51294_NC DOT_20090529

❑ CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL .% . e
r.
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
iONew ❑Modification F1 Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As -authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resou s
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I SA NCAC
O Rules attached.
Applicant Name Project Location: County
Address `'' x Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
CityState' ZIP
Phone # O Fax # O
Authorized Agent
Affected ❑ CW ❑ EW ❑ PTA
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH
❑ PWS: ❑ FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing_
Other
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure
yes
no
Sandbags: not sure
yes
no
Moratorium: n/a
yes
no
Photos:
yes
no
Waiver Attached:
yes
'40"
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
ES ❑ PTS
❑ UBA ❑ N/A
Crit.Hab. yes / no
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
Application Fee(s) Check #
Subdivision
City ZiP
Phone # ( ) River Basin
Adj. Wtr. Body_ (nac /man /unkn)
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
(Scale: )
E See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
/I
Permit Officer's Signature
Issuing Date Expiration Date
Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythat this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
[�] Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office
Mailing Address:
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Location:
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax:[phone]
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/ 1-888-4RCOAST
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
June 1, 2009
NCDOT
c/o Jay Johnson
P.O. Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835
Dear Jay,
Enclosed are General Permits #51292, 51293, 51294, 51295, and 51296 to construct bridges on
existing location to replace existing bridge #31, #35, #40, #42, and #44 respectively on NC304 in
Pamlico County, N.C.
In order to validate these permits, please sign the permits as indicated. Retain the white copy
for your files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-
addressed envelope. If the signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation
of development, you will be working without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of
Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
Enclosures
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
March b, 2009
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Field Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
ATTENTION: Mr. Stephen Lane
NCDOT Coordinator
a �
5
APR 2 7 2009
More -head City DCM
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for CAMA General Permit for the proposed replacement of Five
Bridges on NC304 in Pamlico County, State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP): Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek (B -5129B); Bridge
No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek (B -5129C); Bridge No. 40 over Bear
Creek (B -5129D); Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek (B -5129E); and Bridge No.
44 over UT to Jones Bay (B-4594), Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-0304(3), State
Project No. WBS 42287.1.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace five
bridges on NC304 in Pamlico County (Figure 1). Please accept this letter as a request for a
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) General Permit for the above referenced projects.
NCDOT plans to replace these bridges using staged construction and roadway approach work
will be kept to a minimum so that one lane of traffic can be maintained on site during
construction.
The five bridges are being replaced because they have been deemed structurally deficient.
The new bridges will be built to match existing alignments and parameters on current locations.
Each of the existing bridges has a superstructure composed of a reinforced concrete deck on
timber joists. End bents and interior bents are timber caps on timber piles. The existing bridges
will be removed in accordance with the NCDOT Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal (BMP BDR). The timber and steel components will be removed
without dropping any components into Waters of the U.S.
MAILING ADDRESS:
113 AIRPORT DRIVE
SUITE 100
EDENTON, NC 27932
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
113 Airport Drive
Suite 100.
Edenton, NC 27932

Page 2
,March 6, 2009
The recommended replacement structure for each bridge is a concrete cored slab deck
with a clear roadway width of 33 feet. Table 1 shows the existing bridge length and the proposed
bridge length for the five bridge replacements.
Table 1. Existing and Proposed Bridge Lengths
Bridge Site
Existing Bridge
Length
Proposed Bridge
Length
B -5129B, Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
87 feet
120 feet
B -5129C, Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
52 feet 7 inches
85 feet
B -5129D, Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
52 feet 3 inches
90 feet
B -5129E, Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
101 feet 6 inches
120 feet
B-4594, Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
52 feet
80 feet
The approach roadway will hold the existing horizontal alignment and roadway width. It
will also be at approximately the same elevation as the existing roadway. Deck and roadway
drainage will be maintained at approximately the same slopes as the existing structure and
roadway approaches. No deck drains are included in the project.
The bridges are all located within the Neuse River Basin and US Geological Survey
hydrologic unit 03020105. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) has
designated a best usage classification for each stream and its unnamed tributaries (UT) as shown
in Table 2.
Table 2. NCDWQ Index Number and Best Usage Classification
Stream Name
DWQ Index Number
Best Usage Classification
Vandemere Creek
27-150-15
SC Sw — NSW
Little Vandemere Creek
27-150-15-1
SC Sw — NSW HQW
Bear Creek
27-150-28
SA HQW - NSW
Gale Creek
27-150-31
SA HQW - NSW
UT to Jones Bay
27-152
SA HQW - NSW
There are currently no outstanding resource waters (ORW) or drinking water supply
waters (WS -I and WS -II) within a one mile radius of the project study area. The 2008 Draft
303(d) list (dated January 10, 2008) or the 2006 Final 303(d) list (dated June 19, 2007) indicates
impaired waters located within one mile upstream or downstream of Vandemere Creek, Bear
Creek, and Gale Creek are due to fecal coliform contamination.
Jurisdictional wetlands are located immediately adjacent to the existing bridges.
Avoidance and minimization measures have been incorporated to the extent possible; however,
impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur. Permanent impacts to coastal wetlands include fill
materials required for widening approach roadways at new end bent locations, which is necessary
to conform to current design standards and to accommodate guardrail installation. Permanent
surface water impacts include placement of interior bent bridge supports in the channel and rip -
rap for fill slope stabilization at new end bent locations.

