AQ_F_0900009_20221114_ST_StkTstRpt_PPA

The Chemours Company
Fayetteville Works
11C Chemours- 22828 NC Highway 87 W
Fayetteville,NC 28306
Sent Via email and USPS
Certified Mail 70171450 0002 3902 4409
Certified Mail 7017 1450 0002 3902 4416
Certified Mail 70171450 0002 3902 4423
November 11, 2022 n 1' @ 110 W/ R D
Michael Abraczinskas Iona( NOV 14 2022
Director, Division of Air Quality AIR QUALITY
1641 Mail Service Center STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
Raleigh,NC 27699-1641 RECEIVED
Re: Quarterly Carbon Unit Testing VEN
Annual Carbon Unit Testing VES and PPA N�� 1 4 2022
Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works
Bladen County `ty
pvisiou of�ti*
Facility ID 0900009, Title V Permit No. 03757T48
Dear Mr. Abraczinskas,
Enclosed are the carbon unit quarterly testing results for the Vinyl Ethers North (VEN) operating
area and the annual carbon unit testing results for Vinyl Ethers—South and Polymer Processing
Aid operating areas conducted the week of September 26, 2022. The test reports were prepared
by Alliance Source Testing and are enclosed. The testing is being conducted pursuant to Section
2.2 D. b and c. In addition, the VEN testing completes the testing required under the April 2022
Settlement Agreement.
Two copies of the reports are enclosed.
If there are any questions regarding these reports, please contact Christel Compton at
Christel e comptonna chemours.com.
Kind Regards,
La
4- j �z
Christel Compton
Environmental Program Manager
CC via email, Heather Carter,NCDAQ

P
Alfiarx e
TECHNICAL GROUP
Source Test Report
The Chemours Company, FC, LLC NOV 14 2022
Fayetteville Works AIR QUALITY
22828 Highway 87W STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Source Tested: Polymer Process Aid (PPA) Carbon Bed
Test Date: September 27, 2022
Project No. AST-2022-3359
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
6515A Basile Rowe
East Syracuse,NY 1305

r�
All anoe
Sou RepoH
TECHNICAL GROUP Test Program SnRepay
Regulatory Information
Permit No. North Carolina Department of Air Quality(NCDAQ)Title V Air Permit No.03735T48
Source Information
Source Name Target Parameter
PPA Carbon Bed(Inlet/Outlet) HFPO-DA
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
The Chemours Company,FC,LLC Alliance Technical Group,LLC Eurofins TestAmerica
Fayetteville Works 6515A Basile Rowe 5815 Middlebrook Pike
22828 Highway 87W East Syracuse,MY 13057 Knoxville,TN 37921
Fayetteville,North Carolina Courtney Adkins
Project Manager/Field Team Leader [e-mail]
Facility Contact Patrick Grady
Christel Compton [e-mail]
[e-mail] [phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
[phone]
Report Coordinator
Emily Diaz
[e-mail]
[phone]
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page i
2 of 142

Affia Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP n
Certification Statement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s)tested and operating condition(s)for the specific test date(s)and time(s)identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety,and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format(.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
November 4, 2022
Patrick Grady,QSTI Date
Project Manager
Alliance Technical Group,LLC
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page ii
3of142

Affia
TECHNICAL GROUP source Test Report
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Project Team............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results.....................................................................................................................................2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology....................................................................................................................................3-1
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate.....3-1
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content.........................................................................3-1
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid......................................................3-1
3.4 BFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation.............................................................................3-2
3.5 BFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery..........................................................................................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table1-1: Project Team........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table2-1: Summary of Results................................................................................................................................2-1
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology..................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page iii
4of142

Introduction
5 of 142

Al l iance
Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by The Chemours Company (Chemours) to conduct
compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works facility in Fayetteville, North Carolina. The facility operates under
North Carolina Department of Air Quality (NCDAQ) Title V Air Permit No. 03735T48. Source emissions testing
were conducted at the inlet and outlet of the Polymer Process Aid (PPA) carbon bed. The testing was conducted to
evaluate emissions of hexafluoro-propylene oxide-dimer acid (B PO-DA). BFPO-DA, hexafluoro-propylene oxide
dimer acid fluoride (BFPO-DAF) and hexafluoro-propylene oxide dimer acid ammonium salt are captured and
reported together as BFPO-DA.
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
The PPA facility produces surfactants used to produce fluoropolymer products,such as Teflon®at other Chemours
facilities, as well as sales to outside producers of fluoropolymers. Process streams are vented to a caustic wet
scrubber(ACD-Al),a carbon bed and exhausted through a process stack(AEP-Al).The,process inside the building
is under negative pressure and the building air is vented to the carbon bed and the process stack(AEP-Al).
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
Patrick Grady
Antonio Andersen
Alliance Personnel Jacob Cavallo
Brian Goodhile
Jeff Sheldon
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 1-1
6 of 142

Summary of Results
7 of 142

Affia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Summary of Resulls
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works Facility in Fayetteville, NC on September 27,
2022. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of HFPO-DA at the inlet and outlet of the PPA carbon
bed.
Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results. Any difference between the summary results listed in
the following tables and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
Run Number Run 1' Run 2 ° Run'3 Avera e
g.
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22
HFPO-DA Data
Outlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 3.3E-05 1.9E-05 4.7E-05 3.3E-05
Inlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 3.5E-02 2.7E-01 2.4E-01 1.8E-01
Reduction Efficiency,% 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 2-1
8of142

Testing Methodology
9of142

Alliance
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
U S EkA Reference
Parameter _ Nbtes/Reinarks
Test.Methods
1
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 &2 Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid Modified Method 0010 Isokinetic Sampling
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric-Flow Rate The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 1.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing,each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the
same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid
BFPO-DA emissions were evaluated in accordance with Modified Method 0010.Testing followed the submitted
protocol in the execution of our onsite sampling and analysis activities.Modified Method 0010 procedure was
followed as outlined in the protocol submitted to NC Division of Air Quality.Modified Method 0010 sampling and
analysis procedures performed for this project are-consistent with_01M45,which was released by-EPA in January
2021,subsequent to Chemours submittal of plans to DAQ.
The sample train consisted of a borosilicate glass nozzle attached directly to a heated borosilicate glass-lined probe.
The probe was connected directly to a heated borosilicate glass filter holder containing a solvent-extracted glass
fiber filter.In order to minimize possible thermal degradation of the HFPO-DA,the probe and particulate filter were
heated to just above stack temperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The filter holder exit
was connected to a water-cooled coil condenser followed by a water-cooled sorbent module containing
approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 inlet temperature was monitored to ensure that the module is
maintained at a temperature below 20°C.
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-1
10 of 142

�s
Afflarme
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger and a series of three impingers each
containing 100-ml of high purity deionized water. The water impingers were followed by another condensate
knockout impinger equipped with a second XAD-2 resin trap to account for any sample breakthrough. The final
impinger contained approximately 250 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. The water impingers and condensate
impingers were submerged in an ice bath through the duration of the testing.The water in the ice bath was also used
to circulate around the coil condenser and the XAD-2 resin traps.
Exhaust gases were extracted from the sample locations isokinetically using a metering console equipped with a
vacuum pump,a calibrated orifice,oil manometer and probe/filter heat controllers.
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation
Prior to conducting the field work the following procedures were conducted to prepare the field sampling glassware
and sample recovery tools.
1. Wash all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with low residue soap and hot water.
2. Rinse all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools three(3)times with D.I.H2O.
3. Bake glassware (with the exception of probe liners) at 450°C for approximately 2 hours, (XAD-2 resin tube
glassware is cleaned by Eurofins/TestAmerica by this same procedure).
4. Solvent rinse three(3)times all glassware, brushes, and ancillary tools with the following sequence of solvents:
acetone,methylene chloride,hexane,and methanol.
5. Clean glassware and tools will be sealed in plastic bags or aluminum foil for transport to the sampling site.
6. Squirt bottles will be new dedicated bottles of known history and dedicated to the D.I. Water and
methanol/ammonium hydroxide (Me0H/5%NH40H)solvent contents. Squirt bottles will be labelled with the
solvent content it contains.
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery
Following completion of each test run,the sample probe,nozzle and front-half of the filter holder were brushed and
rinsed three times each with the McOH/ 5% NH40H solution (Container#1). The glass fiber filter was removed
from its housing and transferred to a polyethylene bottle (Container #2). Any particulate matter and filter fibers
which adhered to the filter holder and gasket were also placed in Container#2. The XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,
labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler. The back-half of the filter holder, coil condenser condensate trap and
connecting glassware were rinsed with the same McOH/5%NH40H solution and placed in Container#3.
The volume of water collected in all impingers was measured for moisture determinations and then placed in
Container 44. All impingers and connecting glassware were then rinsed with the McOH/5%NH40H solution and
placed in Container #5. The second (breakthrough) XAD-2 resin trap was sealed, labelled and placed in an iced
sample cooler. The contents of the fifth impinger were placed in its original container and weighed for moisture
determinations.
Containers were sealed and labeled with the appropriate sample information. Samples remained chilled until
analysis.HFPO-DA analysis was conducted using liquid chromatography/dual mass spectrometry(LC/MS/MS).
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-2
11 of 142

12 of 142

Appendix A
aflal'Icle Example Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Meter Pressure(Pm),in.Hg
A
where, Pm = Pb + 1. 6
Pb 29.94 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
OH 0.681 =pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Pm 29.99 =in.H.-
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure(Ps),in.Hg
Pg
where, Ps = Pb + 1.1_6
Pb 29.94 =barometric pressure;in.Hg
Pg -1.30 =static pressure,in.H2O
Ps 29.84 =in.Hg
Standard Meter Volume(Vmstd),dscf
17.636 x Y x Vm x Pm
Vmstd =
where, TM
Y 1.032 =meter correction factor
Vm 42.281 =meter volume,cf
Pm 29.99 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Tm 526.7 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vmstd 43.816 =dscf
Standard Wet Volume(Vwstd),scf
Vwstd = 0.04716 x Vlc
where,
Me 33.5 =volume ofHZO collected,ml
Vwstd 1.580 =scf
Moisture Fraction(BWSsat),dimensionless(theoretical at saturated conditions)
6.37—(( 21827 ll
10 \Ts+ 665/
BWSsat =
PS
where,
Ts 69.1 =stack temperature,°F
Ps 29.84 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
BWSsat 0.024 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless(measured)
Vwstd
BWS =
where, (Vwstd + Vmstd)
Vwstd 1.580 =standard wet volume,scf
Vmstd 43.816 =standard meter volume,dscf
BWS 0.035 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat< BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 0.024 =moisture fraction(theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.035 =moisture fraction(measured)
BWS 0.024
13 of 142

� Appendix A
AMI�1'1Ce Example Calculations
source reSTINCq
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Molecular Weight(DRY)(Md),lb/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %02) + (0.28 (100— %CO2 — %02))
where,
co, 0.1 =carbon dioxide concentration,%
02 20.9 =oxygen concentration,%
Md 28.85 =lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight(WET)(Ms),ib/ib-mole
Ms = Md (1 — BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
BWS 0.024 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ms 28.59 =lb/lb mol
Average Velocity(Vs),ft/sec
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (A P 1/2)avg x Ts
where, , Ps x Ms
Cp 0.840 =pitot tube coefficient
A P12 0.417 =velocity head of stack gas,(in.H2O)12
Ts 528.8 =absolute stack temperature,OR
Ps 29.84 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ms 28.59 =molecular weight of stack gas,lb/lb mol
Vs 23.6 =ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions(Qa),acfm
Qa = 60 x Vs x As
where,
Vs 23.6 =stack gas velocity,ft/sec
As 6.31 =cross-sectional area of stack,ft2
Qa 8,928 =acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions(Qs),dscfm
Ps
Qs = 17.636 x Qa x (1 — BWS) x —
where,
Qa 8,928 =average stack gas flow at stack conditions,acfm
BWS 0.024 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ps 29.84 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ts 528.8 =absolute stack temperature,OR
Qs 8,675 =dscfm
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check(Yqa),dimensionless
Y— 0.0319 x Tm x 29 AH av .
(VO-
gm �H@ x (Pb + �13a6g') x Md
Yqa = x 100
where,
Y 1.032 =meter correction factor,dimensionless
O 96 =run time,min.
Vm 42.281 =total meter volume,dcf
TM 526.7 =absolute meter temperature,OR
AH@ 1.699 =orifice meter calibration coefficient,in.H2O
Pb 29.94 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH avg 0.681 =average pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
(A H)12 0.812 =average squareroot pressure differential of orifice,(in.1­120)12
Yqa -2.9 =dimensionless
14 of 142

