AQ_AM_20230628_BP_AnnPln_Final 2023-2024 Volume 2-E Fayetteville Region_Final

2023-2024 Annual Monitoring Network
Plan for the North Carolina Division of Air
Quality
Volume 2
Site Descriptions by Division of Air Quality Regional Office and
Metropolitan Statistical Area
E. The Fayetteville Monitoring Region

June 28, 2023

E2

Table of Contents
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 2
List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................. 3
E. The Fayetteville Monitoring Region ........................................................................................................... 4
(1) The Non-MSA Portion of the Fayetteville Monitoring Region .............................................................. 4
(2) The Fayetteville MSA ............................................................................................................................ 7
(a) The Honeycutt School site ............................................................................................................. 9
(b) The Wade School site .................................................................................................................. 11
(c) The William Owen School site ..................................................................................................... 15
Appendix E.1 Annual Network Site Review Forms for 2022 ........................................................................ 20

List of Figures
Figure E1. The Fayetteville monitoring region. The dots show the approximate locations of most of the
monitoring sites in this region. ..................................................................................................................... 4
Figure E2. Location of the Candor monitoring site. A is the Candor fine particle, air toxic and CASTNET
monitoring site. The circle approximates the neighborhood scale, 0.5 to 4 kilometers (km)...................... 4
Figure E3. The Candor air toxics shelter and rainwater collection sampler ................................................. 6
Figure E4. The Candor particle monitors, rainwater collection sampler, shelter, and meteorological tower
...................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Figure E5. The Candor mercury deposition monitor and rain gauge............................................................ 7
Figure E6. Looking north from the Candor site ............................................................................................. 7
Figure E7. Looking east from the Candor site ............................................................................................... 7
Figure E8. Looking west from the Candor site .............................................................................................. 7
Figure E9. Looking south from the Candor site ............................................................................................ 7
Figure E10. Monitors located in the Fayetteville MSA ................................................................................. 8
Figure E11. Location of Honeycutt site, B, relative to Golfview, A ............................................................... 9
Figure E12. Honeycutt ozone and sulfur dioxide monitoring site, 37-051-0010 ........................................ 10
Figure E13. Looking north from the Honeycutt site ................................................................................... 10
Figure E14. Looking east from the Honeycutt site ...................................................................................... 10
Figure E15. Looking west from the Honeycutt site ..................................................................................... 10
Figure E16. Looking south from the Honeycutt site ................................................................................... 10
Figure E17. Wade School ozone monitoring Site, 37-051-0011 ................................................................. 12
Figure E18. Looking north from Wade School site...................................................................................... 12
Figure E19. Looking east from the Wade School site ................................................................................. 12
Figure E20. Looking west from the Wade School site ................................................................................ 13
Figure E21. Looking south from the Wade School site ............................................................................... 13
Figure E22. Location of Wade School site relative to the Wade site .......................................................... 14
E3

Figure E23. Aerial view of the Wade School site ........................................................................................ 15
Figure E24. The William Owen particle monitoring site ............................................................................. 15
Figure E25. William Owen site looking north ............................................................................................. 16
Figure E26. William Owen site looking northwest ...................................................................................... 16
Figure E27. William Owen Site looking northeast ...................................................................................... 17
Figure E28. William Owen site looking east ................................................................................................ 17
Figure E29. William Owen site looking west ............................................................................................... 17
Figure E30. William Owen Site looking southwest ..................................................................................... 17
Figure E31. William Owen site looking southeast....................................................................................... 17
Figure E32. William Owen site looking south ............................................................................................. 17
Figure E33. Fort Liberty Lead and Lead Compound Releases to the Air from 2009 to 2020 ...................... 18
List of Tables
Table E1. Site Information Table for Candor................................................................................................. 5
Table E2. Site Information Table for Honeycutt ......................................................................................... 11
Table E3. Site Information Table for Wade ................................................................................................. 13
Table E4. Site Information Table for William Owen School ........................................................................ 16

