AQ_F_0800102_20100701_EI_Fac-EI-Rpt

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
��W REPUBLIC
SERVICES
East Carolina Environmental Landfill
2009 Emission Inventory
Air Permit 08849T03
Presented to:
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
East Carolina Environmental Landfill
1922 Republican Road
Aulander, NC 27805
Presented by:
SCS Engineers, PC
2520 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 450
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
[phone]
RF�
J U L - 1 2010 I
June 23, 2010
File No. 02209360.01-T3 I DAQ WARO
WARO COPY

Inventory Certification Form(Title V)
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region :WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2009
These forms must be completed and returned even if the facility did not operate or emissions were zero
The legally defined "Responsible Official" of record for your facility is Drew Isenhour
This person or one that meets the definition below must sign this certification form.
The official submitting the information must certify that he/she complies with the requirements as specified in Title 15A
NCAC 2Q.0520(b)which references and follows the federal definition. 40 CFR Part 70.2 defines a responsible as meaning one
of the following:
1. For a corporation: a president, secretary,treasurer, or vice—president of the corporation in charge of a principal
business function,or any other person who performs similar policy or decision making functions for the overall
operation of one or more manufacturing,production,or operating facilities applying for a or subject to a permit and
either
i. the facilities employ more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding$25
million(in second quarter 1980 dollars); or
ii. the delegation of authority to such representatives is approved in advance by the permitting authority;
2. For partnership or sole propietorship; a general partner or the proprietor, respectively;
3. for a muncipality, state, federal, or other public agency includes the chief executive officer having responsibility for the
overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency(e.g., a Regional Administrator of EPA).
CERTIFICATION STATEMENTe
(Important: L fficial,read and sign after all submissions are
certify that I am the responsible official for this facility,as described above, and hereby certify that the information contained
in this air emissions report, including attached calculations and documentation, is true,accurate and complete. (Subject to legal
enalities of up to $25,000 per occurrence and possible imprisonment as outlined in G.S.§143-215.3(a)(2))
Responsible Official's Signature Below use blue ink): Date Signed: - Z S7-/0
Printed Name: Drew Isenho
Signature: 0��
This form applies to Title V facilities. If this facility is not classified as Title V,please telephone your regional office Emission
Inventory contact at once for proper forms.
Email address of Responsible Official: �1-5en�oKs '`P Dub��cS2�:�eS. 6^.7
Information on this Form cannot be held confidential
WARO COPY

Morgan, J
From: Greene, David
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:18 AM
To: Morgan, J
Subject: FW: Inventory submission confirmation --0800102
-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail]
[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 10:35 AM
Subject : Inventory submission confirmation -- 0800102
Dear David Greene
Your submittal of the 2009 emission inventory for Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste
Landfill, 0800102, has been received by the North Carolina Division of Air Quality (DAQ) .
Please remember to:
- print the Certification Form (see AERO Closeout page) ,
- have the Responsible Official sign it in blue ink,
- include copies of spreadsheets or calculations used in creating this inventory, and
- mail (postmark) it to NCDAQ, 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 by the
required due date in order for this submittal to be considered complete. If you have any
questions, please feel free to contact Mike Smithwick, in the Washington Regional Office,
at (252) 946-6481.
The Division of Air Quality thanks you for using AFRO, the on line emissions inventory
program.
Sincerely
DAQ
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8 .5.439 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2970 - Release Date: 06/30/10 06:36 :00
1

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
Table of Contents
Section page
SECTION1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1
SECTION 2 Uncollected Landfill Gas Fugitives................................................................................2
LANDFILL GAS FUGITIVE EMISSIONS...........................................................................2
Non-Methane Organic Compound (NMOC) Emissions...............................................2
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions.............................................................3
Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) Emissions......................................................................3
SECTION3 Landfill Gas Flare............................................................................................................4
FlareEmissions...................................................................................................................4
SECTION 4 Insignificant Activities.......................................................................................................5
LeachateStorage Tanks (ES-07)....................................................................................5
DieselStorage Tank (ES-06)...........................................................................................6
WeldingOperations (ES-05)..........................................................................................6
SolarFlares (ES-08)..........................................................................................................6
Attachment
Detailed Emissions Calculations

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
Per Condition 3.X of East Carolina Environmental Landfill (Landfill)Air Quality Permit No.
08849T03 for its Landfill located at 1922 Republican Road, Aulander, North Carolina, the
facility is required to submit an emissions inventory to the Department of Air Quality(DAQ)by
June 30 of each year. The emissions inventory presented herein is the basis for the emissions
values reported in the 2009 Annual Emissions Statement. The emissions sources identified were
based on discussions and correspondence with Landfill staff, SCS Engineers' (SCS) knowledge
of the site, review of existing permits, compliance reports, and other information provided by the
Landfill. Facility-wide emissions at the Landfill are provided in Table 1 below. Facility-wide
emissions including speciated HAPs are provided at the end of this section. Emissions for each
source are further detailed in the remaining sections of this report.
Table 1 . 2009 Annual Emission Rate Summary (tons/yr)
Permit ID Emission Source NMOC VOC TAP/ NOx CO Sox PMio
Municipal Solid
ES-1 Waste Landfill 34.55 13.47 1.37 -- -- -- -
(Fugitive Emission)
CD-01 Landfill Gas Flare 0.36 0.14 1.34 11.59 63.05 1.82 2.84
ES-08 Solar Flares 0.18 0.07 3.54e-6 1.26 5.29 0.25 0.54
Leachate Storage
ES-07 2.29e-3 2.29e-3 1.43e-3
Tanks -- -- -- --
ES-06 Diesel Storage Tank -- - 1.45e-3
ES-05 Welding 5.05e-2 --
Operations2 -
Diesel Engines for
ES-04 Miscellaneous -- 0.55 4.28e-2 6.84 1.47 0.45 0.05
Landfill Support
Total' 35.08 14.23 1 2.81 19.69 69.81 2.51 3.43
Notes:
-- Not Applicable.
I Due to rounding error,"Total"emissions may not exactly equal the sum of the individual source emission rates as
they appear in the table above.
2 The Landfill's welding operations are located entirely indoors and no direct ambient emissions are anticipated nor
estimated for the period covered by this air emissions inventory
Emissions from the Diesel Storage Tank,Welding Operations,and Diesel Engines are"carried forward"for CY2008
as allowed by the DENR DAQ AERO reporting system
1

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
SECTION 2 UNCOLLECTED LANDFILL GAS FUGITIVES
LANDFILL GAS FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
This section addresses the generation of landfill gas(LFG),non-methane organic compounds
(NMOCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs),methane,
and carbon dioxide and their fugitive emissions via passive LFG releases.
LFG generation from the landfill operation was calculated using SCS Engineers' version of the
U.S. EPA Landfill Gas Emissions Model(LandGEM). A description of the model parameters is
provided below and the model output is attached.
LandGEM uses a first-order decay equation to predict landfill gas generation based on the
amount and age of the waste in place. The formula is presented in 40 CFR Part 60.754(a)(1)(i).
The parameters L,, and k used in the LandGEM are the values published in EPA's Compilation
of Air Pollutant Emission Factors(AP-42), Volume I, Section 2.4 (revised November 1998).
The methane generation potential, Lo, for the MSW landfill cells was set equal to 100 cubic
meters (m3) of methane(CH4)per megagram(Mg) of waste. The methane generation rate
constant, k, was 0.04 yf 1 and the concentration of NMOC in LFG was set to 595 parts per
million by volume(ppmv) as hexane. AP-42 recommends these values of L. and k for
municipal solid waste(MSW)landfills that are located in geographical regions that receive
average or above average annual precipitation, such as Aulander,North Carolina.
To calculate landfill emissions,the refuse filling history was input to the LandGEM. Note that
this model estimates emissions based on the amount of waste in place at the beginning of each
year. Waste in place at the beginning of 2009 was approximately 5.83 million Mg, or 6.43
million tons. The LandGEM estimated that the methane generation rate for 2009 is
approximately 18.37 million cubic meters,or approximately 648.6 million cubic feet. Assuming
that the methane content in the LFG is 50 percent, the volume of LFG generated in 2009 is
estimated to be 2,468 cubic feet per minute(W/min).
LandGEM input and output are provided on page 1 of the spreadsheets found at the end of this
section.
Non-Methane Organic Compound (NMOC) Emissions
NMOC generation from the Landfill was calculated using LandGEM. Model parameters were
similar to the values noted above. LandGEM estimated that the NMOC generation rate for 2009
is 78.35 Mg, or 86.36 tons(See page 2 of the spreadsheets provided in the detailed calculations
attachment). The Landfill operates a gas collection and control system(GCCS) to capture LFG
and route it to a control flare. Sixty percent of the LFG is assumed to be captured; therefore, 40
percent of the NMOC generated is assumed to have been emitted as fugitive. Thus,the fugitive
NMOC emission rate for 2009 is 34.55 tons.
2

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions
In determining the VOC emissions from the landfill, VOC generation is assumed to be 39
percent of the NMOC generation. This assumption is based on information contained in AP-42
Section 2.4 (revised November 1998)Table 2.4-2.
VOC emissions were based on the historical tonnages and model parameters noted above. The
LFG and NMOC generation rates were extracted from the LandGEM output and represent the
emissions from the Landfill during 2009. The VOC generation rates were calculated by
converting the NMOC generation rates (shown in the LandGEM output) from Mg/yr to tons/yr,
and then multiplying by 0.39 (i.e., VOC is considered as 39 percent of NMOC). The VOC
generation rate for 2009 is 33.68 tons/yr. The fugitive VOC emission rate is determined is the
same manner as the fugitive emissions rate for NMOC reflecting the operation of the GCCS
during the period. The fugitive VOC emission rate for 2009 is 13.47 tons, as shown in Table 2
below.
Table 2. Air Pollutant Generation and Emission Rates
NMOC NMOC • • VOC Fugitive HAP& TAP
Year Generation Generation Emissions Generation� Emissions' Fugitive
Emissions
-7
2009 78.35 86.36 34.55 33.68 13.47 1.37
Notes:
I VOC generation is assumed to be 39 percent of NMOC generation.
Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) Emissions
The estimation of HAP emissions from the Landfill is based on equations (3) and (4)of AP-42
Section 2.4. Those equations are presented below. The first step is to estimate the generation
rate of each pollutant in cubic meters per year(in 3/yr). Next, the volumetric generation rate
estimate is converted to a mass generation rate(ton/yr).
3
Q m =2.0xQ CP
P yr Cho 106
where:
QP = Pollutant generation rate (m3/yr)
QCh4 = Methane generation rate (in 3/yr) from the LandGEM
Cp = Pollutant concentration in LFG (ppmv)
3

