19970507 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19970604

i
ti-°"°-. --J......~4E011~~ 11 _ _ _
j , ' i'. I
i
~O N ~ j f
1
yQV ! - r ;
~ ~ '
O + vN r r ~
DEN RD,p N ~I
x. T RA N TRAP X04 T ~ PRO EGT{O
~ f j DaA1NAGE AREA = 1.64 Ac QPa = 3.3 CFS 4 I
11 DISTUR$ED AREA = 1,25 Ac = B,O FPS I'
REg19 STORAGE VOU ~ 2,250 Lp = 101 , i r j
2o1W,x~o1L Xd1 DEEP W = 121 ,I
WEIR, LCNC,TH =41 a w , dSo ~ VICINITY MAP _
N.T.S. ~nwx - qIl "il
d = 15" W/FILTER FABRIC / ~I
O
I~ T ~1
N 0 CO n1 STRU CTIO LIMITS
I~ 1 ~I~
~ ~_,~o 1
~~o O I ~ }
i N \ o~ \ t
i
/ ~ l i I
ryo J _ , P ION S INLET PaOTECTiOS.1
t (T'fPlcA~ of I I
~ 3.0 5 I ~ / Q , a I I
V = 3. PS /
~ =1 / n ~.n - I / /
i W - i ati s, f
" 9' L ER FA6 I~ ~ _ ~ ~ d W/ T ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r
/ TE ORARY $6cDIMENT~ AP IQ~b 0 1 i
J S c - d / Cb 5 ~ RAINAG_ REA- I•G3 c I I i
~ ~ - i ~ \ D REA - O.Q ~ I ~ I ~ o
+ I D(S f'UR, A ,r ~ /R>< 'D STORAGE L= I,~2 ~ I ,R T RA Ns r ~ - i ~ ~
4 ~ a ~ \ 1 ~ 1 ~ 15 X 3o L De EP ~ O AI .4 _ I I
' ~ T oR.aR ON Ru 71a ~ a 1
\ 4(~~R EN TN - ~ ~ ~ \ / / Q D ST C ~ ~ G NTA, I.MGCs 'xl 0 I i f _~B
~ ~ RO K DAM \ ~ ~ ' IS_IL X DE ~ A B i
° D AINA A ?A ~ 2L ~ J F I I i
J ~ DI TUF>, ED ARCA = 7.G i I ..q:. _ + ~
e I 1~ R q D Or0.AGE oL- ,1,80 ~ _ _ I
VA ED WE I
I P OTEClrION 0 U X 8 L X~ 2~ I 1 T E J - ~ EIR GT = 151 r ' 1~ ~I I ~ ~ { i
,IO - 3a F5 , NT #2 - c AGE EAS ti / n ~ f~~,_ _ I
v ~ ~ FPS ~ RA f ~ N
I 2 1 ~ ~ 1 i ~
~~.t I W z I SEME a II A/NAG ~~-y I ( d
/ ' a = i 1 ~ I ~
e ~ x-9~ ~ I ~ L G I 1 ~ _ _ ,
n ~ d = I /Flu EA F D G \ \ ~ \ l w ~ ~ 1 / MENT s f . , ~ ~
UT! I YE~S~ „~hPOAARY SeDIh1ENT TRAP N 7 1 T' P pTjc TIQ I I ~ ~ }I \ / I ~ ~
DRAINN4E AREA = 0.4 Ac \ c 94 F ~ I i _ ~ '
N T ED AREA = O.db Ac ~ ~ ~ ~ - Fp ~ . - - ~ I IS uF8 - ~ OSS C,,i / ~ ~ ti f , - - - \ -
• ~ ~E ~D STOR!.GE VOL= 720 ~ _ 3.D ?0 I 4
1 , ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , y W X 24~1s,x ~ DErP , - 23 ~ ~ ~ ; m \
\ 1 ~ - ~ \ WEt L~NGT'}tc / ~f~a Q 1 a
~ V ~ ~ L A ~ I o z -
TY EA FM NT ~ I o \ 1 ~ , ~ I Cj # ~ 21 u~ F1 E FA ,,i 1 ro-amm I ~ ;
i ~ Ok t ~ _ ~ / Ww o
, - _ ~ ~ ~ _ 1C ~
J ` ~ , I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ v ~ - \ q I -h~ - ~ -F- -i- -4- F- - `t /g ~ 1 8 ~ 8\ 2
U I I
F I R M NT TR~ ` , $ \ / ~ T_MPORA Y SEDI ~
1
DRA NAGE AREA = 0• Co Ac, ` 1 ~ ~ < I 4 \ I Z DISTURBED AREA = 0. S2Ac• + I F ff
I I
J 1 I I o0.AGE ou ¦ 580 \ I 1 READ •$T Y ~ f~ 1 I \ ~ t~.ST G 10 ~I r
I W X, 2511. X ~ DEE 1 I \ S ~ i
WEAR LENGTH = J1 I J
1 'J \ 1 12 ~ v /S PO AR SEDIME T Tft / ~ I60 DIME T Tft P N~ OUTLET PROTECTION 2 O T~~T 7EGT1 I T F1PORAR E7tr~ NT TRAP NCI ' ~ I I
~ e ANA E A EA= 2. 4Ac T MPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS 9 1N 10 2. 4 AC Q = d.l CFS QI'~lo O.v CRS D'F\AIntAGE AReA ~ 0.31 At Pilo V = 3 FP5 ISTURBED ARE/'. a 0.23 Ac
c g GISTURHED AF~A = Los Ac DRAINAGE A0.EA = 0.50 AG _ Los AC ~ = 7.T :PS 3 I L = lo' REQ~D STORAGE VoL= ~Id
o ~ REq'D STDRAG,E VOL¦ 1890 015*uaeED AREA = 0.~2 Ac VoL¦ 1890 LQ= l0 a
= 5 0 ~3 151 W X 321 L X 41 DEEP 0.14q D STORA,G~• ~/OL B I I w = 2' ~1 W X IB~L X 4~ DEEP ' r DEEP W 12~ r _ 4' WEIR LENGTH ='~I B I
1` , 1 ~ EP .y 1 ~,JEIR LENGTH a 4~ (nW X 5L X4 DE ' d5a
~I ~ ~ 1 WEI LEN TN ~ d 6' ~ ; 9 n. K' o s K1K d = 9~ w'~ FItT6R FA6RIG
t~ • IS" W/FIUTER FgBRIG 1
- S ~ ~ T I I ~ ~ ~ Sx I a
1
5~(MIN 4 T E 5
TEMPORARY EDI M ENT TRAP N~ Ij I Ac: I (11 ToT~.~ DISTuP,BED AFEa =-t~~~20.4-
DRAIN~,GE p. E = 0 14A Ito N°57 N° 5 STONE (2) CO'1TRgC70R $NAU. TAKC P0.6GAU'r10N5 AGAINST GAOUr.~D WATEA . ~ i 7 COHoITIOr15. ScASo~~I. HIGH Gfo.pVND W~T~2 Ge.+.r b6r EXPL'GTGD
DISTUflBED AREA O. Ac ~ j)vaING w~tiTtR AND rA0.~Y $PaING Irv WETL~N~S AREA. 7E0.CHtD ~ I
READ STORAGE ~(oL SL +t3 ~~p . N wq'fC0. 7,.BLE C~NDITIOrJ IN uPt_~NpS ARGA CAN E>< ExPECrED Ac~"TEK pRIcF ,P~~~oD$ OF HEAVY R°I~S, ~;7 ~
x 121E x ~1 DEE ' 1900w~/ 1900w~/~ d. ~ ; . ~ i~ . i
4 w / h` r
W E: I A LENGTH = •41 ? •V1~~'
MIN,$TONE SIZEl~So` I~ SIZE ~ =9" m ~ ST P~ IO I M ITS ~ ' ~ I ~~5~~ 50 _
i. N \
I 101 2 n,,
I ~ ~1~~~~nNpii ~y i k EY WAY
_ '0 ~ ~ FIUTER FABRIC ~ ~/h, 4
CROSS SECTION j~~ SS ~ ~ ~ EE O,y
= 0 9~ i ~ '
~ SEAL varlet o0. p
FM O M1 DIM NT TgAP NQ I (MIU~ OI(~C/ ~ i
TEMPO ARY SEDIMENT TRAP Lltl W D0./. NA6,e AREA s O.L2Ac i'° fN ~ ti99 N I
DRAINAGE, AREA = 0,12. ,4c U DIS URpED AREA' o•25A ~f h~~ I R L.1.P
D AREA = o. to Ac REQ D gT'oaAGE vo~= 4 0 ~k' plSTUrYBE O `'hlr'nlu~~
- ' ' W 20' Deep REQ1D STORAGE VoL - 18L W ~ L 9G i FILTER FABRIC I
' I 1 X -0I DEEP ? WEIR TH = ' , 4 W x 2 L ~ \
CfJ/1~IT \/IC\Al ,.rr,r-ter ......l.Tr,,,..r,..., r.. ~,.r, ,
WEIR LENGTH W ~ rctt uuN~ nuulluly rLP,~v~ rurc
Z I
w U ROCK DAIM KENSINGTON
LARRY 50' RW XX B -B PVMT 24" ROLL CURB t~ KING 1
REVISION DATE :04/.29/97. L S P A SHEET N0. ELIMINATE 3ED. TRAP NO. 3 SCALE 1 G0 H DATE 10-31 -96 i
r , REV. 2,4, a 5 P.O. Box 53787 1333 MORGANTON ROAD, SUITE 201 ~
1 CAD FILE NAME FAYETTEVIU.E, NORTH CAROLIN,-, 28305 TELEPHONE: [phone];00 7~ DESIGN BY k DRAWN DY D H
[FIELD BOOK FAX: [phone]
1 -r 24 0