E4

E. The Fayetteville Monitoring Region
The Fayetteville monitoring region, shown in
Figure E1, consists of three sections: (1) the non-
Metropolitan Statistical Area, or MSA, portion of
the Fayetteville monitoring region - Bladen,
Montgomery, Moore, Richmond, Robeson,
Sampson and Scotland counties; (2) the
Fayetteville MSA - Cumberland, Harnett and Hoke
Counties; and (3) the southeastern portion of the
Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord MSA - Anson County,
previously discussed as part of the Mooresville
Monitoring Region in Section C.
Figure E1. The Fayetteville monitoring region. The
dots show the approximate locations of most of the
monitoring sites in this region.
(1) The Non-MSA Portion of the Fayetteville Monitoring Region
The non-MSA portion of the Fayetteville monitoring region contains seven counties: Bladen,
Montgomery, Moore, Richmond, Robeson, Sampson and Scotland. It has no MSAs. The Southern Pines-
Pinehurst Micropolitan Statistical Area (MiSA) is in Moore County. The Lumberton MiSA is in Robeson
County. The North Carolina Division of Air Quality, or DAQ, currently operates one monitoring site in this
area of the Sand Hills at Candor in Montgomery County. The location of the Candor monitoring site is
shown in Figure E2.
Figure E2. Location of the Candor monitoring site. A is the Candor fine particle, air toxic and CASTNET monitoring
site. The circle approximates the neighborhood scale, 0.5 to 4 kilometers (km).
At the Candor site, DAQ operates a continuous fine particle beta attenuation monitor, or BAM; a
rotating every-third-year PM10 monitor; air toxics volatile organic compound and carbonyl monitors; a
rainwater collection sampler; and ambient temperature, relative humidity, barometric pressure, wind
speed and direction sensors. DAQ also operates a weekly mercury deposition monitor at this site to
measure total mercury, Hg, concentration and deposition in precipitation. Table E1 summarizes
monitoring information for the site. Figure E3 through Figure E9 show the site and views looking north,
E5

east, south and west. The Candor site is collocated with a clear air status and trends network, CASTNET,
site.

Table E1. Site Information Table for Candor
Site Name: Candor AQS Site Identification Number 37-123-0001
Location: 136 Perry Drive, Candor, North Carolina
CBSA: Not in a CBSA CBSA #: 00000 Elevation 173.1
meters
Latitude 35.263165 Longitude -79.836636 Datum: NAD83
Parameter Name Method
Method
Reference ID
Sample
Duration
Sampling
Schedule
PM 2.5 local
conditions, BAM
Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC,
170 EQPM-0308-170 1-hour Year-round
PM10 total 0-
10µm STP Met One Beta Attenuation BAM-1020, 122 EQPM-0798-122 1-hour
Year-round,
every third year
Volatile organic
compounds
SS 6L- pressurized canister w/ cryogenic
preconcentration: GC/MS, 150 Not applicable 24-hour
Every sixth day,
year-round
Carbonyl
compounds Silica-DNPH-CART-KI O3 Scrub HPLC, 202 Not applicable 24-hour
Every sixth day,
year-round
Date Monitor Established PM 2.5 local conditions, continuous monitor, BAM Aug. 1, 2013
PM10 total 0-10µm STP, primary monitor Feb. 16, 2011
Volatile organic compounds Jan. 26, 2002
Carbonyl compounds July 3, 2013
Nearest Road: McCallum Rd

Traffic Count: 250 Year of Count: 2021
Parameter Name
Distance to
Road
Direction to
Road Monitor Type Statement of Purpose
PM 2.5 local conditions, BAM 1079 meters
North
northeast SLAMS
Real-time data reporting.
AQI reporting.
PM10 total 0-10µm STP 1079 meters
North
northeast Special purpose
Prevention of significant
deterioration, PSD, modeling
Volatile organic compounds 1079 meters
North
northeast Non-regulatory General background monitor
Carbonyl compounds 1079 meters
North
northeast Non-regulatory General background monitor
Parameter Name Monitoring Objective Scale
Suitable for Comparison
to NAAQS
Proposal to Move
or Change
PM 2.5 local conditions, BAM
General background;
welfare related impacts
Regional Yes
Will change to a
BAM 1022 in
summer 2023
PM10 total 0-10µm STP General background Regional Yes None
Volatile organic compounds General background Regional
Not applicable
Monitoring
Suspended
2/6/2023
Carbonyl compounds General background Regional Not applicable None
Parameter Name
Meets Part 58 Requirements for:
Appendix A Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E
PM 2.5 local conditions, BAM Yes Yes Yes- required
background site Yes
PM10 total 0-10µm STP Yes Yes Yes – not required Yes
E6

