55244_NC DOT_20100729

DCAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit#
❑New ❑Modification 17] Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued -
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I SA NCAC
❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name ' Project Location: County
JF
Address U . % Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City r •' v; t c State ZIP
I
Phone #(= S `"') ' s ` ' Fax # O Subdivision
Authorized Agent City ZIP
Affected ❑ CW ❑ EW ❑ PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS Phone # ( ) River Basin
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn)
❑ PWS: ❑FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity i� . '_r f �' k l -
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s) ���jj
Finger pier(s)_^f
Groin length _
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
i
avg distance offshore -
max distance offshore
6* C4 r I
Basin, channel 1
cubic yards
Boat ramp *C111
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
_ v
Shoreline Lerigf
SAV: not sure yes no a
Sandbags: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes no
Photos: yes no
Waiver Attached: yes no
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
! Agent or Applicant Printed Name
(Scale: )
L � �
elvf-Ce6'Q :p Uhr -fie eiLf
GI /owdLl )f7 ✓l-1 g
a � S�.
6 -'f ,f2 1ACyd 40 11l W e,4-/ .ykd.r I- r1c 64Ac C, C'C.'
Signature Please read compliance statement on back of permit
Application Fee(s) Check #
J! See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Permit Officers Signature
Issuing Date Expiration Date
Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythatthis project is consistentwith the North Carolina Coastal Management Program,
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office
Morehead City Headquarters
Mailing Address:
400 Commerce Ave
1638 Mail Service Center
Morehead City, NC 28557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
252-808-2808! 1-8884RCOAST
Location:
Fax: [phone]
2728 Capital Blvd.
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
Raleigh, NC 27604
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
919-733-2293
Fax: [phone]
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

E!
n
Lane, Stephen
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 3:13 PM
To: Lane, Stephen
Cc: Alligood, Dwayne H; Rogerson, Maria A; Jones, Larry L; Johnson, Jay B; Garcy Ward
([e-mail]); Tran, Van K
Subject: Permit Mod B-4086, Craven 10 SR 1111,Old Airport Road Over Brices Creek
Attachments: Craven 10 permit mod.pdf
Good Afternoon to All: Mr. Stephen; We respectfully request a permit mod for B-4086, Craven
10. We would like to increase the 404 Wetland Impacts by an additional 80 Sq. Ft. as shown on
the attached plan. This would bring the total 404 Wetland Impacts to 305 Sq. Ft. (0.007
Acres). The purpose of this request is to have the 404 Wetland Area in B3 permitted to match
the Buffer Impact Area of B3; therefore eliminating any confusion in B3 during the
Construction Process. Thank You .... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
1

RECEIVED
OCT 12 2010
N 33.40'16' W —�lL
7-106-001 e\ �� / `°' a % CPoVEN COUNTY
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY / - -IS cm
\�-D REPUCE BRIDGE M7.p
1785 WEYERHAEUSER RO°O SR /Ill. OLD AIRPORT RD
VANCEBORO,NC 28586 r p0 / OVER BRAE CREEK
/ `•, o• a" .\0\0� )S BETWEEN SR IAV AND SR WIO
DB 1903 PC 494 �h •ti 6Z o'
DB 1046 PC 43 10 N t59 _ CAVA GP,NWP 3,AY0 BUFFER
�-.../ ? JS N?IRWIZATKH/ APPLICATION
PARCEL •2 TRACT 2 3. _ WBS ELEMENT NUMBER JJ44.VJ
.. MB MI5 9 47.91'
586.05 AC ,00 WOODS\ SCALE,
APRIL /5. 3010
FOR PERMITTING ONLY,
I ?�'• Btlff,�Ey2 \ NOT FOR C W5TRUCTp4
gUQNEp ZOO"
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft. Ea f 2p8E
404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft. B f E 2 B2
STREAM IMPACTS - 0 Sq-Ff. �ZU y , COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS 0 Sq.Ft.
FILL REMOVAL = 190 Sq. Ft. RCS s, 404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq.Ff. \
BUFFER ZONE /IMPACTS = 755 Sq.Ft. ' STREAM IMPACTS = 12 Sq.Ft.
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS = 650 Sq.Ft. PROPOSED PILINGS IN STREAM \
s BUFFER ZONE /IMPACTS = 585 Sq.Ft.
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS = J50 Sq.Ft. S 063a2q
.7 EE NNNNEELL Q Z• f
MKOO L N q \ BM•I ANUDPOUNELUDR"% \
EL- STA 21+96.69 ITN
+7 R i 74.99' LT S 0.820. 1
- ELEV=5.66' O
a � pp�NN
A B01-11 RIDGE SEA B2 \ STI118 TOR
7-104-I-001
Jc ERNEST L. REASON JR. & LISA B.
\ P.O. BOX 12386
\ DIFFUSE FLOC' THROUGH NEW BERN, NC 28561
O laSPL:CiAL SEDIMENT DB 2055 PC 418
CONTROL FENCE � PLAT CAB C SLIDE 53-A
- - BRIDGE •10 \ \ � 1' _+ >ti >ti 3.29 AC
® BUFFER ZONE l IMPACTS
C \
s I TvrE
® BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
WOODS PERM? MOD B4 m L
N
OCTOBER 122010 -_ 111 PAT �• \��� ���
404 WETLAND IMPACTS B4 ADDITIONAL 404
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. ft. WETLAND IMPACTS - 80 Sq.Ff.
404 WETLAND IMPACTS - 0 Sq.Ft.
TOTALS, 225 Sq.Ff.IMPACTS AL \ z \
80 Sq.Ff.ADDITIONAL IMPACTS =JO5 Sq.Ff. OTAL n `�
STREAM IMPACTS - 0 Sq.Ft.
FILL REMOVAL - 225 Sq.Ft. r 9r0.
BUFFER ZONE /IMPACTS - 630 Sq.Ft. O e. '�• \ p TF i0
< ~AD PO'
S 3 \
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS 380 Sp. Ft. 7-104-12000 s �9P�,�\ 9��"\�`, �`\ 4 9�:F 00
NOTESf NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL LAND TRUST ` r�ij�f rgF
131 RACINE DR STE 101 'G9,� \ O C C ?B
f11 B-4086 /S ON THE NEW BERN USGS QUAD MAP WILMINGTON, NC 28403 �' > it `�Q` - - �� "%' `\ G A A
E AND SHEET NUMBER 12 OF THE SOILS SURVEY DB 2873 PC 6 ��4'�l �3
OF CRAVEN COUNTY PLAT C7o.�9SACE 159-G •' •\ 3S�ti7 H0 \ C�s3
!21 FIRM PANEL 54%j. MAP NUMBER 372054960OJ N 039 I' \ ` �` ` ` 4
!J1 B-4086 IS IN THE LOWER NEUSE WATERSHED IE I BRpGE HAS oDDEN "
i°w FNG t AT A FFOY' 1
HUC CODE 03020204 s TN srE L I- eE S. \
INEgE R UY r0 DETERAIK THE HIGH78.66' 2
DATER WNK AT TMS BROGE SITE.
!41 BRICE CREEK IS CrSW.NSW BJ m
0,
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES APPLY COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq.Ff.
404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 225 Sq.Ft. 09z 99• 7-104-2000
f5/ 8-4066, CRAVEN IO IS CAVA JURISDICTIONAL AS 2 3s PDWON' LLC
STREAM IMPACTS = 30 Sq.Ff.
PER STEPHEN LANE. NCDCM DECEMBER 4 200 PROPOSED PILINGS IN STREAM \ 5905 NEUSE RD
a 2
v !61 FEBRUARY 15 TO JUNE 15 MORATORIUM AS PER BUFFER ZONE /IMPACTS -990 Sq.Ft. GRANTSBORO, NC 28529
•^ m� \\
TRAVIS WILSON. NCWRC OCTOBER JO 2009 BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS BOS Sq.Ff. \ /
o° y DB 2396 PC 268
a" PLAT CAB G SLIDE 120-H
40.35 AC