Page 3
March 6, 2009
Existing relic wood pilings located in the water at the bridge locations will be pulled out of
the channel because they pose a safety hazard. Sediment curtains will be used to ensure that
sediment releases from this activity will be contained to the immediate location of the pile removal
operation. Construction equipment will be operated from the existing road surface and/or upland
areas and will not enter wetland areas.
As of January 31, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of protected
species includes six federally protected species for Pamlico County (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally rotected species listed for Pamlico Coun
Appropriate habitat for shortnose sturgeon is available within waters of the five bridge
replacement sites. According to NCNHP Virtual Workroom records, updated on September 23,
2008, shortnose sturgeon has been observed in waters of the Neuse River and Pamlico Sound
south of Pamlico County. Shortnose sturgeon is a mobile species that is expected to relocate to
avoid construction activities; therefore, project construction may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect, this species.
There are no viable options for use of an off-site detour and existing traffic must be
maintained on one lane during bridge construction. NCDOT requests relief from moratoriums on
in -water work to allow completion of this project concurrent with the four adjacent bridge sites
along NC 304. Work can be completed in one construction season which will cause minimal
disruption to public school bus traffic.
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Present
Conclusion
Alligator
American alligator
T(S/A)
Yes
Not Required
mississippiensis
Lepidochelys kempii
Kemp's ridley sea
E
No
No Effect
turtle
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded
E
No
No Effect
woodpecker
Acipenser
brevirostrum
Shortnose sturgeon
E
Yes
MA-NLAA
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E *
No
No Effect
Lysimachia
Rough -leaved
as erulae olia
loosestrife
E
No
No Effect
E — Endangered
MA — NLAA — May Affect -Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
T(S/A) — Threatened due to similarity of
appearance
* - Historic record (the species was last
observed in the count more than 50 years ago)
Appropriate habitat for shortnose sturgeon is available within waters of the five bridge
replacement sites. According to NCNHP Virtual Workroom records, updated on September 23,
2008, shortnose sturgeon has been observed in waters of the Neuse River and Pamlico Sound
south of Pamlico County. Shortnose sturgeon is a mobile species that is expected to relocate to
avoid construction activities; therefore, project construction may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect, this species.
There are no viable options for use of an off-site detour and existing traffic must be
maintained on one lane during bridge construction. NCDOT requests relief from moratoriums on
in -water work to allow completion of this project concurrent with the four adjacent bridge sites
along NC 304. Work can be completed in one construction season which will cause minimal
disruption to public school bus traffic.

Page 4
,March 6, 2009
Please find attached a copy of the U.S. Coast Guard letter dated February 19, 2009
granting advance permit approval for these bridge replacements. The following information is
provided for each of the bridge replacement projects: CAMA permit forms MP -1, MP -2, and
MP -5; U.S. Postal Service Return Receipt certification cards from adjacent landowner notification
packages; Pre -Construction Notification Form; permit drawings; and Figures 1 and 2 which
identify the project sites.
We are requesting that the proposed work be authorized under a CAMA General Permit.
By copy of this letter we are also requesting issuance of a US Army Corps of Engineers
Nationwide Permit 14 and the corresponding 401 General Certification 3704. In compliance with
Condition 1 of this certification we request written concurrence from the NC Division of Water
Quality.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the project, please contact me at
[phone]. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Jay B. Johnson
Division Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 2
Attachments (set included for each bridge)
Adjacent Landowner Notification Return Receipts
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 Project Topography
CAMA Permit Forms MP -1, MP -2, MP -5
PCN Application Form
U.S. Coast Guard Advance Permit Approval letter
Permit Drawings (8.5 x 11 and 11 x 17)
w/attachments
Mr. William Westcott, USACE (1 copy, CD)
Mr. Garcy Ward, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ 401 Permit Unit (5 copies, CD)
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
w/o attachments
Mr. Kevin Austin, P.E., Mulkey Inc.

Commander 431 Crawford Street
U.S. Department offf
United States Coast Guard Portsmouth, Va. 23704-5004
Homeland SecurityFifth Coast Guard District Staff Symbol: dpb
Phone: [phone]
United States Fax: [phone]
Coat GuardEmail: [e-mail]
16591
19 FEB 09
Ms. Cindy Simpson Carr
Senior Scientist
Mulkey, Inc.
PO Box 33127
Raleigh, NC 27636
Dear Ms. Carr:
I apologize for our late response to your letter of November 6, 2008, requesting for Advance
Permit Approval for the following North Carolina Department of Transportation Bridge
Replacement Projects in Pamlico County, NC:
1) B -5129B, Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek;
2) B -5129C, Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek;
3) B -5129D, Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek;
4) B -5129E, Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek; and
5) B-4594, Bridge No. 44 over Jones Bay
Our examination and historical data indicate that there is sufficient factual support for
concluding that these waterways are navigable waters of the United States. However, the
waterways also meet the criteria for advanced approval waterways outlined in Title 33, Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 115.70. Advance approval waterways are those that are navigable
in law, but not actually navigated by other than small boats. The Commandant of the Coast
Guard has given his advance approval to the construction and rehabilitation of bridges across
such waterways. Therefore, a Coast Guard Bridge permit will not be required for these proposed
bridge replacement projects.
These projects will be placed in our Advance Approval category for the locations and
replacement of the Abovementioned Bridge projects and is valid for five years from the date of
this letter. If the construction does not commence within this time period, you must contact this
office for reaffirmation of this authorization. Future bridge projects along the same waterways
will have to be independently evaluated before they may be considered for Advance Approval.
The fact that a Coast Guard bridge permit is not required does not relieve you of the
responsibility for compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency
who may have jurisdiction over any aspect of these projects.
Although these projects will not require a bridge permit, other areas of Coast Guard jurisdiction
apply. The following must be met:

From: 7573988334 _Pale: 3f3� Date: 2./119120093:416:20 PM , y
16591
19 FEB 09
a. The lowest portion of the superstructure of the bridge across the waterway should clear the
100 -year Hood height elevation, if feasible.
b. The National Ocean Service (NOS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) is responsible for maintaining the charts of U.S. waters; therefore they must be notified
of these proposed bridge projects. You must notify our office and the NOS upon completion of
the activities approved in this letter. Your notification of completion must include as -built
drawings, which certifies the location and clearances of the each bridge that was constructed.
This information will be sent to the following address:
Ken Forster
National Ocean Service (NOS)
N/CS25, Room 7317
1315 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
Please contact me at the above address or telephone number for any further assistance.
Si69ti
Bran
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
Copy; Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Waterways Management
Mr. Ken Forster, NOS
2
This fax was received by GFi FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http://www.gfi.com

