AQ_F_0800107_20120710_ST_StkTstRpt

PARTICULATE MATTER
AND CARBON MONOXIDE
EMISSIONS TESTING
ON
BIOMASS FIRED BOILERS (ID No.ESB-1,ESB-2 and ESB-3)
LLONftAS
Inorgy Solutions
W.E.PARTNERS II,LLC
3539 Governors Road,
Lewiston Woodville, North Carolina 27849
[phone] Plant Contact Telephone Number
May 10,2012
June 19,2012
Project#P-12022
ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS, INC.
1630 Dale Earnhardt Blvd.
Kannapolis,N. C. 28083
[phone] telephone
800 733-3193 toll-free
PADEP Ree.No.58-574 ( )
[phone] facsimile
tV
corp(a)atc-net.net e-mail
www.atc-net.net Web site
L L 1 Distribution:
Mr. Frankie Fox
., Qt (Three copies)
# Ilifi Issue Date:
Certificate#040 ° lion 6/30113 July 10, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Certificationof Results........................................................................................................3
SourceDescription...........................................................................................................................4
Particulate Emission Rate Summary................................................................................................5
CO Emission Rate Summary...........................................................................................................6
Results, Conclusions and Comments...............................................................................................7
Sampling and Analytical Procedures...............................................................................................8
References......................................................................................................................................10
Nomenclature.................................................................................................................................I I
CalculationFormulae.....................................................................................................................13
Appendix........................................................................................................................................16
W.E. Partners 11, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test - 2012) Page 2 of 16

INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of compliance particulate matter emissions testing performed on
the exhaust of an Electrostatic Precipitator which services three biomass fired boilers. Facility
permit 10126ROI identifies these sources as ESB-1, ESB-2 and ESB-3.
Filterable particulate matter emissions were measured using US EPA reference methods 1, 2, 3a,
4, 5. The source is subject to NSPS standards contained in 40CFR60 Subpart Dc. Pursuant to
Specific Condition and Limitation A.3. of Air Permit 101261101, ESB-1, ESB-2 and ESB-3 must
comply with a 0.43 lb/MMBtu filterable particulate matter emission limit and 100 TPY of CO.
Testing was conducted by ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS, INC.,Kannapolis,
North Carolina. Members of the test team were James Roberts,Luke Boor, Larry Kirkman, Ilya
Alimov and Kent Childers.
CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS
"I certify under penalty of law that I believe the information provided in this document is true,
accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant civil and criminal penalties,
including the possibility of fine or imprisonment or both,for submitting false, inaccurate or
incomplete information."
07/10/12 KW N44u V10/12
Signature/Date Signature/Date
Report Author Report Review
Ilya Alimov J.Kent Childers
Technical Director Sr.Project Mgr.
Printed Name/Title Printed Name/Title
W.E. Partners II, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test -2012) Page 3 of 16

SOURCE DESCRIPTION
Testing was completed on three Biomass fired boilers permitted to a production/process rate of
29.4 MMBtu/hr each. Emissions from the biomass fired boiler are controlled by an electrostatic
precipitator. During the emissions test the Biomass fired boilers averaged a process rate of
approximately 100%. Production data collected during each emission test run is included in the
Appendix.
W.E.Partners II, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 4 of 16

RESULTS SUMMARY
SYSTEM W.E. Partners II, LLC
Biomass Fired Boilers
TEST DATE 05/10/12
PARAMETER Run #1 Run #2 Run#3 AVERAGE
GENERAL
QS, FLOW, ACFM 40,032 40,081 40,038 40,050
Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 22,062 21,838 21,782 21,894
Vm STD(ft3) 77.27 75.76 75.33
%1 94.62 93.73 93.43
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
PMRc (Ibsihr) 0.483 0.904 0.704 0.697
Cs(GR/SCFD) 0.0026 0.0048 0.0038 0.0037
PMRU(IblMMBtu) 0.0051 0.0104 0.0080 0.0079
NCDENR ALLOWABLE /b/MM Btu) 0.43
SUBPART JJJJJJ ALLOWABLE(Ib/MMBtu) 0.07
W.E. Partners II, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test- 2012) Page 5 of 16

Results Summary of Gaseous Emissions Testing
Client: Wellons II
Location: Lewiston, NC
Date: 06/19/20
Source: ESP Outlet
General Stack Parameters Run#1 Run#2 Run#3 Average
Stack Velocity, feet per second 47.93 49.94 49.23 49.04
Actual Volumetric Air Flow Rate, 38,432 40,046 39,460 39,313
cubic feet per minute
Stack moisture, percent 17.87 17.74 17.33 17.65
Stack temperature, degrees F 333.7 337.0 337.1 335.92
Standard Volumetric Air Flow Rate, dscfm 21,003 21,824 21,623 21,483
cubic feet per minute
Heat Input, MMBtu/hour 88.20 91.19 88.32 89.24
Oxygen Concentration. percent 7.41 7.48 7.78 7.56
(corrected per 6c-1)
Carbon Dioxide concentration, percent 13.61 13.36 13.34 13.44
(corrected per 6c-1)
Measured Gaseous Pollutants Run#1 Run #2 Run#3 Average
Carbon Monoxide
CO, ppm v/v dry basis-corrected 413.0 412.7 453.2 426.30
CO, Ibs/hr 37.65 39.09 42.53 39.75
CO, Ibs/mmBtu 0.43 0.43 0.48 0.45
RESULTS, CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS
W.E. Partners II, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test- 2012) Page 6 of 16

Results are presented in the preceding Summary. Additional information may be reviewed in the
Calculations and Appendix sections of this report.
During the particulate matter testing, actual velocity measurements averaged 49.95 feet per
second (ft/s)through the fourty-nine and a half(49.5) inch diameter exhaust stack yielding an
actual volumetric flow rate of 40,050 cubic feet per minute(acfm)for the three two hour runs.
Standard flows were calculated at 21,894 scfin and were based upon an average stack moisture
of 17.83%, stack temperature of 327.65'Fahrenheit, and a station (barometric)pressure of 29.70
inHg. Stack static pressure was measured at-0.25 inches of water.
During the CO measurements, actual velocity measurements averaged 49.04 feet per second
(ft/s)through the fourty-nine and a half(49.5) inch diameter exhaust stack yielding an actual
volumetric flow rate of 39,313 cubic feet per minute(acfin) for the three one hour runs.
Standard flows were calculated at 21,483 scfm and were based upon an average stack moisture
of 17.65%, stack temperature of 335.920 Fahrenheit, and a station (barometric) pressure of 30.00
inHg. Stack static pressure was measured at-0.16 inches of water.
Filterable particulate emissions averaged 0.697 pounds per hour(lb/hr), 0.0037 grains per dry,
standard cubic foot and 0.0079 lb/MMBtu.
Carbon Monoxide emissions averaged 39.75 lb/hr and 0.45 lb/MMBtu.
Sampling and Data Issues
No sampling, data issues or method modifications were required during this test program.
W.E. Partners I1, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test- 2012) Page 7 of 16

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Particulate Emissions Sampling
Particulate testing and analysis were performed according to procedures developed by the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency(US EPA)and referred to as Method 5. Sampling port
locations and number of test points to be used were determined according to Method 1. The
above federal test methods appear in the Code of Federal Regulations(Reference 1).
Test point locations and sampling port placement for velocity traverses are shown in the
Appendix. Test point locations were calculated based upon a 49.5"diameter stack. Twelve
points were sampled in each of the two ports for a total of twenty-four test measurement points.
For particulate sampling, a standard US EPA method five all-glass sampling train(except for
stainless nozzles)was utilized(probe liners and glass-to-glass connections to the impingers).
Pre-tared 3" round glass fiber filters were used as the filterable particulate collection media. The
condenser train consisted of four glass impingers connected sequentially; impingers 1-2 were
filled with 100 mL of deionized water and impinger 3 was initially left empty and the fourth
began with 300g of silica gel.
The impingers were maintained at less than 68°F;All sample recovery was conducted on site.
Each sample was forwarded to Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. of Durham,North Carolina for analysis.
Gaseous Emissions Sampling
Gaseous emissions sampling for carbon monoxide, oxygen and carbon dioxide were
accomplished according to the methodologies summarized in the table below.
US EPA Description Analyzer Analytical Principle
Methodology Utilized
3a Instrumental determination of Servomex 02-Paramagnetic
oxygen and carbon dioxide 1400B CO2-NDIR
10 Determination of carbon monoxide CAI ZRH NDIR
concentrations CAI 3300A
Sampling Issues
There were no deviations from the planned scope of work or test methodology for this project.
W.E. Partners II, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 8 of 16

Quality Assurance Procedures
The following steps were conducted to ensure the accuracy and precision of this test project.
1) All laboratory glassware was cleaned and prepped according to US EPA
methodologies and ATC SOPs prior to use.
2) All sampling equipment (nozzles, pitot tubes, modules, exit gas thermometers,
thermocouple bridges, etc) has primary calibrations performed on an annual
schedule.
4) All sampling equipment was visually inspected prior to assembly in the shop.
5) Sampling trains were leak checked at a vacuum of no less than 15"Hg prior to the
start of sampling.
6) At the conclusion of the sampling project, pitot tubes were inspected according to
US EPA method 2 specifications, thermocouples calibrated, and the sampling
module calibrated at test ranges.
7) All data that has been entered into an Excel spreadsheet in the field and on pre-
printed ATC forms was double-checked in the office and reviewed.
8) A draft report was generated and submitted to the on-site project manager for
review.
W.E. Partners I1, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 9 of 16

REFERENCES
1. CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS,Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2008.
W.E. Partners II, LLC(NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 10 of 16

NOMENCLATURE
AN (square inches), cross sectional area of nozzle
As (square feet), cross sectional area of stack
Cp Pitot tube calibration coefficient, dimensionless
% EA Percent excess air
F (scfd/MMBtu), F factor
DH (inches of water) average orifice meter reading
HI (MMBtu/hr), heat input rate
% I Percent isokineticity
M (lb/lb mole), molecular weight of wet gas
% M Percent moisture
MD Mole fraction of dry gas
MWD (lb/lb mole)molecular weight of dry gas
N DP Number of sampling data points
PATM (in Hg), local atmospheric pressure
PNI (in Hg), absolute pressure in dry gas meter
Ps (in Hg), absolute stack pressure
Ps Gauge (inches of water), measured static stack pressure gauge
PSTD (29.92 in Hg), standard pressure
PMRC(lb/hr), pollutant mass rate based on concentration
PMRU(lb/mmBtu), specific emission rate
W.E. Partners II, LLC(NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 11 of 16

NOMENCLATURE
(continued)
Dp (inches of water), velocity pressure
QS (ft3/min.), actual stack volume flow rate
QSTD (ft3/min.), stack volume flow rate at standard
Conditions
Time(min) duration of test
TM (°R), average dry gas meter temperature
Ts (°R), average stack temperature
TSTD (528 °R), standard temperature
VLQ (ml), liquid volume
VM (ft), sample volume measured by dry gas meter
VMSTD (ft), Sample volume at standard conditions
Vs (ft/sec), stack velocity
WSTD (ft), volume of water vapor collected,
corrected to standard conditions
WT (grams), total weight of particulate collected
W.E. Partners Il, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test- 2012) Page 12 of 16

CALCULATION FORMULAE
1. Absolute pressure
lat the dry gas meter, Pm
Pm =Pbo.fl dHJ
13.6
2. Absolute stack pressure, PS
Ps =Pb.,± Pg
(13.6)
3. Sample volume at standard conditions, Vm(Std)
Oh
Pbar+13.6
V.(std) =Kl X V.X Y X
Tm
=Yx(V.x528xP.)l(T.x29.92)
_ 528°R
K' 29.92inHg
4. Volume of water collected, corrected to standard conditions, Vv(std)
Vv(vd) =Vv(vd)w+Vv(std)sg
Vv(sd)w =0.04706 ft3 x 29.92o Hg x ml
m1 528 R
K(nd)g =0.04715 fy3 x 29.92o Hg x ml
Jm�1 528 R
5. Total sample volume at standard conditions, Vstd
Kod =V,.(sd)+K(vd)
6. Percent moisture in stack gas, %M
%M= V"(S,d) x 100
ys d)
7. Mole Fraction of the dry gas, MD
MD= (100—%M)
100
W.E.Partners I1, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 13 of 16

CALCULATION FORMULAE
(continued)
8. Molecular weight of the Dry Gas, MWD
MWD=0.440(%CO2)+0.320(%02)+0.280(0/,N2+%CO)
9. Molecular weight of stack gas,wet basis,g/g-mole(lb/lb-mole), M
M=Alf WDxMD+18(1—MD)
10. Stack velocity, VS
F(T,-hVS =Kp X Cp Apx
11. Average stack gas dry volumetric flow rate, Qstd dry
Q,s(d,y) =17.647x60xMDxVSxAx Ps
TS
12. Pollutant mass rate, concentration basis, lbs/hr
0.13231b—min
PMRC= x grams x Qa,d-Vs,d
gram—hr
13. Percent Isokineticity
I_ 100Ts[K3V,,+(V.Y/TmXPbQ,+Ah/13.6)]
60xOxVsxPSxA„
14. %Excess Air
%EA= (%OZ —0.5%CO) x 100
(0.264 x%N2)—%02+0.5 x%CO
W.E. Partners 11, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 14 of 16

CALCULATION FORMULAE
(continued)
15. Dry Gas Meter Check
vz
Y _ 100.0319Tm
V n Pbar
16. Heat Input Rate, mmBtu/hr
HI— 60 min/hr x dscf/min x 20.9—%O2
dscf/mmBtu 20.9
17. Specific emission rate, lbs/mmBtu
PMRU= PMRC
HI
18. Modified Carrier Equation for Prediction of Stack Moisture with a Wet Bulb Thermometer
(6.6911 3144
%M= 100 10` R+390.86] _(0.000367XPSXTd—T,y 1+T„,—32
P 1571 ]
s
19. Correction of Gas Concentrations for Calibration Error, Equation 6c-1
Cma
Cg. =r—Ca
20. VOC Emission Rate as (compound specified by molecular weight)
ppmvd x M g 3
1bsC1 = g—mole x 1 x 10 mg x Q x 3.75e-06
hr 22.414 liters x 103 m3 x 293.15a K 1 x 106 ppm g stddry
g—mole liter 273.150 K
3.75e-06 = 0.00221bs x g x 60min x m3
g 1000mg hour 35.315 ft3
W.E. Partners II, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 15 of 16

APPENDIX
EPA Method 205 Dilution Verification
EPA Method 205 Raw Data
Analyzer Calibration Records
Raw CEM Data
CEM Corrections
PM Data Reduction Spreadsheets
Field Data Sheets
Laboratory Data
Calibrations
Reference Gas Certificates of Analysis
LELAP Laboratory Accreditation
Process Operating Parameters
W.E. Partners II, LLC (NCDENR-DAQ Compliance Test-2012) Page 16 of 16

Dilution System Verification
US EPA Method 205-40CFR51,Appendix M
ATC Project No. P-12022
Client: Wellons Instrument Used: CAI 200
Location: Lewiston,NC High Level Gas Type: Oxygen in Nitrogen
Date: 6/18/2012 Gas Concentration: 20.9% (Cylinder No.SX-44943 exp.8/26/13
Technicians : KC US EPA Method(s): 3A
Cylinder Number Gas Type Protocol Gas Concentration Actual Reading(ppm or%) IF Average within±2%
1 2 3 Response Precision Accuracy
S Mid-level audit 1" 11 10.72 1 10.68 1 10.70 IL 10.70
MFC Dilution Trial(record reading in ppm or%) Average Within+2%
Dilution Number -
Flowrate Concentration 1 2 3 Response Precision Accuracy
1 3,000 10.0 10.03 10.05 10.05 10.04 0.13% 0.43%
2 3,000 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.50 0.00% 0.00%
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Precision-Calculate the%difference between the average response and the individual reading that most deviates.
Accuracy-Calculate the%difference between the average response and the predicted response.
QA/QC Check:
Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
KC 6/19/12
Signatures: Technician(Signature/Date) Project Manager(Signature/Date)
ATC Form 176-version 4.0(7/13/2007) ATC @[phone]

Page 1 of 3
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc.
CEM Data
Parameter 02
Units
18-Jun-12 18:11:19 9.03
18-Jun-12 18:11:49 8.46
18-Jun-12 18:12:19 8.27
18-Jun-12 18:12:49 8.05
18-Jun-12 18:13:19 8.00
18-Jun-12 18:13:49 8.04
18-Jun-12 18:14:20 4.95
18-Jun-12 18:14:49 0.24
18-Jun-12 18:15:19 7.51
18-Jun-12 18:15:49 9.55
18 Jun 12 18:16.:1 9 2.59
18-Jun-12 18:16:49 5.12
18-Jun-12 18:17:20 0.68 Start Direct Calibrations 02
18-Jun-12 18:17:49 0.58
18-Jun-12 18:18:20 0.06
18-Jun-12 18:18:49 0.05
18-Jun-12 18:19:56 0.04 Direct Zero 3
18-Jun-12 18:19:57 0.04
18-Jun-12 18:20:19 4.39
18-Jun-12 18:20:49 17.83
18-Jun-12 18:21:20 21.24
18-Jun-12 18:21:49 21.34
18-Jun-12 18:22:19 20.91 02 Direct Span(26.90
18-Jun-12 18:22:49 20.93
18-Jun-12 18:2 3:19 18.84
18-Jun-12 18:2 3:4 9 15.6 0
18-Jun-12 18:24:19 12.3 8

Page 2 of 3
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc.
CEM Data
Parameter 02
Units
18-Jun-12 18:24:50 15.3 2
18-Jun-12 18:25:19 15.32
18-Jun-12 18:25:49 15.32
18-Jun-12 18:26:19 15.33
18-Jun-12 18:26:49 11.17
18-Jun-12 18:2 7:2 2 10.04
18-Jun-12 18:27:49 10.04
18-Jun-12 18:2 8:19 10.42
18-Jun-12 18:28:50 10.75
18-Jun-12 18:29:32 10.75 02 Direct Mid(10.7
18-Jun-12 18:29:49 10.75
18-Jun-12 18:30:21 13.12
18-Jun-12 18:30:49 1.56 Start 205 Dilution Verticatioin Check
18-Jun-12 18:31:19 4.22
18-Jun-12 18:31:49 8.89
18-Jun-12 18:32:19 9.29
18-Jun-12 18:33:40 9.99
18-Jun-12 18:33:41 10.03 02 Dilution(10%)No 1
18-Jun-12 18:33:49 10.05
18-Jun-12 18:34:19 13.3 8
18-Jun-12 18:34:53 7.90
18-Jun-12 18:35:19 2.57
18-Jun-12 18:35:50 2.51
18-Jun-12 18:36:19 2.50 02 Dilution
18-Jun-12 18:36:50 2.50
18-Jun-12 18:37:19 3.39
18-Jun-12 18:37:49 7.08
18-Jun-12 18:38:19 9.80
18-Jun-12 18:38:49 9.98
18-Jun-12 18:39:19 10.03
18-Jun-12 18:39:50 10.05 02 Dilution(10%)No 2
18-Jun-12 18:4 0:19 10.0 6
18-Jun-12 18:40:50 9.88
18-Jun-12 18:41:19 3.91
18-Jun-12 18:41:49 2.58
18-Jun-12 18:42:19 2.52
18-Jun-12 18:42:49 2.51
18-Jun-12 18:43:20 2.50 02 Dilution(2.5%)No 2
18-Jun-12 18:43:50 2.50
18-Jun-12 18:44:19 2.62
18-Jun-12 18:44:49 5.89
18-Jun-12 18:45:19 9.64

