Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_0400058_20191210_CMPL_InspRpt NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF Fayetteville Regional Office AIR QUALITY Laserwood,LLC NC Facility ID 6200079 Inspection Report County/FIPS: Montgomery/123 Date: 12/11/2019 Facility Data Permit Data Laserwood,LLC Permit 09751 /R02 402 Capel Street Issued 4/11/2017 Biscoe,NC 27209 Expires 3/31/2025 Lat: 35d 21.3158m Long: 79d 46.9322m Class/Status Small SIC: 2421 /Sawmills&Planing Mills General Permit Status Active NAICS: 321113 /Sawmills Current Permit Application(s)None Contact Data Program Applicability Facility Contact Authorized Contact Technical Contact SIP Chris Evans Jay Jordan Gilbert Shaw Plant Manager Facility Manager Plant Manager (704)244-5920 (910)439-6121 (910)220-5632 �p�_� Compliance Data Comments: Inspection Date 12/09/2019 Inspector's Name Jeffrey Nelson Inspector's Signature: li 2 _ Operating Status Operating Compliance Code Compliance-inspection Action Code FCE Date of Signature: 4 Z I .so f )0)1 On-Site Inspection Result Compliance Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR: TSP S02 NOX VOC CO PM10 * HAP L 4.35 --- --- --- --- 2.09 --- 2.41 --- --- --- --- 1.22 --- Highest HAP Emitted(in pounds) iolation History:None Date Letter Type Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date Performed Stack Tests since last FCE:None Date Test Results Test Method(s) Source(s)Tested I. LOCATION/DIRECTIONS Laserwood,LLC is located at 402 Capel Street in Biscoe,Montgomery County,NC. In Biscoe,NC Capel Street is approximately 0.5-mile south on HWY 220 Business from the intersection of HWY 220 Business and NC 24 27. Laserwood is immediately on the right after making the turn. Enter the building through the large warehouse door. II. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS Standard DAQ safety gear. Be aware of sawing operations and trucks traffic outside. III. FACILITY AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION Laserwood,LLC manufactures fence panels and components, and pallet components(they do not assemble pallets at this location). Wood wastes from the saws,molder, and wood hog in the fencing operation are controlled by a cyclone in series with a baghouse. Collected waste from the baghouse is conveyed to the trailer loadout bin by a closed-loop cyclone system that does not discharge to atmosphere. This closed-loop system is not listed as an emission source on the permit, but has been included on the insignificant/exempt activities listing. There are no combustion sources at the facility. IV. PERMITTED SOURCES MI . 05TIJEW'M 9.11,01 v �� Block chopping operation, includes a saw CD-CYC-1 Cyclone,26 inch diameterin series with ES-CHOP and a wood hog In series with Operating with 0%opacity CD-BAGHSE Baghouse (4,892 square feet filter area) Wood chip and dust storage bin and trailer ES-TRUCK LOAD load out N/A N/A Not operating INSIGNIFICANT/EXEMPT SOURCES ni � r fv a D"M MI IES- RECIR SYS Wood dust transport system, closed j 2Q .0102 (h)(5) No Yes loop transfer V. INSPECTION CONFERENCE On 9 December 2019,I Jeff Nelson and Stephen Allen of FRO DAQ,met with Chris Evans (Plant Manager)to conduct the facility's annual compliance inspection. We discussed the following: a) Verified the FACFINDER information. Mr. Chris Evans is the new facility contact. I have updated contact information in IBEAM. b) Mr. Evans provided me with a printout of the facility's inspection and maintenance records for the control devices. The facility conducts monthly inspections that meet the requirements of the annual inspection. The last monthly inspection was completed on 19 November 2019. K&M conducts annual inspections and replaces the bags for the facility.The bags were last changed on 17 April 2019. b) Production 2018 3-4 truckloads/week 2017 3-4 truckloads/week 2016 4-5 truckloads/week 2015 4-5 truckloads/week 2014 4-5 truckloads/week 2013 6 truckloads/week VI. INSPECTION TOUR Mr. Angel Martinez, Maintenance Manager, escorted us on a tour of the facility which was operating during the inspection. The woodworking operation(ES-Chop)was operating and appeared to be well maintained. There was a slight accumulation of sawdust around the sawing operation,but Mr. Martinez stated that area is cleaned daily. All of the ductwork appeared to be well maintained and operating without any leaks or issues. We then viewed the cyclones,baghouse,and truck loadout areas.The facility currently produces—3-4 truckloads of woodwaste per week. VII. PERMIT STIPULATIONS a) A2 2Q .0304 EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT—The facility shall submit a permit renewal request and a completed air emissions inventory at least 90 days prior to permit expiration APPEARED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE—The facility's current permit expires on 31 March 2025. The facility has a deadline for submission of the emissions inventory by 31 December 2024 for CY 2023. b) A3 2D .0512 PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT-Provision of adequate ductwork for the collection and control of particulate matter in the working, sanding, or finishing of wood. APPEARED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE -Adequate ductwork is being used to collect refuse dust, and all woodworking activities appeared to have adequate control. There was slight sawdust accumulation around the block chopping operation and that is cleaned daily. Overall,the facility was clean and appeared to be well maintained. c) A4 2D .0521 VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL-Visible emissions from the emission sources, manufactured after July 1, 1971, shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six- minute period. APPEARED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE—The facility was operating during the inspection and I did not observe any visible emissions from any sources. d) A5 2D .0535 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT- The facility is required to notify DAQ if excess emissions occur for more than a 4-hour period caused by a breakdown or other abnormal condition. APPEARED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE — Mr. Shaw stated the facility has had no exceedances, breakdowns,or abnormal conditions requiring notification. e) A6 2D .0540 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT—The Permittee shall not cause or allow fugitive dust emissions to cause or contribute to substantive complaints or excess visible emissions beyond the property boundary. APPEARED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE - I did not observe any fugitive dust beyond the property boundary. Mr. Shaw stated the facility has not received any dust complaints. No complaints have been received by FRO. 1) A7 2D .0611 BAGFILTER REQUIREMENTS—Particulate matter shall be controlled by the permitted equipment list. The Permittee shall perform, at a minimum, an annual internal inspection of each particulate collection device system. In addition,the Permittee shall perform periodic inspections and maintenance as recommended by the equipment manufacturer.Records of all maintenance activities shall be recorded in the logbook. The logbook shall be kept on-site and made available to DAQ personnel upon request. APPEARED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE—Facility staff conduct monthly inspections of the baghouse and record maintenance in an electronic log. The last monthly inspection was completed on 19 November 2019. Mr.Evans also performs weekly thorough walk-around inspections.Any repairs or maintenance issues are noted in the electronic log. g) A8 2D .0611 CYCLONE REQUIREMENTS—Particulate matter shall be controlled by the permitted equipment list. The Permittee shall perform, at a minimum, an annual internal inspection of each particulate collection device system. In addition,the Permittee shall perform periodic inspections and maintenance as recommended by the equipment manufacturer. Records of all maintenance activities shall be recorded in the logbook. The logbook shall be kept on-site and made available to DAQ personnel upon request. APPEARED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE—I observed maintenance records reflecting monthly inspections as well as an annual inspection.The monthly inspections meet the requirements of the annual inspection. The last monthly inspection was completed on 19 November 2019. Mr. Evans also performs weekly thorough walk-around inspections. Any repairs or maintenance issues are noted in the electronic log. h) A9 2D .1806 CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS—The facility shall prevent odorous emissions from causing or contributing to objectionable odors beyond the property boundaries. APPEARED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE—I did not observe any objectionable odors outside of the facility. Mr. Evans stated the facility has not received any odor complaints.No complaints have been received by FRO. VIII. 112R STATUS The facility does not store any of the listed 112(r) chemicals in amounts that exceed the threshold quantities. Therefore, the facility is not required to maintain a written Risk Management Plan (RMP). IX.NON-COMPLIANCE HISTORY SINCE 2010 None. X. COMMENTS AND COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Laserwood,LLC appeared to be IN COMPLIANCE with their current air permit during the compliance inspection on 9 December 2019. Pink Sheet:None /j In