Cv"CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
NY 55244
GENERAL PERMIT
Previous permit#
:Jew, ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
b'7i 3 `�
H
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant
to 15A NCAC •
_
Applicant Name n•y - f •
N9<Ules attached. nn
Project Location: County C rc,v Z n �Y
Address X ) S b' %
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City 5;;�)-e ;�N ``. State LZIP �%�sf
L'rc,ve-,
ci '
Phone # (� ��'} r3 s Fax # ()
Subdivision
Authorized Agent
City A/� `� �' A/ �' ZIP
-� !�J
El CW ❑ EW L TA El ES IIrTS
Phone # ( ) River Basin
Affected D OEA ❑ HHF [I[I IH ❑ UBA N/A
AEC(s):
Adj. Wtr. Body T Creek
(nat)/man L-_
❑ PWS: El FC:
ORW: yes /(n> no PNA yes / Crit.Hab. yes / no
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
J. f -f' ^
°; l 1 © x Y,
(Scale: D✓/A )
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)j
- -- - - -
�
Groin length -
i
L
—
number
Bulkhead/ Ri raP length
� I
— -- -—
avgdistance offshore
max o
i
�
)
f
-
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat ramp —
_
—
--
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
� 3Xb�
r
—
Other
' i• I I
' I
I—
I � j
I I I
Shoreline Length Z O
- - -
- - — --- -
—
-
�— -
SAV: not sure yes
Sandbags: not sure yes
Moratorium: n/a es
©o ..!__.-.�
o
1
------
!
i
4 i
�-
I 1
i -
Photos: ems
no 1-1
i
Waiver Attached: yes n
A building permit may be required by: �tl✓
C .rt / T T /vG`✓ry✓r1
River Basin rules.
J ! G Y L ee note on back regarding River
Notes/ Special Conditions
�i /�a �'�✓`'�
!�
W. �K JS � ��o �'c.�
I
r L!H fNGI S/
Tr�j« � y / �=
.i :,� 2 `� p '! s: r' �Zd%
r y
�:. � �.�r ,.�_,��.� �,,. �� »y ,Jam F; ,^��. �. <i
z rr� �k. (� T hz � � �t 6 ::,) (` C ,
,l 'W ur..j.�4i.,r �-he 11 U) I
� ► � r � � �
c,h)r
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
o a 33 `fids t • !
Application Fee(s) Check #
PermitOfficer s Signature 1
Issuing Date Expiration Date
Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
July 29, 2010
Jay Johnson, NC DOT
Division of Environmental Officer
Division 3
PO Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Attached is General Permit #55244C to construct a 130'x33' bridge to replace the existing
80'x21' Bridge at SR 1111, Bridge # 10 in Craven County.
Also, enclosed is a Buffer Authorization Certificate for Shoreline Stabilization, please sign and
print your name as indicated and return it in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope.
In order to validate this permit, please sign the permit as indicated. Retain the white copy for
your files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-addressed
envelope. If the signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation of
development, you will be working without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of
Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
lsb
Enclosures
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

BUFFER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS
A riparian buffer authorization is required for bridge replacement activities within the Neuse and Tar -
Pamlico River basins per Division of Water Quality (DWQ) regulations 15A NCAC 026.0233 &.0259. The
Division of Coastal Management (DCM) through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) has reviewed your project proposal, determined that the project as proposed
complies with the aforementioned regulations, and made a "no practical alternatives" determination
per those regulations.
Those activities covered by your Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit have received Buffer authorization
as long as the project is constructed in a manner that continues to meet all of the conditions listed below. Failure
to comply with this Buffer Authorization shall subject the property owner & the party (contractor) performing the
construction &/or land clearing to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day per violation.
1) All stormwater runoff shall be directed as sheetflow through stream buffers at non-erosive velocities,
unless otherwise approved by this certification.
2) All riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored
to the preconstruction contours and re -vegetated. Maintained buffers shall be permanently re -
vegetated with non -woody species by the end of the growing season following completion of
construction. For the purpose of this condition, maintained buffer areas are defined as areas within
the transportation corridor that will be subject to regular.NCDOT maintenance activities including
mowing. The area with non -maintained buffers shall be permanently re -vegetated with native woody
species before the next growing season following completion of construction.
3) Pursuant to NCAC15A 2B .0233 & .0259, sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in
Zone 1 of any Neuse or Tar -Pamlico Buffer without prior approval by NCDWQ. At this time, NCDWQ
has approved no sediment and erosion control devices in Zone 1, outside of the approved project
impacts, anywhere on this project. Moreover, sediment and erosion control devices shall be allowed
in Zone 2 of the buffers provided that Zone 1 is not compromised and that discharge is released as
diffuse flow.
4) Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across
the bridge and pre-treated through site -appropriate means (grassed swales, pre -formed scour holes,
vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current version of
Stormwater Best Management Practices.
By your signature below you agree to be held responsible for meeting all of the above listed conditions and verify
that all information is complete and accurate.
Agent or Applicant Printed Name Permit Officer's Signature
Agent or Applicant Signature Issue Date
CAMA GENERAL PERMIT#. j /�4

Mc Mvisicm 0 MqtHnabitat In. pact 'pox-„ " %�sheet
p�'r �-5- - y
(v
Applicant: (0, �� is
Date: T — i_`l— /0
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
Habitat Name
DISTURB TYPE
Choose One
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
includes any
anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Sq. Ft.
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
and/or temp
im aGct am/ount)
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration and/or
temp impact
amount
U Z► �`
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other 2
u`sA t L
Dredge [" Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
'2-
Dredge ❑ Fill ['Both ❑ Other ❑
�J ��
Sj yS
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑

Attachment G: Low/Minimal Impact
Bridqe Proiect Data Sheet {*
RECEIVED
3
County
Craven elly
4
Bridge Number
Craven 10
5
Description
REPLACE BRIDGE 10 OVER BRICE CREEK ON SR499:iL SR III I
6
7
8
101
Stream
lBasin _ _
Neuse
Classification
C:Sw:NSW
SIN
27-101-40-(1
Size
inland
60'
11
12
13
Existing Structure
Type
2 -span bridge
Size
80' L x 21' W
Suff. Rating
50.2
14
15
Proposed Structure
IT a
3 -span bridge
,Size
130'L x 33'W
16
17
Stream USACE (LF)
iNCDWQ Impacts LF
0
p
18
19
20
USACE Im acts AC)
Wetlands Non 404 Impacts (A�
LAMA Impacts SF
0.005
0
0
21 NC DWQ Buffers Impacts (SF)
Total 5145 Sq. Ft. Buffer Zone 1 Impacts = 2960 FL Buffer Zone 2 Impacts = 2185 Sq. ft.
22 Buffer Applicaton Required (>40 ft) YIN
N/A
23 State Stormwater Permit Required(YIN)
No
24
25
26
Habitat
T&E Species Present
Bio Conclusion
No
_ No
No effect
27
28
Moratorium
Type
Anadramous Fish
Dates
Feb 15 to June 15
29
30
31
32
Trout Waters
Native/Hatchery
N/A
Trout Species Present
N/A
Trout Conditions /N
N/A
WRC Reviewer
NIA
33
CAMA; AECs
Yes
34
Essential Fish! Habitat
No
35
Nay.'Opening
Existing Bridge 32' Wide x 4.5' High Proposed Bridge 40' Wide x 4.5' High
36
USCG I Permit
No
37
Historic lProperties
No
38
ArchaeolGgicaljResources
No
39
Tribal1ands
No
40
4 jResources
No
41
6(0 [LWCF] I Resources
No
42
Wild andlScenic River
No
431
Federal Lands
No
441
TVA I Area
No
45
FEMA, Buyout
No
46
FEMA Flood Stud
V No
47
USTs i Haz Mats
No
48
1 Relocatees
None
49
50
Location SLAT
(LONG
N 35.009485 Degrees
_
W 77.026997 Degrees
51 Project Comments
'
Completed by atimt
Lead Engin r
Division En #ntal Offi r

BCM EPA
L
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12127!06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
North Carolina Department Of Transportation
B-4086, Craven 10 SR 1111,Old
Airport Road Road Over
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
Brice Creek Craven County
Last Name
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
City
Jay
B.
Johnson
Phone No. 1
-
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Contractor#
ff additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Street Address (f different from above)
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
ZIP
State
1587
Greenville
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
X No.
27835 1587
us
252 - 830 -
3490 ext. 248 =252-
830 - 3341
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
Ml
Last Name
Mailing Address
I
I PO Box
City
State
�
ZIP
Phone No. 1
-
- ext.
Phone No. 2
- - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor#
Street Address (f different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple) Street Address
b. Size of entire tract (sq.R)
State Rd. #
Craven
c. Size of individual lot(s)
SR 1111, Old Airport
Subdivision Name City
State
Zip Road
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
Maintained Roadside Grasses
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed
Neuse
project
Brice Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Trent River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the
❑Yes ®No
proposed
work falls within.
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.R)
120' (60' North and 60' South)
N/A
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach addtional page with a list)
6.5' ❑NHW or ®NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Maintained Roadside Grasses
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Road
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Residential Property and Wood Lands
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? E3 Yes No
k. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. OYes No NA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a Dyes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<ForTn continues on next page>
M. (i) Are there wetlands on the
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
►R7
Oyes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (i) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes []No
(Attach documentation, if available)

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 5)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
N/A
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The Existing 18" x 44' RCP Will Be Replaced By 30"x 48' CMP. The Proposed Pipe Will Keep The Roadway From
Collapsing, Thus Preventing Possible Injury and Death.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
The Existing Pipe Will Be Removed and the Proposed Pipe Will Be Installed. Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Will
Be Used, Including,But Not Limited To Tracked Excavators,Dump Trucks, Flat -Bed Trucks,Back-Hoes,And Boom Trucks.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Bridge Replacement
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Both
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 6755 ®Sq.Ft or []Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes No ®NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
N/A
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? []Yes [:]No []NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes No CINA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, dearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.

