28090_WYNN, PHILLIP V_20010612

,moo
AMA and DREDGE AND FILL
G E N E R A L
P E RM IT
as authorized by the State of North Carolina j
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Coastal Resources Commission
in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15 NCAC
Applicant Name
Address
Phone Number
City' State Nt zip
Project Location (County, State Road, Water Body, etc.) ` r a v y � ('t u„ a A .i ��� 1",41 t{.
Type of Project Activity
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SKETCH Aft,
Pier (dock) Length
Groin Length
number
Bulkhead Length
max. distance offshore
Basin, channel dimensions
cubic yards
Boat ramp dimensions
Other
r" F V (SCALE: 1J1 N r )
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing
and attached general and specific conditions. Any violation of these terms
may subject the permittee to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; and
may cause the permit to become null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit of-
ficer when the project is inspected for compliance. The applicant certi-
fies by signing this permit that 1) this project is consistent with the local
land use plan and all local ordinances, and 2) a written statement has
been obtained from adjacent riparian landowners certifying that they
have no objections to the proposed work.
In issuing this permit the State of North Carolina certifies that this project
is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
applicant's signature
signature
permit officer's signature
>7G b Z A:
issuing date expiration date
071) 1' 0
attachments
41 f; u < v x'
application fee

�; � �,:,
v

f�`''F
� ��
r.
,'
.i
,.

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
i item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this caid to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front.if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
I
2. Article Number (Copy from service label)
got 3 a�C'a'7
PS Form 3811, July 1999
A. Received by (Please Print Clearly)
El Agent
Xr"1 e,Aa.a
D. IsIlivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If ES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
,'Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for March
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
-�'63
Domestic Return Receipt

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class M-nil
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4,in this box •
^�c-

a
1 '
May 7, 2001
Dante Chinni
10314 Tower Hill Court
Ellicott City, MD 21042
Dear Dante,
I hope everything is going well with you and Jean. I am
writing to let you know that the shoreline along Clubfoot
Creek continues to slowly erode due to storms and boat
traffic.
CAMA has introduced a new general permit for placement of
riprap for wetland protection in estuarine and public trust
waters.
I have enclosed a copy of Section .2400 outlining what I
propose to do with the wetlands in front of my property.
I have also enclosed a drawing of the proposed development.
This project only effects our common shoreline. The
shoreline I share with Duane Usa is not effected. However,
CAMA requires that I notify both property owners on either
side of the project.
Please sign the Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Statement
and mail back to me. I will turn it into CAMA. Let me know
if you have any questions. I hope to see you and Jean at the
next Moorings Association meeting. Take care and God bless.
Sincerely,

U.S.Rostal Service
(DomesticCERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
Only; • -Provided)m
m
m
a
Postage $ 3 y �P O R 7
Er �` (IM
�' Certified Fee 1
Return Receipt Fee / Postm k
(Endorsement Required)/�Yre�Restricted Delivery Fee F1
E-3 (Endorsement Required)
O Total Postage S Fees y V(1�✓�h1O�!
ru
r-U Narrte`iplease P�Clea ( be completed by mailer) A -
0 Stret, Apt. No.; or ox No.
o�Y- Ltif'jLv ��

SECTION .2400 —GENERAL PERMIT FOR PLACEMENT OF RIPRAP FOR WETLAND PROTECTION IN
ESTUARINE AND PUBLIC TRUST WATERS
15A NCAC 07H .2401 PURPOSE
The general permit for placement riprap for wetland protection in estuarine and public trust waters shall allow the placement of
riprap immediately adjacent to and waterward of wetlands. This permit shall only be applicable where a shoreline is experiencing
erosion in public trust areas and estuarine waters according to authority provided in 15A NCAC 7J .1100 and according to the
rules in this Section. This permit shall not apply within the Ocean Hazard System of Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) or
waters adjacent to these AEC's with the exception of those portions of shoreline within the Inlet Hazard Area AEC that feature
characteristics of Estuarine Shorelines. Such features include the presence of wetland vegetation_ lower wave energy, and lower
erosion rates than in the adjoining Ocean Erodible Area.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107; 113A-118.1;
Eff. August 1, 2000.
15A NCAC 07H .2402 APPROVAL PROCEDURES
(a) The applicant must contact the Division of Coastal Management and request approval for development. The applicant shall
provide information on site location, dimensions of the project area, and his name and address.
(b) The applicant must provide:
(1) confirmation that a written statement has been obtained signed by the adjacent riparian property owners
indicating that they have no objections to the proposed work; or
(2) confirmation that the adjacent riparian property owners have been notified by certified mail of the proposed
work. Such notice shall instruct adjacent property owners to provide any comments on the proposed
development in writing for consideration by permitting officials to the Division of Coastal Management within
10 days of receipt of the notice, and, indicate that no response will be interpreted as no objection. DCM staff
will review all comments and determine, based on their relevance to the potential impacts of the proposed
project, if the proposed project can be approved by a General Permit. If DCM staff finds that the comments
are worthy of more in-depth review, the applicant will be notified that he must submit an application for a
major development permit.
(c) DCM staff shall review all comments and determine, based on their relevance to the potential impacts of the proposed project
if the proposed project meets the requirements of the rules in this Section. If DCM staff finds that the comments are worthy of
more in-depth review, the applicant shall be notified that he must submit an application for a major development permit.
(d) No work shall begin until an on -site meeting is held with the applicant and appropriate Division of Coastal Management
representative so that the wetland protection structure can be appropriately marked. Written authorization to proceed with the
proposed development maybe issued during this visit. Construction of the wetland protection structure must be completed within
90 days of this visit or the general authorization expires and it shall be necessary to re-examine the alignment to determine if the
general authorization can be reissued.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107; 113A-118.1;
Eff. August 1, 2000.
15A NCAC 07H .2403 PERMIT FEE
The applicant must pay a permit fee of fifty, dollar 50; This fee maybe paid by check or money order made payable to the
Department.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107, 113A-118.1; 113A-119.1;
Eff. August 1, 2000.
15A NCAC 07H .2404 GENERAL CONDITIONS
(a) This permit authorizes only the construction of wetland protection structures conforming to the standards herein.
(b) Individuals shall allow authorizedrepresentatives of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to make
periodic inspections at any time deemed necessary in order to be sure that the activity being performed under authority of this
general permit is in accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed herein.
(c) There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation or use of the waters by the public by the existence of the riprap
structure authorized herein.

M
(d) This permit shall not be applicable to proposed construction where the Department has determined, based on an initial review
of the application, that notice and review pursuant to G.S. I I3A-119 is necessary because there are unresolved questions
concerning the proposed activity=s impact on adjoining properties or on water quality; air quality; coastal wetlands; cultural or
historic sites; wildlife; fisheries resources; or public trust rights.
(e) This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any other required state, local, or federal authorization.
(f) Development carried out under this permit must be consistent with all local requirements, AEC Guidelines. and local land use
plans current at the time of authorization.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107; 113A-118.1;
Eff. August 1, 2000.
15A NCAC 07H .2405 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
(a) This general permit shall only be applicable along shorelines possessing wetlands, and which exhibit an identifiable erosion
escarpment.
(b) The height of the erosion escarpment shall not exceed three feet.
(c) The riprap shall be placed immediately waterward of the erosion escarpment.
(d) The riprap must be positioned so as not to exceed a maximum of five feet waterward of the erosion escarpment at any point
along its alignment.
(e) The riprap must be positioned so as not to exceed a maximum of six inches above the elevation of the adjacent wetland
substrate.
(f) Where Department staff determine that insufficient wetlands or coastal marsh exists along the permittee's shoreline to provide
adequate shoreline stabilization, the permittee shall be required to plant appropriate coastal marsh or wetland species landward of
the riprap structure as directed by Department staff.
(g) Construction authorized by this general permit will be limited to a maximum length of 500 feet.
(h) No backfrll or any other fill of wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, estuarine waters, public trust areas, or highground
areas is authorized by this general permit.
(i) No excavation of the shallow water bottom, any wetlands, or high ground is authorized by this general permit.
0) The riprap must not be placed in such a manner as to impede water flow into or out of any natural channel or stream.
(k) The riprap material must be free from loose dirt or any pollutant. It must be of a size sufficient to prevent its movement from
the site by wave or current action.
(1) Riprap material must consist of clean rock or masonry materials such as marl, granite or broken concrete. Materials such as
tires, car bodies, scrap metal, paper products, tree limbs, wood debris, organic material or similar materials are not appropriate
riprap for the purposes of this General Permit.
(m) If the crossing of wetlands with mechanized or non -mechanized construction equipment is necessary, temporary construction
mats shall be utilized for the area(s) to be crossed. The temporary mats shall be removed immediately upon completion of
construction of the riprap structure.
(n) The permittee shall maintain the structure in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit
or the remaining riprap structure shall be removed within 90 days of notification from the Division of Coastal Management.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107, 113A-118.1,
Eff. August 1, 2000.
7