DCM MP4
APPLICUION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06) bA
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
North Carolina Department Of Transportation, Division 2
Project Name (if applicable)
B -5129D, Replace Bridge No. 40 on NC 304 over Bear Creek
Applicant 1: First Name
Jay
MI
B.
Last Name
Johnson
Mulkey, Inc.
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Last Name
Mailing Address
105 Pactolus Highway (INC 33)
PO Box
1587
City
Greenville
Carr
State
NC
ZIP
27835
Country
Pitt County, NC
Phone No.
252 — 830
- 3490 ext.
FAX No.
252 - 830 - 3341
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
33127
Raleigh
2. AgentlContractor Information
Business Name
Mulkey, Inc.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Cindy
S.
Carr
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO BoxCity
State
33127
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27636 3127
919 - 858 - 1871
ext.
- ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
919 851 1918
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
6750 Tryon Road
Cary
NC
27518 -
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
e1-888-4RCOAST -- www

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Pamlico
Bridge No. 40 on NC 304 over Bear Creek
INC 304
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
n/a
Mesic
NC
28537 -
Phone No.
Lot No. (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
n/a - - ext.
n/a,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse River
Bear Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Bear Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work falls within.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
n/a
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
approx. 100 linear feet
approx. 21,550
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
n/a, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
5 feet ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Approximately 1.51 acres of maintained/disturbed areas; approx. 0.27 acre of tidal freshwater marsh with dominant
vegetation of black needlerush, arrowleaf tearthumb, foxtail grass, seaside goldenrod, silverling, marsh elder, and eastern
redcedar; and approx. 0.41 acre of mesic pine flatwoods with dominant vegetation of loblolly pine, red maple, wax myrtle,
silverling, and eastern red cedar.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
NC 304 roadway and bridge spanning Bear Creek.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
Privately owned undeveloped or rural residential property.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
No zoning indicated by County
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes []No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n/a
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
n/a
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems,
Existing bridge structure has open scuppers draining stormwater into surface waters.
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑ Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Replace the deficient Bridge No. 40 structure with a new safer structure that meets current design standards. The new
bridge will be constructed in-place using top-down and staged construction methods. The new bridge will have 3 spans and
be 90 feet long with a 33 foot wide clear roadway width. Roadway approaches will require minimal widening for installation of
guard rail at new end bent locations.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Top-down and staged construction will allow use of an on-site detour to reduce environmental impacts. All construction
equipment will operate from the existing road and no equipment will be placed in wetlands or open waters. Typical roadway
construction equipment such as excavators, crane, backhoes, dump trucks, paving machines, and rollers will be used.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Demolition and removal of existing bridge, removal of relic wood piles located in the water at the bridge site, and construction
of new bridge on existing alignment. Relic wood piles will be pulled completely out of the water using a crane; sediment
curtains will be installed to capture any sediment created by pylon removal.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Replace the existing structure with a
new structure.
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 15,000 ®Sq.Ft or ❑Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area []Yes ❑No ®NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
The existing bridge has open scupper drains that discharge stormwater directly over the stream channel. The new bridge
will not have deck drains located over surface waters. Stormwater will be drained to modified concrete flumes and
discharged to Class II rip -rap with filter fabric on upland areas at end bent locations.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>

,Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name SEE ATTACHED LIST Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
n/a
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date March 6, 2009
WBS 42287.1.1 Print Name Jay B. Johnson
t^ �
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information

Form DCM MP -2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ® This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
C. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area? d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner. (ii) If yes, where?
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected. (ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization)
Length
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Width
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg. Existing
Depth
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n/a
Final Project
Depth
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n/a
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ® This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
C. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area? d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner. (ii) If yes, where?
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected. (ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:

Fo,r t'd DCM MP -2 (Excavation and Fitt, Page 2 of 3)
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION El This section not applicable
(if development is a wood groin, use MP -4 — Structures)
yHv v a Ui cm is aLOUm­auUi 1.
❑Bulkhead ®Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:
C. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 3 feet
e. Type of stabilization material:
Class II riprap with filter fabric
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other 7.5 CY
i. Source of fill material.
Pre -cast Concrete Piers
U. Lung[n: zu Teer (max. (engin)
Width: 10 feet (max. width)
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 6 feet
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
New pre -cast concrete bridge piers
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh ((W)
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW _ ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Erosion control methods for sensitive waters, including sediment Standard roadway construction equipment
curtains for work in water, silt ditches, special silt fence with
filter fabric for stone removal in Coastal wetlands
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
March 6, 2009 WBS 42287.1.1 Debit $400
Date
B -5129D, Replace Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
Project Name
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Jay B. Johnson, NCDOT Div. 2 Environmentpi Officer
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature /�

Form OCM MP -5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community
C. Type of bridge (construction material):
3 -Span pre -cast concrete cored slab bridge on precast
substructure
b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
Bear Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
Approximately 3 to 4 feet
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes []No f
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 52.4 feet
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 28.1 feet (clear roadway)
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 4.2 feet
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) All of the existing structure will be removed.
In addition, relic wood piles located in the water from
previous structures will be removed by pulling them
completely out.
9• Length of proposed bridge: 90 feet
(i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h- Width of proposed bridge: 33 feet, clear roadway width
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes ®No j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
k• Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 4.2 feet
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable
waters? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Fill material at existing end bents will be
excavated and removed to match elevations of adjacent
wetlands. Approximately 1,358 sq.ft. will be restored New
bridge will span wetland restoration areas.
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes []No
If yes, explain: Advanced permit approval received from
Chief, USCG Bridge Administration Branch in a letter dated
February 19, 2009 (copy attached).
n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: approx. 3 feet.
revised: 10/26/06

FoIrm 0CM-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a• Number of culverts proposed:
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f• Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes []No
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9• Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
?. EXCAVATION and FILL El This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
252-808-2808 :: 1-8884RCOAST — wWW nc.coasta managem _ t.net r vise . 90126!06

