HomeMy WebLinkAboutAQ_F_0800044_20190502_ST_ProtRvw ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
MICHAEL ABRACZINSKAS
Director
May 2,2019
Dr.David M.Peele,Ph.D.
President
Avoca LLC
P.O.Box 129
Merry Hill,NC 27957-0129
Subject: Avoca LLC
Merry Hill,Bertie County,North Carolina
Facility ID 0800044,Air Permit No.01819T52
Protocol for Particulate Matter(PM),Hydrogen Chloride(HCl), Carbon Monoxide(CO), and
Mercury(Hg)Emissions Testing of No. 2 Fuel Oil-Boilers H-101 and H-102
Proposed Test Date: May 20,2019,To Be Performed by McHale Environmental
Tracking No. 2019-092ST
Dear Mr.Peele:
The protocol submittal for emissions testing boilers H-101 and H-102 has been reviewed and is acceptable.
Testing will be performed as required by permit condition 2.1.A(5)to demonstrate compliance with
40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources:
Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters and for emissions inventory.
15A NCAC 02D .1109 CAA§ 1120) Case-by-Case MACT for Boilers&Process Heaters emission limits as
defined in permit condition 2.1.A(4)apply through May 19,2019.
The emissions sources are to be tested are:
• Boiler(ID No.H-101)is a No.2 fuel oil-fired boiler(20.3 million Btu per hour maximum heat input rate,and
• Boiler(ID No.H-102)is a No.2 fuel oil-fired boiler(20.3 million Btu per hour maximum heat input rate.
Testing will be performed firing ultra low sulfur No.2 fuel oil in accordance with permit condition
2.1.A(5)(g). Provided the subject test results meet the emissions limits the facility intends follow the
requirements of 40 CFR 63.7515(h)to-demonstrate ongoing emissions compliance and avoid further
performance tests. 40 CFR 63.7515(h)requires the facility to record the type of fuel combusted on a monthly
basis for ongoing compliance.
The proposed test process rate for boilers H-101 and H-102 of approximately 18 MMBtu/ r each. The
following table addresses the parameters/pollutants,test methods,run time,and minimum sample collection
volumes with applicable regulations and limitations for each boiler. Note a minimum of 3-test runs per boiler
are to be performed.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Air Quality
217 West Jones Street 11641 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1641
919.707.8400
Dr.David M. Peele,Ph.D.,President
May 2,2019
Page 2(Avoca LLC -Boilers H-101 and H-102,40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD MACT Testing)
Table 1: Test' Methods and Limits for each Boiler Tested
EPA
Parameters/Pollutants Method Run Time Emission Limit Regulation
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 2 3 runs Concurrent
Molecular Weight 3A --- ---
Moisture Content sand 4 with Methods 5,26A,30B
3 runs,>60 minutes each
Filterable PM 5 (minimum 3 dscm/run) 7.9E-03 lb/MMBtu of heat input Standard starting May 20.2019
40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD
CO 10 3 runs,60 minutes each 130 ppmvd @ 3%02 Permit Section 2.1 A(5)(e)
Hg 30B 3 runs,minimum sample as 2 0E-06 lb/MMBtu of heat input Standard through May 19,2019
specified in the method 15A NCAC 02D.1109
[CAA§1120)J
Permit Section 2.1 A
HCl 26A 3 runs,>_60 minutes each 1.1E-03 lb/MMBtu of heat input
(minimum 2 dscm/run) Standard startinL May-20, 2019
40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD
Permit Section 2.1 A(5)(e)
Note an audit samples analysis is required for EPA Method 26A. McHale Environmental has submitted an
audit sample order request. The sample must be present for inspection on request during the test period. For
additional information please see EPA web page https://www.et)a.gov/emc/emc-technical-support.
No deviations from the applicable testing methodology were requested in the test protocol. Testing should be
conducted in strict accordance with the requirements of EPA Methods 1,2, 3A,4, 5, 10,26,and 30B. The
proposed test methods are acceptable for the specified pollutants. Approval of the protocol does not exempt
the tester from the minimum requirements of the applicable methods.
The final test report should include information to establish that the testing performed was near maximum
normal or approximately>90%of maximum normal. The applicable test period monitoring parameters
should also be included.
If there are questions concerning this matter,please contact me at(919)707-8415 or
gregg.onealAncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Thomas G. ONeal,III,P.E.,Environmental Engineer
Division of Air Quality,NCDEQ
cc: Brian Conner,Avoca LLC -Merry Hill,NC
Michael Dickerson,McHale Environmental-Durham,NC
Robert Fisher,Washington Regional Office
Central Files,Bertie County
IBEAM Documents-0800044
ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
MICHAEL ABRACZINSKAS
Director
May 2,2019
Dr.David M.Peele,Ph.D.
