AQ_F_0900009_20221114_ST_StkTstRpt_VEN

The Chemoors Company
9 ChemQuls Fayetteville Works
22826 NC Highway 87 W
Fayetteville,NC 28306
Sent Via email and USPS
Certified Mail 70171450 0002 3902 4409
Certified Mail 7017 1450 0002 3902 4416
Certified Mail 7017 1450 0002 3902 4423
November 11, 2022
Michael Abraczinskas NOV 14 2022
Director, Division of Air Quality
1641 Mail Service Center AIR QUALITY
Raleigh, NC 27699-1641 STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
Re: Quarterly Carbon Unit Testing VEN RECEIVED
Annual Carbon Unit Testing VES and PPA
Chemours Company —Fayetteville Works
Bladen County NOV 14 2012
Facility ID 0900009, Title V Permit No. 03757T48
D ve" n of Au Qua!ity
Director's O ce
Dear Mr. Abraczinskas,
Enclosed are the carbon unit quarterly testing results for the Vinyl Ethers North (VEN) operating
area and the annual carbon unit testing results for Vinyl Ethers—South and Polymer Processing
Aid operating areas conducted the week of September 26, 2022. The test reports were prepared
by Alliance Source Testing and are enclosed. The testing is being conducted pursuant to Section
2.2 D. b and c. In addition, the VEN testing completes the testing required under the April 2022
Settlement Agreement.
Two copies of the reports are enclosed.
If there are any questions regarding these reports, please contact Christel Compton at
Christel.e.compton_,chemours.con .
Kind Regards,
�` 6
--( CeZ4�
Christel Compton
Environmental Program Manager
CC via email, Heather Carter, NCDAQ

Alfiarx;e
TECHNICAL GROUP
Source Test Report PME O d C1 D
uu NOV 14 2022
The Chemours Company, FC, LLC
Fayetteville Works AiRauAun
22828 Highway 87W STAiIONARYSOURCECOMPLIANCE
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Source Tested: Vinyl Ethers North (VEN) Carbon Bed
Test Date: September 28, 2022
Project No. AST-2022-3359
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
6515A Basile Rowe
East Syracuse, NY 1305

� '
All ance
Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Test Program Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit No. North Carolina Department of Air Quality (NCDAQ)Title V Air Permit No.03735T48
Source Information
Source Name Target Parameter
VEN Carbon Bed(Inlet/Outlet) HFPO-DA
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
The Chemours Company,FC,LLC Alliance Technical Group,LLC Eurofins TestAmerica
Fayetteville Works 6515A Basile Rowe 5815 Middlebrook Pike
22828 Highway 87W East Syracuse,NY 13057 Knoxville,TN 37921
Fayetteville,North Carolina Courtney Adkins
Project Manager/ [e-mail]
Facility Contact Field Team Leader
Christel Compton Patrick Grady
[e-mail] [e-mail]
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie.shonk@all iancetechnicalgroup.com
[phone]
Report Coordinator
Emily Diaz
[e-mail]
[phone]
AST-2022.3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page i
2 of 125

Affia Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Certification Statement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s)tested and operating condition(s)for the specific test date(s)and time(s)identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety,and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, ei-ror-fi•ee and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format(.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
November 1, 2022
Patrick Grady,QSTI Date
Project Manager
Alliance Technical Group,LLC
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page ii
3of125

Alfia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Project Team............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results .....................................................................................................................................2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology....................................................................................................................................3-1
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate.....3-1
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content.........................................................................3-1
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid......................................................3-1
3.4 BFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation.............................................................................3-2
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery..........................................................................................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table1-1: Project Team........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table2-1: Summary of Results................................................................................................................................2-1
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology..................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page iii
4of125

Introduction
4
5 of 125

frF-:�'
Alfia
T Source Test Repo
TECHNICAL GROUP
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by The Chemours Company (Chemours) to conduct
compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works facility in Fayetteville, North Carolina. The facility operates under
North Carolina Department of Air Quality (NCDAQ) Title V Air Permit No. 03735T48. Source emissions testing
were conducted at the inlet and outlet of the Vinyl Ethers North (VEN) carbon bed. The testing was conducted to
evaluate emissions of hexafluoro-propylene oxide-dimer acid(BFPO-DA).
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
VEN is part of the fluoromonomer area at the Fayetteville facility. This area produces fluorocarbon compounds used
to produce Chemours products, such as Nafion®Krytox® and Viton®. Indoor air fugitive emissions from VEN are
vented to a carbon bed which is then vented to atmosphere through the Division Stack.Process emissions from VEN
are directed to a thermal oxidizer.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
Patrick Grady
Antonio Andersen
Alliance Personnel Jacob Cavallo
Brian Goodhile
Jeff Sheldon
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 1-1
6 of 125

Summary of Results
7 of 125

Alfia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Summary of Results
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works Facility in Fayetteville, NC on September 28,
2022. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of BFPO-DA at the inlet and outlet of the VEN carbon
bed.
Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results. Any difference between the summary results listed in
the following tables and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
in Number 3 stun 1 4 Ru 3 n,2 Run Avera;e `
:
Date 9/28/22 9I28/22' 9/28/22'
HFPO-DA Data
Outlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 7.8E-05 2.6E-05 6.0E-05 5.5E-05
Inlet Emission Rate,Ib/hr 1.0E-02 9.4E-03 9.3E-03 9.6E-03
Reduction Efficiency,% 99.2 99.7 99.4 99.4
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 2-1
8 of 125

MethodologyTesting
9of125

Allia Source Test Rep
ort
ort p
TECHNICAL GROUP Testing Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
U S EPA Reference s
Parameter Notes/Remarks
° Test.M,etliods
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 &2 Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid OTM-45 Isokinetic Sairipling
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 1.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing,each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the
same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid
BFPO-DA emissions were evaluated in accordance with Modified Method 0010.Testing followed the submitted
protocol in the execution of our onsite sampling and analysis activities.Modified Method 0010 procedure was
followed as outlined in the protocol submitted to NC Division of Air Quality.Modified Method 0010 sampling and
analysis procedures performed for this-project are consistent with OTM-45,which was released by—EPA in January.
2021,subsequent to Chemours submittal of plans to DAQ.
The sample train consisted of a borosilicate glass nozzle attached directly to a heated borosilicate glass-lined probe.
The probe was connected directly to a heated borosilicate glass filter holder containing a solvent-extracted glass
fiber filter.In order to minimize possible thermal degradation of the BFPO-DA,the probe and particulate filter were
heated to just above stack temperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The filter holder exit
was connected to a water-cooled coil condenser followed by a water-cooled sorbent module containing
approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin.The XAD-2 inlet temperature was monitored to ensure that the module is
maintained at a temperature below 20°C.
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-1
10 of 125

Aflia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger and a series of two impingers each
containing 100-m1 of high purity deionized water. The water impingers were followed by another condensate
knockout impinger equipped with a second XAD-2 resin trap to account for any sample breakthrough. The final
impinger contained approximately 250 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. The water impingers and condensate
impingers were submerged in an ice bath through the duration of the testing.The water in the ice bath was also used
to circulate around the coil condenser and the XAD-2 resin traps.
Exhaust gases were extracted from the sample locations isokinetically using a metering console equipped with a
vacuum pump,a calibrated orifice,oil manometer and probe/filter heat controllers.
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation
Prior to conducting the field work the following procedures were conducted to prepare the field sampling glassware
and sample recovery tools.
1. Wash all glassware,brushes,and "ancillary tools with low residue soap and hot water.
2. Rinse all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools three(3)times with D.I.H2O.
3. Bake glassware (with the exception of probe liners) at 450°C for approximately 2 hours, (XAD-2 resin tube
glassware is cleaned by Eurofins/TestAmerica by this same procedure).
4. Solvent rinse three(3)times all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with the following sequence of solvents:
acetone,methylene chloride,hexane,and methanol.
5. Clean glassware and tools will be sealed in plastic bags or aluminum foil for transport to the sampling site.
6. Squirt bottles will be new dedicated bottles of known history and dedicated to the D.I. Water and
methanol/ammonium hydroxide(MeOH/5%NH40H) solvent contents. Squirt bottles will be labelled with the
solvent content it contains.
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery
Following completion of each test run,the sample probe,nozzle and front-half of the filter holder were brushed and
rinsed three times each with the McOH/ 5%NH40H solution (Container#1). The glass fiber filter was removed
from its housing and transferred to a polyethylene bottle (Container 42). Any particulate matter and filter fibers
which adhered to the filter holder and gasket were also placed in Container#2. The XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,
labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler. The back-half of the filter holder, coil condenser condensate trap and
connecting glassware were rinsed with the same McOH/5%NH40H solution and placed in Container#3.
The volume of water collected in the second and third impingers was measured for moisture determinations and then
placed in Container#4. Impingers#2 and#3 were then rinsed with the McOB/5%NH40H solution and placed in
Container#5.The second(breakthrough)XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler.
The second condensate trap was rinsed with the McOH/ 5% NH40H solution and placed in Container #5. The
contents of the fifth impinger were placed in its original container and weighed for moisture determinations.
Containers were sealed and labeled with the appropriate sample information. Samples remained chilled until
analysis.BFPO-DA analysis was conducted using liquid chromatography/dual mass spectrometry(LC/MS/MS).
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-2
11 of 125

Appendix A
12 of 125

Appendix A
Example Calculations
Sp-URGE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Meter Pressure(Pm),in.Hg
A
Pm = Pb + 13.h
where,
Pb 30.16 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH 1.454 =pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Pm 30.27 =in.Hg
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure(Ps),in.Hg
Pg
where, PS = Pb + 13_F,
Pb 30.16 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
Pg 2.00 =static pressure,in.H2O
Ps 30.31 =in.Hg
Standard Meter Volume(Vmstd),dscf
17.636 x Y x Vm x Pm
where,Vmstd = Tm
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor
Vm 64.682 =meter volume,cf
Pm 30.27 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Tin 527.6 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vmstd 65.508 =dscf
Standard Wet Volume(Vwstd),scf
Vwstd = 0.04716 x Vlc
where,
Vlc 21.8 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vwstd 1.028 =scf
Moisture Fraction(BWSsat),dimensionless(theoretical at saturated conditions)
6.37—( 21827
10 Ms+365�
BWSsat =
PS
where,
Ts 77.3 =stack temperature,T
Ps 30.31 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
BWSsat 0.031 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless(measured)
Vwstd
BWS =
where, (Vwstd + Vmstd)
Vwstd 1.028 =standard wet volume,scf
Vmstd 65.508 =standard meter volume,dscf
BWS 0.015 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat< BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 0.031 =moisture fraction(theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.015 =moisture fraction(measured)
BWS 0.015
13 of 125

Appendix A
imila Ce Example Calculations
BquROe rESr�NQ
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Molecular Weight(DRY)(Md),lb/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %02) + (0.28 (100— %CO2 — %02))
where,
CO,, 0.1 =carbon dioxide concentration,%
02 20.9 =oxygen concentration,%
Md 28.85 =lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight(WET)(Ms),lb/lb-mole
Ms = Md (1 — BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
BWS 0.015 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ms 28.68 =lb/lb mol
Average Velocity(Vs),ft/sec
Qsx-m
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (A P 1/2)avg x s
where, , S
Cp 0.840 =pitot tube coefficient
A p12 0.583 =velocity head of stack gas,(in.H20)12
Ts 536.9 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 30.31 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ms 28.68 =molecular weight of stack gas,lb/lb mol
Vs 32.9 =ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions(Qa),acfm
Qa = 60 x Vs x As
where,
Vs 32.9 =stack gas velocity,ft/sec
As 7.07 =cross-sectional area of stack,ft2
Qa 13,943 =acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions(Qs),dscfm
Ps
Qs = 17.636 x Qa x (1 — BWS) x —
where,
Qa 13,943 =average stack gas flow at stack conditions,acfm
BWS 0.015 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ps 30.31 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ts 536.9 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Qs 13,666 =dscfin
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check(Yqa),dimensionless
Y— 0 0.0319xTmx29 pH .
(PbVmAH@ x + 13a6g av g) x MdYqa = x 100
where,
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor,dimensionless
O 96 =run time,min.
Vm 64.682 =total meter volume,def
Tin 527.6 =absolute meter temperature,°R
AH@ 1.841 =orifice meter calibration coefficient,in.H2O
Pb 30.16 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH avg 1.454 =average pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
(A H)12 1.178 =average squareroot pressure differential of orifice,(in.H20)1°
Yqa 3.8 =dimensionless
14 of 125

r--- Appendix A
ID A cMi a Example Calculations
SO'UNGE TESTMO
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HYPO-DA
Volume of Nozzle(Vn),ft3
Vn =Pc (0.002669 x Vlc+Vm T m x Y l
where, II
Ts 536.9 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 30.31 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Vlc 21.8 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vm 64.682 =meter volume,cf
Pin 30.27 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor,unitless
Tm 527.6 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vn 66.836 =volume of nozzle,fti
Isokinetic Sampling Rate(1),%
_ Vn
1 (Ox60xAnxVs x100
where,
Vn 66.836 =nozzle volume,113
0 96.0 =run time,minutes
An 0.00034 =area of nozzle,ftZ
Vs 32.9 =average velocity,ft/sec
I 103.5 =%
HFPO-DA Concentration(C),ng/dscm
_ M x 35.313
C Vmstd
where,
M 2,832 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Vmstd 65.508 =standard meter volume,dscf
CNm 1.5E+03 =ng/dscm
HFPO-DA Emission Rate(ER),lb/hr
ER = MxQsx60
Vm..ctd x 4.S4F + 11
where,
M 2,832 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Qs 13,666 =average stack gas flow at standard conditions,dscfm
Vmstd 65.508 =standard meter volume,dscf
ER 7.8E-05 =lb/hr
15 of 125