Table E1. Site Information Table for Candor
Volatile organic compounds Yes Not applicable Yes – not required Yes
Carbonyl compounds Yes Not applicable Yes – not required Yes
Parameter Name Probe Height in meters Distance to Support Distance to Trees Obstacles
PM 2.5 local conditions, BAM 2.46 > 2 meters >20 meters None
PM10 total 0-10um STP 3.17 2.87 meters >20 meters None
Volatile organic compounds 3.91 1.117 meters > 20 meters None
Carbonyl compounds 3.91 1.117 meters > 20 meters None
Each CASTNET dry deposition station measures:
• Weekly average atmospheric
concentrations of sulfate, nitrate,
ammonium, sulfur dioxide and nitric
acid; and
• Hourly concentrations of ambient
ozone levels.
The CASTNET meteorological equipment was
transferred to the division in 2012.
The Candor site is located on the eastern edge of
the Uwharrie National Forest. In 2013, DAQ added
a BAM and a one-in-six-day carbonyl sampler to
support a background monitoring study. July 1,
2015, the BAM became the primary monitor at
the site when DAQ shut down the FRM. Currently,
DAQ has been forced to suspend the VOC portion
of the UAT program due to staffing issues at the
Reedy Creek Analysis Laboratory. This suspension
of the VOC program began in February of 2023
and is expected to continue for the remainder of
the year. DAQ hopes to reestablish the program in
2024 when staffing and training issues are
resolved. DAQ continues to operate the UAT
Aldehydes program.
Figure E3. The Candor air toxics shelter and rainwater
collection sampler

Figure E4. The Candor particle monitors, rainwater
collection sampler, shelter, and meteorological tower
E7

Figure E5. The Candor mercury deposition monitor
and rain gauge

Figure E6. Looking north from the Candor site
Figure E7. Looking east from the Candor site

Figure E8. Looking west from the Candor site
Figure E9. Looking south from the Candor site
There are no new monitoring requirements that will require additional monitoring in this area.
(2) The Fayetteville MSA
The Fayetteville MSA consists of three counties: Cumberland, Harnett and Hoke. The major urban area is
the City of Fayetteville. In July 2021, the U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, estimated 524,588
E8

people lived here.1 DAQ currently operates three monitoring sites in the Fayetteville MSA. These sites
are all located in Cumberland County at William H. Owen Elementary School, E. Melvin Honeycutt
Elementary School in Fayetteville and at District 7 Elementary School. The division shut down the
Golfview site in Hope Mills on Oct. 31, 2014, and moved the Wade site to Wade School on March 1,
2022. The locations of these monitors are shown in Figure E10.

Figure E10. Monitors located in the Fayetteville MSA

1 Source: Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States and
Puerto Rico: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 (CBSA-MET-EST2021-POP), U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division,
Released March 2022, available online at https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-
total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html.
E9

(a) The Honeycutt School site
At the Honeycutt site, DAQ operates a seasonal ozone monitor and a special purpose sulfur dioxide
monitor that operates for 12 months every three years. DAQ established this site in April 2015. The
division discovered in February 2014 that the golf course where the Golfview monitoring station was
located was closed and the property where the monitor was located was for sale. The property owner
agreed to allow DAQ to continue using the site until the property sold. The property sold in August 2014
and the new owner requested DAQ move the monitoring station as soon as possible. The division
investigated surrounding properties to identify a potential location for the monitoring station. The
property abuts YMCA property on one side and city property on the other. DAQ considered relocating
the monitoring station about 100 meters southeast to the YMCA property, however, the YMCA never
responded to the request. Thus, the division worked with the school system to move the site to E.
Melvin Honeycutt Elementary School at 4665 Lakewood Drive, Fayetteville, North Carolina. As shown in
Figure E11, the school is located about 3.2 kilometers northwest of the former Golfview location.
Figure E11. Location of Honeycutt site, B, relative to Golfview, A
Figure E12 through Figure E16 show the site and views looking north, east, south and west. Table E2
summarizes monitoring information for the site. The Honeycutt ozone site is the upwind site for the
Fayetteville MSA. Sulfur dioxide monitoring occurs here every third year because the site is a good
background site for obtaining data for Prevention of Significant Deterioration modeling requirements.
This sulfur-dioxide monitor operated from March 15, 2021, through March 31, 2022.
E10

