30279_PEREIRA, CHARLES M_20020626

7fa
CAMA V—DREDGE & FILL VIP Fr�', 1;`!f N V 3, 6 tfg
GENERAL PERMIT i-Previous permit #
-New Modification Complete Reissue Partial Reissue JUL 0 1 200'ZDate previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pulisuant to 15A NCAC
Applicant Name -A AkL6$ M - fiz4
Address_-&q- CV.
City —OEN State NI! ZIP 217-7+
Phone # Fax #
Authorized Agent J C-
Affected --CW '�EW I\"A JES E PTS
AEC(s): OEA F-1 HHF El IH E UBA E N/A
PWS: OFC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes /--no Crit. Hab. yes / no
Project Location: County
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)__
Subdivision
City' ZIP
Phone# River Basin
Adj. Wtr. Body NTIt
fhat /man /unkn)
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity f-)L,
(Scale: krjS
Pier (dock) length X i
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
f
Groin length
number
144
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
ma
x
ax distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift -4-
Beach Bulldozing
Other
fA
Shoreline Length
SAM not sure yes no Z-
Sandbags: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes no I I `7
Photos: yes) no
Q L4
Waiver Attached: yes --kLJ
A building permit may be required by: C See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature **'Please read compliance statement on back of permit"
Application Fee(s) Check #
Peennit,Officer's'Signature
Issuing Date Expiration Date
Local PlanningJuriscliction Rover File Name

f
Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-395-3900) for more information on how to comply with thesebuffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Central Office Elizabeth City District
Mailing Address: 1367 U.S. 17 South
1638 Mail Service Center Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 252-264-3901
Location:
Parker -Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293 / 1-888-4RCOAST
Fax:[phone]
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Morehead City District
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, NC 28557
202-808-2808
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-395-3900
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 10/05/01

�C-S J U L 0-1 2002
-eC
T e
p 3�s? y WDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Govemor Donna D. Moffitt, Director 9
Mr. Al Glimis
Ms. Emily Cook
79 Dempsey Avenue
Princeton, NJ 08542
Re: Objection to Pier on Lot 7101,
Rocky Rollinson Road, Dare County
Dear Mr. Glimis and Ms. Cook:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
June 27, 2002
This letter is in reference to your correspondence received by facsimile on June 24, 2002,
objecting, as an adjacent riparian property owner, to a request from Mr. Charles M. Pereira, to
construct a pier at the end of a Rocky Rollinson Road, adjacent to the Pamlico Sound, in Dare
County. Mr. Dennis Hawthorn of the Division of Coastal Management staff was recently on site
and has reviewed Mr. Pereira's proposal.
Mr. Hawthorn reviewed the request to construct a 24-foot long by 6-foot wide pier along this
shoreline. According to information supplied by Mr. Pereira's contractor, this proposed pier
structure also includes a 20-foot by 6-foot "T" platform at the waterward end of this pier. During
Mr. Hawthorn's site visit and review of this proposal, measurements were taken concerning the
proposed pier alignment, and its relationship to both adjacent riparian setback areas, and the
existing navigation constraints. Mr. Hawthorn's findings clearly indicated that the structure as,
proposed, will be well within the applicant's riparian waters, and will not infringe upon any
adjacent riparian access or navigation. These findings indicate that the proposed pier structure is
consistent with T15A. Section 07H.1200 General Permit for Construction of Piers: Docks: and
Boat Houses in Estuarine and Public Trust Waters, of the North Carolina Administrative Code,
The Division has also reviewed the concerns noted in your June 24, 2002 correspondence, and
has determined the following:
1) The existing water depths in the vicinity of the proposed pier are all approximately 2 feet
below the normal water level (NWL). The referenced navigation channel, to the east of Mr.
Pereira's property, is also 2 feet in depth. The proposed pier will extend approximately 30-feet
beyond the shoreline of Mr. Pereira's property. Mr. Hawthorn actually observed navigational
use of these waters during his visit, and found no evidence that indicated that the proposed pier
would infringe upon any navigation or adjacent riparian access.
2) Mr. Pereira's lot is approximately 123 feet wide along the shoreline. Although there may be
some confusion on the actual "T" platform dimensions provided in the adjacent riparian
notification letters sent to Mr. Willis and yourself, according to information provided to Mr.
1367 U.S. 17 South, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state,nc.us
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post consumer Paper

Mr. Al Glimis, Ms. Emily Cook
June 27, 2002
Page 2
Hawthorn during his site visit, the proposed platform will be 6-feet by 20-feet, 120 square feet.
This dimensional area is consistent with our rules regarding the allowable size of platform area.
The proposed pier "T" platform will be approximately 45 feet northwest of Mr. Willis' riparian
line, or 30 feet northwest of Mr. Willis' riparian setback. This platform will be approximately 60
feet southeast of your riparian line, or 45 feet southeast of the riparian setback. These findings
indicate that the proposed pier structure will be well outside of the riparian setback areas for both
adjacent riparian property owners.
3) According to Mr. Pereira, as of June 27, 2002, Mr. Willis is still the adjacent riparian property
owner to the east. If this property should be sold prior to the commencement of construction on
this pier, the permittee is required to notify the new adjacent property owner only if some portion
of the pier will encroach into the new property owner's adjacent riparian setback area, and an
adjacent riparian property owner waiver statement will be required. The proposed pier will not
encroach into either neighboring setback area, and as proposed, will not require a waiver
statement from either adjacent riparian neighbor.
The Division of Coastal Management has given your objections careful consideration and has
found that the project is consistent with the appropriate rules and regulations of the Coastal
Resources Commission. Therefore, the Division issued CAMA General Permit 30279A (copy
enclosed) on June 26, 2002 to Mr. Pereira.
If you wish to appeal this decision, you may file a request with the Director of the Division of
Coastal Management, Department of Environment and Natural Resources within twenty (20)
days of the permit decision. If you have any questions regarding this matter please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Dennis Hawthorn or myself at [phone] in our Elizabeth City
Office.
Sincerely,
Z,,'Ted pson
District Manager
TSldwh
Enclosure
cc: Charles S. Jones, Assistant Director, DCM
Dennis W. Hawthorn, DCM, Elizabeth City
Jim Meads, Dare County LPO
Charles M. Pereira, 6804 Oakrise Court, New Market, Md. 21774
File