AQ_F_0800102_20201007_EI_Cmb-EI-File

2019 Emissions Inventory Review / Data Tracking Form
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID: 0800102
Facility Assigned to: Data Entry: Bertie County
Classification: Kurt Tidd Confidential Copy Submitted?
Title V �41� ❑. YES
NO
Initial Review /Data Entry
04' Enter date received into ED. Date Received: Z Z 120
I�Assigned to appropriate individual. Date Assigned: Date Due: 16 I' 2-O V3
Q/�aper copy submitted: One co y received with supporting documentation,certification form signed by responsible official,and
pears generally complete;, ANC
Electronic copy submitted: All supporting documentation and certification form(with time/date stamp)signed by responsible
official has been received.
Comments:
Inventory Review
11 forms and supporting documentation appear to be complete if paper submission(check ED OS data if electronic).
ntact,address,phone number changes entered into I-Beam/Facilities if necessary.
All known operating scenarios,control devices,and emission release points have been entered for each emission source(permitted,
.gnificant,and unpermitted)or note that the emission source was not operated or not required to report.
check if SCC codes for each OS are accurate and update if needed.
valuate U sources for significance and address according to policy.
Calculations/forms appear to add up correctly.
compliance issues are being addressed(e.g.Toxics limits,above TV thresholds,large emissions increase/decrease, installation
without a permit).
/ill volatile HAPs/TAPS were included in the VOC total.
L" Calculations and control efficiencies appear correct. Emission factors are the best available and most current factors appropriate
9f r the reporting facility(e.g. stack testing,AP-42,etc.).
Review facility comments and address any issues.
&"(Jpdate ED(Data Entry Main)if additional information is required(corrections due date and date received).
[ZAheck all ED QA/QC reports.
V�C,Pmparison with previous emission inventory must be made and outliers(> 10%)must be investigated and explained.
Put inventory review comments and summarize any changes in ED- Data Entry Main "DAQ internal comments".
Print and attach the facility total report.
Date Info Requested: Date Info Received: Total Days on Hold..
Date Review Complete: Signature:
Date Submitted to El Coordinator: lo�/ZoLb
Date Approved: 19/7/2o2-p Initials: 541,

Inventory notes for East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill.
SCC ok.
Only AP-42 Emission Factors used.
Kurt,
I apologize for the delay in my response. My responses to your questions are listed below. I have
attached Appendix B from the 2019 Annual Emissions Inventory and have referenced it in my responses.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions or would like any further clarification.
1 -Since HAP emissions are a function of both surface fugitives and flare emissions, the increase in flare
throughput would slightly increase emissions coming from the flare, but more significantly decrease
emissions from the surface fugitives since more gas is collected. In 2018,the facility had a collection
efficiency of 75%, which improved to a collection efficiency of 79% in 2019 (See Exhibit 1).That
amounted to 744 scfm of fugitive emissions in 2019 compared to 885 scfm of fugitive emissions in 2019.
While the flare throughput did increase (2,882 scfm in 2019 compared to 2,656 scfm in 2018), the
majority of HAPS (with the exception of HCL) come from fugitive emissions (See Exhibit 3). Therefore the
reduction in HAPs from fugitive emissions, outweighs the increase of HAPs from an increase in
throughput, and therefore decreases the facility's total HAP emissions.
2 - Since SO2 is a function of flare throughput (since SO2 is generated from the oxidation of sulfur
compounds in LFG at the flare), the increase in collection in 2019 resulted in an increase in SO2 when
compared to 2018 (See Exhibit 1).
Thank you,
Lucas Nachman
SCS Engineers
804-840-5325

From: Tidd, Kurt N <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, September 24, 2020 10:30 AM
To: Nachman, Lucas<[e-mail]>
Subject: Emissions Inventory for Republic Services, Aulander
Good Morning Lucas,
I'm reviewing the emissions inventory for Republic Services and had a couple of questions,
1. Why was there a decrease of HAPS for flares 1 and 2 while the throughput increased?
2. Why was there a large increase in SOP

A
Facility Total CY 2019 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID#: 0800102
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T08
Green House Gases Pollutants (GHG) Actual Emissions
Tons/Yr
Pollutant CAS
Demini- Change
mus
Not Not N i A
Reported Reported
CO2 equivalent(sum of individual GHG pollutant emission No GHGs
times their 1995 IPCC Global Warming Potential (GWP), Reported
converted to metric tons)
Criteria Pollutants Actual Emissions
(Tons/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2019 CY 2018 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
CO CO 120.27 123.92 0.5 -2.9%
NOx Nox 32.90 33.71 0.5 -2.4%
PM(TSP) TSP 6.36 6.64 0.5 -4 2%
PM10 PM10 6.36 6.64 0.5 -4.2%
PM2.5 PM2.5 6.36 6.64 0.5 -4 2%
S02 SO2 6.27 3.21 0.5 95.3%
0
VOC voc 11.45 13.92 0.5 -17.7 /o
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2019 CY 2018 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Manganese& compounds 101.00 101.00 10.0 0.0°%
Manganese Unlisted Compounds - Specify Compound MNC-Other 101.00 101.00 10.0 0.0%
(Component of MNC)
Mercury & Compounds- all total mass includes Hg Vapor 0.291000 0.300000 0.001 -3.0%
Mercury, vapor(Component of HGC) 7439-97-6 0.291000 0.300000 0.001 -3.0%
Total Reduced Sulfur(TRS as total mass) 882.17 1,115.951 -20.9%
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 818.83 1,035.82 1.0 -20.9%
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 63.34 80.13 1.0 -21.0%
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.40 2.40 10.0 0.0%
10/02/2020 Page 1 of 4

Facility Total CY 2019 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID#: 0800102
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T08
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants(TAPs) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2019 CY 2018 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.300000 0.300000 10.0 0.0%
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 1.94 2.46 10.0 -21.1%
Benzene 71-43-2 80.85 101.34 1.0 -20.2%
Butadiene, 1,3- 106-99-0 0.100000 0.100000 1.0 0.0%
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 24.78 31.40 10.0 -21.1%
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.24 1.46 1.0 -15.1%
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11 .20 14.17 1.0 -21.0%
CFC-12 ) 7s 71 8 Dichlorodifluoromethane _ 243.52 287.23 100.0 -15.2%
(
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 29.39 34.66 10.0 -15.2%
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.88 3.40 100.0 -15.3%
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 271.69 320.50 1.0 -15.2%
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 735.14 929.72 100.0 -20.9%
Ethyl chloride (chloroethane) 75-00-3 17.74 20.91 10.0 -15.2%
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 85.85 108.61 10.0 -21.0%
Ethylene dibromide (dibromoethane) 106-93-4 9.94 11.73 1.0 -15.3%
Ethylene dichloride (1,2-dichloroethane) 107-06-2 13.65 16.12 1.0 -1.5.3%
Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-dichloroethane) 75-34-3 84.36 99.50 100.0 -15.2%
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.60 3.60 10.0 0.0%
Hexane,n- 110-54-3 204.09 258.18 100.0 -21.0%
Hydrogen chloride (hydrochloric acid) 7647-01-0 5,918.32 6,100.05 100.0 -3.0%
MEK (methyl ethyl ketone, 2-butanone) 78-93-3 812.67 1,015.24 100.0 -20.0%
Methyl chloride (chloromethane) 74-87-3 14.46 17.06 1.0 -15.2%
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 25.78 30.40 100.0 -15.2%
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 332.0 l 391.51 1.0 -15.2%
MIBK(methyl isobutyl ketone) 108-10-1 77.17 97.40 10.0 -20.8%
Perch loroethylene (tetrachloroethylene) 127-18-4 227.56 268.40 100.0 -15.2%
10/02/2020 Page 2 of 4

Facility Total CY 2019 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID#: 0800102
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T08
Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPS) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2019 CY 2018 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Inc PAH, dioxins,etc.NC pom 74.10 74.10 1.0 0.0%
&AP 42 historic)
Propylene dichloride (1,2-dichloropropane) 78-87-5 2.99 3.52 10.0 -15.1%
TCE(trichloroethylene) 79-01-6 102.93 121.40 1,000.0 -15.2%
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 13.52 15.94 100.0 -15.2%
Toluene 108-88-3 2,388.37 3,020.26 100.0 -20.9%
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 77.43 91.32 0.1 -15.2%
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 10.26 12.10 0.1 -15.2%
Xylene (mixed isomers) 1330-20-7 1,796.33 2,271.58 100.0 -20.9%
Largest Individual HAP Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid) 5,918.32 lbs
Total HAP Emissions 12,657.81 Ibs
Largest Individual CAP CO 120.27 tons
Total CAP Emissions 177.25 tons
Total TAP Emissions 13,498.51 Ibs
Total Aggregate 180.92 tons
Emissions
10/02/2020 Page 3 of 4

DAQ's Comments Regarding Inventory
DAQ Covid-19 enforcement guidance allows for certification submittal up to August 31st
Inventory notes for East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill.
SCC ok.
Only AP-42 Emission Factors used.
Kurt,
I apologize for the delay in my response.My responses to your questions are listed below.I have
attached Appendix B from the 2019 Annual Emissions Inventory and have referenced it in my
responses.Please let me know if you have any additional questions or would like any further
clarification.
1 -Since HAP emissions are a function of both surface fugitives and flare emissions,the increase in
flare throughput would slightly increase emissions coming from the flare,but more significantly
decrease emissions from the surface fugitives since more gas is collected.In 2018,the facility had a
collection efficiency of 75%,which improved to a collection efficiency of 79%in 2019(See Exhibit 1).
That amounted to 744 scfm of fugitive emissions in 2019 compared to 885 scfm of fugitive emissions
in 2019.While the flare throughput did increase(2,882 scfm in 2019 compared to 2,656 scfm in
2018),the majority of HAPS(with the exception of HCL)come from fugitive emissions(See Exhibit
3).Therefore the reduction in HAPs from fugitive emissions,outweighs the increase of HAPs from an
increase in throughput,and therefore decreases the facilityLs total HAP emissions.
2-Since S02 is a function of flare throughput(since S02 is generated from the oxidation of sulfur
compounds in LFG at the flare),the increase in collection in 2019 resulted in an increase in S02
when compared to 2018(See Exhibit 1).
Thank you,
Lucas Nachman
SCS Engineers
804-840-5325
From:Tidd,Kurt N<[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday,September 24,2020 10:30 AM
To:Nachman,Lucas<[e-mail]>
Subject:Emissions Inventory for Republic Services,Aulander
Good Morning Lucas,
Ism reviewing the emissions inventory for Republic Services and had a couple of questions,
1. Why was there a decrease of HAPS for flares I and 2 while the throughput increased?
2. Why was there a large increase in S02?
10/02/2020 Page 4 of 4

