51161_WILLIAMS, KAY_20080717

❑ CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL �n /
GENERAL PERMIT /
❑ New ,, ❑ Modification ❑ Complete Reissue ❑ Partial Reissue
Previous permit #
Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources , y hr
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC % [ I. (- n
`CQRules attached.
Applicant Name ii Project Location: County '� ; , +i �, C.
1.`
Address `t C"' v,CX ! Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) L.; 4-.
CiTo State ;`c' ZIP
Phone # O Fax # O-^'�
Authorized Agent (r) {}'I -
Affected ❑ CW ❑ EW ❑ PTA [9 ES ❑ PTS
AEC(s): ❑ 0EA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
❑ PWS: ❑ FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no
Subdivision
City ZIP �` C
Phone # ( `%,T-),� �cy� River Basin
Adj. Wtr. Body �Z� "!" C� t U�� at:/man /unkn)
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body i � ! �, 1 L T
E■■E■■■■■■■■O■■■1ffilEa■■i�NN■l Ir i■■!I■7■■■
EMMEMMOMME ■MENEM
.
■■■■■■■■■M
M:::■■■
■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NONE■■■
■
■ONES■ENE■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■E■
NOON■■
IIMMMIMMMMMMMM
■
E■E■EENE■NEEN■EE■■N■■E■■E■■E■■■■IIN■
0
■
EN■■■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■NEE
■■C�;■.■■...■...�■NIMUMNERE
17M
ME=
ommom
ENE■■■ENEENEENEEr�L9ii!!!!`IIiENENN
MESON
offla
MEMO
■■
NOON■
■■■
MMENEWSMEM1111r�■
11■ENE■
M
FRI
M.
-.1Y-
I
Aw__4
f/•._.Ail�•i�ll`���
A
1,
AIL
4
■■■■1E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■E■ELONESOMENESS
E■■;
IMMISMOMMEMME
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■NEE■
INS■■■■■■■■■■:.■■■■■■■:
.21
61,9.�
n
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
(
Signature Pleas r ad ompliancestatementonback ofp�rit
Application Fee(s) Check #
Pe it Officer's ignatu e
-Ili 70? %O�
Issuing Date ^ Expiration Date
Local Planningjurisdiction Rover ile Nam

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
- Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer ru e�___'�'
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office Morehead City Headquarters
Mailing Address: 400 Commerce Ave
1638 Mail Service Center Morehead City, NC 28557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 252-808-2808/ 1-888-4RCOAST
Location: Fax: [phone]
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

NCDENR r
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor James H. Gregson, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Date
Applicant Name 4, (/ P)ILLI 4 M-S
Mailing Address /
I certify that I have authorized (agent) .6_ 6,,W-tact on my
behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA Permits necessary to
install or construct (activity)
at (location) \c�C st v� 6�-vt L
This certification is valid thru (date)
Signature k/'Z'C��--
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Intemet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 501/6 Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER
FORM
Name of individual applying for the permit:
Address of property:IXT-40-!l A-UZ14AI r- .S �
fy� (Lot or street#, street of road)
(city & county)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has described to me (as shown on the attached
drawing) the development they are proposing. A description or drawing, with
dimensions, should be provided with this letter.
have no objections to this proposal -
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, 400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone]
within 10 days of receipt of the notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
Waiver Section
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift or
sandbags must be set back a minimum distance of 15' From my area of riparian
access unless waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the
appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement
Signature Date
J"s- e, 14, /fie/ /J
Print Name
-�'5'�? - C� 9 9— / z CD/
Telephone number with area code

From:Greene & Wilson, P.A. 252 634 3484 07/09/2008 08:34 #963 P.004/004
CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER
FORM
Name of individual applying for the permit: `� 1
Address of property:
f
«a,- ur�+oaa,
we- A-97st—w'stred
ncic' -
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has described to me (as shown on the attached
drawing) the development they are proposing. A description or drawing, with
dimensions, should be provided with this letter.
r
I have no objections to this proposal V464
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, 400 Commerce Ave_, Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone]
within 10 days of receipt of the notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by Certified MaiL
Waiver Section
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift or
sandbags must be set back a minimum distance of 15' From my area of riparian
access unless waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the
appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15'setback requirement
X 1 do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement
Signature Da
R V efts C prtQ,i Z�
Print Name
!IL g •
Telephone number with area code
p'd VAP6-fib7.-7.G7 Nn i 1nN 1 CNnn NnnuH-) ,� gpnp d7n:cn Qn 177 unr

