HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_1000067_20070320_CEM_GenCorr NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
B. Keith Overcash, P.E., Director
March 20, 2007
Mr. Lynn Haynes
Air Monitoring and Technical Support Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
The Atlantic Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
SUBJECT: Part 75 EPA Field Audit Summary Report
Primary Energy—Southport Facility,Units 1 and 2
Facility I.D.No. 1000067 ORIS 10378
Dear Mr.Haynes:
Attached is the Part 75 Level II audit report for Primary Energy's Southport Facility, Units 1 and 2 that I
conducted on February 8, 2007. The audit addressed all aspects of a Level Il audit including: Inspections of
the CEMS, Records review and RATA observation.
During the Level Il audit, no compliance problems involving any regulatory requirements of Part 75 were
observed. The Quality Assurance manual appears complete and fully implemented. The maintenance logs
as well as emission data records appear complete.
Records from EPA's Monitoring Data Checking software 4.2.55 (MDC 4.2.55)were checked with facility
records. The facility information was consistent with the MDC information for missing data,failed
calibrations, linearity test reports, CEMS model numbers and serial numbers. These records correctly
reflect the daily and quarterly activities on the CEM systems. Additional data and RATA results are
attached in Appendix"1.
If you have any questions regarding this audit, please call me at(919) 715-0726.
Sincerely, I
Richard R. Simpson
Environmental Engineer
Attachment
cc: Mr.Manuel Olivia, EPA Clean Air Market Division
Mr. Gregory Wagoner, Primary Energy- Southport
Mr. Wayne Cook, Wi1RO
Central Files,Brunswick Co.
Mike Aldridge, NCDENR-w/o attachment
.Dennis Igboko, NCDENR
IvIPAQ—Documents— 1000067
Technical Services Section One
1641 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1641 NorthCarohna
2728 Capital Blvd.,Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 NaturallyPhone: 919-733-17281 FAX 919-733-1812/ Intemet: www.ncair.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer—50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper
PART 75 CEMS FIELD AUDIT MANUAL:
Appendix A - Example Audit Forms and Guide Sheets
Primary Energy
Southport Units 1 and 2
North Carolina
r EPA Region 4
CEMS Inspection Sheet Appendix A
CEMS Inspection Sheet
1. Plant and Audit Information
Plant Name: Primary Energy-Southport
ORIS Code: 10378
City: Southport
State: North Carolina
Plant Contact: Gregory Wagner
Contact Phone Number: 1-910-457-5056 x29
Inspector Name: Richard Simpson
Audit Date: February 8,2007
2. Probe and Probe Location Checks
What to Check Observations
Probe locations in the stack or duct are in the Probe locations are the same as in the monitoring plan.
same location as in the monitoring plan?
Has the duct or stack location been Stack location is the same and has not changed.
modified? (Dimensions)
Have the probe or probe components(e.g., Probe and components are the same and has not changed.
dilution probe orifice)been changed?
Page A-2 Part 75 Field Audit Manual-July 16,2003
Appendix A CEMS Inspection Sheet
3. Flow Monitors
What to Check Observations
Ask the source to perform a daily Daily interference checks procedure as per QA/QC plan.
interference check or review the results of the
most recent test.App.B §2.1.2 requires a
daily interference check for flow monitors.
The interference check procedure and criteria
are not defined by rule in Part 75. It should be
described in the QA/QC Plan.
When were the filters or transducers last Filters and transducers are replaced as needed.
replaced? How does this compare to the
QA/QC Plan?
Ask what the QA/QC procedures are for any All temperature and stack pressure monitors compares with
temperature and stack pressure monitors QA/QC plan and procedures.
used in conjunction with the flow monitor.
Have there been any problems? Compare to
the QA/QC plan and maintenance records.
I
Check if there have been any changes to k- Gas RATA was performed with monitors at high/normal
factors and polynomial coefficients since the load. No changes on k-factors, temp. may fluctuate so
last RATA. Changes to correction factors equation may change.
should be recorded in the maintenance log.
A three load RATA is required following any
change to flow monitor k-factors(§75.20(b)).
Also see Table 8 -DAHS.
What is the status of the control panel lights, All control panel lights ,indicators and alarms were
indicators and alarms? Displays will vary by functional and O.K.
analyzer, so ask the source what the displays
are and what they mean.
Check range settings, and compare to the Range/span settings were compared to MDC data and O.K.
monitoring plan. Has the source done the NOx—400 ppm, CO2—20%.
annual span/range check required by App.A?
Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16,2003 Page A-3
CEMS Inspection Sheet Appendix A
4. Dilution Air Systems (Including Air Cleaning Subsystem)
What to Check Observations
Has the dilution probe orifice been changed? The dilution probe orifice is normally changed as needed
If the orifice has been changed,ask if there is and according to the QA/QC plan.
a procedure for changing the orifice in the
QA/QC Plan, what prompts a change, and
how the dilution ratio is verified.
Is the dilution probe ejector pump vacuum NA.
at or below the certification value? How often
is it checked?
What is the dilution ratio? Check the Dilution ratio is 100:1 and analyzer flow settings correspond
dilution air and analyzer flow settings. to the QA/QC plan.
How are these set and verified? These should
all be described in the QA/QC plan.
Are correction factors applied to the dilution Correction factors are not used on this small system
ratio for changes in pressure,temperature,or
molecular weight? Have these been changed
since the last RATA? Changes to correction
factors should be recorded in the maintenance
log,. QA testing may also be required .
(Also see Table 8 -DAHS).
Check the inlet and outlet pressures of CO2 The inlet pressure is 95 psi and outlet pressure is 80 psi.
air cleaner filter. Compare levels to the Levels compare to QA/QC procedure.
QA/QC Plan.
How often are the air cleaning filters and Heatless filter replaced semiannual as needed.
drying agents replaced? Compare to the
QA/QC plan.
5. Source Level Extractive Systems
What to Check Observations
Check the umbilical lines entering the CEMS Umbilical lines were checked and no moisture was present.
shelter for condensation (visible water drops).
For a dry system using chillers check the Wet, NA
chiller temperature. What is the proper
temperature range, and how often is it
verified? Compare against the QA/QC Plan.
Page A-4 Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16,2003
Appendix A CEMS Inspection Sheet
6. Analyzers
What to Check'' Observations
Ask the source if there have been any changes since the No major changes have taken place. Analyzer
last audit or certification/recertification. Document the serial numbers correspond to MDC data and the
serial numbers and compare to those in the monitoring monitoring plan.
plan.
What is the status of the control panel lights, indicators All control panel lights, indicators and alarms
and alarms? Displays will vary by analyzer,so ask the were functional and O.K.
source what the displays are and what they mean.
Check range settings,and compare to the monitoring Range/span settings were compared to MDC
plan. Has the source done the annual span/range check data and O.K.
required by App.A? NOx—400 ppm, CO2—20%, Flow 4020 afpm
Compare the sample flow rate,if displayed by a Sample now rate is displayed and corresponds to
rotameter(or a digital reading),to the QA/QC Plan. the QA/QC plan.
Unit 1: NOx—0.787 Lpm CO2—0.553 Lpm
Unit 2: NOx—0.699 Lpm CO2—0.551 Lpm
Have there been any changes to correction factors (NO, No known changes to the correction factors.
quenching and moisture monitors)since the last RATA?
Changes to correction factors should be recorded in the
maintenance log,and the QA/QC Plan should outline the
procedures for changing the correction factors(Appendix
B, Section 1.13). QA testing may also be required(See
§75.20(b),and Recertification and Diagnostic Testing
Policy).
Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16,2003 Page A-5
CEMS Inspection Sheet Appendix A
7. Calibration Gases
What to Inspect Observations
Spot check the cylinder certificates versus the cylinder Cylinder numbers engraved checked with
numbers engraved on the cylinder. Table A may be used certificates and everything o.k.
to record information for each cylinder.
Verify that gases meet calibration gas definition in§ Verified and o.k.
72.2. See Table B.
Check the expiration date of gas in cylinders. Use of an All cylinders in use before expiration and o.k.
expired cylinder is not in compliance with§75.21(c).
Check the concentration values for each cylinder. Are Concentration ranges are correct with the span.
concentration ranges correct for the span? Linearity
test point ranges are shown below:
Point 1: 20%-30%of span
Point 2: 50%-60%of span
Point 3: 80%- 100%of span
Check the zero air gas documentation. (Supplier Just zero air is used not zero gas.
certification):
SO,,NO,and THC < 0.1 ppm
CO <_ 1 ppm,and COZ s 400 ppm
[See§72.2 and Policy Manual 10.2, 10.3]
Record the concentration values to check against the Concentration values checked with DAHS
values recorded by the DAHS for calibration error and through daily calibration.
linearity tests.
Read the cylinder regulator pressure. Cylinder pressure All cylinder regulator pressures are above
should not be< 150 psi. 150 psi.
Check the regulator outlet pressure. The pressure or Checked and pressure as per QA test and
calibration gas flow rate should be set as specified in the QA/QC procedure.
