20081436 Ver 1_Complete File_20081209

. -
United States Departm.enf orf the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post,Oflice Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
March 2, 2007
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. MAR 2 2 2007
Project Development Carolina and Environmental Transportation
Anal L ?NDSAN°SS 4?V,, ily
yS1S"
?RS?,kw
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
This letter is in response to your letter of February 6, 2007 which provided the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) with the biological determination of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) that the replacement of Bridge No. 52 on SR 1505 over Deep Creek in
Edgecombe County (TIP No. B-4504) may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the
federally endangered Tar spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana) and red-cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis). In addition, NCDOT has determined that the project will have no effect on
the federally threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). These comments are provided in
accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543).
According to information provided, mussel.surveys were conducted at the project site on May
26, 2005 and July 8, 2005. The surveys extended 100 -meters upstream and 400 meters
downstream of SR 1505. No federally listed species were found, and habitat quality was
impaired by tannic conditions and unstable substrate conditions. It is understood that the new
bridge will completely span the channel with no bents in the water. It is also understood that an
off-site detour will be utilized. Based on all available information, the Service concurs with your
determination that the proposed project may affect, bitt.,is not likely to adversely affect the Tar
spinymussel.
Based on all available information, the Service concurs with your determination that the project
may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the red-cockaded woodpecker. Also, due to the
lack of habitat, the Service concurs with your determination that the project will have no effect
on the bald eagle. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been
satisfied. We remind you that obligations under section: 7 consultation must be reconsidered if:
(1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or
critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by this identified action.

The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions
regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
cc: William Wescott, USACE, Washington, NC
Rob Ridings, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
John Sullivan, FHwA, Raleigh, NC

Y .
February 16, 2004

Mr. Mike Bell
r Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
Post Office Box 1000

Rummel, Washington, NC 27889-1000
- FEB 1 S 2004
, IQepper Reference: Bridge Replacement Project for the following
?p
Dahl LLr
& B-4504 in Edgecombe County SECT!®N
. B-4538 in Halifax County
WilliamK Hellmann B-4540 in Halifax County
David W. Wallace B-4560 in Johnston County
Stephen W. Kagay B-4567 in Lenoir County
Robert I. Halbert B-4587 in Nash County
Stephen G. Zentz B-4664 in Warren County (sent to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE)
J Michael Potter B-4665 in Warren County (sent to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE)
B-4671 in Wayne County
Charles M. Easter, Jr. (NCDOT Contract No. A304264)
John G. Mintiens
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr. Dear Mr. Bell;
Michael L. Ympsaw
James A. Zito Please find attached copies of each bridges' USGS map, aerial photograph (overlain with
Geoffrey V. Kolberg the county soils layer and GPSed wetland and stream areas), COE wetland data forms,
Lars E. Hill
J
To
Tommy
P lr DWQ wetland rating forms, USACE intermittent stream forms, and DWQ stream rating
ic
hael
W. Myers
M forms. A copy of this information is being sent to Mr. John Hennessey at DWQ (and the
Martin C. Rodgers Warren County information for B-4664 and B-4665 to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE). This
Kenneth A. coon information will assist you in the verification of jurisdictional wetlands and streams. Also
Richard I. Adams, Jr attached are the latitude/longitude coordinates and some general information on the
John A. d'Epagnier referenced nine (9) bridge replacement projects.
Barbara J. Hoage
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery
We will be contacting you soon to set up field reviews. A jurisdictional determination is
Nancy R. Bergeron necessary to complete the Natural Resources Technical Report, currently due in March
Stuart A. Montgomery 2004.
David G. Vanscoy .
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Very truly yOUfS',
Robert J. Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr. R MME L, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
Thomas M. Heil
B. Keith Skinner
l
Thomas E. Mohler c
Kevin Nunnery, Ph.D
Karen B. Kahl
Project Manager
5800 Faringdon Place
Suite 105
Raleigh; North Carolina Attachments
27609-3960 ESW/
Ph: 919-878-9560 CC: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDENR - DWQ
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
Fax: [phone] W ES
www.rkkengineers.com ESW
KTN
JTP
DCW
JDC
F:\WORD\DOCUMENT\302-052\NRTR's - RK07\Corr\USACE-001.doc
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Allentown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
W W W co W W W W co _I

(n Cn rn Cn m 0) M cn
0) 0) - A W A V O W
4 O n
C 0
0
r C_
?
? ? i
n !- v sv
" w n0 w 0
0
rt
CD CD ::r EP
x
x
O 0 7 7
3
cr
CD
-n W m o = cn o E o cn
o x CD Cll 0 4
3 T) ='r :0' COD
0 CD
co

o
?
o
o
? =
5
n
i
a ? oo x m ? m ? 0
- o
CA
n M X 0
?
?.
CD ?
CD
CD
v

cn

Cn w Cn Cn w N W W -?
O W W 0 0 0 0
-? ? N Cn A. 0 0 Cn W
Q W O x O O
CL (D

CL _
Z5
o _ N
x
=
C2
C- CD
0 X
CCD
O
?
(D
p)'
Q
O v

co =

cn -n
m

o

a,
N
Cn

Z

:03 D
3 C v

W :3.
o
?
o 3
CD
o ;o 3 w
C1. o n
°- o °1 o o
Q n
)
Q Q Q"
W
Q
CD
(A O W Cn W N (b A N Z
C Fj cn N m (n N N Cn 0

_<0
Fn' 0
00

N A A ? Cn Cn .A ? A
N 0 0 0 ?
CD 0 w 0
" 0 <
C C C ?' CD fv ?' ? O

CD (D CD p) O O p? O O W
O CD CD

O O O
r
v

?I LO v -t W 00 Cb -J V CD
00 2n A N O C)1 (a
-? W 00 -1 N Cn QO -? a)
CO N N Cn O N N ?l -
Cn Cn CO ?I m N co '.A Cn
4 " v W O C) N Cn A
W CO O .A W .1?6 m --l
Z O

W W W W W W W W W ?. (fl
Cn Cn Cn Ul CA O M G> CA =r in
W .A .A C4 Cn Cn CO N N 7 C

?
O
V
P
N
CD
W
(fl
P Q
(a
D
? -I Cn -I N N OD 00 -D,
O v M v C4 O V - .1?6
CO N CO Cb (>o 0) cn C0
C4 Cn ,I CO -? CD ? co CO
L .? 5if? jh?Yr n Y'c?a °. v?.a '] •Y? a
77
Ito
a aF' ?' .?. a Ckt ? ? Y
'Stt '# r t?
?? ? oars r,:, ? ? ? o ? ? ;? ? ;? >< i• € ? ~_?
$ s -a
X .p?Y/n. = l?? ?S S yJS
rLr t f`7 LL r w II ? ?? N ? t ? +
OS 7, 1.;
x
+p T
i q c k ?y tix.:? .. ? •*+ ? z a
i
Y l r=?
ia4S ? ? S 7 ? F _ 3 ?? y ?
/A
7*1
?-
LF i
b kr? 'fir -, ?w
.47
r? a IF• ;?' Kk a
??ki. ;. _.x x.$ C
S •' r }'3"f? r rye.; ,-.._ '`5 C! x ?a rat _ t'ORTH C L.01"
A';''y
FIEL-
S?
4. Q
-pa
ll? 77,
{
z ?
rte -Umo/?.
J I ? gem -- ?
EDGECOMBE
` `IRO
t § r J ? ???, • ? _ ?`, `_ - \ tip.
,,??, _ S' '••? •' `?..`1 is r'. •...
it lr(_ ` 1 r ?
;,? ? ?,``> •?? ? t Vii` ? ?r
r N { -
#?_ ? _ ? is -^ r, ,\`\i???' r•=?_?
oiM i r o
J% i -
{T 7 i 5
\ \ z=
/'t ? ? I t? f7.f •?=mss= s `s??=y,adw\. z.?'} tr
r `? Bld 1 ? I .t , ? ??
( 2a.? ? 111 i ?• i ; r
Scats. 4= 2000'1
Ao i N?r - 'i
Sourc USGS 7.5 Minute aadr glas,
Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: • 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es oTo-) Transect ID: Wetland A
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
run inana gigan ea er uercus yra a ree
Cane, Giant a , vercup
a anus occi en a is ree - igus rum sinense ru
Sycamore, American rivet, inese
cer ru rum Shrub e u a nigra Tree FACW
ape, a irc aver

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 6/6 = 100.00% FAC Neutral: 4/4 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 13/6 =2.17
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 2 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained?Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtl
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(9987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: 8-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 1
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
=- 10YR3/1 N/A N/A Clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors TO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
'Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
ng
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
. . Plot ID: 2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No luommunityu): roresi
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (ITo) Transect ID: Upland A
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
ymp ocos inc ona ru run inana gigan ea Herb. FACW
Horse-Sugar Cane, Giant
or onia asian us ree accinium corym osum ru
Bay, o of y ue erry, ig bus
iqui am ar s racy ua Tree + MitChella repens Herb +
Gum,Sweet Partridge-Berry
ynca tern era ru +
ay erry, Southern

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 6/7 =85.71% FAC Neutral: 3/4 = 75.00%
Numeric Index: 19/7 = 2.71
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A.Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe.
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 2
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes 0°
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
--T-6 A 10YR3/2 N/A N/A N/A Loamy sand
Sandy loam
16-22 ommon Prominent any loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 WetForml'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 3
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Zes' No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Transect ID: Wetland B
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes S Field Location:
(if needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
run 'inana gigan ea er uercus nigra ree
ane, cant a , ater
iqui am ar s rac? ua ree 7277 ersea or oma ru
Gum, Sweet ay, e
accinium corym osum Shrub u a is viminea Herb +
ue erry, ig us icrostegium, Nepal
-
mi ax ro un o is Vine a semium sempervirens ine
TTC
Greenbrier,Common essamme, a ow

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 8/8 = 100.00% FAC Neutral: 3/3 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 21 /8 =2.63
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 6 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 3
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well D rained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ Sandy loam
5-10 B 2.5Y3/1 5YR5/6 Few Distinct Silt loam
C -T 10YR5/2 F-7.71YR5/6 Few ain an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 wetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: 8-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Zes' No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (ITO-) Transect ID: Upland.8
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
ymp ocos me ona Shrub run inana gigan ea er .
Horse-Sugar Cane, Giant
or onia astan us ree acc n?um corym osum ru
Bay, o o y ue erry, ig us
iqu? am ar s yraci ua ree FAG+ Mitchelia repens Herb +
Gum, Sweet Partridge-Berry
ynca cen era ru +
ay erry, out em

