Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050785 Ver _Information Letter_20090416a STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ,1. MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPE I`i ' GovERNOR SECRETARY April 13, 2009 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers NCDENR Division of Coastal Management Regulatory Field Office 400 Commerce Ave Post Office Box 1000 Morehead City, NC 28557 Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000 N. C. Dept of Env. and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Washington District Office O 943 Washington Square Washington, North Carolina 27889 ATTN: Mr. William Wescott, USACE NCDOT Coordinator Mr. Steven Lane, DCM NCDOT Coordinator Mr. Garcy Ward, DWQ NCDOT Coordinator Dear Sirs: Subject: Submittal of Revised In-Water Work Study Plan for Review and Approval per Permit Conditions of 404 Individual Permit, 401 Water Quality Certification Permit, and Letter of Refinement for CAMA Major Development Permit for the proposed Washington Bypass. US 17 from South of SR 1149 (Price Road.) to US 17 North of SR 1509 (Springs Road.). TIP Number: R-251013, Federal Aid Project NHF-17-(54). Reference: USACE Action ID 199301143 DWQ Project No. 050785, WQC No. 3527 The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is submitting a revised study plan to monitor the effects of in-water pile driving work on anadromous fishes per the revised permit conditions. The study plan submitted on March 19, 2009 via email has been revised based on verbal comments from a meeting held on March 23, 2009 and written comments forwarded to the Department and the Design-Build Team via email from March 30, 2009 through April 6, 2009. NCDOT will also strictly adhere to requirements of the permit modification, in relation to the proposed study, concerning the mortality rates of certain fish species. If the mortality of any of the following fish species with respective numbers is observed, then all in-water work shall cease pending further evaluation by the applicable permitting agencies: Sturgeon- I fish for the entire in-water work period, and/or 25 fish per bent installation in any combination of the following species: River herring, Hickory Shad, American Shad, or Striped Bass. MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING PROTECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWWNCDOTORG RALEIGH NC RALEIGH NC 27899-1548 April 13, 2009 Page 2 The NCDOT respectfully requests that the referenced study be reviewed as soon as possible. We are providing copies of this study to all applicable resource agencies directly. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (252) 830- 3495. Sincerely, Mana A. Rogerson,PE Assistant Resident Engineer cc: W/attachment Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC Mr. Pete Benjamin, USFWS Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS Mr. Louis B. Daniel, III, NCDMF Mr. Ron Sechler, NCDMF Mr. Steve Sollod, NCDCM Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ Mr. Chris Underwood, PDEA Mr. C. E. Lassiter, Jr., P.E., NCDOT Mr. Rodger Rochelle, PE, NCDOT Mr. Ron Hancock, PE, NCDOT Mr. Ed Eatmon, PE, NCDOT Mr. Mike Robinson, PE, NCDOT Mr. Jay Johnson, NCDOT 2 Assessing the Effects of Bridge Construction Pile Driving Events on Anadromous Fish Species: NCDOT TIP Project R-2510B, Washington Bypass Revised Research Proposal to Mark Mallett Project Manager Washington Bypass Project Flatiron/United JV 2895 US Highway 17 South Chocowinity, North Carolina 27817 Contract Dates: April 10, 2009- April 9, 2010 Total Project Costs: $481, 675 Prepared by: Roger A. Rulifson, Ph.D. Senior Scientist, Institute for Coastal Science and Policy Professor, Department of Biology Joseph J. Luczkovich, Ph.D. Associate Scientist, Institute for Coastal Science and Policy Associate Professor, Department of Biology Mark W. Sprague, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Physics Anthony S. Overton, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Biology Patrick J. Harris, Ph.D. Instructor, Department of Biology East Carolina University Flanagan 250 Greenville, NC 27858 Revised April 8, 2009 2 BACKGROUND The contractor for NCDOT TIP Project R-22510B, Washington Bypass (Flatiron/United), has requested a variance to the construction moratorium from February 15 to June 15. The moratorium falls under the USACE 404 Permit, the DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification, and the DCM Major Development Permit. This moratorium prohibits in-water work in the Tar- Pamlico River just upstream of the current U.S. Highway 17 Bridge at Washington during the springtime anadromous fish spawning run (Figure 1). If the variance is granted, the contractor agrees to restrict pile driving activity to four hours one day per week, with those four hours spread over the day. Figure 1. Completed pile driving event for the first bent crossing over the Tar-Pamlico River, February 2009. Each pile driving event takes about 20-30 minutes. There are 10 or 12 concrete pilings spaced every eight feet for a section of the bridge, referred to here as a "bent" (Figure 1). If the moratorium is enforced until June 15, Flatiron/United estimates that bridge construction could take an additional year. Seven agencies are involved in resolving this issue - The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Fish and, Wildlife Service, NOAA Fisheries, the NC Division of Marine Fisheries, the NC Wildlife Resources Commission, the NC Division of Water Quality, and the NC Division of Coastal