Page 3 of 3
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc.
CEM Data
Parameter 02
Units
18-Jun-12 18:45:49 9.95
18-Jun-12 18:46:19 10.02
18-Jun-12 18:46:49 10.05 02 Dilution(10%)'No 3
18-Jun-12 18:4 7:2 0 10.06
18-Jun-12 18:47:49 10.07
18-Jun-12 18:48:19 10.07
18-Jun-12 18:48:49 10.08
18-Jun-12 18:49:19 5.72
18-Jun-12 18:49:49 2.65
18-Jun-12 18:50:19 2.52
18-Jun-12 18:50:49 2.51
18-Jun-12 18:51:20 2.50 02 Dilution(2.5%)No 3
18-Jun-12 18:51:49 2.50
18-Jun-12 18:52:19 4.05
18-Jun-12 18:52:4 9 10.61
18-Jun-12 18:53:19 10.73
18-Jun-12 18:53:49 10.73
18-Jun-12 18:54:19 10.72 02(10.7%)Audit No 1
18-Jun-12 18:54:49 5.99
18-Jun-12 18:55:20 3.23
18-Jun-12 18:55:49 0.05
18-Jun-12 18:56:19 7.08
18-Jun-12 18:56:49 9.64
18-Jun-12 18:5 7:19 10.41
18-Jun-12 18:57:49 10.63
18-Jun-12 18:58:20 10.68 02(10.7%)Audit No 2
18-Jun-12 18:58:49 10.69
18-Jun-12 18:59:20 5.67
18-Jun-12 18:59:49 0.43
18-Jun-12 19:00:19 0.35
18-Jun-12 19:00:49 3.29
18-Jun-12 19:01:19 8.52
18-Jun-12 19:01:49 10.63
18-Jun-12 19:02:20 10.70 02(10.7%)Audit No 3
18-Jun-12 19:02:49 10.69
18-Jun-12 19:03:20 5.67
18-Jun-12 19:03:49 0.76
18-Jun-12 19:04:19 0.19
18-Jun-12 19:04:49 0.16

SYSTEM CALIBRATION ERROR DATA
Client: Wellons Location: Lewiston,NC Date: 6/19/12 Project No.: 120
Calibration Gas: CO in N2(502 ppm) Cylinder No.:SX 50135 Exp.Date: 5/26/14 Cylinder Pressure(psi):
US EPA Method: 10 Analyzer ID: CAI Was instrument stable prior to beginning calibrations?Yes
Initial Analyzer Direct Calibration usin!Dilution System
Dilution Target Level Instrument Direct Difference Allowable Difference
Range Response Specification
tppm or%) (ppm or%) (ppm or%) (am or%)
Low Range(Zero) 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 t2%of span
Mid Range 250.00 249.17 0.83 10.00 f2%of span-3a,6c,7e,10
High Range(S an) 500.00 498.32 0.68 10.00 f2%of Span-3a,6c,7e,10
Initial and Post System Bias and Drift Checks
Instrument Direct
Run Time Response System Response System Bias SNstcm Bias Calibration Drift Calibration Drift
(24 Hour m or% m or% m or% ( ercent error) (ppm or'%,) ( ercent error)
Clock) Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero 5lidscale Zero Midscale Zero Jlidscale
Pre 0.00 249.17 1.50 248.50 1.50 0.67 0.30% 0.13%
Run 1 0.00 249.17 0.51 250.53 0.51 1.36 0.10% 0.27% 0.99 2.03 0.20% 0.41%
Run 2 0.00 249.17 1.89 247.88 1.89 1.29 0.38% 0.26% 1.38 2.65 0.28% 0.53%
Run 3 0.00 249.17 0.36 250.29 0.36 1.12 0.07% 0.22% 1.53 2.41 0.31% 0.48%
Specification-System Bias:must be within±5%of calibration span;Calibration Drift:must be within t3%of span of previous System Response
Field Notes:
OA/OC Check
Completeness Legibility A ccu,w i, Speclf-adons Reasonableness
Kent Childers 6/19/12
Technician(Signawr&Vate) Data Review(.4ignatarelDate)
F:\WORK\Client Files\Wellons\Lewiston NC CO Compliance\Wellon System Calibration Error Data CO

SYSTEM CALIBRATION ERROR DATA
Client: Wellons Location: Lewiston,NC Date: 6/19/12 Project No.: 12022
Calibration Gas: 02 in N2 Cylinder No.:SX 44943 Exp.Date: 8/26/13 Cylinder Pressure(psi):
US EPA Method: 3A Analyzer ID: CAI Was instrument stable prior to beginning calibrations?Yes
Initial Analyzer Direct Calibration using Dilution S. stem
Dilution Target Level Instrument Direct Difference Allowable Difference
Range Response Specification
(ppm or%) (ppm or%) ( pm or%) (Rpm or%)
Low Range(Zero) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 :U%of span
Mid Range 10.00 10.06 0.06 0.42 t2%of Span-3a,6c,7e,10
High Ran e S an) 20.90 20.90 0.00 0.42 t2%of Span-3a,6c,7e,10
Initial and Post System Bias and Drift Checks
Run Time Instrument Direct System Response System Bias System Bias Calibration Drift Calibration Drift
(24 Hour Response
Clock) (pp-or% m or% m or% erceuterror m or% (percent error)
Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero I Midscale
Pre 0.00 10.06 0.02 9.98 0.02 0.08 0.10% 0.38%
Run 1 0.00 10.06 0.07 9.98 0.07 0.08 0.33% 0.38% 0.05 0.00 0.24% 0.00%
Run 2 0.00 10.06 0.01 10.01 0.01 0.05 0.05% 0.24% 0.06 0.03 0.29% 0.14%
Run 3 0.00 10.06 0.03 10.02 0.03 0.04 0.14% 0.19% 0.02 0.01 0.10% 0.05%
Specification-System Bias:must be within t5%of calibration span;Calibration Drift:must be within t3%of span of previous System Response
Field Notes:
OA/OC Check
Conwieteness Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Kent Childers 6/19/12
Technician(SignatureDate) Data Review(SignuturelDate)
F:\WORK\Client Files\Wellons\Lewiston NC CO Compliance\Welton System Calibration Error Data 02

SYSTEM CALIBRATION ERROR DATA
Client: Wellons Location: Lewiston,NC Date: 6/19/12 Project No.: 12022
Calibration Gas: CO2 in N2 Cylinder No.:SX 52242 Exp.Date: 5/17/14 Cylinder Pressure(psi):
US EPA Method: 3A Analyzer ID: CAI Was instrument stable prior to beginning calibrations? Yes
Initial Analyzer Direct Calibration usine Dilution System
Dilution Target Level Instrument Direct Difference Allowable Difference
Range Response Specification
(ppm or%) (ppm or%) (ppm or%) (opm or%)
Low Range Zero) 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.39 t2%of Span
Mid Range 10.00 9.98 0.02 0.39 f2%of Span-3a,6c,%10
High Range(Span) 19.60 19.60 0.00 0.39
t2%of Span-3a,6c,7e,10
Initial and Post System Bias and Drift Checks
Instrument Direct
Run Time Response System Response tiystcm Bias System Bias Calibration Drift Calibration Drift
(24 Hour m or% m or%) m or% ( ercent error) ( i im or%) (percent error)
Clock) Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero 'Midscale
Pre 0.01 9.98 0.03 10.02 0.02 0.04 0.10% 0.20%
Runt 1 0.01 9.98 0.07 9.95 0.06 0.03 0.31% 0.15% 0.04 0.07 0.20% 0.36%
Rum 2 0.01 9.98 0.00 10.01 0.01 0.03 0.05% 0.15% 0.07 0.06 0.36% 0.31%
Zen 3 0.01 9.98 0.06 10.06 0.05 0.08 0.26% 0.41% 0.06 0.05 0.31% 0.26%
Specification-System Bias:must be within f5%of calibration span;Calibration Drift:must be within t3%of span of previous System Response
Field Notes:
OA/OC Check
Conrpteleners Legibmuy Accuracy Specifications Reasonablenec,
Kent Childers 6/19/12
Technician(Signalure/Dale) Data Review(Signatare4hite)
F:\WORK\Client Files\Wellons\Lewiston NC CO Compliance\Wellon System Calibration Error Data CO2

Page 1 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 10:40:08 20.13 0.18 8.25
19-Jun-12 10:40:25 20.79 0.18 8.24
19-Jun-12 10:40:55 20.79 0.18 8.34
19-Jun-12 10:41:26 20.73 0.08 8.11
19-Jun-12 10:41:55 15.68 -0.03 7.91
19-Jun-12 10:42:25 20.53 0.01 7.39
19-Jun-12 10:42:56 9.93 -0.07 7.53
19-Jun-12 10:43:26 0.25 -0.12 7.35 Begin Direct Calibrations
19-Jun-12 10:43:55 0.03 -0.09 7.39
19-Jun-12 10:44:25 0.00 -0.01 4.81
19-Jun-12 10:44:56 0.00 -0.01 1.87 Direct 02 CO CO2 Zero
19-Jun-12 10:45:25 0.32 -0.01 1.11
19-Jun-12 10:45:55 14.75 0.07 1.31
19-Jun-12 10:46:25 19.43 0.00 1.89
19-Jun-12 10:46:55 20.75 -0.01 1.93
19-Jun-12 10:47:25 20.90 -0.01 2.07 Direct 02 Span(20.9%)
19-Jun-12 10:47:55 20.93 0.00 2.18
19-Jun-12 10:48:25 12.16 -0.01 2.01
19-Jun-12 10:48:55 10.08 -0.01 2.00
19-Jun-12 10:49:25 10.06 -0.01 1.87 Direct 02 Mid(10.0%)
19-Jun-12 10:49:55 13.29 0.03 2.04
19-Jun-12 10:50:29 11.56 6.87 2.46
19-Jun-12 10:50:55 0.30 20.63 1.89
19-Jun-12 10:51:25 0.00 19.48 2.01
19-Jun-12 10:51:55 -0.04 19.60 2.22 Direct CO2 Mid(19.6%)
19-Jun-12 10:52:25 2.50 17.10 2.33
19-Jun-12 10:52:55 0.18 12.43 1.93
19-Jun-12 10:53:25 -0.03 9.67 1.47
19-Jun-12 10:53:55 -0.03 9.64 1.51
19-Jun-12 10:54:25 -0.03 9.96 1.45
19-Jun-12 10:54:55 -0.03 9.98 1.37 Direct CO2 Mid(10.0%) �, `
19-Jun-12 10:55:25 11.58 3.85 1.47
19-Jun-12 10:55:55 18.60 1.80 1.24
19-Jun-12 10:56:25 12.15 1.81 185.47
19-Jun-12 10:56:55 2.51 0.28 496.75
19-Jun-12 10:57:25 0.00 0.04 511.44
19-Jun-12 10:57:56 0.00 0.02 498.32 Direct COS an 5Q0 m
19-Jun-12 10:58:25 0.94 0.03 498.69
19-Jun-12 10:58:55 0.17 0.03 363.16
19-Jun-12 10:59:25 -0.01 0.02 251.13
19-Jun-12 10:59:56 -0.01 0.02 249.17 Direct CO Mid(250 ppm) x
19-Jun-12 11:00:25 17.10 0.12 249.27
19-Jun-12 11:01:34 20.73 0.14 249.21
19-Jun-12 11:01:35 20.73 0.13 249.21 Start System Calibrationsmm
19-Jun-12 11:01:56 15.56 0.07 105.93
19-Jun-12 11:02:25 9.55 0.06 106.49
19-Jun-12 11:02:55 1.24 0.04 214.09
19-Jun-12 11:03:25 0.50 0.03 236.28
19-Jun-12 11:03:56 0.30 0.03 231.39
19-Jun-12 11:04:25 0.17 0.03 235.07
19-Jun-12 11:04:55 0.13 0.03 235.70
19-Jun-12 11:05:26 0.18 0.03 236.24

Page 2 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 11:05:56 0.11 0.03 239.10
19-Jun-12 11:06:25 0.05 0.03 240.39
19-Jun-12 11:06:55 0.03 0.03 240.67
19-Jun-12 11:07:26 0.03 0.03 240.70
19-Jun-12 11:07:55 0.03 0.03 245.23
19-Jun-12 11:08:25 0.02 0.03 248.50 System 02/CO2 Zero/CO Mid(250 ppr
19-Jun-12 11:09:16 0.02 0.03 246.77
19-Jun-12 11:09:25 9.95 0.06 125.31
19-Jun-12 11:09:55 9.24 0.05 81.85
19-Jun-12 11:10:25 9.27 0.04 18.35
19-Jun-12 11:10:55 9.56 0.04 9.90
19-Jun-12 11:11:25 9.87 0.04 6.68
19-Jun-12 11:11:55 9.95 0.04 4.95
19-Jun-12 11:12:25 9.97 0.04 4.27
19-Jun-12 11:12:55 9.98 0.04 3.93 System 02 Mid(10.0%)
19-Jun-12 11:13:25 9.28 1.13 3.37
19-Jun-12 11:13:55 2.64 7.57 2.19
19-Jun-12 11:14:25 0.55 9.36 1.56 System Zero CO
19-Jun-12 11:14:55 0.17 9.92 1.56
19-Jun-12 11:15:25 0.07 10.02 1.50 System CO2 Mid(10%)
y 19-Jun-12 11:15:55 0.03 10.04 1.57
19-Jun-12 11:16:25 0.01 10.02 1.76
19-Jun-12 11:16:55 0.05 5.94 1.91
19-Jun-12 11:17:25 0.02 0.96 2.48
19-Jun-12 11:17:55 1.77 0.49 2.50
19-Jun-12 11:18:25 15.90 0.45 2.86
19-Jun-12 11:18:55 19.87 0.27 2.97
19-Jun-12 11:19:25 20.38 0.20 2.85
19-Jun-12 11:19:55 20.49 0.19 2.90
19-Jun-12 11:20:26 20.56 0.18 2.77
19-Jun-12 11:20:55 20.60 0.16 2.59
19-Jun-12 11:21:25 20.28 0.70 14.24
19-Jun-12 11:21:55 11.61 9.57 230.42
19-Jun-12 11:22:26 8.03 12.84 326.72
19-Jun-12 11:22:55 7.58 13.33 302.57
19-Jun-12 11:23:25 7.54 13.38 324.11
19-Jun-12 11:23:55 7.58 13.36 346.14
19-Jun-12 11:24:26 7.56 13.38 364.37
19-Jun-12 11:24:55 7.49 13.45 397.78
19-Jun-12 11:25:25 7.45 13.49 346.38
19-Jun-12 11:2555 7.42 13.52 354.18 Stara Run 1 (11:25)
19-Jun-12 11:26:26 7.40 13.54 371.59
19-Jun-12 11:26:55 7.48 13.45 399.25
19-Jun-12 11:27:25 7.56 13.38 346.29
19-Jun-12 11:27:56 7.52 13.42 336.03
19-Jun-12 11:28:26 7.51 13.42 357.47
19-Jun-12 11:28:55 7.61 13.33 368.03
19-Jun-12 11:29:25 7.64 13.30 349.53
19-Jun-12 11:29:56 7.63 13.31 370.08
19-Jun-12 11:30:25 7.59 13.35 385.48
19-Jun-12 11:30:55 7.55 13.39 389.09
19-Jun-12 11:31:25 7.47 13.47 403.03

Page 3 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 11:31:55 7.39 13.54 424.95
19-Jun-12 11:32:25 7.38 13.55 453.12
19-Jun-12 11:32:55 7.45 13.48 413.92
19-Jun-12 11:33:25 7.54 13.40 363.83
19-Jun-12 11:33:55 7.51 13.43 392.59
19-Jun-12 11:34:25 7.49 13.44 422.59
19-Jun-12 11:34:55 7.65 13.27 449.58
19-Jun-12 11:35:25 7.86 13.08 399.71
19-Jun-12 11:35:55 7.85 13.09 409.77
19-Jun-12 11:36:25 7.88 13.07 437.46
19-Jun-12 11:36:55 7.85 13.09 431.02
19-Jun-12 11:37:25 7.72 13.23 426.35
19-Jun-12 11:37:55 7.41 13.54 437.07
19-Jun-12 11:38:25 7.32 13.62 458.37
19-Jun-12 11:38:55 7.30 13.63 470.48
19-Jun-12 11:39:25 7.37 13.56 422.02
19-Jun-12 11:39:55 7.41 13.53 464.47
19-Jun-12 11:40:25 7.39 13.53 393.79
19-Jun-12 11:40:55 7.44 13.50 385.29
19-Jun-12 11:41:25 7.40 13.55 448.51
19-Jun-12 11:41:55 7.42 13.51 455.37
19-Jun-12 11:42:25 7.48 13.48 459.03
19-Jun-12 11:42:56 7.53 13.42 448.74
19-Jun-12 11:43:25 7.44 13.52 455.36
19-Jun-12 11:43:55 7.33 13.62 435.45
19-Jun-12 11:44:25 7.26 13.70 473.53
19-Jun-12 11:44:56 7.27 13.68 416.04
19-Jun-12 11:45:25 7.30 13.66 455.62
19-Jun-12 11:45:55 7.25 13.70 459.54
19-Jun-12 11:46:25 7.29 13.67 421.19
19-Jun-12 11:46:56 7.40 13.57 377.05
19-Jun-12 11:47:25 7.46 13.51 374.22
19-Jun-12 11:47:55 7.41 13.56 411.87
19-Jun-12 11:48:25 7.47 13.49 392.82
19-Jun-12 11:48:56 7.51 13.47 359.89
19-Jun-12 11:49:25 7.55 13.43 412.94
19-Jun-12 11:49:55 7.45 13.52 407.78
19-Jun-12 11:50:26 7.46 13.53 337.20
19-Jun-12 11:50:56 7.35 13.64 361.23
19-Jun-12 11:51:25 7.26 13.72 383.03
19-Jun-12 11:51:55 7.20 13.77 432.83
19-Jun-12 11:52:26 7.26 13.71 362.07
19-Jun-12 11:52:55 7.29 13.68 392.75
19-Jun-12 11:53:25 7.30 13.67 418.90
19-Jun-12 11:53:55 7.37 13.60 418.63
19-Jun-12 11:54:25 7.45 13.55 439.47
19-Jun-12 11:54:55 7.34 13.65 430.73
19-Jun-12 11:55:25 7.40 13.59 403.42
19-Jun-12 11:55:55 7.38 13.61 403.75
19-Jun-12 11:56:25 7.45 13.54 409.79
19-Jun-12 11:56:55 7.50 13.51 394.56
19-Jun-12 11:57:25 7.39 13.61 380.35