Appendix A
Ql1ME3r1e Example Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HYPO-DA
Volume of Nozzle(Vn),ft'
Vn = p� (0.002669 x Vlc +Vm T m x Y
where,
Ts 528.8 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 29.84 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Vic 33.5 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vm 42.281 =meter volume,cf
Pm 29.99 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Y 1.032 =meter correction factor,unitless
TM 526.7 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vn 45.605 =volume of nozzle,ft'
Isokinetic Sampling Rate(I),%
Vn
1 Bx60xAnxVs x100
where,
Vn 45.605 =nozzle volume,ft3
0 96.0 =run time,minutes
An 0.00034 =area of nozzle,ft2
Vs 23.6 =average velocity,ft/sec
I 97.3 =%
HFPO-DA Concentration(C),ng/dscm
_ M x 35.313
C Vmstd
where,
M 1,345,260 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Vmstd 43.816 =standard meter volume,dscf
C"' 1.1E+06 =ng/dscm
HFPO-DA Emission Rate(ER),lb/hr
MxQsx60
ER = Vartctd x 4.54F. + 11
where,
M 1,345,260 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Qs 8,675 =average stack gas flow at standard conditions,dscfm
Vmstd 43.816 =standard meter volume,dscf
ER 3.5E-02 =lb/hr
15 of 142

Appendix j
16 of 142

5E-
A IIEEr Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22 --
Start Time 8:05 10:30 12:50 --
Stop Time 9:53 12:18 14:38 --
Run Time,min (0) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 29.94 29.94 29.94 29.94
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.001 1.001 1.001 1.001
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) 1.841 1.841 1.841 1.841
Meter Volume,113 (Vm) 62.691 64.113 62.504 63.103
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 69.1 78.1 84.8 77.3
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 528.8 537.8 544.4 537.0
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (AH) 1.298 1.346 1.286 1.310
Volume H2O Collected,mL (Vlc) 30.3 28.2 27.1 28.5
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ft2 (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 991.0 479.0 1,450.0 973.3
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 578.0 475.0 972.0 675.0
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -- -- -- --
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 143.0 13.9 12.8 56.57
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,712.0 967.9 2,434.8 1,704.9
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 62.862 63.224 60.874 62.320
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.429 1.330 1.278 1.346
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.027 0.028 0.028 0.028
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.04 30.04 30.03 30.04
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 64.580 65.002 62.647 64.08
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 103.6 103.1 103.0 103.2
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Y'J 3.7 3.2 2.8 3.2
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(IPODA) 9.6E+02 5.4E+02 1.4E+03 9.7E+02
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,Ib/hr ER(HFPODA) 3.3E-05 1.9E-05 4.7E-05 3.3E-05
REDUCTION CALCULATIONS
Inlet HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr RE(HFPODA) 3.5E-02 2.7E-01 2.4E-01 1.8E-01
HFPO-DA Reduction Efficiency,% RE(HFPODA) 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reporting limit.
17 of 142

Alliance Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Tolymer Process Aid Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22 --
Start Time 8:05 10:30 12:50 --
Stop Time 9:53 12:18 14:38 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.33
Point 2 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 3 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 4 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 5 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 6 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 7 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.35
Point 8 0.34 0.34 0.35 _ 0.34
Point 9 0.34 0.30 0.23 0.29
Point 10 0.33 0.30 0.23 0.29
Point 11 0.33 0.29 0.22 0.28
Point 12 0.33 0.29 0.22 0.28
Point 13 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.33
Point 14 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.33
Point 15 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.33
Point 16 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.33
Point 17 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 18 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 19 0.34 0.33 0.35 0.34
Point 20 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.34
Point 21 0.34 0.30 0.35 0.33
Point 22 0.21 0.30 0.19 0.23
Point 23 0.21 0.30 0.19 0.23
Point 24 0.21 0.25 0.19 0.22
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.562 0.568 0.547 0.559
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 29.94 29.94 29.94 29.94
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 30.05 30.05 30.05 30.05
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 4.91 4.91 4.91 4.91
Temperature,°F _(Ts) __ 72.7 . _ _-74...0 74.5 73.8
Temperature,°R (Ts) 532.4 533.7 534.2 533.420
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.027 0.028 0.028 0.028
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021
02 Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2 Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.61 28.63 28.63 28.62
Velocity,ft/sec (Vs) 31.8 32.1 31.0 31.6
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 9,355 9,459 9,121 9,312
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 9,106 9,200 8,862 9,056
18 of 142

AID anCNG Method 1 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Cheenuurs Company-Fayetteville Worls Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Outict
Project No.2022-3359
Date: 09/26/22
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Vertical D.5 t.o 1.5 2.0
Duct Design: Circular eHigher Number Is f
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 46.00 in Rectangular Stacks a Duets
Nipple Length: 16.00 in LL-Z
"MDepth ofDuct: 30.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 4.91 ftr
No.ofTest Pon dnts
s: 2 za or 2s eace
Distance A: 32.0 ft 20"his
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) to o0i Suck 0umeler>o.ot m(za m.)
Distance B: 12.0 fteo�,ota,v'rsvoa �a odors
Distance B Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>2) w.,vm (esna,e a ors"prints
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 24 wnwcuon.ok:.)
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 Suck aomour°0.30 w 0.61 m(12-2a o,.)
Number of Readings per Point: I
Measurer(Initial and Date):BAG-92622 2 3 a is 6 7 a g
Revimver(Initial and Date): IS-92622
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Traverse %of from
Number ojtraverse points on a diameter from inside
Paint Diameter arall outside of
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 II 12port
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 17.00
2 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.01 18.01
3 - - 75.0 - 29.6 -- 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 3.54 19.54
4 - - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 5.31 21.31
5 - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 - 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 7.50 23.50
6 - - - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 10.68 26.68
7 - - - - - - 89.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 19.32 35.32
8 - -• - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 22.50 38.50
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 24.69 40.69
10 - - - - - - - - 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 26.46 42.46
11 - -- - - -- - - -- - - 93.3 11 93.3 27.99 43.99
12 97.9 12 1 97.9 29.00 43.00
'Percent ofstack diameterfrom inside call to traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=32 ft.
B=12 ft.
Depth of Duct=30 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
•
•
•
B
Upstream
Disturbance
19 of 142

Alliance SOURCE 7'ES TING Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/27/22
Sample Point Angle(AP=O)
1 6
2 8
3 8
4 6
5 8
6 4
7 10
8 10 -
9 12
10 10
11 10
12 10
13 10
14 8
15 8
16 4
17 4
18 4
19 6
20 10
21 10
22 12
23 13
24 12
Average 8
20 of 142

0--
Alliance Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 302.6 498.6 743.8 760.6 736.5 499.8 342.7 842.3 4726.9
Final Mass,g 314.6 499.5 743.6 757.0 738.1 498.3 354.9 851.2 4757.2
Gain 12.0 1 0.9 1 -0.2 1 -3.6 1.6 1 -1.5 12.2 8.9 1 30.3
Run 2 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 303.9 483.7 734.3 752.0 761.3 476.6 308.8 867.6 4688.2
Final Mass,g 313.5 484.3 733.4 751.8 761.9 478.0 314.9 878.6 4716.4
Gain 9.6 0.6 -0.9 -0.2 0.6 1.4 6.1 11.0 1 28.2
Run 3 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 307.7 499.6 733.5 771.3 736.6 498.3 317.2 839.8 4704.0
Final Mass,g 317.9 499.9 732.3 773.0 737.8 499.2 324.6 846.4 4731.1
Gain 10.2 0.3 -1.2 1.7 1.2 1 0.9 7.4 6.6 27.1
21 of 142

9-5
A fiarKM
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:05 Source:Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Date: 9127l22 Run 1 IVALID End Time: 9:53 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Boa ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 75 °F Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(MI)
Barometric: 30.03 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 83 °F Pg: 1.50 in.WC 30.3
Static Press: 1.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.35 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.16 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-51) Est.Dn: 0.271 in. CO': 0.1 % 4.096
COt: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm I Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL•3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - - 10 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole 1 Nozzle Du(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - Pass Mid-Paint Leak Check Vol(co: -
Pitot Gas Tempera ores°F Orifice Press. Gas Terneratures °F
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
o. (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) Ate. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
G° (fta) (in WC) (in.Hg)
(JD Qy Begin End 60 60 Ideal Actual 60 60 60 60
I 0.00 4.00 509.281 0.33 60 57 1.38 1.40 I 80 86 51 45 105.7 31.91
2 4.00 8.00 512.000 0.33 62 73 1.35 1.35 1 81 84 51 44 109.3 32.40
3 8.00 12.00 514.780 0.33 63 73 1.35 1.31 1 81 80 49 43 103.2 32.40
4 12.00 16.00 517.410 0.33 65 73 1.35 1.30 1 81 80 48 41 102.8 32.40
5 16.00 20.00 520.040 0.33 66 73 1.36 1.30 1 81 81 48 39 103.4 32.40
6 20.00 24.00 522.690 0.33 66 73 1.36 1.30 1 80 80 47 38 103.4 32.40
7 24.00 28.00 525.340 0.34 67 73 1.40 1.40 1 81 82 47 38 I03.6 32.88
8 28.00 32.00 528.040 0.34 68 73 1.40 1.40 1 - 81 - 80 - --48 38- 103.8 32.88 - J -
9 32.00 36.00 530.750 0.34 68 73 1.40 1.40 I 81 81 48 38 103.4 32.88
10 36.00 40.00 533.450 0.33 68 74 1.36 1.35 1 81 80 47 37 105.8 32.43
11 40.00 44.00 536.170 0.33 69 73 1.36 1.35 1 81 81 47 37 103.9 32.40
12 44.00 48.00 538.850 0.33 70 73 1.37 1.35 1 81 _81 47 38 102.0 32.40
1 48.00 52.00 541.486 0.33 71 73 1.37 1.35 1 80 80 52 43 102.9 32.40
2 52.00 56.00 544.150 0.33 68 73 1.36 1.35 1 81 81 51 42 103.8 32.40
3 56.00 60.00 546.820 0.33 71 74 1.37 1.35 1 81 1 81 49 41 103.7 32.43
4 60.00 64.00 549.500 0.33 71 74 1.37 1.35 1 81 80 49 40 103.7 32.43
5 64.00 68.00 552.180 0.33 72 74 1.37 1.35 1 81 81 50 41 101.9 32.43
6 68.00 72.00 554.820 0.33 73 74 1.37 1.35 I 81 81 51 41 101.3 32.43
7 72.00 76.00 557.450 0.34 74 74 1.41 1.40 1 81 81 50 42 102.7 32.91
8 76.00 80.00 560.160 0.34 73 74 1.41 1.40 1 80 81 50 40 103.3 32.91
9 1 80.00 1 84.00 562.880 0.34 73 74 1.41 1.40 1 81 80 49 41 103.3 32.91
10 84.00 88.00 565.600 0.21 73 74 0.87 0.88 1 81 81 51 42 108.1 25.87
11 88.00 92.00 567.840 0.21 74 73 0.88 0.88 I 1 81 80 51 42 98.6 25.84
12 92.00 96.00 569.890 0.21 74 73 0.88 0.88 1 I 1 81 81 52 41 100.2 1 25.84
Final DGM: 571.972
Max
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy.
r`1•
to
WC� 96.0 min 62.691 ft3 0.32 in.WC 69.1 °F 72.7 °F 1 1.298 in.WC 103.E 0.022 3.7
22 of 142

