General Permits (915)

CERTIFICATION OF EXEMPTION
FROM REQUIRING A CAMA PERMIT
as authorized by the State of North Carolina,
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources and the Coastal Resources Commission
in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15 NCAC Subchapter 7K .0203.
Applicant Name _•- ic:. c�.• +: �.i kl U3t_S. Phone Number 4Lo , I r-o �3 1t
Address , .� i VrI
City
Project Location (County, State Road, Water Body, etc.)
i ype aria uimerisioris or rrofect
State
The proposed project to be located and constructed as described This certification of exemption from requiring a CAMA permit is
above is hereby certified as exempt from the CAMA permit re- valid for 90 days from the date of issuance. Following expiration,
quirement pursuant to 15 NCAC 7K .0203. This exemption to a re-examination of the project and project site may be necessary
CAMA permit requirements does not alleviate the necessity of to continue this certification. 7-•
your obtaining any other State, Federal, or Local authorization. (� j
SKETCH' `_.''i 1 P �hC., ! I. (SCALE: )
Any person who proceeds with a development without the con-
sent of a CAMA official under the mistaken assumption that the
development is exempted, will be in violation of the CAMA if there
is a subsequent determination that a permit was required for the
development.
The applicant certifies by signing this exemption that (1) the ap-
plicant has read and will abide by the conditions of this exemp-
tion, and (2) a written statement has been obtained from adjacent
landowners certifying that they have no objections to the
proposed work.
Applicant's signature
Attachment: 15 North Carolina Administrative Code 7K .0203

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Donna D. Moffitt, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jerry Sullivan
3206 Spring Forest Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27616
Dear Mr. Sullivan,
e_wn
AN
NCDENR
May 21, 2001
This letter is to inform you that I made a site visit to your property at 177 Crow Hill Road
in Otway, Carteret County, on May 16, 2001. At that time, I noticed that Turner Marine
Construction was constructing a pier and t-head from your property into Leopard Creek.
To my knowledge, there was no authorization for this structure. I called Mr. Robbie
Webb of Turner Marine and discovered that he had neither obtained nor seen
authorization for this project. At that time, I asked Turner Marine to stop work until the
situation was resolved. As it turns out, no authorization had been obtained for the
development. Mr. Webb has since submitted a drawing sufficient to indicate that the
project qualifies for a CAMA Exemption, a form of authorization that exempts the
property owner from obtaining a full permit. Additionally, he has submitted signatures
from the adjacent riparian property owners, as is required by law.
This letter serves as your authorization to continue with the development of your pier and
dock, in accordance with the plans submitted on May 18, 2001, and in compliance with
15 NCAC 07K .0203 (enclosed). Please note that this authorization is only as good as the
information submitted. If this information is found to be in error sufficient to result in the
project being found non -compliant with the appropriate guidelines, further enforcement
action will follow. This authorization does not relieve you of the necessity of
obtaining any other federal, state, or local permits. Specifically, you must obtain a
building permit from the Carteret County Inspections Office. In the future, it is
imperative that you pursue and obtain all necessary permits and authorizations
prior to commencing development.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free
to call me.
Sincerely,
T. Barrett
Tjb
Cc: Ted Tyndall, DCM
Scott Jones, DCM
Morehead City District \ 151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY \ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED / 109% POST CONSUMER PAPER
/` 1

'-- it"a
'f
(FOR A PIERIUNt✓O�TRE•D BOAT LIB
MAY I e Oglhereav c21
:;y that I own properry adjacent to
S �5 �U S
cO.A` ASTALIVIANAGEMEN I CVarne of ProF�ert Omer)
MOREHEAD
-- proper Icca a, '% % Q H
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.) _
on Ci}f *L in _ C) �T .C.
(w�aterl��ody)
(Trod andior Count)
He his des_ -bed tc me, as shown belcw, t^e de,,c!cr�Ment he is propcsin, at t.:at
lccsticn, and, I ha•. e no ooiections to his prOPOsal. r-hac apier/ �,
ncover-boat Iir'
must be set back a ,:iirlimum distance of Illteen iwt (1 5') rTom M, llta or ripa-man c:.ess urL -ss1,6
waived by me.
� Q
I do got wah to waive the setback rPauire. tent.
I do sh to waive that setback ��e,r ent.
------------------------- l l\`t\C' '
----
i'v r F PROPO^ DE`ELOP��� :
(To be filled in bY indip Ing de�e opmenl)
(4 VY I f -9�
��
M �
J
-- ------------ -
o
15qu►�{�r� 1 ignature
P,- r.t or T• - Na,7e
Telephone Numbcr
Date:
4

