19970330 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090204

C OSeOI?.?
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: Evaluator's Name(s): 1 t-tl
Date of Report: u2l? 'cq reC.d I/I l.a?()qReport for Monitoring Year:
Date of Field Review: Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: SW of Greensboro near Exit 120 off 1-85. Site is generally bordered by Wiley Davis Rd., High Point Rd., and
existing developments
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 19970330
Project Name: Grandover/Holden Road
County(ies): Guilford
Basin & subbasin: Cape Fear 03030003
Nearest Stream: Reddick's Creek/Deep River
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: WS-IV
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
Project History
Event
Report Review - Streams
Report Review - Wetlands
Site Visit - Streams
Site Visit - Wetlands
Report Review - Streams
Report Receipt: Monitoring
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 2 acres
Stream: 3000 linear feet
Event Date
2/22/2007
3/1/2007
6/5/2007
6/5/2007
1/28,2008
1/16/2009
Buffer:
I
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site. Yes No
- - - - --
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
L Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
19970330-1 3000 linear feet Stream Restoration 7
19970330-2 2 acres Wetland Creation 7
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
--- --
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 2 acres Wetland Creation
Description:
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
j HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
sat within 12" of surface for apprx 12 cons days; evidence of sat
1 within root zone 5-12.5% of GS

Component ID: 19970330-2
j Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
? Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success Ye No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Ye No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
rl%? 1 a - l 5 d?.?
'Jy1?•. l 5 rr?.orvh-or in-) i; l?
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria.
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
1
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
when at least 60% or 320 woody spa are surviving and a Species Story TPAP/ Cover
75% survival of herbaceous plants
' Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per repo
Observational field data agrees? a No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Ye No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:

Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
ec+
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)?rl Page 1 of 2
M)6?c --I>0 -ho
(?U ?DYL-Nru.-<_s? ?? (? IRIS a-? (Y'om'
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
na Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: s cces ul partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
i
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2