QA test procedures in the QA/QC plan.
Are stainless steel regulators used for SOZ cylinders? NA
Page A-6 Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16,2003
Appendix A CEMS Inspection Sheet
Table A:
Calibration Gas Records
Gas` Cylinder Certi#icate� Type of Cal Gas Cylinder, )Expiration` Certificate
No: Concentration% . (e:g,,SRM,PRM, Pressure'' Date on File
r etc.,
NOx CC]69325 233 Daily Calibration 800 4/24/08 Yes
CO2 I CC154 11.2% Daily Calibration 1200 4/19/09 Yes
Table B:
Part 75 Calibration Gases (§ 72.2)
Calibration Gas Type Abbr: .I :Description ,
NIST-standard reference material SRM Calibration gas obtained from the National Institute of
Standards and Technology(NIST)
NIST- standard reference material- PRM Listed in a declaration of equivalence with"EPA
equivalent compressed gas primary Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of
reference material Gaseous Calibration Standards,"September 1997,EPA-
600/R-97/12 I[Traceability Protocol]
NIST-traceable reference material NTRM Tested and certified by NIST
NIST/EPA-approved certified CRM Approved by EPA and NIST as evidenced by a certificate
reference materials or other documentation issued by a certifying
standard-setting body
Gas manufacturer's intermediate GMIS Assayed and certified by direct comparison to one of the
standard other NIST standards listed in this table according to
section 2.1.2.1 of the Traceability Protocol
EPA protocol gas Protocol Vendor-certified to be within 2.0 percent of the cylinder
label concentration[See Traceability Protocol]
Zero air material Zero Air Calibration gas certified by gas vendor: S02,NO,and
Total Hydrocarbons s 0.1 ppm, CO s 1 ppm,or CO2 s 400
ppm. If a mixture, other components certified not to
interfere with target compound.
Research gas mixture RGM NIST analyzed and certified as "NIST traceable."
8. DAHS
Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16,2003 Page A-7
CEMS Inspection Sheet Appendix A
What to Check I Observations
Make sure that the version used is previously DAHS certified per MDC information and
certified/recertified by checking against the Monitoring monitoring plan.
Plan.
Ask to see and check the DAHS verification test for the DAHS verified for missing data procedure and
missing data and calculation routines. Verification test attached in Appendix 1 as maintenance log.
results for the missing data routines and emissions
calculations are required to be kept on site by§§
75.20(c)(9)and 75.63(a)(2)(iii). A vendor certification
that the software meets Part 75 requirements is sufficient
for missing data routines.
Ask the source what type of correction factors are Correction factors are applied when needed and
applied, and how they are entered into the DAHS as noted in QA/QC procedure. Real time data of
(pressure/temperature compensation,flow and moisture boiler variables are attached in Appendix 1.
monitoring polynomials, sonic velocity correction factors,
NO,. quenching correction factors,dilution ratio settings).
Also ask if any changes have been made. Changes to
correction factors should be recorded in the maintenance
log, and the QA/QC Plan should outline the procedures for
changing the correction factors(Appendix B, Section
1.1.3). QA testing may also be required (See§75.20(b),
and Recertification and Diagnostic Testing Policy).
How are the RATA results recorded? RATA reference RATA results are recorded in the 600 records
method data and RATA results can be input by hand. through MDC. The stack testing transfer results
Review some recent tests to verify that hard copy and through computer disc or laptop.
electronic data match. Check that the dates and time,
linearity error,relative accuracy,and bias adjustment
factors (BAF)match. (See the RATA review sheet for
additional checks.)
Is any other data input by hand?If so spot check to see No other known data is input by hand.
that the DAHS data agree with hard copy data.
The following types of data may be entered manually:
-Negative (<0)emission values
-Erroneous emission values(if significant must be
approved by EPA)
-SOS concentration <2.0 ppm
-Reference method back-up data
-RATA reference method data and RATA results
-Leak checks,7-day calibration error tests, and cycle time
tests
-Operating data(load and time)
-Add-on control equipment operation during missing data
periods [See item 8,below]
Page A-8 Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16,2003
Appendix A CEMS Inspection Sheet
9. Optional Control Equipment Parameter Monitoring (§ 75.34)
What to Check Observations
Check the QA/QC Plan which will identify add-on SO2 or NA
NO,,control equipment parameters and acceptable
ranges if the source is using add-on control equipment
missing data options. Parameters and acceptable ranges
are required by App B,§ 1.1.1.
Review control equipment parameter monitoring NA
records for a number of missing data periods. Compare
the parameter data to the acceptable ranges in the QA/QC
Plan. Identify any periods when the range is exceeded and
how the missing data period was flagged in the DAHS
(control operating properly or not operating properly).
Ask the source how it enters proper control equipment NA
operation for missing data periods into the DAHS.
Manual entry of missing data period information is
allowed by Part 75.
Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16, 2003 Page A-9
CI MS Inspection Sheet Appendix A
10. Maintenance Log Review
What to Check Observation
Do the log entries sufficiently describe the action taken? Log entry sufficiently described the action taken
Are the entries understandable? and entry was understandable. See Appendix 1.
Does the log show maintenance checks at the frequency The maintenance log represents the correct
identified in the QA/QC Plan? Are all records available frequency and were available as per QA/QC
(see Table C)? procedure.
Identify recurring failures or malfunctions recorded in No recurring failures and malfunctions were
the log. recorded outside of quarterly maintenance.
Are malfunctions resolved as specified in the QA/QC Malfunctions were resolved as per QA/QC plan.
Plan?
Do events in the maintenance log correspond to reported Maintenance log corresponds to the missing data
missing data periods in the quarterly reports? periods.
Are there repeated adjustments to the zero or span? No known repeated adjustments to the zero or
span.
Have system parts or components been replaced? If so has No known major replacements or components.
the proper recertification or diagnostic testing been
performed?
Does the log show any pre-RATA adjustments? No known pre-RATA adjustments.
Table C:
Maintenance Record Requirements (Appendix B § 1.1.3)
The following records arerequired by the QA/QC Plan provisions of Part 75:
• date, time, and description of any testing, adjustment,repair,replacement,or preventive maintenance action
performed on any monitoring system.
• records of any corrective actions associated with a monitor's outage period.
• any adjustment that changes a system's ability to record and report emissions data(e.g., changing of flow
monitor or moisture monitoring system polynomial coefficients, K factors or mathematical algorithms,
changing of temperature and pressure coefficients and dilution ratio settings).
• a written explanation of the procedures used to make the adjustment(s)shall be kept.
Page A-10 Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16,2003
Appendix A CEMS Inspection Sheet
11. QA/QC Plan Review
What to Check: Observation
Is there a written QA/QC Plan(it may be stored QA/QC procedure documents were revised on
electronically but should be available), and when was it 9/4/04.
last updated?
(Appendix B § 1)
Are calibration error test and linearity test procedures Calibration error test and linearity test
outlined in the plan? procedures were outlined in the QA/QC
(Appendix B, § 1.2.1) procedure.
Are calibration and linearity test adjustment Calibration and linearity test adjustment
procedures outlined? (Appendix B,§ 1.2.2) procedures were outlined in the QA/QC
procedure.
Preventive maintenance procedures and recordkeeping Preventive maintenance procedures and record
identified? keeping were outlined in the QA/QC procedure.
(Appendix B,§§ 1.1.1 and 2)
Are RATA test procedures provided?(Appendix B,§ RATA test procedures are provided in the
1.2.3) QA/QC procedure.
Are emissions and QA test recordkeeping and reporting Record keeping and reporting procedures were
procedures, including missing data procedures, outlined in the QA/QC procedures.
addressed?(Appendix B, § 1.1.2)
If using add-on control equipment missing data options, NA
are control equipment parameters identified?(Appendix
B, § 1.
Part 75 Field Audit Manual-July 16,2003 Page A-I I
Dailv Calibration Error Test Observation Sheet Appendix A
Daily Calibration Error Test Observation
If offline calibrations are done,was the offline-online test passed? NA
System/Component ID: Parameter Monitored: Span Value,S:
CE Results
Date/time Calibration Value,R CEM Response,A
(ppm,%,SCFH or fpm) (ppm,%,SCFH or fpm) (%ofspan) R-A
(ppm,%,SCFH or fpm)
Zero level check ee a ac a daily calibration sheet.