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or PAC:
(excluding FAC-) 6/7 =85.71% FAC Neutral: 3/4 = 75.00%
Numeric Index: 19/7 =2.71
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTorrn m
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner; NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 2
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ Loamy sand
_ Sandy loam
16-22 C 2.57573 10YR4/3 ommon Prominent any loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
ng
Page 2 of 2 WeTormcm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
icant/Owner: NCDOT
:tiaators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
Date: 4-Feb-2004
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 5
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Pe No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Transect ID: Wetland C
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes S Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Smilax ro un o is ine uercus yra a ree
reen rier, ommon a , vercup
run inana gigan ea er cer ru rum ree
Cane, Giant ape, e
accinium corym osum Shrub iqu? am ar s yraci ua Tree +
Blueberry, ig us um, wee
uercus nigra ree ex opaca ru -
a , ater o y,American

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 7/8 = 87.50% FAC Neutral: 3/3 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 20/8 = 2.50
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: = 0.5 (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 0 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 5
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-2 a 10YR2/2 N/A N/A Loam
_ Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
(Wetland Hydrology Present? Pes No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Page 2 of 2 Wefform"°
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
Date: 4-Feb-2004
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 6
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site7 a No t;ommurnty n): rorest
Transect ID: Upland C
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Pe (Iqo
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(if needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
uercus a a ree or onia asjan us ru
Oak, White ay, ob o ly
accmium corym osum ru Smilax ro un o is ine
Blueberry, ig us Greenbrier, Common
run maria gigan ea Herb a semium sempervirens Vine FAG
Cane, Giant essamine, a ow
cer ru rum ree 11ex opaca ru -
ap e, e o y, mencan
inus ae a ree FAC
ine, ob o y

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 7/9 = 77.78% FAC Neutral: 3/4 = 75.00%
Numeric Index: 25/9 =2.78
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 6
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well D rained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ any oam
_ Few Prominent any oam
10YR6/8 Few Distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 WetFormh"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 7
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Wetland D
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Specles(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
arpinus caro iniana " Shrub iqu? am ar s yraci ua ree +
orn eam,Amencan um, weet
accinium corym osum ru ex opaca ru -
Blueberry, ig us Holly, American
e u a nigra Tree FACW agus gran ? o is Tree FACU
irc aver eec , merican

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAG:
(excluding FAC-) 4/6 = 66.67% FAC Neutral: 2/3 = 66.67%
Numeric Index: 17/6 = 2.83
Remarks:
vegetation occurs along the banks of the depression
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 12 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
depth of water in depression is 1 ft.
Page 1 of 2 Wefforrntm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 7
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_
10YR3/2
N/A
N/A N/A
Sandy loam
- + Few Prominent an
10YR6/8 Few Distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetForm`m
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 8
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ';!es' No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (lTo) Transect ID: Upland D
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
agus gran i o ?a ree accinium corym osum ru
eec , mencan Blueberry, ig ush
ynca cen era ru + e sem?um semperv?rens ine
ay erry, out ern essamme, a ow
uercus a ca a ree FACU - Smilax ro un o is Vine FAG
a , out ern a reen rier, ommon
mus ae a ree onicerajaponica ine -
ine, o o y oneysuc e, apanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/8 = 62.50% FAC Neutral: 1/3 = 33.33%
Numeric Index: 25/8 = 3.13
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 wetFormcm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 8
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
Sand
2-18 B 2.5Y6/4 N/A N/A N/A Sand
-TF-2T- 10YR5/3 -N/A N/A N/A ISand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 WefFormtO1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
licant/Owner: NCDOT
sticiators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
o: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 9
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? aes oqo-) Transect ID: Wetland E
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum
- Indicator
e u a nigra ree ynca cen era 70 66
Birc ,River ay erry, outhern
accintum corym osum ru iqu? am ar s yraci ua ru +
Blueberry, igh us um, weet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/4 = 100.00% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 10/4 = 2.50
Remarks:
vegetation occurs along banks of depression
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 24 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NOWater-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
depth of water in depression is 2 ft.
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 9
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well D rained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
2.5Y6/3 N/A N/A NIA Sand
8-10 A/B 2.5Y5/2 N/A N/A N/A Sand
-TU-79- 2.5Y5/4 N/A N/A N/A Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Nes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 wefform""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 10
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site! Yes n4a tommunny w; ruiesL
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (IVd-) Transect ID: Upland E
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
agus gran ? o is ree accinlum corym osum ru
Beec mencan ueberry, ig ush
ynca cern era ru + e semium sempervirens ine
Bay erry, out ern essamine, el ow
uercus a ca a Tree FACU- Smilax ro un o is vine FAG
ak, out em a reen rier, ommon
inus ae a ree Lonicera Japonica
me, o to y oneysuc e, apanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/8 = 62.50% FAC Neutral: 1/3 = 33.33%
Numeric Index: 25/8 = 3.13
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormt"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 10
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well D rained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-2 77- 2.5Y5/3 N/A N/A N/A an
_ an
-Tg--24- I Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
es
(Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
Date: 4-Feb-2004
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 11
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Wetland F
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cerru rum ree onicerajaponica ine -
Map e, a Honeysuc e, apanese
a anus occi en a is ree - 7575715 vimmea er +
Sycamore, American icrostegium, Nepal
oo war is wrgm?ca Herb Smilax ro un i o is Vine FAC
hain ern, irgima reen ner, ommon

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 15/6 = 2.50
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 12 (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
depth of water in depression is 2 ft.
Page 1 of 2 Wefformtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 11
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
- Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_
10YR2/1
-- N/A
W
N/A
Loamy sand
7272-6-+ ommon Distinct
- Sandy clay loam
10-18 j 13 2.5Y5/4 j N/A N/A
NTA an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 12
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Upland Levee
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (Jqo-) Transect ID: Upland F
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a n?gra ree cer ru rum ree
irc ,River Map e, e
Smilax ro un ? o ?a ine on?cera Japon?ca ine -
Green brier, Common oneysuc e, apanese
a anus occ? en a ?s Tree FAC;W- ?qu? am ar s yrac? ua ree FAU+
ycamore,Amencan Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 = 2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NOWater-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Prolect/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 12
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-77- ---K- 2.5Y7/6 N/A N/A N/A San
- +
2.5Y613
N/A
N/A N/A
an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
es
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 WetForrntm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 13
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (go-) Transect ID: Wetland G
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
73-57757r-um ree FAC u a is viminea er +
Maple, Red icrostegium, epa
a anus occi en a is ree - Smilax ro un i o is ine
Sycamore, American reen rier, ommon
oo war is virginica Herb onicerajaponica Vine FAC-
Chainfern,Virginia oneysuc e, apanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 15/6 =2.50
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 24 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtf°
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 13
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ ---77- 1 OYR3/1 N/A N/A N/A Sandy loam
5-20+ Few Faint any loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetFormlm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ct/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
cant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
tigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 14
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Upland Levee
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (]TO) Transect ID: Upland G
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a n?gra ree FACW cer ru rum ree
arch, aver Map e, e
?
Smilax ro un ? o ?a me on?cera japon?ca ine 171K -
reenbrier, ommon Honeysuc Ie,Japanese
a anus occ? en a ?s ree FACW- ?qu? am ar s yrac? ua Tree +
Sycamore, American Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 =2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 14
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_
2.5Y7/6
N/A
N/A
an
+
2.5Y6/3
N/A
N/A N/A
an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
IWetiand Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 15
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No community iu: uepression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es o Transect ID: Wetland H
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cer ru rum ree FAU Smilax ro un o ?a ine
ap e,Red reen rier, ommon
a anus occi en a is ree - omcerajaponica ine -
ycamore,American oneysuc le, apanese
oo war is virg?n?ca Herb asman ium a i o wm Herb -
hain ern, irginia ea- ats, n ian
u a is vimmea er +
icrostegium,Nepal

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/7 = 71.43% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 18/7 =2.57
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 6 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 15
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes (M
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-U-77- 10YR3/1 N/A N/A R7A i loam
+
10YR4/1
N/A
N [A N/A
any loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Page 2 of 2 WeTormt'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 _ Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 16
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Upland Levee
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Upland H
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
757575 nrgra ree FACW cer ru rum ree
irc ,River aple,Re
Smilax ro un r o ra ine onicera japonica ine -
reen rier, ommon oneysuc e,Japanese
a anus occr en a rs ree I-AUW- iqur am ar s yracr ua ree +
Sycamore, American um, weet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 =2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 16
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Q!
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_
2.5Y7/6
N/A
NIA N/A
an
- +
2.5Y6/3
N/A
N/A NIA
an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 Weffortntf0
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 17
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es oqo-) Transect ID: Wetland I
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
a anus occj en a is ree - arpinus caro 1niana ru FAG
ycamore,Amencan Horn eam, merican
onicerajaponica ine - mus amencana ree
oneysuc e, apanese 5m-,American
cer ru rum Tree Smilax ro un ? o is Vine FAC
ape, a reen rier, ommon

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 = 2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- YES Water Marks
YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: = 1 (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'O1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 17
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ + ay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 18
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (Zs' No Community ID: Upland Levee
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Transect ID: Upland I
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes S Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
(USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a nigra ree cer ru rum ree
irc , iver aple, e
Smilax ro un o is me onicera japonica me -
reen der, mmon Honeysuc e,Japanese
a anus occi en a is Tree iqui am ar s yrac? ua ree FAC+
Sycamore, American Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 =2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

Page 1 of 2 WetForm''
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 18
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
Sand
+ B 2.5Y6/3 N/A NIA N/A an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
ng
Page 2 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 19
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Pe No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Transect ID: Wetland J
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
- Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
axo ium is is um ree 7597 eersia exan ra er
ypress, a utgrass, lub- ead
uercus p e os ree - arex spp. er
a , i ow carex
arpinus Caro iniana ree FAC uercus mic auxii Tree -
orn eam, mencan a , wamp Chestnut
iqui am ar s race ua ree + yssa aqua ica ree
Gum, Sweet Water-Tupelo
asman ium a o ium Herb - uercus yra a ree
ea- ats, n ian a , vercup

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 9/10 =90.00% FAC Neutral: 7/7 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 19/10 = 1.90
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 5 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormcm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 19
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-779- ---77- 10YR4/1 N/A N/A NIA Clay loam
- +
1 OYR4/2
N/A
N/A N/A
an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 20
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Pe No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (IT o-) ID: Upland J
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(if needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
onicerajapornca me - inus ae a ree FAC
oneysuc e, apanese Pine, o olly
iqui am ar s yraci ua ree + a anus occi en a is ree -
um, weet ycamore, merican
cer ru rum Free FAC
ap e,Re