1~SOOi 'ON 9Ni.MVaO ~NIN Atltl71 :1.8 3bf1501~ 9 03~~3H~ ~~0 Aitl3dOtld '3AOAtl 101 HOf108H1 Ptl) NI 03 OIlB(ld A8g10N -NIVINOO SNOISIA08d Ol Stl AllllAtl 1tlN015S3d0ad 6E£I-183AWf1N OI1tl81S1038 Sl8
nea,o» 'i3a nie 7M1 Ae tir7aa .Doi . ,i :317)5 dNI 10bd0 H1bON :3iru 83H 2X1 SIH i0 1S3A 3H1 O1 NOI1tlNIW83134 tl ~_-1__ 3XVW O1 31AVNf1 SI 80J,3A8fIS 3H1 LtlHl HOPIS SI fo11/ ~ '
:NOOK Ol3ii 7N1 :AA 03A3~a05 966iii0i'~ON 3170 80A3A811S 3H1 O1 31Atl11VAtl NOI1tlW80dNl 3H1 1tlH1 °3
ONd1a38W~0 :x3Hnoa HS I.3~00b :aiHS~oi Z~Oti-~8b (016) :Xd3 0pd 001 SL OS 5Z u :NOISIAIOAf1S d0 NOI11NIi30 3H1 O1 NOILd30X3 83H10 NO 'A3A80S 0383080 18000 '0'tl '9661 AVW
00`rb-98ti (016) :3NOHd3131 1661'9Z'N(lf tl 'Sl3O8tld ONIISIX3 i0 NoI1tlNIAW0O38 3H1 SV 'OV '9661 AtlW 40 1,tl0 4191 SIHL lg3s HOPIS 'A210031gO 83H10Nq 40 SI A3A8(1S 3H1 1tlH1 '0 40 Aq0 Hltl SIH1 ltl3S ONq ONVH AW SS3N11M
~OESZ °0 'N '3~11~131131~dd ONtl 83AWf1N N011gd1S193H '38111gN01S ldNl'JINO 1.W '1N3Wf181SN1 ON1003804 3H1 40 NOI1f103X3 :ONtlI i0 Sl3O8tld SS3N11M '030N3Wq Stl 0£-Lb 'S'0 H11M 30Ng08000q
L661'~ I'Ndf 3~d~s ~~Hd7as IOZ 311f1S 'ad0~ N01Nd`7~OW ~`=`rl 80 13O8tld ONIISIX3 NV i0 SI A3A8fIS 3H1 1tlH1 'O 3H1 030031MONXOq ONtl ,1q0 SIH1 3W 38043A 03
L8L£~ X08 '0'd :Okgl NI 03dgd3!!d 5tlM dqW SIHL 1tlH1 :000`01:1 SI 031 -8tl3ddtl AIItlNOS83d '801,3A8f1S ONtlI 0383151038 i0 Sl3O8tld S31tl10038 1tlH1 3ONVN1080 Ntl O1 Stl -V1f191tl0 Stl NOISI038d i0 OIltlB 3H1 1tlH1 :S3NIl
r .S y d SNO I s l n3a 031tl1f1038N0 SI 1gH1 AlllgdlOiNnN 80 AINOOO q q' ONIXA88g1'M1gH11.411830'01VS3804q i0 NOI180d HOnS NI 031tlO01 SI A3A8f1S 3H1 1VH1 'A 03HSg0 Sq NMOHS 3Htl 03A3A8fiS lON S318gONN08 31g1S 0Ntl A1Nf100 3H1 40 OllBfld A8tl10N q 'I
~KI7 ~ 07 0?~~Z ~d ~ :ONtl1 i0 0Nq NOISIA83df1S AW 830N0 30gW A3A8fIS T1f110q S13O8tld S31g1f1038 1tlH1 3ONVN1080 Ntl SVH 1VH1 Ntl W084 NOISUN3dfIS AW 830N0 NMg80 SVM dqW
I~ ~ JN ~OSSd S31d1 AllltldlOlNnW 80 A1Nn0O tl i0 tl38tl 3H1 NIH!.IM 1,1Nf10O ONtll83AWf10 ONtlI i0 NOISIAIOAf1S tl S31tl38O A3A8f1S 3H11VH1 'tl SIHL 1gH1 ,14112130' ONIH1.88g1'M 'I
:dVW SIHL Ol Alddtl MOl3A (S1W311 gN1108g0 H180N
03XO3HO 3H1 1tlH1 Ad1183O AA383H UNIX A88tl1 'M 'I AOg8f100tl 0Nq A3A8f1S 40 31tl01411830 31801411830 A8g10N
6i9Zi
.09 ° ^ iV A;
a ,
d °
~ ,28'961 ,00'06 ,00'06 ,ZO'89 ,9Z'011 ,Ob'8 ,6B'68£I M.f0,6~yagZN
0 I 8 ,OZ'£8 ,69'161
``U ' ip ~ v~ i cn , I £'£LL
~ O _
I ~ N N d L• 16b 39tld a co N r Z8 ~ ~ r m o ~ N ~ ~8 ,Cv ~ ~ cb ~ N
I 'S6BZ N008 0330 I I I ~ ~ ~ I £Z 307d £OB 3J7d '986£ H008 0330 3 - 0~ ~ (P ~ i0~ ~ ~ ~ b8 ~ o° 0y , o LZb 39gd `1£6l NOOA 0330 0 ~
AA9 3'J7d 'bZEb )?008 0330 113 ~ I !bl 30pd 'A9BZ >too8 0330 ~ I 'OSAZ NOOA 0330 ~ ~ ~ 18 2 N U' o ~~N ~ ~ ~ 6B ~ ~ti 1 HJfl0AN311d ~
££t 3ovd ~ 410Nab' 'da00 3JbJ1a0W NOINfI 1Sb13 SIAb'0 N • ~ * 6£~ 307d '610b HOOA 0330 b'031N001 - 410Nd`~ ~ ~7 D.O£ . JOA 0330 I I I c co ~ ~0,• .0 ' ~ ~ . I ~ $
\ 3Q~H ~ d3Ja38N30HS _ 'a'ss = ~ :zb'sal , 2
~ I I i I I ~zb'szl I ~ in `N"0'I,ZboOZ ~ M.61,zb°oa '00'~a 4
~ I I ~ ~ I , w N 98 c;;
t4 0~ o~ ~ ~ a~ ~ `,.aa? ,60'9bl ~ a~ ,19'Z9£ M,1~,£I°SZN a ,OL 162 M,ZO,O~o1ZN a ,61'89£ M„96,£I,SZN ,Ob'11d M,9b,b~oBZN , I ~'Z6~ 'M„ I £,60,8ZN ' oL '
'b a.'a"„p M,9Z,£bo6ZN ,86'b8b M,OS~,fi6o1ZN w : u 8 ,00'001 ,86'29 ,00'001 ,00'68 ,00'001 16'65 ,00'6L ,00'6L ,61' 18 ,00'6L ,00'61 ,00'00 I y ,b6'b I I _ ,Ob'118, 08 ~~b1 \ 3 ,10'161 ,69'£LI ,bb'OZZ ,L£'Lb 08 '~h'11 ,0 ati ~ M ~ I
,60'901 ,00'0 ,91'22 I ,00'001 ,00 0 ti~ v ~ ~ Z 6, Z Z N fA S N N Z N Z Z Q ~ ~ Ic Q? Z Z ~ N rn Oi 0~ 0> 0~ p~ ~ 0~ Qi 0~ p •A ~t,~ . S ~N I 1 ~CJ ~ ~ Vii ~ r ~ Z I 1
~ ~ - u e ~ ° ~ N o o N o N o N o N o N o N ° 81 ;U A r • r I
CJ 'i o N N~ N U N U A to A V ,p N Ln A N ~ N W N W N W N W N Oy ~ 61 C~.•..' ~ CCJ +C_ _ d s. U ~ u _ a _ L ? - 8 6 ~ O I ~ - I I Z I e, `=1 N _ b l ~ - ~ I _ 91 - L I ~ w (p~ tiN ~ SONVIdfI 8 1 N _ ~ ( N w wti w
a ~ 0'a a U v rs ~ u - v ~ U m•u N N u~ -u -u -u - cn cn 0, .91 ~ ~ a i. ~ s u _U _u ~ 10 ~ ~ in 'oa c' os ~ m m m ra f f f ~ m ~ m m ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ cn° B1 2 ~ w I 1 - - ,0 ° m N o ~ , 9 I N W ~ y4. ~ ~
N N ~ m m ~OVbO N N ~ N ,o, ~ LL I l Ri I ' U L 61 I ~ ti. ~6 0~' )
I; °s 2 00'001 ,00'S6 ,00'001 ,00'68 ,00'001 ,00'69 ,00'6L ,00'6L ,00'58 ,00'61 ,00'61 M„ g ~y ,00'001 ,00'08 o s ° ° ~ .`1 SaNbldfl ~ ~ ~ ~ti ~ ~ I
s , / ~ . ~ ~ .09 ~YY ~OOI2LL~~ft , ; ; ~ ~ ti0 p° , , i1 ~ ,00'05 OZI 91
OZ ~ , ~ti. ~ „IE,9Z°9 I IN r i~.; ~
00'6L ,00'18 ,00'06 ,00'68 z ,00'06 ,00'001 ,Lb'16 - ~ M,b lg/ ,£6'LI I ,00'08 Z , ~ rn a ,66.16 i~
' ° S > V1 z ~ a u, ~ N M F~o2 - rn a ty0 ~ w ~ _ ° +r 2o6fN 08'8 1 1'61 .10'£6 S4Ndldfl',e~bZl ! ~ m
A ~ °N ti •9 - £b bb - o b6 - 66 ~ vI U / ~ MM~Z,I p~ w Zd I Z N g1N 512~~ X0'84:1 M.Ig ZZB ~i~ . 3 i' ,00'051 °i z '9Zo91 6 ~ i t I IZI 1~'07r~` m , 6 N 6' I ~ r; M Z1£I 'H„gb 6 ~ 88 ''g N ~ 'v oog~N. ~
,6!,001 ~ , p ~ / 0~,2 ~ r
' ' o ~ ~ ~ 0: ~ g ~ ti m C" ~ 3, I £,£OoO~S ~ 90'$1 I Z 3 ~
' ~ i m ~ ,bfi'B8 ~ .ti ,9F'~! ~.j ,66'Zfl p0.6. 6~S .s z 7' ,68'901 °'ti 3.~•0,80o8ZS d ~ g5 ~ ,b 3,6Z,gZ ~,52'1Z0I ~i .N rn N N '7'~ , ~ ~ o o~ .0 61 •,,o,L .g a m
~£6'9Z1 o DRIB LL'61 , bg9f a ~ w ...................................n> o w ° , e. 3,Lf,ISobZS q~' .'L0 3 L Z 1~ ~ ' 3 _ ~..o•..,, co N , ~ ~ ~~'011 6b .6b, !Y ~ / . ` N 1£I W ~ ~7, co ~ ; ~ tiL ~ ~ ~n - o / w ~ : nj
N / ~ ~ ~ ° 1 r zJ
~d~ ~OQI~I o '~'9£I o ~Z U . V V ~ 6 ~ N - _ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ ~ d p 3 o I 1 ) rri rn - ~P .pb•,. ''c~ "c~ y~g1 N m i~ ~ ,bg'b .£0'ILZ ,b6'~b m rn 66 Y ti ~ ~006V % cv M bl ~
- A Z6 ; 3.21,80 ~ Fs'ti91 ~ u u ~ 99 0° ' OL ~ ` A °IZS vl ~9 M L9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~L ~L ~ ~9. 4~ Mo~~, r rn ce „£Z,Sfo6! M„10,56o9ZN ) 1p~ .••i~ ~ O N 'r~
.n ~T ~ a O ~ w ,SO,Z ,89'921 i a ~ 2 ZL g ,29'6£1 '0 Q'' 9b o ZS ~ ~ ~ L1 s...... ~ , Z ' v s
,0~' ~ o O~ ,98'6bl N N p ~~b~ a ~y '~8 ~ gll 9£I ~ ,00' £al S f/ Ob > £9 M„FZ,S£
66 ~7 3,9Z,9b°IZS ~ b~S L6 0 •60 69 4 . , t ~ ~ _ ~ ui S4.b£, 3,6p,$~° ~ bZ °FOS ~ - Z 1Y1/2I .09 oSIN ,88' S M 6b1 a
~ .t N ~ g ~Z,~6o14•S ~ ~ OObo6ZS'~, 99 S502iH
~ a I6 3. Z9 ~ 3,1 , rn ~ g g ~ ~ m I g21 a~ ,ti u~ -0 ~N °r N o 4£I ~ O o5:1N ,(6'gZ
- M I b w o Lb m ~ ,L9'6£ ,52 ~S o i0 o c r ~ ,8Z'Lf cob , ~ .01 , ~ a ,00'SZ ~ £N 3.10,E N 0b ,~co5 ,8Z'Zb ,bb 6b I6 ~ o ~ LJ ~ o O
a o+ ~ h7 I .101 M~SO,IOo$ 85 ~ N y~'~° W .p o ~ s : ,s1'b S .s :
u\ 3,9Z,9b°IZS yS •111 •i ; ~ ~ ~ o'.;
x.261 p o _ ~ 3 ~ i. ,s ~ 1tiS .1,~ 's 96 - ' 66 o w b6 a N! £6 a, Z 2°gbN g ° ~ c ~~6~ $0io ti sr ~ a• d o w v - ~ ~ 40 a £s o- 2 M. I b,6Z°LZN M I b 6Z ur : b£1 ' 18'b6Z ~ _ m ~ S ~ oLZN
' 25 L ~1 w ou ~ Si •p6 6Z'S$ 1~ 's, "~i .t~~0 = u m w z M• 0~ w 6b ~ Bb _ ~ s ,L2 $~S s9 e9 a ~ N ~ N o ro ro _ _ W~ ~....dT 9Q~ b ~ 8 '~£o~I 1 '1~'Z1 V 2 gyp, N ~
_ ~ w w 3, I b,110 i~ m~ m , ~ M ~ ,_._......__.........m ' ~ ,90'911 ~ _ ~ hNl ~ o •c~° \ M,£Z, o
' 0 m N 19 w m 3 b9 4; •d , 16 ~ w , bb b . b6,10o0Z1y ~6 b ~~'001 • ~ i~ w 09 U . '~'0r sS ,06.6 •19 • Z9 a. 0 0\ 6to° ~ cD '0£061 N ~a l 6j) ,0~ ~ c- 'V, ; v rn
,00'08 m . w 6~ X68 1 ; ,Z18 ,9g'£. ,09 ,06'b6 m g gZ ~ C~`' 6 9bS X0'08 •bl ,~•+JL ~ 901 ~ r- ~ c„° u ~ ££1 Ib N J
v ~0~ ,00'61 ~ s Op ~ m z w d L ~OQI a 'use ~ a 001 w ~ ~ ~ 'ro 401 ~ ~ ~ ! cn ,0 •19' 2~ £dl W ~ ~ 2 ~ 1 ,Q ~ 1 ~ `9~C£ ~
Z ° ~ ,oo'ool ~ A ,oo'~$ ,n 86 ~ ,Z ~ _ m _ z co rn ~ ~,°p ~ ~ Z ,00'6 v ° N ~ - w ~ 6 6~ z ,00'001 ~ u w of w N ~ ro ~ ,:t
4 ~w N m z ,00'S9 'ss v w 66 ~ a W N lol W o 201 o rn eo Ip £01 O p 901 N d' ~ 891 £oSIN ,FS•6 Z01 0 ~ ~Z N { N ~ „6Z,SSoOZN ~ "
. ~ c„' 9£ a w N o _ ~ ~ ~ ,00';1 s' ' ~ ~ ~ w c ~ a - ° ~ y .QO' ~ m g ' g ~ W Lf ~ W ~N _ N ~ ~ ~ y 001 m ,00'001 Z ~ ' N ~ , gal '0911 y a.Za r
~ ~ 9f W ,p _ N s ~ ~ y 6 1 wp J
,Zf'681 • ~ 6£ w A - °i ~ 001 'ab8 00'0 m wp a~~,~'~ ~ r" ~ a ~ b£ • w ~ = rv m rn z ,96'68 8 , ,fb'L I f , 11'08 m N w a. ro c~ m z X09 ~ w
ti ~ 3•I~,SZ ,8b'SS rn ro ZE w - m rn z y 0~'Id t.. ~ ° I zs ,00'001 ~ - a ~ I ~ ? - N o _ ~ z O~IZHS~ '1Zo~'1 9'061 M„11,6b ,
~at'~~ a S6 ,00'001 F F ~ cow iv w 6Z ? _ ro ~ a ° v w ,00'09 .a.4, 9 . ~~'S9 ~ ~ - •a ~ ~ N w 9Z a w w LII io w rn ~ ~ ,0006 . tol N j ,b o I ZN
I I bb9 3,bi ~ ,00' s ~ N u - LZ u w ui 9I I _ ~ ~ rn cn 09 .f l'0 ,LO ~ ,Lb, I ZS ~1 ,69'f9 •2\ cn a w A v o = _ ~ _ ° 5 8. r'"° 8 901 ,=0 F k. ~2 ~
I ,00'66 6V m ' T m ~ w 91 I N- N~ - o rn z ' ~~b 6r~~ 1£I ~g6.1
cn w a 3.fI,lOZ .I~'18 ~ _ W bII~ W 611 ,cNn ro ~ _ 3 . ~ ~ 2° •w OZ 3 601 "o Zn~' ~ M„1I~Ob oIZN
i N: 30vd ' I ~b NOOA 0330 I 18, o ZS a~ 3,b9 ,9f'L9 0~, - m ~A Qu w a ~ ZI I ? ° N OI I N c I I £bl ,9b,IZS 18 0b ~ . a _ u u w III ;n~ p OI I N N, ,n W tj.. rn ,ZZZ ~A5
NOS~Odf I 9ZC 397d'ZZ6 N008 0330 ,bl'OZI a ,b6'8bZ ~OZ'69 ~ ,Zb'B ~ ~ • { u w p I I 3.LZ,9bo I ZS 9 ,00 S1 ~ N o D ~ ~ 'N g,~ o o d' a ~ 22 Apo O ~ 0~ ~ M~ 9al ~ fib,
NOS~Ob'f sec 3ova'IZIZ N008033a I I a 'x'09 ,9Z• ~ I £9Z 3074 ,69'BbZ I - m I I 3.11,£2 6b ,b1'bb ,00'08 /1 O ~J r V'
1,31~b'H I S£OZ aoo8 4330 L86 3974 I I ° Zs '6L'£e I I ~ ,1£'121 Z ~ \ ~ ~ p 0p .Cy~i
I A31atiH I 'blLZ )1008 0330 I I iSl 3~7d I ,9B'£B o ro sal ~
I I I ,l3lab'H 'LL6z vooe c33a I 3~vd I I '6boz >'ooa 0330 I I W 2 rv ~
~ I N~WNI I SaabM03 I ,11'662 1 3~1Z,£ZoZZS ~ •0~.......
I I I I I 6£6 307d '8662 H00A 033( 9~ ' ,b9'£IZ
' I I J,dMJNIWW3H I ~ ,6b'
I I a 601 I
I
I I £LI 39Vd '8012 N008 0330 ~ ~
I I ~N'da0 916 30tld '9192 N008 0334 bSb6- i 9 (61160b0 Nld
I I 3Nda0 ~~aQla
I I (3ld~S ON)
I ,sA•L I ,b I'Lb ,68'L I 3.L6,9doBbN LZl ~ ~ V ~ ,bl Lb 3.£1,81of8N 9Z1
I ,srsl ,61'61 3„Ib,L0oZ9N 6Z1
,sL'~ I ,£L'9£ ,6L'6 3„L6,8£o96S bdl ,£L'9£ 3„6Z,6Zo1dS £Z1 ~
31b'~I~d - 133b1S 'L 'b£ sb ,sz'LE ,b£'6b 3„81,IboZLN ZZl ,6Z'L£ M.L£,bSaS I N I Zl
40`01-a--3NOZ '9 ,Ae'Az ,88'82 M. I I , I Oa06N OZl
,96'1£ ,96' I £ M.Ob,£Oo01 N 61 l ,SI'6Z 3,6Z,S6o6ZN 81l
'0'M'd 31~IA3113Ad.3 ,l8 a31dM 'S ~sl'~z ,69'8 I ,69'81 3. I b,Z2o6LN L I1 ,b£'9b 3.£b,01ob9S 91l 3ao1+
'0'M'd 3111~3113J,dd Jl8 d3M3S J,ad11N'dS 'ti ,bc'9b ,26'69 ,26'69 3,ZZ,Zbo86N Sll ONf10219 7d1NOZIaOH S3~Ntl1S10 lTJ - 310N ovoa s~,W
8£ I S101 d0 b38Wf1N ,bl'b~ ,sz'Iz ,bl'b6 3,81,90o26N bll 3ivis ,5Z' I Z 3.8S,LOo£ON £ I l
S3a0d 69'ZL `,i3ab 'Z ,ze'As ,st•oz ,ZB'86 3.10,61ob£N Zll ,SL'OZ 3,9b,1 LION I I1 'avow 3a~3fu~ sc31Mn uisa ~Hn
Ob16-6b(90)bOb0---6808-6~(LO)bObO Nld ' I ,so'S1 ,60'61 3.S£,£IoObN Oll s3d1d Noal xe a3NSlnsNUS1a 683N2100 ALtl3d08d llq - 310N 3~na
,oz'b I ,OZ'bl 3.££,Z6o68N 6l 3414 NO81 13S dIS emaoa ,B9'6Z 3.Z£,bZoZbS 8l
:S 3 1 0 N ,e9•sz I L•ob ,£6'Lb ,IL'Ob 3,96,LOo68S Ll ,£6'Lb 3.LZ,£lo£8N 91 3414 NO@I ONIlSIX3 dl3
,IZ'IL ,IZ'IL 3.56,8£o99N 5l 311S
89'L2 89'L2 3~96.Z6~61N bl iuawnww aiau~um n
,90'09 90'06 3„81,£ZoZM 21
,06'81 I S'S6 ,06'81 3„90,OZoILS Zl N Q~ ,1 6'6 It, 1,b1 o21N I 1 tl3Ntl00 10N11100 5310N30
N
3:)NViS1C 30Ntl1S14 ONIatl38 3N11 NI WHO tl0 3dld NPNI S31ON30 3af100 0 aaa
ON3931