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
2.0 = Multiplication factor(assumes LFG is 50 percent methane, and the
balance is carbon dioxide,nitrogen, oxygen and other trace gases)
M p(tons/yr)= Q p ((MWP(gggmol))(I atm)) ton
(8.205x10-5)(gmo1—K))(
m s —atm 1000g (273+TK) 1907.185 k g
kg
where:
MP = Pollutant mass generation rate
MWP = Molecular weight of pollutant(g/gmole)
T = Temperature of LFG(°C) (Standard temp of 25 degrees Celsius)
Of the 188 chemical compounds identified as HAPs under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act,28
of these compounds are listed in AP-42 Table 2.4-1 and 2.4-2. Site-specific data from testing
performed by Research Triangle Park Laboratories was used to determine the concentration of
these compounds. This report is dated May, 5,2005 and was submitted as part or the
Compliance Demonstration Report dated June 3, 2005. These site specific concentrations are
shown on page 4 of the spreadsheets in the detailed emissions attachment. Annual emissions of
the remaining HAP compounds(i.e.,those not included in the AP-42 tables) are assumed to be
negligible. The HAP fugitive rate for 2009 was calculated to be 1.37 tons. Total HAP and TAP
fugitive emissions for 2009 are 1.37 tons.
SECTION 3 LANDFILL GAS FLARE
Flare Emissions
The landfill operates one flare,with a design capacity of 3,000 scfin, as a landfill gas control
device. The emission factors and annual emissions associated with the flare(permitted as CD-1)
are summarized in Table 3.
4

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
Table 3. LFG Flare Emissions
2009 LFG
Flare
Compound LFG Flare Emission Factors Emissions
NOx 0.068 Ib/MMBtu 11.59
CO 0.37 lb/MMBtu 1 63.05
NMOC 99.2 %destruction•2 0.36
VOC3 99.2 %destruction•2 0.14
99.8 %destruction for halogenated HAP species2
HAPs/TAPS 99.7%for non-halogenated HAP species 2 1.37
0%for mercury species 2
PM10 17 Ib/106 ft3 methane4 2.84
SO2 H2S concentration: 35.5 ppmv5 1.82
Notes:
I Emission factor obtained from AP-42,Table 1 3.5-1.
2 Control efficiency obtained from AP-42,Table 2.4-3.
3 VOC generation is estimated to be 39 percent of the NMOC generation per Table 2.4-2
of AP-42 Section 2.4"Municipal Solid Waste Landfills,"revised 11/98. These estimates
assume a 60% LFG collection efficiency for the active landfill gas collection system.
4 Control efficiency obtained from AP-421 Table 2.4-5.
5 S02 emissions are calculated per AP-42,Section 2.4.4;
SECTION 4 INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES
Leachate Storage Tanks (ES-07)
The Landfill operates two (2) leachate storage tanks to store collected leachate and condensate
from the Landfill prior to disposal at an offsite wastewater treatment system. The throughput of
leachate in 2009 was 1,001,808 gallons.
Table 4. Emission Data
Parameter 2009
Leachate Throughput 1,001,808 gallons
Calculated emissions (VOC) 4.58 Ibs
5

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
Detailed emission calculations are provided in the attachment.
Diesel Storage Tank (ES-06)
The Landfill's permit includes an insignificant activity listing for a diesel storage tank.
Emissions from the tank are"carried forward" as allowed in the Division's AERO reporting and
are therefore identical to the previous reporting period. As reported in 2008, emissions of
Benzene total 2.9 pounds for CY2009.
Diesel Engines for Miscellaneous Landfill Support (IES-04)
Emissions from the Landfill's diesel engines for miscellaneous support are"carried forward" as
allowed in the Division's AERO reporting and are therefore identical to the previous reporting
period. As reported in 2008, emissions are provided in Table 5:
Table 5. Emissions from Diesel Engines
••• Diesel
Compound tpY
(Carried Forward from •• :
NOx 6.84
CO 1.47
PM 0.05
VOC3 0.55
SO z 0.45
HAPs/TAPs 4.28e-2
Welding Operations (ES-05)
The Landfill's permit also includes an insignificant activity listing for"Welding Operations"
with the emission source ID ES-05. Emissions from the Landfill's welding operations are
"carried forward" as allowed in the Division's AERO reporting and are therefore identical to the
previous reporting period. As reported in 2008, emission of Manganese total 101 pounds.
Solar Flares (ES-08)
Eight(8) solar flares were used during this period(noted here as ES-08). To estimate emissions,
flow was conservatively assumed to be 60 scfm per each flare (total of 480 scfm) for 12 hours
6

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
per day during the entire 365 day period. Based on emission rate data from a solar flare
manufacturer, Landfill Services, emissions were estimated as shown in Table 6:
Table 6. Solar Flare Emissions Data
00• Solar
Flare
Compound Solar Flare Emission Factors Emissions
ES-08
NOx 0.072lb/hr 1.26
CO 0.302lb/hr 5.29
NMOC NMOC assumed 1/0.39 of VOC (per AP-42) 0.18
VOC3 0.0041b/hr 0.07
99.8 %destruction for halogenated HAP species'
HAPs/TAPS 99.7%for non-halogenated HAP species 3.54e-6
0%for mercury species
PMI0 0.031 Ib/hr 0.54
502 0.014lb/hr 0.25
7

East Carolina Environmental Landfill
DETAILED EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of 4
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Fugitive Landfill Emissions D.GREENE 5/21/2010
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
OBJECTIVE:Calculate Fugitive Landfill Emissions
APPROACH:Use USEPA's Landfill Gas Emissions Model(LandGEM)and AP-42 equations and emission factors.
SOLUTION:
(1) Methane and LFG Generation*
'As calculated by LandGEM(See Section 2 of 2009 Emission Inventory Report)
Estimated LFG Generation/Emission Rates
MethanegGeneration
LFG
Disposal Refuse Disposal Refuse Generation Fugitive
Rate In-Place Rate In-Place Rates Rates
Year tons/yr) tons M /�r M (m3/yr) (cfm)
2007 532,509 5 376,603 483 084 4,877,572 1.585E+07 2 129 852
2008 518,584 5,909,112 470,451 5,360,656 1.716E+07 2 306 922
2009 471,959 1 6,427,696 428,154 1 5,831,108 1.837E+07 2,468 98711
ESTIMATED NMOC CONCENTRATION IN LFG: 595 ppmv
ASSUMED METHANE CONTENT OF LFG: 50%
ASSUMED COLLECTION EFFICIENCY OF LFG SYSTEM: 60%
SELECTED DECAY RATE CONSTANT: 0.04
SELECTED ULTIMATE METHANE RECOVERY RATE: 3,203.7 cu ft/ton
METRIC EQUIVALENT: 100 cu m/Mg
Conversions: 35.314667 cu ft per cu in
1.1023113 ton per Mg
32.037 cu ft/ton per cu m/Mg

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 2 of
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Fugitive Landfill Emissions D.GREENE 5/21/2010
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
(2) NMOC and VOC Emissions*
'As calculated by LandGEM(See Section 2 of 2009 Emission Inventory Report)
NMOC and VOC Generation/Emission Rates
NMOC NMOC NMOC VOC VOC VOC
Generation Generation Surface Fugitive Generation Generation Surface Fugitive
Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates
Year tons/ r M / r tons/ r tons/ r M /yr) (tons/ r)
2007 74.51 67.60 29.81 29.06 26.36 11.62
2008 80.68 73.19 32.27 31.46 28.54 12.59
2009 86.36 78.35 34.55 33.68 30.56 13.47
ESTIMATED NMOC CONCENTRATION IN LFG: 595 ppmv
ASSUMED METHANE CONTENT OF LFG: 50%
AP-42 DEFAULT(11/98)VOC CONTENT OF NMOC: 39%
ASSUMED COLLECTION EFFICIENCY OF LFG SYSTEM: 60%
SELECTED DECAY RATE CONSTANT: 0.04
SELECTED ULTIMATE METHANE RECOVERY RATE: 3,203.7 cu ft/ton
METRIC EQUIVALENT: 100 cu m/Mg
Conversions: 35314667 cu ft per cu m
1.1023113 ton per Mg
32.037 cu ft/ton per cu m/Mg

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 3 of 4
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Fugitive Landfill Emissions D.GREENE 5/18/2010
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
(3) Hazardous Air Pollutant(HAPs) Emissions
Methane production= 18,366,194 m3/yr (As caculated by LandGEM,see'Estimated LFG Generation/Emission
Methane content of LFG= 50% Rates"table on page 1.)
Assumed Collection efficiency= 60%
Fugitive LFG production=(18,366,194 m3/0.5)*(1-0.60)= 14,692,955 m3/yr
Example
1,1,1-trichloroethane Molecular weight= 133.41 g/gmol
Concentration= 0.0003 ppmv Site Speck Testing for the 2005 Compliance Demonstration
Q,,j,ja.hw,th„a=(9,183,097 m)*(0.0003 ppmv/1E+06)= 0.004 m3/yr
UMj,j,j_tkbj. _(0.004 m3/yr)*((133.41 g/gmol*1 atm)/(8.205E-5 m3-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))J
UM1,1,1_ = 0.024 kg/yr
UM1,14-mchlo,odhao =(0.24 kg/yr)*(2.2 Ib/kg)= 0.053 1b/yr 1,1,1-trichloroethane
UMI,1,1_,,khi..dh.__(0.0531b/yr)/(2,000 lb/tn)= 0.00003 ton/yr 1,1,1-trichloroethane

