20081705 Ver 1_Application_20081117

rt
I
t?

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
?OV
N0l l
7 20 D
Nk. 08
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F EASLEY
GOVERNOR
November 5, 2008
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27857
ATTN Mr John Thomas
NCDOT Coordinator
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
081705
Subject Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 23, 33, and Section 401 Permit
for replacement of Bridges 256 & 257 on US 52 over Norfolk Southern Railroad in
Forsyth County, Federal Aid Project Number NBF-52 (4), State Project No 8 1622801,
T I P No U-2826A
Debit $240 00 from WBS No 34871 1 1
Dear Sir,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridges 256 and 257 in
Forsyth County There will be 132 feet of permanent surface water impacts and 101 feet of temporary
surface water impacts to three unnamed tributaries to Brushy Fork Creek These impacts occur as a
result of the placement of five corrugated steel pipes
Please see the enclosed copies of the permit drawings, design plans, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) acceptance letter, and Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) for the above-referenced protect The
Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed for this project in March 2004 and was distributed shortly
thereafter Additional copies are available upon request
This project calls for a letting date of June 16, 2009 and a review date of April 28, 2009
MAILING ADDRESS
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
TELEPHONE [phone] Or
919-715-1335
FAX [phone]
LOCATION
2728 CAPITAL BLVD SURE 240
RALEIGH NC 27604
WEBSITE WWW NCDOT ORG

A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at
http //www ncdot org/doh/preconstruct/pe/ If you have any questions or need additional information,
please call Deanna Riffey at [phone]
Smforry ,
Gre Thorpe, PhD
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
W/attachment
Mr Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Ms Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Ms Marella Buncick, USFWS
W/o attachment (see website for attachments
Dr David Chang, P E , Hydraulics
Mr Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr Greg Perfetti, P E , Structure Design
Mr Victor Barbour, Project Services Unit
Mr S P Ivey, P E, Division 9 Engineer
Mr Kent Boyer, Division 9 Environmental Officer
Mr Jay Bennett, P E, Roadway Design
Mr Mated Alghandour, P E , Programming and TIP
Mr Art McMillan, P E, Highway Design
Mr Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr Todd Jones, NCDOT External Audit Branch
Ms Beth Hammon, EEP
Mr Ma'ad Hassan, PDEA
U-2826 A Permmt Application
Page 2 of 2
Y
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2 0 0 8 1 7 0 5
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" )
1. Processing
1 Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2 Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested 23,33
3 If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here ?
4 If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here
5 If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here ?
II. Applicant Information
1 Owner/Applicant Information
Name Gregory J Thorpe, PhD Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699
Telephone Number 919-733-3141 Fax Number 919-715-5501
E-mail Address
2 Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant )
Name
Company Affiliation
Mailing Address _
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
Fax Number
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format,
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided
1 Name of project replacement of Bridges 256 & 257 on US 52 over SR 2456 (Liberty St)
and the Norfolk Southern Railroad
2 T I P Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only) U-2826 A
3 Property Identification Number (Tax PIN)
4 Location
County Forsyth Nearest Town Winston-Salem
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number)
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc) I-40 west to US 52 west
from 26a' Street to Glen Avenue
5 Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody )
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum) 36 1173 ON 80 2354 °W
6 Property size (acres)
7 Name of nearest receiving body of water Brushy Fork Creek
8 River Basin Yadkin-Pee Dee (HUC 03040101)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins The
River Basin map is available at http //h2o enr state nc us/admin/maps/ )
9 Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application urban principal main artery
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9
r
J
10 Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
Bridge numbers 256 & 257 will be replaced at their existing location with new dual
structures Each of the new structures will have a clear roadway width of approximately 52
feet This width will accommodate three 12-foot travel lanes, 6-foot inside and 10-foot
outside shoulders The structure carr lying the northbound traffic will be approximately 418
feet in length The second structure carr iy ng the southbound traffic will be approximately
405 feet in length A temporary onsite detour will be required to maintain traffic Heavy duty
excavation equipment will be used such as trucks dozers cranes and other equipment
necessary for roadway construction
11 Explain the purpose of the proposed work Improve safety and efficiency of overall traffic
operations
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable) If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T I P project, along with
construction schedules
Onsite field meeting held July 10, 2007 with USACE, John Thomas and Sue Homewood,
NCDWQ The USACE is not requirin mitigation for UT 2 and 3 but is requiring mitigation
for UT 4 at a 1 1 ratio Action Id# 200801611
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e g, culvert installation should be listed separately from
nprap dissipater pads) Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9
J
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet
1 Provide a written description of the proposed impacts
Permanent Impacts There will be 132 feet of permanent surface water impacts due to
placement of five new corrugated steel pipes (CSP) for two intermittent unnamed tributaries
(UT 2 and UT 3) to Brushy Fork Creek and one perennial unnamed tributary to Brush Fork
Creek (UT 4)
Temporary Impacts There will be 0 03 acres (101 feet) of temporary channel impacts to
Brushy Fork Creek due to the placement of CSPs
Utility Impacts There will be no impacts to surface waters or wetlands from sewer, water,
electric or other utilities associated with this bridge replacement project
2 Individually list wetland impacts Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodiniz
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e g , forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

