19970972 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090610 (2)

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: cci
Date of Report:

Date of Field Review: Lo IA2 -O:11 Evaluator's Name(s
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:' Pc M
Weather Conditions (today & recent): %
Directions to Site: located off US Route 74 between Polkton and Wadesboro
(.Office Review Information:
Project Number: 19970972
Project Name: Anson Co. Waste Management Facility
County(ies): Anson
Basin & subbasin: Yadkin 03040104
Nearest Stream: Pinch Gut Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 0.98 acres
Stream: 2040 linear feet
Buffer: 0
Nutr. Offset:
Project History
Event
Report Review - Streams
Report Review - Wetlands
Closeout
Event Date ?i
4/10/2007
6/6/2007
9/21/2007
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
- On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit
II. Summary of Results:
-1
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
19970972-2 2040 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 1 8
19970972-1 0.98 acres Wetland Creation 8
Evaluator's Name(s): K-U,VL/A)LI
Report for Monitoring Year:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
I
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 2040 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 1 Component ID: 19970972-2
Description: forested stream; E4, shallow, meandering stream channel
Location within project: central and western portion of project
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
STREAMBANK STABILITY - Approved Success Criteria:
channel stability of a stable stream system
Are streambanks stable? Ye No
If no, provide description and no regarding stability issues:
STRUCTURES - Approved Success Criteria:
List all types of structures present on site:
Are the structures installed correctly? Yes No
Are the structures made of acceptable material? Yes No
(Unacceptable materials include: railroad ties, concrete with rebar, etc.
Are the structures located approximately where shown on the plan? Yes No
Are the structures stable (e.g. erosion, deposition, etc.)? Yes No
Provide description and notes regarding problematic structures:
FEATURES - Approved Success Criteria:
not clear at this time; pebble counts conducted
Are riffles and pools in approximately the correct locations Yes No
Is the final sinuosity and gradient designed approximately to plan specifications? es No
Any evidence of vegetation growing on the stream bed or in the thalweg Yes No
Percentage of the restoration reach that has: Flowing water Ponded areas
Describe any stream features that provide evidence of unstable stream reaches (e.g. mid-channel bars,
downstream meander migration, chute cutoff formation, etc.):
AQUATIC BIOTA - Approved Success Criteria:
increase in # of EPT genus/sp. required to increase in 5 years; eval. of in-stream and riparian habitat to be c
Is aquatic life present in the channel? Yes No
Description of taxa observed, incl. quantities of individuals and general distribution of biota. Include a brief
description of the sampling methodology.
List any remaining aquatic biota issues to address (e.g. erosion, discharges or toxicants, etc.):
ihonr car ?,??,,? DoDr CE:SW+s cam-. -l? ?eol
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
none specified for stream; (wetland Crit =)min. mean de nsity
320 charac. Tree species/acre surviving at least 5 years after
planting; at least 5 charac. Tree sp. Present, and no sp.
>20% of total; softwood sp. <10%
Monitoring report indicates success? Ye No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Ye No

e
based on community composition? s No
based on TPA and/or % cover? No
Vegetation planted on site? Ye No
Date of last planting:
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'1o cover
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas (e.g. buffer width, overall health of vegetation,
etc.):
r?c_6 weQ Q - pls?-cam ?1ur? r ?pct.?

Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
' I
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful artia ly success unsuccessful
Lists ecific reasons for lack of success for this component:
trnex t?, esp . fop O,? StU? r-?Ca:?iOn ?t (N 2 '
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
r4 ax?
Use the definitions in the joint state/federal stream mitigation guidelines to determine the correct type of
mitigation used for this component.
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important stream features.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2