51295_NC DOT_20090529

❑CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL J NO 512,95
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
❑New ❑Modification Ll Complete Reissue L1 Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natur41esources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name Project Location: County
Address Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City State ZIP
Phone # ( ) Fax # ( ) Subdivision
Authorized Agent - City - ZIP
Affected ®'CW ❑ EW ❑ PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS Phone # ( ) River Basin
AEC(S): [IOEA ElHHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA El N/A Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn)
El PWS: El FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure
yes
Sandbags: not sure
yes
no
Moratorium: n/a
no
Photos:
yep
no
Waiver Attached:
yes
doh
J
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
(Scale: I
See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Permit Officer's Signature
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit ** Issuing Date
Application Fee(s)
Check # Local PlanningJurisdiction
Expiration Date
Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythatthis project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
[� Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-648 I) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office Morehead City Headquarters
Mailing Address: 400 Commerce Ave
1638 Mail Service Center Morehead City, NC 28557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 252-808-2808/ 1-888-4RCOAST
Location: Fax: [phone]
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

A�..
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
June 1, 2009
NCDOT
c/o Jay Johnson
P.O. Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835
Dear Jay,
Enclosed are General Permits #51292, 51293, 51294, 51295, and 51296 to construct bridges on
existing location to replace existing bridge #31, #35, #40, #42, and #44 respectively on NC304 in
Pamlico County, N.C.
In order to validate these permits, please sign the permits as indicated. Retain the white copy
for your files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-
addressed envelope. If the signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation
of development, you will be working without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of
Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
Enclosures
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
n o.,
h.
�� para voQ'�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
March 6, 2009
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Field Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
ATTENTION: Mr. Stephen Lane
NCDOT Coordinator
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
APR 2 7 2009
Morehead City 0CM
Subject: Application for CAMA General Permit for the proposed replacement of Five
Bridges on NC304 in Pamlico County, State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP): Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek (B -5129B); Bridge
No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek (B -5129C); Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
(B -5129D); Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek (B -5129E); and Bridge No. 44 over
UT to Jones Bay (B-4594), Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-0304(3), State Project
No. WBS 42287.1.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace five
bridges on NC304 in Pamlico County (Figure 1). Please accept this letter as a request for a
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) General Permit for the above referenced projects.
NCDOT plans to replace these bridges using staged construction and roadway approach work
will be kept to a minimum so that one lane of traffic can be maintained on site during
construction.
The five bridges are being replaced because they have been deemed structurally deficient.
The new bridges will be built to match existing alignments and parameters on current locations.
Each of the existing bridges has a superstructure composed of a reinforced concrete deck on
timber joists. End bents and interior bents are timber caps on timber piles. The existing bridges
will be removed in accordance with the NCDOT Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal (BMP-BDR). The timber and steel components will be removed
without dropping any components into Waters of the U.S.
MAILING ADDRESS:
113 AIRPORT DRIVE
SUITE 100
EDENTON, NC 27932
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
113 Airport Drive
Suite 100.
Edenton, NC 27932

Page 2
March 6, 2009
The recommended replacement structure for each bridge is a concrete cored slab deck
with a clear roadway width of 33 feet. Table 1 shows the existing bridge length and the proposed
bridge length for the five bridge replacements.
Table 1. Existing and Proposed Bridge Lengths
Bridge Site
Existing Bridge
Length
Proposed Bridge
Length
B -5129B, Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
87 feet
120 feet
B-5 129C, Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
52 feet 7 inches
85 feet
B -5129D, Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
52 feet 3 inches
90 feet
B -5129E, Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
101 feet 6 inches
120 feet
B-4594, Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
52 feet
80 feet
The approach roadway will hold the existing horizontal alignment and roadway width. It
will also be at approximately the same elevation as the existing roadway. Deck and roadway
drainage will be maintained at approximately the same slopes as the existing structure and
roadway approaches. No deck drains are included in the project.
The bridges are all located within the Neuse River Basin and US Geological Survey
hydrologic unit 03020105. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) has
designated a best usage classification for each stream and its unnamed tributaries (UT) as shown
in Table 2.
Table 2. NCDWQ Index Number and Best Usage Classification
Stream Name
DWQ Index Number
Best Usage Classification
Vandemere Creek
27-150-15
SC Sw—NSW
Little Vandemere Creek
27-150-15-1
SC Sw — NSW HQW
Bear Creek
27-150-28
SA HQW - NSW
Gale Creek
27-150-31
SA HQW - NSW
UT to Jones Bay
27-152
SA HQW - NSW
There are currently no outstanding resource waters (ORW) or drinking water supply
waters (WS -I and WS -II) within a one mile radius of the project study area. The 2008 Draft
303(d) list (dated January 10, 2008) or the 2006 Final 303(d) list (dated June 19, 2007) indicates
impaired waters located within one mile upstream or downstream of Vandemere Creek, Bear
Creek, and Gale Creek are due to fecal coliform contamination.
Jurisdictional wetlands are located immediately adjacent to the existing bridges.
Avoidance and minimization measures have been incorporated to the extent possible; however,
impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur. Permanent impacts to coastal wetlands include fill
materials required for widening approach roadways at new end bent locations, which is necessary
to conform to current design standards and to accommodate guardrail installation. Permanent
surface water impacts include placement of interior bent bridge supports in the channel and rip -
rap for fill slope stabilization at new end bent locations.

Page 3
March 6, 2009
Existing relic wood pilings located in the water at the bridge locations will be pulled out
of the channel because they pose a safety hazard. Sediment curtains will be used to ensure that
sediment releases from this activity will be contained to the immediate location of the pile
removal operation. Construction equipment will be operated from the existing road surface
and/or upland areas and will not enter wetland areas.
As of January 31, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of protected
species includes six federally protected species for Pamlico County (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally protected species listed for Pamlico County.
Appropriate habitat for shortnose sturgeon is available within waters of the five bridge
replacement sites. According to NCNHP Virtual Workroom records, updated on September 23,
2008, shortnose sturgeon has been observed in waters of the Neuse River and Pamlico Sound
south of Pamlico County. Shortnose sturgeon is a mobile species that is expected to relocate to
avoid construction activities; therefore, project construction may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect, this species.
There are no viable options for use of an off-site detour and existing traffic must be
maintained on one lane during bridge construction. NCDOT requests relief from moratoriums on
in -water work to allow completion of this project concurrent with four adjacent bridge sites along
NC 304. Work can then be completed in one construction season which will cause minimal
disruption to public school bus traffic.
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Present
Conclusion
Alligator
American alligator
T(S/A)
Yes
Not Required
mississippiensis
Lepidochelys kempii
's ridley sea
E
No
No Effect
tKem
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded
E
No
No Effect
woodpecker
Acipenser
serum
Shortnose sturgeon
E
Yes
MA-NLAA
brevir
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E *
No
No Effect
Lysimachia
Rough -leaved
E
No
No Effect
as erulae olia
loosestrife
E — Endangered
MA — NLAA — May Affect -Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
T(S/A) — Threatened due to similarity of
appearance
* - Historic record (the species was last
observed in the county more than 50 years ago)
Appropriate habitat for shortnose sturgeon is available within waters of the five bridge
replacement sites. According to NCNHP Virtual Workroom records, updated on September 23,
2008, shortnose sturgeon has been observed in waters of the Neuse River and Pamlico Sound
south of Pamlico County. Shortnose sturgeon is a mobile species that is expected to relocate to
avoid construction activities; therefore, project construction may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect, this species.
There are no viable options for use of an off-site detour and existing traffic must be
maintained on one lane during bridge construction. NCDOT requests relief from moratoriums on
in -water work to allow completion of this project concurrent with four adjacent bridge sites along
NC 304. Work can then be completed in one construction season which will cause minimal
disruption to public school bus traffic.

