20081798 Ver 1_Reports_20040218

February 16, 2004 '

Mr Mike Bell
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers WETLANDS/ 401 G
ROUP
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000 FEB 1 9 200

,
Rummel, 4
Klepper Reference Bridge Replacement Project for the following VVAXR) t?

& Dahl SECTIO
B-4504 in Edgecombe County N
ui? B-4538 in Halifax County
B-4540 in Halifax County
William K Hellmann B-4560 in Johnston County
David W Wallace B-4567 in Lenoir County
Stephen WICagay B-4587 in Nash County
Robert ) Halbert B-4664 in Warren County (sent to Mr Eric Alsmeyer, USACE)
Stephen G Zentz B-4665 in Warren County (sent to Mr Eric Alsmeyer, USACE)
J Michael Potter B-4671 in Wayne County
Charles M Easter Jr (NCDOT Contract No A304264)
John G Mintiens
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr Dear Mr Bell,
Michael L Krupsaw
JamesA Zito Please find attached copies of each bridges' USGS map, aerial photograph (overlain with
Geoff q V`Kolberg the county sods layer and GPSed wetland and stream areas), COE wetland data forms,

Hill
Lars E

DWQ wetland rating forms, USACE intermittent stream forms, and DWQ stream rating

I
Tommy
Peacock, Jr
Tom
Michael W Myers

forms A copy of this information is being sent to Mr John Hennessey at DWQ (and the
Martin C Rodgers Warren County information for B-4664 and B-4665 to Mr Eric Alsmeyer, USACE) This
Kenneth A. Goon information will assist you in the verification of jurisdictional wetlands and streams Also
Richard J Adams Jr attached are the latitude/longitude coordinates and some general information on the
JohnA d'Epagmer referenced nine (9) bridge replacement projects
Barbara J Hoage
Christopher F Wnght
OwenL Peery
We will be contacting you soon to set up field reviews A jurisdictional determination is
Nang R. Bergeron necessary to complete the Natural Resources Technical Report, currently due in March
StuartA Montgomery 2004
David G Vanscoy
Henry J Bankard, Jr
Peter C D'Adamo
Very truly yours,
James F Ridenour Jr
Robert J Andryszak
RaymondM Harbeson Jr
R MMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
Thomas M Heil
B Keith Skinner
ThomasE Mohler Kevin Nunnery, Ph.D U
Karen B Kahl Project Manager
5800 Fanngdon Place
Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina Attachments
27609 3960 ESW/
Ph 919 878-9560 CC Mr John Hennessy, NCDENR - DWQ
Mr Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
Far 919-790-8382 W ES
www rkkengineers com ESW
KTN
JTP
DCW
JDC
F \W0RD\D0CUMENTQ02-052\NRTR's - RK07\Corr\USACE-001 doc
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Allentown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
CJD W W W W W W W W _I

cn cn m cn F m cn
-4 cn cn
4 O - A Cn A O M
r- C-
<
<
G
(D
O O
?
W Q
L11
CU
ms w w
_ W

_ O
O 7 :3
W CD
0 's
" S W
X W
X 7
:3
3
r
a
CD
I
I
I
M W m 0 = cn c T O W
O N X CD W 3
- o "
o x 0 C:
3 CD
'a
,
E- 0
(D =) CD
W
(D CD (n ?7 00 3
W (? _ CD C) (D
0 =T
- C)
W
- X CO X m X CD W O
y
N
O CD CD C7 O (n
CD
CD 0
=r CD
CD

W
3

Cn W Cn un W N W W
O W W O O O
" ? N Cn .01 m m m W
p "i m o o x r :? O x
Q Q W
C) C) O
CD
(n
CD CL aO)
C- CD X
W CD -x Q

:3 - O cn N

3 O U)
cn
W

o

3
n o

3 o

fl

o =
o W

(D X

o
W 3

m

W
Q 7

o
W
W
SCI
Q
-
a O 0. 0
°
Q Q
W
!.
CD
C) CA) co
CD N Cn N 0) Cn N cn 0-
0
0
N 0
Op

