED LENGTH: 3 SPANS 1@ 20'; 1 P 45'; 1
33' CLEAR ROADWAY
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
85'
�! 20' . i 45' �! 20' 1
NOT TO SCALE
MA-2004_hy_permit_REV.dgn 11/3/2008 3:07:46 PM
304

I RIP RAP
N
FABRIC
BL 'F - F; IMPAC
nn WE/TB,;
B
/ - DF,
.
BRIDGE WIDENED
70NF I / / —ZONE I
1
ZONE 2 �� ZONE 2
S'ECIAL `'UI JI I CH
SEE DETAIL 'A' REMCVE Q�
* EXISTING
B- 1 BRlnar
REMOVE / /� n
15 KONG.
c I l
1C SR 1271 LF- -
NC hWr M4
L— -L- I _ sG5•0e"
MCF
MODIFIED CONCRETE
FLUKE WITH ZIP N
RAP DITCH N
REMOVE
EXIST
SPECIAL. CLT DITCH 15' CONC,
SFT DETAIL 'A' m DM
-BL- S-A n+29.64
70.34 RIGHT
ELEV. 6.02'
B2
rOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
USE MFIHOD 2 FOR C -FARING V WE -LANDS
NO GRUBBING ACTIVITIES ALLOW=D IV WETLANDS.1
IDUE TO SPREADI
wEnB
R-TAIN EXISTING DITCHES
.., _,...
.. - --
LNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
_-
.4'C
1
Cl
70NF I / / —ZONE I
1
ZONE 2 �� ZONE 2
S'ECIAL `'UI JI I CH
SEE DETAIL 'A' REMCVE Q�
* EXISTING
B- 1 BRlnar
REMOVE / /� n
15 KONG.
c I l
1C SR 1271 LF- -
NC hWr M4
L— -L- I _ sG5•0e"
MCF
MODIFIED CONCRETE
FLUKE WITH ZIP N
RAP DITCH N
REMOVE
EXIST
SPECIAL. CLT DITCH 15' CONC,
SFT DETAIL 'A' m DM
-BL- S-A n+29.64
70.34 RIGHT
ELEV. 6.02'
B2
rOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
USE MFIHOD 2 FOR C -FARING V WE -LANDS
NO GRUBBING ACTIVITIES ALLOW=D IV WETLANDS.1
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: V a 50'
r R
c
MCF
7� 7TH
——FPETJON
.., _,...
.. - --
_-
.4'C
1
— —
L Nc nwr 30a _ _.....
I. ..
CF
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
-- REFA 'A. RCTA_IN
'�
'f
---
:/.
�.. F g-
PROJECT: B-51290
�
i'
TO SR 1722
zk
�'-
-
ON NC .104 OVER
=1106 SY•
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
-'
8
SHOULDER
I I i
\
BERM GUTTERL
(TYP.)
—ZONE 2
ZC NE I
1
WE/Td
I m
v
B4
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: V a 50'
r R
c
AV `ice DOT
M
i�
,➢/
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
'�
'f
PROJECT: B-51290
�
i'
REPLACE BRIDGE 035
�'-
-
ON NC .104 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
-'
8
s•
1
SHEET OF 4/15/05