Figure E12. Honeycutt ozone and sulfur dioxide monitoring site, 37-051-0010
Figure E13. Looking north from the Honeycutt site Figure E14. Looking east from the Honeycutt site
Figure E15. Looking west from the Honeycutt site Figure E16. Looking south from the Honeycutt site
E11

Table E2. Site Information Table for Honeycutt
Site Name: Honeycutt AQS Site Identification Number: 37-051-0010
Location: 4665 Lakewood Drive, Fayetteville, North Carolina CBSA: Fayetteville, NC CBSA #: 22180
Latitude 35.00165 Longitude -78.99075 Datum: WGS84
Elevation 59.1 meters
Parameter Name Method Method Reference ID
Sample
Duration Sampling Schedule
Ozone
Instrumental with ultraviolet
photometry, 047 EQOA-0880-047 1-Hour March 1 to Oct. 31
Sulfur dioxide
Instrumental with pulsed
fluorescence, 060 EQSA-0486-060 1-Hour
Year-round; every third
year
Date Monitor Established: Ozone May 9, 2015
Sulfur dioxide May 9, 2015
Nearest Road: Fisher Road Traffic
Count:
9,500 Year of Count: 2021
Parameter Name Distance to Road Direction to Road Monitor Type Statement of Purpose
Ozone 43 meters North northeast SLAMS
Real-time AQI reporting and
forecasting. Compliance w/NAAQS.
Sulfur dioxide 43 meters North northeast
Special
purpose
Prevention of significant
deterioration, PSD, modeling
Parameter Name Monitoring Objective Scale
Suitable for Comparison
to NAAQS
Proposal to Move
or Change
Ozone Population exposure Neighborhood Yes None
Sulfur dioxide
Population exposure
General background
Neighborhood Yes
Will start 1/1/2024
and operate to
12/31/2024
Parameter Name
Meets Part 58 Appendix
A Requirements
Meets Part 58 Appendix
C Requirements
Meets Part 58
Appendix D
Requirements
Meets Part 58
Appendix E
Requirements
Ozone Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sulfur dioxide Yes Yes Yes - Not required Yes
Parameter Name Probe Height in meters Distance to Support Distance to Trees Obstacles
Ozone 4.26 meters 1.2 meters >20 meters None
Sulfur dioxide 4.22 meters 1.5 meters >20 meters None
Because 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D requires MSAs with more than 350,000 people to have two ozone
monitors, this site is the second required ozone site for the Fayetteville MSA.
(b) The Wade School site
At the Wade School site, DAQ operates a seasonal ozone monitor. A picture of the site as well as views
looking north, east, south, and west are provided in Figure E17 through Figure E21. Table E3 summarizes
monitoring information for the site.
E12

Figure E17. Wade School ozone monitoring Site, 37-051-0011
Figure E18. Looking north from Wade School site Figure E19. Looking east from the Wade School site
E13

Figure E20. Looking west from the Wade School site Figure E21. Looking south from the Wade School site
Table E3. Site Information Table for Wade
Site Name: Wade School AQS Site Identification Number: 37-051-0011
Location: 5721 Smithfield Road, Wade, North Carolina CBSA: Fayetteville, NC CBSA #: 22180
Latitude 35.1487 Longitude -78.7068 Datum: WGS84 Elevation 48 meters
Parameter
Name Method
Method Reference
ID
Sample
Duration Sampling Schedule
Ozone Instrumental with ultraviolet photometry, 047 EQOA-0880-047 1-Hour March 1 to Oct. 31
Date Monitor Established: Ozone March 1, 2022
Nearest Road: Smithfield Road