Farm ®CM MP -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Wage 3 of 4)
C. (1) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ONo # )"
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 18 feet
t�ll, l
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 52 feet
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3 feetMore►�� �r A � 8,
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 225
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Upland area to be determined by contractor
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by contractor
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ONo (if no, attach a tetter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? []Yes NNo
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shelf
bottom (SB)?
OCW ❑SAV OWL OSB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? NYes ONo
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 32 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 3 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: At Bridge No. 40 (TIP B -5129D),
198 square feet of open water impacts for interior bridge
support piers. See table on stream and wetland impacts
permit drawing (pian sheet 8).
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ONo
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 200 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 12
(iv) Purpose of fill: Approximately 472 cu. yds. of fill
material will be placed in uplands for roadway approach
to new bridge. See fill slope boundaries on stream and
wetland impact permit drawing (plan sheet 8).
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes ONo
If yes, explain: Telephone and water lines will be
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlandstmarsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
NCW 267 sq. ft E) SAV OSB
OWL ❑None
(fi) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Fill placed at toe of roadway slope at new bridge end
bents to allow for guardrail placement.
b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ONo
If yes, explain:
252-808-2808 :: 1-880-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalm?!nageltieLrt.glet sev€sed: 10,'261Q6
����0

Form DDM MP -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. Strict enforcement of NCDOT's Best Management
Practices, including Sediment and Erosion Control in
Sensitive Watersheds
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
❑Yes ®No
Typical roadway construction equipment such as backhoe, If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
crane, dump truck, crane, paving machine as determined environmental impacts.
by contractor
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
March 6, 2009 WBS 42287.1.1 - Debit $400
Date
B -5129C, Replace Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
Project Name
Jay B. Johnson, DEO NCDOT Division 2
Applicant Name �^J
Applicant Signature ' `
0
�'�: ? vvw ."ccaast,afmar►ag:q�_ enfi.net revised:/0/26106

I„: � � � : �4
tc '306j t \ t�+uo
45
~�
s
IS Po_ mlrco Pr. .
Aures ` F,oyal - \
Me c ?oy •v
•. Askins ��—'--
H011 Wile
�. ,Cash Corner2 V3laemere y -Y r/
z
'^
bMarineQ
!
r +' at 2. w M.
9 noro .>, 30� .
hmpia Gra nlsborr. 2 _ Y
y S`Yboewa4 1191 nce
" 55 At W e 1: Project Vicinity
' ', P
tt Y/herten6Vllle •� ' _
> � / t �3os� 556 ramime .•,r,r
Arapahoe \.. Bvy �
-itmental n 11,'
)ar�gije {✓
�- CEDAR
AVD <
0.N '♦ Mrnnestit[.��•
Croat n FR�-4tRraM , y� i t
)NALL^'I t /` r30s
<Uf W,
L
Havelock
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
B-5129 B through E, B-4594
Bridge Replacement Projects on NC 304
Pamlico County, North Carolina
B -5129B Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
B -5129C Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
B -5129D Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
B -5129E Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
B-4594 Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
Ot NOl!/r ,4\
4't Gj i
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
a
��M Tlfr•%'
t✓M .ate
,�,. ter. ,.° `r"r" --- -- -.r.l �"` -•►' �,� :,� • - .r. �- � "'"" �.-
-"-_
,�;. -^+�^- _,�,,, ..aye. _ -rl► /i .M. _ J►.
ort County-, _-- ------ - •� _ - .�, -
wBeau _ _-----
.- 4AW
-P -
,.'
.0; 304
�h conwt
C,
r► � r r. .t_
J"
Legend
----- County Boundary
/�— Roads
Bridge Locations
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
USGS 1:24K Maps: Vandemere, Jones Bay
South Creek and Lowland

Prepared For:
a
x`
'd
PROJECT LOCATION
B -5129D
Replace Bridge No. 40 on NC 304 over Bear Creek
Pamlico County, North Carolina
Figure
2
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles
1.24,000
USGS 7.5- Minute Topographic Vandemere and Jones Bay (Contour Interval 5 Feet)

E t f:A;Fs4sxt4'mvax' k
n+tea ye:. je o.•+'�'•x"� � �__..r;
i t
4
t
FF,6
Fm sr)s
A.
o , O c • 11 Hesic (c): •!
- ,st ='" +� N t _ • \'. ' Ut Olive
+ _ �: i" �Z e••�' Ch / b s .Post Ol(ica .a
� 1_ �" � .�.• �� - .moi
c
t •
I'
———— �t
yy-
��a_ Foini
i �` < 7a�a / •4 i `` 1 4,0
ra and
Cedar oin �$
X4 C.
Point
demere
)RR
AI�)1) /��j
lv CDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
T O P O M A P PROJECT: B-5129D
WBS NUMBER: 42287.1.1
SCALE: 1" = 1500, REPLACE BRIDGE #40
ON NC 304 OVER
BEAR CREEK
SHEET 2 OF 7 1/19/09

i� NORTH CAROLINA
BRIDGE X40
a
\� t MESIC
.. _ . tt POP. 253 `
i
Bear
b(OLMLE
ASH CORNERL
POP. 100
�— VANDE)AERE
` POP. 287
.T
\ - 1218 al 1217
VICINITY
MAPS
M
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129D
WBS NUMBER:42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE .0
ON NC 304 OVER
BEAR CREEK
SHEET 1 OF 7 1 / 19 / 09

G
PROPERTY OJA,,7NERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
REFERENCE INTO. NAMES ADDRESSES
1 JOSEPH E. WOOD 1929 CIVIETO✓1N RD SW
SUPPLY, NC 28462
2 RAYMOND U ORNDORFF, JR. 10586 HWY 304
BAYBORO. NC 28515
3 GARY B FLITCH 2095 UPPER NECK RD
BAYBORO, NC 28515
1'®I C D O T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129D
WBS NUMBER: 4-2287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE X40
ON NC 304 OVER
BEAR CREEK
SHEET 3 OF 7 1/19/09

