Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_0400051_20171011_CMPL_CAV-Rpt NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF Fayetteville Regional Office AIR QUALITY Lisk Sand NC Facility ID 0400051 Inspection Report County/FIPS:Anson/007 Date: 10/12/2017 Facility Data Permit Data Lisk Sand Permit n/a 6975 NC Highway 742 Issued n/a Wadesboro,NC 28170 Expires n/a Lat: 35d 2.9360m Long: 80d 10.3080m Classification Permit Exempt SIC: 1446/Industrial Sand Permit Status Inactive NAICS: 212322/Industrial Sand Mining Current Permit Application(s)None Contact Data Program Applicability Facility Contact Authorized Contact Technical Contact SIP Chris Tucker Chris Tucker Chris Tucker Plant Manager Plant Manager Plant Manager (704)272-6101 (704)272-6101 (704)272-6101 Compliance Data Comments: Inspection Date 10/11/2017 Inspector's Name Mike Thomas Inspector's Signature: Operating Status Operating Compliance Code Compliance-inspection Action Code FCE Date of Signature: On-Site Inspection Result Compliance Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR: TSP S02 NOX VOC CO PM10 *HAP 2014 0.0000 --- --- --- --- 0.0000 --- i 2009 0.0000 --- --- --- --- 0.0000 --- *Highest HAP Emitted(in pounds) Five Year Violation History:None Date Letter Type Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date i i Performed Stack Tests since last FCE:None Date Test Results Test Method(s) Source(s)Tested i 1) Location/Directions Lisk Sand is located at 6975 NC Hwy 742 North,NW of Wadesboro,NC,Anson County. In Wadesboro,turn right onto Hwy 52 North at the western part of town, drive almost%Z mile,and then turn left onto Hwy 742 North. Go—7 miles, and facility will be on the left hand side 1 mile past Red Hill-Mount Vernon Road to the right). Once facility is seen,go a short way and turn left onto Luke White Road(there's a sign saying"Lisk Trucking-Main Office"), and then another quick left into office parking lot. 2) Safety Considerations Standard DAQ safety equipment. Watch for trucks entering and exiting,as Lisk Trucking Company is here, also. 3) Facility and Process Description Lisk Sand is a bulk hauling company that specializes in industrial and abrasive material hauling. The facility receives dried sand from an outside vendor(currently Unimin Corporation in Richmond County). The sand is offloaded via pneumatic truck into a silo located inside a building. The sand is then gravity fed to a bagging machine to produce various size packages,which are stacked on pallets prior to shipping to customers via truck. The facility produces play sand and sandblasting sand products. The silo filling and packaging operations are controlled by a simple cyclone in series with a cartridge type fabric filter. There are no fuel combustion devices on site. There are no emergency generators. i 4) Permitted Emission Sources Storage silo,40 ton capacity Cyclone j ES-1 Not operating CD-1 (34 inches in diameter) __....... _.... __._ . _.. __ _.._ in series with in series with CD-2 Cartridge Type Fabric Filter ES-2 Bagging operation (1,808 square feet of filter area) Not operating ___.__ _._.... ... _...._..__.. .._ .. . ..........__..__ Production: Year Tons/week 2016 26 2015 24 2014 75 2013 150 k 5) Inspection Conference On 11 October 2017,I,Mike Thomas of FRO DAQ conducted a compliance assurance visit of this facility. I met with facility contact,Mr. Chris Tucker. Mr.Tucker led me on a tour of the facility. Bagging only occurs once or twice a week.I verified with Mr. Tucker that the bagging operation still operates as follows: the bagging operation is dependent on the supply truck,the silo,and the bagging machine all working simultaneously. The supply truck is attached to the silo and allowed to build pressure(1 Opsi)for a few minutes and to allow partial filling of the silo. Once pressure is obtained the bagging machine is started and bag filling proceeds. The speed and continuous nature of how the system works does not allow for over filling of the silo. In addition,the two operators have visual cues from the movement of the pneumatic line to the rate of bag filling to indicate that the system is running at the appropriate pressure. Waste from the baghouse is collected in covered 50 gallon drums. The drums are emptied approximately once a week. The waste is stockpiled at the facility and then disposed of at the landfill. The facility was not operating during the inspection,however,I did not observe any accumulations of PM that would indicate possible problems with V.E. r a I observed the maintenance records for the cyclone and baghouse. Both control devices had detailed logs documenting inspections and maintenance actions. The facility is doing a good job of maintaining records 1 since rescinding their permit. 6) Applicable Air Quality Regulations: A. A.3 2D .0515—PARTICULATES FROMMISCELLANEOUS INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES— Particulate control emissions from emission sources shall not exceed allowable emission rates. Appeared to be in compliance—The facility is no longer permitted, but compliance was determined during the last permit review based on operating the source as described in the permit conditions. No changes have been made to operations since that determination. B. A.4 2D .0521 VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT—Visible emissions from sources shall be less than 20%opacity. Appeared to be in compliance—The facility was not operating during the inspection,however, I did not observe any accumulations of PM that would indicate possible problems with V.E. : C. A.5 2D .0535 NOTIFICATIONREQUIREMENT- The facility is required to notify DAQ if excess emissions occur for more than a 4-hour period caused by a breakdown or other abnormal condition. Appears to be in compliance —According to Mr. Tucker, the facility has had no exceedances, breakdowns, or abnormal conditions requiring notification. D. A.6 2D .0540 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT—The Permittee shall not cause or s allow fugitive dust emissions to cause or contribute to complaints or excessive visible emissions beyond the property boundary. Appears to be in compliance—I observed no issues with fugitive dust at the facility on my approach in or during the inspection. Mr.Tucker stated that the facility has never had a dust complaint. 6) 112R Status This facility does not store chemical compounds that require a written risk management plan under the Clean Air Act, Section 112R. { 7) Non-compliance History Since 2010 None since 2010. t 8) Comments and Compliance Statement Lisk Sand appeared to be in compliance on 11 October 2017. i Pink Sheet:No comments. C /mst i i i fI kt 1 i