AQ_F_0400009_20220603_PRMT_PmtRvw

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF Region: Fayetteville Regional Office
AIR QUALITY County: Anson
Application Review NC Facility ID: 0400009
Inspector's Name: Mike Thomas
Issue Date: 06/03/2022 Date of Last Inspection: 11/17/2021
Compliance Code: 3/Compliance- inspection
Facility Data Permit Applicability(this application only)
Applicant(Facility's Name): Homwood Inc SIP:
NSPS:
Facility Address: NESHAP:
Hornwood Inc PSD:
766 Hailey's Ferry Road PSD Avoidance:
Lilesville,NC 28091 NC Toxics:
112(r):
SIC: 2258/Warp Knit Fabric Mills Other:
NAICS: 313312/Textile and Fabric Finishing(except Broadwoven Fabric)Mills
Facility Classification: Before: Small After: Small RENEWAL
Fee Classification: Before: Small After: Small
Contact Data Application Data
Facility Contact Authorized Contact Technical Contact Application Number: 0400009.22A
Benny Burr Charles Horne Dale Kelly Date Received: 01/31/2022
Environmental Manager President Plant Engineer Application Type: Renewal
[phone] [phone] [phone] Application Schedule: State
766 Hailey's Ferry Road 766 Hailey's Ferry Road 766 Hailey's Ferry Road Existing Permit Data
Lilesville,NC Lilesville,NC Lilesville,NC Existing Permit Number: 04888/R16
28091+9759 28091+9759 28091+9759 Existing Permit Issue Date: 09/07/2021
Existing Permit Expiration Date: 04/30/2022
Review Engineer: Jeffrey D.Cole Comments/Recommendations:
Issue 04888/R17
Review Engineer's Signature: Date: Permit Issue Date: 06/03/2022
4:;�, C/ Permit Expiration Date: 05/31/2030
3�az
1. Purpose of Application
Hornwood Inc is an existing textile manufacturing facility located in Lilesville, Anson County. The
facility has requested a permit renewal without modification.
This facility is currently classified as Small. The facility has a permit stipulation that limits the
facility to only combusting ultra-low sulfur No.2 fuel oil with a maximum sulfur content of 15 ppm
by weight(0.0015%),therefore,the facility's potential emissions will not exceed Title V permitting
thresholds.
The application did not contain any confidential information.
There was one facility file"Pink Sheet" item to be addressed in this permit revision(see Section 5).
The facility contact for the application is Dale Kelly, Plant Engineer(704-848-4121).

Homwood Inc
Permit R17 Review
Page 2 of 11
2. Facility Description
Hornwood, Inc. is a textile company that warps,weaves, and dyes yarn, and heat-sets(tenter frame
finishes)and doffs(textures)nylon and polyester knit fabrics. They produce baseball uniforms,
automobile seat fabric, cloth for reverse osmosis water purification, gauze liners for tennis shoes,
cowboy shirts,and other cloth items.
This process may be divided into several distinct operations as follows:
Warping; Yarn is spun onto a single spool for processing in the knitting room. Yarn may also be
draw warped which draws the diameter of the yarn down by heat and tension, and effectively reduces
the size of the yarn.
Knitting Room: Spools go onto a mandrel that feeds the knitting machines.
Middle Warehouse: This is where both finished and unfinished fabric is stored until either future
processing is done, or it is shipped to the customer.
Dye House: Dye is added to the fabric in one of two processes,beam or jet dying. In beam dying,
fabric is wound onto a beam with holes that allow the dye to pass through. The dye solution is
pumped from the rear of the chamber and passes through holes in the beam and out through the
fabric. In jet dying,the cloth is pulled through a tube in the top of the dye chamber by means of a
roller and is constantly in motion through a dye water solution in the bottom of the chamber.
Finishin,: Cloth is passed through one of four tenter frame dryers which heat set the fabric to reduce
shrinking and stretching;chemicals which stiffen or coat the material may be added.
Napping_ One of three things may be performed on the material during this process. The fabric may
be napped(which gives it the appearance of fleece), sheared(which cuts off the top of the fleece), or
sueded(which sands the fabric).
Utilities: Heat for the processes is provided by two natural gas/#2 fuel oil-fired boilers, a natural
gas/#2 fuel oil-fired Therminol heater,and a natural gas-fired Therminol heater. Heat for the tenter
frame dryers is provided by direct-fired natural gas burners.
Mist Eliminators: The facility was historically permitted to operate two condenser/mist eliminators
(CD-1 and CD-2). CD-1 is no longer in use and was last operated on 3 March 2021. The exhaust air
from the tenter frames flows through a pre-filter that takes out some of the dry particles with a one-
inch fiberglass mesh using two trays to pass the air through. In Condenser/Mist Eliminator(ID No.
CD-2),which currently controls TF-1 and TF-2,the air passes over four(4)cold water coils and six
(6)spray rings that both condense the vapor prior to the mist eliminator. Both mist eliminators house
sixteen(16)two inch wire mesh cylinders that are each surrounded by a fiberglass mesh. The
condensed vapor passes through the center of these filter tubes and then proceeds out the stack. The
rinse water is collected at the bottom of each collector unit and sent through oil/water separators to a
single holding tank for collection and disposal. Prior to the units being shut down for cleaning,jet
nozzles located at the bottom center of each filter tube are used to spray wash water into each.

