AQ_F_0800102_20220809_EI_Cmb-EI-File

2021 Emissions Inventory Review / Data Tracking Form
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID: 0800102
Facility Assigned to: Data Entry: Bertie County
Classification: Kurt Tidd KT Confidential Copy Submitted?
Title V ❑YES
❑NO
Initial Review /Data Entry
Enter date received into ED. Date Received: 0 2U2 Z
1R Assigned to appropriate individual. Date Assigned: Q oG 202 Date Due:
ET Paper copy submitted: One copy received with supporting documentation,certification form signed by responsible
official,and appears generally complete;OR
a Electronic copy submitted: All supporting documentation and certification form(with time/date stamp)signed by
responsible official has been received.
Comments: IC
Inventory Review
V"'All forms and supporting documentation appear to be complete if paper submission(check ED OS data if electronic).
W-16ontact,address,phone number changes entered into I-Beam/Facilities if necessary.
All known operating scenarios,control devices,and emission release points have been entered for each emission
source(permitted, insignificant,and unpermitted)or note that the emission source was not operated or not required to report.
UL- Rheck if SCC codes for each OS are accurate and update if needed.
evaluate"U"sources for significance and address according to policy.
p/t~alculations/forms appear to add up correctly.
Z--IAIl compliance issues are being addressed(e.g.Toxics limits,above TV thresholds, large emissions
increase/decrease, installation without a permit).
All volatile HAPs/TAPS were included in the VOC total.
❑/Calculations and control efficiencies appear correct. Emission factors are the best available and most current factors
appropriate for the reporting facility(e.g.stack testing,AP-42,etc.).
kl—Review facility comments and address any issues.
El,-'Update ED(Data Entry Main)if additional information is required(corrections due date and date received).
Q/Check all ED QA/QC reports.
111/Comparison with previous emission inventory must be made and outliers(> 10%)mutt be investigated and explained.
o,.,Put inventory review comments and summarize any changes in ED-Data Entry Main"DAQ internal comments".
Date Info Requested: Date Info Received: Total Days on Hold:
Date Review Complete: r 9 iziZZ— Signature: i&� Q�
Date Submitted to EI Coordinator: Z qz
Date Approved: ZZ. Initials:

1. Landfill waste decreased in 2021.
2. Flare CD-1 throughput up.
3. Flare CD-2 throughput down.
4. Emissions factors checked.
5. All SCC codes checked and okay
6. Reduction in emissions due to reduction in landfill throughput and flare throughput.

Facility Total CY 2021 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID #: 0800102
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T08
Green House Gases Pollutants (GHG) Actual Emissions
Tons/Yr
Pollutant CAS
Demini- Change
mus
Not Not N/A
Reported Reported
CO2 equivalent (sum of individual GHG pollutant emission No GHGs
times their 1995 IPCC Global Warming Potential (GWP), Reported
converted to metric tons)
Criteria Pollutants Actual Emissions
(Tons/Year)
Pollutant CAS
CY 2021 CY 2020 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
CO CO 125.87 119.37 0.5 5.4%
NOx NOx 34.14 32.69 0.5 4.4%
PM(TSP) TSP 6.66 6.31 0.5 5.5%
PM10 PM10 6.66 6.31 0.5 5.5%
PM2.5 PM2.5 6.66 6.31 0.5 5.5%
S02 S02 6.52 6.19 0.5 5.3%
VOC VOC 12.19 13.04 0.5 -6.5%
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPS) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2021 CY 2020 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Manganese & compounds 101.00 101.00 10.0 I 0.0%
Manganese Unlisted Compounds - Specify Compound MNC-Other 101.00 101.00 10.0 0.0%
(Component of MNC)
Mercury & Compounds-all total mass includes Hg Vapor 0.060000 0.070000 0.001 I -14.3
Mercury, vapor(Component of HGC) 7439-97-6 0.060000 0.070000 0.001 F 14.3%
Total Reduced Sulfur (TRS as total mass) 924.94 1,014.67 I -8.8%
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 858.62 941.81 1.0 -8.8%
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 66.32 72.86 1.0 -9.0%
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.40 2.40 10.0 0.0%
08/09/2022 Page 1 of 3

Facility Total CY 2021 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID#: 0800102
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T08
Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2021 CY 2020 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Acrolein 107_02-8 0.300000 0.300000 10.0 0.0%
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 2.04 2.24 10.0 -8.9%
Benzene 71-43-2 84.65 92.51 1.0 -8.5%
Butadiene, 1,3- 106-99-0 0.100000 0.100000 1.0 0.0%
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 26.04 28.55 10.0 -8.8%
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.23 1.40 1.0 -12.1%
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11.75 12.88 1.0 -8.8%
CFC-12 (Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 240.77 275.70 100.0 -12.7%
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 29.06 33.27 10.0 -12.7%
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.86 3.26 100.0 -12.3%
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 268.65 307.62 1.0 -12.7%
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 770.84 845.45 100.0 -8.8%
Ethyl chloride(chloroethane) 75-00-3 17.53 20.08 10.0 -12.7%
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 90.02 98.75 10.0 -8.8%
Ethylene dibromide(dibromoethane) 106-93-4 9.83 11.25 1.0 -12.6`%o
Ethylene dichloride (1,2-dichloroethane) 107-06-2 13.51 15.47 1.0 -12.70/,
Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-dichloroethane) 75-34-3 83.40 95.51 100.0 -12.7%
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.60 3.60 10.0 0.0%
Hexane, n- 110-54-3 214.01 234.75 100.0 -8.8%
Hydrogen chloride (hydrochloric acid 4 454.52 4 216.96 100.0 5.6%
( Y
) 7647-01-0 >
MEK(methyl ethyl ketone, 2-butanone) 78-93-3 850.37 929.19 100.0 -8.5%
Methyl chloride (chloromethane) 74-87-3 14.30 16.37 1.0 -12.6%)
Methyl chloroform 25.49 29.18 100.0 -12.6%
Y 71-55-6
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 328.26 375.84 1.0 -12.7%
MIBK(methyl isobutyl ketone) 108-10-1 80.89 88.66 10.0 -8.8%
Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene) 127-18-4 224.99 257.62 100.0 -12.7°/o
08/09/2022 Page 2 of 3

Facility Total CY 2021 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID#: 0800102
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T08
Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2021 CY 2020 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Inc PAH, dioxins,etc.NC pom 74.10 74.10 1.0 0.0%
&AP 42 historic)
Propylene dichloride (1,2-dichloropropane) 78.87-5 2.96 3.39 10.0 -12.7%
TCE (trichloroethylene) 79-01-6 101.76 116.53 1,000.0 -12.7%
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79.34.5 13.36 15.30 100.0 -12.7%
Toluene 108-88-3 2,504.28 2,746.61 100.0 -8.8%
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 76.55 87.65 0.1 -12.7%
Vnylidene chloride 75-35-4 10.14 11.61 0.1 -12.7%
Xylene (mixed isomers) 1330-20-7 1,883.53 2,065.78 100.0 -8.8%
Largest Individual HAP Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid) 4,454.52 lbs
Total HAP Emissions 11,437.99 lbs
Largest Individual CAP CO 125.87 tons
Total CAP Emissions 185.38 tons
Total TAP Emissions 12,328.44 lbs
Total Aggregate 188.3.1 tons
Emissions
DAO's Comments Retarding Inventory
1. Landfill waste decreased in 2021.
2. Flare CD-1 throughput up.
3. Flare CD-2 throughput down.
4. Emissions factors checked.
5. All SCC codes checked and okay
6. Reduction in emissions due to reduction in landfill throughput and flare throughput.
08/09/2022 Page 3 of 3

2021 Annual Emissions Inventory
East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill
Aulander, North Carolina
Facility ID No. 0800102
Title V Permit No. 08849T08
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill
1922 Republican Road
Aulander, NC 27805
252-348-3322
Submitted to:
North Carolina Dept. of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
nCE SCS ENGINEERS
02219201.00-4 June 30, 2022
QAQ WARD
15521 Midlothian 55Turnpike,
» ke, Suite 305
Midlothian, VA 23113
804-378-7440

Table of Contents
Section Page
TITLE V INVENTORY CERTIFICATION FORM ................................................................................................1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... ES-1
Table
Table ES-1. 2020 Air Emissions Summary........................................................................................ ES-1
Attachments
A Engineering Calculations
B Emissions Calculations Spreadsheets
C NCDEQ AERO Forms
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory
i

Inventory Certification Form(Title V)
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County :Bertie
DAQ Region : Washington
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory-Calendar Year 2021
These forms must be completed and returned even if the facility did not operate or emissions were zero
The legally defined "Responsible Official" of record for your facility is Shane Walker
This person or one that meets the definition below must sign this certification form.
The official submitting the information must certify that he/she complies with the requirements as specified in Title 15A NCAC
2Q.0520(b)which references and follows the federal definition.40 CFR Part 70.2 definesa responsible as meaning one of the
following:
1. For a corporation: a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in chargeof a principal business
function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision makingfunctions for the overall operation of one or
more manufacturing,production, or operatingfacilities applying for a or subject to a permit and either the facilities employ
more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding$25 million(in second quarter 1980 dollars);
orthe delegation of authority to such representatives is approved in advance by the permittingauthority;
2. For partnership or sole propietorship; a general partner or the proprietor,respectively;
3. for a muncipality, state, federal, or other public agency includes the chief executive officerhaving responsibility for the
overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the a enc e. .,a Regional Administrator of EPA).
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT:
Important:Legally Responsible Official,read and sign after all submissions are final.)
I certify that I am the responsible official for this facility, as described above,and hereby certify that the information contained in
this air emissions report, including attached calculations and documentation, is true, accurate and complete. (Subject to legal
penalties of up to $25,000 per occurrence and possible imprisonment as outlined in G.S. § 143-215.3(a)(2))
Responsible Official's Signature Below (use blue ink): Date Signed: Y 2 7 z-it—
Printed Name: Shane Wa er
Signature:
This form applies to Title V facilities. If this facility is not classified asTitle V,please telephone your regional office
Emission Inventory contact at once for proper forms.
Email address of Responsible Official: [e-mail]
� CEAV ,
Information on this Form cannot be held confidential
J U N 3
DA►Q WARQ

' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This 2021 Annual Air Emissions Inventory Report (Report) has been prepared by SCS Engineers, PC
(SCS) on behalf of Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC for the East Carolina Regional Solid
Waste Landfill located in Aulander, North Carolina. This Report was prepared in accordance with
Section 3A of the Landfill's Title V Air Operating Permit(No. 08849T08) and Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC)Sections 2Q .0207 and 2D .0202, pursuant to North Carolina
General Statutes Sections 143-215.65 and 143-215.107.
The purpose of this Report is to provide the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ) with an estimate of the actual emissions of air pollutants from the Landfill during calendar
year 2021. These estimates are based upon Landfill waste receipt records, site-specific testing
data, data provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA), landfill gas(LFG)
quantities measured at the site, and typical engineering assumptions for landfills. This data will be
used by the NCDEQ to collect fees from the Landfill, and to ensure compliance with the Landfill's
Title V Permit.
The estimated emissions from the Landfill in 2021 are summarized below in Table ES-1. These
estimates are summarized from all applicable sources,such as the fugitive (uncontrolled) emissions
from the Landfill surface and the point source emissions from the two utility flares as well as certain
insignificant sources. All other sources of air pollutant emissions from the Landfill are considered to
be insignificant and are not quantified in this report.
Table ES-1 . 2021 Air Emissions Summary
Pollutant NMOCs VOCs HAPs NOX CO SOX PM PMio PM2.5 TRS HCl
Total
Emissions 28.46 12.19 6.16 34.14 125.9 6.52 6.66 6.66 6.66 0.81 2.22
(tons/yr)
This facility is equipped with an active LFG collection system, which supplies the extracted LFG to an
on-site utility flare.
Included in this Report are the following:
• Engineering Calculations (Attachment A);
• Emissions Calculation Spreadsheets (Attachment B); and,
• NCDEQ AERO Forms (Attachment C).
The NCDEQ AERO Forms have also been submitted electronically.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory
ES-1

Attachment A
Engineering Calculations
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory

Attachment A
Engineering Calculations
Table of Contents
Section Page
1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................1
SiteBackground.................................................................................................................................2
2 Uncollected Landfill Gas Fugitives (ES-1).........................................................................................3
Non-Methane Organic Compound Emissions...................................................................................4
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions.............................................................................................4
Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions...................................................................................................4
Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions.......................................................................................................5
AmmoniaEmissions...........................................................................................................................6
3 Landfill Gas Flare FL-100 (CD-1).......................................................................................................7
FlareEmissions..................................................................................................................................7
LFG Utility Flare CD-1 Operating Parameters .........................................................................8
HeatRelease (MMBtu/hr) .......................................................................................................8
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions......................................................................................................8
' Carbon Monoxide Emissions...................................................................................................8
Particulate Matter Emissions...................................................................................................8
NMOCEmissions......................................................................................................................8
VOCEmissions..........................................................................................................................9
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions...............................................................................................9
Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) Emissions........................................................................................ 10
HAPEmissions....................................................................................................................... 11
4 Landfill Gas Flare FL-150 (CD-2).................................................................................................... 12
FlareEmissions............................................................................................................................... 12
LFG Utility Flare CD-2 Operating Parameters ...................................................................... 13
HeatRelease (MMBtu/hr) .................................................................................................... 13
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions................................................................................................... 13
Carbon Monoxide Emissions ................................................................................................ 13
Particulate Matter Emissions................................................................................................ 13
NMOCEmissions................................................................................................................... 13
VOCEmissions....................................................................................................................... 14
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions............................................................................................ 14
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A

Attachment A
Engineering Calculations
Table of Contents
Section Page
Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) Emissions........................................................................................ 15
HAPEmissions....................................................................................................................... 16
5 Insignificant Activities..................................................................................................................... 17
Diesel Engines For Miscellaneous Support(IES-04) .................................................................... 17
Welding Operations (IES-05) .......................................................................................................... 17
DieselStorage Tank (IES-06) ......................................................................................................... 17
Leachate Storage Tanks (IES-07) .................................................................................................. 17
Tables
Table 1. 2021 Annual Emission Rate Summary (tons/yr)................................................................1
Table 2. Utility Flare FL-100 (CD-1) Emission Factors.......................................................................7
Table 3. Utility Flare FL-150 (CD-2) Emission Factors.................................................................... 12
Table 4. Fuel Storage Tank Summary............................................................................................. 17
Table 5. Leachate Tanks Combined Emissions Data..................................................................... 18
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A

I INTRODUCTION
The emissions inventory presented herein is the basis for the emissions values for calendar year
2021 reported in the NCDEQ forms that have been submitted electronically. The emissions sources
identified were based on SCS Engineers' (SCS) knowledge of the site, discussions and
correspondence with East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill staff, and review of existing
permits, compliance reports, and other information provided by Republic Services and CEC (LFG
system operator) personnel.
Table 1. 2021 Annual Emission Rate Summary (tons/yr)
Emission
Sources
ID No. Emission Source NMOC VOCs HAPs NOX CO SOX PM104 TRS HCI
Municipal Solid
Waste Landfill
ES-1 (Fugitive Surface 27.6 10.8 3.72 -- -- -- -- 0.81 --
Emissions) 1.2.3
Landfill Gas Open
CD-1 Flare FL-100 (3000 0.47 0.46 1.32 15.6 71 3.46 3.78 -- 1.27
scfm) 1,5.6
Landfill Gas Open
CD-2 Flare FL-150 (3000 0.36 0.35 0.99 11.7 53.4 2.61 2.83 -- 0.95
scfm)1,5-6
Diesel Engines for
IES-04 Miscellaneous -- 0.55 0.043 6.84 1.47 0.45 0.05 -- --
Landfill Support
IES-05 Welding -- _ 0.051
Operations
IES-06 Diesel Storage 0.002 0.002 0.002
Tank
IES-07 Leachate Storage 0.03 0.03 0.03
Tanks
Total 28.46 12.19 6.16 34.14 125.9 6.52 6.66 0.81 2.22
Notes:
-- Not Applicable
1 These estimates are based on a 79% LFG collection efficiency for the active LFG collection system.
2 VOC generation is estimated to be 39 percent of the NMOC generation before combustion per Table
2.4-2 of AP-42 Section 2.4 "Municipal Solid Waste Landfills," revised 11/98.
3 Total HAPs are conservatively estimated using those pollutants present in the HAPs, Section 112 of
the Clean Air Act and AP-42 Table 2.4-1 and 2.4-2 (revised 11/98), and those LFG pollutants
classified as TAPs by NCDEQ-DAQ.
4 Per guidance from AP-42 and in an effort to be conservative, particulate matter emissions such as
PM, PM-10, and PM-2.5 are assumed to be equal.
5 Flare destruction efficiency for NMOCs is 99.2% and 98.0% for VOCs per Table 2.4-3 of AP-42.
6 The flare emissions reflect 100% of the collected LFG (on an annual average basis).
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
1

SITE BACKGROUND
The East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill (Landfill) is owned and operated by Republic
Services of North Carolina, LLC.The site is located on Republican Road near Aulander, North
Carolina. The Landfill is subject to the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)for Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills(40 CFR 60 Subpart WWW) and the Landfill Maximum Achievable Control
Technology(MACT) Standard (40 CFR 63 Subpart AAAA) based upon a waste design capacity
exceeding 2.5 million Megagrams (Mg) and 2.5 million cubic meters.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) published updated LFG rules in the Federal
Register on August 29, 2016. These rules included an NSPS rule under Title 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (40 CFR) Part 60, Subpart XXX and an Emission Guideline (EG) rule under 40 CFR Part
60, Subpart Cf. These rules affect newly-defined NSPS facilities(i.e., "new" landfills that are new or
modified (expanded in capacity) after July 17, 2014) and EG facilities(i.e., "existing" landfills that
have not been expanded after July 17, 2014), respectively. The effective date for the new NSPS
Subpart XXX rule was October 28, 2016. The effective dates for the various State 111(d) Plans (or
an applicable Federal Plan) under the new EG Subpart Cf rule was dependent on promulgation
and/or approvals by EPA and the individual state regulatory agencies.
The East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Facility is an EG facility,since it conforms to the cirteria of an
"existing" landfill.At this time, North Carolina has not implemented an EPA approved State Plan.
Therefore, the Landfill became subject to the Federal Plan under 40 CFR Subpart 000, which
became effective on June 21, 2021. The Facility submitted an initial Subpart 000 Report in
accordance with 40 CFR 62.16724(h), demonstrating compliance with these new regulations. Until
such time as the Facility's Title V Air Permit is modified to reflect the requirements of the Federal
Plan, the Facility will continue to address Subpart WWW (as well as Subpart AAAA).
The Landfill commenced waste placement operations in 1993 and cells 1-14 have been developed,
which comprise of approximately 122.4 acres. The Facility initially constructed an active LFG
collection and control system during 2001. The system has been routinely upgraded with new
installations and/or upgrades to vertical extraction wells, horizontal collectors, leachate cleanout
connections, header and lateral collection piping, condensate sumps, condensate storage tank, and
a blower/flare station.
As of the end of 2021,the current collection and control system consisted of 95 vertical extraction
wells, 18 leachate cleanout connections, 3 manholes, 5 pressure vents, 3 near surface collectors, 3
near surface slope risers, and 2 caisson wells. The wells are connected via a network of below grade
HDPE collection piping and the main header pipes are equipped with butterfly isolation valves. The
LFG collection piping transports the LFG from the fill areas to the blower/flare station.
The LFG control system consists of a blower/flare station equipped with two 4,000-scfm blowers and
two utility flares each with a maximum rated capacity of 3,000 cfm (cumulative flare capacity of
6,000 cfm).
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
2