Appendix p is
16 of 125

OF;"
Al r Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/28/22 9/28/22 9/28/22 --
Start Time 8:15 10:46 13:25 -
Stop Time 10:10 12:48 15:24 --
Run Time,min (0) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.16 30.16 30.17 30.16
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.001 1.001 1.001 1.001
Orifice Calibration Value (OH @) 1.841 1.841 1.841 1.841
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 64.682 64.195 63.922 64.266
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 67.9 78.5 82.7 76.4
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 527.6 538.2 542.3 536.0
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (OH) 1.454 1.433 1.427 1.438
Volume H2O Collected,mL (VIC) 21.8 26.2 28.3 25.4
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ft2 (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,690.0 7.0 1,410.0 1,035.7
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,130.0 917.0 730.0 925.7
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) -- -- -- --
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 12.1 -- -- 12.10
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 2,832.1 924.0 2,140.0 1,965.4
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 65.508 63.733 62.994 64.078
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.028 1.236 1.334 1.199
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.018
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.031 0.034 0.037 0.034
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.018
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.27 30.27 30.27 30.27
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 66.836 65.610 65.243 65.90
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 103.5 102.7 102.4 102.9
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Yqa) 3.8 2.8 2.2 2.9
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(HFPODA) I.SE+03 5.1E+02 1.2E+03 1.1E+03
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 7.8E-05 2.6E-05 6.0E-05 5.5E-05
REDUCTION CALCULATIONS
Inlet HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr RE(DPPODA) 1.0E-02 9.4E-03 9.3E-03 9.6E-03
HFPO-DA Reduction Efficiency,% RE(HFPODA) 99.2 99.7 99.4 99.4
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reporting limit.
17 of 125

Al a lr=e Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/28/22 9/28/22 9/28/22 --
Start Time 8:15 10:46 13:25 --
Stop Time 10:10 12:48 15:24 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.40 0.41 0.40 0.40
Point 2 0.40 0.41 0.40 0.40
Point 3 0.39 0.40 0.40 0.40
Point 4 0.43 0.41 0.45 0.43
Point 5 0.45 0.42 0.45 0.44
Point 6 0.41 0.40 0.44 0.42
Point 7 0.29 0.25 0.29 0.28
Point 8 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.26
Point 9 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.25
Point 10 0.26 0.27 0.25 0.26
Point 11 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.25
Point 12 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.24
Point 13 0.57 0.53 0.49 0.53
Point 14 0.55 0.55 0.50 0.53
Point 15 0.56 0.56 0.49 0.54
Point 16 0.67 0.61 0.63 0.64
Point 17 0.61 0.56 0.58 0.58
Point 18 0.46 0.45 0.43 0.45
Point 19 0.22 0.23 0.20 0.22
Point 20 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.18
Point 21 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.17
Point 22 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.16
Point 23 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
Point 24 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.17
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.583 0.575 0.571 0.576
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.16 30.16 30.17 30.16
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 30.31 30.31 30.32 30.31
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07
Temperature,°F _ __(Ts) 77.3___ _ _80.1________ 82.6 80.0
- - - -- - -- --- - - - ----
Temperature,OR (Ts) 536.9 539.8 542.3 539.670
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.018
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.031 0.034 0.037 0.034
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.018
02 Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2 Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.68 28.65 28.63 28.65
Velocity,ft/sec (Vs) 32.9 32.6 32.4 32.6
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 13,943 13,806 13,758 13,836
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 13,666 13,410 13,284 13,453
18 of 125

Alliance Method 1 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Date. 092822
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Horizontal 5 t.o t.s 2.0
Duct Design: Circular a Higher Number is for nt
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 51.13 in Rectangular Stacks or Ducts
M�suneMs.Hr -
Nipple Length: 15.13 in o'rE
Depth of Duct: 36.00 in
Cross Sectional Arco of Duct: 7.07 Ba _
No.of Test Ports: 2 24 or 25 apolats 1 e�e+�+ cE
Distance A: 4.8 ft 20 vo;ure
Distance Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) fe points sta x Diameter-o.01 m(24 m.)
Distance B: 5.7 k
+a pamo
Distance B Duct Diameters: L9 (must be>2) w.r�.mPoa a Ewp„we1p„ 0 or s s points
Minimum Number of Traverse Paints: 24 °On1°e0on'st`')
Actual Number of Traverse Paints: 24 sour Do-a o.30 m o.et m(12-24 m.)
Number of Readings per Point: 1
Measurer(Initial and Date): IS 92822 2 3 4 5 5 7 8 9
Reviewer(Initial and Date):BAG 92822
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Number oftrat-points an a diameter Traverse %of from in from
i
Point Diameter pn outside of
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 of
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 16.13
2 93.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 17.54
3 - - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 19.37
4 - - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 21.50
i - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 - 34.2 - 23.0 5 25.0 9.00 24.13
6 - - - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 27.94
7 - - - - - - 89.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 38.31
8 - - - - - - 96.8 - 15.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 4113
9 •- - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 44.75
10 - - - - - - - - 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 46.88
11 - - - - - - - - - - 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 48.71
12 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 50.13
'Percent of stack dlmnefer from inside wall to traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=4.8 ft.
B-5.7 B.
Depth of Duct-36 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
B
Upstream
Disturbance
19 of 125

Alliance SOURCE TESTING Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/28/22
Sample Point Angle(AP=0)
1 10
2 12
3 12
4 15
5 15
6 10
7 10
8 8
9 8
10 10
11 10
12 8
13 12
14 12
15 10
16 10
17 15
18 15
19 12
20 12
21 10
22 10
23 8
24 8
Average 11
20 of 125

Alliance Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 313.6 484.2 735.2 759.4 752.3 476.6 306.0 856.4 4683.7
Final Mass,g 313.9 484.5 733.3 759.2 753.7 478.4 �315.8 866.7 4705.5
Gain 0.3 0.3 -1.9 -0.2 1.4 1 1.8 1 9.8 10.3 21.8
Run 2 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 307.4 499.8 744.0 758.9 718.6 498.1 314.6 840.6 4682.0
Final Mass,g 315.5 500.4 741.5 759.7 719.5 499.9 322.4 849.3 4708.2
Gain 8.1 0.6 -2.5 1 0.8 0.9 1 1.8 1 7.8 8.7 26.2
Run 3 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 341.4 484.7 718.7 772.3 752.5 476.9 312.5 861.3 4720.3
Final Mass,g 357.1 484.9 716.4 773.3 754.1 478.4 313.2 871.2 4748.6
Gainj 15.7 1 0.2 -2.3 1 1.0 1 1.6 1.5 0.7 9.9 28.3
21 of 125

Alliance
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:15 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/28/.2 Run 1 IVALID End Time: 10:10 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) EFILTER:NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:7 Est.Tm: 85 OF Ph: 30.16 in.Hg Vlc(MI)
Barometric: 30.31 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 93 °F Pg: 2.00 in.WC 21.8
Static Press: 2.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.67 in. %: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.52 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-2 Est.Dn: 0.230 in. COz: 0.1 % 4.107
COz: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
Os: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(co 731.600###W 0.376
NZ/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.001 0.001 - - 0.000 Mid 2(co -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-1 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 10 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 Ib/lb-mole Nozzle Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cf): 0.376
Pitot Gas Tem eratures °F Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures of
(minutes) Reading Vac %ISO
44 Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Tube DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
0.
� (ft3) AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) (in.Hg) Amb. Amb. Amb. And. (fps)
rn W Begin End (�H'�l 58 58 Ideal Actual 58 58 58 58
Al 0.00 4.00 699.773 0.40 58 75 1.61 1.60 2 82 82 54 43 103.8 35.53
2 4.00 8.00 702.640 0.40 61 76 1.62 1.60 2 82 83 46 42 103.0 35.56
3 8.00 12.00 705.500 0.39 62 76 1.58 1.60 2 83 82 45 42 103.8 35.11
4 12.00 16.00 708.350 0.43 63 76 1.75 1.75 2 83 82 45 1 40 102.1 36.87
5 16.00 20.00 711.300 0.45 65 77 1.83 1.85 2 83 82 44 39 103.3 37.75
6 20.00 24.00 714.360 0.41 65 77 1.67 1.70 2 84 84 44 40 105.3 36.04
7 24.00 28.00 717.340 0.29 66 77 1.19 1.20 2 83 83 44 41 106.4 30.31
8 28.00 32.00 719.880 0.27 66 77 1.10 1.10 2 84 84 43 39 103.7 2924
9 32.00 36.00 722.270 0.25 67 78 1.02 1.00 2 84 84 45 40 104.1 28.17
10 36.00 40.00 724.580 0.26 67 77 1.07 1.05 2 85 85 45 41 103.3 28.70
11 40.00 44.00 726.920 024 1 68 78 0.98 1.00 2 85 83 45 41 106.9 27.60
12 44.00 48.00 729.250 0.24 68 78 0.98 1.00 2 85 85 45 40 107.9 27.60
B1 48.00 52.00 731.976 0.57 68 76 2.34 2.30 4 84 85 47 41 97.6 42.45
2 52.00 56.00 735.250 0.55 68 76 2.26 2.25 4 83 85 47 41 102.9 41.70
3 56.00 60.00 738.640 0.56 69 76 2.30 2.30 4 83 82 47 41 101.8 42.08
4 60.00 64.00 742.030 0.67 69 76 2.75 2.75 5 83 84 45 41 102.2 46.02
5 64.00 68.00 745.750 �0.61 72 76 2.52 2.50 5 83 82 44 1 41 104.5 43.91
6 68.00 72.00 749.400 0.46 73 78 1.90 1.90 4 83 83 45 42 105.3 38.20
7 72.00 76.00 752.600 0.22 73 79 0.91 0.90 2 85 85 47 42 109.3 26.45
8 76.00 80.00 754.900 0.17 73 79 0.70 0.70 2 85 87 46 41 108.1 23.25
9 80.00 84.00 756.900 0.18 72 79 0.74 0.75 2 85 86 47 46 109.4 23.92
10 84.00 88.00 758.980 0.18 72 79 0.74 0.70 2 85 87 48 45 105.7 23.92
11 88.00 92.00 760.990 0.16 72 79 0.66 0.65 2 85 83 49 41 106.6 22.55
12 92.00 96.00 762.900 0.18 73 79 0.74 0.75 2 85 85 48 45 101.4 23.92
Final DGM: 764.831
Max
IT. LRe Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy,
W�
a
min 64.682 ft3 0.36 in.WC 67.9 of 77.3 of 5 1.454 in.WC 103.5 0.015 3.8
22 of 125