\ =SLAM & VV E T L 4\ ND IN/1PACT S
a BP,IDGE WIDENED
pp Gll"r f0 S�Rr=AG
_ _
q p OwEira RETAIN EXISTING DITCH= O
1 4 ASS I RIP RAP -- S� �` UNLESS OTHERWISE NOT] O
tY/ FILTER FABR,'„ `1 -�6 ���'�,
1YP.1 � J�o�` �
ZONE I �� ZONE
ZONE 2�
SPECIAL CUT DITCiI
SEE DETAIL 'A'
REMOVE l
EXIST ..
15' CONC.
.TO SR IZ21 F 5� —
NC /rwr 304 L L- 1 S6.5•)8'30.4"E
- -- - MCF__,
MODIFIED CONCRETE -`
FLUME WITH R:D N
RAP DITCH IN N �..%
SPECIAI CUTDITCH
SEE DETAIL 'A'
FOR PERMITTING ONI Y
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
m m
REMUVE
EXIST
5' CONC.
BPA
BL- STA 11+29.64
70.34 RIGHT
ELEV. 6.82'
USE ME7HOD 2 FOR CI FARING IN wCTLAN3S
NO GRUBDING ACTIVITIES ALLOWED IN WE I I AIJI S.
REMOVE
FXISTI.NG
BRIDGE
i
ZONE 2 •.
n
.n
MCF _`-- RETAIN RETAIN
-- /. S" F RETAIN
e _
+ 70 SR 1222y
\ SHOULDER - '.--
BERM GUTTER t—
ZONE ZONE 2
(TYP.)
v
m ;'m
n m
n �
m
\ JWFIT8
`\/ PROPOSED BENTS ARE S-IOWN AS SLRFACE
WATER IMPACTS DUE TC THE FACT THAT AT
-IIGH TDE T -1E WAIER SUR -ACF b_FVATION
IS ABOVE THE BENT ELEVATION AT NATURAL
GROUND.THIS CAN NOT BE OBSERVED JUST BY
LOOKING AI THE SHOWN WATER EDGE LINE.
SEE THE PROFILE FOR V SUAL CXPLANTION.
{� -.. /(i(,GU ✓��' /U % �'G"Y/OCU
I
C
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLAN VIEWPAMLICO
C.
COUNTY
PROJECT: B -1119C
SCALE: 1" = 50' f
- REPLACE BRIDGE '3S
ON NC 304 OVER
-
F
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET OF 9/15/05
{� -.. /(i(,GU ✓��' /U % �'G"Y/OCU
I

(. ._. I-�._____T._r� .. 4-
' SrTA.. 15+27 2Z L IPI f 15 �95.00f -
_90-
F?-- _
1 I, { S;•cCIPr
I..
EXCAVAT101\ I I ,I: �:. 121 (0 C. CORED, SLAB,,.;_. _ r )7+ 5 0 ` I
195 YC3(i Y�) L.. T i C 0 PI 2 l
-.. I _ - '_
CLEW 3@3 _ - 4 17 • I I I � i i � -
L LEW.ROADWAY 3.3.. EL
_
10 TI ' O No' DECK I DRAIN ALLOWED �.:L
PI_ 13+25 p ..�. I w ., TKAIA r- OIA Tw -
EL .65 r)b i t i OLE
G ; (+) .o,8174%. I l 3bO� - -- � E.� r..�=.
ifl:9-p A. - -
_ ,
A _
_
I I I
T_._. RI�HT I, FT I i'--MINIA�U�i b!'TH .:. _
G/ OUNDL GROU L _ `' I !y`_, : ! J RLP RA1P_ 3:5.' I _.- �_. NATL. RSL
1_ r ,
CLASS I IP �` . NATURAL
�� ,. GROUND � Cf 0 Nb
c - j ! -- — LEI-•
r RI HT }
- VJ:7 F LT�ERI � N ,: 1 ^.. : _._.. I � ��, _ __ � I , _ Gi�� - , _-'
(5�0 E NORMAL ) !.._ _ r...._
YO" -7-ND BENT) _ _I - r i
EIXC .V. _ I_I �t�Al
_ E�
XCAUpTE TO - f r
N �}--
I + I TU A ( U� L GROUND'
L �� ELCV
_ L� { { I i 4l NIDE:.: k
_.
-. r _.... .._ -;-
( 059 (2-2-05)
TI HIG
(I I I !E 60- CLQ I -....
j - -
j
414-1
'14. + oo._.._:.--_:__:..1.... _ .-__{._
04_�
:
a _
�_ _;_.�_l 6-
oo , _.
:,: _ - -
NCD OT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
COUNTY
7
E
PAMLICO
PROJECT: B -5129C
l[�� 1f
�O F I L E
PROFILE
T
X35
\`
�
REPLACE BRIDGE
ON NC 300 OVER
SCALE: V = 50, (NI'iJRI: .ENTAL)
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK.
I" = 10• (VERTICAL)
9
t�
SHEET OF 4,115/05
0
Cl t4

