AQ_F_0800102_20140730_EI_Cmb-EI-File

2013 Emissions Inventory Review / Data Tracking Form
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landrill Facility ID: 0800102
Facility Assigned to: Data Entry: Bertie County
Classification: Alicia Mangum -7I ,l I Confidential Copy Submitted?
Title V S q- i YES
NO
Initial Review/Data Entry
Enter date received into ED. Date Received: G., Qa Zoitl
[g' Assigned to appropriate individual. Date Assigned: UT3�2otq Date Due: 9/Ni& v
Paper copy submitted: One copy received with supporting documentation,certification form signed by responsible official,and
appears generally complete;,(A
Electronic copy submitted: All supporting documentation and certification form (with time/date stamp)signed by responsible
official has been received.
Comments: $u a.aw "vv%, —
Inventory Review
Ili All forms and supporting documentation appear to be complete if paper submission(check ED OS data if electronic).
I/ Contact,address, phone number changes entered into I-Beam/Facilities if necessary.
All known operating scenarios,control devices,and emission release points have been entered for each emission source(permitted,
insignificant,and unpermitted)or note that the emission source was not operated or not required to report.
Evaluate "U" sources for significance and address according to policy.
Calculations/forms appear to add up correctly.
id All compliance issues are being addressed(e.g.Toxics limits,above TV thresholds, large emissions increase/decrease, installation
/ without a permit).
R All volatile HAPs/TAPS were included in the VOC total.
Calculations and control efficiencies appear correct. Emission factors are the best available and most current factors appropriate
for the reporting facility(e.g. stack testing,AP-42, etc.).
Review facility comments and address any issues.
Update ED(Data Entry Main) if additional information is required(corrections due date and date received).
I� Check all ED QA/QC reports.
[ Comparison with previous emission inventory must be made and outliers(> 10%)must be investigated and explained.
Put inventory review comments and summarize any changes in ED-Data Entry Main "DAQ internal comments".
Print and attach the facility total report.
Date Review Complete:119t Signature: _
Date Submitted to El Coordinator:
Date Approved: Z!��Wy Initials: ___

2013 Emissions Inventory Review
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID:0800102
Facility Classification:Title V Data Entry: Alicia Mangum 7/30/2014 Bertie County
DAQ Internal Comments:
As of August 7, 2013, the CISWI rule no longer applies to facility due to the re-instatement of the
definition of"contained gaseous material".
Based on the assumptions provided by the facility, the amount of LFG combusted and fugitive LFG do
not add up perfectly. The facility has indicated that the LFG combusted is an actual monitored and
recorded number; however, the fugitive LFG is modeled and is therefore overestimated.
Major differences between the HAP and/or TAP emissions from CY2013 as compared to CY2012 are a
result of using the pollutant concentrations from AP-42 and Site Specific Testing from the 2005
Compliance demonstration for CY2012 versus using pollutant concentrations from Waste Industry
Coalition (WIAC-2001). The facility has indicated that the Site Specific testing data is older than five
years; therefore,they felt it necessary to use the industry standards provided by WIAC.
General Comments to Facility:
As of August 7, 2013, the CISWI rule no longer applies to facility due to the re-instatement of the
definition of"contained gaseous material". WaRO is aware that Flare CD-2 is labeled as CISWI
applicable. Due to a partial year of applicability for CY2013, the label will remain with the expiration
noted. The CISWI language will need to be removed for the CY2014 Emissions Inventory.

Facility.Total CY 2013 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID #: 0800102
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T07
Green House Gases Pollutants (GHG) Actual Emissions
Tons/Yr
Pollutant C-1S
Dcmmi_ Change
III t S
Not Not N/A
Reported Reported
CO2 equivalent(sum of individual GHG pollutant emission No GHGs
times their 1995 IPCC Global Warming Potential(GWP), Reported
converted to metric tons)
Criteria Pollutants Actual Emissions
(Tons/Year)
Pollut:I„t CAS CY 2013 CY 2012 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
CO CO 137.36 128.09 0.5 7.2%
NOx NOx 31.82 30.19 0.5 5.4%
PM(TSP) TSP 6.17 5.84 0.5 5.7%
PM 10 PM 10
6.17 5.84 0.5 5.7%
PM2.5 PM2.5 6.17 5.84 0.5 5.7%
S02 SO2 4.37 4.12 0.5 6.1%
VOC VOC 11.39 10.81 0.5 5.4%
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPS) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2013 CY 2012 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Manganese & compounds 101.00 101.00 10.0 MI.
Manganese Unlisted Compounds-Specify MNC-Other 101.00 101.00 10.0 0.0%
Compound(Component of MNC)
Mercury& Compounds-all total mass includes Hg Vapor 0.280000 0.260000 0.001 7.7%
Mercury, vapor (Component of HGC) 7439-97-6 0.280000 0.260000 0.001 7.7%
Total Reduced Sulfur(TRS as total mass) 904.3 11,313.76 1-31.2%
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 839.38 1,195.40 1.0 -29.8%
Methyl mercaptan 74-93-1 64.93 118.36 1.0 -45.1%
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.40 2.40 10.0 0.0%
07/30/2014 Page I of 3

Facility Total CY 2013 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID #: 0800102
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T07
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPS) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2013 CY 2012 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.300000 0.300000 10.0 0.0%
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 1.99 0.030010 10.0 ,531.1°/
Benzene 71-43-2 82.39 5.73 1.0
Butadiene, 1,3- 106-99-0 0.100000 0.100000 1.0 0.0%
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 25.44 0.020000 10.0 1 7,1.00.0 0
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.19 5.05 1.0 -76.4%
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11.48 29.09 1.0 -60.5%
CFC-12 (Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 234.63 335.60 100.0 -30.1%
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 28.32 0.020000 10.0 1 1,500.0 °
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.78 0.040000 100.0 8847.5°/
Dichlorobenzene(p), 1,4- 106-46-7 261.79 0.040010 1.0 6 4,211.4 °
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 753.07 0.220010 100.0 3-2,189.0c 0
Ethyl chloride (chloroethane) 75-00-3 17.09 0.010000 10.0 1 0,800.0 6
Ethyl mercaptan 75-08-1 88.01 139.97 10.0 -37.1%
Ethylene dibromide (dibromoethane) 106-93-4 9.58 Not 1.0 N/A
Reported
Ethylene dichloride (1,2-dichloroethane) 107-06-2 11. 16 0.030010 1.0 9752.00
Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-dichloroethane) 75-34-3 81.27 3.50 100.0 ,222.0°/
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.60 3.60 10.0 0.0%
Hexane, n- 110-54-3 209.22 8.97 100.0 9232.4%
Hydrogen chloride (hydrochloric acid) 7647-01-0 5,740.05 5,292.48 100.0 8.5%
MEK (methyl ethyl ketone, 2-butanone) 78-93-3 805.88 193.72 100.0 316.0%
Methyl chloride (chloromethane) 74-87-3 13.94 0.000010 1.0 N/A
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 24.84 0.040010 100.0 1,984.50
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 319.67 0.080230 1.0 3 189342V°
MIBK (methyl isobutyl ketone) 108-10-1 78.65 0.160010 10.0 9,053.20
Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene) 127-18-4 219.25 5.74 100.0 ,719.6°/
07/30/2014 Page 2 of 3

Facility-Total CY 2013 Emission Summary Recorded in ED Facility ID #: 0800102
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Permit#(s): 08849T07
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Actual Emissions
and/or Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPS) (Pounds/Year)
Pollutant CAS CY 2013 CY 2012 Demini- %
from ED from Fees mus Change
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Inc PAH, dioxins, etc. NDOM 74.10 74.10 1.0 0.0%
& AP 42 historic)
Propylene dichloride (1,2-dichloropropane) 78-87-5 2.88 0.030000 10.0 ,500.0°/
TCE(trichloroethylene) 79-01-6 99.16 0.030070 1,000.0E 9,663.940,0
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 79-34-5 13.02 0.030040 100.0 4 39242.20/)
Toluene 108-88-3 2,446.82 9.12 100.0 169728.90A
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 74.60 26.06 0.1 186.3%
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 9.89 0.020000 0.1 4 91350.00A
Xylene (mixed isomers) 1330-20-7 1,840.22 4.66 100.0 9,389.40
Largest Individual HAP Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid) 59740.05 lbs
Total HAP Emissions 2,563.54 Ibs
DAQ's Comments Reeardine Inventory
As of August 7,2013,the CISWI rule no longer applies to facility due to the reinstatement of the definition of"contained
gaseous material'.
Based on the assumptions provided by the facility,the amount of LFG combusted and fugitive LFG do not add up
perfectly. The facility has indicated that the LFG combusted is an actual monitored and recorded number;however,the
fugitive LFG is modeled and is therefore overestimated
Major differences between the HAP and/or TAP emissions from CY2013 as compared to CY2012 are a result of using the
pollutant concentrations from AP-42 and Site Specific Testing from the 2005 Compliance demonstration for CY2012 versus
using pollutant concentrations from Waste Industry Coalition(WIAC-200 1). The facility has indicated that the Site
Specific testing data is older than five years;therefore,they felt it necessary to use the industry standards provided by
WIAC.
07/30/2014 Page 3 of 3

REPUBLIC
4#14 SERVICES
June 9, 2014
Mr. Robert Fisher
Regional Air Quality Supervisor
NCDENR—Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Subject: CY2013 Emission Inventory
East Carolina Environmental Landfill
Aulander, North Carolina
Facility ID No:0800102
Title V Permit No: 08849T07
Dear Mr. Fisher:
Republic Services (Republic) is submitting the attached CY 2013 Emission Inventory for
the referenced site. If you have any questions or require additional information, please
contact me at(919) 354-3227 or J. Morgan with SCS Engineers at(704) 504-3107.
Sincerely,
/i
Matt Einsmann, P.E. -
Environmental Manager
CC. Matt East(East Carolina Environmental Landfill) 00 2 0 2014
J Morgan P.E. (SCS Engineers)
1220 Commerce St SW,Box 1
Conover,NC 28613
Phone [phone]• Fax [phone]
Toll Free 866.473.7778
www.repubhcservices.com

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
qf.REPUBLIC
ZWA SERVICES
East Carolina Environmental Landfill
2013 Emission Inventory
Air Permit 08849T07
Presented to:
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
East Carolina Environmental Landfill
1922 Republican Road
Aulander, NC 27805
Presented by:
SCS Engineers, PC
2520 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 450
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
[phone]
June 2, 2014
File No. 02209360.07

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
Table of Contents
Section Page
SECTION1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1
SECTION 2 Uncollected Landfill Gas Fugitives................................................................................ 2
SECTION3 Landfill Gas Flare............................................................................................................5
SECTION4 Insignificant Activities.......................................................................................................6
Attachment
A 2013 Annual Emissions Statement
B Detailed Emissions Calculations