Homwood Inc
Permit R17 Review
Page 3 of 11
I
Electrostatic Precipitators: The facility is permitted to operate two electrostatic precipitators(CD-3
and CD-4)both of which are 2,367 square feet of collection surface area. CD-3 controls emissions
from Tenter Frames#3 and#4. CD-4 (which is currently still under construction)will control
emissions from Tenter Frame#1.In electrostatic precipitator(ID No.CD-3),which controls TF-3 and
TF-4, emission gases are passed through transmission plates, particles in the gas stream are ionized
and obtain an electrical charge. The charged particles are then collected on the collection plates and
removed from the gas stream.
3. Zoning
A zoning consistency determination is not required, as this is permit renewal.
4. Application Chronology
Date Acdyfity
10/06/21 FRO sent the"Air Permit Renewal Reminder and Emission Inventory Due
Notification"letter to the facility.
Mike Thomas of FRO DAQ inspected the site and found it to be in
apparent compliance. Mr.Thomas offered assistance with preparing the EL
Mr. Kelly requested help in logging into AERO. Mr. Thomas went over
11/17/21 the user ID and password information for the AERO system with Mr. Kelly
and made certain that he was able to log in successfully. Mr. Kelly told
Mr. Thomas that he felt like he knew what needed to do to complete their
j inventory and thus declined Mr. Thomas's offer to help enter the emissions
data.
i
FRO received the renewal packet including the"A Form".No fees were k
O1/31/22 required. There was no request to keep any information confidential. The
application appeared to be complete for processing.
PERMIT APPLICATION CLOCK OFF
02/01/22 FRO sent the facility a letter acknowledging receipt of the permit
application.
i
Mike Thomas determined the application was actually incomplete for
processing as the emission inventory utilized data from CY 2021 rather
02/11/22 than CY 2020 as required. Mr. Thomas disputed the incorrect operation
scenarios and sent the EI back to the Mr.Kelly for corrections. Mr. Cole
entered a"Completeness Additional Information"event into IBEAM
resetting the permit clock back to when the application was received.
Mike Thomas further reviewed the EI data calculations and found that the
company's VOC calculations were incomplete and did not reflect the
02/17/22 VOCs from a specific polymer chemical that they utilized. Mr. Thomas
contacted Mr.Kelly and suggested that he consult the polymer's
manufacturer to determine its VOC content.