Page 4 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 11:57:55 7.37 13.63 401.93
19-Jun-12 11:58:25 7.40 13.60 399.85
19-Jun-12 11:58:55 7.45 13.54 415.65
19-Jun-12 11:59:25 7.56 13.43 405.37
19-Jun-12 11:59:55 7.77 13.22 399.71
19-Jun-12 12:00:25 7.83 13.16 458.47
19-Jun-12 12:00:55 7.75 13.24 457.65
19-Jun-12 12:01:25 7.79 13.20 405.61
19-Jun-12 12:01:56 7.82 13.17 459.00
19-Jun-12 12:02:25 7.92 13.07 469.28
19-Jun-12 12:02:55 7.88 13.13 480.28
19-Jun-12 12:03:25 7.69 13.32 484.50
19-Jun-12 12:03:55 7.55 13.45 427.40
19-Jun-12 12:04:25 7.48 13.53 365.89
19-Jun-12 12:04:55 7.40 13.61 383.73
19-Jun-12 12:05:25 7.29 13.72 382.88
19-Jun-12 12:05:55 7.20 13.80 446.06
19-Jun-12 12:06:25 7.13 13.86 417.23
19-Jun-12 12:06:55 7.04 13.95 415.30
19-Jun-12 12:07:25 7.03 13.96 349.79
19-Jun-12 12:07:55 6.89 14.11 390.29
19-Jun-12 12:08:25 6.96 14.03 384.22
19-Jun-12 12:08:55 7.04 13.95 362.87
19-Jun-12 12:09:25 7.21 13.78 372.89
19-Jun-12 12:09:55 7.31 13.69 345.93
19-Jun-12 12:10:25 7.31 13.69 316.51
19-Jun-12 12:10:55 7.44 13.55 346.76
19-Jun-12 12:11:25 7.50 13.51 310.83
19-Jun-12 12:11:55 7.58 13.42 349.46
19-Jun-12 12:12:25 7.72 13.27 442.02
19-Jun-12 12:12:55 7.81 13.18 424.46
19-Jun-12 12:13:25 7.72 13.30 376.42
19-Jun-12 12:13:55 7.51 13.49 419.93
19-Jun-12 12:14:25 7.52 13.49 444.19
19-Jun-12 12:14:55 7.45 13.55 495.72
19-Jun-12 12:15:25 7.26 13.75 500.79
19-Jun-12 12:15:55 7.13 13.87 468.96
19-Jun-12 12:16:25 7.03 13.97 475.43
19-Jun-12 12:16:55 6.83 14.18 429.49
19-Jun-12 12:17:25 6.82 14.19 420.69
19-Jun-12 12:17:55 6.76 14.25 451.03
19-Jun-12 12:18:25 6.86 14.14 417.50
19-Jun-12 12:18:55 6.83 14.19 385.63
19-Jun-12 12:19:25 6.86 14.14 380.04
19-Jun-12 12:20:01 7.06 13.93 413.33
19-Jun-12 12:20:26 7.22 13.77 425.50
19-Jun-12 12:20:55 7.38 13.62 389.60
19-Jun-12 12:21:25 7.56 13.45 400.51
19-Jun-12 12:21:55 7.65 13.37 424.16
19-Jun-12 12:22:26 7.60 13.42 448.85
19-Jun-12 12:22:55 7.57 13.45 431.05
19-Jun-12 12:23:25 7.56 13.46 375.77

Page 5 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 12:23:55 7.35 13.68 358.18
19-Jun-12 12:24:26 7.14 13.87 440.68 Run 1 Averages
19-Jun-12 12:24:55 7.07 13.93 523.71 02 CO2 CO
19-Jun-12 12:25:25 7.06 13.95 458.20 7,41 13,57 411.58
.02 3 19 Jun-12 12:25:55 7 1 .98 453.46 End Run 1
19-Jun-12 12:26:25 7.07 13.94 492.80
19-Jun-12 12:26:55 7.12 13.88 397.29
19-Jun-12 12:27:25 7.06 13.95 451.93
19-Jun-12 12:28:03 7.07 13.94 426.44
19-Jun-12 12:28:26 7.27 13.74 404.34
19-Jun-12 12:28:55 7.31 13.63 382.11
19-Jun-12 12:29:25 3.15 4.94 134.36
19-Jun-12 12:29:55 0.46 1.07 26.53
19-Jun-12 12:30:25 0.28 0.79 18.56
19-Jun-12 12:30:55 0.23 0.73 16.25
19-Jun-12 12:31:25 0.18 0.63 13.29
19-Jun-12 12:31:55 0.14 0.56 11.01
19-Jun-12 12:32:25 0.11 0.20 9.28
19-Jun-12 12:32:55 0.10 0.17 8.02
19-Jun-12 12:33:25 0.07 0.12 6.01 02 Zero
19-Jun-12 12:33:55 0.06 0.07 1.30 CO2 Zero
19-Jun-12 12:34:25 0.05 0.08 2.04
19-Jun-12 12:34:55 0.04 0.04 0.51 CO Zero
19-Jun-12 12:35:27 0.94 1.92 67.83
19-Jun-12 12:35:55 0.69 7.57 38.00
19-Jun-12 12:36:25 0.19 9.03 10.28
19-Jun-12 12:36:55 0.09 9.31 3.91
19-Jun-12 12:37:26 0.04 9.40 0.97
19-Jun-12 12:37:55 0.01 9.58 -0.90
19-Jun-12 12:38:25 -0.01 9.94 -1.90
19-Jun-12 12:38:55 -0.02 9.95 -2.45
19-Jun-12 12:39:25 -0.02 9.95 -2.68 CO 2 Mid(10%)
19-Jun-12 12:39:55 2.06 8.81 53.64
19-Jun-12 12:40:38 7.87 1.98 10.75
19-Jun-12 12:40:55 9.50 0.50 0.67
19-Jun-12 12:41:25 9.62 0.37 -0.14
19-Jun-12 12:41:55 9.71 0.25 -0.75
19-Jun-12 12:42:25 9.76 0.19 -0.99
19-Jun-12 12:42:56 9.81 0.13 -1.28
19-Jun-12 12:43:25 9.89 0.08 -1.90
19-Jun-12 12:43:55 9.98 0.03 -2.28 02 MId(10%) .3y ..a
19-Jun-12 12:44:25 9.99 0.01 -2.44
19-Jun-12 12:44:56 9.85 -0.01 -2.70
19-Jun-12 12:45:25 4.50 1.73 56.72
19-Jun-12 12:45:55 3.01 3.16 106.51
19-Jun-12 12:46:25 0.21 0.11 242.80
19-Jun-12 12:46:56 0.11 0.75 251.76
19-Jun-12 12:47:25 0.58 0.69 250.53 CO Mid(250 ppm)'
19-Jun-12 12:47:55 4.72 6.94 258.29
19-Jun-12 12:48:25 7.62 13.16 327.47
19-Jun-12 12:48:55 7.56 13.29 449.97
19-Jun-12 12:49:25 7.40 13.47 441.75
19-Jun-12 12:49:55 7.33 13.54 494.33
19-Jun-12 12:50:25 7.35 13.51 500.03
19-Jun-12 12:50:55 7.37 13.50 475.01
19-Jun-12 12:51:25 4.31 7.21 232.73

Page 6 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % PPm
19-Jun-12 12:51:55 3.73 7.01 228.79
19-Jun-12 12:52:25 2.19 4.01 126.77
19-Jun-12 12:52:55 5.73 11.52 388.20
19-Jun-12 12:53:25 3.50 6.35 256.41
19-Jun-12 12:53:55 4.30 8.67 259.95
19-Jun-12 12:54:25 6.82 12.83 384.13
19-Jun-12 12:54:55 7.16 13.32 427.96
19-Jun-12 12:55:25 7.35 13.36 454.79
19-Jun-12 12:55:55 7.41 13.38 461.38
19-Jun-12 12:56:25 7.34 13.48 459.12
19-Jun-12 12:56:55 7.28 13.55 409.56
19-Jun-12 12:57:25 7.29 13.55 412,13
19-Jun-12 12:57:55 7.19 13.66 464.80
19-Jun-12 12:58:25 7.15 13.69 426.90
19-Jun-12 12:58:55 7.19 13,66 384.56
19-Jun-12 12:59:25 7.13 13.71 433.11
19-Jun-12 12:59:55 6.98 13.86 382.79
19-Jun-12 13:00:25 6.96 13.87 356.85
19-Jun-12 13:00:55 7.01 13.81 383.11
19-Jun-12 13:01:25 7.16 13.67 438.05
19-Jun-12 13:01:55 7.23 13.60 414.20
19-Jun-12 13:02:25 7.28 13.54 385.66
19-Jun-12 13:02:55 7.43 13.40 452.58
19-Jun-12 13:03:25 7.56 13.26 405.57
19-Jun-12 13:03:55 7.70 13.13 414.79
19-Jun-12 13:04:25 7.74 13.10 445.88
19-Jun-12 13:04:55 7.59 13.24 462.28
19-Jun-12 13:05:26 7.62 13.21 466.59
19-Jun-12 13:05:55 7.58 13.25 448.79
19-Jun-12 13:06:25 7.44 13.40 427.41
19-Jun-12 13:06:55 7.27 13.56 458.15
19-Jun-12 13:07:26 7.27 13.56 470.42
19-Jun-12 13:07:55 7.23 13.60 478.33
19-Jun-12 13:08:25 7.15 13.68 488.16
19-Jun-12 13:08:55 7.08 13.74 521.53
19-Jun-12 13:09:26 7.11 13.71 472.80
19-Jun-12 13:09:55 7.17 13.66 473.10
19-Jun-12 13:10:25 7.17 13.65 521.93
19-Jun-12 13:10:55 7.16 13.66 515.16
19-Jun-12 13:11:31 7.19 13.63 487.84
19-Jun-12 13:11:58 7.35 13.48 399.37
19-Jun-12 13:12:25 7.30 13.53 486.42
19-Jun-12 13:12:55 7.28 13.54 436.79
19-Jun-12 13:13:25 7.28 13.51 418.31
19-Jun-12 13:13:55 4.91 8.35 255.65
19-Jun-12 13:14:25 2.97 5.53 194.02
19-Jun-12 13:14:55 6.15 11.59 426.12
19-Jun-12 13:15:25 7.19 13.05 532.38
19-Jun-12 13:15:55 7.49 13.14 495.01 Start,Run 2(13:15)
19-Jun-12 13:16:25 7.67 13.07 481.31
19-Jun-12 13:16:55 7.74 13.05 477.75
19-Jun-12 13:17:25 7.59 13.22 465.38
19-Jun-12 13:17:55 7.37 13.45 450.94
19-Jun-12 13:18:25 7.27 13.54 469.27
19-Jun-12 13:18:55 7.29 13.52 473.02
19-Jun-12 13:19:25 7.33 13.50 453.42
19-Jun-12 13:19:55 7.28 13.55 422.52
19-Jun-12 13:20:25 7.19 13.64 450.69

Page 7 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 13:20:55 7.20 13.62 398.49
19-Jun-12 13:21:25 7.29 13.54 349.66
19-Jun-12 13:21:55 7.26 13.57 380.87
19-Jun-12 13:22:25 7.25 13.58 392.29
19-Jun-12 13:22:55 7.14 13.69 398.09
19-Jun-12 13:23:25 7.09 13.73 382.64
19-Jun-12 13:23:55 7.18 13.64 405.09
19-Jun-12 13:24:25 7.25 13.57 419.68
19-Jun-12 13:24:55 7.27 13.56 383.53
19-Jun-12 13:25:25 7.26 13.57 351.02
19-Jun-12 13:26:07 7.23 13.59 371.36
19-Jun-12 13:26:25 7.26 13.56 346.58
19-Jun-12 13:26:55 7.23 13.60 371.27
19-Jun-12 13:27:25 7.23 13.60 341.15
19-Jun-12 13:27:56 7.16 13.67 350.23
19-Jun-12 13:28:25 7.11 13.70 417.71
19-Jun-12 13:28:55 7.23 13.57 437.84
19-Jun-12 13:29:25 7.42 13.40 404.12
19-Jun-12 13:29:56 7.39 13.44 403.74
19-Jun-12 13:30:25 7.40 13.42 338.49
19-Jun-12 13:30:55 7.46 13.38 319.18
19-Jun-12 13:31:25 7.42 13.41 311.96
19-Jun-12 13:31:56 7.43 13.41 325.98
19-Jun-12 13:32:25 7.33 13.50 388.77
19-Jun-12 13:32:55 7.41 13.40 374.83
19-Jun-12 13:33:25 7.56 13.25 376.41
19-Jun-12 13:33:55 7.61 13.19 378.29
19-Jun-12 13:34:25 7.71 13.10 330.43
19-Jun-12 13:35:04 7.68 13.14 416.76
19-Jun-12 13:35:25 7.64 13.17 423.88
19-Jun-12 13:35:56 7.66 13.15 404.28
19-Jun-12 13:36:25 7.61 13.21 355.72
19-Jun-12 13:36:55 7.60 13.21 370.24
19-Jun-12 13:37:25 7.63 13.19 397.52
19-Jun-12 13:37:55 7.50 13.33 386.29
19-Jun-12 13:38:27 7.37 13.45 390.33
19-Jun-12 13:38:55 7.40 13.41 382.89
19-Jun-12 13:39:31 7.49 13.31 388.42
19-Jun-12 13:39:55 7.54 13.28 387.49
19-Jun-12 13:40:25 7.62 13.19 387.61
19-Jun-12 13:40:55 7.67 13.15 380.27
19-Jun-12 13:41:25 7.60 13.21 391.30
19-Jun-12 13:41:55 7.64 13.17 386.05
19-Jun-12 13:42:25 7.63 13.18 396.54
19-Jun-12 13:42:55 7.70 13.10 430.50
19-Jun-12 13:43:25 7.78 13.03 376.07
19-Jun-12 13:43:55 7.75 13.07 342.57
19-Jun-12 13:44:25 7.60 13.22 379.73
19-Jun-12 13:44:55 7.43 13.38 389.10
19-Jun-12 13:45:25 7.32 13.50 357.14
19-Jun-12 13:45:55 7.21 13.60 370.40
19-Jun-12 13:46:25 7.16 13.64 390.42
19-Jun-12 13:46:55 7.29 13.50 421.98
19-Jun-12 13:47:25 7.38 13.42 382.65
19-Jun-12 13:47:55 7.43 13.38 391.81
19-Jun-12 13:48:25 7.47 13.33 407.02
19-Jun-12 13:48:55 7.53 13.27 424.67
19-Jun-12 13:49:25 7.59 13.21 376.04
19-Jun-12 13:49:55 7.66 13.15 397.56

Page 8 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants,Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 13:50:26 7.72 13.09 394.27
19-Jun-12 13:50:55 7.75 13.05 404.10
19-Jun-12 13:51:25 7.75 13.06 381.85
19-Jun-12 13:51:55 7.71 13.10 340.10
19-Jun-12 13:52:26 7.61 13.19 430.90
19-Jun-12 13:52:55 7.63 13.16 453.62
19-Jun-12 13:53:25 7.60 13.21 389.37
19-Jun-12 13:53:55 7.50 13.30 424.77
19-Jun-12 13:54:26 7.40 13.42 429.63
19-Jun-12 13:54:55 7.34 13.46 434.45
19-Jun-12 13:55:25 7.41 13.38 482.46
19-Jun-12 13:55:55 7.52 13.27 457.47
19-Jun-12 13:56:25 7.55 13.23 492.76
19-Jun-12 13:56:55 7.65 13.14 458.52
19-Jun-12 13:57:25 7.57 13.23 467.05
19-Jun-12 13:57:55 7.53 13.27 420.30
19-Jun-12 13:58:25 7.45 13.34 466.15
19-Jun-12 13:58:55 7.45 13.34 431.07
19-Jun-12 13:59:25 7.38 13.42 376.56
19-Jun-12 13:59:55 7.32 13.48 389.81
19-Jun-12 14:00:25 7.21 13.59 362.41
19-Jun-12 14:00:55 7.15 13.64 415.03
19-Jun-12 14:01:25 7.23 13.53 496.38
19-Jun-12 14:01:55 7.42 13.34 458.97
19-Jun-12 14:02:25 7.54 13.24 454.44
19-Jun-12 14:02:55 7.60 13.17 447.78
19-Jun-12 14:03:25 7.67 13.11 406.99
19-Jun-12 14:03:55 7.77 13.01 419.37
19-Jun-12 14:04:25 7.75 13.04 437.25
19-Jun-12 14:04:55 7.71 13.06 475.27
19-Jun-12 14:05:25 7.73 13.03 476.39
19-Jun-12 14:05:55 7.80 12.96 430.92
19-Jun-12 14:06:25 7.75 13.03 468.09
19-Jun-12 14:06:55 7.74 13.02 453.29
19-Jun-12 14:07:25 7.81 12.95 435.14
19-Jun-12 14:07:55 7.84 12.93 415.04
19-Jun-12 14:08:25 7.76 13.02 432.93
19-Jun-12 14:08:55 7.68 13.10 394.46
19-Jun-12 14:09:25 7.65 13.13 425.09
19-Jun-12 14:09:55 7.65 13.12 491.38
19-Jun-12 14:10:25 7.63 13.14 480.27
19-Jun-12 14:10:55 7.56 13.21 495.45
19-Jun-12 14:11:25 7.56 13.21 473.83
19-Jun-12 14:11:55 7.51 13.27 400.29
19-Jun-12 14:12:25 7.41 13.38 410.98
19-Jun-12 14:12:56 7.23 13.55 477.04
19-Jun-12 14:13:25 7.25 13.51 452.64
19-Jun-12 14:13:55 7.39 13.38 409.13
19-Jun-12 14:14:25 7.47 13.30 375.21 Run 2 Averages
19-Jun-12 14:14:56 7.49 13.27 405.94 02 CO2 CO
19-Jun-12 14:15:25 7.46 13.31 379.80 7.48 13.32 410.57
19-Jun-12 14:15:55 7.38 13.39 424.08 End Run 2
19-Jun-12 14:16:25 7.46 13.29 392.75
19-Jun-12 14:16:56 7.55 13.22 351.02
19-Jun-12 14:17:25 7.52 13.24 376.45
19-Jun-12 14:17:55 7.49 13.26 382.12
19-Jun-12 14:18:25 3.89 5.99 166.31
19-Jun-12 14:18:55 0.73 1.12 31.87

