Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout201706201120Dr. Sergei Chernikov NCDENR Division of Water Quality Point Source Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 SUBJECT:.. Comments on the Draft NPDES Pei�rnit Permit NC0003573 .DuPont Company —Fayetteville Worlcs Bladen County DuPont Fluoroproducts 22828 NC Highway 87 W Fayetteville, NC 78308-7332 September 19, 2011 E��� �,n ,' E _ J I i � ,� SEP � �� 2011 Dear Dr. Chernikov: ��-���-��"-� The DuPont Company —Fayetteville Works ("DuPont") has received the subject draft NPDES Pei�rnit, and respectively submits the following as comments to that permit: 1. Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet: In Item 1, the listing of existing wastewater treatment facilities includes "tertiary filters"; however this site's wastewater treatment plant does not have any tertiary filters. This bulleted item should therefore be eliminated. 2. Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet: In Item 2, the process area shown as Sentryglas® should be SentryGlas®. 3. Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet: In Item 3, the Cape Fear River is shown as being a Class C water, however the segment of the river receiving the DuPont effluent discharge is now a Class WS -IV water. 4. Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet: On July 26, 2011, DuPont submitted to DWQ a letter titled "NPDES Pei�rnit Renewal Application -Addendum 2" that included the Biocide/ Chemical Treatment Worksheet Form 101's for the five (5) chemicals that will be used with a future cooling tower. Neither those biocide chemicals nor the cooling tower blowdown are shown in the draft permit. E.I. du Pont da Nemours and Company Dr. Sergei Chernikov NCDENR Division of Water Quality September 19, 2011 Page 2 of 2 5. Section A(1) — Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements: The Chronic Toxicity parameter is listed as a requirement for Outfall 001, with Note 1 specifying that the compliance monitoring point is actually at Outfall 002. This site's DWQ inspector in the Fayetteville Regional Office mentioned during his last inspection that he would prefer if the permit was modified and the chromic toxicity monitoring requirement be moved to the Outfall 002 section so that the permit matches the site's practice. 6. Section A(3) —Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements: Currently the flow of Outfall 002 is measured as the daily quantity of water pumped from the Cape Fear River into the DuPont facility, so the "Sample Location" should be "Influent". However, a project is underway that will reroute the final Outfall 002 effluent from entering the river downstream of Lock and Dam No. 3 to entering the river upstream of the lock and dam. As part of this project, a flow rate monitoring station will be installed to measure the actual daily flow of Outfall 002, at which time the "Sample Location" would be "Effluent". It may be appropriate to include a description of the Outfall 002 flow as being the "Influent" prior to the completion of the project, and "Effluent" after the project. 7. Section A(3) —Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements: In Note 1, the second sentence should read: "As a participate in the Middle Cape Fear River Basin Association... ". 8. Section A(4) —Chronic Toxicity Permit Limit (Quarterly) —Outfall 001: See Comment 5 above. This site's DW Q inspector in the Fayetteville Regional Office would prefer if the chromic toxicity monitoring requirement be specified for Outfall 002. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please call me at (910) 678-1155. Chernikov, Se From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: ei Dear Mr. Poupart: Myers.Pamala@epamail.epa.gov Monday, September 19, 2011 11:40 AM Poupart, Jeff Belnick, Tom; Nuhfer.Mark@epamail.epa.gov; Chernikov, Sergei; Mckay, James No comments to three draft permits: NCG510000, NC0003573 and NC0032077 In accordance with the EPA/NC Memorandum of Agreement, we have completed our review of three draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits referenced above and have no comments to the proposed conditions. The EPA requests that we be afforded an additional review opportunity only if significant changes are made to the draft permits prior to issuance, or if significant objections to them are received. Otherwise, please send Region 4 one copy of each final permit when issued with its signed cover letter. Official letters of n vent are being mailed to you today for each draft permit to include: NCG510000, NC0003573 and NC00320770 If you have any questions, please call me or respond by email. Sincerely, Pamala Myers Environmental Engineer and Technical Advisor Water Protection Division Municipal GA 30303 404.562.9421 myers.pamala(aepa.gov Pollution Control and Implementation Branch and Industrial NPDES Section U.S. EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, 1