Wetlands Tracking
Facility Name GS Materials
Project Number 99 0717
Project Type purpose of pond construction
County Harnett
Location ( County2
Received From APP COE ID # I Region Fayetteville I
Received Date July 7,1999 COE Susp Date I Reg. Contact Ken Averitte I
Sent to Region Date 7/3/1999 DCM Susp Date I APPLICATION FEE INFO
Rcvd Region Date TIP Number I Payment Date 7/711999 1
Last Action Date July 26,1999 1 More Info Requested I Amount Paid $200.001
Last Action Issue General More Info Received I Payor GS Materials
Latitude (ddmmss) 35 deg 13' 41" Mitigation ? N I Check # 11207
Longitude (ddmmss) 79 deg 9' 41"
"
Certificates Stream Area - j
e Area jLength Length
-
Permit E Wetland Wetland 3 Stream a Class - ! 3 Wetland " (Rees) ! (acres) (feet) ( (feet)
Type Cert # Type Im Impact Score - Index ' Prim. Su pp. I Class q
P PP• APPr• ! Req. Appr.
1 26 1 3108 1 J O Y ON 1 118-20-13-3-1 C 1 1 030613 1 1 0.251 0.251
OY ON
WRP
Mitigation Project Wetland Wetland
MitigationType Number Type Class
Stream Stream stream
401s
Total for 401: 0.25
Mitigation
Area Length: i Completion
(acres) (feet) Date Subbasin
1
Total Mitigation: 1,200.00
IookupWRP