Page 9 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 14:19:25 0.30 0.46 13.96
19-Jun-12 14:19:55 0.20 0.30 7.26
19-Jun-12 14:20:25 0.16 0.22 0.99
19-Jun-12 14:20:55 0.15 0.19 0.78
19-Jun-12 14:21:25 0.13 0.13 1.01
19-Jun-12 14:21:55 0.01 0.02 1.43 02 Zero
19-Jun-12 14:22:25 0.03 0.00 1.14 CO2 Zero
19-Jun-12 14:22:55 0.08 0.01 1.89 CO Zero
19-Jun-12 14:23:25 0.07 -0.01 2.22
19-Jun-12 14:23:55 0.04 -0.08 0.82
19-Jun-12 14:24:25 0.15 0.21 7.97
19-Jun-12 14:24:55 2.81 2.67 66.95
19-Jun-12 14:25:25 8.02 0.71 17.21
19-Jun-12 14:25:55 9.53 0.13 3.51
19-Jun-12 14.26.25 9.83 -0.01 0.62
19-Jun-12 14:26:55 9.94 -0.05 -0.44
19-Jun-12 14:27:25 10.01 -0.03 -1.20 02 Mid(10%)
19-Jun-12 14:27:55 10.06 -0.02 -1.36
19-Jun-12 14:28:25 10.10 -0.06 -1.52
19-Jun-12 14:28:55 8.11 3.51 47.00
19-Jun-12 14:29:25 2.39 8.01 14.81
19-Jun-12 14:29:55 0.79 9.21 2.97
19-Jun-12 14:30:25 0.28 9.59 2.37
19-Jun-12 14:30:55 0.10 9.85 4.14
19-Jun-12 14:31:25 0.04 10.01 3.19 CO2 Mid(10%)
19-Jun-12 14:31:55 0.00 10.04 5.07
19-Jun-12 14:32:25 -0.02 6.05 4.90
19-Jun-12 14:32:55 0.26 10.21 22.71
19-Jun-12 14:33:25 4.68 11.78 247.86 CO Mid(250 ppm)
19-Jun-12 14:33:55 7.25 12.56 248.02
19-Jun-12 14:34:25 7.83 12.83 250.15
19-Jun-12 14:34:55 7.99 12.94 535.15
19-Jun-12 14:35:26 8.02 13.08 516.96
19-Jun-12 14:35:55 7.76 13.38 446.33
19-Jun-12 14:36:25 7.64 13.51 479.84
19-Jun-12 14:36:55 7.66 13.51 508.27
19-Jun-12 14:37:26 7.54 13.64 521.13
19-Jun-12 14:37:55 7.54 13.63 505.07
19-Jun-12 14:38:25 7.62 13.56 429.88
19-Jun-12 14:38:57 7.56 13.63 562.98
19-Jun-12 14:39:26 7.63 13.56 543.86
19-Jun-12 14:39:55 7.60 13.60 452.96
19-Jun-12 14:40:25 7.58 13.61 476.60
19-Jun-12 14:40:55 7.68 13.51 441.28
19-Jun-12 14:41:25 7.74 13.45 552.02
19-Jun-12 14:41:55 7.68 13.52 573.45
19-Jun-12 14:42:25 7.68 13.52 485.10
19-Jun-12 14:42:55 7.76 13.42 558.42
19-Jun-12 14:43:25 7.86 13.32 494.57
19-Jun-12 14:43:55 7.87 13.32 434.73
19-Jun-12 14:44:25 7.84 13.35 488.97
19-Jun-12 14:44:55 7.90 13.29 510.87
19-Jun-12 14:45:25 7.83 13.37 425.98
19-Jun-12 14:45'55 7.82 13.38 471.62 Start Run 3 (14,46)
19-Jun-12 14:46:25 7.76 13.43 432.71
19-Jun-12 14:46:55 7.77 13.42 471.59
19-Jun-12 14:47:25 7.77 13.42 483.12
19-Jun-12 14:47:55 7.85 13.34 488.61
19-Jun-12 14:48:25 8.02 13.16 442.70

Page 10 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants,Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 14:48:55 8.01 13.17 502.29
19-Jun-12 14:49:25 7.98 13.22 447.96
19-Jun-12 14:49:55 7.89 13.31 468.91
19-Jun-12 14:50:26 7.84 13.35 563.95
19-Jun-12 14:50:55 7.88 13.29 421.69
19-Jun-12 14:51:25 7.97 13.20 454.81
19-Jun-12 14:51:55 7.99 13.19 473.51
19-Jun-12 14:52:25 8.04 13.14 445.14
19-Jun-12 14:52:55 8.05 13.13 461.26
19-Jun-12 14:53:25 8.05 13.15 459.73
19-Jun-12 14:53:55 7.88 13.32 462.02
19-Jun-12 14:54:25 7.78 13.42 486.11
19-Jun-12 14:54:55 7.53 13.67 467.69
19-Jun-12 14:55:28 7.41 13.77 441.96
19-Jun-12 14:55:55 7.40 13.80 452.23
19-Jun-12 14:56:26 7.32 13.88 433.01
19-Jun-12 14:56:55 7.47 13.71 407.92
19-Jun-12 14:57:29 7.61 13.56 458.86
19-Jun-12 14:57:56 7.60 13.57 459.31
19-Jun-12 14:58:25 7.75 13.42 411.86
19-Jun-12 14:58:55 7.78 13.40 470.51
19-Jun-12 14:59:25 7.72 13.46 413.83
19-Jun-12 14:59:56 7.78 13.39 409.79
19-Jun-12 15:00:25 7.97 13.19 421.71
19-Jun-12 15:00:55 7.98 13.18 477.93
19-Jun-12 15:01:25 7.92 13.23 442.77
19-Jun-12 15:01:56 7.97 13.19 402.53
19-Jun-12 15:02:25 7.94 13.24 420.89
19-Jun-12 15:02:55 7.92 13.24 429.10
19-Jun-12 15:03:25 7.92 13.25 489.26
19-Jun-12 15:03:55 7.87 13.31 475.85
19-Jun-12 15:04:25 7.70 13.49 431.92
19-Jun-12 15:05:00 7.43 13.76 417.25
19-Jun-12 15:05:25 7.34 13.84 391.08
19-Jun-12 15:05:57 7.30 13.88 397.64
19-Jun-12 15:06:25 7.33 13.83 444.44
19-Jun-12 15:06:55 7.46 13.72 498.68
19-Jun-12 15:07:25 7.50 13.69 389.69
19-Jun-12 15:07:55 7.52 13.67 417.33
19-Jun-12 15:08:25 7.59 13.60 466.34
19-Jun-12 15:08:56 7.63 13.56 416.75
19-Jun-12 15:09:25 7.64 13.54 426.47
19-Jun-12 15:09:55 7.69 13.49 455.59
19-Jun-12 15:10:25 7.70 13.48 465.05
19-Jun-12 15:10:55 7.70 13.48 447.62
19-Jun-12 15:11:25 7.61 13.58 450.28
19-Jun-12 15:11:55 7.50 13.67 456.83
19-Jun-12 15:12:25 7.60 13.58 454.06
19-Jun-12 15:12:55 7.66 13.53 450.02
19-Jun-12 15:13:25 7.74 13.44 487.32
19-Jun-12 15:13:55 7.85 13.32 433.37
19-Jun-12 15:14:25 8.04 13.15 412.90
19-Jun-12 15:14:55 7.90 13.29 481.15
19-Jun-12 15:15:25 7.76 13.42 488.87
19-Jun-12 15:15:55 7.80 13.37 496.33
19-Jun-12 15:16:42 7.89 13.28 471.03
19-Jun-12 15:17:01 7.97 13.22 443.94
19-Jun-12 15:17:25 7.87 13.32 439.01
19-Jun-12 15:17:55 7.60 13.60 484.13

Page 11 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 15:18:25 7.44 13.74 452.71
19-Jun-12 15:18:55 7.53 13.66 447.18
19-Jun-12 15:19:25 7.54 13.65 428.30
19-Jun-12 15:19:55 7.50 13.68 448.26
19-Jun-12 15:20:44 7.44 13.75 473.13
19-Jun-12 15:20:55 7.37 13.82 479.82
19-Jun-12 15:21:25 7.38 13.82 408.76
19-Jun-12 15:21:55 7.37 13.82 416.12
19-Jun-12 15:22:26 7.42 13.77 379.16
19-Jun-12 15:22:55 7.50 13.68 413.48
19-Jun-12 15:23:25 7.62 13.56 434.84
19-Jun-12 15:23:55 7.64 13.55 445.77
19-Jun-12 15:24:26 7.86 13.31 493.28
19-Jun-12 15:24:55 8.03 13.14 494.72
19-Jun-12 15:25:25 8.09 13.08 408.43
19-Jun-12 15:25:55 8.09 13.09 489.35
19-Jun-12 15:26:25 8.10 13.08 453.43
19-Jun-12 15:26:55 8.14 13.04 448.06
19-Jun-12 15:27:25 8.10 13.09 444.97
19-Jun-12 15:27:55 8.02 13.17 436.13
19-Jun-12 15:28:25 7.78 13.43 431.95
19-Jun-12 15:28:55 7.71 13.48 471.77
19-Jun-12 15:29:25 7.69 13.50 396.83
19-Jun-12 15:29:55 7.63 13.56 455.92
19-Jun-12 15:30:25 7.58 13.61 443.21
19-Jun-12 15:30:55 7.62 13.57 474.35
19-Jun-12 15:31:25 7.62 13.58 408.23
19-Jun-12 15:31:55 7.56 13.63 417.55
19-Jun-12 15:32:25 7.58 13.61 429.91
19-Jun-12 15:32:55 7.64 13.53 478.79
19-Jun-12 15:33:25 7.72 13.46 445.23
19-Jun-12 15:33:55 7.76 13.42 460.00
19-Jun-12 15:34:25 7.76 13.42 464.50
19-Jun-12 15:34:55 7.77 13.42 476.47
19-Jun-12 15:35:25 7.69 13.49 478.16
19-Jun-12 15:35:55 7.70 13.48 489.29
19-Jun-12 15:36:25 7.77 13.41 411.60
19-Jun-12 15:36:55 7.73 13.46 462.71
19-Jun-12 15:37:25 7.67 13.50 482.30
19-Jun-12 15:37:55 7.94 13.19 477.14
19-Jun-12 15:38:25 8.20 12.95 450.84
19-Jun-12 15:38:55 8.26 12.88 498.03
19-Jun-12 15:39:25 8.29 12.86 440.86
19-Jun-12 15:39:55 8.41 12.73 419.91
19-Jun-12 15:40:25 8.18 13.00 472.84
19-Jun-12 15:40:55 8.00 13.17 450.67
19-Jun-12 15:41:25 7.96 13.19 462.21
19-Jun-12 15:41:55 8.14 13.01 458.75
19-Jun-12 15:42:25 8.22 12.94 416.74
19-Jun-12 15:42:56 8.28 12.86 445.83
19-Jun-12 15:43:25 8.31 12.84 440.43
19-Jun-12 15:43:55 8.26 12.89 459.13
19-Jun-12 15:44:25 8.33 12.83 479.29 Run 3 Averages
19-Jun-12 15:44:56 8.27 12.88 440.99 02 CO2 CO
19-Jun-12 15:45:25 8.26 12.89 458.82 7.80 13.38 450.62
19-Jun-12 15:45:55 8.21 12.94 437.62 End Run 3
19-Jun-12 15:46:25 8.19 12.96 454.84
19-Jun-12 15:46:56 8.04 13.13 464.74

Page 12 of 12
Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc. Wellons
CEM Data Lewiston,NC
Parameter 02 CO2 CO
Units % % ppm
19-Jun-12 15:47:25 7.98 13.18 491.88
19-Jun-12 15:47:55 5.80 11.86 358.02
19-Jun-12 15:48:27 1.83 10.20 77.05
19-Jun-12 15:48:55 1.11 9.80 26.94
19-Jun-12 15:49:25 0.22 9.88 5.72
19-Jun-12 15:49:55 0.03 9.95 0.36 021 CO2 Zero
19-Jun-12 15:50:25 -0.16 10.06 1.23 CO 2 Mid(10%)
19-Jun-12 15:50:55 0.06 9.90 10.19
19-Jun-12 15:51:25 0.83 9.79 29.59
19-Jun-12 15:51:55 4.89 5.80 57.58
19-Jun-12 15:52:25 9.06 1.07 6.09
19-Jun-12 15:52:55 9.74 0.37 1.69
19-Jun-12 15:53:25 9.85 0.22 3.14
19-Jun-12 15:53:55 9.99 0.06 4.41 CO2 Zero
19-Jun-12 15:54:25 10.02 0.03 4.99 02 Mid(10%)
19-Jun-12 15:54:55 7.09 -0.01 34.27
19-Jun-12 15:55:25 1.14 0.05 99.80
19-Jun-12 15:55:55 0.98 0.68 171.62
19-Jun-12 15:56:25 0.02 0.03 247.57
19-Jun-12 15:56:55 0.09 0.10 250.29 CO Mid(250'ppm)
19-Jun-12 15:57:25 0.02 0.10 145.70
19-Jun-12 15:57:55 8.01 3.20 84.78
19-Jun-12 15:58:25 13.12 0.11 34.92
19-Jun-12 15:58:55 17.25 0.97 7.36
19-Jun-12 15:59:25 19.49 0.08 7.01

CEM BIAS CORRECTION - 02
Client: Wellons II
Location: Lewiston, NC
Source: ESP Outlet
Date: 6/19/12
Run One
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in percent
7.41
Uncorrected Average for Run#1 1 7.41
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations 7.41
Run Two
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in percent
7.48
Uncorrected Average for Run#2 1 7.48
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations 7.47
Run Three
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in percent
7.80
Uncorrected Average for Run#3 1 7.80
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations 1 7.78

CEM BIAS CORRECTION - CO2
Client: Wellons II
Location: Lewiston, NC
Source: ESP Outlet
Date: 6/19112
Run One
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in percent
13.57
Uncorrected Average for Run#1 1 13.57
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations 13.611 F�l
Run Two
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in percent
13.32
Uncorrected Average for Run#2 1 13.32
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations 13.36
Run Three
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in percent
13.38
Uncorrected Average for Run#3 1 13.38
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations 1 13.34

Carbon Monoxide Emission Rate Calculation
Run One
Client: Wellons II
Location: Lewiston, NC
Source: ESP Outlet
Date: 6/19/12
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in parts per million
411.58
Uncorrected Average for Run#1 1 411.58
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations L 413.04
Run Two
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in parts per million
410.57
Uncorrected Average for Run#2 1 410.57
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations 412.661 E�A
Run Three
Time Unit Concentration Comments
in parts per million
450.62
Uncorrected Average for Run#3 1 450.62
Data corrected for Pre-/Post-Calibrations 1 453.19

ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS, INC.
Initial Source Survey
Test Date 05/10/12
Company W.E. Partners II, LLC
Address
City,State Lewiston Woodville, NC
Process Tested Biomass Fired Boilers
Specific Source ESB 1-3
Air Pollution Controls ESP
Test Methods 1-5

Method 1 -Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources
p 9 Y rY
(Circular Stack) Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction
1/16 1/8 3/16 1/4 5116 3/8
Distance- Far Wall to Outside of Port(in) 58.00 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.38
Distance-Near Wall to Outside of Port(in) 8.50 Port Length
PROBE MARKINGS
Inside Diameter of Stack(in) 49.50 Decimal Inches
Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter
Traverse
Point
Port Diameter-For Ref. Only(in) 4.00 Number 2 4 6 8 10 12
1 15.73 11.82 10.68 10.08 9.79 9.54
Distance to Upstream Disturbance(ft) 17.17 2 50.77 20.88 15.73 13.70 12.56 11.82
Distance to Downstream Disturbance (ft) 7.83 3 45.63 23.15 18.10 15.73 14.34
Diameters Upstream 4.16 4 54.68 43.35 24.49 19.69 17.26
Diameters Downstream 1.90 5 50.77 42.01 25.43 20.88
6 55.82 48.40 41.07 26.12
Minimum Distance to Stack Wall 1.00 7 52.80 46.81 40.38
(Default is 1.0 inch) 8 56.42 50.77 45.63
9 53.94 49.24
10 56.71 52.16
11 54.68
12 56.96

PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE CALCULATION
LOCATION: W.E.Partners 11,LLC
SOURCE: Biomass Fired Boilers
DATA Run#1 Run#2 Run#3 AVERAGE
DATE 05/10/12 05/10/12 05/10/12
RUN TIME(min) 120.00 120.00 120.00
Dn(in) 0.275 0.275 0.275
An(ft2) 4.12E-04 4.12E-04 4.12E-04
AVG DH(in H2O) 1.63 1.59 1.60 1.61
P ATM(in Hg) 29.70 29.70 29.70
Pm(in Hg) 29.82 29.82 29.82
Ps(GAUGE) -0.25 -0.25 -0.25
Ps(IN HG) 29.68 29.6E 29.68
TM(F) 75.33 77.58 81.13
Tm(R) 535.02 537.27 540.82
Vm(ft3) 79.68 78.46 78.52
Vm STD(ft3) 77.27 75.76 75.33
VLQ(MI) 349.50 352.00 349.00
W STD(ft3) 16.48 16.60 16.46
V STD(ft3) 93.76 92.37 91.79
Y..M 17.58 17.97 17.93 17.83
%SVP 1 100.00 100.00 100.00
MD 0.824 0.820 0.821
MWD 30.41 30.31 30.33
M 28.23 28.09 28.12
Ts(F) 323.63 328.88 330.46 327.65
Ts(R) 783.32 788.57 790.15 787.34
SUM SQRTDP 17.26 17.18 17.15
N DP 24.00 24.00 24.00
AVG SQRT DP 0.72 0.72 0.71
CP 0.84 0.84 0.84
Vs(ft/s) 49.92 49.99 49.93 49.95
Ds(in) 49.50 49.50 49.50
As(ft2) 13.36 13.36 13.36
QS,FLOW,ACFM 40.032 40,081 40,038 40,050
Q STD(ft3/min) 26,769 26,623 26,542 26,645
Q STD DRY,FLOW SCFM 22,062 21,838 21,782 21,894
WT(9m) 0.0128 0.0237 0.0184 0.0183
WT(gm)-Organic Condensable
WT(gm)-Inorganic Condensable
%I 94.62 93.73 93.43
%CO2 13.26 12.39 12.57 12.74
%02 7.20 8.10 7.90 7.73
%CO 0.00 0.00 0.00
1'.N2 79.54 79.51 79.53
PMRc(Ibs/hr) 0.483 0.904 0.704 0.697
Cs(GR/SCFD) 0.0026 0.0048 0.0038 0.0037
PMRc(Iblhr)-Organic Condensable
PMRc(Ib/hr)-Inorganic Condensable
F FACTOR 92.400 92.400 92.400
HI(MMBtu/hr) 93.909 86.B47 87.978 89.58
PMRU(Ib/MMBtu) 0.0051 ,.6;0}p4 r 0,0080, 0.0079
NCDENR Allowable(Ib/MMStu)
GACT(Subpart JJJJJJ)Allowable 0.07;
Theoretical amount of moisture thatTs can hod.
If%M>%SVP,%SVP will be utilized in calculations.