Management. All agencies agree that, if the moratorium is lifted, then field research must be conducted during construction to determine potential effects of pile driving and in-water work on the anadromous fish species spawning run. The species in question are the striped bass Moron saxatilis, American shad Alosa sapidissima, hickory shad Alosa mediocris, alewife Alosa pseudoharengus, blueback herring Alosa aestivalis, and Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrhynchus oxyrhynchus. The Atlantic sturgeon is considered a species of special concern. Alewife and blueback herring, collectively referred to as "river herring", are species of special concern in North Carolina. There may be limits for mortality placed in this variance by the regulatory agencies to determine cessation. GOAL AND OBJECTIVES Goal of the study proposed herein is to provide information about anadromous fish passage during the moratorium variance period, and to determine potential effects of pile driving on various life history stages of these key species. Specific objectives are: 1. To determine the pattern of sound propagation in the Tar River during pile driving events; 2. To determine the effects of pile driving on fish movement, specifically upstream migration of anadromous species, during pile driving events; 3. To estimate rate of injury and death of pile driving events on adult anadromous fish species, primarily hickory shad, American shad and striped bass; 4. To determine the extent of larval fish passage downstream during the pile driving events; 5. To estimate rate of injury and death of larval fish species during pile driving events. These five objectives will be broken down into six field research activities, all of which overlap and most will be performed concurrently. Job 1 - Pile Driving Sound Propagation Measurements (Sprague) Job 2 - Adult Fish Upstream Passage (Luczkovich) Job 3 - Adult Fish Identification and Relative Abundance during Upstream Passage and Mortality Survey (Rulifson) Job 4 - Fish Injury and Mortality (Overton, Sprague, Harris, Krahforst) Job 5 - Larval Fish Downstream Migration (Rulifson) Job 6 - Larval Fish Injury and Mortality (Overton and Sprague) In order to be ready to perform the measurements for Jobs 1-6, we must have a minimum of three weeks from the time the contract is finalized in order to purchase supplies and assemble our equipment and to make background sound measurements and fish passage baseline measurements at the study site. It is expected that Flatiron/United will coordinate the pile driving schedule with the researchers to allow us adequate time to prepare to take measurements before pile driving begins on each bent and to move our equipment into position before driving each piling. We cannot work during the night, especially Job 3, which requires visual sighting of floating fishes as required by the agencies listed above. This aspect would be infeasible in the dark Assuming April 10 for a contract, that puts us at May I for initiating pile driving Job 1 - Pile Driving Sound Propagation Measurements (Sprague) The major concern with a variance on the moratorium is the potential damage or death to resident and anadromous fish species, and potential behavioral changes that might result from exposure to the noise of pile driving events. The Tar-Pamlico River at the site of bridge construction is typical of a lower portion of coastal watershed: wide and slower moving waters brackish or fresh depending on upstream flow rates, with a narrow channel and wider shallow shorelines. Shallow areas typically have submerged and emergent vegetation combined with submerged and emergent tree stumps. Predicting sound propagation in shallow water can be difficult due to many factors that affect the sound waves. Sound reflects from the water surface and the bottom and scatters from any irregularities in the bottom profile. Sound propagating in shallow water has a cutoff frequency, below which the sound waves decay exponentially. For hard bottoms, the cutoff frequency is the frequency with wavelength equal to four times the water depth (i.e., the depth is'% wavelength), but the cutoff frequency is greater for soft bottoms such as sand. The cutoff frequency for 5 in (16 ft) deep water over a sandy silt bottom is approximately 220 Hz, and for 1 m (3 ft) deep water over the same bottom is approximately 1,100 Hz. Sound also propagates in the substrate reflecting off of underground layers with different acoustic properties and passing back into the water. At frequencies below the cutoff frequency most of the sound propagating significant distances from the source propagates in the substrate. What this means for the Tar River site in question (which is very shallow <l m, except in the channel which is 3 m) is that sound frequencies above 1100 Hz will propagate in the shallow water, and frequencies above 220 Hz will propagate in the channel. Sound frequencies below the cutoff frequency will likely propagate in the riverbed and reflect back into the water. The sound will have peak pressure around 200 dB re 1 µPa at the 10 m distance from the pile. Sound exposure levels near 170-180 dB re 1 µPa 2-s1 and above are expected, with most of that energy in the frequencies below 1000 Hz (Hastings and Popper 2005). The frequency spectrum will have a peak sound exposure spectral density of approximately 170 dB re 1 µPa 2-s 1 /Hz near 200 Hz and will drop off to 140 dB re 1 µPa 2-s l /Hz above 1000 Hz. Particle velocities will also increase at the onset of each strike, which will vibrate the otoliths (ear bones) of the exposed fish, and other internal cavities, potentially causing internal hemorrhaging and death. Little work has been done to study these effects on fishes (see Hastings and Popper 2005 for a review for CalTrans on Pacific species), and no work on the species in question here. A further complication is that particle velocities in a sound wave are maximum at the water surface. Fish in shallow water are likely to be near the surface and exposed to higher particle velocities than fish at greater depths in deep water. Before construction begins, sound levels will be recorded at the construction site for a 24-hour period to establish background sound levels. Pile driving will happen in 20 min periods of hammering, then a short break occurs to set up for another piling (-1.5 h), then the second pile is driven; there are 12 piles per bent (bridge section). Preliminary sound propagation measurements will be conducted during the pile driving at Bent 94 using three hydrophones and three small boats. A reference hydrophone will be placed approximately 10 m (30 ft) from Bent 94 and will be connected to a digital recorder on a small boat anchored in the river. The reference hydrophone will make a continuous recording during all of the pile driving events, which will serve as a reference for recordings made with the other hydrophones. Hydrophones will be deployed from two additional boats, which will move to different sites during each of the 12 pile driving events during pile driving for Bent 94. The sound recordings at these 25 sites (see Table 1) will allow us to make a sound field map for the pile driving at the bent. Sound recording sites will be closer together near the bent site and farther apart at greater distances where the sound levels are likely to be much lower and will decay less rapidly. A similar sound recording pattern will be used for pile driving at each bent during bridge construction, but the deployment pattern will be optimized to obtain maximum sound field information for the pile- driving sound produced at that location. In addition to using hydrophones to measure the sound pressure, a sound particle velocity probe will be constructed using an encapsulated accelerometer. This probe will be deployed at the 10- m reference site to measure the particle velocity at that location. This instrument must be custom-built and will not be available during the initial pile driving. Particle velocities from the initial pile driving locations will be estimated using sound pressure measurements in propagation models. The accuracy of this use of propagation modeling to estimate particle velocities will be verified using later particle velocity measurements. Table 1. Hydrophone sites for measuring sound levels during pile-driving at Bent 94. Angles are given with respect to a transect line across the river perpendicular to the bank. Positive distances indicate positions toward the opposite (south) river bank, and negative distances refer to positions toward the near (north) river bank. The,hydrophone at 10 m along the 0° line will record sound during all pile driving events and will serve as a reference hydrophone for the other sound measurements. 90" downstream 20, 30, 50 45° upstream 20, 30, 50 0° -30, -20, -10, 10 (reference), 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 200, 300, 400 45° downstream 20, 30, 50 90° downstream 20, 30, 50 Job 2 - Adult Fish Upstream Passage (Luczkovich with consulting BioSonics, Inc. scientists, Eric Munday, BioSonics team leader). Adult fish frequenting the construction area of the Tar-Pamlico River will be counted and their direction of travel will be determine using hydroacoustic methods (scientific echosounders). The anadromous fish migrating through the area during the period of the in-water construction moratorium include American shad (Alosa sapidissima), hickory shad (Alosa mediocris), river herrings (Alosa pseudoharengus and A. aestivalis), Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrhynchus), and striped bass (Morone sazatilis). Upstream fish migration will be monitored at a portion of the river 1.5 mi upstream from the bridge project site (see Figure 2), where the river narrows and deepens into a choke point. There we can ensure complete coverage of the river with an echosounder acoustic beam from bank to bank, and count migrating fishes as they pass. All migrating fish will pass first by the construction site (Site 1) then through this location (Site 2). 6 Figure 1. Tar River channel in the center, Kennedy Creek in upper center and the City of Washington, NC is in the upper right. The location of the Route 17 by-bass bridge crossing and pile driving activity (days 1-6) (Site 1, inset photo) is shown. The BioSonics echosounder monitoring stations will be located at the existing US Route 17 bridge downstream and at a site where the Tar River narrows upstream (Site 2), shown on the western end of this image. Caging studies with adult and larval fishes will be done at place marks (for pile driving event 1), then will follow across the river in successive weeks. A continuously operating long-term hydroacoustic monitoring stations downstream at the existing Route 17 bridge in the deepest part of the channel (4 m) at Site 2 (6.5 m), using a BioSonics scientific echosounder and two transducers aimed at the center of the Tar River. Each fish (this includes all species that pass by site, which will be compared with data collected in gill nets, see Job 3) passing by the downstream (where a portion of the river channel can