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 4 of 4
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Fugitive Landfill Emissions D.GREENE 5/21/2010
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
(3)HAP Emissions,continued
2009 Methane Generation(m3/yr)= 18,366,194
2009 LFG Generation(m3/yr)= 36,732,388
2009 LFG Fugitive Production(m3/yr)= 14,692,955
Landfill Gas Temperature 0C)t= 25
Pollutant Mol.Wt. ConC.4 Q(p)s UM(p)6 FM 7
ol) my (m3/yr) k lb/ ton/ lbs/ ton/ )
1,1 1-trichloroethane TAP'HAP 133.41 0.0003 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00
1,1 2 -tetrachloroethane TAP,HAP 167.85 0.0002 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00
1,1 dichloroethane TAP,HAP 98.97 0.0338 0.50 2.01 4.42 0.00 4.42 0.00
I,l dichloroethene TAP.HM 96.94 0.0002 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00
1,2dichloroethane TAP,HAP 98.96 0.0003 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00
1,2dichloro ro eH"P 112.99 0.0003 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00
acrylonitrileTAP,R"P 53.06 0.0005 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.00 1 0.04 0.00
benzeneTAP,H"P 78.11 0.0348 0.51 1.63 3.59 0.00 3.59 0.00
carbon disulfide TAP'HAP 76.13 0.0003 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00
carbon tetrachloride TAP,HAP 153.84 0.0314 0.46 2.90 6.39 0.00 6.39 0.00
carbonyl sulfide H"P 60.07 0.4900 7.20 17.69 38.91 0.02 38.91 0.02
chlorobenzene TAP,H"P 112.56 0.0002 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.00 1 0.03 0.00
chloroethane TAP,R"P 64.52 0.0002 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00
chloroform TAP,HAP 119.39 0.0003 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00
chloromethane TAP,HAP 50.49 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
dichlorobenzene TAP,H"P 147.00 0.0003 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.00
dichlorodifluoromethane TAP 120.91 2.6511 38.95 192.62 423.76 0.21 423.76 0.21
dichloromethane TAP,HAP 84.94 0.0010 0.01 0.05 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.00
ethyl mercaptan TAP 62.13 2.2800 33.50 85.12 187.27 0.09 187.27 0.09
eth lbenzene TAP'HAP 106.16 0.0003 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00
ethylene dibromide TAP'HAP 187.88 0.0002 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00
hexane T"P' 86.18 0.1053 1.55 5.45 12.00 0.01 12.00 0.01
h ro en sulfideT"P 34.08 35.5000 521.60 727.01 1599.43 0.80 1599.43 0.80
mercury and compounds TAP'HAP 200.61 0.0003 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00
-ethyl ethyl ketoneT"P 72.11 2.5838 37.96 111.96 246.31 0.12 246.31 0.12
-ethyl isobutyl ketone TAP,HAP 100.16 0.0002 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00
methyl merca tan TAP 48.11 2.4900 36.59 71.99 158.37 0.08 158.37 0.08
erchloroeth ene TAP,HAP 165.83 0.0331 0.49 3.30 7.25 0.00 7.25 0.00
toluene TAP,' 92.13 0.0804 1.18 4.45 9.79 0.00 9.79 0.00
trichloroeth lene TAP,HAP 131.40 0.0002 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00
vin 1 chloride TAP'HAP 62.50 0.3983 5.85 14.96 32.91 0.02 32.91 0.02
xylenes TAP'HAP 106.16 0.0318 0.47 2.03 4.46 0.00 4.46 0.00
Total HAPs Only --- 18.28 54.77 120.49 0.06 120.49 0.06
Total TAPS Only 679.68 1,225.76 2,696.68 1.35 1 2,696.68 1.35
Total HAPs/TAPS 686.88 1,243.47 2,735.64 1.37 1 2.735.64 1.37
Notes:
1.The landfill gas temperature was obtained from AP-42 Page 2.4-5.
2. The AP-42 Section 2.4 default for Flare Destruction Efficiency was assumed.
3. Generation rate calculated in 2009.
4. Pollutant concentrations used to compute the estimated emissions are from AP-42 and Site Specific Testing for the 2005 Compliance Demonstration
5. Q(p)=Volumetric emission rate of the pollutant. AP-42 Section 2.4 equation(3).
6. UM(p)=Uncontrolled mass emissions of pollutant. If no collection exists,this is also equal to the fugitive emission rate,FM(p)of the pollutant. AP-42 equation(4).
TM denotes compounds that are classified as toxic air pollutants per North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
H"denotes compounds that are classified as hazardous air pollutants per AP-42 and CAA Section 112.

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Invento 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Flare Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, D.GREENE 5/24/2010
NMOC,VOC,S02,Uncombusted HAPs,HCl CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
OBJECTIVE:Calculate flare emissions based on LFG consumption
LFG Consumption: 681,619,694 scf/yr(CY09)
Heat Content: 500 Btu/scf
Calculated MMBTU: 340,810 MMBtu/yr(CY09)
APPROACH:Use manufacturer data and AP-42 equations and emission factors
SOLUTION:
(1)NOx Emissions
NOx emission factor= 0.068 Ib/NIMBtu (AP-42,Table 13.5-1)
LFG consumed= 340,810 MMBtu/yr
Hours of operation= 8,760 hr/year
CMNox=(0.06 lb/MMBtu)*(681,619,694 MMBtu/yr)= 23,175.1 lb/yr NOx
CMN0�= (23,175.1 lb/yr)/(8,760 hr/yr)= 2.65 Ib/br NOx
CMNox= (23,175.1 lb/yr)/(2,000 hr/yr)= 11.59 tn/yr NO.
(2)CO Emissions
CO emission factor= 0.37 lb/MMBtu (AP-42,Table 13.5-1)
LFG consumed= 340,810 MMBtu/yr
Hours of operation= 8,760 hr/year
CMco= (0.37lb/MMBtu)*(681,619,694 MMBtu/yr)= 126,099.6 Ib/cr CO
CMco=(126,099.6 lb/yr)/(8,760 hr/yr)= 14.39 lb/hr CO
CMoo=(126,099.6 lb/yr)/(2,000 hr/yr)= 63.05 tnh r CO
(3)PM Emissions
PM emission factor= 17 lb/106 ft3 CH4 (AP-42,Section 2.4,Table 2.4-5)
LFG consumed= 340,810 MMBtu/yr
Hours of operation= 8,760.0 br/yr
HHV of natural gas= 1,020 Btu/ft3 (AP42,Section 3.2)
Equivalent amount of CH4 consumed=(340,810 MMBtu/yr)/(1,020 MMBm/106 11)= 334.13 x 106 ft3 CH4
CM,=(17 lb/106 ft3 CH4)*(334.13 x 101 ft3 CH4)= 5.680.2 Ib/yr P Q
CMpM=(5,680.2 lb/yr)/(8,760 hr/yr)= 0.65 Ib/hr PNl
CMPM=(5,680.2 lb/yr)/(2,000 hr/yr)= 2.84 tn/ r P U

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 2 of
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Invent 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
Flare Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, D.GREENE 5/12/2010
NMOC,VOC,S02,Uncombusted HAPs,HCl CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
(4)NMOC Emissions
Use the default concentration of NMOC(as hexane)from AP-42 Table 2.4-2. The default NMOC concentration is 595 ppmv.
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(5)of AP-42,Section 2.4 to determine NMOC emissions.
Molecular weight of hexane= 86.18 g/gmol
LFG consumed= 340,810 MMBtu/yr
Hours of operation= 8,760 hr/yr
HHV of landfill gas= 500 Btu/ft'
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(340,810 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/IC6 fe)= 681.62 x106 W LFG
Eqn(3)
QNMOC=(681.62 x 106 ft3)*(m�/35.3198 f)*(595 ppmv/106)= 11,483 tn3/yr
Eqn(4)
UMNMoc=(11,483 m')*[(86.18 g/gmol*1 atm)/(8.205E-5 m3-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMNMoc= 40,471.8 kg
Eqn(5)
CMNMoc=[40,471.8 kg*(1-NcoL/100)]+40,471.8 kg*(NcoL/100)*(1-NcNT/100)]
NcoL=100%since calc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
NcNT=99.2%Assume that the flare is capable of reducing NMOCs 99.2%by weight(AP-42 Table 2.4-3).
CMwoc=40,471.8 kg*(1-100/100)]+40,471.8 kg*(100/100)*(1-99.2/100)]= 323.77 kg
CMwoc=(323.77 kg)*(2.2 lb/kg) = 712.3 lb/yr NMOC
CMNMoc=(712.3 lb/yr)/(8,760 hr/yr) 1 0.0 Ib/hr NMOC
CMNMoc=(712.3 lb/yr)/(2,000 b/tn)= 0.36 tn/yr NMOC
(5)VOC Emissions
-Use Note"c"from Table 2.4-2. The default VOC content at non-co-disposal sites is 39%of NMOC by weight(235 ppmv as hexane).
CMvo,=712.3 b/yr NMOC*0.39= 277.80 Ib/yr VOC
CMv,c=277.8 b/hr NMOC*0.39= 0.03 lb/hr VOC
CMvoc=0.36 tn/yr NMOC*0.39= 0.14 tn/yr VOC

