51296_NC DOT_20090529

7-Z -Dci
❑CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit#
❑New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
_ ❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name Project Location: County
Address Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City State ZIP
Phone # ()_ Fax # ( ) Subdivision
Authorized Agent
❑ CW
❑ EW ❑ PTA
Affected
❑ OEA
❑ HHF ❑ IH
AEC(s):
❑ PWS:
❑ FC:
ORW:
yes / no
PNA yes, / no
City
ZIP
❑ ES ❑ PTS Phone # ( ) River Basin
❑ UBA ❑ N/A Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn)
Crit.Hab. yes / no Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
(Scale: )
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other l
I
1
--
-
I
-
--
—
—
--
-----
- -
n
r
i
p
p�
C
C
O
i
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure yes no
i i I
Sandbags: not sure yes no —
Moratorium: n/a yes no
Photos: yes no I, _
I
Waiver Attached: yes no
A building permit may be required by: r' ` " r Y Q See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Notes/ Special Conditions i
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
PermitOfficer's Signature
Signature Please read compliance statement on back of permit" Issuing Date
Expiration Date
Application Fee(s) Check # Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythat this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar- Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
[ N use River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office Morehead City Headquarters
Mailing Address: 400 Commerce Ave
1638 Mail Service Center Morehead City, NC 28557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 252-808-2808/ 1-888ARCOAST
Location: Fax: [phone]
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

.A
���
��
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
June 1, 2009
NCDOT
c/o Jay Johnson
P.O. Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835
Dear Jay,
Enclosed are General Permits #51292, 51293, 51294, 51295, and 51296 to construct bridges on
existing location to replace existing bridge #31, #35, #40, #42, and #44 respectively on NC304 in
Pamlico County, N.C.
In order to validate these permits, please sign the permits as indicated. Retain the white copy
for your files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-
addressed envelope. If the signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation
of development, you will be working without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of
Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
Enclosures
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Ernployer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

APR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA morehead CitvC
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MWCHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 6, 2009
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Field Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
ATTENTION: Mr. Stephen Lane
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Application for CAMA General Permit for the proposed replacement of Five
Bridges on NC304 in Pamlico County, State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP): Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek (B-5129B); Bridge
No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek (B-5129C); Bridge No. 40 over Bear
Creek (B-5129D); Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek (B-5129E); and Bridge No.
44 over UT to Jones Bay (B-4594), Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-0304(3), State
Project No. WBS 42287.1.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace five
bridges on NC304 in Pamlico County (Figure 1). Please accept this letter as a request for a
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) General Permit for the above referenced projects.
NCDOT plans to replace these bridges using staged construction and roadway approach work
will be kept to a minimum so that one lane of traffic can be maintained on site during
construction.
The five bridges are being replaced because they have been deemed structurally deficient.
The new bridges will be built to match existing alignments and parameters on current locations.
Each of the existing bridges has a superstructure composed of a reinforced concrete deck on
timber joists. End bents and interior bents are timber caps on timber piles. The existing bridges
will be removed in accordance with the NCDOT Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal (BMP-BDR). The timber and steel components will be removed
without dropping any components into Waters of the U.S.
MAILING ADDRESS:
113 AIRPORT DRIVE
SUITE 100
EDENTON, NO 27932
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
113 Airport Drive
Suite 100.
Edenton, NO 27932

Page 2
March 6, 2009
The recommended replacement structure for each bridge is a concrete cored slab deck
with a clear roadway width of 33 feet. Table 1 shows the existing bridge length and the proposed
bridge length for the five bridge replacements.
Table 1. Existing and Proposed Bridge Lengths
Bridge Site
Existing Bridge
Length
Proposed Bridge
Length
B-5129B, Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
87 feet
120 feet
B-5129C, Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
52 feet 7 inches
85 feet
13-51291), Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
52 feet 3 inches
90 feet
B-5129E, Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
101 feet 6 inches
120 feet
B-4594, Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
52 feet
80 feet
The approach roadway will hold the existing horizontal alignment and roadway width. It
will also be at approximately the same elevation as the existing roadway. Deck and roadway
drainage will be maintained at approximately the same slopes as the existing structure and
roadway approaches. No deck drains are included in the project.
The bridges are all located within the Neuse River Basin and US Geological Survey
hydrologic unit 03020105. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) has
designated a best usage classification for each stream and its unnamed tributaries (UT) as shown
in Table 2.
Table 2. NCDWQ Index Number and Best Usage Classification
Stream Name
DWQ Index Number
Best Usage Classification
Vandemere Creek
27-150-15
SC Sw — NSW
Little Vandemere Creek
27-150-15-1
SC Sw — NSW HQW
Bear Creek
27-150-28
SA HQW - NSW
Gale Creek
27-150-31
SA HQW - NSW
UT to Jones Bay
27-152
SA HQW - NSW
There are currently no outstanding resource waters (ORW) or drinking water supply
waters (WS-I and WS-II) within a one mile radius of the project study area. The 2008 Draft
303(d) list (dated January 10, 2008) or the 2006 Final 303(d) list (dated June 19, 2007) indicates
impaired waters located within one mile upstream or downstream of Vandemere Creek, Bear
Creek, and Gale Creek are due to fecal coliform contamination.
Jurisdictional wetlands are located immediately adjacent to the existing bridges.
Avoidance and minimization measures have been incorporated to the extent possible; however,
impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur. Permanent impacts to coastal wetlands include fill
materials required for widening approach roadways at new end bent locations, which is necessary
to conform to current design standards and to accommodate guardrail installation. Permanent
surface water impacts include placement of interior bent bridge supports in the channel and rip -
rap for fill slope stabilization at new end bent locations.