GREENE & WILSON, P.A.
KELLY L. GREENE
THOMAS R. WILSON
-�' G -os

CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUEST
DIVISION OF COASTAL MAN Favea MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION .
FORM ltl9k Y 2008
Name of individual applying for the permit: �/4 IMLLIArep 8d City DC
9
Address of property:
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has described to me (as shown on the attached
drawing) the development they are proposing. A description or drawing, with
dimensions, should be provided with this letter.f �j
w4v4�
I have no objections to this proposalJGZz`�"`C
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, 400 Commerce Ave_, Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone]
within 10 days of receipt of the notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
Waiver Section
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift or
sandbags must be set back a minimum distance of 15' From my area of riparian
access unless waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you mast initial the
appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement
X � I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement
Signature Da
R r> Pyt m V� . C p�Q �-
Print Name
1L 4t - 660 - 53S5
Telephone number with area code
p,-d tPPR-Ft7.-7q7 Nni i nnm 1 cninn NlnOPV) Aqanq d7n-C'n on 1-,7 unr

W
GREENE & WILSON, P.A.
409 Pollock Street ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P.O. Box 1676
New Bern, North Carolina 28563
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9 July 2008
Mr. Gene Crow
Bobby Cahoon Construction, Inc.
6003 Neuse Rd.
Grantsboro, NC 28529
Re: Carr Riparian Notification Letter for Proposed Shoreline Development at Lot #4
Indian Bluffs (Ms. Kay Williams' property)
Dear Gene:
This letter is to memorialize the discussions at our meeting held on Ms. Kay Williams'
property, Lot #4 Indian Bluffs, Section 1, in Pamlico County, North Carolina. On 2 July
2008, you, Judge Carr, and I met at the proposed construction site to discuss Ms.
Williams proposed shoreline development.
At that meeting we discussed the following terms and objectives for the proposed
development:
l . That there would be as little disturbance as possible to the existing tree -line at the
top of Ms. Williams' bluff;
2. That, using an existing open area in the tree line at the top of the bluff, there
would be a "driveway" down the face of the bluff, as narrow as possible, used to
reach and undertake the riprap/shoreline stabilization development;
3. That at the toe of the of the proposed development and running the entire distance
of the shoreline of Ms. Williams property (from Mr. Carr's property line to the
western adjacent property line), a "Geoweb" approximately 6 inches deep and
eight feet wide, filled with granite stone, would be installed;
4. That the toe of the development would be approximately eight feet landward of
Mr. Carr's outer most sea wall, at about the point of the second piling on Mr.
Carr's sea wall;
5. That you estimated approximately 12,000 cubic yards of fill would be dumped on
the site prior to placement of riprap;
6. That the riprap height would not be significantly higher than the first tier of Mr.
Carr's sea wall as it ran up the bluff;
www.greenewilson.com

Page 2
9 July 2008
Letter to Gene Crow
7. That riprap and fill would be placed in a manner to support Mr. Carr's existing
retaining walls and seawall, of greatest concern being the portion of Mr. Carr's
retaining wall beginning to slope towards Ms. Williams' property due to the
erosion of Ms. Williams' bluff; and,
8. That Mr. Carr's largest concern is at his adjacent property line at the top of the
bluff. We discussed that no work is being shown here on the current drawings,
but that we understand the plan is to do some development at this point. We
discussed that any cutting or pushing over of the bluff at this point will cause Mr.
Carr's property to cave toward the Williams' property. Therefore, we discussed
that some type of preventative measures will have to be taken before the cut or
pushing over of the bluff is done as this particular point.
It was a real pleasure meeting you. I know Mr. Carr has confidence in your work.
Therefore, in light of the representations you made regarding the proposed development,
Mr. Carr does not have any objections to Ms. Williams moving forward with her
shoreline development.
With Warmest Regards,
A/� U
)2-
Thomas R. Wilson
cc. Judge Carr (via electronic mail)
Division of Coastal Management, Ms. Tere Barrett