All�ar�
S O.U R C E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Faye tteville Works Facili ,N( Start Time: 10:30 Source:Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Date: 9/Z7/22 Run 2 VALID End Time: 1Z:18 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 69 OF Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Me(ml)
Barometric: 30.03 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 73 OF Pg: 1.50 in.WC 28.2
Static Press: 1.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.32 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.16 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-5D Est.Dm 0.278 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.13
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pilot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid I(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.002 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Noule ID:GL-3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - 10 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole 1 Nozzle But(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: -
Pitot Gas Temperatures(°F) Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures(°F
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH P°mp Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
P. (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO Vs
(fta) AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) (in.Hg) Amu. Amu. Amb. Amb. (fps)
Begin End (in WC) Ideal Actual
1 0.00 4.00 572.250 0.33 72 74 1.37 1.35 2 80 80 58 48 105.0 32.43
2 4.00 8.00 574.970 0.34 73 74 1.41 1.40 2 81 81 48 48 101.7 32.91
3 8.00 12.00 577.650 0.34 74 74 1.41 1.40 2 81 81 49 50 102.7 32.91
4 12.00 16.00 580.360 0.34 75 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 80 49 1 49 101.0 32.91
5 16.00 20.00 583.030 0.34 76 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 82 49 50 102.3 32.91
6 20.00 24.00 585.740 0.34 76 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 81 50 50 101.2 32.91
7 24.00 28.00 588.420 0.35 77 74 1.46 1.45 2 81 81 50 50 103.6 33.40
8 28.00 32.00 591.210 0.34 77 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 1 81 51 54 102.9 32.91
9 32.00 36.00 593.940 0.30 77 74 1.26 1.25 2 81 81 52 53 105.1 30.92
10 36.00 40.00 596.560 0.30 78 74 1.26 1.25 2 81 81 51 52 102.9 30.92
11 40.00 44.00 599.130 0.29 78 74 1.22 1.20 2 81 81 51 A
102.6 30.40
12 44.00 48.00 601.650 0.29 78 74 1.22 1.20 2 81 82 51 102.6 30.40
1 48.00 52.00 604.171 0.34 77 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 80 55 101.7 32.91
2 52.00 56.00 606.870 0.34 78 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 81 50 101.6 32.91
3 56.00 60.00 609.570 0.33 78 74 1.38 1.40 2 81 81 47 103.5 32.43
4 60.00 64.00 612.280 0.34 78 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 80 48 102.7 32.91
5 64.00 68.00 615.010 0.34 79 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 82 So 101.0 32.91
6 68.00 72.00 617.700 0.34 80 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 82 50 50 104.9 32.91
7 72.00 76.00 620.500 0.33 82 74 1.39 1.40 2 81 81 51 46 106.1 32.43
8 76.00 80.00 623.300 0.34 83 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 81 51 47 108.1 32.91
9 80.00 84.00 626.200 0.30 83 74 1.27 1.30 2 80 80 51 46 100.7 30.92
10 84.00 88.00 628.740 0.30 83 74 1.27 1.30 2 81 82 51 46 101.5 30.92
11 88.00 92.00 631.300 0.30 81 74 1.27 1.30 2 81 81 51 47 105.5 30.92
12 92.00 96.00 633.950 0.25 81 74 1.05 1.05 2 81 80 52 46 105.2 28.22
Final DGM: 636.363
Max
aLRunTine Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy°
rA
min 64.113 fta 0.32 in.WC 78.1 OF 74.0 OF 2 1.346 in.WC 103.1 0.021 3.2
04
23 of 142

AJ11CnrKM
s O.u R C E T E'S't I N G Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works.Facility,N( Start Time: 12:50 Source:Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Date: 9/27/22 Run 3 VALID End Time: 14:38 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 78 OF Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.03 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 74 OF Pg: 1.50 in.WC 27.1
Static Press: 1.80 in.WC AH C(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.32 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.16 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-51) Est.Dn: 0.275 in. CO,,: 0.1 % 4.189
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Past Mid 1(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Du(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cf): -
Pitot Gas Tempera ures(OF) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(OF)
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Aux vs
Exit Au
a (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
(fta) AP Amb. Amu. (in.WC) (fps)
(, g) Amb. AmL. Amb. Amb•
m.H
to P.i Begin End (in WC) Ideal Actual - - - -
1 0.00 1 4.00 636.575 0.34 79 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 85 59 46 101.9 32.91
2 4.00 8.00 639.290 0.34 79 74 1.43 1.40 2 80 83 53 50 103.2 32.91
3 8.00 12.00 642.040 0.34 80 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 82 51 47 103.0 32.91
4 12.00 16.00 644.790 0.34 82 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 81 50 49 102.3 32.91
5 16.00 20.00 647.530 0.34 83 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 82 50 47 102.5 32.91
6 20.00 24.00 650.280 0.34 84 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 81 50 50 102.3 32.91
7 24.00 28.00 653.030 0.35 84 74 1.48 1.50 2 81 82 50 47 102.7 33.40
-8 28.00 32.00 655.830 0.35 85 74 1.49 1.50 2 81 - 83 49 49 103.2 33.40
9 32.00 36.00 658.650 0.23 85 74 0.98 0.98 2 81 82 50 49 106.4 27.07
10 36.00 40.00 661.010 0.23 86 74 0.98 0.98 2 81 81 51 49 102.2 27.07
11 40.00 44.00 663.280 0.22 86 74 0.94 0.94 2 81 80 52 51 104.0 26.48
12 44.00 48.00 665.540 0.22 86 74 0.94 0.94 2 81 80 52 48 105.0 26.48
1 48.00 52.00 667.821 0.33 83 74 1.40 1.40 2 81 83 61 52 101.3 32.43
2 52.00 56.00 670.500 0.33 84 74 1.40 1.40 2 81 83 52 52 100.8 32.43
3 1 56.00 60.00 673.170 0.34 85 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 83 53 49 101.4 32.91
4 60.00 64.00 675.900 0.33 85 75 1.40 1.40 2 81 83 52 56 103.0 32.46
5 64.00 68.00 678.630 0.34 86 75 1.44 1.45 2 81 84 54 56 103.1 32.95
6 68.00 72.00 681.410 0.34 87 75 1.45 1.45 2 81 85 55 56 103.3 32.95
7 72.00 76.00 684.200 0.35 87 75 1.49 1.50 2 81 86 56 57 103.3 1 33.43
8 76.00 80.00 687.030 0.35 87 75 1.49 1.50 2 82 87 57 56 103.3 1 33.43
9 80.00 84.00 689.860 0.35 87 76 1.49 1.50 2 83 88 57 59 103.8 33.46
10 84.00 88.00 692.700 0.19 88 76 0.81 0.81 2 83 89 59 56 108.7 24.65
11 88.00 92.00 694.900 0.19 88 76 0.81 0.81 2 85 90 60 58 103.8 24.65
12 92.00 96.00 697.000 0.19 88 76 0.81 0.81 2 87 90 60 56 102.7 24.65
Final DGM: 699.079
aRun Time Via AP Tin Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Yy,
96.0 min 62.504 ft, 0.30 in.WC 84.8 OF 74.5 OF 2 1.286 in.WC 103.0 0.021 2.8
24 of 142

.-
A11 anae Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22 --
Start Time 8:05 10:30 12:50 --
Stop Time 9:53 12:18 14:38 --
Run Time,min (9) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 29.94 29.94 29.94 29.94
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.032 1.032 1.032 1.032
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) 1.699 1.699 1.699 1.699
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 42.281 43.445 45.074 43.600
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 67.0 75.3 78.8 73.7
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 526.7 535.0 538.5 533.4
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (AH) 0.681 0.717 0.734 0.711
Volume HZO Collected,mL (Vlc) 33.5 32.6 26.2 30.8
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ftZ (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 934,000.0 909,000.0 797,000.0 880,000.0
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 387,000.0 9,320,000.0 8,600,000.0 6,102,333.3
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 23,100.0 -- 31.4 11,565.7
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,160.0 27.1 37.1 408.07
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,345,260.0 10,229,027.1 9,397,068.5 6,990,451.9
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 43.816 44.332 45.693 44.613
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.580 1.537 1.235 1.451
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.035 0.034 0.026 0.032
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.024 0.027 0.029 0.027
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.024 0.027 0.026 0.026
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 29.99 29.99 29.99 29.99
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 45.605 46.375 47.699 46.56
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 97.3 97.7 99.5 98.1
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Y') -2.9 -3.1 -1.2 -2.4
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 1.IE+06 8.1E+06 7.3E+06 5.5E+06
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr EK(HFPODA) 3.5E-02 2.7E-01 2.4E-01 1.8E-01
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reportmg limit.
25 of 142

Alliance Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22 --
Start Time 8:05 10:30 12:50 --
Stop Time 9:53 12:18 14:38 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.27 0.25 0.29 0.27
Point 2 0.27 0.26 0.29 0.27
Point 3 0.25 0.25 0.28 0.26
Point 4 0.24 0.23 0.25 0.24
Point 5 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.23
Point 6 0.18 0.22 0.22 0.21
Point 7 0.14 0.19 0.16 0.16
Point 8 0.12 0.18_ 0.11 0.14
Point 9 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.13
Point 10 0.08 0.18 0.08 0.11
Point 11 0.08 0.16 0.08 0.11
Point 12 0.07 0.15 0.08 0.10
Point 13 0.25 0.30 0.26 0.27
Point 14 0.23 0.28 0.26 0.26
Point 15 0.23 0.28 0.25 0.25
Point 16 0.22 0.24 0.23 0.23
Point 17 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22
Point 18 0.21 0.15 0.21 0.19
Point 19 0.20 0.11 0.18 0.16
Point 20 0.16 0.11 0.16 0.14
Point 21 0.15 0.09 0.16 0.13
Point 22 0.15 0.08 0.17 0.13
Point 23 0.14 0.08 0.15 0.12
Point 24 0.14 0.07 0.14 0.12
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.417 0.423 0.429 0.423
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 29.94 29.94 29.94 29.94
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) -1.30 -1.40 -1.30 -1.33
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 6.31 6.31 6.31 6.31
Temperature,°F __(Ts) __ _69.1___ _ 72.4_ _ _ 75.3 _72.3
Temperature,°R (Ts) 528.8 532.0 535.0 531.948
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.035 0.034 0.026 0.032
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.024 0.027 0.029 0.027
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.024 0.027 0.026 0.026
Oz Concentration,% (OZ) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO,Concentration,% (COZ) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.59 28.56 28.57 28.58
Velocity,ft/sec (Vs) 23.6 24.0 24.4 24.0
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 8,928 9,084 9,237 9,083
lAt Standard Conditions,dscfin (Qs) 8,675 8,746 8,848 8,757
26 of 142

Alliance Method 1 Data
SOUHC'E TE$TING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Pol),mcr Process Aid Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Date: 09126122
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Vertical os lin is 2.D
Duct Design: Circular aHigher Number Is for p rmuee
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 47.50 in Rectangular Stacks or Duets ` y
Nipple Length: 1350 in I(-
Depth of Duct: 34.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 6.31 ft2 -
No.ofTestPorts: 2 24or25epo;ats
Distance A: 3.5 ft 20 points
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.9 (must be>0.5) to pofma sraas Dtammor>o.nt m(2a m.>
Distance B: 5.0 ft
12 pw.ts Distance B Duct Diameters: 1.8 (must be 2)m a or s a po;ata
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 24 Co1inc1ipj"`'r
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 stock Dmmmer.o.30 ro 0.61 m(12-241�,.)
Number of Readings per Point: 1
Measurer(Initial and Date):BAG-92622 2 3 a 5 8 7 8 9
Revimvcr(Initial and Date): IS-9/2622
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance
Distance
Number 0f traverse Traverse %of points an a diameter from inside from
Point Diameter wall outside of
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 port
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 14.50
2 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.28 15.78
3 -- - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.01 17.51
4 - - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.02 19.52
5 - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 - 34.2 - 23.0 5 25.0 8.50 22.00
6 - - - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.10 25.60
7 - -- - - -- -- 89.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 21.90 35.40
8 - - - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 25.50 39.00
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 27.98 41.48
10 - -- - - -- - - - 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 29.99 43.49
11 - -- - - - - -- - - - 93.3 11 93.3 31.72 45.22
12 97.9 12 97.9 33.00 46.30
'Parcenl of slack diameter from inside rva11 to traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=3.5 ft.
B=5ft.
Depth of Duct=34 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
•
A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
B
Upstream
Disturbance
27 of 142