N A ? A Cn cn A A A
0 O O O
N
C N
C o
C W W W W
i' W <
(D
N
(D y
(D N
(D '9
W 7
O ?
O ?
W -0
W >
O Co
3 M (D (D
(n

O
O
O _
r
W
w A.
4 Co ? --4 M W ---4 -4 m
CD (n -? N c0 Cn (n
? w 0o ?1 N Cn Cb ? rn
M N N cn O N N -4
Cn Cn 0 ? O N w A Cn

Z o
0 7
w w W w W W w w w ?.cn
cn al cn Cn M 0 M 0 W ??
W A A O U1 C1t co N N 7 C2
A
A W
-I -I
Cn A
-4 N
N O
N W
M 0
W A
A (Q
"(D
O ? O V CO O ?I - A
O " O Cb (A -? CS, O
O Cn
c
A ?J CO s O -? W CO
1.000 2.000 4.000 6.000 5.000
NONE= ?? Feet
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner NCDOT
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper
Project No B-4587
County Franklin/Nash
State North Carolina
Plot ID 1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (Yes No Community ID PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? Pe o Transect ID Wetland A
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a nigra ree oxico en ron ra icans ine
Birch, River Ivy,Poison
cer ru rum ree arex spp er
aple, a carex
a anus occi en a is ree - o ygonum spp Herb
Sycamore, American Po ygonum spp
onicera japonica ine - u a is vimmea er +
oneysuc e, apanese Microstegium, Nepal
Smilax ro un i o is Vine FAG
reen rier, ommon

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 8/9 = 88 89% FAC Neutral 4/4 =100007
Numeric Index 23/9 =256
Remarks
many snags within wetland area
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit = 4 (in) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil = 0 (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 1
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-

----
-
1 OYR4/2
fu
N/A N/A
Loam
- gT R5/3 7 5YR5/6 any istmct ay loam
/
M IoYIZ s 2

12+
any
istmct Silty clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Sods
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Res No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydrnc Sods Presents No
Remarks
Page 2 of 2 Wefformlm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Ze?s No Community ID Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? (FT0 Transect ID Upland A
Is the area a potential Problem Area?e oo Field Location
(if needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
onicera japonica ine - escu us sy va ica ru
oneysuc le, apanese Buc eye, ainte
cer ru rum ree iqui am ar s yraci ua ree +
Map e, a Gum, Sweet
11ex opaca ree - Smilax ro un ? o is vine FAC
o y, mencan reen rier, ommon
oxico en ron ra icans Vine FAC u us e u o ius ru
vy,Poison Blackberry
arpmus caro miana ru
Horn beam,American

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 7/9 = 77 78% FAC Neutral 0/0 = 0 00%
Numeric Index 27/9 = 3 00
Remarks
many snags within area
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Descnbe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit = 15 (in) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil N/A (in) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 2
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
10YR3/6
N/A
N/A
ay loam
-
1 OYR4/6
N/A
N/A N/A
ay loam
8-16+ Few Faint Silty clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
soil materia has probably eroded from uphill agncultural area
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Presents es (IQo
Explanation for response to Normal Circumstances? Atypical Situation ? Potential Problem Area
area appears to be a wetland but sods do not meet hydric critena
Page 2 of 2 WetForm'"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 3

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sites a No Community ID PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? es o Transect ID Wetland B
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
arex spp Herb iqui am ar s yraci ua ru +
carex Gum, Sweet
cer ru rum ru u a is viminea er +
ap e,Re icrostegium,Nepal
e u a nigra ru
irc iver

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 5/5 = 100 00% FAC Neutral 2/2 = 100 00%
Numeric Index 13/5 =260
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit = 10 (in) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil = 0 (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
some inundated areas present within wetland (water depths 1-2")
Page 1 of 2 WetForm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 3
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Types Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
Few Prominent Sandy clay loam
+
1 OYR4/1
N/A
N/A N/A
Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Sods
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Sods
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydnc Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present9 es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetlands es No
Wetland Hydrology Present9 es No
Hydnc Soils Present9 es No
Remarks
Page 2 of 2 Wefform""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 4