Alliance
S-O.U R C E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chrmours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 30:46 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/28,22 Run 2 VALID End Time: 12:48 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:7 Est.Tm: 68 OF Ph: 30.16 in.Hg Vic(ml)
Barometric: 30.31 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 77 °F Pg: 2.00 in.WC 26.2
Static Press: 2.80 in.WC AH®(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.36 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.52 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-2 Est.Dn: 0.272 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.09
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid I(cf) 796.755 4009 0.214
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-I glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - 10 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 Ib/lb-mole Nozzle Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(cf): 0.214
Pitot Gas Tempera ures(°F) Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures °F)
^: Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux
O. (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO Vs
(fta) AP Amb. Amb. Ideal
WC) ( g) Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
m.H
!/) P. Begin End (�N'C) Ideal Actual - - - -
Al 0.00 4.00 765.226 0.41 72 79 1.69 1.70 2 85 86 65 57 99.0 36.I0
2 4.00 8.00 768.060 0.41 73 79 1.69 1.70 2 85 85 64 51 100.8 36.I0
3 8.00 12.00 770.950 0.40 74 79 1.65 1.65 2 85 86 63 50 102.5 35.66
4 I2.00 16.00 773.860 0.41 75 79 1.70 1.70 2 85 85 63 1 49 102.9 36.10
5 I6.00 20.00 776.820 0.42 75 80 1.73 1.75 2 86 86 61 49 104.8 36.57
6 20.00 24.00 779.870 0.40 76 80 1.66 1.65 2 86 87 60 47 101.9 35.69
7 24.00 1 28.00 782.770 0.25 76 80 1.04 1.00 2 86 86 59 48 106.1 28.22
8 28.00 32.00 785.I60 0.25 77 80 1 1.04 1.00 2 87 87 59 51 104.5 28.22
9 32.00 36.00 787.520 0.26 77 80 1.08 1.10 2 87 87 59 52 100.8 28.78
10 36.00 40.00 789.840 0.27 77 80 1.12 1.10 2 87 86 59 52 99.3 29.32
11 40.00 44.00 792.170 0.26 77 80 1.08 I.10 2 87 87 60 52 102.1 28.78
12 44.00 48.00 794.520 0.24 78 81 1.00 I.00 2 86 86 59 51 101.0 27.67
BI 48.00 52.00 796.969 0.53 77 81 2.19 2.20 4 87 86 64 51 98.1 41.12
2 52.00 56.00 800.I80 0.55 78 81 2.28 2.30 4 87 86 55 50 103.9 41.89
3 56.00 60.00 803.650 0.56 78 81 2.32 2.30 4 87 87 54 51 103.5 42.27
4 60.00 64.00 807.I40 0.61 81 81 2.54 2.55 4 88 88 54 51 100.7 44.12
5 64.00 68.00 810.700 0.56 81 81 2.33 2.30 5 88 88 55 51 103.2 42.27
6 68.00 72.00 814.200 0.45 81 81 1.87 I.90 4 87 88 53 49 104.9 37.89
7 72.00 76.00 817.390 0.23 83 80 0.97 0.95 2 87 88 52 49 I04.1 27.07
8 76.00 80.00 819.670 0.19 84 80 0.80 0.80 2 87 88 53 49 I09.3 24.60
9 80.00 84.00 821.850 0.16 85 80 0.67 0.68 2 87 89 50 47 106.3 22.57
10 84.00 88.00 823.800 0.16 83 80 0.67 0.65 2 87 88 53 50 104.0 22.57
II 88.00 92.00 825.700 0.16 83 80 0.67 0.65 2 87 88 51 49 107.8 22.57
12 92.00 96.00 827.670 0.16 83 80 0.67 0.65 2 87 88 51 49 107.5 22.57
Final DGM: 829.635
aLRunTime Vm AP Tm Ts VaAH %ISO BWS Yy,
min 64.195 It, 0.35 in.WC 78.5 OF 80.1 OF 5 1.433 in.WC 102.7 0.019 2.8
23 of 125

AlllarKM.
S O U R C E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 13:25 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/28/22 Run 3 IVALID End Time: 15:24 Project No.:2022-3359 T Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:7 Est.Tm: 79 OF Pb: 30.17 in.Hg Vic(ml)
Barometric: 30.31 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 80 OF Pg: 2.00 in.WC 28.3
Static Press: 2.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.35 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.52 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-2 Est.Do: 0.271 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.155
Coe: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Tar et Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(co 862.537 4NHNHH 0.194
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.000 Mid 2(co -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nom le ID:G-1 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - - - 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(ct): 0.194
Pitot Gas Tempera ures(°F) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(°F)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Tube DGM Average Stack AH rump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
s2. (minutes) Reading Vac %ISO
M � ft2 AP amh. Am6. (in.WC) (in.H Amh. Amb. Aroh. AmU. (fps)
to a Begin End ( ) (in wC1 Ideal Actual g)
Al 0.00 4.00 829.955 0.40 80 81 1.66 1.65 3 87 90 63 58 101.8 35.73
2 4.00 8.00 832.870 0.40 80 81 1.66 1.65 3 88 89 54 48 101.6 35.73
3 8.00 12.00 835.780 0.40 80 81 1.66 1.65 3 87 87 51 48 101.9 35.73
4 12.00 16.00 838.700 0.45 82 81 1.88 1.90 3 87 88 51 50 101.7 37.89
5 16.00 20.00 841.800 0.45 83 81 1.88 1.90 3 87 88 51 45 104.2 37.89
6 20.00 24.00 844.980 0.44 83 81 1.84 1.85 3 87 88 50 46 106.6 37.47
7 24.00 28.00 848.200 0.29 83 82 1.21 1.20 2 87 88 50 46 101.9 30.45
8 28.00 32.00 850.700 0.25 83 82 1.05 1.05 2 88 87 50 45 104.5 28.27
9 32.00 36.00 853.080 0.25 84 82 I.05 1.05 2 88 89 50 48 103.8 28.27
10 36.00 40.00 855.450 0.25 83 82 1.05 1.05 2 87 88 50 47 103.6 28.27
11 40.00 44.00 857.810 0.26 83 82 1.09 1.I0 2 87 87 50 46 101.8 28.83
12 44.00 48.00 860.175 0.25 83 82 1.05 1.05 2 87 88 50 48 103.7 28.27
B1 48.00 52.00 862.731 0.49 80 82 2.03 2.00 4 90 90 60 53 97.9 39.58
2 52.00 56.00 965.830 0.50 81 82 2.08 2.10 4 87 89 50 46 103.7 39.98
3 56.00 60.00 869.150 0.49 83 83 2.04 2.05 4 88 88 51 46 102.2 39.61
4 60.00 64.00 872.400 0.63 83 83 2.62 2.60 5 90 90 51 47 101.7 44.92
5 64.00 68.00 876.060 0.58 83 83 2.41 2.40 1 4 89 90 51 50 99.6 43.10
6 68.00 72.00 879.500 0.43 85 83 1.80 1.80 4 89 88 51 52 107.0 37.11
7 72.00 76.00 882.700 0.20 84 84 0.84 0.85 2 89 89 52 51 103.0 25.33
8 76.00 80.00 884.800 0.17 84 85 0.71 0.70 2 90 92 53 48 102.7 23.38
9 80.00 84.00 886.730 0.16 84 85 0.67 0.67 2 90 90 52 49 104.8 22.68
10 94.00 88.00 888.640 0.15 84 85 0.63 0.63 2 89 90 54 49 IO2.6 21.96
11 88.00 92.00 890.450 0.16 83 85 0.67 0.67 2 89 90 54 50 100.6 22.68
12 92.00 96.00 892.280 0.16 83 85 0.67 0.67 2 89 89 1 55 51 98.5 22.68
Final DGM: 894.071
Max
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yqa
rW7
W
96.0 min 63.922 ft2 0.34 in.WC 82.7 OF 82.6 OF 5 1.427 in.WC 102.4 0.021 2.2
24 of 125

%
Alliar Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/28/22 9/28/22 9/28/22 --
Start Time 8:15 10:46 13:25
Stop Time 10:09 12:48 15:24
Run Time,min (A) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.16 30.16 30.17 30.16
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.032 1.032 1.032 1.032
Orifice Calibration Value (OH @) 1.699 1.699 1.699 1.699
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 56.700 56.795 58.384 57.293
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 62.0 73.6 78.2 71.3
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 521.7 533.3 537.9 530.9
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (AH) 1.175 1.188 1.251 1.205
Volume H2O Collected,mL (Vlc) 29.9 22.1 22.0 24.7
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ft2 (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 133,000.0 184,000.0 101,000.0 139,333.3
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 221,000.0 135,000.0 213,000.0 189,666.7
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 36.4 34.5 105.0 58.6
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 17.7 14.3 122.0 51.33
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 354,054.1 319,048.8 314,227.0 329,110.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 59.833 58.629 59.784 59.415
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.410 1.042 1.037 1.163
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.019
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation. (BWSsat) 0.026 0.032 0.037 0.032
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.019
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.25 30.25 30.26 30.25
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 61.762 %860 62.493 61.71
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 99.0 97.0 96.9 97.6
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Yqa) -1.4 -2.6 -3.0 -2.3
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 2.1E+05 1.9E+05 1.9E+05 2.0E+05
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,lb/hr EF(HFPODA) 1.0E-02 9.4E-03 9.3E-03 9.6E-03
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reporting limit.
25 of 125

All arm3G' Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/28/22 9/28/22 9/28/22 --
Start Time 8:15 10:46 13:25 --
Stop Time 10:09 12:48 15:24 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.32 0.30 0.26 0.29
Point 2 0.33 0.30 0.33 0.32
Point 3 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.32
Point 4 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.33
Point 5 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Point 6 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31
Point 7 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.30
Point 8 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.29
Point 9 0.30 0.33 0.30 0.31
Point 10 0.32 0.34 0.32 0.33
Point 11 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.32
Point 12 0.32 0.35 0.36 0.34
Point 13 0.30 0.22 0.23 0.25
Point 14 0.29 0.19 0.37 0.28
Point 15 0.30 0.37 0.36 0.34
Point 16 0.36 0.39 0.42 0.39
Point 17 0.37 0.41 0.40 0.39
Point 18 0.38 0.41 0.40 0.40
Point 19 0.34 0.32 0.34 0.33
Point 20 0.32 0.30 0.32 0.31
Point 21 0.30 0.30 0.34 0.31
Point 22 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.31
Point 23 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.31
Point 24 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.31
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.561 0.562 0.575 0.566
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.16 30.16 30.17 30.16
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) -3.80 -3.70 -3.60 -3.70
Stack Pressure, in.Hg (Ps) 29.88 29.89 29.91 29.89
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07
Temperature,°F (Ts) 71.8 78.0 82.3 77.3
Temperature,°R (Ts) 531.5 537.6 541.9 537.003
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.019
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.026 0.032 0.037 0.032
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.019
02 Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2 Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.60 28.66 28.67 28.64
Velocity,ft/sec (Vs) 31.8 32.0 32.9 32.2
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 13,478 13,552 13,935 13,655
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 13,056 13,055 13,330 13,147
26 of 125

Alliance Method 1 Data
SOUFrE TESTINCa
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Date: 09/28/22
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Horizontal 10
Duct Design: Circular aHigher NumOar is for *uee+wce
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 51.13 in Rectangular Slacks ar Duos
Nipple Length: 15.13 in ens
Depth of Duct: 36.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 7.07 R1 No.of Test Ports: 2 2a or 25°poirds
Distance A: 5.1 ft 20 pol.
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) 18 pants str.a�Dram°mr r 0.01 m(2a In.)
Distance B: 5.7 ft 12
Distance Dud mus[he>2 Diameters: 1.9 lFrom roml of nnyrypoa pip1^�
( ) asn,ma�e reeaa e.psnalon, a or s a roN>s
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 24 eonLacsO"'p1')
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 Stack Dlameter n 0.30 b 0.81 m(12-24 ft,.)
Number of Readings per Point: I
Measurer(Initial and Date):AA 9/2822 2 3 a s s 7 e D
Reviewer(Initial and Date): 1S 92822
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Traverse %of from
Number of traverse points on a diameter from inside
Point Diameter wan port
of
e�a
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 14.6 -- 6.7 - 4.4 -- 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 16.13
2 85.4 -- 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 17.54
3 - - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 19.37
4 -- - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 -- 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 21.50
5 - - -- - 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 24.13
6 - - - - 93.6 -- 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 27.94
7 -- - - - -- -- 89.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 38.31
8 - - - - - - 96.8 -- 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 42.13
9 -- - - - - - - -- 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 44.75
10 -- - - - - - -- -- 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 46.88
11 - - - - -- - -- - - - 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 48.71
12 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 50.13
'Percent of stack d"mneler from inside wall to traverse point.
Slack Diagram
A=5.1 ft.
B=5.7 ft.
Depth of Duct=36 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
•
•
• A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
B
Upstream
Disturbance
27 of 125

Alliance SOURCE TESTING Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/28/22
Sample Point Angle(eP=O)
1 8
2 10
3 10
4 10
5 10
6 15
7 15
8 15
9 10
10 10
11 10
12 8
13 10
14 10
15 15
16 15
17 18
18 15
19 15
20 12
21 10
22 10
23 10
24 10
Average 12
28 of 125

All ante Method 4 Data
SOURCE TES'rING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 299.7 468.2 760.5 754.4 716.3 477.6 318.9 829.1 4624.7
Final Mass,g 309.4 468.0 760.0 754.8 717.6 478.9 326.1 839.8 4654.6
Gain 9.7 -0.2 -0.5 0.4 1.3 1.3 7.2 10.7 29.9
Run 2 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 301.7 467.1 718.5 745.3 728.9 490.7 285.9 826.5 4564.6
Final Mass,g 305.9 469.4 716.7 745.5 730.1 491.9 289.9 837.3 4586.7
Gain 4.2 2.3 -1.8 0.2 1.2 1.2 4.0 10.8 22.1
Run 3 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 316.1 468.2 759.9 757.7 716.9 478.4 329.9 833.0 4660.1
Final Mass,g 325.9 468.2 757.1 757.4 718.7 480.5 330.5 843.8 4682.1
Gainj 9.8 0.0 -2.8 -0.3 1.8 2.1 0.6 10.8 22.0
29 of 125

