General Permits (2289)

1. V
0
CERTIFICATION OF EXEMPTION rah'
FROM REQUIRING A CAMA PERMIT
as authorized by the State of North Carolina,
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources and the Coastal Resources Commission
in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15,NCAC Subchapter 7K .0203.
Phone Number
Applicant Name'r'
Address
City
Project Location (County, State Road, Water Body, etc.)
Type and Dimensions of Project
f
The proposed project to be located and constructed as described
above is hereby certified as exempt from the CAMA permit re-
quirement pursuant to 15 NCAC 7K .0203. This exemption to
CAMA permit requirements does not alleviate the necessity of
your obtaining any other State, Federal, or Local authorization.
This certification of exemption from requiring a CAMA permit is
valid for 90 days from the date of issuance. Following expiration,
a re-examination of the project and project site may be necessary
to continue this certification.
�SKETCH (SCALE:
■■1i■■���■■�■■■■■■
-
■■
1
■■0■■■■■■■■■■■MEN
10110
SiMMUNS
■
■■■
a
■ir■
■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■
■■N
■■■■■E1M■■
■��.'�i�■■��■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
/'J1i■/�■■■NA
■
■■
■�:4i��?�i�i'�■
■IO�ei:
`ilk!®®■
or.1//NEVt
��■■■■■■■
Any person who proceeds with a development without the con-
sent of a CAMA official under the mistaken assumption that the
development is exempted, will be in violation of the CAMA if there
is a subsequent determination that a permit was required for the
development.
The applicant certifies by signing this exemption that (1) the ap-
plicant has read and will abide by the conditions of this exemp-
tion, and (2) a written statement has been obtained from adjacent
landowners certifying that they have no objections to the
proposed work.
Applicant's signature
CAMA Official's signature !
Issuing date
r
Expiration date
Attachment: 15 North Carolina Administrative Code 7K .0203

December 1, 1994
To Whom It May Concern:
RE: Appraisal on wooden bridge located at
134 Pirate Island Drive, Hubert, NC
Dear Sirs,
In accordance with Mr. Richard Schlaefer's request,
I have made an appraisal of the above captioned property
for the purpose of estimating its Fair Market Value as of
December 1, 1994.
The Fair Market Value is defined as being the highest
price estimated in terms of money that a willing buyer
would pay a willing seller, both parties being familiar
with the property and all uses to which it might be put,
allowing a reasonable time in the market.
As a result of the analysis and appraisal, it is my
opinion that the Fair Market Value of said property is:
TWENTY ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS
($21,840.00)
Supporting data, analysis and conclusions upon
which this value is based were obtained from
our records. If you have any questions,
please advise.
oRetfully sub .tted,
Alan Shelor
REALTOR/Broker/CREA
AS/vg
REALTOR
ND A. Sy,,
•j *tiE CEk
*r r
ae A 1292 a
T
70
~! ( y
St41E AQe4
" 1AL PV�P
Crow's Nest Shopping Center - lant! , .[phone]
P.O. Box 3001 Atlantic Beach, NC 28512

OFFICE OF THE
BUILDING INSPECTOR
DECEIIIIEk R, 1994
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
RE: WOODEN BRIDGE LOCATED AT
604 COLLEGE ST'REE'r
JACKSONVILLE, NC 28544
TELEPHONE 1919i347-6782
134 PIRATE DR.
HUBERT, NC
DEAR STR,
Not having any experience in the fair market value of the
bridge located at 134 Pirate Dar. in Hubert. I will accept the two
appraisals made by Mr. Alan Shelot and Mr John Simko as being lees
the 50% of the physical value of said bridge.
Sincerely,
le -
Marshall Batchelor
Chief Building Inspector
MB/ko