F,Drm DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management_
Name Weyerhaeuser company, Inc.
Phone No. 1785 Weyerhaeuser Road Vanceboro,NC 28586 Parcel #2, Tract 2
Address Ernest L. reason and Lisa B. Reason
Name P.O. Box 12386 New Bern, NC 28561
Phone No, PDWOW, LLC
Address 5905 Neuse Road Grantsboro, NC 28529
Name North Carolina Coastal Land Trust
Phone No. 131 Racine drive Suite 101 Wilminton, NC 28403
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
None
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), rf necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Cert cation and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date _June 16,2010 Print Name _Jay B. Johnson
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your prosed project.
®DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information

Form DCM MP -2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet
1. EXCAVATION
Access
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
C. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW) submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
Channel
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV OSB
Other
❑WL ❑None
(NLW or
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
C. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
NWL
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
❑Yes []No []NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
Breakwater
shoreline
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
❑Yes []No ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
stabilization
Length
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
Width
Avg. Existing
Depth
NA
NA
Final Project
Depth
NA
NA
1. EXCAVATION
®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
C. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW) submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV OSB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
S This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area.
b. Dimensions of disposal area.
C. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
❑Yes []No []NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
f. (i) Does the disposal indude any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
❑Yes []No ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL []None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ❑This section not applicable
(If development is a wood grain, use MP -4 — Structures)

Form. DCM MP -2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 2)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length: 120' (60' North And 60' South)
❑Bulkhead ®Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other. Width: T
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 2' d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 20'-25'
e. Type of stabilization material:
Class B Marl or Granite
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
Clark's Quarry
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? Yes No CINA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
rr yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b
controlled?
Sift Fences and TRSC-B's
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project? d
❑Yes ®No [INA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
suumergea aquatic vegetation (5AV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Typical Road Construction Equipment
(i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No DNA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
June 16, 2010p
plicant Signatu
Date
8-4086 Craven 10, Sr 111 1,01d Airport Road Over Brice Creek,
Bridge Replacement WBS Element Number 33445.1.1 W,
Project Name
Jay B. Johnson
plicant Name

RECEIVED
�i �► 2 � 201
a Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length: 120' (60' North And 60' South)
[]Bulkhead ®Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other: Width: 7' mJ orehead City DCVI
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 2' d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 0'
e. Type of stabilization material:
Class B Marl or Granite
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
Clark's Quarry
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ❑Yes []No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW _ ❑SAV ❑SB
[:]WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Silt Fences and TRSC-B's Typical Road Construction Equipment
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
June 16, 2010
Date
B-4086 Craven 10, Sr 111 1,01d Airport Road Over Brice Creek,
Bridge Replacement WBS Element Number 33445.1.1
t-rolect Name
Jay B. Johnson
plicant Name
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No []NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
plicant Signature
252-808-2808;. 1-668- 6 :: _cccx i revised- 12126f06

Wrm BCM MP -5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES El This section not applicable
. is ine proposed ondge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Govemment ❑PrivatelCommunity Brice Creek
C. Type of bridge (construction material):
Cored Slab
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
3'
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No f
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 80'
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 20'
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 6_0
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) All of the Existing Bridge will Be Removed
9- Length of proposed bridge: 125'
(i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? [--]Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h- Width of proposed bridge: 32'
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes ®No j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
k• Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 6_5'
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: 6.5'
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed: b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>

Form DCjN1 MP -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
d. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance undemeath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f- Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9- Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
I EXCAVATION and FILL El This section not applicable
a. t iii the piacement or the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 27" South 15' North
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 23' South 25' North
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 2.0'
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 149
Cubic Yards
b- (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlandsJmarsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑Sg _
®WL 225 Sq. Ft. []None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Bridge Foundation

Form DCVI jNiP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Temporary Spoil Area is in the Existing Road
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: 100'x200'
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes []No (/f no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes ❑No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL OSB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any f.
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg, width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
1:1 CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
utility lines? ❑Yes ®No detour structures?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: If yes, explain:
if this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval orcerfification.
< Form continues on back>

Eorrri'DCM MP -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. Turbidity Curtains and Silt Fences will be used to retain
sediment on-site
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Typical Bridge Construction Equipment
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, complete fort MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
June 16.2010
Date
B-4086, Craven 10, SR 111 1,01d Airport Road, Bridge
Replacement, Craven County WBS Element Number 33445.1.1
Project Name
Jay B. Johnson
Applicant Name
Applicant Signal
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.

BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR
B-4086
`:K = CRAVEN 10
- SR 1111, OLD AIRPORT ROAD OVER BRICES' CREEK
J WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 33445.1.1
" NEW BERN USGS QUAD MAP
_ SHEET NUMBER 12 OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF CRAVEN COUNTY
- FIRM PANEL 5496 J
MAPNUMBER 3720549600 J OCTOBER 27, 2009
W
_ _
8 F cypress .i-�` x2e
41
`{{ ILL.•' �` , � n - �'//(' R� -,� \(/ // � 7C , fr ` `r0
�' \! Y ���• �r'-��i 1�t�'t( 1� 'i- - ,i :.• p �� - �.^•. ( �- � iii . `"' -
Z
. CRAVEN 10
? / J',,^ Y= 464251-4590
.�'i•4 ter•• ,�' i l 4 rf X= 2590739.8192 .�.'
W 77^-01'-37"
-� �J ��•,�-.,� N 35.009485 DEGREES
W 77.026997 DEGREES:
��-
�__._ _ 0 650 1,300 2,600 3,900 5,200 — -- �---� �-- --'
Feet

BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR
B-4086
CRAVEN 10
SR 1111, OLDAIRPORT ROAD OVER BRICES, CREEK
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 33445.1.1
NEW BERN USGS QUAD MAP
SHEET NUMBER 12 OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF CRAVEN COUNTY
FIRMPANEL 5496 J
MAPNUMBER 3720549600 J
,a
240
B-4086 1
CRAVEN 10
Y= 464251.4590
X= 2590739.8192
N 35^-00'-34"
W 77^-01'-37,
N 35.009485 DEGREES
W 77.026997 DEGREES Kerma
�s
yr
2401520!,k
0
CL
0
olVell
0
0 2,8505,700 11,400 17,100 22,800
Fe.
OCTOBER 27, 2009
.N

Studied Detour Route
NORTH CAROLINA DUARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DrVMON OF HWiHWAYS
PROJECT DEvEI.omcDa &
EMMONMENTAL A24ALYSIS BRANCH
CRAVEN Courrry
REPLACE BRIDGE N0. 10 ort SR 1111
OVER $RICES CREEK
B-4086
Figure I

NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-4086
WBS No: 33445.1.1
County: Craven
Document:
Project Tracking No. (Interna/ Use)
[::10-03-0157
F.A. No: Funding: ❑ State X Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: CAMA or NWP 3/NWP 4
Project Description: Replace existing timber bridge with a proposed 130 foot Long Cored Slab Bridge
on SR 1111, Old Airport Road over Brice's Creek.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on March 15, 2010.
Based on this review, there are no existing NR properties in the Area of Potential Effects. No properties
are recorded in the project APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE.-
State
PE.State Historic Preservation Office issued a letter [ May 3, 2002] stating that a file search yielded no
historic resources which would be affected by the proposed project and thus they would have no comment
regarding the proposal.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s), Soil Survey, SHPO letter.
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED
Resources
"Na Survey Regrrired "Jorm for Minor Trwrsporfation Projects as 0miffred in dre 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
N('M7T A.rh.....,I .0 H:.i..�,. e...ir...y.... r:........
Date

NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-4086
WBS No: 33445.1.1
F. A. No:
Federal (USACE) Permit Required?
Project Tracking No. (Internal U3e)
0-3
County: Craven
Document: RCE
Funding: State X Federal
CAMA GP or Major;
X Yes No Permit Type: NWP 3/14
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 10 on SR 1111 (Old Airport Road) over Brice's Creek
with off-site detour (no improvements planned).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: HPO quad maps, historic
designations roster, and indexes reviewed on 12 May 2010 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). The county architectural survey (1980) and related
publication recorded no properties of concern in the APE (Peter B. Sandbeck, The HistoricArchitectrire
of New Bern and Craven County, North Carolina (New Bern: Tryon Palace Commission, 1988)). Bridge
replacement project B-4086 reviewed in 2002 by state historic preservation office — see attached letter
of no comment. Craven County current GTS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicate
mostly wooded parcels in the APE and one house dating to 2003 in the NW quadrant (viewed 12 May
2010). Constructed in 1954, Bridge No. 10 is a single -span, 80 -foot, steel stringer/multi-beam bridge
and is not eligible for the National Register according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey, as it is not
historically, architecturally, or technologically significant Google Maps "Street Yew" confirmed
absence of historic structures/ landscapes in APE (viewed 12 May 2010). No architectural survey
required for project as currently defined.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: APE centered on existing bridge and
extends 200 feet from centerline to the W and E and 100 feet from either end of the existing bridge to
the N and S to encompass proposed construction activities. While not recent, the county survey is very
well -executed and records no properties in the APE. County GTS/tax materials and other images
support absence of significant architectural resources. No National Register -listed or —eligible
properties or other properties of concern are located within the APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: APE map; aerial map
FIND BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO URVEY REQUIRED — Historic Structures
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist
is
Date
"No Survey Required " form for ,Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups
"No Survey Required"form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement,
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups

Replace Bridge #10 on SR 1111 (Old Airport Road) over Brice's Creek
B-4086, WBS #33445.1.1 Not to scale Base map: Craven County GIS
MCDOT— Historic Architecture. Mav 2010

-Sutton, Michael W
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 12:02 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Caldwell, Betty A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: RE: Bridges
Attachments: multibrige070303.doc; 2002NRTRS.doc
multibrige07O3O3.d 2002NRTRS.doc
oc(78 KB) (84 KS)
The 2002NRTRS document contains comments for B-4086: this stream
is designated AFSA and these comments are valid. The multibridge 070303document contains
comments for B-4233 and these comments are still valid (no moratorium). However B-4025
comments are also in the multibridge07O3O3 document but are not accurate. Broomfield
Swamp at this location is designated AFSA and will have a moratorium of Feb 15 to June 15,
also I cannot determine why we requested any RCW review (this may be a cut and paste
error). Let me know if you have any questions.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:25 AM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
Cc: Caldwell, Betty A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: Bridges
Good Morning Mr. Travis .... Hope you are well on this Thursday Morning..... Division 2 is
planning to replace Craven 10, Beaufort 39, and Pitt 65. We would like to know if these
bridges are anadromous fish locations and if a moratorium exists... please see attachment
for maps .... many thanks .... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
1

TO: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Unit Head
Bridge Replacement & Environmental Analysis Branch
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: May 22, 2002
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements:
Beaufort County - Bridge No. 77, NC 99, Pantego Creek, B-3611
Beaufort County - Bridge No. 136, SR 1626, Canal, B-4024
Bertie County - Bridge No. 45, SR 1110, Choowatic Creek, B-4026
Brunswick County - Bridge No. 72, NC 179, Jinnys Branch, B-4031
Chatham County - Bridge No. 142, SR 2170, Meadow Creek, B4065
Craven County - Bridge No. 10, SR 1111, Brices Creek, B-4086
Cumberland County - Bridge No. 85, I-95 Business, Cape Fear River, B-4091
Durham County - Bridge No. 5, SR 1616, Mountain Creek, B-4110
Edgecombe County - Bridge No. 19, SR 1135, Cokey Swamp, B-4111
Franklin County - Bridge No. 15, SR 1106, Little River, B-4113
Granville County - Bridge No. 84, SR 1141, Tar River, B-4124
Greene County - Bridge No. 46, SR 1091, Wheat Swamp Creek, B-4125
Greene/Lenoir Cos. - Bridge No. 49, SR 1434, Wheat Swamp Creek, B-4126
Greene County - Bridge No. 43, SR 1438, Rainbow Creek, B-4127
Halifax County - Bridge No. 11, SR 1001, Jacket Swamp, B-4133
Harnett County - Bridge No. 35, NC 42, Norfolk and Southern Railway, B-4137
Hertford County - Bridge No. 67, SR 1118, Ahoskie Creek, B-4150
Hyde County - Bridge No. 108, SR 1340, Old State Canal, B4154
Jones County - Bridge No. 7, SR 1129, Big Chinquapin Branch, B-4169
Lee County - Bridge No. 4, SR 1423, Gum Fork, B-4171
Martin County - Bridge No. 5, SR 1417, Conoho Creek, B-4187
Nash County - Bridge No. 56, SR 1544, Tar River, B-4211
Onslow County - Bridge No. 24, US 17, New River, B-4214
Onslow County - Bridge No. 19, NC 210, Stones Creek, B-4215
Pamlico County - Bridge No. 65, SR 1304, UT to Neuse River, B4219
Pamlico County - Bridge No. 4, SR 1344, South Prong Bay River, B4221
Perquimans County - Bridge No. 69, SR 1222, Mill Creek, B-4227
Pitt County - Bridge No. 98, SR 1407, Conetoe Creek, B-4234
Pitt County - Bridge No. 118, SR 1538, Grindle Creek, B-4235
Randolph County - Bridge No. 34, SR 1304, Second Creek, B-4242

Bridge Memo 2 May 22, 2002
Randolph County — Bridge No. 257, SR 2824, Vestal Creek, B-4245
Richmond County — Bridge No. 129, SR 1321, Big Mountain Creek, B-4247
Sampson County — Bridge No. 150, SR 1006, Little Coharie Creek, B4268
Sampson County — Bridge No. 191, SR 1845, Great Coharie Creek, B-4272
Vance County — Bridge No. 3, SR 1107, Ruin Creek, B-4298
Wake County — Bridge No. 189, SR 2333, Little River, B-4305
Washington County — Bridge No. 29, SR 1163, Maul Creek, B-4314
Wilson County — Bridge No. 52, SR 1131, Turkey Creek, B-4327
Wilson County — Bridge No. 3, SR 1634, Great Swamp, B- 4328
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.

Bridge Memo 3 May 22, 2002
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment -free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.

Bridge Memo 4 May 22, 2002
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100 -year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. Beaufort County — Bridge No. 77, NC 99, Pantego Creek, B-3611
YELLOW LIGHT. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is potential for
wetland impacts at this location due to the width of stream and site elevation. Due to the
potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream
Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes a moratorium on
work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to June 15.
2. Beaufort County — Bridge No. 136, SR 1626, Canal, B-4024
GREEN LIGHT. No concerns indicated by biologists. Standard conditions should be
appropriate.
3. Beaufort County — Bridge No. 136, SR 1626, Canal, B-4024
GREEN LIGHT. No concerns indicated by biologists. Standard conditions should be
appropriate.
4. Bertie County — Bridge No. 45, SR 1110, Choowatic Creek, B4026
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15.
5. Brunswick County — Bridge No. 72, NC 179, Jinnys Branch, B-4031
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality coastal wetlands at this
location. NCDOT should employ all measures necessary to avoid impacts to these
resources.

Bridge Memo
May 22, 2002
6. Chatham County — Bridge No. 142, SR 2170, Meadow Creek, B-4065
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to the Cape Fear
Shiner, NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting
to discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Standard
recommendations apply.
7. Craven County —
June 15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is also the potential for
impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts
to these wetlands. Other standard recommendations apply.
8. Cumberland County — Bridge No. 85, I-95 Business, Cape Fear River, B-4091
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. Other standard recommendations apply.
9. Durham County— Bridge No. 5, SR 1616, Mountain Creek, B-4110
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the DWQ water quality classification, we recommend High
Quality Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures be used. Other standard
recommendations apply.
10. Edgecombe County — Bridge No. 19, SR 1135, Cokey Swamp, B-4111
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Standard recommendations
apply.
11. Franklin County — Bridge No. 15, SR 1106, Little River, B-4113
RED LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should
closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This
includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to June 15.
There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project vicinity. Therefore,
due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that NCDOT perform a
mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site meeting should be held
with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit application, to discuss
bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project. Other
standard recommendations apply.
12. Granville County — Bridge No. 84, SR 1141, Tar River, B-4124
RED LIGHT. The Tar River supports a good fishery for sunfish, therefore, we
recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June 15.
There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project vicinity. Therefore,
due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that NCDOT perform a
mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site meeting should be held
with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit application, to discuss
bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project. Other
standard recommendations apply.

Bridge Memo 6 May 22, 2002
13. Greene County — Bridge No. 46, SR 1091, Wheat Swamp Creek, B-4125
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Standard recommendations
apply.
14. Greene/Lenoir Cos. — Bridge No. 49, SR 1434, Wheat Swamp Creek, B4126
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Standard recommendations
apply.
15. Greene County — Bridge No. 43, SR 1438, Rainbow Creek, B-4127
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Standard recommendations
apply.
16. Halifax County — Bridge No. 11, SR 1001, Jacket Swamp, B-4133
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Standard recommendations
apply.
17. Harnett County — Bridge No. 35, NC 42, Norfolk and Southern Railway, B-4137
GREEN LIGHT. No comment.
18. Hertford County — Bridge No. 67, SR 1118, Ahoskie Creek, B-4150
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. Other standard comments apply.
19. Hyde County — Bridge No. 108, SR 1340, Old State Canal, B-4154
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
20. Jones County — Bridge No. 7, SR 1129, Big Chinquapin Branch, B-4169
YELLOW LIGHT. Big Chinquapin Branch supports a good fishery for sunfish;
therefore, we recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1
to June 15. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard
recommendations apply.
21. Lee County — Bridge No. 4, SR 1423, Gum Fork, B-4171
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
22. Martin County — Bridge No. 5, SR 1417, Conoho Creek, B-4187
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is also the potential for
impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts
to these wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
23. Nash County — Bridge No. 56, SR 1544, Tar River, B4211