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Joseph E. Wood
1929 Civietown Road SW
Supply, NC 28462
A. Sig ure
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
Received by (Prin d Name C. rDate of Delive
D. Is delivery Address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Se ice Type
Certified Mail
El Express Mail
❑ Registered
13,<tum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ insured Mail
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label) 7003 0500 0000 0852 3311
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Gary B. Futch
2095 Upper Neck Road
Bayboro, NC 28515
A
u , //
/'1 ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Ffeceived by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
-)/
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
IgGertified Mail 11 ress Mail
❑ Registered 6YReturn Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7003 0500 0000 0852 4257
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A ignature
C
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑ Agent
■ Print your name and address on the reverse i ❑ Addressee
so that we can return the card to you. B. Rceived by (Printed Name) a of Deli `ery
■ Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece,
or on the front if space permits. �r �
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
1. Article Addressed to: YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
Raymond M. Orndorff, Jr.
10586 NC 304 Hwy
Bayboro, NC 28515
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label) 7003 0500 0000 0852 3335
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

�
LEGEND
—WLB
WETLAND BOUNDARY
PROPOSED BRIDGE
WETLAND
_ PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
L��LU1La DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
i
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12`-48°
FILL IN
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
FILL
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
SINGLE TREE
DENOTES TEMPORARY
i
FILL IN WETLAND
WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
I
®
IN WETLAND
DRAINAGE INLET
®
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE^
WATER
- RODTWAD
ODENOTES
MECHANIZED
•
CLEARING
>
FLOW DIRECTION
RTP RAP
TB
TOP OF BANK
+ WE
---•
EDGE OF WATER
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
5
OR PARCEL NUMBER
C
IF AVAILABLE
—
PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
F
® PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
—
PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
AIL
PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
NG
NATURAL GROUND
PL —
PROPERTY LINE
DITCH /
—TDE—
TEMP. DRAINAGE
GRASS SWALE
EASEMENT
—PDE—
PERMANENT DRAINAGE
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
EASEMENT
BUFFER ZONE 1
—EAB—
EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
®DENOTES
IMPACTS TO
—EPB—
EXIST. ENDANGERED
BUFFER ZONE 2
PLANT BOUNDARY
—�- - —
WATER SURFACE
x x x x x
LIVE STAKES
x x x
NCDOT
BOULDER
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
---
CORE FIBER ROLLS
PROJECT: B -5129D
WBS NUMBER: 42287.1.1
CE
CE BRIDGE X40
REPLACE
E;
DENOTES AREA TO BE
EXCAVATED
OILS 306 OVER
BEAR CREEK
_I SHEET _ 5 OF 7 1/19 09

IMPACTSUMMARY
0, WETLANDS
CAMA WETLANDS
®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®
0000
0000
®0
�
�®©0
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO
PROJECT: 00
BRIDGEREPLACE 0 ON NC 304
OVER BEAR CREEK
SHEET .. 00•

5
PROJECT No. B -51290
WBS No. 42287.1.1
DATE: 1-19-2009
ROAD: NC 304
ROAD NAME. NC 304 OVER
BEAR CREEK
I COUNTY: PAMLICO
CROSS SECTION
OF BRIDGE No. 40
EXISTING BRIDGE
I @ 17'--8"
1 @ 16'-11 "
I@ 17'-9"
28'--1" CLEAR ROADWAY
52'-4° �1
NOT TO SCALE
304
PROPOSED 21" CONCRETE CORED SLAB
PROPOSED LENGTH: 3 SPANS @ 30'
33' CLEAR ROADWAY
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
°0'
i 30' 1 30' 1 30' i
NOT TO SCALE
304
Sheet 4 of 7

CD >
o
CD
FIE,
BUFFER IMDACTS
B-1 Il
WP
W. 533 *f B-2
SZ
WAC I 3913f ooe�—
(L3)
D3 CLASS IIRIP RAP
+ W/ FILTER FARIC+ R
O (TYP.) 2
0
FER DUO 0
ONErs
0' 30'
wm wm c C?- DODS
w 0
8R, FOO
'o
NC 304 ED, asr
0Cl RBSTs,
II L/ C6
--j
WOODS 2�11 1 P ��IAI
", I C
(TYP.1
FE - 2
14Eior,`PE9
B-3 WOODS
2
l.p.c
FOR MITTING ONLY
NO_V7
FOR
CONSTRICTIONI DENO FtS AREA TO BE EXCAVA rrD W.
nn Af
O BUFFER ZONE I
USE METHOD II FOR CLEA �IN� DENOTES IMPACTS TO
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
BUFFER ZONE 2
ZONE (BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE — 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
- - --------- I = — N� ---- -- -- EXISTING BR0GE: NCDOT
T
B -I 533 SCUARE FEET B -I 391 SQUARE FEESPANS: IV17'-8'; 10!6-11%1017'-9' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WIDTH: 28'-1' CLEAR ROADWAY
T
---2 483 SQUARE FEET B M-2 281SQUARE FFFT RC FLOOR CN TIMBER JOISTS PLAN VIEW PAMLICO COUNTY
FNO RENTS AND INTERIOR BENTS PROJFCT.B-5129D
R-3 0 SQUARE FEE- 0 SQUARE FEET TIMBER CAPS / TIMBER PILES WBS NUMBER: 42287.1.1
—4 3715QLARE FEET B-4 279 SQUARE FEET SCALE: 1" 60'
PROPOS-�D 3RIDGE: REPLACE BRIDGE NO
2*CONCRETE CORED SLAB ON N -C 504 OVER
TOTAL 1387 SOUARE FEEI TOTAL 950 SQUARE FEET WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY BEAR CREEK
0105 ACRES 0.022 LENG74:3 Q 30' 7
SHEET OF 8 1/19109
:20,

