Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_0800107_20121005_CMPL_InspRpt NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF Washington Regional Office AIR QUALITY W.E. Partners II,ILLC NC Facility ID 0800107 Inspection Report County/FIPS: Bertie/015 Date: 10/05/2012 Facility Data Compliance Data = s W.E. Partners II,LLC Inspection Date 09/27/2012 3539 Governors Road Inspector's Name Yongcheng Chen Lewiston Woodville,NC 27849 Operating Status Operating Lat: 36d 8.3832m Long: 77d 13.4331m Compliance Code Compliance - inspection SIC: 4961 /Steam Supply Action Code FCE NAICS: 22133/Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply On-Site Inspection Result Compliance I Contact Data Permit Data Facility Contact Authorized Contact Technical Contact Permit ]0126/ RO 1 i Garald Cottrell Garald Cottrell Garald Cottrell Issued 11/28/2011 President& General President& General President&General Expires 11/30/2015 Manager Manager Manager Classification Synthetic Minor (360)750-3583 (360) 750-3583 (360) 750-3583 Permit Status Active ! Inspector's Signature: Cthe inspection.omments: The facility appeared in compliance \�ith all !ro� the conditions and regulations in the permit at the time of Date of Signature:. 7/I,✓ Directions: Driving directions to 3539 Governors Rd,Lewiston Woodville, NC 27849 Washington Square Mall 719 West 15th Street Washington,NC 27889 1.Head northwest on W 15th St toward Minuteman Ln 0.3 mi 2. Slight right onto U.S. 17 Business S 0.6 mi 3.Turn right onto US-17 N 17.7 mi 4.Continue onto US-17 BUS N 2.7 mi 5.Continue onto N Carolina 125 N/N Haughton St Continue to follow N Carolina 125 N 12.5 mi 6.Continue onto NC-903 N/N Front St Continue to follow NC-903 N 1 f � 3.8 mi 7.'Turn right onto N Carolina 11 N/N Carolina 42 E 10.4 mi 8.Turn left onto N Carolina 308 W/W Church St Continue to follow N Carolina 308 W Destination will be on the left 2.9 mi 3539 Governors Rd Lewiston Woodville,NC 27849 a it Scotland Neck t: Windsor Y�fa Plymouth Wil r ston 7D I`33 1 Greenville I43 Washington rvmzeNine i� 2 General Facility Summary W.E. Partners II, LLC is a subsidiary of Wellons Energy Solutions, LLC. It is a biomass cogeneration facility. It supplies steam to the Perdue plant(DAQ Facility ID: 0800081). The boilers began operation on June 1, 2012. Permit History • Permit ROO was issued on December 29, 2010 for a greenfield facility(three boilers with multi-clones/ESP and the fuel bunker). • Permit RO1 was issued on Nov. 28, 2011 for addition of green wood, cotton gin residue, soybean and peanut crop residuals as fuels. Safety Concerns • Hard hat, safety glasses, ear plugs, and steel-toe shoes are required. • Be aware of trip hazards. • Much of the equipment is hot, so do not touch anything. • Be careful around the fuel bunker. There are unloading activities and truck traffic. F Permitted Sources/Inspection Observations On 9/27/2012, I, Yongcheng Chen conducted the annual inspection of the facility. Garald Cottrell (president)and Ron Mark(boiler operator)assisted me during the inspection. All of the sources were in operation and were inspected. The following sources are included on the current permit(No. 10126ROI): Emission Emission Source Control Control System Source ID Description D IDCe Description i ESB-1 one biomass-fired boiler(green MC-1 ;multi-cyclone (NSPS, wood, cotton gin residue, soybean (18 tubes,each 9 inches in NESHAP) and peanut crop residuals,29.4 diameter) million Btu per hour maximum heat , ESl 1 electrostatic precipitator input);the biomass fuel is not (9,222 sq ft total collection plate't considered a CISWI solid waste area, two fields with 60 kv charge per field) ESB-2 one biomass-fired boiler(green MC-2 multi-cyclone (NSPS, wood, cotton gin residue, soybean (18 tubes,each 9 inches in NESHAP) and peanut crop residuals,29.4 diameter) million Btu per hour maximum heat i input);the biomass fuel is not ESP-1 electrostatic precipitator considered a CISWI "solid waste" (9,222 sq ft total collection plate area, two fields with 60 kv .charge per field) 3 Emission Emission Source Control Control System Device Source II) Description ID 3 Description ESB-3 one biomass-fired boiler(green MC-3 multi-cyclone (NSPS, wood, cotton gin residue,soybean (18 tubes,each 9 inches in NESHAP) and peanut crop residuals,29.4 diameter) million Btu per hour maximum heat ESP-1 jelectrostatic precipitator input);the biomass fuel is not (9,222 sq ft total collection plate