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
�;lichael F. Easey,'Sovernor Division of Marine Fisheries Dr. Louis B. Daniel III, Director
Nilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Rouse
THROUGH: Anne Deaton
FROM: Sean McKenna
DATE: December 23, 2008
SUBJECT: Request for comments on NCDOT Pamlico County Bridge Replacement Projects.
The following comments by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) on the
replacement of the subject bridges are offered pursuant to G.S. 113-131.
Bridge numbers 35 (Little Vandemere Creek), 40 (Bear Creek), 42 (Gale Creek), and 44 (UT to
Jones Bay) cross Primary Nursery areas, and the NCDMF requests that NCDOT impose an in -
water work moratorium from April 1 through September 30. Additionally, the NCDMF requests that
the replacement bridges span high ground to high ground; deck drains should not discharge directly
into the stream; uncured concrete should not contact the water in or entering the stream; and that
the NCDOT utilize sedimentation and erosion control measures to protect aquatic resources.
While Vandemere Creek (bridge No.31) is not a Primary Nursery area, there are numerous
Primary Nursery Areas located downstream of this site. All care must be taken to protect these
critical habitat areas. The NCDMF requests that NCDOT take a risk adverse approach to this
project and impose an in -water moratorium from April 1 through September 30, and follow the other
aforementioned guidelines.
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: www.ncdmf.net
An Equal Opportunb i A"irmaNe Action Employer — 50 `b Recycled 110% post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
A'atimally
•

Lane, Stephen
From: Wilson, Travis W. [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 200911:29 AM
To: Stephen Lane
Subject: FW: FW: bridge replacements
See attached emails below, I believe I "no commented" the scoping notice and attached the cover letter with a note
differing to DIVIF. WRC will continue to differ to DMF for the moratorium recommendations.
Travis.
From: Travis Wilson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:42 AM
To: 'Sean McKenna'
Subject: RE: FW: bridge replacements
Sean, since NC 304 is the I/C line and our biologist did not have specific comments; In my comment letter I differed to
DMF for project specific comments / moratoriums.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sean McKenna[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:54 PM
To: Travis Wilson
Subject: Re: FW: bridge replacements
Travis, DMF's comments for the subject bridges are attached. Have a good one. Sean
Travis Wilson wrote:
No data, therefore I wanted to coordinate with you to make sure I captured DMF recommendations. If you can
send me an electronic copy of you comments when you get them completed.
Travis.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sean McKenna [mailto:Sean.McKenna(�ncmail.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 8:43 AM
To: Travis Wilson
Subject: Re: FW: bridge replacements
Travis, Hopefully i'll get my comments out today. For all projects I'm asking for an April thru
September in -water work moratoruim. Do you have any data to support an anadromous
moratoruim (Feb - Sept)? Have a good x -mass. Sean
Travis Wilson wrote:
Sean, has DMF commented on the projects below?
Hi Travis, 0
Justin Homan looked at these crossings yesterday. All of these streams appear to be very
productive biologically. Vandemere Creek (B -5129A Bridge No. 31) is the only low -salinity

. -r"
stream (salinity =1.3 ppt) and this bridge crossing is a boundary between inland and coastal
waters, so downstream impacts would affect waters under jurisdiction by Division of Marine
Fisheries. With the exception of Vandemere Creek, the rest of the bridges cross very saline
waters and downstream impacts would affect coastal fishing waters (all of which are designated
as PNA's by DMF)............
-----Original Message -----
From: Travis Wilson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:17 PM
To: Barwick, Bob
Subject: bridge replacements
Comments? All of these are in Pamlico County.
B -5129A Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
B -5129B Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
B -5129C Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
B -5129D Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
B -5129E Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay.
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1142 I-85 Service Rd.
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone] ext. 226
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Pubic Rscords Law and may be disclosed to third pa'ies.
Is
9

Lane, Stephen
From: Lane, Stephen
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:53 PM
To: 'Johnson, Jay B'
Cc: 'Sutton, Michael W'
Subject: B-5129(Replacement of five bridges on Hwy 304 in Pamlico County)
Hi Jay,
DCM received the general permit applications for TIP Project B -5129(A -E) on April 27, 2009. Review of the applications
indicate that 3 of the 5 bridges do not qualify for the general permit. As you are aware, the general permit allows a
maximum of 500 square feet of wetland impacts. Bridges 31, 42, and 44 exceed that amount and will have to be
processed under a major permit application as they are currently proposed. Additionally, there are minor corrections
needed to the drawings and MP -5 forms for Bridge 35 and Bridge 40. To obtain general permits for the projects the
following items need to be addressed:
Bridge 31
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 35
1 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas
2 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 40
1 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas in cross section and plan view
2 Correctly show marsh and stream in area of existing dock
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Ol Bridge 42
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Correctly show marsh and stream in area of wetland impact area W-1.
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 44
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas in cross section
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Some of the information listed above can possibly be corrected over the phone, however, the biggest obstacle is the
wetland impacts being over 500 square feet. I have visited the sites and have tried to figure out how to help you fit the
projects under the general permit process. I have some possible recommendations that may help in this regard. Please
call me when you get a chance so we can discuss this further.
Thanks,
Stephen
***** Note new E-mail Address is: Stephen.Lane(@ncdenr.gov *****
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

December 17, 2009
Page 3
Nv/o attachments
Mr. Devin Austin, P.E., Mulkey Inc.