NOV 1 J 2007
November 15, 2007 Morehead City DCM
Robert W. Carr, Jr. — Owner
47 Indian Bluff Drive
Arapahoe, North Carolina, 28510
Mr. Brad Connell
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Re: Land Improvements to 65 Indian Bluff Drive —Pamlico County, NC
Kay Williams —Property owner-65 Indian Bluff Drive
Dear Mr. Connell,
This is to advise you that I have now received a second sketch with a cover letter dated November
13, 2007 on the proposed work on the above referenced property owner's land. There are several
changes to this sketch when compared to the original sketch. (I am enclosing a copy for your
records.)
Again, and unfortunately there are some significant factual errors on this sketch as was the case
with the original sketch. I hope you understand my deep concern that these sketches are so flawed
that neither the property owner, nor the contractor fully understands the true complexity of this
project. In my opinion this project cannot be accomplished as shown without severe damage to
my property.
Let me attempt to explain where I notice errors in this most recent sketch. There are THREE
separate bulkhead walls on my property. (The sketch only shows TWO!) The walls are stacked on
top of each other and there is approximately fifteen feet of sand and plantings between the top of
my second wall and the top of my third wall. Again the sketch only shows TWO of my bulkhead
walls omitting this sand/plantings area between the second and third wall.
Now look to the left and you will see a "wavy line" called "Top of Property". This line is taken
straight off the top of my SECOND bulkhead wall per the sketch. As I mentioned above there is
at least another FIFTEEN FEET of elevation above the top of my second wall and the top of my
THIRD bulkhead wall! Where is this fifteen feet of sand/plantings and the third wall shown on
the contractor's sketch??
So, for argument's sake lets assume the contractor is considering my second wall is my third wall
and that is where he designates as "upper level". Therefore we will assume the wavy line which is
the "Top of Property" line is taken straight off the top of my THIRD wall.
_J

Page 2
Mr. $rad Connell,
a
I
November 15, 2007 N0
V
l L1oro
So with this assumption the contractor would have to go back toward the street at a con,,%
distance in order to have adequate sand to provide a reasonable sloe on the bank. The worst
P P .Y
problem with this design is there would be an approximate FIFTEEN -foot drop from my back
yard property elevation to the new elevation of the above referenced property and nothing is
shown to hold my property in place. At this shear drop at the property line considerable sand
would have to be brought in from off site to accomplish this as drawn. Is the contractor figuring to
do this?
Again, I am requesting two additional drawings for ALL of us to better understand what is
proposed here. ---1,) a section drawn through the bank from the MHW level to the "Top of
Property" line and 2.) a section drawn at the property line between the two properties and I want
this section taken from about ten feet back of my third wall.
I also request a meeting with a representative from your office at the property site to discuss this
project in full. Please call me when this can be arranged.
Until we have this meeting I continue my objection to this work because the sketch provided is
factually flawed and again is to vagued to understand what the contractor is planning to do.
With best regards.
Sincerely,
Robert W. "Judge" Carr, Jr.
P.O. Box 1594
Durham, North Carolina, 27702
Enclosures

NOV-1%3-2007 04:40P FROM:
TO:19196844860 P.2
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
(Bulkhead/rip rap)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to 1604 4.,, 's
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at &,s��i *9��y �✓�
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.) /J
on /U�� i:� in �- / m . �c , N.C.
(Water body) JoN6 and/or County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at the
location, and, I have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTSI,L
(to beoiled in by individualproposing development) �� ti� ,,�OF 0�
R0 1
a N
Foley & Foley Contractors, Inc.
Phone#: [phone]
Fax# [phone]
Signature
Print or Type Name
Telephone Number
Date

H V-1+3-2007 04:39P FROM: TO:19196844860 P.1
Foley & Foley Contractors, Inc.
1810 Old Airport Rd.
New Bern, NC 28562
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Send To: Form:
Robert W. Carr Jr. Dan Foley
Attention:
Date -
November 13.2007
Re(#
Kay Williams P 1651ndian Bluffs Dr.
Fax Number
Phone Number
91948"860
252-636-2515
Total Pages, including cover sheet: 2
Kay William/Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Statement
65 Indian Bluffs Dr.
Arapahoe, NC 28510

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/W City 0CM
Name of individual applying for Permit: Kay Williams
Address of Property: 65 Indian Bluff Dr.
Arapahoe/Pamlico
(Lot or Street #, Street or Road, City & County)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing
the development they are proposing. A description or drawing, with dimensions, should
be provided with this letter.
I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, 400 Commerce Ave, Morehead City, NC, 28557 or call [phone]
within 10 days of receipt of this notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift or sandbags
must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless
waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank
below)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
Signature Date
Print Name
a5a_a4-q-)9DI
Telephone Number With Area Code
Foley & Foley Contractors
Phone#: [phone]
Fax#: [phone]