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sites a No Community ID Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? es o Transect ID Upland B
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latm/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
o ys is um acros is of es er igus rum smense ru
ern, ristmas
- Privet, Chinese
u a is viminea 77 7 ignonia capreo a a ine
icrostegium,Nepal rossvme
iqui am ar s yraci ua ru + e u a nigra ree
Gum, Sweet irc aver
agus gran i o is Tree FACU
eec ,American

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 6/7 =8571% FAC Neutral 1/2 = 50 00%
Numeric Index 21 /7 =300
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Descnbe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (in) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Sod N/A (in) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 Wefformnn
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Dehneation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 4
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Tatum Loam
Map Symbol TaE Drainage Class Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Q°
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
7 5YR4/6
N/A
N/A
Silt loam
- + ew Faint Silty clay loam
Hydric Sod Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Sods
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
soil has probably eroded from adjacent hillside
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes o
Wetland Hydrology Present? es o
Hydnc Sods Present? Yes o
Remarks
Page 2 of 2 WetForm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 5
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Pes No Community ID PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? o Transect ID Wetland C
Is the area a potential Problem Areal Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
arex spp er iqui am ar s yraci ua 77 7-
carex um, weet
cer ru rum ru u a is viminea er +
aple, a Microstegium,Nepal
e u a nigra Shrub
irc ever

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 5/5 = 100 00% FAC Neutral 2/2 =10000%
Numeric Index 13/5 = 2 60
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit = 10 (in) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil = 0 (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
some inundated areas present within wetland (water depths 1-2")
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 5
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydnc Inclusion'?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type's Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- Few rommen Sandy clay loam
- +
10YR4/1
N/A
N/A N/A
Sandy clay loam
Hydric Sod Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Agwc Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydnc Sods List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydnc Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Presents es No
Hydnc Sods Present? es No
ing
Page 2 of 2 WetFormt"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner NCDOT
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper
County Franklin/Nash
State North Carolina
Plot ID 6
uo Normai circumstances exist on the site", re No community iu rorest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? es (IT O,) ID Upland C
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Speaes(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
ex opaca ree - arpmus caro niana ree
o y,Amencan Horn beam, American
ornus on a ree o ys is um acros is of es er
Dogwood, Flowering Fern, Christmas

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 2/4 = 50 00% FAC Neutral 0/1 = 0 00%
Numeric Index 13/4 = 3 25
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (m) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil N/A (in) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 WetFormt'°
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 6
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Tatum Loam
Map Symbol TaE Drainage Class Well Drained Mapped Hydnc Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
7 5YR3/4
N/A
N/A N/A
Silt loam
- + t
7 5YR4/6
N/A
N/A N/A
Silty clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
soil has probably eroded from adjacent hillside
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes o Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes o
Wetland Hydrology Presents es o
Hydnc Soils Presents es o
Remarks
Page 2 of 2 WetForm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/5ite B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 7
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation es o Transect ID Wetland D
7
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
7
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latm/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
arpinus caro iniana ree ignonia capreo a a ine
orn eam,Amencan Crossvine
e u a nigra ree smilax ro un i o la ine
irc ,River Greenbrier, Common
o ygonum spp ree FACW? asman ium a i o ium Herb -
Po ygonum spp ea- ats, ndian
arex spp ree cer ru rum ree
carex aple, e

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 7/ 8 = 87 50% FAC Neutral 3/3 =10000%
Numeric Index 21 /8 =263
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Descnbe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines

Field Observations YES Sediment Deposits
YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (In) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil = 1 (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 Wefformun
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 7
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydnc Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
10YR5/1
N/A
N/A N/A
i loam
- t ew Prominent ay
Hydnc Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydnc Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydnc Sods List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydnc Sods Present? es No
in
Page 2 of 2 WetForm"°
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 8
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sites a No Community ID Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )'7 es (Jo-) Transect ID Upland D
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
agus gran 7 o 1a Tree iqui am ar s yraci ua ru +
Beec , merican Gum, Sweet
onicerajapomca ine TW- - uercus a a ree
Honeysuckle, Japanese a kite
arpinus caro m?ana ree FAG arex spp Herb
orn eam, merican carex
e u a nigra Shrub Smilax ro un o is ine
Birc aver Green brier,Common