2019 Annual Emissions Inventory
East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill
Aulander, North Carolina
Facility ID No. 0800102
Title V Permit No. 08849T08
Republic Services of NC, LLC
East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill
1922 Republican Road
Aulander, NC 27805
252-348-3322
Submitted to:
North Carolina Dept. of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
AlZpZv Washington Regional Office
i I 943 Washington Square Mall
�G Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
2 2�
�X>
aS C S - E N G I N E E R- SA
02219201.00-4 1 June 23, 2020
15521 Midlothian Turnpike, Suite 305
Midlothian, VA 23113
804-378-7440

15521 Midlothian Turnpike, Suite 305
Midlothian, VA 23113
804 378-7440 www.scsengineers.com
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: ELIZABETH HUDDLESTON DATE: 6/30/20
ASHI DAQNGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
W JOB NO: 02219201.00-4
ASHI
943 WASHI NGTON SQUARE MALL RE: EAST CAROLINA REG.SOLID WASTE LF
WASHINGTON, NC 27889 AULANDER,NORTH CAROLINA
CC: MATT EINSMANN, REPUBLIC SERVICES
MIKE KAVANAUGH, ECE
. . . . . . . . . .
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
® Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover Via
® Report ❑ Prints
❑ Plans ❑ Change Order
❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
1 6/23/20 2019 EMISSIONS INVENTORY.EAST CAROUNA ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFILL
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For Approval ❑ Approved as Submitted ❑ Resubmit Copies for Approval
® For Your Use ❑ Approved as Noted ❑ Submit Copies for Distribution
❑ As Requested ❑ Returned for Corrections ❑ Resubmit Corrected Prints
❑ For Review and Comment
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 2020 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS:
SIGNED L
LUCAS S.NACHMAN
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

Table of Contents
Section Page
TITLE V INVENTORY CERTIFICATION FORM ................................................................................................1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... ES-1
Table
Table ES-1. 2019 Air Emissions Summary........................................................................................ ES-1
Attachments
A Engineering Calculations
B Emissions Calculations Spreadsheets
C NCDEQ AERO Forms
2018 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
Inventory Certification Form(Title V)
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bettie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality,
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory-Calendar Year 2019
These forms must be completed and returned even if the facility did not operate or emissions were zero
The legally defined "Responsible Official" of record for your facility is Shane Walker
This person or one that meets the definition below must sign this certification form.
The official submitting the information must certify that he/she complies with the requirements as specified in Title 15A NCAC
2Q.0520(b)which references and follows the federal definition.40 CFR Part 70.2 defines a responsible as meaning one of the
following:
1. For a corporation: a president,secretary,treasurer,or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business
function,or any other person who performs similar policy or decision making functions for the overall operation of one or
more manufacturing,production,or operating facilities applying for a or subject to a permit and either
i. the facilities employ more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding$25 million(in
second quarter 1980 dollars);or
H. the delegation of authority to such representatives is approved in advance by the permitting authority;
2. For partnership or sole proprietorship;a general partner or the proprietor,respectively;
3. For a municipality,state,federal,or other public agency includes the chief executive officer having responsibility for the
overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency(e.g.,a Regional Administrator of EPA).
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT:
(Important: Legally Responsible Official.read and sign after all submissions are final,)
I certify that I am the responsible official for this facility,as described above,and hereby certify that the information contained in
this air emissions report, including attached calculations and documentation, is true, accurate and complete. (Subject to legal
penalties of up to$25,000 per occuyrence and possible imprisonrwnt as outlined in G.S. § 143-215.3(a)(2))
Responsible Official's Signatur Below (use blue i Date Signed: f If
Printed Name: Shane Walke
Signature:
This form app ' s to Title V facilities.If this facility is not classified asTitle V,please telephone your regional office Emission
Inventory Contact at once for proper forms.
Email address of Responsible Official: [e-mail]
Information on this Form cannot be held confidential
COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This 2019 Annual Air Emissions Inventory Report(Report) has been prepared by SCS Engineers, PC
(SCS) on behalf of Republic Services of NC, LLC for the East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill
located in Aulander, North Carolina. This Report was prepared in accordance with Section 3.X of the
Landfill's Title V Air Operating Permit(No. 08849T08)and Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC)Sections 2Q .0207 and 2D .0202, pursuant to North Carolina General
Statutes Sections 143-215.65 and 143-215.107.
The purpose of this Report is to provide the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
P P P P P Q Y
(NCDEQ) with an estimate of the actual emissions of air pollutants from the Landfill during calendar
year 2019. These estimates are based upon Landfill waste receipt records, site-specific testing
data, data provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA), landfill gas(LFG)
quantities measured at the site, and typical engineering assumptions for landfills. This data will be
used by the NCDEQ to collect fees from the Landfill, and to ensure compliance with the Landfill's
Title V Permit.
The estimated emissions from the Landfill in 2019 are summarized below in Table ES-1. These
estimates are summarized from all applicable sources,such as the fugitive (uncontrolled) emissions
from the Landfill surface and the point source emissions from the two utility flares as well as certain
insignificant sources. All other sources of air pollutant emissions from the Landfill are considered to
be insignificant and are not quantified in this report.
Table ES-1 . 2019 Air Emissions Summary
Pollutant NMOCs VOCs HAPs NOx CO SOX PM PM10 PM2.5 TRS HCI
Total
Emissions 26.83 11.45 5.80 32.9 120.3 6.27 6.36 6.36 6.36 0.77 2.13
(tons/yr)
This facility is equipped with an active LFG collection system, which supplies the extracted LFG to an
on-site utility flare.
Included in this Report are the following:
• Engineering Calculations (Attachment A);
• Emissions Calculation Spreadsheets (Attachment B); and,
• NCDEQ AERO Forms(Attachment C).
The NCDEQ AERO Forms have also been submitted electronically.
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory
ES-1

Attachment A
Engineering Calculations
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory

Attachment A
Engineering Calculations
Table of Contents
Section Page
1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................1
SiteBackground.................................................................................................................................2
2 Uncollected Landfill Gas Fugitives (ES-1).........................................................................................3
Non-Methane Organic Compound Emissions...................................................................................4
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions.............................................................................................4
Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions...................................................................................................4
Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions.......................................................................................................5
AmmoniaEmissions...........................................................................................................................6
3 Landfill Gas Flare FL-100 (CD-1).......................................................................................................7
FlareEmissions..................................................................................................................................7
LFG Utility Flare CD-1 Operating Parameters .........................................................................8
HeatRelease (MMBtu/hr) .......................................................................................................8
NitrogenOxides Emissions ......................................................................................................8
Carbon Monoxide Emissions...................................................................................................8
Particulate Matter Emissions...................................................................................................8
NMOCEmissions......................................................................................................................9
VOCEmissions..........................................................................................................................9
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions...............................................................................................9
Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) Emissions........................................................................................ 10
HAPEmissions....................................................................................................................... 11
4 Landfill Gas Flare FL-150 (CD-2).................................................................................................... 12
FlareEmissions............................................................................................................................... 12
LFG Utility Flare CD-2 Operating Parameters ...................................................................... 13
Heat Release (MMBtu/hr) .................................................................................................... 13
NitrogenOxides Emissions................................................................................................... 13
Carbon Monoxide Emissions................................................................................................ 13
Particulate Matter Emissions................................................................................................ 13
NMOCEmissions................................................................................................................... 14
VOCEmissions....................................................................................................................... 14
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions............................................................................................ 14
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A

Attachment A
Engineering Calculations
Table of Contents
Section Page
Hydrochloric Acid (HCl) Emissions........................................................................................ 15
HAPEmissions....................................................................................................................... 16
5 Insignificant Activities..................................................................................................................... 17
Diesel Engines For Miscellaneous Support (IES-04) .................................................................... 17
Welding Operations (IES-05).......................................................................................................... 17
DieselStorage Tank (IES-06) ......................................................................................................... 17
Leachate Storage Tanks (IES-07) .................................................................................................. 17
Tables
Table 1. 2019 Annual Emission Rate Summary (tons/yr)................................................................1
Table 2. Utility Flare FL-100 (CD-1) Emission Factors.......................................................................7
Table 3. Utility Flare FL-150 (CD-2) Emission Factors.................................................................... 12
Table 4. Fuel Storage Tank Summary............................................................................................. 17
Table 5. Leachate Tanks Combined Emissions Data..................................................................... 18
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A