considered a CISWI "solid waste" area, two fields with 60 kv charge per field) 513-1 green wood fuel storage bunker N/A _ N/A The boilers were in operation when I was there. I observed the visible emissions from the boiler stacks with 0% - 5%. The total steam produced during the inspection was 47.40 KPPH. Stack testing data: Boiler 1: 40.050 KKPH; Boiler 2: 40.081 KKPH; Boiler 3: 40.038 KKPH. Compliance indicated. The fuel bunker has large augers and moving floor grates that carry the wood chip under the floor to the boiler room. There were no visible emissions from the bunker. Regulatory Review and Record keeping/R.eporting 2D.0504 "Particulates from Wood Burning Indirect Heat Exchangers" DAQ is treating the residuals as wood under this rule. The allowable emissions of particulate(PM)from the boilers are calculated by the equation E = 1.1698 Q-02230 Where E=allowable emission limit for particulate matter in lb/million Btu Q= Maximum heat input in million Btu/hour. The total of maximum heat inputs of all wood burning indirect heat exchangers at the facility must be used to determine the allowable emission limit for each boiler. Therefore,a total of 58.8 MMBtu/hour is applied to calculate each limit. Each boiler has a limit of 0.47 lb particulate/MMBtu. W.E. Partners provided an emission factor of 0.38 Ib/MMBtu for biomass in their initial application. Because the emission factor is vendor supplied and the facility has a synthetic minor limit,the permit contains a PM testing condition. The test was done and the report was received by WaRO on July 17, 2012 and the review was finished by RCO on May 21,2012. The testing result is 0.0079 lb/mm Btu. The facility is in compliance with 213.0504. 2D.0515 "PARTICULATES FROMMISCELLANEOUS INDUSTRL4L PROCESSES" This rule applies to the fuel bunker. The initial permit application stated that the maximum fill rate for the bunker is 100 tons/hour. The unloading rate is 8 tons/hour. The equation to calculate the emission limit for filling is E=55.0(P)0-11-40 4 o.b� The equation to calculate the unloading emission limit is E=4.10(P) . E=the maximum allowable emission rate for particulate matter in lbs/hour(calculated to three significant figures for process rates greater than 30 tons/hour) P=the process rate in tons/hour The filling emission limit is 51.277 lbs/hour. The unloading emission limit is 16.514 Ibs/hour. The closest emission factor for the bunker is one for aggregate handling and storage piles in AP-42 Section 13.2.4. The particulate factor has to be calculated using moisture content and silt(fines)content. The aggregate factor that Weyerhaeuser New Bern(facility ID No. 2500104) uses for its green wood chip truck unloading and chip handling seems to be the best factor for the bunker emission. Filling 100 tons/hour(8.5E-4 lbs/ton)= 0.09 Ibs/hour Unloading 8 tons/hour(8.5E-4 lbs/ton)=0.01 lbs/hour The facility is in compliance with 213.0515. 2D.0516 "SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION SOURCES" Sulfur dioxide emissions from fuel combustion may not exceed 2.3 lbs/MMBtu heat input. This rule does not apply if there is a limit provided in NSPS for the source. NSPS Dc applies to the boilers. However, Subpart Dc provides no sulfur dioxide limit for wood or crop residual combustion. This means that t>. 213.0516 is the more restrictive rule and applies to the facility. } Wood is low in sulfur. The permittee analyzed the crop residuals for sulfur content. Sulfur is well under 0.5% by weight. The boilers are in compliance with 213.0516. 2D.0521 "CONTROL OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS" This rule states that the 20%opacity limit does not apply if an affected source has an applicable NSPS limitation. NSPS Dc applies to the boilers. However,there is no NSPS opacity limit for the boilers because their sizes are less than 30 MMBtu/hour. Therefore,the limit under 2D.0521 applies(it becomes the more restrictive limit). The boilers and the fuel bunker must meet a limit of 20%when averaged over a six-minute period. One exceedance in an hour is acceptable(if less than 87%),up to four times in a 24-hour period. Visible emissions during the inspection were 0% - 5%. The facility is in compliance with 2D.0521. 2D.0524 "NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS,"40CFR 60,SUBPART DC Subpart Dc applies to any steam generating unit constructed after June 9, 1989 and that has a maximum design heat input capacity less than 100 MMBtu/hr and greater than 10 MMBtu/hr. The regulated pollutants are SO2 and PM. However,there are no SOZ or PM emissions limitations provided for these boilers. 