Oro
4
aCD
�J
W
WATER
)2AL
j GARY F
DB q UTCH
M4P
;N fFgpM X 41
CL
<
0.0061 ACRES
o
•'-t
O
CO «�
a
0E�
o
/ Cg
RAI�y
STREAM & WETLAND IMPACTS ®DENOTES
FILL IN
•�`" AND
r4X MAp7 / DENOTES FILL IN
I SJRFACE WATER
DBAN M JONE I I O3 CA B. FUrC
(FRp 11
TAX MAPS lFRpMBTAXpMq 3 O
s wp Wecl 0 4i
I
CO'YCvI I
WAf 0 10,91 c
NG Riw WM ' WMA WM
r
WOOD BROCE0 / • — — ��-___
2 AC 309 201857 rc sa iur x n•sr ore
.�-EdIFsMN------------
0 Ag
II A I RA
p 1 J C M 11 L ABRIC
W000$ YP.)
I m"
RAYMO�p
DM3lAk ���JR
RFF.
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
USE METHOD II FOR CLEARING I
II IP RAP
"ILTE A 1_
EXISTING BRIDGE:
SPANS: 1017-8': 1016'-11'; 1017'-9'
NIDTH: 28'-1' CLEAR ROADWAY
RC FLOOR ON TIMBER JOISTS
END BENTS AND INfF.RIOR BENTS
TIMBER CAPS / TIMBER PILES
/
N CDO ll
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -6129D
WBS NUMBER: 42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE '40
ON NC 304 OVER
BEAR CREEK
SHEET 8 OF 8 1/19/09
W
WATER
)2AL
j GARY F
DB q UTCH
M4P
;N fFgpM X 41
/
ALBERT
fFRO&, XC BBEY
0.0061 ACRES
PEES
a
0E�
o
/ Cg
RAI�y
c C3
WOODS
FXIS iu/G R/W
^ =— t Is SLK p
E"90
CIO �.a,,,__ `-� R NC
P .l ROS�Bsr
C6,
-UN D BR,S ER
REMOVAL
7a1�
"s \. JOSEPH E. W
"RI0" 348 M TAXCOpO 000$ EMEippy
\,
O
SURFACE WATERS FILL (OPEN WATERS) FILL N WETLANDS
EXISTING BRIDGE:
SPANS: 1017-8': 1016'-11'; 1017'-9'
NIDTH: 28'-1' CLEAR ROADWAY
RC FLOOR ON TIMBER JOISTS
END BENTS AND INfF.RIOR BENTS
TIMBER CAPS / TIMBER PILES
7
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: I" = 30,
N CDO ll
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -6129D
WBS NUMBER: 42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE '40
ON NC 304 OVER
BEAR CREEK
SHEET 8 OF 8 1/19/09
0 I 99 SQUARE FEET W-1 63 SQUARE FEET
0-2 99 SQUARE FEET W-2 204 SQUARE FEET
_
TOTAL 198 SOUARE FEET__
0.0045 ACRFS TOTAL 267 SQUARE FEET
PROPOSED BRIDGE:
21' CONCRETE CORED SLAB
WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY
I ENGTH: 3 0 30'
0.0061 ACRES

6--�2

. 1%
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michad F. Easley, Governer Division of Marine Fisheries Dr. Louis B. Daniel III, Director
".Villiatn G. Ross Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Rouse
THROUGH: Anne Deaton
FROM: Sean McKenna
DATE: December 23, 2008
SUBJECT: Request for comments on NCDOT Pamlico County Bridge Replacement Projects.
The following comments by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) on the
replacement of the subject bridges are offered pursuant to G.S. 113-131.
Bridge numbers 35 (Little Vandemere Creek), 40 (Bear Creek), 42 (Gale Creek), and 44 (UT to
Jones Bay) cross Primary Nursery areas, and the NCDMF requests that NCDOT impose an in -
water work moratorium from April 1 through September 30. Additionally, the NCDMF requests that
the replacement bridges span high ground to high ground; deck drains should not discharge directly
into the stream; uncured concrete should not contact the water in or entering the stream; and that
the NCDOT utilize sedimentation and erosion control measures to protect aquatic resources.
While Vandemere Creek (bridge No.31) is not a Primary Nursery area, there are numerous
Primary Nursery Areas located downstream of this site. All care must be taken to protect these
critical habitat areas. The NCDMF requests that NCDOT take a risk adverse approach to this
project and impose an in -water moratorium from April 1 through September 30, and follow the other
aforementioned guidelines.
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncdmf.net
An Equal opportunity i A ,irmat ve Action Employer — 50 % Recycled' 10% post Consumer Paper
Nne
orthCarofina
Natltrally
•

La,4e. Stephen
From: Wilson, Travis W. [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:29 AM
To: Stephen Lane
Subject: FW: FW: bridge replacements
See attached emails below, I believe I "no commented" the scoping notice and attached the cover letter with a note
differing to DMF. WRC will continue to differ to DMF for the moratorium recommendations.
Travis.
From: Travis Wilson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:42 AM
To: 'Sean McKenna'
Subject: RE: FW: bridge replacements
Sean, since NC 304 is the I/C line and our biologist did not have specific comments; In my comment letter I differed to
DMF for project specific comments / moratoriums.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sean McKenna [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:54 PM
To: Travis Wilson
Subject: Re: FW: bridge replacements
Travis, DMF's comments for the subject bridges are attached. Have a good one. Sean
Travis Wilson wrote:
No data, therefore I wanted to coordinate with you to make sure I captured DMF recommendations. If you can
send me an electronic copy of you comments when you get them completed.
Travis.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sean McKenna [mailto•Sean.McKennaCaOncmail.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 8:43 AM
To: Travis Wilson
Subject: Re: FW: bridge replacements
Travis, Hopefully i'll get my comments out today. For all projects I'm asking for an April thru
September in -water work moratoruim. Do you have any data to support an anadromous
moratoruim (Feb - Sept)? Have a good x -mass. Sean
Travis Wilson wrote:
Sean, has DMF commented on the projects below?
Hi Travis, 0
Justin Homan looked at these crossings yesterday. All of these streams appear to be very
productive biologically. Vandemere Creek (B -5129A Bridge No. 31) is the only low -salinity