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
Per Condition 3.X of East Carolina Environmental Landfill (Landfill) Air Quality Permit No.
08849T07 for its Landfill located at 1922 Republican Road, Aulander, North Carolina, the
facility is required to submit an emissions inventory to the Department of Air Quality (DAQ)by
June 30 of each year. The emissions inventory presented herein is the basis for the emissions
values reported in the 2013 Annual Emissions Statement. The emissions sources identified were
based on discussions and correspondence with Landfill staff, SCS Engineers' (SCS) knowledge
of the site, a review of existing permits, compliance reports, and other information provided by
the Landfill. Facility-wide emissions at the Landfill are provided in Table 1 below. Facility-
wide emissions including speciated HAPs are provided at the end of this section. Emissions for
each source are further detailed in the remaining sections of this report.
Table 1 . 2013 Annual Emission Rate Summary (tons/yr)
Permit ID Emission Source NMOC VOC HAPs/ NOx CO sox PM10
TAPs
Municipal Solid
ES-01 Waste Landfill 27.00 10.53 3.25
(Fugitive Emission)
CD-Flarel Landfill Gas Flare 1 0.36 0.14 1.39 11.84 64.40 1.86 2.90
CD-Flare2 Landfill Gas Flare 2 0.40 0.16 1.55 13.14 71.49 2.06 3.22
Diesel Engines for
IES-04 Miscellaneous 0.55 4.28E-02 6.84 1.47 0.45 0.05
Landfill Support
IES-05 Welding 5.05E-02
Operations
IES-06 Diesel Storage Tank 2.31 E-03 2.31 E-03
IES-07 Leachate Storage 9.73E-03 9.73E-03 8.41 E-04 -- -- -- --
Tanks
Totals 27.78 11.39 6.28 31.82 137.37 4.37 6.17
Notes:
-- Not Applicable.
Due to rounding,"Total"emissions may not exactly equal the sum of the individual source emission rates as they
appear in the table above.
2 Site reports solar flares were not operated during this reporting period.
Emissions from Welding Operations, and Diesel Engines are"carried forward"from the prior reporting year as
allowed by the DENR DAQ AERO reporting system
1

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
SECTION 2 UNCOLLECTED LANDFILL GAS FUGITIVES
LANDFILL GAS FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
This section addresses the generation of landfill gas(LFG),non-methane organic compounds
(NMOCs),volatile organic compounds(VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants(HAPs),methane,
and carbon dioxide and their fugitive emissions via passive LFG releases.
LFG generation from the landfill operation was calculated using SCS Engineers' version of the
U.S. EPA Landfill Gas Emissions Model(LandGEM). A description of the model parameters is
provided below and the model output is attached.
LandGEM uses a first-order decay equation to predict landfill gas generation based on the
amount and age of the waste in place. The formula is presented in 40 CFR Part 60.754(a)(1)(i).
The parameters Lo and k used in the LandGEM are the values published in EPA's Compilation of
Air Pollutant Emission Factors(AP 42),Volume I, Section 2.4(revised Novem�er 1998). The
methane generation potential, Lo, for the MSW landfill cells was set equal to 100 cubic meters
(m3) o fAethane(CH4)per megagram(Mg)of waste. The methane generation rate constant,k,
was 0.04 yr I and the concentration of NMOC in LFG was set to 595 parts per million by volume
(ppmv)as hexane. AP-42 recommends these values of Lo and k for municipal solid waste
(MSW) landfills that are located in geographical regions that receive average or above average
annual precipitation, such as Aulander,North Carolina.
To calculate landfill emissions,the refuse filling history was input to the LandGEM. Note that
this model estimates emissions based on the amount of waste in place at the beginning of each
year. Waste in place at the beginning of 2013 was approximately 7.77 million Mg, or 8.56
million tons. The LandGEM estimated that the methane generation rate for 2013 was
approximately 22.97 million cubic meters,or approximately 811.2 million cubic feet. Assuming
that the methane contgpKm the LFG is 50 percent, the volume of LFG generated in 2013 is
estimated to be 3,087 cubic feet per minute(W/min).
LandGEM input and output are provided on page 1 of the spreadsheets included with this
submittal as Attachment B.
Non-Methane Organic Compound ( NMOC) Emissions
NMOC generation from the Landfill was calculated using LandGEM. Model parameters were
similar to the values noted above. LandGEM estimated that the NMOC generation rate for 2013
is 97.99 Mg,or 108.01 tons(See page 2 of the spreadsheets provided in the detailed calculations
attachment). The Landfill operates a gas collection and control system(GCCS)to capture LFG
and route it to a control flare. Seventy five percent of the LFG is assumed to be captured;
therefore,twenty five percent of the NMOC generated is assumed to have been emitted as
fugitive. Thus, the fugitive NMOC emission rate for 2013 is 27.00 tons.
2

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions
In determining the VOC emissions from the landfill, VOC generation is assumed to be 39
percent of the NMOC generation. This assumption is based on information contained in AP-42
Section 2.4(revised November 1998)Table 2.4-2.
VOC emissions were based on the historical tonnages and model parameters noted above. The
LFG and NMOC generation rates were extracted from the LandGEM output and represent the
emissions from the Landfill during 2013. The VOC generation rates were calculated by
converting the NMOC generation rates(shown in the LandGEM output) from Mg/yr to tons/yr,
and then multiplying by 0.39(i.e.,,V6C is considered as 39 percent of NMOC). The VOC
generation rate for 2013 is 42.12 tons/yr. The fugitive VOC emission rate is determined in the
same manner as the fugitive emissions rate for NMOC reflecting the operation of the GCCS
during the period. The fugitive VOC emission rate for 2013 is 10.53 tons, as shown in Table 2
below.
Table 2. Air Pollutant Generation and Emission Rates
NMOC NMCC • • VOC Fugitive HAP Fugitive
Year Generation Generation Emissions Generation' Emissions' Emissions
2013 V 97.99 / 108.01 ✓ 27.00 42.12 10.53 3.25
Notes:
VOC generation is assumed to be 39 percent of NMOC generation.
Hazardous Air Pollutant ( HAP) Emissions
The estimation of HAP emissions from the Landfill is based on equations(3)and(4)of AP-42
Section 2.4. Those equations are presented below. The first step is to estimate the generation
rate of each pollutant in cubic meters per year(m3/yr). Next, the volumetric generation rate
estimate is converted to a mass generation rate(ton/yr).
3
m =2.0 x CP
QP yr QCh4 106
where:
QP = Pollutant generation rate(m3/yr)
QCh4 = Methane generation rate(m3/yr) from the LandGEM
Cp = Pollutant concentration in LFG (ppmv)
2.0 = Multiplication factor(assumes LFG is 50 percent methane, and the
balance is carbon dioxide,nitrogen, oxygen and other trace gases)
3

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
M p(tons/yr)= Qp ((MW,(glgmol))(Iatm)) ton
3ll 1907.185 k
C�8.205x10_Slrm —atm110009)
�273+TK� I g
1I\gmol—Kkg JJ
where:
MP = Pollutant mass generation rate
MWP = Molecular weight of pollutant(g/gmole)
T = Temperature of LFG(IC)(Standard temp of 25 degrees Celsius)
Of the 188 chemical compounds identified as HAPs under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act,28
of these compounds are listed in AP-42 Table 2.4-1 and 2.4-2. Site-specific data from testing
performed by Research Triangle Park Laboratories was used to determine the concentration of
these compounds. This report is dated May, 5,2005 and was submitted as part or the
Compliance Demonstration Report dated June 3,2005. These site specific concentrations are
shown on page 4 of the spreadsheets in the detailed emissions attachment. Annual emissions of
the remaining HAP compounds(i.e.,those not included in the AP-42 tables)are assumed to be
negligible. The HAP fugitive rate for 2013 was calculated to be 3.25 tons.
4

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
SECTION 3 LANDFILL GAS FLARE
Flare Emissions
The landfill operates two (2) flares, each with a design capacity of 3,000 scfm, as a landfill gas
control devices. The emission factors and annual emissions associated with each flare (permitted
as CD-Flarel and CD-Flare2) are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. LFG Flare Emissions Data
Flare Emissions
Compound LFG Flare Emission Factors (tPY)
2013 LFG
NOx 0.068 Ib/MMBtu ' 11.84 13.14
CO 0.37lb/MMBtu ' 64.40 71.49
NMOC 99.2 % destruction•2 0.36 0.40
VOC3 99.2 %destruction•2 0.14 0.16
99.8 % destruction for halogenated HAP species2
HAPs 99.7%for non-halogenated HAP species 2 1.39 1.55
0%for mercury species 2
PM10 17 Ib/106 ft3 methane4 2.90 3.22
S02 H25 concentration: 35.5 ppmv5 1.86 2.06
Notes:
' Emission factor obtained from AP-42,Table 13.5-1.
2 Control efficiency obtained from AP-42,Table 2.4-3.
3 VOC generation is estimated to be 39 percent of the NMOC generation per Table 2.4-2
of AP-42 Section 2.4 "Municipal Solid Waste Landfills," revised 1 1/98. These estimates
assume a 75%LFG collection efficiency for the active landfill gas collection system.
4 Control efficiency obtained from AP-42,Table 2.4-5.
5 502 emissions are calculated per AP-42,Section 2.4.4;
5

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
SECTION 4 INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES
Diesel Engines for Miscellaneous Landfill Support (IES-04)
Emissions from the Landfill's diesel engines for miscellaneous support are"carried forward"as
allowed in the Division's AERO reporting and are therefore identical to the previous reporting
period. As reported in for CY2012, emissions are provided in Table 5:
Table 4. Diesel Engines Emissions Data
2013 Diesel Engine (IES-04) Emissions
Compound (tpy)
(Carried Forward from CY201 2)
NOx 6.84
CO 1.47
PM 0.05
VOC3 0.55
SO2 0.45
HAPs/TAPS 4.28E-02
Welding Operations (IES-05)
The Landfill's permit also includes an insignificant activity listing for"Welding Operations"
with the emission source ID IES-05. Emissions from the Landfill's welding operations are
"carried forward"as allowed in the Division's AERO reporting and are therefore identical to the
previous reporting period. As reported in 2012, emissions of Manganese total 101 pounds as
reported for calendar year 2013. This is reported as HAPs/TAPs of 5.05E-02 tons per year for
the welding operations.
Diesel Storage Tank (IES-06)
Calendar Year 2013 emissions were calculated using EPA's Tank software. According to the
program 0.00231 tons per year of VOCs were emitted. NMOC emissions are conservatively
estimated to be equal to VOC emissions.
6

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
Leachafe Storage Tanks (IES-07)
The Landfill operates two (2) leachate storage tanks to store collected leachate and condensate
from the Landfill prior to disposal at an offsite wastewater treatment system. The throughput of
leachate in 2013 was 4,260,115 gallons.
Table 5. Leachate Emissions Data
Parameter 2013
Leachate Throughput 4,260,1 15 gallons
Calculated emissions (VOC) 19.46 Ibs
Detailed emission calculations are provided in the attachment.
7

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
ATTACHMENT A
2013 ANNUAL EMISSIONS STATEMENT

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
Inventory Certification Form(Title V)
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2013
These forms must be compacted and returned even if the facility did not operate or emissions were zero
The legally defined "Responsible Official" of record for your facility is Drew Isenhour
This person or one that meets the definition below must sign this certification form.
The official submitting the information must certify that he/she complies with the requirements as specified in Title 15A
NCAC 2Q.0520(b)which references and follows the federal definition.40 CFR Part 70.2 defines a responsible as meaning one
of the following:
1.For a corporation: a president,secretary,treasurer,or vice—president of the corporation in charge of a principal
business function,or any other person who performs similar policy or decision making functions for the overall
operation of one or more manufacturing,production,or operating facilities applying for a or subject to a permit and
either
i. the facilities employ more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding$25
million(in second quarter 1980 dollars);or
ii.the delegation of authority to such representatives is approved in advance by the permitting authority;
2.For partnership or sole propietorship;a general partner or the proprietor,respectively;
3. for a muncipality,state,federal,or other public agency includes the chief executive officer having responsibility for the
overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency(e.g.,a Regional Administrator of EPA).
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT7
(Important7 Legally Responsible Official,read and sign after all submis5iQns are final.)
certify that I am the responsible official for this facility, as described above,and hereby certify that the information contained
in this air emissions report,including attached calculations and documentation,is true,accurate and complete.(Subject to legal
enalities of up to$25,000 per occurrence and possible imprisonment as outlined in G.S.§143-215.3(a)(2))
Responsible Official's Signature Below use blue ink): Date Signed:
Printed Name: ew Isenh`��/�
Si gnat
This form applies to Title V facilities. If this facility is not classified as Title V,please telephone your regional office Emission
Inventory contact at once for proper forms.
Email address of Responsible Official: [e-mail]
Information on this Form cannot be held confidential
COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20 1