Alliance
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fa etteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:15 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9128122 Run 1 VALID End Time: 10:09 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFpO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:15 Est.Tm: 70 of Ph: 30.16 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.09 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 93 °F Pg: -3.80 in.WC 29.9
Static Press: -6.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.62 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.59 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D Est.Do: 0.239 in. CO2: 0.1 % 3.601
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 61.416 61.484 0.068
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot CplType:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.005 0.004 0.003 - 0.005 Mid 2(cf) 61.484 61.569 0.085
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID.GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 9 10 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.153
Pitot Gas Temperatures(oF Orifice Press. Gas Ternteratures(oF)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
(minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO
E AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) ( g) Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
m.H
w Pr Begin Ead (in WC) Ideal Actual
A-1 0.00 1 4.00 33.289 0.32 57 70 1.17 1.20 5 82 85 48 41 96.8 32.12
2 4.00 8.00 35.600 0.33 57 70 1.21 1.20 5 81 84 43 43 95.7 32.62
3 8.00 12.00 37.920 0.32 58 70 1.18 1.20 5 80 83 43 41 98.7 32.12
4 12.00 16.00 40.280 0.33 58 70 1.21 1.20 5 79 1 84 1 43 42 99.7 32.62
5 16.00 20.00 42.700 0.32 59 70 1.18 1.20 5 82 85 43 41 101.4 32.12
6 20.00 24.00 45.130 0.30 59 70 1.11 1.10 5 83 82 43 42 102.1 31.10
7 24.00 28.00 47.500 0.30 60 71 1.11 1.10 5 83 80 43 42 98.2 31.13
8 28.00. 32.00 49.780 0.29 60 70 1.07 1.10 5 80 78 43 43 99.7 30.58
9 32.00 36.00 52.060 0.30 60 70 1.11 1.10 5 79 77 43 44 98.5 31.10
10 36.00 40.00 54.350 0.32 60 71 1.18 1.20 5 82 78 43 42 101.7 32.15
11 40.00 44.00 56.790 0.29 61 71 1.07 1.10 5 81 81 44 43 97.5 30.60
12 44.00 48.00 59.020 0.32 60 71 1.18 1.20 5 81 84 44 40 99.9 32.15
B-1 48.00 52.00 61.416 0.30 62 71 1.11 1.10 5 84 85 49 41 103.5 31.13
2 52.00 56.00 63.830 0.29 63 72 1.07 1.10 5 85 85 43 38 102.8 30.63
3 56.00 60.00 66.190 0.30 63 72 1.11 1.10 5 84 83 43 39 100.7 31.16
4 60.00 64.00 68.540 0.36 64 73 1.33 1.30 5 82 79 45 41 97.0 34.16
5 64.00 68.00 71.020 0.37 64 73 1.37 1.40 5 82 80 45 40 94.1 34.63
6 68.00 72.00 73.460 0.38 65 74 1.40 1.40 5 82 80 45 40 93.2 35.13
7 72.00 76.00 75.910 0.34 65 74 1.26 130 5 80 79 45 40 101.3 33.23
8 76.00 80.00 78.430 0.32 65 74 1.18 1.20 5 83 80 45 40 98.6 32.24
9 80.00 84.00 80.810 0.30 66 74 1.11 I.10 5 80 80 45 40 100.3 31.22
10 84.00 88.00 83.160 0.29 67 74 1.08 1.10 5 82 80 46 42 101.8 30.69
11 88.00 92.00 85.510 0.29 67 74 1.08 1.10 5 82 80 46 42 99.7 30.69
12 92.00 96.00 87.810 0.29 68 74 1.08 1.10 5 82 79 1 47 1 41 100.9 1 30.69
Final DGM: 90.142
aLRunTine Vm AP Tm Ts VacMax AH %ISO BWS Yq,min 56.700 ft2 0.32 in.WC 62.0 of 71.8 of 5 1.175 in.WC 99.0 0.023 -1.4
30 of 125

Alliance
souRcr Tr=sT,NG Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 10:46 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/28/22 Run Z IVALID End Time: 12:48 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) I MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Boa ID:15 Est.Tm: 62 °F Ph: 30.16 in.Hg Vic(ml)
Barometric: 30.09 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 72 °F Pg: -3.70 in.WC 22.1
Static Press: -6.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.32 in.WC O=: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.59 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D Est.Do: 0.282 in. CO2: 0.1 % 3.69
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2: 20.9 % Pilot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 119.168 9100H 0.091
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pilot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.003 0.005 0.003 - 0.004 Mid 2(cf) 119.259###### 0.065
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 9 9 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole 1 Nozzle Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.156
Pilot Gas Temperatures of Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures oF)
^: Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux
y (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %ISO Vs
fl2 AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) A-. Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
m.H�
Cl) 0.. Begin End ( ) f W� Ideal Actual ( - - -
A-1 0.00 1 4.00 90.413 0.30 70 75 M2 1.10 4 90 85 60 45 102.9 31.24
2 4.00 8.00 92.840 0.30 71 75 1.12 1.10 4 86 85 58 45 102.0 31.24
3 8.00 12.00 95.250 0.32 71 76 1.19 1.20 4 87 86 53 45 95.2 32.30
4 12.00 16.00 97.570 0.34 71 77 1.26 1.30 4 85 85 52 44 94.8 33.32
5 16.00 20.00 99.950 0.32 71 77 1.19 1.20 4 85 84 52 44 96.5 32.33
6 20.00 24.00 102.300 0.31 71 77 1.15 1.20 4 88 85 52 44 102.6 31.82
7 '24.00 28.00 104.760 0.30 72 77 1.12 1.10 4 85 85 52 45 96.9 31.30
8 28.00 32.00 107.050 0.30 73 78 1.12 1.10 4 86 85 51 46 99.4 31.33
9 32.00 36.00 109.400 0.33 73 78 1.23 1.20 4 87 85 52 46 96.4 32.86
10 36.00 40.00 111.790 0.34 73 78 1.27 1.30 4 87 85 53 46 102.9 33.36
11 40.00 44.00 114.380 0.33 73 78 1.23 1.20 4 84 85 53 46 94.8 32.86
12 44.00 48.00 116.730 0.35 74 78 1.31 1.30 4 84 85 53 46 95.3 33.84
B-1 48.00 52.00 119.168 0.22 74 76 0.83 0.83 3 92 89 59 42 104.8 26.78
2 52.00 56.00 121.300 0.19 75 76 0.71 0.70 3 92 84 50 41 95.0 24.89
3 56.00 60.00 123.100 0.37 75 76 1.39 1.39 4 91 80 48 42 94.7 34.73
4 60.00 64.00 125.600 0.39 76 76 1.47 1.50 4 89 81 48 42 99.5 35.66
5 64.00 68.00 128.300 0.41 75 79 1.53 1.55 4 88 81 48 43 90.3 36.66
6 68.00 72.00 130.800 0.41 75 80 1.53 1.55 4 86 80 48 43 94.0 36.70
7 72.00 76.00 133.400 0.32 75 80 1.19 1.20 3 85 80 49 41 102.2 32.42
8 76.00 80.00 135.900 0.30 75 81 1.12 1.10 3 84 81 50 42 100.1 31.42
9 80.00 84.00 138.270 0.30 76 80 1.12 1.10 3 84 85 49 43 99.0 31.39
10 84.00 88.00 140.620 0.29 76 81 1.08 1.10 3 84 85 49 42 102.1 30.89
I1 88.00 92.00 143:000 0.29 76 81 1.08 1.10 3 82 86 48 43 93.3 30.89
12 92.00 96.00 145.175 0.29 76 81 1.08 1.10 3 83 85 49 43 93.9 30.89
Final DGM: 147.364
aLRu Vm AP Tm Ts VacAH %ISO BWS Ys.
rAain 56.795 fta 0.32 in.WC 73.6 °F 78.0 of 4 1.188 in.WC 97.0 0.017 -2.6
31 of 125

Alliance
SOURCE TESTING, Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fa etteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 13:25 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/28/22 Run 3 VALID End Time: 15:24 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:15 Est.Tm: 74 °F Ph: 30.17 in.Hg Vlc(roll
Barometric: 30.09 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 78 of Pg: -3.60 in.WC 22.0
Static Press: -6.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.32 in.WC Ot: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.59 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-713 Est.Dn: 0.279 in. CO,: 0.1 % 3.727
COz: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm I Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O=: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 175.941 9904H 0.099
NZ/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.003 0.002 0.003 - 0.002 Mid 2(cf) 176.040#IH#H## 0.052
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle H):GIr4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 8 8 9 10 Mid 3(cQ
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.151
Pitot Gas Tem eratures(o Orifice Press. Gas Tern eratures(oF)
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux(minutes) Reading Tube Vac -%ISO
Vs
(ft� AP Amh. Amb. (in.WC) (in.H Amb. Amh. Amh. Amh. (fps)
0.0.. Begin End ) f WC) Ideal Actual g)
A-1 0.00 4.00 147.543 0.26 77 80 0.97 0.97 4 90 88 66 50 95.1 29.22
2 4.00 8.00 149.650 0.33 77 81 1.23 I.20 5 87 88 56 50 99.9 32.95
3 8.00 12.00 I52.140 0.33 77 82 1.23 I.20 5 90 88 53 54 95.6 32.98
4 I2.00 16.00 154.520 0.32 77 82 1.19 I.20 5 90 88 53 1 54 97.1 32.48
5 16.00 20.00 156.900 0.32 77 82 1.19 I.20 5 88 88 52 53 99.9 32.48
6 20.00 24.00 I59.350 0.31 77 82 1.16 I.20 5 89 88 52 52 100.7 31.97
7 24.00 28.00 161.780 0.29 78 82 1.08 1.10 5 89 87 52 53 100.1 30.92
8 28.00 32.00 164.120 0.29 78 82 1.08 I.10 5 88 88 52 53 99.2 30.92
9 32.00 36.00 I66.440 0.30 78 82 1.12 1.10 5 90 89 53 52 99.2 31.45
10 36.00 40.00 168.800 0.32 78 82 1.19 I.20 5 89 88 53 52 97.7 32.48
11 40.00 44.00 171.200 0.35 78 82 1.31 I.30 5 87 88 53 54 92.7 33.97
12 44.00 48.00 173.580 0.36 78 82 1.34 I.30 5 88 88 54 55 90.7 34.45
B-1 48.00 52.00 175.941 0.23 78 81 0.86 0.86 4 93 91 62 48 102.1 27.51
2 52.00 56.00 178.070 0.37 79 82 1.38 1.40 5 88 84 52 47 96.4 34.93
3 56.00 60.00 180.620 0.36 79 83 1.34 1.40 5 88 88 50 50 95.2 34.48
4 60.00 64.00 183.100 0.42 79 83 1.57 1.60 6 89 87 51 51 96.0 37.24
5 64.00 68.00 185.800 0.40 79 83 1.49 1.50 6 90 88 51 51 98.3 36.35
6 68.00 72.00 188.500 0.40 79 83 1.49 I.50 6 88 91 51 50 I03.4 36.35
7 72.00 76.00 191.340 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 87 91 51 49 101.1 33.51
8 76.00 80.00 193.900 0.32 79 83 1.20 1.20 5 87 91 51 49 101.7 32.51
9 80.00 84.00 196.400 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 87 90 52 51 98.7 33.51
10 94.00 88.00 198.900 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 92 91 53 51 94.7 33.51
11 88.00 92.00 201.300 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 92 91 53 51 94.7 33.51
12 92.00 96.00 203.700 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 87 87 53 51 93.9 33.51
Final DGM: 206.078
a Run Time Vm AP Tm Max Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy,
ai
96.0 in
58.384 f? 0.33 in.WC 78.2 of 82.3 of 6 1.251 in.WC 96.9 0.017 -3.0
32 of 125

1
AlliarmLax' m
TECHNICAL GROUP K TM W20
NOV 14 2022
Source Test Report AIR QUALITY
STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
The Chemours Company, FC, LLC
Fayetteville Works
22828 Highway 87W
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Source Tested: Vinyl Ethers North (VEN) Carbon Bed
Test Date: September 28, 2022
Project No. AST-2022-3359
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
6515A Basile Rowe
East Syracuse, NY 1305

.r
I' wwx%mvem Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Test Program Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit No. North Carolina Department of Air Quality (NCDAQ)Title V Air Permit No.03735T48
Source Information
Source Name Target Parameter
VEN Carbon Bed(Inlet/Outlet) FFPO-DA
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
The Chemours Company,FC,LLC Alliance Technical Group,LLC Eurofins TestAmerica
Fayetteville Works 6515A Basile Rowe 5815 Middlebrook Pike
22828 Highway 87W East Syracuse,NY 13057 Knoxville,TN 37921
Fayetteville,North Carolina Courtney Adkins
Project Manager/ [e-mail]
Facility Contact Field Team Leader
Christel Compton Patrick Grady
[e-mail] [e-mail]
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shook
[e-mail]
[phone]
Report Coordinator
Emily Diaz
[e-mail]
[phone]
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page i
2 of 125

Allia Source Test Report
TECHNICAL GROUP Certification Statement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s)tested and operating condition(s)for the specific test date(s)and time(s)identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format(.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
November 1, 2022
Patrick Grady,QSTI Date
Project Manager
Alliance Technical Group,LLC
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page ii
3 of 125