0
3 List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property N/A
4 Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts Be sure to identify temporary
impacts Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e g, cement walls, np-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc ), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9
Q
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Intermittent? Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
Site I UT 2 Brushy Fork 24" CSP&18" CSP Intermittent 6 feet 55 0 01

Site 1
UT 2 Brushy Fork
Temp
pipe
Intermittent 6 feet
25
001
placement
Site 2 UT 3 Brushy Fork 15" CSP&24" CSP Intermittent 3 feet 31 0 01
Site 2 UT 3 Brushy Fork Temp pipe Intermittent 3 feet 45 0 01
p
lacement
Site 3 UT 4 Brushy Fork 18" CSP Perennial 8 feet 46 001
Site 3 UT 4 Brushy Fork plm piip Perennial 8 feet 31 0 01
t
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 233 0 06
5 Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U S ) Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6 List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U S resulting from the project
Stream Impact (acres) 0 06
Wetland Impact (acres) 0
Open Water Impact (acres) 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U S (acres) 0 06
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) 233
7 Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property9 ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet) Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9

8 Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application
Pond to be created in (check all that apply) ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e g , dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc)
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e g, livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc )
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond
Size of watershed draining to pond Expected pond surface area
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts It may be useful to
provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances,
accessibility, and financial viability of the project The applicant may attach drawings
of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not
feasible Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was
developed If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during
construction to reduce impacts
With the exception of the "do nothing " alternative, there are no means of avoidine impacts to
waters of the U S NCDOT will minimize impacts to the streams through the use of Best
Management Practices NCDOT will locate the temporary detour on the west side of US 52,
which is the opposite side as the streams Steep side slopes in the areas of the streams will be
used to help minimize stream impacts
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H 0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to reducing the size of the project, establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams, and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version )
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e g , deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed
Onsite field meeting held July 10 2007 with USACE John Thomas He is not requiring
mitigation for UT 2 and 3, but is reauirin mitigation for UT 4 at a 1 1 ratio EEP is
providing the mitigation for 46 feet of stream impacts
2 Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP Indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http //www nceep net/pages/Inlieureeplace htm If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet) 46
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet) 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres) 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres) 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres) 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ? -
2 If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)9
Note If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation
Yes ® No ?
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9
la
3 If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Cleannghouse9 If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion
1 Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B 0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B 0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B 0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B 0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2 If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers
* I Impact I I Required
Zone Multiplier
2
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendic
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
15
the top of the near bank of channel, Zone 2 extends an
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i e,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund) Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B 0242 or 0244, or 0260
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) or any Buffer Rules9
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http //h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands If no, please provide a short narrative description
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e g, draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control)
As of January 31, 2008 the United States Fish and Wildlife Service lists three federally protected
species for Forsyth County the bog turtle, red-cockaded woodpecker, and small-anthered
bittercress No suitable habitat was found for the red-cockaded wood pecker, small-anthered
bittercress, or bog turtle within the project study area This project will have no effect on the
above mentioned species No further documentation or concurrence from the USFWS is
required n

