Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_1400166_20180523_ST_RvwMemo (4) DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY May 23,2018 MEMORANDUM To: Brendan Davey, P.E.,Asheville Regional Office From: Shannon Vogel, Stationary Source Compliance Branchv" Subj ect: Sealed Air Corporation—Hudson Hudson, Caldwell County,North Carolina Facility ID 1400166,Permit No. 07550R08 VOC Emissions Testing of Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer OX-2 Controlling Emissions from Curing Room ES-CR,Fluff Processing Operations ES-FP,and Polyethylene Foam Extruders EXT-1,EXT-2,EXT-3 and EXT-4 Performed November 16,2017 by Civil&Environmental Consultants,Inc. Tracking No.2017-280st Civil&Environmental Consultants,Inc. (CEC)performed EPA Method 1 through 4 and 25A VOC emissions testing at the inlet and outlet of regenerative thermal oxidizer OX-2 to determine the VOC destruction efficiency. The test results are acceptable to determine the VOC destruction efficiency as detailed below. No capture efficiency testing or permanent total enclosure verification was performed in conjunction with the subject destruction efficiency testing. OX-2 controls emissions from curing room ES-CR, fluff processing operations ES-FP, and four polyethylene foam extruders EXT-1,EXT-2, EXT-3 and EXT-4. 15A NCAC 2Q .0315 Synthetic Minor Facilities applies to avoid the applicability of 15A NCAC 2Q .0501 Purpose of Section and Requirement for a Permit. Permit Condition A.8 specifies a 100 ton per 12-month period VOC limit for 2Q .0315. CEC reported a total production rate of 260.0 pounds per,hour for the polyethylene foam extruders. Permit Condition A.1 La requires the"minimum bed temperature shall not be less than 1790 degrees F, unless otherwise established by stack testing." Permit Condition A.I Lb requires the"process capture efficiency shall not be less than 97 percent,and the destruction efficiency of the thermal oxidizer shall not be less than 95 percent. The overall control efficiency(capture efficiency times destruction efficiency) shall not be less than 92 percent." The VOC emissions test results as tabulated below demonstrate that the oxidizer efficiency meets VOC destruction efficiency requirement in the permit. The test results are not acceptable to use as VOC mass emissions rates. The oxidizer bed temperature averaged 843°F during testing. Pollutant/Parameter Test Results Requirement Inlet VOC as carbon 145.9 lb/hr --- Outlet VOC as carbon 2.34 lb/hr --- Destruction Efficiency 98.4% >95% Capture Efficiency Not Tested 97% Overall Control Efficiency Not Determined 92% In conclusion,the EPA Method 25A testing demonstrates OX-2 meets the required destruction efficiency specified in the permit. If you have any questions regarding the results of this review,please contact me at 919-707-8416 or shannon.vogel(?ncdenr.gou. cc: Central Files, Caldwell County IBEAM Documents- 1400166