NORTH CAROUNA
BRIDGE tt35
MESIC ►
' POP. 253 `
-- oe i
304 ♦ �
N. ♦ 3 M
/ ♦ Bear
~ OLLYVILLE
(CASH CORNERL
POP. 100 ,' Sanders
Point
30
C�
V NDMERE
OPE 287 ♦ (��
1216
1215 1218 a` 1217 rn
VICINITY
MAPS
NCD® 11
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE X35
ON NC 30,4 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET OF S 10/22/09

SHFIRT 02 OF R 10/22109

REFERENCE NO.
I
2
3
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
NAMES
NAMES B. JONES
MT. OLIVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST
RUSSEL L. JONES
ADDRESSES
10239 NC HWY 304
BAYBORO, NC 28515
1012 BAY STREET
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
8940 NC HWY 304
BAYBORO, NC 28515
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE "35
ON NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET 3 OF 0 10/22/09

-�- - — WATER SURFACE
xx xxx x x LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- CORE FIBER ROLLS
&I
DENOTES AREA TO BE EXCAVATED
"•
lel CD® 1L
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE #35
ON NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHRRT i DF f 10 / 22 / 09
LEGEND
I
—WLB
WETLAND BOUNDARY
PROPOSED BRIDGE
L
WETLAND
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES FILL IN
t
®
WETLAND
t PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
F I.
12"-48'
FILL IN
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54" PIPES
& ABOVE
FILL IN
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
SINGLE TREE
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
®
IN WETLAND
DRAINAGE INLET
DENOTES TEMPORARY
®
FILL IN SURFACE
ROOTWAD
WATER
®
DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
* `
DENOTES MECHANIZED
RIP RAP
CLEARING
FLOW DIRECTION
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
�—
OR PARCEL NUMBER
TOP OF BANK
IF AVAILABLE
—••• WE
EDGE OF WATER
® PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
— C
PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
— F
PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
—� PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
NG
NATURAL GROUND
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE
PL —
PROPERTY LINE
— TDE —
TEMP. DRAINAGE
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
EASEMENT
BUFFER ZONE 1
—PDE—
PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
IMPACTS TO
—EAB—
EXIST. ENDANGERED
®DENOTES
BUFFER ZONE 2
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
—EPB—
EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
-�- - — WATER SURFACE
xx xxx x x LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- CORE FIBER ROLLS
&I
DENOTES AREA TO BE EXCAVATED
"•
lel CD® 1L
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE #35
ON NC 304 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHRRT i DF f 10 / 22 / 09

.._NATI)R-AL
GROUND
LEFT s
SS I I RIP RAP
FILTER FABRIC ..
....... ..... .
SHOULDER
T. -THICK)-
-PE NORMAL
-ND BENT)
EXCAVATE: TO
NATURAL. GROUND ..i
_ELI�V. Q::_0 .---
LOW TIDE.
ELEV. = 0,6(
(2-2-05)
14+00 15+0
SCALE: 1" = 50' (HORIZONTAL)
F'= 10' (VER'T'ICAL)
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE a35
ON NC 304 OVER
LIT'T'LE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET J OF 10/22/09

IMPACT SUMMARY
404 WETLANDS
CAMA WETLANDS
SURFACE WATERS
BUFFERS
STRUCTURE FILL
TEMP. HAND
FILL EXCAVATION CLEARING
FILL
TEMP.
FILL
HAND
EXCAVATION CLEARING
FILL
TEMP. FILL
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
TOTAL FILL REMOVAL FILL REMOVAL
ft2)
ft2) Wft2
ft2)
L�)
(ft)
lft2 (ft2)
(ft)ft2)
ft2)
(ft2
(ft)ft2) (ft2)
W 1
20
61
556
403
959
B2
634
498
1132
B3
713
291
1004
B4
483
295
778
01
100
02
100
wl
21
427
LFilIRemoval
L 0
0 0
0
41
0
0 0
200
0
2386
1487J3873
427 0
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE #35 ON NC 304
OVER LITTLE VANDDEMERE CREEK
SHEET G OF 9 10/22/2009