Upscale check
System/Component ID: Parameter Monitored:_ Span Value,S:
CE Results
Date/time Calibration Value,R CEM Response,A
(ppm,%,SCFH or fpm) (ppm,%,SCFH or fpm) (%of span) R-A
(ppm,%,SCFH or fpm)
7.ern level rherk
I Impale check
System/Component ID: Parameter Monitored; Span Value,S:
CE Results
Date/time Calibration Value,R CEM Response,A
(ppm,%,SCFH or fpm) (ppm,%,SCFH or fpm) (%of span) R-A
(ppm,%,SCFH or fpm)
7e.rn lrvnl c.her.k
Ilnccale nheo.k
System/Component ID: Parameter Monitored: Span Value,S:
CE Results
Date/time Calibration Value,R CEM Response,A
(ppm,%,SCFH or fpm) (ppm,%,SCFI3 or fpm) (%of span) R-A
(ppm,%,SCFH or fpm)
Tern level che.ck
Ilnsrale.rheck
For NOX and S02:
CE=I RSAI x 100
For CO2 and 02: CE = IR— Al
where: CE = Calibration Error(%of span) A = Actual CEMS Response
R = Reference Gas Value S = CEMS Span Value
Page A-12 Part 75 Field Audit Manual-July 16,2003
Appendix A Daily Calibration Error Test
Gas RATA Observation
1. Plant and RATA Information
Plant Name: Primary Energy-Southport ORIS Code: 10378
State: North Carolina State Plant ID: 1000067
Plant Contact: Gregory Wagner Phone Number: 1-910-457-5056 x29
Test Firm: TRC Environmental Corp. Crew Chief: Mr.Derek Brewster
Inspector Name: Richard Simpson RATA Date: February 8,2007
2. Unit/System Information
Stack/Unit ID: Units 1 and 2
Parameter Monitored: NOx, CO2
System/Component ID:
Span Value: NOx—400, COZ-20
3. RATA Observations
RATA Checks Observations
Unit Operation Conditions: Fuel Burned: Coal and wood
Check and record unit fuel and operating load. Is the load level
stable throughout the RATA test?
Load During Test(Run/Load):
The fuel should be a normal fuel listed in the monitoring plan (App. Unit land 2— 175,000 lb each
A,§ 6.5(a))
RATA should be performed at normal load. Check the load against
CEMS Calibration Error Test(Prior to the RATA) Zero Result: See Daily Calibration
Upscale Result:
Were any pre-RATA adjustments made to the CEMS? No known non-routine pre-RATA
adjustments were made to the CEMS.
Pre-RATA non-routine adjustments are allowed by Part 75.
Adjustments may not be made between runs at a load level or
between load levels except for routine adjustments as a result of the
calibration error test(App. B §2.1.3).
(cont.)
Part 75 Field Audit Manual - July 16,2003 Page A-15
Gas RATA Observation Sheet Appendix A
3. RATA Observations (cont.)
' RATA Checks,,, I Observations
Does the stack test equipment setup match that required by the No known non-routine pre-RATA
reference method? adjustments were made to the CEMs.
02/CO2/MW-RM3 or RM3a
H20-RM4(wet bulb-dry bulb technique may not be used to correct
dry basis measurements in determining emission rate)
S02-RM6 or RM6c
NO,,-RM7, RM7E,or RM20
Check the traverse point locations for the reference method tests, The traverse point locations were
and the sampling location dimensions. The stack dimensions should acceptable for the 3 pt. reference
be based on measurements not drawings. Gas tests should use at method.
least 3 traverse points. Check PS2 in Part 60,App.B. Units with
wet scrubbers may use a shorter measurement line than required by
PS2 if minimal stratification is demonstrated,and moisture and gas
systems may use a single point if the stratification test is passed
(App. A,§6.5.6).
Has a stratification test been performed and passed? NA
Stratification testing is required for units wishing to use fewer
traverse points under the alternatives allowed by App. A,§6.5.6(a)
and(b). Stratification testing is described in App. A,§6.5.6.1 -
6.5.6.3.
For a NO,.RATA using the instrumental RM 7E,is the NO,, N A
converter efficiency documented through a performance test? A
NO,,converter efficiency test is required if the NO2 concentration is
greater than 5 ppm. The efficiency test is described in RM 20.
Check the reference method calibration gases used for instrumental Calibration gases used for instruments
methods. The calibration gas certificate should show; were acceptable for the RATA.
• EPA Protocol gases or other Part 75 certified gases.
• Concentrations which match that used in the bias/drift check
calculations.
• Expiration date after the RATA
The regulator gauge should show a cylinder pressure>150 psi.
Check the results of the pretest linearity check of the reference The pretest linearity check was within
method analyzer. Were the calibration gases injected at the same the response of less than 2%.
pressure and temperature as the stack gases? Difference between the
calibration gas value and response should be within 2%of the span
for the linearity test. Otherwise the test is repeated until passed. No
adjustments can be made to the analyzer after the linearity check.
Record and check the span of the reference method analyzers. A Measured reference analyzers were
test run is invalid if a measured concentration exceeds the span.
within span.
(Method 6C,Sec. 2.1)
(cont.)
Page A-16 Part 75 Field Audit Manual—July 16,2003
Appendix A Gas RATA Observation Sheet
3. RATA Observations (cont.)
RATA Checks Observations
Record and independently calculate the bias/drift checks performed
on the reference method sampling system before and after each run The sampling system bias and
that you observe (Use Table in 4). The response should be stable calibration drift checks were within
before it is recorded. For bias/drift checks the sampling system bias 5% and 3% respectively.
must be within 5%of the span,and the calibration drift must be
within 3% of span.
Check that the CEMS data periods and reference method data run The CEMs data periods and RM data
times match. Also check that run times meet the required run times match and the run times met
minimum 21 minutes. the required 21 minutes.
Observe post-test leak check. Wet chemistry reference methods NA
require a post-test leak check--if failed the run is not valid.
Record or obtain a copy of the results if test calculations are See attached initial results for the gas
performed on site. You should also perform your own calculations RATA in Appendix 1.
on site directly from the test data to compare to the tester's results.
(See Tables 5 and 6).
Part 75 Field Audit Manual - July 16,2003 Page A-17
APPENDIX 1
Part 75 CEMS Field Audit Information
FLOW RATE RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CFR 75 RATA
PLANT: Prunary Energy,Southport DATE: 2/8/07
UNIT NAME: UNIT 1 UNIT ID/COMMON STACK ID: CS001
MONITOR: FLOW MONITORING SYSTEM LD: FIO
COMPARISON: SCFH,wet TEST NUMBER: I
OPERATING LEVEL.: L AVERAGE GROSS LOAD,klb/hr: 160.0
1-USED
O=NOT START START END END WAD SCFH,wet
USED RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME k1b/hr RM CEMS DIFF
1 1 02/14/06 1553 02/14/06 1608 160.0 5,285,102 5,427,200 -142,098
0 2 02/14/06 1608 02/14/06 1623 159.0 5,281,415 5,451,600 -170,185
1 3 02/14/06 1659 02/14/06 1714 164.0 5,645,739 5,487,600 158,139
1 4 02/14/06 1715 02/14/06 1730 174.0 5,477,415 5,454,400 23,015
1 5 02/14/06 1752 02/14/06 1807 160.0 5,482,826 5,352,000 130,826
1 6 02/14/06 1808 02/14/06 1823 154.0 5,539,684 5,344,800 194,884
1 7 02/14/06 1841 02/14/06 1856 163.0 5,558,894 5,348,800 210,094
1 8 02/14/06 1856 02/14/06 1911 152.0 5,330,803 5,322,800 8,003
1 9 02/14/06 1925 02/14/06 1940 159.0 5,404,286 5,276,400 127,886
1 10 02/14/06 1940 02/14/06 1955 154.0 5,381,864 5,321,200 60,664
0 11 02/14/06 1843 02/14/06 I850 167.0 5,402,092 5,172,857 229,235
0 12 02/14/06 1850 02/14/06 1858 174.0 5,405,991 5,188,500 217,491
#OF RUNS: . 9 MEANS: 160.0 5,456,290 5,370,578 85,713
T-VALUE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 111,211
BIAS TEST: NOT PASSED 95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 85,484
BIAS FACTOR: 1.016 RELATIVE ACCURACY(<7.5%of RM?): 3.1%
D'AFT
i
i
t-low flow rata-cf
F
f`_ r FLOW RATE RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
r
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CFR 75 RATA
PLANT: Primary Energy,Southport DATE: 2/8/07
UNIT NAME: UNIT 2 UNIT ID/COMMON STACK ID: CS002