II.5Sed8
Applilant/Afent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided )
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9
rlb,*V-
?
ement
PROGRAM
October 30, 2008
Mr John Thomas
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Dear Mr Thomas.
Subject EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter
U-2826A, Winston-Salem - Replace Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 on
US 52 over the Norfolk Southern Railroad, Yadkin River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 03040101), Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide the stream mitigation for the unavoidable impact associated with the above
referenced project As indicated in the NCDOT's mitigation request dated October 24, 2008,
stream mitigation from EEP is required for approximately 46 feet of warm stream impacts
Stream restoration mitigation associated with this project will be provided in accordance
with Section X of the Amendment No. 2 to the Memorandum of Agreement between the N C
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the N C Department of Transportation, and
the U. S Army Corps of Engineers fully executed on March 8, 2007 (Tri-Party MOA) In the
mitigation request, the NCDOT indicated this project would only require stream mitigation at a
1 1 ratio EEP commits to implement sufficient stream mitigation up to 46 stream restoration
credits to offset the impacts associated with this project by the end of the MOA year in which this
project is permitted. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation
acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required
from EEP
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929
Sincerely,
Will D Gilmore, P E
EEP Director
cc Mr Gregory J Thorpe, Ph D, NCDOT-PDEA
Mr Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File U-2826A
'?'?
R?storu29...'E... Pro,-" oar sta&
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 16S2 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715.0476 / www nceep net
rt`*V_
iaicement
PROGRAM
October 30, 2008
Mr Gregory J Thorpe, Ph D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr Thorpe
Subject EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter
U-2826A, Winston-Salem - Replace Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 over
the Norfolk Southern Railroad, Forsyth County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide the stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information
supplied by you on October 24, 2008, mitigation for the impacts associated with the project are
only required at a 1.1 ratio. The impacts are located in CU 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin
in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows
Warm Stream. 46 feet
EEP commits to implementing sufficient stream restoration mitigation to offset the
impacts associated with this project by the end of the MOA Year in which this project is
permitted, in accordance with Section X of the Amendment No 2 to the Memorandum of
Agreement between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the
North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the U. S Army Corps of Engineers, fully
executed on March 8, 2007 If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this
mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter well be
required from EEP
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929
Sin rely,
11_? 46
Will D Gilmore, P.E
EEP Director
cc Mr. John Thomas, USACE - Raleigh
Mr. Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File U-2826A
kutoriptg... E ... Prot"' 0M.Y .Rate, &RAM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service (enter, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
c
04-AUG-2008 13 56
r \hydrauhcs\permits-environment al\drawings\u2826a-permit-tsh dgn
wshunt AT HY2447M
CONTRACT:
w w
0 0
o w
_
T

rn ?y
x
O n

O o o
Z
y
0 0
i
C1 0 O O
14 ?L < -4 < O 0 G7
4116 th ?^ ? II II II II II II II ?,'
II
T C 0 N O O 4 4 a
aRaR00
y a x x •

M

cl
txii 0O

m
z m
z
Z ?

M
v
=
?+
n
c O
O ° m
Z
Z
m
Z°

N
O
a
C
N

O
m

C

O
m

C
g
D

II CO N
N
D co
N
D
0
??Ul
mow
? CD
r
in
3 m
CA N
`O
n
H

Zr m
M m? b
acs M?
0
0

V RI

b

., v x
V
z
Z
N a

o?
y
Z m

o?
t2
a
e
?z
y ,yy ?
?n
y
y
y C ?
?t3 gr
x b A>
r
z?
?y y
N
to0
?y
O
x
P
?a
h
aN
n `'
M?
a
n
f7 x
O
?a
yn
o?

I
r
I
Z
i
L
Q
c.
r
1
V
TIP PROJECT: U-2826A
I^
n

i
y
a
V
a
V
C
V
Z
D
'VZ
+Q
tl
N 0
M

?a vv l
m
/

m 4?1

o:
/ Z
0
_ s
OI
I
I
:4 C?I
V
G1 I
I
I
r?
y ? b
x
I
"C SO
?j7 h y? l
I
y ? yl
O?CI
I
y y `?
I
v?
O
0
x
y
N
yo
o?
0
O

K
n
0
z
CD CD
Ln N
kk
? n
o
ti
o ?
m `k°
gy

z z
00
it M
z
VI7I h 15
1 IC: I 45 il
NI
z ap
?bD
SImI
f •
04-AUG-2008 13 51
r \hydroullcs\permits-environmentol\drawings\u2826a_permlt-quad-vlclnrtymop dgn
wshunt AT HY244728 M/RR/99
CONTRACT,
0 0 ? -o
70 N N