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 1/1 =100.00%
Numeric Index: 14/5 =2.80
Remarks:
plot taken along road
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormt'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 20
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
I OYR4/3
-1q7
N/A N/A
Loam
- Sandy clay
14-20 any Distinct Sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
roj
NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 21
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No community iu: Ft-u
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es oqo-) Transect ID: Wetland K
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
axo ium is is um ree eersia exan ra er
ypress,Bald utgrass, ub- ea
uercus p e os ree - arex spp. er .
a , i ow carex
arpinus taro iniana ree FAC uercus mic auxii Tree
Horn earn American a wamp Chestnut
iqui am ar s yrac? ua ree + yssa aqua ica ree
Gum, Sweet Water-Tupelo
asman ium a i o ium Herb - uercus yra a ree
ea- ats, n ian a vercup

L
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 9/10 = 90.00% FAC Neutral: 7/7 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 19/10 = 1.90
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 5 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 21
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-D--fg- -77- 10YR4/1 N/A N/A ay loam
- + 1 an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? CD No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WeTormtl
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 22
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 'Zs' No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? o Transect ID: Upland K
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
oniceraJaponica vine - inus ae a ree
oneysuc e,Japanese Pine, o oily
iqui am ar s race ua ree + a anus occi en a s ree -
Gum, Sweet ycamore, merican
cer ru rum ree FAC
ape, e

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 1/1 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 14/5 = 2.80
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 Wefformtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 22
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes T°
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ Sandy loam
-
I OYR4/4
N/A
N/A N/A
Sandy clay
- +
2.5Y6/3
2.5Y5/6
any Distinct
Sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
IWetiand Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 WetForm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 23
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es oTo-) Transect ID: Wetland L
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cer ru rum ree onicera japonica ine -
ap e, a oneysuckle,Japanese
a anus occidental is ree 7ACW- u a is viminea er +
ycamore,Amencan icrostegium, epa
oo war is virginica Herb Smilax ro un i o is Vine FAC
ain ern, irginia reen rier, ommon

T

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 15/6 = 2.50
Remarks:
vegetation occurs along banks of depression
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data
- YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 12 (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 23
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
10YR2/1 NIA N/A N/A Loamy sand
- + --C ommon Distinct Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Solis List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
l Remarks:
ng
Page 2 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 24
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (Jo,) Transect ID: Upland L
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
onicerajaponica ine - mus ae a ree FAC
oneysuck e, apanese Pine, Loblolly
iqui am ar s race ua ree + a anus occi en a is ree 7AGW-
Gum,Sweet Sycamore, American
cer ru rum ree FAC
Maple, Red

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 1/1 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 14/5 =2.80
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormt`"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(9987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 24
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
' Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
IOYR413
N/A N/A
Sandy loam
- Sandy clay
14-20+ 13 2.5Y6/3 Z.byb/b any Distinct Sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 WetForm'm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 25
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Wetland M
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
- Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cer ru rum ree 777 onicera japonica ine -
ap e, ed oneysuck e, apanese
a anus occi en a is ree u a fla wmmea er +
ycamore,Amencan icrostegwm, Nepal
oo war is virginica Herb Smilax ro un i o is Vine FAG
ain ern, irginia Greenbrier, Common

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 15/6 =2.50
Remarks:
vegetation occurs along banks of depression
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data
- YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 12 (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 25
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes 0
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- Loamy sand
72720-+ 5 Common Distinct Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
ng
Page 2 of 2 WetForm2f0
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 26
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Forest
Transect ID: Upland M
oTo
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
- Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
onicerajaponica V-ine- 7A7 mus ae a ree
Honeysuc e, apanese me, o lolly
iqui am ar s yrac? ua ree + a anus occi en a is ree -
um, weet ycamore,Amencan
cer ru rum ree FAU
ape, e

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 1/1 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 14/5 =2.80
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 26
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
10YR4/3
N/A
N/A N/A
Sandy loam
1 OYR4/4 N/A N/A Sandy clay
14-20+ 1T 2.5Y6/3 2.5Y5/6 any Distinct an ycay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-450,
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 27
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ZeDs No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? oTo-) Transect ID: Wetland N
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
- Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
inus ae a ree 7717 cer ru rum ru
Pine, o o y ape, e
uncus a usus er + ris a s nc a er -
Rus o Grass, Eneland Three-Awn
upa onum ep op y um Herb + iqui am ar s yrac? ua Shrub +
Fennel Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 1/1 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 17/6 = 2.83
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 1 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 27
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
I Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
2.6Y4/1
N/A
N/A
N/A
ay
- Few Prominent ay
8-10 2.5Y7/2 2.5Y5/6 any Prominent ay
- +
2.5Y6/6
2.5Y7/2
Common Prominent
ay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Res No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetFormt10
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 28
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site7 a No community iu: t-orest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Upland N
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes S Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
uercus a a ree FAZ= Smilax ro un r o is ine
a , ite Greenbrier, Common
uercus a ca a ree - ex opaca ru -
a , out em Red o y, merican
agus gran ? o is ree FACU
eec ,American

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 1/5 =20.00% FAG Neutral: 0/3 = 0.00%
Numeric Index: 18/5 =3.60
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 28
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
10YR4/3
NIA
N/A N/A
ay
- + Few Faint ay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors TO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Ao Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes o
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes Re
marks:
Page 2 of 2 WetFormLfO
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 29
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (ITo) Transect ID: Wetland O
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
acc ans a i o is Shrub upa ovum ep op y um Herb +
Fa se- illow, astern Fennel
Phytolacca amencana er + uncus a usus er +
o ewee ommon us , o
run inaria gigan ea er e u a mgra Tree FAGW
Cane, Giant arch, aver
iqui am ar s yraci ua ree + Magnolia virgmiana ru +
Gum, Sweet agno ia, weet ay
inus ae a ree FA Lonicera japonica vine
Pine, ob o y oneysuc e, apanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 8/10 =80.00% FAC Neutral: 4/5 = 80.00%
Numeric Index: 27/10 =2.70
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 29
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Roanoke Loam
Map Symbol: Ro Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Ochraquult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Q
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
--Z-7- 1 OYR2/1 N/A NIA N/A Sandy clay loam
Few Faint Sandy clay loam
14-20+ 1 ommon Prominent Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
11
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetFormb"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Proiect No: B-450,
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 30
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (Jqo-) Transect ID: Upland O
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
n ropogon virg?nicus er - arex spp. er
Broom-Sedge carex
upa onum ep op y um er + uncus a usus er +
Fennel Rush,955ff

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 3/4 = 75.00% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 10/4 = 2.50
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 3 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormff0
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 30
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ Sandy loam
5-10 B 2.5Y614 2.5Y6/6 Few Prominent Clay loam
---7.376/4 2.5Y6/6 Many Prorninent Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes (IQo
Page 2 of 2 wetFormtm
1JA
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name '31- J Nearest Road
R
County -r?? £ cwt Wetland Acreage % Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator E- (' ' U`t S G 1 Date 2&Z O
7

Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/i mile upstream, upslope or .
• On and or lake radius)
• On perennia stream • Forested/natural vegetation 22%
• n interrmttent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban -IS %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface 5 %
• Other
Soil Series rz f- Dominant Vegetation
4
,
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
/
T
Peat (2) to
• Predominantly mineral - non-sandy,,
-Y?
/
/
• redomman (3) u
/
L
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semip mmane_nt ly_to permanently' flooded or inundated
Ditched or channelized ??- • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• .Total wetland width > 1 ee • Intermittently hooded or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select
(Zotto and hardwood forest
ea wa er
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 = p2
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 = 7
RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
G7
COMMENTS: L,3/11 300 ? 010Vd „?' C'r0 . A >70 ?/" ? ? 2 ?=
n ?- _ ,ass r?/, c?•r-t'vr artc.?
W?rn 300' % dial. i d1- SfhSav,.? ??dCO a,?rJ .
C?obd sd cov?J _ L? 1c ul (orc . J..d - sa - 9n s;--?

?r rny.nJt.?GI ?'.Itr•el n ° F-n-?c,Jn. 7 SO9/?'GOJf! L-7
/ J )
?'tCf?SS'iyl£ p?-l?•ia-? F.?S?J ?r'„?,°?P.f?cr(? '-
(J ?
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project yName Nearest Road
Count r,:4
CGc> ?F Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator Date b
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or .
• On pond or lake radius)
C- Dn perennial stream • Forested/natural vegetationZ%
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban 7!? %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface S %
• Other
Soil Series o CtV, 1A SA- Dominant Vegetation
6
J (1) .
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) C?vt L
• rminantly mineral - non-san y
3 s? jL !,z
• Predominantly sandy. ? (
)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography
Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
itched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland wi > 100 feet • - Intermittently flooded or inun ate
• - No evidence of floo 1n or surface water
c
Wetland
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 = I
?U
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =

RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
?_ 35
COMMENTS: 6t1V 1.J -' . w L I (`- P? -; 7() v- . ?ru?O. L oZ r? ` I
o 'I' Gant- . ,
o Jig ?n in f -1
r+y? ? sf s.??-Fri.,( ?. S ? f ?,-5-f-? Lw?? ? = I
OC
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name ? Nearest Road 'Si L 1 o S
County Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator S? Date Z-/ b `/
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within Y2 mile upstream, upslope or .
• On pond or lake radius),
On perennial strea • Forested/natural vegetation ?%
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban L'S %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface f %
• Other
Soil Series ?L Dominant Vegetation
I
(1) ?
Wl aa-
Predominantly organic - humus muck r
eat (2) /t
• Predominantly mineral - non-sandy
3
`I r£
r /1
• Predominantly sandy. (
) Z
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semi permanently to permanently' flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally floode or 19 ate
otal wetland width > 100 feet Intermittently flooded or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland T e?select_one)
Bottomlai?d hardwood forest
? crferest-
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:

Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen .
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
RATING VALUES:
Water storage X 4.00 = I -
a-Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = b
Pollutant removal X 5.00 = /
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
b
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
COMMENTS: 0 Je r (tJ -t-
j Y 7
0- > -;b"/.
_. ,j . ?Z A C_ ` '3
rt o-f ds 5cr`'iV_7'd l 0 °?` ?,? 4 d-Tp/ic S5. 2t? a C. ( I (A) S+ 3
-GdF1r? t? tr 6e4,,' A It d . So-fins,-as a s .s-l cfir _ ?l
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Q ' V ? / Nearest Road s D S t `? %^ S < I
County Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator Date_ _21&110 7
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/a mile upstream, upslope or .
• On and or lake radius)
• On perennial stream /? ASS; N ?? • Forested/natural vegetation 0%
• On intermittent stream GI • Agricultural, urban/suburban 3S %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surfaces %
• Other
Soil Series /Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
` (2)
i ?bv?. d a
i
V
Predominantly mineral -non-sandy
3 rr
L b
• Predominantly sandy )
( t /ii(
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• e to po aphy • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or clianne zee • Seasongyl floode I orinundat
• o w 1 > 100 feet • Intermittently flooded or inundated
• No evidence o 0o in or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
E hemera wet ann
Carolina 7Hay
Other
Water storage La. X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 = vt
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS:
w, ?
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name !? -t Nearest Road Jk
County ? CA C h ?. Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator Date % . 1 VI O Cat
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/i mile upstream, upslope or .
• _Qn p_ond._or radius)
• On perennial stream ( c??f SSi
! • Forested/natural vegetation Lv %
• On intermittent stream Agricultural, urban/suburban V %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface S %
• Other
Soil Series. Dominant Vegetation
???f ?
(1) y
,vZ ?
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2)
• anti mineral - non-sandy
• Predominantly sandy. (3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated 7 r
a
• Total wetland width > 100 feet •- - ?
-i?'f"errru?ten?ll`y?l`ooded or inundated
• No evi ence o floodin or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh '7 ?cfro-)
Mhem f ,s 6ra we an
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage J_ X 4.00 = 1
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = 0
Pollutant removal X 5.00 = 5
Wildlife habitat ! X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =
I?
RATING VALUES:
High=60.or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS:

Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name - Ll.SO -1
Nearest Road 5;1z' i so S C D' C.k£/t S fJ
County C ?? £ Gown £_ Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator, ?.S 0 S C ?.J Date
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1A mile upstream, upslope or .
• On and or lake radius)

clog 'CJn'perennia s • Forested/natural vegetation -%
• n tnt'ernu a eam • Agricultural, urban/suburban 3<- %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface
• Other
Soil Series Aominant Vegetation
(1) ?rnnr?a0d
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or y
Peat _
(2) Cam
• nantly nun - -san
?
• Predominantly and
?.

(3) ' `e
maole
IF
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet ntermittently flooded or inundate
• - No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
+a2 emera we an
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage -J-- X 4.00 =
Bank/Shorehne stabilization Q- X 4.00 = O
Pollutant removal_ X 5.00 = 1
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value Q X 4.00 = O
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 = I
RATING VALUES:
as
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
COMMENTS:
6-
Wetland Rating Worksheet n r
Project Name 450 Nearest Road 2 S S F/I S?
County Ede s ez_ Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator 1F SLJ -DCLJ , UES Date Zjy/a
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or .
• On pond or lake radius)
• non rem-'? • Forested/natural vegetation (,OW %
• On intermittent stream Agricultural, urban/suburban%
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation
?
(1) ?'C'Cla'l?Wfl
_
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat
Belli (2)
ed _
_6 na
• Predominantly sandy.
(3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently' flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet •
• - No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bo /fen
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage _12NN_ X 4.00 =
Bank/Shorehne stabilization x 4.00--
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 = 1
Recreation/ Education / X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
a?
COMMENTS: & Q ? )
04
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name T " y?0 7 Nearest Road S? ?Sd ?'£?S Kd
County Gf? E Goyw? ?. Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator_ Date Z/q/0
Y
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within V2, mile upstream, upslope or .
• On and or lake radius)
• er pia stre Forested/natural vegetation &0%
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface S %
• Other
Soil'Series Dominant Vegetation
(1) ?tot'11
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2
•
• e ?yinpral _ pnn-san
redominantly sandy.
(3)
,++? kfty, %?N&<
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently' flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet • n er ded or mun ate
• - No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Carolina Bay
Other
. Water storage X 4.00 = 9
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = -
V
Pollutant removal X 5.00 = X
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 = ,
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:
a?
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
COMMENTS: ac rj Y"".-
WZ
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name - Ys D Nearest Road 52 15,65 ?D'LILSIS 12)
County L 64y-n?C. Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet) -
Name of Evaluator i S L) , £ S ?c J Date 2 I VIO y
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within Y2 mile upstream, upslope or .
• On and or lake radius
• ennia • Forested/natural vegetation 0 %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban S %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
(
'
r?id
Peat - (2) rY1
C_
G/J
redomtnantly mineral - non-sandy
"
• Predorrunan y san y (3) S
_ K "V JLl oc?
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
itc a or nlinnn 17 1P. • Season e o ced
• wetland width > 100 ee Intermittently flooded or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water

Wetland
ttomland hardwood fores
Headwater ores
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
I /
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 = '
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = 6
Pollutant removal x 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 = ?y
Aquatic life value X 4.00 = `
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:
? 67
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
COMMENTS: 4, (JA
W-)--
Wetiand Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road
County C" E- _ Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator ?S c-) S J Date
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or ..
• On pond or lake radius)
• OWN"
,,y!. 1e • Forested/natural vegetation .55%
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburbanyQ %
• +Within interstream divide • Impervious surface -5%
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation
(1)
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat
(2)
?Wek<um
• re. o n - -sa d
?
• Predominantly sandy. . (3) ?Qh
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semi ep rmanently to permanently flooded or inundated
•
• Ditched or channelized
otal wetland width > eet •
• 49- nl- ooc?e?'orr"mun a
intermittently flooded or inundated
• - No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
[ an oo_ _ res
eadwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education rx 1.00 = 3
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
g- J,
COMMENTS:
UK-
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name L S b q Nearest Road S t S a 62 Lk e nS
County E Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator S c 3 t,) s C LJ Date ?< 6
pd)
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• n,= Pr..g_nn?ial s~ tr • Forested/natural vegetation ,1%
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban V40 %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface Z %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation -

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) .]oM
• onantl mineral - non-sand
• Predominantly sandy. (3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
plra h
Stee • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• ?
-15i_tched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet' n er tl flooded or inun
• . No evidence of oo m or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
oSwarn forest
fla
osm
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
8
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal x 5.00 = t
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
I
L4
Aquatic life value X 4.00 = p
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
HN
COMMENTS:
WL
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name K SO Nearest Road .SZ (..So5 t1b, Gk€n t
County ?1-44 £Gcv+14 C. Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
V ``
Name of Evaluator CJ D.. -2 IL 110
P-di
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/i mile upstream; upslope or .
• On pond or lake radius)
• perenni tlt? • Forested/natural vegetation $S %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface-5 %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation
?
^ ?r
. c.
?Q?
(1)
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) _OeAt-'cYK
• orrunant v Honer -non-
t
• Predominantly sandy. (3) Iyl
o '-
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet • TAFTELut-FFIX e or inundate
• ' No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
SIr"a1
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value _I X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS:
W V?
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name `? ?d
Nearest Road ??. ?S0 5 ,(? G S
County C.?a £C&-'L 'Z- Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator IF-SO -4 L F S , 1b C o Date /(//0 7'
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• Forested/natural vegetation 60 %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban 3.5 %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface 6 %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation

(1)
tie.
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or t
Peat (2)
• e ormnan - no - n
-

• waft
Predorrunan y.sany
(3) --??
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Season flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet termittentlyy ooded o nund"ate
• No evidence of 77 in or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
?Bp4o"`41 "
f?.1aE1iTP???, n
d•arroolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat _J X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education --- X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS: Gtmw 9&
0?
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name ` ?S d 7 Nearest Road sq-5
County LGr?t f-Gay L. 7 Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator :,-,5 C Date oZ A/ 6 y
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or .
• On pond or lake radius)
• On perennial stream • Forested/natural vegetation To
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation
;
(1) o e
z,? f
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) MS-r-
• redonunantly mineral - non-san J
• Predominantly sandy (3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or chid • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• .
otal wetland width > 1 0 eet • Intermittent]. floo ted
• • b evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
SLet forest
C a RA 1'5
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 = ^
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = Q
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 = 44
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
39
COMMENTS:
\? ?,'
wo
/Wetland Rating Worksheet n /
Project Name Nearest Road s'? so S ' ?'? £n S I
County Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator ?? E S f7CC.? Date Ado
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• On perennial stream • Forested/natural vegetation _%
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban Sj %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface -,rL-%

• ?ttl3rr/
Soil Series t?Dominant Vegetation
(1) C i9`p.
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) _A?!CUm
• Predominantly mineral - non-sandy
3
ft 6f'1 ?
• Predominantly sandy )
(
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• d? or channelized
itche • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• ?
otal wetland wi t _> fee • rmitten Qogg"
r lnun a e
,.?
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select ones ___
motto and ardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 = /
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal- X 5.00 = I
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS:
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICANT NAME ?C 0

DATE
r !?
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) ?-
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN ?r^/ ?M ?iL D COUNTY/CITY G? / £ C cYY; ?o?
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS `?~u/?^ /?Gc r.- . J
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
V Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
/ Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
v Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
y.- Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
a5S;bl
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Stmambanks
Channel Substrate 1/'74'
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) 910 r o
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
V Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June through Sept.)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
Important To Domestic Water Supply? V` IN
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? C?/ N Approx. Drainage Area:
Determination:
Perennial Channel (stop) e Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no id) (attach map indicating location of important(unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager)

P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98

INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICANT NAME NC `D DATE 4116) `f
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert(,} relocation, etc.) C£ b ? Gd Gr /
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN rA/ f <v? l C. y COUNTY/CITY del
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS S?? y /?? %- "
P SP NP Observation Continents or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
v, Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
S.
?
.y'
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure)
o v
1/ Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue) (a o ,,.tip S,. S
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June'throu Sept.)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
? Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y /e
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y No Approx. Drainage Area:
11111/11111/lll/l/lll/1/ll/11111/11111///111111111/1111111111/llllllllllllll/11111/1111111/l%ll/111111/l//ll/ll/lll/ll/lll11111111/11111/1111111111/lll/1111111//ll/!ll/1111//l/l/111111/ll//ll/ll1/lll/lll////l/l/11111111111
Determination:
Perennial Channel (stop) B Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials _
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no id) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager)
iiiuiiniuinillnl/11111/illlll//////1111/lll////l/1111///l//l/ll/11111/l/l//1111111//lll//11111/l//l/lll/l/ll/l/ll//l/llllllll//l//l//lll/l/l///l//ll/ll//l//ll/1111/l///l//l//111111///l///l//l//l/ll/l////////lll/11111//
P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name:
DWQ Project Number:
River Basin: -/"-/ PMI4r. o
County: Evaluator: C;fi.,J
Nearest Named Stream: ???j? ,?atitude: Signature:
Date: USGS QUAD: // Longitude: Location/Directions:
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural strewn-this.
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? (.2) .1 2 3
MOTE: !fBed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosiu Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2°a Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
II Hydroloey Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: _L
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:

II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter ?-1
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 1 1.5 `
Last Known Rain? *NOTE. I Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Ski This Ste And #5 Below*
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? es=l.5 No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: --
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Ski This Ste UNLESS SAV Present* .
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary), ?? (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: ?j ?? 0 ! l River Basin: / Pa,,- 1; G o County: % Evaluator: t?
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: ktitude: Signature:
Date: 2. 0 L/ USGS QUAD: Longitude: Lo cation/Directions:
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed

3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3 ?£ n£ ?o??a4?s
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 ( 3' os5??? (C rl' L?`'`r
t*NDTF- If Red & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2°° Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: I
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since . 0 .5 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE.- If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)?,?, Yes=15 No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly F'ACW stly C Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 5 0 0
As Noted Above Ski This Ste UNLESS SAV Present* .
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: .S
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)=?JIf Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
B-4504
- -----------
? .' Imo; .t `? ? , ?,`, ? _ Y I ??r f ?f' 4?ir' I .??- ?ilriiPPP,.
/' (?`? ?\ it G-?/l ? ? , °G c_ i1,'^?,'4ih. aia • f ? /? \l t f?l?__ ??\ ?
4 , ? r g ???,,Cy
/ j i-•5?'t \.•" ._ -- I I r Uri ?' s `-?
Inn
'Ar
/• '? ; ', ? ?t. fJ •?a is ?'f
i gam- ? ? (' ?+ • ? - ? ?;
24 4 `t !
Scat 1"1= 2000'
Sourc ; OSGS 7.5 M'r a les S,y?PP? r1 ?? '' `
Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Zes' No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (IT 61) ID: Wetland A
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
run inaria gigan ea er uercus yra a ree OBL
Cane, Giant a vercup
a anus occi en a is ree - igus rum sinense ru rx=
Sycamore, American Privet, Chinese
cer ru rum Shrub e u a nigra Tree
ape, a irc aver

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 6/6 = 100.00% FAC Neutral: 4/4 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 13/6 =2.17
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 2 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTorm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 1
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon
-
- (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- 77 1 OYR3/1 N/A N/A -N/A ay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
ng
Page 2 of 2 WetFormTM"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
. Plot ID: 2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Pes No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (lqo) Transect ID: Upland A
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
ymp ocos inc one ru run inane gigan ea er
Horse-Sugar Cane, Giant
or onia asian us ree accinium corym osum ru
ay, o o y ue erry, ig us
iqui am ar s yraci ua ree FAC+ Mitchella repens Herb +
Gum,Sweet Partridge-Berry
yrica ceri era ru +
ay erry, out em

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 6/7 = 85.71% FAC Neutral: 3/4 = 75.00%
Numeric Index: 19/7 = 2.71
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(9987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 2
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_
1 OYR3/2
N/A
N/A N/A
Loamy sand
Sandy loam
c ommon rominen any oam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
I Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 WeTorm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 3
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Zes No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (1%-) Transect ID: Wetland B
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
run inaria gJgan ea er uercus nigra ree
ane, cant a , ater
iqui am ar s race ua ree + ersea or onta ru
Gum, Sweet ay, e
accinium corym osum ru u a fla viminea Herb +
Blueberry, ig us icrostegium, epa
Smilax ro un o ?a ine a semium sempervirens ine rA7
reen ner, ommon essamine, a ow

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FACT
(excluding FAC-) 8/8 = 100.00% FAC Neutral: 3/3 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 21 /8 =2.63
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 6 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm°i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 3
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ Sandy loam
2.5Y3/1 5YR5/6 ew Distinct Silt loam
10-18 Few Faint an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 WetFormt'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Upland .?
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
ymp ocos ?nc or?a ru run ?nana g?gan ea er
Horse-Sugar Cane, Giant
or on?a as?an us ree T7 W acc?n?um corym osum ru
ay, o o y ue erry, ig us
?qu? am ar s yrac? ua Tree FAC+ ? c e a repens Herb +
Gum, Sweet Partridge-Berry
ynca cen era ru +
Bayberry, Southern

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 6/7 =85.71% FAC Neutral: 3/4 = 75.00%
Numeric Index: 19/7 = 2.71
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 Wefform""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 2
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes C
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-7-9- -A 107R77-- NIA N/A N/A Loamy sand
_
1 OYR3/4
N/A
N/A
Sandy loam
16-22 C ommon Prominent any loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Solis List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 WeTormtr
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 5
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 'Zs' No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? o Transect ID: Wetland C
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Smilax ro un ? o ?a me uercus yra a ree
reen vier, ommon a , vercup
run mans g?gan ea er cer ru rum ree
Cane, Giant ape, e
acc?n?um corym osum Shrub ?qu? am ar s yrac? ua Tree +
Blueberry, ig us Gum, Sweet
uercus n?gra ree FAG ex opaca ru -
75ak,Water o y, mencan

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 7/8 = 87.50% FAC Neutral: 3/3 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 20/8 = 2.50
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: = 0.5 (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 0 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTorm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 5
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
Oa 107ru/T-- N/A N/A N/A Loam
Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 Wr
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 6
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es o Transect ID: Upland C
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
uercus a a ree FAC= or onia asian us Shrub
a , hite ay,Lo oily
accinium corym osum ru Smilax ro un i o is ine
Blueberry, ig us reen rier, ommon
run inaria gigan ea Herb a semium sempervirens Vine FAC
Cane, Giant essamme, a ow
cer ru rum ree ex opaca ru -
ap e, e o y, mencan
inus ae a ree
ine, o to y

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 7/9 = 77.78% FAC Neutral: 3/4 = 75.00%
Numeric Index: 259 = 2.78
Remarks:
nTUMULUUT
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (/n.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormt'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 6
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ Sandy loam
-
2.5Y614
2.5YR4/3
Few Prominent
any loam
10YR6/8 Few Distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 we''
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 7
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Q!
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
10YR3/2 N/A N/A N/A Sandy loam
- +
2.5Y6/2
3
Few rom?nent
an
10YR6/8 Few Distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Res No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 weTorm`m
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 7

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on the reverse side) Zes' No
oTo-)
Yes o Community ID:
Transect ID:
Field Location: Depression
Wetland D
VEGETATION (USFWS Re gion No. 2 )
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicato
arpinus caro miana ru iqui am ar s yrac1 ua ree +
orn earn, merican um, weet
accinium corym osum ru rAGW ex opaca ST, ru -
ue erry, ig bus of y, mencan
e u a mgrs Tree I-ALM agus gran ? o ha ree FAGU
i-h,- R iver eec , mencan

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/6 = 66.67% FAC Neutral: 2/3 = 66.67%
Numeric Index: 17/6 =2.83
Remarks:
occurs along the banks of the depression
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water Marks
YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 12 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
of water in depression is 1 ft.
Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 8
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Zes No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (1TO-) Transect ID: Upland D
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum
_
__ Indicator
agus gran 1 o is ree accinwm corym osum ZE
rU7
eec , merican ue erry, ig us
yrica cern era ru + e semium semperwrens ine
ay erry, out em essamme, a ow
uercus a ca a ree Smilax ro un i o is Vine FAC
a out ern a reen ner, ommon
gnus ae a ree omcerajapon?ca ine -
me, o o y oneysuc e, apanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/8 = 62.50% FAC Neutral: 1 /3 = 33.33%
Numeric Index: 25/8 = 3.13
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NIA (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: S
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well D rained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes (
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
Sand
2.5Y6/4 N/A N[A Sand
18-24 C 10YR5/3 N/A N/A N/A an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
nt
Page 2 of 2 wetr
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 9
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (JTO-) Transect ID: Wetland E
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(if needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Indicator
e u a nigra ree ynca ceri era +
irc iver ay erry, outhern t
accinium corym osum ru iqui am ar s yraci ua +
ue erry, igh us Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/4 = 100.00% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 10/4 = 2.50
Remarks:
vegetation occurs along banks of depression
H T UKULUU T
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 24 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in,) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
depth of water in depression is 2 ft.
Page 1 of 2 WetForm1m
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 9
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes C
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ an
_ an
10-18 2.5Y5/4 N/A NIA N/A Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 w,
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
,ner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 10
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Upland E
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
agus gran ? o ?a ree FA= acc?n?um corym osum ru FACW
Beech, American ue erry, ighbus
ynca ceri era ru + e sem?um sempervirens ine
ay erry, out ern essamine, a ow
uercus a ca a ree m? ax ro un ? o ?a Vine FAC
Oak, Southern Red Greenbrier, Common
?nus ae a ree TXZ? on?cera japonica ine -
ine, o o y Honeysuc e, apanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/8 = 62.50% FAC Neutral: 1/3 = 33.33%
Numeric Index: 25/8 = 3.13
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormSp1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 10
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tarborro Loamy Sand
Map Symbol: TaB Drainage Class: Somewhat Ex. Well D rained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipssament Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
-
-- Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_
A
2.7797-
N/A
ITTK
N/A
an
2.5Y6/4 N/A N/A N/A Sand
an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 we+r
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 11
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Zes' No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? o Transect ID: Wetland F
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
(USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cerru rum ree onicerajaponica ine -
ap e, a oneysuc e, apanese
a anus occi en a is ree - u a is vimmea er +
ycamore, mencan icrostegium, Nepal
oo war is wrgmica Herb mi ax F-3 75-n =75 13 vine FAG
ain ern, irgima reen rier, ommon

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 272 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 15/6 = 2.50
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines

Field Observations YES Sediment Deposits
YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 12 (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
depth of water in depression is 2 ft.
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 11
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
- Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-12 10YR2/1 N/A 179
N/A Loamy sand
12-20+ C ommon Distinct Sandy clay loam
Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
11
1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 WP'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 12
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (1?es No Community ID: Upland Levee
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es o Transect ID: Upland F
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a nigra ree cer ru rum ree FX;
arch, aver
- Maple, Red
mf ax ro un i o is ine 777 onicerajapornca me -
reen ner, ommon oneysuc e, apanese
a anus occi en a s ree iqu? am ar s yrac ua ree FAC+
ycamore, mencan um, weet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 =2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (/n.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTorm1°
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
NCDOT
Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
SOILS
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 12
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes C!
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
an
- + an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes
Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 W,
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 13
w 114ummi Larcumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (Yeses o Transect ID: Wetland G
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Reuion No. 21
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cer ru rum ree u a ?a wmmea Herb +
a
e
a
p
, icrosteglum,Nepa
a anus occi en a is ree - Smilax ro un 1 o is Ine FAC
ycamore, mencan Greenbrier, Common
oo war is virgirnca Herb onicera/aponica vine -
am ern
ir
l
,
g
nia oneysuck e, apanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% Numeric Index: 15/6 = 2.50
Remarks:
Hnr;V
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
YES Drift Lines
Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: = 24 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L
Page 1 of 2 WetForm""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
SOILS
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 13
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes C°)
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
=- -A 1 UVRTT-- N/A N/A Sandy loam
- + Few Faint any loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 w,
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 14
uo normai wrcumstances exist on ine size r res ivo L.ommumzy w: upiana Levee
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Upland G
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes S Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a nrgra ree cer ru rum ree
irc iver ape, e
Smilax ro un r o ra ine onicera japon?ca me 7-77
reen ner, ommon oneysuc e, apanese
a anus occr en a rs ree FACW- iqur mbar s yracr ua ree FAC+
Sycamore, American Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 =2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
NO Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 Wefformt1O
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 14
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_
A
2.7777T-
NIA
N/A N/A
an
- +
2.5Y6/3
N/A N/A
an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 W,
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 15
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (Yes1 No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es o Transect ID: Wetland H
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cer ru rum ree Smilax ro un ? o ?a ine
ape, a reen rier, ommon
a anus occ? en a ?s ree - on?cerajapon?ca ine
ycamore,Amencan oneysuc e, apanese
oo war ?a v?rg?n?ca Herb asman ?um a ? o ?um Herb
am ern, irgmia
-- ea- ats, n ian
u a ?a vim?nea er rXC+
Microstegium, Nepal

F-
t

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/7 = 71.43% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 18/7 =2.57
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 6 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (/n.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
SOILS
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 15
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- i loam
-T2--2-4+-- any loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 WetFormt'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 16
uv Nurmar Lrrcumstances exist on the site? (Zes' No Community ID: Upland Levee
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? o Transect ID: Upland H
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a Mgra ree FALM cer ru rum ree FAC
irc aver ape, e
Smilax ro un i o fia Vine FAC onicerajaponica Vine FAC-
Greenbrier,Common oneysuc e, apanese
a anus occi en a hs ree - iqui am ar s yraci ua Tree +
Sycamore, American Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 = 2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY

NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTorm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 16
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
-
- Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_
A
T57719-
N/A
ITT
N/A
an
2.5Y6/3 N/A N/A an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Solis List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 Wei'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Proiect No: 13-455
NCDOT
Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 17
uo rvormai Loircumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes o Transect ID: Wetland I
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
a anus occi en a is ree - arpinus caro rrnana ru FAC;
ycamore, mencan orn eam, mencan
onicerajaponica Vine mus amencana ree FACW
oneysuc e, apanese m, mencan
cer ru rum ree FAC Smilax ro un o is vine
ape, a reen rier, ommon

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FA C:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 =2.67
Remarks:
wvnoni nr_v
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
YES Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: = 1 (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 17
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- + ay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
,
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor
YES Aquic Moisture Regime
NO Reducing Conditions
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors
NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2
We+•
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/51te: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 18
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Zes No Community ID: Upland Levee
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Transect ID: Upland I
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
e u a nigra ree cer ru rum ree
irc aver ape, e
Smilax ro un o is 1ne onicera japonica ine -
reen rier, ommon oneysuc e, apanese
a anus occien a is ree - iguiam ar s yraci ua Tree FAG+
Sycamore, American Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 16/6 =2.67
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTorm m
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 18
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-4 A 2.5777r- N/A N/A an
+ an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Solis List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 We''
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
NCDOT
Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 19
uo Normai circumstances exist on the site,e a No community iu: Fit-u
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es Transect ID: Wetland J
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes T5 Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
axo ium is ?c um ree eersia exan ra er
ypress, a utgrass, lub- ea
uercus p e os ree - arex spp. er
a , i ow carex
arpmus caro iniana ree uercus mic auxii Tree
orn earn, mencan a wamp Chestnut
iqui am ar s yraca ua ree + yssa aqua ica ree
Gum, Sweet Water-Tupelo
asman ium a o ium er - uercus yra a ree
ea- ats, n ian a , vercup

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 9/10 =90.00% FAC Neutral: 7/7 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 19/10 = 1.90
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 5 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormtm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 19
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Q!
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
-
-
- ay loam
-TG--24
+ an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 We*-
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
!cant/Owner: NCDOT
>tigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 20
uo rvormai Circumstances exist on the site-? (Yes' No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (Jo-) Transect ID: Upland J
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
onicerajaponica Vine - inus ae a ree
oneysuc e, apanese ine, o lolly
iqui am ar s racy ua ree + a anus occi en a is ree -
um, weet Sycamore, American
cer ru rum ree FAG
ape, e

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 1/1 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 14/5 = 2.80
Remarks:
plot taken along road
NTUKULUUY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm`m
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 20
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Q!
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- T-r- Loam
_
10YR414
N/A
N/A N/A
an y c ay
14-20 any istmct an y clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon
NO Sulfidic Odor
NO Aquic Moisture Regime
NO Reducing Conditions
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors
NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 we.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No:
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 21
Uo IVormai uircumstances exist on the site,! a No community iu: F t-u
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es o Transect ID: Wetland K
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
axo ium is ?c um ree 7597- eersia exan ra er
ypress, a utgrass, u - ea
uercus p e os ree - arex spp. er .
a , i ow carex
arpinus caro finiana ree VAC uercus mic auxii ree -
orn earn, mencan a wamp Chestnut
iqui am ar s racy ua ree + yssa aqua ica ree
um, weet Water-Tupelo
asman ium a o ium er - uercus yra a ree
ea- ats, n ian a vercup

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 9/ 10 = 90.00% FAC Neutral: 7/7 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 19/10 = 1.90
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data YES Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 5 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtf°
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2UU4
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 21
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- ay loam
-f67 22F an
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
YES Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 WetFormti
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 22
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 'Zs' No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? o Transect ID: Upland K
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
onicerajapornca Vine mus ae a ree FAG
oneysuc e, apanese ine, o o y
iqui am ar s yraci ua ree FAG+ a anus occi en a hs ree -
um, weet ycamore, merican
cer ru rum ree
ape, e

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 1/1 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 145 = 2.80
Remarks:
uvnonl nn_v

NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormt"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 22
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- Sandy loam
- Sandy clay
14-20+ B 2.5Y6/3 - F 2.5Y5/6 any Distinct Sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 WeTorm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 23
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 'Zs' No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? o Transect ID: Wetland L
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
- Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cer ru rum ree FAG onicera japonica ine -
ap e, ed oneysuc e,Japanese
a anus occi en a is ree - u a fta vimmea er +
Sycamore, American icrostegium, Nepal
oo war is virgmica Herb mf ax ro un o is Vine
ain em, irgirna reen ner, ommon

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 15/6 = 2.50
Remarks:
vegetation occurs along banks of depression
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines

Field Observations YES Sediment Deposits
YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 12 (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm°i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
SOILS
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 23
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes C°
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- Loamy sand
-T2--20-+ Common Distinct Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
R
Hydric Soils Present? No
es
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 Wr
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
icant/Owner: NCDOT I County: Edgecombe
stigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 24
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Wes No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? (Jqo-) Transect ID: Upland L
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
onicerajapornca ine - inus ae a ree
oneysuc Ie,Japanese ine, o o y
iqui am ar s yraci ua ree + a anus occi en a is ree -
um, weet Sycamore, American
cer ru rum ree FAG
ape, e

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 1/1 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 14/5 = 2.80
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormcm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 24
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes QE0
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- -0 107RT/7-- N/A N/A N/A Sandy loam
- Sandy clay
- + any Distinct Sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes
es
Page 2 of 2 w' _
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
NCDOT
Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 25
?o Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Ze3s No Community ID: Depression
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? OT 6) ID: Wetland M
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(if needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
cerru rum ree onicerajapornca ine -
ap e, a oneysuc e, apanese
a anus occi en a is ree - u a is viminea er +
Sycamore, American icrostegium, Nepal
oo war is virginica Herb Smilax ro un o is vine FAG
ain ern, irgmia reen ner, ommon

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 15/6 = 2.50
Remarks:
vegetation occurs along banks of depression
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- YES Drift Lines
YES Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 12 (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtf0
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 25
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
oamy san
- + Common Distinct Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 WetFormt"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
V'vJ tit; J"e[ 040U4
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford

- Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 26
Nor
l Ci
D
o

[[
ma
rcumstances exist on the site?
s the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on the reverse side) a No
es (Jo)
Yes ommuniForest
Transect ID: Upland M
Field Location:
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common)
onicera Japonica Vine - inus ae a
oneysuc e, apanese me, ob olly
Stratum Indicator
ree FAG
iqui am ar s yraa ua ree FAC+ a anus occi en a is ree FA

um
weet GW-
, Sycamore, American
cer ru rum ree FAG
ape
e
,

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY FAC Neutral: 1/1 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 145 = 2.80
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L-
I
Page 1 of 2 url
WetForm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 26
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
_ Sandy loam
_
1 OYR4/4
N/A
N/A N/A
Sandy clay
2.5Y6/3 2.5Y5/6 any Distinct an y clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Page 2 of 2 wetr
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 27
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es o Transect ID: Wetland N
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
mus ae a ree FAG cer ru rum Shrub
ine, o o y ape, e
uncus a usus er + ns a s ric a er
us o Grass,Pineland Three-Awn
upa orium ep op y um Herb + iqui am ar s yraci ua Shrub +
enne Gum, Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 1 /1 =100.00%
Numeric Index: 17/6 = 2.83
Remarks:
" I YRVLVV 1
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: = 1 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm"
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 27
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee Silt Loam
Map Symbol: Wh Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- -A 2-5747- N/A N/A ay
-
2.5Y6/2
2.5Y5/6
Few Prominent
ay
- any rominent ay
10-20+ 2.5Y6/6 2.5Y7/2 ommon Prominent ay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 V11
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
- --""' Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 28
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es o Transect ID: Upland N
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side) 1-11
VEGETATION
(USFWS Reaion No. 21
nt Plant Species(Latin/Common)
a a Stratum
ree Indicator
FACU Plant Species(Latin/Common)
mi ax ro un o la Stratum
vin Indicator

te e FAC
reen rner, ommon
a ca a ree FACU-

t ern ed
R ex opaca Shrub
o y, merican
I-agus
an i o is ree FAGU
mencan

es that are OBL, FACW or FAC: FAC Neutral: 0/3
= 20.00% Numeric Index: 18 5 = 3.60
tRemarkFs-.
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remark
s):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
[ NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
ieId Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormlm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 28
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-6 A 10YR4/3 N/A N/A Clay
6-20+ 2.5Y6/6 2.5Y7/4 ew Faint ay
Hydric 5011 Inaicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes o Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes o
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes o
Hydric Soils Present? Yes o
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 wP'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 29
uo normal t ircumstances exist on the site-r a No community w: Ft-u
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es oqo-) Transect ID: Wetland O
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum
-
-
- Indicator
- Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
acc ans a imp o is S7r
u
F 7A7 upa orium ep op y um Herb +
False- i ow, astern Fennel
o acca amencana er + uncus a usus Herb +
okewee ommon us , o
run mana gigan ea Herb e u a nigra ree
Cane, Giant irc , aver
iqui am ar s yraci ua ree + agno is wrginiana ru +
Gum, Sweet agno ia, weet ay
inus ae a ree onicerajaponica Vine FAC-
Pine,Loblolly oneysuc e, apanese