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID :0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Listing of Emission Sources and Control Devices on Permit. See instructions
ES ID on DES Description 'CS ID GCS Description ' CD ID's
Air
Permit
Municipal solid waste landfill Flare,One landfill gas—fired open
ES-01 [NSPS,MACT] CS-1,CS-4 flare(3000 scfrn maximum flow rate) CD—Flare I, CD—Flare2
[CISWI],
IES-04 Diesel engines for
miscellaneous landfill support
IES-05 Welding operations
IES-06 Diesel storage tank
IES-07 One leachate storage tank
2

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landoll Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County: Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Emission Source & Operating Scenario List— See Instructions
ES Group ID ES ID OS ID OS Description
1 Municipal solid waste landfill
ES-01 8 CD—Flare 1
9 CD—Flare 2
IES-04 4 No. 2 fuel oil—diesel engines for
miscellaneous landfill support
IES-05 3 maintenance shop welding rods
IES-06 6 diesel storage tank
IES-07 2 temporary storage of collected
leachate
3

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County: Bertie
DAQ Region :WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2013
1. Emission Source ID(from permit)or �ES-01
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS,MACT]
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: OS— 1/Municipal solid waste landfill
4. SCC Number/Description: 50100402/Landfill Dump ; Fugitive Emissions
5. Throughput/units in 2013: 405761200 FT3/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) ro
Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
9. Emission Release Point i ERPI Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow Rate ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) (Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK
4

Operating Scenario: OS— 1 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10.Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2013)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
an—Feb +Dec 250/ arch—May 25"�o une—Aug. 25"�o ept.—Nov. 25%
013 013 �013 �013
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emission
Emissions— Estimation Control
GHG CAS GHG Method Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2013
Emission
Criteria Emissions— Estimation Control
Pollutant Criteria Method EfficiencyEmission
Po�QS Code Pollutants Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
Pollutantss
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2013
CO CO 0 08
NOx NOx 0 08
TSP TSP 0 08
P.N110 PM10 0 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 0 08
S02 S02 0 08
VOC VOC 10.53 08
Emission
CAS Emissions Estimation Control
HAP/TAP Method Efficiency Emission(see HAP/TAPS y EF Control
Pollutants (In Alphabetical Order) instructions) (Pounds/Year) Code (Net after all Factor
(See controls)
Instructions
2013
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 1.97 08
Benzene 71-43-2 78.46 08
CFC-12 ichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 218.78 08
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 25.17 08
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.11 08
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11.36 08
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 26.4 08
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.59 08
Dichlorobenzene 14— 106-46-7 244.11 08
5

Eth lbenzene 100-41-4 744.77 08
Ethyl chloride chloroethane 75-00-3 15.93 08
Ethyl merca tan 75-08-1 87.06 08
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 8.93 08
Ethylene dichloride 1 2—dichloroethane 107-06-2 12.27 08
Ethylidene dichloride 75-34-3 75.78 08
1 1—dichloroethane
Hexane n— 110-54-3 206.97 08
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 830.35 08
Mercury,vapor(Component
of HGC 7439-97-6 0.06 08
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 12.99 08
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 23.16 08
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 786.67 08
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 77.63 08
Methyl merca tan 74-93-1 64.23 08
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 297.99 08
Perchloroeth lene tetrachloroeth lene 127-18-4 204.44 08
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 2.69 08
Tetrachloroethane 1 1 2 2— 79-34-5 12.14 08
Toluene 108-88-3 2418.67 08
Trichloroeth lene 79-01-6 92.47 08
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 69.56 08
Vin lidene chloride 75-35-4 9.22 08
X lene 1330-20-7 1819.09 08
6

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County: Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2013
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or ES-01
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS,MACT]
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: VOS—8/CD—Flare 1
4. SCC Number/Description: 5030060 1/Landfill Dump ;Waste Gas Flares
5. Throughput/units in 2013: 696236727 FT3/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) ro
Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control 100
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
I CS-1 CD—FlareI One landfill as—fired open flare 3000 scfm maximum flow rate
9. Emission Release Point ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional ntry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
Flare VERTICAL STACK 35 1 1200 28.09 1324 PlarC
7

Operating Scenario: OS—8 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10.Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2013)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
an—Feb +Dec 250�o 25"�u une—Aug. 25"�u ept.—Nov. u
�013 �arch—May
13 �013 �013 25/o
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emission
Emissions— Estimation Control
GHG CAS GHG Method Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2013
Emission
Criteria Emissions— Estimation Control
Pollutant Criteria Method Efficiency Emission
(NAA Code Pollutants Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
Pollutants
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2013
CO CO 64.4 08 0
NOx NOx 11.84 08 0
TSP TSP 2.9 08 0
PM10 PM10 2.9 08 0
PM2.5 PM2.5 2.9 08 0
S02 S02 1.86 08 0
VOC VOC 0.14 08 0.98 AFTER
Emission
CAS Emissions Estimation Control
HAP/TAP Method Efficiency Emission
Pollutants (In Alphabetical Order) (see HAP/TAPS Code (Net after all Factor EF Control
instructions) (Pounds/Year)
(See controls)
Instructions
2013
Acr lonitrile 107-13-1 0.01 08 98
Benzene 71-43-2 0.4 08 98
CFC-12 ichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 7.51 08 98
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 0.13 08 98
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.04 08 98
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 0.06 08 98
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.91 08 98
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.089 08 98
Dichlorobenzene 14— 106-46-7 8.38 08 98
8

Eth lbenzene 100-41-4 3.83 08 98
Ethyl chloride chloroethane 75-00-3 0.55 08 98
Ethyl merca tan 75-08-1 0.45 08 98
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 0.31 08 98
Ethylene dichloride 1 2—dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.42 08 98
Ethylidene dichloride 75-34-3 2.6 08 98
1 1—dichloroethane
Hexane n— 110-54-3 1.07 08 98
Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 2720.23 08 98
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 4.28 08 98
Mercury,vapor(Component of HGC 7439-97-6 0.1 08 98
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.45 08 98
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 0.8 08 98
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 4.05 08 98
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.4 08 98
Methyl merca tan 74-93-1 1 0.33 08 98
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 10.23 08 98
Perchloroeth lene tetrachloroeth lene 127-18-4 7.02 08 98
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.09 08 98
Tetrachloroethane 1 1 2 2— 79-34-5 0.42 08 98
Toluene 108-88-3 12.45 08 98
Trichloroeth lene 79-01-6 3.17 08 98
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 2.39 08 98
Vin lidene chloride 75-35-4 0.32 08 98
X lene 1330-20-7 9.37 08 98
9

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County: Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2013
1. Emission Source ID(from permit)or ES-01
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS,MACT]
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: OS—9/CD—Flare 2
4. SCC Number/Description: 5030060 1/Landfill Dump ; Waste Gas Flares
5. Throughputlunits in 2013: /772916503 FT3/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) ro
Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control 100
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
1 CS-4 CD—Flare2 One landfill as—fired open flare 3000 scfm maximum flow rate CISWI
9.Emission Release Point ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional ntry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
Flare2 VERTICAL STACK 40 1.17 1200 22.78 1470 Flare 2
10

Operating Scenario: OS —9 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10.Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2013)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
an—Feb +Dec 250o —May 25% une—Aug. 250�o ept.—Nov.
�013 �arch
13 013 �013
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emission
Emissions— Estimation Control
GHG CAS GHG Method Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2013
Emission
Criteria Emissions— Estimation Control
Pollutant Criteria Method Efficiency Emission
Po�QS Code Pollutants Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
Pollutantss
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2013
CO CO 71.49 08 0
NOx NOx 13.14 08 0
TSP TSP 3.22 08 0
PM10 PM10 3.22 08 1 0
PM2.5 PM2.5 3.22 08 0
S02 S02 2.06 08 0
VOC VOC 0.16 08 0.98 AFTER
Emission
CAS Emissions Estimation Control
HAP/TAP Emission
(see HAPl1'APS Method Efficiency EF Control
Pollutants (In Alphabetical Order) Code (Net after all Factor
instructions) (Pounds/Year) (See controls)
Instructions
2013
Acr lonitrile 107-13-1 0.01 08 98
Benzene 71-43-2 0.45 08 98
CFC-12 ichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 8.34 08 98
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 0.14 08 98
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.04 08 98
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 0.06 08 98
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 1.01 08 98
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.1 08 98
Dichlorobenzene 14— 106-46-7 9.3 08 98
11

Eth (benzene 100-41-4 4.26 08 98
Ethyl chloride chloroethane 75-00-3 0.61 08 98
Ethyl merca tan 75-08-1 0.5 08 98
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 0.34 08 98
Ethylene dichloride 1 2—dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.47 08 98
Ethylidene dichloride 75-34-3 2.89 08 98
1 1—dichloroethane
Hexane n— 110-54-3 1.18 08 98
Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 3019.82 08 98
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 4.75 08 98
Mercury,vapor(Component of HGC 7439-97-6 0.12 08 98
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.5 08 98
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 0.88 08 98
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 4.5 08 98
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.44 08 98
Methyl merca tan 74-93-1 0.37 08 98
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 11.36 08 98
Perchloroeth lene tetrachloroeth lene 127-18-4 7.79 08 98
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.1 08 98
Tetrachloroethane 1 1 2 2— 79-34-5 0.46 08 98
Toluene 108-88-3 13.83 08 98
Trichloroeth lene 79-01-6 3.52 08 98
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 2.65 08 98
Vin lidene chloride 75-35-4 0.35 08 98
X lene 1330-20-7 10.4 08 98
12

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region :WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2013
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or VIES-04
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Diesel engines for miscellaneous landfill support
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: ✓OS—4/No. 2 fuel oil—diesel engines for miscellaneous landfill support
4. SCC Number/Description: 2020040I/Diesel ;Diesel
5. Throughput/units in 2013: 60000 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) ro
Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed in permit)
9. Emission Release Point ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
RP—DIESEL FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 miscellaneous diesel
STACK) engines
13

Operating Scenario: OS—4 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-04
10.Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2013)
Hours per Day ( 10 ) Days per Week ( 6 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start&End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throu hut:
an—Feb +Dec o arch—May ° une—Aug. 25% �ept.—Nov. °
013 25/O 013 25 %° 013 013
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions— Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) See Instructions all controls
2013
Criteria Emissions— Emission Control
Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency
Emission
(NAA Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
Pollutants (Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2013
CO CO 1.47 08
NOx NOx 6.84 08
TSP TSP 0.05 08
PM10 PM10 0.05 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 0.05 08
S02 S02 0.45 08
VOC VOC 0.55 08
HAP/TAP Emissions Emission Control
CAS Estimation Efficiency Emission
Pollutants (in HAP/TAPS EF Control
Alphabetical Order)
(see instructions) (Pounds/Year) Method Code (Net after all Factor
See Instructions) controls)
2013
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.4 08
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.3 08
Benzene 71-43-2 2.9 08
Butadiene 13— 106-99-0 0.1 08
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.6 08
Polycyclic Organic
Matter(Inc PAH,
dioxins,etc.NC AP 42 POAI 74.1 08
historic amorphous
lob
Toluene 108-88-3 1.3 08
X lene 1330-20-7 0.9 08
14