a
I INTRODUCTION
The emissions inventory presented herein is the basis for the emissions values for calendar year
2019 reported in the NCDEQ forms that have been submitted electronically. The emissions sources
identified were based on SCS Engineers' (SCS) knowledge of the site, discussions and
correspondence with East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill staff, and review of existing
permits, compliance reports, and other information provided by Republic Services and CEC (LFG
system operator) personnel.
Table 1. 2019 Annual Emission Rate Summary (tons/yr)
Emission
Sources
ID No. Emission Source NMOC VOCs HAPs NOX CO SOX PMio° TRS HCl
Municipal Solid
Waste Landfill
ES-1 (Fugitive Surface 26.0 10.1 3.51 -- -- -- -- 0.77 --
Emissions) 1,23
Landfill Gas Open
CD-1 Flare FL-100 (3000 0.43 0.41 1.18 14.00 63.8 3.12 3.39 -- 1.14
scfm) 1.5.6
Landfill Gas Open
CD-2 Flare FL-150 (3000 0.37 0.36 1.02 12.06 55.0 2.70 2.92 -- 0.99
scfm)1.5,6
Diesel Engines for
IES-04 Miscellaneous -- 0.55 0.043 6.84 1.47 0.45 0.05 -- --
Landfill Support
IES-05 Welding -- -- 0.051
Operations
IES-06 Diesel Storage 0.002 0.002 0.002
Tank
IES-07 Leachate Storage 0.03 0.03 0.03
Tanks
Total 26.83 11.45 5.80 32.9 120.3 6.27 6.36 0.77 2.13
Notes:
-- Not Applicable
1 These estimates are based on a 79% LFG collection efficiency for the active LFG collection system.
2 VOC generation is estimated to be 39 percent of the NMOC generation before combustion per Table
2.4-2 of AP-42 Section 2.4 "Municipal Solid Waste Landfills," revised 11/98.
3 Total HAPs are conservatively estimated using those pollutants present in the HAPs, Section 112 of
the Clean Air Act and AP-42 Table 2.4-1 and 2.4-2 (revised 11/98), and those LFG pollutants
classified as TAPs by NCDEQ-DAQ.
4 Per guidance from AP-42 and in an effort to be conservative, particulate matter emissions such as
PM, PM-10, and PM-2.5 are assumed to be equal.
5 Flare destruction efficiency for NMOCs is 99.2% and 98.0% for VOCs per Table 2.4-3 of AP-42.
6 The flare emissions reflect 100% of the collected LFG (on an annual average basis).
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
1

SITE BACKGROUND
The East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill (Landfill) is owned and operated by Republic
Services of North Carolina, LLC.The site is located on Republican Road near Aulander, North
Carolina. The Landfill is subject to the New Source Performance Standards(NSPS)for Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills(40 CFR 60 Subpart WWW) and the Landfill Maximum Achievable Control
Technology(MACT) Standard (40 CFR 63 Subpart AAAA) based upon a waste design capacity
exceeding 2.5 million Megagrams (Mg) and 2.5 million cubic meters.
The Landfill commenced waste placement operations in 1993 and cells 1-14 have been developed,
which comprise of approximately 122.4 acres. The Facility initially constructed an active LFG
collection and control system during 2001. The system has been routinely upgraded with new
installations and/or upgrades to vertical extraction wells, horizontal collectors, leachate cleanout
connections, header and lateral collection piping, condensate sumps, condensate storage tank, and
a blower/flare station.
As of the end of 2019,the current collection and control system consisted of 95 vertical extraction
wells, 17 leachate cleanout connections,three manholes, and four collectors. The wells are
connected via a network of below grade HDPE collection piping and the main header pipes are
equipped with butterfly isolation valves. The LFG collection piping transports the LFG from the fill
areas to the blower/flare station.
The LFG control system consists of a blower/flare station equipped with two 4,000-scfm blowers and
two utility flares each with a maximum rated capacity of 3,000 cfm (cumulative flare capacity of
6,000 cfm).
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
2

2 UNCOLLECTED LANDFILL GAS FUGITIVES (ES-1)
This section addresses the generation of LFG, non-methane organic compounds(NMOCs), volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), and total reduced sulfur(TRS)
compounds, and their emissions via passive LFG releases. The 2019 LFG fugitive emissions for the
site are estimated in this section.
LFG generation from the landfill was estimated using Version 3.02 of the EPA's Landfill Gas
Emissions Model (LandGEM version 3.02). A description of the model parameters is provided in this
section and the model output is included as Exhibit 1.
LandGEM 3.02 uses a first-order decay equation to predict LFG generation based on the amount and
age of the waste in place. The formula calculates and sums the LFG generation rate for every 1/10th
of a year and uses the sum to form the annual LFG Generation Rate. The formula is presented
below:
n 1 M. -kt..
QCH4 (m3 lyr) = Y_ Y_ U0 10 e Y
i = lj =0.1
where:
QcH4 = Methane generation rate (m3/yr)from the LANDGEM
i = 1 year time increment
n = (year of the calculation) - (initial year of waste acceptance)
j = 0.1 year time increment
k = methane generation rate constant (year-')
Lo = potential methane generation capacity(m3/Mg)
M; = mass of waste accepted in the ith year (Mg)
t;; = age of the jth section of waste mass M; accepted in the ith year(decimal
years, e.g., 3.2 years)
The methane generation potential, Lo,for the MSW landfill cells was set equal to 100 cubic meters
(m3) of methane (CH4) per megagram (Mg) of waste. This value is published in EPA's Compilation of
Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42), Volume I, Section 2.4 revised November 1998. AP-42
recommends this value of Lo for MSW landfills that are located in geographical regions that receive
average or above average annual precipitation, such as Aulander, North Carolina. The methane
generation rate constant, k, was set to 0.04 yr-l. This value for k is published in AP-42 and is
reflective of actual LFG recovery rates measured at the site and SCS' professional engineering
experience. The concentration of NMOC in LFG was set to 595 parts per million by volume (ppmv) as
hexane and is based on the EPA AP-42 recommended value for municipal solid waste landfills
located in areas of above average rainfall.
The refuse filling history based on scale house records provided by the facility and coinciding with
values used in the Title V Permit application was input to the LandGEM. Note that this model
estimates emissions based on the amount of waste in-place at the beginning of each year. Note that
since 2013, the Facility has documented certain wastes as inerts. These inert wastes, under the
presumption that they do not produce any landfill gas, have been excluded in total waste
calculations in the LandGem Model.
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
3

The waste in-place at the beginning of 2019 was 10.37 million Mg, which is about 11.40 million
tons.The LandGEM calculates that the methane generation rate for 2019 is 27.0 million cubic
meters, or about 952.9 million cubic feet(1,813 cfm).Assuming a LFG methane concentration of 50
percent,the LFG generation rate for 2019 is estimated to be 3,626 cfm. The model output is
included as Exhibit 1 in Attachment B.
Flow data is recorded at 10 minute intervals and compiled from the flowmeters installed at the
flares. The sum of these measured flowrates represents the total LFG collection rate while the
average obtained from these meters represent the average LFG flowrates. These average LFG
flowrates are normalized to 50 percent methane using monitoring data obtained from the header
piping at the blower/flare station.The flow data recorded from January 1 through December 31,
2019 indicates an average LFG flowrate to utility flare FL-100 of 1,547 cfm at 50 percent methane
and an average LFG flowrate to utility flare FI-150 of 1,335 cfm at 50 percent methane.This value is
an annualized average, not a run-time average. Thus,the average LFG recovery rate at the Facility for
2019 is 2,882 cfm, which yields a calculated collection efficiency equal to 79 percent.
NON-METHANE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS
NMOC generation from the Landfill was calculated using the LandGEM. The model parameters were
similar to the values noted above and the model output is attached as Exhibit 2 in Attachment B.
The LandGEM calculates that the NMOC generation rate for 2019 is 115.1 Mg or 126.9 tons. In
estimating the NMOC fugitive emissions from the Landfill, LFG is calculated to be collected and
combusted at 79 percent of LFG generation for 2019 using flowrate data provided by the LFG
system operator, which indicated an average LFG flowrate of 2,882 cfm (normalized to 50 percent
methane) collected by the existing system. Thus,the fugitive NMOC emission rate for 2019 is 26.0
tons, as shown in Exhibit 2 of Attachment B.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS
The LFG and NMOC generation rates were extracted from the LandGEM output and used to calculate
the fugitive NMOC emissions from the Landfill during 2019. The VOC generation rates were
calculated by multiplying the NMOC generation rates (shown in the LandGEM output) by 0.39 (i.e.,
VOC is 39 percent of NMOC per AP-42 Table 2.4-2). The Landfill fugitive VOC emission rates were
calculated by multiplying the annual VOC generation by the percentage of uncollected LFG, which is
calculated to be 21 percent. The fugitive VOC emission rate for 2019 is 10.1 tons, as shown in
Exhibit 2 in Attachment B.
HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS
The estimation of fugitive HAP emissions from the landfill surface is based on equations (3) and (4)
in AP-42 Section 2.4. Those equations are presented below. The first step is to estimate the
generation rate of the pollutant in cubic meters per year(m3/yr). Next,the volumetric generation
rate estimate is converted to a mass generation rate (tons per year).
QP(M'
yr = 2.00 x Qcna 1 (3)
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
4