Alliance SOURCE TESTING Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/27/22
Sample Point Angle(eP=0)
1 10
2 12
3 10
4 10
5 12
6 10
7 12
8 10
9 8
10 10
11 10
12 8
13 12
14 12
15 10
16 10
17 10
18 10
19 8
20 10
21 10
22 10
23 12
24 14
Average 10
28 of 142

All ance Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 308.8 466.4 712.2 744.7 732.4 489.9 387.1 841.9 4683.4
Final Mass,g 322.8 469.6 712.1 745.1 733.6 490.8 394.0 848.9 4716.9
Gain 14.0 1 3.2 1 -0.1 1 0.4 1.2 0.9 6.9 7.0 33.5
Run 2 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 299.2 467.5 759.1 755.6 735.6 477.3 299.3 824.6 4618.2
Final Mass,g 312.4 467.9 759.2 756.0 736.8 478.3 307.9 832.3 4650.8
Gain 13.2 0.4 0.1 0.4 1.2 1.0 8.6 7.7 32.6
Run 3 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 300.3 467.2 704.5 756.0 733.1 490.8 326.0 848.3 4626.2
Final Mass,g 306.5 467.4 704.0 757.1 734.5 491.6 337.0 854.3 4652.4
Gainj 6.2 0.2 -0.5 1.1 1.4 0.8 11.0 6.0 26.2
29 of 142

Alliance
S O U R C E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Cbemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:05 Source:Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Date: 9/27/22 Run 1 VALID End Time: 9:53 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 15 Est.Too: 70 °F Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.02 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est Ts: 81 °F Pg: -1.30 in.WC 33.5
Static Press: -1.43 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.22 in.WC O=: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.91 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D Est.Dn: 0.306 in. COs: 0.1 % 3.730
CO=: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O=: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-I LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(co -
Ns/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.005 - - - 0.002 Mid 2(co -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Noule ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in 11g): 30 - 7 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: -
Pitot Gas Temperatores °F Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures °F
^: Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump as
Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
a (minutes) Reading Tube Vac -%ISO
(fit") AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) ( g) Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
m.H
W Begin End P"W� 67 68 Ideal Actual 68 69 69 68
A-1 0.00 4.00 901.915 0.27 66 68 1.03 1.00 4 72 70 51 36 101.0 29.29
2 4.00 8.00 904.190 0.27 66 68 1.03 1.00 4 75 77 43 36 98.1 29.29
3 8.00 12.00 906.400 0.25 65 68 0.95 0.94 3 78 80 40 35 99.3 28.18
4 12.00 16.00 908.550 0.24 65 68 0.91 0.91 3 77 79 41 35 96.7 27.61
5 16.00 20.00 910.600 0.22 65 68 0.83 0.83 3 82 80 41 35 96.0 26.44
6 20.00 24.00 912.550 0.18 64 68 0.68 0.68 3 77 78 41 36 95.4 23.91
7 1 24.00 28.00 914.300 0.14 64 68 0.53 0.53 3 82 80 41 36 100.1 21.09
8 28.00 1 32.00 915.920 0.12 -64 68 0.45 0.45 2 81 79 42 37 102.1 19.52
9 32.00 36.00 917.450 0.11 65 69 0.42 0.42 2 82 79 43 37 96.8 18.71
10 36.00 40.00 918.840 0.08 65 69 0.30 0.30 2 79 79 43 37 93.9 15.96
11 40.00 44.00 919.990 0.08 66 69 0.30 0.30 2 80 80 44 40 96.1 15.96
12 44.00 48.00 921.170 0.07 66 69 0.27 0.27 2 81 79 45 38 98.4 14.93
B-1 48.00 52.00 922.300 0.25 67 69 0.95 0.95 3 80 79 53 39 101.4 28.21
2 52.00 56.00 924.500 0.23 68 70 0.87 0.87 3 80 80 44 37 91.2 27.08
3 56.00 60.00 926.400 0.23 68 70 0.87 0.87 3 84 79 45 37 96.0 27.08
4 60.00 64.00 928.400 0.22 68 70 0.84 0.84 4 83 79 47 38 94.2 26.49
5 64.00 68.00 930.320 0.21 69 70 0.80 0.80 4 78 80 47 38 97.2 25.88
6 68.00 72.00 932.260 0.21 69 70 0.80 0.80 4 80 79 47 38 97.2 25.88
7 72.00 76.00 934.200 0.20 69 70 0.76 0.76 4 87 80 46 38 102.7 25.25
8 76.00 80.00 936.200 0.16 69 70 0.61 0.61 4 88 80 46 39 93.0 22.59
9 80.00 84.00 937.820 0.15 70 70 0.57 0.57 4 87 80 47 38 98.2 21.87
10 84.00 88.00 939.480 0.15 70 70 0.57 0.57 4 83 79 48 39 92.9 21.87
11 88.00 92.00 941.050 0.14 70 70 0.53 0.53 3 79 79 48 40 96.1 21.13
12 92.00 96.00 942.620 0.14 71 70 0.54 0.54 3 80 79 48 40 96.3 21.13
Final DGM: 944.196
E.
PRune Vm AP Tm Ts VacAH %ISO BWS Yq,min 42.281 ftl 0.18 in.WC 67.0 °F 69.1 °F 4 0.681 in.WC 97.3 0.024 -2.9
30 of 142

Alliance
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Coro any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 10:30 Source:Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Date: 9/27122 Run 2 IVALID End Time: 12:18 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 15 Est.Tm: 67 °F Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.02 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 69 °F Pg: -1.40 in.WC 32.6
Static Press: -1.43 in.WC AH a1(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.18 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.91 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D Est.Dn: 0.321 in. CO2: 0.1 % 3.79
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.002 - - - 0.002 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 8 9 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Du(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Paint Leak Check Vol(cf): -
Pitot Gas Tempera ures of Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(oF)
9: Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump �PrfoberFilter Im Exit Aux Vs
(minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
aAP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) in.H mb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
to Pr Begin End (ft) (i^WTI Ideal Actual ( g)
A-1 0.00 4.00 944.368 0.25 73 71 0.96 0.96 4 87 86 63 47 101.9 28.26
2 4.00 8.00 946.600 0.26 73 71 1.00 1.00 4 88 86 55 46 94.9 28.82
3 8.00 12.00 948.720 0.25 74 71 0.96 0.96 4 85 82 52 42 99.3 28.26
4 12.00 16.00 950.900 0.23 74 72 0.88 0.88 4 80 80 51 43 94.1 27.13
5 16.00 20.00 952.880 0.22 74 72 0.84 0.84 4 78 79 50 42 94.8 26.54
6 20.00 24.00 954.830 0.22 75 72 0.84 0.84 4 82 79 50 43 95.5 26.54
7 24.00 28.00 956.800 0.19 75 72 0.73 0.73 3 87 79 49 43 95.5 24.66
8 28.00 32.00 958.630 0.18 75 72 0.69 0.69 3 1 82 79 49 42 100.2 24.00
9 32.00 36.00 960.500 0.17 75 71 0.65 0.65 3 79 79 50 42 96.4 23.30
10 36.00 40.00 962.250 0.18 76 72 0.69 0.69 4 78 79 51 43 96.3 24.00
11 40.00 44.00 964.050 0.16 76 73 0.61 0.61 3 84 80 1 50 42 96.5 22.65
12 44.00 48.00 965.750 0.15 75 72 0.58 0.58 3 87 79 51 45 96.3 21.91
B-1 48.00 52.00 967.390 0.30 76 73 1.15 1.15 4 82 79 61 45 95.9 31.02
2 52.00 56.00 969.700 0.28 76 73 1.07 1.10 4 88 79 51 42 98.9 29.96
3 56.00 60.00 972.000 0.28 76 73 1.07 1.10 4 85 79 52 42 95.0 29.96
4 60.00 64.00 974.210 0.24 76 73 0.92 0.92 4 82 79 52 41 95.6 27.74
5 64.00 68.00 976.270 0.22 76 73 0.84 0.84 4 79 79 51 42 98.4 26.56
6 68.00 72.00 978.300 0.15 76 73 0.58 0.58 3 79 79 51 43 95.0 21.93
7 72.00 76.00 979.920 0.11 76 73 0.42 0.42 2 83 80 51 44 94.5 18.78
8 76.00 80.00 981.300 0.11 76 73 0.42 0.42 2 84 79 51 42 99.3 18.78
9 80.00 84.00 982.750 0.09 76 73 0.35 0.35 2 82 79 52 43 98.4 16.99
10 84.00 88.00 984.050 0.08 76 73 0.31 0.31 2 79 80 53 42 100.3 16.02
11 88.00 92.00 985.300 0.08 76 73 0.31 0.31 2 79 79 53 42 103.5 16.02
12 92.00 96.00 986.590 0.07 76 73 0.27 1 0.27 2 84 80 53 43 104.9 14.98
Final DGM: 987.813
Max
aLRune Vm AP Tm Ts VacAH %ISO BWS Ys,
min 43.445 It, 0.19 in.WC 75.3 of 72.4 of 4 0.717 in.WC 97.7 0.027 -3.1
31 of 142

,All aMe
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 12:50 Source:Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Date: 9/27/22 Run 3 VALID End Time: 14:38 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 15 Est Tm: 75 °F Pb: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.02 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 72 °F Pg: -1.30 in.WC 26.2
Static Press: -1.43 in.WC AH Q(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.19 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.91 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D ESL Do: 0.316 in. C%: 0.1 % 3.829
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm I Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
%: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid I(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.003 - - - 0.002 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Noule ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - 9 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nom le Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cO: -
Pitot Gas Tempera ures(°F) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(°F)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH rump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
a (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
(ft') AP Amb. Amb. (in.W 2C) (,n.H g) Al. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
rn p.i Begin End (inWQ Ideal Actual - - - -
A-1 0.00 4.00 98T915 0.29 77 74 1.11 1.10 4 77 88 66 43 96.4 30.52
2 4.00 8.00 990.200 0.29 77 74 1.11 1.10 4 88 90 51 40 100.8 30.52
3 8.00 12.00 992.590 0.28 77 74 1.07 1.10 4 90 88 50 40 99.2 29.99
4 12.00 16.00 994.900 0.25 77 74 0.96 0.96 3 90 84 50 40 99.9 28.34
5 16.00 20.00 997.100 0.24 78 75 0.92 0.92 3 87 83 1 50 40 97.3 27.79
6 20.00 24.00 999.200 0.22 78 75 0.84 0.85 3 85 82 50 42 99.2 26.61
7 1 24.00 1 28.00 1001.250 0.16 78 75 0.61 0.62 3 81 80 51 39 97.5 22.69
8 28.00 32.00 1002.970 0.11 78 75 0.42 0.42 2 80 80 51 40 96.3 18.82
9 32.00 36.00 1004.380 0.11 79 75 0.42 0.42 2 80 79 51 40 100.9 18.82
10 36.00 40.00 1005.860 0.08 79 75 0.31 0.31 2 82 79 52 42 99.1 16.05
11 40.00 44.00 1007.100 0.08 79 75 0.31 0.31 2 82 79 54 42 98.3 16.05
12 44.00 48.00 1008.330 0.08 79 75 0.31 0.31 2 80 79 54 42 97.5 16.05
B-1 48.00 52.00 1009.550 0.26 79 76 1.00 1.00 4 81 79 59 43 97.8 28.96
2 52.00 56.00 1011.750 0.26 79 76 1.00 1.00 4 81 79 49 38 97.8 28.96
3 56.00 60.00 1013.950 0.25 79 76 0.96 0.96 4 81 79 46 39 98.4 28.39
4 60.00 64.00 1016.120 0.23 79 76 0.88 0.88 3 80 79 46 43 99.7 27.23
5 64.00 68.00 1018.230 0.22 80 76 0.85 0.85 3 80 79 48 43 100.8 26.64
6 68.00 72.00 1020.320 0.21 80 76 0.81 0.81 3 81 79 50 43 96.3 26.02
7 72.00 76.00 1022.270 0.18 so 76 0.69 0.69 3 82 79 So 43 97.5 24.09
8 76.00 80.00 1024.100 0.16 80 76 0.62 0.62 3 81 79 50 42 101.7 22.71
9 80.00 84.00 1025.900 0.16 80 76 0.62 0.62 2 80 79 48 40 I03.4 22.71
10 84.00 88.00 1027.730 0.17 80 76 0.65 0.65 2 79 79 48 41 IO2.6 23.41
11 88.00 92.00 1029.600 0.15 80 76 0.58 0.58 2 81 79 48 41 101.6 21.99
12 92.00 96.00 1031.340 0.14 80 76 0.54 0.54 2 83 79 48 43 99.6 21.25
Final DGM: 1032.989
Max
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Y,
rA
WCC 96.0 min 45.074 fta 0.19 in.WC 78.8 °F 75.3 °F 4 0.734 in.WC 99.5 0.026 -1.2
32 of 142