Stream Impacts (ft.)
Peren- 1 Inter- '
niai mittent
1 1.200.01 w
Wetlands Tracking .01
Facility Name KENSINGTON VILLAGE S/D
Project Number 97 0507
Project Type purpose of SUBDIVISION I County sCUNIBERLAND
Location I County2
Received From APP COE ID # 199707808 Region. Fayetteville
Received Date June 4, 1997 COE Susp Date 8/22/1997 Reg. Contact:
Sent to Region Date 6/17/1997 DCM Susp Date 7/31/1997 APPLICATION FEE INFO
Rcvd Region Date 6/26/1997 TIP Number Payment Date`
Last Action Date October 1, 1997 More Info Requested I Amount Paid I
Last Action ISSUE WQC I More Info Received I Payor " I
Latitude (ddmmss) Mitigation ? N Check #' I
Longitude (ddmmss)
Certificates Stream Area i i
R Area b Length ( Length
Permit a i Wetland Wetland Stream Class ' t (acres)'. ,
Cert # Score . Subbasin $ Wetland (acres) (feet) (feet)
I Type Type I Impact , Index ; Prim. Supp. Class Req. ` Appr. i Req. 1 Appr.
_?? J O Y O N 0 18-31-24-(4 C 1 030615 riparian 1.20 1.20 IND 3158 IIWI?
1OY ON f -
Total for 401:. 1.20
i
Stream Imparts (ft.)
WRP Mitigation
Mitigation Project Wetland ? Wetland Area Length Completion Peren- Inter-
Subbasm
MitigationType Number Type Class (acres) (feet) Date nial mittent
T
Total Mitigation::
IookupWRP
10 )
"'%Ok a -"4 a...uwuuvu va anc auu ?.ma..o .avua?a.? ?..u....w !ltL;O[U ivumDer Iwin,Y
rYMENR
Custonjc?',?ervice Division of Water Quality - 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1 800 623-7748 [phone] 401 number 94 50
Type of
inspection
Inspector
' ? Q'1??1 ?.fY 1 k d?T'7? ® {q5 f'"k e?Rllilf IZ?Sf ? t }- ?:
1,7
iA'
li,???14>
1 1 11 • is 1
Region Asheville _
County RUTHERFORD
Basin 1030802 -l
Stream class C
Receiving
Waters
303d listed streams ? yes ? no ? N/A
Date of ?- entry time exit time
inspection
Location
Project
status
Acerage
Estimate of
Acerage
Project type
10 <l acre 0 1-5 acres 0>5 acres
Expected
Project
Completion
Approved S&EC Plan ? yes ? no Date
I
Contractor
Contractor Contact
Phone i
Owner's
Name
Address I I
Latitude
Longitude
Plot Number
Tract Name
I
Does visit prompt NOV? ? yes ? no ? N/A
NOV Date
Documentation to
Support Evaluation
City,
State,
zip
Inspection
Summary
i
I 1
Violations/Concerns
Record Number 00004
No 401 Certification Confrimed by ACE E] Yes El no ? N/A 401 cert. required ? yes ? no ? N/A
Date of ACE confirm
Stream impacts
Wetlands impacts
No
certification
comments
? None to report Type of stream
? <150 feet of stream impact impacts
? >150 feet of stream impact
? 150 feet of perennial stream impacts I
? none to report Type of wetland
? < 1/3 ac.wetland impacts
? 1/3>1.0 acre of wetland
? >1.0 acre of wetland
? Loading ? Others
? Culverting
? Relocation
? Flooding
? None to report ? dumping
? filling ? ditching
? pumping
? flooding

I -

Projects with 401 Certification
Proposed project has not started: date proposed
Project development in process: date est.complete
401 wetland impacts
? none to report
? < 1/3 ac.wetland
? 1/3>1.0 acre of wetland
? > 1.0 acre of wetland
Project work complete
Type of wetland impacts w/401 cert
? None to report ? dumping
? filling ? ditching
? pumping
? flooding
? yes ? no ? N/A
wetland impacts beyond
authorization estimate
acerage
Type of stream impacts w/401 cert stream impacts
401 stream impacts beyond authorization
? None to report ? Loading ? Others
? <150 feet of stream impact ? Culverting
? > 150 feet of stream impact ? Relocation
? 150 feet of perennial stream impacts ? Flooding
Wetlands and streams certification conditions
Additonal
conditions and other
comments
Mitigation required ? Mitgation plan implemented ? Other...
WRP option ? Stormwater plan required
WRP payment received ? Stormwater management plan approved
DWQ mitigation plan required ? Stormwater Management plan implemented
Mitigation plan received ? Deed notification requirements
Mitigation plan approved ? Deed notification implemented

.................................................................................................................................................................................................... r
..................................................................................................................................................................................................
2
Record Number 00004
W tiand' Wetland confirmed by ACE ? yes ? no ? N/A Date confirmed ACE
Standards 401 cert. required ? yes ? no ? N/A
Type of impacts ? None to report ? dumping

? none to report ? filling ? ditching
Wetland impact
? < 1/3 ac.wetland [:1 pumping ? Other...
? 1/3>1.0 acre of wetland ? hooding
? >1.0 acre of wetland Noticeable substances in amounts which cause adverse impacts
18.0231 (h)
Have you noticed if impact(s) preclude any of the below uses of
wetlands. Indentified uses 2B.0231 (a)
Is there evidence of liquids, fill or other ? yes ? no ? N/A
Hydrologic functions ? yes ? no ? N/A Is there evidence of ? yes
? no ? N/A
floating/submerged debris, oil
Stormwater retention and
e ? yes ? no
stora
? N/A Is there evidence of
r? yes ? no [:1 N/A]
g materials producing color,

Filtration or storage of ? yes ? no
? N/A, nrl tact ?
Is there evidence of toxic substances ?yes no N/A
pollutants
Is the biological (flora, funa) ? yes ? no ? N/A
Shoreline protection ? yes ? no ? N/A integrity maintained
Habitat for aquatic
organisms
Habitat for wetland
dependent wildlife
Wetland
Standards
comments
? yes ? no ? N/A Does the impairment(s) alter the
natural hyrological conditions of
the wetland(s) to such a degree in
? yes ? no ? N/A which the wetland(s) now fails to
support the its biological and
physical characteristics. Noticed
inpacts in: (Please check any)

..................................................................................................................................................................................................

Riparian Buffer Zone Buffeer Rules
Confirmation of stream subject to the rule
Neuse and Tar-Pamlico
Buffer impact zone ] ? yes ? no ? N/A
? Neuse ? Tar-Pam ? Randleman ? Water supply watershed
? Topo/Soil Survey ? Topographic map
? Site specific conditions ? Local gov. map
Estimate of linear
feet of buffer
impact
Estimate of acerage of
mean width of buffer
impact
Buffer impact zone 2
Estimate of linear
feet of impact zone
2
Estimate of acerage
of mean width in
zone 2
? yes ? no[:] N/A
Buffers use observered Buffer use designation O Exempt Q Allowable w/ mitigation
Q Allowable 0 Prohibited
Randleman Watershed and Water Supply Randleman watershed local gov [3 N/A?
juristication ? Yes [I no
DWQ notification of ? yes ? no ? N/A Local program response ? yes ? no ? N/A
local program
Buffer comments

Record Number ,(>n(x)4
10 0&
Stream Standards Stream present confirmed by DWQ ? yes ? no ? N/A Date confirmed
Stream Impacts ? None to report Type of stream impact ? Loading ? Others
? <150 feet of stream impact ? Culverting
? >150 feet of stream impact ? Relocation
? 150 feet of perennial stream impacts ? Flooding
Alledged types
of water quality
standards
violations:
02B.0211
Stream
standards
comments
Best Usage ? Deletrious substances ? Oil/petroleum
Dissolve Oxygen ? Color ? Debris/refuse
Floating solids ? Other wastes ? Other...
Settleable solids ? pH
Sludge deposits ? Temperature
Oils ? Turbidity
........................................................ .................................................................................................................................
?
.......................... ...............................................................................................................................................................I

Is a permit required ? yes ? no ? N/A Permit Number
Permit Conditions for this activity ?
Was permit Are control devices ? yes ? no ? N/A?
? yes ? no ? N/A? inspected after
properly secured
storms(>0.5" per 24 hr. rain

S&E Plan approved
? yes ? N/A
[I no

event ?m gauge on site
is a r.