Bridge Memo 7 May 22, 2002
YELLOW LIGHT. The Tar River supports a good fishery for sunfish; therefore, we
recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June 15.
If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels, NCDOT should
contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to discuss special
measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Other standard recommendations apply.
24. Onslow County — Bridge No. 24, US 17, New River, B-4214
YELLOW LIGHT. The New River is designated as a Primary Nursery Area on the
downstream side of the existing US 17 bridge. Due to the potential for adult and larval
stages of anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream
Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes a moratorium on
work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to September 30. Other standard
recommendations apply.
25. Onslow County — Bridge No. 19, NC 210, Stones Creek, B-4215
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is also the potential for
impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts
to these wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
26. Pamlico County — Bridge No. 65, SR 1304, UT to Neuse River, B-4219
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality coastal wetlands at
this location. NCDOT should employ all measures necessary to avoid impacts to these
resources. Other standard comments apply.
27. Pamlico County — Bridge No. 4, SR 1344, South Prong Bay River, B4221
YELLOW LIGHT. There is the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments
apply.
28. Pender County — Bridge No. 21, NC 210, NE Cape Fear River, B-4223
RED LIGHT. There are records of the federally listed Shortnose sturgeon in the NE
Cape Fear in the project area. Due to the potential for anadromous fish and Shortnose
sturgeon at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines
for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes a moratorium on work within
jurisdictional waters from February 1 to June 15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is
preferred. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments
apply.
29. Perquimans County — Bridge No. 69, SR 1222, UT to Mill Creek, B-4227
YELLOW LIGHT. Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT
should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
This includes a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from February 15 to
June 15. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site.
NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments
apply.
30. Pitt County — Bridge No. 98, SR 1407, Conetoe Creek, B-4234
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
31. Pitt County— Bridge No. 118, SR 1538, Grindle Creek, B4235

Bridge Memo
May 22, 2002
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. There is also the potential
for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize
impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
32. Randolph County — Bridge No. 34, SR 1304, Second Creek, B-4242
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
33. Randolph County — Bridge No. 257, SR 2824, Vestal Creek, B-4245
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Other standard comments
apply.
34. Richmond County — Bridge No. 129, SR 1321, Big Mountain Creek, B-4247
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Other standard comments
apply.
35. Sampson County — Bridge No. 150, SR 1006, Little Coharie Creek, B-4268
YELLOW LIGHT. Little Coharie Creek supports a good fishery for sunfish; therefore,
we recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June
15. There is also the potential for impacts to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT
should avoid or minimize impacts to these wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
36. Sampson County — Bridge No. 191, SR 1845, Great Coharie Creek, B-4272
YELLOW LIGHT. Great Coharie Creek supports a good fishery for sunfish; therefore,
we recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June
15. Biologists indicate that a bridge is preferred. There is also the potential for impacts
to high quality wetlands at this site. NCDOT should avoid or minimize impacts to these
wetlands. Other standard comments apply.
37. Vance County — Bridge No. 3, SR 1107, Ruin Creek, B-4298
RED LIGHT. There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project
vicinity. Therefore, due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that
NCDOT perform a mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site
meeting should be held with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit
application, to discuss bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate
High Quality Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project.
Other standard recommendations apply.
38. Wake County — Bridge No. 189, SR 2333, Little River, B-4305
RED LIGHT. The Little River supports a good fishery for sunfish, therefore, we
recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June 15.
There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project vicinity. Therefore,
due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that NCDOT perform a
mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site meeting should be held
with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit application, to discuss
bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project. Other
standard recommendations apply.

Bridge Memo 9 May 22, 2002
39. Washington County — Bridge No. 29, SR 1163, Maul Creek, B-4314
GREEN LIGHT. Standard comments apply.
40. Wilson County — Bridge No. 52, SR 1131, Turkey Creek, B-4327
RED LIGHT. Turkey Creek supports a good fishery for sunfish, therefore, we
recommend a moratorium on work within jurisdictional waters from April 1 to June 15.
There are records of state and federally listed mussels in the project vicinity. Therefore,
due to the potential for impacts to listed species we request that NCDOT perform a
mussel survey prior to the construction of this bridge. An on-site meeting should be held
with NCWRC and USFWS biologists, prior to the `404' permit application, to discuss
bridge design and construction. We request NCDOT incorporate High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures into the design of this project. Other
standard recommendations apply.
41. Wilson County — Bridge No. 3, SR 1634, Great Swamp, B- 4328
YELLOW LIGHT. If aquatic surveys indicate the potential for impacts to listed mussels,
NCDOT should contact USFWS and NCWRC biologists for an on-site meeting to
discuss special measures to reduce potential adverse effects. Other standard
recommendations apply.
NCDOT should routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources in the
vicinity of bridge replacements. Restoring previously disturbed floodplain benches should
narrow and deepen streams previously widened and shallowed during initial bridge installation.
NCDOT should install and maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the
project and prevent wet concrete from contacting water in or entering into these streams.
Replacement of bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box
culverts, is recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks and reduce habitat fragmentation.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
cc: USFWS, Raleigh

WATZ9OG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification.-
ertification:❑ Yes ® No
E]
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
El Yes
No
Ig. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
B-4086,Craven 10 Bridge To Bridge Replacement SR 1111, Old Airport Road Over
Brice Creek
WBS Element Number 33445.1.1
2b. County:
Craven
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
New Bern
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
B-4086
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d. Street address:
105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.:
252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.:
252-830-3341
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b.
Name:
Jay B. Johnson
4c.
Business name
(if applicable).-
pplicable):4d.
North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d.Street address:
P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
4f.
Telephone no.:
252-830-3490
4g.
Fax no.:
252-830-3341
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
NIA
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
5d.
City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
B-4086 Craven 10 SR 1111, Old Airport Road Over Brice
Creek
Latitude: N 35.009485 Longitude: - W
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
77.026997
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Brice Creek, a Tributary of Trent River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SC;Sw;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1111, Old Airport Road is an un -paved secondary state highway. Woodlands dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
225 Square Feet (0.005 Acres) of 404 Welland Impacts For The Bridge To Bridge Replacement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Bridge Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 80' Long By 21' Wide Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 130' Long by 33' Wide Cored Slab
Bridge. Excavators, Dump Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Bridge Replacement.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes E] No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary EJ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: NCDCM
Name (if known): Stephen Lane and Jay B. Johnson
Other. NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
December,2009
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d_
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Bottmland
® Yes
® Corps
0.005
Hardwood Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
225 Sq.
Ft.0.005 Acres
2h. Comments: 225 Sq. Ft. Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ®P ❑ T
Pilings in Stream
Brice Creek
® PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
® DWQ
60'
30'
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
A Total stream and tributary impacts
30 LF
3i. Comments: 30 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 [:]PDT
4f. Total open water impacts
None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres).-
acres):5j.
5j.Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other: None
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c,
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Tem ora
impact
required?
61 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Brice Creek
® Nos
755 Sq. Ft.
650 Sq. Ft.
B2 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Brice Creek
®Nos
585 Sq. Ft.
350 Sq. Ft.
B3 ® P ❑ T
Fill
Brice Creek
® Nos
990 Sq. Ft.
805 Sq. Ft.
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Page 6-A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 [:1 PDT
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑PEI
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
517. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mit. ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other: None
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
61 ®P ❑ T
64 Fill
Brice Creek
® Nos
630 Sq. Ft.
380 Sq. Ft.
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
2960 Sq. Ft.
2185 Sq. Ft.
6i. Comments:
PageS-
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are 225 Sq. Ft. Wetland Impacts for this Project; Therefore,The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the greatest
extent feasible, with minimal impacts occurring on the project
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page b of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
None
6g. if buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
WA
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control
Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from the road. Roadside ditches will
not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated
® Yes ❑ No
uplands before entering into the
buffers. There are no weep holes in the proposed bridge,thus eliminating
stormwater run-off from the proposed bridge deck.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A Roadway/Bridge Project %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from
the road. Roadside ditches will not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated uplands
before entering into the buffers.There are no weep holes in the proposed bridge,thus eliminating stormwater run-off from
the proposed bridge deck.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
El DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other. N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state4mplemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
® Other. NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments.-
omments:2.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
WII this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ®No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
El Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Determination was made by Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC, October 30, 2009
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
[] Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Bridge designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson
June 16, 2010
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
p ntt nt's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature i va o N ' a authorization letter from the applicant
i rovided.
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

USPS - Track & Confirm
AUUNITEDST13TES
POSTAL SERVICE.
Track & Confirm
Search Results
Page 1 of 1
Home I Help I Sign In
F.
Track & Confirm FAQs
Label/Receipt Number. 7009 0080 0002 4040 4896
Service(s): Certified Mail" Track &Confirm
Status: Notice Left Enter Label/Receipt Number.
We attempted to deliver your item at 10:33 AM on July 7, 2010 in NEW
BERN, NC 28562 and a notice was left. You may pick up the item at the
Post Office indicated on the notice, go to www.usps.com/redelivery, or
call 800 -ASK -USPS to arrange for redelivery. If this item is unclaimed
after 30 days then it will be returned to the sender. Information, if
available, is updated periodically throughout the day. Please check again
later.
Detailed Results:
• Notice Left, July 07,2010,10:33 am, NEW BERN, NC 28562
• Notice Left, July 01, 2010, 8:44 am, NEW BERN, NC 28561
• Arrival at Unit, July 01, 2010, 8:44 am, NEW BERN, NC 28562
Notification Options
Track & Confirm by email
Get current event information or updates for your item sent to you or others by email. Cb0> )
Site Map Customer Service Forms Gov't Services Careers
Copyright© 2010 USPS. All Rights Reserved. No FEAR Act EEO Data FOIA
Privacy Policy Terms of Use
19
Go
Business Customer Gateway
http://trkcnfrm l.smi.usps.com/PTSIntemetWeb/InterLabelInquiry.do 7/14/2010