15

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County: Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2013
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or vds-05
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Welding operations
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: A—3/maintenance shop welding rods
4. SCC Number/Description: 30900500/Metal Work—Welding; General
5. Throughputtunits in 2013: 1/5000 LB/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) ro
Sulfur °; AWh Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
9. Emission Release Point i ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow Rate ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) (Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK
16

Operating Scenario: OS—3 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-05
10.Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2013)
Hours per Day ( 1 ) Days per Week ( 5 ) Weeks per Year ( 50 )
11.Typical Start&End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 900 End: 1000
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
an—Feb +Dec ° ° une—Aug. ° Sept.—Nov. °
013 25/0 �arch—May
13 25/0 �013 25%O 2013 25/o
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions— Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
Tons/Year See Instructions all controls
2013
Criteria Emissions— Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2013
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 08
HAP/TAP Emissions Emission Control CAS Estimation Efficiency
Emission
Pollutants Alphabetical (see instructions) HAHAP/TAPSMethod Code (Net after all Factor EF Control
Order) (Pounds/Year)
See Instructions controls)
2013
Manganese Unlisted
Compounds(Specify MNC—Other 101 08
Component of MNC
17

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County: Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2013
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or v/IES-06
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Diesel storage tank
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: ✓OS—6/diesel storage tank
4. SCC Number/Description: 39090004/Fuel Storage—Fixed Roof Tanks;Distillate Oil(No. 2): Working
Loss
5. Throughputtunits in 2013: /184908 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) ro
Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
9. Emission Release Point i ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow Rate ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter ft (F) (Feet/see) (Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
F—I FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= I fugitive
STACK
18

Operating Scenario: OS—6 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-06
10.Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2013)
Hours per Day ( 10 ) Days per Week ( 6 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start&End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 600 End: 1600
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Thronghput:
�an—Feb +Dec y arch—Ma une—Aug. o ept.—Nov. o
013 25% 013 25% 013 25/0 �013 25/o
13. Actual Emissions ner Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions— Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
Tons/Year See Instructions all controls
2013
Criteria Emissions— Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2013
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 0 08
HAP/TAP CAS Emissions Emission Estimation Control Emission
Pollutants (In HAP/TAPS Efficiency EF Control
(see instructions) Method Code
Alphabetical Order) (Pounds/Yeaz) (Net after all controls) Factor
See Instructions
2013
19

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region :WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2013
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or, -07
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: One leachate storage tank
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: AS—2/temporary storage of collected leachate
4. SCC Number/Description: 40714698/Fixed Roof Tanks—Miscellaneous ; Specify In Comments: Working
Loss
5. Throughput/units in 2013: 1/4�60115 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (if fuel is used) ro
Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
9. Emission Release Point i ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow Rate ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) (Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK
20

Operating Scenario: OS—2 Emission Source/Group ID: IES-07
10.Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2013)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11.Typical Start&End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throughput:
an—Feb +Dec 250/o 25"�o uneAug. 25% ept.—Nov. 25%
013 �arch—May
13 �013_
�013
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions— Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
Tons/Year See Instructions all controls
2013
Criteria Emissions— Emission Control
Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficient Emission
Po�QS Code Pollutants Method Code y Ef Control
Pollutantss (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2013
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 0.01 08
HAP/TAP Emissions Emission Control
Pollutants (In Alphabetical CAS HAP/TAPS Estimation Efficiency Emission EFControl
Order) (see instructions) (Pounds/Year) Method Code (Net after all Factor
See Instructions controls)
2013
Benzene 71-43-2 0.18 08
Eth 1 benzene 100-41-4 0.21 08
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 10.66 08
Meths l isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.18 08
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.09 08
Toluene 108-88-3 0.57 08
X lene 1330-20-7 0.46 08
21

Facility Total CY 2013 Emissions Summary
COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory-Calendar Year 2013
Record Facility-Wide Totals From all Permitted and Non-Permitted Air Pollutant Emission Sources
Green House Gases Pollutants(GHG)
Actual Emissions Tons/Year
Pollutant CAS 1 2013 1 2012 % Change
Criteria Pollutants
Actual Emissions Tons/Year
Pollutant CAS 2013 2012 % Change
CO CO 137.36 128.09 7.2371025%
NOx NOx 31.82 30.19 5.3991356%
PM TSP TSP 6.17 5.84 5.6506834%
PM10 PM10 6.17 5.84 5.6506834%
PM2.5 PM2.5 6.17 5.84 5.6506834%
S02 S02 4.37 4.12 6.067961%
VOC VOC 11.39 10.81 5.3654013%
Hazardous Air Pollutants HAPS and/or Toxic Air Pollutants TAPS
Actual Emissions Pounds/Year
Pollutant I CAS 2013 2012 "/, Change
Pollutant Grou :Man anese compounds Group Sum:101
Manganese Unlisted Compounds(Specify MNC-Other 101.0 101 0.0%
Component of MNC
Pollutant Grou :Mercu Compounds-all total mass inc Hg Vapor Group Sum:.28
Mercury,vapor(Component of HGC 7439-97-6 1 0.28 1 .26 7.692312%
Pollutant Grou :Total Reduced Sulfur TRS as total mass Gr up Sum:904.31
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 839.38 1195.40003 -29.7825%
Methyl merca tan 74-93-1 64.93 118.36 -45.14194%
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.4 2.4 0.0%
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.3 .3 0.0%
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 1.99 .03001 6531.123%
Benzene 71-43-2 82.39 5.73 1337.8707%
Butadiene 1 3- 106-99-0 0.1 1 .1 0.0%
CFC-12 Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 234.63 335.6 -30.096412%
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 25.44 .02 127100.0%
22

Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.19 5.05 -76.43564%
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 11.48 29.09 -60.536266%
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 28.32 .02 141500.0%
Chloroform 67-66-3 2.779 .04 6847.5%
Dichlorobenzene 14- 106-46-7 261.79 .04001 654211.44%
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 753.07 .22001 342189.0%
Ethyl chloride chloroethane 75-00-3 17.09 .01 170800.0%
Ethyl merca tan 75-08-1 88.01 139.97 -37.122242%
Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 9.58 Not reported N/A
Ethylene dichloride 1 2-dichloroethane 107-06-2 13.16 .03001 43752.05%
Ethylidene dichloride 75-34-3 81.27 3.50004 2221.9734%
1 1-dichloroethane
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.6 3.6 0.0%
Hexane n- 110-54-3 209.22 8.97002 2232.4363%
Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 5740.05 5292.48 8.456713%
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 13.94 .00001 1.39399904E8%
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 24.84 .04001 61984.477%
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 805.88 193.72002 316.00244%
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 78.65 .16001 49053.18%
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 319.67 .08023 398342.0%
Perchloroeth lene tetrachloroeth lene 127-18-4 219.25 5.74012 3719.6067%
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Inc PAH,
dioxins,etc.NC AP 42 historic amorphous POM 74.1 74.1 0.0%
lob
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 2.88 .03 9500.0%
Tetrachloroethane 1 1 2 2- 79-34-5 13.02 .03004 43242.215%
Toluene 108-88-3 2446.82 9.1201 26728.873%
Trichloroeth lene 79-01-6 99.16 .03007 329663.9%
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 74.6 26.06009 186.26147%
Vin lidene chloride 75-35-4 9.89 .02 49350.0%
X lene 1330-20-7 1840.22 4.66004 39389.363%
23

COPY of RECORD Date Submitted: 6/4/2014 14:25:20
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region :WARO
Comments From Facility:
6/2/2014—Control Device Comments
CD CD—Flare2 : The Flare identified as CD-2 in the AERO reporting system is incorrectly labeled as CISWI applicable.
24

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
ATTACHMENT B
DETAILED EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS

i
SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of 4
CI [ENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Fugitive Landfill Emissions M.VanDussen 5/8/2014
CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
OBJECTIVE:Calculate Fugitive Landfill Emissions.
IAPPROACH:Use USEPA's Landfill Gas Emissions Model(LandGEM)and AP42 equations and emission factors.
SOLUTION:
I (1) Methane and LFG Generation*
*As calculated by LandGEM(See Section 2 of 2013 Emission Inventory Report)
Estimated LFG Generation/Emission Rates
IMethane LFG LFG
Disposal Refuse Disposal Refuse Generation Generation Fugitive
Rate In-Place Rate In-Place Rates Rates Rates
Year (tons/r) (tons) (Mg/vr) (M ) (m�hr) (cfm) (cfm)
2012 575,739 985363 522,301 74244,200 22173E+07 2 920 730
2013 567,422 8,561,102 514,757 7,766,501 2.297E+07 3,087 772
IESTIMATED NMOC CONCENTRATION IN LFG: 595 ppmv
ASSUMED METHANE CONTENT OF LFG: 50%
ASSUMED COLLECTION EFFICIENCY OF LEG SYSTEM: 75%
SELECTED DECAY RATE CONSTANT: 0.04
SELECTED ULTIMATE METHANE RECOVERY RATE: 3,203.7 cu ft/ton
METRIC EQUIVALENT: 100 cu m/Mg
Conversions: 35.314667 cu ft per cu in
1.1023113 ton per Mg
32.037 cu ft/ton per cu m/Mg
I
I
I

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 2 of 4
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Fugitive Landfill Emissions M.VanDussen 5/8/2014
CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
(2) NMOC and VOC Emissions*
*As calculated by LandGEM(See Section 2 of 2013 Emission Inventory Report)
NMOC and VOC Generation/Emission Rates
NMOC NMOC NMOC VOC VOC VOC
Generation Generation Surface Fugitive Generation Generation Surface Fugitive
Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates
Year (tons/ r) (M vr) (tonsh�r) (tonsAr) (Mg vr) (tons/vr)
2012 102.19 92.71 25.55 39.86 36.16 9.96
2013 108.01 97.99 27.00 42.12 38.21 10.53
ESTIMATED NMOC CONCENTRATION IN LFG: 595 ppmv
ASSUMED METHANE CONTENT OF LFG: 50%
AP442 DEFAULT(11/98)VOC CONTENT OF NMOC: 39%
ASSUMED COLLECTION EFFICIENCY OF LFG SYSTEM: 75%
SELECTED DECAY RATE CONSTANT: 0.04
SELECTED ULTIMATE METHANE RECOVERY RATE: 3,203.7 cu ft/ton
METRIC EQUIVALENT: 100 cu m/Mg
Conversions: 35.314667 cu ft per cu in
1.1023113 ton per Mg
32.037 cu ft/ton per cu m/Mg

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 3 of 4
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Fugitive Landfill Emissions M.VanDussen 5/8/2014
CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
(3) Hazardous Air Pollutant(HAPs) Emissions
Methane production= 22,969,881 m'/yr� (As caculated by LandGEM,see"Estimated LFG Generation/Emission
Methane content of LFG= 50% Rates"table on page 1.)
Assumed Collection efficiency= 75%
Fugitive LFG production=(22,969,881 m3/0.5)*(1-0.75)= 11,484,941 m'/yr
Example
l,l,l-trichloroethane Molecular weight= 133.41 g/gmol
Concentration= 0.168 ppmv Waste Industry Air Coalition(WIAC);2001
QI,I,Itrichbemhene=(11,484,941 m'/yr)*(0.168 ppmv/1 E+06)= 1.929 m'/yr
UMI J Jancwnmehsne=(1.929 m'/yr)*[(133.41 g/gmol*I arm)/(8.205E-5 m'-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]
UM .rcmboen"n = 10.528 kg/yr
UM1,1,1,,r&.h._(10.528 kg/yr)*(2.2Ib/kg)= 23.161 lb/yr 1,1,1-trichloroethane
UM1,1j hb�=(23.161 Ib/yr)/(2,000lb/ton)= 1.16E-02 too/yr l,l,l-trichloroethane