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 3 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
R ublic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
Flare Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, D.GREENE 5/24/2010
NMOC,VOC,5O2,Uncombusted HAPs,HCl CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
(6)SO2 Emissions
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(7)from AP-42 Section 2.4 to determine SO2 emissions.
H2S concentration= 35.5 ppmv AP-42
Molecular weight of sulfur(S)= 32 g/gmol
Molecular weight of hydrogen sulfide Q 34 g/gmol
HHV of landfill gas= 500 Btu/ft3
LFG consumed= 340,810 MMBtu/yr
Hours of operation= 8,760 hr/yr
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(340,810 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/106 ft)= 681.62 x106 ft3 LFG
Eqn(3)
Qn2s= (681.62 x 1('ft)*(m3/35.3198 ftt)*(35.5 ppmvH2S/10�= 685 in HZS
Qs=(685 rn HZS)*(32 g/gmol S/34 g/gmol HZS)= 645 in S
Eqn(4)
UM,=(645 m3)*[(32 g/gmol*1 atm)/(8.205E-5 m3-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMs= 843.88 kg S
Eqn(7)
CMso2=843.88 kg S*(Ncor/100)*2.0*(98%conversion efficiency of S to SO2)
NcoL=100%since talc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
CMso2=843.88 kg S*(100/100)*2.0*0.S8= 1,654.00 Itg/yr
CMso2=(1654.00 kg)*(2.2 lb/kg)= F 3,638.79 Ib/yr SO2
CMso2=(3,638.79 b/yr)/(8,760 hr/yr)= 0.42 Whir SO2
CMso2=(3,638.79 b/yr)/(2,000 lb/tn)= 1.82 tn/yr SO2
(7) Hazardous Air Pollutant(HAPs)Emissions
-HAPs are calculated in a manna consistent with NMOCs,except that the concentration and molecular weight of the individual HAPs
are substituted intothe equations. See Table 3 for a summary of flare HAP emissions.
Examule
1,1,1-trichloroethane Molecular weight=133.41 dgmol
Concentration=0.0003 ppnv Site Specific Testing for the 2005 Compliance Demonstration
QLI.�,ricLlaoN�ane=(681.62 x 1('ft3)*(m3/35.3198 ft3)*(0.0003 ppmVIO)= 0.0058 in3/yr
CM, j-tricw0_&_=(0.0058 ID/yr)*[(133.41 g'gmol*1 atm)/(8.205E-5 m3-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 IQ)]
CM1.1,1_a;cid-twe= 0.032 kg/yr 1,1,1-trichloroethane
CMI,1,1_,n�W-e,s-e=(0.032 kg/yr)*(2.2 lb/kg)*(ton/2,000 Ib)= I 3.47E-05 ton 1,1,1-trichloroethane to flare
1,1,1-trichloroethane=CMt,i,i-t ch1.0&1-(tons/yr)*(I-NL,,/100)
NcNT=98%destruction efficiency(AP-42 Table 2.4-3)
1,1,1-trichloroethane=3.47e-5 tons/yr*(I-(98/100)) r 6.95E-07 ton 1,1,1-irichloroethane to atmosphere-1

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 4 of 5
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions lnvento 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
Flare Emission Calculations-NOx,CO,PM, D.GREENE 5/24/2010
NMOC,VOC,SO2,Uncombusted HAPs,HCI CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
(7)HAP Emissions,continued
2009 LFG Consumption(MMBtu/yr)= 340,810
HHV of LFG(Btu/ft3) 500
2009 LFG Consumption(ft3/yr)= 681,619,694
2009 LFG Consumption(m3/yr)= 19,298,515
Landfill Gas Temperature 0C)'= 25
Halogenated Destruction Eff.(%)2= 98.0%
Non-Halogenated Destruction Eff.(%)2= 99.7%
Mercury Compound Destruction Eff.(%)2= 0.0%
Pollutant Mol.Wt. CODC.4 Q(p)5 UM 6 Flare Flare
Wp'mol) my m3/ lb/ ) lb/ to
1,1,1-trichloroethane 133.41 0.0003 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.00 6.95E-07
1 1 2 2-tetrachloroethane TAP'HAP 167.85 0.0002 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.00 5.83E-07
I1-dichloroethaneTA"H" 98.97 0.0338 0.65 2.64 5.81 0.12 5.81E-05
1,1-dichloroetheneTA'J"''P 96.94 0.0002 0.00 K2.1
0.03 0.00 3.37E-07
1,2-dichloroethaneT'P'� 98.96 0.0003 0.01 0.05 0.00 5.16E-07
12-dichloro ro anew 112.99 0.0003 0.01 0.06 0.00 5.89E-07
ac lonitrileTAP'HAP 53.06 0.0005 0.01 0.05 0.00 6.91E-08
benzene 78.11 0.0348 0.67 4.72 0.01 7.08E-06
carbon disulfide 76.13 0.0003 0.01 0.04 0.00 5.95E-08
carbon tetrachloride TAP'W 153.84 0.0314 0.61 3.81 8.39 0.17 8.39E-05
carbonyl sulfide H" 60.07 0.4900 9.46 23.23 51.11 0.15 7.67E-05
chlorobenzene 112.56 0.0002 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 3.91E-07
chloroethane ' 64.52 0.0002 0.00 0.01 1 0.02 0.00 2.24E-07
chloroform TAP'HAP 119.39 0.0003 0.01 0.03 0.06 1 0.00 6.22E-07
chloromethaneTAP'HAP 50.49 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 8.77E-08
dichlorobenzeneTAP'H'4P 147.00 0.0003 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.00 7.66&07
dichlorodifluoromethaneTAP 120.91 2.6511 51.16 253.00 556.59 11.13 5.57E-03
dichloromethane TAP'HAP 84.94 0.0010 0.02 0.07 0.15 0.00 1.47E-06
ethyl merca tan TAP 62.13 2.2800 44.00 111.81 245.97 0.74 3.69E-04
eth lbenzeneHAP 106.16 0.0003 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.00 8.30E-08
ethylene dibromide TAP,HAP 187.88 0.0002 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.00 6.52E-07
hexane T`"HA' 86.18 0.1053 2.03 7.16 15.76 0.05 2.36E-05
hydrogen chloride TAP,HAP 7 35.45 42.0000 N/A N/A N/A 2663.12 1.33E+00
hydrogen sulfide TAP 34.08 35.5000 685.10 954.90 2100.78 6.30 3.15E-03
mercury and compounds TAP'H" 200.61 0.0003 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.10 5.09E-05
methyl ethyl ketone TA' 72.11 2.5838 49.86 147.06 323.52 0.97 4.85E-04
methyl isobutyl ketone TAP,HAP 100.16 0.0002 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.00 5.22 E-08
methyl merca tan TAP 48.11 2.4900 48.05 94.55 208.01 0.62 3.12E-04
erchloroeth leneTAP'HAP 165.83 0.0331 0.64 4.33 9.53 0.19 9.53E-05
tolueneTAP'W'P 92.13 0.0804 1.55 5.84 12.86 0.04 1.93E-05
trichloroeth lene TAP'HAP 131.40 0.0002 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 4.56E-07
vinyl chloride TAP'HAP 62.50 0.3983 7.69 19.65 43.23 0.86 4.32E-04
xyleneS TA,HAP 106.16 0.0318 0.61 2.66 5.85 0.02 8.78E-06
Total HAPs Only -- --- 71.94 15816 2 664.85 1.33
Total TAPS Only 11.609.961 3 541.91 2,684.46 134
Total HAP.s TAPS 1.633.24 3.593.13 1 21684.67 1.34
Notes:
1.The landfill gas temperature was obtained from AP-42 Page 2.4.5.
2. The AP-42 Section 2.4 default for Flare Destruction Efficiency was assumed.
3.Average flow rate recorded in 2009.
4. Pollutant concentrations used to compute the estimated emissions are from AP-42 and Site Specific Testing for the 2005 Compliance Deomonstration.
5. Q(p)=Volumetric emission rate of the pollutant. AP-42 Section 2.4 equation(3).
6. UM(p)=Uncontrolled mass emissions of pollutant ti no collection exists,this is also equal to the fugitive emission rate,FM(p)of the pollutant.AP-42 equation(4).
7. HCI emissions are a product of the combustion process and are calculated in a manner different than the other pollutants listed above. See page 5 of the calculation shee
TAP denotes compounds that are classified as toxic air pollutants per North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
denotes compounds that are classified as hazardous air pollutants per AP-42 and CAA Section 112.
'The compounds listed above were compiled from AP-42(revised Nov.1998)and CAA Section 112.

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 5 of
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE ii
Flare -Emissions D.GREENE 5/12/2010
Uncombusted HCI ICHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/23/2010
(8)HCI Emissions
-Use Equations(3),(4),&(10)from AP-42 Section 2.4 to determine HCI emissions.
HCI concentration= 42.0 ppmv (AP-42,Page 2.4-9)
Molecular weight of chlorine(Cl)= 35.453 g/gmol
HHV of landfill gas= 500 Btu/ft3
LFG consumed= 340,810 MMBIu/yr
Hours of operation= 8,760 hr/yr
Amount of landfill gas consumed=(340,810 MMBtu/yr)/(500 MMBtu/106 ft)= 681.62 x 106 ft3 LFG
Eqn(3)
Qs= (681.62 x 106 ft3)*(m3/35.3198 ft)*(42.0 ppmv CV106)= 810.54 m3 Cl
Eqn(4)
UMC1=(810.54 m')*[(35.453 g/gmol*I atm)/(8.205E-5 m'-atm/gmol-K*1,000 g/kg*(273+25 K))]_
UMCI= 1,175.3 kg CI
Eqn(10)
CMHc,=1,175.3 kg Cl* (NcoL/100)*1.03*(NcN,/100)
NCOL=100%since calc is based on actual flow rate to the flare and not an assumed collection rate.
NcNT=100%Assume the flare is capable of converting 100%of the Cl to HCI.
CMHcj=1,175.3 kg Cl*(100/100)*1.03*(100/100)= 1,210.5 kg/yr HCl
CMHC1=(1,210.5 kg)*(2.21b/kg) = 2,663.1 lb/yr HC1
CMHC1=(2,663.1 lb/yr)/(8,760 hr/yr)= r 0.30 lb/hr HCI
CMHcl=(2,663.1 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/ta)= 1.33 tn/yr HCl