Page 3
March 6, 2009
Existing relic wood pilings located in the water at the bridge locations will be pulled out of
the channel because they pose a safety hazard. Sediment curtains will be used to ensure that
sediment releases from this activity will be contained to the immediate location of the pile removal
operation. Construction equipment will be operated from the existing road surface and/or upland
areas and will not enter wetland areas.
As of January 31, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of protected
species includes six federally protected species for Pamlico County (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally protected species listed for Pamlico County.
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Present
Conclusion
Alligator
American alligator
T(S/A)
Yes
Not Required
mississippiensis
Lepidochelys kempii
Kemp's ridley sea
E
No
No Effect
turtle
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded
E
No
No Effect
woodpecker
Acipenser
Shortnose sturgeon
E
Yes
MA-NLAA
brevirostrum
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E *
No
No Effect
Lysimachia
Rough -leaved
E
No
No Effect
as erulae olia
loosestrife
E — Endangered
MA — NLAA — May Affect -Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
T(S/A) — Threatened due to similarity of
appearance
* - Historic record (the species was last
observed in the county more than 50 years ago)
Appropriate habitat for shortnose sturgeon is available within waters of the five bridge
replacement sites. According to NCNHP Virtual Workroom records, updated on September 23,
2008, shortnose sturgeon has been observed in waters of the Neuse River and Pamlico Sound
south of Pamlico County. Shortnose sturgeon is a mobile species that is expected to relocate to
avoid construction activities; therefore, project construction may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect, this species.
There are no viable options for use of an off -site detour and existing traffic must be
maintained on one lane during bridge construction. NCDOT requests relief from moratoriums on
in -water work to allow completion of this project concurrent with the four adjacent bridge sites
along NC 304. Work can be completed in one construction season which will cause minimal
disruption to public school bus traffic.

Page 4
March 6, 2009
Please find attached a copy of the U.S. Coast Guard letter dated February 19, 2009
granting advance permit approval for these bridge replacements. The following information is
provided for each of the bridge replacement projects: CAMA permit forms MP-1, MP-2, and
MP-5; U.S. Postal Service Return Receipt certification cards from adjacent landowner notification
packages; Pre -Construction Notification Form; permit drawings; and Figures 1 and 2 which
identify the project sites.
We are requesting that the proposed work be authorized under a CAMA General Permit.
By copy of this letter we are also requesting issuance of a US Army Corps of Engineers
Nationwide Permit 14 and the corresponding 401 General Certification 3704. In compliance with
Condition 1 of this certification we request written concurrence from the NC Division of Water
Quality.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the project, please contact me at
[phone]. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Jay B. Johnson
Division Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 2
Attachments (set included for each bridge)
Adjacent Landowner Notification Return Receipts
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 Project Topography
CAMA Permit Forms MP-1, MP-2, MP-5
PCN Application Form
U.S. Coast Guard Advance Permit Approval letter
Permit Drawings (8.5 x 11 and 11 x 17)
w/attachments
Mr. William Westcott, USACE (1 copy, CD)
Mr. Garcy Ward, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ 401
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
w/o attachments
Permit Unit (5 copies, CD)
Mr. Kevin Austin, P.E., Mulkey Inc.

�. H v�ieW' a Rai ntl, ♦.c+_ � \ 2 84j
.riE
L�45 .r
x Bonnr too �neti "iT
C.os vacs
i Mounts ;A N 1 G
15
�� Creek / / _ �•
LtlW$ro _ I(L0�'{r3
Au— nal
��••^^'''' Muceu,n
Hootitkeri I.`
Askins
f c
Hollyville 304 ° ..4 l -b �,`•
{Cash Corner •�
� z ! 2 Va taemere enr lr .�
1 Marihel
Ympta G—I borc t e boro
2 SYbnewdl Fl�elrCb l
55 Am
PI A ance t Project Vicinity
d 'k M L I G�-
• 6 1 PCC M—At wh"Ortonsville
-
R
kN I l `, M1MIC$btt
C-16 R�E:+tylach�.
t C?4t PL p
)N AL Cony tak< , J06
It-
1"ke Havelock�
l,nkr
�R-a[npcn arb,n
'
ttny
ntal �•�
'
llr Ik !/ .. .../
CEUAft�' Ct'�tz.
EDAN c
_
C� �� 'AT
-WI2 xL,
��
ErV
_ r
P\(tJ
i
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
B-5129 B through E, B-4594
Bridge Replacement Projects on NC 304
Pamlico County, North Carolina
B-5129B Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
B-5129C Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
B-5129D Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
B-5129E Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
B-4594 Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
o� woarH 49
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
N�cnr•
..
.:
AW—
'�''
`'""` Beaufort CuntY ---- —':.
�.,.
-,+.- _ _ -�.. • — - 304
k «�- _
-
Pao mlic
«r ..• 4W -
_
- _
,ram AW
f
304
-
40
M
too
h Comer
C,
s — point J�h
Legend
------ County Boundary
/�-- Roads
Bridge Locations
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
USGS 1:24K Maps: Vandemere, Jones Bay
South Creek and Lowland

�. x7
aR ii �
�+."-�-#�-- - -.� <a'� �.,,,-I(C � .�. - _.�`' r• r fir.. �,¢ � ln�. =
1i
� � �t � -„k•- "'ems , � �`,pa
t a' GOOSEpit
�
_ 24,
-yam �
r-.
B-4594 - i
_ k• r
Al
�,� i,ys, -� _'w „� •�' E� �,• — �^� # _- + -- Qiy1'Iia7YrnaG�'`li
L"gIy ° } - �. E -+-- Cl' �:
Legend
- - - Q Study Corridor
Prepared For:
moo, ��_•„�
k I
+.,
PROJECT LOCATION
B-4594
Replace Bridge No. 44 oon NC 304 over UT to Jones Bay
Pamlico County, North Carolina
Figure
2
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles
1:24,000
USGS 7 5- Minute Topographic Vandemere and Jones Bay (Contour Interval 5 Feet)