MONITOR: FLOW MONITORING SYSTEM ID: F20
COMPARISON: SCFH,wet TEST NUMBER: 1
OPERATING LEVEL: L AVERAGE GROSS LOAD,klb/hr: 172.7
]-USED
0=NOT START START END END LOAD SCFH,wet
USED RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME klb/hr RM CEMS RIFF
1 1 02/14/06 1553 02/14/06 1608 163.0 4,846,315 4,680,400 165,915
1 2 02/14/06 1608 02/14/06 1623 165.0 4,892,979 4,662,800 230,179
1 3 02/14/06 1659 02/14/06 1714 167.0 5,121,297 4,878,800 242,497
1 4 02/14/06 1715 02/14/06 1729 173.0 5,222,658 5,048,000 174,658
1 5 02/14/06 1752 02/14/06 1822 174.0 5,334,694 5,328,000 6,694
1 6 02/14/06 1726 02/14/06 1736 174.0 5,417,718 5,340,000 77,718
1 7 02/14/06 1841 02/14/06 1856 182.0 5,696,377 5,677,200 19,177
1 8 02/14/06 1856 02/14/06 1911 180.0 5,785,928 5,633,200 152,728
1 9 02/14/06 1925 02/14/06 1940 176.0 5,563,723 5,479,200 84,523
0 10 02/14/06 1940 02/14/06 1955 159.0 5,627,236 5,332,000 295,236
0 11 02/14/06 1843 02/14/06 1853 168.0 5,720,673 5,884,200 -163,527
0 12 02/14/06 1853 02/14/06 1903 172.0 5,690,148 5,625,000 65,148
#OF RUNS: 9 MEANS: 172.7 5,320,187 5,191,956 128,232
T-VALUE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 85,697
BIAS TEST: NOT PASSED 95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 65,872
BIAS FACTOR: 1.025 RELATIVE ACCURACY(<7.5%of RM?): 3.6%
FT
2-low flow rata-cf
I
1
i
t,
FLOW RATE RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CPR 75 KATA
PLANT: Primary Energy-Southport DATE: 2/14/06
UNIT NAME: UNIT 1 UNIT ID/COMMON STACK ID: CS002
MONITOR: FLOW MONITORING SYSTEM ID: F20
COMPARISON: SCFH,wet TEST NUMBER: I
OPERATING LEVEL: H AVERAGE GROSS LOAD,klb/hr: 514.9
I=USED
O=NOT START START END END LOAD SCFH,wet
USED RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME klb/hr RM CEMS RIFF
1 1 02/14/06 0806 02/14/06 0827 515.0 10,672,784 10,578,000 94,784
1 2 02114/06 0838 02/14/06 0859 516.0 10,081,297 10,491,429 -410,132
1 3 02/14/06 0914 02114106 0935 513.0 10,438,101 10,672,571 -234,470
1 4 02/14/06 1007 02/14/06 1028 515,0 10,296,162 10,482,857 -186,695
1 5 02/14/06 1043 02/14/06 1104 516.0 10,422,745 10,616,571 -193,826
1 6 02/14/06 1124 02/14/06 1145 516.0 10,259,621 10,571,143 -311,522
1 7 02/14/06 1158 02/14/06 1219 514.0 10,440,541 10,636,571 -196,030
0 8 02/14/06 1230 02/14/06 1251 519.0 12,907,536 10,451,143 2,456,393
1 9 02!14/06 1303 02/14/06 1324 518.0 10,359,504 10,517,429 -157,925
1 10 02/14/06 1335 02/14/06 1356 511.0 10,238,759 10,502,857 -264,098
#OF RUNS: 9 MEANS: 514.9 10,356,613 10,563,270 -206,657
T-VALUE: 2,306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 137,108
BIAS TEST: PASSED 95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 105,391 j
BIAS FACTOR: 1.000 RELATIVE ACCURACY(<7.5%of RM?): 3.0%
DRAFT
i
i
f
i
1 a-high floc rata-cf 1
e::
i
FLOW RATE RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CFR 75 RATA
PLANT: Primary Energy-Southport DATE: 2/14/06
UNIT NAME: UNIT 2 UNIT ID/COMMON STACK ID: CS002
MONITOR: FLOW MONITORING SYSTEM ID: F20
COMPARISON: SCFH,wet TEST NUMBER: I
OPERATING LEVEL: H AVERAGE GROSS LOAD,klb/hr: 515.8
I=USED
11=NOT START START END END LOAD SCFH,wet
USED RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME klb/hr RM CEMS RIFF
1 I 02/14/06 0806 02/14/06 0836 515.0 10,593,212 10,984,286 -391,074-
1 2 02/14/06 0838 02/14/06 0859 516.0 10,761,240 10,968,000 -206,760
1 3 02/14/06 0914 02/14/06 0935 513.0 10,564,845 11,034,000 -469,155
1 4 02/14/06 1007 02/14/06 1028 515.0 10,578,412 10,966,857 -388,445
1 5 02/14/06 1043 02/14/06 1104 516.0 10,470,621 10,999,714 -529,093
1 6 02/14/06 1124 02/14/06 1145 516.0 10,571,396 10,972,286 -400,890
1 7 02/14/06 1158 02/14/06 1219 514.0 10,535,689 10,912,571 -376,882
1 8 02/14/06 1230 02/14/06 1251 519.0 10,707,604 10,925,429 -217,825
1 9 02/14/06 1303 02/14/06 1324 518.0 10,603,797 10,929,714 -325,917
0 10 02/14/06 1335 02/14/06 1356 511.0 10,459,484 10,950,286 -490,802
#OF RUNS: 9 MEANS: 515.8 10,598,535 10,965,873 -367,338
T-VALUE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 105,245
BIAS TEST: PASSED 95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 80,898
11AS FACTOR: 1.000 RELATIVE ACCURACY(<7.5%o€RM?): 4.2%
DRAFT
i
f
i
I
2-high flow rata-ef !'
bl
P',
�f NOx RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CFR 60 RATA
PLANT: Primary Energy-Southport DATE: 2/14/06
UNIT NAME: UNIT 1 SAMPLING LOCATION: CS001
MONITOR: NOx MONITOR SERIAL NO.: 42C-71812-369
COMPARISON: Ib/mmBtu OPERATING LOAD,klb/hr: 536.7
l-used START START END END LOAD IbhnmBtu
0-not us" RI)N DATE TIME DATE TIME Itlb/br RM CEMS DIFF
1 1 02/14/06 0806 02/14/06 0827 532.4 0 281 0.270 -0.011
1 2 02/14/06 0838 02/14/06 0859 535.8 0.280 0.270 -0.01
1 3 02/14/06 0914 02/14/06 0935 538.3 0.290 0.280 -0.01
1 4 02/14/06 1007 02/14/06 1028 537.4 0.302 0.290 -0.012
1 5 02/14/06 1043 02/14/06 1104 537.7 0.302 0.280 -0.022
1 6 02/14/06 1124 02/14/06 1145 5372 0.301 0.280 -0.021
1 7 02/14/06 1158 02/14/06 1219 537.2 0.285 0.270 -0.115
1 8 02/€4/06 1230 02/14/06 1251 537.1 0.281 0.270 -0.011
1 9 02/I4/06 1303 02/14/06 1323 537.3 0.273 0.260 -0.013
0 10 02/14/06 1335 02/14/06 1356 535.8 0.278 0.270 -0.008
#OF DUNS: 9 MEANS: 536.7 0.288 0.274 -0.014
T-VALUE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 0.005
95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 0.004
RELATIVE ACCURACY(<20%of RM?): 6.0%
R A Flo
f
i
`r
t
i
rl
k
southport-gas RATA-EDR-cf
i
6
Z.
r!
f-
r, CO2 RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CFR 75 RATA
PLANT: Primary Energy-Southport DATE: 2/14/06
UNIT NAME: UNIT 1 UNIT ID/COMMON STACK ID: CSOO1
MONITOR: CO2 MONITORING SYSTEM ID: CIO
COMPARISON: %Wet TEST NUMBER: 1
OPERATING LEVEL.: H AVERAGE GROSS LOAD,kkb/hr: 536.7
!=used START START END END LOAD %wet
$=not used RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME k1h/hr RM CEMS RIFF
1 1 02/14/06 0806 02/14/06 0827 532.4 12.03 12.70 -0.7
1 2 02/14/06 0838 02/14/06 0859 535.8 12.19 1.2.80 -0.6
I 3 02/14!06 0914 02/14/06 0935 538.3 12.02 12.70 -0.7
1 4 02/14/06 1007 02/1.4/06 1028 537.4 12.13 12.90 -0.8
1 5 02/14/06 1043 02/14/06 1104 537.7 12.20 12.80 -0.6
1 6 02/14/06 1124 02/14/06 1145 537.2 12.15 12.70 -0.5
1 7 02/14/06 1158 02/14/06 1219 537.2 12.20 12.70 -0.5
1 8 02/14/06 1230 02/14/06 1251 537.1 12.24 12.80 -0.6
1 9 02/14/06 1303 02/14/06 1323 537.3 13.18 12.80 OA
0 10 02/14/06 1335 02/14/06 1356 535.8 13.22 12.80 0.4
#OF RUNS: 9 MEANS: 536.7 12.26 12.77 -0.507
T-VALUE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 0.342
BIAS TEST: NA 95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 0.263
BIAS FACTOR: 1.000 RELATIVE ACCURACY(<10%of RM?): 6.3%
DR"'AFT
i
1
F
southport-gus RATA-EDR-ef
i
k
[P
.... _......_.. .. {'
NOx RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CFR 75 RATA
PLANT: Primary Energy-Southport DATE: 2/14/06
UNIT NAME: UNIT 1 UNIT ID/COMMON STACK ID: CS001
MONITOR: NOx MONITORING SYSTEM ID: M10
COMPARISON: ppm wet TEST NUMBER: 1
OPERATING LEVEL: H AVERAGE GROSS LOAD,klb/hr: 536.7
1=used START START END END LOAD ppm wet
$-not used RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME k1b/hr RM CEMS DIFF
1 1 02/14/06 0806 02/14/06 0827 532.4 157.1 158.3 -1.2
1 2 02/14/06 0838 02/14/06 0859 535.8 158.7 158.8 -0.1
1 3 02/14/06 0914 02/14/06 0935 538.3 162.0 163.9 -1.9
1 4 02/14/06 1007 02/14/06 1028 537.4 170.5 172.4 -1.9
1 S 02/14/06 I043 02/14/06 1104 537.7 171.3 169.1 2.2
1 6 02/14/06 1124 02/14/06 1145 537.2 170.1 168.4 1.7
1 7 02/14/06 1158 02/14/06 1219 537.2 162.0 160.7 1.3
1 8 02/14/06 1230 02/14/06 1251 537.1 160.1 160.2 -0.1
1 9 02/14/06 1303 02/14/06 1323 537.3 167.1 154.9 12.2
0 10 02/14/06 1335 02/14/06 1356 535.8 171.1 158.3 12.8
f#OF RUNS: 9 MEANS: 536.7 164.3 163.0 1.356
T-VALUE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.336
BIAS TEST: PASSED 95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 3.333
BIAS FACTOR: 1.000 RELATIVE ACCURACY(<10%o€Rb17): 2.9%
UKAFT
i'
r
1
f
southport-gas RATA-EDR-cf f.