be covered) and upstream Site 2 (complete coverage of the river) will create a target on an echogram as the sound energy bounces off them and is received by the echosounder transducer. These fish targets will be counted using standard echo-sounder analysis methods (BioSonics Visual Analyzer will be used to prepare echograms and generate reports). Use of 420 kHz split-beam echosounders will allow scientifically defensible hydroacoustic data to be collected continuously (day and night) for entire study period March 1 - June I (or longer if construction is prolonged). The 420 kHz acoustic pings are above the hearing range of all fishes in the river, including American shad, thus it should not cause any avoidance or prevent fish passage. Information on fishes will be collected on target strength (proportional to fish size), direction of travel (upstream or downstream) and velocity of target (m/s). We hypothesize that during periods of pile-driving and heavy construction activity at the bridge downstream, there will be fish avoidance and migration will be impeded. Fish will remain below the construction site (near the Washington Route 17 Bridge) until the activity associated with pile-driving ceases, and then they will migrate upstream again past Site 2 (right to left in the image in Figure 1). We will use two BioSonics 420-kHz split-beam transducers, with swivel mounts for aiming the beam, a 600-foot waterproof cable, and a rack-mount low power solid state computer for data logging with RAID hard drive, (above equipment will be leased from BioSonics, Inc. for 4 months), a DTX surface unit (ECU-owned) (Figure 2), 2 TB back-up hard drives (to be purchased), power supply (12-V battery bank to be purchased), and an environmental housing (elevated lockable shed, to be purchased). We will place the environmental housing on the north side of the river bank, and string the cable across the river (weighted down with chain). On each side of the Tar River, we will position one of the 420-kHz transducers, aimed in such a way as to direct the echosounder acoustic beam in the entire water column in the river (Figure 3). This installation will take 3-4 days and will be done by ECU divers, ECU boat operators, and supervised by BioSonics scientists. BioSonics is experienced in river hydroacoustic studies of fish passage and counting. BioSonics will be responsible for preparation and shipping of equipment, installation, data storage and analysis, report preparation. Figure 2. BioSonics DTX digital scientific echosounder, with laptop and 420-kHz transducer. Rack-mounted low power computer for data collection and real-time analysis. Laptop computer will not be required for a fixed-site deployment at Site 2. 8 --------------;---------;---------------- _--- ------------ 2, obtained on 13 Feb 2009. Lower panel is a schematic from other BioSonics fish passage studies down elsewhere for illustration. We will use 420-kHz transducers, which will minimize any avoidance responses of the migrating clupeid fishes. On the Tar River at Site 2, an environmental housing will be built and a multiplexing cable (600' long) will be laid across the river bed, connecting the transducer to the DTX echosounder in the housing. A similar set up will be deployed downstream at the existing Washington Route 17 bridge. The housing at each site will be elevated 10 feet to allow for flooding and will enclose a rack-mounted computer and RAID hard drive to store the echosounder data. Experimental Design When the pile driving is operational, we expect the fish counts to decline and when the operation ceases, we expect the fish counts to be increased. We also expect fish counts at Site 2 to increase as anadromous species continue their spawning runs (pre-spawn, spawning, and post- spawn) April through June 2009. We will sample continuously to estimate variability in the fish count data. We will compare the fish counts obtained when pile driving operations are underway (acoustic disturbance period, a cumulative amount of 4 hours per day, 1 day per week) to those obtained during non-pile driving days (a comparable period of time during the preceding week and following week (control periods). BioSonics scientists can examine up to 12 hours of data the day after an event of pile driving (comparing before, during and after periods) to see if there was a decline in the number of fish heading upstream. We expect that the cumulative number of ":Ibl, hoM:990 vas,s Q1IM11MM9 Mn.101'N Jl'9931YN 9 fish passing at the echosounder upstream location will fall below the 95% confidence interval around the mean fish counts obtained during control periods. Job 3 - Adult Fish Identification and Relative Abundance during Upstream Passage and Mortality Survey (Rulifson) The purpose of Job 3 is to identify the species of fish observed on the echosounders during Job 2, and to determine relative abundance of those fishes upstream, within, and below the construction site on the day prior to, during, and one day after pile driving events. Also, we will survey the river's surface waters for any mortality of fishes associated with the pile-driving events. Shallower portions of the river cannot be sampled with electroshocking units, so therefore only gillnets will be used for several reasons. First, electroshocking cannot be conducted in the area near the echosounders or near the hydrophones. The manufacturers are concerned about electronic failure of these devices if high electrical current passes through the water in which they are deployed. Second, no brackish water