MOISTURE DATA
ESB 1-3
5/10/2012
Run#1
1st Imp. 2nd Imp. 3rd Imp. 4th Imp. TOTALS
BEGINNING 100 100 0 300.0
ENDING 328 174 21 326.5
NET 228 74 21 26.5 349.5
Run#2
1st Imp. 2nd Imp. 3rd Imp. 4th Imp. TOTALS
BEGINNING 100 100 0 300.0
ENDING 331 180 20 321.0
NET 231 80 20 21.0 352.0
Run#3
1st Imp. 2nd Imp. 3rd Imp. 4th Imp. TOTALS
BEGINNING 100 100 0 300.0
ENDING 308 191 25 325.0
NET 208 91 25 25.0 349.0

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION
The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the
desired critical orifice pressure drop.
OH = KxOp
The constant,K,is determined by the following equation.
OH =1846.72 x D„ X OFI� X c2 (1-Bws)2 x M`'T„Ps Ms x Op
T.P
W.E.Partners II,LLC
5/10/2012
Run#1 Run#2 Run#3
Module ID ATC 5 ATC 5 ATC 5
Dn 0.275 0,275 0.275
dH@ 1.921 1.921 1.921
Y,gamma factor 0.986 0.986 0.986
CP 0.84 0.84 0.84
Bw(FRACTION,NOT%) 0.,20 0.20 0,20
Md 29.0 29.0 29.0
Pbar 29.70 29.70 29.70
PS(GAUGE) -0.25 -0,25 -0,25
Ps 29.68 29.68 29.68
Tm,F 75 80 85
Tm,R 534.69 539.69 544.69
Ms 26.80 26.80 26.80
Ts,F 310 325 325
Ts,R 769.69 784.69 784.69
Pm 29.81 29,82 29.82
K 3.1442 3.1119 3.1410
Terminology
Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT
=Md(1-Bw)+18Bw
Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT(29)OR
=(0.44*%CO2)+(0.32`%02)+(0.28`(%N 2+%CO))
Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE(IN.H20)
Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE(IN.Hg)
Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE(IN.Hg)
=Pbar+(avg dH/13.6)
'The method 5 sampling train is intended to operate at a sampling rate of 0.75 cfm of dry air at 68 of
and 29.92 in.Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such a sampling rate through
the orifice is designated as OH,A.
The theoretical nozzle calculation is optional. If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle
size through other means(experience,prior testing,etc.),this is also acceptable. Dn(theoretical)is
calculated on the assumption that a 0.75 cfm flowrate is achieved at 68°F and 29.92 in. Hg.

ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS
DATE 05/10/12
SOURCE Biomass Fired Boilers
Run#1 K= 3.1442
POINT# TM Ts dp dH SQRT DP %02 %CO2 Fuel Factor
Fo
Al 68 318 0.48 1.51 0.693 #DIV/0!
A2 68 318 0.50 1.57 0.707
A3 69 319 0.51 1.60 0.714 #DIV/0!
A4 70 320 0.52 1.63 0.721
A5 70 320 0.52 1.63 0.721 #DIV/0!
A6 71 322 0.52 1.63 0.721
A7 71 324 0.52 1.63 0.721 #DIV/0!
A8 72 324 0.51 1.60 0.714
A9 72 324 0.51 1.60 0.714 #DIV/01
A10 74 325 0.50 1.57 0.707
All 76 325 0.50 1.57 0.707 #DIV/0!
Al2 76 325 0.50 1.57 0.707
B1 77 325 0.53 1.67 0.728 #DIV/0!
B2 78 326 0.53 1.67 0.728
B3 78 326 0.54 1.70 0.735 #DIV/0!
B4 78 326 0.54 1.70 0.735
B5 79 326 0.51 1.60 0.714 #DIV/0!
B6 79 326 0.51 1.60 0.714
B7 80 325 0.52 1.63 0.721 #DIV/0!
B8 80 325 0.52 1.63 0.721
B9 80 325 0.52 1.63 0.721 #DIV/0!
B10 80 325 0.52 1.63 0.721
Bll 81 325 0.54 1.70 0.735 #DIV/0!
B12 81 323 0.54 1.70 0.735
75.33 323.63 1.63 17.256 7.20 13.26 1.03
Vm(M) Initial 331.84
Final 411.52
Total 79.68

ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS
DATE 05/10/12
SOURCE Biomass Fired Boilers
Run#2 K= 3.1119
POINT# TM Ts dp dH SQRT DP %02 %CO2 Fuel Factor
Fo
Al 76 328 0.52 1.62 0.721 #DIV/01
A2 76 329 0.52 1.62 0.721
A3 76 329 0.53 1.65 0.728 #DIV/0!
A4 76 329 0.53 1.65 0.728
A5 76 329 0.54 1.68 0.735 #DIV/01
A6 77 330 0.54 1.68 0.735
A7 77 330 0.54 1.68 0.735 #DIV/01
A8 77 330 0.51 1.59 0.714
A9 77 329 0.50 1.56 0.707 #DIV/0!
A10 78 329 0.50 1.56 0.707'
All 78 329 0.51 1.59 0.714 #DIV/0!
Al2 78 328 0.51 1.59 0.714
B1 78 327 0.47 1.46 0.686 #DIV/0!
B2 78 328 0.49 1.52 0.700
B3 78 330 0.51 1.59 0.714 #DIV/0!
B4 78 331 0.51 1.59 0.714
B5 78 331 0.51 1.59 0.714 #DIV/0!
B6 78 330 0.51 1.59 0.714
B7 78 330 0.52 1.62 0.721 #DIV/0!
B8 78 329 0.52 1.62 0.721
B9 79 327 0.51 1.59 0.714 #DIV/0!
B10 79 327 0.50 1.56 0.707
Bll 79 327 0.50 1.56 0.707 #DIV/0!
B12 79 327 0.50 1.56 0.707
77.58 328.88 1.59 17.179 8.10 12.39 1.03
Vm(ft3) Initial 412.26
Final 490.72
Total 78.46
i'

ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS
DATE 05/10/12
SOURCE Biomass Fired Boilers
Run#3 K= 3.1410
POINT# TM Ts dp dH SQRT DP %02 %CO2 Fuel Factor
Fo
Al 79 330 0.49 1.54 0.700 #DIV/01
A2 80 331 0.49 1.54 0.700
A3 80 331 0.52 1.63 0.721 #DIV/0!
A4 80 332 0.52 1.63 0.721
A5 81 332 0.53 1.66 0.728 #DIV/0!
A6 81 332 0.53 1.66 0.728
A7 81 332 0.54 1.70 0.735 #DIV/0!
A8 81 332 0.50 1.57 0.707
A9 81 332 0.48 1.51 0.693 #DIV/0!
A10 82 332 0.48 1.51 0.693
All 82 330 0.48 1.51 0.693 #DIV/0!
Al2 82 330 0.47 1.48 0.686
B1 82 332 0.51 1.60 0.714 #DIV/0!
B2 82 332 0.51 1.60 0.714
B3 82 332 0.52 1.63 0.721 #DIV/0!
B4 82 331 0.52 1.63 0.721
85 82 330 0.52 1.63 0.721 #DIV/0!
B6 81 329 0.52 1.63 0.721
B7 81 329 0.53 1.66 0.728 #DIV/0!
B8 81 328 0.53 1.66 0.728
89 81 328 0.52 1.63 0.721 #D V/0!
B10 81 328 0.52 1.63 0.721
B11 81 328 0.52 1.63 0.721 #DIV/0!
B12 81 328 0.51 1.60 0.714
81.13 330.46 1.60 17.150 7.90 12.57 1.03
Vm(w) Initial 493.03
Final 571.55
Total 78.52

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
W.E. Partners ll, LLC
Lewiston Woodville, NC
Run #1
1) ABSOLUTE PRESSURE IN DRY GAS METER
Pm=P ATM+AVG DH/13.6 T STD= 528 DEG R.
P STD= 29.92 IN.HG
P ATM Avg.DH Pm
29.70 1.63 29.82
2) ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE
Ps=P ATM+Ps(GAUGE)/13.6
P ATM Ps(GAUGE) PS
29.70 -0.25 29.68
3) SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VM STD=(VM)'(Y)'(T STD/TM)'(PM/P STD)
Vm Tm Y Vm STD
R
79.68 535.02 0.986 77.27 ft3
Y'
4) VOLUME OF WATER COLLECTED,CORRECTED TO STANDARD CONDITIONS 1�
W STD=W STDw+WSTDSg r�
W STDw=(.002673)'(VLQw)'(T STD/P STD)
W STDsg=(.002668)'VLQsg)'(T STD/P STD)
WHERE 0.002673=0.04707 FT3/ML'IN.HG/17.64 DEG.R.
WHERE 0.002668=0.04715 FT3/G'IN.HG/17.64 DEG.R.
VLQ(w) VLQ(sg) W STD
323.00 26.50 16.48 ft3
5) TOTAL SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
V STD=Vm STD+W STD= 93.76 ft3
6) PERCENT MOISTURE IN STACK GAS
%M=(100)'(W STD)N STD= 17.58%
7) MOLE FRACTION OF DRY GAS
MD=(100-%M)/100= 0.824

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
(continued)
W.E. Partners ll, LLC
Lewiston Woodville, NC
Run #1
8) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS
MWD=(%CO2*0.44)+(02*0.32)+((%CO+%N2)*0.28)
%CO2 %02 %CO %N2 MWD
13.3 7.2 0.0 79.5 30.41
9) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS
M=(MWD)*(MD)+18(1-MD)= 28.23
WHERE 18=MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF WATER,G/G-MOLE
10) STACK VELOCITY
VS=(85.49)*(CP)*((TS/(PS)(M))Al/2*((SUM SORT DP)/N DP))
where 85.49=ft/sec*[lb/lb-mole*in.Hg)/(deg.R*in H20)]A0.5
CID Ts(R) SUM SORT N DP VS
0.84 783.32 17.26 24 49.92
11) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
QS=(60)*(VS)*(AS)
AS(inlet) QS
13.36 40,032
12) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE,STANDARD CONDITIONS INCLUDING MOISTURE
Q STD=Q STD DRY/MD 26,769
13) STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITIONS DRY
Q STD DRY=17.647*60*Md*Vs*A*(Ps/Ts(R))= 22,062
14) POLLUTANT MASS RATE,CONCENTRATION BASIS
PMRC=(.1323)*(WT)*(Q STD)N STD
WHERE 0.1323=COMBINED CONVERSION FACTOR(60 MIN/HR*0.00220 LBS/GRAM)
WT(GRAMS) PMRC
0.0128 0.483
15) PERCENT ISOKINETIC
%I=(0.09450*Ts*Vm std)/(Ps*Vs*An*Time*Md)
Run Time Area of Nozzle %I
120 4.12E-04 94.62
16) CONCENTRATION,GR/SCFD
Cs=15.43 gr/gm*WTNm STD
Cs= 0.0026

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
(concluded)
W.E. Partners ll, LLC
Lewiston Woodville, NC
Run #1
17) HEAT INPUT,mmbtu/hr
HI=(60min/hr/l00)(scfm)(20.9-%O2)/(F-factor'20.9)
F-factor %02 SCFM HI
92.4 7.20 22,062 93.909
18) PROCESS RATE RELATED EMISSION RATE,LBS/MMBTU
PMRU=PMRC/HI
PMRU= 0.005

AIRC
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING DATA SHEET
CLIENT ` DATE I() Za1Z -Pb. Of. 70 Module No.
LOCATION SOURCE :j5Q PS --O.Z2: Filter No.
TEST TEAM L1�, RUN # Methods h-$' Pitot No. j
MODULE LEAK RATE Comments (list other personnel on site) :
star t@�,D "Hg ❑H@ �.�ZA NOZZLE P.2?5-( 3 Z �2
endQ.(3�519 3�5 ��Hg � H2o -7�?_ �Zn"f"
Pitot Leak Check: Ts' Cal. Factor 2�
start end
A `� " A ✓ "H2O Md Pm ��j ATC Project No.
B " B ✓ "H2O K �j- \1AIA2 Xc — Start Finish i
Time Point Line TH Ts TP Te Ti ❑P 3H VM REMARKS
Vacuum OF OF °F OF OF a Ft3
(in.)HZO (in.)H20
oAl I I.C) 69 2 + 0.14t r. 33l.83
(07 ems" .s? 5-. 1$
1 9.5I �S-
h o z I 0.5-z
z I3
-z ZZ- �'i-
�i5" zy 0
"?Z .51 A (90 3S� 52-
c v zs- " I 15 `y I.5
It 2 Z5� i O.SD
1_ CQAD S? Z
&v -71 17, 1 22 1 z! 1 0,5 0
&5 77 3zb t -�' ( JO-53 z$
Toasater temperature T,=stack temperature Tpprobe temperature Te-filter temperature, e(ft3)_gas sample Volume
T.-exhaust temperature of st impinger, OP,=Velocity head differential pressure pH pressure differential across the orifice meter
QA/QC Chec plet e s Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checked b 2,
ule Oper t r (Signature/Date) Data Review (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 16-revision 5.1 11/13/07) A7C F 1-800-733-3193
F:\Nork\All Forms-Field Data Sheets,Ulc Formula@,No nclatute,etc\Field\16-Isokinetid Sampling Data Slleet.dot

i
AiRC
i ISOK,INETIC SAMPLING DATA SHEET
CLIENT `��Q�l�}�4 DATE �-4//o hz- Pbar Module No. /
LOCATION f ��C- SOURCE -C� Pg Filter No.
TEST TEAM L RUN #$ Met. S Pitot 011.
MODULE LEAK RATE SAN2T.TVM PA F, SETUPComments (list other personnel on site) :
Start @ g ❑H@ NOZZLE (# }
end @ "Hg Tm - x?o
Pitot Lea Check: Ts Cal. Fac r
start and
A A "H2C Md Pm ATC Protect No.
B B "hzC KZ Y Start Finish
Time Point Line T� TS Tv T= Tl ❑P, L;H �M REMARKS
Vacuum °F °F °E' OF OF (i s
(in.)H10 n.}H2p Ft
- o 1. o -76 37-f,
7 �' -7--7 " 1,70 .j Z
$b `� -72
� � �� �2-z .5--� l•too ���. �� f
,j JoS r0 V.SZ- /.lam 0(, bZ
10 �-
:,,=meter temperature ,=stack temperature Tv--probe temperature Tt=filter temperature, vm(ft')=gas sample volume
T;=exhaust temperature of -8 'linger, ❑P,=Velocity head differential pressure 11U=pressure differential acres. the orifice meter
QA/QC Check plet es Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checked by
odule Opera o (Signature/Date) Data Review (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 16-revision .1 ( /13/01) ATC $ 1-B00-733-3193
F:\Fork\All Forma-Field Data sheets,caic Formalao,Nomenclature,etc\Field\16-Isok ine tic sampling Data Sheet.dot

AMC
ISOKINETIC SAMPLING DATA SHEET
CLIENT We& DATE 511 C' )Z Pbar 9 7© Module No.
LOCATION SOURCE Lf S Ps -�® L.� Filter No.
TEST TEAM 1.{C. RUN # Methods Pitot No.
MODULE LEAK RATE 10, Comments (list other personnel on site) :
star p3 @ O "Hg []$@ Z) NOZZLEQ1 -7Jf ( )
end0.002@ ,o "Hg Tm % H2O 0'2'0
Pitot Leak Check: TS Z Cal. Factor
start Z'H20
d
A ,/ A Md % Pm 1.�'� ATC Project No.
B `/11 B��"H2O K Yo -- -- ' Start 1620 Finish 117,ii
Time Point Line TM Ts Tp TF T; 0P ❑H VM REMARKS
Vacuum °F °F °F °F °F a Ft
(in.)H20 (in.)H20
O Z SZI.&Z Z. ZSLQ
z 3-Z I r.(o?- !�
-7& 3 9 7 �) o s"3 to (g.g
df �G7 1 z7 �z t t .5-
'7(, 319 Z5' --1,z l Z5
2 7 550 51- Z-C> �' s zS 5
30 2' v �z 1 Leg 3 . SD
`'2 v ILI S? Os /5-9 F .�
-,7 d.s
�31 79 ��' zv .Y-1 J-{ q51 . qo
62s' Z- -7�'S ryz, �°r 1 �2 O4
Ta-meter temperature T,=stack temperature T.-probe temperature Tf-filter temperature, ,(£t3)=gas sample volume
Ti-exhaust temperature of last impinger, OP,=velocity head differential pressure OH--pressure differential across the orifice meter
QA/QC Check- plete s Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checked by I o 7i
o ul Oper to (Signature/Date) Data Review (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 16-revision 5.1 (7/13/07) ATC 8 1-800-733-3183
F:\Work\A.11 Forms-Field Data Sheate,Calc Formulao,t4 m nclatura,etc\Fiald\16-l60kinetia Sampling Data Shaet.dot

me
IS KINETIC SAMPLING DATA SHEET
CLIENT ��'r _DATE loll Z-- _ Phar " Module No. J.-
LOCATION SOURCE Fs / Filter No.
TEST TEAM j RUN # 'Z le.,AjT' Me ods Pitot
MODULE LEAK RATE SAMPT.TVrZ RATE SET Comments (list other personnel on site) ;
start @ If LH@ NOZZLE
end @ If Fig Tm
Pitot Lea Check: Tg Cal. Fact 'r
start end
A A ,H2O Md p i ATC Project No.
B B Hz0 --- y Start Finish
Tim s pT;
Vacu 04 ❑pa CH Vs REMARKSe Point Li TM Ti'17
( n ) 2
a r33 1, o -7 v 2 {
0 ?mod
o .52- /.6'Z 0. 9
T9 o,s- &Iz . 0-
loo 5 z0 &-V O. 1 /Sri l 7 . ,
) 1 1 `7 'y 71 z�l 7�t '� 0.6
Tm--meter temperature T,=stack temperature To probe temperature Tf=finer temperature, V„(ft')=gas sample volume
T,=exhaust temperature of last impirger, ❑P,=Velocity head differential pressure D2I=pressure differential across the orifice meter
QA/QC Check o plet c s Legibility y_ _ Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checked by: �v
cdule Qperat r (Signature/Date) Data Review (Signature/Date)
Arc Corm 16-revision 5.1
ms (7/i3/07) A2C ( ;-600-733-3i93
F:\Fork\All For -Field Data shsats,Calc rormcl ae,Nonxncla tune,etc\Field\26-2sokinatic 5ampling Data shoot.dot