NORTH CAROLINA
--_- -
--
1290 ,,
1229 -
p,WE
uJo \
a5 W
_ 1245
4�
I / 1228
1
BRIDGE PA44 4
, 2e
1249
1238 �o
2
' 1246
,
_
v .
s
sa.
b
\
MMC
POP. 250 `
POP. 1o0 , •
a
YMIOEMEPE
POYtl
. M
i�
NCD®T
DIVISION' OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY
PAMLICO COUNTY
r
PROJECT: B-4594
MAPS
W BS NUMBER: 42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE Rt4
ON NC 304 OVER
JONES BAY
SHEET OF 7 1d 19/ 09

ouF O� t •
t _� ` Tr
E
1
:.
Pk tit ! t-e`'Creek
1
4 _
-
` l�•l
JONES BAY
LE E
� .- ` ''`_ #ham-� . w.w,_ • '_"._ '11 � t _ " _` -..'' '\`\ �,
h
C fr a
t p' u e
B
4mm
q
lk
41
t' - ,
X2 _ _ ( ( ! _ :► t —i'�' — _
_
_
�-
•� +-`._� fit'' _ ��-•�--'' -- � y. � 7 .y � _ _ - _F-='� -�-
- •, - _tee } -- .I ff x _ l a -1�+ _-i
AI
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
T ®P ® MAP PROJECT: B-4594
WBS NUMBER:42287.1.1
SCALE: 1" = 1500' REPLACE BRIDGE 444
ON NC 304 OVER
JONES BAY
SHEET OF 7 1 / 19 / 09

Commander 431 Crawford Street
U-S. Department of United States Coast Guard Portsmouth, Va. 23704-5004
Homeland Security ' Q' Fifth Coast Guard District Staff Symbol: dpb
Phone: [phone]
Fax; [phone]
United States Email: [e-mail]
Coast Guard
16591
19 FEB 09
Ms. Cindy Simpson Carr
Senior Scientist
Mulkey, Inc.
PO Box 33127
Raleigh, NC 27636
Dear Ms. Carr:
I apologize for our late response to your letter of November 6, 2008, requesting for Advance
Permit Approval for the following North Carolina Department of Transportation Bridge
Replacement Projects in Pamlico County, NC:
1) B-5129B, Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek;
2) B-5129C, Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek;
3) B-51291), Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek;
4) B-5129E, Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek; and
5) B-4594, Bridge No. 44 over Jones Bay
Our examination and historical data indicate that there is sufficient factual support for
concluding that these waterways are navigable waters of the United States. However, the
waterways also meet the criteria for advanced approval waterways outlined in Title 33, Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 115.70. Advance approval waterways are those that are navigable
in law, but not actually navigated by other than small boats. The Commandant of the Coast
Guard has given his advance approval to the construction and rehabilitation of bridges across
such waterways. Therefore, a Coast Guard Bridge permit will not be required for these proposed
bridge replacement projects.
These projects will be placed in our Advance Approval category for the locations and
replacement of the Abovementioned Bridge projects and is valid for five years from the date of
this letter. If the construction does not commence within this time period, you must contact this
office for reaffirmation of this authorization. Future bridge projects along the same waterways
will have to be independently evaluated before they may be considered for Advance Approval.
The fact that a Coast Guard bridge permit is not required does not relieve you of the
responsibility for compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency
who may have jurisdiction over any aspect of these projects.
Although these projects will not require a bridge permit, other areas of Coast Guard jurisdiction
apply. The following must be met:

From: 7573986334 Page: 313� Date: 2/1912009 3:46:20 PM
16591
19 FEB 09
a. The lowest portion of the superstructure of the bridge across the waterway should clear the
100-year flood height elevation, if feasible.
b. The National Ocean Service (NOS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) is responsible for maintaining the charts of U.S. waters; therefore they must be notified
of these proposed bridge projects. You must notify our office and the NOS upon completion of
the activities approved in this letter. Your notification of completion must include as -built
drawings, which certifies the location and clearances of the each bridge that was constructed.
This information will be sent to the following address:
Ken Forster
National Ocean Service (NOS)
N/CS26, Room 7317
1315 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
Please contact me at the above address or telephone number for any further assistance.
Sincerely,
WAVERLY G RY,
Chief, Bridge Adm' .strati Bran
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
Copy: Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Waterways Management
Mr. Ken Forster, NOS
2
This fax was received by GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http:/twww.gfi.com

DO MP-1
APPLICUIDN for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant Landowner Information
Business Name
North Carolina Department Of Transportation, Division 2-
Project Name (if applicable)
B-4594 Replace Bridge No. 44, NC304 over UT to Jones Bay
Applicant 1: First Name
Jay
MI
B.
Last Name
Johnson
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
105 Pactolus Highway (NC 33)
PO Box
1587
City
Greenville
State
NC
ZIP
27835
Country
Pitt County, NC
Phone No.
252 — 830
- 3490 ext.
FAX No.
252 - 830 - 3341
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. AgentContractor Information
Business Name
Mulkey, Inc.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Cindy
S.
Carr
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
33127
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27636 3127
919 - 858 -
1871 ext.
- ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
919 851 1918
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
6750 Tryon Road
Cary
NC
27518 -
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Pamlico
Bridge No. 44 on NC 304 over LIT to Jones Bay
NC 304
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
n/a
Mesic
NC
28537 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
n/a - - ext.
n/a, , , ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse River
LIT to Jones Bay
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
LIT to Jones Bay
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes NNo
work falls within.
n/a
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
approx. 120 linear feet
approx. 21,550
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
n/a, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
5 feet ❑NHW or NNWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Approximately 0.6 acres of maintained/disturbed areas and approx. 1.0 acre of tidal freshwater marsh with dominant
vegetation of black needlerush, sawgrass, marsh elder, silverling, seaside goldenrod, and occasional small patches of
Atlantic white cedar and redbay along the edges.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
NC 304 roadway and bridge spanning LIT to Jones Bay.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
State and privately owned undeveloped property is located in each quadrant of the bridge.
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
No zoning indicated by County
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No NNA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes NNo
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ❑No NNA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes []No NNA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
252-808-2808 :: 1-8, _ ;: www.ncco astalmanage ent.nnt