tu��r�t,t.t� 1 nlrrut,r�l� rlcvrL.1x1 I v VYOJEAN 131AIr.lvmil 1
Lot ID
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to ?P I L L i r V, w�-J N rJ
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at
1/ 3 Q/yKi N i COu1e i
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
's
on C C t 1? PcY%i r ek-tZg K , in N/4 ✓t L o Cx , N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location,
and, I have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(To be filled in by individual proposing development)
CLit J� F-°° % c Q elL
Loi ')
CRoS � o�J �SCgc�y�, Ciu—Jt
Signature
Print or Type Name
- %so - 7-�7, D
Telephones Number
v? Date: G� �� 5 , Z�
L0 r
IR

COMPLETE THIS SECTION
■ r,omplete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece
or on the front'if space permits.
AM I Addressed to:
B. Date of Delivery
C. Signature
X
n „
jq$�iL
El Agent
❑Addressee
D. Is delivery addre dill ent from item 1?
❑ Yes
If YES, enter delive
ddress below:
❑ No
3. Service Type
4R-Certified Mail
❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
Cl Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service label)
I_ '9 d �► 9 '� a b 6 i!v%9b '7 1 3 9d
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE R 0 UY—N First -Class Mail
M4Y Postage & Fees Paid
S�` - �- ,
er,J�liNo; GK10�
• Sender: Please print your name, address, a1ZIP+4 in Ii,'
H tW ff L- 0 c_ K) ti L
ZFs3Z

May 7, 2001
Duane Usa
1844 Mission Hills Lane
North Brook, IL. 60062
Dear Duane,
oia
I hope everything is going well with you and Dorothy. I am
writing to let you know that the shoreline along Clubfoot
Creek continues to slowly erode due to storms and boat
traffic.
CAMA has introduced a new general permit for placement of
riprap for wetland protection in estuarine and public trust
waters.
I have enclosed a copy of Section .2400 outlining what I
propose to do with the wetlands in front of my property.
I have also enclosed a drawing of the proposed development.
This project only effects the common shoreline between my
property and Dante Chinni's property. However, CAMA requires
that I notify both property owners on either side of the
project.
Please sign the Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Statement
and mail back to me. I will turn it into CAMA. Let me know
if you have any questions. I hope to see you and Dorothy at
the next Moorings Association meeting. Take care and God
bless.
Sincerely,

0
Ir
m
a
..n
a-
r- Return Receipt Fee
p (Endorsement Required)
IM Restricted Delivery Fee
d (Endorsement Required)
Cl Total Postage & Fees
ru
mNamf : e Print Ck
Ir
`Q—
O
rti
t,1H r p 1 2001