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 5/ 8 = 62 50% FAC Neutral 2/4 = 50 00%
Numeric Index 24/8 =300
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (,n) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil N/A (in) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 8
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes (
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- oam
-TT--f + w any loam
Hydrtc Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydrtc Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydrtc Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Ves' No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes o
Wetland Hydrology Present? o
Hydric Soils Present? Yes o
Remarks
Page 2 of 2 WetForm'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Del?neation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 9

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sites
' No Community ID PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )?
Zes o Transect ID Wetland E
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a nigra Fee TW= arpinus caro iniana ree
irc aver orn eam, mencan
-
-
cer ru rum ree ex eci ua MFF
56 TM -
ap e, e o Iy,Deci uous
arex spp Herb ignonia capreo a a Vine FAC
carex rossvine
a anus occI en a is ree -
ycamore, merican

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 7/7 =10000% FAC Neutral 4/4 =10000%
Numeric Index 17/7 =243
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- YES Water Marks
YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit = 5 (in) NO Local Sod Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil N/A (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 WetForm°n
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(9987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 9
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- -T-TT- Silty c ay oam
- 5 ew Prominent Silty clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydnc Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
soils are marginal
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydnc Soils Present? es No
in
are marginal but area appears to be a wetland by all other criteria and landscape position (immediately adjacent to channel)
Page 2 of 2 WeTormt 1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 10
UO Normai Circumstances exist on the site', a No Community ID Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? Pe (Jqo) Transect ID Upland E
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common)
' Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
775
x opaca ru 7A-- uercus p e os ree -
o y,American Oak, Willow
cer ru rum ree runus sero ma ree
ape, a herry,6 ac
cer ru rum ru ?qui am ar s yraci ua ree FAC+
ap e,Re Gum, Sweet
ignonia capreo a a ine Smilax ro un i o is ine
rossvine Greenbrier, Common
arex spp er
carex

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 7/ 9 = 77 78% FAC Neutral 2/3 = 66 67%
Numeric Index 26/9 =289
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (,n) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil N/A (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 10
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Altavista Sandy Loam
Map Symbol AaA Drainage Class Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type*7 Yes C°
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
N/A N/A
Loam
-
1 OYR4/4
N/A N/A
Loam
8-16+ Bt 1 OYR5/6 N/A N/A N/A ay loam
Hydnc Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Sods
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydnc Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydnc Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes QD
Wetland Hydrology Present? es (:no)
Hydnc Sods Present? Yes o
Page 2 of 2 WetFormt 1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 11
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? es o Transect ID Wetland F
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
inus ae a ree 777- uncus a usus er +
Pine, o o y Rus o
Smilax ro un o is ine iqui am ar s yraci ua ru +
Green brier, ommon Gum, Sweet
e u a nigra ree FACW arex spp Herb
Birc ,River carex
onicerajaponica Vine FAC- uercus p e os ree -
oneysuc e, apanese
_
_ ak, it ow
uniperus wrgmiana 7Fr
U5
-
7Z
e ar, astern Re

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 7/ 9 = 77 78% FAC Neutral 4/5 = 80 00%
Numeric Index 24/9 =267
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (in) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil = 14 (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
weak evidence of primary hydrologic indicators within wetland area, generally
Page 1 of 2 wetForm'm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 11
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Altavista Sandy Loam
Map Symbol AaA Drainage Class Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion)
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Typel Yes C
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- Loam
- +
1 OYR4/2
N/A
N/A N/A
Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Sods
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtl
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 12