V:
f'
4-
...............
=°_`==` ~~=~-~�,
�
'
|
/ NOx ���L�^���T������K���
�=�=�" , � �^���=^�� SUMMARY
TYPE 0P TEST: 4OCBD6ORAT&
PLANT: Primary DATE: 2/14/06
UNIT NAME: UNIT SAMPLING LOCATION: CS002
83ONI7OR: N0x MONITOR SERIAL NO.. 42C-7l83O'309
C0&89&R0ON: |h6nmB/u OPERATING LOAD,kKdbc 523.8
I~"=d START START END END m»Am /mmmmm
o=w/used RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME mum, o/m cENio oapx
-
l l 02/14/06 0806 02/14/06 0827 510.2 0.269 0.200 '0.008
l 2 02/14/06 0838 02/14/00 0859 529.5 0.267 0.260 '0.007
l 3 02/14/06 0914 02/14/06 0935 5252 0.288 0.280 '0.008
l 4 02/14/06 1007 02/1406 1028 524.5 0.276 0.270 '0.006
l S 02/14N6 1043 02/14/00 1104 524.6 0.293 0.280 -0.013
7 6 02/1406 1124 02/14/06 1145 525.3 0.286 0270 '0.016
l 7 02/14/06 1158 02/14/06 1219 525.2 0280 0.270 'O.O]O
l 0 02/14/06 1230 02/14/06 1251 524.0 0.290 0.290 -0.006
l 9 02/1406 1503 02/14/06 1323 520.1 0295 0.380 '0.015
0 20 02/14N6 1335 02/1406 1350 524.4 0.292 0.280 '0.012
. -
. wOFRUNS: u MEANS: 523.8 0283 0273 'O.OlO
' z-VALUE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 0.004
y5%CONFIDENCE COERFICxENT., 0.003
RELATIVE ACCURACY(<20%vrRAl?)' 4.5%
DRAFT
southport-gusnATa-EDR-e[
i
CO2 RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CFR 75 RATA
PLANT: Primary Energy-Southport DATE: 2114/06
UNIT NAME: UNIT 2 UNIT ID/COMMON STACK lD: CS002
MONITOR: CO2 MONITORING SYSTEM ID: C20
COMPARISON: %wet TEST NUMBER: I
OPERATING LEVEL: H AVERAGE GROSS LOAD,klb/hr: 523.9
I=Used START START END END LOAD %wet
0-not used RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME klblhr RM CEMS DIFF
1 1 02,114/06 0806 02/14/06 0827 510.2 11.37 12.00 -0.630
1 2 02/14/06 0838 02/14/06 0859 529.5 11.69 I2.20 -0.510
1 3 02/14/06 0914 02/14/06 0935 525.2 11.74 12.10 -0.360
1 4 02/14/06 1007 02/14/06 1028 524.5 11.81 12.20 -0.390
1 5 02/14/06 1043 02/14/06 1104 524.6 11.68 12.00 -0.320
1 6 02/14/06 1124 02/14/06 1145 525.3 11.65 12.00 -0.350
1 7 02/14/06 1158 02/14/06 1219 525.2 11.68 12.10 -0.420
1 8 02/14/06 1230 02/14/06 1251 524.0 11.78 12.10 -0.320
1 9 02/14/06 1303 02/14/06 1323 526.1 12.63 12.20 0.430
0 10 02/14/06 1335 02/14/06 1356 524.4 12.56 12.00 0.560
0 0.0
0 0.0
9 OF RUNS: 9 MEANS; 523.8 11.78 12.10 -0,319
T-VALUE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 0.298
BIAS TEST: NA 95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 0.229
BIAS FACTOR: 1.000 RELATIVE ACCURACY(<10%of RM?): 4.7%
DR AIFT
1
}
r
f
1
southport-gas RATA-EDR-cf
r.
NOx RELATIVE ACCURACY CALCULATION SUMMARY
TYPE OF TEST: 40 CFR 75 RATA
PLANT: Primary Energy-Southport DATE: 2/I4/06
UNIT NAME: UNIT 2 UNIT ID/COMMON STACK 1D: CS002
MONITOR: NOx MONITORING SYSTEM ID: M20
COMPARISON: ppni wet TEST NUMBER: I
OPERATING LEVEL: H AVERAGE GROSS LOAD,klb/hr: 523.8
h,wed START START END END LOAD ppm wet
0=nnt used RUN DATE TIME DATE TIME k!b/hr RM CEMS DIFF
1 1 02/14/06 0806 02/14/06 0827 510.2 141.9 143.6 -1.7
1 2 02/14/06 0838 02/14/06 0859 529.5 145.3 14.5.3 0
1 3 02/14/06 0914 02/14/06 0935 525.2 157.5 156.3 1.2
1 4 02/14/06 1007 02/14/06 1028 524.5 151.9 149.4 2.5
1 5 02/14/06 1043 02/14/06 1104 524.6 159.4 157.6 1.8
1 6 02/14/06 1124 02/14/06 1145 525.3 155.1 153.2 1.9
1 7 02/14/06 1158 02/14/06 1219 525.2 152.2 152.6 44
1 8 02/14/06 1230 02/14/06 1251 524.0 162.0 161.1 0.9
1 9 02/14/06 1303 02/14/06 1323 526.1 173.1 162.0 11.1
0 10 02/14/06 1335 02/14/06 1356 524.4 170.9 158.2 12.7
0 0.0
0 0.0
#OF RUNS: 9 MEANS: 523.8 155.4 153.5 1.922
T.VALIIE: 2.306
STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.680
BIAS TEST: PASSED 95%CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 2.829
BIAS FACTOR: 1,000 RELATIVE ACCURACY(<I0%of RM?): 3.1%
DR AsIFT
I
i
i
i
Southport-gas RATA-EDR-ef F-
f.'