SECTION .2400 —GENERAL PERMIT FOR PLACEMENT OF RIPRAP FOR WETLAND PROTECTION IN
ESTUARINE AND PUBLIC TRUST WATERS
15A NCAC 07H .2401 PURPOSE
The general permit for placement riprap for wetland protection in estuarine and public trust waters shall allow the placement of
riprap immediately adjacent to and waterward of wetlands. This permit shall only be applicable where a shoreline is experiencing
erosion in public trust areas and estuarine waters according to authority provided in 15A NCAC 7J .1100 and according to the
rules in this Section. This permit shall not apply within the Ocean Hazard System of Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) or
waters adjacent to these AEC's with the exception of those portions of shoreline within the Inlet Hazard Area AEC that feature
characteristics of Estuarine Shorelines. Such features include the presence of wetland vegetation, lower wave energy, and lower
erosion rates than in the adjoining Ocean Erodible Area
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107; 113A-118.1;
Eff. August 1, 2000.
15A NCAC 07H .2402 APPROVAL PROCEDURES
(a) The applicant must contact the Division of Coastal Management and request approval for development. The applicant shall
provide information on site location, dimensions of the project area and his name and address.
(b) The applicant must provide:
(1) confirmation that a written statement has been obtained signed by the adjacent riparian property owners
indicating that they have no objections to the proposed work; or
(2) confirmation that the adjacent riparian property owners have been notified by certified mail of the proposed
work. Such notice shall instruct adjacent property owners to provide any comments on the proposed
development in writing for consideration by permitting officials to the Division of Coastal Management within
10 days of receipt of the notice, and, indicate that no response will be interpreted as no objection. DCM staff
will review all comments and determine, based on their relevance to the potential impacts of the proposed
project, if the proposed project can be approved by a General Permit. If DCM staff finds that the comments
are worthy of more in-depth review, the applicant will be notified that he must submit an application for a
major development permit.
(c) DCM staff shall review all comments and determine, based on their relevance to the potential impacts of the proposed project,
if the proposed project meets the requirements of the rules in this Section. If DCM staff finds that the comments are worthy of
more in-depth review, the applicant shall be notified that he must submit an application for a major development permit.
(d) No work shall begin until an on -site meeting is held with the applicant and appropriate Division of Coastal Management
representative so that the wetland protection structure can be appropriately marked. Written authorization to proceed with the
proposed development may be issued during this visit. Construction of the wetland protection structure must be completed within
90 days of this visit or the general authorization expires and it shall be necessary to re-examine the alignment to determine if the
general authorization can be reissued.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107; 113A-118.1;
Eff. August 1, 2000.
15A NCAC 0711.2403 PERMIT FEE
The applicant must pay a permit fee of fifty doll 50.0 This fee may be paid by check or money order made payable to the
Department.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107; 113A-118.1; 113A-119.1;
Eff. August 1, 2000.
15A NCAC 07H .2404 GENERAL CONDITIONS
(a) This permit authorizes only the construction of wetland protection structures conforming to the standards herein.
(b) Individuals shall allow authorizedrepresentatives of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to make
periodic inspections at any time deemed necessary in order to be sure that the activity being performed under authority of this
general permit is in accordance with the terns and conditions prescribed herein.
(c) There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation or use of the waters by the public by the existence of the riprap
structure authorized herein.

(d) This permit shall not be applicable to proposed construction where the Department has determined, based on an initial review
of the application, that notice and review pursuant to G.S. 113A-119 is necessary because there are unresolved questions
concerning the proposed activity=s impact on adjoining properties or on water quality; air quality; coastal wetlands; cultural or
historic sites; wildlife; fisheries resources; or public trust rights.
(e) This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any other required state, local, or federal authorization.
(f) Development carried out under this permit must be consistent with all local requirements, AEC Guidelines, and local land use
plans current at the time of authorization.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107,- 113A-118.1;
Eff. August 1, 2000.
15A NCAC 07H .2405 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
(a) This general permit shall only be applicable along shorelines possessing wetlands, and which exhibit an identifiable erosion
escarpment.
(b) The height of the erosion escarpment shall not exceed three feet.
(c) The riprap shall be placed immediately waterward of the erosion escarpment.
(d) The riprap must be positioned so as not to exceed a maximum of five feet waterward of the erosion escarpment at any point
along its alignment.
(e) The riprap must be positioned so as not to exceed a maximum of six inches above the elevation of the adjacent wetland
substrate.
(f) Where Department staff determine that insufficient wetlands or coastal marsh exists along the pemuttee's shoreline to provide
adequate shoreline stabilization, the permittee shall be required to plant appropriate coastal marsh or wetland species landward of
the riprap structure as directed by Department staff.
(g) Construction authorized by this general permit will be limited to a maximum length of 500 feet.
(h) No backfill or any other fill of wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, estuarine waters, public trust areas, or highground
areas is authorized by this general permit.
(i) No excavation of the shallow water bottom, any wetlands, or high ground is authorized by this general permit.
6) The riprap must not be placed in such a manner as to impede water flow into or out of any natural channel or stream.
(k) The riprap material must be free from loose dirt or any pollutant. It must be of a size sufficient to prevent its movement from
the site by wave or current action.
0) Riprap material must consist of clean rock or masonry materials such as marl, granite or broken concrete. Materials such as
tires, car bodies, scrap metal, paper products, tree limbs, wood debris, organic material or similar materials are not appropriate
riprap for the purposes of this General Permit.
(m) If the crossing of wetlands with mechanized or non -mechanized construction equipment is necessary, temporary construction
mats shall be utilized for the area(s) to be crossed. The temporary mats shall be removed immediately upon completion of
construction of the riprap structure.
(n) The permittee shall maintain the structure in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit
or the remaining riprap structure shall be removed within 90 days of notification from the Division of Coastal Management.
History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107; 113A-118.1;
Eff August 1, 2000.
7