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n/a
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
n/a
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
Existing bridge structure has open scuppers draining stormwater into surface waters.
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Replace the deficient structure Bridge No. 44 with with a new safer structure. The new bridge will be constructed in -place
using top -down and staged construction methods. The new structure will be 80 feet long and 33 feet wide (clear roadway
width). Roadway approaches will require minimal widening for installation of guard rail at new end bent locations.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Top -down construction and on -site detour will be utilized to reduce environmental impacts. All construction equipment will
operate from the existing road and no equipment will be placed in wetlands or open waters. Typical roadway construction
equipment such as excavators, crane, backhoes, dump trucks, and paving machines will be used.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
Demolition and removal of existing bridge, removal of relic wood piles in water at the bridge site, and construction of new
bridge on existing alignment. Relic wood piles will be pulled completely out of the water using a cable; sediment curtains will
be installed to capture any sediment created by pylon removal.
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Replacement of existing structure with
new structure.
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 14,690 ®Sq.Ft or ❑Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
The existing bridge has open scupper drains that discharge stormwater directly over the stream channel. The new bridge
will not have deck drains located over surface waters. Stormwater will be drained to modified concrete flumes and
discharged to Class II rip -rap with filter fabric on upland areas at end bent locations.
i.
Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (t) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Laura Mayo Warren Phone No.
Address 308 Burlage Circle, Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Name State Property Office, Goose Creek Island Game Reserve Phone No.
Address 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
n/a
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date March 6, 2009
WBS 42287.1.1 Print Name Jay B. Johnson
n
Signature
i
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed projec .
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization)
Length
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Width
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg. Existing
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
Final Project
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
1.
EXCAVATION
®This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b.
Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c.
d.
High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2.
DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
®This section not applicable
a.
Location of disposal area.
b.
Dimensions of disposal area.
c.
d.
(i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes [:]No ❑NA
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
e.
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
f.
(i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
i- 0 t:: •RO, . t

3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ❑This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
❑Bulkhead ERiprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 1 feet
e. Type of stabilization material:
Class II riprap with filter fabric
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other 16 CY
i. Source of fill material.
Pre -cast concrete bridge piers
b. Length: 30 feet
Width: 12 feet
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 3 feet
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
Pre -cast concrete bridge piers
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ❑This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brouqht to the site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW _ ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL 595 ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
Roadway,new end bents,guard rails installation.
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Erosion control methods for sensitive waters, including sediment Standard roadway construction equipment
curtains for work in water, silt ditches, special silt fence with
filter fabric for stone removal in Coastal wetlands
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
March 6, 2009
Date
WBS 42287.1.1 Debit $400
B-4594, Replace Bridge No. 44 over LIT to Jones Bay
Project Name
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No DNA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Jay B. Johnson, NCDOT Div. 2 Environmental Officer
Applicant Name i1
Applicant Signature 6/00
252-808-2808 :: 1-588-4RCOAST:: ww} aiccoastatmarfagemegLnf:t revised: 12/26/06

Form DCM MP-5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community UT to Jones Bay
c. Type of bridge (construction material): d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
2-Span pre -cast concrete cored slab bridge on precast Approximately 7 to 8 feet
substructure
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No f
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 52.5 feet
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 22 feet (clear roadway)
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 3.0 feet
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) All of the existing structure will be removed.
In addition, relic wood piles in water from previous
structures will be removed by pulling them
completely out.
9. Length of proposed bridge: 80 feet
(i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 33 feet, clear roadway width
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes ®No j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 3.0 feet
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable
waters? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Fill material at existing end bents will be
excavated and removed to match elevations of adjacent
wetlands. Approximately 1,208 sq.ft. will be restored New
bridge will span wetland restoration areas.
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Advanced permit approval received from
Chief, USCG Bridge Administration Branch in a letter dated
February 19, 2009 (copy attached).
n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: approx. 3 feet.
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagemcrst.net revised:10/26106

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes [:]No ❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f• Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? [-]Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9• Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL El This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:

Foem ®CM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 12 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 45 feet
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3 feet
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 86
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Upland area to be determined by contractor
e.
111
s
M Orehead City oum
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by contractor
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ®No (if no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? []Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill: At Bridge No. 44 (TIP B-4594),
164 sq. ft. of open water and surface water impacts for
interior bridge support piers. See table on stream and
wetland impact permit drawing (plan sheet 6).
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill: Approximately 132 cu. yds. of fill
material will be placed in uplands for roadway approach
to new bridge structure. See fill slope boundaries on
stream and wetland impact permit drawing (plant sheet 6)
4. GENERAL
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL 364 so.ft. ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Fill for roadway at new end bentsto allow guard rail
installation.
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: Water line utility will be relocated If yes, explain:
­z408-2808 :: 1-8884ACOAST :: wvrrv.nccoastal tnanage rnent.not a Fsed: 101i6/0'
,���QiS�t• 5-A110 y , �s�� i��c