_• (FOR A PIER I U'V' C Y RED B OA T LI,F7)
c'UO( ! j hereby c _y that I ov,n property adia-_r,t to _:Y 2r_'. 5(,�((��(JAN
s
(Name of Property O,�ner) —
STAL tv1ANAGEW=N t QCaC�!� `
.�!viOREHE�itfiQL`er`'r t:'d a! —Ll r !— � 1 (%.� d I C._l_. 2
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on L ul OTDA _��- t'7-- ?v.C.
(Waterbod�•) (T_� andloir County)
He has des_ -gibed to me, as shown belc%4, the dcvc!er-,ment he is propcsir:g at ,ha-
Ic<_t_�cn, and, I ha•. e no obje_-t.Tcns to his prccos ]. I unders•and ghat a pieriuncover�d beat Iir-
must be set back a r,linimum dlstaSlC� c Illiern Iw- (' 5') rTom m'•;' ` �3 0 r
waived b/y me.
�� r riper. �an acmes A
I do not wish to waive she setback re.^uirernent. .v
I do vish to waive that setback
CQ
------------ -----------------
--- --� ------------------------ ---
i 0 O j DE VELOP �LEti�f : --- ----
ro b e 7/ RL( filled cn b`. irzditiz4 cr�Dosirg detie�opm
CAP � r
n C �.
�• J
7a
.-------------------
Su (-(-IO Opt 071✓E7a'�
Pr r: or Type Na:7e
'Do j
Teiechone Number
Date:

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources 4 • 0
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Donna D. Moffitt, Director
January 30, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Robbie Webb
P.O. Box 1885
Morehead City, NC 28557
Subject: Permit Authorization
Dear Mr. Webb:
I wanted to take this opportunity to address permit authorization procedures in
light of the most recent General Permit (Permit # 27552-C) issued to your client signed
by you as the agent. The Division of Coastal Management has been given the
responsibility by as many as fourteen other review agencies to issue General Permits in
lieu of every applicant going through the major review process. The General Permit
process is by design intended to expedite permit procedures but does not guarantee an
instantaneous decision and issuance of permits.
The aforementioned permit commanded additional scrutiny based on its location
in relation to the main access canal for one of the most heavily traveled corridors in
Atlantic Beach. You were asked to provide information showing that the project as
planned would meet the conditions of the General Permit. Upon closer review with aids
such as aerial photography, available in the Coastal Management Office, a second site
visit was required to identify where the boatlifts would be located along the channel. It is
not unusual or should not be a surprise for the Division of Coastal Management to
request an applicant or the applicant's agent to stake the location of a proposed structure
in relation to site conditions.
It is important for all conditions of the General Permit to be met to eliminate any
cause for concern from citizens and other resource agencies. For this reason and
stipulated within the General Permit, construction of a project should not be
initiated until a permit is secured from Coastal Management as well as other local,
state, or federal authorization. Please heed this as a notice, that in the future any work
completed without a permit will result in a Notice of Violation and will require the
assessment of a civil penalty and may further require restoration at the applicant's
expense.
I wanted to convey the decision process of a General Permit to you so that you
understand what responsibilities the Division of Coastal Management has in issuing
General Permits. I have enjoyed working with you to date and look forward to working
with you in the future.
Sincerely,
cc. Ted Tyndall
Brad Shaver
Wilmington District \ 127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