? yes ? no ? N/A
Implementation of ? yes [I no El N/A Are weekly inspections ? yes ? no
[] N/A
S&E Control plan records avilable
S&E plan on site ? yes [I no El N/A Are visible monitoring data ? yes ? no ? N/A
available
Any occurances when
DLR found site not in
? yes
[I no [I N/A
Off site sedimentation present
yes [I no ? N/A
compliance
Off site sedimentation events
? yes ? no ? N/A
Noticeable petroleum
? yes
? no ? N/A recorded
? None
discharges Deposition of Sediment
? Slight <] inch
EPA approved ? yes ? no ? N/A in water bodys (waters) ? Moderate 1> 4 inches (intersperst)
herbicide, pesticide ? Severe >4 inches (covers bottom)
and fertilizers use
Linear footage of stream
? None to report
Construction waste ? yes ? no ? N/A? impacts ? <150 feet of stream impact
disposed properly ? >150 feet of stream impact
? 150 feet of perennial stream impacts
Are controls inspected ? yes ? no ? N/A
weekly All anticipated ? yes ? no ? N/A?
noncompliance events
reported
Permit ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
comments ........................................................................................................................................................................................ ?7
..........................................................................................................................................................................................I 'r I
4
w
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, ATR;WA
Health and Natural Resources • 0
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor C) E H N F?
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 1, 1997
Mr. Greg Floyd
Floyd Properties
5416 Raeford Road
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28304
Dear Mr. Floyd,
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed Kensington Road Subdivision
WQC Project #970507 COE #1997078
Cumberland County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3158 issued to Mr. Greg Floyd dated
October 1, 1997.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact Mr. John Dorney at 919-
733-1786.
P.E.
Attachments
970507wgc
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Fayetteville DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mr. John Parker, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Craig Turner, Land Management Group
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
Enviro. Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Crook Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section
401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to Greg
Floyd resulting in 1.2 acres of wetland impact in Cumberland County pursuant to an
application filed on the 31 st day of July 1997 to construct the Kensington Village
Subdivision.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the
waters of Little Rockfish Creek in conjunction with the proposed development will not
result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines.
Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your
application, as described in the Public Notice or as modified below. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to submit a revised application. If
total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below. In addition, you should
get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and
Water Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available
from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices) shall be
utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50
NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all
lakes and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters);
2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released
the project;
3. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands, compensatory mitigation is
required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities;
4. Deed restrictions, conservation easements or similar mechanisms shall be placed in
all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to prevent future wetland and/or
water impact.' These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this
letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
5. Stormwater from this development shall be directed to sheet flow at nonerosive
velocities into remaining wetlands on site before entering stream channel.
6. A copy of this certification shall be given to each purchaser of any lot before
closing by the applicant.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this
Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall
become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404
and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration
of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This
request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box
27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification,
you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request
within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are
made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 1 st day of October 1997
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Pr son ard, O.E.
P.
WQC 970507
's ,
It
?a6eet .soul
J
May 15, 1997
Mr. Jeff Richter
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
RE: Kensington Village individual permit application
Dear Mr. Richter: _
99W& Y4
%. 5aiuk
9805 ?Wi0&WA .4vMW
WWdlminytm, ?Y`B ,48403
Enclosed is a revi d individual permit lication by Floyd Properties for Kensington
Village Subdivision in Cu he permit has been revised to reflect all proposed
impacts, including the excavated pond, road crossings, drainage easements, and utility
easements. Total impacts are 1.2 acres. All utility easements will be restored to original grade
after installation.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have further questions, please
contact Craig Turner or myself.
Si erely:
Paul M. Farley
Wetland Scientist
cc: John Dorney, D.W.Q.
Ken Averette, D.W.Q.
Greg Floyd
Yw 5WMA, cyIZG.
&43 WMMXrn&/
Ad r/ Aro 2542
V/mMytm, ?YaWA Wi w&m 2840.2 3d' . 9f0-452-000,-
°ROM Wi15HINQTON 06.27. 1996 11:73 P. 04
Arru%onm I run rVn ucrAn I Intsi I ur I Mt vAnnn t t'tnMI I UMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
!33 CFR 32S) I Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of Inforrrtadcn U estimated 10 average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing Instructions,
searching existing data $otlroe8, gathering and maintaining the data needed. and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
01111341IT"ent of Defense, Washington Headquaners Service Directorate of InformationOperadons and Roporis. 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22202.4302; and to the Office of Management and budget. Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC
20SO3. Pteese DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
Jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATSiMENT .
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: Theme laws require pomtits authorizing •ctivitisa in, or affecting,
navigable weta?s of the United States, the diacherge of dredged or fill materiel into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged
matarial for the purpose of dumping 1% into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application
for a permit. Disclosure: Disdosure of requested information Is voluntary. If Information Is not provided, however, the permit applicatian cannot be
processed nor can a permit be issued.
one set of original drawings or good reproducibi.- espies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and Instructio(is) and be submitted to the District Engineer having Jurisdiction over the location of time proposed
activity. An eQppdatien that Is not completed in full will be returned.
nrsa,r t 1 7'249711 -r Tim nC me I !11 aV TLC
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETEI
__ (1771NS 8ELOW TO BE FMLED BY AIPf1CAA171
5. APPLICANT'S NAME B. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE unroenr is nor rrqu4,rd)
Floyd Properties Land Management Group, Inc.
S. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
5416 Raeford Road

Fayetteville
NC 28304 P.O. Box 2522
, Wilmington, NC 28402
7. A 1 ANT' M40N N W REA CODE 10 AG NT' PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence - a. Rasidence
b. Business 9.10-433-3205 b. Business 910-452-0001
?' - STATEMENT OF AUTHOAaA-TJON
1 hereby authorize, to act in MY behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
fumieh, upon re(luest, supplemental information in support of thin permit appftcstion,
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE v« Umruatlonr)
Kensington Village
13. NAME OF WATERSOOY, IF KNOWN af rpPr_b;W 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS li/?ovuuasr
Little Rockfish Creek
'5. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Cumberland-- NC
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS,. IF KNOWN, a" iKmm mnai
A Hope Mills North Carolina
7. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Project is located north of state road 1003, approximately 2500'
north west of the intersection of State Road 1003 and State Road 1112
tNG aRM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION OF SF 1 I O SQL i E.
{Proponent*
06/27/96 10:53 TX/RX x0.0774 P.004
PROM WASHINGTON 06. 27.I996 111Sd P.0?
•l•• •••••?•••••,w•, •,•r W?a?r,ywrr Yr WVlw4 wrVlYVa ?w lallwltlif
Project requires three road crossings to otherwise inaccessible uplands.
Two drainage easements and two utility/sewer easements are necessary to
complete the subdivision. A previously excavated pond requires fill
to remove a potential safety hazard to adjacent property owners.
19. Ptofect Purpose tDe cmw rM ra..on er purpo" or rA. p*"t, sr. wrsnuewe .v
To complete all necessary fill for the completion of Kensington Village
.Subdivision. Included are all road crossings, drainage and utility
easements, as well as the removal of an excavated wetland.
USE BCOCXS 20 22 IF ORM43ED AMDIOR FILL MATERIAL IS TO SE OtSCHARgED
20, Roasonlc) for Discharge
Fill is necessary to complete road crossings for otherwise inacessible
uplands. Drainage and utility easements are necessary for subdivision
completion. The excavated wetland posed a safety hazard to adjacent lots
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Fill material will meet acceptable engineering standards
22. Surface Atea in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled tse?ArtmroNony
See attached sheet
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
Pond has been filled.
24, Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be enterzd here,
please attach a supplemental list?.
Paulette N. Richardson, Rt 12 Box 754,'Fayetteville, NC 28306
Jean W. Davis, Rt. 12, Box 754-M, Fayetteville, NC 28306
James R. & Luci Hemingway, Rt. 12, Box 763-B, Fayetteville, NC 28306
Roscoe K. & Edith Y. Crane, Rt. 12, Box 764-A, Fayetteville, NC 28306
J.P. Riddle, P.O. Box 53646, Fayetteville, NC 28305
25. List of Ocher Certifications or Approvalalocnlais Mcsived from other Federal, State Of Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DAIS APPROVED DATE DENIED
'Would include but Is not restricted to coning, building and fk>od plain permits
26. Application is hereby made fof a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the Information in this
application is complete and accurate. I further cartrfy that I possess the authority t undertake the work described heroin or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AG T DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (ap licant) or it may ba signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement In block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and wilHully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any falso, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or Imprisoned not more than five years or both.
-U.s.ca07J"A•520-47sre2o1 a
06/27/96 10:53 TX/RX NO.0774 P.005
Question 22. Summary of fill areas:
1. Road crossing #1. This crossing is necessary to complete access to otherwise
inaccessible uplands. Crossing distance has been minimized. The crossing is
approximately 120' in length and totals 0.12 acres.
2. Road crossing #2. This crossing is necessary to complete access to otherwise
inaccessible uplands. This crossing also utilizes a small upland "island" to minimized
wetland impacts. Total centerline length is -200' and the proposed fill area totals 0.20
acres.
3. Road crossing #3. This crossing (-60', 0.13 acres) completes all wetland/upland
access. This crossing has been raised to minimize drainage.
4. Excavated pond/wetland fill. This area (9439 ft2, 0.22 acres) requires fill to
eliminate safety hazard to adjacent lots. All adjacent lots can be completed without fill
but the pond depth (greater than 3'), will present a safety hazard to these property
owners with small children.
5. Drainage easements. These easements (0.11 acres and 0.09 acres) are
necessary to complete storm water road drainage to acceptable engineering standards.
6. Utility easements. These areas (0.11 acres and 0.24 acres) are necessary to
complete utility and sewer access for subdivision completion. All effected areas will be
restored to their original grade after installation is completed.
The applicant has attempted to complete the subdivision with minimal wetland
impacts. Impacts are necessary to complete the project to acceptable standards.
Table 1. Summary of impacts
IMPACTS AREA (ACRES)
Road Crossings 0.4
Pond/excavated wetland fill 0.2
Drainage easements 0.2
Utility/sewer easements 0.4
TOTAL IMPACTS 1.2
j .AUG. -12' 96 ('"ION) 10:29 FLOYD PROPERTIES TEL: [phone],14 P.
.,v•va.tio its:aa r_Ai
LETTER OF AUTHOR17-ATION
Date:
TO O IT MAY CONCERN.
do hereby authorize
Land Management Grou , Inc. to act as my/our agents (s) in the delineation of
,404/CAMA wetlands and in requested permit work on my/our property known as
rl d--++'D„ t/, Ii G
located in
County, N. C_ Land Management
Group, Inc. should be contacted when questions arise regarding the wetland
delineation activity and/or permit applications on the above property.
08/12/96 10:55 TX/RX N0.1128 P on? M
¦ Vt+?vv¦ ¦OWv.
DATA FORM
€2QUT NE WETLAND DETERMINATION
X1967 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Pane 1 of 2
Project/Site: Kensington Village Date: 1/27/97
Applicant/Owner: Greg Floyd County: Cumberland
Investigator: Craig Turner State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? e J No Community ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Cjg-g) Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes TE?) Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant ant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant ant pecies tra um Indicator
Nyssa sylvatica Tree FACW 9. Sphagnum Herb OBL
Pinus serotina Tree FACW 10. Panicum sp. Herb FAC
Liriodenderon tulipifera Tree FAC 11.
Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 12.
Lyonea lucida Shrub FACW 13.
Cyrilla racemiflora Shrub FACW 14.
Vacinium corymbosum Shrub FACW 15.
Smilax sp. W. vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC.) 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
Stream,Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Inundated
Aerial Photographs Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Other _ Water Marks
_
x No Recorded Data Available _ Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) _
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
x Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks:
Used presence of mucky modifier as hydrology indicator along with FAC-Neutral Test
SOILS
Proiect/Site: Kensinaton Villaae - Cumberland County Page 2 of 2
Map Unit Name "00r
(Series and Phase) : Drainage Class:
C' _ ,, h µ w» p t? Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): t s Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 black muck loam sand
6-18 gray loam sand
8-30 v. dark brown sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon _
x High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Soil verified by Craig Turner, N.C. Licensed Soil Scientis #1091
I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present? Ye
arks:
No (Circle) (Circle)
No
No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetaanc es No
Land Management Group, Inc.
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, N.C 28402
910-452-0001
LAND MANAU&MCIV I VKVUr, IIVI..
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Paae 1 of 2
Project/Site: Kinsington Village Date: 1/27/97
Applicant/Owner: Greg Floyd County: Cumberland
Investigator: Craig Turner State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? \ es No Community ID: upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
ominant ant ies tratum n icator Dominant ant penes tra um Indicator
Pinus palustris Tree FACU+ 9.
Quercus laevis Tree UPL 10.
Quercus marilandica Tree NI 11.
Rristida stricta Herb FAC- 12.
Ilex glabra Shrub FACW 13.
Vaccinium crassitolium Herb FAC+ 14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC.) 33%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
Stream,Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Inundated
_
Aerial Photographs Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Other _ Water Marks
_
x No Recorded Data Available _ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >36 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >36 (in.)
Remarks:
Neither free water or soil saturation observed. No hydrology indicators.