' 2 UNCOLLECTED LANDFILL GAS FUGITIVES (ES-1)
This section addresses the generation of LFG, non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs), volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), and total reduced sulfur(TRS)
compounds, and their emissions via passive LFG releases. The 2021 LFG fugitive emissions for the
site are estimated in this section.
LFG generation from the landfill was estimated using Version 3.02 of the EPA's Landfill Gas
Emissions Model (LandGEM version 3.02). A description of the model parameters is provided in this
section and the model output is included as Exhibit 1.
LandGEM 3.02 uses a first-order decay equation to predict LFG generation based on the amount and
age of the waste in place. The formula calculates and sums the LFG generation rate for every 1/101h
of a year and uses the sum to form the annual LFG Generation Rate. The formula is presented
below:
3
n 1 M. -kt j
QCH, (m lyr) - I Y_ kLo 10 e t
i = 1 j =0.1
where:
QcH4 = Methane generation rate (m3/yr)from the LANDGEM
i = 1 year time increment
n = (year of the calculation) - (initial year of waste acceptance)
j = 0.1 year time increment
k = methane generation rate constant (year-1)
Lo = potential methane generation capacity(m3/Mg)
M; = mass of waste accepted in the ith year(Mg)
t;; = age of the jth section of waste mass M, accepted in the ith year(decimal
years, e.g., 3.2 years)
The methane generation potential, Lo,for the MSW landfill cells was set equal to 100 cubic meters
(m3) of methane (CH4) per megagram (Mg) of waste. This value is published in EPA's Compilation of
Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42), Volume I, Section 2.4 revised November 1998. AP-42
recommends this value of Lo for MSW landfills that are located in geographical regions that receive
average or above average annual precipitation, such as Aulander, North Carolina. The methane
generation rate constant, k, was set to 0.04 yr-1. This value for k is published in AP-42 and is
reflective of actual LFG recovery rates measured at the site and SCS' professional engineering
experience. The concentration of NMOC in LFG was set to 595 parts per million by volume (ppmv) as
hexane and is based on the EPA AP-42 recommended value for municipal solid waste landfills
located in areas of above average rainfall.
The refuse filling history based on scale house records provided by the facility and coinciding with
values used in the Title V Permit application was input to the LandGEM.This model estimates
emissions based on the amount of waste in-place at the beginning of each year. Note that since
2013, the Facility has documented certain wastes as inerts. These inert wastes, under the
presumption that they do not produce any landfill gas, have been excluded in total waste
calculations in the LandGEM Model.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
3

The waste in-place at the beginning of 2021 was 11.23 million Mg, which is about 12.38 million
tons. The LandGEM calculates that the methane generation rate for 2021 is 28.3 million cubic
meters, or about 1.000 billion cubic feet (1,903 cfm). Assuming a LFG methane concentration of 50
percent,the LFG generation rate for 2021 is estimated to be 3,807 cfm.The model output is
included as Exhibit 1 in Attachment B.
Flow data is recorded at 10 minute intervals and compiled from the flowmeters installed at the
flares. The sum of these measured flowrates represents the total LFG collection rate while the
average obtained from these meters represent the average LFG flowrates. These average LFG
flowrates are normalized to 50 percent methane using monitoring data obtained from the header
piping at the blower/flare station.The flow data recorded from January 1 through December 31,
2021 indicates an average LFG flowrate to utility flare FL-100 of 1,724 cfm at 50 percent methane
and an average LFG flowrate to utility flare FI-150 of 1,294 cfm at 50 percent methane.This value is
an annualized average, not a run-time average.Thus,the average LFG recovery rate at the Facility for
2021 is 3,018 cfm, which yields a calculated collection efficiency equal to 79 percent.
NON-METHANE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS
NMOC generation from the Landfill was calculated using the LandGEM. The model parameters were
similar to the values noted above and the model output is attached as Exhibit 2 in Attachment B.
The LandGEM calculates that the NMOC generation rate for 2021 is 120.8 Mg or 133.2 tons. In
estimating the NMOC fugitive emissions from the Landfill, LFG is calculated to be collected and
combusted at 79 percent of LFG generation for 2021 using flowrate data provided by the LFG
system operator, which indicated an average LFG flowrate of 3,018 cfm (normalized to 50 percent
methane) collected by the existing system. Thus,the fugitive NMOC emission rate for 2021 is 27.6
tons, as shown in Exhibit 2 of Attachment B.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS
The LFG and NMOC generation rates were extracted from the LandGEM output and used to calculate
the fugitive NMOC emissions from the Landfill during 2021. The VOC generation rates were
calculated by multiplying the NMOC generation rates (shown in the LandGEM output) by 0.39 (i.e.,
VOC is 39 percent of NMOC per AP-42 Table 2.4-2). The Landfill fugitive VOC emission rates were
calculated by multiplying the annual VOC generation by the percentage of uncollected LFG, which is
calculated to be 21 percent.The fugitive VOC emission rate for 2021 is 10.8 tons, as shown in
Exhibit 2 in Attachment B.
HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS
The estimation of fugitive HAP emissions from the landfill surface is based on equations(3) and (4)
in AP-42 Section 2.4. Those equations are presented below. The first step is to estimate the
generation rate of the pollutant in cubic meters per year(m3/yr). Next,the volumetric generation
rate estimate is converted to a mass generation rate (tons per year).
QP(M,
yr = 2.00 x Q(.h4 cp lob (3)
)
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
4

' where:
Qp = Pollutant generation rate (m3/yr)
QCH4 = Methane generation rate (m3/yr)from the LandGEM
Cp = Pollutant concentration in LFG (ppmv)
2.00 = Multiplication factor(assumes LFG is 50.0 percent methane)
UMW,(tons/yr)= Qp ((MWP(glgmol))(Iatm)) ton (4)
(8.205 x 10-') m3 —atm 1000 g ((273+T)K) 1907.185 kg
�gmol—K))( kg
where:
UMp = Pollutant mass generation rate (tons/yr)
MwP = Molecular weight of pollutant(g/gmole)
T = Temperature of LFG (oC) (Standard temp of 25 degrees Celsius)
Of the 187 chemical compounds identified as HAPs under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 28 of
these compounds are listed in AP-42 Table 2.4-1 and 2.4-2. Site-specific speciated LFG data was
not available for the East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill.Therefore, default concentration
values from AP-42 and the WIAC report (dated January 2001) were used, as shown in the HAP/TAP
spreadsheet included as Exhibit 3 in Attachment B. Annual emissions of the remaining HAP/TAP
compounds (i.e.,those not included in the AP-42 tables) are assumed to be negligible. The actual
HAP generation rate associated with LFG produced within the waste mass for 2021 was calculated
to be 16.33 Mg or 17.96 tons, and does not include hydrochloric acid, which is a by-product of LFG
combustion at the utility flare. LFG is calculated to be collected and combusted at 79 percent of LFG
generation for 2021. Thus,the fugitive HAP emission rate for the facility is 3.72 tons for 2021. In
addition,the Non PM,o/Non-VOC HAPs fugitive emission rate was calculated to be 0.22 tons for
2021. Note that HCI is not included in the calculation of fugitive HAP emissions since it is a by-
product of combustion at the flare and is not present in raw LFG.
Using similar procedures, the TAP generation rate for 2021 was calculated to be 17.71 Mg(19.48
tons). In determining the TAP emissions from the Landfill, LFG is collected and combusted at 79
percent of LFG generation for 2021. Thus, the fugitive TAP emission rate for 2021 is 4.04 tons.
TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR EMISSIONS
Since the site-specific TRS concentration in LFG was not available,the AP-42 Section 2.4 default
concentration of 46.9 parts per million by volume (ppmv) was assumed.The estimation of TRS
emissions from the Landfill is based on equations (3) and (4) in AP-42 Section 2.4.
The volumetric generation rate of total reduced sulfur compounds is estimated by the following
equation. Note that the 2021 methane generation rate from the Landfill cells (28.3 million cubic
meters) is equal to 1,903 cfm. Because the LFG collection efficiency for 2021 is calculated to be 79
percent, only fugitive emissions (21 percent of LFG generation) were used in these calculations.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
5