_ t
Alfia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Project Team............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results.....................................................................................................................................2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology....................................................................................................................................3-1
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate.....3-1
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content.........................................................................3-1
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid......................................................3-1
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation.............................................................................3-2
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery..........................................................................................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table1-1: Project Team........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table2-1: Summary of Results................................................................................................................................2-1
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology..................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page iii
4 of 125

Introduction
5 of 125

Alfia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source rest Report
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by The Chemours Company (Chemours) to conduct
compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works facility in Fayetteville, North Carolina. The facility operates under
North Carolina Department of Air Quality (NCDAQ) Title V Air Permit No. 03735T48. Source emissions testing
were conducted at the inlet and outlet of the Vinyl Ethers North (VEN) carbon bed. The testing was conducted to
evaluate emissions of hexafluoro-propylene oxide-dimer acid(BFPO-DA).
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
VEN is part of the fluoromonomer area at the Fayetteville facility. This area produces fluorocarbon compounds used
to produce Chemours products, such as Nafion®Krytox® and Viton®. Indoor air fugitive emissions from VEN are
vented to a carbon bed which is then vented to atmosphere through the Division Stack.Process emissions from VEN
are directed to a thermal oxidizer.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
Patrick Grady
Antonio Andersen
Alliance Personnel Jacob Cavallo
Brian Goodhile
Jeff Sheldon
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 1-1
6 of 125

Summary of Results
7 of 125

Alfia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Summary of Results
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works Facility in Fayetteville, NC on September 28,
2022. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of HFPO-DA at the inlet and outlet of the VEN carbon
bed.
Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results. Any difference between the summary results listed in
the following tables and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
un Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Averages
y �.
Date 9i.2 ` 9/28/22 9/28/22;.,
HFPO-DA Data
Outlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 7.8E-05 2.6E-05 6.0E-05 5.5E-05
Inlet Emission Rate,lb/hr 1.0E-02 9.4E-03 9.3E-03 9.6E-03
Reduction Efficiency,% 99.2 99.7 99.4 99.4
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 2-1
8of125

9of125

Affia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
x ;TJ S EPA Reference *� ' ° `t
Parameter NoteS/RemarU
Test Methods
Volumetric Flow Rate 1&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid OTM-45 Isokinetic Sampling
3.1 U.S.EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2—Sampling/Traverse.Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 1.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
3.2 U.S.EPA Reference Test Method 4—Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing,each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the
same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.3 Modified Method 0010—Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid
BFPO-DA emissions were evaluated in accordance with Modified Method 0010.Testing followed the submitted
protocol in the execution of our onsite sampling and analysis activities.Modified Method 0010 procedure was
followed as outlined in the protocol submitted to NC Division of Air Quality.Modified Method 0010 sampling and
analysis procedures performed_for_this project_are_consistent with_OTNL-45,_which was_released_by_EPA-in_January
2021,subsequent to Chemours submittal of plans to DAQ.
The sample train consisted of a borosilicate glass nozzle attached directly to a heated borosilicate glass-lined probe.
The probe was connected directly to a heated borosilicate glass filter holder containing a solvent-extracted glass
fiber filter.In order to minimize possible thermal degradation of the BFPO-DA,the probe and particulate filter were
heated to just above stack temperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The filter holder exit
was connected to a water-cooled coil condenser followed by a water-cooled sorbent module containing
approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 inlet temperature was monitored to ensure that the module is
maintained at a temperature below 20°C.
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-1
10 of 125

Allia
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger and a series of two impingers each
containing 100-ml of high purity deionized water. The water impingers were followed by another condensate
knockout impinger equipped with a second XAD-2 resin trap to account for any sample breakthrough. The final
impinger contained approximately 250 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. The water impingers and condensate
impingers were submerged in an ice bath through the duration of the testing.The water in the ice bath was also used
to circulate around the coil condenser and the XAD-2 resin traps.
Exhaust gases were extracted from the sample locations isokinetically using a metering console equipped with a
vacuum pump,a calibrated orifice,oil manometer and probe/filter heat controllers.
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation
Prior to conducting the field work the following procedures were conducted to prepare the field sampling glassware
and sample recovery tools.
1. Wash all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with low residue soap and hot water.
2. Rinse all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools three(3)times with D.I.H20.
3. Bake glassware (with the exception of probe liners) at 450°C for approximately 2 hours, (XAD-2 resin tube
glassware is cleaned by Eurofins/TestAmerica by this same procedure).
4. Solvent rinse three(3)times all glassware,brushes,and ancillary tools with the following sequence of solvents:
acetone,methylene chloride,hexane,and methanol.
5. Clean glassware and tools will be sealed in plastic bags or aluminum foil for transport to the sampling site.
6. Squirt bottles will be new dedicated bottles of known history and dedicated to the D.I. Water and
methanol/ammonium hydroxide(MeOH/5%NH40M solvent contents. Squirt bottles will be labelled with the
solvent content it contains.
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery
Following completion of each test run,the sample probe,nozzle and front-half of the filter holder were brushed and
rinsed three times each with the McOH/ 5%NH40H solution (Container#1). The glass fiber filter was removed
from its housing and transferred to a polyethylene bottle (Container #2). Any particulate matter and filter fibers
which adhered to the filter holder and gasket were also placed in Container#2. The XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,
labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler. The back-half of the filter holder, coil condenser condensate trap and
connecting glassware were rinsed with the same McOH/5%NH40H solution and placed in Container#3.
The volume of water collected in the second and third impingers was measured for moisture determinations and then
placed in Container#4. Impingers#2 and#3 were then rinsed with the McOW 5%NH40H solution and placed in
Container#5.The second(breakthrough)XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler.
The second condensate trap was rinsed with the McOH/ 5% NH40H solution and placed in Container #5. The
contents of the fifth impinger were placed in its original container and weighed for moisture determinations.
Containers were sealed and labeled with the appropriate sample information. Samples remained chilled until
analysis.HFPO-DA analysis was conducted using liquid chromatography/dual mass spectrometry(LC/MS/MS).
AST-2022-3359 Chemours—Fayetteville,NC Page 3-2
11 of 125

Appendix
12 of 125

Appendix A
Affie lOB Example Calculations
SOUROE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Meter Pressure(Pm),in.Bg
OH
where, Pm = Pb + 13.6
Pb 30.16 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH 1.454 =pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Pm 30.27 =in.Hg
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure(Ps),in.Hg
Pg
where, PS = Pb 1 q_6
Pb 30.16 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
Pg 2.00 =static pressure,in.H2O
Ps 30.31 =in.Hg
Standard Meter Volume(Vmstd),dscf
17.636 x Y x Vm x Pm
Vmstd =
where, TM
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor
Vm 64.682 =meter volume,cf
Pm 30.27 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Tin 527.6 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vmstd 65.508 =dscf
Standard Wet Volume(Vwstd),scf
Vwstd = 0.04716 x Vlc
where,
Vlc 21.8 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vwstd 1.028 =scf
Moisture Fraction(BWSsat),dimensionless(theoretical at saturated conditions)
6.37—( 21827 1
10 \7Ts+365)
BWSsat =
PS
where,
Ts 77.3 =stack temperature,OF
Ps 30.31 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
BWSsat 0.031 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless(measured)
Vwstd
BWS =
where, (Vwstd + Vmstd)
Vwstd 1.028 =standard wet volume,scf
Vmstd 65.508 =standard meter volume,dscf
BWS 0.015 =dimensionless
Moisture Fraction(BWS),dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 0.031 =moisture fraction(theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.015 =moisture fraction(measured)
BWS 0.015
13 of 125

Appendix A
A16 r=e Example Calculations
SOURCE TESriNG
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Molecular Weight(DRY)(Md),lb/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %02) + (0.28(100— %CO2 — %02))
where,
CO' 0.1 =carbon dioxide concentration,%
02 20.9 =oxygen concentration,%
Md 28.85 =lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight(WET)(Ms),lb/lb-mole
Ms = Md (1 — BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
BWS 0.015 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ms 28.68 =1b/lb mol
Average Velocity(Vs),ft/sec
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (0 P 1/2) avg x F-SX-M
where, ,
Cp 0.840 =pitot tube coefficient
A P11-1 0.583 =velocity head of stack gas,(in.H20)1n
Ts 536.9 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 30.31 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.H.-
Ms 28.68 =molecular weight of stack gas,lb/lb mol
Vs 32.9 =ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions(Qa),acfm
Qa = 60 x Vs x As
where,
Vs 32.9 =stack gas velocity,ft/sec
As 7.07 =cross-sectional area of stack,ft2
Qa 13,943 =acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions(Qs),dscfm
Qs = 17.636 x Qa x (1 — BWS) x PS
Tc
where,
Qa 13,943 =average stack gas flow at stack conditions,acfm
BWS 0.015 =moisture fraction,dimensionless
Ps 30.31 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Ts 536.9 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Qs 13,666 =dscfin
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check(Yqa),dimensionless
Y_ 0 0.0319xTmx29 AHavg.
Vm AH@ x (Pb + A 13avg•) x Md
Yqa = x 100
where,
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor,dimensionless
O 96 =run time,min.
Vm 64.682 =total meter volume,dcf
Tin 527.6 =absolute meter temperature,°R
AH@ 1.841 =orifice meter calibration coefficient,in.H2O
Pb 30.16 =barometric pressure,in.Hg
AH avg 1.454 =average pressure differential of orifice,in H2O
Md 28.85 =molecular weight(DRY),lb/lb mol
(A m112 1.178 =average squaremot pressure differential of orifice,(in.H20)1/2
Yqa 3.8 =dimensionless
14 of 125

r Appendix A
Affila1'Me Example Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source: VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.: 2022-3359
Run No.: 1
Parameter: HFPO-DA
Volume of Nozzle(Vn),ft3
Vn =p� (0.002669 x Vlc+Vm T m x Y l
where, II
Ts 536.9 =absolute stack temperature,°R
Ps 30.31 =absolute stack gas pressure,in.Hg
Vlc 21.8 =volume of H2O collected,ml
Vol 64.682 =meter volume,cf
Pm 30.27 =absolute meter pressure,in.Hg
Y 1.001 =meter correction factor,unitless
TM 527.6 =absolute meter temperature,°R
Vn 66.836 =volume of nozzle,ft3
Isokinetic Sampling Rate(1),%
C Vn
1 Bx60xAnxVs x100
where,
Vn 66.836 =nozzle volume,ft3
0 96.0 =run time,minutes
An 0.00034 =area of nozzle,ft''
Vs 32.9 =average velocity,ft/sec
I 103.5 =%
HFPO-DA Concentration(C),ng/dscm
_ M x 35.313
C Vmstd
where,
M 2,832 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Vmstd 65.508 =standard meter volume,dscf
CN, 1.5E+03 =ng/dscm
HFPO-DA Emission Rate(ER),lb/hr
MxQsx60
ER = Vrn..ctd x 4.54F. + 11
where,
M 2,832 =HFPO-DA mass,ng
Qs 13,666 =average stack gas flow at standard conditions,dscfm
Vmstd 65.508 =standard meter volume,dscf
ER 7.8E-05 =lb/hr
15 of 125