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
' No Community ID Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )?
Zes Transect ID Upland F
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
o ys is um acros is o? es er iqui am ar s yraci ua ru +
Fern, hnstmas Gum, weet
agus gran i o is ree cer ru rum
ru
7F C
Beech,Amencan ape, e
77n -us ae 7a_ I ree FAG Smilax ro un o is Vine FAC
Pine,Lo lolly Green brier,Common
ex opaca ree - oni eera/apornca
Holly,Amencan oneysuc e, apanese
ornus on a 775
Dogwood, Flowering

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 5/9 = 55 56% FAC Neutral 0/2 = 0 00%
Numeric Index 29/9 =322
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Descnbe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (in) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil N/A (in) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 12
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Altavista Sandy Loam
Map Symbol AaA Drainage Class Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
- Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
10YR3/3
N/A
RT,7
N/A
Loam
- t
1 OYR5/6
N/A N/A
ay loam
10-16+ 1 OYR5/8 N/A N/A N/A a
Hydric Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
(Remarks
es
Page 2 of 2 WetForm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION'
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 13
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )7 es Transect ID Wetland (r
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latm/Common) Stratum Indicator
uercus mic auxin ree - arex spp 7e-r-
Oak, Swamp Chestnut carex
e u a nigra ree igus rum sinense ru
irc aver Pnvet,C inese
a anus occi en a is ree FAL;W- ignom,a capreo a a vine FAC
ycamore,Amencan rossvine
raxinus pennsy van?ca ru u a fia viminea

er
T_7_

+
T77-
s reen icrostegium, Nepal
arpmus caro miana ru
orn eam, mencan

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 9/9 = 100 00% FAC Neutral 5/5 = 100 00%
Numeric Index 22/9 =244
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Descnbe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit = 12 (?n) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil = 4 (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
inundated areas patchy in wetland area with water depths of 1-2"
Page 1 of 2 WeTorm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 13
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydnc Inclustonl
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type > Yes (
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
1 OYR4/1
N/A
N/A N/A
Silt loam
5YR5/6 N/A N/A Loamy sand
Hydric Sod Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Sods
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks
Page 2 of 2 WetForm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Del?neat?on Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 14
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site's (Pe No Community ID Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? To Transect ID Upland ' Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Speaes(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
arpinus caro iniana ree ignonia capreo a a ine
orn eam,Amencan rossvine
ex opaca ree - Smilax ro un i o is ine T7C
o ly, mencan reen rier, ommon
uercus mic auxn Tree - u us e u o ius Vine FAC
a wamp Chestnut Blackberry
-
-
onicera japonica me 77 - u us e u i o ius M
ruF 7-7c
oneysuc le, apanese Blackberry

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 6/8 = 75 00% FAC Neutral 1/1 =10000%
Numeric Index 23/8 = 2 88
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Depth of Surface Water N/A (in) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (in) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Sod N/A (in) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site B-4587 Project No B-4587 Date 11-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner NCDOT County Franklin/Nash
Investigators David Ward, Elizabeth Workman, Jim Cooper State North Carolina
Plot ID 14
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Wehadkee Loam
Map Symbol Wh Drainage Class Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
10YR3/3
N/A
N/A N/A
Loam
- Loam
8-16+ t 1 OYR6/6 NIA N/A
ay oam
Hydric Soil Indicators
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Zs) No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes o
Wetland Hydrology Present? o
Hydric Soils Presents Yes o
Remarks
I
Page 2 of 2 WetForm`m
Wa
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road e
County /V u-s h Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator -`SIJ , 3-1) G 7)C J Date ?//, /o t/
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within V2 mile upstream, upslope or
• or lake radius)
• Tn
perennial
strea • Forested/natural vegetation ?%
rmittent
nte
stream Agricultural, urban suburban s %
• W-Ahin interstream divide • Impervious surface S %
• Other
Soil Series lc-q- Do nant Vegetation
?
(1) ,rc
/,?£
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) .S CRm ?`c_
• e ominantly mineral - non-san y
• Predominant y sandy (3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • erma?-manently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • all flooded or inundated
o a wetlan > Intermittently flooded or inun ate
• No evidence of flooding or surface water