��_ � _�y
��i���L
� �����.
� �_�
L � � � ��`�
fl' ���,fIo�+'A
11� e IW��Y

General Contracting
Alternative Energy Systems & Retrofit
CARICK CO.
P.O. Box 3068, 216 W. Atlantic Blvd.
Atlantic Beach, North Carolina 28512
Phone: [phone]
Nov. 28,
James L. Mercer
N.C. Dept. of Env., Health and Nat'l Res.
Div. of. Coastal Management
P. 0. Box 769
Morehead City, NC 28557
RE: Repair and maintenance of existing structure
Lic. No. 191W
ResldentlaVCommerclal
ENCL: 1. Plan view and elevation of proposed work area
2. Statements of adjacent riparian property owners
3. Statement by Onslow County Building Inspector
4. Engineer's repair plan
Dear Mr. Mercer:
We spoke in your office on 11-18-94 regarding the ref-
erenced repair of the private bridge at 134 Pirate Island
Dr., Hubert, NC. Since then I have been compiling the req-
uisite documentation to acquire C.A.M.A. permission to per-
form those repairs. The enclosures constitute that docu-
mentation.
Enclosure 4 is the repair and maintenance plan we pro-
pose to execute. Mr. John Simko (Structural Engineer NC
#6422) intends to inspect the work at various times, in
lieu of the Onslow County Building Inspector, to insure
compliance with his plan. I trust you will find this pack-
et complete and that it will meet with your approval. If
so, I expect that an on site review and inspection is the
next step in the process. I am available for that meeting
at your convenience.
Please respond as soon as you are reasonably able.
S'ncerely,
ichard K. Schlaef r

November 21, 1994
Mr. James Riffle
203 Hollywood St.
Havelock, N.G. 28532
RE: Repair and maintenance of existing bridge at
134 Pirate Island Dr., Hubert, NC
Dear Mr. Riffle:
We plan to perform the referenced work, but before be-
ginning, C.A.M.A. requires certain administrative tasks be
performed. One of them is a written release from all adja-
cent riparian property owners stating that they do not ob-
ject to the planned project/work. I discussed the project
and that requirement with you on the phone.
You are one of two of those property owners. Please
sign and date where indicated below. It will signify that
you have no objection to the repair work.
ncerely,
Richard K. Schlaefer
Signed in concurrence with the above:
James Riffle
Date

n > '
General Contracting
Alternative Energy Systems & Retrofit
CARICK CO.
P.O. Box 3068, 216 W. Atlantic Blvd.
Atlantic Beach, North Carolina 28512
Phone: [phone]
Mr. Joseph Werrell
120 Pirate Island Dr.
Hubert, N.C. 28539
Uc. No. 19160
Reeldential/Commerclal
November 211, 1994
RE: Repair and maintenance of existing bridge at
134 Pirate Island Dr., Hubert, NC
Dear Mr. Werrell:
We plan to perform the referenced work, but before be-
ginning, C.A.M.A. requires certain administrative tasks be
performed. One of them is a written release from all adja-
cent riparian property owners stating that they do not ob-
ject to the planned project/work. I discussed the project
and that requirement with you on the phone.
You are one of two of those property owners. Please
sign and date where indicated below. It will signify that
you have no objection to the repair work.
Sincerely,
Richar K. Schla fer
Signed in concurrence with the above:
Joseph Werrreell '%
t\�- Date

�9� D � � �no— 13�0
�l�t-�'(� -6�'82

riNSLQW EIlEPGEICSflr3 lT TEL 1-910-----V67 Ncv 28 , 94 :'9 57 No .00 P 0
SLO\/\/ COUNTY y
.604 COLL
OFFICE OF THE JACKSONVILLE, O 28
IN
BUILDG INSPECTOR C .
TELEPHONE., i 47
Al
November 28, 1994 F
To Who* It May ConrLlro;
The private bridge located at 134 Pirate Island in Hubert, NC,
does no•t nr-?crf a building perw►iit from Onslov County Inspections
Department,
However, after our conversation Hovember 23, 1994 it was
understood that you have been in contact vith CAHA pertaining to
a permit. When 't.hijst pe�wai.t is obtained go ahead and repair the
private bridge.
Thank --you,
M, J6A- zj 6"1
may-r7hall Hatahelor
Chief Building Inspector,
ii
4 i
i
i
i
i

r
12 , I I f LY, 1994
SWKO ENGINEERING
F.O. BOX 638
SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460
(910-327-3470 )
Inspection Report for Mrs. Christiansen
wansboro, NC
JOHN SIMKO P.E.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
,y
�t
I
r,
E�
f
x
,'