T

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 8/ 10 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 4/5 = 80.00%
Numeric Index: 27/10 =2.70
Remarks:
11 - 11
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO. Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WeTormcm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
NCDOT
Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford
SOILS
Date:
County: Edgecombe
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 29
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Roanoke Loam
Map Symbol: Ro Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Ochraquult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
' Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- Sandy clay loam
- Few Faint Sandy clay loam
14-20+ Common Prominent Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions YES Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Page 2 of 2 WetFormt'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: B-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 30
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? es (lTo-) Transect ID: Upland O
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
n ropogon virginicus Herb - arex spp. er
room- a ge carex
upa onum ep op y um er + uncus a usus er +
Fennel us , o

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 3/4 = 75.00% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 10/4 = 2.50
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 3 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 Wefform""
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 8-4504 Project No: B-4504 Date: 4-Feb-2004
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Edgecombe
Investigators: Elizabeth Workman; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina
Plot ID: 30
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Dogue Fine Sandy Loam
Map Symbol: DgA Drainage Class: Moderately Well Drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Q!
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
- an y oam
- 2.5Y6/4 2.5Y6/6 Few Prominent ay loam
-
2.5Y6/4
2.5yb/b
any Prominent
ay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ms No
Hydric Soils Present? es (IQo
Page 2 of 2 WPB.

Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road ?
C,
County Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator "7 Date

Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• On perennial stream- • Forested/natural vegetation 1%
• n mterinittent stream
•
Agricultural, urban/suburban ='-• %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface
• Other
Soil Series ` a- Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2)
• Predominantly mineral - non-sandy `
• redomina tly'sat3d ?? (3) ,
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography. _. Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
_ _Ditched or channelized Seasonally flooded or inundated
Total wetland width > 1 ?feot • Intermittently flooded or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one) Bottomland hEdwood forest
Headwater forest _.?
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
R A TTNCC-
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 400-
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

COMMENTS:
300',
o? s

?oG?,,.?• cta . , ? %? ?F? ?

? 2 ?; _

-W/,^ 3 00' /h 0/.
sgl
Z C /Ga£ 5 f inn.,, F 7
c F ,l.`< . M_ ?Vll
('Sava 4?.,4 r-i s r I-A4 ' .. s P_ - _f. A C-A - Lln'? . J' - ¢ ?L-1' <;- - -_J_ +,I - I
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
,t"
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road
County_ Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator Date G
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within Y7 mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
?? On perennial stream....'1 • Forested/natural vegetation
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban Z5 %

•
Within interstream divide
• r
Impervious surface 5 %
• Other ,
Soil Series too n io c ei,_ f r Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) :
• o ' nantly mineral - non-sand'y` --?
• Predominantly sandy, x__ _ 1 ?? (3)

Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep tomography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
-
.pitched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland widkh> 100 feet t" gentl flooded or inundaated----,
• No evidence of floodin or surface water
c
Wetland TCPe select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest")
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 = f
`?
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 = '
COMMENTS: [ cP,,. -6"J Id.
G' (:9?{p?` r, ti t3 >'a ?.n-N--d,,-,. (?ti? SCJ - i ?1 c? ?l
? a e
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
_? 35
4->;t t
3
t
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name r= Nearest Road +
n
County Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator . Date -7- r,
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/s mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
,4- On perennial stream -•., • Forested/natural vegetation -70%

_,
On
• ntetm ittent stream
•
Agricultural, urban/suburban '- %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface `I %
• Other
Soil Series E_ Dominant Vegetation

t' Predominantly organic - humus - 'muck ',or
eat
(2)
• Predominantly mineral - non-sandy r
• Predominantly sandy (3)
.
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semi ermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or iriun3at6d
Total wetland width > 100 feet • Intermittently flooded or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetla"
T _e select one
_-
Bottomlahd hardwood forest `
?' -Hemdwaterforest°=-°
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
R A TTNG
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage T X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = b
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 = /
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

COMMENTS: r t.
n d? -t; ? ) J
/Iv? i SCF, '<__c? X10 ?!6 r?! 4of, £Pl ss- -f l r 1 1? P
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
- ;2JAac
0o ins daft' J_ p

Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name t % Nearest Road r
County , Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator Date ?-f ;' I >
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/s mile upstream, upslope or
• On and or lake radius)
,On perennial streamm _ • Forested/natural vegetation %
• On intermittent stream ' ` / • Agricultural, urban/suburban t `= %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface. %
• Other
Soil Series : Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or ) t
(2) r h a
• Predominantly mineral - non-sandy
• Predominantly sandy. (3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• -_S.teep [opo aphy
` • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
Ditched or channehzed
i
-
- • Seasonally flooded or inundated.,_
• otTw
etland-W
1
dff i > 100 feet Intermittently flooded or inundated
?.. _ No evidence of flood or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Car-olna B.ay __._ ..
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education -jCL X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
%y
COMMENTS:
I 1 ?'
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road _--?`
County Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator Date
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/i mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake--- ?, radius)
• erenmal stream .'j - -
-QnR-?___ r • Forested/natural vegetation : ???-' %
• On intermittent stream E • Agricultural, urban/suburban `` L%
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or 1
Peat (2)
!__..Preda 'nand mineral - non-sandy

•
Predominantly sand
(3) _
`?

hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently' flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet • Intermittently flooded or inundated
• - No evi ence of -flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
B-?
E hemera-rw"Y'etIand`4-w
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal_ X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
COMMENTS:

Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road
County C dc' I C'.' Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator S S J Date l Y h `f
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or
• On and or lake radius)
Un perennim s"tr am • Forested/natural vegetation %
• n mterrru?tte`n? S eam • Agricultural, urban suburban %
• Within interstream divide Impervious surface %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation
(1) ?ra?i??
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
°
Peat a C)tA
(2)
• ) tiflnantlyrru"r1tin=san }
• Predorrunantly sandy. (3) Q "\A Ole
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet • intermittently flooded or inundate
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
i?`emera we an
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage -J- X 4.00 = j
Bank/Shoreline stabilization _) X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal_ X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value 0 X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 = I
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
as
COMMENTS:
w 6-
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name *F! 450Y
Nearest Road S Z. (S d S b'-C'?Snl
County_ Edc €Ct-A? Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator G< S? L0 , 0E S Date_ Z ?yl b 7

Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/i mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• n e e fltT = • Forested/natural vegetation %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface . %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation
?
:
N \4 Dim:
To
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) i?,.f7.t Oy""
'-Z
• P e o Man 1 miner, no -, _ -
?
• Predominantly sandy. (3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet ?te
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
n2m?e
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 = p
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
a?
t
COMMENTS:. }a, ''
01+
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name WO 7 Nearest Road S/C
County Gt?ra Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator ?Sw Date_ Z 910
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or
• On and or lake radius)
• erg stre • Forested/natural vegetation 60 %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban V %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface S %
• Other
Soil Series ±Dominant Vegetation
`
`
(1) ?.Cr
,
.Q
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or ,
Peat (2) 9\0-6
•

•
JUWN11nagtj;Ng wine,
e "
- n-san
redominantly sandy.

3) t?;?'1= +
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet • nter ded or mun ate
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
B og/fen
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shorehne stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
?4
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education _I X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS: ` 1 tom'
WL
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name 7- Nearest Road 51p- 15"6-5 County l G? Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator S 0 Date 2 yl?

Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or
• On and or lake radiu
(fin n.Prennial area • Forested/natural vegetation %
4
On intermittent stream • `?
Agricultural, urban/suburba%
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface 5 %
• Other
Soil Series k_ Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Y ?d j
Peat - (2) ?
redormnan. y mineral -non-sandy
<
`T
`
• Predominantly san y (3) r iV
,
G'AI
,-t
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
ltc ed or ch Seasonall . e o ' ---;-
• wetland width >
-Tofff • Intermittently flooded or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water

Wetland
ttomland hardwood fores
Headwater or°"`
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
/
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
B og/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 = /6
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = b
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:
? 67
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
COMMENTS: (5,,.,,' tiw 4, 0 A
l )T
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name - LIS O `7
Nearest Road r ire
County ?O? q L? rb E- Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator ?,S J ?- } Date 2 f I/A

Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• <=` a i h • Forested/natural vegetation .55%
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban4Q-%
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
l
Peat (2)
• re onunantl?.mineral - non-sanv
((3)
• Predominantly sandy.
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
•
• Ditched or channelized
otal wetland width > ee •
• pon rL oo a or inun a
Intermittently flooded or inundated
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
a _woo res
eadwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 = p?
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS:
0 ?_
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name - Lls b Nearest Road
County Z_" . Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator S t 7 i^? S C Date %4_6

Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/Z mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)

•

nP?rennl- al_ _.,. ?'a?ma
?
Stie
• Forested/natural vegetation
-Z_%
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban Y40 %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface %
• Other
Soil Series g. ; Dominant Vegetation
n
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
'
Peat (2) tl M
• e?ie o nantly mineral - non-sandy
• Predominantly sandy (3) 'Tt'
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Stee a h • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• , it r channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet • enter ' .flooded or lnune
• No evidence of oo in or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swam forest
et fla
ocosln
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 = '
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower
? yN
COMMENTS:
WL
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road k f
County LP'l Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator a , > CJ Date
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within Y2 mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• p° eienni • Forested/natural vegetation ?!& %i
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban 4-5 %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface . ` %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) oy%
• edominant?l miner -non- ri,
N
• Predominantly sandy. (3) 0
WA t'e-
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet or inundate
• - No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bo /fen
era e
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value _ I X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =

RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

rc
COMMENTS:
CJ
W M
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name _ l
Nearest Road S K "'5 u.5 4 * e, i -C /"?-
Countca" r Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator O 'Fs, b c o Date -'a /q/0 Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/i mile upstream, upslope or