electroshocking unit is available with such late notice. Gillnet Sampling Design Gillnets will be set in the deep reaches of the river downstream, at, and above the construction site one day prior, during, and one day after the event. Site 1 is the new bridge construction site. Site 2 is the upstream constricted area where the echosounders will be located (Figure 1). Site 3 is near the existing U.S. Highway 17 bridge and the echosounders located there, as described in Job 2. Gillnets will be set for 30 minutes or 1 hour (as determined by abundance) in the south shallow water area (< 2 m), in the river mid-channel (2-8 m), and north shallow water area of the river at Sites 1, 2 and 3. Samples will be taken in the morning, again in the afternoon, and at sunset. We will set gillnets in the deep areas of the river because this is the area being monitored by the echosounding units, and we want to measure the same portion of the river. Surface floating gillnets will be used with anchors, constructed of 104 (.33 mm) twine, to ensure that any fish in the area are caught. There will be 126-yards of gill nets (three 42-yard nets) in each depth section of the sample areas: I to 5 inch stretch mesh, %2 inch stretch mesh intervals. Fish will be enumerated by species and returned to the water. Key species (striped bass, hickory shad, American shad, and river herring) may be retained for use in Job 4 (see below). Standard water quality parameters will be measured during the study including dissolved oxygen (mg/L) and percent saturation, water temperature (°C), and salinity (ppt). Mortality Survey In addition, we will conduct a visual examination of shallow and shoreline areas for injured and dying/dead fish. We will use the protocol and methods that are generally consistent with the NC DENR methods outlined in their fish kill surveys (based on the American Fisheries Society publication, Investigation and Valuation of Fish Kills, Special Publication 24 (1992). The protocol for this mortality survey is as follows: 1. We will survey the river from the upstream constriction (Site 2) to the existing NC 17 bridge (Site 3). We will conduct river surveys (back and forth across the river using ten belt transects of 20-m width) from a slowly moving boat with two lookouts, one looking to each side within 10 in 10 of the boat. We will conduct these in the morning and again late afternoon one day prior to pile- driving (control), on the day of pile driving, and one day after the event. No nighttime surveys will be conducted due to dangers of navigating the shallows at night, and the inability to see floating fish in the dark. 2. All fish encountered floating at the surface during the survey will be retrieved, identified to species, and examined externally for damage. These will be noted on field data sheets. 3. Any fish collected will be bagged, labeled with capture location coordinates and time of collection, and returned to the lab for post-mortem analysis to determine cause of death. Methods for this step are detailed in the next section (Job 4 Experimental Adult Mortality Study). 4. Standard water quality parameters will be measured at each location of a collected dead or injured fish. Job 4 - Experimental Injury and Mortality Study of Selected Fish Species (Overton, Harris, Krahforst and Sprague) The purpose of Job 4 is to test examine the effects of sound on short-term mortality on sub-adult and adult fish. Experimental Design: We will measure the physical effects of the sound produced by pile-driving on fishes. Pile- driving causes a propagation of sound outward from the source through both the water column and the sediment, causing an increase in both sound pressure and particle motion. This leads to an increase in fluid motion which can impact the fluid-filled and air-filled structures within a fish, causing tissue damage (e.g., ruptured swim bladder), blood embolisms, neurotrauma, and even death (Hastings and Popper 2005). Some of these damaging effects may not be observed immediately but may be more prominent 24h or more after the pile-driving event (McCauley et al. 2003). In order to measure the physical effects of pile-driving on fish, we will obtain threadfin shad (Dorosoma petenense), striped bass (Moron saxatilis), or white perch (Moron americanus) from hatcheries and fish farms. Bennett Wynne of the NC WRC has offered to provide threadfin shad from their hatcheries. These species were selected because the threadfin shad (Order: Clupeiformes) is a hearing specialist and the striped bass and white perch (Order: Perciformes) are hearing generalists. Hearing specialists have a direct connection between the swim bladder and the otolith sac (contains the hearing bone) and are generally thought to be more sensitive to sound propagation (Hastings and Popper 2005) and therefore may exhibit increased signs of stress during a pile-driving event. If possible, we will try to gather additional species including Alosa sp. and striped bass from gillnetting, rod and reel, and seining for at least one experiment. These are fragile species, and it is unknown about the extent of damage that will result from capture and transport. Fish cages will be constructed of aluminum frames with knotless nylon netting and submersed at each location. We may consider two plastic fish baskets tie-wrapped together (these are orange baskets used to hold commercial fish catches) as an alternative cage design, if we can demonstrate that they have small acoustic artifacts and they are cost-effective. Five fish of each II species will be placed