4L
In accordance with your request structural inspections of the above
subject property was made on May 20 and June 2,1994. The
following report has been prepared based on those findings. The
conditions, and recommendations contained herein are the result of
a visual inspection, without removing surface materials.
Findings:
Analysis;
1. Approximately seven (7) joists and (5) piling have deteriorated to the
point that their load carrying capacity has been diminished.
2. The spandrel (side) joists (2x8) have deteriorated.
3. The piling hardware (bolts, nuts and washers) have extreme corrosion.
4. The planking (3x8) in some cases is not nailed and have warped.
5. The piling has severe decay in at the water line.
G. The U` steel channels at the bridge entrance spanning approximately
13' have severe corrosion.
1. Wood is hydroscopic, which means that its moisture content adjusts to
reach equilibrium with the temperature and relative humidity of the
atmosphere in which it is exposed. Wood used in possible moist
locations will absorb moisture from the surroundings or from water
penetration.
2. The bridge has sustained deterioration and decay of some of its
members along with the associated hardware.
It appears to be a normal maintenance repair rather than any
construction or design flaw.
3. The members mentioned have deteriorated due to weather conditions
and overall usage of the bridge with time. It could be that the
members that have decayed were not pressure treated lumber
I,A

4. The growth of decay caused by the fungi at this time has only affected
and weakened the areas indicated.
Recommendations:
1. Remove the affected joists and any affected hardware and replace
with a treated 2" x 10" joists and new hot -dipped galvanized hardware.
2. Re -nail the planking that is loose and replace any planking that is not
treated or has major splitting.
3. Cut-off the affected piling and cap with 12" diameter concrete cap
formed with a 12" sonotube form. Reinforce the concrete cap with 444 ,
bars vertically and #3 ties @ 8" o/c. Provide hot -dipped galvanized
connection angle between the top of the concrete cap and the new
spandrel beams. Shore the bridge in the area of cut-off and capping.
4. All mernbers shall be properly attached to their adjoining members with
hot -dipped galvanized hardware.
5. Provide double 2x joists in the area of travel (27" from each side and
67") which should occur at the approximate wheel -base of the vehicle.
These new joists shall be pressure -treated.
6. The steel channels/angles that have corroded shall be replace with new
angles and are painted for corrosion resistance.
I
The overall condition of the bridge is good and will sustain a maximum loading of 2 ton ;r
when the repairs as noted above are complete. In order to increase the bridge'
capacity to 5 tons will require a complete structural revamping of the existing
members.
7,III

SIMKO ENGINEERING
R.O. BOX 638
SNEAKS FERRY, NBC 28460
(910-327-347€ )
20 JUL1° 1994 (FOLLOW-UP Rr-DOR.T)
owansboro, NCO
JOHNI SIMKO P.E.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

In accordance with your request structural inspections of the above
subject proper was made on .lay 20 and June 2,1994. The '
following report has been prepared based on those findings., The ;,'��,
conditions, and recommendations �ontaic�ed herein are the re aft of�6,!
a visual inspection, without removing surface materials.
F�idirl�!s; 4 , a
i
f.
'. Approximately seven ,7., ,to�stc and (5
) t
piling have. deteriorated to the.,;
point that their load carrying capacity has been diminished.
2. The spandrel (side) joists (2x8) have deteriorated.
J. The to pint ig hardware (bol�S, nuts and washers) have extreme cOirOSiOi'i �I
a
a! ,
4. The planking (3x8) in some cases is not nailed and have warped.
5. The piling has severe decay in at the water line.
Analysis:
6. The 8" steel channels at the bridge entrance spanning approximately
13' have severe corrosion.
1. Wood is hydroscopic, which means that its moisture content adjusts to
reach equilibrium with the temperature and relative humidity of the
atmosphere in which it is exposed. Wood used in possible moist
locations will absorb moisture from the surroundings or from water
t
penetration.
2. The bridge has sustained deterioration and decay of some of its
members along with the associated hardware.
a (!��•.
I' i
f I f !• 3 I
p Y i
it
t i

