AQ_F_1000067_20170131_CEM_RptRvwLtr

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Kra- secretary
Air Quality SHEILA C. HOLMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Director
January 31,2017
Mr.David H.Groves
Plant Manager
Capital Power Corporation
P.O.Box 10836
1281 Powerhouse Drive SE
Southport,North Carolina 28461
Subject: 31"'Quarter 2016 Continuous Emissions Monitoring Compliance Report(CEMCR)
3RDQuarter 2016 2016 Excess Emission Report(EER)
Air Permit No. 05884T21
Facility I.D.No. 1000067
Dear Mr.Groves,
The Division of Air Quality(DAQ)has received the subject reports(CEMCR and EER)submitted by The
Capital Power Corporation in a letter dated October 21,2016. The reports were submitted for the
continuous emission monitoring system(CEMS)and continuous opacity monitoring system(COMS)
operating on electric generating Unit 1 and Unit 2,each consisting of three Boilers with the common stack.
DAQ has reviewed the quarterly EERs for the ending September 30,2016. The percent excess emissions
(%EE)and percent monitor downtime(%MD)are summarized as follows:
Emission Unit Pollutant %EE %MD Emission Applicable
Violations Regulation
CEMCR
Unit 1 NOx 0.00% 0.58% 0 §60,44b(a)/60.44b(c)
Boiler No. 0.00% NCAC 2D .0530
ES-1-IA 0.00% NCAC 2D .0501(c)
ES-1-113 S02 0.00% 0.58% ----- NCAC 2D .0530
ES-1-IC 94.99% NCAC 2D .0501(c)
Common Stack O acity 0.00% 0.70% ----- §60.43b
CO 0.00% 0.58% ----- NCAC 2D.1109
Unit 2 NOx 0.00% 0.43% 0 §60.44b(a)/60.44b(c)
Boiler No. 0.00% NCAC 2D .0530
ES-2-1A 0.00% NCAC 2D .0501(c)
ES-2-113 S02 0.00% 0.43% 0 NCAC 2D .0530
ES-2-1C 86.83% NCAC 2D .0501(c)
Common Stack 10.00% 10.70% ----- §60.43b
C 10.00% 10.43% ----- NCAC 2D .1109
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Air Quality
217 W.Jones Street 11641 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1641
919 707 8400

Mr. David H. Groves
January 31,2017
Page 2
A review of the quarterly excess emissions reports(EE.K)indicated there were no violations of the
applicable emissions standards.Please note that the SOz excess emissions of 94.99% and 86.83%for the
Unit I and Unit 2 are addressed in the Special Order by Consent(SOC 2016-001)signed on June 24,
20I6. The other excess emissions noted above are excused pursuant to the applicable regulation. Please
note that each exceedance of the emission control standard unless excused by applicable regulation can be
credible evidence of a violation consistent with 40 CFR 60.11(g).
The reports were also reviewed with the general provision of 40 CFR 60.11(d), and 40 CFR 60,13 to
assess good operation and maintenance(O&M)practices for the facility and monitoring systems.As
summarized in the table on the previous page,the emission units and associated CEMS/COMS appeared
to have operated using good O&M practices since quarterly percent excess emissions (%EE)and percent
monitor downtime(%MD)were less than 3%for two consecutive quarters and 6%for any single
calendar quarter.
The CGA(NO, SO2 and CO)result for the Unit 1 and Unit 2,conducted during third quarter were within
15%specification given in 40 CFR 60,Appendix F.
The opacity monitor appears to meet the requirements of QA/QC rule(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix F,
Procedure 3).
If you have any questions,please contact me at(919)707-8409 or samir.parekhkncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Samir Parekh,P.E., Environmental Engineer
Division of Air Quality,NCDEQ
cc: Michael Pjetraj
Brad Newland—WiRO
Central File—Brunswick Co.
IBEAM—Documents— 1000067
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Air Quality
217 W.Jones Street 1 1641 Mail Service Center i Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1641
919 707 8400