15 NCAC 7H .1102 has been proposed to be amended as follows:
1102 APPROVAL PROCEDURES
(b) The applicant must provide: .A $?Q0>
Confirmation that a written statement has been obtained signed by thy,
adjacent riparian property owners indicating that they have no objection&Z
to the proposed work, or, �®
(2) Confirmation that the adjacent riparian property owners have been
notified by certified mail of the proposed work. Such notice should
instruct adjacent property owners to provide any comments on the
proposed development in writing for consideration by permitting officials
to the Division of Coastal Management within 10 days of receipt of the
notice, and, indicate that no response will be interpreted as no objection.
DCM staff will review all comments and determine, based on their
relevance to the potential impacts of the proposed project, if the proposed
project can be approved by a General Permit. If DCM staff finds that the
comments are worthy of more in-depth review, the applicant will be
notified that he must submit an application for a major development
permit.
HistoryNote: Statutory Authority G.S. 113A-107(a);
113A-107(b); 113A-113(b); 113A-118.1; 113A-124;
Eff. March 1, 1984;
Amended Eff. January 1, 1990; December 1, 1987.

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMEI�
(Bulkhead/rip rap) N�✓
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to L%,zi + 's BeOp,�
(Nalne of Property 0wii6q(x
property located at �� �w�.��A /���{ zr • , 4/0•
�
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on�l9�ut� l2� v►i in d �"' rh . Lc N.C.
(Water body) ( own and/or County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at the
location, and, I have no objections to his proposal. jX- -S� avae" '5�'
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(to be filled in by individual proposing development)
:c-
1
Foley & Foley Contractors, Inc.
Phone#: [phone]
Fax# [phone]
Signature
E-f i s -A- -E'o h Nun
Print or Type Name
�a — 9k4q — IS©(
Telephone Number
Nam, /' -a'q07
Date

Page 1 of 2
Site: 65 INDIAN BLUFF DR
F994-1-��
F094-1 s7
00
09
F994-1 <5 " �_ FOOW
c
9 Q F9
�9 9
F 9 94 -1 -4;�
1889
., - a S -3 �r� 286
3 F994-1 -2
1'
Property Details:
START
479
UNIQUEID 11476
ACCTNUM �I
4503
LASTNAME
WILLIAMS, KAY P.
FIRSTNAME -�
CAREOF
ADDR1
P.O. BOX 1295
ADDR2
CITY
NEW BERN
STATE
NC
ZIP 1128560
PARRECNUM
2520
[NAME
WILLIAMS, KAY P.
MAPNO -�
F094-1-4
CONTROLNUM
PIN
CLSCODE
MB
DISTTOWN
D05
INSERT
F094
JIDBLCIR
[BLOCK
1
PARCELNO
14
SITEADDIR
1165 INDIAN BLUFF DR
SITUSADDR
65
SITUSROAD
INDIAN BLUFF DR
JEXEMPT
LEGDESCI
LOT 4 INDIAN BLUFFS
LEGDESC2
ON RIVER INDIAN BLUFF DR
TOTACRES
10
CRNTTOTUEE
0
CRNTTOTDEF i�
0
CRNTLANDVA
85571
CRNTBADGVA
0
CRNTOBLDGV
2470
TOTCRNTVAL
1188041
FIRECODE
JA
HOUSECODE -�
SEWERCODE
SALEAMNT �[0
-
SALEDATE
3/312003
7SALEDATE2
73872
SALECODE
ROADNUM --�
0
JPCTCOMP 1
100
WILLBOOK
10
WILLPAGE
0
DB_PG
395/635
DEEDBOOK
395
DEEDPAGE
635
PLAT
15-Aug
i
vv�
It
http: //www2. undersys. com/scriptsltestadvlusiwebpc. dlllusi? formis=ptmap&MouseX=O&... 10/3 /2007

(f oLc4.,,/MhO''eo,

ROBERT W. C.ARR JR.
P.O. SOX 1594
DURNAM, NORTH CAROUNA 27702
IDUKE
ROBERT W. "JUDGE" CARR, JR. E'71
SENIOR ASSOCIATE DEAN
rvSCHO rxnrr,I"_' FOR DEVELOPMENT
WUM
SCHOOL OF
ENGINEERING AND ALUMNI AFFAIRS
DUKE UNIVERSITY
305 TEER ENGINEERING BUILDING [phone]
BOX 90271 FAX: [phone]
DURNAM, NC 27708-0271 [e-mail]
Mr. Brad Connell
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557