TRS (7n') = (2.0) [5.95xl06 7n3 of 1H41 [L69-6-]
= 558.1 M' of Syr yr J yr
TRSkgl _ f 558.1 m3 Sl (32gmol) (1 atm) (4)
Cyr/ L yr J 8.205 x 10-5m3-atm (1000g (298 OK)
( gmol- 0K ) \ kg ) l
The uncontrolled mass emissions of total reduced sulfur compounds are calculated below:
TRS = 730.4 kg/yr = 0.81 tons/yr
AMMONIA EMISSIONS
Although MSW landfills are sources of ammonia (NH3) emissions, according to an Environmental
Protection Agency(EPA)funded report titled "Development and Selection of Ammonia Emission
Factors," MSW landfills are "very uncertain and not very important sources" and are "minor and
insignificant influences" when compared to other possible sources.' Therefore, for purposes of this
emission inventory,fugitive emission rates of ammonia from the landfill surface will be considered
insignificant.
1 R. Battye,W. Battye, C. Overcash, and S. Fudge. Development and Selection of Ammonia Emission Factors
Final Report. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Aug. 1994.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
6

3 LANDFILL GAS FLARE FL-100 (CD-1)
Landfill gas is delivered to the blower/flare station located south of the Landfill via a 24-inch-
diameter HDPE main header pipe. During 2021,the LFGCCS consisted of two 4,000 scfm skid-
mounted blowers and two 3,000-cfm utility flares. During 2021,the flare emissions for FL-100 were
calculated based on an average LFG flowrate of 1,724 cfm at 50 percent methane to the flare
(which is equal to 57.1% of the LFG quantity collected by the system). The following calculations
present emissions from the utility flare FL-100 during 2021.
FLARE EMISSIONS
The LFG,for purposes of calculating the products of combustion and the associated emissions, is
assumed to be 50 percent methane, 40 percent carbon dioxide and 10 percent nitrogen, oxygen,
and hydrogen. The presence of nitrogen and oxygen in LFG is assumed due to the potential
infiltration of ambient air into the gas extraction system through the surface of the landfill, while the
presence of hydrogen,typically around two percent at this Facility, is a biproduct of incomplete
methanogenesis.This Facility Concentrations of other LFG constituents are negligible with regard to
the combustion process. Trace LFG constituents typically make up less than 1 percent of the total
gas volume. The flare emission factors are presented below in Table 2 and calculations for the FL-
100 3,000 cfm flare (CD-1)are calculated using the annual average flow rate to the flare.
Table 2. Utility Flare FL-100 (CD-1) Emission Factors
Compound LFG Flare Emission Factors
NMOCs 99.2%destruction 2
VOCs 98%destruction 2
HAPs 98%and 99.7%destruction 3
NOx 0.068 Ib/MMBtu
CO 0.31 Ib/MMBtu
S02 46.9 ppmv total reduced sulfur in LFG 2
PMI0 0.001 Ib/hr cfm of methane 2
HCl 30.2 ppmv total Cl-in LFG 4
Notes:
1 Emission factors were obtained from AP-42, Tables 13.5-1 and
13.5-2 (revised 2/18)
2 Emission factors and destruction efficiencies were obtained
from AP-42, Section 2.4 (revised 11/98).
3 HAP destruction efficiencies are for halogenated (98%) and
non-halogenated (99.7%) pollutants as outlined in AP-42
(revised 11/98).
4 Cumulative chloride ion concentration as calculated using
default HAP concentrations presented in the WIAC report.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
7

LFG Utility Flare CD-1 Operating Parameters
Maximum firing rate of LFG for Utility Flare: 3,000 scfm
Average firing rate of LFG for Utility Flare: 1,724 scfm
Average Btu content of LFG: 506 Btu/scf
Assumed hours of operation: 8,760 hours
Percentage of collected LFG delivered to flare: 57.1 %
Heat Release (MMBtu/hr)
506 Btu 60 min 1 MMB to
(1 724 scfm)
\ml ( ) ( l ( l = 52.3 MMBtu hr
scf \ hr / \ 106 Btu / /
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions
r0.068 lb NOXI (52.3 MMBtuI (8,760 hrl (2,000
1 ton l
MMBtu I l hr 1 ` yr I 2,0001b1
NOx = 15.6 tons/yr
Carbon Monoxide Emissions
\0.31 lb MMBtu0) (52.3 �MBtul (8,7r hr) 1 ton
2,000 lbl
CO = 71.0 tons/yr
Particulate Matter Emissions
3
_ f t3LFG 0.001 lb PM10 0.5 f min
8,760 hrl f 1 ton l
PM10 1,724 min hr —f t3CH4 1 f t3 LFG L yr 1 L2000 lbJ
min min
Flare PMio= 3.78 tons/yr
PM2.5 is the same as PM10 since the same emission factor is used according to AP-42 Table 2.4-5.
Flare PM2.5 = 3.78 tons/yr
NMOC Emissions
Using the NMOC concentration in the LFG of 595 ppmv as hexane (based on AP-42) and the average
LFG firing rate of the utility flare FL-100 of 1,724 scfm at 50% methane for the 8,760 hours of
operation,the corresponding NMOC input to the flare is calculated using Equations 3 and 4 from AP-
42.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
8

M 3)
595
NMOC Yr = (2) 1.28 x 10'm3ofrCFI4 [�j06J — 15,232 yr of NMOC
9
15,232 m31 (86.18 gmol) (latm)) ton _ tons
NMOC = � J f l 59.2
Yr' 8.205 x 10-5m3 —atm 1000 g L907.185 kg] yr
(( gmol—K ) ( kg ) (273 + 25 K))
Assuming an NMOC destruction efficiency equal to 99.2 percent,the actual NMOC emissions for
2021 from the utility flare FL-100 is calculated as follows:
NMOCs Input to Flare * (100%-99.2%) = 59.2 tons/yr * 0.008 = 0.47 tons
VOC Emissions
Using the AP-42 VOC concentration of 39 percent of total NMOCs and VOC destruction efficiency of
98 percent:
VOC = NMOCs * 39%*(100%-98%) = 59.2 tons/yr * 0.39 *0.02 = 0.46 tons/yr
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions
The emissions of sulfur oxides, particularly sulfur dioxide (S02), from the flare are dependent on the
inlet concentration of sulfur-bearing compounds in the LFG. The calculation of the estimated S02
emissions from the flare is based on the assumption that reduced sulfur compounds in the LFG are
oxidized to S02. Because site-specific data for the Total Reduced Sulfur(TRS) concentration in the
LFG was not available, S02 emissions from the flare are estimated based on a TRS concentration in
LFG of 46.9 ppmv as cited in AP-42 Section 2.4-3.
S02 (max)- MW = 32.0 g/gmole
Qcha = 1,724 ft3/min *50% CHa *(525,600 min/year) =1.28 x107 m3/yr
Cp = 46.9 ppmv
T = 25.OoC (AP-42 default value)
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
9

Calculation of the generation rate of the pollutant:
m3 m3 o f CH4 46.9 m3
TRS — = (2.0) 1.28 x 10 f 6l = 1,200.6 — of S
(Yr Yr L 10 J Yr
(32 9 (1 atm)
S L
TR = 1,200.6 m3 (\ 9 ) ) ton - 1.73 tons
( l
Yr J 8.205 x 10-5m3 -atm 1 g000 L907.185 kgJ Yr
)
(( gmol -K ) ( kg ) (273+25 K )
For every 1 tons of TRS there is approximately 2 tons of S02 due to differences in molecular weights
and detailed in U.S. EPA AP-42 (revised November 1998),therefore,
S02 = 3.46 tons/yr
Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) Emissions
Hydrochloric acid HCI emissions are formed when chlorinated compounds in LFG are combusted in
y (HCI) p
control equipment. The estimation of HCI emissions from the Landfill are based on Equations 3, 4
and 10 in AP-42 Section 2.4. Since no site-specific values are available for the cumulative chloride
ion concentration of the 18 HAP/TAP constituents that have a chloride ion,the cumulative chloride
ion concentration is calculated using WIAC report default value concentration of 30.18 ppmv. The
total HCI emissions are calculated by using the concentration of 30.18 ppmv and the molecular
weight of 35.453 g/gmol for chloride.
Calculate the chloride emission rate, Qc, using Equation 3.
QCI — (i mint31 525,600 min l (35.3198f t3) 130.18op mv\ _ 774.3 yr (3)
Calculate the uncontrolled mass emissions of chloride, UMc, using Equation 4.
(774.3m3) 35.45 9 *latm
UMCI = \ / 3_ gM01 = 1,12 2.7 kg (4)
yr 8.205E-05 mgmolttmt*1,000-1*(273+25K) Yr
kg
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
10

Finally, calculate the controlled mass emissions of HCI, CMci, using Equation 10.
CMHC1 = (1,122.7) (11000)
o (1.03) 2.21b) ( ton (10)
kg 2,0001b
HCI = 1.27 tons/yr
HAP Emissions
The total flare HAPs emission rate, including HCI emissions,for the flare unit FI-100 for 2021, shown
in the attached Exhibit 3, was estimated to be 1.32 tons. The total flare TAPs emission rate for
2021 was estimated to be 1.32 tons. In addition,the Non-PMlo/Non-VOC HAPs flare emission rate
Flare FI-100 was calculated to be 1.28 tons for 2021.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
11