Daily Cal Report
Facility Name: Primary Energy - Southport
Location: Southport, NC
Date Time Analyzer Type Target Analyzer Analyzer Drift P60 5-day Span NBP Process Stack Cal
Value Value Drift Limit Status Counter Status Status Press Type
02/08/07 07:34:21 U1 NOx ZERO 0.00 0.20 0.05 10.00 PASS 0 400.00 PASS Online 30.37 Norm
02/08/07 07:38:07 U1 NOx SPAN 232.00 223.30 -2.17 10.00 PASS 0 400.00 PASS Online 30.37 Norm
02/08/07 07:34:21 U1 CO2 SPAN 11.20 10.88 -0.32 2.00 PASS 0 20.00 PASS Online 30.37 Norm
02/08/07 07:38:07 U1 CO2 ZERO 0.00 0.15 0.15 2.00 PASS 0 20.00 PASS Online 30.37 Norm
Report Printed on: 02/08/07 09:30:45 Pagel
Daily Cal Report
Facility Name: Primary Energy - Southport
Location: Southport, NC
Date Time Analyzer Type Target Analyzer Analyzer Drift P60 5-day Span NBP Process Stack Cal
Value Value Drift Limit Status Counter Status Status Press Type
02/08/07 07:34:21 U2 NOx ZERO 0.00 0.30 0.07 10.00 PASS 0 400.00 PASS Online 29.76 Norm
02/08/07 07:38:07 U2 NOx SPAN 232.00 231.30 -0.18 10.00 PASS 0 400.00 PASS Online 29.76 Norm
02/08/07 07:34:21 U2 CO2 SPAN 11.20 11.12 -0.08 2.00 PASS 0 20.00 PASS Online 29.76 Norm
02/08/07 07:38:07 U2 CO2 ZERO 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 PASS 0 20.00 PASS Online 29.76 Norm
Report Printed on: 02/08/07 09:31:49 Pagel
Daisy Cal Report
Facility Name: Primary Energy - Southport
Location: Southport, NC
Date Time Analyzer Type Target Analyzer Analyzer Drift P60 5-day Span NBP Process
Value Value Drift Limit Status Counter Status Status
02/08/07 09:43:37 U1 Opacity ZERO 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 PASS 0 100.00
02/08/07 09:44:37 U 1 Opacity SPAN 39.00 40.20 1.18 2.50 PASS 0 100.00
02/08/07 09:43:07 U1 Stk Flow ft/min ZERO 402.00 403.44 0.04 100.00 PASS 0 4020.00 PASS Online
02/08/07 09:44:07 U1 Stk Flow ft/min SPAN 2412.0 2413.19 0.03 100.00 PASS 0 4020.00 PASS Online
02/08/07 09:43:59 U1 Flow Interferenc PASS Online
?onnrt Printarl nn• ngtnRN17 (n-dR-97 PaaP 1
Daisy CaB Report
Facility Name: Primary Energy - Southport
Location: Southport, NC
Date Time Analyzer Type Target Analyzer Analyzer Drift P60 5-day Span NBP Process
Value Value Drift Limit Status Counter Status Status
02/08/07 09:43:37 U2 Opacity ZERO 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 PASS 0 100.00
02/08/07 09:44:37 U2 Opacity SPAN 31.50 30.90 -0.56 2.50 PASS 0 100.00
02/08/07 09:43:07 U2 Stk Flow ft/min ZERO 402.00 402.57 0.01 100.00 PASS 0 4020.00 PASS Online
02/08/07 09:44:07 U2 Stk Flow ft/min SPAN 2412.0 2412.57 0.01 100.00 PASS 0 4020.00 PASS Online
02/08/07 09:43:59 U2 Flow Interferenc PASS Online
p P75 DataSumm
Facility Name: Primary Energy-Southport /l cl n f Location: Southport,NC Source: Common Stack 1
Period: 02/08/07 08:07:59 To 02/08/07 08:27:59, Records=20
C r�� y GCS Heat I nput NOx CO2 Stack Flow Stk Stk Stk
Total NOx Rate Blr A Blr B Blr C Fuel Vel. Temp Press
Date PC Process Steam Ib/hr MBtu/hr ppm MC % MC kscfm MC scfh Steam Steam Steam Factor fUmin Deg-F in Hg
02/08/07 08:08:45 08 Normal 532 200.7 754.0 157.3 00 12.7 00 178.1 00 10686000 177 179 176 1800 3423.0 286.2 31.61
02/08/07 08:09:45 08 Normal 531 199.6 745.1 158.3 00 12.7 00 176.0 00 10560000 177 178 176 1800 3383.5 286.6 31.61
D2/08/07 08:10:45 08 Normal 531 201.4 756.5 157.3 00 12.7 00 178.7 00 10722000 179 179 173 1800 3435.3 286.5 31.61
02/08/07 08:11:45 08 Normal 531 199.6 743.8 157.3 00 12.6 00 177.1 00 10626000 179 179 173 1800 3405.8 286.6 31.61
D2/08/07 08:12:45 08 Normal 531 198.3 743.8 156.3 00 12.6 00 177.1 00 10626000 177 180 174 1800 3405.9 286.9 31.62
D2/08/07 08:13:45 08 Normal 532 196.7 733.3 156.0 00 12.5 00 176.0 00 10560000 176 180 176 1800 3385.3 286.8 31.62
02/08/07 0814:45 08 Normal 532 197.3 738.8 156.6 00 12.6 00 175.9 00 10554000 180 177 175 1800 3382.4 286.7 31.63
02/08/07 0815:45 08 Normal 532 199.1 742.1 157.3 00 12.6 00 176.7 00 10602000 179 178 175 1800 3396.4 286.4 31.62
02/08/07 08:16:45 08 Normal 532 198.3 745.1 157.3 00 12.7 00 176.0 00 10560000 179 178 175 1800 3385.9 287.0 31.61
02/08/07 08:17:45 08 Normal 532 197.6 751.4 156.6 00 12.8 00 176.1 00 10566000 179 179 174 1800 3385.1 286.4 31.62
D2/08/07 08:18:45 08 Normal 532 204.9 784.2 155.6 00 12.8 00 183.8 00 11028000 179 178 175 1800 3522.6 284.2 31.62
D2/08/07 08:19.45 08 Normal 533 190.8 723.2 157.1 00 12.8 00 169.5 00 10170000 179 178 176 1800 3257.6 286.4 31.62
02/08/07 08:20:45 08 Normal 534 194.4 731.1 157.1 00 12.7 00 172.7 00 10362000 176 176 182 1800 3313.8 285.2 31.61
D2/08/07 08:21:45 08 Normal 538 198.0 745.1 157.0 00 12.7 00 176.0 00 10560000 177 175 186 1800 3339.3 276.8 31.62
D2/08/07 08.22.48 08 Normal 539 199.7 750.5 158.5 00 12.8 00 175.9 00 10554000 182 178 179 1800 3322.3 273.3 31.63
D2/08/07 08:23:45 08 Normal 535 195.8 729.7 162.3 00 13.0 00 168.4 00 10104000 181 181 173 1800 3224.7 283.6 31.62
32/08/07 08:24:45 08 Normal 531 207.2 767.2 164.6 00 13.1 00 175.7 00 10542000 181 179 171 1800 3376.6 286.5 31.61
D2/08/07 0825:45 08 Normal 530 210.5 771.4 163.8 00 12.9 00 179.4 00 10764000 180 178 172 1800 3450.6 287.1 31.62
02/08/07 08:26:45 08 Normal 530 207.0 745.4 161.5 00 12.5 00 178.9 00 10734000 177 177 176 1800 3441.8 287.3 31.61
D2/08/07 08:27:45 08 Normal 530 201.8 721.4 158.8 00 12.2 00 177.4 00 10644000 176 176 178 1800 3414.2 287.2 31.61
Report Average: 532 199.9 746.2 158.3 12.7 176.3 10576200 179 178 176 1800 3382.6 285.2 31.62
Report Max Values: 539 210.5 784.2 164.6 13.1 183.8 11028000 182 181 186 1800 3522.6 287.3 31.63
'C-Process Codes: MC-Monitoring Codes:
11 -Changing Fuels 06-Clean Process Equipment 00-System OK 14-Recalibration 19-Sample Interface Malfunction
Q-Control Equipment Malfunction 07-Clean Control Equipment 10-Required Adjustment Not Made 15-Preventative Maintenance 20-Corrective Maintenance
13-Startup 08-Normal Operation 11 -Excess Drift Primary Analyzer 16-Primary Analyzer Malfunction 21 -Blowback
,4-Shutdown 09-Missing 12-Excess Drift Ancillary Analyzer 17-Ancillary Analyzer Malfunction 22-Analyzer Under/Over Range
)5-Process Down 13-Process Down 18-Data Handling System Malfunction 98-Automatic Calibration
99-Software Adjust
report printed on: 02/08/07 09:28:59 Pagel
Facility Name: Primary Energy-Southport xxx Location: Southport,NC Source: Unit 2
Period: 02/088/07 08:07:59 To 02/08/07 08:27:59, Records=20
aGc Ii7`f G�/ �5 Opacity NOx CO2 _Boiler A_ Boiler B_ _Boiler C_
Steam Steam Steam Stack Fuel NOx(Plant)
)ate PC Process % MC PC Process ppm MC Ib/MBtu MC /o MC PC klb/hr PC klb/hr PC klb/hr Press Factor Ib/MBtu MC
)2/08/07 08:08:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 144.3 00 0.26 00 11.8 00 08 178.4 08 173.7 08 155.3 25.68 1800 0.263 00
)2/08/07 08:09:45 08 Normal 24 00 08 Normal 145.1 00 0.26 00 11.8 00 08 178.0 08 174.0 08 153.9 25.68 1800 0.264 00
)2/08/07 08:10:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 146.3 00 0.26 00 11.9 00 08 178.5 08 173.2 08 156.2 25.63 1800 0.264 00
)2/08/07 08.11:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 147.0 00 0.27 00 11.9 00 08 177.0 08 174.8 08 159.6 25.65 1800 0.265 00
)2/08/07 08:12:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 149.3 00 0.27 00 12.1 00 08 177.3 08 175.4 08 159.4 25.63 1800 0.265 00