Hornwood Inc
Permit RI Review
Page 4 of 11
02/23/22 Mr. Kelly emailed Mr. Thomas and noted that there had been no response
from the polymer's manufacturer to their inquiry.
03/03/22
To There were several emails between Mr. Kelly and Mr. Thomas on other
03/16/22 Possible methods to determine the specific polymer's VOC content.
Mr. Kelly emailed Mr. Thomas stating that they had contracted a laboratory 1j
03/17/22 i to analyze a sample of the specific polymer to determine its VOC content.
i
� I
04/07/22 The facility submitted the emissions inventory data via AFRO.
04/08/22 FRO received the emission inventory and certification sheet. '
PERMIT APPLICATION CLOCK ON
< i
04/11/22 Stephen Allen approved the emission inventory and forwarded it to the
permit engineer.
5. Changes in Equipment,Emissions,and Regulations,and PE Review Requirements
Hornwood Inc is requesting a permit renewal without modification.
• There are no changes to equipment or regulations.
• There was one facility file"Pink Sheet" item to be addressed in this permit revision. The
following note stated, "See the R14 permit review for updated information on emission
factors for this facility for use in submittal of the next El." The facility appears to have
utilized the R14 permit review emission factor logic in their current EI.
• No PE Seal is required for a permit renewal without modification.
The facility Emission Sources and Controls are as follows:
t ._
Emission Control Control
Farce Emission Source Description System System
ID Description
Boiler Operations,including:
Main-031 Natural gas/Ultra-low Sulfur No.2 fuel oil-fired boiler N/A
(NSPS Dc) (44.398 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input)
Textile Operations,including:

Homwood Inc
Permit R17 Review
Page 5 of 11
Emission Control Control
Source ID Emission Source Description System System
ID Description
Textile tenter frame(1,500 lbs of cloth per hour maximum Electrostatic
capacity)consisting of the following: Precipitator
Tenter 1 a) pad-applied fmishing station,and CD-4 (2,367 sq.ft.
b) therminol(hot oil)heated oven. collection surface
area)
Textile tenter frame(2,300 lbs of cloth per hour maximum F-
capacity)consisting of the following:
Tenter 2 a) pad-applied finishing station,and CD-2 Condenser/Mist
b) natural gas fired six zone oven Eliminator
(9 million Btu per hour maximum heat input)
Textile tenter frame(2,000 lbs of cloth per hour maximum
Tenter 3 capacity)consisting of the following:
a) pad-applied finishing station,and
b) therminol(hot oil)heated oven. Electrostatic
Precipitator
-- --------_-- ------ -- CD-3 (2,367 sq.ft.
Textile tenter frame(2,100 lbs of cloth per hour maximum collection surface
capacity)consisting of the following: area)
Tenter 4 a) pad-applied finishing station,and
b) natural gas fired six zone oven
(6 million Btu per hour maximum heat input)
TH-01 Natural gas/Ultra-low Sulfur No.2 fuel oil-fired therminol heater N/A
(9.06 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input)
B-03 Natural gas/Ultra-low Sulfur No.2 fuel oil-fired boiler N/A
(22.65 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input)
1
The insignificant/Exempt Activities at the facility are as follows:
S of Source of
Source Source Exemption Regulation ounce Title V
Pollutants?
I-ES I I 02Q.0102(h)(5) Yes Yes
Surface Finishing Operation
r7
I-Main-058
Natural gas-fired therminol heater 02Q.0102(h)(1)(B) j Yes Yes
(15 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input) 1
(NSPS Dc)