i
where:
Qp = Pollutant generation rate (m3/yr)
QcH4 = Methane generation rate (m3/yr)from the LanclGEM
Cp = Pollutant concentration in LFG (ppmv)
2.00 = Multiplication factor(assumes LFG is 50.0 percent methane)
UM,,(tons/yr)= Qp ((MWp(g/gmol))(1atm)) ton (4)
(8.205 x 10-5) m 3 —atm 1000 g ((273+T)K) 1907.185 k g
(gmo1—K))( kg
where:
UMp = Pollutant mass generation rate (tons/yr)
MWp = Molecular weight of pollutant (g/gmole)
T = Temperature of LFG (OC) (Standard temp of 25 degrees Celsius)
Of the 187 chemical compounds identified as HAPs under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 28 of
these compounds are listed in AP-42 Table 2.4-1 and 2.4-2. Site-specific speciated LFG data was
not available for the East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill. Therefore, default concentration
values from AP-42 and the WIAC report (dated January 2001) were used, as shown in the HAP/TAP
spreadsheet included as Exhibit 3 in Attachment B. Annual emissions of the remaining HAP/TAP
compounds(i.e.,those not included in the AP-42 tables) are assumed to be negligible. The actual
HAP generation rate associated with LFG produced within the waste mass for 2019 was calculated
to be 15.55 Mg or 17.11 tons, and does not include hydrochloric acid, which is a by-product of LFG
combustion at the utility flare. LFG is calculated to be collected and combusted at 79 percent of LFG
generation for 2019. Thus,the fugitive HAP emission rate for the facility is 3.51 tons for 2019. In
addition,the Non PM,o/Non-VOC HAPs fugitive emission rate was calculated to be 0.21 tons for
2019. Note that HCI is not included in the calculation of fugitive HAP emissions since it is a by-
product of combustion at the flare and is not present in raw LFG.
Using similar procedures, the TAP generation rate for 2019 was calculated to be 16.87 Mg(18.55
tons). In determining the TAP emissions from the Landfill, LFG is collected and combusted at 79
percent of LFG generation for 2019. Thus,the fugitive TAP emission rate for 2019 is 3.81 tons.
TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR EMISSIONS
Since the site-specific TRS concentration in LFG was not available,the AP-42 Section 2.4 default
concentration of 46.9 parts per million by volume (ppmv) was assumed. The estimation of TRS
emissions from the Landfill is based on equations (3) and (4) in AP-42 Section 2.4.
The volumetric generation rate of total reduced sulfur compounds is estimated by the following
equation. Note that the 2019 methane generation rate from the Landfill cells (27.0 million cubic
meters) is equal to 1,813 cfm. Because the LFG collection efficiency for 2019 is calculated to be 79
percent, only fugitive emissions (21 percent of LFG generation) were used in these calculations.
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
5

TRS m 3 =(2.0) 5.67x 106 m3 of CH, 46.9 =531.8 m3 of S (3)
yr yr [ 106 ✓
] yr
32 g (1 atm)
TRS �kg)= 531.8 m3 S gmol (4)
yr yr 8.205 x 10_5 m3 -atm 1 OOOg (298°K)
gmol- °K kg
The uncontrolled mass emissions of total reduced sulfur compounds are calculated below:
TRS = 696.0 kg/yr = 0.77 tons/yr
AMMONIA EMISSIONS
Although MSW landfills are sources of ammonia (NH3)emissions, according to an Environmental
Protection Agency(EPA)funded report titled "Development and Selection of Ammonia Emission
Factors," MSW landfills are "very uncertain and not very important sources" and are "minor and
insignificant influences" when compared to other possible sources.' Therefore,for purposes of this
emission inventory,fugitive emission rates of ammonia from the landfill surface will be considered
insignificant.
1 R. Battye,W. Battye, C. Overcash, and S. Fudge. Development and Selection of Ammonia Emission Factors
Final Report. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Aug. 1994.
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
6

- l
3 LANDFILL GAS FLARE FL-100 (CD-1)
Landfill gas is delivered to the blower/flare station located south of the Landfill via a 24-inch-
diameter HDPE main header pipe. During 2019,the LFGCCS consisted of two 4,000 scfm skid-
mounted blowers and two 3,000-cfm utility flares. During 2019, the flare emissions for FL-100 were
calculated based on an average LFG flowrate of 1,547 cfm at 50 percent methane to the flare
(which is equal to 53.7% of the LFG quantity collected by the system). The following calculations
present emissions from the utility flare FL-100 during 2019.
FLARE EMISSIONS
The LFG,for purposes of calculatingthe products of combustion and the associated emissions, is
assumed to be 50 percent methane,40 percent carbon dioxide and 10 percent nitrogen and oxygen.
The presence of nitrogen and oxygen in LFG is assumed due to the potential infiltration of ambient
air into the gas extraction system through the surface of the landfill. Concentrations of other LFG
constituents are negligible with regard to the combustion process. Trace LFG constituents typically
make up less than 1 percent of the total gas volume. The flare emission factors are presented below
in Table 2 and calculations for the FL-100 3,000 cfm flare (CD-1) are calculated using the annual
average flow rate to the flare.
Table 2. Utility Flare FL-100 (CD-1) Emission Factors
Compound LFG Flare Emission Factors
NMOCs 99.2%destruction 2
VOCs 98%destruction 2
HAPs 98%and 99.7%destruction 3
NOx 0.068 Ib/MMBtu '
CO 0.31 Ib/MMBtu '
S02 46.9 ppmv total reduced sulfur in LFG 2
PM10 0.001 Ib/hr cfm of methane 2
HCl 30.2 ppmv total Cl-in LFG 4
Notes:
1 Emission factors were obtained from AP-42, Tables 13.5-1 and
13.5-2 (revised 2/18)
2 Emission factors and destruction efficiencies were obtained
from AP-42, Section 2.4 (revised 11/98).
3 HAP destruction efficiencies are for halogenated (98%) and
non-halogenated (99.7%) pollutants as outlined in AP-42
(revised 11/98).
4 Cumulative chloride ion concentration as calculated using
default HAP concentrations presented in the WIAC report.
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
7

LFG UtilityFlare CD-1 Operating Parameters
P g
Maximum firing rate of LFG for Utility Flare: 3,000 scfm
Average firing rate of LFG for Utility Flare: 1,547 scfm
Average Btu content of LFG: 506 Btu/scf
Assumed hours of operation: 8,760 hours
Percentage of collected LFG delivered to flare: 53.7 %
Heat Release (MMBtu/hr)
(1,547 scfm) 506 Btu 60 min 1 1 MMBtu
scf hr J 106 Btu
= 47.0 MMBtu/hr
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions
C0.068 lb NOx )(47.OMMBtu 1 8,760 hr 1 ton
MMBtu ) hr ) yr )�2,0001b)
NOx = 14.00 tons/yr
Carbon Monoxide Emissions
(0.31 lb CO)(47.0 MMBtu)(8,760 hr 1 ton
MMBtu hr J yr 2,0001b)
CO = 63.8 tons/yr
Particulate Matter Emissions
.fit s CHa
PM,o = 1,547 ft3LFG 0.001 lb PM,o 0.5 s min 8,760 hr 1 ton
ft ft
min hr_ CH4 1 LFG I yr 112000 lb
min min
Flare PMso=3.39 tons/yr
PM2.5 is the same as PMio since the same emission factor is used according to AP-42 Table 2.4-5.
Flare PM2.5 = 3.39 tons/yr
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
8

NMOC Emissions
Using the NMOC concentration in the LFG of 595 ppmv as hexane (based on AP-42) and the average
LFG firing rate of the utility flare FL-100 of 1,547 scfm at 50% methane for the 8,760 hours of
operation,the corresponding NMOC input to the flare is calculated using Equations 3 and 4 from AP-
42.
3
NMOC y 3 =(2) 1.15x107 m of yCH4 ]r591 =13,685.0 y3 of NMOC
r r L 106 r
86.18 g (latm)
NMOC— 13,685 gmol ton _53.2 tons
Yr 8.205 x 10-5 m3 —atm 1000 g (273+25 K) 1907.185kgl yr
gmol—K kg
Assuming an NMOC destruction efficiency equal to 99.2 percent,the actual NMOC emissions for
2019 from the utility flare FL-100 is calculated as follows:
NMOCs Input to Flare * (100%-99.2%) = 53.2 tons/yr * 0.008 = 0.43 tons
VOC Emissions
Using the AP-42 VOC concentration of 39 percent of total NMOCs and VOC destruction efficiency of
98 percent:
VOC = NMOCs * 39%*(100%-98%) = 53.2 tons/yr * 0.39 *0.02 = 0.41 tons/yr
Sulfur Dioxide (S02) Emissions
The emissions of sulfur oxides, particularly sulfur dioxide (SO2),from the flare are dependent on the
inlet concentration of sulfur-bearing compounds in the LFG. The calculation of the estimated SO2
emissions from the flare is based on the assumption that reduced sulfur compounds in the LFG are
oxidized to SO2. Because site-specific data for the Total Reduced Sulfur(TRS) concentration in the
LFG was not available, SO2 emissions from the flare are estimated based on a TRS concentration in
LFG of 46.9 ppmv as cited in AP-42 Section 2.4-3.
SO2 (max)- MW = 32.0 g/gmole
Qcha = 1,547 ft3/min *50% CHa *(525,600 min/year) =1.15 x107 m3/yr
Cp = 46.9 ppmv
T = 25.OoC (AP-42 default value)
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
9

Calculation of the generation rate of the pollutant:
3 f 3
TRS m = x 10' m3 o CHI 46.9
(2.0� 1.15 _1078.7 m of S
yr yr 106 yr
32 g (1 atm)
TRS = 1078.7 m3 gmol ton =1.56 tons
Yr 8.205 x 10-5 m3 —atm 1000 g (273+25 K) 907.185 kg yr
gmol—K kg
For every 1 tons of TRS there is approximately 2 tons of S02 due to differences in molecular weights
and detailed in U.S. EPA AP-42 (revised November 1998);therefore,
S02 = 3.12 tons/yr
Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) Emissions
Hydrochloric acid (HCl) emissions are formed when chlorinated compounds in LFG are combusted in
control equipment. The estimation of HCl emissions from the Landfill are based on Equations 3, 4
and 10 in AP-42 Section 2.4. Since no site-specific values are available for the cumulative chloride
ion concentration of the 18 HAP/TAP constituents that have a chloride ion,the cumulative chloride
ion concentration is calculated using WIAC report default value concentration of 30.18 ppmv. The
total HCl emissions are calculated by using the concentration of 30.18 ppmv and the molecular
weight of 35.453 g/gmol for chloride.
Calculate the chloride emission rate, Qci, using Equation 3.
_ 1,547 ft3 525,y 0 min m3 30.18 ppmv 1_ y 3
Q" min r 35.3198 f t3 106 694.8 (3)
J r
Calculate the uncontrolled mass emissions of chloride, UMa, using Equation 4.
3 35.45 g *1 atm
UM(., = 3 694.8m gmol =1,007.4 kg (4)
Yr 8.205E-05 m —atm *1,000 9 *(273+25 K) Yr
gmol—K kg
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
10