�r
fiarnoe
TECHNICAL GROUP
Source Test Report NOV 14 2022
AIR QUALITY
STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
The Chemours Company, FC, LLC
Fayetteville Works
22828 Highway 87W
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Source Tested: Polymer Process Aid (PPA) Carbon Bed
Test Date: September 27, 2022
Project No. AST-2022-3359
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
6515A Basile Rowe
East Syracuse, NY 1305

All anoe
Source
TECHNICAL GROUP Report
Tes!Programm S Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit No. North Carolina Department of Air Quality(NCDAQ)Title V Air Permit No.03735T48
Source Information
Source Name Target Parameter
PPA Carbon Bed(inlet/Outlet) HFPO-DA
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
The Chemours Company,FC,LLC Alliance Technical Group,LLC Eurofins TestAmerica
Fayetteville Works 6515A Basile Rowe 5815 Middlebrook Pike
22828 Highway 87W East Syracuse,NY 13057 Knoxville,TN 37921
Fayetteville,North Carolina Courtney Adkins
Project Manager/Field Team Leader [e-mail]
Facility Contact Patrick Grady
Christel Compton [e-mail]
[e-mail] [phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
[phone]
Report Coordinator
Emily Diaz
[e-mail]
[phone]
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page i
2 of 142

Allia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Certification Statement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s)tested and operating condition(s)for the specific test date(s)and time(s)identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format(.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
D November 4, 2022
Patrick Grady,QSTI Date
Project Manager
Alliance Technical Group,LLC
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page ii
3of142

Alliance
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Project Team............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results.....................................................................................................................................2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology....................................................................................................................................3-1
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate.....3-1
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content.........................................................................3-1
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid......................................................3-1
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation.............................................................................3-2
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery..........................................................................................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table1-1: Project Team........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table2-1: Summary of Results................................................................................................................................2-1
Table3-1: Source Testing Methodology..................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page iii
4of142

ffntroduction
5 of 142

Allia
Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by The Chemours Company (Chemours) to conduct
compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works facility in Fayetteville, North Carolina. The facility operates under
North Carolina Department of Air Quality (NCDAQ) Title V Air Permit No. 03735T48. Source emissions testing
were conducted at the inlet and outlet of the Polymer Process Aid(PPA) carbon bed. The testing was conducted to
evaluate emissions of hexafluoro-propylene oxide-dimer acid (BFPO-DA). BFPO-DA, hexafluoro-propylene oxide
dimer acid fluoride (BFPO-DAF) and hexafluoro-propylene oxide dimer acid ammonium salt are captured and
reported together as BFPO-DA.
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
The PPA facility produces surfactants used to produce fluoropolymer products,such as Teflon®at other Chemours
facilities, as well as sales to outside producers of fluoropolymers. Process streams are vented to a caustic wet
scrubber(ACD-Al),a carbon bed and exhausted through a process stack(AEP-A1).The process inside the building
is under negative pressure and the building air is vented to the carbon bed and the process stack(AEP-A1).
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
Patrick Grady
Antonio Andersen
Alliance Personnel Jacob Cavallo
Brian Goodhile
Jeff Sheldon
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 1-1
6of142

7of142

Affia
Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Summary of Results
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works Facility in Fayetteville, NC on September 27,
2022. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of BFPO-DA at the inlet and outlet of the PPA carbon
bed.
Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results. Any difference between the summary results listed in
the following tables and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
un Number, Run 1 Run 2, ; Run 3';' Average,
Date .. `, y 9/27/22. 9/27/22, 9/27/22,
HFPO-DA Data
Outlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 3.3E-05 1.9E-05 4.7E-05 3.3E-05
Inlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 3.5E-02 2.7E-01 2.4E-01 1.8E-01
Reduction Efficiency,% 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 2-1
8of142

Testing Methodology
9 of 142

Alliance
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report'
Testing Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
Parameter Notes/Remarks,-
Test Methods
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 &2 Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid Modified Method 0010 Isokinetic Sampling
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 1.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing,each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the
same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid
BFPO-DA emissions were evaluated in accordance with Modified Method 0010.Testing followed the submitted
protocol in the execution of our onsite sampling and analysis activities.Modified Method 0010 procedure was
followed as outlined in the protocol submitted to NC Division of Air Quality.Modified Method 0010 sampling and
analysis procedures performed for this project-are-consistent with_0TM-45,-which was released by EPA in January
2021,subsequent to Chemours submittal of plans to DAQ.
The sample train consisted of a borosilicate glass nozzle attached directly to a heated borosilicate glass-lined probe.
The probe was connected directly to a heated borosilicate glass filter holder containing a solvent-extracted glass
fiber filter.In order to minimize possible thermal degradation of the BFPO-DA,the probe and particulate filter were
heated to just above stack temperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The filter holder exit
was connected to a water-cooled coil condenser followed by a water-cooled sorbent module containing
approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 inlet temperature was monitored to ensure that the module is
maintained at a temperature below 20°C.
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-1
10 of 142

Affia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger and a series of three impingers each
containing 100-ml of high purity deionized water. The water impingers were followed by another condensate
knockout impinger equipped with a second XAD-2 resin trap to account for any sample breakthrough. The final
impinger contained approximately 250 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. The water impingers and condensate
impingers were submerged in an ice bath through the duration of the testing.The water in the ice bath was also used
to circulate around the coil condenser and the XAD-2 resin traps.
Exhaust gases were extracted from the sample locations isokinetically using a metering console equipped with a
vacuum pump,a calibrated orifice,oil manometer and probe/filter heat controllers.
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation
Prior to conducting the field work the following procedures were conducted to prepare the field sampling glassware
and sample recovery tools.
1. Wash all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with low residue soap and hot water.
2. Rinse all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools three(3)times with D.I.H2O.
3. Bake glassware (with the exception of probe liners) at 450°C for approximately 2 hours, (XAD-2 resin tube
glassware is cleaned by Eurofins/TestAmerica by this same procedure).
4. Solvent rinse three(3)times all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with the following sequence of solvents:
acetone,methylene chloride,hexane,and methanol.
5. Clean glassware and tools will be sealed in plastic bags or aluminum foil for transport to the sampling site.
6. Squirt bottles will be new dedicated bottles of known history and dedicated to the D.I. Water and
methanol/ammonium hydroxide(MeOH/5%NH40H)solvent contents. Squirt bottles will be labelled with the
solvent content it contains.
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery
Following completion of each test run,the sample probe,nozzle and front-half of the filter holder were brushed and
rinsed three times each with the McOH/ 5%NH40H solution (Container#1). The glass fiber filter was removed
from its housing and transferred to a polyethylene bottle (Container #2). Any particulate matter and filter fibers
which adhered to the filter holder and gasket were also placed in Container#2. The XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,
labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler. The back-half of the filter holder, coil condenser condensate trap and
connecting glassware were rinsed with the same McOH/5%NH40H solution and placed in Container#3.
The volume of water collected in all impingers was measured for moisture determinations and then placed in
Container#4. All impingers and connecting glassware were then rinsed with the McOH/5%NH40H solution and
placed in Container #5. The second (breakthrough) XAD-2 resin trap was sealed, labelled and placed in an iced
sample cooler. The contents of the fifth impinger were placed in its original container and weighed for moisture
determinations.
Containers were sealed and labeled with the appropriate sample information. Samples remained chilled until
analysis.HFPO-DA analysis was conducted using liquid chromatography/dual mass spectrometry(LC/MS/MS).
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-2
11 of 142

Appendix `',
12 of 142

r Appendix A
a�af7m Example Calculations
sounoE rE$T.MO
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: BFPO-DA
Meter Pressure(Pm),in.Hg
A
Pm = Pb + 1�.h
where,
Pb 29.94 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH 0.681 =pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Pm 29.99 =in.H.-
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure(Ps),in.Hg
Pg
where, Ps = Pb + 1.6
Pb 29.94 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
Pg -1.30 =static pressure,in.H2O
Ps 29.84 =in.Hg
Standard Meter Volume(Vmstd),dscf
17.636 x Y x Vm x Pm
Vwstd =
where, Tm
Y 1.032 =meter correction factor
Vm 42.281 =meter volume,cf
Pm 29.99 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Tin 526.7 =absolute meter temperature,OR
Vmstd 43.816 =dscf
Standard Wet Volume(Vwstd),scf
Vwstd = 0.04716 x Vlc
where,
Vlc 33.5 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vwstd 1.580 =scf
Moisture Fraction(BWSsat),dimensionless(theoretical at saturated conditions)
6.37—(f 21827 11
10 lTs+365/
BWSsat =
PS
where,
Ts 69.1 =stack temperature,OF
Ps 29.84 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
BWSsat 0.024 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless(measured)
Vwstd
BWS =
where, (Vwstd + Vmstd)
Vwstd 1.580 =standard wet volume,scf
Vmstd 43.816 =standard meter volume,dscf
BWS 0.035 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat< BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 0.024 =moisture fraction(theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.035 =moisture fraction(measured)
BWS 0.024
13 of 142

G Appendix A
AI�laf'ICe Example Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: BFPO-DA
Molecular Weight(DRY)(Md),Ib/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %02) + (0.28 (100— %CO2 — %02))
where,
CO2 0.1 =carbon dioxide concentration,%
02 20.9 =oxygen concentration,%
Md 28.85 =lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight(WET)(Ms),lb/lb-mole
Ms = Md (1 — BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
BWS 0.024 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
MS 28.59 =lb/lb mol
Average Velocity(Vs),ft/sec
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (0 P 1/2) avg x T
where, ,F-xsms
Cp 0.840 =pitot tube coefficient
A P'^ 0.417 =velocity head of stack gas,(in.H,0)12
Ts 528.8 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 29.84 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ms 28.59 =molecular weight of stack gas,lb/lb mol
Vs 23.6 =ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions(Qa),acfm
Qa = 60 x Vs x As
where,
Vs 23.6 =stack gas velocity,ft/sec
As 6.31 =cross-sectional area of stack,ft2
Qa 8,928 =acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions(Qs),dscfm
Ps
Qs = 17.636 x Qa x (1 — BWS) x —
where, Ts
Qa 8,928 =average stack gas flow at stack conditions,acfm
BWS 0.024 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ps 29.84 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ts 528.8 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Qs 8,675 =dscfm
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check(Yqa),dimensionless
Y— 0 0.0319 x Tm x 29 pH av .
g
Vm AH@ x (Pb + A 13avg.) x Md
Yqa = x 100
where,
Y 1.032 =meter correction factor,dimensionless
O 96 =run time,min.
Vm 42.281 =total meter volume,dcf
TM 526.7 =absolute meter temperature,°R
AH@ 1.699 =orifice meter calibration coefficient,in.H2O
Pb 29.94 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH avg 0.681 =average pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
(A H)12 0.812 =average squareroot pressure differential of orifice,(in.H20)""-
Yqa -2.9 =dimensionless
14 of 142

Appendix A
Example Calculations
souscE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: BFPO-DA
Volume of Nozzle(Vn),fO
Ts Vn =pc (0.002669 x Vlc+Vm Pam x Y 1
where, J
Ts 528.8 =absolute stack temperature,°R
PS 29.84 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Vlc 33.5 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vm 42.281 =meter volume,cf
Pm 29.99 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Y 1.032 =meter correction factor,unitless
TM 526.7 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vn 45.605 =volume of nozzle,W
Isokinetic Sampling Rate(10,%
( Vn 1
1 8x60xAnxVs x100
where,
Vn 45.605 =nozzle volume,ft3
0 96.0 =run time,minutes
An 0.00034 =area of nozzle,ft2
Vs 23.6 =average velocity,ft/sec
I 97.3 =%
HFPO-DA Concentration(C),ng/dscm
_ M x 35.313
C Vmstd
where,
M 1,345,260 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Vmstd 43.816 =standard meter volume,dscf
CNm 1.1E+06 =ng/dscm
HFPO-DA Emission Rate(ER),lb/hr
MxQsx60
ER = Vrn_ctd. x 4_54F. + 11
where,
M 1,345,260 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Qs 8,675 =average stack gas flow at standard conditions,dscfm
Vmstd 43.816 =standard meter volume,dscf
ER 3.5E-02 =lb/hr
15 of 142

