19970972 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090610

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: 1 Q- 10 - C)q Evaluator's Name(s): ' 11 ddb

Date of Report: _
Report for Monitoring Year: J
Date of Field Review: Lp - (p-T)q Evaluator's Name(s): L_
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: ???- ':U L aid ?i Ae- U rwne C ms
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: located off US Route 74 between Polkton and Wadesboro
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 19970972 I Project History
Project Name: Anson Co. Waste Management Facility Event Event Date
County(ies): Anson
I

Basin & subbasin: Yadkin 03040104 Report Review - Streams 4/10/2007
Report Review - Wetlands 6/6/2007
'Nearest Stream: Pinch Gut Creek Closeout 9/21/2007
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
» Total Mitigation on Site
' Wetland: 0.98 acres
Stream: 2040 linear feet
Buffer: 0
Nuti. Offset:
rA
dv'
iti
ti
l
il
bl
?
ppr
m
ga
on p
an ava
a
e
Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
PrWler areas identified in reports? Yes No
r
Problerh are i .addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation requo on site:
Associated impacts (if known): 'Add significant project-related events: reports,
received
construction
lantin
re
airs
etc
,
, p
g,
p
,
.
During offi review, note success criteria and evalua
c te each component based on monitoring report
results. Re
d relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
19970972-2 2040 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 1 8
j 19970972-1 0.98 acres Wetland Creation 8
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is. ecess I partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 0.98 acres Wetland Creation Component ID: 19970972-1
Description: bottomland hardwood forest
Location within project: eastern portion of project west of Pich Gut Creek
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
saturation or inundation rquired between 5-12% of GS during Inundated
avreage climatic conditions _ ? Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? gYe No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: no
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? e No
List indicators of hydric soils: 0,8 QA]C14 CVU-0A l(L_ VAC)V ?A6- VL_LAX1C.
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, u land areas, etc.):
%I" y as
1,? G t-C.A4 u14 -t-
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
min. mean density 320 charac. Tree species/acre surviving
at least 5 years after planting; at least 5 charac. Tree sp.
Present, and no sp. can comprise >20% of total; softwood
sp. no more than 10%
Monitoring report indicates success? a No
Average TPA for entire site (per report :
Observational field data agrees? UYeNo
based on community composition? based on TPA and/or % cover? Vegetation planted on site? Date of last planting:
Dominant Plant Species
Species Storv TPA/'/ cover
??-3? nnC)oCLJOt_ ?? .
Vegetation growing successfully? a o- I
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
Rang Yeqetati@44s&ues_to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
0_00-'?> mja? ??- 4? A . -to

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
none Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
[Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: s ccessf I partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up aActiions,, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
- Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2