4 LANDFILL GAS FLARE FL-150 (CD-2)
Landfill Gas destruction device CD-2 is a 3,000 scfm utility flare FL-150. During 2021, the flare
emissions were calculated based on an average LFG flowrate of 1,294 cfm at 50 percent methane
to the flare (which is equal to 42.9% of the LFG quantity collected by the system). The following
calculations present emissions from the utility flare FL-150 during 2021.
FLARE EMISSIONS
The LFG,for purposes of calculating the products of combustion and the associated emissions, is
assumed to be 50 percent methane, 40 percent carbon dioxide and 10 percent nitrogen, oxygen,
and hydrogen. The presence of nitrogen and oxygen in LFG is assumed due to the potential
infiltration of ambient air into the gas extraction system through the surface of the landfill, while the
presence of hydrogen,typically around two percent at this Facility, is a biproduct of incomplete
methanogenesis. This Facility Concentrations of other LFG constituents are negligible with regard to
the combustion process.Trace LFG constituents typically make up less than 1 percent of the total
gas volume. The flare emission factors are presented below in Table 3 and calculations for the FL-
150 3,000 cfm flare (CD-2) are calculated using the annual average flow rate to the flare.
Table 3. Utility Flare FL-1 50 (CD-2) Emission Factors
Compound LFG Flare Emission Factors
NMOCs 99.2%destruction 2
VOCs 98%destruction 2
HAPs 98%and 99.7%destruction 3
NOx 0.068 lb/MMBtu
CO 0.31 Ib/MMBtu
S02 46.9 ppmv total reduced sulfur in LFG 2
PM10 0.001 Ib/hr cfm of methane 2
HCl 30.2 ppmv total Cl-in LFG 4
Notes:
1 Emission factors were obtained from AP-42, Tables 13.5-1 and
13.5-2 (revised 2/18).
2 Emission factors and destruction efficiencies were obtained
from AP-42, Section 2.4 (revised 11/98).
3 HAP destruction efficiencies are for halogenated (98%) and
non-halogenated (99.7%) pollutants as outlined in AP-42
(revised 11/98).
4 Cumulative chloride ion concentration as calculated using
default HAP concentrations presented in the WIAC report.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
12

LFG Utility Flare CD-2 Operating Parameters
Maximum firing rate of LFG for Utility Flare: 3,000 scfm
Average firing rate of LFG for Utility Flare: 1,294 scfm
Average Btu content of LFG: 506 Btu/scf
Assumed hours of operation: 8,760 hours
Percentage of collected LFG delivered to flare: 42.9 %
Heat Release (MMBtu/hr)
1,294 scfm)
506 Btu 60 min 1 MMBtu
l
scf hr 106 Btu I
= 39.3 MMBtu/hr
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions
0.068 lb NOXI (39.3 MMBtuI (8,760 hrlG,-00-01b)
1 ton MMBtu 1 hr 1 \ yr 1
NOx = 11.7 tons/yr
Carbon Monoxide Emissions
\0.31 lb MMBtu CO)
(39.3 MMBtu) (8,760y hr) ( 1 ton
2 000 lbl
CO = 53.4 tons/yr
Particulate Matter Emissions
3
f t3LFG 0.001 lb PMla 0.5 f 3 CH4 8,760 hrl f 1 ton l
PMlo = 1,294 min hr —f t3CH4 1 f min t3 LFG yr J L2000 lbJ
min min
Flare PMlo=2.83 tons/yr
PM2.5 is the same as PM10 since the same emission factor is used according to AP-42 Table 2.4-5.
Flare PM2.5 =2.83 tons
/Yr
NMOC Emissions
Using the NMOC concentration in the LFG of 595 ppmv as hexane (based on AP-42) and the average
LFG firing rate of the utility flare FL-150 of 1,294 scfm at 50% methane for the 8,760 hours of
operation,the corresponding NMOC input to the flare is calculated using Equations 3 and 4 from AP-
42.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
13

3 3 f CH 4595 3
NMOC Yr = (2) 9.63 x 106 m yr r 1061 _ 11,459.7 yr of NMOC
9
NMOC — [11,459.7
m3 J 5(86.18 gmol) (latm)) ton l — 44 tons
— Y► 8.205 x 10-Sm3 —atm 1000 g 27 Z K L907.185 kg1 yr
(( gmol —K ) ( k- ) ( 3 + 5 ))
Assuming an NMOC destruction efficiency equal to 99.2 percent,the actual NMOC emissions for
2020 from the utility flare FL-100 is calculated as follows:
NMOCs Input to Flare * (100%-99.2%) = 44.5 tons/yr * 0.008 = 0.36 tons
VOC Emissions
Using the AP-42 VOC concentration of 39 percent of total NMOCs and VOC destruction efficiency of
98 percent:
VOC = NMOCs * 39%*(100%-98%) = 44.5 tons/yr * 0.39 *0.02 = 0.35 tons/yr
Sulfur Dioxide (S02) Emissions
The emissions of sulfur oxides, particularly sulfur dioxide (S02),from the flare are dependent on the
inlet concentration of sulfur-bearing compounds in the LFG. The calculation of the estimated S02
emissions from the flare is based on the assumption that reduced sulfur compounds in the LFG are
oxidized to SO2. Because site-specific data for the Total Reduced Sulfur(TRS) concentration in the
LFG was not available, S02 emissions from the flare are estimated based on a TRS concentration in
LFG of 46.9 ppmv as cited in AP-42 Section 2.4-3.
S02 (max)- MW = 32.0 g/gmole
Qch4 = 1,294 ft3/min *50% CH4 *(525,600 min/year) =9.63 x106 m3/yr
Cp = 46.9 ppmv
T = 25.OoC (AP-42 default value)
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
14

' Calculation of the generation rate of the pollutant:
TRS y3 3 f CH 3
r = (2.0) 9.63 x 106 m yr4 [106] = 903.3 Yr of S
9
TRS _ [903.3 mil (32 gmol) (1 atm) ( ton l - 1.30 tons
Yr J 8.205 x 10-5m3-atm 1000 g 7 L907.185 kgJ yr
(( gmo -K ) ( kg ) (2 3 + 25 K))
For every 1 ton of TRS there is approximately 2 tons of S02 due to differences in molecular weights
and detailed in U.S. EPA AP-42 (revised November 1998);therefore,
S02 = 2.61 tons/yr
Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) Emissions
Hydrochloric acid (HCI) emissions are formed when chlorinated compounds in LFG are combusted in
control equipment. The estimation of HCI emissions from the Landfill are based on Equations 3, 4
and 10 in AP-42 Section 2.4. Since no site-specific values are available for the cumulative chloride
ion concentration of the 18 HAP/TAP constituents that have a chloride ion,the cumulative chloride
ion concentration is calculated using WIAC report default value concentration of 30.18 ppmv. The
total HCI emissions are calculated by using the concentration of 30.18 ppmv and the molecular
weight of 35.453 g/gmol for chloride.
Calculate the chloride emission rate, Qci, using Equation 3.
1 min
(525,YO min) (35.3198ft3) 1 30.180ppmv581.2 yr (3)
QCl — (
Calculate the uncontrolled mass emissions of chloride, UMci, using Equation 4.
UM _ 581.2 ms 35.45gmo1"latm _ 842.7 kg 4
Cl — ( ) m3-atm g ( )
yr
(8.205E-059mo1-K*1,000kg*(273+25 K) 3'r
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
15

Finally, calculate the controlled mass emissions of HCI, CMc, using Equation 10.
ton
CMHcI = (842.7) `Zoo) (1.03) C2kgb/ `2,00otbl (10)
HCI = 0.95 tons/yr
HAP Emissions
The total flare HAPs emission rate, including HCI emissions, for the utility flare unit FI-150 for 2021,
shown in the attached Exhibit 3, was estimated to be 0.99 tons. The total flare TAPs emission rate
for 2021 was estimated to be 1.00 tons. In addition,the Non-PMso/Non-VOC HAPs flare emission
rate Flare FI-150 was calculated to be 0.96 tons for 2021.
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
16

' 5 INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES
DIESEL ENGINES FOR MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT (IES-04)
The Landfill's permit includes an insignificant activity listing for "Diesel Engines for Miscellaneous
Landfill Support" with the emission source ID IES-04. Emissions from this source were estimated in
previous Annual Emissions Inventory documentation. Emissions for 2021 are estimated to be
approximately equivalent and are being"carried forward" as allowed by NCDEQ guidance.
WELDING OPERATIONS (IES-05)
The Landfill's permit also includes an insignificant activity listing for "Welding Operations" with the
emission source ID IES-05. Emissions from the Landfill's welding operations were estimated in
previous Annual Emissions Inventory documentation. Emissions for 2021 are estimated to be
approximately equivalent and are being"carried forward" as allowed by NCDEQ guidance. As
reported in previous years, emissions of manganese remained at 101 pounds for calendar year
2021. This is reported as HAPs/TAPs of 5.05E-02 tons per year for the welding operations.
DIESEL STORAGE TANK (IES-06)
The Landfill's permit includes an insignificant activity with description as "Diesel Storage Tank" (IES-
06). The emissions from the diesel storage tank were estimated in previous Annual Emissions
Inventory documentation using the U.S. EPA's TANKS 4.0.9d software.VOC emissions for the diesel
for 2021 are estimated to be approximately equivalent based on similar throughput values and were
applied to 2021. VOC emissions from diesel storage tank are presented below in Table 4. Note that
the Total HAP volatilization and NMOC emissions are conservatively estimated to equal VOC
emissions.
Table 4. Fuel Storage Tank Summary
Tank Tank Net Estimated
Volume Length Diameter Throughput VOC Emissions'
Contents (gal) (ft) (ft) (gal/yr) (lbs/yr)
Diesel Fuel 3,000 est. 15 est. 5.8 est. 158,538 4.66
(2.33E-03 tons)
Note:
1 Emissions estimated using U.S.EPA's Tanks 4.0.9d software.
LEACHATE STORAGE TANKS (IES-07)
The Landfill operates three (3) leachate storage tanks, with emission source ID IES-07 on the
insignificant activities list in the permit. These tanks are used to store collected leachate and
condensate from the Landfill prior to disposal at an offsite wastewater treatment system. The
throughput of leachate in calendar year 2021 was as shown below in Table 5. For purposes of this
air emissions inventory,throughput was allotted equally to all three leachate storage tanks. NMOC
and Total HAP volatilization emissions were conservatively estimated to be equal to VOC emissions
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
17

for leachate tanks as shown in Exhibit 5. Estimated VOCs emissions are presented below in Table 5
and detailed emission calculations are included in Attachment B.
Table 5. Leachate Tanks Combined Emissions Data
Parameter CY 2021
Leachate Throughput 19,618,273
(gallons)
Calculated VOC Emissions 67.35
(lbs/yr) (3.37E-02 tons/yr)
2021 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
18