Finally, calculate the controlled mass emissions of HCI, CMci, using Equation 10.
CM = 007.4 1.03 2.21b ton 10
y" 1 �(100 �100) kg 2,000lb
HCI = 1.14 tons/yr
HAP Emissions
The total flare HAPs emission rate, including HCI emissions,for the flare unit FI-100 for 2019, shown
in the attached Exhibit 3, was estimated to be 1.18 tons. The total flare TAPs emission rate for
2019 was estimated to be 1.19 tons. In addition,the Non-PMso/Non-VOC HAPs flare emission rate
Flare FI-100 was calculated to be 1.15 tons for 2019.
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
it

4 LANDFILL GAS FLARE FL-150 (CD-2)
Landfill Gas destruction device CD-2 is a 3,000 scfm utility flare FL-150. During 2019,the flare
emissions were calculated based on an average LFG flowrate of 1,335 cfm at 50 percent methane
to the flare (which is equal to 46.3% of the LFG quantity collected by the system). The following
calculations present emissions from the utility flare FL-150 during 2019.
FLARE EMISSIONS
The LFG, for purposes of calculating the products of combustion and the associated emissions, is
assumed to be 50 percent methane, 40 percent carbon dioxide and 10 percent nitrogen and oxygen.
The presence of nitrogen and oxygen in LFG is assumed due to the potential infiltration of ambient
air into the gas extraction system through the surface of the landfill. Concentrations of other LFG
constituents are negligible with regard to the combustion process. Trace LFG constituents typically
make up less than 1 percent of the total gas volume. The flare emission factors are presented below
in Table 3 and calculations for the FL-150 3,000 cfm flare (CD-2)are calculated using the annual
average flow rate to the flare.
Table 3. Utility Flare FL-1 50 (CD-2) Emission Factors
Compound LFG Flare Emission Factors
NMOCs 99.2%destruction 2
VOCS 98%destruction 2
HAPs 98%and 99.7%destruction 3
NOx 0.068 Ib/MMBtu '
CO 0.31 Ib/MMBtu '
S02 46.9 ppmv total reduced sulfur in LFG 2
PMio 0.001 Ib/hr cfm of methane 2
HCl 30.2 ppmv total Cl-in LFG 4
Notes:
1 Emission factors were obtained from AP-42, Tables 13.5-1 and
13.5-2 (revised 2/18).
2 Emission factors and destruction efficiencies were obtained
from AP-42, Section 2.4 (revised 11/98).
3 HAP destruction efficiencies are for halogenated (98%) and
non-halogenated (99.7%) pollutants as outlined in AP-42
(revised 11/98).
4 Cumulative chloride ion concentration as calculated using
default HAP concentrations presented in the WIAC report.
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
12

LFG Utility Flare CD-2 Operating Parameters
Maximum firing rate of LFG for Utility Flare: 3,000 scfm
Average firing rate of LFG for Utility Flare: 1,335 scfm
Average Btu content of LFG: 506 Btu/scf
Assumed hours of operation: 8,760 hours
Percentage of collected LFG delivered to flare: 46.3 %
Heat Release (MMBtu/hr)
(1,335 scf n) 506 Btu 60 min 1 1 MMBtu
scf hr J 106 Btu
= 40.5 MMBtu/hr
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions
C0.0681b NOX )(40.5MMBtu 1 8,760 hr 1 ton
MMBtu )I\ hr J yr )(2,0001b)
NOx = 12.06 tons/yr
Carbon Monoxide Emissions
(0.31 lb CO)(40.5 MMBtu 1 8,760 hr 1 ton
MMBtu hr J yr 2,000 lb
CO =55.0 tons/yr
Particulate Matter Emissions
ft3 CH4
PM10 =[1,335 ft3LFG 0.0011b3PM10 0.5 3 min 8,760 hr 1 ton
min hr_ft CH4 1 ft LFG I yr 1120001b]
min min
Flare PMio=2.92 tons/yr
PM2.5 is the same as PM10 since the same emission factor is used according to AP-42 Table 2.4-5.
Flare PM2.s =2.92 tons/yr
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
13

NMOC Emissions
Using the NMOC concentration in the LFG of 595 ppmv as hexane (based on AP-42) and the average
LFG firing rate of the utility flare FL-100 of 1,335 scfm at 50% methane for the 8,760 hours of
operation,the corresponding NMOC input to the flare is calculated using Equations 3 and 4 from AP-
42.
3 f
NMOC m =(2) 9.96 x 106 m3 o CH4 595] =11,852.4 m3 of NMOC
Yr Yr 106 J Yr
[11,85 m g86.18g )(I'tm))NMOC3mol46.12 4 ton tons
= =
Yr 8.205 x 10-5 m3 —atm 1000 g 1907.185 kg Yr
(273+25 K�
gmol—K kg
Assuming an NMOC destruction efficiency equal to 99.2 percent,the actual NMOC emissions for
2019 from the utility flare FL-100 is calculated as follows:
NMOCs Input to Flare * (100%-99.2%) = 46.1 tons/yr * 0.008 = 0.37 tons
VOC Emissions
Using the AP-42 VOC concentration of 39 percent of total NMOCs and VOC destruction efficiency of
98 percent:
VOC = NMOCs * 39%*(100%-98%) = 46.1 tons/yr * 0.39 *0.02 = 0.36 tons/yr
Sulfur Dioxide (S02) Emissions
The emissions of sulfur oxides, particularly sulfur dioxide (S02),from the flare are dependent on the
inlet concentration of sulfur-bearing compounds in the LFG. The calculation of the estimated S02
emissions from the flare is based on the assumption that reduced sulfur compounds in the LFG are
oxidized to S02. Because site-specific data for the Total Reduced Sulfur(TRS) concentration in the
LFG was not available, S02 emissions from the flare are estimated based on a TRS concentration in
LFG of 46.9 ppmv as cited in AP-42 Section 2.4-3.
S02 (max)- MW = 32.0 g/gmole
Qch4 = 1,335 ft3/min *50% CH4 *(525,600 min/year) =9.96 x106 m3/yr
Cp = 46.9 ppmv
T = 25.OoC (AP-42 default value)
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
14

Calculation of the generation rate of the pollutant:
3 3o f CH 3
TRS y =(2.0) 9.96 x 106 m4 46.9 I
1 =934.3 y of S
r Y r 106 J r
32 g )(I 'tm))
TRS=[934.2 m3 gmol ton =1.35 tons
Yr 8.205 x 10-5 m3 —atm 1000 g (273+25 K) 1907.185 kg Yr
gmol—K kg
For every 1 tons of TRS there is approximately 2 tons of S02 due to differences in molecular weights
and detailed in U.S. EPA AP-42 (revised November 1998);therefore,
S02 = 2.70 tons/yr
Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) Emissions
Hydrochloric acid (HCl) emissions are formed when chlorinated compounds in LFG are combusted in
control equipment. The estimation of HCl emissions from the Landfill are based on Equations 3, 4
and 10 in AP-42 Section 2.4. Since no site-specific values are available for the cumulative chloride
ion concentration of the 18 HAP/TAP constituents that have a chloride ion,the cumulative chloride
ion concentration is calculated using WIAC report default value concentration of 30.18 ppmv. The
total HCl emissions are calculated by using the concentration of 30.18 ppmv and the molecular
weight of 35.453 g,/gmol for chloride.
Calculate the chloride emission rate, Qci, using Equation 3.
_ 1,335 ft3 525,600 min In 30.18ppmv =599.6 m3 (3)
Qu min Yr 35.3198 ft3 ( 106 ) Yr
Calculate the uncontrolled mass emissions of chloride, UMo, using Equation 4.
3 35.45 1 atm
UMW., =(599.6m g *
3 gmol =869.4 kg (4)
Yr 8.205E—05 m —atm *1,000 g*(273+25 K) Yr
gmol—K kg
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
15

Finally, calculate the controlled mass emissions of HCI, CMc, using Equation 10.
21b ton
CM/1C1 =(869.4) 100— (1.03) 2. (10)
(100) kg 2,000lb
HCI = 0.99 tons/yr
HAP Emissions
The total flare HAPs emission rate, including HCI emissions,for the utility flare unit FI-150 for 2019,
shown in the attached Exhibit 3, was estimated to be 1.02 tons. The total flare TAPs emission rate
for 2019 was estimated to be 1.03 tons. In addition,the Non-PMlo/Non-VOC HAPs flare emission
rate Flare FI-150 was calculated to be 0.99 tons for 2019.
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
16

