Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_0100010_20210330_ST_ProtRvw �t c STATE ROY COOPER , Governor 6 1 Z DIONNEDELLFGATTI Secretary $ ° MICHAEL ABRACZINSKAS NORTH CAROLINA Director Environmental Quality March 30, 2021 Mr.Kirk Yarbrough,Facility Manager Stericycle,Inc. P.O. Box 310 Haw River,NC 27258-0310 Subject: Stericycle,Inc. Haw River,Alamance County,North Carolina Facility ID 0100010,Air Permit No. 05896T25 Emissions Compliance Testing of Two Dual Chamber Hospital,Medical,and Infectious Waste Incinerator Emission Sources ID No. ES01 and ES02 Proposed Test Dates: Week of April 5, 2021,To be performed by TRC Environmental Tracking No. 2021-078ST Dear Mr. Yarbrough: The emissions test protocol for the two subject sources has been reviewed. Incinerators ESO1 and ES02 each controlled respectively in series by: selective non-catalytic reduction(SNCR) system with ammonia or urea injection ID No. CD07 and CDO8,packed bed scrubber and associated quench column ID No. CDO1 and CD02,with venturi scrubber ID No. CD03 and CD04, and sulfur impregnated carbon bed ID No. CD05 and CD06. Incinerators ES01 and ES02 are subject to 15A NCAC 2D .1206 Hospital,Medical and Infectious Waste Incinerators; 15A NCAC 2D A 100 Control of Toxic Air Pollutants;40 CFR 60 Subpart Ce Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Incinerators; 40 CFR 60 Subpart Ec Standards of Performance for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Incinerators for Which Construction is Commenced After June 20, 1996; and 40 CFR 62 Subpart HHH Federal Plan Requirements for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Incinerators Constructed on or Before June 20, 1996. The following table lists the pollutants and acceptable test methods for each incinerator to be tested. Incinerator ES01 and ES02-Pollutants and Test Methods Source To Be Tested Target/Pollutant EPA Method Rum Time Notes Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide 3A 3 runs,60-120 minutes Concurrent with each 5/29 and 26A ES01 Filterable Particulate, 3 runs, 120 minutes and Cadmium(Cd),Lead(Pb), 5/29 each ES02 Mercury(Hg) Visible Emissions 9 13 runs,60 minutes each Hydrogen Chloride(HCl) 26A 13 runs,60 minutes each The tester must verify the absence of cyclonic flow as described in Section 11.4 of EPA Method 1. TRC shall perform a pre-test analysis of the filter blank, following the procedure in EPA Method 29 section 7.2.1. Stericycle must submit to the Division of Air Quality(DAQ)the pretest filter blank analysis values for each target metal prior to testing. DAQ will not allow any correction to the test results above the maximum blank correction as specified in EPA Method 29. TRC will also prepare duplicate Method 29 field blanks for potential analyses by DAQ. D Q �� North Carolina Department of Environmental.Quality I Division of Air Quality 217 West Jones Street 11641 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1641 NORTH OAAOHNF oboe m of Efl'k mea l4wiiry 919.707.8400 Mr.Kirk Yarbrough-Facility Manager March 30,2021 Page 2 (Stericycle,Inc. -Incinerator ESO1 and ES02 -April 2021 Emissions Compliance Testing) Please note that an audit sample to be analyzed along with the samples collected for the EPA Methods 26A and 29 testing are recommended but not required. The US EPA does not currently list on their web site 2 commercially available SSAS audit sample providers. Therefore,the requirement to analyze SSAS audits when performing compliance testing is not in effect at this time. For additional information please see EPA web page http://www.epa.gov/emc/emc-technical-support. Please note that the detection limits for some of the proposed methods are based on actual source parameters. No estimated detection limits are listed in the protocol. Therefore,the responsibility will remain with Stericycle and the tester to ensure that the minimum method detection limits will be low enough to demonstrate compliance with the applicable emissions limits. The result cannot be reported as zero. The result must be reported as less than the method detection limit determined from the test. Permit condition 2.1.A.La,limits the total combined emissions from both incinerators. Thus, Stericycle has proposed to test both units for comparison with the condition 2.1.A.1.a toxic emission limits. The test protocol is approved as represented in the table. Stericycle shall be responsible for ensuring, within the limits of practicality,that each subject incinerator being tested is operated at or near the maximum normal waste charge rate(i.e., at or above approximately 90%of the maximum). The maximum normal waste charge rate for each incinerator is 1,870 pounds per hour. Thus,the proposed test period waste charge rate of 1,710 pounds per hour is acceptable. The final report must include the applicable test period monitored parameters data(i.e.,incinerator hourly waste charge rate and secondary chamber temperature)and the control system parameters data(i.e., flue gas temperature, secondary chamber temperature,NOX reagent injection rate,pressure drop across scrubbers, scrubber liquor flow rates, scrubber pH and the bypass stack position). The parametric data shall be based on a 3-hour rolling average calculated each hour as the average of the previous 3 operating hours. Approval of the proposed methods does not exempt the tester,in any way, from the minimum requirements of the applicable test methods. Any deviations from the applicable methodologies not specifically addressed in this letter remains subject to the approval of the Division of Air Quality. If there are questions concerning this matter,please contact me at(919) 707-8415 or gregg.onealgncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Thomas G. O`Neal, 111,P.E.,Environmental Engineer Division of Air Quality,NCDEQ cc: Derek Brewster,TRC Environmental-Raleigh,NC Ray Stewart,P.E.,Winston-Salem Regional Office Central Files,Alamance County IBEAM Documents -0100010