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 4 of 4
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Invento 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Fugitive Landfill Emissions M.VanDussen 5/8/2014
CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/14/2014
(3)HAP Emissions,continued
2013 Methane Generation(m3/yr)= 22,969,881 s S o'10 of LFE1 tZ en
2013 LFG Generation(m3/yr)= 45,939,762
2013 LFG Fugitive Production(m3/yr)= 11,484,941 =-A G 67a LFEI Cq A n
Landfill Gas Temperature 0C)t= 25
Pollutant Mol.Wt. Conc.4 Q(p)5 UM s FM
of my (m3/yr) k r Ib/ r ton/ r) lbs/ r ton/ r
1,1,1-trichloroethane TAP.HAP 133AI 0.168 1.93 10.53 23.16 0.01 23.16 0.01
1,1,2,2-teirachloroethane TAP,HAP 167.85 0.070 0.80 5.52 12.14 0.01 12.14 0.01
1,1-dichloroethane TAP,"AP 98.97 0.741 8.51 34.45 75.78 0.04 ✓ 75.78 0.04
1,1-dichloroetheneTAKHAP 96.94 0.092 1.06 4.19 9.22 0.00 9.22 0.00
1,2-dichloroethanet AP,HAP 98.96 0.120 1.38 5.58 12.27 0.01 12.21 0.01
1,2-dichloro ro ane"AP 112.99 0.023 0.26 1.22 2.69 0.00 2.64 0.00
acrylonitrileTAP.HAP 53.06 0.0361 0.41 0.90 1.97 0.00 1.91 0.00
benzene TAP.HAP 78.11 0.972 11.16 35.66 78.46 0.04 78.46 0.04
carbon disulfide TAP'RAP 76.13 0.320 3.68 11.44 25.17 0.01 25.17 0.01
carbon tetrachloride TAP,HAP 153.84 0.007 0.08 0.51 1.11 0.00 ✓ 1.11 0.00
carbonyl sulfide HAP 60.07 .18 2.10 5.16 11.36 0.01 ✓ 11.36 0.01
chlorobenzene TAP,HAP 112.56 0.227 2.61 12.00 26.40 0.01 26.40 0.01
chloroethane TAP.HAP 64.52 0.239 2.74 7.24 15.931 0.01 15.93 0.01
chloroform TAP"" 119.39 0.021 0.24 1.18 2.59 0.00 V 2.59 0.00
chloromethane TAP,HAP 50.49 0.249 2.86 5.91 12.99 0.01 12.99 0.01
dichlorobenzene TAP,HAP 147.00 L607 18.46 110.96 244.11 0.12 244.11 0.12
dichlorodifluoromethaneTAP 120.91 .751 20.11 99.44 218.78 0.11 -218.78 -0.11
dichloromethane TAP,HAP 84.94 3.395 38.99 135.45 297.99 0.15 297.94 0.15
ethyl merca tan TAP 62.13 1.356 15.57 39.57 87.06 0.04 -- 87.06 0.04
eth lbenzeneHAP 106.16 6.789 77.97 338.53 744.77 0.37 744.77 0.37
ethylene dibromide TAP,HAP 187.88 0.046 0.53 4.06 8.93 0.00 8.93 0.00
hexane TAP,HAP 86.18 2.324 26.69 94.08 206.97 0.10 206.91 0.10
hydrogen sulfide TAP 34.08 .5781 270.79 377.43 830.35 0.42 --0:42
mercury and compounds TAP,HAP 200.61 -3i'. 0.00029 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.6 0.00
methyl ethyl ketone TAP 72.11 10.557 121.25 357.58 786.67 0.39 -786.67 -0.39
methyl isobutyl ketone TAP,HAP 100.16 0.750 8.61 35.28 77.63 0.04 77.63 0.04
methyl merca tan TAP 48.11 Q.29 14.84 29.20 64.23 0.03 64.23 093
erchloroeth lene TAP.HAP 165.83 1.193 13.70 92.93 204.44 0.10 264.44 0.10
toluene TAP.HAP 92.13 25.405 291.77 1099.40 2418.67 1.21 2418.67 1.21
trichloroeth leneTAP,HAP 131.40 0.681 7.82 42.03 92.471 0.05 92.471 0..05
vinyl chloride TAP.HAP 62.501 1.077 12.37 31.62 69.561 0.03 69.56 0.03
Xylenes TAP,HAP 106.161 16.582 190.441 826.86 1819.091 0.91 1819.091 0.91
Total HAPs Only 727.201 2,952.701 6,495.951 3.251 6,495.951 3.25
oz 3
Notes:
I.The landfill gas temperature was obtained from AP42 Page 2.4-5.
2. The AP42 Section 2.4 default for Flare Destruction Efficiency was assumed.
3. Generation rate calculated in 2009.
4. Pollutant concentrations Waste Industry Coalition(WIAC-2001)
5. Q(p)=Volumetric emission rate of the pollutant. AP-42 Section 2.4 equation(3).
6. UM(p)=Uncontrolled mass emissions of pollutant. If no collection exists,this is also equal to the fugitive emission rate,FM(p)of the pollutant. AP42 equation(4).
TAP denotes compounds that are classified as toxic air pollutants per North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
HAP denotes compounds drat are classified as hazardous air pollutants per AP42 and CAA Section 112.

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare 1 Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, M.VanDussen 5/8/2014
NMOC,VOC,SOZ,Uncombusted HAPs,HCI CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
OBJECTIVE:Calculate flare emissions based on LFG consumption
LFG Consumption: 696,236,727 scf/yr(CY2013)
Heat Content: 500 Btu/scf(assumed at 50%CH4)
Calculated MMBTU: 348,118 MMBtu/yr(CY2013)
APPROACH:Use manufacturer data and AP42 equations and emission factors
SOLUTION:
(1)NOx Emissions
NO emission factor= 0.068// Ib/MMBtu (AP42,Table 13.5-1)
LFG consumed= 348,118 MMBtu/yr
CMNOx=(0.068 Ib/MMBtu)*(348,118 MMBtu/yr)= 23,672.0 Ib/ r NOx
CMNOx= (23,672.0 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 11.84 ton/yr NOx
(2)CO Emissions
CO emission factor= 0.37`/ Ib/MMBtu (AP42,Table 13.5-1)
LFG consumed= 348,118 MMBtu/yr
CMCO=(0.370 Ib/MMBtu)*(348,118 MMBtu/yr)= 128,803.8 IbJ r CO
CMCO= (128,803.8 Ib/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 64.40 ton/ r CO
(3)PM Emissions
PM emission factor= 17 ,/ lb/10'ft3 CH4 (AP42,Section 2.4,Table 2.4-5)
LFG consumed= 348,118 MMBtu/yr
HHV of natural gas= 1,020 Bm/ft3 (AP42,Section 3.2)
Equivalent amount of CH4 consumed=(348,118 MMBtu/yr)/(1,020 MMBtu/106 ft3)=341.29 x 1 O6 ft3 CH4
CMPM=(17 lb/million ft3 CH4)*(341.29 million 113 CH4) 5,802.0 Ib/ r PM
CMPM= (5,802.0 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 2.90 ton/ r PM

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 2 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Invent 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare I Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, M.VanDussen 5/8/2014
NMOC,VOC,S02,Uncombusted HAPs,HCl CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
(4)NMOC Emissions
-Use the default concentration of NMOC(as hexane)from AP-42 Table 2.4-2. The default NMOC concentration is 595 ppmv.
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(5)of AP-42,Section 2.4 to determine NMOC emissions.
Molecular weight of hexane= ✓86.18 g/gmol
LFG consumed= 348,118 MMBtu/yr
HHV of landfill gas= ✓500 Btu/ft3
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(348,118 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/million ft3)= 696.24 x106 ft3 LFG
Eqn(3)
QNMOC=(696.24 x 106 113)*(m3/35.3198 ft3)*(595 ppmv/106)= 11,729 m3/yr
Eqn(4)
UMNMOC=(11,729 m3/yr)*[(86.18 g/gmol* 1 atm)/(8.205E-5 m3-atm/gmol-K* 1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMNMOC= 41,339.7 kg
Eqn(5)
CMNMoc=[41,339.7 kg*(1 -NCO /100)]+41,339.7 kg*(NCO /100)*(1 -NCNi/100)]
NCOL= 100%since calc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
NCNr=99.2% Assume that the flare is capable of reducing NMOCs 99.2%by weight(AP-42 Table 2.4-3).
CMNMOC=41,339.7 kg*(1 - 100/100)]+41,339.7 kg*(100/100)*(1 -99.2/100)]= 330.72 kg
CMNMOC=(330.72 kg)*(2.2 lb/kg) = 727.6 Ib/yr NMOC
CMNMOC=(727.6 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 0.36 ton/yr NMOC
r5)VOC Emissions
Use Note"c"from Table 2.4-2. The default VOC content at non-co-disposal sites is 39%of NMOC by weight(235 ppmv as hexane).
CMvoc=727.6 lb/yr NMOC*0.39= 283.8 Ib/yr VOC
CMvoc=0.36 ton/yr NMOC*0.39= 0.14 ton/yr VOC

I
SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 3 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare 1 Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, M.VanDussen 5/72014
NMOC,VOC,SO2,Uncombusted HAPs,HCI CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
(6)SOZ Emissions
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(7)from AP-42 Section 2.4 to determine S02 emissions.
HZS concentration= V35.5 ppmv EPA AP-42 Chapter 2
Molecular weight of sulfur(S)_ VA2 g/gmol
Molecular weight of hydrogen sulfide g/gmol
HHV of landfill gas= X0 Btu/ft'
LFG consumed= 348,118 MMBtu/yr
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(348,118 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/MM ft3)= 696.24 x106 fe LFG
Eqn(3)
Qttzs= (696.24 x 106 ft`)*(mr/35.3198 ft')*(35.5 ppmv H2S/106)= 700 m'HZS
Qs=(700 m'HZS)*(32 g/gmol S/34 g/gmol HZS)= 659 m3 S
Eqn(4)
UMs=(659 m`)*[(32 g/gmol*I atm)/(8.205E-5 m'-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMs= 861.97 kg S
Eqn(7)
CMso2=861.97 kg S*(NCOL/I00)*2.0*(98%conversion efficiency of S to SO2)
NCoL=100%since calc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
CMso2=861.97 kg S*(100/100)*2.0*0.98= 1,689.47 kg/yr
CMso2=(1,689.47 kg)*(2.2 lb/kg)= r 3,7 66.82 Ib/yr SO,
CMso2=(3,716.82 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 1.86 ton/yr SOZ
(7) Hazardous Air Pollutant(HAPs)Emissions
-HAPs are calculated in a manner consistent with NMOCs,except that the concentration and molecular weight of the individual HAPs
are substituted into the equations. See Table 3 for a summary of flare HAP emissions.
Example Vi)01
1,1,1-trichloroethane Molecular weight=133.41 g/gmol d
Concentration=0.168 ppmv to Industry Air Coaliti
Qi,i,j.h,.e,h,._(696.24 x lob ft')*(m`/35.3198 ft)*(0.168 ppmv/106)= 3.3117 m'/yr
CMt,t,i. ,w.,ont n,_(0.0059 m-/yr)*[(133.41 g/gmol*I atm)/(8.205E-05 m"-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]
CMt,t,i-ukWuro ethane= 18.069 kg/yrl,l,l-trichloroethane
CMr,,,i-mld,,Oeeune=(0.032 kg/yr)*(2.2 lb/kg)*(ton/2,000 Ib)= 1.99E-02 ton 1,1,1-trichloroethane to flare
1,1,1-trichloroethane=CMt,t,-aMn o oaban<(tons/yr)*(I-NCM/100)
Ncrrr=98%destruction efficiency(AP42 Table 2.4-3)
I,I,I-trichloroethane=3.55E-05ton'yr*(I-(98100))= 398E-04 ton I.I,I-trichloroethane to atmosphere