DUKE
IN ROBERT W. "JUDGE" CARR, JR. E'71
SENIOR ASSOCIATE DEAN
EDMuhVT.mTaT, lx. FOR DEVELOPMENT
-SCHOOL OF AND ALUMNI AFFAIRS
LENGINEERING
DUKE UNIVERSITY 919 660-5385
305 TEER ENGINEERING BUILDING FAX: [phone]
BOX 90271 [e-mail]
DURHAM, NC 27708-0271

PIC,r�
Nov7 2007
November 5, 2007 Wrehea ci City DCM
Robert W. Carr, Jr. — Owner
47 Indian Bluff Drive
Arapahoe, North Carolina, 28510
Mr. Brad Connell
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Re: Land Improvements to 65 Indian Bluff Drive —Pamlico County, NC
Kay Williams —Property owner-65 Indian Bluff Drive
Mr. Connell,
This is in response to a letter that I received concerning some proposed development changes to
the adjacent property (65 Indian Bluff Drive) to our property, (47 Indian Bluff Drive) in Pamlico
County, North Carolina.
First let me say that I am pleased to learn that the property owner of 65 Indian Bluff Drive is at
long last considering some improvements to the above referenced property which has become, in
my estimation, a serious and grave hazard to any unsuspecting trespasser who might walk out for
a view of the river on this property. There are no warning signs or barriers preventing someone
from falling forty feet straight down off the cliff of this property! I cannot imagine what a
property owner is thinking who would open themselves up to this type of liability!
Also, because of the above referenced property owner's lack of reasonable responsibility of
maintaining some minimum upkeep of their property, and being a "good" neighbor, it has caused
us adjacent property owner's considerable expense on our part to maintain our properties to
protect our dwellings from damage from erosion caused from the neglect by the above referenced
property owner.
Having stated the above let me direct the remainder of this letter to comments on the "sketch" that
we received pertaining to the specific work proposed on the above referenced property. (I would
hope that your office will require something with considerable more details than what has been
provided so far!)
The sketch as it is now drawn is factually flawed, and is entirely too vague for me approve this
work! Therefore, I OBJECT to the proposed work until it is better clarified to my
satisfaction. I will also request that this be done in a meeting with the above referenced
property owner or the property owner's representative.
There are many ways to achieve what I guess the above referenced property owner is attempting

Page 2
Mr. Brad Connell
November 5, 2007
to do here, and that is to make this property more inviting to be purchased. (It has been on the
market for quite some time now.) I submit that the proposed solution is probably the cheapest and
most expedient to accomplish this. HOWEVER, I will also submit it is the LEAST desirable
solution from an adjacent property owner's point of view!!!!!
Specifically here are my concerns:
1. The drawing is factually flawed because (facing the property from the river) the above
referenced property owner is encroaching on my property on the right hand side starting
at my existing lower bulkhead and going up the bank by at least eight feet or more at the
top. Obviously this is unacceptable!
2. The sketch is entirely too vague to understand totally what the above referenced property
owner is doing and what the property will look like when the work is completed.
3. 1 am assuming that the above referenced property owner is coming out 16 feet from each
adjacent property line and then is more or less pushing the existing cliff over toward the
river by cutting the bank down to the river bed. The height of the bank is approximately
forty feet so is the referenced property owner beginning this cut from forty feet back on
the property for a one to one slope? A two to one slope? What?
This is important to me as the adjacent property owner because the steepness of the slope has a
direct impact to how stable the property will be where the sixteen feet is to remain. By cutting
the slope the above referenced property owner will weaken this sixteen feet, which could cause
it to cave in bringing my property with it. This would cause me to lose my garden and adjacent
landscaping not mentioning the peril it could bring to the foundation of my dwelling.
4. The amount of granite rock that is to be deposited on the bank after the earthwork is
complete will determine how stable the bank will be. The sketch gives no indication to
the amount of granite rock that will used! One layer, three layers, what? And again this
all goes back to stability of the bank at our property line!
5. The sketch indicates that granite rock will be placed next to my existing wood bulkhead
walls. l have no objection to this, however if this granite is not placed with care it will
cause my wood bulkhead to split or break. I will expect this to be repaired to my
satisfaction including the replacement of my bulkhead wall if necessary. A letter of
agreement will have to be signed between me and the above referenced property owner to
this point before I will approve the work to be done.
6. In order to better understand the total work to the adjacent property I would like
additional drawings with stated dimensions --one in "plan," and one --a cross section
through where the rock as it will be typically placed on the bank and on the adjacent
property bank at the sixteen foot area. I think granite rock should be placed over the
whole area at the sixteen -foot area and at the proper depth to prevent possible
erosion.

