Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_0900009_20160303_CMPL_InspRpt NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF Fayetteville Regional Office AIR QUALITY Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works NC Facility ID 0900009 Inspection Report County/FIPS: Bladen/017 Date: 03/04/2016 Facility Data Permit Data Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works Permit 03735 /T41 22828 NC Highway 87 West Issued 11/24/2015 Fayetteville,NC 28306 Expires 1/31/2020 Lat: 34d 50.6000m Long: 78d 50.2930m Classification Title V SIC: 2869/Industrial Organic Chemicals,nec Permit Status Active NAILS: 32512/Industrial Gas Manufacturing Current Permit Application(s)TV-Minor, TV- Renewal Contact Data Facility Contact Authorized Contact Technical Contact Program Applicability Michael Johnson Ellis McGaughy Michael Johnson SIP/Title /112r Environmental Manager Plant Manager Environmental Manager 1VI�`CT Partt 63: Subpart Boiler-112j, Subpart (910)678-1155 (910)678-1224 (910)678-1155 NSPS: Subpart Dc FFpart ZZZZ Compliance Data Comments: Inspection Date 03/03/2016 Inspector's Name Gregory Reeves Inspector's Signature: i j.� Operating Status Operating a Compliance Code Compliance-inspection Action Code FCE Date of Signature: fJJ� l�l U�6 On-Site Inspection Result Compliance Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR: TSP SO2 NOX VOC CO PM10 *HAP 2014 0 1.95 76.26 332.17 38.10 8.60 39138.00 2013EJ7.95 7 0.2100 80.13 312.90 30.45 9.47 39856.00 2012 1.23 63.76 260.86 29.24 7.95 37401.00 *Highest HAP Emitted(in pounds) Five Year Violation History:None Date Letter Tyne Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date Performed Stack Tests since last FCE:None Date Test Results Test Method(s) Source(s)Tested Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 2 of 11 1. DIRECTIONS TO SITE: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works(formerly DuPont)is located on NC Highway 87 in Bladen County. From FRO,take Highway 87 south. The entrance to the facility is approximately 18 miles from FRO on the left side of Highway 87 just before the Cumberland/Bladen County line. 2. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: The usual FRO safety gear is required(hardhat,safety glasses,safety shoes, hearing protection). Entry into several areas of the plant requires specialized safety gear. In the Nation®reactor and Nafion®MMF process areas,personnel are not allowed to enter unless the process is not operating due to the possibility of explosion hazards of the chemical reaction process. 3. FACILITY DESCRIPTION: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works is a chemical manufacturing facility located in Bladen County. The facility was formerly named DuPont. The facility employs approximately 500 employees and 250 full-time contractors on a 24 hr,7 day per week basis. The facility consists of four individual manufacturing plants,a boiler house and a waste treatment operation. Several processes have PSD avoidance conditions. The facility has two permanent boilers onsite,one permanent boiler which is permitted but not yet constructed, and one permitted temporary boiler. 4. INSPECTION SUMMARY: On Thursday,March 3,2016,I,Greg Reeves,of the Fayetteville Regional Office, met with Mike Johnson,Environmental Manager,for a full compliance inspection. Mr.Johnson reviewed the FacFinder sheet and noted no changes for the facility contacts. Facility records were reviewed for emissions,control device inspections,and visible emissions from the emission sources. There are extensive electronic records for the facility operations available on the local computer area network. Mr. Johnson confirmed that there have been no changes in emission sources since the previous inspection/permit modification and that the emissions sources listed on the permit had not changed. Mr.Johnson led a tour of individual plants and provided the required records. PSD records and most all other records are accessible on the facility computer LAN in Mr.Johnson's office. For the operating areas, flow rates and pressure drops in scrubbers are available in the control rooms of the respective areas. Two boilers(PS-A and PS-B)were operating,firing natural gas. The third permitted boiler(PS-C)is not yet constructed and Mr.Johnson stated that the modification would not happen in the near future. The permitted temporary boiler(PSC-Temp)is not currently on site,and was not on site during 2015. The Vinyl Ethers North product container decontamination process(ID No.NS-0),and the Vinyl Ethers South product container decontamination process(ID No.NS-P)were not operating during the inspection. All other processes were in operation during the inspection. I observed zero visible emissions from each of the operating source emission points during the inspection. 5. PERMITTED EMISSION SOURCES: At the time of the inspection, Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works was operating under Permit No. 03735T41 which includes the following emission sources: E hissioh Emiss on Source DwWri(ition Control I)evlee .Coufrol'Device Deser pt�on Si oree ID N6 ID No. ... PS-A Natural Gas/No.2 fuel oil/No. 6 fuel oil- N/A N/A Case-by-case fired boiler(139.4 million Btu per hour MACT maximum heat input) OPERATING PS-B Natural Gas/No.2 fuel oil No. 6 fuel oil- N/A N/A Case-by-case fired boiler(88.4 million Btu per hour MACT maximum heat input) OPERATING PS-C Natural Gas/No.2 fuel oil-fired boiler N/A N/A NSPS Dc (97 million Btu per hour maximum heat Case-by-case input)equipped with a low-NOx burner MACT NOT YET CONSTRUCTED Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 3 of 11 Etiiission Ess mii1on Source'Desariptioti Contras Device. rol D Contevice Description PS-Temp Natural Gas/No. 2 fuel oil-fired boiler N/A N/A (greater than 30.0 and less than 100.0 million Btu per hour maximum heat input) NOT ON SITE AT TIIIS TIME NS-A Nation Hexfluoropropylene epoxide NCD-Hdrl Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 MACT FFFF process(HFPO) kilogram/hour liquid injection rate OPERATING -or- averaged over a 3-hour period) NCD-Hdr2 Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 J1 kilogram/hour liquid injection rate averaged over a 3-hourperiod) NS-B Nafion®Vinyl Ethers North process NCD-Hdrl Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 MACT FFFF OPERATING kilogram/hour liquid injection rate -or- averaged over a 3-hour period) NCD-Hdr2 Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 kilogram/hour liquid injection rate averaged over a 3-hour period) NS-C Nafion®Vinyl Ethers South process NCD-Hdrl Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 MACT FFFF OPERATING kilogram/hour liquid injection rate -m- averaged over a 3-hour period) NCD-Hdr2 Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 j kilogram/hour liquid injection rate averaged over a 3-hour period) NS-D Nafion®RSU Process NCD-Hdrl Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 OPERATING kilogram/hour liquid injection rate -or- averaged over a 3-hour period) NCD-Hdr2 Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 j kilogram/hour liquid injection rate avera ed over a 3-hourperiod) NS-E Nafion®Liquid waste stabilization NCD-Hdrl Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 i OPERATING kilogram/hour liquid injection rate -or- averaged over a 3-hour period) NCD-Hdr2 Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 kilogram/hour liquid injection rate averaged over a 3-hour period) NS-F Nafion®MMF process NCD-Hdrl Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 OPERATING kilogram/hour liquid injection rate -or- averaged over a 3-hour period) NCD-Hdr2 Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 kilogram/hour liquid injection rate averaged over a 3-hour period) NS-G Nafion®Resins process NCD-G Venturi vacuum jet caustic scrubber MACT FFFF OPERATING NS-H Nafion®membrane process N/A N/A OPERATING I ChemoursCompany—FayettevilleWorks Compliance Inspection Report Page 4 of 11 emission TmissiunSourceDgscri(ttiop ;Control Device Cbut0)P iceDgscritthou': Suiuil+oe`ID No. ;. ! 'ID No; NS-I Nafion®membrane coating N/A N/A OPERATING NS-J Nafion®semiworks N/A N/A OPERATING NS-K Nafion®E-2 Process N/A N/A OPERATING NS-L Nafion®TFE/HC1 separation unit NCD-Hdrl Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 REMOVED FROM SERVICE kilogram/hour liquid injection rate -or- averaged over a 3-hour period) NCD-Hdr2 Baffle-plate scrubber(7,000 kilogram/hour liquid injection rate averaged over a 3-hour period) NS-M Nafion®TFE/CO2 separation process N/A N/A OPERATING NS-N HFPO product container decontamination N/A N/A process OPERATING NS-O Vinyl Ethers North product container N/A N/A decontamination process OPERATING NS-P Vinyl Ethers South product container N/A N/A decontamination process OPERATING SW-1 Semiworks polymerization operation N/A N/A OPERATING SW-2 Semiworks laboratory hood N/A N/A OPERATING AS-A Polymer Processing Aid Process ACD-AI Wet scrubber(30 gallons per minute OPERATING water injection rate averaged over a 3- hour period)(state-enforceable only) ACD-A3 Wet scrubber installed on the building exhaust vent(voluntary use only) WTS-A Extended aeration biological wastewater N/A N/A treatment facility OPERATING WTS-B, Two(2)Indirect steam-heated,rotary WTCD-1 Impingement-type wet scrubber with WTS-C sludge dryers mist eliminator(state-enforceable only) OPERATING Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 5 of 11 6. APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS: Regulations will be discussed for each of the various manufacturing processes as listed on the current air permit. *Powerhouse(Boilers PS-A,PS-B,and PS-C)* The facility is permitted to operate one Natural Gas/No. 2 fuel oil-fired boiler(139.4 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input,PS-A), one Natural Gas/No. 2 fuel oil-fired boiler(88.4 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input,PS-B),and one Natural Gas/No.2 fuel oil-fired boiler with low-NOx burner(97 mniBtu/hr maximum heat input,PS-C). The third boiler(PS-C)has not yet been constructed. According to Mr.Johnson,the construction project will not begin anytime soon. Both of the boilers are currently combusting natural gas. The larger boiler(PS-A)has a steam capacity of 113,000 pounds of steam per hour(139.4 mmBtu maximum heat input)and was manufactured in 1969. The smaller boiler(PS-B)was manufactured in 1982 with a steam capacity of 72,000 pounds per hour(88.4 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input). They are both pre-NSPS boilers;however,Boiler PS-B does have a PSD avoidance condition for NO.and S02. Boiler PS-C will be subject to NSPS Subpart Dc when constructed. All three of the boilers are now subject to the 2D .1109 Case-by-case MACT condition,in lieu of the NESHAP Subpart DDDDD Boiler MALT. Therefore,they are not currently subject to any of the requirements of the Boiler MACT. Boiler MACT requirements will become effective in 2019. Chemours has a facility-wide PSD S02 emissions limitation of 702.5 tons per consecutive 12-month period. 15A NCAC 2D.0503 PARTICULATES FROM FUEL BURNING INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS— Particulate emissions from boilers PS-A and PS-B shall not exceed 0.2667 lbs/mmBtu. Particulate emissions from PS-C shall not exceed 0.2268 lbs/mmBtu. No monitoring/recordkeeping/reporting is required. APPEARS IN COMPLLANCE—The AP-42 emissions factor for Natural Gas is 0.007 lbs/mmBtu and for No. 2 fuel oil is 0.024 lbs/mmBtu. As long as the facility only combusts these fuels,they should not exceed the emission limits. The facility is currently combusting natural gas. The last#2 fuel oil was combusted in March 2013 and July 2013 during boiler tune-ups(total of 5,635 gallons of#2 fuel oil combusted)and in June 2015 for a short test(109 gallons combusted). The#2 fuel oil used is extremely low sulfur content(< 15 ppm sulfur by weight.) 15A NCAC 2D.0516 SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION SOURCES—The sulfur dioxide emissions from boilers PS-A and PS-B shall not exceed 2.3 pounds per million Btu heat input. No monitoring/recordkeeping/reporting is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—The AP-42 emissions factor for Natural Gas is 0.001 lbs/mmBtu and for No. 2 fuel oil(with 0.5%sulfur content by weight)is 0.507 lbs/mmBtu. All No.2 fuel oil is extremely low sulfur fuel oil(< 15 ppm sulfur content by weight.)The facility should never exceed the S02 emission limit while combusting either natural gas or#2 fuel oil. 15A NCAC 2D.0521 CONTROL OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS—Visible emissions from Boiler PS-A shall not exceed 40%opacity. Visible emissions from PS-B,and PS-Temp shall not exceed 20%opacity. No monitoring/recordkeeping/reporting is required. APPEARS IN COMPLLANCE—The boilers are currently combusting natural gas and I observed 0%opacity from the boiler stacks. 15A NCAC 2D.0524 NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS—SUBPART Dc(for PS-C only)— The sulfur content of fuel combusted in the new boiler(PS-C)shall not exceed 0.5%by weight and visible emissions are limited to 20%opacity. Initial notifications are required at construction and startup. The facility must conduct Method 9 testing after boiler start-up using No. 2 fuel oil. The Permittee shall maintain records of fuel usage and fuel certifications. A semi-annual summary report is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—Boiler PS-C is not yet under construction,and there are no current plans to install this unit. The last semi-annual report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 6 of 11 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION AVOIDANCE CONDITIONS(PS-B only)—Emissions from Boiler PS-B shall not exceed the following: 40 TPY NO.,and 40 TPY SO2. The Permittee shall keep monthly records of fuel usage, fuel sulfur content,and maintain fuel certifications. A semi-annual report is required,listing monthly emissions(14 month period),fuel usage, and sulfur content. The Permittee must also list all deviations from the requirements in the report. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—All records show that the facility is well below these emissions limits. The highest 12-month total NOx emissions during 2013 were 6.8 tons and SO2 emissions were 0.0 tons. The last semi-annual report was received at FRO on O1/19/16. 15A NCAC 2D.1109 CASE-BY-CASE MACT—This stipulation includes requirements for boilers PS-A,PS- j B,and PS-C that were instituted as a result of the vacating of the Boiler MACT. Requirements include an annual inspection and tune-up of each boiler each calendar year. Records of inspections and tune-ups are required. A semi-annual report is required, starting January 30,2014. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—Inspection and tune-up of PS-A was conducted on 09/22/15 and 10/19/15,and inspection and tune-up of PS-B was conducted on 03/13/15. The last semi-annual report was received on O1/19/16. i *Nafion®Process Area(all sources labeled with NS-and NCD-)* The Nafion®operation produces a variety of relatively uncommon monomer and polymer chemicals. Some of the monomers are shipped offsite,while others are used onsite in the production of various polymers. The polymers are shipped offsite or used onsite to produce Nafion®membrane material. A principal use of the membrane is in the electrolysis cells for production of chlorine and sodium hydroxide at chloro-alkali plants. The two waste gas scrubbers located at the Nafion®process area are used to control the emissions of various pollutants including hydrogen fluoride and other acid fluorides. The Nafion®process at this facility manufactures plastic materials classified under SIC code 2821, and are therefore existing affected sources under the NESHAP"MON".The Nafion®process is subject to the Miscellaneous Organic NESHAP, Subpart FFFF. 15A NCAC 2D.0515 PARTICULATES FROM MISCELLANEOUS INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES— Particulate matter emissions from the Nafion®process shall not exceed E-4.10*P0 67. The Permittee shall maintain production records. A semi-annual summary report is required. APPEARS INCOMPLIANCE—The initial permit application indicated that compliance would be achieved based on the process description as permitted. No changes to the process have been made since that application, and therefore compliance is indicated. Production records are available at each manufacturing facility. The last semi-annual summary report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. 15A NCAC 2D.0521 CONTROL OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS—Visible emissions from the membrane coating process NS-I shall not exceed 20%opacity. No monitoring,recordkeeping,or reporting is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—During the inspection,I observed 0%VE from all emission points at the facility. 15A NCAC 2D.1506 CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS(State Enforceable Only)—The Nation process shall not operate without odor control equipment. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—Odorous emissions from the Nafion®process are controlled by two baffle- plate scrubbers NCD-Hdrl and NCD-Hdr2. The control devices also have monitoring parameters that are continually recorded and interlocked into the system. All the facility's monitoring parameters are recorded and viewable in an Aspen program. No noticeable odor was detected away from the facility,and Mr.Johnson indicated that no odor complaints had been received. Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 7 of 11 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION AVOIDANCE CONDITIONS—VOC emissions from the Vinyl Ethers North process,NS-B,shall not exceed 68.9 TPY VOC. The Permittee shall keep monthly records of VOC emissions. A semi-annual report is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—VOC emissions are calculated using stack test results,material balances,and flow rates/concentrations on a monthly basis. These records are submitted to Mike Johnson within 30 days of the following month. Records indicate that the highest 12-month VOC emissions during 2015 were 49.56 tons. The last semi-annual report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION AVOIDANCE CONDITIONS—Emissions from the resin process NS-G shall not exceed the following: 40 TPY VOC. The Permittee shall keep monthly records of VOC emissions. A semi-annual summary report is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—Records indicate that the highest 12-month VOC emissions during 2015 were 17.52 tons. The last semi-annual summary report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. I 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION AVOIDANCE CONDITIONS—Emissions from the resin process NS-A shall not exceed the following: 85.3 TPY VOC. The Permittee shall keep monthly records of VOC emissions. A semi-annual summary report is required. APPEARS INCOMPLIANCE—Records indicate that the highest 12-month VOC emissions during 2015 were 52.13 tons. The last semi-annual summary report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION AVOIDANCE CONDITIONS—Emissions from the HFPO Product Container Decontamination Process(NS-N)shall not exceed the following: 40 TPY VOC. The Permittee shall keep monthly records of VOC emissions. The Permittee shall also maintain records of dates each container is decontaminated and total mass of VOC removed i from each container. A semi-annual summary report is required. APPEARS INCOMPLIANCE—Records indicate that the highest 12-month VOC emissions during 2015 were 9.64 tons. The last semi-annual report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart FFFF: MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC NESHAP(MON)—The Nafion®process must comply with all provisions of this MALT. The MON requires 99%control efficiency for some Group 1 sources;however,DuPont determined that their sources are not subject to the stricter requirements of a control device. The Permittee shall monitor and inspect all the valves,pumps,compressors, agitators,and connectors for leaks using the instrument monitoring methods described in 40 CFR 63.1023(b)-(c). All equipment affected by the leak requirements shall be identified. The Permittee shall create and retain a record of the monitoring Ili schedule for each process unit. If a leak is identified,it shall be repaired as provided in the repair provisions of this section. After a leak has been repaired,the valve shall be monitored at least once within the first 3 months after its repair. This requirement is in addition to the monitoring required to satisfy the definition of repaired and first attempt at repair. The required periodic monitoring may be used if it satisfies the timing requirement of this condition. The Permittee shall repair each leak detected as soon as practical,but not later than 15 calendar days after it is detected. The facility operates two process heat exchangers that are subject to the MON. To monitor for presence of a leak in a heat exchanger system,requires that three samples of both the cooling water entrance to and exit from the heat exchanger be monitored for the presence of hazardous air pollutants monthly for the first six months of operation and quarterly thereafter. A semi-annual summary report II is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—The scrubbers currently controlling the Nafion®process(NCD-Hdrl and Hdr2)meet the control efficiency requirement. The scrubbers were tested at 99.6%efficiency in August 2003. Initial notification was received on 2 March 2004. However,no controls are required for this facility based on HAP content,THE values,and other various parameters. The facility has an extensive LDAR program,and inspects all the valves,pumps, compressors, agitators, and connectors for leaks on a monthly basis.Records are i I Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 8 of 11 available at the site. Each affected unit has a physical tag for equipment identification. Three samples of both the cooling entrance and exit are taken at the heat exchangers to analyze for leaks on a monthly basis. The facility also submits a semi-annual report for MACT Subpart FFFF. There were no deviations from the emission limits, operating limits,or work practice standards during 2015. The last semi-annual summary report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. Amore extensive MACT FFFF report is submitted to EPA and FRO also,which includes several items not required in the Title V permit,but are required by the MACT. The facility has a"zero leak"policy. If a leak is discovered,it is fixed ASAP, even if the process must be shut down. No delay of repair scenarios are permitted by the facility's LDAR policy. *Polymer Processing Aid(PPA)Process(all sources labeled with AS-and ACD-)* The polymer processing aid process,formerly the ammonium perfluorooctanoate(APFO)process,began operation in December of 2002. Formerly,the Polymer Processing Aid reaction process used perfluorooctanoate(brought in by truck in its iodide/salt form)reacted with sodium hydroxide(stored in totes)to form the acid fluoride. The acid fluoride is then reacted with ammonia to produce the ammonium salt. Fuming sulfuric acid(oleum)is received by truck and used as a solvent in the process. Currently,APFO and the associated perfluorooctanoic acid(PFOA),also known as C8,are not regulated as toxic or hazardous air pollutants. However,the EPA has been reviewing the chemical with the possibility of its designation in the future as a regulated pollutant. Due to historical pollution and health effects concerns and recent controversy regarding the DuPont facility in West Virginia, and the recent activities by the U.S.EPA to develop and review toxicity data for this chemical,the DAQ file includes several documents and articles related to APFO,PFOA,or C8. The APFO process is subject to the 112(r)chemical accident prevention program for oleum. DuPont has made a decision to eliminate APFO by 2015. The PPA process at the Fayetteville Works has been modified, and no longer produces AFPO. A more environmentally friendly polymer is currently being produced in the existing reactor as a replacement for APFO. 15A NCAC 2D.1806 CONTROLAND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS(State Enforceable Only)—The Polymer Processing Aid Process facility shall not operate without implementing a management plan or without odor control equipment. APPEARS INCOMPLL4NCE—The APFO process is controlled by scrubbers. No odors were noticeable during the inspection. Mr.Johnson stated that no odor complaints had been received. 15A NCAC 2D.1100 CONTROL OF TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS(State Enforceable Only)—Emissions from the APFO facility shall be controlled by a wet scrubber. The liquid flow rate in the packed bed section shall be at least 30 gallons per minute and the differential pressure across the bed shall be a maximum of 12 inches of water. An alarm is required for the pressure monitoring. Records of all inspections shall be kept in a logbook. No reporting is required. APPEARS INCOMPLL4NCE—The scrubber is interlocked so that the system will shut down,almost instantaneously,if the parameters are exceeded. The facility will go into shutdown mode if the two hour average is less than 30 gpm or pressure is 5 inches of water. The system is set up such that upon startup after an extended shutdown,the scrubber must be operated for two hours to establish the minimum 2-hour average prior to allowing the startup of the remaining equipment. The polymer processing aid chemical is a surfactant; therefore,the dP increases occasionally due to `suds' in the scrubber. The liquid flowrate during the inspection was 37.9 gpm,and the pressure drop across the scrubber bed was 0.1"H2O. The last internal inspection of the scrubber was performed on 10/12/14. Inspections are on a two-year interval. I Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 9 of 11 *Wastewater Treatment Area fall sources labeled with WTS-and WTCD-)* For the wastewater treatment operations,the Title V permit specifies two rotary sludge dryers controlled by an impingement-type wet scrubber with mist eliminator. The Miscellaneous Organic NESHAP(MON)will also address emissions from wastewater. With respect to quantity of emissions,methanol is the most significant air pollutant from the wastewater treatment operation. 15A NCAC 2D.1806 CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS—The wastewater treatment facility shall not operate without a management plan or odor control equipment. An objectionable odor shall not be detected from these sources. The sludge dryers shall be controlled by a caustic injection scrubber. An I&M logbook is also required for the scrubber. No reporting is required. APPEARS INCOMPLIANCE—Odorous emissions from the sludge dryers are controlled by a scrubber utilizing potassium hydroxide solution. Inspections of this scrubber are on a 5-year cycle. Wastewater treatment odors were not noted at boundary lines. The sludge dryers are located inside a building. The facility keeps maintenance records for the scrubber in their electronic maintenance program. The most recent 5-year inspection was 11/01/11. *Temporary Boiler(PS-Temp)* This boiler is permitted for Natural Gas/No.2 fuel oil and is brought on-site on an `as needed' basis. There is currently no temporary boiler on site. The temporary boiler was last on site during the period 11/19/12 through 01/09/13 and utilized natural gas for fuel. 15A NCAC 2D.0503 PARTICULATES FROM FUEL BURNING INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS— Particulate emissions from the temporary boiler shall not exceed 0.2426 lbs/mmBtu. No monitoring/recordkeeping/reporting is required. APPEARS INCOMPLIANCE—The AP-42 emissions factor for Natural Gas is 0.007 lbs/mmBtu and for No. 2 fuel oil is 0.0241bsflnmBTU. This boiler was not on site during this inspection. 15A NCAC 2D.0516 SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION SOURCES—Sulfur Dioxide emissions from the temporary boiler shall not exceed 2.3 lb/mmBtu heat input. No monitoring/recordkeeping/reporting is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—The AP-42 emission factor for Natural Gas is 0.001 lb/mmBtu and for No.2 fuel oil burning extremely low sulfur content oil(<15 ppm Sulfur by weight)is 0.0021b/mmBtu. Therefore, the source will not exceed the limits while combusting either of these permitted fuels. 15A NCAC 2D.0521 CONTROL OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS—Visible emissions shall be no more than 20% opacity. No monitoring/recordkeeping/reporting is required. APPEARS INCOMPLIANCE—The source was not on site during the inspection. While combusting either natural gas or#2 fuel oil,it is expected that there will be no visible emissions from this source(VE=0% opacity). 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 AVOIDANCE OF 15A NCAC 2D.0524 NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS(NSPS Subpart Dc)—In order to avoid the applicability of NSPS Subpart Dc,the temporary boiler shall combust natural gas or distillate oil with potential Sulfur Dioxide emissions rate no greater than 0.060 lb/mmBtu,be capable of being moved from one location to another,and remain onsite for no longer than 180 consecutive days as defined in 40 CFR 60.41c(temporary boiler). Notification is required if the 180 days will be exceeded. Recordkeeping and a semi-annual summary report are required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—The temporary boiler was not on site during the inspection,and had not been on site during 2015. The last semi-annual report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 10 of 11 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 AVOIDANCE OF 15A NCAC 2D.0530 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION—The temporary boiler PS-Temp shall discharge into the atmosphere less than 40 tons of S02 per consecutive 12-month period. Monthly records of fuel usage are required. Monthly calculation of S02 emissions and rolling 12-month S02 emissions are required. A semi-annual report is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—The boiler was note onsite during 2015. The last semi-annual report was received at FRO on 01/19/2016. 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 AVOIDANCE OF 15A NCAC 2D.1109 CASE-BY-CASE MACT FOR BOILERS AND PROCESS HEATERS AND OF 40 CFR 63 SUBPART DDDDD MACT FOR BOILERS AND PROCESS HEATERS—The temporary boiler shall remain onsite for no longer than 180 consecutive days. APPEARS 17V COMPLIANCE—The boiler was not onsite during 2015. *Multiple Emission Source(s)Specific Limitations and Conditions* *Boilers* 15A NCAC 2Q.0317 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION AVOIDANCE CONDITIONS—Emissions from the boilers(PS-A,PS-B,PS-C,and PS-Temp)shall not exceed 702.5 tons of S02 per consecutive 12-month period. Records must be maintained for the quantities of fuels used monthly. Fuel supplier certification must be maintained for fuel oil shipments. A semi-annual report is required. APPEARS INCOMPLIANCE—The highest 12-month rolling total S02 emissions during 2014 from the 4 boilers was 0.2 tons. Current fuel is natural gas. Fuel oil certifications are available in the company records on site. #2 fuel oil used is ultra-low sulfur content(< 15 ppm sulfur by weight.) The last semi- j annual report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. *Facility-Wide* 15A NCAC 2D.1100 CONTROL OF TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS(State Enforceable Only)—The Pemrittee shall maintain records of production rates,throughputs,material usage,excess emissions,and control equipment failures. A quarterly summary report is required APPEARS INCOMPLIANCE—Production rates,material usages, emissions,and equipment failure records are available on the company electronic data system. TAP reports are submitted quarterly and show emissions well below the 2D .I100 limits. The last quarterly report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. 15A NCAC 2D.1100 CONTROL OF TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS(State Enforceable Only)—The Permince shall emit less than the limits listed in the permit for HF from high dispersion stacks and from all other sources. The Permittee shall also report quarterly all TPER exceedances,the maximum 1-hour emission rate and the maximum 24-hour emissions rate. The liquid flow rate in the Nafion®scrubbers (NCD-Hdr-I and NCD-Hdr-2)shall be a minimum 7,000 kg/hr. The Permittee shall maintain a logbook of all inspection and maintenance activities on the applicable scrubber. A quarterly report is required. APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—The liquid flow rates during the inspection were 14,661 kg/hr for Hdr-1 and 17,936 kg/hr for Hdr-2. The scrubber utilizes a potassium hydroxide solution in the scrubber and is interlocked to shut the systems down at 7,000 kg/hr and to alarm at 9,000 kg/hr. The electronic I&M logbook appeared to be complete. TAP reports are submitted quarterly and show emissions well below the 2D .1100 limits. Hdr-1 and Hdr-2 are inspected every 4 years. The last inspection of Hdr-1 was performed on 05/23/11 and the last inspection of Hdr-2 was performed on 08/25/11. The last quarterly report was received at FRO on 01/19/16. Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works Compliance Inspection Report Page 11 of 11 15A NCAC 2D.0541 CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM ABRASIVE BLASTING—Abrasive blasting shall take place inside a building unless the item exceeds eight feet in length or is permanently situated at an outside location. Fugitive emissions shall not migrate beyond the property boundaries. APPEARS IN COMPLL4NCE—The facility now has an abrasive blasting building in which the sand blasting occurs. Outside blasting of tanks and equipment is accomplished using shrouds to contain the blasting materials. 40 CFR Part 68 CHEMICAL ACCIDENT PREVENTION AND Clean Air Act,Section 112(r): The Nafion process is subject to 112(r)for sulfur trioxide. The TFE process is subject to 112(r)for Tetrafluoroethylene. The PVF process is subject to 112(r)for Vinyl Fluoride. APPEARS IN COMPLL4NCE- The facility submitted the written Risk Management Plan to the U.S. EPA in June 1999. In addition,the facility is subject to the OSHA Process Safety Management(PSM) I Standard. The latest update of the RMP was submitted by the facility to EPA on 06/09/15. The last full 112(r)compliance inspection was conducted by Mike Thomas, Greg Reeves,and Mike Reid of DAQ and Thomas Steelman of the Division of Emergency Management(DEM)on 03/05/15. The facility appeared to be in compliance during that inspection. The facility has the following processes subject to 112(r): TFE Process 1 TFE(Tetrafluoroethylene) 59,400 Nation®Process 3 Sulfur Trioxide 61,000 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION [15A NCAC 2Q.0509(n)]: The facility is required to submit an { annual compliance certification to DAQ and EPA by March 1 of each year for the previous calendar year. i APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE—The 2015 compliance certification was received at FRO on 02/18/16. 7. NON-COMPLIANCE HISTORY SINCE 2010: There have been no non-compliance instances at this facility since 2010. 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the observations made during the 03/03/16 inspection,Chemours Company—Fayetteville Works APPEARS IN COMPLIANCE with the requirements outlined in their current air permit,03735T41. PINK SHEET: N/A GWR