Homwood Inc
Permit R17 Review
Page 6of11
6. NSPS,NESHAP,PSD,and Attainment Status, 112(r)
• NSPS—
✓ Boiler(ID No. Main-031) is subject to NSPS Subpart Dc because it was constructed in
2001.
✓ Therminol heater(ID No.TH-01) is not subject to NSPS Subpart Dc because it has less
than 10 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input and was constructed in 1972.
✓ Boiler(ID No. B-03)is not subject to NSPS Subpart Dc because it was constructed in
1971.
✓ Therminol heater(ID No.I-Main-058)is subject to NSPS Subpart Dc because it was
constructed in 2014.
• NESHAP—There are no current NESHAP regulations that are applicable to this facility.
✓ The natural gas/Ultra-low Sulfur No. 2 fuel oil-fired boilers(ID Nos. Main-031 and
B-03)are not subject to NESHAP Subpart JJJJJJ(6J)because they are considered as
gas-fired boilers and avoid the applicability of the rule by combusting liquid fuels only
during periods of gas curtailment,gas supply interruption, startups,or periodic testing on
liquid fuel(periodic testing not to exceed 48 hours during any calendar year).
✓ The therminol heaters(ID Nos.TH-01 and I-Main-058)are not subject to NESHAP
Subpart 6J,as they do not meet the definition of boilers under this rule, since they do not
utilize water.
• PSD—PSD does not impact this application, as the potential emissions after controls are less than
PSD threshold quantities. Anson County has not triggered minor source increment tracking.
• 112(r)—The facility does not store any of the subject chemicals in amounts that exceed the
threshold quantities. The facility is therefore not required to maintain a written Risk Management
Plan(RMP).
• Attainment Status—Anson County is in attainment.
7. Facility Emissions Review
The Actual Emissions for 2020 are from the latest facility emission inventory submitted via AERO
and for this permit review. Potential PMio emissions from the tenter frame dryers were calculated
using the emission factor from the Lumberton Dyeing and Finishing facility stack testing in 1980,
which indicated an uncontrolled emission factor of 4.18 lb/ton of fabric dried. PM2.5 emission factors
were determined based on testing for condensable particulate at the Kordsa facility in January 2014.
The condensable PM was considered to be PM25 and was found to be approximately 80%of the PM]o
emissions. We have therefore used a factor of PM2.5=0.8 x 4.18=3.3441b/ton of fabric dried.
Maximum throughput rate for Tenters 1/2 and Tenters 3/4 are 1.975 tons/hr fabric dried for each pair
of tenters(total facility throughput 3.95 tons/hr of fabric dried). Potential before control PM, PMIo
and PM2.5 from tenter frame process emissions are 72.31 ton/yr, 72.31 ton/yr and 57.85 ton/yr,

Homwood Inc
Permit R 17 Review
Page 7 of 11
respectively. Note that potential emissions of PM,PMIo and PM2.5 from the tenter frames only are
expected to be reduced by 90%for Tenter 2(controlled by a Condenser/Mist Eliminator)and by 95%
for Tenter's 1,3 and 4(each controlled by an ESP).
Potential combustion emissions for the boilers and tenter frame burners are taken from the DAQ
Natural Gas Combustion Emissions Calculator Revision N 1/05/2017 and the DAQ Fuel Oil
Combustion Emissions Calculator Revision G 11/5/2012. Potential emissions assume the worst-case
emissions using either fuel permitted.
Tenter frame process VOC emissions are estimated using material balances from actual
2020 materials usages and VOC content(based on 7,488 hours of operation), ratioed up to
8,760 hours operation.
See page 11 of this review for the emission calculations and basis.
Facility-wide emissions expected after this modification are as follows:
2020 Emissions Potential Emissions Potential Emissions
Pollutant tonslyr More Controls After Controls j
tonslyr tons/yr
PM 5.91 80.43 12.24*
PM10 5.91 74.95 1 6.76*
PMz.s �4.79 ____[_ 59.67 4.25* ---
SO2 o.a-I 0.91 0.81
NO: 4.26--1 97 �� 97
CO 2.92 68.94 68.94
VOC 2.45--1 7.02 7.02
*Note that these totals include the Tenter potential emissions before control for Tenter's 1,3 and 4 reduced by 95%(ESP
equipped)and for Tenter 2 reduced by 90%(Condenser/Mist Eliminator equipped)added to the boiler potential emissions
before control as the boilers are uncontrolled.
8. Toxies Review
No previous toxics modeling has been performed for this facility. The permit contains a 02Q .0711
toxics permit condition but does not contain a 02D .1100 toxics condition. Note that the toxics
condition did not previously apply to the boilers or therminol heaters,and the toxic pollutants from
these sources have not been included in the 02Q .0711 permit condition.
9. Facility Compliance History
11/17/21 Mike Thomas conducted the latest facility inspection and found the facility to be in
apparent compliance during the inspection.
08/03/21 Mike Thomas conducted a facility inspection and found the facility to be in apparent
compliance during the inspection.