Page 3
Mr. Brad Connell
November 5, 2007
7. I will assume and ask that filter cloth be placed under wherever the granite rock will be
placed.
8. I have serious concerns that when this project is complete all existing vegetation, trees,
bushes, etc. will be removed leaving this property completely barren, except for granite
rock. This could necessarily lower the value of my property and at the very least add
another scar to our already fragile environment.
9. There are no erosion fences or other erosion control devices shown to prevent erosion
from occurring on our property during the construction period. This will be required
before we will approve the work on the above referenced property.
10. There is no grass or other minimum landscaping indicated on the sketch to prevent
erosion at the completion of the project. Though we may not be able to require this I hope
the referenced property owner will consider this as part of the project.
11. Any and all damage to my property as a result of the work on the above referenced
property will be repaired to my satisfaction. A letter of agreement will have to be signed
between me and the referenced property owner to this point before I will approve the
work to be done.
12. I will require a meeting of the above property owner and/or representative of the above
property owner to have a clear understanding of the work to be accomplished before I
will approve any work to begin.
I have left a message on your machine and look forward to discussing this letter with you.
With best regards.
Sincerely,
Robert W. "Judge" Carr, Jr.
P.O. Box 1594
Durham, North Carolina, 27702
Enclosures

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of individual applying for Permit: Kay Williams
Address of Property: 65 Indian Bluff Dr.
Arapahoe/Pamlico
(Lot or Street #, Street or Road, City & County)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing
the development they are proposing. A description or drawing, with dimensions, should
be provided with this letter.
I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, 400 Commerce Ave-, Morehead City, NC, 28557 or call [phone]
within 10 days of receipt of this notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift or sandbags
must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless
waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank
below)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
Signature Date
Foley & Foley Contractors
Print Name Phone#: [phone]
Fax#: [phone]
Telephone Number With Area Code

15 NCAC 7H .1102 has been proposed to be amended as follows:
1102 APPROVAL PROCEDURES
(b) The applicant must provide:
W-Confirmation that a written statement has been obtained signed by the
adjacent riparian property owners indicating that they have no objections
to the proposed work, or,
(2) Confirmation that the adjacent riparian property owners have been
notified by certified mail of the proposed work. Such notice should
instruct adjacent property owners to provide any comments on the
proposed development in writing for consideration by permitting officials
to the Division of Coastal Management within 10 days of receipt of the
notice, and, indicate that no response will be interpreted as no objection.
DCM staff will review all comments and determine based on their
relevance to the potential impacts of the proposed project, if the proposed
project can be approved by a General Permit. If DCM staff finds that the
comments are worthy of more in-depth review, the applicant will be
notified that he must submit an application for a major development
permit.
HistoryNote: Statutory Authority G.S. 113A-107(a);
113A-107(b); II3A-113(b); 113A-118.1; 113A-124;
Eff. March 1, 1984;
Amended Eff. January 1, 1990; December 1, 1987.

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
(Bulkhead/rip rap)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to LC2' i s
(Nalne of Property Owner)
property located �xo 14 fie'
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on/V�ur� /2, �_� in d It�� fi . , N.C.
(Water body) ( own and/or County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at the
location, and, I have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(to be filled in by individual proposing development)
f6 16, �� o
p 0 Q, oC--) rX;a►
n00 C)60
G� oo 6 b o b°
a
Foley & Foley Contractors, Inc.
Phone#: [phone]
Fax# [phone]
Signature
Print or Type Name
Telephone Number
Date