)2/08/07 08:13:45 08 Normal 13 00 08 Normal 146.6 00 0.26 00 12.3 00 08 175.7 08 175.3 08 159.8 25.65 1800 0.256 00
)2/08/07 08:14:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 142.0 00 0.26 00 11.9 00 08 177.6 08 175.1 08 156.9 25.66 1800 0.256 00
)2/08/07 08:15:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 142.6 00 0.26 00 11.7 00 08 181.0 08 174.7 08 151.5 25.71 1800 0.262 00
)2/08/07 08:16:45 08 Normal 13 00 08 Normal 143.5 00 0.26 00 11.7 00 08 180.4 08 173.9 08 153.1 25.72 1800 0.264 00
)2/08/07 08:17:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 143.1 00 0.26 00 11.7 00 08 177.3 08 172.8 08 157.7 25.70 1800 0.263 00
)2/08/07 08:18:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 142.3 00 0.26 00 11.8 00 08 173.4 08 174.3 08 161.2 25.67 1800 0.259 00
)2/08/07 08:19:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 141.5 00 0.26 00 11.9 00 08 176.0 08 174.4 08 162.1 25.63 1800 0.256 00
)2/08/07 08:20:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 140.0 00 0.25 00 11.9 00 08 178.8 08 173.3 08 160.9 25.60 1800 0.253 00
)2/08/07 08:21:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 138.8 00 0,25 00 12.1 00 08 181.2 08 172.3 08 160.0 25.64 1800 0.247 00
)2/08/07 08:22:48 08 Normal 13 00 08 Normal 140.0 00 0.25 00 12.2 00 08 185.6 08 171.9 08 158.4 25.65 1800 0.247 00
)2/08/07 08:23:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 142.1 00 0.25 00 12.3 00 08 184.7 08 171.9 08 159.0 25.67 1800 0.248 00
)2/08/07 08:24:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 142.1 00 0.25 00 12.4 00 08 179.4 08 172.6 08 162.0 25.71 1800 0.246 00
)2/08/07 08:25:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 146.1 00 026 00 12.2 00 08 173.8 08 175.5 08 161.4 25.72 1800 0.257 00
)2/08/07 08:26:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 144.8 00 0.26 00 12.0 00 08 172.4 08 174.7 08 159.8 25.69 1800 0.259 00
)2/08/07 08:27:45 08 Normal 14 00 08 Normal 144.1 00 0.27 00 11.6 00 08 172.9 08 171.7 08 160.5 25.65 1800 0.267 00
Report Average: 14 143.6 0.26 12.0 178.0 173.8 158.4 25,67 0.258
Report Max Values: 24 149.3 0.27 12.4 185.6 175.5 162.1 25.72 0.267
,C-Process Codes: MC-Monitoring Codes:
1 -Changing Fuels 06-Clean Process Equipment 00-System OK 14-Recalibration 19-Sample Interface Malfunction
2-Control Equipment Malfunction 07-Clean Control Equipment 10-Required Adjustment Not Made 15-Preventative Maintenance 20-Corrective Maintenance
3-Startup 08-Normal Operation 11 -Excess Drift Primary Analyzer 16-Primary Analyzer Malfunction 21 -Blowback
4-Shutdown 09-Missing 12-Excess Drift Ancillary Analyzer 17-Ancillary Analyzer Malfunction 22-Analyzer Under/Over Range
5-Process Down 13-Process Down 18-Data Handling System Malfunction 98-Automatic Calibration
99-Software Adjust
:eport printed on: 02/08/07 09:30:17 Page 1
Calibration Error Test, Run 1 STRATA Version. 2.0
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Reference Cylinder Nmul-,ers
Zero Low-range Mid-range High-range
02-1 Nitrogen NO2 CC20270i CC194283 XCO11719
CO2-1 Nitrogen CC194283 XCO11719
NOx-1 Nitrogen NO2 CC202706 CC217102 XC035091
02-2 Nitrogen XCO26168 CC194283 XCi11719
CO2-2 Nitrogen CC194283 XCO11719
NOx-2 Nitrogen NO2 CC202706 CC217102 XC035091
Date/Time 02-08-2007 06:40:00 PASSED
Analyte 02-1 CO2-1 NOx-1 02-2 CO2-2
Units % % ppm % %
Zero Ref Cyl 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000
Zero Avg 0.012 0.000 0.24 0.015 0.021
Zero Error% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
Low Ref Cyl 54.70
Low Avg 54.78
Low Error% 0.0%
Mid Ref Cyl 11.010 9.000 223.00 11.p10 9.000
Mid Avg 11.038 9.003 226.49 11.044 9.006
Mid Error% 0.1% 0.0% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0%
High Ref Cyl 19.800 16.860 496.00 19.800 16.860
High Avg 19.944 16.710 496.18 19.961 16.782
High Error% 0.6% 0.8% 0.0% 0.6% 0.4%
Page 1
Calibration Error Test, Run 1 STRATA. Version 2.0
Operator: Wayne Abbott , .
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Refei.eflce Cy'lii,de.' Nu;C_crs
Zero Low-range Mid-range High-range
02-1 Nitrogen NO2 CC202706 CC194283 XCO11719
CO2-1 Nitrogen CC194283 XC011719
NOx-1 Nitrogen NO2 CC202706 CC217102 XC035091
02-2 Nitrogen XCO28168 CC194283 XCO11719
CO2-2 Nitrogen CC194283 XCO11719
NOx-2 Nitrogen NO2 CC202706 CC217102 XC035091
Date/Time 02-08-2007 06:40:00 PASSED
Analyte NOx--2
Units ppm
Zero Ref Cyl 0.00
Zero Avg 0.17
Zero Error% 0.0%
Low Ref Cyl 54,70
Low Avg 54.69
Low Error9s 0.0%
Mid Ref Cvl 223.00
Mid Avg 226.38
Mid Error% 0.7%
High Ref Cyl 496.00
High Avg 496.70
High Error% 0.1%
Calibration Error Test End
Page 2
Initial System Bias Check, Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Refe eiice Cylinder 11,. be:
Zero Span
02-1 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-1 Nitrogen CC1.94283
NOx-1 Nitrogen CC217102
02-2 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-2 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-2 Nitrogen CC217102
Date/Time 02-08-2007 08:00:10 PASSED
Analyte 02-1 CO2-1 NOx-1 02-2 CO2-2
Units % o ppm % %
Zero Ref Cyl 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000
Zero Cal 0.012 0.000 0.24 0.015 0.021
Zero Avg 0.047 0.159 1.17 0.041 0.170
Zero Bias% 0.1% 0.8% 0.2% 0.1% 0.7%
Zero Drift%
Span Ref Cyl 11.010 9.000 223.00 11.010 9.000
Span Cal 11.038 9.003 226.49 11.044 9.006
Span Avg 10.956 9.090 221.94 10.962 9.100
Span Bias% 0.3% 0.4% 0.9% 0.3% 0.5%
Span Drift%
Page 1
Initial System Bias Check, Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0 1q,! 1�
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Reference Cylinder Numbers
Zero Span
02-1 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-1 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-1 Nitrogen CC217102
02-2 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-2 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-2 Nitrogen CC217102
Date/Time 02-08-2007 08:00:11 PASSED
Analyte NOx-2
Units ppm
Zero Ref Cyl 0.00
Zero Cal 0.17
Zero Avg 1.67
Zero Bias% 0.3%
Zero Drift%
Span Ref Cyl 223.00
Span Cal 226.38
Span Avg 224.28
Span Bias% 0.4%
Span Drift%
System Bias Check End
Page 2
Test Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0
02-1 CO2-1 NOx-1 02-2 CO2-2
% % ppm a %
Begin calculating run averages
02-08-2007 08:07:04 5.913 13.201 10.40 6.899 12.293
02-08-2007 08:08:04 5.933 13.175 169.01 6.904 12.300
02-08-2007 08:09:04 5.965 13.157 169.74 7.041 12.204
02-08-2007 08:10:04 6.022 13.128 168.84 6.964 12.252
02-08-2007 08:11:04 6.143 13.025 168.59 6.861 12.339
02-08-2007 08:12:04 6.294 12.909 167 .56 6.307 12.773
02-08-2007 08:13:04 6.181 12.997 166.90 6.959 12.222
02-08-2007 08:14:04 6.083 13.073 167 .86 7.008 12.216
02-08-2007 08:15:03 6.046 13.098 168.62 6.986 12.218
02-08-2007 08:16:03 5.922 13.187 168.25 6.923 12.253
02-08-2007 08:17:03 5.807 13.263 168.12 6.815 12.347
02-08-2007 08:18:03 5.904 13.181 166.41 6.674 12.420
02-08-2007 08:19:03 5.965 13.143 168.93 6.676 12.371
02-08-2007 08:20:03 5.965 13.149 168.35 6.495 12.478
02-08-2007 08:21:03 5.929 13.209 168.36 6.329 12.600
02-08-2007 08:22:03 5.454 13.645 170.59 6.047 12.872
02-08-2007 08:23:03 5.513 13.607 175.49 6.019 12.998
02-08-2007 08:24:03 6.159 13.055 176.70 6.493 12.682
02-08-2007 08:25:03 6.514 12.743 175.29 6.528 12.755
02-08-2007 08:26:03 6.533 12.688 172.48 7.299 12.054