M M!
N m
o tz

m

? =

O

n
?
n o ?-° ?
p o to (q
0
L
0 0 0
.n <
z • O y
g

nc
14 <-40 °
cow
? ? ?
'
II II I I II II it II
. 1
II
T°
w N O
V V
a
C
ooa

m -
O nn
Z r
Z

(A m
Z
?
O
m
° = n
c
O m
Z
Q
w
o c
N i A
N
D N
? V1

II
N
D
P
D ???+++444???111
0 y
11 II
a -
CA P
a
m o
r 3
3
H
M
N N
v? I
Z m
m° b

a

,o ? 0
0
o
•o? e
v
b
m
pa A
>R
q
? ? ?1 v x

m
O N
a a
Z
N O
r_
Z m ?J
o?
H
1
+Ap ?rf+
e
i
i
Q
O
?y
?y
O?
x
a
coli
a
O
a
n
0
n
4
TIP PROJECT: U-2826A
• _.-
NAD 83
-iff IF
Irv
7Rr Sr d??' ~1 I'?IL rt
PIL I? L l1 ?h G 4 • `?' , Ay? t a'1 411I'll
.fv d , '4q
m L A- er-l" I? r
-T
0.2 711
I Sul Ih'i Iii W ?, , "
{
• (rc? }t = (Ti
CD CD
uv,
ca I f ' +{mod = cn X "
,
,• l"t r_;
'lic
D
n
O

w?
?o
Ell
CJ ry
J
.1C
Utz
?o b b P>
_yq I-? ?"C
9 i O °Cb"
0:9
y
D
t>
v
vZ
?O b
I F a
con
,Af
m A),
b / ?\
0
o2
z
O
0
O
?Ccl
x SO
yob
x
y
r?
x?4i
Nyy?x
M y C) ?
COD r b
O Sro) x
n
S)
O
Z
0
y
N
x ?
0
0
yl
b
0
'"Cy
n
0
z
mn
o
O J
o?
g"

F?
b
00

a

I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
1
I
I
I I
I
I
fJ
a ^
\, m
1 1 1 1 1
1
I I I I I ? ? d
1?
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I N
N ?
i b
I I I I I
C
i
i
I I
S
=
+
,V
M

I

I
I
I
? oll

V _

I
I
I

1

I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
p,
A
1
I 1
I 1 1
I 1 1
I
I
I I
I I
I
IIp66
I I I I I
? h.r ?9
99
I
I I 1
I I
I I
I P f,n
I

I I

I I

I I

I I

1
I
5
IF
----------------------------------------------------
07-AU0-20081401 ----------------------------------------------------
r \hydr aul?cs\per m?t^ en??r onmental\dr evinys\ 28,25LSA5 QCTS!]IS?9?--------------------------------------
MATCHLINE -L- STA.46+00 SEE SHEET NO.5
? Q I
si I I g
/ II
II I
?G I I'I I
/ '?J ?? I I I c s I II
h?9zj 9? I I IN III ? ?
JJ ???? ? I I?III I ?
ti
rn
/// E I I I I I
?„ 6 ? ie ?' O Sl ly11 m
II
II
II
II
11
11
11
1
11
?" ? y / w ie CA 1 I
o.
/// ?? ??i°• ? ? cM 11 11 I
11 ?
111 ?
11
1, ? H
i,
II ? ?
11
II N/
I,
??II
/ / 'z cF

I
-
c m -D FT
1
?z z
D
-Ti CD > o
D

F) m rTl
C/) U)
m 00
m
D (?
D
m ?u O
7?
cn D DT
N
H M
z ?
D

m

' R
?S? I
ma

cn?,
t ?
MATCHLINE
I I I ?,
I ?r I I (I Iq ?' ? /
rz
va-
I / 1 O
1 1
I III IJ` ?,
I I I I m
I I I I ? >o/
I I \
OX
a
I I I I I I I? ? ? ,?, ? ??
I „ a
lox
L- ST A. 57 +00 SEE SHEET N0.7
CA
m
/ I
' I
I
II , 7A-
a /
T ?
?I v
I N
I

A I
II r I
I r
22
N
m
? rn
a
oN
? N oat
s b

C
?z
0
Z?

z A
i

-Fu E C
(0 O
v
Z

U) rn N N
C C U CL

V _
C
m m E

X L E

v)
N

LO
v

'o

O
Q W U -
<

? C
m C U C
W N r-- c m 0. E m LO LO M VO' C%j
W U E a

W
Q Cl
U
U
E
_O
_O
O
r'
p

CD
d M O O O
O O O C)