Page 4
March 6, 2009
Please find attached a copy of the U.S. Coast Guard letter dated February 19, 2009
granting advance permit approval for these bridge replacements. The following information is
provided for each of the bridge replacement projects: CAMA permit forms MP -1, MP -2, and
MP -5; U.S. Postal Service Return Receipt certification cards from adjacent landowner
notification packages; Pre -Construction Notification Form; permit drawings; and Figures 1 and 2
which identify the project sites.
We are requesting that the proposed work be authorized under a CAMA General Permit.
By copy of this letter we are also requesting issuance of a US Army Corps of Engineers
Nationwide Permit 14 and the corresponding 401 General Certification 3704. In compliance
with Condition 1 of this certification we request written concurrence from the NC Division of
Water Quality.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the project, please contact me at
[phone]. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Ja. J �on
Division Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 2
Attachments (set included for each bridge)
Adjacent Landowner Notification Return Receipts
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 Project Topography
CAMA Permit Forms MP -1, MP -2, MP -5
PCN Application Form
U.S. Coast Guard Advance Permit Approval letter
Permit Drawings (8.5 x 11 and 11 x 17)
w/attachments
Mr. William Westcott, USACE (1 copy, CD)
Mr. Garcy Ward, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ 401 Permit Unit (5 copies, CD)
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
w/o attachments
Mr. Kevin Austin, P.E., Mulkey Inc.

s >ri n v 94,
Chi { +
+wan Quaff
'r
r i
Etlwo•:. 3 e ' ^ � �� 1 : � ..y,LeKla'tJ rmmiro ��. '^<,;
� ar �•<ra ,. : j Hon&3rced
Hnlly�N e 304
(Cash Care
i�ympia GranMb—
�' P A
scu �s
AN t'roaW 1 >-
DNAL;
^kc
�1Fandyrtne; �r w.
X 105
o FI Y
�� Project Vcinity'I
Mer•itt rtonSrill�!
556 gdo�tKa
retro CEWAf)!'S` 7r
ISLAND`( .'
+f solt.� boa r i. W° � ,•
c• , 't .e �;;,
� A IrM�
r �
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
B-5129 B through E, B-4594
Bridge Replacement Projects on NC 304
Pamlico County, North Carolina
B -5129B Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
B -5129C Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
B -5129D Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
B -5129E Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
B-4594 Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
C+e
North Carolina
I Department of Transportation
_...�
� County
...Beauto
Gibb
o -County;
h
Pamlic
304_
� Legend
�,. ----- County Boundary
�— Roads
Sa
�trr $alap PO Bridge Locations
0 0.5 1 2
h Miles
30 i
USGS 1:24K Maps: Vandemere, Jones Bay
At South Creek and Lowland
Pl point

mss-
0
a fJ
'
//
4-
« B 51298 r<—:
k
` •e
:
... ' . Cat h Gorner9
��� "�M1� `''"r!� ■ Pettflp ��y ` w s, �iE�t 410)!i
AR
Legend
Study Corridor
M lut rian Cht 3 7 r a
F
PROJECT VICINITY
Prepared For:
B-51298
Figure
/;;>• „�
Replace Bridge No. 31 on NC 304 over Vandemere Creek
Pamlico County, North Carolina
0 I 0.25 I� Miles 1:24,000
USGS 7.5- Minute Topographic Vandemere and Jones Bay (Contour Interval 5 Feet)

gem Mr -1
nppucAnoN for
Maier Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
North Carolina Department Of Transportation, Division 2
Project Name (if applicable)
B -5129E, Replace Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
Applicant 1: First Name
Jay
MI
B.
Last Name
Johnson
Mulkey, Inc.
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Last Name
Mailing Address
105 Pactolus Highway (NC 33)
PO Box
1587
City
Greenville
Carr
State
NC
ZIP
27835
Country
Pitt County, NC
Phone No.
252-830-3490
ext.
No.
T252- 830 - 3341
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
33127
Raleigh
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Mulkey, Inc.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Cindy
S.
Carr
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
33127
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27636 3127
919 - 858 -1871
ext.
- - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
919 851 1918
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
6750 Tryon Road
Cary
NC
27518 -
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-668-4RCOAST . vvww.nccoastaImanagement. net

Form QCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Pamlico
Bridge No. 42 on NC 304 over Gale Creek
NC 304
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
n/a
Mesic
NC
28537 -
Phone No.
Lot No. (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
n/a - - ext.
n/a, , , ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse River
Gale Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Gale Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work falls within.
h.
n/a
4.
Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
approx. 120 linear feet
approx.5300 sq.ft.
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
n/a, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
1.1 feet ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Approximately 0.77 acres of maintained/disturbed areas and approx. 0.51 acre of tidal freshwater marsh with dominant
vegetation of black needlerush, sawgrass, marsh elder, silverling, seaside goldenrod, and rice cutgrass.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
NC 304 roadway and bridge system spanning Gale Creek.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Private residence and undeveloped privately owned property is located adjacent to the bridge.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
No zoning indicated by County
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
[]Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>

Four DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes [:)No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n/a
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
n/a
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
Existing bridge structure has open scuppers draining stormwater into surface waters.
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Replace the deficient structure Bridge No. 42 with with a new safer structure. The new bridge will be constructed in-place
using top-down construction methods. The new structure will be approximately 110 feet long with a 33 foot wide clear
roadway width. Roadway approaches will require minimal widening at the new end bents for installation of safety guard rail.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Top-down and staged construction methods using on-site detour will be utilized to reduce environmental impacts. All
construction equipment will operate from the existing road and no equipment will be placed in wetlands or open waters.
Typical roadway construction equipment such as excavators, crane, backhoes, dump trucks, and paving machines will be
used.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
Demolition and removal of existing bridge, removal of relic treated wood piles in water at the bridge site, and construction of
new bridge on existing alignment. The relic piles will be pulled completely out of the water using a crane and cable;
sediment curtains will be installed to control turbidity and capture any sediment created by pile removal.
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Replace the existing structure with a
new structure.
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 5,294 ®Sq.Ft or ❑Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
The existing bridge has open scupper drains that discharge stormwater directly over the stream channel. The new bridge
will not have deck drains located over surface waters. Stormwater will be drained to modified concrete flumes and
discharged to Class II rip -rap on filter fabric which are located on upland areas at end bent locations.
i.
Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 :, 1-885-4 ST . ,vww,tiecoas,aalmana ement.net

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name SEE ATTACHED LIST Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date March 26, 2009 Print Name Jay B. Johnson
WBS 42287. 1.1
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your pro osed proj t.
®DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information
252-BOB-28DB :. 1-888-4RCOAST :: www. nccoastalmanagement. net