Attachment B
Emissions Calculations Spreadsheets
2020 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory

EXHIBIT 1. ESTIMATED LFG GENERATION RATES
EAST CAROLINA REGIONAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL-AULANDER,NORTH CAROLINA
Methane LFG
Disposal Refuse Disposal Refuse Generation Generation Collection Collection Fugitive
Year Rate In-Place Rate In-Place Rates Rates Efficiency Rates Rates
(tons/yr) (tons) (Mg/yr) (Mg) (m,/Yr) (cfm) (0 (cfm) (cfm)
1993 39,176 0 35,540 0 0 0 0% 0 0
1994 243,409 39,176 220,817 35,540 1.399E+05 19 0% 0 19
1995 338,155 282,585 306,769 256,357 1.004E+06 135 0% 0 135
1996 360,489 620,740 327,030 563,126 2.172E+06 292 0% 0 292
1997 348,254 981,229 315,931 890,156 3.375E+06 453 0% 0 453
1998 404,852 1,329,483 367,276 1,206,087 4.486E+06 603 0% 0 603
1999 455,998 1,734,335 413,674 1,573,362 5.756E+06 774 0% 0 774
2000 479,380 2,190,333 434,886 1,987,037 7.159E+06 962 0% 0 962
2001 348,049 2,669,713 315,745 2,421,923 8.591E+06 1,154 25% 289 866
2002 476,861 3,017,762 432,601 2,737,668 9.497E+06 1,276 75% 957 319
2003 347,583 3,494,623 315,322 3,170,269 1.083E+07 1,455 75% 1,091 364
2004 523,055 3,842,206 474,508 3,485,591 1.164E+07 1,565 75% 1,174 391
2005 483,571 4,365,261 438,688 3,960,098 1.306E+07 1,755 75% 1,316 439
2006 527,771 4,848,832 478,786 4,398,786 1.427E+07 1,918 75% 1,438 479
2007 532,509 5,376,603 483,084 4,877,572 1.560E+07 2,096 75% 1,572 524
2008 518,584 5,909,112 470,451 5,360,656 1.689E+07 2,269 75% 1,702 567
2009 471,959 6,427,696 428,154 5,831,108 1.808E+07 2,429 75% 1,822 607
2010 547,097 6,899,655 496,318 6,259,262 1.905E+07 2,561 75% 1,920 640
2011 542,909 7,446,752 492,519 6,755,580 2.026E+07 2,723 75% 2,042 681
2012 575,739 7,989,661 522,302 7,248,099 2.141 E+07 2,877 75% 2,157 719
2013 513,022 8,565,400 465,406 7,770,400 2.262E+07 3,040 75% 2,2801 760
2014 468,705 9,078,422 425,202 8,235,806 2.357E+07 3,167 75% 2,375 792
2015 438,643 9,547,127 397,930 8,661,008 2.432E+07 3,268 75% 2,451 817
2016 470,577 9,985,770 426,900 9,058,938 2.493E+07 3,350 75% 2,513 838
2017 483,825 10,456,347 438,919 9,485,839 2.563E+07 3,445 75% 2,584 861
2018 463,804 10,940,172 420,756 9,924,757 2.636E+07 3,542 75% 2,656 885
2019 484,621 11,403,976 439,641 10,345,513 2.698E+07 3,626 79% 2,882 744
2020 492,721 11,888,597 446,989 10,785,154 1 2.765E+07 3,716 77% 2,858 858
2021 511,104 12,381,318 463,666 11,232,143 2.833E+07 3,807 79%1 3,0181 789
MEASURED NMOC CONCENTRATION IN LFG: 595 ppmv
ASSUMED METHANE CONTENT OF LFG: 50%
SELECTED DECAY RATE CONSTANT: 0.04
SELECTED METHANE GENERATION POTENTIAL, 3,203.7 ft3/ton
METRIC EQUIVALENT: 100 cu m/Mg
Conversions: 35.314667 cu ft per cu m
1.10231 13 ton per Mg
32.037 cu ft/ton per cu m/Mg

EXHIBIT 2. ESTIMATED NMOC and VOC GENERATION RATES
EAST CAROLINA REGIONAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL-AULANDER, NORTH CAROLINA
NMOC VOC
Surface Surface
Generation Generation Fugitive Generation Generation Fugitive
Year Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates
(tons/yr) (Mg/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (Mg/yr) (tons/yr)
1993 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1994 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.3
1995 4.7 4.3 4.7 1.8 1.7 1.8
1996 10.2 9.3 10.2 4.0 3.6 4.0
1997 15.9 14.4 15.9 6.2 5.6 6.2
1998 21.1 19.1 21.1 8.2 7.5 8.2
1999 27.1 24.6 27.1 10.6 9.6 10.6
2000 33.7 30.5 33.7 13.1 11.9 13.1
2001 40.4 36.6 30.3 15.8 14.3 11.8
2002 44.7 40.5 11.2 17.4 15.8 4.4
2003 50.9 46.2 12.7 19.9 18.0 5.0
2004 54.8 49.7 13.7 21.4 19.4 5.3
2005 61.4 55.7 15.3 23.9 21.7 6.0
2006 67.1 60.9 16.8 26.2 23.7 6.5
2007 73.3 66.5 18.3 28.6 25.9 7.2
2008 79.4 72.0 19.9 31.0 28.1 7.7
2009 85.0 77.1 21.2 33.1 30.1 8.3
2010 89.6 81.3 22.4 34.9 31.7 8.7
2011 95.3 86.4 23.8 37.2 33.7 9.3
2012 100.6 91.3 25.2 39.3 35.6 9.8
2013 106.4 96.5 26.6 41.5 37.6 10.4
2014 110.8 100.5 27.7 43.2 39.2 10.8
2015 114.3 103.7 28.6 44.6 40.5 11.1
2016 117.2 106.3 29.3 45.7 41.5 11.4
2017 120.5 109.3 30.1 47.0 42.6 11.8
2018 123.9 112.4 31.01 48.3 43.8 12.1
2019 126.9 115.1 26.0 49.5 44.9 10.1
2020 130.0 118.0 30.0 50.7 46.0 11.7
2021 133.2 120.8 27.6 51.9 47.1 10.8
MEASURED NMOC CONCENTRATION IN LFG: 595 ppmv
ASSUMED METHANE CONTENT OF LFG: 50%
AP-42 DEFAULT(1 1/98)VOC CONTENT OF NMOC 39%
SELECTED DECAY RATE CONSTANT: 0.04
SELECTED ULTIMATE METHANE RECOVERY RATE: 3,203.7 ft3/ton
METRIC EQUIVALENT: 100 cu m/Mg
35.314667 cu Ft per cu m
1.10231 13 ton per Mg
32.037 cu Ft/ton per cu m/Mg