Hornwood Inc
Permit R17 Review
Page 8 of 11
10/01/20 NOV issued for failure to conduct a Method 9 VE observation required by NSPS Dc.
09/02/20 Jeffrey Nelson conducted the latest facility inspection and found the facility to be in
apparent violation for failure to conduct a Method 9 VE observation under NSPS Dc.
07/29/20 NOD issued for installing an unpermitted air pollution control device per NCGS
143-215.108.
04/15/20 A virtual inspection (partial inspection due to COVID restrictions)was conducted by
Jeffrey Nelson. The facility was found to be in apparent compliance during the
inspection.
04/26/19 NOV/NRE issued for excess visible emissions and failure to properly maintain a control
device.
04/09/19 The facility was inspected by Jeffrey Cole and was found to be in violation of 02D .0521
Visible Emissions during the inspection.
04/13/17 The facility was inspected three(3)times by Jeffrey Cole and was found to be in apparent
through compliance during each of these inspections.
04/25/18
05/16/16 NOD issued for failure to perform VE testing under NSPS Dc.
05/12/16 The facility was inspected by Joshua Harris and was found to be in violation of 02D
.0524 NSPS Dc during the inspection for failure to perform VE testing during January to
February 2014.
06/10/09 The facility was inspected seven(7)times by Robert Hayden and Maureen
through Matroni-Rakes and was found to be in apparent compliance during each of these
05/26/15 inspections.
10. Stipulation Review
The following regulations are applicable to this facility:
Regulation Affected Emission Limit
Sources Or Requirement
15 NCAC 02D ( Facility Wide I Permit Renewal&Emissions Inventory Submittal
.0202
15 NCAC 02D Main-031
.0503 TH-01 PM<0.39 lb/mmBtu
B-03
Tenter 1
15 NCAC 02D Tenter 2 E=4.10 * (P)0-61 for P<30 tons/hr,or
.0515 Tenter 3 E=55 *(P)01-40 for P>30 tons/hr
fTenter 4

Homwood Inc
Permit R17 Review
Page 9 of 11
Regulation Affected Emission Limit
Sources Or Requirement
15 NCAC 02D Main-031
0516 ( TH-01 2.3 pounds SO2 per million Btu heat input.
B-03
15 NCAC 02D F20 percent opacity when averaged
.0521 Facility Wide over a six-minute period
For Oil-fired boilers>30 mmBtu/hr maximum heat
input:
15 NCAC 02D No.2 Oil Sulfur content<0.5%by weight
.0524 Main-031 Fuel Usage Records;Semi-annual Reporting
NSPS Subpart Dc Initial Method 9 VE source testing if combusting oil
Periodic Method 9 VE testing frequency depends on
most recent Method 9 observation after starting to
combust oil
15 NCAC 02D
.0535 Facility Wide Excess Emissions Reporting
15 NCAC 02D Facility Wide Fugitive Dust
0540
Maintain fuel certification records and confirm that the
15 NCAC 02D Main-031 ultra-low sulfur No.2 fuel oil combusted meets the
.0605 TH-01 specification for ASTM D975 Grade No.2-D S15 fuel
Ad-Hoc B-03 oil(maximum 15 ppm [0.0015%] sulfur content,by
weight).
Condenser/Mist Eliminator Requirements
15 NCAC 02D CD-2 Periodic I&M per Manufacturer's Recommendations
.0611 Annual internal inspection
Recordkeeping
Electrostatic Precipitator Requirements
15 NCAC 02D CD-3 Periodic I&M per Manufacturer's Recommendations
.0611 CD-4 Annual inspection
Recordkeeping
15 NCAC 02D Facility Wide Odorous Emissions
.1806 1 �
15 NCAC 02Q FI-M
ain-058 Applicability of NSPS Subpart Dc
.0102 to the exempt therminol heater
Avoidance condition for NESHAP Subpart JJJJJJ(6J)
15 NCAC 02Q Main-031 Liquid fuels permitted only during periods of gas
.0317 B-03 curtailment,gas supply interruptions,startups,and
periodic testing on liquid fuels(not to exceed 48 hours
F
in any calendar year)
15 NCAC 02Q Facility Wide TPER Limits
0711
11. Conclusion,Comments,and Recommendations
I
I
i