into separate cages or baskets, and there will be two cages of each species placed at 10 in, 50 in and 400m (control) from the pile driving site. We will also conduct a fourth treatment of fishes that are handled in a similar manner to all treated fish, but never exposed to sound effects of pile driving (Handling Stress Control, to be held in separate cages in Tranter's Creek). This makes a total of 12 cages per 20-minute pile driving event. A hydrophone with digital recorder will be placed adjacent to the cages at 10 in, 50 in and 400 in to measure sound exposure levels. Each cage will be suspended in the water column for a pile-driving event at Bents 91, 92, and 93 (these have water depths >2 m). The holding cages in Tranter's Creek will be at 2 in. Fish will be moved to the experimental site and re-acclimated to depth of 2 in (we will allow -40 min for fish to adapt to the hydrostatic changes, based on a change in pressure of 0.18 atm for 0-2 in depth change and the swim bladder adaptation equation for cod in Harden-Jones and Scholes 1985). Standard water quality parameters will be measured during the study including dissolved oxygen (mg/L) and percent saturation, water temperature (°C), and salinity (ppt). After the 20-minute pile driving event the cage will be checked, dead fish will be removed and stored in a bag filled with water, then placed on ice for storage and later necropsy. Any remaining fish will be separated into a group for immediate necropsy (see euthanization and necropsy procedure below) and a delayed mortality group, which will be held alive for continued observation. We will take blood samples from the immediate necropsy group using a caudal puncture. Delayed mortality individuals will be placed into cages in Tranter's Creek and held for up to four days. We expect that with 12 pile driving events with each Bent location per day, we can obtain up to three replicated tests per day, with cage locations adjusted as the construction work proceeds. We plan to conduct these experiments beginning April and May. We will not conduct experimental caging studies in shallow water driving sites on the south side of the river (Bents 90 - 84), because the sound propagation in shallow water sites (below 2 m) will be above the frequency heard by most fishes. By this time fish mortality rates will be established, and fishes will be largely past the mid-channel locations. This Job 4 will coordinate very closely with the schedule of Job 1. Larval mortality studies (Job 6) will begin then in shallow waters. Necropsy studies and delayed mortality studies will be carried out in the 5 days following each experimental exposure study. Five fish of each species will be sacrificed immediately after exposure for necropsy. The remaining fish from each treatment group will be placed in delayed mortality cages (one per species and treatment) and monitored for survival. Any dead or injured fishes will be examined at four-hour intervals for 96 hr. Necropsies on all fishes will include examination for hemorrhaging in tissues and eyes, swim bladder ruptures, and gross examination of tissues. To assess the possibility of neurotrauma, we will dissect out the otolith sacs and take scanning electron microscope images of the sensory epithelium (macula) to ascertain if there is any impact on the ciliary bundles (used for hearing) due to the pile-driving sounds. Blood serum chemistry will be used as a measure of short-term stress. Blood will be immediately collected from five fish from each treatment following removal from experimental cages with a caudal puncture using a 3-ml plastic syringe and a 22-gauge needle. The blood sample will be transferred gently to a plastic vial without anticoagulant and allowed to clot at air temperature. The fish will then be weighed and measured, then placed on ice for further evaluation. Serum will be separated by centrifugation at 14,000x g for 3 minutes. Plasma will be immediately removed, and then frozen at -40°C until analysis. Serum samples will be sent to Antech Laboratories,_ Farmingdale, New York for determination of the blood constituents. 12 Statistical analysis will include ANOVA and non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis) as appropriate for each response variable (% mortality, injured, numbers with various tissue damaged). Mean and variance of each response variable will be assessed statistically with respect to two factors: distance from pile-driving site (10m, 50m, 400m, and handling stress control treatments) and hearing capabilities of each species (hearing generalist vs. hearing specialist). We will use water depth and Sound Exposure Levels (SEL) measured at each distance as a covariates in the analysis. Job 5 -Larval Fish Downstream Migration (Rulifson) The presence of larval fish moving through the construction site region of the river could result in extensive mortality of larvae (Job 6). To determine presence and absence of larval key fish species, and relative abundance, we will conduct larval fish sampling using push-nets and a pair of ichthyoplankton nets pulled in an oblique manner through the water column. The push-nets (1-m wide by 0.5-m deep and constructed of 1-mm nitex mesh) will be mounted on a metal skiff and pushed through the water to obtain samples of larval Alosa, which tend to be near the surface during certain times of the day. Push-nets will be used for 5 minutes in the north and south side of the river shallow areas and in mid-channel at Sites 1, 2 and 3. Samples will be taken in the across the river from North to South. Caging studies will follow the pile driving progress, with distance from the pile driving sites 1-6 (10 m, and >100m, flowing along river depth contours upstream). Distance from each pile driving site will be measured at the start of each test using a laser rangefinder. 