CLASS II RIP RAP
W/ FILTER FABRIC
(TYP,)
STREAM & WETLAND IMPACTS
WE/TB
O
Ln
ZONE I `\
ZONE 2
SPECIAL CUT DITCH << ,
SEE DETAIL 'A' },,•
LAWN W/ � "- •, � �
SCATIEREU
'TREEREMOVE
'
EXIST15' CONIC.
,tfs-19
TO SR 122115'
F'
_ . ____ .
NC HWY 304 -L- i S65°08'30.4"E 11,
MODIFIED CONCH
FLUME WITH RIP
RAP DITCH
LAWN W1
SCAT TERL[)
TRF: FS
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 'A'
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
(v
N
ro
REMOVE —'
EXIST
15' CONC.
BM
-BL- STA 11+29.64
70.34 RIGHT
ELEV. 6.82'
USE METHOD 2 FOR CLEARING IN WETLANDS
NO GRUBBING ACTIVITIES ALLOWED IN WETLANDS.
WOt1[;$
WE/TB
WE/TB
BRIDGE WIDENED
DUE TO SPREAD
RETAIN EXISTING DITCHES
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
O
j.
ZONE I
� ZONE 2
REMOVE
EXISTING rL ( CEW FERY
BRIDGE .<
�0 ' 'I
L 8±— — -� .'� , DI BHtC�
W(SIGN)
r I
r
N
F. r
I
,
n ni r NC HWY 304
II•' I yV iii/I� � it
SCALE: 1" = 50'
M Fr�
m
MCF -
R
RETAI� ET IN
I
� � •'�. I'' � it
4 � .
SHOULDERS
BERM GUTTER I ZONE 2
(TYP.) 1 ZONE I
i
WE/TB
"LATrORfvl
RETAIN,y� .�
�--
` TO SR 1222
LAWN
I _`
i
i`:BKD
PROPOSED BENTS ARE SHOWN AS SURFACE
WATER IMPACTS DUE TO THE FACT THAT AT
HIGH TIDE THE WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
IS ABOVE THE BENT ELEVATION AT NATURAL
GROUND. THIS CAN NOT BE OBSERVED JUST BY
LOOKING AT THE SHOWN WATER EDGE LINE.
SEE THE PROFILE FOR VISUAL EXPLANTION.
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE '155
ON NC 504 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET 7 OF
N
ti
r
CLASS II RIP RAP
W/ FILTER FABRIC
(TYP,)
STREAM & WETLAND IMPACTS
WE/TB
O
Ln
ZONE I `\
ZONE 2
SPECIAL CUT DITCH << ,
SEE DETAIL 'A' },,•
LAWN W/ � "- •, � �
SCATIEREU
'TREEREMOVE
'
EXIST15' CONIC.
,tfs-19
TO SR 122115'
F'
_ . ____ .
NC HWY 304 -L- i S65°08'30.4"E 11,
MODIFIED CONCH
FLUME WITH RIP
RAP DITCH
LAWN W1
SCAT TERL[)
TRF: FS
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 'A'
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
(v
N
ro
REMOVE —'
EXIST
15' CONC.
BM
-BL- STA 11+29.64
70.34 RIGHT
ELEV. 6.82'
USE METHOD 2 FOR CLEARING IN WETLANDS
NO GRUBBING ACTIVITIES ALLOWED IN WETLANDS.
WOt1[;$
WE/TB
WE/TB
BRIDGE WIDENED
DUE TO SPREAD
RETAIN EXISTING DITCHES
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
O
j.
ZONE I
� ZONE 2
REMOVE
EXISTING rL ( CEW FERY
BRIDGE .<
�0 ' 'I
L 8±— — -� .'� , DI BHtC�
W(SIGN)
r I
r
N
F. r
I
,
n ni r NC HWY 304
II•' I yV iii/I� � it
SCALE: 1" = 50'
M Fr�
m
MCF -
R
RETAI� ET IN
I
� � •'�. I'' � it
4 � .
SHOULDERS
BERM GUTTER I ZONE 2
(TYP.) 1 ZONE I
i
WE/TB
"LATrORfvl
RETAIN,y� .�
�--
` TO SR 1222
LAWN
I _`
i
i`:BKD
PROPOSED BENTS ARE SHOWN AS SURFACE
WATER IMPACTS DUE TO THE FACT THAT AT
HIGH TIDE THE WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
IS ABOVE THE BENT ELEVATION AT NATURAL
GROUND. THIS CAN NOT BE OBSERVED JUST BY
LOOKING AT THE SHOWN WATER EDGE LINE.
SEE THE PROFILE FOR VISUAL EXPLANTION.
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE '155
ON NC 504 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
SHEET 7 OF