16 of 142

Afflatice Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chcmours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22 -
Start Time 8:05 10:30 12:50 -
Stop Time 9:53 12:18 14:38 --
Run Time,min (6) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 29.94 29.94 29.94 29.94
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.001 1.001 1.001 1.001
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) 1.841 1.841 1.841 1.841
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 62.691 64.113 62.504 63.103
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 69.1 78.1 84.8 77.3
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 528.8 537.8 544.4 537.0
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (AH) 1.298 1.346 1.286 1.310
Volume HZO Collected,mL (VIC) 30.3 28.2 27.1 28.5
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ftZ (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(H"oDA) 991.0 479.0 1,450.0 973.3
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 578.0 475.0 972.0 675.0
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -- -- -- --
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 143.0 13.9 12.8 56.57
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,712.0 967.9 2,434.8 1,704.9
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 62.862 63.224 60.874 62.320
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.429 1.330 1.278 1.346
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.027 0.028 0.028 0.028
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.04 30.04 30.03 30.04
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 64.580 65.002 62.647 64.08
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 103.6 103.1 103.0 103.2
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Y') 3.7 3.2 2.8 3.2
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm CWPODA) 9.6E+02 5.4E+02 1.4E+03 9.7E+02
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 3.3E-05 1.9E-05 4.7E-05 3.3E-05
REDUCTION CALCULATIONS
Inlet HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr RE(H"oDA) 3.5E-02 2.7E-01 2.4E-01 1.8E-01
HFPO-DA Reduction Efficiency,% RE(HFPODA) 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reporting unit.
17 of 142

Alliance Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Tolymer Process Aid Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22 --
Start Time 8:05 10:30 12:50 --
Stop Time 9:53 12:18 14:38 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.33
Point 2 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 3 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 4 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 5 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 6 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 7 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.35
Point 8 0.34 0.34 0.35 _ _ _ 0.34
Point 9 0.34 0.30 0.23 0.29
Point 10 0.33 0.30 0.23 0.29
Point 11 0.33 0.29 0.22 0.28
Point 12 0.33 0.29 0.22 0.28
Point 13 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.33
Point 14 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.33
Point 15 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.33
Point 16 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.33
Point 17 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 18 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34
Point 19 0.34 0.33 0.35 0.34
Point 20 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.34
Point 21 0.34 0.30 0.35 0.33
Point 22 0.21 0.30 0.19 0.23
Point 23 0.21 0.30 0.19 0.23
Point 24 0.21 0.25 0.19 0.22
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.562 0.568 0.547 0.559
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 29.94 29.94 29.94 29.94
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 30.05 30.05 30.05 30.05
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 4.91 4.91 4.91 4.91
Temperature,°F _(Ts)____ 72.7 _ 74.0 74.5 73.8
Temperature,°R (Ts) 532.4 533.7 534.2 533.420
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.027 0.028 0.028 0.028
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021
Oz Concentration,% (OZ) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO,Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.61 28.63 28.63 28.62
Velocity,ft/sec (Vs) 31.8 32.1 31.0 31.6
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfin (Qa) 9,355 9,459 9,121 9,312
At Standard Conditions,dscfin (Qs) 9,106 9,200 8,862 9,056
18 of 142

Altar Method 1 Data
SOUF40E 'rE$TlNG
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Pol3mer Process Aid Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Date: 09/26122
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Vertical O5 .0 its 2.0
Duct Design: Circular aHigher Number Is f ruum.,ce
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 46.00 in Rectangular St..k o Ducts
renutrsastrnr -
Nipple Length: 16.00 in �re
Depth of Duct: 30.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 4.91 fts _
No.ofTestPons: 2 24 or 25°nouns / e�s+++�•acn
Distance A: 32.0 ft 20 points
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) 16 points sma,Dmmetor>0.61 m(24 to.)
Distance B: 12.0 h +Fran voms otnevTtysw 12 points
Distance B Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>2) asu.ms„os(e°m.a:wm+". 8-9'points
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 24
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 smu,Dmmster.o.ao m o.et m"a-241n.)
Number of Readings per Point: 1
Measurer(Initial and Date):BAG-92622 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g
Reviewer(Initial and Date): IS-9/2622
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Number oftraversepoinis on a diameter Traverse %of from inside from
Point Diameter wall outside of
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 11 12 port
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 16 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 17.00
2 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 9.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.01 18.01
3 -- - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 3.54 19.54
4 - - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 5.31 21.31
5 - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 -- 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 7.50 23.50
6 -- - - - 95.6 -- 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 10.68 26.68
7 - -- - - - - 89.5 - 77A - 64.4 7 64.4 19.32 35.32
8 - - - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 22.50 38.30
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 24.69 40.69
10 - - - - - -- - - 97.4 - 38.2 10 88.2 26.46 42.46
11 - - - - - - -- - - - 93.3 11 93.3 27.99 43.99
12 97.9 12 97.9 29.00 45.00
•Percent ofslack diameter from inside ivall to traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=32 ft.
B=12ft.
Depth of Duct=30 in.
Cross Sectional Arco
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
•
•
•
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•
•
•
•
•
•
B
Upstream
Disturbance
19 of 142

Alliance SOURCE TESTING Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/27/22
Sample Point Angle(eP=O)
1 6
2 8
3 8
4 6
5 8
6 4
7 10
8 10
9 12
10 10
11 10
12 10
13 10
14 8
15 8
16 4
17 4
18 4
19 6
20 10
21 10
22 12
23 13
24 12
Average 8
20 of 142

Alllame Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 302.6 498.6 743.8 760.6 736.5 499.8 342.7 842.3 4726.9
Final Mass,g 314.6 499.5 743.6 757.0 738.1 498.3 354.9 851.2 4757.2
Gain 12.0 0.9 1 -0.2 -3.6 1.6 -1.5 12.2 8.9 30.3
Run 2 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 303.9 483.7 734.3 752.0 761.3 476.6 308.8 867.6 4688.2
Final Mass,g 313.5 484.3 733.4 751.8 761.9 478.0 314.9 878.6 4716.4
Gain 9.6 0.6 -0.9 1 -0.2 1 0.6 1.4 6.1 11.0 28.2
Run 3 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 307.7 499.6 733.5 771.3 736.6 498.3 317.2 839.8 4704.0
Final Mass,g 317.9 499.9 732.3 773.0 737.8 499.2 324.6 846.4 4731.1
1-7 Gain 10.2 0.3 -1.2 1.7 1.2 0.9 7.4 6.6 27.1
21 of 142

Allibffice
SOURCE T E,S T I N G Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:05 Source:Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Date: 9/27/22 Run I VALID End Time: 9:53 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFP0.DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 75 of Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Me(ml)
Barometric: 30.03 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 83 °F Pg: 1.50 in.WC 30.3
Static Press: 1.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.35 in.WC 0t: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.16 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-51) Est.Dn: 0.271 in. CO,: 0.1 % 4.096
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid I Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pilot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID.GI-3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 30 10 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: -
Pitot Gas Tem eratores °F Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures °F
,u Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Pump
_ Tube DGMAverage Stack AH Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
(minutes) Reading Vac %ISO
y fta AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) Amh. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
m.Hg
tia W� 60 60 Ideal Actual 60 60 60 60
to a Begin End ( )
1 0.00 4.00 509.281 0.33 60 57 1.38 1.40 1 80 86 51 45 105.7 31.91
2 4.00 8.00 512.000 0.33 62 73 1.35 1.35 1 81 84 51 44 109.3 32.40
3 8.00 12.00 514.780 0.33 63 73 1.35 1.30 1 81 80 49 43 103.2 32.40
4 12.00 16.00 517.410 0.33 65 73 1.35 1.30 1 81 80 48 41 102.8 32AO
5 16.00 20.00 520.040 0.33 66 73 1.36 1.30 1 81 81 48 39 103.4 32.40
6 20.00 24.00 522.690 0.33 66 73 1.36 1.30 1 80 80 47 38 103.4 32.40
7 24.00 28.00 525.340 0.34 67 73 1.40 1.40 1 81 82 47 38 103.6 32.88
8 28.00 32.00 528.040 0.34 68 73 1.40 1.40 1- 81 80'- - 48 - 38- 103.8 32.88
9 32.00 36.00 530.750 0.34 68 73 1.40 1.40 1 81 81 48 38 103.4 32.88
10 36.00 40.00 533.450 0.33 68 74 1.36 1.35 1 81 80 47 37 105.8 32.43
11 40.00 44.00 536.170 0.33 69 73 1.36 1.35 1 81 81 47 37 103.9 32.40
12 44.00 48.00 538.850 0.33 70 73 1.37 1.35 1 81 81 47 38 102.0 32.40
1 48.00 52.00 541.486 0.33 71 73 1.37 1.35 1 80 80 52 43 102.9 32.40
2 52.00 56.00 544.150 0.33 68 73 1.36 1.35 1 81 81 51 42 103.8 32.40
3 56.00 60.00 546.820 0.33 71 74 1.37 1.35 1 81 81 49 41 103.7 32.43
4 60.00 64.00 549.500 0.33 71 74 1.37 1.35 1 81 80 49 40 103.7 32.43
5 64.00 68.00 552.180 0.33 72 74 1.37 1.35 1 81 81 50 41 101.9 32.43
6 68.00 72.00 554.820 0.33 73 74 1.37 1.35 1 81 81 51 41 101.3 32.43
7 72.00 76.00 557.450 0.34 74 74 1.41 1.40 1 81 81 50 42 102.7 32.91
8 76.00 80.00 560.160 0.34 73 74 1.41 1.40 I 80 81 50 40 103.3 32.91
9 80.00 84.00 562.880 0.34 73 74 1.41 1.40 1 81 80 49 41 103.3 32.91
10 84.00 88.00 565.600 0.21 73 74 0.87 0.88 1 81 81 51 42 108.1 25.87
11 88.00 92.00 567.840 0.21 74 73 0.88 0.88 1 81 80 51 42 98.6 25.84
12 92.00 96.00 569.890 0.21 74 73 0.88 0.88 1 81 81 52 41 100.2 25.84
Final DGM: 571.972
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Ys,
W�
a
16.0 min 62.691 ft� 0.32 in.WC 69.1 °F 72.7 °F 1 1.298 in.WC 103.6 0.022 3.7
22 of 142