2x
';d Form �I:,!',e�'¢�i rr.^1. 1�f i.: Y4":' ;. s�.Yi�. 4�#': 3 ,,;v, j�.3?,�'sr
C. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert:
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
g. Width of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL. i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL C1 This section not applicable
a
C.
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 3' West End of
Bridge'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 30' West End of
Bridge'
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 1_0'
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 0_3
Cubic Yards
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 40' North 40' South
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 15'
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 4_5'
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 200
Cubic Yards
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
El CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
2. Article Number 7Q09 0080 0002 4040 4879
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595 -02 -M -154Q
Agent
Addressee
UR ceived by (P inted Name)
i
C. Date of Delivery
4,4e, 1,ei , ,4t
D. is delivery address different from item 1?
❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below:
❑ No
3. Service Type
0-_15ertified Mail ❑ Upress Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7Q09 0080 0002 4040 4879
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595 -02 -M -154Q

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
IVC- C / ZNa rT
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004
Z,� VO 3
A.Sig�nure
X J� _ ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
IV GY P9FJy&V —/b
D. Is delivery address different from Ite ? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7009 0080 0002 4040 4794
Domestic Return Receipt
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
X
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
p
Y\"
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Dt
590 S ),kL)5 C )U -
C-Y-RAN7-s bolo NC
-28 S Z-9
102595-02-M-1540
❑ Agent
Td a d) 1 C. Date of Delivery
C --2y /0
R9
dress different from item 1? ❑ Yes
delivery address below: ❑ No
090
3. ServicbType
�rtifieffiyiAail ❑ I--�pl��
❑ Registered' "--4044Oh7 n Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ yes
2. Article Number
(transfer from service label) 7009 0080 0002 4040 4800
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595.02-M-1540

:- fi � N
�a

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
yU f.1 c -C l -e V SEIL. G, ANG
A. Signature
0 Agent
❑ Addre
B. eceib\y,(Pne�d-Name) C. Date of Del
::>! tai 1� `
D. is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
3. SServvi e Type
pF Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
2. ArticleNumber7009 0080 0002 4040 4817
{Ti�lsfer from service label) _ -
PS Form 3811, February 2004
Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

BUFFER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS
A riparian buffer authorization is required for bridge replacement activities within the Neuse and Tar -
Pamlico River basins per Division of Water Quality (DWQ) regulations 15A NCAC 028.0233 &.0259. The
Division of Coastal Management (DCM) through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) has reviewed your project proposal, determined that the project as proposed
complies with the aforementioned regulations, and made a "no practical alternatives" determination
per those regulations.
Those activities covered by your Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit.have received Buffer authorization
as long as the project is constructed in a manner that continues to meet all of the conditions listed below. Failure
to comply with this Buffer Authorization shall subject the property owner & the party (contractor) performing the
construction &/or land clearing to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day per violation.
1) All stormwater runoff shall be directed as sheetflow through stream buffers at non-erosive velocities,
unless otherwise approved by this certification.
2) All riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored
to the preconstruction contours and re -vegetated. Maintained buffers shall be permanently re -
vegetated with non -woody species by the end of the growing season following completion of
construction. For the purpose of this condition, maintained buffer areas are defined as areas within
the transportation corridor that will be subject to regular.NCDOT maintenance activities including
mowing. The area with non -maintained buffers shall be permanently re -vegetated with native woody
species before the next growing season following completion of construction.
3) Pursuant to NCAC15A 2B.0233 &.0259, sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in
Zone 1 of any Neuse or Tar -Pamlico Buffer without prior approval by NCDWQ. At this time, NCDWQ
has approved no sediment and erosion control devices in Zone 1, outside of the approved project
impacts, anywhere on this project. Moreover, sediment and erosion control devices shall be allowed
in Zone 2 of the buffers provided that Zone 1 is not compromised and that discharge is released as
diffuse flow.
4) Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across
the bridge and pre-treated through site -appropriate means (grassed swales, pre -formed scour holes,
vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current version of
Stormwater Best Management Practices.
By your signature below you agree to be held responsible for meeting all of the above listed conditions and verify
that all information is complete and accurate.
1�w 5
Agent or pplicant Printed Name
Q" __
Agen a Ap ca ignature
CAMA GENERAL PERMIT#:
Permit Officer's Signature
Issue Date

W
O
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sieets
C
O�
L
f1
co
o
D
o GRAPHIC SCALES
C
> 50 25 Q 50 100
PLANS
Z
w�
Taw 50 25 Q 50 100
��w y
�Na 'moi PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
'JVZ
o�w 10 5 0 10 20
NV
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4086
-LREV - STATION 18+79.64
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRA VEN C 0 UN7Y
LOCATION.- SR 1111 (OLD AIRPORT RD)
BRIDGE NO. OVER BRICES CREEK
TYPE OF WORK: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, GUARDRAIL,
PAVINIG, GRADING AND DRAINAGE
BEGIN STRUCTURE
-LREV- STATION 20+62.36
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TJP PROJECT B-4086 = 0.076 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4086 = 0.025 RULES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4086 = 0.101 MILES
�k
END STRUCTURE
-LREV - STATION 21+92.35
�k
o�a
y o z'i
a ala raocr lx a a
8-4086
RIrS llOt10 Rt3r&3ft
-r----- `r=r✓,�I \ � - � \ END TIP PROJECT B-4086
" \:k -LREV - STATION 24+10.70
\ \ ` N,
To sp 0'r
t /
Prewred In tte offloe of,
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1704 N°rtk Groexo Strsrt Orop.ottls, NC 27835
no suAma n sPacmrArra%T
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: I E H. ALUGQQD—
PjtQm= sxcaae
LETTING DATE: I LANG JONES
AUGUST 2010 fl P`o;mc= DESA ` MN"°ZM`
BYDRAULMS ENGMMM
ROADWAY DESrGN
ENGINEER
.DIVISION OF ffiGHiPAYS
SIAM OF NORM CAROLINA
°
,„s
�
I
New Sem
PROJECT
++++
B4086
s
0
1
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCAM
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sieets
C
O�
L
f1
co
o
D
o GRAPHIC SCALES
C
> 50 25 Q 50 100
PLANS
Z
w�
Taw 50 25 Q 50 100
��w y
�Na 'moi PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
'JVZ
o�w 10 5 0 10 20
NV
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4086
-LREV - STATION 18+79.64
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRA VEN C 0 UN7Y
LOCATION.- SR 1111 (OLD AIRPORT RD)
BRIDGE NO. OVER BRICES CREEK
TYPE OF WORK: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, GUARDRAIL,
PAVINIG, GRADING AND DRAINAGE
BEGIN STRUCTURE
-LREV- STATION 20+62.36
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TJP PROJECT B-4086 = 0.076 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4086 = 0.025 RULES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4086 = 0.101 MILES
�k
END STRUCTURE
-LREV - STATION 21+92.35
�k
o�a
y o z'i
a ala raocr lx a a
8-4086
RIrS llOt10 Rt3r&3ft
-r----- `r=r✓,�I \ � - � \ END TIP PROJECT B-4086
" \:k -LREV - STATION 24+10.70
\ \ ` N,
To sp 0'r
t /
Prewred In tte offloe of,
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1704 N°rtk Groexo Strsrt Orop.ottls, NC 27835
no suAma n sPacmrArra%T
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: I E H. ALUGQQD—
PjtQm= sxcaae
LETTING DATE: I LANG JONES
AUGUST 2010 fl P`o;mc= DESA ` MN"°ZM`
BYDRAULMS ENGMMM
ROADWAY DESrGN
ENGINEER
.DIVISION OF ffiGHiPAYS
SIAM OF NORM CAROLINA
°

NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE I: /UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
Cl D
a
m
D
WEDGING DETAIL FOR BRIDGE
NOT TO SCALE
U
ORIG
ORIG
2` 30'-6`(CLEAR ROADWAY)
PROP. APPROX. 11/2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT
Cl
AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER SQ.YD.
1'-2`
PROP. APPROX. 21/2" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE
D1
I19.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 285 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
15'-3`
PROPOSED VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE
D 2
COURSE, TYPE I19.OB, AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER
-
SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH.
PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB,
E1
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
T
EARTH MATERIAL.
U1
CONCRETE CORED SLABS
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE I: /UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
Cl D
a
m
D
WEDGING DETAIL FOR BRIDGE
NOT TO SCALE
U
ORIG
ORIG
2` 30'-6`(CLEAR ROADWAY)
1'-2`
15'-3`
15'-3`
-
-LREV-
3'/4" 2 GL ERG.
GRADE PT.
Ci D
0.02
7" CJ BRG.
D
0.02
31/4" (al CL BRG,
C1
00100100100
00
-1
U1
16'-6'
U1
16'-6'
11 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORED SLAB UNITS =
33'-0`
TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTION (NTS)
-LREV - STA 20+62.36 TO -LREV - STA 2/+9236
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4086 2
OADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
RECEIVED
JUL 2 8 2010
Morehead City DCM
ORIGIF
-LRE-V'- 22+8833 - 24410.70
USE TYPICAL SECTION •2
-LREV - 21+92.36 - 22+88.33
tOUND
BUND
)UND