SOILS
Proiect/Site: Kensinaton Villaae - Cumberland Countv Paae 2 of 2
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Blanton fine sand Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Grossarenic Paleudults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-1 A black and white black and white sand
1-36 B pale yellow loam sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No hydrologic indicators present
Soil verified by Craig Turner, N.C. Licensed Soil Scienbs #1091
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
No (Circle)
0
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetlanc Yes No
Land Management Group, Inc.
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, N.C 28402
910-452-0001
Not to scale
Kensington Village LAND MANAGEMENT
Cumberland County, NC GROUP, INC Fill Permit Request
Vicinity Map
May 12, 1997

1r•'; h

t site ^- rf
w?
;

pinet,
Knolll
COO
Stony p(Aw
'
'
,ca !" 'ark
1000 2000 4000
SCALE 1" = 2000'
Kensington Village
Cumberland County, NC
LAND MANAGEMENT
GROUP, INC
May 12, 1997
Fill Permit Request
U.S.G.S. Topo Map
Hope Mills Quad

O
S ?
?? l1
e
is
/

Zvi j
z'7
?Y
it
Ilk,
a
1
2 ?

+f
.
{a1 P
+ 1 : •77 ? A

t
a :' ! }li?
F

u
o ,--?

W s
Up
ZO
Q t <, f
0..

:
ctim
Z .

• 1 r
Y

r;;1J' ie

• t: '1

vt
•
l
T >;? ?? '
is

'?
?? ... 1.

•
ai,.l
i
?Ii?:
t
q 7so7
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 199707808 July 31, 1997
PUBLIC NOTICE
FLOYD PROPERTIES, 5416 Raeford Road, Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304,
has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) after-the-fact permit TO PLACE
FILL MATERIAL IN WETLANDS ADJACENT TO LITTLE ROCKFISH CREEK, ON SR 1003, IN
HOPE MILLS, CUMBERLAND County, North Carolina.
This public notice does not imply, on the parts of the Corps of Engineers
or other agencies, either favorable or unfavorable opinion of the work
performed; but it is issued to solicit comments regarding the factors on which
a final decision will be based. Legal action has been suspended pending the
outcome of this consideration.
f
b lz

The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by a
representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans submitted with the
application show the applicant requests authorization to fill an old borrow
pit, 9,439 square feet (0.22 acre) in size and 6 to 8 feet deep, as a safety
measure for future property owners. The pit was dug in or adjacent to
jurisdictional wetlands at an undetermined time, and has become jurisdictional
due to abandonment.
Three road crossings of wetlan &-ha e been partially completed. These
three crossings total approximate) 0.4 acre of impact. Originally, the road
crossings were roughed in and toe d tc?hes, up to 8 feet deep and 10 to 15 feet
wide, were excavated prior to advertisement by Corps Public Notice. In
addition, one other ditch was dug and some fill adjacent to a cul-de-sac was
placed in wetlands. The original application was put on hold and restoration
of the unauthorized work was requested. All restoration work was
satisfactorily completed. Subsequently, the elevations of the road crossings
were raised to eliminate the need for ditches, thereby reducing the drainage
area of wetlands adjacent to the project.
Utility and sewer easements will result in impacts to approximately
0.4 acre of wetlands. Upon completion of the installation of the utilities,
all affected areas will be restored to preconstruction contours.
Drainage easements will result in impacts to approximately 0.2 acre of
wetlands. These impacts primarily involve either the placement of fill over
stormwater outlets or the excavation of outlet swales to facilitate stormwater
and meet acceptable standards. In addition, temporary sediment and erosion
control features are to be utilized. These features are to be removed in
their entirety at the completion of construction.
The entire area of permanent wetland impacts will be approximately
1.2 acres. Wetland impacts appear to have been minimized, although no
mitigation has been offered. The purpose of the work is to allow development
of the residential subdivision presently known as Kensington Village. Plans
showing the work are included with this public notice.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the
comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
t
-2-
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and
this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible
for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register
constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District
Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources.
Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical
data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that
the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat,
designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order
11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water
supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in
general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the
placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a
permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit
would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1)
guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable
guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer
determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal,
State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested
parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed
activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers
to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this
proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on
endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental
effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used
in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and
to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made
until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or
waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
The NCDWQ considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with
Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and
this public notice for the DA permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for
certification.
W?
-3-
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Sciences Branch, NCDWQ, 4401
Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be
furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
The NCDWQ plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water
Act certification on or after August 22, 1997.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the NCDWQ, 4401
Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before August 18,
1997, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Jeff Richter, until 4:15 p.m., August
26, 1997, or telephone [phone].
y..... , ?yz PV111
. , ;. -\ . % ? _ ?%/? ?•-i ?', ? -' ? "1', ,.a. may" / •,?,..
fl \
Scale 1:150,000
Knightridge Subdivisio
Hope Mills
:umberland County, N.1
LAND MANAGEMENT
GROUP, INC
August-6,-+9966
Permit Request
Vicinity Map
P9 I ?F ?

!bI
,r
c
C
v1
r
5
V
4 ?
,t .
M
:-.ten--smr_. s?ais •r__ •.vs _?_ _.. ._... _

r - f i t I a ???t? o a 7
1 II I` i.t SRI
F1
I ?
tt .?
7 ?
2 \ IS
\ I I
t \\\ \ O 1>
uj !c
4i? ' I I =
a z_
J f I
14
r

t
t
A
t,VVv _ AN ? vlr--',
ON3931
a: „ 1
tit
i p1 10 C, ?p
iO
? • uo 0
J
co w m
1 O rn ( ? v jl
?' J V O ` p
lIT V ? ? ?Q ? ?1
_._.h _ ' J u v o _
4 U ti.l
I• J Q Or1 ?? I U _
?IT u O O t
1 m J a I ? li
• 1 N U ? ? I .. U V? -I =n
1 1 .
N l" t I xl
U Lr ~ i 1
a F L 1 ...... .. .. I 1
4 N 1 + U
1.. _ l
N
1 N ?? o Y'"' ? f 1
i 1 ? d -+' aJ /?( 1 n I
a? W a
_ ? to
10
' 4 10 -
` N u ? U y ? 1
N

SBUISSOJO peon m

fi

N
rn m
?J J b i
N
Y- m
r
y?
r
w \, i
Scale: 1" = 100'
Knightridge Subdivisio LAND MANAGEMENT Permit Request
Hope Mills GROUP, INC Road Crossings
Cumberland County, N. s

_, , - -

Nt

l
M

mot'
N
N

Q h, -
'`
V Q0
?Q N
4
1
I?
o y N
INN,
F/1o
N
N
N ?

C
Scale: I" = 100'
Knightridge Subdivision LAND MANAGEMENT Proposed Excavated
Hope Mills GROUP, INC Wetland Fill
Cumberland County, N.C. A 6

44
?_3 5 ,T

Y-a4a'WWiaWC,nC'rc1 5WMA,
9wed Y. d&d
W 994#. d"& .
5F' Mr. John Dorney
DWQ, ESB
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: WQC # 970507
Dear Mr. Dorney,
At pm yOOX ,U22 RECEIVE[)
Wes , A" %56v na 28402 AUG 2 1 1991
3el• 910-452-000Y ENVRONMEN'TAL,3GWjCn
99a& >¢
9)«?? ep. Sauk
August 19, 1997 3805 °h' *44t &'Wwm w
%dmi, ytm, ?1'Fe ,MOJ
Pursuant to our telephone conversation on August 19, 1997 1 have examined the plat
of Kensington Village per your request and would offer the following comments which
should address your concerns.
The preliminary plat, dated July 17, 1996, showed this project having 146 lots while
the final plat I recently sent contains 138 lots. These larger lots allowed for less
encroachments on 404 areas thereby minimizing our impacts. Also, the initial road
alignment down to the lots next to Little Rockfish Creek was on the opposite side of
the tract and would have impacted substantially more 404 Wetlands.
Concerns about subsequent 404 fill permits due to insufficient building area is best
addressed by examining the attached scale drawing. The notations in red reflect the
front setbacks and a conceptual house footprint. These footprints are based on a
fifteen hundred square foot house using front and side setbacks of thirty and five feet,
respectively, per Larry King, 08/19/1997. All of the lots, 20, 70, 73, 68, 87, 88, 91, 92,
and 93 reflect adequate space to build without requiring additional permits. Note the
404 line is shown as a finely, dotted line. Please review and contact me if you have
questions about this permit or project.
Respectfully,
ji 01" . c?M
G. Craig Arner
Vice President
Land Management Group, Inc.
N.C. Licensed
Soil Scientist, #1091
cc: G. Floyd
K. Averitte