Homwood Inc
Permit R17 Review
Page 10 of 11
• I recommend that air permit 04888R17 be issued to Hornwood Inc.
• Modifications to IBEAM:
✓ Adjusted column widths,bolded and shaded throughout to improve appearance.
✓ In the 02D .0524 NSPS Dc condition for boiler ID No.Main-031,changed the emission
limitations pollutant from"Particulate"to"Visible Emissions".
✓ In the 02D .0524 NSPS Dc condition for boiler ID No.Main-031,changed the NSPS
Performance Testing pollutant from"Particulate"to"Visible Emissions".
✓ Added the Ad-Hoc condition for"Records Maintenance Requirement"under 02D .0605 for
the description of Ultra-low Sulfur fuel oil(language excerpted from the Kansas City Sausage
Permit R14(Facility ID 8200115).
✓ Changed the title of the 02D .0611 "Condenser Requirements"condition to read
"Condenser/Mist Eliminator Requirements".
✓ Modified the wording in the 02Q .0317 Avoidance condition for NESHAP Subpart JJJJJJ
(6J)to indicate that two boilers(ID Nos. Main-031 and B-03)are included in this exemption
and that the fuel oil is Ultra-low Sulfur No. 2 fuel oil.
✓ Deleted the columns in the 02Q .0711 condition table that listed"Carcinogens",Chronic
Toxicants"and"Acute System Toxicants,"as these columns had no entries.
Review Engineer Date /7l7 z
Permit Coordinator K4L, —C Date 06/03/2022
DAQ Supervisor � _ Date J ?Z
/JDC
FRO Files
I
I
i