Alliance
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fa etteville Works Facili ,N( Start Time: 10:30 Source:Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Date: 9127122 Run 2 VALID End Time: 12:18 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:ME 7 Est.Tan 69 °F Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.03 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 73 °F Pg: 1.50 in.WC 28.2
Static Press: 1.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.32 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.16 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-5D Est.Dn: 0.278 in. CO=: 0.1 % 4.13
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 sefm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
Os: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid I(co -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp(Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.002 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 10 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 23.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Do,(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: -
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Pitot Gas Tempera ures(OF) Orifice Press. as Temperatures(°F)
S (minutes) Reading Tube DGMAvera a Stack AH ramp Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) in. c Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. %ISO (fps)
p+ Begin End (ft) (in WC) Ideal Actual ( �
I 0.00 4.00 572.250 0.33 72 74 1.37 1.35 2 80 80 58 48 105.0 32.43
2 4.00 8.00 574.970 0.34 73 74 1.41 1.40 2 81 81 48 48 101.7 32.91
3 8.00 12.00 577.650 0.34 74 74 1.41 1.40 2 81 81 49 50 102.7 32.91
4 12.00 16.00 580.360 0.34 75 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 80 49 49 101.0 32.91
5 16.00 20.00 583.030 0.34 76 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 82 49 50 102.3 32.91
6 20.00 24.00 585.740 0.34 76 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 81 50 50 101.2 32.91
7 24.00 28.00 588.420 0.35 77 74 1.46 1.45 2 81 81 50 50 103.6 33.40
8 28.00 32.00 591.210 0.34 77 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 81 51 54 102.9 32.91
9 32.00 36.00 593.940 0.30 77 74 1.26 1.25 2 81 81 52 53 105.1 30.92
10 36.00 40.00 596.560 0.30 78 74 1.26 1.25 2 81 81 51 52 102.9 30.92
11 40.00 44.00 599.130 0.29 78 74 1.22 1.20 2 81 81 51 51 102.6 30.40
12 44.00 48.00 601.650 0.29 78 74 1.22 1.20 2 81 82 51 50 102.6 30.40
1 48.00 52.00 604.171 0.34 77 74 1.42 1.40 2 81 80 55 46 101.7 32.91
2 52.00 56.00 606.870 0.34 78 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 81 50 43 101.6 32.91
3 56.00 60.00 609.570 0.33 78 74 1.38 1.40 2 81 81 47 44 103.5 32.43
4 60.00 64.00 612.280 0.34 78 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 80 48 45 102.7 32.91
5 64.00 68.00 615.010 0.34 79 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 82 50 46 101.0 32.91
6 68.00 72.00 617.700 0.34 80 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 82 50 50 104.9 32.91
7 72.00 76.00 620.500 0.33 82 74 139 1.40 2 81 81 51 46 106.1 32.43
8 76.00 80.00 623.300 0.34 83 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 81 51 47 108.1 32.91
9 80.00 84.00 626.200 0.30 83 74 1.27 1.30 2 80 80 51 46 100.7 30.92
10 84.00 88.00 628.740 0.30 83 74 1.27 1.30 2 81 82 51 46 I01.5 30.92
11 88.00 92.00 631.300 0.30 81 74 1.27 1.30 2 81 81 51 47 105.5 30.92
12 92.00 96.00 633.950 0.25 81 1 74 1.05 1.05 2 81 80 52 46 105.2 28.12
Final DGM: 636.363
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Ys,
.`W�
a
96.0 min 64.113 f? 0.32 in.WC 78.1 °F 74.0 °F 2 1.346 in.WC 103.1 0.021 3.2
23 of 142

A111arMe
5 O.U R C E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 12:50 Source:Polymer Process Aid Outlet
Date: 9/27/22 Run 3 IVALID End Time: 14:38 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 78 IF Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.03 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 74 IF Pg: 1.50 in.WC 27.1
Static Press: 1.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.32 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.16 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-51) Est.Dn: 0.275 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.189
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GIr3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - 10 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole 1 Nozzle Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: -
Pitot Gas Tempera ures °F Orifice Press. Gas Terneratures(IF)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGMAvera a Stack AH P°mp Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
(minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO Vs
AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC)End Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
H
W Begin (0 (in Ideal Actual (m. g) - - - -
1 0.00 4.00 636.575 0.34 79 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 85 59 46 101.9 32.91
2 4.00 8.00 639.290 0.34 79 74 1.43 1.40 2 80 83 53 5o 103.2 32.91
3 8.00 12.00 642.040 0.34 80 74 1.43 1.40 2 81 82 51 47 103.0 32.91
4 12.00 16.00 644.790 0.34 82 74 1.44 1.45 1 2 81 1 81 50 49 102.3 32.91
5 16.00 20.00 647.530 0.34 83 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 82 50 47 102.5 32.91
6 20.00 24.00 650.280 0.34 84 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 81 50 50 102.3 32.91
7 24.00 28.00 653.030 0.35 84 74 1.48 1.50 2 81 82 50 47 102.7 33.40
8 28.00 32.00 655.830 0.35 85 74 1-.49 1.50 2 81 - 83 "49--- 49 103.2 33.40
9 32.00 36.00 658.650 0.23 85 74 0.98 0.98 2 81 82 50 49 106.4 27.07
10 36.00 40.00 661.010 0.23 86 74 0.98 0.98 2 81 81 51 49 102.2 27.07
11 40.00 44.00 663.280 0.22 86 74 0.94 0.94 2 81 80 52 51 104.0 26.48
12 44.00 48.00 665.540 0.22 86 74 0.94 0.94 2 81 80 52 48 105.0 26.48
1 48.00 52.00 667.821 0.33 83 74 1.40 1.40 2 81 83 61 1 52 101.3 32.43
2 52.00 56.00 670.500 0.33 84 74 1.40 1.40 2 81 83 52 52 100.8 32.43
3 56.00 60.00 673.170 0.34 85 74 1.44 1.45 2 81 83 53 49 101.4 32.91
4 60.00 64.00 675.900 0.33 85 75 1.40 1.40 2 81 83 52 56 103.0 32.46
5 64.00 68.00 678.630 0.34 86 75 1.44 1.45 2 81 84 54 56 103.1 32.95
6 68.00 72.00 681.410 0.34 87 75 1.45 1.45 2 81 85 55 56 103.3 32.95
7 72.00 76.00 684.200 0.35 87 75 1.49 1.50 2 81 86 56 57 103.3 33.43
8 76.00 80.00 687.030 0.35 87 75 1.49 1.50 2 82 87 57 56 103.3 33.43
9 80.00 84.00 689.860 0.35 87 76 1.49 1.50 2 83 88 57 59 103.8 33.46
10 84.00 88.00 692.700 0.19 88 76 0.81 Ul 2 83 89 59 56 108.7 24.65
11 88.00 92.00 694.900 0.19 88 76 0.81 0.81 2 85 90 60 58 103.8 24.65
12 92.00 96.00 697.000 0.19 88 76 0.81 0.81 2 87 90 60 56 102.7 24.65
Final DGM: 699.079
W Run Time Van AP Tm Ts Vae AH %ISO BWS Ys,
C4
96.0 min 62.504 ft2 0.30 in.WC 84.8 IF 74.5 OF 2 1.286 in.WC 103.0 0.021 2.8
24 of 142

A!1 arm Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22 --
Start Time 8:05 10:30 12:50 --
Stop Time 9:53 12:18 14:38 --
Run Time,min (6) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 29.94 29.94 29.94 29.94
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.032 1.032 1.032 1.032
Orifice Calibration Value (OH @) 1.699 1.699 1.699 1.699
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 42.281 43.445 45.074 43.600
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 67.0 75.3 78.8 73.7
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 526.7 535.0 538.5 533.4
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (AH) 0.681 0.717 0.734 0.711
Volume HZO Collected,mL (Vlc) 33.5 32.6 26.2 30.8
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ftZ (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 934,000.0 909,000.0 797,000.0 880,000.0
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 387,000.0 9,320,000.0 8,600,000.0 6,102,333.3
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HHODA) 23,100.0 -- 31.4 11,565.7
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,160.0 27.1 37.1 408.07
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,345,260.0 10,229,027.1 9,397,068.5 6,990,451.9
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 43.816 44.332 45.693 44.613
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.580 1.537 1.235 1.451
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.035 0.034 0.026 0.032
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.024 0.027 0.029 0.027
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.024 0.027 0.026 0.026
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 29.99 29.99 29.99 29.99
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 45.605 46.375 47.699 46.56
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (1) 97.3 97.7 99.5 98.1
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Y') -2.9 -3.1 -1.2 -2.4
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 1.1E+06 8.1E+06 7.3E+06 5.5E+06
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 3,5E-02 2.7E-01 2.4E-01 1.8E-01
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reporting limit.
25 of 142

All al'1CG Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/27/22 9/27/22 9/27/22 --
Start Time 8:05 10:30 12:50 --
Stop Time 9:53 12:18 14:38 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.27 0.25 0.29 0.27
Point 2 0.27 0.26 0.29 0.27
Point 3 0.25 0.25 0.28 0.26
Point 4 0.24 0.23 0.25 0.24
Point 5 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.23
Point 6 0.18 0.22 0.22 0.21
Point 7 0.14 0.19 0.16 0.16
Point 8 0.12 0.18 0.11 0.14
Point 9 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.13
Point 10 0.08 0.18 0.08 0.11
Point 11 0.08 0.16 0.08 0.11
Point 12 0.07 0.15 0.08 0.10
Point 13 0.25 0.30 0.26 0.27
Point 14 0.23 0.28 0.26 0.26
Point 15 0.23 0.28 0.25 0.25
Point 16 0.22 0.24 0.23 0.23
Point 17 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22
Point 18 0.21 0.15 0.21 0.19
Point 19 0.20 0.11 0.18 0.16
Point 20 0.16 0.11 0.16 0.14
Point 21 0.15 0.09 0.16 0.13
Point 22 0.15 0.08 0.17 0.13
Point 23 0.14 0.08 0.15 0.12
Point 24 0.14 0.07 0.14 0.12
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.417 0.423 0.429 0.423
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 29.94 29.94 29.94 29.94
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) -1.30 -1.40 -1.30 -1.33
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 29.84 29.84 29.84 29.84
Stack Cross-sectional Area,W (As) 6.31 6.31 6.31 6.31
Temperature,°F (Ts)__ 69.1 72.4 75.3 72.3
Temperature,°R (Ts) 528.8 532.0 535.0 531.948
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.035 0.034 0.026 0.032
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.024 0.027 0.029 0.027
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.024 0.027 0.026 0.026
02 Concentration,% (Oz) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
COZ Concentration,% (COZ) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.59 28.56 28.57 28.58
Velocity,ft/sec NO 23.6 24.0 24.4 24.0
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfin (Qa) 8,928 9,084 9,237 9,083
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 8,675 8,746 8,848 8,757
26 of 142

All�at1�� Method 1 Data
SOUR OE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Proms Aid Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Date: 0926122
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Vertical O 5 1.0 7.5 2.0
Duct Design: Circular -Higher Number Is for .una.nca
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 47.50 in Rest-ngular Stacks or Duets
uusueca¢xr -
Nipple Length: 13.50 in
Depth of Duct: 34.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 6.31 @' -
No.ofTestPorts: 2 uorzs-color- 1 as.ur+-..ucc
Distance A: 3.5 R 20-oists
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.9 (must be>0.5) is roima sma,wam<ror>o.os m(za i-.>
Distance B: 5.0 k
sz
Distance B Duct Diameters: 1.8 must be 'F,om vmm oraiyryoa or r,wma
( ) omn,rnanco Be,m.Finan&o-, a a a°points
Minimum Number of Traverse Paints: 24 co„wwoo em.t
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 smvr ommoter-o.30 to oss m 112-za m.l
Number of Readings per Point: 1
Measurer(Initial and Date):BAG-926/22 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0
Revimver(Initial and Date): JS-92622
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS F14.50
Distance
Traverse %of
Number oJhaverse paints on a diameter from inside
Point Diameter wall
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 11 12
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.002 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.283 - - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.014 - - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.02
5 - - - - 85.4 -- 67.7 - 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 8.50 22.00
6 - - - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.10 25.60
7 - - - - - - 89.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 21.90 35.40
8 -- - - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 25.50 39.00
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 27.98 41.48
10 - - - - - - - - 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 29.99 43.49
11 - - - - - - - - - - 93.3 11 93.3 31.72 45.22
12 97.9 12 97.9 33.00 46.50
'Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=3.5 ft.
B=5fl.
Depth of Duct=34 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
•
• A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
B
Upstream
Disturbance
27 of 142

Alliance SOURCE TESTING Cyclonic Flow Check
SOUR
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/27/22
Sample Point Angle(AP=O)
1 10
2 12
3 10
4 10
5 12
6 10
7 12
8 10
9 8
10 10
11 10
12 8
13 12
14 12
15 10
16 10
17 10
18 10
19 8
20 10
21 10
22 10
23 12
24 14
Average 10
28 of 142

Alliance Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 308.8 466.4 712.2 744.7 732.4 489.9 387.1 841.9 4683.4
Final Mass,g 322.8 469.6 712.1 745.1 733.6 490.8 394.0 848.9 4716.9
Gain 14.0 3.2 -0.1 10.4 1.2 10.9 6.9 7.0 33.5
Run 2 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 299.2 467.5 759.1 755.6 735.6 477.3 299.3 824.6 4618.2
Final Mass,g 312.4 467.9 759.2 756.0 736.8 478.3 307.9 832.3 4650.8
Gain 13.2 0.4 0.1 0.4 1.2 1.0 8.6 7.7 32.6
Run 3 Date: 9/27/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 300.3 467.2 704.5 756.0 733.1 490.8 326.0 848.3 4626.2
Final Mass,g 306.5 467.4 704.0 757.1 734.5 491.6 337.0 854.3 4652.4
Gainj 6.2 0.2 -0.5 1.1 1.4 0.8 11.0 6.0 26.2
29 of 142

A��1�1'1GG
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:05 Source:Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Date: 9117122 Run 1 VALID End Time: 9:53 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 15 Est.Tm: 70 °F Ph: 29.94 in.Hg V1c(ml)
Barometric: 30.02 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 81 °F Pg: -1.30 in.WC 33.5
Static Press: -1.43 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.22 in.WC. 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.91 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-71) Est.Do: 0.306 in. Co': 0.1 % 3.730
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pilot Cp/Type:0.840 S type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.005 - - - 0.002 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 7 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Noule Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cf): -
Pitot Gas Tempera ures of Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(°F
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux
^ (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO Vs
ft2 AP Amb. A Amb.
mb. (in.WC) m.H Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
rn 0. Begin End ( ) (��' ) 67 68 Ideal Actual ( g) 68 69 69 68
A-1 0.00 4.00 901.915 0.27 66 68 1.03 1.00 4 72 70 51 36 101.0 29.29
2 4.00 8.00 904.190 0.27 66 68 1.03 1.00 4 75 77 43 36 98.1 29.29
3 8.00 12.00 906.400 0.25 65 68 0.95 0.94 3 78 80 40 35 99.3 28.18
4 12.00 16.00 908.550 0.24 65 68 0.91 0.91 3 77 79 41 1 35 96.7 27.61
5 16.00 20.00 910.600 0.22 65 68 0.83 0.83 3 82 80 41 35 96.0 26.44
6 20.00 24.00 912.550 0.18 64 68 0.68 0.68 3 77 78 41 36 95.4 23.91
7 24.00 28.00 914.300 0.14 64 68 0.53 0.53 3 82 80 41 36 100.1 21.09
8 28.00 32.00 915.920 0.12 64 68 0.45 0.45 2-- - 81-- 79--- =42--- - 37'-- 102.1 19.52
9 32.00 36.00 917.450 0.11 65 69 0.42 0.42 2 82 79 43 37 96.8 18.71
10 36.00 40.00 918.840 0.08 65 69 0.30 0.30 2 79 79 43 37 93.9 15.96
11 40.00 44.00 919.990 0.08 66 69 0.30 0.30 2 80 80 44 40 96.1 15.96
12 44.00 48.00 921.170 0.07 66 69 0.27 0.27 2 81 79 45 38 98.4 14.93
B-1 48.00 52.00 922.300 0.25 67 69 0.95 0.95 3 80 79 53 39 101.4 28.21
2 52.00 56.00 924.500 0.23 68 70 0.87 0.87 3 80 80 44 37 91.2 27.08
3 56.00 60.00 926.400 0.23 68 70 0.87 0.87 3 84 79 45 37 96.0 27.08
4 60.00 64.00 928.400 0.22 68 70 0.84 0.84 4 83 79 47 38 94.2 26.49
5 64.00 68.00 930.320 0.21 69 70 0.80 0.80 4 78 80 47 38 97.2 25.88
6 68.00 72.00 932.260 0.21 69 70 0.80 0.80 4 80 79 47 38 97.2 25.88
7 72.00 76.00 934.200 0.20 69 70 0.76 0.76 4 87 80 46 38 102.7 25.25
8 76.00 80.00 936.200 0.16 69 70 0.61 0.61 4 88 80 46 39 93.0 22.59
9 80.00 84.00 937.820 0.15 70 70 0.57 0.57 4 87 80 47 38 98.2 21.87
10 84.00 88.00 939.480 0.15 70 70 0.57 0.57 4 83 79 48 39 92.9 21.87
11 88.00 92.00 941.050 0.14 70 70 0.53 0.53 3 79 79 48 40 96.1 21.13
12 92.00 40 96.00 942.620 0.14 71 70 0.54 0.54 3 80 79 48 96.3 31.13
Final DGM: 944.196
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Ys,
a96.0 min 42.281 ft2 0.18 in.WC 67.0 °F 69.1 °F 4 0.681 in.WC 97.3 0.024 -2.9
30 of 142

J
AIIIQA
SOURCE TESTING. I$okinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 10:30 Source:Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Date: 9/27/21. Run 2 VALH) End Time: 12:18 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 15 Est.Tm: 67 OF Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(MI)
Barometric: 30.02 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 69 OF Pg: -1.40 in.WC 32.6
Static Press: -1.43 in.WC AH Q(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.18 in.WC O=: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.91 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D Est.Dn: 0.321 in. CO2: 0.1 % 3.79
CO,: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
Or: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cl) -
Nt/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S type Leak Rate(cim): 0.002 - - - 0.002 Mid 2(co -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 8 9 Mid 3(co -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole I Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cf): -
Pitot Gas Tempera ures(OF) Orifice Press. Gas Tenteratures(°F)
a: Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGMAvera a Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
a (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
s AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) (m.H Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
ri Ay Begin End (ft) (in WC) Ideal Actual g)
A-1 0.00 1 4.00 944.368 0.25 73 71 0.96 0.96 4 87 86 63 47 101.9 28.26
2 4.00 8.00 946.600 0.26 73 71 1.00 1.00 4 88 86 55 46 94.9 28.82
3 8.00 12.00 948.720 0.25 74 71 0.96 0.96 4 85 82 52 42 99.3 28.26
4 12.00 16.00 950.900 0.23 74 72 0.88 0.88 4 80 80 51 43 94.1 27.13
5 16.00 20.00 952.880 0.22 74 72 0.84 0.84 4 78 79 50 42 94.8 26.54
6 20.00 24.00 954.830 0.22 75 72 0.84 0.84 4 82 79 So 43 95.5 26.54
7 24.00 28.00 956.800 0.19 75 72 0.73 0.73 3 87 79 49 43 95.5 24.66
8 28.00 32.00 958.630 0.18 75 72 0.69 0.69 3 82 79 49 42 I00.2 24.00
9 32.00 36.00 960.500 0.17 75 71 0.65 0.65 3 79 79 50 42 96.4 23.30
10 36.00 40.00 962.250 0.18 76 72 0.69 0.69 4 78 79 51 43 96.3 24.00
11 40.00 44.00 964.050 0.16 76 73 0.61 0.61 3 84 80 50 42 96.5 22.65
12 44.00 48.00 965.750 0.15 75 72 0.58 0.58 3 87 79 51 45 96.3 21.91
B-1 48.00 52.00 967.390 0.30 76 73 1.15 1.15 4 82 79 61 45 95.9 31.02
2 52.00 56.00 969.700 0.28 76 73 1.07 1.I0 4 88 79 51 42 98.9 29.96
3 56.00 60.00 972.000 0.28 76 73 1.07 1.10 4 85 79 52 42 95.0 29.96
4 60.00 64.00 974.2I0 0.24 76 73 0.92 0.92 4 82 79 52 41 95.6 27.74
5 64.00 68.00 976.270 0.22 76 73 0.84 0.84 4 79 79 51 42 98.4 26.56
6 68.00 72.00 978.300 0.15 76 73 0.58 0.58 3 79 79 51 43 95.0 21.93
7 72.00 76.00 979.920 0.11 76 73 0.42 0.42 2 83 80 51 44 94.5 18.78
8 76.00 80.00 981.300 0.11 76 73 0.42 0.42 2 84 79 51 42 99.3 18.78
9 80.00 84.00 982.750 0.09 76 73 0.35 0.35 2 82 79 52 43 98.4 16.99
10 84.00 88.00 984.050 0.08 76 73 0.31 0.31 2 79 80 53 42 100.3 16.02
11 88.00 92.00 985.300 0.08 76 73 0.31 0.31 2 79 79 53 42 103.5 16.02
12 92.00 96.00 986.590 0.07 76 73 0.27 0.27 2 84 80 53 43 1 104.9 14.98
Final DGM: 987.813
Max
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yq,
W�
ai
96.0 min 43.445 ft3 0.19 in.WC 75.3 OF 72.4 OF 4 0.717 in.WC 97.7 0.027 -3.1
31 of 142

f
i
�'
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fa etteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 12:50 Source:Polymer Process Aid Inlet
Date: 9127/22 Run 3 VALID End Time: 14:38 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 15 Est.Tm: 75 OF Ph: 29.94 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.02 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 72 OF Pg: -1.30 in.WC 26.2
Static Press: -1.43 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.19 in.WC Oz: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.91 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D Est.Dn: 0.316 in. CO2: 0.1 % 3.829
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) -
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.003 - - - 0.002 Mid 2(co -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nonle ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - - 9 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cf): -
Pitot Gas Tempera ores°F Orifice Press. Gas Tenteratures(OF)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGMAvera a Stack AH Pump Probe Filter 1m Exit Aux Vs
G (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
AP AmU. AmU. (in.WC) AmU. AmU. A.U. AmU. (Cps)
l
m.H
to Oi Begin End (ff) 0n WC) - - Ideal Actual ( g) - - - -
A-1 0.00 4.00 987.915 0.29 77 74 1.11 1.10 4 77 88 66 43 96.4 30.52
2 4.00 8.00 990.200 0.29 77 74 1.11 1.10 4 88 90 51 40 100.8 30.52
3 8.00 12.00 992.590 0.28 77 74 I.07 1.10 4 90 88 50 40 99.2 29.99
4 12.00 16.00 994.900 0.25 77 74 0.96 0.96 3 90 84 50 40 99.9 28.34
5 16.00 20.00 997.100 0.24 78 75 0.92 0.92 3 87 83 50 40 97.3 27.79
6 20.00 24.00 999.200 0.22 78 75 0.84 0.85 3 85 82 50 42 99.2 26.61
7 24.00 28.00 1001.250 0.16 78 75 0.61 0.62 3 81 80 51 39 97.5 22.69
8 28.00 32.00 1002.970 0.11 78 75 0.42 0.42 2 80 80 51 40 96.3 18.82
9 32.00 36.00 1004.380 0.11 79 75 0.42 0.42 2 80 79 51 40 100.9 18.82
10 36.00 40.00 1005.860 0.08 79 75 0.31 031 2 82 79 52 42 99.1 I6.05
11 40.00 44.00 1007.100 0.08 79 75 0.31 0.31 2 82 79 54 42 98.3 16.05
12 44.00 48.00 1008.330 0.08 79 75 0.31 0.31 2 80 79 54 42 97.5 16.05
B-1 48.00 52.00 1009.550 0.26 79 76 I.00 1.00 4 81 79 59 43 97.8 28.96
2 52.00 56.00 1011.750 0.26 79 76 I.00 I.00 4 81 79 49 38 97.8 28.96
3 56.00 60.00 1013.950 0.25 79 76 0.96 0.96 4 81 79 46 39 98.4 28.39
4 60.00 64.00 1016.120 0.23 79 76 0.88 0.88 3 80 79 46 43 99.7 27.23
5 64.00 68.00 1018.230 0.22 80 76 0.85 0.85 3 80 79 48 43 100.8 26.64
6 68.00 72.00 1020.320 0.21 80 76 0.81 0.81 3 81 79 50 43 96.3 26.02
7 72.00 76.00 1022.270 0.18 80 76 0.69 0.69 3 82 79 50 43 97.5 24.09
8 76.00 80.00 1024.100 0.16 80 76 0.62 1 0.62 3 81 79 50 42 101.7 22.71
9 80.00 84.00 1025.900 0.16 80 76 0.62 1 0.62 2 80 79 48 40 103.4 22.71
10 84.00 88.00 1027.730 0.17 80 76 0.65 0.65 2 79 79 48 41 102.6 23.41
II 88.00 92.00 1029.600 0.15 80 76 0.58 0.58 2 81 79 48 41 101.6 21.99
12 92.00 1 96.00 1031.340 0.14 80 76 0.54 1 0.54 2 83 79 48 43 1 99.6 21.25
Final DGM: 1032.989
aRun Time Vm AP Tot Ts Val AH %ISO BWS Yqa
rW7
a
96.0 min 45.074 f? 0.19 in.WC 78.8 OF 75.3 OF 4 0.734 in.WC 99.5 0.026 -1.2
32 of 142