?iurta?rnne?aC ?a?zsccld
%6i6uuvr lan, ?l'a!h Waco = X59V_'
?cL 910,452-0009
t 2 J&d
2-7 3t' .?i644an
%K : W..d(.d.
%'Ug Mrs. John Domey
DWQ, ESB
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: WQC # 970507
Dear Mr. Domey,
August. 19, 1997
SPa& 14
.1305 91iIpu'u' L'(.."
Pursuant to our telephone conversation on August 19, 1997 1 have examined the plat
of Kensington Village per your request and would offer the following comments which
should address your concerns.
The preliminary plat, dated July 17, 1996, showed this project having 946 lots while
the final plat I recently sent contains 138 lots. These larger lots allowed for less
oncroachmonts on 404 areas thereby minimizing our impacts. Also, the initial road
alignment down to the lots next to Little Rockfish Crook was on the opposite _sido of
the tract and would have impacted substantially more 404 Wetlands.
Concerns about subsequent 404 fill permits due to insufficient building area is best
addressed by examining the attached scale drawing. The notations in red reflect the
front setbacks and a conceptual house footprint. These footprints are based on a
fifteen hundred square foot house using front and side setbacks of thirty and five feet,
respectively, per Larry King, 08/19/1997. All of the lots, 20, 70, 73, 68, 87, 88, 91, 92,
and 93 reflect adequate space to build without requiring additional permits. Note the
404 line is shown as a finely, dotted line. Please review and contact me if you have
questions about this permit or project.
Respectfully,
?S
G. Craig Turner
Vice President .
cc: G. Floyd
K. Avoritto
Land Management Group, Inc.
N.C. Licensed
Soil Scientist, 41091
zoo [a aaouo iKartaovNvii aIa i 0900 Z96 OT6 XXd 90:60 Q3A L61091180
r r ?
Nv
qN " e it tiyv r71 ??
ar [JI tz -9? w w 1 ?' LV LZ1 L
J t L`c'< ; lt,,2"+ •? °? f1 r x}.59,19.1 `?
ed52nul '?Zli s>
y n
{'r { "?' tll ?7e?? a? s- 3 I? ?O ?CJ'?r$S 3.,SS,14e191! .C3'Cll t..
f;``f? [? bar O',•SI
s, '13
P; 10
.r w .a
Q 79
?y Y
•4 - 41 ? 3°0? ? ? ' ra? r? ?r
4} ? 0-41
aNI
tY '? A7 14.4©' i2 f f.
1103
f.,,_- Z:.£0. 92 N ? .GG 4YJ ..
t7N
16.
?_ ? ? S f': , •:' DES , ?? ?.? ,?j!
ml tADT Jrr h o Wf
t ti
Y0 , ?• ?4 Can I ^r?
-vAA
.3q JD f yH of
r ?.f e3 ° ; 3, wJr? ?
11.8
`r WN ? Y
I?g2.8 • 4
lµl /=? -•-? ?

LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington. North Carolina 28402
FAX: [phone]
TEL: [phone]
TO o (?,,, r rye c
WE ARE SENDING YOU
DATE JOE3 NO.
ATTENTION
Fti;
? Wetland maps 1:1 Soil maps ? Aerial photo
d Septic tank plans Er E=nvironmental reports ?
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
? For approval
C] For your use
? As requested
0 For review and comment
REMARKS:
? Prints
r? •
7
COPY TO SIGNED: l
TOOO da02I0 ,LKaimmii awi 0900 M OT6 XF3 90:60 (ISA L6/09/ 90

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James R Hunt, Jr., G ovemor
Jonathan & Howes Secretary
Steven J. Levitas, Deputy Secretary
a
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
FAX:[phone]
PI-ZONE:
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 3

cg?-
_ j?
Eric F
From: Ken Averitte WO [Ken_Averitte00 fro.enr.state.nc.us]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 1998 3:00 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: kensington village response
After you read Paul Farley's response of Sept. 29 regarding the
Kensington Village NOV, let me know if you got anything out of it.
Particularly the attachment dated March 17. 1997.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources &T?WA Division of Coastal Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary 1DEiHNF;Z
Roger N. Schecter, Director
August 5, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P. E.
Director
Division of Water Quality
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Inland "404" Coordinator
SUBJECT: "404" Project Review
The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199707808 dated July 31,
1997 describing a proposed project by Floyd Properties is being circulated to interested state agencies
for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 8/26/97. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact me at 733-2293.
When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY This office supports the project proposal.
No comment.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Signed
Date
P.O. Box 27687, ??4 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 f C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-733-2293 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

i
RECEIVED
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Action ID No. 199707808 July 31, 1997
PUBLIC NOTICE
FLOYD PROPERTIES, 5416 Raeford Road, Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304,
has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) after-the-fact permit TO PLACE
FILL MATERIAL IN WETLANDS ADJACENT TO LITTLE ROCKFISH CREEK, ON SR 1003, IN
HOPE MILLS, CUMBERLAND County, North Carolina.
This public notice does not imply, on the parts of the Corps of Engineers
or other agencies, either favorable or unfavorable opinion of the work
performed; but it is issued to solicit comments regarding the factors on which
a final decision will be based. Legal action has been suspended pending the
outcome of this consideration.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by a
representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans submitted with the
application show the applicant requests authorization to fill an old borrow
pit, 9,439 square feet (0.22 acre) in size and 6 to 8 feet deep, as a safety
measure for future property owners. The pit was dug in or adjacent to
jurisdictional wetlands at an undetermined time, and has become jurisdictional
due to abandonment.
Three road crossings of wetlands have been partially completed. These
three crossings total approximately 0.4 acre of impact. Originally, the road
crossings were roughed in and toe ditches, up to 8 feet deep and 10 to 15 feet
wide, were excavated prior to advertisement by Corps Public Notice. In
addition, one other ditch was dug and some fill adjacent to a cul-de-sac was
placed in wetlands. The original application was put on hold and restoration
of the unauthorized work was requested. All restoration work was
satisfactorily completed. Subsequently, the elevations of the road crossings
were raised to eliminate the need for ditches, thereby reducing the drainage
area of wetlands adjacent to the project.
Utility and sewer easements will result in impacts to approximately
0.4 acre of wetlands. Upon completion of the installation of the utilities,
all affected areas will be restored to preconstruction contours.
Drainage easements will result in impacts to approximately 0.2 acre of
wetlands. These impacts primarily involve either the placement of fill over
stormwater outlets or the excavation of outlet swales to facilitate stormwater
and meet acceptable standards. In addition, temporary sediment and erosion
control features are to be utilized. These features are to be removed in
their entirety at the completion of construction.
The entire area of permanent wetland impacts will be approximately
1.2 acres. Wetland impacts appear to have been minimized, although no
mitigation has been offered. The purpose of the work is to allow development
of the residential subdivision presently known as Kensington Village. Plans
showing the work are included with this public notice.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the
comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
40
-2-
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and
this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible
for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register
constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District
Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources.
Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical
data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that
the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat,
designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive order
11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water
supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in
general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the
placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a
permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit
would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1)
guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable
guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer
determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal,
State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested
parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed
activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers
to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this
proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on
endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental
effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used
in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and
to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made
until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or
waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
The NCDWQ considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with
Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and
this public notice for the DA permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for
certification.
%
n
-3-
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Sciences Branch, NCDWQ, 4401
Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be
furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
The NCDWQ plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water
Act certification on or after August 22, 1997.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the NCDWQ, 4401
Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before August 18,
1997, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Jeff Richter, until 4:15 p.m., August
26, 1997, or telephone [phone].

Scale 1:150,000
Knightridge Subdivisio LAND MANAGEMENT
Hope Mills Permit Request
'umberland County, N. GROUP, INC Vicinity Map

,,?zt! ev 111 c.

-41
._.- A ? •:`I \ I ?t/ '?. -N .li s'I?L?II?CJ'?1..
I;r

bi

:-?+L??r_.__s-?ai?_•r_ _ psi ..._ _ ._-
•

'

'_ I I e y!i CL

d
t
.c

r

?- I? .
Q
i
O /
2
i

I ? 1. .
I I

u

I ) Li
• : z
N ?
F

/
Z c
c

I•
?
z
w c
1=

o I>

: i
? I

? ?? ? ? I 11

3
r
14
100V _ „? al"s
.. -- tcI" J,-
aN3931
5.
Y I , .o
S b 10 C, D
m m m l
1 _ ? A U N O I
f O ? ? N jl
i rJ' V m I p
_ V vCID?
`tt U v, ° 1 ? ? {1
i V O O {
_ A
-. ? {, ? ? aT W m m 10
i ? i y A ( O
7 Lit 4 p ? I O ?l
{ m J r 01 i
O C1 J { ^I
N ?, u I I ! X9
` N
r 1
u vl o j • .... ? ?.
1M N y ; N TT44 j .i
O, ? ? ( O? rat
1&g2pN ?_ Y ' ?' J t
O? 1
N ?? I
.? N l? h U ? In t
1• 1
U

N

LCD
i'
Scale: V= 100'
Knightridge Subdivisio LAND MANAGEMENT Permit Request
Hope Mills GROUP, INC Road Crossings
Cumberland County, N. s