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 4 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill IJOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Invent o 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare I Emission Calculations-NOx.CO,PM. M.VanDussen 5/4/2014
NMOC,VOC,SO,Uncombusted HAPs,HCI CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/14/2014
(7)HAP Emissions,continued
2013 LFG Consumption(MMBtu/yr)= 348,118
HHV of LFG(Btu/fta) -/500
2013 LFG Consumption(felyr)= 696,236,727
2013 LFG Consumption(m3/yr)= 19,712,363
Landfill Gas Temperature(aC)1= 15
Halogenated Destruction Eff.(%)z= 98.0%
Non-Halogenated Destruction Eff.(7)T= 99.7%
Mercury Compound Destruction Eff.(%)2= 0.0%
Pollutant Mot.Wl. C'onc., Q(P), UM( ), Flare
(u nnol) ( mc) (in yr) (k rvr) (lb vr) (lb vr ItoN r
L 1.1-trichlorocthane T°PH'%P 133.41 0.168 3.31 18.07 39.75 0.80 3.98E-04
1.12.2-tetmchloroethane TAP,HAP 167.85 0.070 1.38 9.47 20.84 0.42 2.08E-04
1.1-dichloroethane TAP.HAP 98.97 0.741 14.61 59.12 130.07 2.60 1.30E-03
IA-dichloroethene TAP.HAP 96.94 0.092 1.81 7.19 15.82 0.32 1.58E-04
1.2-dichloroethane TAP.HAP 98.96 0.120 2.37 9.57 21.06 0.42L2.92E-05
1.2-dichioro ro arse HAP 112.99 0.023 0.45 2.10 4.61 0.09
c IomtnIe T;1W 53.06 0.036 0.71 1.54 3.39 0.01
benune 78.11 0.972 19.16 61.21 134.66 0.40
carbon disulfide 76.13 0.320 6.31 19.64 43.21 0.13
carbon tetrachloride TAP'HAP 153.84 0.007 0.14 0.87 1.91 ✓ 0.04
carbonyl sulfide HAP 60.07 0.183 3.61 8.86 19.50 0.06
chlorobenzene ' 112.56 0.227 4.47 20.60 45.32 0.91 4.53E-04
hlomethane 64.52 0.239 4.71 12.43 27.35 V 0.55 2.74E-04
chloroform TAP.HAP 119.39 0.021 0.41 2.02*1278.303.83
.09 4.45E-05
chlommethane TAP.HAP 50.49 0.249 4.91 10.14 .45 2.23E-04
dichlombenzene TAP.HAP 147.00 1.607 31.68 190.45 .38 4.19E-03
dichlorodifiuoromethane TAP 120.91 1.751 34.52 170.68 .51 3.76E-03
dichlommethane TAP.HAP 84.94 3.395 66.92 232.49 .23 5.11E-03
ethyl merca tan TAP 62.13 1.356 26.73 67.92 .45 2.24E-04
eth (benzene HAP 106.16 6.789 133.83 581.05 .83 1.92E-03
ethylene dibromide TAP.HAP 187.88 0.046 0.91 6.97 15.33 V 0.31 1.53E-04
hexane TAP.HAP 86.18 2.324 45.81 161.47 355.23 V 1.07 5.33E-04
hydrogen chloride TAP.11AP7 35.45 42.0000 N/A N/A N/A 2,720.23 1.36E+00
hydrogen sulfide TAP 34.08 23.578 464.78 647.81 1,425.19 4.28 2.14E-03
mercury and compounds TAP.HAP 200.61 0.000292 0.01 0.05 0A 0 0.10 5.19E-05
meth lethyl ketone TAP 72,11 10.557 208.10 613.73 1350.21 V 4.05 2.03E-03
methyl isobutyl ketone TAP.HAP 100.16 0.750 14.78 60.561 133.24 V 0.40 2.00E-04
methyl merca tan TAP 48.11 1.2921 25.47 50.11 11025✓ 0.33 1.65E-04
rohloroeth lene TAP.MP 165.83 1.193 23.52 159.50 350.89✓ 7.02 3.51E-03
toluene TAP.HAP 92.13 25.405 500.79 1886.97 4151.33 12.45 6.23E-03
Irichlometh Iene TAP.ttAP 131.40 0.681 13.42 72.14 158.71 3.17 1.59E-03
ehtvl chloride TAP.HAP 62.50 1.077 21,23 54.27 119.39 V 239 1.19E-03
w erics TAP.H'P 106.16 I6.582 326.87 1419.19 3122.23 9.i7 4.68E-03
final HAP,(nI --- --- --- 5,067.92 11,149.43 2,786.221 1.39
Notes:
1.The landfill gas temperature was obtained from AP42 Page 2.4-5.
2.The AP42 Section 2.4 default for Flare Destruction Efficiency was assumed.
3.Average flow rate recorded in 2009.
4.Pollutant concentrations used to compute the estimated emissions are from Waste Industry Coab6on(WIAC-2001).
5. Q(p)=Volumetric emission rare of the pollutant.AP42 Sermon 2.4 equation(3).
6.UM(p)=Uncontrolled mass emissions of pollutant If no collection exists.this is also equal to the fugitive emission rate.FM(p)of the pollutant.AP42 equation(4).
7. HCl emissions are a product of the combustion process and are calculated in a manna different than the other pollutants listed above. See page 5 of the calculation sheers.
Tv denotes compounds that are classified as toxic air pollutants per North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
HAP denotes compounds that are classified as ha tiodom air pollutants per AP42 and CAA Section 112.
'The compounds listed above were compiled from AP42(revised Nov.1998)and CAA Section 112.

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 5 of
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare 1 - Emissions M.VanDussen 5/7/2014
Uncombusted HCI CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
(8)HCl Emissions
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(10)from AP-42 Section 2.4 to determine HCI emissions.
HCI concentration= �✓42.0 ppmv (AP-42,Page 2.4-9)
Molecular weight of chlorine(CI)= V 35�453 g/gmol
HHV of landfill gas= V500 Btu/ft3
LFG consumed= 348,118 MMBtu/yr
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(348,118 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/MM ft3)= 696.24 x10*fO LFG
Eqn(3)
QS= (0,696.24 x MM ft3)*(m3/35.3198 113)*(42.0 ppmv Cl/10^6)= 827.92 m3 Cl
Eqn(4)
UMCI=(827.92 m3)*[(35.453 g/gmol*I atm)/(8.205E-5 m3-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMci= 1,200.5 kg CI
Eqn(10)
CMHCI= 1,200.5 kg Cl* (NCOL/100)*1.03*(NCNT/100)
NcoL=100%since calc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
NcNT=100%Assume the flare is capable of converting 100%of the CI to HCI.
CMHCI= 1,200.5 kg Cl*(100/100)*1.03*(100/100)= 1,236.5 kg/yr HCI
CMHCI=(1,236.5 kg)*(2.2 lb/kg) = 2,720.2 Ib/ r HCI
CMHCI=(2,720.2 Ib/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 1.36 too/ r HCI

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare 2 Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, M.VanDussen 5/8/2014
NMOC,VOC,SOZ,Uncombusted HAPs,HCl CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
OBJECTIVE:Calculate flare emissions based on LFG consumption
LFG Consumption: 772,9�16,503 scf/yr(CY2013)
Heat Content: 500 Btu/scf(assumed at 50%CH4)
Calculated MMBTU: 386,458 MMBtu/yr(CY2013)
APPROACH:Use manufacturer data and AP42 equations and emission factors
SOLUTION:
(1)NOx Emissions
NO,emission factor= /,068 Ib/MMBtu (AP-42,Table 13.5-1)
LFG consumed= 386,458 MMBtu/yr
CMNOx=(0.068 Ib/MMBtu)*(386,458 MMBtu/yr)= 26,279.2 Ib/ r NOx
CMNOx= (26,279.2 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 13.14 ton/ r NOx
(2)CO Emissions
CO emission factor= V10.37 lb/MMBtu (AP42,Table 13.5-1)
LFG consumed= 386,458 MMBtu/yr
CMCO=(0.37 Ib/MMBtu)*(386,458 MMBtu/yr)= 142,989.6 Ib! r CO
CMCO= (142,989.6 Ib/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 71.49 ton/ r CO
(3)PM Emissions
PM emission factor= V 17 lb/106 ft3 CH4 (AP-42,Section 2.4,Table 2.4-5)
LFG consumed= 386,458 MMBtu/yr
Hours of operation= #REF! hr/yr
HHV of natural gas= 1,020 Btu/ft' (AP42,Section 3.2)
Equivalent amount of CH4 consumed=(386,458 MMBtu/yr)/(1,020 MMBtu/106 ft3)=378.88 x 106 ft3 CH4
CMPM=(17 lb/million ft3 CH4)*(378.88 million ft3 CH4)4 6,441.0 Ib/ r PM
CMPM= (6,441.0 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 3.22 ton/yr PM

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 2 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare 2 Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, M.VanDussen 5/7/2014
NMOC,VOC,S02,Uncombusted HAPs,HCl CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
(4)NMOC Emissions
-Use the default concentration of NMOC(as hexane)from AP42 Table 2.4-2. The default NMOC concentration is 595 ppmv.
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(5)of AP42,Section 2.4 to determine NMOC emissions.
Molecular weight of hexane= v/86.18 g/gmol
LFG consumed= 386,458 MMBtu/yr
HHV of landfill gas= ✓500 Btu/ft3
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(386,458 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/million ft3)= 772.92 x 1 O6 ft3 LFG
Eqn(3)
QNMOC=(772.92 x 106 ft3)*(m3/35.3198 ft3)*(595 ppmv/106)= 13,021 m3/yr
Eqn(4)
UMNmoc=(I3,021 m3)*[(86.18 g/gmol* 1 atm)/(8.205E-5 m3-atm/gmol-K* 1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMNMOC= 45,892.6 kg
Eqn(5)
CMNMOC=[45,892.6 kg*(1 -NCOL/100)]+45,892.6 kg*(NcoL/100)*(1 -NCNT/100)]
NcoL=100%since calc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
NCNT=99.2% assume that the flare is capable of reducing NMOCs 99.2%by weight(AP42 Table 2.4-3).
CMNmoc=45,892.6 kg*(I - 100/100)]+45,892.6 kg*(100/100)*(1 -99.2/100)]= 367.14 kg
CMNMOC=(367.14 kg)*(2.2 lb/kg) = 1 807.7 Ib/yr NMOC
CMNmoc=(807.7 Ib/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= OAO ton/yr NMOC
(5)VOC Emissions
Use Note"a"from Table 2.4-2. The default VOC content at non-co-disposal sites is 39%of NMOC by weight(235 ppmv as hexanc).
CMvoc=807.7 lb/yr NMOC*0.39= 315.0 Ib/yr VOC
CMvoc=0.40 ton/yr NMOC*0.39= 0.16 ton/yr VOC