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET I of
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Invent 02209360,01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Insignificant Sources-Solar Flares(ES-06) D.GREENE 6/28/2010
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/28/2010
OBJECTIVE:Estimate emissions resulting from the use of small solar spark flares
kP13ROACH:Use manufacture and site provided data
SOLL'TION:
Number of Solar Flares in operation during CY09: 8
Estimated flow per flare: 60 scfm
Total Estimated Flow: 480 scfin
Solar Flare Usage
12 brs/day
365 days/year
262,900 min/yr
(1)NO: Emissions
NOx Emissions Rate 0.072 lbs Nox/hr/Flare
Total NOx Emisisons 0.576 lbs Nox/hr
2.522.88 Ib/r NOx
0.58 Ib/br NOx
1.26 td r NOr
(2)CO Emissions
CO Emissions Rate 0.302 lbs CO/hr/Flare
Total CO Emisisons 2.416 lbs CO/hr
10,582.08 Ib r CO
2.42 Ib/hr CO
5.29 W CO
(3)PM Emissions
PM Emissions Rate 0.031 lbs PM/hr/Fhve
Total PM Emissions 0.248 lbs PM/hr
1,086.24 Ib/r PM
0.25 Ib/hr PM
0.54 tn/r PM

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 2 of 3
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Insignificant Sources-Solar Flares(ES-06) D.GREENE 6/28/2010
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/28/2010
OBJECTIVE:Estimate emissions resulting from the use of small solar spark flares
APPROACH:Use manufacture and site provided data
SOLUTION:
Number of Solar Flares in operation during CY09: 8
Estimated flow per flare: 60 scf n
Total Estimated Flow: 480 scf n
Solar Flare Usage
12 hrs/day
365 days/year
262,800 min/yr
(1)SOr Emissions
SOZ Emissions Rate 0.014 Ibs S02/hr/Flare
Total S02 Emisisons 0.112 Ibs SOZ/hr
490.56 Ib/yr SOr
0.11 lb/br SO=
0.25 tn/yr S02
(2)VOC Emissions
VOC Emissions Rate 0.004 Ibs VOC/hr/Flare
Total VOC Emisisons 0.032 Ibs VOC/hr
140.16 Ib/r VOC
0.03 lb/hr VOC
0.07 tntvr VOC
(3)NMOC Emissions
Per AP-42,assume NMOC=1/0.39 of VOC
359.38 Ib/r NMOC
0.39 VOC to NMOC
0.08 Ib/hr NMOC
0.18 t r NMOC

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 3 of 3
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Insignificant Sources-Solar Flares(ES-06) D.GREENE 6/28/2010
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/28/2010
Emissions Rates based upon data for compounds common with main Flare and listed by manufacturer
Total Solar Flares: 8
Hydrogen chloride emissions calculated from ratio of Solar Flare H2S emission to Main Flare H2S emission:
Main Flare H2S Emissions*(Solar Flare H2S Emissions/Main Flare H2S Emissions)= 0.11 Ibs/yr
Pollutant Mol.Wt. Flare Flare 8 Flares 8 Flares
( / ol) (lb/T) (to lb/ to )
1 1,1-trichloroethaner"P H"P 133.41 1.2E-05 6.00E-09 9.60E-05 4.80E-08
1 1 2 2-tetrachloroethane T"P.H"e 167.85 3.5E-05 1.75E-08 2.80E-04 1.40E-07
1 1-dichloroethane TAP'HAP 98.97 4.4E-05 2.20E-08 3.52E-04 1.76E-07
11-dichloroetheneT'P'Ho 96.94 3.7E-06 1.85E-09 2.96E-05 1.48E-08
12-dichloroethaneT"P'H"P 98.96 7.6E-06 3.80E-09 6.08E-05 3.04E-08
1,2-dichloropropane H"P 112.99 3.9E-06 1.95E-09 3.12E-05 1.56E-08
acrylonitrile TAP'HM 53.06 9.6E-06 4.80E-09 7.68E-05 3.84E-08
benzeneT1,HAP 78.11 4.2E-06 2.10E-09 3.36E-05 1.68E-08
carbon disulfide TAP'HAP 76.13 1.3E-06 6.50E-10 1.04E-05 5.20E-09
carbon tetrachloride TAP.HAP 153.84 1.2E-07 6.00E-I I 9.60E-07 4.80E-10
carbonyl sulfide HAP 60.07 1 8.4E-07 4.20E-10 6.72E-06 3.36E-09
chlorobenzeneT"P'H"P 112.56 5.4E-06 2.70E-09 4.32E-05 2.16E-08
chloroform TAP'HAP 119.39 6.8E-07 3.40E-10 5.44E-06 2.72E-09
chloromethane TM'HAP 50.49 1.2E-05 6.00E-09 9.60E-05 4.80E-08
dichlorobenzeneT"P'H"P 147.00 5.9E-06 2.95E-09 4.72E-05 2.36E-08
dichlorodifluoromethane TAP 120.91 3.4E-06 1.70E-09 2.72E-05 1.36E-08
dicbloromethane T11.1 84.94 2.3E-04 1.15E-07 1.84E-03 9.20E-07
ethyl mercy tan TAP 62.13 4.0E-06 2.00E-09 3.20E-05 1.60E-08
eth (benzene' 106.16 1.4E-05 7.00E-09 1.12E-04 5.60E-08
ethylene dibromide TAP'HAP 187.88 3.6E-08 1.80E-11 2.88E-07 1.44E-10
hexane TAP'HAP 86.18 1.6E-05 8.00E-09 1.28E-04 6.40E-08
hydrogen sulfide TAP 34.08 3.4E-05 1.70E-08 2.72E-04 1.36E-07
mercury and compounds TAP.HAP 200.61 5.6E-07 2.80E-10 4.48E-06 2.24E-09
methyl ethyl ketone TAP 72.11 1.5E-05 7.50E-09 1.20E-04 6.00E-08
methyl isobutyl ketone TM'HAP 100.16 5.3E-06 2.65E-09 4.24E-05 2.12E-08
methyl mercy tan TAP 48.11 3.4E-06 1.70E-09 2.72E-05 1.36E-08
perchloroethylene TAP'HAP 165.83 1.213-04 6.00E-08 9.60E-04 4.80E-07
tolueneT"P'H"P 92.13 1.0E-04 5.00E-08 8.00E-04 4.00E-07
tnchloroeth lene TAP'HAP 131.40 7.0E-05 3.50E-08 5.60E-04 2.80E-07
vinyl chloride Tnr'HnP 62.50 8.7E-05 4.35E-08 6.96E-04 3.48E-07
x lens Tnr'H"P
Y 106.16 3.7E-05 1.85E-08 2.96E-04 1.48E-07
Total HAPs/TAPs --- I 8.9E-04 I 4.43E-07 7.09E-03 3.54E-06

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of 1
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Leachate Tanks Emission Calculations-NMOC,VOC,HAPs D.GREENE 5/25/2010
CHECKED DATE
J. MORGAN 6/23/2010
OBJECTIVE:Calculate emissions for leachate storage tanks based on laboratory analysis and throughput.
APPROACH:Use mass balance approach,assumes that all organic content volatilizes.
SOLUTION:
Leachate throughput: 1,001,808 gallyr (Data obtained from landfill)
Organic content: 547.3 µg/L. (See Below)
CMvoc=(547.3 µg/L)*(1,001,808 gal/yr)*(3.785 L/gal)*(1 Ib/453.6E+03 mg)*(1 mg/1,000 µg) 4.58 Ib/yr VOC
CMv0c=(4.8 lb/yr)/(8,760 hr/yr)= 5.22E-04 Ib/hr VOC
CMv,c=(4.8 lb/yr)/(2,000 lb/tn)= 2.29E-03 ton/yr VOC
Note: VOC emissions are conservatively estimated to equal NMOC,HAP,and TAP emissions.
VOC µ L1 Ib/ r Ib/d
Acetone 200 1.67 4.58E-03
Benzene 5 0.04 1.15E-04
Dichloromethane 2.5 0.02 5.73E-05
Eth 1 benzene 5.8 0.05 1.33E-04
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 300 2.51 6.87E-03
Methyl Isobu 1 Ketone 5 0.04 1.15E-04
Toluene 16 0.11 3.66E-04
X lenes 13 0.11 2.98E-04
547.3
Notes:
1 "Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Leachate Characterization Study,"Environmental Research&Educational
Foundation,September 2007,(Table 4"Extended VOCs")
Assumes data is representative of East Carolina Landfill lechate VOC content(Table 4"Extended VOCs")
2 Acetone neither HAP or TAP,but included as a VOC for VOC purposes