60.43c(c)exempts boilers under 30 MMBtu/hr from opacity requirements. 60.43c(e)(1)exempts boilers under 30 MMBtu/hr from particulate limits. NSPS is essentially hollowed out for the boilers at this facility. Permit Specific Condition No. 6.a. requires the facility to record the amount of fuel combusted daily. 1 checked the record. 5 As required by permit Specific Condition No. 6.b.,W.E. Partners II submitted their notice of construction on 3/25/2011. The notice of startup was submitted on 1/18/2012. The facility is in compliance with 2D.0524. 2D.0535 "I XCESSIVE EMISSIONS REPORTING AND MALFUNCTIONS" NSPS Subpart A has general requirements for excess emissions recordkeeping for the NSPS Dc boilers. However, 2D.0535 provides requirements for reporting. The permit condition requires the facility to report excessive emissions that require more than four hours to repair. Any excess emissions that do not occur during start-up or shut-down are considered a violation of the applicable standard unless the facility demonstrates to the Director that the excess emissions are the result of a malfunction. The facility just began operation. It is in compliance with 2D.0535. 2D.0540 "PARTICULATES FROM FUGITIVE DUST EMISSION SOURCES" This rule requires the facility to prevent fugitive dust emissions from causing or contributing to substantive complaints or excess visible emissions beyond the property boundary. Some fugitive dust may be generated when loading and unloading the crop residuals on-site. None were observed on the property during the inspection. The facility is in compliance with 2D.0540. 2D.1806- "CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS" This rule requires the facility to prevent objectionable odors from the facility from moving off of the property. I do not expect the wood and crop residuals to produce a strong odor while in storage or when combusted. 'There was a strange smell(like sulfur)on-site when we first arrived at the facility,but we suspect it came from Perdue. The smell dissipated soon after arrival. W.E. Partners is in compliance with 2 D.1806. 2D.2609 "PARTICULATE TESTING METHODS" This rule states that particulate testing must be conducted using Methods 5 and 202. Permit Specific Condition No. 9 was crafted so that the results could be compared to 2D.0504 and applied as a factor for synthetic minor emissions reporting. There are not many boilers burning crop residuals. The test report was received by WaRO on July 17, 2012(2012-176st)and the review was finished by RCO on May 21, 2012(#2011-226st). 2Q Q.0315 "SYNTIIETIC MINOR FACILITIES" The uncontrolled potential facility wide PM10 emission is greater than 100 tons per year. W.E. Partners calculates the maximum actual emission at 88.32 tons/year,assuming 8760 hours of operation. The company wishes to limit their PM10 emissions to less than 100 tons/year;therefore,the facility size is synthetic minor. 6 Permit Condition 14. requires the company to submit an annual report that includes the monthly amount of each fuel combusted,the total annual amount of each fuel combusted and the associated emissions of PM10. The report is due on January 300'every year. Conditions 10 and 11. also has I&M requirements for annual internal inspection and monthly external inspections on the multi-cyclones and ESP. The facility must keep a logbook of inspection and maintenance activities. I checked their record(a copy is attached to this report)and compliance indicated. The facility just started up,so it is in compliance with 2Q. 0315 and Specific Conditions Nos. 10/1 1. MULTI-CYCLONE REQUIREMENTS(Condition No. 10). As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0611,particulate matter emissions shall be controlled as described in the permitted equipment list. Records checked and compliance indicated. ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR REQUIREMENTS (Condition No. 11). As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0611,particulate matter emissions shall be controlled as described in the permitted equipment list. Records checked and compliance indicated. LIMITATION TO A VOID 15A NCAC 2D.0530 "PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION' In accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0317,to comply with this permit and avoid the applicability of 15A NCAC 2D .0530 "Prevention of Significant Deterioration," as requested by the Permittee,facility-wide PM and PMto emissions shall be less than 250 tons per consecutive 12-month period. The facility just started up, so it is in compliance with this stipulation.. TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS LIMITATIONAND REPORTING REQUIREMENT Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2D .1100 "Control of Toxic Air Pollutants".Compliance indicated by modeling using NCASI factors. GENERALLYAVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY For the three biomass-fired boilers(ID Nos. ESBA,ESB-2 and ESB-3)the Permittee shall comply with all applicable provisions, including the notification,testing, and monitoring requirements contained in Environmental Management Commission Standard 15A NCAC 2D .1111, as promulgated in 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJJ, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers", including Subpart A "General Provisions." I checked every line of the conditions in the permit and they company followed exactly these condition. DAQ confirmed by letter(dated 3/16/2011)that the boilers are considered existing sources under the MACT rule. W.E. Partners will have to perform a one-time energy assessment by 3/21/2014(37 months 7 after the performance test). The company will also have to perform biennial tune-ups beginning 3/21/2012 and they did on May 10 and.June 19,2012. A sample data information is as follows: Initial Results Prior to Tuning Tuning Trials on "A" Boiler, Lewiston, NC Using New recipe called Recipe 75 Trial 1 Change: Baseline testing. 10:55 Comments: Appears that we will need to reduce top overfire with the new 4"air line to the metering screw `. HZ Trim Results Firing Rate 70.9% 32.9 0 CO2 8.7% Top Overtire (mz 42.0°/4 Excess Air 73% Overfire 42.4% -1 CO 920-1100 UnderFire 34.1% 0 02 9.30% 02 computer 8.7% 1 D setti ng -0.5 Results After to Tuning Tuning Trials on "A" Boiler, Lewiston,NC Using New recipe called Recipe 75 Trial 1 Change. Baseline testing 4:42 Comment EXCELLENT results % HZ Trim Results Firing Rate 69.7% 32.5 0 CO2 10.7% Metering screw 1 100.0% Excess Air 43% Top Overfire (mi 40.01/o CO 150-165 Overtire 42.9% 0 02 6.60°/Q UnderFire 33.7% 0 02 computer 5.9% 1 D setti ng -0.5 Compliance History and Conclusion There have been no compliance issues for this facility. The facility was in compliance with all the conditions in the permit at the time of the inspection. 8 /�,, Operator: Oe�ek /Ken Date 6113119 700 Urs 1300 Hrs 1900 Hrs 0100 Hrs Blr A Blr B Blr C Blr A Btr B Blr C Blr A Blr B Blr C Blr A Blr B Blr C Electric Meter Readin #1 Electric Meter Readin #2 --�' Rain Gauge in. (!f more 11=1.5",w.plae Bio Ration Repo") r Steam Flow KPPH 314. 1 S 5-1/1 5-1 -7 2• (z D. Steam Pressure Header a5 311 2 315 4W AN Steam Pressure Line 130 131 I AV& /3(" Firing Rate 3(00/, qa 8.2 Exhaust Stack Temp S6 IMI g 3 540 Furnace Draft"H20 13.aq 13.6 a 13.I a 11, 13 I •6 r ,a 9 aS11.9, /D,vz 10-17 LevelNalve% S Z/q y 60 fi5 9S 7 941 179 177 ESP KW 12 Hr AVG AM 6•a ESP KW 12 Hr AVG PM q ESP Purge Air Heater Duct Control Tcm 1y(o 1 .6 ESP Purge Air Heater Overtri Temp 1 19fj /$D ESP Field#1 Secondary Voltage O y8,P 7 ESP Field#2 Secondary Voltage O ESP Ho Heater#1 Temp 'ASS AS 21 .32 ESP Hopper Heater#2 Temp 313 331 320 Blow Down Water Column ✓ ✓ ✓ ve Blow Down Tri le Low SwitchBlow Down Si t Glass ✓ ✓ ✓Boiler Gas Outlet Tem TOO TOO 5'00 5"r D O Bottom Blow Front Sidewall Headers ✓ ✓ Soot Blow Economizer ✓ ✓ ✓ Bottom Blow Back Sidewall Headers ✓ ✓ Soot Blow Airheater ✓ I ✓ Inspect Multiclone Discharge,Inspection Door 1,1 1 ✓ Air Compressor PSI 1014 J04/ 104Y /D Air Compressor Temp 1 76' /7 0 Air Compressor Se rator and Dryer filter Diff ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Blow Down Air Compressor Water Tra ✓ ✓ Turbine Bearing Temperature ✓ i/ ✓ Turbine Bearing Vibration ✓ FD Fan Outlet Temperature 915' a75 X60 a70 1d #175 3o3 1.3j D 131a 3 S D 3mS Grate Water Pump #operating)and Pressure oZ $a (a) SC! Grate Water Temperature A44( .2.31 Feedwater Pump #operating)and Pressure 2 6 5'0 2 10 z S Ash Container Inspection and Level ✓ ✓ ESP Ash Auger Inspection ✓ ✓ ✓ ESP Ash Roto Lock Inspection ✓ Fuel Bunker Conveyor Chain Inspection Fuel Incline Conveyor Chain Inspection ✓ Turbine Bearing Oil Level ✓ Turbine Vibration Level ✓ •� '� Turbine Bearing Temperature