Appendix sic
16 of 125

e--
• Alfico r'1Ct Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/28/22 9/28/22 9/28/22 --
Start Time 8:15 10:46 13:25 --
Stop Time 10:10 12:48 15:24 --
Run Time,min (6) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Ph) 30.16 30.16 30.17 30.16
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.001 1.001 1.001 1.001
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) 1.841 1.841 1.841 1.841
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 64.682 64.195 63.922 64.266
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 67.9 78.5 82.7 76.4
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 527.6 538.2 542.3 536.0
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (AH) 1.454 1.433 1.427 1.438
Volume HZO Collected,mL (VIC) 21.8 26.2 28.3 25.4
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ftZ (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,690.0 7.0 1,410.0 1,035.7
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 1,130.0 917.0 730.0 925.7
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) --
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 12.1 - -- 12.10
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 2,832.1 924.0 2,140.0 1,965.4
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 65.508 63.733 62.994 64.078
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.028 1.236 1.334 1.199
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.018
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.031 0.034 0.037 0.034
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.018
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.27 30.27 30.27 30.27
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 66.836 65.610 65.243 65.90
Isokinctic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 103.5 102.7 102.4 102.9
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Y') 3.8 2.8 2.2 2.9
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 1.5E+03 5.1E+02 1.2E+03 1.1E+03
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,Ib/hr ER(HFPODA) 7.8E-05 2.6E-05 6.0E-05 5.5E-05
REDUCTION CALCULATIONS
Inlet HFPO-DA Emission Rate,Ib/hr RE(HFPODA) 1.0E-02 9.4E-03 9.3E-03 9.6E-03
HFPO-DA Reduction Efficiency,% RE(HFPODA) 99.2 99.7 99.4 99.4
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reporting Imut.
17 of 125

s
Alliance Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source TEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/28/22 9/28/22 9/28/22 --
Start Time 8:15 10:46 13:25 --
Stop Time 10:10 12:48 15:24 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.40 0.41 0.40 0.40
Point 2 0.40 0.41 0.40 0.40
Point 3 0.39 0.40 0.40 0.40
Point 4 0.43 0.41 0.45 0.43
Point 5 0.45 0.42 0.45 0.44
Point 6 0.41 0.40 0.44 0.42
Point 7 0.29 0.25 0.29 0.28
Point 8 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.26
Point 9 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.25
Point 10 0.26 0.27 0.25 0.26
Point 11 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.25
Point 12 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.24
Point 13 0.57 0.53 0.49 0.53
Point 14 0.55 0.55 0.50 0.53
Point 15 0.56 0.56 0.49 0.54
Point 16 0.67 0.61 0.63 0.64
Point 17 0.61 0.56 0.58 0.58
Point 18 0.46 0.45 0.43 0.45
Point 19 0.22 0.23 0.20 0.22
Point 20 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.18
Point 21 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.17
Point 22 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.16
Point 23 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
Point 24 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.17
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.583 0.575 0.571 0.576
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure, in.Hg (Pb) 30.16 30.16 30.17 30.16
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 30.31 30.31 30.32 30.31
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07
Temperature,°F __(Ts) 77.3_ _10.1_ _ 82.6------- _80.0____
Temperature,°R (Ts) 536.9 539.8 542.3 539.670
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.018
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.031 0.034 0.037 0.034
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.015 0.019 0.021 0.018
02 Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2 Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.68 28.65 28.63 28.65
Velocity,ft/sec (Vs) 32.9 32.6 32.4 32.6
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 13,943 13,806 13,758 13,836
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 13,666 13,410 13,284 13,453
18 of 125

A ante Method 1 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No.2022,3359
Date: 09/28/22
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Horizontal a t.o ifs 2.0
Duct Design: Circular a Higher Number is for asruaonuce
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 51.13 in Rectangular Stacks or Ducts uensune.rcur
Nipple Length: 15.13 in
Depth of Duct: 36.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 7.07 fta _
No.ofTeslPorts: 2 24 or 25°pore t o;,veosuce
Distance A: 4.8 ft 20 pints
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) to panto Smear Dl-w-o.0s m(24 m.)
Distance B: 5.7 It 12 ammo
Distance H Duct Diameters: 1.9 (must he>2) rq--is m E„w,m�,a,,, a ors a Moire
Minimum Number of Traverse Points: 24 QOn1oCfiOn'ere t
Actual Number of Traverse Points: 24 Stack ommmer=0.30 to O.es m 112-2411.)
Number of Readings per Point-. 1
Measurer(Initial and Date): JS 928/22 2 3 4 s 6 7 a s
Reviewer(Initial and Date):BAG 9/28E
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Number oftraversepoints on a diameter Traverse %of from inside from
Point Diameter wall outsideaf
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 ort
1 14.6 -- 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 16 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 16.13
2 95.4 -- 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 17.54
3 - -- 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 19.37
4 - - 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 21.50
5 - - - - 85.4 - 67.7 - 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 24.13
6 - - - - 95.6 -- 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 27.94
7 - -- - - - - 89.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 38.31
8 - - - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 42.13
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 44.75
10 - - - - - - - - 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 46.88
31 - - - - - - -- - - - 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 48.71
I. 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 50.13
'Percent ofstach diameter from inside wall io traverse point.
Slack Diagram
A=4.8R
B=5.7 D.
Depth of Duct=36 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
•
A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
B
Upstream
Disturbance
19 of 125

AID anCNG SOURCE TESTINGCyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/28/22
Sample Point Angle(SP=O)
1 10
2 12
3 12
4 15
5 15
6 10
7 10
8 8
9 8
10 10
11 10
12 8
13 12
14 12
15 10
16 10
17 15
18 15
19 12
20 12
21 10
22 10
23 8
24 8
Average 11
20 of 125

All ante Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 313.6 484.2 735.2 759.4 752.3 476.6 306.0 856.4 4683.7
Final Mass,g 313.9 484.5 733.3 759.2 753.7 478.4 315.8 866.7 4705.5
Gain 0.3 0.3 -1.9 1 -0.2 1 1.4 1 1.8 9.8 10.3 21.8
Run 2 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 307.4 499.8 744.0 758.9 718.6 498.1 314.6 840.6 4682.0
Final Mass,g 315.5 500.4 741.5 759.7 719.5 499.9 322.4 849.3 4708.2
Gain 8.1 0.6 -2.5 0.8 0.9 1.8 7.8 8.7 26.2
Run 3 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica -
Initial Mass,g 341.4 484.7 718.7 772.3 752.5 476.9 312.5 861.3 4720.3
Final Mass,g 357.1 484.9 716.4 773.3 754.1 478.4 313.2 871.2 4748.6
Gain 15.7 0.2 -2.3 1.0 1.6 1.5 0.7 9.9 28.3
21 of 125

Alliance
SOURCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Compan -Fa etteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:15 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/28l22 Run 1 VALID End Time: 10:10 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:7 Est.Tm: 85 OF Ph: 30.16 in.Hg Vic(ml)
Barometric: 30.31 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 93 OF Pg: 2.00 in.WC 21.8
Static Press: 2.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.67 in.WC %: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.52 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-2 Est.Dn: 0.230 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.107
CO': 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 sefm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Picot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK: Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(en 731.600 444#fl 0.376
N,1CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.001 0.001 - - 0.000 Mid 2(co -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole N=le ID:Gl glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 10 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Picot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(c1): 0.376
Pitot Gas Tem eratores OF Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures OF
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Avera a Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
O. (minutes) Reading Tube Vac %
ft� AP amb. Amb. (in.WC) in.H AmL. Amb. Amb. Am ISO b. (fps)
M 0.yi Begin End ( ) f WC) 58 58 Ideal Actual ( g) 58 58 58 58
Al 0.00 4.00 699.773 0.40 58 75 1.61 1.60 2 82 82 54 43 103.8 35.53
2 4.00 8.00 702.640 0.40 61 76 1.62 1.60 2 82 83 46 42 103.0 35.56
3 8.00 12.00 705.500 0.39 62 76 1.58 1.60 2 83 82 45 42 103.8 35.11
4 12.00 16.00 708.350 0.43 63 76 1.75 1.75 2 83 82 45 40 102.1 36.87
5 16.00 20.00 711.300 0.45 65 77 1.83 1.85 2 83 82 44 39 103.3 37.75
6 20.00 24.00 714.360 0.41 65 77 1.67 1.70 2 84 84 44 40 105.3 36.04
7 24.00 1 28.00 717.340 0.29 66 77 1.19 1 1.20 2 83 83 44 41 106.4 30.31
8 28.00 32.00 719.880 0.27 66 77 1.10 1.10 2 84 84 43 39 103.7 29.24
9 32.00 36.00 722.270 0.25 67 78 1.02 1.00 2 84 84 45 40 104.1 28.17
10 36.00 40.00 724.580 0.26 67 77 1.07 1.05 2 85 85 45 41 103.3 28.70
11 40.00 44.00 726.920 0.24 68 78 0.98 1.00 2 85 83 45 41 106.9 27.60
12 44.00 48.00 729.250 0.24 68 78 0.98 1.00 2 85 85 45 40 107.9 27.60
B1 48.00 52.00 731.976 0.57 68 76 2.34 2.30 4 84 85 47 41 97.6 42.45
2 52.00 56.00 735.250 0.55 68 76 2.26 2.25 4 83 85 47 41 102.9 41.70
3 56.00 60.00 738.640 0.56 69 76 2.30 2.30 4 83 82 47 41 101.8 42.08
4 60.00 64.00 742.030 0.67 69 76 2.75 2.75 5 83 84 45 41 102.2 46.02
5 64.00 68.00 745.750 0.61 72 76 2.52 2.50 5 83 82 44 41 104.5 43.91
6 68.00 72.00 749.400 0.46 73 78 1.90 1.90 4 83 83 45 42 105.3 38.20
7 72.00 76.00 752.600 0.22 73 79 0.91 0.90 2 85 85 47 42 109.3 26.45
8 76.00 80.00 754.900 0.17 73 79 0.70 0.70 2 85 87 46 41 108.1 23.25
9 80.00 84.00 756.900 0.18 72 79 0.74 0.75 2 85 86 47 46 109.4 23.92
10 84.00 88.00 758.980 0.18 72 79 0.74 0.70 2 85 87 48 45 105.7 23.92
11 88.00 92.00 760.990 0.16 72 79 0.66 0.65 2 85 83 49 41 106.6 22.55
12 92.00 96.00 762.900 0.18 73 79 0.74 0.75 2 85 85 48 45 1 01.4 23.92
Final DGM: 764.831
F Run Time ViaAP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Ys,
�l Vac
rW7
ai
96.0 min 64.682 ft, 0.36 in.WC 67.9 OF 77.3 OF 5 1.454 in.WC 103.5 0.015 3.8
22 of 125

Alliance
S O U R C E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Company-Fa etteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 10:46 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/28/22 Run 2 VALID End Time: 12:48 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:7 Est.Tm: 68 °F Ph: 30.16 in.Hg Vic(nil)
Barometric: 30.31 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 77 °F Pg: 2.00 in.WC 26.2
Static Press: 2.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.36 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.52 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-2 Est.Dm 0.272 in. C%: 0.1 % 4.09
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Carr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK! Pre Mid I Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(co 796.755 04444 0.214
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.000 Mid 2(ct) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-1 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - 10 Mid 3(co -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Du(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(ct): 0.214
Pitot Gas Tempera ures(°F) Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures(oF)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Tube DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
(minutes) Reading Vac %ISO
3 AP Amb. Amb. (in.WC) Amh. Amb. Amb. Amh. (fps)
rig p� Begiu End (ff) (I.WC) Ideal Actual (in.Hg)
Al 0.00 4.00 765.226 0.41 72 79 1.69 1.70 2 85 86 65 57 99.0 36.10
2 4.00 8.00 768.060 0.41 73 79 1.69 1.70 2 85 85 64 51 100.8 36.10
3 8.00 12.00 770.950 0.40 74 79 1.65 1.65 2 85 86 63 50 102.5 35.66
4 12.00 16.00 773.860 0.41 75 79 1.70 1.70 2 85 85 63 49 102.9 36.10
5 16.00 20.00 776.820 0.42 75 80 1.73 1.75 2 86 86 61 49 104.8 36.57
6 20.00 24.00 779.870 0.40 76 80 1.66 1.65 2 86 87 60 47 101.9 35.69
7 24.00 28.00 782.770 0.25 76 80 1.04 1.00 2 86 86 59 48 106.1 28.22
8 28.00 1 32.00 785.160 0.25 77 80 1.04 1.00 2 87 87 59 51 104.5 28.22
9 32.00 36.00 787.520 0.26 77 80 1.08 1.10 2 87 87 59 52 100.8 28.78
10 36.00 40.00 789.840 0.27 77 80 1.12 1.10 2 87 86 59 52 99.3 29.32
11 40.00 44.00 792.170 0.26 77 80 1.08 1.10 2 87 87 60 52 102.1 28.78
12 44.00 48.00 794.520 0.24 78 81 1.00 1.00 2 86 86 59 51 101.0 27.67
BI 48.00 52.00 796.969 0.53 77 81 2.19 2.20 4 87 86 64 51 98.1 41.12
2 52.00 56.00 800.180 0.55 78 81 2.28 2.30 4 87 86 55 50 103.9 41.89
3 56.00 60.00 803.650 0.56 78 81 2.32 2.30 4 87 87 54 51 103.5 42.27
4 60.00 64.00 807.140 0.61 81 81 2.54 2.55 4 88 88 54 51 100.7 44.12
5 64.00 68.00 810.700 0.56 81 81 2.33 2.30 5 88 88 55 51 103.2 42.27
6 68.00 72.00 814.200 0.45 81 81 1.87 1.90 4 87 88 53 49 104.9 37.89
7 72.00 76.00 817.390 0.23 83 80 0.97 0.95 2 81 88 52 49 104.1 27.07
8 76.00 80.00 819.670 0.19 84 80 0.80 0.80 2 87 88 53 49 109.3 24.60
9 80.00 84.00 821.850 0.16 85 80 0.67 0.68 2 87 89 50 47 106.3 22.57
10 84.00 88.00 823.800 0.16 83 800.67 0.65 2 87 88 53 50 104.0 22.57
11 88.00 92.00 825.700 0.16 83 1 80 0.67 0.65 2 87 88 51 49 107.8 22.57
12 92.00 96.00 827.670 0.16 83 80 0.67 0.65 2 87 88 51 49 107.5 22.57
Final DGM: 829.635
rJ)a Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Yy,
r'7
W 96.0 min 64.195 ft' 0.35 in.WC 78.5 °F 80.1 OF 5 1.433 in.WC 102.7 0.019 2.8
23 of 125

All arma
SO.UgCE TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com an -Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 13:25 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Outlet
Date: 9/28/22 Run 3 VALID End Time: 15:24 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:7 Est.Tm: 79 OF Ph: 30.17 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.31 in.Hg Y:1.001 Est.Ts: 80 °F Pg: 2.00 in.WC 28.3
Static Press: 2.80 in.WC AH Q(in.WC):1.841 Est.AP: 0.35 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 30.52 in.Hg Probe ID:P4-2 Est.Dn: 0.271 in. CO2: 0.1 % 4.155
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-2 LEAK CHECK! Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cf) 862.537 f!RNW!tl 0.194
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.000 - - - 0.000 Mid 2(cf) -
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:G-1 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 - 10 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole 1 Nozzle Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Val(cO: 0.194
Pitot Gas Tempera ores(OF) Orifice Press. Gas Tern eratures(OF)
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter DGM Average Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Im Exit Aux Vs
G. (minutes) Reading Tube Vac Amb. %ISO
(ft2) AP Amh. Amb. (in.WC) m
(, .Hg)
Amb. Amb. Amb. (fps)
p. Begin End (1a wc) Ideal Actual - - - -
Al 0.00 4.00 829.955 0.40 80 81 1.66 1.65 3 87 1 90 63 58101.8 35.73
2 4.00 8.00 832.870 0.40 80 81 1.66 1.65 3 88 89 54 48 101.6 35.73
3 8.00 12.00 835.780 0.40 80 81 1.66 1.65 3 87 87 51 48 101.9 35.73
4 12.00 16.00 938.700 0.45 82 81 1.88 1.90 3 87 88 51 50 101.7 37.89
5 16.00 20.00 941.800 0.45 83 81 1.88 1.90 3 87 88 51 45 104.2 37.89
6 20.00 24.00 944.980 0.44 83 81 1.84 1.85 3 87 88 50 46 106.6 37.47
7 1 24.00 1 28.00 948.200 0.29 83 82 1.21 1.20 2 87 88 50 46 101.9 30.45
8 _28.00 32.00 850.700 0.25 83 82 1.05 1.05 2 88 -87 50 45 104.5 28.27
9 32.00 36.00 853.080 0.25 84 82 1.05 1.05 2 88 89 50 48 103.8 28.27
10 36.00 40.00 855.450 0.25 83 82 1.05 1.05 2 87 88 50 47 103.6 28.27
11 40.00 44.00 857.810 0.26 83 82 1.09 1.10 2 87 87 50 46 101.8 28.83
12 44.00 48.00 860.175 0.25 83 82 1.05 1.05 2 87 88 50 48 103.7 2827
B 1 48.00 52.00 862.731 0.49 80 82 2.03 2.00 4 90 90 60 53 97.9 39.58
2 52.00 56.00 865.830 0.50 81 82 2.08 2.10 4 87 89 50 46 103.7 39.98
3 56.00 60.00 869.150 0.49 83 83 2.04 2.05 4 88 88 51 46 102.2 39.61
4 60.00 64.00 872.400 0.63 83 83 2.62 2.60F21
90 51 47 I01.7 44.92
5 64.00 68.00 876.060 0.58 83 83 2.41 2.40 90 51 50 99.6 43.10
6 68.00 72.00 879.500 0.43 85 83 1.80 1.80 88 51 52 107.0 37.11
7 72.00 76.00 882.700 0.20 84 84 0.84 0.85 89 52 51 103.0 25.33
8 76.00 80.00 884.800 0.17 84 85 0.71 0.70 92 53 48 102.7 23.38
9 80.00 84.00 886.730 0.16 84 85 0.67 0.67 90 52 49 104.8 22.68
10 84.00 88.00 888.640 0.15 84 85 0.63 0.63 90 54 49 102.6 21.96
11 98.00 92.00 890.450 0.16 83 85 0.67 0.67 90 54 50 100.6 22.63
12 92.00 96.00 892.280 0.16 83 85 0.67 0.67 89 55 51 98.5 1 22.68
Final DGM: 894.071
a kRun Time Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Ys,
�W
C4
0 min 63.922 fta 0.34 in.WC 82.7 OF 82.6 OF 5 1.427 in.WC 102.4 0.021 2.2
24 of 125

Al��ance Emission Calculations
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run I Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/28/22 9/28/22 9/28/22 --
Start Time 8:15 10:46 13:25 --
Stop Time 10:09 12:48 15:24 --
Run Time,min (a) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
INPUT DATA
Barometric Pressure,in.Hg (Pb) 30.16 30.16 30.17 30.16
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.032 1.032 1.032 1.032
Orifice Calibration Value (OH @) 1.699 1.699 1.699 1.699
Meter Volume,ft3 (Vm) 56.700 56.795 58.384 57.293
Meter Temperature,°F (Tm) 62.0 73.6 .78.2 71.3
Meter Temperature,°R (Tm) 521.7 533.3 537.9 530.9
Meter Orifice Pressure,in.WC (OH) 1.175 1.188 1.251 1.205
Volume HZO Collected,mL (Vlc) 29.9 22.1 22.0 24.7
Nozzle Diameter,in (Dn) 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Area of Nozzle,ftz (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
FH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 133,000.0 184,000.0 101,000.0 139,333.3
BH HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 221,000.0 135,000.0 213,000.0 189,666.7
Imp HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 36.4 34.5 105.0 58.6
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 17.7 14.3 122.0 51.33
Total HFPO-DA Mass,ng M(HFPODA) 354,054.1 319,048.8 314,227.0 329,110.0
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume,ft3 (Vmstd) 59.833 58.629 59.784 59.415
Standard Water Volume,ft3 (Vwstd) 1.410 1.042 1.037 1.163
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.019
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.026 0.032 0.037 0.032
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.019
Meter Pressure,in Hg (Pm) 30.25 30.25 30.26 30.25
Volume at Nozzle,ft3 (Vn) 61.762 60.860 62.493 61.71
Isokinctic Sampling Rate,(%) (I) 99.0 97.0 96.9 97.6
DGM Calibration Check Value,(+/-5%) (Y') -1.4 -2.6 -3.0 -2.3
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
HFPO-DA Concentration,ng/dscm CMFPODA) 2.1E+05 1.9E+05 1.9E+05 2.0E+05
HFPO-DA Emission Rate,Ib/hr ER(HFPODA) 1.0E-02 9.4E-03 9.3E-03 9.6E-03
Underlined values are non-detect and reported as the reporting limit.
25 of 125

Allah Volumetric Flow Rate Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 9/28/22 9/28/22 9/28/22 --
Start Time 8:15 10:46 13:25 --
Stop Time 10:09 12:48 15:24 --
Run Time,min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
VELOCITY HEAD,in.WC
Point 1 0.32 0.30 0.26 0.29
Point 2 0.33 0.30 0.33 0.32
Point 3 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.32
Point 4 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.33
Point 5 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Point 6 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31
Point 7 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.30
Point 8 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.29
Point 9 0.30 0.33 0.30 0.31
Point 10 0.32 0.34 0.32 0.33
Point 11 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.32
Point 12 0.32 0.35 0.36 0.34
Point 13 0.30 0.22 0.23 0.25
Point 14 0.29 0.19 0.37 0.28
Point 15 0.30 0.37 0.36 0.34
Point 16 0.36 0.39 0.42 0.39
Point 17 0.37 0.41 0.40 0.39
Point 18 0.38 0.41 0.40 0.40
Point 19 0.34 0.32 0.34 0.33
Point 20 0.32 0.30 0.32 0.31
Point 21 0.30 0.30 0.34 0.31
Point 22 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.31
Point 23 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.31
Point 24 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.31
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP,(in.WC) (AP) 0.561 0.562 0.575 0.566
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure, in.Hg (Pb) 30.16 30.16 30.17 30.16
Static Pressure,in.WC (Pg) -3.80 -3.70 -3.60 -3.70
Stack Pressure,in.Hg (Ps) 29.88 29.89 29.91 29.89
Stack Cross-sectional Area,ft` (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07
Temperature,'F _(TS) 71.8 _ _ _ 78.0 82.3 _ 77.3
Temperature,°R (Ts) 531.5 537.6 541.9 537.003
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.019
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.026 0.032 0.037 0.032
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.023 0.017 0.017 0.019
02 Concentration,% (02) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2 Concentration,% (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85
Molecular Weight,lb/lb-mole(wet) (Ms) 28.60 28.66 28.67 28.64
Velocity,ft/see (Vs) 31.8 32.0 32.9 32.2
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
At Stack Conditions,acfm (Qa) 13,478 13,552 13,935 13,655
At Standard Conditions,dscfm (Qs) 13,056 13,055 13,330 13,147
26 of 125

Alliance Method 1 Data
SOUROE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No.2022-3359
Date: 09/28/22
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation: Horizontal 5 t.o
Duct Design: Circular oHigher Number Is for atvee."ce
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: 51.13 in _ Rectangular stacks or Ducts • ec,SVREr
Nipple Length: 15.13 in snE
Depth of Duct: 36.00 in
Cross Sectional Area of Duct: 7.07 fe
No.of Test Ports: 2 24 or 25
Distance A: 5.1 ft 20oa1ms
Distance A Duct Diameters: 4.8 (must be>0.5) to perms sea,Di-omr>oat m(24 k,.)
Distance B: 5.7 ft t2
°p1".
Distance B Duct Diameters: must be 2 1.9 t FfO1" (0-`E
( ) OnNNnnce(Ben4.E.-t>e^.bn, a or 9°points
Minimum Number of Traverse Paints: 24
Actual Number of Traverse Paints: 24 stack of-ter a o.ao to 0.61 m(12-241n.)
Number of Readings per Point: 1
Measurer(Initial and Date): AA 92822 2 3 4 5 6 1 a g
Reviewer(Initial and Date): 1S 92822
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Distance Distance
Number oftrm�erse points on a diameter Traverse %of from inside from
m Point Diameter from
outside of
w,in
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 art
1 14.6 - 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 16.13
2 85.4 - 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 17.54
3 - - 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.6 - 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 19.37
4 - -- 93.3 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 22.6 - 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 21.50
5 - - - - 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 - 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 24.13
6 -- -- - - 95.6 - 80.6 - 65.8 - 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 27.94
7 - - - - - - 89.5 - 77.4 - 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 38.31
8 -- -- - - - - 96.8 - 85.4 - 73.0 8 75.0 27.00 42.13
9 - - - - - - - - 91.8 - 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 44.75
10 - - - - - - - - 97.4 - 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 46.88
11 - - - - - - - - - - 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 48.71
12 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 50.13
"Percent of slack dimncler fran inside call to traverse point.
Stack Diagram
A=3.1 ft.
B=3.7 ft.
Depth of Duct=36 in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbance
•
•
•
•
•
• A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
B
Upstream
Disturbance
27 of 125

AID ariCNG SOURCE TESTING Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2022-3359
Date 09/28/22
Sample Point Angle(eP=O)
1 8
2 10
3 10
4 10
5 10
6 15
7 15
8 15
9 10
-- - - — - 10 - -- — — - — -10 -- - —
11 10
12 8
13 10
14 10
15 15
16 15
17 18
18 15
19 15
20 12
21 10
22 10
23 10
24 10
Average 12
28 of 125

Alliance Method 4 Data
SOURCE TESTING
Location Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Facility,NC
Source VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Projeet No. 2022-3359
Parameter HFPO-DA
Analysis Gravimetric
Run 1 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 299.7 468.2 760.5 754.4 716.3 477.6 318.9 829.1 4624.7
Final Mass,g 309.4 468.0 760.0 754.8 717.6 478.9 326.1 839.8 4654.6
Gain 9.7 -0.2 -0.5 1 0.4 1 1.3 1.3 1 7.2 10.7 29.9
Run 2 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 301.7 467.1 718.5 745.3 728.9 490.7 285.9 826.5 4564.6
Final Mass,g 305.9 469.4 716.7 745.5 730.1 491.9 289.9 837.3 4586.7
Gain 4.2 2.3 -1.8 1 0.2 1.2 1 1.2 4.0 10.8 22.1
Run 3 Date: 9/28/22
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O Empty XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass,g 316.1 468.2 759.9 757.7 716.9 478.4 329.9 833.0 4660.1
Final Mass,g 325.9 468.2 757.1 757.4 718.7 480.5 330.5 843.8 4682.1
Gain 1 9.8 0.0 -2.8 -0.3 1.8 1 2.1 0.6 10.8 22.0
29 of 125

Alliance
S O U Ft C E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Cam an -Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 8:15 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/28l22 Run 1 IVALID End Time: 10:09 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:15 Est.Tm: 70 OF Ph: 30.16 in.Hg Vlc(MI)
Barometric: 30.09 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 93 OF Pg: -3.30 in.WC 29.9
Static Press: -6.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.62 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.59 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D Est.Dn: 0.239 in. CO,,: 0.1 % 3.601
CO,: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK! Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post I Mid 1(cf) 61.416- 61.484 0.068
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.005 0.004 0.003 - 0.005 Mid 2(cf) 61.484 61.569 0.085
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL•4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 9 10 - 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Do(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Paint Leak Check Vol(cf): 0.153
Pitot Gas Tempera ures(OF) Orifice Press. Gas Tem eratures(OF)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Tube DGMAverage Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
(minutes) Reading Vac %ISO
c£e (ft2 AP Amb. Amh. (In.WC) (in.Hg) A.ah. AmL. Amb. A. (fps)
m W Begin End ) (in WQ Ideal Actual
A-1 0.00 1 4.00 33.289 0.32 57 70 1.17 1.20 5 82 85 48 41 96.8 32.12
2 4.00 8.00 35.600 0.33 57 70 1.21 1.20 5 81 84 43 43 95.7 32.62
3 8.00 12.00. 37.920 0.32 58 70 1.18 1.20 5 80 83 43 41 98.7 32.12
4 12.00 16.00 40.280 0.33 1 58 70 1.21 1.20 5 79 84 43 42 1 99.7 32.62
5 16.00 20.00 42.700 0.32 59 70 1.18 1.20 5 82 85 43 41 101.4 32.12
6 20.00 24.00 45.130 0.30 59 70 1.11 1.10 5 83 82 43 42 102.1 31.10
7 24.00 28.00 47.500 0.30 60 71 1.11 1.10 5 83 80 43 42 98.2 31.13
8 28.00 32.00 49.780 0.29 60 70 1.07 _1.10 5 __ 80._ 78_-...-43___ _43 - 99.7 30.58
9 32.00 36.00 52.060 0.30 60 70 1.11 1.10 5 79 77 43 44 98.5 31.10
10 36.00 40.00 54.350 0.32 60 71 1.18 1.20 5 82 78 43 42 101.7 32.15
11 40.00 44.00 56.790 0.29 61 71 1.07 1.10 5 81 81 44 43 97.5 30.60
- ----- -12---44:00- -48.00-- --59:020 ----032-------60-- - ---71--1718---1.20---5--- 81- -84- ---44----40---99:9---32-15-- -- - --
B-1 48.00 52.00 61.416 0.30 62 71 1.11 1.10 5 84 85 49 41 103.5 31.13
2 52.00 56.00 63.830 0.29 63 72 1.07 1.10 5 85 85 43 38 102.8 30.63
3 56.00 60.00 66.190 0.30 63 72 1.11 1.10 5 84 83 43 39 100.7 31.16
4 60.00 64.00 68.540 0.36 64 73 1.33 1.30 5 82 79 45 41 97.0 34.16
5 64.00 68.00 71.020 0.37 64 73 1.37 1.40 5 82 80 45 1 40 94.1 34.63
6 68.00 72.00 73.460 0.38 65 74 1.40 1.40 5 82 80 45 40 93.2 35.13
7 72.00 76.00 75.910 0.34 65 74 1.26 1.30 5 80 79 45 40 101.3 33.23
8 76.00 80.00 78.430 0.32 65 74 1.18 1.20 5 83 80 45 40 98.6 32.24
9 80.00 84.00 80.810 0.30 66 74 1.11 1.10 5 80 80 45 40 100.3 31.22
10 84.00 88.00 83.160 0.29 67 74 1.08 1.10 5 82 80 46 42 101.8 30.69
11 88.00 92.00 85.510 0.29 67 74 1.08 1.10 5 82 80 46 42 %7 30.69
12 92.00 96.00 87.810 0.29 68 74 1.08 1.10 5 82 79 47 41 ]00.9 30.69
Final DGM: 90.142
a Run Time Vm AP TM Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Yy,
V)
C4
96.0 min 56.700 ft2 0.32 in.WC 62.0 OF 71.8 OF 5 1.175 in.WC 99.0 0.023 -1.4
30 of 125

AlliaM e
S o u R c E TESTING Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 10:46 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/28/22 Run 2 VALID End Time: 12:48 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: MO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:15 Est.Tm: 62 °F Ph: 30.16 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.09 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 72 °F Pg: -3.70 in.WC 22.1
Static Press: -6.80 in.WC AH Q(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.32 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.59 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-71) Est.Dn: 0.282 in. CO2: 0.1 % 3.69
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
.. 02: 20.9 % Pilot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK Pre Mid I Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(cl) 119.168 NNNNNN 0.091
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pilot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.003 0.005 0.003 - 0.004 Mid 2(cf) 119.259 kkNhW 0.065
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 10 9 9 10 Mid 3(cf)
Ms: 28.63 lb/lb-mole Nozzle Dot(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.156
Pitot Gas Temperatures(°F) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(°F)
y Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Tube DGM Avera a Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
. (minutes) Reading Vac %ISO
(fta) AP Amb. Amb, (in.WC) (in.Hg) Al- Amb. .4mb. Amb. (fps)
p.i Begin End (in WQ Ideal Actual
A-1 0.00 4.00 90.413 0.30 70 75 1.12 1.10 4 90 85 60 45 102.9 31.24
2 4.00 8.00 92.840 0.30 71 75 1.12 1.10 4 86 85 58 45 102.0 31.24
3 8.00 12.00 95.250 0.32 71 76 1.19 1.20 4 87 86 53 45 95.2 32.30
4 12.00 16.00 97.570 0.34 71 77 1.26 1.30 4 85 85 52 44 94.8 33.32
5 16.00 20.00 99.950 0.32 71 77 1.19 1.20 4 85 84 52 44 96.5 32.33
6 20.00 24.00 102.300 0.31 71 77 1.15 1.20 4 88 85 52 44 102.6 31.82
7 24.00 28.00 104.760 0.30 72 77 1.12 1.10 4 85 85 52 45 96.9 31.30
8 28.00 32.00 107.050 0.30 73 78 1.12 1.10 4 86 85 51 46 99.4 31.33
9 32.00 36.00 109.400 0.33 73 78 1.23 1.20 4 87 85 52 46 96.4 32.86
10 36.00 40.00 111.790 0.34 73 78 1.27 1.30 4 87 85 53 46 102.9 33.36
11 40.00 44.00 114.380 0.33 73 78 1.23 1.20 4 84 85 53 46 94.8 32.86
12 44.00 48.00 116.730 0.35 74 78 1.31 1.30 4 84 85 53 46 95.3 33.84
B-1 48.00 52.00 119.168 0.22 74 76 0.83 0.83 3 92 89 59 42 104.8 26.78
2 52.00 56.00 121.300 0.19 75 76 0.71 0.70 3 92 84 50 41 95.0 24.89
3 56.00 60.00 123.100 0.37 75 76 1.39 1.39 4 91 80 48 42 94.7 34.73
4 60.00 64.00 125.600 0.39 76 76 1.47 1.50 4 89 81 48 42 99.5 35.66
5 64.00 68.00 128.300 0.41 75 79 1.53 1.55 4 88 81 48 43 90.3 36.66
6 68.00 72.00 130.800 0.41 75 80 1.53 1.55 4 86 80 48 43 94.0 36.70
7 72.00 76.00 133.400 0.32 75 80 1.19 1.20 3 85 80 49 41 102.2 32.42
8 76.00 80.00 135.900 0.30 75 81 1.12 1.10 3 84 81 50 42 100.1 31A2
9 80.00 84.00 138.270 0.30 76 80 1.12 1.10 3 84 85 49 43 99.0 31.39
10 84.00 88.00 140.620 0.29 76 81 1.08 1.10 3 84 85 49 42 102.1 30.89
11 88.00 92.00 1 143.000 0.29 76 81 I.08 1.10 3 82 86 48 43 93.3 30.89
12 92.00 96.00 145.175 0.29 76 81 1.08 I.10 3 83 85 49 43 93.9 30.89
Final DGM: 147.364
Max
a Run Time Von AP Tm Ts Vac AH %ISO BWS Yy,
rW7
W 96.0 min 56.795 fts 0.32 in.WC 73.6 °F 78.0 °F 4 1.188 in.WC 97.0 0.017 -2.6
31 of 125

Alliance
S"Q,U R C E 1'E S T I N G Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Chemours Com any-Fayetteville Works Facility,N( Start Time: 13:25 Source:VEN Carbon Bed Inlet
Date: 9/28/22 Run IVALID End Time: 15:24 Project No.:2022-3359 Parameter: HFPO-DA
STACK DATA(EST) EQUIPMENT STACK DATA(EST) FILTER NO. STACK DATA(FINAL) MOIST.DATA
Moisture: 2.0 %est. Meter Box ID:15 Est.Tm: 74 °F Ph: 30.17 in.Hg Vlc(ml)
Barometric: 30.09 in.Hg Y:1.032 Est.Ts: 78 °F Pg: -3.60 in.WC 22.0
Static Press: -6.80 in.WC AH @(in.WC):1.699 Est.AP: 0.32 in.WC 02: 20.9 % K-FACTOR
Stack Press: 29.59 in.Hg Probe ID:TC-7D Est.Dn: 0.279 in. CO2: 0.1 % 3.727
CO2: 0.1 % Liner Material:glass Target Rate: 0.78 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
02: 20.9 % I Pitot ID:P4-1 LEAK CHECK! Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1(co 175.941#W44 0.699
N2/CO: 79.0 % Pitot Cp/Type:0.840 S-type Leak Rate(cfm): 0.003 0.002 0.003 - 0.002 Mid 2(cf) 176.040 tW#N 0.052
Md: 28.85 lb/lb-mole Nozzle ID:GL-4 glass Vacuum(in Hg): 8 8 9 - 10 Mid 3(cf) -
Ms: 28.63 Ib/lb-mole Nozzle Dn(in.):0.250 Pitot Tube: Pass - - - Pass Mid-Point Leak Check Vol(co: 0.151
Pitot Gas Temperatures(oF) Orifice Press. Gas Temperatures(oF)
Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Tube DGM Avera a Stack AH Pump Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Vs
a (minutes) Reading Vac %ISO
E s AP amn. amh. (in.W C) m.H Amk. A.L. A.L. Amh. (fps)
� Pr Begiu End (ft) (in WC) Ideal Actual ( g)
A-1 0.00 4.00 147.543 0.26 77 80 0.97 0.97 4 90 88 66 50 95.1 29.22
2 4.00 8.00 149.650 0.33 77 81 1.23 1.20 5 87 88 56 50 99.9 32.95
3 8.00 12.00 152.140 0.33 77 82 1.23 1.20 5 90 88 53 54 95.6 32.98
4 12.00 16.00 154.520 0.32 77 82 1.19 1.20 5 90 88 53 54 97.1 32.48
5 16.00 20.00 156.900 0.32 77 82 1.19 L20 5 88 88 52 53 99.9 32.48
6 20.00 24.00 159.350 0.31 77 82 1.16 1.20 5 89 88 52 52 100.7 31.97
7 24.00 28.00 161.780 0.29 78 82 1.08 1.10 5 89 87 52 53 100.1 30.92
8 28.00 32.00 164.120 0.29 78. 82 1.08 1.10 5 88 88 52 53 99.2 . 30.92
9 32.00 36.00 166.440 0.30 78 82 1.12 1.10 5 90 89 53 52 99.2 31.45
10 36.00 40.00 168.800 0.32 78 82 1.19 1.20 5 89 88 53 52 97.7 32.48
11 40.00 44.00 171.200 0.35 78 82 1.31 1.30 5 87 88 53 54 92.7 33.97
--------1-2--44:00---48:00-- -173.580- -0:36----78- ------82----- -1-34 --1-30----5-- -88-- -88 - --54---55- -90..7- -34.45---- - -- --
B-1 48.00 52.00 175.941 0.23 78 81 0.86 0.86 4 93 91 62 48 102.1 27.51
2 52.00 56.00 178.070 0.37 79 82 1.38 1.40 5 88 84 52 47 96.4 34.93
3 56.00 60.00 180.620 0.36 79 83 1.34 1.40 5 88 88 50 50 95.2W34.484 60.00 64.00 183.100 0.42 79 83 1.57 1.60 6 89 87 51 51 96.05 64.00 68.00 I85.800 0.40 79 83 1A9 L50 6 90 88 51 51 98.36 68.00 72.00 188.500 0.40 79 83 1.49 1.50 6 88 91 51 50103.4
7 72.00 76.00 191.340 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 87 91 51 49 101.1 33.51
8 76.00 80.00 193.900 0.32 79 83 1.20 120 5 87 91 51 49 101.7 32.51
9 80.00 84.00 196.400 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 87 90 52 51 98.7 33.51
10 84.00 88.00 198.900 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 92 91 53 51 94.7 33.51
11 88.00 92.00 201.3002 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 92 91 53 51 94.7 33.51
12 92.00 96.00 203.700 0.34 79 83 1.27 1.30 5 87 87 53 51 93.9 33.51
Final DGM: 206.078
F. Le Vm AP Tm Ts Max AH %ISO BWS Yy,
a Vac
W)
ai
min 58.384 W 0.33 in.WC 78.2 °F 82.3 of 6 1.251 in.WC 96.9 0.017 -3.0
32 of 125