MC
` 140r,INETIC SAMPLING DATA SHEET
CLIENT \,� DATE S Jo / Pb.. Zc/ 70 Module No. 'G-
LOCATION
(L SOURCE �� Ps ��,Z Filter No.
TEST TEAM Ltd RUN # Methods /-j" Pitot No.
MODULE LEAK RATE SAMPLING .RATE SETUP Comments (list other personnel on site) :
start.p� "Hg OH@ -J NOZZLEO.Z-]S (# )
�
end . @ 3. Hg % HZo D.To
Pitot Leak Check: Ts. 25 Cal. Factor-19-29ue
L13-
�nd
"Hz0 Md (� Pm Z ATC Project No.
B "H2O K f D Yc r- ----- Start t� Finish ZDOZ-
Time Point Line Tm Ts Tp Tf Tl ❑p Vn REMARKS
Vacuum OF OF OF OF °F a
(in.)H20 (in.)H20 Ft
1.0 - 7 2�30 37, -lL V, a fl3
- � � SZ-, r ,
zs I 33z� ?7z' 7�� S�3 l.& i
30 37-- O S^ 1• 70
35- $ i ?iZ t D 5-P i•5 " g?
�a `7 �j�12-- �77i t �•J`�� 14. Z
.41L IQ
z Iz1 (P-Z, 6) .sJ 12 53
sv t ► gz �Z(o zo & . S'1 zs.
s tizo � v 7-1 &` 1,7
t Z. 3 ''�Z/ <7 19.5-1 ).t00 5 57-. q0
Ta-qnetar temperature T,=stack temperature TD=probs temperature Tf—filter temperature, „(fts)agas sample volume
T1=exhaust temperature of last impinger, JP,=Velocity head differential pressure CH pressure differential across the orifice meter
QA/QC Check: plete 1 1, Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checked by: 1-5110104,
Module Opera o (Signature/Date) Data Review (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 16-revision 5.1 (7/13/07) ATC A 1-800-733-3193
F:\Work\Ail Forma-Field Data Shaats,Calc Formulae,Nomenclature,etc\Field\16-Isokinatic sampling Data Sheet.dot

MC
ISGKINETIC SAMFLING DATA SHEET
CLIENT DATE`lx'll l- PbarModule No
LOCATION SOURCE P, -� Filter
TEST TZAM RUN ## Met ds Pito o.
MODULE LEAK RATE P Comments (list other personnel on site) :
start @ g _]H@ NOZZLE (# )
end @ "Hg Tm H2O
Pitot Le Check: Ts Cal. Fac oz
star end f
Ate_" A "H20 Md z Pm7 ATC Project No.
B B "Hz0 K y' Start Finish
Time Point Line T Ts Tv Te Ti LFK OH REDS
Vacuum F of (in.
Ft3
(in.)H20 )H20
7-Z_ 6 2 i to
zz
40 ? 1 2 �z5� zZ
os z_
Ito t t 1 Zg Zz �
(( 17- Z9 "'7 7iZ, (1 Z 1
%,meter temperature 'r,==stack temperature Tv=probe temperature Trufilter temperature, V„(ft')=gas sample volume
T,=exhaust temperature oY las.'impinger, DP,=Velocity head differantial pressure DH�ressure differential across the or fice meter
gA/gC Chec o leten s� gibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checked by. {
odule perato �Sigrature/Date) Data Review (Signature/Date)
A':.' Poem 16-revision�5.1 i/13/07) ATC 6 1-60C-733-3193
F:\Work\All forms-Field Data Sheets,Calc Formulao,Nomerclature,eto\Field\16-Isokinetic sampling Cata Sheet.dot

ANAL'. bICAL TESTING CONSULZ&LdTS, INC
RANNAPOLIS, N.C.
Project No. 20 71 IMPINGRR DAT SHES UNIT � G�CLIENT LOCATION t
RIIN# DATE IMPINGER CONTENTS TOTAL CONDENSATE
led
f d 1 2 3 4 (VLQ) REMARKS
f START D F9D
END
Y
dV 2 Z 7J-1 21 2�,-5� 3�f9: .� ML
START
END Ob �Z-j
dV Z- � Gr 1 7 V L/ ML
START
END /
dV ?js� ML
START
END
dV ML
START
END
dV ML
START
END
dV ML
Data y ` Approved by
Date i D. Date
FORM No. ATC 11 ATC ® 1-800-733-3193
F:\WORK\All Forms-Field Data Sheets_\\il-Impinger Data Sheet-blank.doc ver 5.0 January 2001

Dilution System Verification
US EPA Method 205-40CFR51, Appendix M
ATC Project No.
Client: ( J rry Instrument used: CAI Model ZRH
f Location: j =•J(,r�; ti,�_ High Level Gas Type: Carbon Dioxide in N2
1 Date: i Gas concentration: 18.0%(Cylinder No.SX-10515 exp. 12115/2013)
Technician(s): _ u<4 US EPA Method(s): 3A
Actual Reading(ppm or%) Average Within+2%
Cylinder Number Gas Type Protocol Gas ConcentrationIF
� 4 2 3 Response 11 Precision Accuracy
'`s +�i??3��i t�•level audit ��_ /Q•'i('Sy 1�; i w, ,�L.. t �,j L- i J.SO (J.�'� U,
MFC —J Dilution Trial(record reading in ppm or%) Averago Within+2%
Dilution Number
FioWrdte Concentration 1 2 3 Response Precision Accuracy
1 � 10.0%
2 Sy�<.L 5.0% {.ei ( .ctS� 'et k "T(
3
f 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Preci sic n-Calculate the%difference between the average response and the individual reading that most deviates.
Accuracy-Calculate the%difference between the average response and the predicted response.
QA/QC Check: _
Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
�1 !
Signatures: Technician(Signature/Date) Project Manager(Signature/Date)
ATC Form 17G-version 4.0(7/13/2007) ATC [phone]

SYSTEM CALIBRATION ERROR DATA FOR INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSES
Client: )YLL�1t� Location: t- j r ` Date: Project No: (2,o
Calibration Gas: )? t Cylinder No.: S +j 5 Exp. Date: 1 .� Cylinder Pressure(PSI): /emu
US EPA Method: t Analyzer II); A.1_.Z(e 44 Was Instrument stable prior to beginning calibration?
Initial6aulzer Direct • li ti>nDilution Target Level lust rument"Respollse Difference Allowable Difference'
Range Specification
(ppm or%) (ppm or%) (Ppm or%) ( in or%)
Low Range(Zero) � � G S n o ±2%of Span
t v
+2%of Spau-3a,6c,7e,10
Mid Range ,rt R 0,0 z 0.-ZC3
-t
Higb Range(Span) ±2%of Span-3a,6c,7e,10
Initial and Post System Bias and D i t heel
Run Direct Response System Response System Bias System Bias Calibration'Drift Calibration Drift
Time (ppm,or 1% (ppm or'%F) (ppm or°!o) (percent error) Cppm or%) percent error)
(24 Hour -
Clock Zero Midscale Zero Midscale . Zero Midscale Zero Midscale Zero Midscale. Zero Midscale
Pre l 0 .0 - 0,U,- c...Ao Cti `
Run l l`7 !.c) v Li .`c O•i;`i C. C�•�Z G, C .
Runt I e> 01 S-C ( a 3 0 0.G C} G oz cs ,v y 6"-f�'
Run 3 ~ G> U lr C` 0,0z cy ,0 x i^ U C%.1-1
Run 4
Run 5
Specification-System Bias: must be within+5%of actual gas value;Calibration Drift: must be within+3%of span of previous System Response
Field Notes (record system response time here):
QAJQQ Check
Completeness Legibifi Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
per'+ 7 �1.�� r•Z.
Technician(Signature/Date) project Manager(Signature!Datc)
Dpcumenu ATC u!1-800-73.3-3193
«ETC Form No.18a-version 2.1(4/24108)

SYSTEM CALIBRATION ERROR DATA. FOR INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSES
Client: �i el_t ar.l Location: a. 'r I'a Q I �J c Date: -s Ite I I? _ Project No: f z, , z
Calibration Gas: ' t1 r"V2 Cylinder No.: _x r �,ar Exp. Date: `�( �j�.� Cylinder Pressure(PSI):
US EPA Method: Analyzer ID: r 4 _Z 1 F� Was Instrument stable prior to beginning calibration? r/
Initial Analv.er Direct Calibration
Dilution Target Level lnstrulnent Response Aifference Allowable:Difference
Rangc'i Specification
(PPm or%) (Ppm or%) ( Pm"or"/U) (PP or%) .
Low Range(Zero) ±2%of Span
Mid Range
+2%of Span-3a,6c,7e,LO
.� �--.� � �. �' cy � I c� L1
Ia i4;Range(Span) Ci 4� ±2%of Span-3a,Gc,%3U
g
C9 i.J
Initial d Post , and Drift Cbse
Run Direct Response SysteLn.Response;. System 13Las System Bias Calibration llrift Calibration D rif#
Time (ppm or%) (ppm or,%) (pPm or%) (percent error) (ppm or%) (percent error)
(24.Hour Zero Midscale Zero ; ""Midscale Zero:."Midscale zero Midscalc' Zerol Midscale Zero dseate.'`.
Clock)_ ...
Pre 2 'C �> ; a yt � r
I .,> .
Run 1 j y l ( S o't (o 2,6,ci C_n c Ga
Run a 5.2 7- o ri C, 2.S oci 6 0-20 G- 7 v ca
Run 3 -26 0 S" G Z a O 92j cs f d C7 G z�
Run 4
Run 5
Specification-System Bias: must be within+5%of actual gas value;Calibration Drift: must be within+3% of span of previous System Response
Field Notes (record system response time here):
QA/QC Check
Completeness Legibilit Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Technician(Signature/Date) Project Manager(Signature/Date)
Mammal .ATC(p;1-800-7333193
ATC Form No.18a-vemion 2.1(4f14108)

Analytical Testing
Consultants Inc.
1630 Dale Earnhardt Blvd.
Kannapolis, NC 28083
Wellons
Analytical Report
(0512-71 )
EPA Method S
Particulate Matter
Enthalpy Analytical, Inc.
Phone:[phone] / Fax: [phone] / www.enthalpy.com
800-1 Capitola Drive Durham,NC 27713-4385
ate.....
General Page 18

I certify that to the best of my knowledge all analytical data presented in this report:
• Have been checked for completeness
• Are accurate, error-free, and legible
• Have been conducted in accordance with approved protocol, and that all deviations and
analytical problems are summarized in the appropriate narrative(s)
This analytical report was prepared in Portable Document Format(.PDF)and contains 11 pages.
c
QA Rev im Performed by: Michael Step en Scha;pira
Report Issued: 5/29/12
)7O
....
EA#0512-71 Page 2 of 11
General Page 19

Summary of Results
EA#0512-71 Page 3 of 11
General Page 20

Company ATC Client# Wellons
Analyst KTH/JMD Job# 0512-71
Parameters EPA Method 5 #Samples 3 Samples+Blanks
Compound Sample ID/ Particulate Matter PM Weight m
Wellons-MS-R1 Wellons-MS-R2 Wellons-M5-R3
Net Filter Catch 11,1 15.3 15.1
Net Front Rinse 1.7 8.4 3.4
Total Particulate 12.8 23.7 18A
Wellons-MS-RS
Net Filter Catch 0.5
0512-71 results m5 FA#0512-71 Page 4 of 11 5/2912012
General Page 21

Results
EA#0512-71 Page 5 of 11
General Page 22

EPA Afellrnd 5-Purticulate Determination-Data AnulJ'41s
Company ATE Client# Wellons
Analyst KTH 1 JMD Job# 0512-71
Parameters EPA Method 5 9 Samples 3 Samples+Blanks
Anati,sic c f Purficulufe Recurerl,
Sample ID1 it eflow-11541 W"eAnns-31.1-R' 11 ellons-;L/3-R3 fli>Ilntrt-,115.R1f
Filter ll) .1997 Dates 1988 Dates 7) ) Dates 4591 Dates
1'`lhCrtare(fit) I1.3�1!) 4'IS-I1 0.?R4fi 9-'15t1 ().3tt82 l 1�'I1 0.3i9tb
6u2111
Final wt (It) Is1 0. 9a1 5"„-1-' 9P 04002 ;5r22112 91) 0,4035 s�2 t i '1P 1)�40 '2,t.'l,'. 911
Tillalu't (g,)2txi 0.3');0 5.=2� 1- IIA t)40o1 i23�'12 11A t).4n;' ;;�:1?)2 II:L o..40 ?;;13 11A
Net filter catch(mg) 11.1 15.3
Bcaker number 7427 Dates 1428 Dates 7429 Dates
Final wt(g) 1st 2.21696 5i22`12 10A 2.22450 522'12 7P _'21572 5 22'12 10A
frinal wt(g)2nd 2 21 66t 1 5i1-21 12 711 2.22424 5 2;.i 2 11 A '_?154i S:22.'12 711
Beaker tare(g) 2.21301 5'1.1 12 2,21409 S 1112 2,21055 5 11�12
Acetone Monk(g) 0,0019 0.0017 0 0015
Acetone vol tent_) 242 21it I'k)
NLI 1:rtntf ritwe(nig) 1.7 R.4 14
Total particulate{mg) I'`• ?t.7 1S.d
_ Blank Acetone Analpsis
Blank beaker numbs 7
4 il) 1')ates
Blankwitune(m1.y 18S D;,t': Final wAlittll.t 2.20907 12 WA
Beaker fare(a) 2.2071 11 12 Brunt wt I c)2nd 2.20897
Max acetone residue(g) tv0015 Aceuxie residue(g) 0.(XI 1 S
In-House Blank Acetone Analpis
Blank lvaker nuintxr 7431 Uu1ss
Blank volume(tnL) 200� Dues Final wl QO 1 st 1 2.20759 5 22 12 .I O,A
Beaks tare(g) 2,2069 5,1 l r l2 Final w-t l it)2nd 1 °207.(5
N'lax aetuaw rexidtic(p 1 11,0016 Artitawtc residua i u- 1).00tI
EA#0512-71 Page 6 of 11
General Page 23

Narrative Summary
EA#0512-71 Page 7 of 11
General Page 24

1"Inthalpy Analytical Narrative Summary
Company Analytical Testing Consultants Client# Wellons
Analyst KT14 1 JMD Job# 0512-71
Parameters EPA Method 5 #Samples 3 and Blanks
Custody Lindsey Chatterton received the samples on 5 1 1 r 12 after being,
relinquished by Analytical Testing Consultants Inc. The samples were
received at ambient temperature in good condition without Chain of
Custody documentation. Prior to, during,and after analysis, the samples
were kept under lock. with access only to authorized personnel by
Endialpy Analytical,Inc.
Analysis The samples were analyzed for particulate matter using the analytical
procedures in EPA Method 5, Determination of Particulate Matter
Emissions from Stationary Sources(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix A).
The filter fractions were weighed on Balance 2 (Mettler Model AB265-
S, serial # 1125163272) and the rinse fractions were weighed on
Balance 8 (Sartorius Model ME 5-F, Serial # 23104965). Each balance
is certified by Mettler Toledo through July 30.2012.
QC Notes The catch weights were adjusted by a corresponding reagent blank
correction value. A mathematically determined (theoretical) maximum
value was calculated and compared with the actual value measured for
the blank. The tower of the two values was used as the blank correction
value, which was then factored by the sample volume divided by the
blank volume,and subtracted from the sample catch weight.
Reporting Notes Gravimetric analyses are considered to be accurate to 10.5 mg.
Therefore,negative catch weights between 0 and--03 mg are set to zero
and no investigation is undertaken. Negative catch weights less than
-0.5 mg are investigated. There were no fractions with negative catell
weights for this set of EPA Method 5 samples.
These analyses met the requirements of the NELAC Standard. Any
deviations from the requirements of the reference method or NELAC
Standard have been previously noted in the report narrative.
The results presented in this report are representative of the samples as
provided to the laboratory.
Y)O
EA# 0512-71 Page 8 of 11
General Page 25

General Reporting Notes
The following are general reporting notes that are applicable to all Enthalpy Analytical. Inc. data
reports,unless specifically noted otherwise.
• The acronym ;V1DL represents the Minimum Detection Limit. Below this value the laboratory cannot
determine the presence of the analyte of interest reliably.
• The acronym LOQ represents the Limit of Quantification_ Below this value the laboratory camtot
quantitate the analytc of interest within the criteria of the method.
• The acronym AD following a value indicates a non-detect or analytical result below-the MDL.
• The letter J following a value indicates an analytical result between the MDL and the LOQ.A J flag
indicates that the laboratory can positively identify the analyte of uticrest as present, but the value
should be considered an estimate.
• The letter E following a value indicates an analytical result exceeding i00%of the highest calibration
point.The associated value should be considered as an estimate.
• The acronym DF represents Dilution Factor,This number represents dilution of the sample during the
preparation and'or analysis process. The analytical result taken froth a laboratory instrument is
multiplied by the DF to determine the final undiluted sample results.
• The addition of JLV to the Sample ID represents a Matrix Spike. An aliquot of an actual sample is
spiked with a known amount of analyte so that a percent recovery value can be determined.This shows
what effect the sample matrix may have on the target analyte,i.e. whether or not anything in the sample
matrix interferes with the analysis of the analyte(s).
• 'file addition of VSD to the Sample ID represent,-, a Matrix Spike Duplicate, Prepared in the s.'mte
manner as an MS, the use of duplicate matrix spikes allows further confirmatiou of laboratory quality
by showing the consistency of results gained by performing the same steps multiple times.
• The addition of LD to the Sample iD represents a Laboratory Duplicate. The analyst prepares an
additional aliquot of sample for testing and the results of the duplicate analysis are compared to the
initial result.The result should have a difference value of within Ur of the initial result(if the results
of the original analysis are greater than the LOQ).
• The addition of AD to the Sample ID represents an ,Alternate Dilution. The analyst prepares an
additional aliquot at a different dilution factor (usually double the initial factor). This analysis helps
confirm that no additional compound is present and coeluting or sharing absorbance with the analyte of
interest,as they would have a different response/absorbance than the analyte of interest.
• The Sample ID LC.S represents a Laboratory Control Sample.Clean matrix,similar to the client sample
matrix, prepared and analyzed by the laboratory using the same reagents- spiking standards and
procedures used liar the client samples. The LCS is used to assess the control of the laboratory's
analytical system. Whenever spikes arc prepared for our client projects, two extra spikes are prepared.
The extras(randomly chosen)arc labeled with the associated project number and kept in-house at the
appropriate temperature conditions. When the project samples are received for analysis. the LCSs are
analyzed to confirm that the analyte could be recovered from the media, separate from the samples
which were used on the project and which may have been affected by source matrix,sample collection
and/or sample transport.
lr'
EA# 0512-71 Page 9 of 11
General Page 26