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
Loi 10
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to ?PIL L-V, W N�
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at f.3 1 C o u ie
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
I
on CLtAg Pov r eOZtz:�7K , in NA Ve L oC. , N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location,
and, I have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(To be filled in by individual proposing development)
C (-LA`S F�oo'i e.Q tffGLL
C2us � vN �s�p�jy� CN � a
WaT c,gr,�S
Loi g
co i
0
---------------- ---------------- —----- ----------------------- o
x
Signature
Print or Type Name
Telephone Number
Date:

01
Duane Usa
1844 Mission Hills Lane
Northbrook, Illinois 60062
[phone]
May 15, 2001
Mr. Brad Shaver
CAMA
Hestron Plaza II
151 B Hwy #24
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Shoreline Construction for
Mr. Phillip V. Wynn
113 Bimini Court (Lot 9)
The Moorings on
Clubfoot Creek in Havelock NC
Dear Mr. Shaver:
When Mr. Wynn (Lot #9) wanted to put in a seawall in 1998, both adjacent property
owners objected. (See enclosed letters to Mr. Ted Tyndall from both Lot #10 and Lot
48.) But CAMA approved the construction.
The seawall went in and all our concerns, that we outlined to CAMA then, are playing
out now. As adjacent lot owner #10, I object to any further construction or alternation of
the natural shoreline.
Sincer
y
Duane Usa
Lot #10
111 Bimini Court
Havelock, NC
Enc.
Cc: T. Tyndall

Mr. Ted Tyndall
CAMA
Hestron Plaza 11
151 B Hwy 924
Morehead City, North Carolina. 28557
Post -it- Fax Note
r
UIA
10314 Tower Hill Ct.
Ellicott City, Md. 20142
April 4,1998
7671 Date pages
«,D 0
j -.7n a - J-R 3 - Yaae
co.
PhCOel /U 754' _77�iD
Fax q
Dear Mr. Tyndall,
to you regarding the application submitted to you for review regarding
I am writing y application made by Mr. Phillip Wynn to
MT, -
property at Clubfoot Creek. Specifically thepP Set l •
build a 4 foot seawall on Lot # 9 at The Mooring build the 4 foot
of Mx• WY�'s application to
I have received and reviewed a copy
Lot # 8, is adjacent to Mr. Wyzxn 1 have
bulkhead on his property• Since my Property,
s with his proposal and h°�'�' it may affect me and our entire coznmunrty.
some concern e proposed bulkhead and
Based on the description in the application, bethe lieve appearance
cdzraand character of our present
backfilling it would considerably Chang
the bulkhead would ultimately lead to the destruction of existing
shoreline. Backfilling well as providing additional
which add to the natural beauty of our shorelineective I am not sure what affect the
trees h
stability to the wetlands. From an two dengineerhave ing adjacent properties. Will I be forced to
change in water znov id created by Mr• WYMI's bulkhead? I
ead to avoid any negative mp who has completed
continue the bulkha local dock builder, MT. Fran Law,
have taken the time to contact to the shoreline.
several docks at Clubfoot Creek. His recom thednorrmal nimal errosion we could install
sev lash
However, he said if we wanted to eliminate t This would accomp
rocks along the shoreline, a method called RIP-
withoutRP'Ptng'e adjacent properties or
everything the e khead is intended tohdosaffecting are other alternatives to
the natural appearance of loring them before proceeding With
changing � goal I would suggest exp
accomplishing Mr. Wynn s g
the approach applied for.
need to be forwarded to any a
Other encies please fell free
If my comments and Concerns
youIf have the opportunity I would appreciate
ere to send
to do so or advise aecishons made regardingt is application -
notification of any
very Truly Yours,
,4, 1)00t- 7-1���
Dante F. Chinni