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEEI of
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare 2 Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, M.VanDussen 5/8/2014
NMOC,VOC,SO2,Uncombusted HAPs,HCl CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
(6)S02 Emissions
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(7)from AP42 Section 2.4 to determine S02 emissions.
H2S concentration= �3�.5 ppmv EPA AP42 Chapter 2
Molecular weight of sulfur IS)_ 2 g/gmol
Molecular weight of hydrogen sulfide( V 4 g/gmol
HHV of landfill gas= 500 Btu/ft'
LFG consumed= 386,458 MMBtu/yr
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(386,458 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/MM ft3)= 772.92 x 106 ft'LFG
Eqn(3)
QH2s= (772.92 x 106 ft')*(m/35.3198 ft')*(35.5 ppmv H2S/I06)= 777 m'H2S
Qs=(777 m'H2S)*(32 g/gmol S/34 g(gmol H2S)= 731 m'S
Eqn(4)
UM,=(731 m')*[(32 g/gmol*I atm)/(8.205E-5 m'-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMs= 956.91 kg S
Eqn(7)
CMso2--956.91 kg S*(NCOU100)*2.0*(98%conversion efficiency of S to S02)
NcoL=100%since calc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
CMso2=956.91 kg S*(100/100)*2.0*0.98= 1,875.53 kg/yr
CMso2=(1,875.53 kg)*(2.2 lb/kg)= F4,1 66.17 Ib/yr SO,
CMso2=(4,126.17 Ib/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 2. 66 ton/yr S02
(7) Hazardous Air Pollutant(HAPs)Emissions
-HAPs are calculated in a manner consistent with NMOCs,except that the concentration and molecular weight of the individual HAPs
are substituted into the equations. See Table 3 for a summary of flare HAP emissions. ,p
Example AtiaN X- v]y
1,1,1-trichloroethane Molecular weight=133.41 g/gmol V
Concentration=-Q-L68ppmv Waste Industry Air Coalition(WIAC);2001
Qi.i.tm W.eh� _(772.92 x 10'ft)*(m'/35.3198 ft')*(0.168 ppmv/106)= 3.6764 m'/yr
CMI,1,1-a W..rfwnr=(3.6764 m'/yr)*[(133.41 g/gmol*1 atm)/(8.205E-05 m'-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]
CMj.1,1_,,;vW0,0r0,,,,r= 20.059 kg/yr 1,1,1-trichloroethane
CM,,j,j.,,;rao,.nd.r=(20.059 kg/yr)*(2.2 lb/kg)*(ton/2,000 lb)=1 2.21E-02 ton 1,1,1-trichloroethane to flare
1,1,1-trichloroethane=CMj.j,j-o-,jd, ffi.(ton/yr)*(1-Ncm/100)
Near=98%destruction efficiency(AP42 Table 2.4-3)
I,I.I-trichloroethane=2.21E-02ton/yr*(I-(98/100))= 4.41E-04 ton1,1,1-trichloroethane to atmosphere

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 4 of t
('UENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SI113JFCT BY DATE
2013 Flare 2 Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, M.VanDussen 5/72014
NMOC,VOC,SO,,Uncombusted HAPs,HCI CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/14/2014
(7)HAP Emissions,continued
2013 LFG Consumption(MMBtu/yr)= 386,458
HHV of LFG(Btu/ft3) ✓500
2013 LFG Consumption(ft3/yr)= 772,916,503
2013 LFG Consumption(m3/yr)= j1,883,377
Landfill Gas Temperature(8C)1= 25
Halogenated Destruction Eft(%)Z= 48.0%
Non-Halogenated Destruction Eft(%)Z= '9�.7%
Mercury Compound Destruction Eft(%)Z= �I.0%
Pollutant Mol.Wt. Colic' Q(p)' UM( )e 19arc
(,i ol) ( nrv) bn�vr) (ke sT) 0b vr) 0b Vr) (ton vr)
L1.1-inchlomethane'AP.HAP 133.41 0.168 3.68 20.06 44,13 0.88 4.41E-04
I.1.22-tetmchlomethane TAP.HAP 167.85 0.070 1.53 10.52 23.13 0.46 2.31E-04
1.1-dichlomethane TAP,W 98.97 0.741 16.22 65.64 144.40 2.89 1.44E-03
1,1-dichloroethene TAKMP 96.94 0.092 2.01 7.98 17.56 0.35 1.76E-04
1,2-dichloroethane TAP.HAP 98.96 0.120 2.63 10.63 23.38 0.47 2.34E-04
1.2-dichloropropane HAP 112.99 0.023 0.50 2.33 5.12 0.10 5.12E-05
ac lonitnie TAP'HAP 53.06 0.036 0.79 1.71 3.76 0.01 5.64E-06
benzene 78.11 0.972 21.27 67.95 149.49 0.45 2.24E-04
carbon disulfide 76.13 0.320 7.00 21.80 47.97 0.14 7.20E-05
carbon tetrachloride TAP'HAP 153.84 0.007 0.15 0.96 2.12 0.04 2.12E-05
carbonyl sulfide HAP 60.07 0.183 4.00 9.84 21.64 0.06 3.25E-05
chlorobenzene ' 112.56 0.227 4.97 22.87 50.31 1.01 5.03E-04
chloroethane ' 64.52 0.239 5.23 13.80 30.36 0.61 3.04E-04
Chloroform TAP'HAP 119.39 0.021 0.46 2.24 4.94 0.10 4.94E-0a
chloromethane TAP'HAP 50.491 0.249 5.45 11.25 24.75 0.50 2.48E-04
dichlombenzene TAP'HAP 147.00 1.607 35.17 211.42 465.13 9.30 4.65E-03,
dichlomdifluoromethane TAP 120.91 1.751 38.32 189.48 416.86 8.34 4.17E-03
dichloromethane TAP'HAP 84.94 3.395 74.29 258.09 567.80 11.36 5.68E-03
ethyl merca tan TAP 62.13 1.356 29.67 75.40 165.88 0.50 2.49E-04
eth Ibenzene HAP 106.16 6.789 148.57 645.04 1419.09 4.261 2.13E-03
ethylene dibromide TAP'HAP 187.88 0.046 1.01 7.73 17.02 0.34 1.70E-04
hexane TAP.W 86.18 2,324 50.86 179.25 394.35 1.18 5.92E-04
hydrogen chloride TAP'HAP 7 35.45 42.0000 N/A N/A N/A 3,019.82 1.51E+00
hydrogen sulfide TAP 34.08 23.578 515.97 719.16 1.582.15 4.75 2.37E-03
memory and compounds TAP'HAP 200.61 0.000292 0.01 0.05 0.12 0.12 5.77E-05
methyl ethyl ketone TAP 72.11 10.557 231.02 681.33 1498.92 4.50 2.25E-03
methyl isobutyl ketone TAP'HAP 100.16 0.750 16.41 67.23 147.91 0.44 2.22E-04
methyl merca tan TAP 48.11 1.292 28.27 55.63 122.39 0.371 1.84E-04
rchloroeth IeneTAP'""P 165.83 1.193 26.11 177.06 389.53 7.79 3.90E-03
toluene TAP.W 92.13 25.405 555.95 2094.79 4608.53 13,83 6.91E-03
trichloroeth lene TAP'HAP 131.40 0.681 14.90 80.09 176.19 3.52 1.76E-03
vinyl chloride TAP.HM 62.50 L077 23.57 60.24 132.54 2.65 E33F-03
xylenes TAP n1P 106.16 16,5821 362.87 1575,50 34660) 10.40 5.20E-03
Total HAPs On1 --- --- --- 5,626.08 12,377.371 3,093.081 1.55
Notes.
I.The landfill gas temperature was obtained from AP42 Page 2.4-5,
2. The AP42 Section 2.4 default for Flare Desmtnion Efficiency was assumed.
3.Average flow rate recorded in 2009.
4. Pollutant concentrations used to compute the estimated emissions are from Waste Industry Coalition(W IAC-2001).
5.Q(p)=Volumetric emission rate of the pollutant. AP42 Section 2.4 equation(3).
6. UM(p)=Uncontrolled mass emissions of pollutant. If no collection exists,this is also equal to the fugitive emission rate.FM(p)of the pollutant AP42 equation(4).
7. HCI emissions are a product of the combustion process and are calculated in a manna different than the other pollutants fisted above.Sec page 5 of the calculation sheets.
TM denotes compounds that are classified as toxic air pollutants per Nonh Carolino Department of Environment and Normal Resources.
NAP denota compounds that are classified as hazardous air pollutants per AP42 and CAA Section 111
'The compounds listed above were compiled from AP-42(revised Nov.1998)and CAA Section 112.

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 5 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Flare 2 - Emissions M.VanDussen 5/7/2014
Uncombusted HCI CHECKED DATE
D.Greene 5/10/2014
(8)HCl Emissions
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(10)from AP42 Section 2.4 to determine HCI emissions.
HCI concentration= 42.0 ppmv (AP-42,Page 2.4-9)
Molecular weight of chlorine(Cl)= 35.453 g/gmol
HHV of landfill gas= 500 Btu/ft'
LFG consumed= 386,458 MMBtu/yr
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(386,458 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/MM ft3)= 772.92 x106 ft'LFG
Eqn(3)
QS= (772.92 x MM 113)*(m3/35.3198 ft3)*(42.0 ppmv Cl/10^6)= 919.10 m3 Cl
Eqn(4)
UMC1=(919.10 m3)*[(35.453 g/gmol*1 atm)/(8.205E-5 m3-atm/gmol-K* 1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMC,= 1,332.7 kg Cl
Eqn(10)
CMHCI= 1,332.7 kg Cl* (NCOL/100)*1.03*(NCNT/100)
NCoL=100%since calc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
NCNT=100%Assume the flare is capable of converting 100%of the Cl to HCI.
CMHCI= 1332.7 kg CI*(100/100)*1.03*(100/100)= 1,372.6 kg/yr HCI
CMHCI=(1372.6 kg)*(2.2 lb/kg) = 3,019.8 lb/ r HCI
CMHCI=(3,019.8 Ib/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 1.51 ton/ r HCl

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of
CLILN I PROJECT East Carolina Environmental landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SI ABJECT BY DATE
2013 Storage Tank Emissions D.Greene 5/18/2014
CHECKED DATE
M.VanDussen 5/21/2014
013JECTIVE:Insiginificant source tank emissions based on design capacity and throughput.
PPROACH:Use EPA's TANKS 4.09 Program
SOLUTION:
The following information was entered into TANKS 4.09:
Parameter Diesel Tank
Product Diesel Fuel
Volume,gal 3,000
Length,ft 15
Diameter,ft 5.8
Throuh u al 184,908
�s reported by TANKS 4.09(see attached report):
Diesel Tank
PoOutant Ib/ r ton/ r
VOC 4.61 2.31 E-03
NMOC' 4.61 2.31 E-03
NMOC emissions are conservatively estimated to be equal to VOC emissions.
For emissions purposes waste oil modeled as Petroleum Distillate#2

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Leachate Tanks Emission Calculations-NMOC,VOC,HAPs D.Greene 5/I8/2014
CHECKED DATE
M.VanDussen 5/21/2014
O 1 U ECTIVE:Calculate emissions for leachate storage tanks based on laboratory analysis and throughput.
APPROACH:Use mass balance approach,assumes that all organic content volatilizes.
SOLUTION:
Leachate throughput: 4,260,115 gal/yr (Data obtained from landfill)
Organic content: 547.3 µg/L (See Below)
CMva=(547.3 µg/L)*(4,260,115 gal/yr)*(3.785 Ugal)*(I Ib/453.6E+03 mg)*(l mg/1,000 pg)= 19.46 lb/yr VOC—]
CMva=(19.46 lb/yr)/(8,760 hr/yr)= 2.22E-03 Ib/hr VOC
CMva=(19.46 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/ton)= 9.73E-03 ton/yr VOC
Note: VOC emissions are conservatively estimated to equal NMOC,HAP,and TAP emissions.
VOC Lr Ib/ r lb/day
Acetone'- 200 7.11 1.95E-02
Benzene 5 0.18 4.87E-04
Dichlommethane 2.5 0.09 2.43E-04
Eth (benzene 5.8 0.21 5.65E-04
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 300 10.66 2.92E-02
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone 5 0.18 4.87E-04
Toluene 16 7 0.46 1.56E-03
X lenes 13 0.5 1.27E-03
547.3
Notes:
I "Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Leachate Characterization Study,"Environmental Research&Educational
Foundation,September 2007,(Table 4"Extended V OCs").
Assumes data is representative of Fast Carolina Landfill leachate VOC content(Table 4"Extended VOCs").
2 Acetone is neither HAP or TAP,but included as a VOC for VOC purposes.

ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of 1
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Envuomnental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2013 Air Emissions Invento 02209360.07
SUBJECT BY DATE
2013 Facility D.Caeene 5/18/2014
CHECKED DATE
M.VanDussen 5/21/2014
Diesel Welding Diesel Leachate
Pollutant Landfill Flare Hare [ngines Operation Storage Tank Tank TOTAL
(ES-01) (CD-Flarel) (CD-Flarel) (IF.S-04) s(IES-05) (IES-06) (IES-07)
Ib/ r Ib/ r Ib/ r Ib/ r Ib/ r Ib/ r Ib/r Ib/ r tool r
NOx 23 672.05 26,279.16 13,680 63,631 31.82
SO, - 3.716.82 4.126.17 900 - - 8.743 4.37
CO 128,803.79 142.989.55 2,940 274,733 137.37
PM 580L97 6440.97 100 12343 6.17
NMOC 54,006 727.58 807.71 4.61 19.46 55,565 27.78
VOC 21,0621 283.76 315.011 1.100 4.61 19.46 22785 11.39
1.1,1-trichloroethane TAP RAP 23.16 0.80 0.88 2.5.E+01 1.24E-02
I.I2 -tMachlormitane"" 12.14 0.42 0.46 - -
1.3.E+01 6.51E-03
LI-dichloroethaner".1MI, 75.78 2.60 2.89 - B.I.E+01 4.06E-02
1.1-dichloroethene IAP.IIAP 9.22 0.316 0.35 9.9.E+00 4.94E-03
IMP
1.2-dichloroethane AP. 12.27 0.421 0.47 - - - 1.3.E+01 6.58E-03
1.2dichloro e1w 2.69 0.092 0.10 2.9.E+00 1.44E-03
acetaldehyde 2.40 2.4.E+00 1.20E-03
acTolein 0.30 3.0.E-0I 1.50E-04
ac lonitTiler"T'A" 1.97 0.0102 0.01 2.0.E+00 9.98E-04
benzene'"°'""° 78.46 0.40 0.45 2.90 0.18 8.2.E+01 4.12E-02
carbon disulfide iAP''MP 25.17 0.12% 0.14 - - - 2.51E 01 1.27E-02
carbon tetrachloride TAP.IMP 1.11 0.04 0.04 1.21+00 5.97E-04
carbon [sulfide""P 11.36 0.06 0.06 - - - 1.1.E+01 5.74E-03
chlorobrn ne TAP.IMP 26.40 0.91 1.01 2.8.E+01 1.42E-02
chloroethane 1".It"P 15.93 0.55 0.6I 1.7.E+01 8.54E-03
chloroform TAP.IMP 2.59 0.089 0.10 2.8.E+00 1.39E-03
chloromethane T",IMP 12.992 0.4460 0.50 1.4.E+01 6.97E-03
dichlorobenzene TAP.IMP 244.11 8.38 9.30 2.6.E+02 1.31E-01
dichlorodifluoromethane TAP 218.78 7.51 8.34 2.3.E+02 1.17E-01
dichlononethane TAP.IMP 29799 10.23 11.36 0.09 3.2.E+02 1.60E-01
ethyl mecca an TAP 87.06 0.45 0.50 B.S.E+01 4.40E-02
eth Ibenzene IMP 744.77 3.83 4.26 0.21 7.5.E+02 3.77E-01
ethvlene dibromide T".IMP 8.93 0.31 0.34 9.6.E+00 4.79E-03
fiennaldeh de 3.60 3.6.E+00 1.80E-03
hexane IAP.IIAP 206.97 1.07 1.18 - - 2.1.E+02 1.05E-01
hydro,en chloride'"°'11"P 2,720 3,019.82 - 5.7.E+03 2.87E+00
hvdroren sulfide TAP 830.35 4.28 4.75 - 8.394.E+02 420E-01
Manganese 101.00 IAE-02 5.05E-02
mercury and compounds'""'"" 0.06 0.10 0.12 2.8.E-01 1.40E-04
methyl ethyl ketone TAP 786.67 4.05 4.50 10.66 8.1.E+02 4.03E-01
methyl isobutyl ketone I",IMP 77.63 0.40 0.44 0.18 7.9.E+01 3.93E-02
meth i m t.TAP 64.23 0.33 0.37 - - _ 6.5.E+01 3.25E-02
1 clic ot-rant matter 74.10 7.4.E+01 3.71E-02
rchloroeth Iene I".IMP 204.44 7.02 7.79 2.2.E+02 1.10E-01
u,lueneTAP.IT" 2418.67 12.45 13.83 1.30 0.57 2.4.E+03 1.22E+00
trichloroeth lene'"P IMP 92.47 3.17 3.52 - - - 9.9.E+01 4.96E02
yin 1 chloride'AP'IMP 69.56 2.39 2.65 7.5.E+01 3.73E-02
x Ienes TAP IMP 1.819.09 9.37 10.40 0.90 0.46 I.S.E+03 9.20E-01
Taal HAPs Only 6.495.95 278622 309308 85.50 101.00 1.68 12v563A4 6.28
Notes:
iA°denotes compounds dut arc classified As toxic air polluunu per North Carolhu Depamnere of Envirarmem aM Natural Resources.
" dctext,compouMs that arc classified as hazardous air polluunis per.4P42 and CAA Section 112.
The unn umds IIsIcA shore were com it<A from AP-42l miscN\ov.199%1 and CAA SMion 112.

TANKS 4.0 Report
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Tank Indentification and Physical Characteristics
Identification
User Identification: ECE 3000gal Diesel
City:
State: North Carolina
Company:
Type of Tank: Horizontal Tank
Description: East Carolina 3,000 gallon Diesel Tank
Tank Dimensions
Shell Length(ft): 15.00
Diameter(ft): 5.80
Volume(gallons): 3,000.00
Turnovers: 61.64
Net Throughput(gal/yr): 184,908.00
Is Tank Heated(y/n): N
Is Tank Underground(y/n): N
Paint Characteristics
Shell Color/Shade: Gray/Medium
Shell Condition Good
Breather Vent Settings
Vacuum Settings(psig): -0.03
Pressure Settings(psig) 0.03
Meterological Data used in Emissions Calculations:Raleigh,North Carolina(Avg Atmospheric Pressure=14.53 psia)
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Liquid Contents of Storage Tank
ECE 3000gal Diesel - Horizontal Tank
North Carolina
Liquid
Deily Liquid Sud. Bulk Vapa Liquid! Vapor
Tamperature(dog F) Temp Vapor Pressure(psa) Mot. Mass Mass Mol. Basis for Vapor Pressure
M'wturelCompoitert Month Avg. Min. Max. (dap F) Avg Min. Max. Weigh. Fran Fran. We1gia cakuations
DMlllate fuel oil.2 AN 98.49 57.95 79.03 02.36 O.00BB 0,0091 00117 130.0000 188.00 Option 1:VP80=.0085 VP70-.W9
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Detail Calculations (AP-42)
ECE 3000gal Diesel - Horizontal Tank
North Carolina
Annual Emissbn Calmuatwns
Standing Lmsea(lb). 1.3Bt9
Vapor space Volume(Cu 9): 252.4290
Vapor Density Pbku 9): 0.11 0
Vapor Spam Expansion Factor Owen
Versed Vapor Saturation Facor: 0.9087
Tank Vamr Spam Volume:
Vapor Space Volume(w 8): 252.4280
Tank Dametar(0): SAM
E9ective Dametar(8): 10.5275
Vapor Space Outage(it): 2.91Oo
Tank Shell Length(9): 15.0000
Vapor Density
Vapor Density(IWcu 8)'. 0.0002
Vapor MOIewtaT Weigh(lbllb-mob): 130,0000
Vapor Pressure at Daily Average Liquid
Surface Temperature(ma)'. Obom
Daily Avg.Liquid Surface Terra.(deg.RL 528.1618
Daily Average Ambient Tenn.(deg.F): 582833
Ideal Gas Constant R
(puts wit ill mot-deg R))'. 10.731
Liquid Bulk Temperature(dag.R): 522.0333
Tank Paint Soar Absorptanm(Shall): 0.8800
file:///Cl/Program Files/Tanks409d/swnmarydisplay.hml[4/18/2014 3:22:32 PM]

TANKS 4.0 Report
Daily Total Solar Insulation
Factor(BtWagB day): 1,393.0797
Vapor Space Expansion Factor
Vapor Spece Expansion Factor 0,0761
Daily Vapor Temperature Range(deg.R): 42AW2
Deily Vapor Pressure Range(psis): 0.0088
Breather Vent Press Setting Range(psa): O.OB00
Vapor Pressure at Daily Average Liquid
Surface Tertgereture(psa)'. O.00w
Vapor Pressure at Daily Mirgmum Liquid
Surface Tenperature(me), 0.0081
Vapor Pressure at Deily Maxin urn Liquid
Surface Temperature(pse): 0.0117
Daily Avg.Liquid surface Tamp.(deg R): 528.1018
Daily Min.Liquid Surface Temp.(deg Ft): 517.8217
Daily Max.Liquid Surface Temp.(deg R): 538,7018
Daily Ambient raw Range(deg.R): 21.71117
Vented Vapor Saturation Fedor
Vented Vapor Satureton Factor: 0.9987
Vapor Pressure at Daily Average Lquid'.
Surface Tempereture(psa). 0.0098
Vapor Space Outage(it) 29000
Working Losses(lb)'. 3220
Vapor Molecular WegM(lblb-mole)'. 130.0000
Vapor Pressure at Daily Avrerege Liquid
Suit.Temperature(pea): OWN
Anmrel Nal Throughpa(geVyr.): 181,908.0000
Annual Turriovets: 61.63M
Turnover Facto, 0.65M
Tank Diameter(a): 5.8OW
Working Loos Pmduct Factor 1.0000
Total Loss.(Ib): 4,0092
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Individual Tank Emission Totals
Emissions Report for: Annual
ECE 3000gal Diesel - Horizontal Tank
North Carolina
Losses(lbs)
Components Working Loss Breathing Loss Total Emissions
Distillate fuel oil no.2 IF 3.22 1.3:8]1 4.61
.11
file:///CVProgram Files)Tanks409d/summarydisplay.htm[4/18/2014 3:22:32 PM]