Wetland Type se ct one)
of an ardwood forest
Hea water orest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other_
Water storage r X 400=
20
Bank/Shorehne stabilization X 400=
J 2
Pollutant removal S X 5 00 =
Wildlife habitat _L X 2 00 =
Aquatic life value _5 X 4 00 = ?O
Recreation/ Education Z X 100=
2
RATING VALUES.
i h=60 or higher
Medium/Hig = to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

D
COMMENTS
mi1,r?l G?/Pd in?(vPn r '?l v ?LG i? y_
wWetland Rating Worksheet /
Project Name Nearest Road
County A)a 5 Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator ?-s (J TD xc.J Date -2 /t, /a 7
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within Y2 mile upstream, upslope or
• On 12o nd or lake radiu
On perennial stye • Forested/natural vegetation %
• On intermittent stream Agricultural, urban/suburban-U%
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface ':- %
• Other
Soil Series Ga-l-,.,.?n Do nant Vegetation
(1) /It/?/ lO,/G
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2)
redominantly mineral - non-san
• Predominantly sandy
(3) ?/C

Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semi ermanentl to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flZoded or inun
otal wetland wrdth > ee • nterrrutten y e or inun ate
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland T tone 'Z ¢Q?? a--
ottomland hardwood forest
Headwater o
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING-
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
B og/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 400=
7-d
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 3 X 4 00 = 12
Pollutant removal S X 5 00=
Wildlife habitat X 2 00 = c/
Aquatic life value X 4 00 = 1 20
Recreation/ Education 3 X 1 00 = 2
RATING VALUES:

gh=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS
?V o uw 00 ij:4 G?nnN n Nor' ,
OL
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name ??e / Nearest Road IAJL Re Jr 1<= -
County IvaS 4- Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator D C j Date 24 f lb tl
?--
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• On perennial stream
r • Forested/natural vegetation 70%
• ?av e
On intermittent stream / • Agricultural, urban/suburban ?-5 %
• n interstream divide a" ' • Impervious surface S %
Other
o eries a Dominant Vegetation
(1) -I ti-PC -S
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
(2) IL
tl mineral- non-san y
?r V
• Predominantly sandy (3) ?
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonall flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 10 e • Intermittentl flooded or inun ate
• No evidence of flooding or sur ace water
C
Wetland Type select one)
ottomland hardwood fores
Hea wa er es
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING-
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 400=
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4 00 =
^
Pollutant removal X 5 00 =
Wildlife habitat_ X 2 00 =
Aquatic life value X 4 00 =
Recreation/ Education X 100=
RATING VALUES
gh=60 or highe
Mediu g = to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

F?
COMMENTS: 1- ''rr
OD
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name - -I S Nearest Road
County Iv e,-S ?- Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluators Date z/,, Joq
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or
• O o d lake radius)
• oral stream • Forested/natural vegetation 70 %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban 25 %
• Within lnterstream divide • Impervious surface S %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation
?/d
(1) r» Q0 o
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
L
Peat (2) , r
rt Jf l
mi
l P
• Predo
nant
y sandy (3) ° L-
d
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semi erma to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized feason ly flooded or inundate
Total wetland width > 100ieit` nterrm en y oo ed or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland T e se ect one
Bottomland hardwood forest
ea water ores
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING-
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage - X 4 00 = I
(,
Bank/Shoreline stabilization _3 X 4 00 = I
Pollutant removal 5 X 5 00 = C
Wildlife habitat _4 X 2 00 =
Aquatic life value 5 X 4 00 = v
Recreation/ Education 2 X 1 00 =
RATING VALUES.