Form, DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. Strict enforcement of NCDOT's Best Management
Practices, including Sediment and Erosion Control in
Sensitive Watersheds
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
❑Yes ®No
Typical roadway construction equipment such as backhoe, If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
crane, dump truck, crane, paving machine as determined environmental impacts.
by contractor
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes []No
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
March 6, 2009 WBS 42287.1.1 - Debit $400
Date
B-4954, Replace Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay
Project Name
Jay B. Johnson, DEO NCDOT Division 2
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature /
25-0,08-28€ 8 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: vow,w.ncc.cast aifnanaq� ment.net revised: 0,'2'/06

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
REFERENCE NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
1 LAURA MAYO WARREN 308 BURLAGE CIRCLE
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27514
GOOSE CREED. ISLAND GAME, RESERVE 1321 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
2 C l/ O STATE PROPERTY OFFICE RALEIGH, NC 27699
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B-4594
WBS NUMBER:42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE At
ON NC 304 OVER
2 JONES BAY
SHEET J OF 7 19 19,E 09

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
State9f North Carolina
State Pfoperty Office
1321 Mail-Urvice Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
A. Signature
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) I C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery addrgss below: ❑ No
!AN 3'�.
3. �SServffi Type "`,
l3'Certified Mail ❑ �ress Mail
❑ Registered i-Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7003 Q500 `0000 0852 4264
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-1540
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑ Agent
■ Print your name and address on the reverse ddressee
so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Laura Mayo Warren
308 Burlage Circle
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. �Sepice Type
p
Certified Mail ❑ Ex ess Mail
❑ Registered L1YReturn Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from servicelabe 7003 0500 0000 0852 4271
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 1 02595-02-M-1540

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
General Statute 113-229 requires that riparian landowners with property adjoining a proposed
development in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) be given ten (10) days in which to comment
on the proposed development when a General Permit application is requested. This form allows the
adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he objects to the project; or, (2) that he does
not object and desires to waive his/her right to the 10-day period so that the processing of the
application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this
form at all if he/she so chooses.
No response within 10 days following receipt of this letter and form will be construed to
mean the adjacent riparian landowner has no objections.
1, "Q Ra Wal. t e.n , am an adjacent riparian property owner and
am aware of the North Cardfina Department of Transportation's (NCDOT) plans for the project noted
below.
Replacing Bridge No. 44 on NC304 over UT to Jones Bay (WBS 42287.1.1)
I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more AEC's and therefore will require
authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA). The NCDOT has provided a copy of the permit application documents
which includes plans depicting the work to be performed and (enclosures listed below).
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and hereby waive the right of
objection as provided in General Statute 113-229
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my comments are attached.
Please mail written comments to:
NC Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Field Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Print Name of Adjacent Riparian Landowner
Signatures of Adjacent Ri
dv&/L_0_n�
an Landowner (REQUIRED)
( � /, ) �4;� -/Z/-7�
Area Code Telephone Number (REQUIRED)
Enclosures:
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
CAMA Permit Application Cover Letter
CAMA Form MP-1
CAMA Form MP-2
CAMA Form MP-5
Bridge Plan Sheets with Stream and Wetland Impacts
ate:
Laura Mayo Warren
308 Burlage Circle
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
11111
B[ Z009
More rani Clay OGM

LEGEND
-WLB
WETLAND BOUNDARY
PROPOSED BRIDGE
'rl L
WETLAND
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT I
DENOTES FILL IN
®
WETLAND
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
FILL IN
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
FILL IN
®DENOTES
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
SINGLE TREE
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLANO
���� ��f�t WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
11\1 WETLAND
DRAINAGE INLET
DENOTES TEMPORARY
®
FILL IN SURFACE
ROOTWAD
WATER
®
DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
DENOTES MECHANIZED
RIP RAP
CLEARING
- >
FLOW DIRECTION
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
�
5 OR NUMBER
----
TOP OF BANK
IFAAVAILABLE
-•-- WE
EDGE OF WATER
® PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
- C
PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
F
PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
--k
PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
NG
NATURAL GROUND
DITCH /
GRASS SwALE
PL -
PROPERTY LINE
- TOE -
TEMP. DRAINAGE
®
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
EASEMENT
BUFFER ZONE I
-POE-
PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
®
BUFFER ZONE 2
- EAB -
EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB-
EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
-�- -
- WATER SURFACE
NCDO"jj`'
x x x x x
LIVE STAKES
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
x x x
PAMLICO COUNTY
BOULDER
PROJECT: 8-4594
---
CORE FIBER ROLLS
WBS NUMBER:42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE tt44
ON NC 304 OVER
JONES BAY
DENOTES AREA TO BE
EXCAVATED
SHEET f OF 7 1/19/09

PROJECT No. B-4594
NBS No. 42287.1.1
DATE: 1-19-2009
ROAD: NC 304
ROAD NAME: NC 304 OVER
JONES BAY
COUNTY: PAMLICO
U.N VJ J Jll u l l uA
OF BRIDGE No. 44
EXISTING BRIDGE
1 @ IT-Il"
1 @ 16'40"
1 @ 1 T--8"
22' CLEAR ROADWAY
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED 21 " CONCRETE CORED SLAB
PROPOSED LENGTH. 2 SPANS 1 @ 30 ; 1 @ 50'
33' CLEAR ROADWAY
NO DECK DRAINS ALLOWED
f—` 80,
30, 50,
NOT TO SCALE
V4
r -�

��DCD
%yy
Q
0
0
9
RE-AIN ALL
EXISTING DITCHES
ALL WETLAND BOUNDARIES
ARE CAMA WETLANDS,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
j MARSH
N Q
0
N
r8
Wt
1 ST�EAMI & VVETLAND IMPACTS
`\ \ NAD 8383
reJ \�TS MARSH
WE �` Wt
JNDERWATER
UEBRIS 1 IZZ REBdR
\\ I N 550 599.2321
REMOVAL E 2 711858.1631
_ ELE�A1'IOry 15 27
`j
MODIFIED CONC.--�'--
_
—...-
t—
— .00
TS
$R 1124
w-3
N 550,446.5800
E 2,717,896.8380
ELEVATION 4.52
FOR PERMITTING ONLY
NOT FOR CCNSTRUCTION
[7�E METHOD I FOR CLEARING
CAMA WETLANDS FILL SURFACE WATERS FILL (STREAM)
W-1 142 SQUARE FEE] S-1 9 SOUARE FEET
W-2 21B SOUARE FEET S-2 56 SOUARE FEET
W-3 4 SOUARC FEET SURFACE WATERS FILL (OPEN WATEF
0 99 SOUARE FEET
]OTAL 364 SOUARE FEET I TOTAL 1 164 SQUARE FEET
008
MARSH
---- 5. MODIFIED CONC. -
FLUME =:
W-2 We T8 _ -
\ UNDFRWATER
\ \\ DEBRIS v
REMOVAL
CID
� \ MARSH NEEO
i0 NC 33
O \
8 DENDWETLANDL IN
WE DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
CD©T
lv1';
EXISTING BRIDGE:
Sf ANS: I017'-1IDI6'-,0'; 1017'-B'
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Tay ;E��R
PLAN VIEW
PAMLI' COUNTY
WIDTHI: 22' CLEAR ROADWAY
PROJECT: B-4594
SCALE: 1" ❑ SO'
WBS NU14BER:42287.L1
REPLACE BRIDGE =44
PROPOSED BRIDGE:
21' CONCRETE CORED SLAB
ON INC 304 OVER
WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY
JONES B/AY
LENGTH: 103C'. 1050'
OF / 1/19/09
SHEET 7
/4t,v, 51a01v 9 R��liSEl�

cD
_
-
CD
CL
GO
_Z
f J
o
O
®
cc
K
z=o-
RETA�
EXtS�1 AI DITCHES
ALL YJETLAND BOUNDARIES \
ARE CAMA WETLANDS, \`
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. \L.
n q MARSHWE
O-1ES IMPACTS
B U F f-- E R I M P A C T S ° NBUFFER ZONE I10
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
BLFFER ZONE 2
�r83
DFNOTES AREA TO RF EXCAVATED
MARSH n0
TB STAMPED '04594-I•
TO SR 1!1-4 WCTB
550,446.5800
�� E 2.TIT.896.8380
FOR PERNITTtNG ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
USE METHOD I I FOR CLEARING
(BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
NO BUFFERS I I NO BUFFERS
0
0 SQUARE
MARSH
FIIL REMOVAL =
690,
z REBaR
N 550.599.2121
ELE�AilON527
.25. FLUME
ter. line --F R/W-
-- --�`
Ali:
Bs� i
MCO FIED CONC.---�-
FLUME -'
.\ WE TB
q \ \\ O
\ MARSH TO NC 33
Ix�\
Ta-1\ 4y TS
EXISTING BRIDGE:
SPANS: I@17-111; 1016'-10'; 1017-13"
LENGTH: 52'-5'
WIDTH: 22' CLEAR ROADWAY
PROPOSED BRIDGE:
21' CONCRETE CORED SLAB
WIDTH: 33' CLEAR ROADWAY
LENGTH: 1130', Ie50'
WF
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1" = 60'
iv 1 DOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B-4594
WBS NUMBER:42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE A44
ON NC 304 OVER
JONES BAY
OF �� 1/19/09�

r l+7 {T1 1 N t 0��J
,
r i'I i
} r �:'I I
Pl[$®1F]I ILIA
10RGE..NSTORM7�..
i.+., 2' . ' I { _ _tFROM_FiRM MAPX ,.
- . _ ... _l .._ _ .._ ... _
1 I -..
�..._1 5 f pr 4VS EL 2 �i 1 TOO yr .. .
IYS.-_ L,-2 f
CLASS IInZIP RpP TO SHOUL-DE� —
L �t i i. - 1 L -- �_..
-APPROXIMATE
E CAMATION ,
_ -
l
1..
00
NC1®OT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B-4594
WBS NUMBER:42287.1.1
REPLACE
SCALE: 1" = 50' (HORIZONTAL) ONNNBRIDGE �44
AC 304 OVER
I" = I0'(VERTICAL) JONES BAY
SHEET 7 / OF 9 5,/ 15./ 09

J
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural ResCLIrCeS
"ilichaei F. Easley, Governor Division Of Marine Fisheries Dr. Louis B. Daniel III, Director
"Jillia -n G. Ross Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Rouse
THROUGH: Anne Deaton
FROM: Sean McKenna
DATE: December 23, 2008
SUBJECT: Request for comments on NCDOT Pamlico County Bridge Replacement Projects.
The following comments by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) on the
replacement of the subject bridges are offered pursuant to G.S. 113-131.
Bridge numbers 35 (Little Vandemere Creek), 40 (Bear Creek), 42 (Gale Creek), and 44 (UT to
Jones Bay) cross Primary Nursery areas, and the NCDMF requests that NCDOT impose an in -
water work moratorium from April 1 through September 30. Additionally, the NCDMF requests that
the replacement bridges span high ground to high ground; deck drains should not discharge directly
into the stream; uncured concrete should not contact the water in or entering the stream; and that
the NCDOT utilize sedimentation and erosion control measures to protect aquatic resources.
While Vandemere Creek (bridge No.31) is not a Primary Nursery area, there are numerous
Primary Nursery Areas located downstream of this site. All care must be taken to protect these
critical habitat areas. The NCDMF requests that NCDOT take a risk adverse approach to this
project and impose an in -water moratorium from April 1 through September 30, and follow the other
aforementioned guidelines.
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.ncdmf.net
An Equal Opportunity! A"irmatve Action Employer — 50 Recycled \10% post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally
•
•