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 1 of
C7 -11
LIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
R ublic Services 2009 Air Emissions Invento 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
2009 Facility Wide Emissions Summary D.GREENE 6/28/2010
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/28/2010
Landfill Flare Diesel Diesel Welding Leachate Solar TOTAL TOTAL
Pollutant Tank Engines Operations Tank Flares
pbh r) (Ibtyr) (►b/yr) (Iblyr) (Ib/yr) (lb/yr) (lb/yr) pb/yr) tontyr
NOx - 23,175 13,680 2,523 39,378 19.69
SO2 3,639 900 490.6 5,029 2.51
CO -- 126,100 2,940 10582 139,622 69.81
PM - 5.680 100 1.086 6.866 3.43
NMOC 69,091 712.3 4.58 359.4 70,167 35.08
VOC 26,945 277.8 1,100 4.58 140.2 28,468 14.23
11 I-trichloroethaneTA""" 0.05 0.00 9.60E-05 5.E-02 2.72E-OS
1 12 2-tetrachloroethane TAP' "" 0.04 0.00 2.80E-04 5.E-02 2.29E-05
1 1-dichloroethane TAP'' 4.42 0.12 3.52E-04 4.54 2.27E-03
11-dichloroethene"""'" 0.03 0.00 2.96E-05 3.E-02 1.32E-05
12-dichloroethineT""'H"" 0.04 0.00 6.08E-05 4.E-02 2.02E-05
12-dichloro ro aneH4P 0.04 0.00 3.12E-05 5.E-02 2.30E-05
acetaldehyde - 2.40 2.4 1.20E-03
acrolein -- 0.30 3.0.E-01 1.50E-04
a lonitrile"m" 0.04 0.00 7.68E-05 4.E-02 1.76E-05
benzeneT"P''A' 3.59 0.01 :2.90 2.90 0.04 3.36E-05 9.45 4.72E-03
carbon disulfide TAP'HAP 0.03 0.00 1.04E-05 3.E-02 1.52E-05
carbon tetrachloride TAP'HAP 6.39 0.17 9.60E-07 6.55 3.28E-03
carbonyl sulfide"" 38.91 0.15 6.72E-06 39.1 1.95E-02
chlorobenzene'r"P'"" 0.03 0.00 4.32E-05 3.E-02 1.53E-05
chloroethaneT"P'H" 0.02 0.00 2.E-02 8.75E-06
chloroforroT"",1 0.05 0.00 5.44E-06 5.E-02 2.43E-05
chloromethane TAP'HAP 0.01 1 0.00 9.60E-05 7.E-03 3.47E-06
dichlorobenzene TAP'HAP 0.06 0.00 4.72E-05 6.E-02 2.99E-05
dichlorodifluoromedweT"" 423.76 11.13 2.72E-05 434.9 2.17E-01
NFonnaldehyde
ethaneT"P'HA' 0.11 0.00 0.02 1.84E-03 LE-01 6.90E-05
a tan TAP 187.27 0.74 3.20E-05 188.0 9.40E-02
ene TAP'""P 0.04 0.00 0.05 1.12E-04 9.E-02 4.54E-05
ibromide TAP'""" 0.05 0.00 2.88E-07 5.E-02 2.55E OS
de -- 3.60 3.6 1.80E-03
P'HAP 12.00 0.05 1.28E-04 12.0 6.02E-03
chloride TAP'HAP 2,663 1.15E-01 203 5.33E+03
hydrogen sulfide TAP 1,599.43 6.30 2.72E-04 1606 8.03E-01
Manganese 101.00 101 5.05E-02
mercury and compounds TAP'HAP 0.08 0.10 4.48E-06 2.E-01 8.96E-05
methyl ethyl ketone TA' 246.31 0.97 2.51 1.20E-04 249.8 1.25E-01
methyl isobutyl ketone TAP'HAP 0.03 0.00 0.04 4.24E-05 7.E-02 3.42E-05
methyl mercaptan TAP 158.37 0.62 2.72E-05 159.0 7.95E-02
Polycychc Organic Matter 74.10 74.1 3.71 E-02
erchloroeth lene TAP"'" 7.25 0.19 9.60E-04 7.44 3.72E-03
toluene TAP'"" 9.79 0.04 1.30 0.13 8.00E-04 11.3 5.63E-03
trichlometh lene TAP'H" 0.03 0.00 5.60E-04 4.E-02 1.81E-05
vinyl chloride TAP'HAP 44.49 0.86 6.96E-04 45.4 2.27E-02
xylenes TAP,HAP 4.46 0.02 0.90 0.11 1 2.96E-04 5.48 2.74E-03
Total HAPs Only2734.95 21664.85 85.50 101.00 0.40 0.12 5,586.81 2.79
Total TAPs Only 2 740.79 2,684.46 85.50 101.00 2.51 0.12 1 5 614.39 2.81
Total HAPsfrAPs 2,747.22 2,684.62 85.50 101.00 2.90 0.12 1 5.621.36 1 2.81
Notes:
denotes compounds that are classified as tonic av pollutants per North Carolina Deparactatt of Environment and Natural Resources.
denotes compounds that are classified as hazardous air pollutants per AP-42 and CAA Section 112.
'The coropounds hatod above were conpdod from AP-42 revised Nov.1998 and CAA Swum 112.
JUle - U
2��0
b, INA RO

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Listing of Emission Sources and Control Devices on Permit. See instructions
*ES ID on *ES Description *CS ID GCS Description * CD ID's
Air Permit
Municipal solid waste landfill One landfill gas—fired candlestick—type
ES-0I [NSPS] CS-2 flare(3000 scfm, 90 million Btu per hour CD—Flarel
heat input),
I—ES-04 diesel engines for miscellaneous
landfill support
IES05 Welding operations
IES06 Diesel storage tank
IES07 Leachate storage tank
U-8 8 Solar Flares
1

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
Emission Source & Operating Scenario List — See Instructions
*ES Group ID *ES ID *OS ID *OS Description
ES-01 1 Municipal solid waste landfill
I—ES-04 4 No. 2 fuel oil—diesel engines for
miscellaneous landfill support
IES05 3 maintenance shop welding rods
IES06 6 diesel storage tank
IES07 2 temporary storage of collected
leachate
Insignificant source small flares used
U-8 7 to point control landfill gas as needed
(conservatively assumed operation of
12/hr/day for period)
2

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2009
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or ES-01
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Municipal solid waste landfill [NSPS]
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: OS— 1/Municipal solid waste landfill
4. SCC Number/Description: 50100402/Landfill Dump
5. Throughput/units in 2009: 471959 TON/yr
(e.g. production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) /o Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control 60
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
1 CS-2 CD—Flarel One landfill gas—fired candlestick—type flare (3000 scfm, 90 million Btu
per hour heat input)
9. Emission Release Point ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional ntry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
Flare VERTICAL STACK 35 1 1500 60 2827.43 Flare
3

Operating Scenario: OS — 1 Emission Source/Group ID: ES-01
10. Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2009)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11. Typical Start&End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throu h ut:
an—Feb +Dec 25% arch—May 25% une—Aug. 25% Sept.—Nov. 25%
009 009 2009 2009
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentationof emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emission
Emissions— Estimation Control
GHG CAS GHG Method Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2009
Emission
Criteria Emissions— Estimation Control
NAA S Pollutant Criteria Method Efficiency Emission
( Q )Pollutants Code Pollutants Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2009
CO CO 63.05 08 0
NOx NOx 11.59 08 0
TSP TSP 2.84 08 0
PM10 PM10 2.84 08 0
PM2.5 PM2.5 2.84 08 0
S02 S02 1.82 08 0
VOC VOC 13.62 08 98
Emission
CAS Emissions Estimation Control
HAP/TAP Method Efficiency Emission
Pollutants (In Alphabetical Order) instructions) (Pounds/Year)(see HAP/TAPS Code (Net after all Factor EF Control
(See controls)
Instructions
2009
Acr lonitrile 107-13-1 0.035 08 98
Benzene 71-43-2 3.65 08 98
CFC-12 Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 434.9 08 98
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 0.03 08 98
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 6.55 08 98
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 39.07 08 98
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.031 08 98
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.049 08 98
Dichlorobenzene , 1 4— 106-46-7 0.06 08 98
4

Eth lbenzene 100-41-4 0.091 08 98
Ethyl chloride chloroethane 75-00-3 0.018 08 98
Ethyl merca tan 75-08-1 188.01 08 98
Ethylene dichloride 1 2—dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.04 08 98
Ethylidene dichloride
1,1—dichloroethane 75-34-3 4.54 08 98
Hexane n— 110-54-3 12.05 08 98
Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 2663.12 08 0
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 1605.73 08 98
Mercury,vapor(Component of HGC 7439-97-6 0.179 08 98
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.007 08 98
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 0.054 08 98
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 249.79 08 98
Methyl isobut l ketone 108-10-1 0.068 08 98
Methyl merca tan 74-93-1 158.99 08 98
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.136 08 98
Perchloroeth lene tetrachloroeth lene 127-18-4 7.44 08 98
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.046 08 98
Tetrachloroethane 1 1 2 2— 79-34-5 0.046 08 98
Toluene 108-88-3 9.96 08 98
Trichloroeth lene 79-01-6 0.036 08 98
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 45.35 08 98
Vin lidene chloride 75-35-4 0.04 08 98
X lene 1330-20-7 4.58 08 98
5

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2009
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or I—ES-04
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: diesel engines for miscellaneous landfill support
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: OS —4/No. 2 fuel oil—diesel engines for miscellaneous landfill support
4. SCC Number/Description: 20200401/Diesel
5. Throughput/units in 2009: 60000 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) /o Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
17
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
9. Emission Release Point ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter ft (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
RP—DIESEL FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 miscellaneous diesel
STACK) engines
6

Operating Scenario: OS—4 Emission Source/Group ID: I—ES-04
10. Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2009)
Hours per Day ( 10 ) Days per Week ( 6 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11. Typical Start&End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throu h ut:
an—Feb +Dec 25°�° 25°�° une—Aug. ° Sept.—Nov. °
009 �arch—May
09 2009 25%O 2009 25/°
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions— Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
Tons/Year See Instructions all controls
2009
Criteria Emissions— Emission Control
NAA S Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission
( Q ) Code Pollutants Method Code Ef Control
llt
Pollutants (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2009
CO CO 1.47 08
NOx NOx 6.84 08
TSP TSP 0.05 08
PM10 PM10 0.05 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 0.05 08
S02 S02 0.45 08
VOC VOC 0.55 08
HAP/TAP Emissions
Emission Control
Pollutants (In CAS HAP/TAPS Estimation Efficiency Emission
Alphabetical Order) (Pounds/Year)(see instructions) Method Code (Net after all Factor EF Control
See Instructions controls)
2009
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.4 08
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.3 08
Benzene 71-43-2 2.9 08
Butadiene 13— 106-99-0 0.1 08
Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.6 08
Polycyclic Organic
Matter(Inc PAH,
dioxins, etc.NC AP 42 POM 74.1 08
historic amorphous
lob
Toluene 108-88-3 1.3 08
X lene 1330-20-7 0.9
7