Lrvty. ITIVI It/ OG"te
*S. U.E. = subsurface Utility Engineering
STATE OF NORTH CARO]LIIiiA
DIVISION OF
HIGHWAYS
CON'VENTIONAL
PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
WATER:
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY•
Water Manhole
10
RAILROADS.
Water Meter
o
State Line -
-
County Line
Standard Gauge ax
Water Valve
RR Signal Milepost
a
EXISTING STRUCTURES.•
Water Hydrant
Township Line
YI FPoST JS
Switch
0
MAJOR:
Recorded UG Water Line
City Line
—
RR Abandoned
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.')-
----•---
Reservation Line —
—
RR Dismantled ----
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
CO,C Kw
Above Ground Water Line
A/C "oto
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
o
RIGHT OF WAY.-
MINOR:
Property ComerBaseline
Control Point
♦
Head and End Wall
N:
Property Monument
O�
Ea
Existing Right of Way Marker
Pipe Culvert
TV Satellite Dish
O
Parcel/Sequence Number
X23
ExistingRi ht of Wa Line
g y
_
Footbridge
TV Pedestal
Existing F Li _><
n6
;. x
i - -
Proposed Fight of Way Line
�y�---
Drainage Pox: ;;etch Basin, DI or 'B
❑�
TV Tower
entad
Proposed Woven Wire Fence -----
-
Proposed Right of Way Line with
poseg y
PGYC6 Ditch Guiter -
-----
U/G 1`V Cable Hand Hole
ER
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Storm Sewer Manhole
OO
Recorded WG TV Cable
Proposed Chain Link Fence
a
Proposed Right of Way Line with
-�-�----�-
Storm Sewer
�
Designated U/G N Cable (S.U.E.')
--^--
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
-�
Concrete or Granite Marker
Existing Wetland Boundary -
- - --- - - -
Existing Control of Access _-
,n,
Recorded U'G Fiber Optic Cable
Proposed Wetland Boundary
-�
Proposed Control of Access
�_
UTILITIES.'W
Designated G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.')--
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
�A
Existing Easement Line --r—
POWER:
j
Existing Power Pole
GAS:
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - -
BUILDINGS AAD OTHER CULTURE'
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement— -
ME
Proposed Power Pole
b
Gas Valve
0
Gas Pump Vent or UG Tank Cap
p
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement —
P-0, E
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed
Gas Meter
o
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
Joint Use Pole
Recorded WG Gas Line
Sign
o
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement
Power Manhole
©
Designated WG Gas Line (S.U.E.')
- - - -°- - -
Well
Proposed Permanent Easement with
Power Line Tower
®
Above Ground Gas Line
`" `-
Small Mine
ST
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
<�>
Power Transformer
Foundation
ROADS AND REL.A= FEATURES
LIG Power Cable Hand Hole
©
SANITARY SEWER:
Area Outline
0
Existing Edge of Pavement -
----
H -Frame Pole
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Cemetery
Existing Curb -----
Recorded U/G Power Line
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
Building
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut - -
- -r. - - -
Designated LPG Power Line (S.U.E.•)
- - - - - - -
LTG Sonitcry Sewer Line
n
School
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill - -
- F - - -
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
A/C Sa It�y S -
Church
proposed Wheel Chair Ramp -
©
TELEPHONE:
Recorded SS Forced Main Line
Dam
Existing Metal Guardrail
Existing Telephone Pole
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.') -
--
HYDROLOGY.'
Proposed Guardrail T
T T
Proposed Telephone Pole
{?-
Stream or Body of Water —...
__
Existing Cable Guiderail
Telephone Manhole
OO
MISCELLANEOUS:
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Proposed Cable Guiderail
I n
Telephone Booth
❑Q
Utility Pole
•
Jurisdictional Stream -�s
_
Equality Symbol
Telephone Pedestal
p
Utility Pole with Base
p
Buffer Zone 1
B: ,
Pavement Removal
®
Telisphone Cell Tower --
,,4
Utility Located Object
O
Buffer Zone 2
c z
VEGETATION.'
WG Telephone Cable Hand Hole
©
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Flow Arrow
Single Tree
Recorded USG Telephone Cable
Utility Unknown UG Line
*^
Disappearing Stream
—
Single Shrub
©
Designated UG Telephone Cable (S.U.E.') -
- - - - - - - -
UG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
�]
Spring - o''
�_
Hedge
Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit
T
AG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
�]
Wetland -
Woods Line ^"'
f
Designated WG Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.'y
- - - -M----
UG Test Hole (S.U.E.')
m
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head DitchTAT
Orchard f3
fl C) 0
Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable
—T I.—
Abandoned According to Utility Records —
AATUR
False Sump
m
Vineyard -
Y
�y�e
��
Designated USG Fiber Optics Coble (S.U.E."�
- - - -T .- - -
End of Information
E.O.I.

(3 ' -
7-106-001
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY
1785 WEYERHAEUSER RD
VANCEBORO,NC 28586
DB 1903 PG 494
DB 1046 PG 43
PARCEL 12 TRACT 2
MB I I PG 9
586.05 AC
BI
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft.
404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft.
STREAM IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft.
FILL REMOVAL = 190 Sq. Ft.
BUFFER ZONE I IMPACTS = 755 Sq. Ft.
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS = 650 Sq. Ft,
+79.64 LLRl
1 2.00 L _
BUFFER ZONE IIMPACTS
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
404 WETLAND IMPACTS 84
+Jj.00 LREV
30.00 LT
+75.00 LREV
35.00 L
]II
+69.29 LR
�\
LT
c -
(A
irrJ 188.10' _
N 33°40'16" W
tr
=9^�
B1
fid_._ iL�>■-- - —��
WOODS
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft.
404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ff.
STREAM IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft.
FILL REMOVAL = 225 Sq. Ft.
BUFFER ZONE I IMPACTS = 630 Sq. Ft.
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS = 380 Sq. Ft.
Ivul GJ:
(1) B-4086 IS ON THE NEW BERN USGS OUAD MAP
AND SHEET NUMBER xx OF THE SOILS SURVEY
OF CRAVEN COUNTY
E (2) FIRM PANEL 5496J. MAP NUMBER 3720549600)
m
a
(3) B-4086 15 IN THE LOWER NEUSE WATERSHED
NUC CODE 03020204
L
m
c (4) BRICE CREEK IS C, SW. NSW
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES APPLY
(5) 8-4086, CRAVEN l0 IS CAMA JURISDICTIONAL AS
PER STEPHEN LANE. NCDCM DECEMBER 4, 2009
(6) FEBRUARY l5 TO JUNE l5 MORATORIUM AS PER
TRAVIS WILSON. NCWRC OCTOBER 30.2009
+75.84 LREV
(;2�\
7-104-12000
Itz.
)cl
ROJEGT RB:MMCE NO. iXBT NO.
v \ WBS ELEMENT NUMBER J3445JJ
SCALE: r-60'
APRIL 15, 2010
\` FOR PERMITTING ONLY;
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
WOODS
Y
OL
BRD CONC \
IDGE SEAT B2
\\
GIQ PIP \
84
NORTH CAROLINA, COASTAL LAND -RUST
131 RACINE DR STE 101
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
DB 2813 PG 6
PLAT CAE H SLIDE 159-0
30.49 LC
NOTE. -BRIDGE HAS WOODEN DECK AND WING
WALLS WITH STEEL I- BEAMS.
THERE 15 NO WAY TO DETERMINE THE HIGH
WATER MARK AT THIS BRIDGE SITE.
lr`. +71.9 I RFV r'
+2.010 H
.-. 30.00 L
83
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft.
404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 225 Sq.Ft.
STREAM IMPACTS = 30 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED PILINGS IN STREAM
BUFFER ZONE l IMPACTS = 990 Sq. Ft.
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS = 805 Sq.Ft.
B2
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq.Ft°
404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 SQ.Ft.
STREAM IMPACTS = 12 Sq.Ft°
PROPOSED PILINGS IN STRt AU
BUFFER ZONE /IMPACTS = 585 Sq.Ft°
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS = 350 Sq. Ft.
lk
o'?. °B3 .
66d g� q,E
0/
7-104-1-001
ERNEST L. REASON JR. & LISA B.
P.O. BOX 12386
NEW BERN, NC 28561
_ DB 2055 PG 418
PLAT CAB G SLIDE 53-A
" 3.29 AC
P +75.34 LR V
p 16.42 LT
SlOol23• \\`�
5.33 F?EV \. `� +10.70 LREV \
16.42 R \. � ` 2.00 LT \
�.
+6 \LREV
F. 12.ao
06eF1pO�- 4. 0
�L �i2 B�
C
k S(C /S26S
V \ o \ 0 'O I 6�, .
O5
7-104-2002
PDWOW LLC
5905 NEUSE RD \
%NTSBORO,NC 28529 \
DB 2396 PG 268 "`���•••\
T CAB G SLIDE 120-H
B-4086 I P/
a�
WCDOT
-
���`�
8-4086 CRAVEN COUNTY
REPLACE BRIIX;E No. lo
y\o`L°\
SR 1111° OLD AIRPORT RD
OVER BR10E CREEK
BETWEEN SR 1101 AND SR /110
CAVA GP,NWP 3.AND BUFFER
AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION
v \ WBS ELEMENT NUMBER J3445JJ
SCALE: r-60'
APRIL 15, 2010
\` FOR PERMITTING ONLY;
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
WOODS
Y
OL
BRD CONC \
IDGE SEAT B2
\\
GIQ PIP \
84
NORTH CAROLINA, COASTAL LAND -RUST
131 RACINE DR STE 101
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
DB 2813 PG 6
PLAT CAE H SLIDE 159-0
30.49 LC
NOTE. -BRIDGE HAS WOODEN DECK AND WING
WALLS WITH STEEL I- BEAMS.
THERE 15 NO WAY TO DETERMINE THE HIGH
WATER MARK AT THIS BRIDGE SITE.
lr`. +71.9 I RFV r'
+2.010 H
.-. 30.00 L
83
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq. Ft.
404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 225 Sq.Ft.
STREAM IMPACTS = 30 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED PILINGS IN STREAM
BUFFER ZONE l IMPACTS = 990 Sq. Ft.
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS = 805 Sq.Ft.
B2
COASTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 Sq.Ft°
404 WETLAND IMPACTS = 0 SQ.Ft.
STREAM IMPACTS = 12 Sq.Ft°
PROPOSED PILINGS IN STRt AU
BUFFER ZONE /IMPACTS = 585 Sq.Ft°
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS = 350 Sq. Ft.
lk
o'?. °B3 .
66d g� q,E
0/
7-104-1-001
ERNEST L. REASON JR. & LISA B.
P.O. BOX 12386
NEW BERN, NC 28561
_ DB 2055 PG 418
PLAT CAB G SLIDE 53-A
" 3.29 AC
P +75.34 LR V
p 16.42 LT
SlOol23• \\`�
5.33 F?EV \. `� +10.70 LREV \
16.42 R \. � ` 2.00 LT \
�.
+6 \LREV
F. 12.ao
06eF1pO�- 4. 0
�L �i2 B�
C
k S(C /S26S
V \ o \ 0 'O I 6�, .
O5
7-104-2002
PDWOW LLC
5905 NEUSE RD \
%NTSBORO,NC 28529 \
DB 2396 PG 268 "`���•••\
T CAB G SLIDE 120-H