Form DCM MP -2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
1.
Access
®This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b.
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
stabilization)
Length
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Width
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg. Existing
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
e.
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
f.
(i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Final Project
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
number of square feet affected.
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
0 C [I SAV ❑SB
1.
EXCAVATION
®This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b.
Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c.
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
d.
High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2.
DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
®This section not applicable
a.
Location of disposal area.
b.
Dimensions of disposal area.
c.
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
d.
(i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
[]Yes ❑No ❑NA
❑Yes ❑No DNA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
e.
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
f.
(i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
0 C [I SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
252-B£3 -2B 5 :: 1-6 B- T :. www.nccoastaImanagement.net revised: 12/261€36

b:
ori F D IAP— (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 2)
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ❑This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP -4 Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length: up to 30 feet each quadrant (maximum length)
❑Bulkhead NRiprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other: Width: up to 20 feet each quadrant (maximum width)
C. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 1 feet d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 3 feet
e. Type of stabilization material:
Class II riprap with filter fabric placed along fill slope at each end -
bent quadrant to stabilize the new bent and new guardrail.
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other 220
i. Source of fill material.
Precast concrete
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
Bridge interior support piers
4, OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? []Yes []No El NA b.
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
(i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW _ ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Erosion control methods for sensitive waters, including use of Standard roadway construction equipment
sediment curtains for work in water,silt ditches, special silt fence
with filter fabric for stone removal in Coastal wetland areas
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
March 26, 2009 WBS 42287. 1.1 - Debit $400
Date
B -5129E, Replace Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
Project Name a —11 ,
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? [–)Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Jay B. Johnson, NCDOT Div. 2 Environmental Officer
Applicant Name/;
I
1
Q --r- L.L-�--
Applicant Signatu>e 0 ' 1 �"A, ,�
252-808-2808 – i -588-4R0 , " .. www.ncepastalmanagement.net revised:/2126/06

Form DCM MP -5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES El This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community Gale Creek
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
3 -Span precast concrete cored slab bridge on precast
substructure
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 101 feet, 5 inches
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 28 feet (clear roadway)
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 1.1 feet
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) Existing structure will be entirely removed.
Relic treated wood piles in water at the bridge will be
removed by pulling them completely out.
9. Length of proposed bridge: 110 feet
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
Approximately 7 to 8 feet
f. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 33 feet, clear roadway width
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes ®No j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 1.1 feet
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Advance permit approval was received from
Chief, USCG Bridge Administration Branch in a letter dated
February 19, 2009 (copy attached).
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands:
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
2, CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
252 -BOB -2808 8 .: 1-888- T er www.nccoastaim2nagement.net

or ' M PAP- (Bridges ted Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
< Form continues on back>
[]Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes [-]No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9- Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
;08 .,
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:

Form DCC MP -5 (Bridges and Gct6verts, Page 3 of 4)
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 2 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 25 feet
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3 feet
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 25
T=/;Jt% E
Wre111('ad Vita. Lj(�M
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Upland area to be determined by contractor
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by contractor
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ®No (if no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL OSB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 34 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 3 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: At Bridge No. 42 (TIP B -5129E),
431 square feet of open water and surface water impacts
for interior bridge support piers. See table of impacts
shown on stream and wetland impact permit drawings
(plan sheets 7 and 8).
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 100 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 12 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: Approximately 486 cu. yds. of fill
material will be placed in uplands for roadway approach
to new bridge structure. See fill slope boundaries on
stream and wetland impact permit drawings (plan sheets
7 and 8).
4. GENERAL
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
®CW 218 soft. ❑SAV OSB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Fill placed at toe of slope at new bridge end bents to
allow for guardrail placement.
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
252-BOa-2808 n 1-886-4RCt?AST :: www.nccoastaimanageme�^.t..n_c-t
revised- 10126/06
����9 &V 1131445�E

dorm (Bridges and€ lverts, Page 4 of
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. Strict enforcement of NCDOT's Best Management
Practices, including Sediment and Erosion Control in
Sensitive Watersheds
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
❑Yes ®No
Typical roadway construction equipment such as backhoe, If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
crane, dump truck, crane, paving machine as determined environmental impacts.
by contractor
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
March 26, 2009 WBS 42287.1.1 - Debit $400
Date
B -5129E, Replace Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
Project Name
Jay B. Johnson, DEO NCDOT Division 2
Applicant Name
r:
Applicant Signature f j /f'✓
f i J
jrs
{
282-808-2803 1-888- T :c www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 10126/06

Commander 431 Crawford Street
U -S. Department of United States Coast Guard Portsmouth, Va. 23704-5004
Homeland Security Fifth Coast Guard District Staff Symbol: dpb
Phone: [phone]
United States Fax: [phone]
Unite Guard Email: [e-mail]
Coas
16591
19 FEB 09
Ms. Cindy Simpson Carr
Senior Scientist
Mulkey, Inc.
PO Box 33127
Raleigh, NC 27636
Dear Ms. Carr:
I apologize for our late response to your letter of November 6, 2008, requesting for Advance
Permit Approval for the following North Carolina Department of Transportation Bridge
Replacement Projects in Pamlico County, NC:
1) B -5129B, Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek;
2) B -5129C, Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek;
3) B -5129D, Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek;
4) B -5129E, Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek; and
5) B-4594, Bridge No. 44 over Jones Bay
Our examination and historical data indicate that there is sufficient factual support for
concluding that these waterways are navigable waters of the United States. However, the
waterways also meet the criteria for advanced approval waterways outlined in Title 33, Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 115.70. Advance approval waterways are those that are navigable
in law, but not actually navigated by other than small boats. The Commandant of the Coast
Guard has given his advance approval to the construction and rehabilitation of bridges across
such waterways. Therefore, a Coast Guard Bridge permit will not be required for these proposed
bridge replacement projects.
These projects will be placed in our Advance Approval category for the locations and
replacement of the Abovementioned Bridge projects and is valid for five years from the date of
this letter. If the construction does not commence within this time period, you must contact this
office for reaffirmation of this authorization. Future bridge projects along the same waterways
will have to be independently evaluated before they may be considered for Advance Approval.
The fact that a Coast Guard bridge permit is not required does not relieve you of the
responsibility for compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency
who may have jurisdiction over any aspect of these projects.
Although these projects will not require a bridge permit, other areas of Coast Guard jurisdiction
apply. The following must be met:

From: 7573986334 Pale: 313„ Date: 2(19/2009 3:46:20 PM
16591
19 FEB 09
a. The lowest portion of the superstructure of the bridge across the waterway should clear the
100 -year flood height elevation, if feasible.
b. The National Ocean Service (NOS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) is responsible for maintaining the charts of U.S. waters; therefore they must be notified
of these proposed bridge projects. You must notify our office and. the NOS upon completion of
the activities approved in this letter. Your notification of completion must include as -built
drawings, which certifies the location and clearances of the each bridge that was constructed.
This information will be sent to the following address:
Ken Forster
National Ocean Service (NOS)
N/CS26, Room 7317
1315 Last -West highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
Please contact me at the above address or telephone number for any further assistance
SiffiBridge
G RY,
ministrate Bran
By direction of the Corrunander
Fifth Coast Guard District
Copy; Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Waterways Management
Mr. Ken Forster, NOS
2
This fax was received by GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http:/Avww.gfi.com