stream (salinity = 1.3 ppt) and this bridge crossing is a boundary between inland and coastal
- waters, so downstream impacts would affect waters under jurisdiction by Division of Marine
Fisheries. With the exception of Vandemere Creek, the rest of the bridges cross very saline
waters and downstream impacts would affect coastal fishing waters (all of which are designated
as PNA's by DMF)............ 0
-----Original Message -----
From: Travis Wilson[ma iIto: [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:17 PM
To: Barwick, Bob
Subject: bridge replacements
Comments? All of these are in Pamlico County.
B -5129A Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
B -5129B Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
B -5129C Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
B -5129D Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
B -5129E Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay.
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1142 I-85 Service Rd.
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone] ext. 226
Fax: [phone]
Travis.Wilson @ncwildlife.orQ
=R1all correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the 1',C. Pubiic Records I"Iw and may bG disclosed to third pailes,
0

Lane, Stephen
w•
From: Lane, Stephen
�Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:53 PM
To: 'Johnson, Jay B'
Cc: 'Sutton, Michael W'
Subject: B-5129(Replacement of five bridges on Hwy 304 in Pamlico County)
Hi Jay,
DCM received the general permit applications for TIP Project B -5129(A -E) on April 27, 2009. Review of the applications
indicate that 3 of the 5 bridges do not qualify for the general permit. As you are aware, the general permit allows a
maximum of 500 square feet of wetland impacts. Bridges 31, 42, and 44 exceed that amount and will have to be
processed under a major permit application as they are currently proposed. Additionally, there are minor corrections
needed to the drawings and MP -5 forms for Bridge 35 and Bridge 40. To obtain general permits for the projects the
following items need to be addressed:
Bridge 31
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 35
1 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas
2 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 40
1 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas in cross section and plan view
2 Correctly show marsh and stream in area of existing dock
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 42
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under S00 sq. ft.
2 Correctly show marsh and stream in area of wetland impact area W-1.
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 44
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas in cross section
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Some of the information listed above can possibly be corrected over the phone, however, the biggest obstacle is the
wetland impacts being over 500 square feet. I have visited the sites and have tried to figure out how to help you fit the
projects under the general permit process. I have some possible recommendations that may help in this regard. Please
call me when you get a chance so we can discuss this further.
Thanks,
Stephen
***** Note new E-mail Address is: Stephen.Lane(@ncdenr.gov *****
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

December 17, 2009
Page 3
w/o attachments
Mr. Devin Austin, P.E., Mulkey Inc.

Form [SCM P-5 (Bridges and S u llifertsg Pace 3 of • 1,
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 18 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 52 feet
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3 feet
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 225
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Upland area to be determined by contractor
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by contractor
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ®No (if no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL OSB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any f.
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 32 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 3 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: At Bridge No. 40 (TIP B -5129D),
198 square feet of open water impacts for interior bridge
support piers. See table on stream and wetland impacts
permit drawing (plan sheet 8).
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 200 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 12
(iv) Purpose of fill: Approximately 472 cu. yds. of fill
material will be placed in uplands for roadway approach
to new bridge. See fill slope boundaries on stream and
wetland impact permit drawing (plan sheet 8).
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Telephone and water lines will be
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
®CW 267 so.ft ❑SAV OSB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Fill placed at toe of roadway slope at new bridge end
bents to allow for guardrail placement.
b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
252-8£fa-280a — I-M-41RCOAS f:: wvutnr.sgccaastaterear�age eret.cr 4 revised: itt;26! 6
�/��09 Rau/'�'z:70 1�-S

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Roadway fill, riprap
Tidal Freshwater
Marsh
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.001 acre
(63 sq.ft.)
W2 ®P ❑ T
Roadway fill, riprap
Tidal Freshwater
Marsh
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.005 acre
(204 sq.ft.)
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.006 acre
(267 sq. ft.)
2h. Comments:
W1 and W2 impacts include CAMA wetlands. Impacts are for fill placement at new bridge end bent locations and are
necessary for guard rail installation.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Si ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWO
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWO
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
sa.
® Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
69.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ®P ❑ T
Roadpwaayy
Fill,riB2
Bear Creek
® Nos
533
391
®P ❑ T
Fillarip ap dway
Bear Creek
® Nos 483
281
B3 ®P ❑ T
Roadway
Bear Creek
El Yes
0
0
a
p p
® No
6h. Total buffer impacts
* 1,387
*950
(0.032 acre)
(0.022 acre)
6i. Comments: Add additional buffer impact B4 as follows:
*134 XP Roadway Fill Vandemere Creek X No Zone 1: 371 sf Zone 2: 279 sf
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance Measures: Existing roadway and bridge alignment will be maintained during staged construction and an on-site
detour will avoid need for a temporary detour bridge by using a portion of the existing bridge to maintain traffic flow. The new
structure will be constructed using pre-cast concrete components which avoids potential impacts from live concrete. During
demolition, components of the existing bridge will not be dropped in the water. Sediment curtains will be used around relic
pylons to prevent sediment from entering the water column.
Minimization Measures: Wetland impacts have been minimized to the extent feasible, with impacts occurring only where new
location of bridge bents and piers are required to support the structure and installation of safety guard rails. Existing roadway
and bridge alignment have been maintained to minimize impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of the existing roadway to maintain traffic on-site during construction of the new bridge. Use of existing roadway to
operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands or waters. Use of pre-cast concrete bridge components
avoid use of live concrete.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWO ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