13 morning and again in the afternoon: Paired oblique plankton net also will be used in the mid- channel locations at Sites 1, 2 and 3 in the morning and afternoon. The paired plankton net will be towed in an oblique manner through the water column for 5 minutes. Samples will be preserved in formalin and returned to the lab for processing. Standard water quality parameters will be measured during the study including dissolved oxygen (mg/L) and percent saturation, water temperature CC), and salinity (ppt). Thus, all ichthyoplankton sampling will be on the day before pile-driving, on the day of pile- driving, and day after pile-driving events at Sites 1, 2, and 3. Samples will be placed in 5% formalin containing Rose Bengal dye and returned to the laboratory for processing. Larvae will be counted by species and reported as number of larvae per cubic meter. In the laboratory, we will look for dead fish (% of fish occurring at the time of collection) in the samples by examining for partial decomposition. Job 6 Larval Fish Injury and Mortality (Overton and Sprague). The purpose of Job 6 is to test examine the effects of sound on short-term mortality and physiological condition of larval American shad and striped bass. Experimental Design: Experimental Barges will be constructed to each hold six experimental tanks (Figure 5). A single barge will be anchored 10 m upstream away from pile driving activities and second (control)will be located at least 100m from the bridge construction in an area not exposed to the sound produced by the pile driving activities. Hydrophones will be anchored at each barge to estimate the cumulative sound exposure. Larvae (-5-25 days old) will be obtained from state hatcheries and held in ECU rearing facilities until the start of the pile driving event. Approximately 10-15 minutes before a pile driving event, larvae will be placed into the experimental barge tanks (Density of larvae not to exceed 15 individuals/m3 for a single pile driving event. The duration that experimental fish are exposed to sound will depend on operational pile driving activities. Also the number of trials conducted for each species will depend on the availability of larvae. We are expecting two to three days of testing for each species. Standard water quality parameters will be measured during the study including dissolved oxygen (mg/L) and percent saturation, water temperature (°C), and salinity (ppt). Immediately, after each pile driving event (-20 minutes per event), dead and alive fish will be counted to estimate acute mortality. This job will coordinate very closely with the schedule of Jobs 1 and 5. Larval Histology and Acute Stress Test: Histology: Test fish (Dead and alive) will be randomly selected from each tank stored and preserved in Histopaks. The histological samples will be sent to the USGS Leetown Science Center (Keameysville, WV-Dr. Vicki Blazer) Fish Health Laboratory for processing. The larvae will be stained with haematoxylin, eosin, and alcian blue (pH 2.6) sectioned whole for general gross observation. 14 The remaining live fish will be subjected to acute salinity test (SST) in an onshore mobile laboratory. The salinity stress test is widely used to estimate the quality of post-larvae (PL) and as a predictive indicator of performance; on the assumption that it will predict future performance. Here, we will use a high-salinity stress test (40 ppt, @ ambient temperatures °C) on larvae to test the cumulative effects of sound exposure. Larvae from each replicate will be transferred carefully with a wide glass pipette to each of two small glass beakers (25 larvae per beaker), which contained 50 ml of filtered water. Larvae in one beaker will be exposed to 40 ppt salinity by adding 50 ml of high-salinity water (Instant Ocean®), which will result in 100 ml test-solution of 40 ppt in each beaker. Larvae in the other beaker from each replicate served as control and 50 ml of normal sea water (20 ppt) was added by the start of the test. The salinity will be checked by a hand refractometer. Mortality will be recorded every 10 min until all the larvae in the exposed groups are dead. The larvae were considered dead if they were opaque, their body was bent and they did not respond to a gentle touch of the tail. The treatment effects will be compared using a two-way ANOVA. construction. Larval Histology and Acute Stress Test: Figure 5. Proposed experimental design for larval fish exposure trials Rt 17 bridge 15 Histology: Test fish (Dead and alive) will be randomly selected from each tank stored and preserved in Histopaks. The histological samples will be sent to the USGS Leetown Science Center (Kcameysville, WV-Dr. Vicki Blazer) Fish Health Laboratory for processing. The larvae will be stained with haematoxylin, eosin, and alcian blue (pH 2.6) sectioned whole for general gross observation. The remaining live fish will be subjected to acute salinity test (SST) in an onshore mobile laboratory The salinity stress test is widely used to estimate the quality of post-larvae (PL) and as a predictive indicator of performance; on the assumption that it will predict future performance. Here we will use a high-salinity stress test (40 ppt, @ ambient temperatures °C) on larvae to test the cumulative effects of sound exposure. Larvae