5 INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES
DIESEL ENGINES FOR MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT (IES-04)
The Landfill's permit includes an insignificant activity listing for "Diesel Engines for Miscellaneous
Landfill Support" with the emission source ID IES-04. Emissions from this source were estimated in
previous Annual Emissions Inventory documentation. Emissions for 2019 are estimated to be
approximately equivalent and are being"carried forward" as allowed by NCDEQ guidance.
WELDING OPERATIONS (IES-05)
The Landfill's permit also includes an insignificant activity listing for "Welding Operations" with the
emission source ID IES-05. Emissions from the Landfill's welding operations were estimated in
previous Annual Emissions Inventory documentation. Emissions for 2019 are estimated to be
approximately equivalent and are being"carried forward" as allowed by NCDEQ guidance. As
reported in previous years, emissions of manganese remained at 101 pounds for calendar year
2019. This is reported as HAPs/TAPs of 5.05E-02 tons per year for the welding operations.
DIESEL STORAGE TANK (IES-06)
The Landfill's permit includes an insignificant activity with description as "Diesel Storage Tank" (IES-
06).The emissions from the diesel storage tank were estimated in previous Annual Emissions
Inventory documentation using the U.S. EPA's TANKS 4.0.9d software.VOC emissions for the diesel
for 2019 are estimated to be approximately equivalent based on similar throughput values and were
applied to 2019. VOC emissions from diesel storage tank are presented below in Table 4. Note that
the Total HAP volatilization and NMOC emissions are conservatively estimated to equal VOC
emissions.
Table 4. Fuel Storage Tank Summary
Tank Tank Net Estimated
Volume Length Diameter Throughput VOC Emissions'
Contents (gal) (ft) (ft) (gal/yr) (lbs/yr)
Diesel Fuel 3,000 est. 15 est. 5.8 est. 161,244 4.66
(2.33E-03 tons)
Note:
1 Emissions estimated using U.S.EPA's Tanks 4.0.9d software.
LEACHATE STORAGE TANKS (IES-07)
The Landfill operates two (2) leachate storage tanks, with emission source ID IES-07 on the
insignificant activities list in the permit. These tanks are used to store collected leachate and
condensate from the Landfill prior to disposal at an offsite wastewater treatment system. The
throughput of leachate in calendar year 2019 was as shown below in Table 5. For purposes of this
air emissions inventory,throughput was allotted equally to both leachate storage tanks. NMOC
emissions were conservatively estimated to be equal to VOC emissions for leachate tanks as shown
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
17

in Exhibit 5. Estimated VOCs emissions are presented below in Table 5 and detailed emission
calculations are included in Attachment B.
Table 5. Leachate Tanks Combined Emissions Data
Parameter CY 2019
Leachate Throughput 14,747,831
(gallons)
Calculated VOC Emissions 67.35
(lbs/yr) (3.37E-02 tons/yr)
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory Attachment A
18

Attachment B
Emissions Calculations Spreadsheets
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory

twariff
EXHIBIT 1. ESTIMATED LFG GENERATION RATES
EAST CAROLINA REGIONAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL-AULANDER, NORTH CAROLINA
Methane LFG
Disposal Refuse Disposal Refuse Generation Generation Collection Collection Fugitive
Year Rate In-Place Rate In-Place Rates Rates Efficiency Rates Rates
(tons/yr) (tons) (Mg/yr) (Mg) (m3/yr) (cfm) M) (cfm) (cfm)
1993 39,176 0 35,540 0 0 01 0% 0 0
1994 243,409 39,176 220,817 35,540 1.399E+05 19 0% 0 19
1995 338,155 282,585 306,769 256,357 1.004E+06 135 0% 0 135
1996 360,489 620,740 327,030 563,126 2.172E+06 292 0%1 0 292
1997 348,254 981,229 315,931 890,156 3.375E+06 453 0% 0 453
1998 404,852 1,329,483 367,276 1,206,087 4.486E+06 603 0% 0 603
1999 455,998 1,734,335 413,674 1,573,362 5.756E+06 774 0% 0 774
20001 479,380 2,190,333 434,886 1,987,037 7.159E+06 962 0% 0 962
2001 348,049 2,669,713 315,745 2,421,923 8.591 E+06 1,154 25% 289 866
2002 476,861 3,017,762 432,601 2,737,668 9.497E+06 1,276 75% 957 319
2003 347,583 3,494,623 315,322 3,170,269 1.083E+07 1,455 75% 1,091 364
2004 523,055 3,842,206 474,508 3,485,591 1.164E+07 1,565 75% 1,174 391
2005 483,571 4,365,261 438,688 3,960,098 1.306E+07 1,755 75% 1,316 439
2006 527,771 4,848,832 478,786 4,398,786 1.427E+07 1,918 75% 1,438 479
2007 532,509 5,376,603 483,084 4,877,572 1.560E+07 2,096 75% 1,572 524
2008 518,584 5,909,112 470,451 5,360,656 1.689E+07 2,269 75% 1,7021 567
2009 471,959 6,427,696 428,154 5,831,108 1.808E+07 2,429 75% 1,822 607
2010 547,097 6,899,655 496,318 6,259,262 1.905E+07 2,561 75% 1,920 640
2011 542,909 7,446,752 492,519 6,755,580 2.026E+07 2,723 75% 2,042 681
2012 575,739 7,989,661 522,302 7,248,099 2.141 E+07 2,877 75% 2,157 719
2013 513,022 8,565,400 465,406 7,770,400 2.262E+07 3,040 75% 2,280 760
2014 468,705 9,078,422 425,202 8,235,806 2.357E+07 3,167 75% 2,375 792
2015 438,643 9,547,127 397,930 8,661,008 2.432E+07 3,268 75% 2,451 817
2016 470,577 9,985,770 426,900 9,058,938 2.493E+071 3,350 75% 2,513 838
2017 483,825 10,456,347 438,919 9,485,839 2.563E+07 3,445 75% 2,584 861
2018 463,804 10,940,172 420,756 9,924,757 2.636E+07 3,542 75% 2,656 885
2019 484,621 11,403,976 439,641 1 10,345,513 2.698E+071 3,626 79% 2,882 744
MEASURED NMOC CONCENTRATION IN LFG: 595 ppmv
ASSUMED METHANE CONTENT OF LFG: 50%
SELECTED DECAY RATE CONSTANT: 0.04
SELECTED METHANE GENERATION POTENTIAL: 3,203.7 ft3/ton
METRIC EQUIVALENT: 100 cu m/Mg
Conversions: 35.314667 cu ft per cu m
1.10231 13 ton per Mg
32.037 cu ft/ton per cu m/Mg

i
EXHIBIT 2. ESTIMATED NMOC and VOC GENERATION RATES
EAST CAROLINA REGIONAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL-AULANDER, NORTH CAROLINA
NMOC VOC
Surface Surface
Generation Generation Fugitive Generation Generation Fugitive
Year Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates
(tons/yr) (Mg/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (Mg/yr) (tons/yr)
1993 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1994 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.3
1995 4.7 4.3 4.7 1.8 1.71 1.8
1996 1 10.2 9.3 10.2 4.0 3.6 4.0
1997 15.9 14.4 15.9 6.2 5.6 6.2
1998 21.1 19.1 21.1 8.2 7.5 8.2
1999 27.1 24.6 27.1 10.6 9.6 10.6
2000 33.7 30.5 33.7 13.1 11.9 13.1
2001 40.4 36.6 30.3 15.8 14.3 11.8
2002 44.7 40.5 11.2 17.4 15.8 4.4
2003 50.9 46.2 12.7 19.9 18.0 5.0
2004 54.8 49.7 13.7 21.4 19.4 5.3
2005 61.4 55.7 15.3 23.9 21.7 6.0
2006 67.1 60.9 16.8 26.2 23.7 6.5
2007 73.3 66.5 18.3 28.6 25.9 7.2
2008 79.4 72.0 19.9 31.0 28.1 7.7
2009 85.0 77.1 21.2 33.1 30.1 8.3
2010 89.6 81.3 22.4 34.9 31.7 8.7
2011 95.3 86.4 23.8 37.2 33.7 9.3
2012 100.6 91.3 25.2 39.3 35.6 9.8
2013 106.4 96.5 26.6 41.5 37.6 10.4
2014 110.8 100.5 27.7 43.2 39.2 10.8
2015 114.3 103.7 28.6 44.6 40.5 11.1
2016 117.2 106.3 29.3 45.7 41.5 11.4
20171 120.5 109.3 30.1 47.0 42.6 11.8
2018 123.9 112.4 31.0 48.3 43.8 12.1
20191 126.9 115.1 1 26.01 49.5 1 44.91 10.1
MEASURED NMOC CONCENTRATION IN LFG: 595 ppmv
ASSUMED METHANE CONTENT OF LFG: 50%
AP-42 DEFAULT(1 1/98)VOC CONTENT OF NMOC 39%
SELECTED DECAY RATE CONSTANT: 0.04
SELECTED ULTIMATE METHANE RECOVERY RATE: 3,203.7 0/ton
METRIC EQUIVALENT: 100 cu m/Mg
35.314667 cu ft per cu m
1.10231 13 ton per Mg
32.037 cu ft/ton per cu m/Mg