Duane Usa
1844 Mission Hills Lane
Northbrook, Illinois 60062
[phone]
March 26, 1998
via fax to 252-247-3330
Mr. Ted Tyndall
CAMA
151 B Hwy #24
Hestron Plaza #2
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Comment on March 4, 1998 Application
for Seawall on Clubfoot Creek
in The Moorings, Lot #9
Dear Mr. Tyndall:
am in receipt of an application by Mr. Phillip V. Wynn to build a 4' high seawall on his
property (Lot #9 in The Moorings Subdivision on Clubfoot Creek).
I own the adjacent Lot #10. A seawall on Lot #9 will have an adverse effect on my
property. My concerns with the effect of a 4' high seawall are:
• The change of the natural beauty of the land and shoreline with the addition of a
seawall.
• The destruction of a significant number of trees on Lot #9, due to the backfill
planned behind the 4' seawall. Also, due to accelerated shoreline erosion on my lot
from the seawall on Lot #9, 1 also will lose trees that currently help hold soil.
• The accelerated erosion and wash -away of land that will occur on my property due
to wave energy deflected from a seawall on Lot #9 to the shoreline of lots on either
side of Lot #9.
• A change of the entire character of the shoreline; as, others --- like me -- are forced
to erect seawalls in order to prevent accelerated erosion of their own property from
the seawalls of those who desired to have a seawall.
Mr. Wynn's concern with erosion is understandable. I will handle my own shoreline
erosion concerns with natural rock which will absorb wave energy without transferring
that energy in a way that erodes the property of others. With natural rock I hope to
preserve the beauty of the shoreline and protect myself from significant erosion at the
same time and keep Clubfoot Creek from looking like a canal in Ft. Lauderdale.
I met with Mr. Wynn on Monday March 23 regarding his application for a seawall. If the
seawall application is granted, he agreed to start the wall 8' to 10' back from the
existing shoreline adjacent to my property and to drop the seawall height to 3'.

Mr. Ted Tyndall
CAMA
March 26, 1998
Page 2
t
Thank you for your review and consideration of my comments. I would appreciate
hearing what you decide regarding Mr. Wynn's application, since it will impact my
property.
$fin erefy,
l �
ane Usa

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Bill Ross, Secretary
Donna D. Moffitt, Director
June 18, 2001
Mr. Duane Usa
1844 Mission Hills Lane
Northbrook, Illinois 60062
Dear Mr. Usa:
e�A
NCDENR
This correspondence is in reference to your letter of objection to Mr. Phillip V.
Wynn, an adjacent riparian property, proposing to install rock riprap in front of wetlands on
his property. The project is located at 113 Bimini Court, on lot #9, in the Moorings
Subdivision, on Clubfoot Creek, near Harlowe, Craven County. The proposed project
involves the placement of approximately 55' of rock rip rap waterward of the marsh.
The North Carolina, Division of Coastal Management has given your objections
careful consideration and has determined that the project is consistent with Section .2400 -
General Permit for Placement of Riprap for Wetland Protection on Estuarine Waters and
Public Trust Areas. The purpose of this general permit is to provide wetland protection in
estuarine and public trust waters where the shoreline is experiencing erosion. And based on
many past site visits, this shoreline has experienced severe erosion over the recent years.
Therefore, on June 12, 2001 the Division issued CAMA General Permit #28090-C to Mr.
Wynn authorizing 55' of rock riprap in front of the marsh and 6" above the marsh substrate.
This should provide the area protection from erosional forces while still allow the marsh to
function properly.
If you wish to appeal this permit decision, you may file a request with the Director of
the Division of Coastal Management, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
within 20 days of the permit decision. I have enclosed a copy of the pertinent rules for the
development, the permit and an appeal form. If you have any questions regarding this
matter, please don't hesitate to contact me at my Morehead City Office (252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
M. Ted Tyndall
District Manager
Enclosures
cc: Charles Jones - Assistant Director, DCM
Brad Shaver - Field Representative, DCM
Morehead City District, 151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://dcm2,enr.state.nc.us/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUMTY \ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER