AQ_F_0900009_20221114_ST_StkTstRpt_VES

The Chemours Company
Fayetteville Works
Chemours 22828 NC Highway 87 W
Fayetteville,NC 28306
Sent Via email and USPS
Certified Mail 7017 1450 0002 3902 4409
Certified Mail 70171450 0002 3902 4416
Certified Mail 7017 1450 0002 3902 4423
November 11, 2022 rSTATIONARY
v14 2022
Michael Abraczinskas QUALITYDirector, Division of Air Quality OURCE COMPLIANCE
1641 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1641 RECEIVED
Re: Quarterly Carbon Unit Testing VEN
Annual Carbon Unit Testing VES and PPA NOV 14 2022
Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works
Bladen County ivrsron of Av uy
Direcmr's ice
Facility ID 0900009, Title V Permit No. 03757T48
Dear Mr. Abraczinskas,
Enclosed are the carbon unit quarterly testing results for the Vinyl Ethers North(VEN) operating
area and the annual carbon unit testing results for Vinyl Ethers—South and Polymer Processing
Aid operating areas conducted the week of September 26, 2022. The test reports were prepared
by Alliance Source Testing and are enclosed. The testing is being conducted pursuant to Section
2.2 D. b and c. In addition,the VEN testing completes the testing required under the April 2022
Settlement Agreement.
Two copies of the reports are enclosed.
If there are any questions regarding these reports, please contact Christel Compton at
Christel e comp on(a_bchemours.com.
Kind Reg,ar�ds,
Rel C—e
�� x
Christel Compton
Environmental Program Manager
CC via email, Heather Carter, NCDAQ

Allial
TECHNICAL GROUP
NOV 14 2022 `
Source Test Report
AIR QUALITY
STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
The Chemours Company, FC, LLC
Fayetteville Works
22828 Highway 87W
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Source Tested: Vinyl Ethers South (VES) Carbon Bed
Test Date: September 29, 2022
Project No. AST-2022-3359
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
6515A Basile Rowe
East Syracuse, NY 1305

r
All noe
TECHNICAL GROUP source Test Report
Test Program Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit No. North Carolina Department of Air Quality(NCDAQ)Title V Air Permit No.0373ST48
Source Information
Source Name Target Parameter
VES Carbon Bed(Inlet/Outlet) HFPO-DA
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
The Chemours Company,FC,LLC Alliance Technical Group,LLC Eurofins TestAmerica
Fayetteville Works 6515A Basile Rowe 5815 Middlebrook Pike
22828 Highway 87W East Syracuse,NY 13057 Knoxville,TN 37921
Fayetteville,North Carolina Kevin Woodcock
Project Manager/ Courtney Adkins
Facility Contact Field Team Leader [e-mail]
Christel Compton Patrick Grady
[e-mail] [e-mail]
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shook
katie.shonk@all iancetechnicalgroup.com
[phone]
Report Coordinator
Emily Diaz
[e-mail]
[phone]
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page i
2 of 130

Alba -
Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Certification Statement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s)tested and operating condition(s)for the specific test date(s)and time(s)identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format(.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
November 4, 2022
Patrick Grady,QSTI Date
Project Manager
Alliance Technical Group,LLC
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page ii
3 of 130

Affia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Project Team............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results.....................................................................................................................................2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology....................................................................................................................................3-1
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate.....3-1
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content.........................................................................3-1
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid......................................................3-1
3.4 BFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation.............................................................................3-2
3.5 BFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery..........................................................................................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table1-1: Project Team........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table2-1: Summary of Results................................................................................................................................2-1
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology..................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page iii
4 of 130

Introduction
5 of 130

Ocr::�
Allia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by The Chemours Company (Chemours) to conduct
compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works facility in Fayetteville, North Carolina. The facility operates under
North Carolina Department of Air Quality (NCDAQ) Title V Air Permit No. 03735T48. Source emissions testing
were conducted at the inlet and outlet of the Vinyl Ethers South (VES) carbon bed. The testing was conducted to
evaluate emissions of hexafluoro-propylene oxide-dimer acid (BFPO-DA). BFPO-DA, hexafluoro-propylene oxide
dimer acid fluoride (BFPO-DAF) and hexafluoro-propylene oxide dimer acid ammonium salt are captured and
reported together as BFPO-DA.
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
VES is part of the fluoromonomer area at the Fayetteville facility.This area produces fluorocarbon compounds used
to produce Chemours products, such as IXM, Krytox® and Viton®. Indoor air fugitive emissions from VES are
vented to a carbon bed which is then vented to atmosphere through a process stack(NEP-Hdr2).___
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
Patrick Grady
Antonio Andersen
Alliance Personnel Jacob Cavallo
Brian Goodhile
Jeff Sheldon
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 1-1
6of130

Summary
of Results
7of130

Affia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Summary of Results
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works Facility in Fayetteville, NC on September 29,
2022. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of BFPO-DA at the inlet and outlet of the VES carbon
bed. Note that the outlet emission rates for Run 2 were greater than the inlet emissions, therefore, this data is not
included in the reduction efficiency average.A review of the field data and operations data indicate no irregularities
in the process. The laboratory did a thorough review of the analytical data and found no abnormalities with the
analyses.At this time there is no explanation for the anomalies in the test results for Run 2.
Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results. Any difference between the summary results listed in
the following tables and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
Run Number °fY 'Run 1: ti n2 a Ruh 3 Aver`age
ate 9/29/12 9/29/22 9/29/22'
HFPO-DA Data —
Outlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 8.0E-05 9.5E-04 4.7E-05 6.4E-05
Inlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 5.5E-03 4.4E-04 2.1E-03 3.8E-03
Reduction Efficiency,% 98.5 NA 97.8 98.2
'Run 2 test results are not included in the averages.
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 2-1
8 of 130

Testing Methodology
9of130

Affia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
U S EPA Reference . :"
. : • ' Parameter ` ". ., - , Notes/Remmarks;
Test•Methods
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 &2 Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid OTM-45 Isokinetic Sampling
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 1.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing,each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the
same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid
HFPO-DA emissions were evaluated in accordance with Modified Method 0010.Testing followed the submitted
protocol in the execution of our onsite sampling and analysis activities.Modified Method 0010 procedure was
followed as outlined in the protocol submitted to NC Division of Air Quality.Modified Method 0010 sampling and
analysis procedures performed-for-this-project-are consistent with OTM45,_which was released_by.EPA-in-January
2021,subsequent to Chemours submittal of plans to DAQ.
The sample train consisted of a borosilicate glass nozzle attached directly to a heated borosilicate glass-lined probe.
The probe was connected directly to a heated borosilicate glass filter holder containing a solvent-extracted glass
fiber filter.In order to minimize possible thermal degradation of the HFPO-DA,the probe and particulate filter were
heated to just above stack temperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The filter holder exit
was connected to a water-cooled coil condenser followed by a water-cooled sorbent module containing
approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 inlet temperature was monitored to ensure that the module is
maintained at a temperature below 20°C.
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-1
10 of 130

Affia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger and a series of two impingers each
containing 100-ml of high purity deionized water. The water impingers were followed by another condensate
knockout impinger equipped with a second XAD-2 resin trap to account for any sample breakthrough. The final
impinger contained approximately 250 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. The water impingers and condensate
impingers were submerged in an ice bath through the duration of the testing.The water in the ice bath was also used
to circulate around the coil condenser and the XAD-2 resin traps.
Exhaust gases were extracted from the sample locations isokinetically using a metering console equipped with a
vacuum pump,a calibrated orifice,oil manometer and probe/filter heat controllers.
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation
Prior to conducting the field work the following procedures were conducted to prepare the field sampling glassware
and sample recovery tools.
1. Wash all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with low residue soap and hot water.
2. Rinse all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools three(3)times with D.I.H2O.
3. Bake glassware (with the exception of probe liners) at 450°C for approximately 2 hours, (XAD-2 resin tube
glassware is cleaned by Eurofins/TestAmerica by this same procedure).
4. Solvent rinse three(3)times all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with the following sequence of solvents:
acetone,methylene chloride,hexane,and methanol.
5. Clean glassware and tools will be sealed in plastic bags or aluminum foil for transport to the sampling site.
6. Squirt bottles will be new dedicated bottles of known history and dedicated to the D.I. Water and
methanol/ammonium hydroxide(MeOH/5%NH40H) solvent contents. Squirt bottles will be labelled with the
solvent content it contains.
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery
Following completion of each test run,the sample probe,nozzle and front-half of the filter holder were brushed and
rinsed three times each with the Me0H/ 5% NH40H solution (Container 41). The glass fiber filter was removed
from its housing and transferred to a polyethylene bottle (Container #2). Any particulate matter and filter fibers
which adhered to the filter holder and gasket were also placed in Container#2. The XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,
labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler. The back-half of the filter holder, coil condenser condensate trap and
connecting glassware were rinsed with the same McOB/5%NH40H solution and placed in Container 43.
The volume of water collected in the second and third impingers was measured for moisture determinations and then
placed in Container#4. Impingers#2 and#3 were then rinsed with the McOH/5%NH40H solution and placed in
Container 45.The second(breakthrough)XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler.
The second condensate trap was rinsed with the Me0H/ 5% NH40H solution and placed in Container 45. The
contents of the fifth impinger were placed in its original container and weighed for moisture determinations.
Containers were sealed and labeled with the appropriate sample information. Samples remained chilled until
analysis.BFPO-DA analysis was conducted using liquid chromatography/dual mass spectrometry(LC/MS/MS).
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-2
11 of 130

Appendix :,
12 of 130

Appendix A
of al'1De Example Calculations
SCUACE TE$TINd
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: BFPO-DA
Meter Pressure(Pm),in.Hg
A
where, Pm = Pb + h
Pb 30.14 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH 1.251 =pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Pm 30.23 =in.H.-
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure(Ps),in.Hg
Ps = Pb + P9
where, 1!1_6
Pb 30.14 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
Pg 1.40 =static pressure,in.H2O
Ps 30.24 =in.Hg
Standard Meter Volume(Vmstd),dscf
17.636 x Y x Vm x Pm
Vmstd =
where, Tm
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor
Vm 57.958 =meter volume,cf
Pm 30.23 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
TM 527.8 =absolute meter temperature,OR
Vmstd 58.602 =dsef
Standard Wet Volume(Vwstd),scf
Vwstd = 0.04716 x Vlc
where,
Vic 26.3 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vmstd 1.240 =scf
Moisture Fraction(BWSsat),dimensionless(theoretical at saturated conditions)
6.37— 21827 l
10 �Ts+3651
BWSsat =
PS
where,
Ts 75.5 =stack temperature,T
Ps 30.24 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
BWSsat 0.029 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless(measured)
_ Vwstd
BWSwhere, (Vwstd + Vmstd)
Vwstd 1.240 =standard wet volume,scf
Vmstd 58.602 =standard meter volume,dscf
BWS 0.021 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat< BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 0.029 =moisture fraction(theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.021 =moisture fraction(measured)
BWS 0.021
13 of 130

G Appendix A
A lic-Mr Ice Example Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Molecular Weight(DRY)(Md),Ib/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %02) + (0.28 (100 — %CO2 — %02))
where,
co,, 0.1 =carbon dioxide concentration,%
Oz 20.9 =oxygen concentration,%
Md 28.85 =1b/lb mol
Molecular Weight(WET)(Ms),Ib/Ib-mole
Ms = Md (1 — BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
BWS 0.021 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ms 28.63 =lb/lb mol
Average Velocity(Vs),ft/sec
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (0 P 1/2) avg x QsTxsms
where, ,
Cp 0.840 =pitot tube coefficient
A PIn- 0.548 =velocity head of stack gas,(in.H;0)Ia
Ts 535.1 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 30.24 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ms 28.63 =molecular weight of stack gas,lb/lb mol
Vs 31.0 =ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions(Qa),acfm
Qa = 60 x Vs x As
where,
Vs 31.0 =stack gas velocity,ft/sec
As 7.07 =cross-sectional area of stack,ftr
Qa 13,129 =acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions(Qs),dscfm
Ps
Qs = 17.636 x Qa x (1 — BWS) x —
where, Tq
Qa 13,129 =average stack gas flow at stack conditions,acfm
BWS 0.021 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ps 30.24 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ts 535.1 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Qs 12,815 =dscfm
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check(Yqa),dimensionless
Y— 0.0319xTmx29 _AHav .
(VM-1
OH@ x (Pb + 13.6g' g) x Md
Yqa = x 100
where,
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor,dimensionless
O 96 =run time,min.
Vm 57.958 =total meter volume,dcf
Tin 527.8 =absolute meter temperature,OR
AH@ 1.841 =orifice meter calibration coefficient,in.H2O
Pb 30.14 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH avg 1.251 =average pressure differential of orifice,in H;,O
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
(A 11)12 1.112 =average squareroot pressure differential of orifice,(in.H20)In
Yqa -1.5 =dimensionless
14 of 130

Appendix A
a1 Example Calculations
souncE rESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: BFPO-DA
Volume of Nozzle(Vn),W
Ts Vn = p� (0.002669 x VlC+Vm T m x Y
where,
Ts 535.1 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 30.24 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Vlc 26.3 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vm 57.958 =meter volume,cf
Pm 30.23 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor,unitless
TM 527.8 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vn 60.038 =volume of nozzle,W
Lsokinetic Sampling Rate(1),%
Vn 1
1 Ox60xAnxVs x100
where,
Vn 60.038 =nozzle volume,M
0 96.0 =run time,minutes
An 0.00034 =area of nozzle,ft2
Vs 31.0 =average velocity,ft/sec
I 98.8 =%
HFPO-DA Concentration(C),ng/dscm
_ M x 35.313
C Vmstd
where,
M 2,770 =BFPO-DA mass,ng
Vmstd 58.602 =standard meter volume,dscf
Cmj3 1.7E+03 =ng/dscm
HFPO-DA Emission Rate(ER),lb/hr
MxQsx60
ER = Vrn..std x 4..q4R+ 11
where,
M 2,770 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Qs 12,815 =average stack gas flow at standard conditions,dscfrn
Vmstd 58.602 =standard meter volume,dsef
ER 8.0E-05 =lb/hr
15 of 130

Appendix 1 :i':
16 of 130

Afflarice Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/29/22 9/29/22 9/29/22 --
Start Time 8:54 11:27 13:46 --
Stop Time 10:45 13:15 15:35 --
Run Time,min (6) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.001 1.001 1.001 1.001
Orifice Calibration Value (OH @) 1.841 1.841 1.841 1.841
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 57.958 57.199 55.751 56.969
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 68.2 72.4 73.1 71.2
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 527.8 532.0 532.8 530.9
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (OH) 1.251 1.190 1.138 1.193
Volume H2O Collected,mL (VIC) 26.3 31.5 31.6 29.8
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ft2 (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,350.0 751.0 703.0 934.7
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng KHRODA) 1,420.0 32,300.0 919.0 11,546.3
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -- -- -- --
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -- 14.6 -- 14.60
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 2,770.0 33,065.6 1,622.0 12,485.9
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,113 (Vmstd) 58.602 57.369 55.831 57.267
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.240 1.486 1.490 1.405
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.029 0.031 0.031 0.030
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.23 30.23 30.22 30.23
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 60.038 59.212 57.727 58.99
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 98.8 99.7 99.1 99.2
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Y'J -1.5 -0.9 -1.2 -1.2
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 1.7E+03 2.0E+04 1.0E+03 7.7E+03
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 8.0E-05 9.5E-04 4.7E-05 3.6E-04
REDUCTION CALCULATIONS
Inlet HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr RE(HFPODA) 5.5E-03 4.4E-04 2.1E-03 2.7E-03
HFPO-DA Reduction Efficiency,% RE(HFPODA) 98.5 100.0 97.8 98.8
Underlined vaLues are non-detect and reported as the reporting limit.
17 of 130

A111arKm Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESL"ING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source TES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/29/22 9/29/22 9/29/22 --
Start Time 8:54 11:27 13:46 --
Stop Time 10:45 13:15 15:35 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.23
Point 2 0.28 0.23 0.22 0.24
Point-3 0.28 0.24 0.23 0..25
Point 4 0.29 0.28 0.24 0.27
Point 5 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.28
Point 6 0.32 0.27 0.26 0.28
Point 7 0.34 0.29 0.28 0.30
Point 8 0.35 0.30 0.28 0.31
Point 9 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.32
Point 10 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.32
Point 11 0.35 0.33 0.30 0.33
Point 12 0.36 0.33 0.34 0.34
Point 13 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.19
Point 14 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.21
Point 15 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.23
Point 16 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.24
Point 17 0.23 0.25 0.25 0.24
Point 18 0.25 0.29 0.28 0.27
Point 19 0.28 0.32 0.30 0.30
Point 20 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.33
Point 21 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.35
Point 22 0.39 0.35 0.35 0.36
Point 23 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.37
Point 24 0.39 0.36 0.36 0.37
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of OP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.548 0.535 0.524 0.536
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 30.24 30.24 30.24 30.24
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07
Temperature,°F _ (Ts) _ 75.5 77.0 _77.5_ __ 76..6_
Temperature,°R (Ts) 535.1 536.6 537.2 536.309
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.029 0.031 0.031 0.030
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024
02 Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2 Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.63 28.58 28.57 28.59
Velocity,ft/see (Vs) 31.0 30.3 29.7 30.3
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 13,129 12,833 12,579 12,847
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 12,815 12,433 12,165 12,471
18 of 130

AID once Method 1 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Date: 09/29/22
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Hori-tal 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Duct Design: Circular a Higher Number is for L7-:'
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Part: 46.50 in Recrengular Stacks or Ducts
Nipple Lenglh: 10.50 in
Depth of Dud: 36.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Dud: 7.07 R'No.of Test Ports: 2 24or25-points �
Distance A: 12.5 R 20 points
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) 1S pouts St,,-Diommor>psi.n t24 w)
Distance B: 31.0 ft
Distance B Duct Diameters: 10.3 must be>2 1Fmm poor"racy rypo ct 12 points
( ) OIafi.Nnrrca them.F .n�in,, a ear 9 a pe-
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 12 contx;on,ea.1
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 S a&memeter a 0.30 to 0.61 m t12-24 m.1
Number of Readings per Point: I
Measurer(Initial and Date): JS 92922 2 3 4 5 5 7 e 9
Revimer(Initial and Date):BAG 92922
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Number oftraverse points on a diameter Traverse %of tram inside from
Point Diameter wall outside of
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 art
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 11.50
2 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 12.91
3 - - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 14.75
4 - - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 16.87
5 - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 - 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 19.50
6 - - - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 23.32
7 - - - - - - $9.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 33.68
8 - - - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 37.50
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 823 29.63 40.13
10 - - - - - - - - 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 42.25
11 - - - - - - - - - - 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 44.09
12 97.9 1 12 97.9 35.00 45.50
'Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to lroverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=12.5 ft.
B=31 ft.
Depth of Duct=36 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
• A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
g
Upstream
Disturbance
19 of 130

AID anCNG SOURCE TESTING Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/29/22
Sample Point Angle(AP=O)
1 8
2 10
_3 10
4 8
5 8
6 5
7 8
8 10
9 10
10 8
11 8
12 10
13 10
14 10
15 15
16 15
17 10
18 10
19 15
20 15
21 12
22 12
23 10
24 10
Average 10
20 of 130

Alliance Method 4 Data
SOURCE TES"r[NG
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 340.4 499.2 746.4 758.8 752.4 497.8 300.3 826.4 4721.7
Final Mass,g 347.3 499.6 745.0 758.7 753.2 498.6 309.9 835.7 4748.0
Gain 6.9 0.4 -1.4 1 -0.1 1 0.8 1 0.8 9.6 9.3 1 26.3
Run 2 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 304.6 476.9 726.9 762.4 736.1 484.5 294.7 842.6 4628.7
Final Mass,g 310.5 468.2 755.8 759.2 737.3 479.4 300.3 849.5 4660.2
Gain 5.9 -8.7 28.9 1 -3.2 1.2 -5.1 5.6 6.9 1 31.5
Run 3 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 302.3 500.6 747.5 757.2 752.6 498.5 317.4 794.4 4670.5
Final Mass,g 1 313.6 501.2 746.5 758.2 753.7 500.3 326.8 801.8 4702.1
Gainj 11.3 0.6 -1.0 1.0 1.1 1.8 9.4 7.4 31.6
21 of 130

Alliance
so u Rt E Es 7(N G Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:54 Source:VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/29l22 Run 1 IVALID End Time: 10:45 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 65 OF Pb: 30.14 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 80 °F Pg: 1.40 in.WC 26.3
Static Press: 1.60 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.30 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.32 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-5D Est.Dn: 0.285 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.040
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pilot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid I Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 924.306 tHtk#H# 0.104
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pilot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.007 0.002 0.002 - 0.003 Mid 2(ct) 924.410#N##@ 0.068
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G -3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 8 8 12 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole 1 Nozzle on(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(ct): 0.172
Pitot Gas Temperatures(OF) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(°F
y Sample Time Dry Gas MeterPump(minutes) Reading Vac Tube DGM Average Stack AH Vac Probe Filter Im %ISO Exit Aux Vs
R (ftj) AP And. Amb. (in.WC) (. ) Amb. Amb. And. Amb. (fps)
m.Hg
to C.i Begin End (to WC) Ideal Actual
- A-1 0.00- - 4.00 894,358- - 0.26 61 74 1.06 1.10 2 81 87 54 45 _ 108.7 28.71
2 4.00 8.00 896.800 0.28 65 75 1.14 1.15 2 81 82 52 47 94.6 29.82
3 8.00 12.00 899.020 0.28 65 75 1.14 1.20 2 82 85 53 43 104.8 29.82
4 12.00 16.00 901.480 0.29 66 75 1.19 1.20 2 83 87 54 44 95.3 30.35
5 16.00 20.00 903.760 0.30 66 75 1.23 1.20 2 82 85 53 44 92.5 30.87
6 20.00 24.00 906.010 0.32 67 75 1.31 1.30 2 82 83 53 46 102.9 31.88
7 24.00 28.00 908.600 0.34 67 75 1.39 1.40 3 82 85 54 46 92.5 32.86
8 28.00 32.00 911.000 0.35 68 75 1.44 1.40 3 -83 87 - 54 47 91.0 33.34
9 32.00 36.00 913.400 0.35 68 75 1.44 1.40 3 83 85 54 46 102.8 33.34
10 36.00 40.00 916.110 0.35 68 75 1.44 1.40 3 82 87 54 46 102.0 33.34
11 40.00 44.00 918.800 0.35 68 75 1.44 1.40 3 83 86 54 47 102.4 33.34
12 44.00 48.00 921.500 0.36 69 75 1.48 1.50 3 82 87 54 47 104.8 33.81
B-1 48.00 52.00 924.306 0.18 67 75 0.74 0.74 2 82 84 57 49 93.2 23.91
2 52.00 56.00 926.240 0.19 69 76 0.78 0.78 2 83 84 52 46 108.9 24.59
3 56.00 60.00 928.360 0.22 69 76 0.90 0.91 2 83 86 53 48 104.1 26.46
4 60.00 64.00 930.540 0.23 69 76 0.95 0.95 2 83 87 53 49 102.7 27.05
5 64.00 68.00 932.740 0.23 69 77 0.94 0.95 2 83 87 53 49 100.9 27.08
6 68.00 72.00 934.900 0.25 70 76 1.03 1.00 2 83 86 54 49 103.3 28.20
7 72.00 76.00 937.210 0.28 70 76 1.15 120 2 82 87 54 So 101.4 29.85
8 76.00 80.00 939.610 0.33 70 76 1.36 1.40 3 83 85 54 50 92.7 32.40
9 80.00 84.00 941.990 0.38 71 76 1.57 1.60 3 83 87 55 51 91.3 34.77
10 84.00 88.00 944.510 0.39 71 76 1.61 1.60 3 83 86 56 51 94.8 35.23
11 88.00 92.00 947.160 0.40 71 76 1.65 1.65 3 82 88 56 51 90.4 35.68
12 92.00 96.00 949.720 0.39 72 76 1.61 1 1.60 3 83 85 57 52 98.8 35.23
Final DGM: 952.488
to Max
a Run Time VanAP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy,
U)
C4
96.0 min 57.958 ft, 0.30 in.WC 68.2 OF 75.5 OF 3 1.251 in.WC 98.8 0.021 -1.5
22 of 130

Alliance
S O.U R C S TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemovis Facility,N( Start Time: 11:27 Source:VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9�29/22 Run 2 VALID End Time: 13:15 Project No.:2022-3359 1 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) I MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 68 °F Ph: 30.14 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 75 °F Pg: 1.40 in.WC 31.5
Static Press: 1.60 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.30 in.WC 03: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.32 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-5D Est.Dn: 0.282 in. COz: 0.1 % 4.10
Co': 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
%: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(co 982.310 400 0.091
Nt/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.003 0.004 0.003 - 0.003 Mid 2(cf) 982.401 449AYM 0.083
Md: 28.85 1bAb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 6 7 - 8 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.174
Pitot Gas Tempera ores ff) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(°F)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
(minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
(ft3) AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) (m.Hg) Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
zn p.i Begin End f w'CI Ideal Actual - - - -
A-1 0.00 4.00 953.702 0.23 68 77 0.94 0.94 2 83 92 61 54 102.9 27.08
2 4.00 8.00 955.900 0.23 70 77 0.95 0.95 2 83 86 57 53 100.3 27.08
3 8.00 12.00 958.050 0.24 70 77 0.99 0.99 2 83 86 56 51 101.4 27.66
4 12.00 16.00 960.270 0.28 71 77 1.15 1.20 2 83 87 55 49 99.6 29.88
5 16.00 20.00 962.630 0.28 71 77 1.15 1.20 2 82 85 53 50 99.6 29.88
6 20.00 24.00 964.990 0.27 72 77 1.11 1.10 2 82 87 53 52 98.7 29.34
7 24.00 28.00 967.290 0.29 72 77 1.20 1.20 2 82 86 52 51 96.1 30.41
8 28.00 32.00 969.610 0.30 73 77 1.24 1.20 3 83 87 52 51 98.3 30.93
9 32.00 36.00 972.030 0.30 74 77 1.24 1.20 3 83 86 52 49 101.0 30.93
10 36.00 40.00 974.520 0.32 74 77 1.32 1.30 3 82 87 52 50 106.4 31.94
11 40.00 44.00 977.230 0.33 74 77 1.37 1.40 3 83 86 53 52 100.6 32.43
12 44.00 48.00 979.830 0.33 74 77 1.37 1.40 3 84 86 51 53 95.9 32.43
B-1 48.00 52.00 982.310 0.21 70 76 0.86 0.87 2 83 88 58 47 95.4 25.85
2 52.00 56.00 984.440 0.21 72 77 0.87 0.87 2 83 86 51 45 100.6 25.87
3 56.00 60.00 986.510 0.23 72 77 0.95 0.95 2 83 87 50 46 97.6 27.08
4 60.00 64.00 988.610 0.25 73 77 1.03 1.00 2 83 86 50 45 101.9 28.23
5 64.00 68.00 990.900 0.25 73 77 1.03 1.00 2 83 86 50 44 100.1 28.23
6 68.00 72.00 993.150 0.29 73 77 1.20 1.20 3 83 86 51 46 93.8 30.41
7 72.00 76.00 995.420 0.32 73 77 1.32 1.30 3 83 86 51 46 95.2 31.94
8 76.00 80.00 997.840 0.34 73 77 L40 1.40 4 83 88 51 45 97.0 32.92
9 80.00 84.00 1000.380 0.34 73 77 1.40 1.40 4 83 86 51 46 100.8 32.92
10 84.00 88.00 1003.020 0.35 74 77 1.45 1.50 4 83 87 51 46 97.3 33.40
11 88.00 92.00 1005.610 0.36 74 77 1.49 1.50 4 83 85 51 46 101.9 33.88
12 92.00 96.00 1008.360 0.36 74 77 1.49 1.50 4 83 87 51 47 100.6 33.88
Final DGM: 1011.075
aRun Time Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Yy,
W�
C4
96.0 min 57.199 ft, 0.29 in.WC 72.4 °F 77.0 of 4 1.190 in.WC 99.7 0.025 -0.9
23 of 130

Alliance
so.un6s TEST,NG Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 13:46 Source:VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9129/22 Run 3 IVALID End Time: 15:35 Project No.:2022-3359 T Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:NIB 7 Est.Tor: 72 OF Ph: 30.14 in.Hg Vic(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est Ts: 77 OF Pg: 1.40 in.WC 31.6
Static Press: 1.60 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.29 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.32 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-5D Est.Dw 0.285 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.120
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 _ Mid 3 Post Mid I(cf) 38.563 38.646 0.083
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pilot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.005 0.004 0.003 - 0.005 Mid 2(cl) 38.646 38.692 0.046
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 8 6 8 8 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cl): 0.129
Pitot Gas Tempera ores(OF) Orifice Press. Gas Tenteratures(OF)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter(minutes) Reading Tube DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
CL R (ft2) AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) Vac(in.Hg) Amb. Amb. AmL. Aml,. %ISO (fps)
rn a (in WC) Ideal Actual Begin (A-1 - 0.00 1 4.00- 11.314 -0.20 70 77 0.82 0.82 2 82 86 63 55 102.8 25.25
2 4.00 8.00 13.370 0.22 71 77 0.91 0.91 2 82 85 61 52 99.5 26.48
3 8.00 12.00 15.460 0.23 72 77 0.95 0.95 2 82 84 57 51 94.8 27.08
4 12.00 16.00 17.500 0.24 72 77 0.99 1.00 2 83 85 57 51 109.2 27.66
5 16.00 20.00 19.900 0.25 72 77 1.03 1.00 2 83 85 57 51 98A 28.23
6 20.00 24.00 22.100 0.26 72 1 77 1.07 1.00 2 83 1 85 56 51 104.9 28.79
7 24.00 28.00 24.500 0.28 73 77 1.16 1.10 2 84 1 85 55 50 98.8 29.88
8 28.00 32.00 26.850 0.28 74 77 1.16 1.15 2 84 85 55 50 99.9 29.88
9 32.00 36.00 29.230 0.30 74 77 1.24 1.25 2 85 85 55 50 92.1 30.93
10 36.00 40.00 31.500 0.30 74 77 1.24 1.25 2 84 85 56 51 93.3 30.93
11 40.00 44.00 33.800 0.30 74 77 1.24 1.25 2 83 85 56 51 97.4 30.93
12 44.00 48.00 36.200 0.34 74 77 1.41 1.40 2 83 85 56 51 90.1 32.92
B-1 48.00 52.00 38.563 0.19 71 77 0.78 0.78 2 82 86 60 49 97.2 24.61
2 52.00 56.00 40.590 0.22 72 77 0.91 0.91 2 83 87 54 48 100.2 26.48
3 56.00 60.00 42.700 0.23 72 78 0.95 0.95 2 83 86 53 49 101.9 27.10
4 60.00 64.00 44.890 0.24 73 78 0.99 0.99 2 83 88 53 1 51 96.8 27.69
5 64.00 68.00 47.020 0.25 73 78 1.03 1.00 2 83 87 54 51 99.8 28.26
6 68.00 72.00 49.260 0.28 74 78 1.16 120 3 83 87 54 51 99.6 29.90
7 72.00 76.00 51.630 0.30 74 79 1.24 1.20 3 83 84 54 54 98.7 30.98
8 76.00 80.00 54.060 0.32 74 79 1.32 1.30 3 83 87 55 52 99.2 32.00
9 80.00 84.00 56.580 0.34 75 78 1.41 1.40 4 83 86 55 53 92.5 32.95
10 84.00 88.00 59.010 0.35 75 78 1.45 1.50 4 83 86 56 52 101.4 33.43
11 88.00 92.00 61.710 0.36 75 78 1.49 1.50 4 83 88 55 53 I01.1 33.91
12 92.00 96.00 64.440 0.36 75 78 1.49 1.50 4 84 86 55 52 I01.9 33.91
Final DGM: 67.194
nMax
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yq.
W 96.0 min 55.751 It, 0.28 in.WC 73.1 OF 77.5 OF 4 1.138 in.WC 99.1 0.026 -1.2
24 of 130

0-
Alliance Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/29/22 9/29/22 9/29/22 --
Start Time 8:54 11:27 13:46 --
Stop Time 10:45 13:15 15:34 --
Run Time,min (0) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.032 1.032 1.032 1.032
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) 1.699 1.699 1.699 1.699
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 65.944 66.907 66.703 66.518
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 61.8 65.5 68.0 65.1
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 521.4 525.2 527.7 524.8
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (AH) 1.590 1.569 1.581 1.580
Volume HZO Collected,mL (Vlc) 38.4 43.3 49.1 43.6
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222
Area of Nozzle,ft2 (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 26,300.0 9,790.0 8,000.0 14,696.7
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 126,000.0 2,550.0 49,900.0 59,483.3
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -- -- 164.0 164.0
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -- -- 184.0 184.00
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 152,300.0 12,340.0 58,248.0 74,296.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 69.645 70.154 69.606 69.802
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.811 2.042 2.315 2.056
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.025 0.028 0.032 0.029
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.025
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.025
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.26 30.26 30.26 30.26
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 71.564 72.508 72.401 72.16
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 100.2 101.7 101.1 101.0
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (YQa) -0.2 1.0 0.5 0.4
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 7.7E+04 6.2E+03 3.0E+04 3.8E+04
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 5.5E-03 4.4E-04 2.1E-03 2.7E-03
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reportmg limit.
25 of 130

All ante Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/29/22 9/29/22 9/29/22 --
Start Time 8:54 11:27 13:46 --
Stop Time 10:45 13:15 15:34 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.50 0.40 0.55 0.48
Point 2 0.50 0.39 0.56 0.48
Point 3 0.49 0.40 0.56 0.48
Point 4 0.60 0.43 0.61 0.55
Point 5 0.64 0.63 0.65 0.64
Point 6 0.71 0.73 0.67 0.70
Point 7 0.78 0.80 0.73 0.77
Point 8 0.78 0.81 0.73 0.77
Point 9 0.79 0.84 0.74 0.79
Point 10 0.78 0.87 0.75 0.80
Point 11 0.80 0.85 0.75 0.80
Point 12 0.79 0.85 0.74 0.79
Point 13 0.30 0.57 0.30 0.39
Point 14 0.27 0.56 0.31 0.38
Point 15 0.39 0.57 0.30 0.42
Point 16 0.46 0.59 0.49 0.51
Point 17 0.64 0.64 0.59 0.62
Point 18 0.76 0.70 0.74 0.73
Point 19 0.86 0.73 0.84 0.81
Point 20 0.89 0.73 0.87 0.83
Point 21 0.90 0.75 0.89 0.85
Point 22 0.91 0.74 0.95 0.87
Point 23 0.92 0.74 0.94 0.87
Point 24 0.91 0.73 0.94 0.86
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.816 0.812 0.812 0.813
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) -2.50 -2.30 -2.30 -2.37
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 29.96 29.97 29.97 29.97
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07
Temperature,°F _ (Ts)__ 69.5 _ 7.1.2 _ __ 72.5 _ 71 0
Temperature,°R (Ts) 529.1 530.9 532.1 530.712
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.025 0.028 0.032 0.029
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.025
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.025
02 Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2 Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.59 28.58 28.56 28.58
Velocity,ft/sec (Vs) 46.1 45.9 46.0 46.0
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 19,531 19,476 19,502 19,503
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 19,034 18,899 18,858 18,930
26 of 130

All arse Method 1 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facirity,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No.2022,3359
Date:
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Horizontal o s Ile 5 ZO
Duct Design: Circular aHigher Number Is for oisruae nea
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 46.00 in Rectangular Stacks or Duda
rr..suarmwr -
Nipple Length: 10.00 in sire
Depth of Duct: 36.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 7.07 fe
No.of Test Ports: 2 24 ar 25 epdnts �nan��.".ee
Distance A: 2.9 ft 20 owns
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) fe uants stan<0�motnr>o.0t mtza�n.t
Distance B: 3.4 ft 12 Wmta
Distance B Duct Diameters: 1.1 (must be>2) toi A `taew.Eer+on, a ors'polnu
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 24 eonwcuon,em.1
Actual Number of Traverse Paints: 24 staut o ameter a 0.30 to 0.e1 m 02-24 to.1
Number of Readings per Point: 1
Measurer(Initial and Date):AA 9/2922 2 3 a 5 6 7 a s
Reviewer(Initial and Date): IS 92922
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Number of traverse points on a diameter Traverse %of from inside from
Point Diameter 'alloutside of
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10, Il 12 port
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 11.00
2 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 9.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 12.41
3 - - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 14.25
4 - - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 16.37
5 - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 - 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 19.00
6 - - - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 22.82
7 - - - - - - 89.5 -- 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 33.18
8 - - - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 37.00
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 39.63
10 - - - - - - - - 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 41.75
Il - - - - - - - - - - 93.3 11 93.3 3359 43.59
12 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 45.00
"Percent ofstack thameter from inside u 11 to Traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=2.913.
B=3.4 D.
Depth of Duct=36 is
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
•
• A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
6
upstream
Disturbance
27 of 130

Alliance Cyclonic Flow Check
G
SOURCE TESTING G
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/29/22
Sample Point Angle(eP=O)
1 10
2 10
3 10
4 10
5 12
6 12
7 15
8 15
9 12
10 15
11 12
12 10
13 15
14 15
15 12
16 12
17 15
18 15
19 12
20 10
21 10
22 12
23 10
24 10
Average 12
28 of 130

Allah Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetrie
Run 1 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 318.0 466.9 718.3 744.6 726.9 490.5 286.4 833.7 4585.3
Final Mass,g 333.4 467.5 717.2 744.8 728.2 492.3 293.5 846.8 4623.7
Gain 15.4 0.6 -1.1 0.2 1 1.3 1.8 1 7.1 13.1 1 38.4
Run 2 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 310.7 468.0 757.7 759.5 745.3 477.8 303.9 826.0 4648.9
Final Mass,g 316.7 478.7 756.1 762.4 745.9 479.2 310.6 842.6 4692.2
Gain 6.0 10.7 -1.6 2.9 0.6 1.4 6.7 16.6 43.3
Run 3 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 280.0 467.1 698.9 765.5 727.0 490.7 300.6 797.0 4526.8
Final Mass,g 293.6 468.6 700.2 764.2 727.8 492.6 312.6 816.3 4575.9
Gainj 13.6 1.5 1.3 -1.3 0.8 1.9 12.0 19.3 49.1
29 of 130

Alliance
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemoms Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:54 Source:VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/29/22 Run 1 VALID End Time: 10:45 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Boa ID:15 Est.Tm: 85 OF Ph: 30.14 in.Hg VIC(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 80 OF Pg: -2.50 in.WC 38.4
Static Press: -2.50 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.64 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.02 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-I Est.Dn: 0.232 in. CO2: 0.1 % 2.383
FILTER NO.
C%: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 239.166 HHHHH# 0.157
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 0.000 - - 0.001 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-2 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 30 7 12 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Do(in.):0.222 Pitot Tube: Pass Pass - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check VoI(cq: 0.157
Pitot Gas Temperatures(OF) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(OF)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Pump Probe Filter Im E1it Aux DGM Average Stack AH
s1 (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO Vs
AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
a
H
Pr Begin Ead (ft) (in WC) 60 60 Ideal Actual (m. g) 60 60 60 60
_ Al _ 0.00 ___4.00__ _ 206.318 __ 0.50 59 68 1.16 1.15 4 75 75 58 48 99.5 39.79
2 4.00 8.00 208.680 0.50 59 69 1.16 1.15 4 76 76 50 42 99.9 39.82
3 8.00 12.00 211.050 0.49 59 69 L 14 1.15 4 76 76 48 40 100.9 39.42
4 12.00 16.00 213.420 0.60 1 59 69 1.39 1.40 4 76 75 46 42 96.3 43.63
5 16.00 20.00 215.920 0.64 59 69 1.48 1.50 4 77 76 45 41 92.5 45.06
6 20.00 24.00 218.400 0.71 60 69 1.65 1.65 5 78 76 45 41 100.0 47.46
7 24.00 28.00 221.230 0.78 60 69 1.81 1.80 6 77 76 45 41 99.5 49.74
8 28.00 32.00 224.180 0.78 60 69 1.81 1.80 6 75 76 45 41 100.9 49.74
9 32.00 36.00 227.170 0.79 61 69 1.84 1.85 6 76 76 45 42 100.7 50.06
10 36.00 40.00 230.180 0.78 61 69 1.81 1.80 6 76 76 45 41 100.7MO.8
11 40.00 44.00 233.170 0.80 61 69 1.86 1.85 6 76 76 46 42 99.8
12 44.00 48.00 236.170 0.79 62 69 1.84 1.85 6 76 76 45 42 100.1
B1 48.00 52.00 239.323 0.30 63 70 0.70 0.70 3 78 77 49 42 98.1
2 52.00 56.00 241.140 0.27 63 70 0.63 0.65 1 78 77 49 43 100.23 56.00 60.00 242.900 0.39 63 70 0.91 0.91 1 77 77 48 42 97.14 60.00 64.00 244.950 0.46 63 70 1.07 1.10 3 77 77 48 43 101.3
5 64.00 68.00 247.270 0.64 63 70 1.49 1.50 5 78 77 49 44 100.0 45.10
6 68.00 72.00 249.970 0.76 63 70 1.77 1.80 5 78 77 49 45 100.0 49.14
7 72.00 76.00 252.910 0.86 64 70 2.01 2.00 6 78 77 50 45 100.3 52.28
8 76.00 80.00 256.050 0.89 64 70 2.08 2.10 6 77 77 52 47 101.7 53.18
9 80.00 84.00 259.290 0.90 64 70 2.10 2.10 6 77 77 52 47 101.5 53.48
10 84.00 88.00 262.540 0.91 64 70 2.12 2.10 6 76 77 53 48 100.9 53.78
11 88.00 92.00 265.790 0.92 64 70 2.I5 2.15 7 77 77 53 48 101.9 54.07
l2 92.00 96.00 269.090 0.91 64 70 2.12 2.10 7 78 77 55 49 103.4 53.78
Final DGM: 272.419
FERunT-me Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Yy,
.1 Vac
W�
ai
min 65.944 fta 0.68 in.WC 61.8 OF 69.5 OF 7 1.590 in.WC 100.2 0.024 -0.2
30 of 130

AM
S O.U R C F TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 11:27 Source:VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/29/22 Run 2 IVALID End Time: 13:15 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:15 Est.Tm: 62 °F Pb: 30.14 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 69 °F Pg: -2.30 in.WC 43.3
Static Press: -2.50 in.WC AH Q(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.68 in.WC O2: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.02 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-1 Est.Dn: 0.232 in. CO=: 0.1 % 2.33
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O=: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK! Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(co 305.664#1t#NHHfI 0.171
N=/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 0.000 - - 0.000 Mid 2(co -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-2 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 10 - 8 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Du(in.):0.222 Pitot Tube: Pass Pass - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cq: 0.171
Pitot Gas Tempera ores ff) Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures ff)
(minutes) Reading Tube Vac
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im %ISO
Exit Aux Vs
O.
1 AP A.L. Amb. (in.WC) Al. Amb. Amb. AmL. (fps)
(ft\ (in.He)
t/] P. Begin End / (in WC) Ideal Actual - - - -
Al 0.00 4.00 272.594 0.40 64 70 0.94 0.95 5 78 77 54 49 102.1 35.65
2 4.00 8.00 274.780 0.39 64 71 0.91 0.90 5 79 77 47 52 102.2 35.24
3 8.00 12.00 276.940 0.40 64 71 0.93 0.95 5 77 78 48 51 100.5 35.69
4 12.00 16.00 279.090 0.43 64 71 1.00 1.00 5 80 78 48 45 103.7 37.00
5 16.00 20.00 281.390 0.63 64 71 1.47 1.50 6 77 78 48 46 99.6 44.79
6 20.00 24.00 284.060 0.73 64 71 1.70 1.70 6 79 78 48 45 101.9 48.21
7 24.00 28.00 287.000 0.80 64 71 1.86 1.85 7 80 78 48 45 97.1 50.47
8 28.00 32.00 289.930 0.81 65 71 1.89 1.90 7 79 78 49 45 100.9 50.78
9 32.00 36.00 293.000 0.84 65 71 1.96 1.95 7 78 78 49 45 101.0 51.72
10 36.00 40.00 296.130 0.87 65 71 2.03 2.05 7 80 78 48 44 100.5 52.63
11 40.00 44.00 299.300 0.85 65 71 1.98 2.00 7 80 78 49 46 102.0 52.02
12 44.00 48.00 302.480 0.85 65 71 1.98 2.00 7 80 78 50 46 102.2 52.02
B1 48.00 52.00 305.835 0.57 65 71 1.33 1.35 6 80 78 48 45 97.6 42.60
2 52.00 56.00 308.330 0.56 65 71 1.31 1.30 6 79 78 48 45 100.2 42.23
3 56.00 60.00 310.870 0.57 66 71 1.33 1.35 6 80 78 48 45 100.3 42.60
4 60.00 64.00 313.440 0.59 66 71 1.38 1.40 6 79 78 49 45 101.3 43.34
5 64.00 68.00 316.080 0.64 66 71 1.50 1.50 6 78 78 49 46 97.7 45.14
6 68.00 72.00 318.730 0.70 66 71 1.64 1.65 6 78 78 50 46 101.5 47.21
7 72.00 76.00 321.610 0.73 67 72 1.71 1.70 7 77 78 51 47 99.7 48.26
8 76.00 80.00 324.500 0.73 67 72 1 1.71 1.70 7 78 78 51 47 104.9 48.26
9 80.00 84.00 327.540 0.75 -67 72 1 1.75 1.75 7 78 78 52 48 104.2 48.91
10 84.00 88.00 1 330.600 0.74 68 72 1.73 1.75 7 79 78 53 48 104.3 48.59
11 88.00 92.00 333.650 0.74 68 72 1.73 1.75 8 80 78 54 49 103.6 48.59
12 92.00 96.00 1 336.680 0.73 68 72 1.71 1.70 8 81 78 55 51 103.0 48.26
Final DGM: 339.672
E. Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Yy,
a Vac
W�
LYi
96.0 Run
66.907 ft, 0.67 in.WC 65.5 °F 71.2 °F 8 1.569 in.WC 101.7 0.025 1.0
31 of 130

Affi anise
S o U F1 6 S TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 13:46 Source:VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/29/22 Run 3 IVALID End Time: 15:34 Project No.:2022-3359 1 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:15 Est.Tm: 66 °F Pb: 30.14 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 71 °F Pg: -2.30 in.WC 49.1
Static Press: -2.50 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.67 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.02 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-1 Est.Dn: 0.232 in. CO2: 0.1 % 2.336
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pilot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 373.320 NhINUNfl 0.218
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-typeel Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 0.000 - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-2 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 10 30 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.222 Pitot Tube: Pass Pass - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cf): 0.218
Pitot Gas Tem 2eratures(°F) Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures(°F)
^: Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGMAvera a Stack AH rump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
ss (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
(ftl) AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) (. Amb. Amh. Amb. Amb. (fps)
m.H
to Pr Begin End in WC) Ideal Actual
Al _ _ 0.00 1 4.00 339.823_ _.0.55 _ 67 72 1.29 1.30 5 81 82 55 41 102.3 41.89 -
2 4.00 8.00 342.400 0.56 67 72 1.31 1.30 5 78 80 55 41 102.3 42.27
3 8.00 12.00 345.000 0.56 67 72 1.31 1.30 5 77 78 55 41 101.5 42.27
4 12.00 16.00 347.580 0.61 68 72 1.43 1.45 5 77 78 49 52 99.4 44.11
5 16.00 20.00 350.220 0.65 68 72 1.52 1.50 5 81 80 48 42 99.9 45.54
6 20.00 24.00 352.960 0.67 68 72 1.57 1.55 5 79 79 49 43 101.0 46.23
7 24.00 28.00 355.770 0.73 68 72 1.71 1.70 5 79 79 49 43 96.4 48.26
8 28.00 32.00 358.570 0.73 68 72 1.71 1.70 5 79 79 49 43 100.2 48.26
9 32.00 36.00 361.480 0.74 68 72 1.73 1.75 5 78 79 49 43 100.6 48.59
10 36.00 40.00 364.420 0.75 68 72 1.76 1.75 5 78 80 48 43 1 99.5 48.91
11 40.00 44.00 367.350 0.75 68 72 1.76 1.75 5 79 79 49 44 99.2 48.91
12 44.00 48.00 370.270 0.74 68 72 1.73 1.75 6 78 79 51 44 104.3 48.59
B1 48.00 52.00 373.538 0.30 68 72 0.70 0.70 3 79 79 51 46 105.1 30.94
2 52.00 56.00 375.500 0.31 68 73 0.73 0.75 3 79 79 51 47 100.8 31.48
3 56.00 60.00 377.410 0.30 68 73 0.70 0.70 3 80 79 53 47 101.4 30.96
4 60.00 64.00 379.300 0.49 68 73 1.15 1.15 4 80 79 54 48 101.7 39.57
5 64.00 68.00 381.720 0.59 68 73 1.38 1.40 5 79 79 56 50 96.9 43.42
6 68.00 72.00 384.250 0.74 68 73 1.73 1.75 6 80 79 59 51 97.6 48.63
7 72.00 76.00 387.100 0.84 68 73 1.96 1.95 6 79 79 59 52 99.7 51.81
8 76.00 80.00 390.200 0.87 68 73 2.03 2.05 7 78 79 60 53 102.4 52.73
9 80.00 84.00 393.440 0.89 69 73 2.08 2.10 8 80 79 61 53 102.0 53.33
10 84.00 88.00 396.710 0.95 69 73 2.22 220 8 78 79 62 54 100.8 55.10
11 88.00 92.00 400.050 0.94 69 73 2.20 2.20 8 80 79 62 55 101.7 54.81
12 92.00 96.00 403.400 0.94 69 73 2.20 220 8 80 79 63 56 101.5 54.81
Final DGM: 406.744 Ea Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Max Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy,
U)
W 96.0 min 66.703 ft, 0.68 in.WC 68.0 °F 72.5 °F 8 1.581 in.WC 101.1 0.026 0.5
32 of 130

Al 1 ippa�
nce
TECHNICAL GROUP
NOV 14 2022
Source Test Report AIR QUALITY
STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
The Chemours Company, FC, LLC
Fayetteville Works
22828 Highway 87W
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Source Tested: Vinyl Ethers South (VES) Carbon Bed
Test Date: September 29, 2022
Project No. AST-2022-3359
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
6515A Basile Rowe
East Syracuse, NY 1305

r
All rcs
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Test Program Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit No. North Carolina Department of Air Quality(NCDAQ)Title V Air Permit No. 03735T48
Source Information
Source Name Target Parameter
VES Carbon Bed(Inlet/Outlet) HFPO-DA
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
The Chemours Company,FC,LLC Alliance Technical Group,LLC Eurofins TestAmerica
Fayetteville Works 6515A Basile Rowe 5815 Middlebrook Pike
22828 Highway 87W Fast Syracuse,NY 13057 Knoxville,TN 37921
Fayetteville,North Carolina Kevin Woodcock
Project Manager/ Courtney Adkins
Facility Contact Field Team Leader [e-mail]
Christel Compton Patrick Grady
[e-mail] [e-mail]
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shrink
[e-mail]
[phone]
Report Coordinator
Emily Diaz
[e-mail]
[phone]
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page i
2of130

Affia
Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Certification Statement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s)tested and operating condition(s)for the specific test date(s)and time(s)identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format(.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
November 4, 2022
Patrick Grady,QSTI Date
Project Manager
Alliance Technical Group,LLC
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page ii
3 of 130

Alliance
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Project Team............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results.....................................................................................................................................2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology....................................................................................................................................3-1
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate.....3-1
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content.........................................................................3-1
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid......................................................3-1
3.4 BFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation.............................................................................3-2
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery..........................................................................................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table1-1: Project Team........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table2-1: Summary of Results................................................................................................................................2-1
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology..................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page iii
4 of 130

Introduction
5 of 130

Allia- e
Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by The Chemours Company (Chemours) to conduct
compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works facility in Fayetteville, North Carolina. The facility operates under
North Carolina Department of Air Quality (NCDAQ) Title V Air Permit No. 03735T48. Source emissions testing
were conducted at the inlet and outlet of the Vinyl Ethers South (VES) carbon bed. The testing was conducted to
evaluate emissions of hexafluoro-propylene oxide-dimer acid (BFPO-DA). BFPO-DA, hexafluoro-propylene oxide
dimer acid fluoride (BFPO-DAF) and hexafluoro-propylene oxide dimer acid ammonium salt are captured and
reported together as BFPO-DA.
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
VES is part of the fluoromonomer area at the Fayetteville facility.This area produces fluorocarbon compounds used
to produce Chemours products, such as IXM, Krytox® and Viton®. Indoor air fugitive emissions from VES are
vented to a carbon bed which is then vented to atmosphere through a process stack(NEP-Hdr2).
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
Patrick Grady
Antonio Andersen
Alliance Personnel Jacob Cavallo
Brian Goodhile
Jeff Sheldon
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 1-1
6of130

7of130

Allia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Summary ofResulls
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works Facility in Fayetteville, NC on September 29,
2022. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of BFPO-DA at the inlet and outlet of the VES carbon
bed. Note that the outlet emission rates for Run 2 were greater than the inlet emissions, therefore, this data is not
included in the reduction efficiency average.A review of the field data and operations data indicate no irregularities
in the process. The laboratory did a thorough review of the analytical data and found no abnormalities with the
analyses.At this time there is no explanation for the anomalies in the test results for Run 2.
Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results. Any difference between the summary results listed in
the following tables and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
Run Number Run I,` Run 2a'` ..Run 3 ' Average;
ate 9/29/22 9/29/21 9/29/22;
HFPO-DA Data
Outlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 8.0E-05 9.5E-04 4.7E-05 6.4E-05
Inlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 5.5E-03 4.4E-04 2.1E-03 3.8E-03
Reduction Efficiency,% 98.5 NA 97.8 98.2
'Run 2 test results are not included in the averages.
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 2-1
8of130

Testing Methodology
9 of 130

Alliance
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
U S EPA Reference
Parameter yNotesLRemarks
Test_cithod9
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 &2 Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid OTM-45 Isokinetic Sampling
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 1.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing,each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the
same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid
BFPO-DA emissions were evaluated in accordance with Modified Method 0010.Testing followed the submitted
protocol in the execution of our onsite sampling and analysis activities.Modified Method 0010 procedure was
followed as outlined in the protocol submitted to NC Division of Air Quality.Modified Method 0010 sampling and
analysis procedures performed for this-project-are-consistent with-O-T-M-45,which was released-by-EPA-in January
2021,subsequent to Chemours submittal of plans to DAQ.
The sample train consisted of a borosilicate glass nozzle attached directly to a heated borosilicate glass-lined probe.
The probe was connected directly to a heated borosilicate glass filter holder containing a solvent-extracted glass
fiber filter.In order to minimize possible thermal degradation of the BFPO-DA,the probe and particulate filter were
heated to just above stack temperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The filter holder exit
was connected to a water-cooled coil condenser followed by a water-cooled sorbent module containing
approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 inlet temperature was monitored to ensure that the module is
maintained at a temperature below 20°C.
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-1
10 of 130

Allia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger and a series of two impingers each
containing 100-ml of high purity deionized water. The water impingers were followed by another condensate
knockout impinger equipped with a second XAD-2 resin trap to account for any sample breakthrough. The final
impinger contained approximately 250 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. The water impingers and condensate
impingers were submerged in an ice bath through the duration of the testing.The water in the ice bath was also used
to circulate around the coil condenser and the XAD-2 resin traps.
Exhaust gases were extracted from the sample locations isokinetically using a metering console equipped with a
vacuum pump,a calibrated orifice,oil manometer and probe/filter heat controllers.
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation
Prior to conducting the field work the following procedures were conducted to prepare the field sampling glassware
and sample recovery tools.
1. Wash all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with low residue soap and hot water.
2. Rinse all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools three(3)times with D.I.H2O.
3. Bake glassware (with the exception of probe liners) at 450°C for approximately 2 hours, (XAD-2 resin tube
glassware is cleaned by Eurofins/TestAmerica by this same procedure).
4. Solvent rinse three(3)times all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with the following sequence of solvents:
acetone,methylene chloride,hexane,and methanol.
5. Clean glassware and tools will be sealed in plastic bags or aluminum foil for transport to the sampling site.
6. Squirt bottles will be new dedicated bottles of known history and dedicated to the D.I. Water and
methanol/ammonium hydroxide(MeOH/5%NH40H) solvent contents. Squirt bottles will be labelled with the
solvent content it contains.
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery
Following completion of each test run,the sample probe,nozzle and front-half of the filter holder were brushed and
rinsed three times each with the McOH/ 5% NH40H solution (Container#1). The glass fiber filter was removed
from its housing and transferred to a polyethylene bottle (Container #2). Any particulate matter and filter fibers
which adhered to the filter holder and gasket were also placed in Container#2. The XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,
labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler. The back-half of the filter holder, coil condenser condensate trap and
connecting glassware were rinsed with the same McOH/5%NH40H solution and placed in Container#3.
The volume of water collected in the second and third impingers was measured for moisture determinations and then
placed in Container#4. Impingers #2 and#3 were then rinsed with the McOH/5%NH40H solution and placed in
Container#5.The second(breakthrough)XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler.
The second condensate trap was rinsed with the McOH/ 5% NH40H solution and placed in Container #5. The
contents of the fifth impinger were placed in its original container and weighed for moisture determinations.
Containers were sealed and labeled with the appropriate sample information. Samples remained chilled until
analysis.HFPO-DA analysis was conducted using liquid chromatography/dual mass spectrometry(LC/MS/MS).
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-2
11 of 130

Appendix r
12 of 130

Appendix A
A11�arKM Example Calculations
Source Tesnr,G
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Meter Pressure(Pm),in.Hg
A
where, Pm = Pb + 1�.6
Pb 30.14 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH 1.251 =pressure differential of orifice,in HZO
Pm 30.23 =in.Hg
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure(Ps),in.Hg
Pg
where, Ps = Pb + 1 C,
Pb 30.14 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
Pg 1.40 =static pressure,in.HZO
Ps 30.24 =in.Hg
Standard Meter Volume(Vmstd),dscf
17.636 x Y x Vm x Pm
Vmstd =
where, TM
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor
Vm 57.958 =meter volume,cf
Pm 30.23 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Tm 527.8 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vmstd 58.602 =dscf
Standard Wet Volume(Vwstd),scf
Vwstd = 0.04716 x Vlc
where,
Vlc 26.3 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vwstd 1.240 =scf
Moisture Fraction(BWSsat),dimensionless(theoretical at saturated conditions)
6.37—(/ 21827
10 lTs+365�
BWSsat =
PS
where,
Ts 75.5 =stack temperature,T
Ps 30.24 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
BWSsat 0.029 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless(measured)
Vwstd
BWS =where, (Vwstd + Vmstd)
Vwstd 1.240 =standard wet volume,scf
Vmstd 58.602 =standard meter volume,dscf
BWS 0.021 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat< BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 0.029 =moisture fraction(theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.021 =moisture fraction(measured)
BWS 0.021
13 of 130

Appendix A
All;—VICe Example Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Molecular Weight(DRY)(Md),lb/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %02) + (0.28(100— %CO2 — %02))
where,
CO2 0.1 =carbon dioxide concentration,%
02 20.9 =oxygen concentration,%
Md 28.85 =lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight(WET)(Ms),lb/lb-mole
Ms = Md (1 — BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
BWS 0.021 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ms 28.63 =lb/lb mol
Average Velocity(Vs),ft/sec
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (A P 1/2) avg x Ts
ps x Ms
where,
Cp 0.840 =pitot tube coefficient
A P1^- 0.548 =velocity head of stack gas,(in.H20)12
Ts 535.1 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 30.24 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.H.-
Ms 28.63 =molecular weight of stack gas,lb/lb mol
Vs 31.0 =ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions(Qa),acfm
Qa = 60 x Vs x As
where,
Vs 31.0 =stack gas velocity,ft/sec
As 7.07 =cross-sectional area of stack,ft2
Qa 13,129 =acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions(Qs),dscfm
Ps
Qs = 17.636 x Qa x (1 — BWS) x —
where,
Qa 13,129 =average stack gas flow at stack conditions,acfin
BWS 0.021 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ps 30.24 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ts 535.1 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Qs 12,815 =dscfm
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check-(Ygi,—dimensionless
Y— 0.0319xT1nx29 pHav .
(VM-1
AH@ x (Pb + 13a6'1 x Md
g
Yqa = x 100
where,
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor,dimensionless
8 96 =run time,min.
Vm 57.958 =total meter volume,dcf
Tm 527.8 =absolute meter temperature,°R
AH@ 1.841 =orifice meter calibration coefficient,in.H2O
Pb 30.14 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH avg 1.251 =average pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
(A H)12 1.112 =average squareroot pressure differential of orifice,(in.H20)12
Yqa -1.5 =dimensionless
14 of 130

, - Appendix A
A Me Example Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Volume of Nozzle(Vn),ft'
Vn = p� (0.002669 x Vlc+Vm T 'Pm x Y 1
where, J
Ts 535.1 =absolute stack temperature,'R
Ps 30.24 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Vlc 26.3 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vol 57.958 =meter volume,cf
Pm 30.23 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor,unitless
Tm 527.8 =absolute meter temperature,OR
Vn 60.038 =volume of nozzle,ft'
Isokinetic Sampling Rate(10,%
_ Vn
1 kB x 60 x An x Vs) x 100
where,
Vn 60.038 =nozzle volume,ft3
0 96.0 =run time,minutes
An 0.00034 =area of nozzle,ft'
Vs 31.0 =average velocity,ft/sec
I 98.8 =%
HFPO-DA Concentration(C),ng/dscm
_ M x 35.313
C Vmstd
where,
M 2,770 =BFPO-DA mass,ng
Vmstd 58.602 =standard meter volume,dscf
CN, 1.7E+03 =ng/dscm
HFPO-DA Emission Rate(ER),lb/hr
MxQsx60
ER = Vm-std x 4.54F. + 11
where,
M 2,770 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Qs 12,815 =average stack gas flow at standard conditions,dscfm
Vmstd 58.602 =standard meter volume,dscf
ER 8.0E_05 =lb/hr
15 of 130

Appendix` B
16 of 130

Alliance Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/29/22 9/29/22 9/29/22 -
Start Time 8:54 11:27 13:46 -
Stop Time 10:45 13:15 15:35 -
Run Time,min (0) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.001 1.001 1.001 1.001
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) 1.841 1.841 1.841 1.841
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 57.958 57.199 55.751 56.969
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 68.2 72.4 73.1 71.2
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 527.8 532.0 532.8 530.9
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (AH) 1.251 1.190 1.138 1.193
Volume HZO Collected,mL (Vic) 26.3 31.5 31.6 29.8
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ftz (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,350.0 751.0 703.0 934.7
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,420.0 32,300.0 919.0 11,546.3
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) - 14.6 -- 14.60
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(BFPODA) 2,770.0 33,065.6 1,622.0 12,485.9
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 58.602 57.369 55.831 57.267
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.240 1.486 1.490 1.405
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.029 0.031 0.031 0.030
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.23 30.23 30.22 30.23
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 60.038 59.212 57.727 58.99
Isokinctic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 98.8 99.7 99.1 99.2
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Yqa) -1.5 -0.9 -1.2 -1.2
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm CWPODA) 1.7E+03 2.0E+04 1.0E+03 7.7E+03
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 8.0E-05 9.5E-04 4.7E-05 3.6E-04
REDUCTION CALCULATIONS
Inlet HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr RE(HFPODA) 5.5E-03 4.4E-04 2.1E-03 2.7E-03
HFPO-DA Reduction Efficiency,% RE(HFPODA) 98.5 100.0 97.8 98.8
unclerimed values are non-detect and reported as the reporting limit.
17 of 130

AIIIarme Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/29/22 9/29/22 9/29/22 --
Start Time 8:54 11:27 13:46 --
Stop Time 10:45 13:15 15:35 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.23
Point 2 0.28 0.23 0.22 0.24
Point 3 0.28 0.24 0.23 0.25
Point 4 0.29 0.28 0.24 0.27
Point 5 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.28
Point 6 0.32 0.27 0.26 0.28
Point 7 0.34 0.29 0.28 0.30
Point 8 0.35 0.30 0.28 0.31
Point 9 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.32
Point 10 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.32
Point 11 0.35 0.33 0.30 0.33
Point 12 0.36 0.33 0.34 0.34
Point 13 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.19
Point 14 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.21
Point 15 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.23
Point 16 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.24
Point 17 0.23 0.25 0.25 0.24
Point 18 0.25 0.29 0.28 0.27
Point 19 0.28 0.32 0.30 0.30
Point 20 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.33
Point 21 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.35
Point 22 0.39 0.35 0.35 0.36
Point 23 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.37
Point 24 0.39 0.36 0.36 0.37
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of OP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.548 0.535 0.524 0.536
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 30.24 30.24 30.24 30.24
Stack Cross-sectional Area,$` (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07
Temperature,°F _ _ (Ts__ 75.5 77.0 _ 77.5 _ 76.6 _
Temperature,°R (Ts) 535.1 536.6 537.2 536.309
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.029 0.031 0.031 0.030
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024
02 Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2 Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.63 28.58 28.57 28.59
Velocity,ft/see (Vs) 31.0 30.3 29.7 30.3
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 13,129 12,833 12,579 12,847
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 12,815 12,433 12,165 12,471
18 of 130

AID a Method 1 Data
SOURt?E 'fE$TING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Date 0929/22
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Horizontal 0.5 imo f.5 2.O
Duct Design: Circular a Higher Number is for amae.aee
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Part: 46.30 in Rectangular Stacks or Ducts
Nipple Length: 10.50 in
Depth of Duct: 36.00 - in
Cross Sectional Area of Dud: 7.07 fe
No.of Test Ports: 2 24 or 25°;'onto
Distance A: 12.5 R 20 oointa
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be 0.5) to roinv Sty aamamr>D.es m(24 m.)
Distance B: 31.0 k
sz ootnts
Distance B Duct Diameters: 10.3 must be>2 �cra,.no�nt arAnrrsoaa
( ) dmuronrwa(6eM.Exponebn. 8 or 9 a points
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 12 cono-xuon erg)
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 5m x Diameter a o.30 to oss m n.-24 m.)
Number of Readings per Point: 1
Measurer(Initial and Date): 1S 929/22 2 3 4 5 s 7 e e
Reviewer(Initial and Date):BAG 929/22.
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Number oftraverse points on a diameter Traverse %of from inside from
Point Diameter wall outside of
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ort
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 11.50
2 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 12.91
3 - - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.23 14.75
4 - - 93.3 -- 70.4 - 32.3 -- 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 16.87
5 - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 - 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 19.50
6 - - - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 33.6 6 35.6 12.82 23.32
7 - - - - - - 89.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 33.68
8 - - - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 37.50
9 - -- -- -- - - - -- 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 40.13
10 - - - - - - -- - 97.4 - 88.2 30 88.2 31.75 42.25
11 - - - - - - - - - - 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 44.09
12 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 45.50
'Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=12.5 R.
B=31 B.
Depth of Duct-36 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
• A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
g
Upstream
Disturbance
19 of 130

Alliance Cyclonic Flow Check
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/29/22
Sample Point Angle(eP=O)
1 8
2 10
3 10
4 8
5 8
6 5
7 8
8 10
9 10
10 8
11 8
12 10
13 10
14 10
15 15
16 15
17 10
18 10
19 15
20 15
21 12
22 12
23 10
24 10
Average 10
20 of 130

Alliance Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 340.4 499.2 746.4 758.8 752.4 497.8 300.3 826.4 4721.7
Final Mass,g 347.3 499.6 745.0 758.7 753.2 498.6 309.9 835.7 4748.0
Gain 6.9 0.4 -1.4 -0.1 1 0.8 1 0.8 9.6 9.3 26.3
Run 2 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 304.6 476.9 726.9 762.4 736.1 484.5 294.7 842.6 4628.7
Final Mass,g 310.5 468.2 755.8 759.2 737.3 479.4 300.3 849.5 4660.2
Gain 5.9 -8.7 28.9 -3.2 1 1.2 -5.1 5.6 6.9 31.5
Run 3 Date: 9/29/22
ImpingerNo. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 302.3 500.6 747.5 757.2 752.6 498.5 317.4 794.4 4670.5
Final Mass,g 313.6 501.2 746.5 758.2 753.7 500.3 326.8 801.8 4702.1
Gain 11.3 0.6 -1.0 1.0 1.1 1.8 9.4 7.4 31.6
21 of 130

Alliance
sot„36B Trs,T,NG. Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-
Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:54 Source:VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/29/22 Run 1 VALID End Time: 10:45 project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 65 °F Ph: 30.14 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 80 OF Pg: 1.40 in.WC 26.3
Static Press: 1.60 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.30 in,WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.32 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-51) Est.Dn: 0.285 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.040
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm I Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK! Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 924.306 NNNN M 0.104
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.007 0.002 0.002 - 0.003 Mid 2(cf) 924.410 NNNNNN 0.068
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle H):GL-3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 8 8 12 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Noule Da(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.172
Pitot Gas Tempera ures °F Orifice Press. Gas Tern eratures °F
(minutes) Reading Tube V.-
a
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGMAvera a Stack AH V.-p c Probe Filter Im %ISO
Exit Aac Vs
O.
(ftx) AP Am6. Am6. (1°WC) (in.Hg) Aar. AmL. Am6. Am6. (fps)
ri) 0. Begin End (�K'� Ideal Actual
l I - I -
A-1 0.00 4.00 894.358 0.26 61 74 1.06 1.10 2 81 87 54 45 108.7 28.71
2 4.00 8.00 896.800 0.28 65 75 1.14 1.15 2 81 32 52 47 94.6 29.82
3 8.00 12.00 899.020 0.28 65 75 1.14 1.20 2 82 85 53 43 104.8 29.82
4 12.00 16.00 901.480 0.29 66 75 1.19 1.20 2 83 87 54 44 95.3 30.35
5 16.00 20.00 903.760 0.30 66 75 1.23 1.20 2 82 85 53 44 92.5 30.87
6 20.00 24.00 906.010 0.32 67 75 1.31 1.30 2 82 83 53 46 102.9 31.88
7 24.00 28.00 908.600 0.34 67 75 1.39 1.40 3 82 85 54 46 92.5 32.86
8 28.00 32.00 911.000 0.35 68 75 1.44 1.40 3 83 37 54 47 91.0 33.34
9 32.00 36.00 913.400 0.35 68 75 1.44 1.40 3 83 85 54 46 102.8 33.34
10 36.00 40.00 916.110 0.35 68 75 1.44 1.40 3 82 87 54 46 102.0 33.34
11 40.00 44.00 918.800 0.35 68 75 1.44 1.40 3 83 86 54 47 102.4 33.34
12 44.00 48.00 921.500 0.36 69 75 1.48 1.50 3 82 87 54 47 104.8 33.81
B-1 48.00 52.00 924.306 0.18 67 75 0.74 0.74 2 82 84 57 49 93.2 23.91
2 52.00 56.00 926.240 0.19 69 76 0.78 0.78 2 83 84 52 46 108.9 24.59
3 56.00 60.00 928.360 0.22 69 76 0.90 0.91 2 83 86 53 48 104.1 26.46
4 60.00 64.00 930.540 0.23 69 76 0.95 0.95 2 83 87 53 49 102.7 27.05
5 64.00 68.00 932.740 0.23 69 77 0.94 0.95 2 83 87 53 49 100.9 27.08
6 68.00 72.00 934.900 0.25 70 76 1.03 1.00 2 83 86 54 49 103.3 28.20
7 72.00 76.00 937.210 0.28 70 76 1.15 1.20 2 82 87 54 50 101.4 29.85
8 76.00 80.00 939.610 0.33 70 76 1.36 1.40 3 83 85 54 50 92.7 32.40
9 80.00 84.00 941.990 0.38 71 76 1.57 1.60 3 83 37 55 51 91.3 34.77
10 84.00 88.00 944.510 0.39 71 76 1.61 1.60 3 83 86 56 51 94.8 35.23
I1 88.00 92.00 947.160 0.40 71 76 1.65 1.65 3 82 88 56 51 90.4 35.68
12 92.00 96.00 949.720 0.39 72 76 1.61 1 1.60 3 83 85 57 52 98.8 35.23
Final DGM: 952.488
Max
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Ys,
r'7
W 96.0 min 57.958 f? 0.30 in.WC 68.2 OF 75.5 OF 3 1.251 in.WC 98.8 0.021 -1.5
22 of 130

AID r"'a1me
s d.u FI C E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 11:27 Source:VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/29122 Run 2 IVALED End Time: 13:15 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MI1 7 Est.Tm: 68 °F Ph: 30.14 in.Hg Vic(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est Ts: 75 °F Pg: 1.40 in.WC 31.5
Static Press: 1.60 in.WC AH Qa(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.30 in.WC 03: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.32 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-5D Est.Dn: 0.282 in. C%: 0.1 % 4.10
Co': 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
Ot: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK! Pre Mid I Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(co 982.310###### 0.091
Nz/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.003 0.004 0.003 - 0.003 Mid 2(co 982.401####k# 0.083
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-3 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 6 7 8 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 Ib/lb-mole Nozzle Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(ct): 0.174
Pitot Gas Tempera ures °F Orifice Press. Pump Gas Tem eratures(°F)
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Vae Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
a (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
E R' AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
m.H
0 a Begin End ( ) 0.WC) Ideal Actual g - - - -
A-1 0.00 4.00 953.702 0.23 68 77 0.94 0.94 2 83 92 61 54 102.9 27.08
2 4.00 8.00 955.900 0.23 70 77 0.95 0.95 2 83 86 57 53 100.3 27.08
3 8.00 12.00 958.050 0.24 70 77 0.99 0.99 2 83 86 56 51 101.4 27.66
4 12.00 16.00 960.270 0.28 71 77 1.15 1.20 2 83 87 55 49 _ 99.6 29.88
5 16.00 20.00 962.630 0.28 71 77 1.15 1.20 2 82 85 53 50 99.6 29.88
6 20.00 24.00 964.990 0.27 72 77 1.11 1.10 2 82 87 53 52 98.7 29.34
7 24.00 28.00 967.290 0.29 72 77 1.20 1.20 2 82 86 52 51 96.1 30.41
8 28.00 1 32.00 969.610 0.30 73 77 1.24 1.20 3 83 87 52 51 98.3 30.93
9 32.00 36.00 972.030 0.30 74 77 1.24 1.20 3 83 86 52 49 101.0 30.93
10 36.00 40.00 974.520 0.32 74 77 1.32 1.30 3 82 87 52 1 50 106.4 31.94
11 40.00 44.00 977.230 0.33 74 77 1.37 1.40 3 83 86 53 52 100.6 32.43
12 44.00 48.00 979.830 0.33 74 77 1.37 1.40 3 84 86 51 53 95.9 32.43
B-1 48.00 52.00 982.310 0.21 70 76 0.86 0.87 2 83 88 58 47 95.4 25.85
2 52.00 56.00 984.440 0.21 72 77 0.87 0.87 2 83 86 51 45 100.6 25.87
3 56.00 60.00 986.510 0.23 72 77 0.95 0.95 2 83 87 50 46 97.6 27.08
4 60.00 64.00 988.610 0.25 73 77 1.03 1.00 2 83 86 50 45 101.9 28.23
5 64.00 68.00 990.900 0.25 73 77 1.03 1.00 2 83 86 50 44 100.1 28.23
6 68.00 72.00 993.150 0.29 73 77 1.20 120 3 83 86 51 46 93.8 30.41
7 72.00 76.00 995.420 0.32 73 77 1.32 1.30 3 83 86 51 46 95.2 31.94
8 76.00 80.00 997.840 0.34 73 77 1.40 1.40 4 83 88 51 45 97.0 32.92
9 80.00 84.00 1000.380 0.34 73 1 77 1.40 1 1.40 4 83 86 51 46 100.8 32.92
10 84.00 88.00 1003.020 0.35 74 77 1.45 1.50 4 83 87 51 46 97.3 33.40
11 88.00 92.00 1005.610 0.36 74 77 1.49 1.50 4 83 85 51 46 101.9 33.88
12 92.00 96.00 1008.360 0.36 74 77 1.49 1.50 4 83 87 51 47 100.6 1 33.88
Final DGM: 1011.075
Max
a Ellune Vm AP Tm Ts VacAH %ISO BWS Ys,
Wmin 57.199 fta 0.29 in.WC 72.4 °F 77.0 °F 4 1.190 in.WC 99.7 0.025 -0.9
23 of 130

Alliance
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fa etteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 13:46 Source:VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/29/22 Run IVALED End Time: 15:35 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:MB 7 Est.Tm: 72 °F Pb: 30.14 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 77 °F Pg: 1.40 in.WC 31.6
Static Press: 1.60 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.29 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.32 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-5D Est.Da: 0.285 in. CO,: 0.1 % 4.120
C%: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 38.563 38.646 0.083
N2ICO: 79.0 % Pilot Cp/fype:0.840Aglass
Leak Rate(cfm): 0.005 0.004 0.003 - 0.005 Mid 2(cf) 38.646 38.692 0.046
Md: 28.85 Ib/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-3Vacuum(in Hg): 8 6 8 8 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 1b/lb-mole Nozzle Da(in.):0.250Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.129
Pitot Gas Tempera ores(° Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(°
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH P°mp Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
(minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
3 AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) n H Amb. Amb. Amh. Amb. (fps)
rn a Begin End (ft) (in WQ Ideal Actual (i g)
A-1 0.00 4.00 11.314 0.20 70 77 0.82 N0.82 2 82 86 63 55 102.8 25.25
2 4.00 8.00 13.370 0.22 71 77 0.91 2 82 85 61 52 99.5 26.48
3 8.00 12.00 15.460 0.23 72 77 0.95 2 82 84 57 51 94.8 27.08
4 12.00 16.00 17.500 0.24 72 77 0.99 2 83 85 57 51 109.2 27.66
5 16.00 20.00 19.900 0.25 72 77 1.03 2 83 85 57 51 98.1 28.23
6 20.00 24.00 22.100 0.26 72 77 1.07 2 83 85 56 51 104.9 28.79
7 24.00 28.00 24.500 0.28 73 77 1.16 . 2 84 85 55 50 98.8 29.88
8 28.00 32.00 26.850 0.28 74 77 1.16 1.15 2 84 85 55 50 99.9 29.88
9 32.00 36.00 29.230 0.30 74 77 1.24 1.25 2 85 85 55 50 92.1 30.93
10 36.00 40.00 31.500 0.30 74 77 1.24 1.25 2 84 85 56 51 93.3 30.93
11 40.00 44.00 33.800 0.30 74 77 1.24 1.25 2 83 85 56 51 97.4 30.93
12 44.00 48.00 36.200 0.34 74 77 1.41 1.40 2 83 85 56 51 90.1 32.92
B-1 48.00 52.00 38.563 0.19 71 77 0.78 0.78 2 82 86 60 49 97.2 24.61
2 52.00 56.00 40.590 0.22 72 77 0.91 0.91 2 83 87 54 48 100.2 26.48
3 56.00 60.00 42.700 0.23 72 78 0.95 0.95 2 83 86 53 49 101.9 27.10
4 60.00 64.00 44.890 0.24 73 78 0.99 0.99 2 83 88 53 51 96.8 27.69
5 64.00 68.00 47.020 0.25 73 78 1.03 1.00 2 83 87 54 51 99.8 28.26
6 68.00 72.00 49.260 0.28 74 78 1.16 1.20 3 83 87 54 51 99.6 29.90
7 72.00 76.00 51.630 0.30 74 79 1.24 1.20 3 83 84 54 54 98.7 30.98
8 76.00 80.00 54.060 0.32 74 79 1.32 1.30 3 83 87 55 52 99.2 32.00
9 80.00 84.00 56.580 0.34 75 78 1.41 1.40 4 83 86 55 53 92.5 32.95
10 84.00 88.00 59.010 0.35 75 78 1.45 1.50 4 83 86 56 52 101.4 33.43
I1 88.00 92.00 61.710 0.36 75 78 1.49 1.50 4 83 88 55 53 101.1 33.91
12 92.00 96.00 64.440 0.36 75 78 1.49 1.50 4 84 1 86 55 52 101.9 33.91
Final DGM: 67.194
Max
a Run Time Vm AP Tin Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy,
.'7
96.0 min 55.751 ft" 0.28 in.WC 73.1 °F 77.5 °F 4 1.138 in.WC 99.1 0.026 -1.2
24 of 130

Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/29/22 9/29/22 9/29/22 --
Start Time 8:54 11:27 13:46 --
Stop Time 10:45 13:15 15:34 --
Run Time,min (6) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.032 1.032 1.032 1.032
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) 1.699 1.699 1.699 1.699
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 65.944 66.907 66.703 66.518
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 61.8 65.5 68.0 65.1
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 521.4 525.2 527.7 524.8
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (4H) 1.590 1.569 1.581 1.580
Volume HZO Collected,mL (Vlc) 38.4 43.3 49.1 43.6
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222
Area of Nozzle,f Z (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 26,300.0 9,790.0 8,000.0 14,696.7
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 126,000.0 2,550.0 49,900.0 59,483.3
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -- -- 164.0 164.0
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) '- '- 184.0 184.00
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 152,300.0 12,340.0 58,248.0 74,296.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 69.645 70.154 69.606 69.802
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.811 2.042 2.315 2.056
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.025 0.028 0.032 0.029
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.025
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.025
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.26 30.26 30.26 30.26
Volume at Nozzle,113 (Vn) 71.564 72.508 72.401 72.16
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 100.2 101.7 101.1 101.0
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Y'o -0.2 1.0 0.5 0.4
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 7.7E+04 6.2E+03 3.0E+04 3.8E+04
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 5.5E-03 4.4E-04 2.1E-03 2.7E-03
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reporting limit.
25 of 130

Alllicance Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source TES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/29/22 9/29/22 9/29/22 --
Start Time 8:54 11:27 13:46 --
Stop Time 10:45 13:15 15:34 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.50 0.40 0.55 0.48
Point 2 0.50 0.39 0.56 0.48
Point 3 0.49 0.40 0.56 0.48
Point 4 0.60 0.43 0.61 0.55
Point 5 0.64 0.63 0.65 0.64
Point 6 0.71 0.73 0.67 0.70
Point 7 0.78 0.80 0.73 0.77
Point 8 0.78 0.81 0.73 0.77
Point 9 0.79 0.84 0.74 0.79
Point 10 0.78 0.87 0.75 0.80
Point 11 0.80 0.85 0.75 0.80
Point 12 0.79 0.85 0.74 0.79
Point 13 0.30 0.57 0.30 0.39
Point 14 0.27 0.56 0.31 0.38
Point 15 0.39 0.57 0.30 0.42
Point 16 0.46 0.59 0.49 0.51
Point 17 0.64 0.64 0.59 0.62
Point 18 0.76 0.70 0.74 0.73
Point 19 0.86 0.73 0.84 0.81
Point 20 0.89 0.73 0.87 0.83
Point 21 0.90 0.75 0.89 0.85
Point 22 0.91 0.74 0.95 0.87
Point 23 0.92 0.74 0.94 0.87
Point 24 0.91 0.73 0.94 0.86
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.816 0.812 0.812 0.813
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.14 30.14 30.14 30.14
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) -2.50 -2.30 -2.30 -2.37
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 29.96 29.97 29.97 29.97
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07
Temperature,°F (Ts) _____69.5_ _ _ 71.2____ 72.5 __ . 71.0
Temperature,°R (Ts) 529.1 530.9 532.1 530.712
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.025 0.028 0.032 0.029
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.025
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.025
Oz Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
COz Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.59 28.58 28.56 28.58
Velocity,ft/sec (Vs) 46.1 45.9 46.0 46.0
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 19,531 19,476 19,502 19,503
At Standard Conditions,dscfin (Qs) 19,034 18,899 18,858 18,930
26 of 130

Alliance SOUROE TESTING Method 1 Data
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No.20213359
Date.
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Horizontal 2.0
Duct Design: Circular oHigher Number Is for osrumv,sr�
Distance from Far Wail to Outside of Port: 46.00 in Rectangular Stocks or Duets
ue.srmwc.+r
Nipple Length: 10.00 in 611a
Depth of Duct: 36.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 7.07 ftr No.of Test Ports: 2 24 or 25'points ^�
Distance A: 2.9 ft 20pdme
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) to pama staaa Dwmomr>o.a1 m(za in.)
Distance B: 3.4 ft 1 r,om r*wntor a,rrypo a 12 p'oin.
Distance B Duct Diameters: 1.1 (must be>2) aaumanea laew.a:mnaw,, a or 9 a points
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 24 eoitr°` 'O1G')
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 stack Diameter.0.30100.61 m(12-24(n.)
Number of Readings per Point: I
Measurer(Initial and Date):AA 92922 2 3 a s 6 7 a s
Reviewer(Initial and Date): IS 92922
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Numberverse aJtrapaiuts an a diameter Traverse from inside from
Point Diameeer%of outside of
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 wall art
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - I 1 2.1 1.00 11.00
2 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 105 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 12.41
3 - -- 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 14.25
4 - _ 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 16.37
5 - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 - 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 19.00
6 - -- - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 22.82
7 _ _ _ _ __ - 89.3 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 33.18
8 - - - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 37.00
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 39.63
- 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 41.75
I1 -- -- - - - - - - - - 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 43.59
12 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 45.00
-Percent pfstack rbameler from inside aall to traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=2.9 ft.
B=3.4 ft.
Depth of Duct-36 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
B
Upstream
Disturbance
27 of 130

AID amNG SOURCE TESTING Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/29/22
Sample Point Angle(AP=O)
1 10
2 10
3 10
4 10
5 12
6 12
7 15
8 15
9 12
10 15
11 12
12 10
13 15
14 15
15 12
16 12
17 15
18 15
19 12
20 10
21 10
22 12
23 10
24 10
Average 12
28 of 130

r
All ance Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/29/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 318.0 466.9 718.3 744.6 726.9 490.5 286.4 833.7 4585.3
Final Mass,g 333.4 467.5 717.2 744.8 728.2 492.3 293.5 846.8 4623.7
Gain 15.4 0.6 -1.1 1 0.2 1 1.3 1 1.8 7.1 13.1 1 38.4
Run 2 Date: 9/29/22
ImpingerNo. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 310.7 468.0 757.7 759.5 745.3 477.8 303.9 826.0 4648.9
Final Mass,g 316.7 478.7 756.1 762.4 745.9 479.2 310.6 842.6 4692.2
Gain 6.0 10.7 -1.6 2.9 0.6 1 1.4 1 6.7 16.6 43.3
Run 3 Date: 9/29/22
ImpingerNo. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 280.0 467.1 698.9 765.5 727.0 490.7 300.6 797.0 4526.8
Final Mass,g 293.6 468.6 700.2 764.2 727.8 492.6 312.6 816.3 4575.9
Gainj 13.6 1.5 1.3 -1.3 0.8 1.9 12.0 19.3 49.1
29 of 130

SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fa etteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:54 Source:VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/291.2 Run I IVALID End Time: 10:45 Project No.:20223359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:15 Est.Tm: 85 'F Pb: 30.14 in.Hg Vic(ml)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 80 °F Pg: -2.50 in.WC 38.4
Static Press: -2.50 in.WC AH Q(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.64 in.WC O=: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.02 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-1 Est.Dn: 0.232 in. CO,: 0.1 % 2.383
CO,: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm I Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
Os: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Past Mid 1(cf) 239.166#WN 0.157
NZ/CO: 79.0 % Pilot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 0.000 - - 0.001 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Noale ID:G-2 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 7 - 12 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Do(in.):0.222 Pitot Tube: Pass Pass - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.157
Pitot Gas Tempera ores(oF) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(°F)
^: Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGMAvera a Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
(minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
(0 AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) (m.H
g) Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
rn W Begin End (inwcl 60 60 Ideal Actual 60 60 60 60
Al 0.00 1 4.00 206.318 0.50 59 68 1.16 1.15 4 75 75 58 48 99.5 39.79
2 4.00 8.00 208.680 0.50 59 69 1.16 1.15 4 76 76 50 42 99.9 39.82
3 8.00 12.00 211.050 0.49 59 69 1.14 1.15 4 76 76 48 40 100.9 39.42
4 12.00 16.00 213.420 0.60 59 69 1.39 1.40 4 76 75 46 42 96.3 43.63
5 16.00 20.00 215.920 0.64 59 69 1.48 1.50 4 77 76 45 41 92.5 45.06
6 20.00 24.00 218.400 0.71 60 69 1.65 1.65 5 78 76 45 41 100.0 47.46
7 24.00 28.00 221.230 0.78 60 69 1.81 1.80 6 77 76 45 41 99.5 49.74
8 28.00 32.00 224.180 0.78 60 69 1.81 1.80 6 75 76 45 41 100.9 49.74
9 32.00 36.00 227.170 0.79 61 69 1.84 1.85 6 76 76 45 42 100.7 50.06
10 36.00 40.00 230.180 0.78 61 69 1.81 1.80 6 76 76 45 41 100.7 49.74
11 40.00 44.00 233.170 0.80 61 69 1.86 1.85 6 76 76 46 42 99.8 50.37
12 44.00 48.00 236.170 0.79 62 69 1.84 1.85 6 76 76 45 42 100.1 50.06
BI 48.00 52.00 239.323 0.30 63 70 0.70 0.70 3 78 77 49 42 98.1 30.88
2 52.00 56.00 241.140 0.27 63 70 0.63 0.65 1 78 77 49 43 100.2 29.29
3 56.00 60.00 242.900 0.39 63 70 0.91 0.91 KA
77 77 48 42 9T1 35.20
4 60.00 64.00 244.950 0.46 63 70 1.07 1.1077 77 48 43 101.3 38.23
5 64.00 68.00 247.270 0.64 63 70 1.49 1.5078 77 49 44 100.0 45.10
6 68.00 72.00 249.970 0.76 63 70 1.77 1.8078 77 49 45 100.0 49.14
7 72.00 76.00 252.910 0.86 64 70 2.01 2.0078 77 50 45 100.3 52.28
8 76.00 80.00 256.050 0.89 64 70 2.08 2.1077 77 52 47 101.7 53.18
9 80.00 84.00 259.290 0.90 64 70 2.10 2.10 77 77 52 47 101.5 53.48
10 84.00 88.00 262.540 0.91 64 70 2.12 2.10 6 76 77 53 48 100.9 53.78
11 88.00 92.00 265.790 0.92 64 70 2.15 2.15 7 77 77 53 48 101.9 54.07
12 92.00 1 96.00 269.090 0.91 64 70 2.12 2.10 7 78 77 55 49 103.4 53.78
Final DGM: 2712.419
Max
F.
Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy.
rW7
C4
96.0 min 65.944 ft' 0.68 in.WC 61.8 of 69.5 °F 7 1.590 in.WC 100.2 0.024 -0.2
30 of 130

All�]1'1t�
SO.URCS TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fa etteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 11:27 Source:VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/29/22 Run 2 IVALID End Time: 13:15 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Boa ID:15 Est.Tm: 62 °F Pb: 30.14 in.Hg Vlc(ntl)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 69 °F Pg: -2.30 in.WC 43.3
Static Press: -2.50 in.WC AH Qa(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.68 in.WC Oz: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.02 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-1 Est.Dn: 0.232 in. CO=: 0.1 % 2.33
C%: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
Oz: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 305.664 499MM 0.171
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 0.000 - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-2 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 10 8 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Do(in.):0.222 Pitot Tube: Pass Pass - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cf): 0.171
Pitot Gas Tem teratures ff) Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures(nF) _
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux y (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO fps
RW) AP Amh. Amh. (in.WC) (in.Hg) AmU. Amb. Amb. Amh. (fps)
tq W Begin End (��'� Ideal Actual
Al 0.00 1 4.00 272.594 0.40 64 70 0.94 0.95 5 78 77 54 49 102.1 35.65
2 4.00 8.00 274.780 0.39 64 71 0.91 0.90 5 79 77 47 52 102.2 35.24
3 8.00 12.00 276.940 0.40 64 71 0.93 0.95 5 77 78 48 51 100.5 35.69
4 12.00 16.00 279.090 0.43 64 71 1.00 1.00 5 80 78 48 45 103.7 37.00
5 16.00 20.00 281.390 0.63 64 71 1.47 1.50 6 77 78 48 46 99.6 44.79
6 20.00 24.00 284.060 0.73 64 71 1.70 1.70 6 79 78 48 45 101.9 48.21
7 24.00 28.00 287.000 0.80 64 71 1.86 1.85 7 80 78 48 45 97.1 50.47
8 28.00 32.00 289.930 0.81 65 71 1.89 1.90 7 79 78 49 45 100.9 50.78
9 32.00 36.00 293.000 0.84 65 71 1.96 1.95 7 78 78 49 45 101.0 51.72
10 36.00 40.00 296.130 0.87 65 71 2.03 2.05 7 80 78 48 44 100.5 1 52.63
11 40.00 44.00 299.300 0.85 65 71 1.98 2.00 7 80 78 49 46 102.0 52.02
12 44.00 48.00 302.480 0.85 65 71 1.98 2.00 7 80 78 50 46 102.2 52.02
B1 48.00 52.00 305.835 0.57 65 71 1.33 1.35 6 80 78 48 45 97.6 42.60
2 52.00 56.00 308.330 0.56 65 71 1.31 1.30 6 79 78 48 45 100.2 42.23
3 56.00 60.00 310.870 0.57 66 71 1.33 1.35 6 80 78 48 45 100.3 42.60
4 60.00 64.00 313.440 0.59 66 71 1.38 1.40 6 79 78 49 45 101.3 43.34
5 64.00 68.00 316.080 0.64 66 71 1.50 1.50 6 78 78 49 46 97.7 45.14
6 68.00 72.00 318.730 0.70 66 71 1.64 1.65 6 78 78 50 46 J 101.5 47.21
7 72.00 76.00 321.610 0.73 67 72 1.71 1.70 7 77 78 51 47 99.7 48.26
8 76.00 80.00 324.500 0.73 67 72 1.71 1.70 7 78 78 51 47 104.9 48.26
9 80.00 84.00 327.540 0.75 67 72 1.75 1.75 7 78 78 52 48 104.2 48.91
10 84.00 88.00 330.600 0.74 68 72 1.73 1.75 7 79 78 53 48 104.3 48.59
11 88.00 92.00 333.650 0.74 68 72 1.73 1.75 8 80 78 54 49 103.6 48.59
12 92.00 96.00 336.680 0.73 68 72 1.71 1.70 8 81 78 55 51 103.0 48.26
Final DGM: 339.672
Max
F.
Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy,
.D
96.0 min 66.907 ft3 0.67 in.WC 65.5 °F 71.2 OF 8 1.569 in.WC 101.7 0.025 1.0
31 of 130

S
t
Alliance
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 13:46 Source:VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9l29122 Run 3 VALID End Time: 15:34 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Boa ID:15 Est.Tm: 66 °F Ph: 30.14 in.Hg Vlc(nil)
Barometric: 30.20 in.Hg V:1.032 Est.Ts: 71 OF Pg: -2.30 in.WC 49.1
Static Press: -2.50 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.67 in.WC Oz: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.02 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-1 Est.Dn: 0.232 in. CO=: 0.1 % 2.336
CO3: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
Oz: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-I LEAK CHECKI Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Past Mid 1(cf) 373.320 NNNN#11 0.218
Nz/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 0.000 - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-2 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 10 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.222 Pitot Tube: Pass Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(ct): 0.218
Pitot Gas Tempera ures(OF) Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratm•es(OF)
m Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
G (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
fta AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) ,n.H Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
to M� Begin End ( ) (in WC) Ideal Actual ( g
Al 0.00 4.00 339.823 0.55 67 __ 72 1.29 1.30 5 81 82 55 41 102.3 41.89
2 4.00 8.00 342.400 0.56 67 72 1.31 1.30 5 78 80 55 41 102.3 42.27
3 8.00 12.00 345.000 0.56 67 72 1.31 1.30 5 77 78 55 41 101.5 42.27
4 12.00 16.00 347.580 0.61 68 72 1.43 1.45 1 5 77 78 49 52 99.4 44.11
5 16.00 20.00 350.220 0.65 68 72 1.52 1.50 5 81 80 48 42 99.9 45.54
6 20.00 24.00 352.960 0.67 68 72 1.57 1.55 5 79 79 49 43 101.0 46.23
7 24.00 28.00 355.770 0.73 68 72 1.71 1.70 5 79 79 49 43 96.4 48.26
8 28.00 32.00 358.570 0.73 68 72 1.71 1..70 5 79 79 49- 43 100.2 48.26 --'---
9 32.00 36.00 361.480 0.74 68 72 1.73 1.75 5 78 79 49 43 100.6 48.59
10 36.00 40.00 364.420 0.75 68 72 1.76 1.75 5 78 80 48 43 99.5 48.91
11 40.00 44.00 367.350 0.75 68 72 1.76 1.75 5 79 79 49 44 99.2 48.91
12 44.00 48.00 370.270 0.74 68 72 1.73 1.75 6 78 79 51 44 104.3 48.59
BI 48.00 52.00 373.538 0.30 68 72 0.70 0.70 3 79 79 51 46 105.1 30.94
2 52.00 56.00 375.500 0.31 68 73 0.73 0.75 3 79 79 51 47 100.8 31.48
3 56.00 60.00 377.410 0.30 68 73 0.70 0.70 3 80 79 53 47 101.4 30.96
4 60.00 64.00 379.300 0.49 68 73 1.15 1.15 4 80 79 54 48 101.7 39.57
5 64.00 68.00 381.720 0.59 68 73 1.38 1.40 5 79 79 56 50 96.9 43.42
6 68.00 72.00 384.250 0.74 68 73 1.73 1.75 6 80 79 59 51 97.6 48.63
7 72.00 76.00 387.100 0.84 68 73 1.96 1.95 6 79 79 59 52 99.7 51.81
8 76.00 80.00 390.200 0.87 68 73 2.03 2.05 7 78 79 60 53 102.4 52.73
9 80.00 84.00 393.440 0.89 69 73 2.08 2.10 8 80 79 61 53 102.0 53.33
10 84.00 88.00 39G.710 0.95 69 73 2.22 2.20 8 78 79 62 54 100.8 55.10
11 88.00 92.00 400.050 0.94 69 73 2.20 2.20 8 80 79 62 55 101.7 54.81
12 92.00 96.00 403.400 0.94 69 73 2.20 2.20 8 80 79 63 56 101.5 54.81
Final DGM: 406.744
aRun Time Vm AP Tot Ts Max AH %ISO BWS 1y,
rW7
C4
96.0 min 66.703 f? 0.68 in.WC 68.0 OF 72.5 OF 8 1.581 in.WC 101.1 0.026 0.5
32 of 130