President
Avoca LLC
P.O.Box 129
Merry Hill,NC 27957-0129
Subject: Avoca LLC
Merry Hill,Bertie County,North Carolina
Facility ID 0800044,Air Permit No.01819T52
Protocol for Particulate Matter(PM),Hydrogen Chloride(HCl), Carbon Monoxide(CO), and
Mercury(Hg)Emissions Testing of No. 2 Fuel Oil-Boilers H-101 and H-102
Proposed Test Date: May 20,2019,To Be Performed by McHale Environmental
Tracking No. 2019-092ST
Dear Mr.Peele:
The protocol submittal for emissions testing boilers H-101 and H-102 has been reviewed and is acceptable.
Testing will be performed as required by permit condition 2.1.A(5)to demonstrate compliance with
40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources:
Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters and for emissions inventory.
15A NCAC 02D .1109 CAA§ 1120) Case-by-Case MACT for Boilers&Process Heaters emission limits as
defined in permit condition 2.1.A(4)apply through May 19,2019.
The emissions sources are to be tested are:
• Boiler(ID No.H-101)is a No.2 fuel oil-fired boiler(20.3 million Btu per hour maximum heat input rate,and
• Boiler(ID No.H-102)is a No.2 fuel oil-fired boiler(20.3 million Btu per hour maximum heat input rate.
Testing will be performed firing ultra low sulfur No.2 fuel oil in accordance with permit condition
2.1.A(5)(g). Provided the subject test results meet the emissions limits the facility intends follow the
requirements of 40 CFR 63.7515(h)to-demonstrate ongoing emissions compliance and avoid further
performance tests. 40 CFR 63.7515(h)requires the facility to record the type of fuel combusted on a monthly
basis for ongoing compliance.
The proposed test process rate for boilers H-101 and H-102 of approximately 18 MMBtu/ r each. The
following table addresses the parameters/pollutants,test methods,run time,and minimum sample collection
volumes with applicable regulations and limitations for each boiler. Note a minimum of 3-test runs per boiler
are to be performed.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Air Quality
217 West Jones Street 11641 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1641
919.707.8400
Dr.David M. Peele,Ph.D.,President
May 2,2019
Page 2(Avoca LLC -Boilers H-101 and H-102,40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD MACT Testing)
Table 1: Test' Methods and Limits for each Boiler Tested
EPA
Parameters/Pollutants Method Run Time Emission Limit Regulation
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 2 3 runs Concurrent
Molecular Weight 3A --- ---
Moisture Content sand 4 with Methods 5,26A,30B
3 runs,>60 minutes each
Filterable PM 5 (minimum 3 dscm/run) 7.9E-03 lb/MMBtu of heat input Standard starting May 20.2019
40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD
CO 10 3 runs,60 minutes each 130 ppmvd @ 3%02 Permit Section 2.1 A(5)(e)
Hg 30B 3 runs,minimum sample as 2 0E-06 lb/MMBtu of heat input Standard through May 19,2019
specified in the method 15A NCAC 02D.1109
[CAA§1120)J
Permit Section 2.1 A
HCl 26A 3 runs,>_60 minutes each 1.1E-03 lb/MMBtu of heat input
(minimum 2 dscm/run) Standard startinL May-20, 2019
40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD
Permit Section 2.1 A(5)(e)
Note an audit samples analysis is required for EPA Method 26A. McHale Environmental has submitted an
audit sample order request. The sample must be present for inspection on request during the test period. For
additional information please see EPA web page https://www.et)a.gov/emc/emc-technical-support.
No deviations from the applicable testing methodology were requested in the test protocol. Testing should be
conducted in strict accordance with the requirements of EPA Methods 1,2, 3A,4, 5, 10,26,and 30B. The
proposed test methods are acceptable for the specified pollutants. Approval of the protocol does not exempt
the tester from the minimum requirements of the applicable methods.
The final test report should include information to establish that the testing performed was near maximum
normal or approximately>90%of maximum normal. The applicable test period monitoring parameters
should also be included.
If there are questions concerning this matter,please contact me at(919)707-8415 or
gregg.onealAncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Thomas G. ONeal,III,P.E.,Environmental Engineer
Division of Air Quality,NCDEQ
cc: Brian Conner,Avoca LLC -Merry Hill,NC
Michael Dickerson,McHale Environmental-Durham,NC
Robert Fisher,Washington Regional Office
Central Files,Bertie County
IBEAM Documents-0800044