h=60 or higher
Medlu?g?i= to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
?/3
COMMENTS.
J'-c
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name 13 -7 Nearest Road ?? U
County ! l Q S Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator i:S W -D(-O, TbL Date o? //1 /0
T
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within Y:z mile upstream, upslope or
• On and or lake radius)
• erenmal stream • Forested/natural vegetation -70 %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban ZS %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface .S %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation
(1)
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
(
r td
Peat (2) L
na:!S?
• Predominantly rruneral -non-sandy
• Predominant y san y (3) 30` S-p
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semnpermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized easonall flooded or mum ate
Total wetland width > 100 feet • Internuttently flooded or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetlan select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING-
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage --?_ X 400=
I
Bank/Shoreline stabilization _ a X 4 00 =
Pollutant removal X 5 00 =
Wildlife habitat I X 2 00 =
Aquatic life value 9- X 4 00 =
Recreation/ Education ! X 1 00=
I
RATING VALUES
High=60 or higher
to 59

46
COMMENTS-
r+0( JJ,.s 5fJqr0_ raV1&CH CV%), h- he g rjwrn( Ga,,ur
?1
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name
County
Nearest Road
Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator ?-S W f ?? J ?? Date_ ? 111 /y 7
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/a mile upstream, upslope or
•
• On pond or lake
On
erennial
if7i
t
eam k
• radius)
F
t
d/
t
t
l
t
7V%
p
s
r
tr ores
e
na
ura
vege
a
ion
• On intermittent stream f- f r • Agricultural, urban/suburban '3.5 %
• interstream divide ds pl'? S 5
1 • Impervious surface .S %
Soil Series o 7Z -f Dominant Vegetation
(1) /66?a?Ict D•r?
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or U

edominanl v mineral - non-sandy
(3) 0, O
• Predominantly sandy
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography Senupermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channe • Seasonally flooded or inundated
•
L
T
otal wetland width > 100 feet

•

Intermix o e
o evidence o oo In or r
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottoml dwood forest
eadwater forest
Swamp orest
Wet flat
Pocosm
Bog forest
RATING-
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bo eni_
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina ay
Other
Water storage ?* X 4 00 = 12
Bank/Shorehne stabilization O X 4 00 =
Pollutant removal X 5 00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2 00 = )0
Aquatic life value X 4 00 = [
Recreation/ Education 2 X 1 00=
A)a-s L
RATING VALUES.
High=60 or higher
MedlunvThgh=50 to 59
edlum=40 to 4
Low- or er

48
COMMENTS-
?) 65 -
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road P'
County _ Z V 4 S ?zr? ??/t- Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator 2C Date
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius
?On pOn reennia s rea • Forested/natural vegetation
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban ?, %
• Within mterstream divide • Impervious surface S %
• Other
Soil Series fkd k Dominant Vegetation
(l) Seen, p t?.c stns-t' o a
• Predonunantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2)
e ominant y l - non-sandy
S
Predominan y
any (3) SH ???-? •/
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanentl to ermanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized easonally flooded or inundate'
• Total wetland width > 100 feet • ntermitten?y ooTed-or inu-' ndated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water

Wetland T e elect one)
Bo tt om?and hardwood forest
eadwater ore
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING
Pine savanna l
Freshwater marsh I J(°
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland 4L
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 400= 2.0
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4 00 =
12
Pollutant removal S X 5 00 = ?S
Wildlife habitat X 2 00 =
Aquatic life value X 4 00 = 2-o
Recreation/ Education X 1 00=
Q
COMMENTS.
RATING VALUES

High=60 or higher
Medium/F.igh=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
s?
MMILQINTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICANT NAME A)e-0 0 7'r
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i e`clvert, relocation, etc)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN ?[ s4/ /el", !' eo
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS / r /0
W1a
DATE !g / 1 A)
6d
COUNTY/CITY IUG A L
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description

? Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present

Bentluc Macro Invertebrates
Sl ?L (jla rj
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i a tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) p s,
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i a gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =h 50% closure) O ' e >?I
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
v Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig With Channel (Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June through Sept)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept)
Adjacent Floodplam Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation inladjacent to channel
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y / N
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? ? N Approx. Drainage Area
/l//l///l/l/ll/ll//ll/lI/lllllllll///l/lllllll//I/lllllllllllllll/Il/I//l1/l/lI/1//l/lllll//ll/ll/lll/ll//l//llllllllllllllll//lIl/ll//lll/lll//lll/Ill/lll/lll//ll//ll//lll//lll/!l///llll/llll/l/ll/l/llllllll/l/Illl//l////
Determination
Perennial Channel (stop) e Important Channel LF PROJECT MGR Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important(unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature
(if other than C 0 E project manager)
lll/l1/ll/llll/lllllllllllllllllllllll//llllllllllllllllllll/lllll/lllllllllll/l/l/lllll/llll/llll/llllll/l////llllll//ll/lllllllll/l//l/ll/ll///l/lll//lll/lll/lll//l1//l////l///lll//l//l//l/l//l/l/l/ll///ll////l//!l/l/l/l/
P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98

INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
-1/5,P7 EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICANT NAME Ak b r%%' DATE °2/ 11
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i e, culvert, relocation, etc) WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN /mil 1 urge g C o COUNTY/CITY
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS GLo),e,11-1
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaman, Present
i/ Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i a tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i a gravel, cobble, rock, co a sand
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) d t O
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Coatig With Channel (Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June through Sept )
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept)
Adjacent Floodplam Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
f Hydrophync Vegetation WadJacent to channel
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y / N
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map,9 N Approx Drainage Area-
ll//U/ll/lll/1/l//ll1/l/11111/llllllllllllllllllll/llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll/lll/ll/lllllll//lll/ll1/lllll///ll/lI/lllll/ll////l/llll//llllllllll/ll///l////l//l///ll////l//lI//l///l/11////lll//1/ll1/l/1/1///l/ll/
Determination
Perennial Channel (stop) 8 Important Channel LF PROJECT MGR Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel LF
Ephemeral Channel (no A (attach map indicating location of important(unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no Jd)
Evaluator's Signature
(if other than C O E project manager)
lllllllllllllllllllllllll/ll/llllllllll/l1/l//llllllll/lllll/llllll/llllllll/ll/ll///lll/11/ll/l/l/lll//l/I////ll/l/ll/llll/l/lllll/////ll/ll/l//l//l///ll/ll////l/l//ll/l1//l//l//l//ll//ll/ll/l/ll//lll//l/lllll/ll/ll/lllll/

P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98
cy/cs-5
NCDWQ Stream _Classification Form
Project Name 6_ Y50 River Basin /, ?? cv County ??csI/??E/„Evaluator Sc,)
DWQ Project Number Nearest Named Stream C?P,1ssd/J,,LLatitude Signature
Date 2/i 1 /0 / USGS QUAD Longitude Location/Directions
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Perbne)
1.
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 Cv 2 3
(*NOTE If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated /',T)
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater /--?-? _
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS-
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS.
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number PerLne)
I Geomorpholo v Absent
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Ways 0
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS.
Weak Moderate Strong
5 15
?F
5 15
5 1
II Hydrolo Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
PrPer.nt Tn Rtreamhed9 5 0
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs Since 0 5 1
Last Known Rainy *NOTE I Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Ste And #5 Below*
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 5 1
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS.
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed9 SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 75 5 0 0
As Noted Above Ski This Ste UNLESS SAV Present*
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS' q
1
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
NCDWQ Stream_Classification.-Form
Project Name River Basin -7 ?' CEC/'Pl-v1 -c-'o County /(JAS Evaluator I??U>
DWQ Project Number Nearest Named Stream 67P,`-fS Latitude Signature
Date X11 l1 ? ! USGS QUAD Longitude Location/Directions
*PLEASE NOTE If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of thisform is not necessary
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplam Present? 0 1 2
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(*NOTE I,?Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*1
10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated ???
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. ___T:
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS
1.
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 5 1 1 5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS ;2
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong _
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter -?
n
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs Since 0 5 1 L1J
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE ff Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*) -
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 5 1 15
nr Tn (Irnw,no CPacnnl9
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:.
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 75 ?5 0 0
As Noted Above Ski This Ste UNLESS SAV Present*
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
y + Secondary= 2ii; Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
TOTAL POINTS (Primar
i
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Perbne)