8

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2009
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or IES05
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Welding operations
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: OS—3/maintenance shop welding rods
4. SCC Number/Description: 30900500/Metal Work—Welding
5. Throughput/units in 2009: 5000 LB/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (1f fuel is used) /o Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
9. Emission Release Point i ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow Rate ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) (Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK
9

Operating Scenario: OS —3 Emission Source/Group ID: IES05
10. Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2009)
Hours per Day ( 1 ) Days per Week ( 5 ) Weeks per Year ( 50 )
11. Typical Start&End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 900 End: 1000
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throu h ut:
an—Feb +Dec 25% 25% une—Aug. 25% Sept.—Nov. 25%
009 �arch—May
09 009 2009
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions— Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
Tons/Year See Instructions all controls
2009
Criteria Emissions— Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2009
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 08
HAP/TAP Emissions Emission Control
Pollutants (In Alphabetical CAS HAP/TAPS Estimation Efficiency Emission EF Control
Order)
(see instructions) (Pounds/Year) Method Code (Net after all Factor
See Instructions controls)
2009
Manganese Unlisted
Compounds (Specify MNC—Other 101
Component of MNC
10

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2009
1. Emission Source ID (from permit)or IES06
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Diesel storage tank
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: OS —6/diesel storage tank
4. SCC Number/Description: 39090004/Fuel Storage—Fixed Roof Tanks
5. Throughput/units in 2009: 60000 GAL/yr
(e.g. production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) /o Sulfur %Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed in ermit
9. Emission Release Point I ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow Rate ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) (Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK
11

Operating Scenario: OS—6 Emission Source/Group ID: IES06
10. Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2009)
Hours per Day ( 10 ) Days per Week ( 6 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11. Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 600 End: 1600
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throu h ut:
an—Feb +Dec T25% arch—May 25% une—Aug. 25% Sept.—Nov. 25%
009 009 009 2009
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions— Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
Tons/Year See Instructions all controls
2009
Criteria Emissions— Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission
Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
Pollutants (Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2009
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 08
HAP/TAP CAS Emissions Emission
Control
Pollutants (In HAP/TAPS Estimation Emission
(see instructions) Method Code Efficiency Factor EF Control
Alphabetical Order) (Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
See Instructions
2009
Benzene 71-43-2 2.9
12

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit : 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region :WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2009
1. Emission Source ID(from permit)or IES07
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: Leachate storage tank
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: OS—2/temporary storage of collected leachate
4. SCC Number/Description: 40714698/Fixed Roof Tanks—Miscellaneous
5. Throughput/units in 2009: 1001808 GAL/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) /o Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
9. Emission Release Point i ERP Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry lines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow Rate ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter#): (F) (Feet/sec) (Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
(in 0.1 feet)
F-1 FUGITIVE(NO 1 72 Area= 1 fugitive
STACK
13

Operating Scenario: OS—2 Emission Source/Group ID: IES07
10. Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2009)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11. Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throu h ut:
an—Feb +Dec T25% arch—May 25% une—Aug. 25% Sept.—Nov. 25%
009 009 1009 2009
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed :
Attach calculations and documentationof emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emissions— Emission Control
GHG CAS GHG Estimation Efficiency Emission
Pollutants Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
Tons/Year See Instructions all controls
2009
Criteria Emissions— Emission Control
(NAAQS) Pollutant Criteria Estimation Efficiency Emission Ef Control
Pollutants Code Pollutants Method Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See Instructions) all controls)
2009
CO CO 08
NOx NOx 08
TSP TSP 08
PM10 PM10 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 08
S02 S02 08
VOC VOC 0 08
HAP/TAP CAS Emissions Emission
Control
Pollutants (In HAP/TAPS Estimation E Emission EF Control
Efficiency
(see instructions) Method Code y Factor
Alphabetical Order) (Pounds/Year) (Net after all controls)
See Instructions
2009
14

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County:Bertie
DAQ Region :WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory—Calendar Year 2009
1. Emission Source ID(from permit)or U-8
Emission Source Group ID
2. Emission Source Description: 8 Solar Flares
3. Operating Scenario ID/Description: OS—7/Insignificant source small flares used to point control landfill gas as
needed(conservatively assumed operation of 12/hr/day for period)
4. SCC Number/Description: Not required by facility,will be completed by DAQ
5. Throughput/units in 2009: 4380 HR/yr
(e.g.production or fuel use):
6. Fuel Information (If fuel is used) ro
Sulfur /o Ash Heat Content
Btu/units
7. Capture Efficiency
(%of Emissions from this Process Vented to Control
Device or Stack):
8. Control Device Information :None
Order CS—ID CD ID Control Device Description
as listed inpermit)
9. Emission Release Point(ERPI Information: Sources vented to more than one ERP use additional entry fines):
ERP ID ERP Type Height Diameter Temperature Velocity Volume Flow ERP Description
(in feet) Circle(enter ft (F) (Feet/sec) Rate(Acfm)
Rectangle(L x W)
in 0.1 feet)
Insignificant Source
Solar Flare VERTICAL STACK 10 0.33 1050 60 307.9 Solar Flare for odor
control
15

Operating Scenario: OS— 7 Emission Source/Group ID: U-8
10. Operating Schedule: (Source/Operating Scenario that best characterizes Calendar Year 2009)
Hours per Day ( 24 ) Days per Week ( 7 ) Weeks per Year ( 52 )
11. Typical Start& End Times For Operating Scenario: Start: 0 End: 2359
12. Seasonal Periods Percent Annual Throu h ut:
an—Feb +Dec o arch—May o une—Aug. o Sept.—Nov. o
009 25/0 V009 25/0 2009 25/0 2009 25/o
13. Actual Emissions per Pollutant Listed
Attach calculations and documentation of emission factors or other estimation methods used.
Emission
Emissions— Estimation Control
GHG GHG Method Efficiency Emission
Pollutants CAS Ef Control
Pollutants Code (Net after Factor
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2009
Emission
Criteria Emissions— Estimation Control
NAA S Pollutant Criteria Method Efficiency Emission
( Q ) Code Pollutants Code (Net after Factor Ef Control
Pollutants
(Tons/Year) (See all controls)
Instructions
2009
CO CO 5.29 08
NOx NOx 1.26 08
TSP TSP 0.54 08
PM10 PM10 0.54 08
PM2.5 PM2.5 0.54 08
S02 S02 0.25 08
VOC VOC 0.07 08
Emission
CAS Emissions Estimation Control
HAP/TAP Method Efficiency Emission
Pollutants (In Alphabetical Order) instructions) (Pounds/Year)(see HAP/TAPS Code (Net after all Factor EF Control
(See controls)
Instructions
2009
Acr lonitrile 107-13-1 0.00008 08
Benzene 71-43-2 0.00003 08
CFC-12 Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 0.00003 08
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 0.00001 08
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0 08
Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 0.00001 08
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.00004 08
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.00001 08
Dichlorobenzene 14— 106-46-7 0.00005 08
16

Eth lbenzene 100-41-4 0.00011 08
Ethyl merca tan 75-08-1 0.00003 08
Ethylene dichloride 1,2—dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.00006 08
Ethylidene dichloride 75-34-3 0.00035 08
1 1—dichloroethane
Hexane, n— 110-54-3 0.00013 08
Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 0.11 08
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 0.00027 08
Mercury,vapor(Component of HGC 7439-97-6 0 08
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.0001 08
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 0.0001 08
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 0.00012 08
Methyl isobut 1 ketone 108-10-1 0.00004 08
Methyl merca tan 74-93-1 0.00003 08
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.00184 08
Perchloroeth lene tetrachloroeth lene 127-18-4 0.00096 08
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.00003 08
Tetrachloroethane 1 1 2 2— 79-34-5 0.00028 08
Toluene 108-88-3 0.0008 08
Trichloroeth lene 79-01-6 0.00056 08
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 0.0007 08
Vin lidene chloride 75-35-4 0.00003 08
X lene 1330-20-7 0.0003 08
17

Facility Total CY 2009 Emissions Summary
As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region : WARO
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Air Pollutant Point Source Emissions Inventory-Calendar Year 2009
Record Facility-Wide Totals From all Permitted and Non-Permitted Air Pollutant Emission Sources
Green House Gases Pollutants(GHG)
Actual Emissions(Tons ear)
Pollutant CAS 2009 2008 % Difference
Criteria Pollutants
Actual Emissions Tons/Year
Pollutant CAS 2009 2008 % Difference
CO CO 69.81 63.99 9.095164%
NOx NOx 19.69 18.33 7.419534%
PM TSP TSP 3.43 2.87 19.512203%
PM 10 PM 10 3.43 2.87 19.512203%
PM2.5 PM2.5 3.43 2.87 19.512203%
S02 S02 2.52 3.12 -19.230768%
VOC VOC 1 14.24 14.86 1 -4.172274%
Hazardous Air Pollutants HAPS and/or Toxic Air Pollutants TAPS
Actual Emissions Pounds/Year
Pollutant I CAS 1 2009 2008 % Difference
Pollutant Grou :Man anese com ounds Group Sum:101
Manganese Unlisted Compounds (Specify MNC-Other 1:]E:
101 0.0%
Component of MNC
Pollutant Grou :Mercu Compounds-all total mass, inc H Va or Group Sum:.179
Mercury, vapor(Component of HGC 7439-97-6 0.179 .05 258.0%
Pollutant Grou :Total Reduced Sulfur TRS as total mass Gr up Sum:1764.7203
Hydrogen sulfide 7783-06-4 1605.7302 1502.35 6.8812366%
Methyl merca tan 74-93-1 158.99004 148.76 6.876877%
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.4 2.4 0.0%
Acrolein 107-02-8 0.3 .3 0.0%
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 0.03508 .032 9.624997%
Benzene 71-43-2 9.45003 9.09 3.960728%
Butadiene, 1,3- 106-99-0 0.1 .1 0.0%
CFC-12 Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 434.90002 398.04 9.26038%
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 1 0.03001 .028 7.178568%
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 6.55 5.99 9.348922%
18