EXHIBIT 3.2019 HAP/TAP EMISSION RATES
EAST CAROLINA REGIONAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL-AULANDER,NORTH CAROLINA
2019 Total Methane Generation(m3 CH,/yr)= 26,980,795
LFG Collection Efficiency(%)= 79%
Landfill Gas Temperature(C)s= 25
Halogenated Destruction Eff.(%f= 98.0%
Non-Halogenated Destruction Eff.(%f= 99.7%
Percentage of LFG Collected sent to Flore(s)= 100.0%
2019 FLARE HAP EMISSIONS(tpy)'
Year LFG(cfm) Generated Surface Fugitives Flare Emissions Total Emissions
2019 3,626 17.11 3.51 2.202 5.71
Collected HAPs
Pollutant Mol.Wt. Cone' Q(p), M(o)2 FM(p)' M(p)-FM(p)' Flare Emissions
(g/gmol) (PPmv) (m'/yr) (kg/yr) (tPy) (tpy) (tons/yr) (tPy)
1,1,1-trichloroethone TAP,HAP
133.41 0.168 9.07 49.464 0.0544 0.01 0.04 0.0009
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane TAP,HAP 167.85 0.070 3.78 25.930 0.0285 0.01 0.02 0.0005
1,1-dichloroethane"AP 98.97 0.741 39.99 161.850 0.1780 0.04 0.14 0.0028
1,1-dichloroetheneTAP,HAP 96.94 0.092 4.96 19.683 1 0.0217 0.00 0.02 0.0003
1,2-dichloroethane TAP'"AP 98.96 0.120 6.48 26.208 0.0288 0.01 0.02 0.0005
1,2-dichloro ropane HAP 112.99 0.023 1.24 5.735 0.0063 0.00 0.01 0.0001
acrylonitrile" 53.06 0.036 1.94 4.216 0.0046 0.00 0.00 0.0000
benzene TAP AP 78.11 0.972 52.45 167.557 0.1843 0.04 0.15 0.0004
carbon disulfide"° 76.13 0.320 17.27 53.765 0.0591 0.01 0.05 0.0001
carbon tetrachloride TAP'HAP 153.84 0.007 0.38 2.377 0.0026 0.00 0.00 0.0000
carbonyl sulfide"AP 60.07 0.183 9.87 24.260 0.0267 0.01 0.02 0.0001
chlorobenzene TAP,HAP 112.56 0.227 12.25 56.390 0.0620 0.01 0.05 0.0010
chloroethone"AP 64.52 0.239 12.90 34.032 0.0374 0.01 0.03 0.0006
chloroform TAP'HAP 119.39 0.021 1.13 5.533 0.0061 0.00 0.00 0.0001
chloromethane HAP 50.49 0.249 13.44 27.746 0.0305 0.01 0.02 0.0005
dichlorobenzene TAP'HAP 147.00 1.607 86.72 521.342 0.5735 0.12 0.46 0.0091
dichlorodifluoromethane TAP 120.91 1.751 94.49 467.238 0.5140 0.11 0.41 0.0082
dichlorofluoromethone TAP 102.92 2.62 141.38 595.101 0.6546 0.13 0.52 0.0104
dichloromethane TAP'"AP 84.94 3.395 183.20 636.417 0.7001 0.14 0.56 0.01 1 1
ethyl mercaptan TA` 62.13 1.356 73.17 185.931 0.2045 0.04 0.16 0.0005
ethylbenzene"A' 106.16 6.789 366.35 1590.584 1.7496 0.36 1.39 0.0042
ethylene dibromide TAP'HAP 187.88 0.046 2.48 19.073 0.0210 0.00 0.02 0.0003
hexane 1AP'"A' 86.18 2.324 125.41 442.010 0.4862 0.10 0.39 0.0012
hydrogen sulfide TAP 34.08 23.578 1272.31 1773.358 1.9507 0.40 1.55 0.0047
mercury and compounds 'A "A 200.61 0.000292 0.02 0.129 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.0000
methyl ethyl ketone TAP"AP 72.11 10.557 569.67 1680.064 1.8481 0.38 1.47 0.0044
methyl isobut I ketone TA'"A' 100.16 0.750 40.47 165.785 0.1824 0.04 0.14 0.0004
methyl mercaptan TAP 48.11 1.292 69.72 137.179 0.1509 0.03 0.12 0.0004
perchloroeth lene TAP'"AP 165.83 1.193 64.38 436.610 0.4803 0.10 0.38 0.0076
toluene A'"A' 92.13 25.405 1370.89 5165.474 5.6820 1.17 4.52 0.0135
trichloroeth Iene TAP'"AP 131.40 0.681 36.75 197.484 0.2172 0.04 0.17 0.0035
vinyl chloride TAP,HAP 62.50 1.077 58.12 148.554 0.1634 0.03 0.13 0.0026
xylenes T" 106.16 16.582 894.79 3884.970 4.2735 1 0.88 3.40 0.0102
hydrogen chloride Tl 35.45 30.180 1294.35 1876.600 2.1262 --- --- 2.1262
Total HAPs Only --- --- --- 15553.24 17.11 3.51 13.60 2.20
Total TAPs Only 16867.84 18.55 3.81 14.75 2.22
Total HAPs/TAPs 18712.05 20.58 4.22 16.36 2.23
Total Non-PMio Non VOC HAPs •-- --- --- 928.08 1.02 0.21 0.81 2.14
Notes:
1. Q(p)=Volumetric emission rate of the pollutant. AP-42 Section 2.4 equation(3).
2. M(p)=Mass generation of pollutant. AP-42 equation(4).
3. FM(p)=Fugitive emission rate of the landfill surface.
4. M(p)-FM(p)=Quantity of HAPs collected from the LFG collection system.
5.The landfill gas temperature was obtained from AP-42 Page 2.4-5.
6. The AP-42 Section 2.4 default for Flare Destruction Efficiency was assumed.
7. Pollutant concentrations used to compute the estimated emissions are from the WIAC report dated January 2001 and AP-42 Section 2.4,as revised November 1998.
TAP denotes compounds that are classified as toxic air pollutants per North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Air Quality.
M,denotes compounds that are classified as hazardous air pollutants per AP-42 and CAA Section 112.
'The compounds listed above were compiled from AP-42(revised Nov.1998)and CAA Section 1 12.
The compounds in red type are non-halogenated species.
8.New emissions factors beginning 2018 reporting year.

Attachment C
NCDEQ AERO Forms
2019 Air Pollutant Source Emissions Inventory

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Listing of Emission Sources and Control Devices on Permit. See instructions
DES ID on #ES Description *CS ID GCS Description *CD ID's
Air Permit
Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS Flare,One landfill gas-fired open flare(3000 CD-Flare I,CD-
ES-0I Subpart WWW,MACT Subpart CS-1,CS-4
AAAA] scfm maximum flow rate) Flarel
IES-04 Diesel engines for miscellaneous
landfill support
IES-05 Welding operations
IES-06 Diesel storage tank
[ES-07 Two(2)leachate storage tanks
2

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17: 16: 11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Emission Source & Operating Scenario List- See Instructions
DES Group ID #ES ID SOS ID #OS Description
1 Municipal solid waste landfill
ES-01 8 CD-Flare 1
9 CD-Flare 2
IES-04 4 No.2 fuel oil-diesel engines for
miscellaneous landfill support
IES-05 3 maintenance shop welding rods
IES-06 6 diesel storage tank
IES-07 2 temporary storage of collected leachatc
3

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory-Calendar Year 2019
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) ES-01
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS Subpart WWW, MACT Subpart
AAAA]
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS - I/Municipal solid waste landfill
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 1 4 2/1- n fill 50 00 0 a d Dump ; Fugitive Emissions
5. Throughput/units in 2019: 952817777 FT3/yr
(e.g. production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information:(Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
F I FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK)
4

Operating Scenario: OS - 1 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2019)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May ° June-Aug. ° Sept.-Nov. °
2019 2019 25�O 2019 25�° 2019 25�°
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 10.1 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Efficiency Factor Control
(Pounds/Year) Method Code (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2019
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 1.92 08
Benzene 71-43-2 76.45 08
CFC-12 75-71-8 227.18 08
(Dichlorodifluoromethane)
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 24.5 08
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.16 08
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11.07 08
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 27.42 08
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.69 08
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 253.45 08
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 726.09 08
Ethyl chloride 75-00-3 16.55 08
(chloroethane)
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 84.88 08
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 9.27 08
Ethylene dichloride (1,2- 107-06-2 12.74 08
dichloroethane)
Ethylidene dichloride(1,11 75-34-3 78.7 08
dichloroethane)
5

Hexane, n- 110-54-3 201.78 08
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 809.53 08
Mercury,vapor 7439-97-6 0.06 08
(Component of HGC)
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 13.49 08
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 24.05 08
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 766.94 08
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 75.68 08
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 62.62 08
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 309.44 08
Perch loroethylene 127-18-4 212.29 08
(tetrachloroethylene)
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 2.79 08
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 12.61 08
Toluene 108-88-3 2358.01 08
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 96.02 08
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 72.23 08
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 9.57 08
Xylene 1330-20-7 1773.45 08
6

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory - Calendar Year 2019
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) ES-01
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS Subpart WWW, MACT Subpart
AAAA]
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS - 8/CD-Flare 1
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 50300601/Landfill Dump ; Waste Gas Flares
5. Throughput/units in 2019: 813103200 FT3/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented 100
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
1 CS-1 CD-FlareI One landfill gas-fired open flare (3,000 scfm maximum flow rate)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information: (Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Ac[m)
Rectangle(1,x V)
(in 0.1 feet)
Flare VERTICAL 35 1 1200 28.09 1324 Flare
STACK
7

Operating Scenario: OS - 8 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2019)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11. Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12.Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May ° June-Aug. ° Sept.-Nov. 25%
2019 2019 25�O 2019 25�° 2019
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG GHG Estimation Emission Ef
Pollutants CAS Efficiency
Pollutants Method Code ( Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
CO CO 63.8 08 0
NOx NOx 14 08 0
TSP TSP 3.39 08 0
PM10 PM10 3.39 08 0
PM2.5 PM2.5 3.39 08 0
S02 S02 3.12 08 0
VOC VOC 0.41 08 98
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Efficiency Factor Control
(Pounds/Year) Method Code (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2019
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 0.01 08 98
Benzene 71-43-2 0.47 08 98
CFC-12 75-71-8 8.77 08 98
(Dichlorodifluoromethane)
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 0.15 08 98
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.04 08 98
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 0.07 08 98
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 1.06 08 98
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.1 08 98
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 9.79 08 98
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 4.48 08 98
Ethyl chloride 75-00-3 0.64 08 98
(chloroethane)
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 0.52 08 98
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 0.36 08 98
Ethylene dichloride (1,2- 107-06-2 0.49 08 98
dichloroethane)
Ethylidene dichloride(1,1- 75-34-3 3.04 08 98
dichloroethane)
8

Hexane, n- 110-54-3 1.24 08 98
Hydrogen chloride 7647-01-0 3176.84 08 98
(hydrochloric acid)
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 4.99 08 98
Mercury,vapor 7439-97-6 0.121 08 98
(Component of HGC)
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.52 08 98
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 0.93 08 98
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 4.73 08 98
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.47 08 98
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 0.39 08 98
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 11.95 08 98
Perch loroethylene 127-18-4 8.2 08 98
(tetrachloroethylene)
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.11 08 98
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 0.49 08 98
Toluene 108-88-3 14.54 08 98
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 3.71 08 98
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 2.79 08 98
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 0.37 08 98
Xylene 1330-20-7 10.94 08 98
9