9 .
- ? N

C?
N
Ma

i

0
?
a ?
w
N

C
Ef/O
Scale: 1" = 100'
Knightridge Subdivision LAND MANAGEMENT Proposed Excavated
Hope Mills GROUP, INC Wetland Fill
Cumberland County, N.C. A 6
-pn 5 )
(7ni7jYW7w1en&1 &naU&an&
9Zd 61A ?&x 2522
9(Wn iny&n, ?{ul/1. %"na 28402
9d' . 990-452-0009
5Wt 2. Aud
?au? 5F: ?a?ioin
?aiS ?wnu
RECEIVED
f, 4t/c 1 1 /?)?
RC!SyTA UC lZ?S
.q.y 5?a,u/i Of e 9'a k
.7805 91w 1 .C-Iwn"
9(wnan ./{ 23403
August 8, 1997
Mr. John Dorney
DWQ, ESB
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: WQC # 970507
Dear Mr. Dorney,
Pursuant to our telephone conversation on July 30, 1997 1 have attached a plat of
Kensington Village per your request. Note the 404 line is shown as a finely, dotted
line. The lot lines reflect adequate space to build without requiring additional permits.
Please review and contact me if you have questions about this permit or project.
R sp r?tfully,
J ?
G. Craig ?urner
Vice President
Land Management Group, Inc.
N.C. Licensed
Soil Scientist, #1091
cc: G. Floyd
K. Averitte g2iR1'?3
DrI
prff/
ti?S
U3
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 28, 1997
Mr. Greg Floyd
5416 Raeford Road
Fayetteville, NC 28304
WQC #970507
Cumberland County
Dear Mr. Floyd:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material
into 1.2 acres of waters and/or wetlands located at Kensington Village subdivision in
Cumberland County for a subdivision. The Army Corps of Engineers has determined that this
project will be processed through the Individual Permit process. Therefore, the application that
was received on June 4, 1997. Furthermore, insufficient evidence is present in our files to
conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0506. Until we receive additional information including the Public
Notice, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and/or the N.C. Division of Coastal Management place your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that your project must be
constructed as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these waters
and/or wetlands. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address
alternative designs for your project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification.
Also this project will require compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC 2H
.0506(h). Your mitigation proposal is insufficient because one was not included. If we do not
hear from you in two weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and
we will consider the project as withdrawn. I can be reached at 919-733-1786 if you have any
questions.
cc: Fayetteville DWQ Regional Office
Wilmington Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
Paul Farley; Land Management Group
Sincerely, _?'4
1
+J?oR. rney
lity Certific fio ogram
970507.nty
Division of Water Quality - Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 - Telephone [phone] - FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
n X17
2 7
r -
v

MEMORANDUM PRINT NAMES:
Reviewer:
TO: JOHN DORNEY WQ SUPV.:
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES BRANCH DATE: v / fir?
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR NOT APPLICABLE)
PERMIT YR: 97 PERMIT NO: 0000507 COUNTY: CUMBERLAND
APPLICANT NAME: KENSINGTON VILLAGE S/D
PROJECT TYPE: SUBDIVISION PERMIT TYPE: IND.
COE #: DOT #:
RCD_FROM CDA: APP DATE_FRM.CDA: 06/04/97
REG OFFICE: FRO
RIVER AND SUB BASIN J: 0306
STREAM CLASS: C
WL_IMPACT? :OY N
WL REQUESTED : Ac.
WL_SCORE M : ?
MITIGATION?: Y/N
STR INDEX N0: 18-31-24-(4)
WL_TYPE : // to
WL_ACR_EST? :ON
WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?: Y/N
MITIGATION_TYPE:
MITIGATION-SIZE: DID YOU REQUEST MORE INFO?: YO
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: OY N
HAVE PROJECT CHANGES/CONDITIONS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH APPLICANT?: YO
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSU< ISSUE/COND DENY
A z- . . /I _
COMMENTS:

A?4"??i-
2c : Regional Office Central Files .? ?f ?S
?.1
?TLi I A TIN G NVORKSFIEET Fourth verv60u
?V roject e_
ountjItName'of evaluator
? Q
Nearest Road"J
Wetl d ea acres Wetland Width S?, feet'
Date -//-
Wetland Location
on potfd or lake
perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
Dominant vegetation
Soil series
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral - non-sandy
,77 predominantly sandy
Flooding and wetness
Hydrauli factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
_Ztotal wetland width z 100 feet
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
forested/natural vege 'on-
griculture, urb suburb %
impervious surface
(2) ??uff A?. ???
(3) ,? 6 rb Q
semipermanently to permanently
,-flooded or inundated
easonally flooded or inundated
intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
B ttomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
?eadwater forestf G.? Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
_ _ _ _ _
R
A
T
I
N
G
Water storage
Bank/Shoreline stabilization
Pollutant removal
Wildlife habitat
Aquatic life value
weight
x 4.00 =
?- x 4.00 =
* x 5.00 = -
x 2.00 =
x 4.00 =
Recreation/Education ? x 1.00 =
>.7-
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
uyslo2q, or radius
IEMORANDUM
PRINT NAMES-
Reviewer: ?
'0: JOHN DORNEY WQ SUPV.: '
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES BRANCH DATE:
QG ?vifr?
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR NOT APPLICABLE) - ??1? ?^ GO
. A
PERMIT YR: 97 PERMIT NO: 0000507 COUNTY: CUMBERLAND <`F
APPLICANT NAME: KENSINGTON VILLAGE S/D
PROJECT TYPE: SUBDIVISION PERMIT TYPE: IND.
cJ, ?CF//i
COE #: DOT #:
RCD_FROM _CDA: APP DATE_FRM_CDA: 06/04/97F,?LAY Fp
REG_OFFICE : FRO '??q1?? 190,
'n Y"41
IVER_AND_SUB_BASIN _#: 0306 STR_INDEX NO: 18-31-24-(4) ?`'c?FNcFs
STREAM CLASS: C
WL_IMPACT? : Y N WL_TYPE : ff !? ?'?
WL REQUESTED: /. 2, Ac. WL_ACR_EST? :0N
WL_SCORE M : WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?: Y/N
MITIGATION?: Y/N MITIGATION_TYPE:
MITIGATION-SIZE: DID YOU REQUEST MORE INFO?: YCN-?
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?:/ON
HAVE PROJECT CHANGES/CONDITIONS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH APPLICANT?: Y?
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSU =ISSUE/COND DENY
COMMENTS : lk rQ ?. ?/l?c? .?._ t..a? ;?•;; . ?,?, it /?T? . C ??C! , ,v? S

c : Regional Office ?u Ci?fS ??* y?? @ E?? `" G??
Central Files
ate, ? ?/ p

V? ?
1/ roject ?
County=
Name of evaluator
O
? Q
O
O 3
Nearest Road 411?
ea acres Wetland Width S? ? 'Afeet
??etl
-i -
Date
Wetland Location
on pond or lake
perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
Dominant vegetation
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating -system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R
A
T
I
N
G
Soil series
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral - non-sandy
r,,' predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
?steep .-- Y 44
ditched or channelized
total wetland width 2100 feet
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
forested/natural vege on-
griculture, urb suurb
impervious surface '7
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
V seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest a,,74-
Water storage
Bank/Shoreline stabilization
Pollutant removal
Wildlife habitat
Aquatic life value
weight
x 4.00 =
x 4.00 =
x 5.00 =
x 2.00 =
x 4.00 =
Recreation/Education <D x 1.00 =
0
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
uysloeei or radius
Eric Galamb
From: Ken Averitte WQ <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Greg Floyd's Kensington Subdivision, Cumberland County
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 1997 4:39 PM
Paul Farley sent me a copy of the application for the subject 1.2
acre fill in a Cumberland County subdivision. (I haven't received a
copy from your group yet). The 1.2 acres is for road crossings,
utilities, and a small pond(?).
I don't know if you guys have reviewed this one in triage yet, but
please don't issue it. If we are going to be consistent, they need to
include along with this any and all lot fill requirements. I feel sure
there will be some.
Typical of most any Greg Floyd project, this work is already in.
All the roads are rough graded and the storm sewers are now being
installed.
Pag© 1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P. E.
Director
Division of Water Quality
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Inland "404" Coordinator
SUBJECT: "404" Project Review
d o o ?
11
RECEIVED
August 5, 1997 AUG 6 7 1997
ENViRCr,r.,,ENTAL SCIENCES
The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199707303 dated July 31,
1997 describing a proposed project by Floyd Properties is being circulated to interested state agencies
for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 3/26/97. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact me at 733-2293.
When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY This office su s the project proposal.
No comment.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Signed
P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Voice 919-733-2293
Date )b ??
r
l??a
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
John Dorney
From: Ken Averitte WQ [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 1997 3:25 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Kensington S/D, Cumberland county
Met with Craig Turner on the site September 9 for purpose of evaluating realistic uses of the lots
we talked about earlier, specifically 75, 68, and 92. If appears that a house can be put (squeezed)
on these lots without the need for fill. However, it needs to be made explicitly clear in any
certification that there will be no lot file permitted for anyone, anytime, anywhere in the
subdivision. This is IP and they can expect no NWP for future homeowners. Also, WL lines
should be drawn on individual plot plans and restrictions placed on deeds. C. Turner agreed to
communicate these items to the developer. Also, on lot 75 specifically, the WL line should be
re-established and silt fence installed on the line prior to sale in order to eliminate any opportunity
for future buyers to plead ignorance. Craig agreed to pass this along. This would be ideal if we
could get it done on all subdivisions, even if it was nothing more than something like yellow "crime
scene" tape. I hope this gets to you. I'm still getting accustomed to this machine.
CU47 ? ?? , V?-
??P
?o-y¢l{ ,fit}5
?Y? ??
John Dorney
From: Ken Averitte WQ [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 1997 10:30 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Kensington S/D, again
After I sent you the earlier message about my meeting with Craig Turner, I got a copy of a letter
he sent to Greg Floyd. (Will fax to you) It is somewhat misleading to Mr. Floyd, implying that the
only lot of concern is #75. There are numerous lots that are bounded by wetlands and many are
fairly tight. The certification, if issued, needs to point out that "no other fill permits are available"
for any of these lots.
To :Lw
Date Timo O PM

M
of
Phone c_y
Area Code Number Extension
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Mes ago

r.?
&C

C?-
Operator
t•? - - - Ui
•> AMPAD ?V
Olt (nom RE ROER
EFFICIENCY' /
`¢ f
?'i p ( e, If
To Date Time p PM
r- VOU CISE G7
M of
U4c)
PhArea Code Number Extension
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
/R-E/TURNED YOUR CALL
Mes a e pm"
et t !
g
Operator
AMPAD REORDER
EFFICIENCY' #23-006
?aicd ?l/?iizc???rz?.zt 5zaco' 9?izc.

Rd CIAM -Tox 2522
Wmay&n, ? &M, %tokna 28402
56rd- 910-452-0009
92okaY. . ftv( l
Y..y 5r aaiain
Y waif 3-'
August 29, 1997
Mr. Jeff Richter
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Re: Kensington Village Permit Application
Cumberland County
Dear Jeff;
wile 74
2.y jo..'A 0l Ca ?auE
3805 9Vv /'4tW a .sTexntue
9VW,ninSlon, ?{ 6 28403
I am writing as a follow up to our telephone conversation this morning concerning the
above listed permit application. In our conversation, you told me that you had not received any
comments on the application and would be completing the paper work today. You will then
proceed with permit issuance once you receive the 401 certification from the NC Division of
Water Quality.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have questions, please contact Craig
Turner or me. I hope that you had a nice holiday weekend.
Sincerely:
Paul M. Farley 11 C''
Wetland Scientist
cc: Mr. Greg Floyd, Floyd Properties
Mr. John Dorney, NC Division of Water Quality b
0
s