IMPACT SUMMARY
404 WETLANDS
CAMA WETLANDS
SURFACE WATERS
BUFFERS
STRUCTURE FILL
TEMP.
FILL
HAND
EXCAVATION CLEARING
FILL
TEMP.
FILL
HAND
EXCAVATION CLEARING
FILL
TEMP. FILL
ZONE1 ZONE2
ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL FILL REMOVAL FILL REMOVAL
(ft2
ft,
(fe)
ft2)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft2) (fe)
(ftp)
(ftp)
(ft2)
(ft2)
(fe) (fTz) (ft2)
W-1 0
0
0
0
63
0
0 0
12
0
W-2
204
O-1
99
O-2
99
B-1
533
391
1,327
B-2
483
281
B-3
0
0
B-4
371
279
TOTAL 0 1
0 11
0 1
0
267
0
0 1 0 1
198 1
0
1387
951
1 1327 0
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO
PROJECT: MA-2005
REPLACE BRIDGE #40 ON NC 304
OVER BEAR CREEK
SHEET OF 5/20/2009

PROFILE
SCALE: F'= 50' (HORIZONTAL)
1" = 10' (VERTICAL)

B -I
BZ' IIIPAC 5.13 sf
BZR -iMPACT f
0,
i.
STAB 1g (PT)
Too!)
F-00 T
CE
IVC 304 ECYBS7
volm" QD
-------------
WOODS
8UF.FE.R
80-FER
ZONE 2 ZONE I
[
FOR PERNA,11TTING' ONLY NFOOT" FOR CONISTRUC-11ONi
i
H . YP.)
B-4
B21IMPact z 37tsf
SZI2IMPACT m 2795 sf
USE MEETHOD11 FOR C' EARING
:CD
CANE I BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
537, SOIJARE FEET B --I —391 S G:j A P E
2 48 i —SOUARE- FET B-2 28I SQUARE F HT
13 3 �)'J A. REE FEET B-3 Cl SOUAR" FEET
... ..........
B=4
371 SQUAPE FEE; ? t 279 SGUAR
FEET
3 8-7 �d-
7TFAL Lj A P, rE FEET li TOTAL 950 SOUARE F—r
0.032 ACRES 0.022
T
.
LE 'E L-)
FILL REMOVAL
1397 sf
CLASS 'I M.- RAP
FILTER F A 13 P 1 C
1��
EXISTING BRh'-'0E.
SPANS-. lLal6,--IV; &7,'.-cla
WIDTH- 28'-1" CL -AR ROADWAY
R C FLOOR 01,11, 11 m 8 -t R i 0 1 s I s
END BENTS AND INTERIOR KNITS
TIMBER CAPS / TIMBER PILES
PROPOSED BRIDGE!
21" CONCRETE CORED SLAB
10.10TH: 33" CLEAR RQADI01AY
LENGIH-, 3 Q 30"
B-2
(I II
9zi ;MPACT lZ)3 sf
012 IMF -ACT = 281sf
+
0
0
rq
co 1'4
C5
jj.
1-104
304
&sr
2 0'
B - 3 WOODS
821 IMPACT 0
SZ2 IMPACT 0 S -f
DENOTES AREA TO BE EXC.AvArED W.
DENOTES TVIPACTS Tr
BUFFER ZONE I
DEROTES '„JpArTS TO
111 BUFFE�. ZO-Nli 2
PLAN 7VIEW
SCALE, I” = 50'
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAIPALICD COUINTLY
PROJECT: B -5129D
WBS NUjMBER:422V.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE # 40
ON NC '7504 OVER
BEAR CREEK
SI -IEE T 7 OF 8
/ 191 T)
1 `%201o,

„V rAX ''2
k i✓,pP)
RYA1�J tv+
O19 105
0 . JONES
PC 536
OtTAX MAP)
�- ;4--
s L, MEQ L
STC. 13_47.09 -l- t?T7
N. F.iry Wha Ib a4vM
wo
Bgrpro.NC 304 2a'BST —_ .__ -----
7A SR ]2>7
TREAM & WET'I
AND
-14- o
` (TYP.)
UNDERWATER -�
DEBRIS
RErJOVAI-
c 0-2 f
r6 -,
10EEGSr< AAt.ME' f � i `�
CFM
W 0 0 S
� 7
ry
FOR PE MI TTI `Nu ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
USE METHOD I I FOR CLEARING
ACE WATERS FILL (OPEN WATERS)
41
CLASS IiRF RAP
4Y.! FILTER FABRIC
(TYP.)
I'A YMOND M- GRN
OO.
D13 377
MAP FF, JR
D
FILL IN WETLANDS
0-1 99 S.OUARE FEET W-1 63 SOUARE FEE ET 1:
0-2 99 SOUAIZE FEET --rV-2 2.04. SQUARE FEET ;
TO T Al... 198. SQUARE FEET
II TOT �1L 25 7 SOUAR= FEET
0.40�lS. ACRES 7 �
0.0061 ACRES
M P F;T
V
W - 1
co
GARY --t( 1
t/ x
RGM9�AX 0 M483
Cs
W-2 -
j 11 "UNDERWATER
DEBRIS
REMOVAL
c^
9�
1
EXISTING BRIDGE.
SPANS- 1 17'-8'; 1016' -Ii% lQ17'-9°
WIDTH: 28'4' CLEAR ROADWAY
RC FLOOR ON TIMBER jOIS T S
END BENTS !---.NO INTERIOR? BENTS
TIMBER CAPS / TIMBER P11 -17-S
PROPOSED .BRIDGE:
21' CONCRETE CORED SLAB
WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY
LENGTH: 3 0 30°
DCRCTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTESAIN
,r SURFAWI*
CE R�TER
""ERT x
Da 224 MCKl��E Y
o(FROM TAX M �g
y+o�os
i - `_ 'tet .,
rs N a/W
-. <1S
BN O
NC 304
1 -Y
JOSEPH E. Wood k'�QDS tEMt 7qp, I c`�
(PROM BAX- I P) ir^^
O YJ.
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: I" - 50'
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
I'AMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT- B -5129D
WBS NUMBER: 42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE ;;40
ON NC 304 OVER
BEAR CREEK
8 OF 8 1/19/09