Lane. Stephen _
From: Wilson, Travis W. [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:29 AM
To: Stephen Lane
Subject: FW: FW: bridge replacements
See attached emails below, I believe I "no commented" the scoping notice and attached the cover letter with a note
differing to DMF. WRC will continue to differ to DMF for the moratorium recommendations.
Travis.
From: Travis Wilson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:42 AM
To: 'Sean McKenna'
Subject: RE: FW: bridge replacements
Sean, since NC 304 is the I/C line and our biologist did not have specific comments; In my comment letter I differed to
DMF for project specific comments / moratoriums.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sean McKenna [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:54 PM
To: Travis Wilson
Subject: Re: FW: bridge replacements
Travis, DMF's comments for the subject bridges are attached. Have a good one. Sean
Travis Wilson wrote:
No data, therefore I wanted to coordinate with you to make sure I captured DMF recommendations. If you can
send me an electronic copy of you comments when you get them completed.
Travis.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sean McKenna [mailto•Sean [e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 8:43 AM
To: Travis Wilson
Subject: Re: FW: bridge replacements
Travis, Hopefully i'll get my comments out today. For all projects I'm asking for an April thru
September in -water work moratoruim. Do you have any data to support an anadromous
moratoruim (Feb - Sept)? Have a good x-mass. Sean
Travis Wilson wrote:
Sean, has DMF commented on the projects below?
Hi Travis, 0
Justin Homan looked at these crossings yesterday. All of these streams appear to be very
productive biologically. Vandemere Creek (B-5129A Bridge No. 31) is the only low -salinity
1

stream (salinity = 1.3 ppt) and this bridge crossing is a boundary between inland and coastal
waters, so downstream impacts would affect waters under jurisdiction by Division of Marine
Fisheries. With the exception of Vandemere Creek, the rest of the bridges cross very saline
waters and downstream impacts would affect coastal fishing waters (all of which are designated
as PNA's by DMF)............ 0
-----Original Message -----
From: Travis Wilson[ma iIto: [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:17 PM
To: Barwick, Bob
Subject: bridge replacements
Comments? All of these are in Pamlico County.
B-5129A Bridge No. 31 over Vandemere Creek
B-5129B Bridge No. 35 over Little Vandemere Creek
B-5129C Bridge No. 40 over Bear Creek
B-5129D Bridge No. 42 over Gale Creek
B-5129E Bridge No. 44 over UT to Jones Bay.
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1142 I-85 Service Rd.
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone] ext. 226
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records La+n- and may be disclosed to third parties.
0

. Lane, Stephen
From: Lane, Stephen
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:53 PM
• To: 'Johnson, Jay B'
Cc: 'Sutton, Michael W'
Subject: B-5129(Replacement of five bridges on Hwy 304 in Pamlico County)
Hi Jay,
DCM received the general permit applications for TIP Project B-5129(A-E) on April 27, 2009. Review of the applications
indicate that 3 of the 5 bridges do not qualify for the general permit. As you are aware, the general permit allows a
maximum of 500 square feet of wetland impacts. Bridges 31, 42, and 44 exceed that amount and will have to be
processed under a major permit application as they are currently proposed. Additionally, there are minor corrections
needed to the drawings and MP-5 forms for Bridge 35 and Bridge 40. To obtain general permits for the projects the
following items need to be addressed:
Bridge 31
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Revise MP-5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 35
1 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas
2 Revise MP-5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 40
1 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas in cross section and plan view
2 Correctly show marsh and stream in area of existing dock
3 Revise MP-5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 42
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Correctly show marsh and stream in area of wetland impact area W-1.
3 Revise MP-5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Bridge 44
1 Reduce wetland impacts to under 500 sq. ft.
2 Correctly show extent of causeway removal areas in cross section
3 Revise MP-5 Section 3 items (e),(f),(g)
Some of the information listed above can possibly be corrected over the phone, however, the biggest obstacle is the
wetland impacts being over 500 square feet. I have visited the sites and have tried to figure out how to help you fit the
projects under the general permit process. I have some possible recommendations that may help in this regard. Please
call me when you get a chance so we can discuss this further.
Thanks,
Stephen
***** Note new E-mail Address is: Stephen.LanelBncdenr.gov *****
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina PL
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

December 17, 2009
Page 3
w/o attachments
Mr. Kevin Austin, P.E., Mulkey Inc.

e ges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 12 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 45 feet
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3 feet
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 86
If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Upland area to be determined by contractor
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by contractor
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes NNo (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes NNo
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑WL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill: At Bridge No. 44 (TIP B-4594),
164 sq. ft. of open water and surface water impacts for
interior bridge support piers. See table on stream and
wetland impact permit drawing (plan sheet 6).
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? NYes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill: Approximately 132 cu. yds. of fill
material will be placed in uplands for roadway approach
to new bridge structure. See fill slope boundaries on
stream and wetland impact permit drawing (plant sheet 6)
4. GENERAL
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
NWL 364 soft. [--]None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Fill for roadway at new end bentsto allow guard rail
installation.
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
utility lines? NYes ❑No detour structures? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, explain: Water line utility will be relocated If yes, explain:

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Roadway fill,
Tidal Freshwater
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.003
riprap
Marsh
® No
❑ DWQ
(142 sq.ft.)
W2 ®P ❑ T
Roadway fill,
Tidal Freshwater
El Yes
® Corps
0.005
riprap
Marsh
® No
❑ DWQ
(218 sq.ft.)
W3 ®P ❑ T
Roadway fill,
Tidal Freshwater
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.001
riprap
Marsh
® No
❑ DWQ
(4 sq.ft.)
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑No
El DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.008
(364 sq. ft.)
2h. Comments: B-4594, Bridge No. 44: Impacts are for fill placement at new bridge end bent locations and are necessary for
guard rail installation.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Fill (rip -rap)
UT to Jones Bay
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
25
18
S2 ®P ❑ T
Fill (rip -rap)
UT to Jones Bay
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
25
38
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
56
3i. Comments: Impacts occur from rip -rap placed as fill along the toe of slope at north side of bridge, along jurisdictional
lateral ditches that are tributaries to the UT to Jones Bay.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