Hornwood Inc
Permit R17 Review
Page 11 of 11
Emissions Calculations:
PM and PMio emission factors are taken from testing at the Lumberton Dyeing and Finishing facility in 1980. These factors are:
PM=PMio=4.18 lb/ton of fabric dried
PM2.5 emission factors are determined based on testing for condensable particulate at the Kordsa facility in January 2014. The condensable PM was considered to be PM2.5 and was found to
be approximately 80%of the PMio emissions. We have therefore used a factor of PM2.5=0.8 x 4.18=3.344 lb/ton of fabric dried. Maximum throughput rate for Tenters 1/2 and Tenters
3/4 are 1.975 tons/hr fabric dried for each pair of tenters for a total facility throughput 3.95 tons/hr of fabric dried.
Combustion emissions for the boilers and tenter frame burners are taken from the DAQ Natural Gas Combustion Emissions Calculator Revision N 1/05/2017 and the DAQ Fuel Oil
Combustion Emissions Calculator Revision G 11/5/2012. Potential emissions assume the worst-case emissions using either fuel permitted. Tenter frame process VOC and HAP/TAP
emissions are estimated using material balances from actual 2020 materials usages and VOC/HAP/TAP content(based on 7,488 hours of operation),ratioed up to 8,760 hours operation.
CONTROL FACILITY-WIDE FACILITY-WIDE
INDIVIDUAL SOURCES EFFICIENCY
2020 POTENTIAL POTENTIAL
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL EMISSIONS EMISSIONS
POLLUTANT EMISSIONS EMISSIONS (for Tenter BEFORE AFTER
BEFORE CONTROLS frame
tons CONTROLS CONTROLS
tons emissions
tons/yr tons/yr
only)
Tenters Tenters
1,2,3,4 I Tester Tenters 1-4
COMBUSTION
& MAIN-031 TH-1 Main- B-03 1 &2 3&4 PLUS
HAP/TAP 058 PM ONLY PROCESS
ONLY ONLY HAP/TAP
ONLY
PM ------ 4.58* 0.94* 0.03** 2.34* 36.16 36.16 0.22** 90or95 80.43 12.24*****
PM,o ------ 1.39* 0.28* 0.03** 0.71* 36.16 36.16 0.22** 90 or 95 74.95 6.76*****
PM2.5 ------ 0.35* 0.07* 0.03** 0.18* 28.93 28.93 0.18** 90 or 95 58.67 4.25*****
S02 ------ 0.30* 0.06* 0.04** 0.15* ------ ------ 0.26** 0 0.81 0.81
NOx ------ 27.78* 5.67* 6.44** 14.17* ------ I ------ 42.94** 0 97 97
CO ------ 16.01** 3.27** 5.41** 8.17** ------ ------ 36.08** 0 68.94 68.94
VOC 2.15 1.05** 0.21** 0.35** 0.53** ------ ------ 4.88*** 0 7.02 7.02
HAP/TAP 0.16 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.99**** 0 0.99 0.99
*Worst-case emissions from No.2 Fuel oil combustion,using UItra-Low Sulfur No.2 fuel oil(maximum 15 ppm Sulfur content by weight)
"Worst-case emissions from natural gas combustion
***Includes both combustion emissions and process VOC emissions from chemical usage
**** Includes only process HAP/TAP emissions from chemical usage
*****Note that these totals include the Tenter potential emissions before control for Tenter's 1,3 and 4 reduced by 95%(ESP equipped)and for Tenter 2 reduced by
90%(Condenser/Mist Eliminator equipped)added to the boiler potential emissions before control as the boilers are uncontrolled.
I

Facility Total CY 2020 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID #: 0400009
Facility Name: Hornwood Inc Permit#(s): 04888R16
i
Green House Gases Pollutants (GHG) Actual Emissions % j
Tons/Yr
Pollutant CAS
Demini- Change
mus
Not Not N/A
Reported Reported
CO2 equivalent(sum of individual GHG pollutant emissiot No GHGs
times their 1995 IPCC Global Warming Potential (GWP), Reported
converted to metric tons)
Criteria Pollutants Actual Emissions
(Tons/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2020 CY 2013 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
CO CO 2.92 5.32 0.5 -45.1%
NOx NOx 4.20 6.35 0.5 1 -33.9%
PM(TSP) TSP 5.91 8.97 0.5 -34.1%
PM10 PM10 5.91 8.97 0.5 -34.1%
PM2.5 PM2.5 4.79 7.25 0.5 -33.9%
S02 SO2 0.040000 0.050000 0.5 -20.0%
VOC VOC 2.40 10.30 1 0.5 1 -76.7%
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPS) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2020 CY 2013 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Arsenic & Compounds (total mass of elemental AS, arsine and Not 0.000000 0.01 N/A
all inorganic compounds) Reported
Arsenic Compounds -Arsine gas (Component of AS 7784-42-1 Not Not 0.01 N/A
Reported Reported
Beryllium & compounds (Total mass) Not 0.000000 1.0 N/A
Reported
Beryllium Unlisted Compounds - Specify Compoun' BEC-Other Not Not 1.0 N/A
(Component of BEC) Reported Reported
Cadmium & compounds (total mass includes elemental metal) Not 0.000000 0.1 N/A
Reported
Cadmium oxide (Component of CDC) 1306-19-0 Not Not 0.01 N/A
Reported Reported
04/11/2022 Page 1 of 4