Carbonyl sulfide 463-58-1 39.07001 35.65 9.593295%
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.03104 .028 10.857139%
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.04901 .045 8.911109%
Dichlorobenzene 14- 106-46-7 0.06005 .053 13.3018875%
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 0.09111 .039 133.61539%
Ethyl chloride chloroethane 75-00-3 0.018 .016 12.4999895%
Ethyl merca tan 75-08-1 188.01003 175.91 6.8785295%
Ethylene dichloride 1 2-dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.04006 .037 8.270266%
Ethylidene dichloride 75-34-3 4.54035 4.15 9.406021%
1 1-dichloroethane
.Formaldehyde 50-00-0 3.6 3.6 0.0%
Hexane n- 110-54-3 12.05013 10.99 9.646317%
Hydrogen chloride(hydrochloric acid 7647-01-0 2663.23 Not reported N/A
Methyl chloride 74-87-3 0.0071 .006 18.333334%
Methyl chloroform 71-55-6 0.0541 .049 10.408165%
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 249.79012 225.64 10.702942%
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1 0.06804 .024 183.49998%
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.13784 .0106 1200.3774%
Perchloroeth lene tetrachloroeth lene 127-18-4 7.44096 6.81 9.265199%
Polycyclic Organic Matter(Inc PAH,
Toxins, etc.NC AP 42 historic amorphous POM 74.1 74.1 0.0%
lob
Propylene dichloride 78-87-5 0.04603 .042 9.59524%
Tetrachloroethane, 1 1 2 2- 79-34-5 0.04628 .042 10.190478%
Toluene 108-88-3 11.2608 10.27 9.647515%
Trichloroeth lene 79-01-6 0.03656 .033 10.787876%
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 45.3507 30.91 46.71854%
Vin lidene chloride 75-35-4 0.04003 .024 66.791664%
X lene 1330-20-7 5.4803 4.98 10.046183%
19

As entered in AERO
Facility Name: Eastern Carolina Regional Solid Waste Landfill Facility ID : 0800102
1922 Republican Road Permit: 08849
Aulander,NC 27805 County : Bertie
DAQ Region :WARO
Comments From Facility:
Y
20

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET I of 3
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Rs2ublic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
Revised-2009 Insignificant Sources-Solar Flares(ES-06) D.GREENS 6/28/2010 REV 7/27/10
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/28/2010(REV 7127110)
OBJECTIV :Estimate emissions resulting from the use of small solar spark flares
APPROACH:Use manufacture and site provided data
S L 1 N:
Number of Solar Flares in operation during CY09: 8
Estimated flow per flare: 60 sefin
Total Estimated Flow: 480 sefm
Solar Flare Usage
8 hrs/day
365 days/year
175,200 midyr
(1)NOx Emissions
NOx Emissions Rate 0.072 IN Nox/hr/Flare
Total NOx Emisiions 0.576 Ibs Nox/hr
1,681.92 lb/vr NOx
0.58 lb/hr NOx
0.84 trdvr NOx
(2)CO Emissions
CO Emissions Rate 0.302 Ibs CO/hr/Flare
Total CO Emisisort_s 2.416 Ibs CO/hr
7,054.72 Ib/vr CO
2.42 Ilr/hr CO
3.53 tn/ CO
(3)PM Emissions
PM Emissions Rate 0.031 Ibs PM/tv/Flare
Total PM Entisisons 0.248 lbs PM/hr
724.16 Ib/vr PM
0.25 lb/hr PM
036 tn/vr PM
1.

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 2 of 3
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Re ublic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
Revised-2009 Insignificant Sources-Solar Flares(ES-06) D.GREENS 1 6/28/2010 REV 7/27/10
CHECKED DATE
I.MORGAN 6/28/2010(REV 7/27110)
OBJECTIV :Estimate emissions resulting from the use of small solar spark flares
APPROACH:Use manufacture and site provided data
SOLUTION:
Number of Solar Flares in operation during CY09: 8
Estimated Flow per flare: 60 scfm
Total Estimated Flow. 480 scfm
Solar Flare Usage
8 hrs/day
365 days/year
175,200 min/yr
(1)SO, Emissions
SO,Emissions Rate 0.014 Ibs SO/hr/H re
Total SO,Emisssons 0.112 Ibs SO,/hr
327.04 lb/yr SO=
0.11 lb/hr SO=
0.16 in/yr SO=
(2)VOC Emissions
VOC Emissions Rate 0.004 lbs VOC/hr/Flare
Total VOC Emisssons 0.032 Ibs VOC/hr
93.44 Ib/yr VOC
0.03 lb/hr VOC
0.05 to/ r YOC
(3)NMOC Emissions
Per AP-42,assume NMOC=1/0.39 of VOC
239.59 Ib/r NMOC
0.39 VOC to NMOC
0.08 lb/hr NMOC
0.12 tn/r NMOC

SCS ENGINEERS
SHEET 3 of 3
CLIENT PROJECT East Carolina Environmental Landfill JOB NO.
Republic Services 2009 Air Emissions Inventory 02209360.01
SUBJECT BY DATE
Revisied-2009 Insignificant Sources-Solar Flares(ES-06) D.GREEN£ 6/28/2010 REV 7/27/10
CHECKED DATE
J.MORGAN 6/28/2010(REV 7/27/10
Emissions Rates based upon data for compounds common with main Flare and listed by manufacturer
Total Solar Flares: 8
Operational year: 33.3% (percent of full year as operated at 8 hr/d)
Hydrogen chloride emissions calculated from ratio of Solar Flare H2S emission to Main Flare H2S emission:
Main Flare 112S Emissions•(Solar Flare H2S Emissions/Main Flare H2S Emissions)= 0.04 Ibs/yr
Pollutant Mot.Wt. Flare Flare 8 Flares 8 Flares
of Ib/ tn/ lb/ riod tn/ nod yr
1,1,1-trichloroethane TAP'H'P 133.41 1.2E-05 6.00E-09 3.20E-05 1.60E-08
I 1 2 2-tetrachloroethane TAP'H"P 167.85 3.5E-05 1.75E-08 9.33E-05 4.67E-08
1,1dichloroethaneTAP.HAP 98.97 4.4E-05 2.20E-08 1.17E-04 5.87E-08
1,1-dichloroetheneT"P'H"P 96.94 3.7E-06 1.85E-09 9.87E-06 4.93E-09
t 2dichloroethaneTAP.HO 98.96 7.6E-06 3.80E-09 2.03E-05 1.01E-08
1,2dichloro ro aneH"P 112.99 3.9E-06 1.95E-09 1.04E-05 5.20E-09
acrylonitrile TAP*HAP 53.06 9.6E-06 4.80E-09 2.56E-05 1.28E-08
benzene TAR HAP
78.11 4.2E-06 2.10E-09 1.12E-05 5.60E-09
carbon disulfide TAP'HAP 76.13 1.3E-06 6.50E-10 3.47E-06 1.73E-09
carbon tetrachloride TM'H"P 153.84 1.2E-07 6.00E-11 3.20E-07 1.60E-10
carbonyl sulfide HAP 60.07 8.4E-07 4.20E-10 2.24E-06 1.12E-09
chlorobenzene TAP.HAP 112.56 5.4E-06 2.70E-09 1.44E-05 7.20E09
chloroform TAP.HAP 119.39 6.8E-07 3.40E-10 1.81E-06 9.07E-10
chloromethane TAP.HAP 50.49 1.2E-05 6.00E-09 3.20E-05 1.60E-08
dichlorobenzene TAP.HAP 147.00 5.9E-06 2.95E-09 1.57E-05 7.87E-09
dichlorodifluoromethane TAP 120.91 3.4E-06 1.70E-09 9.07E-06 4.53E-09
dichloromethane TAP'HAP 84.94 2.3E-04 1.15E-07 6.13E-04 3.07E-07
ethyl merca tan TM 62.13 4.0E-06 2.00E-09 1.07E-05 5.33E-09
eth IbenzeneH"P 106.16 1.4E-05 7.00E-09 3.73E-05 1.87E-08
ethylene dibromide TM,HAP 187.88 3.6E-08 1.80E-11 9.60E-08 4.80E-11
hexane TAP.NAP 86.18 1.6E-05 8.00E-09 4.27E-05 2.13E-08
hydrogen sulfide TAP 34.08 3.4E-05 1.70E-08 9.07E-05 4.53E-08
mercury and compounds TAP'HAP 200.61 5.6E-07 2.80E-10 1.49E-06 7.47E-10
methyl ethyl ketone TAP 72.11 1.5E-05 7.50E-09 4.00E-05 2.00E-08
methyl isobutyl ketone TAP,H"P 100.16 5.3E-06 2.65E-09 1.41E-05 7.07E-09
methyl mercaptan TAP 48.11 3.4E-06 1.70E-09 9.07E-06 4.53E-09
rchloroeth ene TAP'HAP 165.83 1.2E-04 6.00E-08 3.20E-04 1.60E-07
toluene TM.HAP 92.13 1.0E-04 5.00E-08 2.67E-04 1.33E-07
trichloroeth lene TAP,HAP 131.40 7.0E-05 3.50E-08 1.87E-04 9.33E-08
lvinyi chloride TAP.HAP 62.50 8.7E-05 4.35E-08 2.32E-04 1.16E-07
xylenesT"P'H"P 106.16 3.7E-05 1.85E-08 9.87E-05 4.93E-08
Total HAPs/7APs - 8.9E-04 4.43E-07 2.36E-03 1.18E-06