LAWN W/
S(:/', UERED
FREES
_TO SR 1221
NC HWY 304
CLASS II RIP RAP
W/ FILTER FABRIC
(TYP.)
BUFFER IMPACTS
0
wE/TB
Lr)
ZONE I `\
ZONE 2 \�\
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 'A'
REMOVE
EXIST ��
15' CONC.
1511�-
F �m
-L- I S65'08'30.411E
F
MODIFIED CONCRETE
FLUME WITH RIP
RAP DITCH
I_AWIV w/
SCAIIERED
TREES
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 'A'
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
IJ
N
N N
co / ca
REMOVE
EXIST (tl•
15 CONC. r
BM I
-BL- STA 11+29.64 WOODS
70.34 RIGHT
ELEV. 6.82'
USE METHOD 2 FOR CLEARING IN WETLANDS
NO GRUBBING ACTIVITIES ALLOWED IN WETLANDS.
REMOVE
EXISTING �
BRIDGE
i
MILAN VIEW
SCALE: 1" = 50'
BRIDGE WIDENED
DUE TO SPREAD
WE/TB RETAIN EXISTING DITCHES o
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
ZONE I
ZONE 2 I I I
� 1
1. vJGOGS
n R> 1"I
VLTIL — — _ _ — I 4' RRIC,K I T1
r•
INA
iI i)i
"t�l—�'.r�..l^L=2..` T— '. _. - - J_ c..: J.'+,J.)-t-t_l-T.._hJ-I" ' J -.•y j.... �..\
RETAIN
,
I NC HWY 304
RETAI1� RETAIN
F II
IcJr!c
MA.RIJ k� 1''
rA
SHOULDER,,
BERM GUTTER ZONli 2"
(TYP.) I ZONE I
WE/TB
1, I -L-
=1_; r0R,�
RETAIN ..� -
L, IJh1y 1� _
TO SR 1222
I(-'RAVEI.
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE 455
ON NC 504 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
U OF o 1022/09
0
4�
ti
N
LAWN W/
S(:/', UERED
FREES
_TO SR 1221
NC HWY 304
CLASS II RIP RAP
W/ FILTER FABRIC
(TYP.)
BUFFER IMPACTS
0
wE/TB
Lr)
ZONE I `\
ZONE 2 \�\
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 'A'
REMOVE
EXIST ��
15' CONC.
1511�-
F �m
-L- I S65'08'30.411E
F
MODIFIED CONCRETE
FLUME WITH RIP
RAP DITCH
I_AWIV w/
SCAIIERED
TREES
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 'A'
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
IJ
N
N N
co / ca
REMOVE
EXIST (tl•
15 CONC. r
BM I
-BL- STA 11+29.64 WOODS
70.34 RIGHT
ELEV. 6.82'
USE METHOD 2 FOR CLEARING IN WETLANDS
NO GRUBBING ACTIVITIES ALLOWED IN WETLANDS.
REMOVE
EXISTING �
BRIDGE
i
MILAN VIEW
SCALE: 1" = 50'
BRIDGE WIDENED
DUE TO SPREAD
WE/TB RETAIN EXISTING DITCHES o
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
ZONE I
ZONE 2 I I I
� 1
1. vJGOGS
n R> 1"I
VLTIL — — _ _ — I 4' RRIC,K I T1
r•
INA
iI i)i
"t�l—�'.r�..l^L=2..` T— '. _. - - J_ c..: J.'+,J.)-t-t_l-T.._hJ-I" ' J -.•y j.... �..\
RETAIN
,
I NC HWY 304
RETAI1� RETAIN
F II
IcJr!c
MA.RIJ k� 1''
rA
SHOULDER,,
BERM GUTTER ZONli 2"
(TYP.) I ZONE I
WE/TB
1, I -L-
=1_; r0R,�
RETAIN ..� -
L, IJh1y 1� _
TO SR 1222
I(-'RAVEI.
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129C
REPLACE BRIDGE 455
ON NC 504 OVER
LITTLE VANDEMERE CREEK
U OF o 1022/09