EXHIBIT 3.2021 HAP/TAP EMISSION RATES
EAST CAROLINA REGIONAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL-AULANDER,NORTH CAROLINA
2021 Total Methane Generation(m 3
CH4/yr)= 28,329,344
LFG Collection Efficiency(%)= 79%
Landfill Gas Temperature ec)s= 25
Halogenated Destruction Eff.(%f= 98.0%
Non-Halogenated Destruction Eff.(%f= 99.7%
Percentage of LFG Collected sent to Flare(s)= 100.0%
2021 FLARE HAP EMISSIONS(tpy)'
Year LFG(cfm) Generated Surface Fugitives Flare Emissions Total Emissions
2021 3,807 17.96 3.72 2.307 6.03
Collected HAPs
Pollutant Mol.Wt. Conc.' Q(p)t M( )2 FM(p)' M(p)-FM(p)4 Flare Emissions
(g/gmol) (ppmv) (m3/yr) (kg/yr) (tpy) (tpy) (tons yr) (tpy)
1,1,1-trichloroethane TAP,HAP
133.41 0.168 9.52 51.936 0.0571 0.01 0.05 0.0009
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane TAP,HAP 167.85 0.070
3.97 27.226 0.0299 0.01 0.02 0.0005
1,1-dichloroethone HAP 98.97 0.741 41.98 169.939 0.1869 0.04 0.15 0.0030
1,1-dichloroetheneTAP'HAP 96.94 0.092 5.21 20.666 0.0227 0.00 0.02 0.0004
1,2-dichloroethone TAP'HAP 98.96 0.120
6.80 27.518 0.0303 0.01 0.02 0.0005
1,2-dichloro ro one HAP 112.99 0.023 1.30 6.022 0.0066 0.00 0.01 0.0001
acrylonitrile 53.06 0.036 2.04 4.426 0.0049 0.00 0.00 0.0000
benzene 78.11 0.972 55.07 175.932 0.1935 0.04 0.15 0.0005
carbon disulfide 76.13 0.320 18.13 56.452 0.0621 0.01 0.05 0.0001
carbon tetrachloride TAP'HAP 153.84 0.007 0.40 2.495 0.0027 0.00 0.00 0.0000
carbonyl sulfide H 60.07 0.183 10.37 25.473 0.0280 0.01 0.02 0.0001
chlorobenzene TAP'HAP 112.56 0.227
12.86 59.208 0.0651 0.01 0.05 0.0010
chloroethane HAP 64.52 0.239 13.54 35.733 0.0393 0.01 0.03 0.0006
chloroform TAP,HAP 119.39 0.021 1.19 5.810 0.0064 0.00 0.01 0.0001
chloromethane HAP 50.49 0.249 14.11 29.132 0.0320 0.01 0.03 0.0005
dichlorobenzene TAP,HAP 147.00 1.607 91.05 547.400 0.6021 0.12 0.48 0.0095
dichlorodifluoromethane TAP 120.91 1.751 99.21 490.592 0.5397 0.11 0.43 0.0086
dichlorofluoromethane TAP 102.92 2.62 148.45 624.846 0.6873 0.14 0.54 0.0109
dichloromethone TAP,HAP 84.94 3.395 192.36 668.227 0.7350 0.15 0.58 0.0117
ethyl mercaptan 62.13 1.356 76.83 195.224 0.2147 0.04 0.17 0.0005
eth (benzene 106.16 6.789 384.66 1670.084 1.8371 0.38 1.46 0.0044
ethylene dibromide TAP'HAP 187.88 0.046 2.61 20.027 0.0220 0.00 0.02 0.0003
hexane'°°1" 86.18 2.324 131.67 464.103 0.5105 0.11 0.40 0.0012
hydro en sulfide r4P 34.08 23.578 1335.90 1861.994 2.0482 0.42 1.62 0.0049
mercury and compounds T"'A' 200.61 0.000292 0.02 0.136 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.0000
methyl ethyl ketone`°P HA` 72.11 10.557 598.15 1764.037 1.9404 0.40 1.54 0.0046
methyl isobutyl ketone 100.16 0.750 42.49 174.071 0.1915 0.04 0.15 0.0005
methyl merca ran 48.11 1.292 73.20 144.035 0.1584 0.03 0.13 0.0004
erchloroeth lene TAP'HAP 165.83 1.193 67.59 458.432 0.5043 0.10 0.40 0.0080
toluene " 92.13 25.405 1439.41 5423.653 5.9660 1.24 4.73 0.0142
trichloroeth lene TAP'HAP 131.40 0.681 38.58 207.355 0.2281 0.05 0.18 0.0036
vinyl chloride TAP'HAP 62.50 1.077 61.02 155.979 0.1716 0.04 0.14 0.0027
xylenes 106.16 16.582 939.51 4079.148 4.4871 0.93 3.56 0.0107
hydrogen chloride 35.45 30.180 1355.87 1965.807 2.2273 -- 2.2273
Total HAPs Only --- --- --- 16330.62 17.96 3.72 14.24 2.31
Total TAPS Only --- --- --- 17710.93 19.48 4.04 15.44 2.32
Total HAPs/TAPS --- --- --- 19647.31 21.61 4.48 17.13 2.33
Total Non-PM,o/Non VOC HAPs --- --- --- 1 974.47 1.07 0.22 0.85 2.24
Notes:
1. Q(p)=Volumetric emission rate of the pollutant. AP-42 Section 2.4 equation(3).
2. M(p)=Mass generation of pollutant. AP-42 equation(4).
3. FM(p)=Fugitive emission rate of the landfill surface.
A. M(p)-FM(p)=Quantity of HAPs collected from the LFG collection system.
5.The landfill gas temperature was obtained from AP-42 Page 2.4-5.
6. The AP-42 Section 2.4 default for Flare Destruction Efficiency was assumed.
7. Pollutant concentrations used to compute the estimated emissions are from the WIAC report dated January 2001 and AP-42 Section 2.4,as revised November 1998.
TAP denotes compounds that are classified as toxic air pollutants per North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Air Quality.
'-denotes compounds that are classified as hazardous air pollutants per AP-42 and CAA Section 112.
`The compounds listed above were compiled from AP-42(revised Nov.1998)and CAA Section 112.
The compounds in red type are non-halogenated species.
8.New emissions factors beginning 2018 reporting year.

Attachment C
NCDEQ AERO Forms
2020 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16:12:50
As entered in HERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Listing of Emission Sources and Control Devices on Permit.See instructions
#ES ID on ;ES Description ;CS ID sCS Description #CD ID's
Air Permit
Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS Flare,One landfill gas-fired open flare(3000 CD-Flarel,CD-
ES-01 Subpart WWW,MACT Subpart CS-1,CS-4 scfm maximum flow rate) Flare2
AAAA]
IES-04 Diesel engines for miscellaneous
landfill support
IES-05 Welding operations
IES-06 Diesel storage tank
IE707 Two(2)leachate storage tanks
2

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Emission Source & Operating Scenario List- See Instructions
DES Croup ID ;ES ID *OS ID *OS Description
1 Municipal solid waste landfill
ES-01 8 CD-Flare 1
9 CD-Flare 2
IES-04 4 No.2 fuel oil-diesel engines for
miscellaneous landfill support
IES-05 3 maintenance shop welding rods
IES-06 6 diesel storage tank
IES-07 2 temporary storage of collected leachate
3

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in AERO
' Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2021
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) ES-01
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS Subpart WWW, MACT Subpart
AAAA]
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS - I/Municipal solid waste landfill
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 50100402/Landfill Dump ; Fugitive Emissions
5. Throughput/units in 2021: 414698400 FT3/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information:(Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): lF) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x V1)
(in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE (NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK)
4

Operating Scenario: OS - 1 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10. Operating Schedu le:(Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2021)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11. Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec o March-May o June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2021 25/0 2021 25/0 2021 1 2021
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 10.8 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Method Code Efficiency Factor Control
eo
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2021
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 2.02 08
Benzene 71-43-2 80.21 08
CFC-12 75-71-8 223.66 08
(Dichlorodifluoromethane)
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 25.74 08
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.14 08
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11.61 08
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 26.99 08
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.65 08
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 249.56 08
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 761.39 08
Ethyl chloride
75-00-3 16.29 08
(chloroethane)
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 89 08
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 9.13 08
Ethylene dichloride (1,2- 107-06-2 12.55 08
dichloroethane)
Ethylidene dichloride(1,1- 75-34-3 77.48 08
dichloroethane)
5

Hexane, n- 110-54-3 211.58 08
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 848.88 08
Mercury,vapor 7439-97-6 0.06 08
(Component of HGC)
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 13.28 08
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 23.68 08
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 804.22 08
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 79.36 08
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 65.57 08
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 304.64 08
Perch loroethylene 127-18-4 209 08
(tetrachloroethylene)
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 2.75 08
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 12.41 08
Toluene 108-88-3 2472.64 08
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 94.53 08
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 71.11 08
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 9.42 08
Xylene 1330-20-7 1859.68 08
6

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory -Calendar Year 2021
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) ES-0I
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS Subpart WWW, MACT Subpart
AAAA]
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS - 8/CD-Flare 1
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 5030060 1/Landfill Dump ; Waste Gas Flares
5. Throughput/units in 2021: 906134400 FT3/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu units)
7. Capture Efficiency 100
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
1 CS-1 CD-Flarel One landfill gas-fired open flare (3,000 scfm maximum flow rate)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP)Information: (Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): lF) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x Vl�
(in 0.1 feet)
Flare VERTICAL 35 1 1200 28.09 1324 Flare
STACK
7

Operating Scenario: OS - 8 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2021)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
' 11. Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2021 1 2021 2021 1 2021
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
CO CO 71 08 0
NOx NOx 15.6 08 0
TSP TSP 3.78 08 0
PM10 PM10 3.78 08 0
PM2.5 PM2.5 3.78 08 0
S02 S02 3.46 08 0
VOC VOC 0.46 08 98
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Method Code (Net
Factor Control
(Pounds/Year) ( et after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2021
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 0.01 08 98
Benzene 71-43-2 0.53 08 98
CFC-12 75-71-8 9.77 08 98
(Dichlorodifluo rom ethane)
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 0.17 08 98
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.05 08 98
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 0.08 08 98
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 1.18 08 98
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.12 08 98
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 10.9 08 98
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 4.99 08 98
Ethyl chloride 75-00-3 0.71 08 98
(chloroethane)
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 0.58 08 98
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 0.4 08 98
Ethylene dichloride (1,2- 107-06-2 0.55 08 98
dichloroethane)
Ethylidene dichloride(1,1- 75-34-3 3.38 08 98
dichloroethane)
8

Hexane, n- 110-54-3 1.39 08 98
Hydrogen chloride 7647-01-0 2543.53 08 98
(hydrochloric acid)
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 5.56 08 98
Mercury,vapor 7439-97-6 0 08 98
(Component of HGC)
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.58 08 98
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 1.03 08 98
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 5.27 08 98
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.52 08 98
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 0.43 08 98
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 13.31 08 98
Perch loroethylene 127-18-4 9.13 08 98
(tetrachloroethylene)
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.12 08 98
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 0.54 08 98
Toluene 108-88-3 16.2 08 98
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 4.13 08 98
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 3.11 08 98
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 0.41 08 98
Xylene 1330-20-7 12.19 08 98
9