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory-Calendar Year 2019
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) ES-01
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS Subpart WWW, MACT Subpart
AAAA]
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS -9/CD-Flare 2
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 5030060 1/Landfill Dump ; Waste Gas Flares
5. Throughput/units in 2019: 701676000 FT3/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented 100
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
1 CS-4 CD-Flare2 One landfill gas-fired open flare (3,000 scfm maximum flow rate)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP)Information:(Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): lF) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
Flare2 VERTICAL 40 1.17 1200 28.3 1825.57 Flare 2
STACK
10

Operating Scenario: OS - 9 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10. Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2019)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2019 1 2019 1 2019 2019
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
CO CO 55 08 0
NOx NOx 12.06 08 0
TSP TSP 2.92 08 0
PM10 PM10 2.92 08 0
PM2.5 PM2.5 2.92 08 0
S02 S02 2.7 08 0
VOC VOC 0.36 08 98
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Method Code Efficiency Factor Control
eo
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2019
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 0.01 08 98
Benzene 71-43-2 0.41 08 98
CFC-12 75-71-8 7.57 08 98
(Dichlorodifluoromethane)
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 0.13 08 98
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.04 08 98
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 0.06 08 98
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.91 08 98
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.09 08 98
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 8.45 08 98
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 3.86 08 98
Ethyl chloride 75-00-3 0.55 08 98
(chloroethane)
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 0.45 08 98
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 0.31 08 98
Ethylene dichloride(1,2- 107-06-2 0.42 08 98
dichloroethane)
Ethylidene dichloride (1,1- 75-34-3 2.62 08 98
dichloroethane)
11

Hexane, n- 110-54-3 1.07 08 98
Hydrogen chloride 7647-01-0 2741.48 08 98
(hydrochloric acid)
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 4.31 08 98
Mercury,vapor 7439-97-6 0.11 08 98
(Component of HGC)
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.45 08 98
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 0.8 08 98
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 4.08 08 98
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.4 08 98
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 0.33 08 98
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 10.31 08 98
Perchloroethylene 127-18-4 7.07 08 98
(tetrachloroethylene)
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.09 08 98
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 0.42 08 98
Toluene 108-88-3 12.55 08 98
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 3.2 08 98
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 2.41 08 98
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 0.32 08 98
Xylene 1330-20-7 9.44 08 98
12

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory-Calendar Year 2019
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) IES-04
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Diesel engines for miscellaneous landfill support
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS -4/No. 2 fuel oil - diesel engines for miscellaneous landfill support
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 20200401/Diesel ; Diesel
5. Throughput/units in 2019: 60000 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information: (Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): lF) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
ERP- FUGITIVE(NO miscellaneous
DIESEL STACK) 1 72 Area= 1 diesel engines
13

Operating Scenario: OS -4 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-04
10. Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2019)
Hours per Day ( 10 ) Days per Week ( 6 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2019 1 2019 2019 2019
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
CO CO 1.47 08
NOx NOx 6.84 08
TSP TSP 0.05 08
PM10 PM10 0.05 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 0.05 08
S02 S02 0.45 08
VOC VOC 0.55 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Method Code Efficiency Factor Control
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2019
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.4 08
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.3 08
Benzene 71-43-2 2.9 08
Butadiene, 1,3- 106-99-0 0.1 08
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.6 08
Polycyclic Organic Matter
(Inc PAH,dioxins,etc. NC POM 74.1 08
&AP 42 historic
amorphous glob)
Toluene 108-88-3 1.3 08
Xylene 1330-20-7 0.9 08
14

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AFRO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2019
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) IES-05
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Welding operations
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS - 3/maintenance shop welding rods
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 30900500/Metal Work-Welding ; General
5. Throughput/units in 2019: 5000 LB/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information: (Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x l�
(in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK)
15

Operating Scenario: OS -3 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-05
10. Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2019)
Hours per Day ( 1 ) Days per Week ( 5 ) Weeks per Year ( 50 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 900 End: 1000
12.Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec 25% March-May 25% June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2019 1 2019 1 2019 1 2019
13. Actual Emissions Per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Method Code Efficiency Factor Control
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2019
Manganese Unlisted
MNC-
Compounds (Specify & 101 08
Component of MNC) Other
16

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17: 16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2019
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) IES-06
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Diesel storage tank
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS - 6/diesel storage tank
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 39090004/Fuel Storage-Fixed Roof Tanks ; Distillate Oil (No. 2): Working
Loss
5. Throughput/units in 2019: 159070 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
(If fuel is used)
(Btu/units)
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
8.Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information: (Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): lF) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK)
17

Operating Scenario: OS -6 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-06
10.Operating Schedule: Source/O eratin Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Y 2 1 p g ( p g e C ar Year 0 9)
Hours per Day ( 10 ) Days per Week ( 6 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 600 End: 1600
12.Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec ° March-May ° June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2019 25�O 2019 25�° 2019 2019
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
Pollutant Emission Ef
' (NAAQS) Criteria Estimation Efficiency �
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 08
Emission
HAP/TAP CAS Emissions Estimation Control Emission EF
Pollutants (In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Efficiency Factor Control
(Pounds/Year) Method Code (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2019
18

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory-Calendar Year 2019
1. Emission Source ID(from permit) IES-07
or Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description : Two (2) leachate storage tanks
3. Operating Scenario ID/ OS -2/temporary storage of collected leachate
Description:
4. SCC Number/Description: 40714698/Fixed Roof Tanks - Miscellaneous ; Specify In Comments:
Working Loss
5. Throughput/units in 2019: 14747831 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information %Sulfur %Ash --] Heat�Content(If fuel is used)
(Bt
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented
to Control Device or Stack):
S. Control Device Information :None
Order CS-ID CD ID Control Device Description
(as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERP) Information:(Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): lF) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE (NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK)
19

Operating Scenario: OS -2 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-07
10.Operating Schedule:(Source/OperatingScenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2019)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
Jan-Feb+Dec ° March-May ° June-Aug. 25% Sept.-Nov. 25%
2019 25�O 2019 25�° 2019 2019
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions- Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
Criteria Emissions- Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Control
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2019
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 0.03 08
Emissions Emission Control
HAP/TAP CAS Estimation Emission EF
Pollutants(In Alphabetical Order) (see instructions) HAP/TAPS Mthod Code Efficiency Factor Control
e
(Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
(See Instructions)
2019
Benzene 71-43-2 0.62 08
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.71 08
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 36.92 08
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.62 08
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.31 08
Toluene 108-88-3 1.97 08
Xylene 1330-20-7 1.6 08
20

Facility Total CY 2019 Emissions Summary
COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander, NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory- Calendar Year 2019
Record Facility-Wide Totals From all Permitted and Non-Permitted AirPollutant Emission Sources
Green House Gases Pollutants(GHG
Actual Emissions(Tons/Year)
Pollutant ICAS 12019 12018 %Change
Criteria Pollutants
Actual Emissions(Tons/Year)
Pollutant CAS 2019 2018 %Change
CO CO 120.27 123.92 -2.94545%
NOx NOx 132.9 33.71 -2.4028406%
PM(TSP) TSP 6.36 6.64 -4.2168636%
PM 10 PM 10 6.36 6.64 -4.2168636%
PM2.5 PM2.5 6.36 6.64 -4.2168636%
S02 IS02 16.27 3.21 195.3271%
VOC I VOC 111.45 13.92 -17.744255%
Hazardous Air Pollutants HAPS and/or Toxic Air Pollutants TAPS
Actual Emissions(Pounds/Year)
Pollutant ICAS 12019 12018 %Change
Pollutant Group:Manganese&compounds Group Sum:101
Manganese Unlisted Compounds MNC-Other 101.0 101 0.0%
(Specify&Component of MNC)
Pollutant Group:Mercury&Compounds-all total mass,inc Hg Vapor Group Sum:.291
Mercury,vapor(Component of 7439-97-6 0.291 .3 -3.000001%
HGC)
Pollutant Group:Total Reduced Sulfur(TRS as total mass)Group Sum:882.17
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 818.83 1035.82 -20.948614%
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 63.34 80.13 -20.95345%
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.4 2.4 0.0%
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.3 .3 0.0%
Acry lonitri le 107-13-1 1.94 2.46 -21.13 821%
Benzene 71-43-2 80.85 101.34 -20.219063%
Butadiene, 1,3- 106-99-0 0.1 .1 0.0%
CFC-12
Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 243.52 287.23 -15.217771%
21

Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 24.78 31.4 -21.082798%
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.24 1.46 -15.068496%
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11.2 14.17 -20.959776%
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 29.39 34.66 -15.204849%
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.88 3.4 -15.294117%
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 271.69 320.5 -15.229329%
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 735.14 929.72 -20.928879%
Ethyl chloride(chloroethane) 75-00-3 17.74 20.91 -15.160211%
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 85.85 108.61 -20.955715%
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 9.94 11.73 -15.260017%
Ethylene dichloride(1,2- 107-06-2 13.65 16.12 -15.322587%
dichloroethane)
Ethylidene dichloride(1,1- 75-34-3 84.36 99.5 -15.216081%
dichloroethane)
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.6 3.6 0.0%
Hexane,n- 110-54-3 204.09 258.18 -20.950499%
Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric 7647-01-0 5918.32 6100.05 -2.9791558%
acid)
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 14.46 17.06 -15.240325%
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 25.78 30.4 -15.197365%
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 812.67 1015.24 -19.952917%
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 77.17 97.4 -20.770023%
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 332.01 391.51 -15.197568%
Perchloroethylene 127-18-4 227.56 268.4 -15.216094%
(tetrachloroethy lene)
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Inc
PAH,dioxins,etc.NC&AP 42 POM 74.1 74.1 0.0%
historic amorphous glob)
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 2.99 3.52 -15.056817%
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 13.52 15.94 -15.181927%
Toluene 108-88-3 2388.37 3020.26 -20.921705%
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 102.93 121.4 -15.214169%
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 77.43 91.32 -15.21025%
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 10.26 112.1 -15.206613%
Xylene 1330-20-7 1796.33 12271.58 -20.921566%
22

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 17:16:11
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: East Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Comments From Facility:
23