cl
E
(FOR A PIER/UNC O VERED ,BOAT I.I.
I hereby c ry that I own propemy adiac;.nr to" iE
's
C'Yame of Property Owner)
property locattd a! Cebu)
(Lot, BIock, Road, etc.)
on C A N 1 �//�� 1 L- u1 _OMW R' '' C.A L ( N. C .
(Waterbody) (Town and/or Cam)
He has desc.:bed to me, as shown below the develcl:�ment he is proposing at tha:
location, and, I have no obi�tions to his proposal. I understand that a pieriuncovered boat lir
:must be set back a minimum distance or rirtevn rror,: mv area or no&-ian a ss a ess
waived by me.
�\
I do not wash to waive the setback retiuirelm, .
I do wish to .vai
---------------
D ES
t
g0 C P ,00
u�
q— I o! 4-
secbac�l
O ROP )SE=, DE-�
o be filled in iji�z=4,91 prop Ong deve.op
Pr (f I ((1 ") et4 C
A' 4, k�� ��?I%
T e,
i
STINk
Suu►�► 0
,x 7,aiur--
Telephone Numbe:'
Dare: '::� l
-N ENT:
N
J
J

!iDJtiL.EV i-i?cii� ."1T��i �
(FOR A PIER/UNCOVEKE'D BOAT' LIM
I hereby ce, _ify that I own property ad_iacent to J �j S(4 LL 10 _'s
(,', ame of Property Owuer)
proper-y located ai l.l.
(L.ot, Block, Road, etc.)
on — i n D TV) �'1 y }� �T�Ic-�� N. C.
(W"aterbody") (Town andlojr County
He has described to me, as shown below, the de c!otiment he is proposin; at teat
Iecation, and, I ha,. e no obi cons to his proposal. I understand that a pier uncover d boat lift
must be set back a minimum distance or riftetn feet (15') from m.j area of r,'parian access unless
waived by me. ._
✓ / I do i.�ot wish to waive the setback requirement.
0
140 wish to waive that setback recuirement.
S
--- - ----- -- ---� -------`-, -
CRfON . RAVE -G OF PROPf1SPf DEVFT.np-,r-p-,--r-
(To be )zlloq z b irz�zvi z fop so ng deve
� e�oeP � ��Cr° Pit, i ( "
8t, �F e' y �� r
I ] I
----------------------------------------� -----y
---_---�.yo
St4Qf04 U
ipm,
UI'1 JE
Telephone Number
Date:

r TM I .•� Y: r r:• �,r, , _r ; _ i.
(FOR A PIER/UNC'OVERF.'P, ROATLIM
I hereby c-rr_ify that I ovvn property ad-iacent to _I_._..5_LC.lIUw s
Cliame of Property Owner) -
prcperry lc<�at:,d v 7 r%
on-------�--
(`Vaterbndv)
C-POO
(1.ot, BlGr-k, Road, etc-.)
' in --
(Town and oar County)
He has des--:ibed to me, as shown belo'.v, the de,.e!t,r-ment he is proposing at that
location, and, r ha•.e no oniections to his prncos<ai. I understand that a pieriuncover^d beat lift
i
must be set back a minimum distance of fifteen feAt (I5') from mt area or riparian ccess unlesslb
waived by me.
. � 4
I do not wish to waive the setback requirement.
I do %vish to .o—ive that setback ,eauiremenr.
------------------ -- -/�--- --�-- ---�------ ------------ ------
RTPT7nl�; .itii► LVT-N Rnpf DF-VFLOPNLFN
'5 ?ve�o ment
� Q�oQ���o� ��� tot)
� P
44
J�5
OCIV
P` pr bo
v 7�
ej\5 V� o GK
%� ( S t - IV\ .0 M � IV
; l v
--R---� _ r g n atu re
Print or Tye N-irne
Teiephcne Nurnbc r
P

f" • J S u.Q��,�,
3 Z�,o 6
a-761
'790-'314

MONITORING & COMPLETION REPORT
[CAMA Major Development & State Dredge & Fill Permits]
r (0
�D
�� V
PERMITTEE'SNAME: i�Y?.If��. I I I V(-,Q �_ 1 0 I�� PERMIT#
FIELD REP.
LOCATION:
PHONE: �d vJ '1 �(D ' j 1 DATE REPORTEDLY COMPLETE: 5
1) Do th red dimensions of the development differ from those indicated in the permit and workplat?
='tu
ircle one].
COMMENT:
2) SEDIMENTATION WFEROSION CONTROL: Has Permittee seeded, grassed, or otherwise stabilized
all disturbed areas? ES O [circle one]
COMMENT:
3)
action needed?
COMMENT:
one].
ACTION: Is further investigation or enforcement