General Reporting Dotes
icontinued)
• Significant Figures: %'here the reported value is much greater than unity(I AJ)to the units expressed,
the number is rounded to a whole number of units, rather than to 3 significant figures. For example.a
value of 10.456.45 ug catch is rounded to 10,456 ug.There are five significant digits displayed,but no
confidence should he placed on more than two significant digits.
• Manual Inttirration: The data systems used for processing will flag manually integrated peaks with
an'N". There are several reasons a peak may be manually integrated, These reasons will be identified
by the following two Icuer designations. The peak was,rot into,rated by the software-NI",the peak
was integrated Meorrect1j, by the software ~II" or the wrong peak was integrated by the sollware
*INVP", These codes will accompany the. analyst's manual integration stain laced next to the
p 3 � p p
compound name.
I �a
VW
P
EA# 0512-71 Page 10 of 11
General Page 27

This Is The Last Page
Of This Report.
A�
EA# 0512-71 Page 11 of 11
General Page 28

POST TEST MODULE CALIBRATION CALCULATION
Date: 5/14l2012 12022 Client Project Number
Pbar: 29.22 17562 Wet Test Serial No.or DGM 9
Module ID:LKIATC 5 0.986 Pre-test Calibration Factor
Calibration by: RKMAN Acceptable Post-test Calibration Acceptable?'
Orifice Vac,"H9 Vw Vd Tw Td Time dH
1.60 1.00 7.33 7.51 60.0 62.0 10.0 1.690 0.976
1.60 1.00 7.29 7.48 61.5 64.5 10.0 1.710 0.976
1.60 1.00 7.28 7.51 62.0 65.5 10.0 1.715 0.972
Specifications(QA Handbook-Vol III CD5-1,9130/94)
1)The average post-test meter calibratlon factor(Yi)shall be within t5% 1 1.705 0.975
of the pre-test calibration factor,as stated by the equation below.
'Requirement-40CFR60 App A Method 5 10.3.1.1
VyP,(t, +459.69)
Legend Y, =
Vw= Volume of Wet Test Meter,ft3 jr� P! {ttit +459. 9}
Vd= Volume of Dry Gas Meter,ft3 13.6
Tw= Temperature of Wet Test Meter,°F
Td= Temperature of Dry Gas Meter,°F
dH@i= Pressure differential across the orifce meter, in. H2O 0.95 x Y < Y,, < 1 .05 x Y
Yi= Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient,dimensionless
0.0319AH P +
dH @ _ n 13.6 (t,,, +459.69)0
(td +459.69) V,R
QA/QC Check.
Completeness Le 1 'Ity Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
��-
Signatures. Technician(Sgnatur Date) Project Manager(Signature/Date)
The above equations may be found in EPA/600/R-941038c,Quality Assurance Handbook,Volume 11I-CD5-1 C:0ocuments and SetdngslLKirkmanWy Documentstworkt

Thermocouple Post-test Calibration Data Form
according to Alternative Method 2 Procedures (ALT-011)
Client: mst�L Test Date: 7,
Test Location: t5 i�>Z'c-L Calibration Date /
Ambient Temp.,OF o Thermocouple Number
Technician Reference Thermometer(List ID#)'
Source' Reference Thermocouple Temperature
Thermocouple (Specify) Temperature Potentiometer Difference
OF Temperature,OF °F3
Stack Ambient II-i
Probe Ambient'` 0 3�cs �
' Reference thermometer-mercury in glass
'May be ambient air or other
'Difference must be 2 OF or less.
QA/QQC Check
Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
CheckedW_- 3LZ_ _1 "�yr�z-
li ation Technician Test Team Leader
(Signature/Date) (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 210-Post-test Thermocouple Calibration Record FAWorkWl Forms-...QI O-Post-test thermocouple Calibrations.xls
version 2.1 May 2009 ATC(800)733-3193

Analytical Testing Consultants, Inc.
Post-test Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Sheet
! Level and Perpendicular? \
2 Obstruction 9
�m
3 Damaged?
4 ai (-100<al<+10°) o
Degree indicating level position for determining a,and az. S a2 (1 p°<a2<+100) /
- Bat•a�
r W��3
9 � `
x
Degree indicated level position for determining 01 and 02. 10
Z/4 tan Y (<0.12.5'q t,D4
11 `y A tan ©(<0.03125
12 Dr(3116"<Dr <318')FO
Degree indicating level position for 13 A '
determining of& 14
` A/2Dr (1.05 <PAID, < 1-50) {,
IS If temperature sensor is flush with pltot
8 tube opening, is Z>'/"?
----==� �`- 16 If temperature sensor is set back from
- e pilot tube opening,is W>2"?
Is >%"'forDn=Y22»
Degrees indicating level position for determiningy 17 then calculate �
Z. IS Is impact side ofpitot tube even with or
above nozzle entiy plane?
19 Is Y>3"for 3116"<Lit<318"?
QA 1QC Check
Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Certification
I certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe ID# 5 1 14- meets or exceeds all
specifications criteria and/or appl' le design features and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor CP of
0.84'.
Certified y: 2."
Personnel igna re/Dote) Team Leader(Signature/Date)
f z_z--
' This certification also applies to the specifications of EPA Method 2,section 10.1.4.1.1 regarding inter-component
spacing of pitot tube-sampling probe assemblies. Refer to the figures on the reverse side of this page for specifics.
ATC Form 36-Post-test S-type Pitot Tube Calibrations-version 3.0 September 2007 ATC©[phone]

SYSTEM CALIBRATION ERROR DATA.
Protocol Gases
Client: Date: f r r
]Location: ��_ Q ��y � Method:
Analyzer: C- ,Q- f _ �? E ( Technician: L1-
ATC Project No.: ( 7,3 7 -2 Instrument stable prior to calibrations? f -
PR TOC L GAS DATA
Protocbl>Gas D1 11f10t Cylinder
Concentration; 1'oltutanf Gus Expiicatton Date
- Gas Number
I0.50%o carbon Nitrogen /
Dioxide sac t(3�7� 2 Xiy ( T_
18.00% Carbon Nitrogen >,- ict 5 !
Dioxide i z/,2 t
18.00% Span Value(100%of high range calibration gas)
INITIAL CALIBRATION
Cy lender C lender Systertt
y Difference Calsbrat�on+Error ~`
12A1sIGE Pressure. ;Value.? Respogsg
() . 10j
ZERO f c C) 0.0 0, O Z 0 1
MID
HIGH r l ca c9 18.0
Specification-Methods 3a,bc,7e c& 10=+2% of span value
Field Notes:
_Analyst: Date:
Data Reviewed by: Date:
ANALYTICAL THING CONSULTANTS,INC. FORM 31-Version 7-21512009 ATC 62) 1-B00.1;3-
3193
F',WOILK',AII Forms-Field Data Sheets,Calc Formulae,Nomencisture,etdrieldO I-Protocol Gas Cal Data Big Trails doc

Primary Module Calibration Calculation
Date: 101412011 Calibrations by: KIRKMAN
Pbar: 29.22 Wet Test Meter Serial No.: 17662
Module ID: ATC 5 Pre-test Calibration Factor 0.940
Orifice Vw,fta Vd,ft3 Tw,°F Td,°F
AH(inches Initial Ending Initial Ending Initial Ending Initial Ending
H2O
0.50 73.750 77.513 231.105 234.982 66 66 68,0 72.0
1.00 77.513 82.899 234.982 240.537 66 67 72.0 75.0
1.50 82.899 89.491 240,537 247.310 67 68 75.0 78.0
2.00 89.491 97.244 247.310 255.234 68 70 78.0 81.0
3.001 97.244 106.834 255.234 265.076 701 70 81.01 84.0
4.001 106.834 117.949 265.076 276.471 701 71 84.01 86.0
Orifice Time, dH@a YI
minutes
QH(inches
H2O
0.50 10.0 2.014 0.977
1.00 10.0 1.959 0.980
1,50 10.0 1,961 0.986
2.00 10.0 1.8931 0.993
3.00 10.0 1.8571 0.990
4.00 10.01 1.8431 0,992
1.921 0.9861
Specifications(QA Handbook-Vol III CDS-1,9/30194)
1)No value of AH@i shall vary from the average AH@ by more than 0.20.
2)No value of Yl shall vary from Yavg by more than 0.02.
0.0319AH Pb+ OH 2 V,P6(t, + 459.69)
13.6)[(t,,+459.69)0 Y; -
dH@=- td+459.69 P,Ph Vd Pb+ 3.13.6 (tw + 459.69)
QA1QC Check
Completeness L yi ility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checked by. l( f o `{
P rsonne (Signat re ate) Team Leader (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 34c-Primary Module Ca9bralion Record F:%Wwk%All F-t-Reld Data ShMs,Calc Fwmuae...13a.Pftaty M.W.C.0wwlon Record elank.o
version 4 0 November 2009 ATC(800)733-3193
The above equations may be found in EPAI6001R•941038c,Quathy Assurance Handbook.Volume IIICD5-1 C:%oocumenls and setlings%ti iriananwy DocumenwWork%Od201 l Module Primaries%

POST TEST MODULE CALIBRATION CALCULATION
Date: 6/2612012 12022 Client Project Number
Pbar; 29.05 17562 Wet Test Serial No. or DGM#
Module ID: ATC 4 0.978 Pre-test Calibration Factor
Calibration by: Kirkman Acceptable Post-test Calibration Acceptable?'
Orifice Vac,"Hg VW Vd TW Td Time dH@ V
2.00 1.00 7.61 7.79 85.5 84.0 10.0 2.084 0.969
2.00 1.00 7.64 7.75 86.5 88.0 10.0 2.060 0.984
2.00 1.00 7.59 7.76 87.0 90.5 10.0 2.081 0.979
Specifications(QA Handbook-Vol III c05-1,9/30/94)
1)The average post-test meter calibration factor(Yi)shad be within t5% 2,075 0.977
of the pre-test calibration factor,as stated by the equation below.
'Requirement4DCFR60 App A Method 5 10.3.1.1
V,,,Pb(td + 459.69)
Legend y,
Vw= Volume of Wet Test Meter,ft3 V (P,+ ©H (t,, +459.69)
Vd= Volume of Dry Gas Meter,ft3 , 13.6
Tw= Temperature of Wet Test Meter,OF
Td= Temperature of Dry Gas Meter,OF
AH@i= Pressure differential across the orifce meter, in. H2O 0.95 X G vg C 1 .OS x Y
Yi= Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient, dimensionless
0.0319AH .Pb + 2
dH @ _ _ 13.6)[(tw +459.69)0.
td +459.69 V R
QA/QC Check:
Completeness Will Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
�� (
SignaZ
Technician(Signature/Date) " Project Manager(Signature/Date)
The above equations may be found in EPA O R-W038c,Duality Assurance Handbook.Volume III-CDS-1 C:kDocuments and SetlingslLOkman"Documents\WorMUsefuR

Analytical Vesting Consultants, Inc.
Post-test Type S Not Tube Inspection Sbeet
�`r "' 1 Level and Perpendicular?
2
Obstruction?
3 Damaged?
' 4 of (-10°<a1<+1o°) 3°
Degree indicating level position for determining a,and ax. 5 a2 (_1(j° <a2<+I V)
� D •ej 8 Y Jy
r
9 ® �©
Degree indicated level position for determining 61 and p=.
l0 Z A tan y(<0.1259 0.o9(
it =A tan a(<0.03125") 0,000
A --` 12 Dr(3116"<D, <3/811) .77y
13 Degree indicating level position for A J )
determining of®. 14
A/2D, (1.05<P.*ID,<1.50) I.27
15 If temperature sensor Is flash with pitot
�rz tube opening,is Z>:Y4"?
----- -- 16 If temperature sensor is set back from
° 1tot tube opening,Is W>2"7
Degrees indicating level position for detemnining y then calculate 17 Is X?,-for Dn—Y:"
Z. 18 Is impact side of pilot tube even with or
above nozzle entry lane?
19 Is Y>3"for 3116"<D1<318"?
'Q 1QC Check
Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Certification
I certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe ID# }� meets or exceeds all
specifications,criteria and/or applicabl design features and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor Cr of
0.84'.
Certifie by:
Personnel(Signs Date) Team Leader(Signature/Date)
7,- /-,7 0�Z
' This certification also applies to the specifications of EPA Method 2,section 10.1.4.1.1 regarding inter-component
spacing of pitot tube-sampling probe assemblies. Refer to the figures on the reverse side of this page for specifics.
ATC Form 36-Post-test S-type Pitot Tube Calibrations-version 3.0 September 2007 ATC®[phone]

Thermocouple Post-test Calibration Data Form
according to Alternative Method 2 Procedures(AL T-011)
Client: LWQ Test Date: 1 �
Test Location: u?t C Calibration Date &
Ambient Temp., OF Thermocouple Number S_/41
Technician / Reference Thermometer(List ID#}'
Source Reference Thermocouple Temperature
Thermocouple (Specify) Temperature Potentiometer Difference
OF Temperature,OF °F'
Stack Ambient° �70
Ambient U `'
Probe
Reference thermometer-mercury in glass
2May be ambient air or other
3Difference must be 2 OF or less.
QA/QC Check
Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checked y:
li ation Technician Test Team Leader
(Signature/Date) (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 210-Post-test Thermocouple Calibration Record FftWorkWl Forms-...12t0-Post-test thermocouple Calibrations.xis
version 2.1 May 2009 ATC(800)733-3193

TESTING/CALIBRATION: AMERICANd WET'VEST METER AL19917562
Analytical Testing Consultants 01-16-12
Kannapolis NC
Conditions of Test:
Flow hate 1 CFM
CF per ruin 2 CF(8 runs)
Room Temp 68.5F
Air Temp/Meter 69.75F
Air pressure 1.5"WC
Barometric pressure 30.55"
Meter perfectly level
Readings at final test run: Wet Test Meter---2.00CF, Prover---2.00CF. Meniscus adjusted
according to these results.
As tested on RW 5CF Prover#81. Certified Tape#26727.
Douglas P Miller---SGM

Primary Module Calibration Calculation
Date: 10/4/2011 Calibrations by: KIRKMAN
Pbar: 29.22 Wet Test Meter Serial No.: 17562
Module ID: ATC 5 Pre-test Calibration Factor 0.940
Orifice Vw,ft3 Vd,ft3 Tw,eF Td,°F
AH(inches Initial Ending initial Ending Initial Ending Initial Ending
H2O
0.50 73.750 77.513 231.105 234.982 66 66 68.0 72.0
1.00 77.513 82.899 234.982 240.537 66 67 72.0 75.0
1.50 82.899 89.491 240.537 247.310 67 68 75.0 78.0
2.00 89.491 97.244 247.310 255.234 68 70 78.0 81.0
3.00 97-244 106.834 255.234 265.076 701 70 -81.01 84.0
4.00 106.834 117.949 265.076 276.471 701 71 84.01 86.0
Orifice Time, dH@i Yt
minutes
AH(inches
H2O
0.50 10.0 2.014 0.977
1.00 10.0 1.959 0.980
1.50 10.01 1.9611 0.986
2.00 10.0 1.893 0.993
3.00 10.0 1.857 0.990
4.00 10.0 1.843 0.992
1.921 0.986
Specifications(qA Handbook-Vol III CD5-1,9130194)
1)No value of AH@i shall vary from the average AH@ by more than 0.20.
2)No value of Yi shall vary from Yavg by more than 0.02.
0.0319aH Ph + V14,Pb(t�, + 459.69)
13.6 (t,,,+459.69)0 Y; -
dH _- trt +�t59.69 Ux, Vd Ph+ �H (tH + 459.69)
13.6
OA1QC Check
Completeness Lent ility Accuracy Specifications 1 Reasonableness
Checked by.
P rsonnel(Signat re ate) Team leader (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 34c-Primary Module calibration Record FAMWAII Falr-a 6d Oete Seeet,Calt FttmWae...4'4-Primary Motlda CNlbatl Record elenk.p
version 4 0 November 2009 ATC(000)733-3193
The above equations may be found in EPA18MIR•9"38c,0ustity Assurance Handbook,volume IIICD5-1 CMocuments and settings\LKrkmanwY DocumentsMork\0cf2011 Module Primaries+.

Primary Module Calibration Calculation
Date:1 1115120111 Calibrations by: F(IRKMAN
Pbar: 29.26 Wet Test Meter Serial No.: 17562
Module ID: ATC 4 Pre-test Calibration Factor 0.978
Orifice Vw,ft' Vd,ft' Tw,eF Td,OF
AH(inches Initial Ending Initial Ending Initial Ending Initial Ending
H2O)
0.50 23,573 27.400 918.188 922.214 67 68 69.0 74.0
1,00 27,400 32.700 922.214 927.764 68 69 74.0 78.0
1,50 32.700 39.078 927.764 934.450 69 70 78.0 81.0
2.00 39.078 46.531 934.450 942.179 70 72 81.0 83.0
3.00 46.531 55.614 942.179 951.590 721 74 83.0 86.0
4.00 55.614 66,058 951.590 962.369 741 75 86.01 88.0
Orifice Time, dH@i y
minutes
AH(inches
H2Q
0.50 10.0 1.950 0.957
1.00 10.0 2.026 0.966
1.50 10.0 2.696 0.968
2.001 10.0 2.0511 0.979
3.001 10.01 2.0831 0.979
4.001 10.01 2.1081 0.982
2.052 0.972
Specifications(QA Handbook-Vol Ili CD5-1,9130194)
1)No value of AH@i shall vary from the average AH@ by more than 0,20.
2)No value of Yi shall vary from Yavg by more than 0.02.
0.0319AH Ph +AH 2 V P (td + 459.69)
13.6 (r,,+459.69)9 Y; -
dH@= t, +459.69 ',�Pb vd Ph+ AH (t11, + 459.69)
13.6
QA/QC Check
Completeness Le ii'ty Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness
Checkedby: D ff (U l
Vj P rsonn Signatur 1D te) Team Leader (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 34c-Artmery Module Calibration Record F:1WorkWl Forms•FMd Dau SMea,Cak Fo'mul-Wl Primuy Nodule C.W.5oh R-d 91ank.W.
version 4.0 November 2000 ATC(000)733.3193
The above equations may be found in EPA/000111-941030c,Quality Assurance Handbook,Votun III-005-1 C:1Documenis and 3aUinpsVJGrkmanWty nocumenl1%Work%0g2011 Module Primariest

Thermocouple Primary Calibration Data Form
Calibration Date ' ( �� ( Thermocouple Number 2 `
Ambient Temp., °F "'� ...
� � Barometric Pressure, inches Hg ,7�,
Technician n Reference Thermometer(List ID#)t -I
Reference Source2 Reference Thermocouple Temperature
Point (specify) Temperature Potentiometer Difference,%
Number OF Temperature,OF (calculate in Kelvin)'
(� v
1Ambient Air �. . `> �� .2. i
2 Ice Bath Z-0 u t c) 3
3 Thelco Oven �=' { �1
' Reference thermometer-mercury in glass
'Type of calibration system used
'=[(Ref Temp, C+273) -Test Temp., C + 273)IRef Temp, C + 273j*100<1.5%
Kelvin =(519) * (F-32) +273.15
QAIQC Check
Completeness ' "Legibility �� Accuracy ✓Specifications �!�F2easonableness
Checked b!/:
.ta ibr tion Technician Test Team Leader
(Signature/Date) (Signature/Date)
ATC Form 209-Primary Thermocouple Calibration Record FAWorkWl Form s-...t2o90-Primary thermocouple Calibrations-xis
version 2.1 May 2009 ATC(800)733-3193