02-08-2007 08:27:03 6.298 12.843 169.60 7.297 12.017
Run Averages 02-1 CO2-1 NOx-1 02-2 CO2-2
% % ppm % %
02-08-2007 08:27:03 6.026 13.118 169.77 6.739 12.413
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Page 1
Test Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0
NOx-2
ppm
Begin calculating run averages
02-08-2007 08:07:04 154.- 8
02-08-2007 08:08:04 154.81
02-08-2007 08:09:04 156.39
02-08-2007 08:10:04 157.37
02-08-2007 08:11:04 157.15
02-08-2007 08:12:04 160.78
02-08-2007 08:13:04 157.06
02-08-2007 08:14:04 152.32
02-08-2007 08:15:03 154.55
02-08-2007 08:16:03 156. 06
02-08-2007 08:17:03 154.96
02-08-2007 08:18:03 153.20
02-08-2007 08:19:03 152.70
02-08-2007 08:20:03 151.15
02-08-2007 08:21:03 150.22
02-08-2007 08:22:03 1,53.22
02-08-2007 08:23:03 156.96
02-08-2007 08:24:03 154. 44
02-08-2007 08:25:03 160.72
02-08-2007 08:26:03 155.48
02-08-2007 08:27:03 155.67
Run Averages NOx-2
ppm
02-08-2007 08:27:03 155.24
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Test Run 1 End
Page 2
Final System Bias Check, Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0
Operator: Wayne Abbott K, ��•
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Reference Cylinder Numbecs
Zero Span
02-1 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-1 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-1 Nitrogen CC217102
02-2 Nitroaen CC194283
CO2-2 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-2 Nitrogen CC217102
Date/Time 02-08-2007 08:32:07 PASSED
Analyte 02-1 CO2-1 NOx-1 02-2 CO2-2
Units % % ppm % %
Zero Ref Cyl 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000
Zero Cal 0.012 0.000 0.24 0.015 0.021
Zero Avg 0.034 0.160 0.74 0.032 0.162
Zero Bias% 0.1% 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7%
Zero Drift% -0.1% 0.0% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
Span Ref Cyl 11.010 9.000 223.00 11.010 9.000
Span Cal 11.038 9.003 226.49 11.044 9.006
Span Avg 10.926 9.106 221.93 10.921 9.084
Span Bias% 0.4% 0.5% 0.9% 0.5% 0.4%
Span Drift% -0.1% 0.1% 0.0% -0.2% -0.1%
Ini Zero Avg 0.047 0.159 1.17 0.041 0.170
Ini Span Avg 10.956 9.090 221.94 10.962 9.100
Run Avg 6.026 13.118 169.77 6.739 12.413
Co 0.040 0.160 0.96 0.036 0.166
Cm 10.941 9.098 221.93 10.942 9.092
Correct Avg 6.046 13.048 170.36 6.767 12.349
Page 1
Final System Bias Check, Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC � �•
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Reference Cylinder Numbers
Zero Span
02-1 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-1 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-1 Nitrogen CC217102
02-2 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-2 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-2 Nitrogen CC217102
Date/Time 02-08-2007 08:32:07 PASSED
Analyte NOx-2
Units ppm
Zero Ref Cyl 0.00
Zero Cal 0.17
Zero Avg 1.16
Zero Bias% 0.2%
Zero Drifts -0.1%
Span Ref Cyl 223.00
Span Cal 226.38
Span Avg 223.70
Span Bias% 0.5%
Span Drift% -0.1%
Ini Zero Avg 1.67
Ini Span Avg 224.28
Run Avg 155.24
Co 1.41
Cm 223.99
Correct Avg 154.12
System Bias Check End
Page 2
Test Run 2 STRATA Version 2.0
02-1 CO2-1 NOx-1 02-2 CO2-2
% % ppm % %
Begin calculating run averages
02-08-2007 08:39:03 6.107 12,922 157.15 6.511 1.2.535
02-08-2007 08:40:03 5.764 13.257 166.23 6.570 12.500
02-08-2007 08:41:03 5.728 13.297 166.74 6.684 12.392
02-08-2007 08:42:03 5.795 13.211 166.84 6.331 12.624
02-08-2007 08:43:03 5.522 13.399 166.46 6.212 12.699
02-08-2007 08:44:03 5.485 13.460 168.29 6.119 12.764
02-08-2007 08:45:03 5.703 13.319 167.02 5.944 12.938
02-08-2007 08:46:03 5.966 13.158 168.70 6.087 12.823
02-08-2007 08:47:04 6,120 13.058 169.64 5.581 13.274
02-08--2007 08:48:04 6.113 13.047 169.65 6.417 12.608
02-08-2007 08:49:04 5.912 13.213 172.38 6.213 12.825
02-08-2007 08t50:O4 5.804 13.268 176.90 6.311 12.747
02-08-2007 08:51:04 5.703 13.328 173. 42 6.482 12.636
02-08-2007 08:52:04 5.592 13.411 171.33 6.607 12.514
02-08-2007 08:53:04 5.553 13,485 172.48 6.346 12.664
02-08-2007 08:54:04 5.602 13.466 175.43 6.225 12.732
02-08-2007 08:55:04 5.573 13.506 175.20 6.140 12.808
02-08-2007 08:56:04 5.554 13.540 175.77 6.021 12.871
02-08-2007 08:57:04 5.894 13.277 176.53 5.850 12.951
02-08-2007 08:58:04 5.946 13.217 176.87 5.726 13.074
02-08-2007 08:59:04 5.975 13.179 175.70 6.141 12.758
Run Averages 02-1 CO2-1 NOx-1 02-2 CO2-2
% % ppm % %
02-08-2007 08:59:04 5.782 13.289 171.37 6.215 12.749
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Page 1
Test Run 2 STRATA Version 2.0
NOx-2
ppm
Begin calculating run averages
02-08-2007 08:39:03 152.00
02-08-2007 08:40:03 151.86
02-08-2007 08:41:03 152.25
02-08-2007 08:42:03 153.13
02-08-2007 08:43:03 151.18
02-08-2007 08:44:03 153.27
02-08-2007 08:45:03 156.40
02-08-2007 08:46:03 155.17
02-08-2007 08:47:04 161.28
02-08-2007 08:48:04 158.97
02-08-2007 08:49:04 159.46
02-08-2007 08:50:04 160.82
02--08-2007 08:51:04 164.68
02-08-2007 08:52:04 163.41
02-08-2007 08:53:04 162.50
02-08-2007 08:54:04 161.09
02-08-2007 08:55:04 163.08
02-08-2007 08:56.04 166.10
02-08-2007 08:57:04 160.83
02-08-2007 08:58:04 164.64
02-08-2007 08:59.04 160.73
Run Averages NOx-2
ppm
02-08-2007 08:59:04 158.71
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Test Run 2 End
Page 2
Final System, Bias Check, Run 2 STRATA Version 2.0
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2
Reference Cylinder Numbers
Zero Span
02-1 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-1 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-1 Nitrogen CC217102
02-2 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-2 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-2 Nitrogen CC217102
Date/`Dime 02-08-2007 09:10:40 PASSED
Analyte 02-1 CO2-1 NOx-1 02-2 CO2-2
Units % % ppm %
Zero Ref Cyl 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000
Zero Cal 0.012 0.000 0.24 0.015 0.021
Zero Avg 0.051 0.229 1.39 0.051 0.244
Zero Bias% 0.2% 1.1% 0.2!k 0.1% 1.196
Zero Drift% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4%
Span Ref Cyl 11.010 9.000 223.00 11.010 9.000
Span Cal 11.038 9.003 226.49 11.044 9.006
Span Avg 10.955 9.115 221.42 10.970 9.098
Span Bias% 0.3% 0.6% 1.0% 0.3% 0.5%
Span Drift% 0.1% 0.0% -0.1% 0.21 0.1%
Ini Zero Avg 0.034 0.160 0.74 0.032 0.162
Ini Saran Avg 10.926 9.106 221.93 10.921 9.084
Run Avg 5.782 13.289 171.37 6.215 12.749
Co 0.042 0.194 1.06 0.041 0.203
Cm 10.940 9.110 221.67 10.945 9.091
Correct Avg 5.798 13.219 172.15 6.234 12.705
Page 1
Final System Bias Check, Run 2 STRATA Version 2.0
Operator: Wayne Abbott
Plant Name: Primary Energy, Southport, NC
Location: Common Stacks 1 & 2 /!'�
Reference Cylinder Numbers , /
Zero Span
02-1 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-1 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-1 Nitrogen CC217102
02-2 Nitrogen CC194283
CO2-2 Nitrogen CC194283
NOx-2 Nitrogen CC217102
Date/Time 02-08-2007 09:10:41 PASSED
Analyte NOx-2
Units ppm
Zero Ref Cyl 0.00
Zero Cal 0.17
Zero Avg 2.16
Zero Bias% 0.4%
Zero Drift% 0.2%
Span Ref Cyl 223.00
Span Cal 226.38
Span Avg 223.33
Span Bias% 0.6%
Span Drift% -0.1%
Ini Zero Avg 1.16
Ini Span Avg 223.70
Run Avg 158.71
Co 1.66
Cm 223.51
Correct Avg 157.86
System Bias Check End
Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I