AQ_F_0900049_20091222_CMPL_InspRpt

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF. Fayetteville Regional Office
AIR QUALITY. - Taylor Mfg
NC Facility ID 0900049
Inspection Report' County/FIPS:Bladen/017'.
Date:- 01/08/2010
Facility Data Compliance Data
Taylor Mfg Inspection Date 12/22/2009
1585 US 701 South Inspector's Name Pam Vivian
Elizabethtown,NC 28337 Operating Status Operating
Lat:34d 36.7370in• Long: 78d 36.82QOm Compliance Code Compliance-Inspection,'
SIC: 3559/Special Industry Maehinery,Nec Action Code FCE
NAILS: 333111/Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing On-Site Inspection Result Compliance
Contact Data Permit Data
Facility Contact Authorized Contact Technical Contact
Issued 5/18/2006
Denise Bridgers Denise Bridgers, `Charles King Expires• 4%30/2011
Secretary Treasurer Secretary Treasurer Supervisor Cation
[phone] ' [phone] [phone] Classification
lassific Small
Active
Irispector's Signature: ,n r Comments:
Data of Signature:
GACG/MALT Applicability: GAGT Rule 6H applies for manganese in one of the products: Facility is sending FRO
copies of the`IN' letter they submitted fast year to Central Office and EPA stating the facility is subject to this rule: DAQ
FRO did not receive any copy of the`IN forms from Central Office for this facility.
DIRECTIONS:
From FRO take highway 87 south and travel about 35 miles toward Elizabethtown. On the Hwy,87 south bypass;tum left
at the stoplight onto US 701. Travel about 1,5 miles and the facility is on the"right.
SAFETY EOUIPMENT: Glasses ill all areas;ear-plugs and hard hat in fabrication and assembly areas:
PROCESS/FACILITY DESCRIPTION:
Taylor Manufacturing;builds farm equipment;small metal storage buildings And`wood/coal burning water heaters. .Taylor
receives sheet metal and structurai'tubing. There are different buildings for the.fabrication,assembly/welding,and
finishing of the products. The permitted emission sources are six spray booths each about 9 ft by 15 ft,large enough to
accommodate products: These booths are used for the painting of the:product and the application of the insulating foam,
PERMITTED EMISSION SOURCES:
Three(3)`paint spray booths with 96 square feet of filter area each(ES1,ES2,'and E93);and
*'Three(3)paint spray,booth's with 156 square feet of filter area each(ES4,ES5,and ES6).'
CURRENTTHROUGHPUTS:
Number of Employees 25 (Several employees have been laid off due to'economy)
Hours of Operations- 7:36am to 3:30pm; 8 hrs/day; Mori-Thurs;Office opened on Fridays
PRE-INSPECTION MEETING:-,
Mr.Charles King,Plant Supervisor met with me. Ms.Denise Bridgers was at a previous appointment. I explained to him
I was at the facility to do a routine inspection.-He presented a copy of the permit and we reviewed the it to better
understand stipulation 7 and 8 requirements:' The facility did not use any styrene or MEK in their manufacturing,

process during CY-2009. I explained the need to-develop a test procedure to show compliance with the.TPER limit in '
stipulation A.7 concerning the lbs/hr of the chemical used in the process. I explained measuring the amount used to.
perform one unit while noting the amount,chime to complete the job. He said he would explain to Ms.Bridgers what is
needed to show compliance. He would get back with me for further questions if needed: Ithen noted the annual report due.
by 1 March 2010 to be in compliance with stipulation AX I reminded him of theyfcvious.year when Bob Kennedy
inspected the facility and explained to Ms.Bridgers how to Calculate the proper information. Looking at the MSDS sheets,
1 reviewedwith himwhatnvee ded tD-h"otre-toobtaiirthisr oTnnformation. Ms.Bridgers and him would setlt ii-spor6iid -
sheet,send it to DAQ FRO prior'.to the report deadline to determine if it was being correctly calculated. I also encouraged
him to contact each chemical vendor and see what information they could supply for this report.,Mr.King then guided me
on the inspection of the facility.
STIPULATIONS:
• A 3 2D.0515 PARTIUCLATE CONTROL REOUtItl VMENT Particulate emissions from the emission
sources shall not exceed 55 *P°„ `40 lbs/hour.'IN COMPLIANCE-During the inspection;I did not observe
any particulate emissions escaping-the:facility from the stacks and'doorways. The 6 spray booths are hot all Used
because of the slow economy but each booth had filters'and lappgare, to be well maintained. There
sources,manufactured after 1 July,1971,shall not be more the 20 percent opacity. IN COMPLIANCE During, _
the inspection,I observed 0%VE from the stacks and doorways,
• A.6 2D,0958(c)WORK PRACTICES REQUIREMENTS-The Permittee shall store and handle VOC
containing materials is a,manner that reduces,fugitive emissions. IN COMPLIANCE—I did not observe any
uncovered containers of paint or other solvents.,Covered waste containers are at various locations around the
facility wheremanufacturing needs require disposal of such materials and had covers on each. Mr.King said he
reminds the employees of this work practice, All containers in the storage room were covered.
• A.7 24).0711 TOXIC.AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS LIMITATION REOUIREMENT-The Permittee
shall limit the emissions of all TAPs,iincluding styrene,toluene,MEK;and xylene to less than the TPER limit.
INCOMPLIANCE r The economy has created a significant loss of business,to include chemical usage,thus the
TAPS are below the TPERs limits. Facility didnot use MEK or styrene in the business during CY 2000. Mr.King
is planning to develop a test method,to easure the lbs/hr for the chemical m s of concern.
A:8 20.0803 EXCLUSIONARY RULE REOUIREMENTS=The Permittee shall limit VOC emissions to ,
less than 100 tpy,the largest HAP emission to less than 10 tpy;and the total HAP emission to less than 25'tpy.
INCOMPLIANCE— The facility records showed CY 2009 to be,about:
Total VOCs-12,000 lbs Greatest14APS(toluene) ' 900lbs;and Total HAPs- 1300 lbs.•
PERMIT EXEMPT EMISSION SOURCES! None.
INSPECTION SUMMARY:
Mr.King seems to understand the needed information to determine compliance withstipulations 7&8 of the permit. He will
further discuss with Ms.Bridgers what test method to develop to satisfy,stipulation 7 for the lbs/hr of the specific chemicals
currently used in the facility process. He will work with the chemical vendors and develop a spread sheet to calculate the
pounds necessary for stipulation 8 reporting requirements. This facility is operating IN COMPLIANCE withits current air
permit.
5-YEAR COMPLIANCE HISTORY:
None is found for this facility.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the'observations made during this inspection,the facility appeared to be in compliance;with all requirements outlined
in its current air permit. ,
/pcv
cc: Central Files