Facility Total CY 2020 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID #: 0400009
Facility Name: Hornwood Inc Permit#(s): 04888R16
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2020 CY 2013 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Chromium -All/Total(includes Chromium (VI) categories, Not 0.000000 0.1 I N/A
metal and others) Reported
Chromium(VI)Non-Specific Unlisted Compounds - NSCR6-Other Not Not 0.01 N/A
Specify Compound(Component of NSCR6 &CRC) Reported Reported
Chromium (VI)Non-Specific Compounds, as Chrom(VI) Not 0.000000 0.01 N/A
(Component CRC) Reported
Chromium(VI)Non-Specific Unlisted Compounds - NSCR6-Other Not Not 0.01 N/A
Specify Compound(Component of NSCR6 &CRC) Reported Reported
Glycol ethers (total all individual glycol ethers) Not 15.00 100.0 I N/A
Reported
Glycol Ethers,Unlisted- Specify Compound GLYET-Other Not 15.00 100.0 N/A
(component of GLYET) Reported
Lead& compounds Not 0.000000 1.0 I N/A
Reported
Lead Unlisted Compounds - Specify Compound PBC-Other Not Not 10.0 N/A
(Component of PBC) Reported Reported
Manganese& compounds Not 0.000000 10.0 N/A
Reported
Manganese Unlisted Compounds - Specify Compow MNC-Other Not Not 10.0 N/A
(Component of MNC) Reported Reported
Mercury& Compounds-all total mass includes Hg Vapor Not 0.000000 0.041 N/A
Reported
Mercury Unlisted Compounds - Specify Compound HGC-Other Not Not 0.001 N/A
(Component of HGC) Reported Reported
Nickel& Compounds, sum total mass includes elemental Not 0.000000 1,0 N/A
Reported
Nickel Unlisted Compounds (Component of NIC - NIC-other Not Not 1.0 N/A
Specify) Reported Reported
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Specific Compounds from OAQPS Not 0.000000 1.0
N/A
or Tip Reported
Naphthalene (Component of 83329/POMTV) 91-20-3 Not Not 1.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 Not Not 10.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Acetic acid 64-19-7 90.00 262.00 100.0
04/11/2022 Page 2 of 4

Facility Total CY 2020 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID#: 0400009
Facility Name: Hornwood Inc Permit#(s): 04888R16
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2020 CY 2013 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Benzene 71-43-2 Not Not 1.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Cumene 98-82-8 54.00 Not 100.0 N/A
Reported
Dioxane, 1,4- 123-91-1 Not Not 0.01 N/A
Reported Reported
Epichlorohydrin 106-89-8 Not Not 1.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 Not Not 100.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Ethylene glycol 107-21-1 Not Not 100.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Ethylene oxide 75-21-8 Not Not 1.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Fluorides (sum of all fluoride compounds as mass of 16984-48-8 Not Not 10.0 N/A
ion) Reported Reported
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 13.41 26.61 10.0 F-49.6%
Hexane,n- 110-54-3 128.70 194.60 100.0 1 -33.9%
Methanol(methyl alcohol) 67-56-1 20.16 18.88 1,000.o 6.8%
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 Not Not 100.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Inc PAH, dioxins, etc.N pom Not Not 1.0 N/A
&AP 42 historic) Reported Reported
Selenium Compounds SEC Not Not 10.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Toluene 108-88-3 Not Not 100.0 N/A
Reported Reported
Xylene (mixed isomers) 1330-20-7 108.00 Not 100.0 N/A
Reported
04/11/2022 Page 3 of 4

Largest Individual HAP Hexane, n- 128.70 lbs
HA
P AP Emissions 324.27 lbs
Largest Individual CAP PM10 5.91 tons
Total CAP Emissions 15.47 tons
Total TAP Emissions 340.11 lbs
Total Aggregate 15.47 tons
Emissions
DAQ's Comments Reaardin2 Inventory
2/4/22 Data sent back due to phone call from Dale Kelly informing me that he had used some of the
data from the wrong year.
4/11/2022 Reduction in the facility's emissions is due to production being cut down to nearly 1/4th of what it was in 2013.
I
04/11/2022 Page 4 of 4