Traffic Count: 850

Year of Count: 2021
Parameter Name Distance to Road Direction to Road Monitor Type Statement of Purpose
Ozone 81 meters Southeast SLAMS
Compliance w/NAAQS. Real-time AQI
reporting & forecasting.
Parameter Name Monitoring Objective Scale
Suitable for Comparison
to NAAQS
Proposal to Move or
Change
Ozone Highest concentration Urban Yes None
Parameter Name
Meets 40 CFR Part 58 Requirements for:
Appendix A Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E
Ozone Yes Yes Yes Yes
Parameter Name Probe Height in meters Distance to Support Distance to Trees Obstacles
Ozone 4.40 1.2 meter >20 meters None
North Carolina established a site at Armstrong School in Eastover (37-051-0001) on March 1, 1981, as
the downwind site for the Fayetteville MSA. On May 8, 1990, the site was relocated to 7112 Covington
Lane in Wade (37-051-0008). In October 2019, the DAQ evaluated the Wade site to see if it still met the
siting criteria in Appendix E to 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 58. The Wade site was
surrounded by trees on three sides. The site barely met the 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix E siting
requirements. Because DAQ planned to replace the monitoring shelter at the site, the DAQ decided to
move the site to District 7 Elementary School. The new site at District 7 Elementary School is 2.23
kilometers southeast of the Wade site as shown in Figure E22. The Cumberland County Board of
Education agreed to this location on Feb. 11, 2020.
E14

Figure E22. Location of Wade School site relative to the Wade site
Mr. Mark Whitley, Executive Director for Cumberland County Schools, at District 7 Elementary School,
approved placing the relocated Wade monitor inside the fence where the old pump house is as shown in
Figure E23. The DAQ posted a network plan addendum on the Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality website for public comment for 30 days from Feb. 25 to March 26, 2020, and
submitted it to the EPA on April 1, 2020.2 The DAQ did not receive any public comments on the request
to relocate the Wade site. The Wade School site was established and started operating on March 1,
2022.

2 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 2019-2020 Final Network Monitoring Plan, Volume 1,
Addendum 1. Wade Relocation Siting Analysis and Site Information, Available on the worldwide web at
http://xapps.ncdenr.org/aq/documents/DocsSearch.do?dispatch=download&documentId=12992.
E15

Figure E23. Aerial view of the Wade School site
(c) The William Owen School site
At the William Owen site, DAQ operates continuous fine particle and PM10 monitors. Figure E24 shows
the site. Table E4 summarizes monitoring information for the site. Views looking north, northeast, east,
southeast, south, southwest, west, and northwest are provided in Figure E25 through Figure E32. The
meteorological tower with wind speed and wind direction sensors, ambient temperature sensors at 10
meters and 2 meters, and rainfall and solar radiation sensors was shut down on Nov. 12, 2014. In mid-
January 2016, the collocated high-volume PM10 monitors at the site were shut down and replaced with a
low-volume continuous PM10 monitor. At the end of 2015 the well-impactor ninety-six, WINS, on the
FRM was replaced with a very sharp cut cyclone, VSCC. This change was made because the VSCC is
easier and less expensive to maintain. In mid-2017, a one-in-six-day collocated fine particle FRM was
added to the site. At the end of 2019, the division shut down the two fine-particle FRMs at the site.
Figure E24. The William Owen particle monitoring site
E16

Table E4. Site Information Table for William Owen School
Site Name: William Owen School AQS Site Identification Number 37-051-0009
Location: 4533 Raeford Road, Fayetteville, North Carolina
CBSA: Fayetteville, NC CBSA #: 22180
Latitude 35.041416 Longitude -78.953112 Datum: WGS84 Elevation 63 meters
Parameter Name Method
Method
Reference ID
Sample
Duration
Sampling
Schedule
PM 2.5 local conditions, BAM
Met One BAM-1022 Mass Monitor w/
VSCC EQPM-1013-209 1-Hour Year-round
PM10 total 0-10µm STP, primary Met One Beta Attenuation BAM-1020 EQPM-0798-122 1-Hour Year-round
Date Monitor Established: PM 2.5 local conditions, continuous monitor Dec. 30, 2015
PM10 total 0-10µm STP, primary monitor Jan. 1, 1999
Nearest Road: Raeford Road Traffic Count: 43,500 Year of Count: 2021
Parameter Name
Distance to
Road
Direction
to Road
Monitor
Type Statement of Purpose
PM 2.5 local conditions, continuous 210 meters North SLAMS Real-time AQI reporting & forecasting
PM10 total 0-10µm STP, primary 210 meters North SLAMS Compliance w/NAAQS
Parameter Name
Monitoring
Objective Scale
Suitable for NAAQS
Comparison
Proposal to Move
or Change
PM 2.5 local conditions, continuous Population exposure Urban Yes None
PM10 total 0-10µm STP, primary Population exposure Urban Yes None
Parameter Name
Meets Part 58 Requirements for:
Appendix A Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E
PM 2.5 local conditions, continuous Yes Yes Yes Yes
PM10 total 0-10µm STP, primary Yes Yes Yes Yes
Parameter Name Probe Height in meters Distance to Support Distance to Trees Obstacles
PM 2.5 local conditions, continuous 4.666 > 2 meters >20 meters None
PM10 total 0-10µm STP, primary 2.64 2.38 >20 meters None