�F NORTH CAROLINA
U N —ro AuaoRA
R
c,�x Goon cREEc tsLA.ND
77
s,'GooSE`<� ->
j
GAME 4
LAND -
7 7?
n]]9
'
'-t% Mohucken
04
yg
BRIDGE #42
N L3L I.8 �
� •,�
1 704 1 M -c i]]
9
790112
c>q •• 1
�r'_
HOLLYVILLE
(CASH CORNER rJ �=• s'9� Cf. mz
POP, loo ,t
Pow
' f ANDEMERE1
e ` r .775
O c y
iVER '9' o
1` �: _✓,P), �—�Yu„y«
I]It
1217 �
M1�]19 �1
N 'V 15.1 ® 1L
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
J�
VICINITY
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129E
MAPS/((�S
REPLACE BRIDGE X42
ON NC 301 OVER
GALE CREEK
SHEET 1 OF
E-25-05

..
-
�
-----
^
�
^
'
^
s~
'
`
�
'.
BRIDGE #42o '
/
'
s~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAI-S
REPLACE MUDGE
OVER

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
REFERENCE NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
1 CARL S. RUSS 1009 W. 10TH STREET
PANAMA CITY, FL 32401
2 JOHN PAUL JONES 12040 ITC 304
BAYBORO, NC 28515
3 STANLEY L. STYRON, JR 400 HALF MOON ROAD
BAYBORO, NC 28515

LEGEND
-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
!L
„L WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48"
®DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
®DENOTES FILL
SURFACE WATER
(POND) SINGLE TREE
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND �rti,sr�, WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND DRAINAGE INLET
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
.".�.`. DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
ROOTWAD
> -> FLOW DIRECTION
TB
B TDP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER RIP RAP
C PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
- FPROP. LIMIT OF FILL J OR IFAER
AVAILABLERCEL
�- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
NG NATURAL GROUND N LEVEL SPREADER (L S)
PL - PROPERTY LINE
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE DITCH /
EASEMENT GRASS SWALE
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
-
EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED BUFFER ZONE I
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED ®DENOTES IMPACTS TO
PLANT BOUNDARY BUFFER ZONE 2
�- - - WATER SURFACE
x x x x x LIVE STAKES
x x x �.�I �y `L�v
OT
BOULDER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
-` /- CORE FIBER ROLLS PAMICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129E
FILL REMOVAL REPLACE BRIDGE tt42
ON NC 304 OVER
GALE CREEK
SHEET 4 OF 10 2-22-05

Am.
0
v
NO
)
cn
c
c
0-C."
00
I 9M
°
d
Z r
y
X
o
o
r
z
0
o
CA
ti

PROJECT No. B -5129E
DATE: 7-21-2005
ROAD: NC 304
ROAD NAME: NC 304 OVER
GALE CREEK
COUNTY: PAMLICO
CROSS SECTION
OF
BRIDGE No. 42
EXISTING BRIDGE
I @
16'--6"
1 @
16'41>)
1 @
16'--8"
1 @
16'--9"
1 @
17'-2"
1 @
17'--6"
28' CLEAR ROADWAY
/0/1-51
.5'
NOT TO SCALE
304
PROPOSED 21" CONCRETE CORED SLAB
PROPOSED LENGTH. • 3 SPANS 1 @ 30'- 1 @ 50"; 1 @ 30'
33' CLEAR ROADWAY
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
//G"
_ 30' 50' 30'
/J'I HIGH TIDE 12.00'
\ ow no �]
rvr
7' L0_5'
NOT TO SCALE
NC 304
Sheet 6 of 10

mt, 0
/ `9S
NOTE: GALE CREEK IS A BLUE THE STREAM AS SHOWN ON ')HEI
VANDEMERE USGS QUAD MAPI
METHOD Il CLEARING
SI
7
wi--
--- ---- MODIFIED CONC.-----
....... FLUME
---- ------ . .....
75/,2,1/09
__11
W2
MODIFIED
CONC.
FLUME
7:1'
SHOULDER
<
BERM
GUTTER
nt
EXISTING BRIDGE:
S2
SPANS: 1@16'-6'; 1016'-11"; 1016`8%
1016'-9% 1@171-21; lol7'-61
LENGTH: 101'-6'
WIDTH: 28' CLEAR ROADWAY
TIMBER CAPS, PILES, AND JOISTS
CROWN TO BED: 7'
WATER DEPTH:3'
PROPOSED BRIDGE:
DENOTES FILL IN
21' CONCRETE CORED SLAB
v_zm SURFACE WATER
WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY
LENGTH: 1@301; 1@50'; 1@30'
DENOTES FILL IN
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
WETLAND
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
INOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1
CAMA WETLANDS FILL
OPEN WATERS FILL
NDOT
_W_I 83 SO.FT.
6F --T-1 10 SO.FT.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
W2 127 SO.FT.
0 1 SO.FT.
PAMLICO COUNTY
W3 8 SO.FT.
TOTAL 0.005 ACRES
PROJECT: B -5129B
TOTAL 0.005 ACRES
SURFACE WATERS FILL
REPLACE BRIDGE 1742
ON NC 504 OVER
Si 118 SOFT. 11 FT.
GALE CREEK
PLAN VIEW
S2 93 SOFT. 3 FT.
SCALE: 1" :50'
TOTAL 0.004 ACRES 14 FT. SHEET
7 OF /0
3-27-09
75/,2,1/09
__11

FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
c Imo- DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(7)
cn DENOTES FILL IN
z.13
WETLAND EXISTING BRIDGE:
SPANS:
-9";
L-1 W3—\ LENGTH: 101'-6'
I-
< 02--\ WIDTH: 28' CLEAR ROADWAY
TIMBER CAPS, PILES, AND JOISTS
. ..... CROWN TO BED -.7'
-;-.r-_..__._T_,.__....
WATER DEPTH: 3'
r I NC 304
--- ----------- - -
23' BST
PROPOSED BRIDGE:
21'CONCRETE CORED SLAB
WIDTH. 33' CLEAR ROADWAY
LENGTH: 1030'; 1050': 1030'
w. ..... NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
z
<
'tt
METHOD 11 CLEAll"ING]
NOTE: GALE CREEK IS A BLUE LINE
STREAM AS SHOWN ON THE
VANDEMERE LISGS QUAD MAP
CAMA WETLANDS FILL OPEN WATERS FILL lel CDOT
WI 83 SOFT. oi --T 110 SOFT. PLAN VIEW DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
4412 127 SOFT. 02 IIG SO.FTv PAMLICO COUNTY
---t—
.W3 8 SO.FlTOTAL 0.005 ACRES SCALE: 1" :50' PROJECT: 8-5129E
.
TOTAL 0.005 ACRES SURFACE WATERS FILL REPLACE BRIDGE U42
ON NC 304 OVER
SI 118 SOFT. 11 FT. GALE CREEK
I —
52 93 SOFT. 1; 3 FT.
TOTAL 0.004 ACRESi 14 FT. SHEET Y OF 3-27-09

® DENOTES IMPACTS 70
BUFFER ZONE l
® DENOTES IMPACTS TO
BUFFER ZONE 2
METHOD 11 CLEARING
BZI IMPACT = 0 sf
FILL REMOVAL = 0 sf
BZ2 IMPACT = 0 sf
FILL REMOVAL = 0 sf
NOTE: GALE CREEK IS A BLUE LINE
STREAM AS SHOWN ON THE
VANDEMERE USGS QUAD MAP
7V
i�[[7�
w \
TP
!' E \'
Ln
MODIFIED CONC:
- - - ---
----..
FLUME -- LB— .~
04 23 -- --
- ' 3
E
MODIFIED CONC.
FLUME
EXISTING BRIDGE:
SPANS: 1016'-6'; I@16' -II"; 1016'-8";
10I6'-9'; 1@I7'-2'; 1@17'-6'
LENGTH: 101'-6'
WIDTH: 28' CLEAR ROADWAY
TIMBER CAPS, PILES, AND JOISTS ' n ;
CROWN TO BED:7'
WATER DEPTH:3'
BZI IMPACT = 0 sf
RLL REMOVAL = 0 sf
PROPOSED BRIDGE:
21" CONCRETE CORED SLAB BZ2 IMPACT = 0 sf
WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY FILL REMOVAL = 0 sf
LENGTH: 1@30'; 1@50'; 1@30'
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
PLAN VIEW INOT
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
SCALE: 1":50' FOR CONSTRUCTION
ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
BI 0 SQUARE FEET AREA 1 0 SQUARE FEET
B2 0 SQUARE FEET AREA 2 0 SQUARE FEET
B3 501 SQUARE FEET AREA 3 428 SQUARE FEET
B4 0 SQUARE FEET AREA 4 0 SQUARE FEET
TOTAL 501SOUARE FEET TOTAL 428 SQUARE FEET
0.012 ACRES 1 0,010 ACRES
Ld
z_
J
U
/71 F—
HOULR a
ERM UTTER
n
�vi,
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129E
REPLACE BRIDGE a42
ON NC 304 OVER
GALE CREEK
SHEET 9 OF 10 3-3-09
I
RI
0v�`aF, �'
•4
-L�
4
1 B
�c90
/ 9s
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129E
REPLACE BRIDGE a42
ON NC 304 OVER
GALE CREEK
SHEET 9 OF 10 3-3-09

61
g-
LLJ
Z
J
_
U
Q
1
W �
z FILL REMOVAL-
-j = 6 CY ;
Q I
ME
L II��Arn i
i
mac'
30' 20'
BUFFER BUFFER
ZONE I ZONE 2
—--—— —WLB—
—
NC j04 23' BST
......._..........
....._ -
.I
i
/
F
T \♦
:BUFFER BUFFtR /
ZONE I ZONE i'
BBZI IMPACT -0 sf
FILL REMOVAL = 0 sf
BZ2 IMPACT = 0 sf
FILL REMOVAL = 0 sf
T G
'Pd E
Tf
EXISTING BRIDGE;
SPANS: 1@I6'-6'; f@16' -Il"; 1016'-8";
1@161-91; I@I7'-2'; I@17'-6'
LENGTH: 101'-6'
WIDTH: 28' CLEAR ROADWAY
TIMBER CAPS, PILES, AND JOISTS
CROWN TO BED: 7'
WATER DEPTH:3'
PROPOSED BRIDGE:
21' CONCRETE CORED SLAB
WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY
LENGTH: I@30': I@501; 1@30'
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
- ---_... _..._......_..._.__ _._..._ _...___... ..---....._ .__ ._._ __.. _ ._...___ ......_.__. __.._.__..._ BUFFER ZONE I
TB �M DENOTES IMPACTS TO
- -'
W BUFFER ZONE 2
n.
�!I - FILL REMOVAL
l
B
ru::. 4si.
B3
BZI IMPACT = 501 sf
FILL REMOVAL = 50 sf
r
BZ2 IMPACT = 428 sf /
FILL REMOVAL = 0 sf `
r
NOTE: GALE CREEK IS A BLUE LINE
STREAM AS SHOWN ON THE
VANDEMERE USGS QUAD MAP
_ TP
c
NCDIUD, T
METHOD OD II
CL,1EARXI G
ZONE
IBUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
BI
0 SQUARE FEET
AREA 1 0 SQUARE FEET
O:v NC 304 OVER
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
62
0 SQUARE FEET
AREA 2 0 SQUARE FEET
B3
501SQUARE FEET
AREA 3 428 SQUARE FEET
B4
0 SOUARE FEET
AREA 4 0 SQUARE FEET
TOTAL
501SOUARE FEET
TOTAL 428 SQUARE FEET
0.012 ACRES
0.010 ACRES
NOTE: GALE CREEK IS A BLUE LINE
STREAM AS SHOWN ON THE
VANDEMERE USGS QUAD MAP
_ TP
c
SHEET 10 OF 10 3-3-09
NCDIUD, T
PLAN VIEW
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
SCALE: 1" :50'
PROJECT: B -5129E
REPLACE BRIDGE X42
O:v NC 304 OVER
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
GALE CREEK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SHEET 10 OF 10 3-3-09

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
IN Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Carl S. Russ
1009 W 10`I' Street
Panama City, FL32401
A.
❑ Agent
B.,3gceived by (Pripte Name) Q. Date�af-Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: No
Vj
3. Type
OCertified Mail ❑Mail
❑ Registered @'Ret um Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(transfer from sen 7008 2810 0002 1153 7382
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
John Paul Jones
12040 NC 304 H�vy
Bayboro, NC 28515
A. Signature
X r❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. eceived by (Printed Name) Date of Delivery
A)
D. Is delivery address different fro 1? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Se PWe Type
Certffied Mail ❑ ress Mail
❑ Registered 9 Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7008 2810 0002 1153 7399
(Transferfrom service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Stanley L. Styron, Jr.
400 Half Moon Road
Bayboro, NC 28515
A. Signature
❑ Agent
X i d1� ❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Na e) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. �SS �'i Type
C!'Certified Mail ❑ s Mail
❑ Registered Gi4eturn Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7008 2 810 0002 115 3 7405--"--
(Transfer from service label) _
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
General Statute 113-229 requires that riparian landowners with property adjoining a proposed
development in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) be given ten (10) days in which to comment
on the proposed development when a General Permit application is requested. This form allows the
adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he objects to the project; or, (2) that he does
not object and desires to waive his/her right to the 10 -day period so that the processing of the
application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this
form at all if he/she so chooses.
No response within 10 days following receipt of this letter and form will be construed to
mean the adjacent riparian landowner has no objections.
I, Carl S. Russ , am an adjacent riparian property owner and
am aware of the North Carolina Department of Transportation's (NCDOT) plans for the project noted
below.
Replacing Bridge No. 42 on NC304 over Gale Creek (WBS 42287.1.1)
I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more AEC's and therefore will require
authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA). The NCDOT has provided a copy of the permit application documents
which includes plans depicting the work to be performed and (enclosures listed below).
X I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and hereby waive the right of
objection as provided in General Statute 113-229
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my comments are attached.
Please mail written comments to:
NC Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Field Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Carl S. Russ
Print Name of Adjacent Riparian Landowner
gnature bf Adjacent Rip riap Landowner (REQUIRED)
( 850 ) 785-1398(
Area Code Telephone Number (REQUIRED)
Enclosures:
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
CAMA Permit Application Cover Letter
CAMA Form MP -1
CAMA Form MP -2
CAMA Form MP -5
Bridge Plan Sheets with Stream and Wetland Impacts
Date: 3 -h -n
Carl S. Russ
1009 W 10th Street
Panama City, FL 32401
MAH 9 7009
Morehead city QCM

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Marine Fisheries Dr. Louis 8. Daniel III, Director
;Jilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Rouse
THROUGH: Anne Deaton
FROM: Sean McKenna
DATE: December 23, 2008
SUBJECT: Request for comments on NCDOT Pamlico County Bridge Replacement Projects.
The following comments by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) on the
replacement of the subject bridges are offered pursuant to G.S. 113-131.
Bridge numbers 35 (Little Vandemere Creek), 40 (Bear Creek), 42 (Gale Creek), and 44 (UT to
Jones Bay) cross Primary Nursery areas, and the NCDMF requests that NCDOT impose an in -
water work moratorium from April 1 through September 30. Additionally, the NCDMF requests that
the replacement bridges span high ground to high ground; deck drains should not discharge directly
into the stream; uncured concrete should not contact the water in or entering the stream; and that
the NCDOT utilize sedimentation and erosion control measures to protect aquatic resources.
While Vandemere Creek (bridge No.31) is not a Primary Nursery area, there are numerous
Primary Nursery Areas located downstream of this site. All care must be taken to protect these
critical habitat areas. The NCDMF requests that NCDOT take a risk adverse approach to this
project and impose an in -water moratorium from April 1 through September 30, and follow the other
aforementioned guidelines.
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncdmf.net
An Equal Opportunity i Affirmative Action Employer —5V, Recycled `,.10'.,o post ConsumerPaper
NorthCarofina
Naturally
•
•

,r
%ti .
Lane. Stephen
From: Wilson, Travis W. [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:29 AM
To: Stephen Lane
Subject: FW: FW: bridge replacements
See attached emails below, I believe I "no commented" the scoping notice and attached the cover letter with a note
differing to DMF. WRC will continue to differ to DMF for the moratorium recommendations.
Travis.
From: Travis Wilson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:42 AM
To: 'Sean McKenna'
Subject: RE: FW: bridge replacements
Sean, since NC 304 is the I/C line and our biologist did not have specific comments; In my comment letter I differed to
DMF for project specific comments/ moratoriums.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sean McKenna [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:54 PM
To: Travis Wilson
Subject: Re: FW: bridge replacements
Travis, DMF's comments for the subject bridges are attached. Have a good one. Sean
Travis Wilson wrote:
No data, therefore I wanted to coordinate with you to make sure I captured DMF recommendations. If you can
send me an electronic copy of you comments when you get them completed.
Travis.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sean McKenna[mailto:Sean. [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 8:43 AM
To: Travis Wilson
Subject: Re: FW: bridge replacements
Travis, Hopefully ill get my comments out today. For all projects I'm asking for an April thru
September in -water work moratoruim. Do you have any data to support an anadromous
moratoruim (Feb - Sept)? Have a good x -mass. Sean
Travis Wilson wrote:
Sean, has DMF commented on the projects below?
Hi Travis, 0
Justin Homan looked at these crossings yesterday. All of these streams appear to be very
productive biologically. Vandemere Creek (B -5129A Bridge No. 31) is the only low -salinity
1

stream (salinity = 1.3 ppt) and this bridge crossing is a boundary between inland and coastal
waters, so downstream impacts would affect waters under jurisdiction by Division of Marine
Fisheries. With the exception of Vandemere Creek. the rest of the bridges cross very saline
waters and downstream impacts would affect coastal fishing waters (all of which are designated
as DNA's by DMF)............ 0
-----Original Message -----
From: Travis Wilson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:17 PM
To: Barwick, Bob
Subject: bridge replacements
Comments? All of these are in Pamlico County.
B-51 29A Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
B -5129B Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
B -5129C Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
B -5129D Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
B -5129E Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay.
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1142 I-85 Service Rd.
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone] ext. 226
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Entail correspondence m and from this sender is subject to 'he Ni.C. Pubiic Records Law and may be disposed to third ,parties.
•

Lane, Stephen
From: Lane, Stephen
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:53 PM
To: 'Johnson, Jay B'
Cc: 'Sutton, Michael W'
Subject: B-5129(Replacement of five bridges on Hwy 304 in Pamlico County)
Hi Jay,
DCM received the general permit applications for TIP Project B -5129(A -E) on April 27, 2009. Review of the applications
indicate that 3 of the 5 bridges do not qualify for the general permit. As you are aware, the general permit allows a
maximum of 500 square feet of wetland impacts. Bridges 31, 42, and 44 exceed that amount and will have to be
processed under a major permit application as they are currently proposed. Additionally, there are minor corrections
needed to the drawings and MP -5 forms for Bridge 35 and Bridge 40. To obtain general permits for the projects the
following items need to be addressed:
Bridge 31
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 35
1 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas
2 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 40
1 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas in cross section and plan view
2 Correctly show marsh and stream in area of existing dock
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 42
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Correctly show marsh and stream in area of wetland impact area W-1.
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 44
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas in cross section
3 Revise MP -5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Some of the information listed above can possibly be corrected over the phone, however, the biggest obstacle is the
wetland impacts being over 500 square feet. I have visited the sites and have tried to figure out how to help you fit the
projects under the general permit process. I have some possible recommendations that may help in this regard. Please
call me when you get a chance so we can discuss this further.
Thanks,
Stephen
***** Note new E-mail Address is: Steohen.Lane(@ncdenr.gov *****
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
IVRecords Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

B -5129H B-51290 B-31291)
e of Itri act and Site Bridge No. 31 Bridge No. 3a ::: Bride No. 40
B -5129E
Brid c No. i3
B-4594
� Brid ge No. 43
- Surface Water -
S1
®.
No Chans,t
Nv Change . ' No C halt
75
No ChnnJ"r
(l inear Feet)
S2
No, haiigr
Na'hanin :No _hangs
$1
67
Open Water
(Square Feet)
01
02
03
No ch, nl'.; No Cis tigc Iiia ( E.a -.'
N C ,a .s c ?� : (,i:anr^ :' l c Chan
4 AcrC:i,1n �;nCna:
No chans-
No C},;us{ c
`uCsn�e
�i
Nc C:h ny
tato C h m e
�o(;liange .:.:
Riparian Buffer
B1
No Cw.sri�n' 537::.:No CChn&t :
No Clmiyc
�o Cliarygc
(Square Feet)
B2
No Chi 696 43$
337
No Charge
B3
No C bans* 723 Vo Cham
412
No r.,lianf5e . .:
iLO'1\�-E 1
B4
_ 11\10 chacq;C 479 412
\o Ch -1 -ie
No Chip.
i
Riparian. Buffer
Bl
N� Char.(; 390 No Change
No Ch.Like
1*la Chan e
r (Square Feet)
B2
? oC.Inng 508 1
223
oclsinPc ..
B3
No Changr -' : _.. 297 No C h.ar
345
GONE 2B4
No cha,,6,. 290 313
No ch m6c
cna:,� l
B copy -of this ?etcer die NCDOT requests the L.S. A±my Corps b.f Engineers modih- the N%T 3
B-4594.Pamuco 44 �S,40V-2009-01610 Issued on October 1, 2()0�
9.,i129E,,Pamlico 42 S:�.W-2Q09
01617 Issued Ocv)ber 1, 2009; B-5129D,Pamlico 40 SAW -2009* -0161$ Issued October k, 2(}09, B
5129C,Pami co 35 S W2009-01619 Issued Septer6bes 46,2009; and B-3129F,Paml:ico 31 S %V -
2t}(19 0162(.> Issued September 16; 2009. The INCDOT also requests the N.C. I3iv inionof Fater
Quality- modit� tine Section 401 General Certification 3687 and Meuse %pari,uz Buffer
Authorization :issued on sJutZt 9,2109. PIease provide written concurrence
con flrmin thetie hermit innc{ihc<itions.
It you haN?e any questions or comments concerning this request, please contact me at (252; 830-
3490.:
303` 90. Thank you for your assistance.

December 17, 2009
Page 3
w/o attachments
Mr. Kevin Austin, P.E., Mulkey Inc.

F= ,rrn EIPC—n F KW ­5 (Rriftes: and f• .(%reds., 'Page 3 of 4)
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 2 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 25 feet
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3 feet
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 25
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Upland area to be determined by contractor
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by contractor
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes NNo (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes NNo
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB NNone
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NNW or NWL? ? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 34 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 3 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: At Bridge No. 42 (TIP B -5129E),
431 square feet of open water and surface water impacts
for interior bridge support piers. See table of impacts
shown on stream and wetland impact permit drawings
(plan sheets 7 and 8).
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? NYes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 100 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 12 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: Approximately 486 cu. yds. of fill
material will be placed in uplands for roadway approach
to new bridge structure. See fill slope boundaries on
stream and wetland impact permit drawings (plan sheets
7 and 8).
4. GENERAL
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
NCW 218 sq.ft. ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Fill placed at toe of slope at new bridge end bents to
allow for guardrail placement.
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
2 r2-a0a- 8013 n 1-988 41 COAST revised; to/26j06

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Roadway fill, riprap
Tidal Freshwater
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.002
Marsh
® No
❑ DWQ
(83 square feet)
W2 ®P ❑ T
Roadway fill, riprap
Tidal Freshwater
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.003
Marsh
® No
❑ DWQ
(127 sq. ft.)
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
Roadway fill, riprap
Tidal Freshwater
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.001
Marsh
® No
❑ DWQ
(8 sq. ft.)
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.005
(218 sq.ft.)
2h. Comments: B -5129E, Bridge No. 42: All impacts are to CAMA wetlands for fill placement at new bridge end bent
locations and are necessary for guard rail installation.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ® P ❑ T
Fill (bridge end
Gale Creek
® PER
® Corps
85
11
bent)
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ® P ❑ T
Fill (bridge end
Gale Creek
® PER
® Corps
85
3
bent)
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
14
3i. Comments:
Stream impacts include placement of riprap along the stream bank for stabilization at the new end bent locations and are as
follows: S1: 118 sq.ft. S2: 93 sq.ft.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
or Temporary (T)
01 ®P ❑ T
Gale Creek
Fill (bridge pier)
Perennial Stream
0.003(110
square feet)
02 ® P ❑ T
Gale Creek
Fill (bridge pier)
Perennial Stream
0.003
(110 square feet)
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0.006
(220 sq.ft.)
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
None
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation; then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ®P ❑ T
ipr
Roa wap
Gale Creek
® Nos
501
428
6h. Total buffer impacts
501
428
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance Measures: Existing roadway and bridge alignment will be maintained during staged construction and an on-site
detour will avoid need for a temporary detour bridge by using a portion of the existing bridge to maintain traffic flow. The new
structure will be constructed using pre-cast concrete components which avoids potential impacts from live concrete. During
demolition, components of the existing bridge will not be dropped in the water. Sediment curtains will be used around relic
wood piles to prevent sediment from entering the water column.
Minimization Measures: Wetland impacts have been minimized to the extent feasible, with impacts occurring only where new
location of bridge bents and piers are required to support the structure and installation of safety guard rails. Existing roadway
and bridge alignment have been maintained to minimize impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of the existing roadway to maintain traffic on-site during construction of the new bridge. Use of existing roadway to
operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands or waters. Use of pre-cast concrete bridge components
avoid use of live concrete.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

cn
x
C=7
m
1�
0
O
r t-�
s s
10
lJ
But
14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00
t7
C
z°°
.�y�
°r°z�
rz0
z�,
° v
o�
c
�
10
lJ
But
14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00

METHOD 11 CLEARING
EAIISTN G
I
�� O
/ 9S
NOTE: GALE CREEK IS A BLUE LINE
STREAM AS SHOWN ON THE
VANDEMERE USGS QUAD MAPS
s
--- SlLij
_..• LCA z
W
MODIFIED COPTC. -
FLUME -
---- 04 23BST
-----
1
W
-- -
MODIFIED CONC.-�
z
FLUME
_
c-)
SHOULDER
a
BERM GUTTER
EXISTING BRIDGE:
52 ,
SPANS: 1@16'-6':
I@16'-9'; I@I7'-2'; 1017'-6'
^�
LENGTH: 101'-6'
WIDTH: 28' CLEAR ROADWAY -
TIMBER CAPS, PILES, AND JOISTS
CROWN TO BED: 7' -
WATER DEPTH:3' "
PROPOSED BRIDGE: DENOTES FILL IN
21'CONCRETE CORED SLAB SURFACE WATER
WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY r
LENGTH: 1Q30'; 1050'; 1030' DENOTES FILL IN
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED WETLAND FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CAMA WETLANDS FILL
WI 83 SO.FT.
W2 127 SO.FT.
.;'3 8 SO.FT.
TOTAL 1 0.005 ACRES
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1" :50'
OPEN WATERS FILL
01 110 SOFT.
02 �, 110 SOFT.
TOTAL 0.005 ACRES
SURFACE WATERS FILL
SI 118 SO.FT. I I FT.
S2 93 SO.FT. 3 FT.
TOTAL 0.004 ACRES 14 FT. SHEET
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B -5129E
REPLACE BRIDGE A42
ON NC 304 OVER
GALE CREEK
OF /0 3-27-09
-"&� 5/fit /o 9 /` Kls'C-6

DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
. . ... . .....
. ...... ..
.--; . . . .. .... .....
MC 7r 23BST
-----------
CAMA WFI,-ANDS -_IL [-
85 SO.FT._
W2 1127
SOFT._
W3
. .............. . ...... ... ....
8 S O.FT.
-... - . - . .. ......
T07AL.
0.005 ACRES
...... ..... . ... ...... .. . .... .
........... ....
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING BRI0Gvl'.".-.
-SPANS.- 1@16'45"; 1@16'-8",
1@16'-9"; ICQ17-2"; 1017'-6"
LENGTH: 101'-6`
WIDTH: 28' CLEAR ROADWAY
TIMBER CAPS., I -PILES. AND JOISTS
CROWN TO BED:7'
WATER DEPTH.- 3'
PROPOSCE.D BRIDGE:
21' CONCRETE CORED SI -AB
WIDTH: 33'C * LEAR ROADWAY
LENGTH: 1@50'; 1@5G'. 1930'
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
...........
"Al1.
. .. . ........ ...
50
(PC.
[I CLEARI.NQJ'
NOTE.
GALE CREEK IS A BI UE L11NE
-
STREAM AS SfIOWN ON Ti IL
. . . ........ .
VANDEMERE USES QUAD MAP
OPEN WATERS FILL
. . . . . ....... ............. . . . .. ....... .....
01 110 SO.FT.
02 110 SO.F T,
TOTAL 0.005 ACRES
--- -- ........... . .
SURFACE WATERS FILL
Sl 118 SOFT. 11 F�
TOTAL 10.004 ACRES 14 FT -
'PLAN VIEW
SCALE.- V - 50'
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO CGLJN'kr'Y
PROJECT, B -5129B
REPLACE BRIDGE ;;!2
ON NC 304 OVER
GALE CREEK
SHEET 0, , /0 3-27-09
-�07//4?f AF-e4e-6

07—Nc s 1"IPAZTS TO
F31FF.:Fi ZONE f / ll"ET 111OD 11 CLEAA G
DENOTES YAPACTS TO
DUFi ER ZONE 2
NOTE: GALE CREEK IS A BLUE LINA
awl; 1 FILL REMOVAL STREAM AS SHOWN ON TIS
VANDEMERE USES bOAD MIAP
B
BZ1 tMpAC.T 0 �(
RLL REMOVAL = 0
Y�
SZ2 IMPACT = 0 s`
Ffl_L. REMOVAL
NT
Ln
F ---
..-
FLUME
4
�cT -
0
= MODIFIED CONC.
FLUME CAMA
z'
$AOUL R (
EXISTING BRI ,GE.: i - ERM UTTER }
SPANS: '016'-0': !0!6'-i!"; I�1.6' S'; ZD L� 1 l
1016'-3':1017-2":I@i7'-o' - ,a
LENGTH: 101'-6"
WIDTH: 2E' CLEAR ROADWAY
TIMBER CAPS, P1l.ES" AND JOISTS
CROWN. 13 BED: 7'
WATER DEPTH -3' Bft (Q
r .�c
BZI LVPACT = 0 sf -- I C-,...
PROPOSED FRIDGE: FILL REIACVAL = 0 sf ti°
21" CONCRETE CORED SLAB SO.IMPAc! : n s+
W+DTH: 33' CI -EAR ROADWAY FILL REMOVAL : 0 sf
LENGTH: V30': 1-+50'; 1030' — yc'
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
�5
]ELAN VIEW FOR PERMITTING ONLY _
SCALL- 1" :50, INOTFOR CONSTRUCTIONJ NCDO13
-ZONE IBIJUER ilutPACTS 20Nt-2 BUFFER i?JPAi,TS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BI s 0 SOJARE FEES AREA I 0 SODARE ?=Ef- _T PAMLICO COUNTY
-- — -- _ .� , PROJECT: I3 -5129E
BL 0 SOJARE F=ET A}2_A G U S.OUA4E FEE;
63 501 SG DARE FEET AREA 3 42H cOOARE— FEE i REPLACE }iRIDGE X42
0 SCUARE FEET aREa 4-- --- °
ON ATC 301 OVER
- ---- J SOUgRE FEET j GALT: CREEK
TOTAL ! 50;SQJARE F,HT TOTAL 1 `28 SQUARE FEET
0.012 ACRES —_ J 00 ACRES
— ---- SHEET OP
"� r

EXISTING BRIDGE:
B% 1@17'- 2% I@f7'- G*
8ZI IMPACT 770'sf i LENGTH: IDV -6"
REMOVAL = o s= I WIDTH: 28' CLEAR ROADWAY
20'
30' 6 TIMBER CAPS. PILES, AND JOISTS
LJJI t —
tnm EIZ2 IMPACT = 0 sf CRdWN TO BED. 7'
BUrPER BUFFER FILL REMOVAL 0 s -F
ZONE
I& ZONE I ZONE 2 WATER DEPTH:.3'
_J
.
PROPOSED BRIDGE:
......... j
<
421" CONCRETE CORED SLAB
.... ... . .. ..... . WIDTH: 33' CILEAR ROADWAY
F............. ...
LENCTI-4: 10.30': ILD
'M.PACCT� TO
P11C 304 2_3' DST
c;
NO Dr DRAINS Al I_ 6 W F D
DENOTES
... .... . . .... ... .. BUFFER ZONE I
rrJOTES IMPArTS TO
Zf
BUFFER ZO�4E 2
w
FILL RFM0V'_)!
<
ry
r
�AhG_MERE USES QUAL? MAP
LT CLE A:RING--]
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: V 50'
FOR
POP, PERMITTING ONLY
FOR CONSTRUCTION
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT-. B -5129E
REPLACH BRIDGE 942
ON NC 304 OVER
CALE CREEJC
ISLIC
Z0111L 'FER, M�:IACIS ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
RE FEET AREA _1
B3
.... .. ......
_-B2 0 SQLJARL, FEF. AR A 2
0 _OUARE FECT
BZi IMPACT 501 .01-75
83 AR ffA­
..... . ....... _=01 SOUARE FEET
.. ......... .. ..
428 SQUARE BEET—
0 SOUARE FEET AREA 4,
,'0f 5 0 U A R E -FEET I TOT
1 0 SOLIARr FF, --T
RE FEET
FILL PEv_0v IL 5 f
r R
�13UFF'eR
BZ2, 'MPAC T = 428 S -f
I
ZONE
FILL REMOVAL ='0 sf,
.......... ........... . .. ......................... . . . ...
NOTE: CALE CREEK IS A BLU, -LINE
STREAM AS SHOWN ON THE
r
�AhG_MERE USES QUAL? MAP
LT CLE A:RING--]
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: V 50'
FOR
POP, PERMITTING ONLY
FOR CONSTRUCTION
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT-. B -5129E
REPLACH BRIDGE 942
ON NC 304 OVER
CALE CREEJC
ISLIC
Z0111L 'FER, M�:IACIS ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
RE FEET AREA _1
C SQUARE FEET —
.... .. ......
_-B2 0 SQLJARL, FEF. AR A 2
0 _OUARE FECT
83 AR ffA­
..... . ....... _=01 SOUARE FEET
.. ......... .. ..
428 SQUARE BEET—
0 SOUARE FEET AREA 4,
,'0f 5 0 U A R E -FEET I TOT
1 0 SOLIARr FF, --T
RE FEET
0;01? 12. A C R E S ACRES
........ . .................. .
SHEET A OF /0