• On pond or lake radius)
• ? is? • Forested/natural vegetation W %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban -'?6 %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface 6 %
• Other
Soil Series
Dominant Vegetation
,
1
p
6i L-1
1
,1.4 f i
• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or ?
Peat (2) „
F't1 . jto-
• I- --''Corrunan`f l rff - no - an
• Predorrunantty san y (3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently' flooded or inundated
• Ditched or channelized • 3easo?flooded or inundated
• Total wetland width > 100 feet • termittently oho end or n n ate
• No evidence of Yood n ors ace water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
"?Bgo/fen
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 =
`
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value_ X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education x 1.00 =

RATING VALUES:
High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS: &ii( '
0?
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name Nearest Road S162- 157 0.5 6p C- 4 E4
County ?Je? Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
c.1 t
Name of Evaluator S? . £ C w Date 7
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/z mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• On perennial stream • Forested/natural vegetation o
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban U %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface %
• Other
Soil Series Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or
Peat (2) iezn ?.
• " omuna eral - non
-san ,
• ce
Predominantly sandy (3)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• Ditched or
channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• rc
? wetland width 1100 eet • Intermittently flooded oar inWdat
ed
?
,
• o evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swam forest ?y
Wet fla r= `r.
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Water storage X 4.00 = '
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal ..7 X 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat _..27
;-
X
2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 = 44
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =

Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS: ??. "
L) o
Wetland Rating Worksheet
Project Name L15-6 L/ Nearest Road s? f SOS ?7?,eKr £re 5 f
f
County C_ Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet)
Name of Evaluator c s D C ?.J Date / d o q
Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or
• On pond or lake radius)
• On perennial stream • Forested/natural vegetation %
• On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban/suburban -IS %
• Within interstream divide • Impervious surface %
• ?(,ttber?
Soil Series l Dominant Vegetation

• Predominantly organic - humus, muck or s
Peat (2) ? AC?IQW,
• Predominantly mineral - non-sandy
3
• Predominantly sandy. (
)
Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness
• Steep topography • Semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated
• itched or channelized • Seasonally flooded or inundated
• o al wetland 1 t> fee • nter n r mun a e
• No evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland Type (select one)
?ttom sand hajd&2od forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
RATING:
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
B og/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina Bay
Other
Water storage X 4.00 = /
/
Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 =
Pollutant removal X 5.00 = '
Wildlife habitat X 2.00 =
Aquatic life value X 4.00 =
Recreation/ Education X 1.00 =
RATING VALUES:

High=60 or higher
Medium/High=50 to 59
Medium=40 to 49
Low=39 or lower

COMMENTS:
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICANT NAME? DATE
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) r `
WATERBODYIRIVER BASIN
COUNTY/CITY a'.
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS °• /?l µ-
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
# . Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
aSS??aI
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) Gr1Q o
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue)

f Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June through Sept.)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines

l-,
v
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
Important To Domestic Water Supply? ( / N
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? ?)/ N Approx. Drainage Area:
ni?niannnuninnnnunll/ll/llI/ll/ll/Ull1/ll/l1/ll/l//ll/l//l/ll/lllll/l/l/lllll///lll//l/lll////ll///l/ll//llll///lll////ll/////ll/lll/ll/lll/l//l//l//llllll//l/l/l/lll/ll//l///l//l//////l/llll///lll/l1//l/l/l
Determination:
Perennial Channel (stop) 8 Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager)
unll//////l//ll//ll/lllllllllllll//////lll//ll//l/ll/l//ll/l//ll/lllllll/!ll//l//llll/llll//llll/l/l//l//!/l/ll//lll///l////ll/ll//////l/ll/ll//l///l/l/l /////ll//lll/ll//l////l////l///llllll/lllll/l//l/lll//Ill///l/ll//l
P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98
J
ACTION ID
! F:
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAME ` -
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.)
r? I
K
t
DATE
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN COUNTY/CITY
r?
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
? Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) `'' t
U
L/ Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
? Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue) ( y
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June through Sept.)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
t/ Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y /(N
Does Channel Appear On A
Quad Or Soils Map. Y CN) Approx. Drainage Area:

Determination:
Perennial Channel (stop) 8 Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager)

P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98

? _
J ..

- ,.
?-., l

-
F%,:) & z,.
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: ; r! Evaluator: C 1? f
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location/Directions:
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? CO) .1 2 3
MOTE If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*) --
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 `, 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1-
- ""
4 Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3 r)
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
v
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
II HydroloQV Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter ?-?
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since . 0 .5
Last Known Rain? *NOTE. I Ditch Indicated In #9 Above ki This Ste And #5 Below*
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? ies=1 S No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 _5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bactetia/Fungus Present? 0 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Ski This Ste UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
e i '
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name i j River Basin: y-

County i Evaluator
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
Date: - I I USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location/Directions:
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorpholog-v Absent Weak Mod to Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 a 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 r' 2 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3 G ' . ". .
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 r2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic) ?.?
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 3 i, 14
I*NnTF- If Red & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosiri Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharme Present? 0 41 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: _J
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since . 0 .5 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE.- If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In HeadcutZ, Yes=1.5 No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: C4
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW stly5C Mostly FACU Mostly UPI,
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 0 0
As Noted Above Ski This Ste UNLESS SAV Present* .
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: h
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + secondary= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
OF W A T?9
?? QG
>
Cd `C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 8, 2005
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joel Johnson, NCDOT Project Development Engineer
FROM: Nicole Thomson, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Uni
SUBJECT: Scoping Review of NCDOT's proposed bridge replacement projects: B-4658, B-4504, B-
4560, and B-4671
In reply to your correspondence dated April 29, 2004 (received May 6, 2004) in which you requested
comments for the referenced projects, the NC Division of Water Quality has the following comments:
- Proiect-Specifc Comments
B-4658 Bride No. 345 over Buckhorn Creek, Wake Co.
Buckhorn Creek are class B waters of the State. DWQ is very concerned with sedimentation and erosion
impacts °that could result from this project. NC DOT should `address these concerns by describing the.
potential impacts that may occur to the aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would'reduce.
the impacts.
x=4504 Bridee No. 52 over Deep Creek, Edeeombe Co.
Deep Creek are class WS-IV; NSW waters of the State. DWQ is very concerned with sedimentation and
erosion impacts that could result from this project. DWQ recommends that highly protective
sedimentation and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of sediment runoff to Deep
Creek. Storm water should be transported through vegetated conveyance to the greatest extent
practicable. Because Deep Creek are nutrient sensitive waters, any required engineered storm water
controls are required to be constructed wetlands, bio-retention areas, or grassed swales. Refer to 15A
NCAC 2B .0216(3)(b)(ii) and 2B .0258.
/13=4560 Bridle No. 102 over Black Creek, Johnston Co.
Black Creek are class C; NSW waters of the State. DWQ is very concerned with sedimentation and
erosion impacts that could result from this project. DWQ recommends that highly protective
sedimentation and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of nutrient runoff to Black
Creek. DWQ requests that road design plans provide treatment of the storm water runoff through best
management practices as detailed in. Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters.
Refer to 15A NCAC 2B .0224(2) and 15A NCAC 2H. 1006.
..B=4671 Bride No. 35 over Exum Mill Branch, Wayne Co.
Exum Mill Branch are class C; Sw; NSW waters of the State. DWQ is very concerned with
sedimentation and erosion impacts that could result from this project. DWQ recommends that highly
protective sedimentation and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of nutrient runoff
to Exum Mill Branch. DWQ requests that road design plans provide treatment of the storm water runoff
through best management practices as detailed in Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters. Refer to 15A NCAC 2B .0224(2) and 15A NCAC 2H. 1006.
NOothCarolina
Transportation Permitting Unit Qtllt'6I??lJ
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httg://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands

IL General Comments Reizardinz Bridge Replacement Protects
1. If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are used to replace
the bridge, then DWQ recommends the use of Nationwide Permit No. 14 rather than Nationwide
Permit 23.
2. If the old bridge is removed, no discharge of bridge material into surface waters is preferred. Strict
adherence the Corps of Engineers guidelines for bridge demolition will be a condition of the 401
Water Quality Certification.
3. DWQ prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require work within the stream
and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by
bridges allows for human and wildlife passage beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and
does not block navigation by canoeists and boaters.
4. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream; stormwater should be directed
across the bridge and pre-treated through site-appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-formed scour
holes, vegetated buffers, etc.) before •entering the. stream.'..Please refer to NCDOT Best Management
Practices for the Protection of -Surface- Waters
5. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream. Concrete is
mostly made up of lime (calcium carbonate) and when in a dry or wet state (not hardened) calcium
carbonate is very soluble in water and has a pH of approximately 12. In an unhardened state concrete
or cement will change the pH of fresh water to very basic and will cause fish and other
macroinvertebrate kills.
6. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
7. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to original ground
elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed areas should be seeded or
mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should be planted with a spacing of not more than
10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed.
Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving
the stumps and root mat intact, allows the area to re-vegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
8. A clear bank (rip rap-free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the steam underneath
the bridge.
9. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be
implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be maintained regularly,
especially following rainfall events.
10. Bare soil should be stabilized through vegetation or other means as quickly as feasible to prevent
sedimentation of water resources.
11. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area. Sandbags, rock
berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where possible to prevent excavation
in flowing water.
1
12. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to
minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This
equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface water?°from
leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic. fluids, or other toxic materials.
III. General Comments if Replacing the Bridke with a Culvert
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the culvert or pipe
invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed (measured from the natural
thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels other than the base flow barrel(s) should be
placed on or near stream bankfull or floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These
should be reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by utilizing
sills on the upstream end to restrict or divert flow to the base flow barrel(s). Sufficient water depth
should be provided in the base flow barrel during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be installed in a
manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance aquatic life passage: 1) by
depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by
providing resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms. In essence, the base flow barrel(s)
should provide. aicontinuum of water,depth and channel width without substantial modifications of
velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain dry during
normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever possible to avoid
channel realignment. Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at
the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition that
requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that
precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be professionally
designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location with road closure.
If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and located to avoid wetland
impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing stream banks. If the structure will be
on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed and the approach fills removed from the 100-
year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed down to the natural ground elevation. The area
should be stabilized with grass and planted with native tree species. Tall fescue should not be used in
riparian areas. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the area to
wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject project or other
projects. in the watershed.
e`
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact Nicole Thomson 919-715-3415.
pc: Mike Bell, USACE Washington Field Office
Eroc Alsmeyer, USACE Raleigh Field Office
Chris Militscher, USEPA
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Gary Jordan, USFWS
File Copy
Y ,
irH qq? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
?•, TRANSPORTATION
?i DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 52 ON SR 1505
OVER DEEP CREEK
B-4504
Figure 1