PROFILE
SCALE: I" ' 50'(HORIdO1`T'lAl,)
1" = 10' WL"H.'11CAL)

.. .. ......
RETAIN' Al L
R
r i �� 1
lF-XISTII'QlG CIT(H:ES T
O
ALI VAfiE.TBL
; AND JNOARICS
ARE LAMA WI-TILANDS,
UNI.. 11. .c"SS OTHER�ISE NOTED.
-NX
- T
TC,
WE
MARSI-I
CD
6
CL-
L
T;. l.
re
_0 WE -
0 S.R;
FER FERMING ONI; - Y
i
NOT �170R CC)NISTRUCTION . . .. . .......
!'V L
NAIL 83
A F)\ -S H Ql) 1� 0)
UNDERVATER--j
DEBRIS I 124REBAR
N 550 -99 2321
R E.kl 0 V A E 2,ff,856-1612
ELEVATION 5.27
MODIPED CONC.
S
0-1 /
. . . . . . R/W
E7
T
14,
. ... . ... ...
N . C. . DO .. T A - L - UM. Di .. S . K i IW - 3­
STAMPED 'B4594-I'1
N.550,448 5800
E 2,717.89.'V80
ELEVATION 4.52
E METHOD -II POP CLEARING
..... .......
FILL ISTREAM)
CAMA WETLANDS FILL I - SURFAC" ,WA.- I k
,#-1
142 SQUARE FEET
............
S
9 SQUARE FEET
Vl- 2
218 SQUARE Frr7..ET
S-2
Sel SO;UARE ^EET
W-j
4 SQUARE FEET
SURFACE. WATERS 171-1 (OPEN WATFRS)
9-0, S, JU A RE FEE -
0=1
TO AL%4
SQUARE FEET
IOTAL
164 SQUARE FEET
0. 0 0 8 A CR E S
O.004 ACRES
�--MoDiPED CoNc.
S-2
W - 2
WE
UNDERWATER
QEBR5
R F M. 0 IJ
MARSH
MARSH
OA yes ""X
T8 B
UiTING BRIDGE-
SFA\6- M1171-11 IvI6'--!0'-
I r
52" I
WI,) T H, 22' CLEAR R 0 A[.) VVA Y
PROPOSED BRI:01GE:
211 C'ON(-"'Rt-TE LOBED SLAB
'4-'IDTH-, CLE-t-.R ROADIhlAY
LE-INIG"! H: :!Q-31-0% o,
'it-ILAN VIEW
SCALE: I" = 50'
413
TO '`NC.
3 3
D711
DITNOTE'S Fit L IN
W! Ti
D
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACF. WATER
NCDOT
Dn"ISION W? HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNTY
PROJECT: B-4594
WBS NUMBER,. 42287.1.1
REPLACE BRII)GE # 44
ON, NC 304 OVER
JONES BAY
SHEET oF 7 1/1.9/s

RETI'AIN ALL
LE DITC:LlEjS
ALL WETLAN.' BOUNDARIES.]
ARE CAMA �*IETI ANDS,
NOTED, UNLESS 0:'*Hl:._RV-';--E
. . ......... -
foll
c�)
Ir—
CL,
MAR SH
�Al
NAD 83
T3
Ivi A R'S I- I
T 3
WE
WE
\� \ 12" RFBAR
N 550,599.2:391
E 2�7417�858_J6321
ELEVATION 5.27
p
5Q4
R,
lo
TB
NCDO-T ALUM. DISK
STAMPED A84594-1'
Wt
N 550,446,5800
E 2,711,896M80
ELEVATION
MARSH
�iIL R EOVA,
IM
190 sf
FP'ERlMITT
ONLY
__;NG
T FOR CONS 7RUCTION1
USE tETHOD 1: FOR
—MBLUJIF—FE
CLEAR]NO"
ZONE !CT;
MPAS . k'
.._.0NE 2 BUFFER
!MPAff< 11
EXISTING BRIDGE:
NO BUFFERS NO BUFFERS
11 - 10-16 ICp17' 8:-
. ...... . .... S P N S
L E N G T H: 5- 2'- 5'
VflDTL-!, 22` CLEAR ROADWAY
PROPOSED BRIDGE,
TOTAL 0 s 21' CONCRE-E CORED SIAB
QUAR. FEET T 0 "1 A L 0 SQtjA . . 11 ,
ARE FEET WIDTH: 33 ' CLEAR RfOAD'NA Y,
0.00 Ar'Rp r, LEND H. 1@30', lQ50'
. ..... .00 ACRES
. ...... — --------- L-0 1� I
/7
D"ENO—1 .
f c: 'IMPACTS TO
811,1,�;—ER ZONE I
DENOTES IMPACTS TO
RUFFER ZONE 2
DENOTES AREA TO 9E EX(.AVATE.r,
MODIFIED CONC.
FLUME
R /W
7
NC
0,
LA
N4001F ED CONC,
FLUME T
WE r-
8
MARSH
PLAN VIEW
.. . 1
SCALE: 1" = 50'
..— . .
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO COUNITY
PROJECT: B-4594
WBS, NUMBER-42287.1.1
REPLACE BRIDGE '11114
ONT NC 30,4 OVER
JONES BAY
SHEET - / OF f 1/19/09
V)_O/a� R_r_vls_4F