Figure E25. William Owen site looking north
Figure E26. William Owen site looking northwest
E17

Figure E27. William Owen Site looking northeast
Figure E28. William Owen site looking east
Figure E29. William Owen site looking west
Figure E30. William Owen Site looking southwest

Figure E31. William Owen site looking southeast
Figure E32. William Owen site looking south
Additional monitoring could be required in the Fayetteville MSA to comply with the 2010 lead
monitoring requirements,3 as revised in 2016 4. In 2013, Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg) reported over
0.5 tons of fugitive lead emissions in the TRI, as shown in Figure E33. Calculation of the 2014 fugitive

3 Revisions to Lead Ambient Air Monitoring Requirements, Federal Register, Vol. 75, No. 247, Monday, Dec. 27,
2010, p. 81126, available on the worldwide web at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-27/pdf/2010-
32153.pdf#page=1.
4 Revisions to Ambient Monitoring Quality Assurance and Other Requirements, Federal Register, Vol. 81, No. 59,
Monday, March 28, 2016, p. 17248, available on the worldwide web at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-
03-28/pdf/2016-06226.pdf.
E18

lead emissions using AP-42 emission factors resulted in 2014 emissions of less than 0.5 tons. 5 Thus, in
2015, DAQ requested a waiver from lead monitoring at Fort Liberty. The EPA did not grant the waiver
because the lead emissions were less than 0.5 tons. As shown in Figure E33, in 2018, Fort Liberty again
reported over 0.5 tons of fugitive lead emissions in the TRI.6 As a result, DAQ requested a waiver for
monitoring at the facility.7

Figure E33. Fort Liberty Lead and Lead Compound Releases to the Air from 2009 to 2020
In its response to the 2020-2021 network plan,8 the EPA agreed with the rationale DAQ provided;
however, the EPA asked to work with DAQ and Fort Liberty to further determine if base activities have
the potential to cause elevated ambient lead concentrations. Thus, the EPA neither required lead
monitoring nor granted a waiver of lead monitoring requirements for the area near Fort Liberty. Instead,
the EPA requested that DAQ work with the EPA to provide supplemental information in the next
network plan on whether Fort Liberty would be expected to potentially contribute to elevated lead
concentrations. DAQ met internally after receiving EPA’s request and determined DAQ has done all it
has the authority to do regarding monitoring at Fort Liberty. DAQ will provide the EPA with all the

5 United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2014 Toxic Release Inventory, released March 2015, available on
the worldwide web at https://iaspub.epa.gov/triexplorer/tri_release.chemical.
6 Data obtained from the 2020 EPA Toxics Release Inventory Tracker available at
https://edap.epa.gov/public/extensions/TRIToxicsTracker/TRIToxicsTracker.html#
7 2020-2021 Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Volume 1, July 2, 2020,
Section II.G.2, https://xapps.ncdenr.org/aq/documents/DocsSearch.do?dispatch=download&documentId=14029
(accessed May 5, 2021).
8 United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2020-2021 State of North Carolina Ambient Air Monitoring
Network Plan, The U. S. EPA Region 4 Comments and Recommendations, p14, available at
https://xapps.ncdenr.org/aq/documents/DocsSearch.do?dispatch=download&documentId=13593
E19

information obtained to date on lead emissions and modeling for lead at Fort Liberty via a separate
document.
There are no other new or existing monitoring requirements that will require additional monitoring in
this area.
E20

Appendix E.1 Annual Network Site Review Forms for 2022
Candor
Honeycutt
Wade School
William Owen in Fayetteville
E21

E22

E23

E24

E25

E26

E27

E28