• Site: 65 INDIAN BLUFF DR
t
n 094-
F0 94 -1
�� n' 0 9
0046
1 _ O
9�
�r4 ,r 06 889
9 �� 1 r'
Property Details:
START 479 UNI QUEI D 476
ACCTNUM 4503 LASTNAME WILLIAMS, KAY P.
FIRSTNAME CAREOF
ennR-1 11P O ROX 1995 HADDR2
L. . ,
CITY
I - -
NEW BERN
STATE
NC
2 P
28560
PARRECNUM
2520
NAME
WILLIAMS, KAY P.
MAPNO
I F094-1-4
L ONTROLNU M I !PIN
CLSCODE MB DISTTOWN D05
lticFcrr 11 Fng4 IDBLC R
[BLOCK
1
PARCELNO
4
SITEADDR
65 INDIAN BLUFF DR
— —
SITUSADDR
65
SITUSROAD
11INDIAN BLUFF DR
EXEMPT
LEGDESCI
LOT 4 INDIAN BLUFFS
LEGDESC2
ON RIVER INDIAN BLUFF DR
TOTACRES
110
t CRNTTOTUSE
110
CRNTTOTDEF
0
CRNTLANDVA
85571
CRNTBLDGVA
0
CRNTOBLDGV
2470
TOTCRNTVAL
88041
FIRECODE
A
HOUSECODE
SEWERCODE
SALEAM NT
0
SALEDATE
3l31 i2003
SALEDATE2
73872
SALECODE
ROADNUM
00
JPCTCOMP
100
WILLBOOK
0
WILLPAGE
110
DB PG
395/635
DEEDBOOK
395
DEEDPAGE
11635
IPLAT
15-Aug
http://www2.undersys.comlscripts; testadv!uslwebpc.dlllusl"forml's�ptmap&MouseX=O&... 10%3/2007

NOV-13-2007 04:00P FROM: T0:2473330 P.1
Foley & Foley Contractors, Inc.
1810 Old Airport Rd.
New Bern, NC 28562
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Send To:
Form:
Terry
Dec Foley
Attention:
Date:
Novevnher 13, 2007
Refl1 Judd Carr
Kay Williams Pry rt /65 Indian Bluffs Dr.
Fax Number
Phone Nutnber
274-3330
252-636-2515
Total Pages, including cover sheet: 4
rnmmpntQ!
Kay William/Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Statement
65 Indian Bluffs Dr.
Arapahoe, NC 28510

NOV-13-2007 04:01P FROM:
TO:2473330 P.2
Foley & Foley Contractors, Inc.
1810 Old Airport Rd.
New Bern, NC 28562
Phone: [phone] ] 5
Fax: [phone]
Send To:
Form:
Robert W_ Carr Jr.
Dan Fole
Attention:
Date:
November 13 2007
Refit
Kay Williams Proa /65 Indian Bluffs Dr,
Fax Number
Phone Number
919-6844860
252-636-2515
Total Pages, including cover sheet: 2
Comments:
Kay Willis m/Adj acent Riparian Property Owner Statement
65 Indian Bluffs Dr.
Arapahoe, NC 28510
©�S��e,

NOV-13-2007 04:01P FRCM:
TO: R. 3
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
(Bulkhead/tip rap)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to 16dv It), ) i J'0.,, 's
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at �S �i �� � J D
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on /l]g,1I_lr r �» in ^fit / ZdFi , �- �il� , 4c2 , N.C.
(Water body) —� (ToA and/or County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at the
location, and, I have no objections to his proposal.
proposingDESCREMON AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVE] "V-
op
1 a;ma i a7'��:,
M
Foley & Foley Contractors, Inc.
Phone#: [phone]
Fax# [phone]
J.V }'? fZ46 - � 0 4 Roc K
Signature
Print or Type Name
Telephone '_Dumber
Date
kAd

NOU-13-2007 04:01P FROM: TO:2473330 PA
Sending Conf i-rm
Date : NOV-13-2007 TUE 04:54PM
Name
Tel,
Phone [phone]
Pages 2
Start Time 11-13 04:39PM
Elapsed Time 00'43"
Mode ECM
Result Ok

I

BOBBY CAHOON
MARINE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
DBA BOBBY CAHOON NEUSE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
6003
GRA H �2 O O,,9 C 8529
PAY TO THE
ORDER OF .
W
�l(
ujI 1 ICLns 511(1
68 48 281�'
it. 00 5 5 L 71I' I:0 5 3000 2 191: 20000 L 4
WACHOVIA BANK, NA
BAYBORO, NC 28515
66-21I530
:h
5517
DOLLARS 8