Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_1000067_20160407_CEM_RptRvwLtr PAT MCCRORY Governor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Air Quality Secretary ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SHEILA C. HOLMAN Director April 7,2016 Mr. David H.Groves Plant Manager Capital Power Corporation P.O.Box 10836 1281 Powerhouse Drive SE Southport,North Carolina 28461 Subject: 21 Semi-Annual 2015 Continuous Emissions Monitoring Compliance Report(CEMCR) 21''D Semi-Annual 2015 Excess Emission Report(EER) Air Permit No.05884T18 Facility I.D.No. 1000067 Dear Mr.Groves, The Division of Air Quality(DAQ)has received the subject reports(CEMCR and EER)submitted by The Capital Power Corporation in a letter dated January 20, 2016 and e-mail dated October 29,2015.The reports were submitted for the continuous emission monitoring system(CEMS)and continuous opacity monitoring system(COMS)operating on electric generating Unit 1 and Unit 2,each consisting of three Boilers with the common stack. DAQ' has reviewed the quarterly EERs for the semi-annual period ending December 31,2015.The percent excess emissions (%EE)and percent monitor downtime (%MD)are summarized as follows: Emission Pollutant Emission Excess Monitor Applicable Unit Violations Emissions Downtime Regulations (CEMCR) (%EE) (%MD) Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4 Unit 1 NOx 0 0 ----- ----- 0.92% 1.30% §60.44b(a)/60.44b(c) Boiler No. NCAC 2D .0530 ES-1-lA NCAC 2D .0501(e) ES-1-113 S02 ----- ----- 0.00% 0.00% 0.92% 1.30% NCAC 2D .0530 ES-1-1C NCAC 2D .0501 e Common Opacity ----- ----- 0.04% 0.01% 0.61% 0.96% §60.43b(f) Stack CO 0 0 ----- ----- 0.92% 1.30% NCAC 2D .1109 Unit 2 NOx 0 0 ----- ----- 0.77% 0.72% §60.44b(a)/60.44b(c) Boiler No. NCAC 213 .0530 ES-24A NCAC 2D .0501(e) ES-2-1B S02 ----- ----- 0.00% 0.00% 1.11% 0.72% NCAC 2D .0530 ES-2-1 C NCAC 2D .0501(e) Common Opacity ----- ----- 0.03% 0.01% 0.59% 1.05% §60.43b(f) Stack CO 0 0 ----- ----- 0.72% 0.67% NCAC 2D .1109 State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Air Quality 1641 Mail Service Center[ 217 W.Jones Street,Suite 4000 1 Raleigh,NC 27699-1641 919 707 8400 T Mr.David H. Groves April 7, 2016 Page 2 The reports were reviewed for compliance with the applicable emission standards.There are opacity excess emissions attributed to the"other known causes"during third and fourth quarter for the Unit 1 and during third quarter for the Unit 2. Please note that these excess emissions are not excused pursuant to 40 CFR 60, Subpart A,and Subpart Db.These unexcused excess emissions prevent you from certifying compliance in your Annual Compliance Certification(ACC) for the calendar year 2015 pursuant to 15A NCAC 02Q .0508. The other excess emissions in your reports are excused pursuant to the applicable regulation. Please note that each exceedance of the emission control standard unless excused by applicable regulation can be credible evidence of a violation consistent with 40 CFR 60.11(g). The reports were also reviewed with the general provision of 40 CFR 60.11(d),and 40 CFR 60.13 to assess good operation and maintenance(O&M)practices for the facility and monitoring systems. As summarized in the table on the previous page,the emission units and associated CEMS/COMS appeared to have operated using good O&M practices since quarterly percent excess emissions(%EE) and percent monitor downtime(%MD)were less than 3%for two consecutive quarters and 6%for any single calendar quarter. The CGA(NO., SO2 and CO)result for the Unit 1 and Unit 2, conducted during third and fourth quarter were within 15%specification given in 40 CFR 60,Appendix F. The opacity monitor appears to meet the requirements of QA/QC rule(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix F, Procedure 3). If you have any questions,please contact me at(919)707-8409 or samir.parekhgncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Samir arekh,P.E.,Environmental Engineer Division of Air Quality,NCDEQ cc: Michael Pjetraj Brad Newland—WiRO Central File—Brunswick Co. IBEAM—Documents— 1000067