It appears to be a normal maintenance repair rather than any
construction or resign flaw.
3. The members mentioned have deteriorated due to'weather'conditions!
and overall usage of the bridge with tirr re. It could be that the
rnembers that have decayed were not pressure treated lumber.
4. -he grov/tin of decay caused by the fungi at this time has only effected ,
f r
and v�feakened the areas indicated.
I
Rccommendations:
1. Remove the affc—C-'wd joists and any affected hardware and replace
with a treated 2" x 10'; joists and, new hot -dipped galvanized hardware.
2. Re -mail the planking that is loose and replace any planking that is not
treated orhas sas major splitting.
3. Cut-off the affected Riling and cap with 12" diameter concrete cap
forrned with a 1 r" sonotube forth. reinforce the concrete cap with 444
bars vertically and #3 fies Co) 8" o/c. Provide hot -ripped galvanized
conn.ec+ion ang!e between the top of the concrete cap and the new
sp- ndrel bearns. S! ,ore the bridge in the area of cut-off and copping.
4. .i; rnemhers shall be properly attached to their adjoining ri3erTit?nrS �/Vlth
-ot-di he:d galvanised !'hardware.
- Provide double 2x jaists in the area. of travel (27" frorn each side and
87") whicn should occur at the approximate wheel -base of the vehicle.
These new joists shall be pressure -treated.
'1

The steel channels/angles that hazve corroded shall be replace with ne%vv
angles and are painted for corrosion resistance.
The overall condition of the bridge is good and will sustain a maximum ;oading of 4 ton
when the r^, ,Ts as no.e a ove are complete. An approximate enginpCring ��ctS fCr
the repair work is $7000. In order to increase the bridge capacity to
require a complete structural revamping of the existing members wit, i an approximate
cost for the work being $15000.00. If a new bridge is considered and the existing
bridge would be demolished, the approximate cost for the new bridge would be
$60,000.00. The new bridae would be designed for H2O loadings.
This report is not to be construed as a guaranty, or warranty of the premises or the
equipment therein or of the fitness for use. It is suggested that consideration be given
to engaging the services of a competent contractor to determine the extent of the
items noted herein to provide a cost estimate.
A placard should be installed indicating a maximum capacity of 4Ton after completion of
repairs.
I hope the foregoing report will give you a word picture of the main structural features of
this bridge at this time.
At the time the bridge will be repaired a detailed plan will be provided.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
The above recommendations should be implemented as soon as in Order
to maintain the complete integrity of the structure.
SINCERELY
JOHN SIMKO P.E.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NC #642_1

cyl tAn; � fte�
December 1, 1994
To Whom It May Concern:
RE: Appraisal on wooden bridge located at
134 Pirate Island Drive, Hubert, NC
Dear Sirs,
In accordance with Mr. Richard Schlaefer's request,
I have made an appraisal of the above captioned property
for the purpose of estimating its Fair Market Value as of
December 1, 1994.
The Fair Market Value is defined as being the highest
price estimated in terms of money that a willing buyer
would pay a willing seller, both parties being familiar
with the property and all uses to which it might be put,
allowing a reasonable time in the market.
As a result of the analysis and appraisal, it is my
opinion that the Fair Market Value of said property is:
TWENTY ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS
($21,840.00)
Supporting data, analysis and conclusions upon
which this value is based were obtained from
our records. If you have any questions,
please advise.
Re tfully sub tted,
Alan Shelor - OND.A.
REALTOR/Broker/CREA Z tiE <<��,, K
113 AS/vg
REALIOn
o
x hA1292 * -
W
a�Q,Ar
T/A L AP�Q
Crow's Nest Shopping Center - Atlantic- , . [phone]
® P.O. Box 3001 Atlantic Beach, NC 28512

L
)�?f

14
17
,�\ \ \: .\�� \9y /� / /\.

MLI
"Nip,
'Al

AV -
IN

/�• +��„', jCr�M gyp: ►. , , ' .i . , ��v
a

IN
Awl