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in AERO
' Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2021
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) ES-01
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS Subpart WWW, MACT Subpart
AAAA]
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS -9/CD-Flare 2
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 50300601/Landfill Dump ; Waste Gas Flares
5. Throughput/units in 2021: 680126400 FT3/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency 100
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
1 CS-4 CD-Flare2 One landfill gas-fired open flare (3,000 scfm maximum flow rate)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP)Information:(Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
Flare2 VERTICAL 40 1.17 1200 28.3 1825.57 Flare 2
STACK
10

Operating Scenario: OS - 9 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2021)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12.Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. o Sept.-Nov. o
2021 2021 2021 25/0 2021 25/o
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
CO CO 53.4 08 0
NOx NOx 11.7 08 0
TSP TSP 2.83 08 0
PM10 PM10 2.83 08 0
PM2.5 PM2.5 2.83 08 0
S02 S02 2.61 08 0
VOC VOC 0.35 08 98
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Method Code Efficiency Factor Control
eo
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2021
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 0.01 08 98
Benzene 71-43-2 0.39 08 98
CFC-12 75-71-8 7.34 08 98
(Dichlorodifluoromethane)
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 0.13 08 98
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.04 08 98
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 0.06 08 98
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.89 08 98
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.09 08 98
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 8.19 08 98
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 3.75 08 98
Ethyl chloride 75-00-3 0.53 08 98
(chloroethane)
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 0.44 08 98
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 0.3 08 98
Ethylene dichloride(1,2- 107-06-2 0.41 08 98
dichloroethane)
Ethylidene dichloride(1,1- 75-34-3 2.54 08 98
dichloroethane)
11

Hexane, n- 110-54-3 1.04 08 98
Hydrogen chloride 7647-01-0 1910.99 08 98
(hydrochloric acid)
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 4.18 08 98
Mercury,vapor 7439-97-6 0 08 98
(Component of HGC)
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.44 08 98
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 0.78 08 98
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 3.96 08 98
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.39 08 98
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 0.32 08 98
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 10 08 98
Perch loroethylene 127-18-4 6.86 08 98
(tetrachloroethylene)
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.09 08 98
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 0.41 08 98
Toluene 108-88-3 12.17 08 98
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 3.1 08 98
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 2.33 08 98
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 0.31 08 98
Xylene 1330-20-7 9.16 08 98
12

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in HERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2021
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) IES-04
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Diesel engines for miscellaneous landfill support
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS -4/No. 2 fuel oil - diesel engines for miscellaneous landfill support
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 20200401/Diesel ; Diesel
5. Throughput/units in 2021: 60000 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information: (Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x l�
(in 0.1 feet)
ERP- FUGITIVE(NO miscellaneous
DIESEL STACK) 1 72 Area= 1 diesel engines
13

Operating Scenario: OS -4 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-04
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2021)
Hours per Day ( 10 ) Days per Week ( 6 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
' 11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2021 1 2021 2021 2021
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
CO CO 1.47 08
NOx NOx 6.84 08
TSP TSP 0.05 08
PM10 PM10 0.05 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 0.05 08
S02 S02 0.45 08
VOC VOC 0.55 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Efficiency Factor Control
(Pounds/Year) Method Code (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2021
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.4 08
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.3 08
Benzene 71-43-2 2.9 08
Butadiene, 1,3- 106-99-0 0.1 08
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.6 08
Polycyclic Organic Matter
(Inc PAH,dioxins,etc. NC POM 74.1 08
&AP 42 historic
amorphous glob)
Toluene 108-88-3 1.3 08
Xylene 1330-20-7 0.9 08
14

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in HERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2021
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) IES-05
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Welding operations
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS - 3/maintenance shop welding rods
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 30900500/Metal Work- Welding ; General
5. Throughput/units in 2021: 5000 LB/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
(ERP) ( rY )
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate Acfm
Rectangle(L x )
(in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE (NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK)
15

Operating Scenario: OS - 3 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-05
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2021)
Hours per Day ( 1 ) Days per Week ( 5 ) Weeks per Year ( 50 )
t11. Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 900 End: 1000
12.Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2021 1 2021 2021 2021
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
Pollutants (Tons/Year) controls) (See Instructions) )
2021
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/'TAPS Method Code Efficiency Factor Control
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2021
Manganese Unlisted
Compounds(Specify & Other 101 08
Component of MNC)
16

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2021
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) IES-06
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Diesel storage tank
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS - 6/diesel storage tank
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 39090004/Fuel Storage- Fixed Roof Tanks ; Distillate Oil (No. 2): Working
Loss
5. Throughput/units in 2021: 159070 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP)Information: (Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK)
17

Operating Scenario: OS - 6 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-06
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2021)
Hours per Day ( 10 ) Days per Week ( 6 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
' 11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 600 End: 1600
12.Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2021 1 2021 2021 2021
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Method Code Efficiency Factor Control
eo oe
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2021
18

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16:12:50
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory - Calendar Year 2021
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) IES-07
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Two (2) leachate storage tanks
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS -2/temporary storage of collected leachate
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 40714698/Fixed Roof Tanks -Miscellaneous ; Specify In Comments:
Working Loss
5. Throughput/units in 2021: 14747831 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information: (Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (FeeVsec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE (NO 1 72 Area= I fugitive
STACK)
19

i
Operating Scenario: OS -2 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-07
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2021)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
' 11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12.Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2021 1 2021 2021 2021
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2021
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 0.03 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Method Code Efficiency Factor Control
eo oe
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2021
Benzene 71-43-2 0.62 08
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 0.71 08
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 36.92 08
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.62 08
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.31 08
Toluene 108-88-3 1.97 08
Xylene 1330-20-7 1.6 08
20

Facility Total CY 2021 Emissions Summary
COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2021
Record Facility-Wide Totals From all Permitted and Non-Permitted AirPollutant Emission Sources
Green House Gases Pollutants(GHG
Actual Emissions(Tons/Year)
Pollutant ICAS 12021 12020 1%Change
Criteria Pollutants
Actual Emissions(Tons/Year)
Pollutant CAS 2021 2020 %Change
CO CO 125.87 119.37 5.4452543%
NOx NOx 34.14 32.69 4.43561%
PM(TSP) TSP 6.66 6.31 5.54675%
PM 10 PM 10 6.66 6.31 5.54675%
PM2.5 PM2.5 6.66 6.31 5.54675%
S02 S02 6.52 6.19 5.331178%
VOC I VOC 112.19 13.04 -6.518408%
Hazardous Air Pollutants HAPS and/or Toxic Air Pollutants TAPS
Actual Emissions(Pounds/Year)
Pollutant ICAS 12021 2020 %Change
Pollutant Group:Manganese&compounds Group Sum:101
Manganese Unlisted Compounds MNC-Other 101.0 101 0.0%
(Specify&Component of MNC)
Pollutant Group:Mercury&Compounds-all total mass,inc Hg Vapor Group Sum:.06
Mercury,vapor(Component of F439-97-6 To6 .07 -14.285716%
HGC)
Pollutant Group:Total Reduced Sulfur(TRS as total mass)Group Sum:924.94
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 858.62 941.81 -8.832992%
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 66.32 72.86 -8.97612%
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.4 2.4 0.0%
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.3 .3 0.0%
Acry lonitrile 107-13-1 2.04 2.24 -8.928573%
Benzene 71-43-2 84.65 92.51 -8.496379%
Butadiene, 1,3- 106-99-0 0.1 .1 0.0%
CFC-12 75-71-8 240.77 275.7 -12.669571%
(Dichlorodifluoromethane)
21

Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 26.04 28.55 -8.791588%
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.23 1.4 -12.142855%
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11.75 12.88 -8.7732935%
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 29.06 33.27 -12.654045%
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.86 3.26 -12.269941%
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 268.65 307.62 -12.668227%
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 770.84 845.45 -8.824884%
Ethyl chloride(chloroethane) 75-00-3 17.53 20.08 -12.6992%
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 90.02 98.75 -8.84051%
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 9.83 11.25 -12.622222%
Ethylene dichloride(1,2- 107-06-2 13.51 15.47 -12.669683%
dichloroethane)
Ethylidene dichloride(1,1- 75-34-3 83.4 95.51 -12.6793%
dichloroethane)
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.6 3.6 0.0%
Hexane,n- 110-54-3 214.01 234.75 -8.834933%
Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric 7647-01-0 4454.52 4216.96 5.6334434%
acid)
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 14.3 16.37 -12.645085%
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 25.49 29.18 -12.64565%
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 850.37 929.19 -8.482658%
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 80.89 88.66 -8.763822%
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 328.26 375.84 -12.659638%
Perchloroethylene 127-18-4 224.99 257.62 -12.665938%
(tetrachloroethy lene)
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Inc
PAH,dioxins,etc.NC&AP 42 POM 74.1 74.1 0.0%
historic amorphous glob)
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 2.96 3.39 -12.684367%
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 13.36 15.3 -12.679743%
Toluene 108-88-3 2504.28 2746.61 -8.822879%
Trichloroethy lene 79-01-6 101.76 116.53 -12.674845%
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 76.55 87.65 -12.664003%
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 110.14 111.61 -12.661494%
Xylene 1330-20-7 11883.53 12065.78 -8.822333%
22

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/28/2022 16: 12:50
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Comments From Facility:
23