0
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
188.10'
N 33°40'16, W �8-4086 Pl
NCDOT
7-106-001 � 5� / �' �B-4086 CRAVEN COUNTY COMPANY REPLACE BRIDGE N0.10
1785 WEYERHAEUSER RD / SR I111,OLD AIRPORT RD
VANCEBORO, NC 28586 iP�a�C� $ / OVER BRICE CREEK
o
D B 190 3 P G 4 94 h ti 6Z $ )S �7�
BETWEEN SR 1101 AND SR 1110
1e N 69O CAMA GP,NWP 3,AND BUFFER
DB 1046 PG 43 a is �" AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION
PARCEL "2 TRACT 2 39.3 '43' WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 33445JJ
MB I I PG 9 y�
586.05 AC cn o� 47'91 WOODS SCALE: F=60'
APRIL l5, 20/0
�a tiOO ER FOR PERMITTING ONLY:
BUFFE 2 \ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
o ER ZON
EXCAVATION = 190 Sq. Ft. R 5GoNE. gUFN�I ZCl \
BUpNE 2 Z 3 �� ? B2 \ RECEIVED
EXCAVATION = 97 Sq.Ft.
BEGIN GRASS SWALE AT STATION /8+79.64 Lt.-LREV- JUL9 2U10
END GRASS SWALE AT STATION 20+45 Lt.-LREV- s
orehead City DCM
s dr
S
08 3g
+75.00 LREV
66e• �29•F
35.00 LT `' \ BM"I
EL- STA 21+96.69 PROPOSED FUNNEL \
+7 R V i � � � 74.99' LT AND FUNNEL DRAIN
30.00 LT — ELEV=5.66' STD. 820.01
O
OLD COEAT � DISSRPATOR
+ 0,41 V BRIDGE B2 STD. 876.02 7-104-I-001
3 00 LT IP PROPO�}LRIP RAPT ERNEST L. REASON JR. & LISA B.
` B/ �F \ 1 P.O. BOX 12386
` — DIFFUSE FLOC' THROUGH NEW BERN, NC 28561
— ' IO SPECIAL SEDIMENT DB 2055 PG 418
CONTROL FENCE PLAT CAB G SLIDE 53-A
` BRIDGE •10 1 \ � � � � 3.29 AC
BUFFER ZONE I IMPACTS
TYPE p) \ TL \ \ \
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS �. \ ��
PROPOSED RIP RAP +71.93 LR V s\
WOODS 30.00 LT-\ 30.00 L R V
�0
NER
404 WETLAND IMPACTS BEGIN GRASS SWALE AT STATION 18+79.64 Rt.-LREV- \ F — PAT
,I � � \
END GRASS SWALE AT STATION 20+45 Rt.-LREV- gym\ \ S o 0823• \ \�
8
B4 \
EXCAVATION = 225 Sq.Ft. °\ `
s90.
O ✓s � 9�.
A
7 -104 -12000 s\ l 4�A0OF6' 6 L O
NOTES:
NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL LAND TRUST �� J JF`��d �\ O `�\ qT�B FQ� r�y °O
131 RACINE DR STE 101
(l) B-4086 /S ON THE NEW BERN USGS QUAD MAP m Q _
WILMINGTON, NC 28403 c�'
AND SHEET NUMBER 12 OF THE SOILS SURVEY DB 2873 PG 6 Bl �� k Jia eTp. \� T OSo
PLAT CAB H SLIDE 159-G /SQ3A
S qYi
OF CRAVEN COUNTY
30.49 AC
(2)FIRM PANEL 5496), MAP NUMBER 3720549600) ✓� 8039' i c��`�` \ ` T
" NOTE: EXISTING BRIDGE HAS��yyOODEN DECK `
(3) B-4086 /S IN THE LOWER NEUSE WATERSHED AND DING FALLS WITH STEEE I- BEAMS. FF ` 6'16°
HUC CODE 03020204 THERE IS NO 14AY TO DETERMINE THE HIGH j�� >) 78.66'
o
*A IS A K AT THIS BRIDGE SITE. �F�\ 2
(4) BRICE CREEK IS C. SW, NSW B3 °o�2d s S ✓s /9 5 `
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES APPLY EXCAVATION = 168 Sq.Ft. 2093ul 9
w f5) 8-4086, CRAVEN l0 IS CAMA JURISDICTIONAL AS 9229y \✓S P -10 2002
a PER STEPHEN LANE, NCDCM DECEMBER 4,2009 5905 NEUSE RD
(6) FEBRUARY l5 TO JUNE /5 MORATORIUM AS PER �� GRANTSBORO, NC 28529\
wo DB 2396 PG 268
TRAVIS WILSON, NCWRC OCTOBER 30. 2009 / PLAT CAB
GA
SLIDE 120-H \

SHEET NO.

RECEIVED
JUL 2 9 2010
Morehead City DCM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
DATUM DESCRIPTION
R LWA(AD ®lYR snits EROEA ri %vs romo
g is a= W rE STATE PLIE (mIYAs sSTialso A
a AM FW IprsOrl "t -OW,.
JIM
W WS SrArt FLEE 0I0 (T)IIIIIIYRS 0
IOtsli+ M?j1.2MTII1 LxSTIW 73TIR.ns+T/1+
TE xEOLQ (70011I112 Will FILTM WEII W MIS mmol
1IIIIMAIII IT 110+ IM L9"NM
TE LL LxLSPT 0110 EEIE AM
ISAIAO oI1PITxL Wu OISIKE FSW
}qi-I" ITS {Er• suilo u.K" is
S IP42"r s 1.04nfr
AL LISW OIIE16106 L< SWAIM "MIMA OiSTMILSS
K CA 11fi101 gy IS 0001 W
18
uAMWW
-LREV- PROFILE
WALE* r.W EAM.
1,10' VLltv.
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
\M CII �p CA(q,
SFIL�1
` IenO 1an0
9 �+roix\0 hclx\n
HYDRAULIC DATA
NATURAL 10 yr. ■S EL. -4.8
E)OSTNC 10 yr. K EL.•4.9
PROPOSED IO yr. WS EL, -4.9
E"IOTSTf1O yr. WS IL. -S.9
yr MS EL.•6J
PROPOSED 25 yr. tS EL. -LO
NATURAL 100 yr. WS EL. -?.4
EIOSTNO IDO yr. AS EL: 7.5
PROPOSED 100 yr. RS EL. -T.5
OVERTOPPOlG OfORl1AT10N
�fSTOW ees