Analytical Testing consultants, Inc.
Primary Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Sheet
Level and Perpendicular?
Obstruction?
Damaged?
r
al (-10°<a1<+10°)
Degree indicating level position for determining a,and az. a2 (40°<az<_+IQ°) O
//1, (_V< X :5 +r) 0
Q�!*vq N2(-r< Q2 < +V) i
�p
19
Degree indicated level position for determining 0,and(i;.
z—A ran y(<n.12s") ®r p y+q u�
O 4-1 W=A tan (O(<0.03125'9 Dr(3116"<Dr <3/8'9
Degree indicating level position for A �< 4
determining of O. �
;v Al2D, (L 05<Pi IDt <1.50)
If temperature sensor is flush with
+t t" pilot tube opening,is Z?:314
1f temperature sensor is set back from
pitot tube opening,is W>2"?
Degrees indicating level position for determining y then calculate Is X>4"for Du=%"
Z.
Is impact side of pilot tube even with
or above nozzle enity plane?
QA/QC Check Is Y>3"for 3116"<Dt<318"?
Completeness ✓� Legibility �/"' Accuracy ✓^ Specifications Reasonableness
Certification
I certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe 1D 4 meets or exceeds all
specifications,criteria and/or"cable design features and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor Cp of
0.84'.
ZA r
Certified biy: --
Personnel(Signature/Dale) Team leader(Signature/Date)
' This certification also applies to the specifications of EPA Method 2,section 10.1.4.1.1 regarding inter-component
spacing of pitot tube-sampling probe assemblies. Refer to the figures on the reverse side of this page for specifics.
ATC form 206-Primary S-type Not Tube Calibrations-version 3.1 May 2009 ATC©[phone]

......................
I a!!niut uu>aittntuwuwudwwau _�.
IMP.e uluiyrLw+ 1 .
Il t,r»�e!u!wnV'M@Ip4�MN�+I"�INM. 1`
-' 111nGlNiia!
I 1�1 r aMUNiNi1�l �
h t. �!
,MI a
fi I�
L
1 1 ai�l !!,:
Report on Calibration of Field Barometers
The following barometers were calibrated:
By: Akzmw /
Date: / 9 �r
Barometer ID Pre-Calibration Reading Adjustment Needed
ATC #1 Z, 20
ATC #2 Z 9. 190 O- 1
ATC #3 z / 7 c 0. o&
ATC #4 2 . S-g c 1 1 D. 10u 1
Barometer adjusted to reading obtained from National Weather Service website. Reading
adjusted for elevation of 814 ft.
National Weather Service Barometer reading, actual
Elevation Adjustment ATC Office=814 ft
Adjusted Station Pressure for correction of ATC Barometers
ATC Fonn 53-Barometer C: libiations version 1.1 February 2007
/ Analytical Testing Consultants,[ne.
[phone]

STEEL NOZZLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Red: Box 1
DATE: 12/1/2011 Black: Box 2
CALIBRATED BY: Luke Boor Initials: LAB
SERIES: All
NOZZLE NOZZLE DIAMETER* DIAMETER AVERAGE
I.D. D1 D2 D3 DIFF.** DIA.***
NO. INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES
0.123 0.121 0.124 0.003 0,123
0.122 0.123 0.124 0.002 0.123
0.127 0.125 0.127 0.002 0.126
0.125 0.126 0.126 0.001 0.126
0.127 0.127 0.128 0.001 0.127
• 0.127 0.126 0.127 0.001 0.127
0.132 0.132 0.130 0.002 0.131
0.151 0.151 0.151 0.000 0.151
0.151 0.153 0.152 0.002 0.152
0.172 0.174 0.171 0.003 0.172
0.177 0.177 0.178 0.001 0.177
0.189 0.186 0.188 0.003 0.188
0.210 0.211 0.209 0.002 0.210
0.213 0.213 0.213 0.000 0.213
0.241 0.241 0.240 0.001 0.241
0.250 0.250 0.250 0.000 0.250
0.275 0.276 0.275 0.001 0.275
0.276 0.276 0.277 0.001 0.276
0.301 0.303 0.301 0.002 0.302
0.301 0.302 0.303 0.002 0.302
0.307 0.309 0.306 0.003 0.307
0.312 0.311 0.311 0.001 0.311
0.327 0.325 0.326 0.002 0.326
0.335 0.332 0.331 0.004 0.333
0.369 0.367 0.369 0.002 0.368
0.369 0.367 0.368 0.002 0.368
0.370 0.368 0.368 0.0021 0.369
0.3691 0.3701 0.371 0.0021 0.370
where:
'= Measure each nozzle three times in different orientations each time. Measure to the closest 0.001 inch.
'=Maximum difference between any two diameters must be less than or equal to 0.005 inches
Average of three diameters
F:\Work\AII Forms-Field Data Sheets,Calc Formulae...
ATC Form 149-Primary Nozzle Calibration Record \149-Primary Nozzle Calibration Record.xls
version 1.0 January 2006 ATC(800)733-3193

Cherokee Instruments, Inc
FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SIAEET
Description.: MFC-1 Size: 10 SLM K-factor: 1.0
Model: Tylan FC-280AV Barometric 30.0 in.Hq.
Serial Number: AW9410211 Calibration Temperature: 75 F
Range: 10000 cc/min Positioning: HESD
Calibration Gas: N2 Conv. Factor: 1.0
This flow controller was calibrated using a CM2-C1 a MIST traceable Primary Flow Standard
Calibration System.This calibration is referenced to dry air at a temperature of 32 degrees F
and a pressure of 30.0 in.HG (760 Tarr).
Bench Flow Inst Flow % Difference
(cc/min) (cc/min)
5% 500 502 0.4
10% 1000 1003 0.3
20% 2000 2003 0.2
30% 3000 3001 0.0
40% 4000 3999 0.0
50% 5000 5001 0.0
60% 6000 6002 0.0
70% 6995 7000 0.1
80% 8000 8000 0.0
90% 9000 9000 0.0
100% 10000 9998 0.0
Verified by: Jim Kree4er Date: 4/6/2012

Cherokeo Instruments, Inc
FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SHEET
Description: MFC-2 Size: 10 SLM K-factor: 1.0
Model: TYlan FC-280AV Barometric 30.0 in. Hg•
Serial Number: AW9410208 Calibration Temperature: 75 F
Range: 10000 cc/min Positioning: HESD
Calibration Gas: N2 Conv. Factor: 1_0
This flow controller was calibrated using a CM2-C1 a NIST traceable Primary Flow Standard
Calibration System.This calibration is referenced to dry air at a temperature of 32 degrees F
and a pressure of 30.0 in.HG(760 Torr).
Bench Flow Inst Flow % Difference
(cclmin) (cc/min)
5% 500 496 -0.8
10% 1000 997 -0.3
20% 1990 1994 0.2
30% 3000 2996 -0.1
40% 4000 3996 -0.1
50% 5000 4996 -0.1
60% 6000 5996 -0.1
70% 7000 6993 -0.1
80% 7990 7999 0.1
90% 8990 8998 0.1
100% 9980 9985 0.1
Verified by: Jim Kreeger Date: 4/6/2012

Cherokee Instruments, Inc
FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SHEET
Description: MFC-3 Size: 1000 K-factor: 1.0
Model: FC-280 AV Barometric 29.9 in. Hg.
Serial Number: AW9410187 Calibration Temperature: 75F
Range: 1000 cc/min Positioning: HESD
Calibration Gas: N2 Conv. Factor: 1_0
This flow controller was calibrated using a CM2-C1 a MIST traceable Primary Flow Standard
Calibration System. This calibration is referenced to dry air at a temperature of 32 degrees F
and a pressure of 29.92 in.HG (760 Torr).
Bench Flow Inst Flow % Difference
(cc/min} (cc/min)
5% 50 50 0.0
10% 100 100 0.0
20% 200 200 0.0
30% 299 300 0.3
40% 399 400 0.3
50% 500 500 0.0
60% 600 600 0.0
70% 699 699 0.0
80% 799 800 0.1
90% 901 900 -0.1
100% 1000 999 -0.1
Verified by: Jim Kreeger Date: 4/6/2012

Cherokee Instruments, Inc
FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SHEET
Description: MFC-4 Size: 100 sccm K-factor: 1.0
Model: Environics 202 Barometric 30.2 in• Hg.
Serial Number: not found Calibration Temperature: 75F
Range: 100 cc/min Positioning: HESD
Calibration Gas: N2 Conv. Factor: 1_0
This flow controller was calibrated using a CM2-Cl a NIST traceable Primary Flow Standarc
Calibration System.This calibration is referenced to dry air at a temperature of 32 degrees F
and a pressure of 29.92 in.HG(760 Torr).
Bench Flow Inst Flow %Difference
(cc/min) (cc/min)
5% 4.9 4.89 -0.2
10% 9.9 9.8 -1.0
20% 20.1 19.93 -0.8
30% 30 29.95 -0.2
40% 39.85 39.95 0.3
50% 49.75 49.94 0.4
60% 59.7 59.96 0.4
70% 69.6 69.93 0.5
80% 79.5 79.94 0.6
90% 89.5 89.94 0.5
100% 98.7 99 0.3
Verified by: Jim Kreeger Date: 4/6/2012

Cherokee Instruments, Inc
FLOW CONTROLLER CALIBRATION SHEET
Description:MFC-5 Size: 10 SCCM K-factor: 1.0
Model: Tylan FC-280AV Barometric 30.2 in.H
Serial Number: AV9406002 Calibration Temperature: 75F
Range: 10 SCCM Positioning: HESD
Calibration Gas: N2 Conv. Factor: 1.0
This flow controller was calibrated using a CM2-Cl a NISI traceable Primary Flow Standard
Calibration System.This calibration is referenced to dry air at a temperature of 32 degrees F
and a pressure of 29.92 in.HG(760 Torr).
Bench Flow Inst Flow %Difference
(cclmin} (ccJmin)
0% 0.5 0.497 0.0
10% 1.0 1.0 0.0
20% 2.0 2.0 0.5
30% 3.0 3.0 0.3
40% 4.0 4.0 0.3
50% 5.0 5.0 0,2
60% 6.0 6.0 0.0
70% 6.99 7.0 0.1
80% 7.9 7.99 1.1
90% 8.9 8.99 1.0
100% 9.9 9.9 0.0
Verified by: Jim Kreeger Date: 4/612012

4 1650 ENTERPRISE PKWY
TeRI-GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS-EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURE TWINSBURG,OHIO 44087
b MATHESON
:sk...rn.r s�F"oWaU- 215-6464000
Customer: ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS, INC. Protocol: Reference# Lot#
Cylinder Number. SX-52242 G1 556416 109-16-05322
Cylinder pressure: 2000 psi9
Last Analysis date: 5/17/2011
Expiration Date: 5/17/14 r ? C
REPLICATE RESPONSES
Date: 5117/2011 Date:
Component: Carbon Dioxide 19 7%
Certified Conc: 19.6%t 1%rel 19.7%
19.5%
BALANCE GAS: Nitrogen
REFERENCE STANDARDS
Component: Carbon Dioxide
SRM#: SRM-2745
Sample#: 9-C-12
Cylinder M. CAL-016083
Concentration: 15.633%
CERTIFICATiON INSTRUMENTS
Component: Carbon Dioxide
Make/Model: Nicolet 560
Serial Number: ACN-9402192
Measurement Principle: FTiR
Last Calibration: 5/16/2011
Notes: T156960
This certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay &Certification of Gaseous
Calibration Standards September 1997,using procedure GI and/or G2.
U.S.EPA Vendor ID No.:D42011, PGVP Participation Date:04/12/11 PGVP Renewal Date 0110V12
Analyst SIGNATURE ON FILE Date 5/1 8120 1 1

ON
0410 TRI-GAS
ast--.7he Gas ft.kul—&4`
'EPA. 9tT0C©L GAS ANALYSIS. C1!L Aff3tfRE3ER: Sx449,
LOMPCWWTNAM£ MEAN CONC£NMATiON ;LAB REFERENCE#': 5388(
Rx,
9en LOT NUMBER. 1050617"1!
SIZE: 1R CGA:590
Volume: 140 cult
Pressure: 2000 psig @ 70F
This mixture has been analyzed
according to EPA Traceability
Protocol for Assay and
Balance Gas: Nitrogen Certification of Gaseous
PROCEDURE:G1 ASSAY DATE: 8426110 Calibration Standards revised
epterberp1997 h
EXPIRATION DATE: 8l2W/
NOTE:.t"'s mixture should not.be usod ! analyst s name
when the pressuro faits b_low,160 psig. J1 tnforma!ion:eantinued on other side.oF"thls.tac

MATHESON 1650 ENTERPRISE PKWY
TRI-GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS-EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURE TWINSBURG,OHIO 44087
Wxk...The WSPraftW—%k` 215-648-4000
Customer. ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS,INC. Protocol: Reference# Lot#
Cylinder Number: SX-50135 G1 566416 i09-16-05323
Cylinder pressure: 2000 psig
Last Analysis date: 5/26/2011
Expiration Date: 5/26/14 � �
REPLICATE RESPONSES
Date: 5119/2011 Date: 5/26/2011
Component: Carbon Monoxide 499 ppm 509 ppm
Certifled Conc: 502 ppm t 1%rel 499 ppm 504 ppm
502 ppm 498 ppm
BALANCE GAS: Nitrogen
REFERENCE STANDARDS
Component: Carbon Monoxide
SRM#: SRM-1680b
Sample#: 2-J-58
Cylinder#: CAL-018076
Concentration: 490A ppm
CERTIFICATION INSTRUMENTS
Component: Carbon Monoxide
Make/Model: Nicolet 550
Serial Number: ACN-9402192
Measurement Principle: FTIR
Last Calibration: 5/11/2011
Notes: T156960
This certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay&Certification of Gaseous
Calibration Standards September 1997, using procedure G1 and/or G2.
U.S.EPA Vendor ID No.:D42011, PGVP Participation Date:04/12/11 PGVP Renewal Date 01/01/12
Analyst SIGNATURE ON FILE Date 5127/2011

99 MATHESON 1650 ENTERPRISE PKINY
TRI*GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS-EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURE TWINSBURG,OHIO 44087
.k...Thc Gn P.fts K 215-648-4000
Customer. ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS Protocol: Reference# Lot#
Cylinder Number: SX-26150 G1 566416 109-16-05320
Cylinder pressure: 2000 psig a �
Last Analysis date: 5/19/2011iSR>~ �1R ,�v 'Sf
Expiration Date: 5/19114
REPLICATE RESPONSES
Date: 5/1 912 0 1 1 Date:
Component: Oxygen 10.7%
Certifled Conc: 10.7%t 1% REL 10.7%
10.7%
BALANCE GAS: Nitrogen
REFERENCE STANDARDS
Component: Oxygen
SRM#: SRM-2658a
Sample#: 72-D-30
Cylinder#; CAL-016828
Concentration: 9.918%
CERTIFICATION INSTRUMENTS
Component: Oxygen
Make/Model: Rosemount 755
Serial Number: 2002832
Measurement Principle: Paramagnetic
Last Calibration: 4/29/2011
Notes: T 156960
This certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay&Certification of Gaseous
Calibration Standards September 1997,using procedure G1 and/or G2.
U.S.EPA Vendor ID No.-D42011, PGVP Participation Date:04/12/11 PGVP Renewal Date 01/01/12
Analyst _ SIGNATURE ON FILE Date 511912011

STATE OF LOUISIANA a�a Enviroo
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
t \�
0
Is hereby granting a Louisiana Environmental Laboratory Accreditation to LEr A n,
r L
E ,C, \v Quo
LOUISIANA Analytical Testing Consultants Inc �'�itatio�`
1630 Dale Earnhardt Blvd
Kannaholis, North Carolina 28083
Agency Interest No. 94216
According to the Louisiana Administrative Code,,Title 33,Part I,Subpart 3, LABORATORY ACCREDITATION,the State of Louisiana formally
recognizes that this laboratory is technically competent to perform the environmental analyses listed on the scope of accreditation detailed in the
attachment.
The laboratory agrees to perform all analyses listed on this scope of accreditation according to the Part I, Subpart 3 requirements and
acknowledges that continued accreditation is dependent on successful ongoing compliance with the applicable requirements of Part I. Please
contact the Department of Environmental Quality,Louisiana Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program(LELAP)to verify the laboratory's
scope of accreditation and accreditation status.'
Accreditation by the State of Louisiana is not an endorsement or a guarantee of validity of the data generated by the laboratory. To be accredited
initially and maintain accreditation,the laboratory agrees to participate in two single-blind, single-concentration PT studies,where available,per
year for each field of testing for which it seeks accreditation or maintains accreditation as required in LAC 33:I.4711.
L-11ti
Certificate Number: 04044
Lourdes Iturralde,Administrator Expiration Date: June 30,2013
Notifications and Accreditation Section Issued On: July 1, 2012
Public Participation&Permit Support Services Division

6/19/2012
Run#1 Run#2 Run#3
Steam
Time Flow Rate Time Steam Steam
Time
Flow Rate Flow Rate
(PPH)
11:30 61,660 13:15 61,640 14:45 61,820
11:45 61,670 13:30 61,750 15:00 62,010
12:00 61,590 13:45 61,660 15:15 61,940
12:15 61,510 14:00 61,610 15:30 61,670
12:30 61,650 14:15 61,730 15:45 61,940
Average 61,616 Average 61,678 Average 61,876

Run#1 Run#2 Run#3
Steam Flow ESP Steam Flow ESP Steam Flow ESP
Rate(PPH) kW Rate kW Rate kW
12:00 63,300 3.4 15AS 67,090 3.4 18:00 64,350 3.4
12:15 64,500 3.4 15:30 68,600 3.5 18:15 62,370 3.4
12:30 63,860 3.3 15:45 68,940 3.5 18:30 63,860 3.5
12:45 65,780 3.3 16:00 69,220 3.4 18:45 64,930 3.4
13:00 64,330 3.4 16:15 68,020 3.5 19:00 64,540 3.3
13:15 62,450 3.4 16:30 67,450 3.3 19:15 63,240 3.4
13:30 62,010 3.5 16:45 66,040 3.4 19:30 62,340 3.4
13:45 61,460 3.4 17:00 67,230 3.4 19:45 64,340 3.5
14:00 62,080 3.4 17:15 66,340 3.5 20:00 62,340 3.5
14:15 63,070 3.5 17:30 66,560 3.5 20:15 63,890 3.4
Average 63,284 3.4 Average 67,549 3.4 Average 63,620 3.4
_1

This I* s the last page
of this report .