from each replicate will be transferred carefully with a wide glass pipette to each of two small glass beakers (25 larvae per beaker), which contained 50 ml of filtered water. Larvae in one beaker will be exposed to 40 ppt salinity by adding 50 ml of high-salinity water (NaCl dissolved in filtered sea water), which will result in 100 ml test-solution of 40 ppt in each beaker. Larvae in the other beaker from each replicate served as control and 50 ml of normal sea water (20 ppt) was added by the start of the test. The salinity will be checked by a hand refractometer. Mortality will be recorded every 10 min until all the larvae in the exposed groups are dead. The larvae were considered dead if they were opaque, their body was bent and they did not respond to a gentle touch of the tail. The treatment effects will be compared using a two-way ANOVA. REPORTING Event Reports Following each pile driving event, an Event Report will be prepared for the agencies summarizing the results of the various research activities during that event (see Timeline). For example, Event 3 might include results of the hydrophone survey (Job 1), adult fish acoustic survey (Job 2), adult fish ID and abundance study (Job 3), adult injury and mortality study (Job 4), and larval fish assessment (Job 5). There may be no Job 6 report because the larvae may not be available for sound exposure until later in the study. Final Report A Final Report will be prepared detailing the methodologies and results of all experiments and field sampling conducted during the study. Due to the amount of data collected, it is anticipated that the final report will require considerable time requirement. We anticipate that a draft of the report can be sent to agencies for review by Feb 14, 2010. REFERENCES CITED Harden Jones, F. R., and Scholes, P. 1985. Gas secretion and resorption in the swimbladder of the cod Gadus morhua. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 155: 319-331. Hastings, M. C.; and A. Popper. 2005. Effects of Sound on Fish. Final Report #CA05-0537. Project P476 Noise Thresholds for Endangered Fish. California Department of 16 Transportation Division of Research and Innovation and Division of Environmental Analysis. Sacramento, CA. McCauley, R. D; J. Fawrewll; and A. N. Popper. 2003. High intensity anthropogenic sound damages fish ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113: 638-642. 17 BUDGET Salaries $110,732 Fringe Benefits (1800) $16,863 Total $127,595 Other Contracted Services (1900) $194,208 Consumable Supplies/Matedals (2000) $19,400 Travel/Subsistence(3100) $10,428 Other Direct Costs/Services Communications (3200) $250 Other Direct Costs -- CurrentServices (3000) $3,850 Other Direct Costs - Fixed Charges (4000) $5,000 Other Direct Costs - Specify $14,550 Total $23,650 Equipment Purchase (5000) $50044,9991Item $0 Over$5,000/Item $0 Total $0 Sub-Contracts (1995) $7,000 (MTDC) Modified Total Direct Costs: $382,281 (F & A)Facilities & Administrative Costs (4800): $99,394 Total Budget $481,675 18 BUDGET NOTES SALARIES Name Base Salary # Mos. % Effort Sponsor Salary Benefits Summer Salary/9-Month Faculty (1000) Roger Rulifson $89,464 2.0 100% $19,881 $3,799 Anthony Overton $63,894 2.0 100% $14,199 $2,713 Joseph Luczkovich $71,750 2.0 100% $15,944 $3,047 Patrick Harris $35,865 2.0 100% $7,970 $1,523 Mark Sprague $68,571 2.0 100% $15,238 $2,912 Subtotal $73,232 $13,994 Student Pay/Academic Year (1000) Cecila Krahforst $10,800 4.0 100% $4,800 $367 Subtotal $4,800 $367 Hourly Personnel (1000) Boat Operator 1 $15.00 300 $4,500 $344 Boat Operator 2 $15.00 300 $4,500 $344 Sound Recorder 1 $15.00 300 $4,500 $344 Sound Recorder2 $15.00 300 $4,500 $344 Diver 1 $15.00 40 $600 $46 Divert $15.00 40 $600 $46 Unnamed undergrad-field $15.00 500 $7,500 $575 Unnamed undergrad-lab $10.00 600 $6,000 $459 Subtotal $32,700 $2,502 Total $110,732 $16,863 Total $127,595 OTHER COSTS Other Contracted Service (1900) Fixed Site Hydroacoustic monitoring at two sites as per agreement with Biosonics, Inc. $191,008 Antec, Inc $3,200 Total $194,208 Consumable Supplies/Materials (2000) Laser Rangefinders 2 @ $250 $500 Edirol R-09HR Digital Recorders (3 @ 450) $1,350 Fish purchases from Aquaculture farms $2,000 8 GB SDHC Flash Memory Cards (9 @ $50) $450 Handheld GPS (2 @ 350) $700 External Hard Drive (4 TB of disk space) $800 0 N 9b 7 ti w° c C N 0. o ' NO v M 3 a N 19 1 1 ? V l .Yy (?1 ...p L`5.i A? Fl 3 N" c:4r I a t, S t a a ^y C 7 Wi ll a. f l I a 31 3 N f Rd ? , z"3 , al l W E, 1, 1 IS . k ' PH 1 4` ' ` N ry J 4: °${ v5k - ? z ?.5 t?? s a b S a{2s 3 N v #F z : ;? T ism l 3 a to ,? H i l l ? y .T ; xy. 7 00 N C > v v _ O FL o0 C v o G N w v ? a ? 'O d m v E ac ° °- m c 2 - 4 5 v A a o Si rn t WO .? O' O N 0 N {U. . c ?. F r . cc F C G 7 J W G U 7 0 ? .? c 'C CS, O m W •? 7 p T N 31 E td W N 9 [.' ? Q ? N .? ft?? ? N N N ' ^ C d U v ?G N ;; ? v w v 'C o °' a • 5 ? v •a ? lC E N T s U ? Q G m T O? O b >C N O Cpp N v 00 N N GO ? j b '+? N .7 A U v NO yy v Q d ?. w? N G' O O N 0 •,> yy C ? G 0. ?i y O v y ? F L 'O t y? a C ?'' y d N w O ? a ? ? y ? ? A ? O m ? u Q «? ? y o a i v w m ? ° ' v' k., ? v a m v ? A> ? Q u U u?> 5 ¢ a o?> 5 ¢ ? o° m> i ? c? ? A w il. i a w w A w i,, i O ? A w (,. W O? A w ti ? N 0 c? ^ ? O y ti N .,O M 1 1 122 1 M. e IF AI .?#p# y I ,? ?Atk 1 :t7,. I ME ? + ti mi ll I N 00 N N > W 'O N y w ? T td OD > .? C O H ? F C O rz ??cc .4 ? Y O yp p v w .- 5 F Q ? N A N fO n' ? d U O ? ? U 3 >` ?^y m ? t ? G. N O .V CI O i y o = W a R " H N N N y U ? 61 ?-1 'O ? w 0 cn A w> w U V sn b O O O aR. ti t r C iC A w v,