?L
M C U

f0 t0 U
3: O O O O
N E Q S O O O p
N E O O O p
U a
IL m N

I- C
l9 CD c m m
? U

W
IL v v>
N
C
D m
C C U
Z

W
3
a
o
> m
p
z X
W
F-
LU N
a==
E -??
~ "?
m_?

m =
m
€
U-
°'
a
a-
U Lj-
co
N
'
m
T
t5 oo
_ v a

U
a? oiS at$
a a
co
U U
v
N in
r
O w W
O t J J J
E i
co co LO
t

0) t

CY) t
Cl)
U) O

(D 0 J
05 Z N (n O

I I .

05-AUG-2008 15 26
r \rnndwnv\nrm \u9A96n_rdv_tsh dan
$$$$USERNAMEt$l$ - - e9ie8ia9
[KO:j,%TTRACT.- TIP PROJECT. U-2826A_--]
w to
0 0 0
O o r
m o C? Bo b
c MCI,
0
0 0 ?? m m n
< N °
C1 C O 0
E v P< o a v?, py o sT o to
y?` II II II II II II II ?' ? A/1 ? ?? .??
V' ? y
II _ _
Us 0 14 -4 01 6?
m??3?aeaeoo? n ? /
< S 0?
rZ
m m m r `•? s
O Z z
Z
_ o --- -
v ? ::D v
O m < p?
Z O W? h U1?
M 'o o
ccl y n , I? I y O
IT!
CA G) ?07
?a ?G
N a c? y a nCo
II > ' to ? Do
y p o C
n { 8 (-n is y
OD o° o ''ny anC? o y
- ti ?N o v?
to y ?a r n+
m m. b b cn -N - p N
?CD
O rh. y wj.,i
c m ?! (C'-3
V
boy y ? o ? y ? o ?
?$ y c?
m N L CD 4VV Q v ® \I/ O ?Ay
? A a / •? ? y? ?y
tZi? i y a
O r„ n O C43 y
C)
Z m Z y C
D n ,o b
y
o V (!j ill r,03
x r
? ? y y H b
? ?b b o
caw,
R Coll
ho o n , w4'
y
+
ab e N
zr I
o? ?? ?? pNp N
K ?y
,l ,+ r
?y

? V
N ?
C
;
N

N
N
D
A A

6 n
a? °= o? o a a
N ? ? T
m p 3 g° 3
3 s o 9 $ °
I
1 n ? O
I a =- I I
0 ? 1 3 i ? Z `
I ` I 1 1 I I
1 = I I I I I 1 M
I p 1 I I I I I I
I p. 1 I I 1 1 1 I
I 1 I I 1 1 1 I
I ° I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I 1 1 I I I I
I ? I 1 I I I I 1
1 S I I I I I I I
1 I I I ; I I I
I ; 1 i I ; 1 I
I I 1 1 I
1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1
1 I i 1 1 I I I I
1 I I I i I I I
1 i I I I I I I
I I I I I I I 1 I
I 1 I I I I 1 1 1
? T' II
o T X' m v 2t 0 3? o a QJ
3 c o a 3 $ c 2°
o S V ti
I I I ; ? 1 1
1 1 1 i I a
i i 1 I 1 I I I
1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I
I I I I 1 I I ; 1 I O
I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1
I I I I I i i , 1 I
I I I I I 1 1 I
1 1 1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 1 I I I
I I I I I i I i 1 1
1
1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I ° O
1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 7
1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1
1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1
I I I I I 1 I 1 I I
I I I I 1 I I 1 I I
an
I I I I i I I I I I 'Q
I 1 1 t i I I i I I
I 1 I I 1 I I i 1
1 1 1 i I 1 I I 1 1 I
1 i I I I I I 1 I 1
1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1
I I I ; 1 I 1 i I I !
I I I I I i I
1 I I i I I I I
1 i I 1 1 I I 1
; I I I i I I I I I 1
I I 1 I 1 I I i 1 i
I I I I I I I I I 1
•0-0v
°om ?Cca
p o. n_ n o 0 9= v v 0
a. '^ n p _
a o Q7 0 4 o n `• n A o s s c o
CA --1 L 2 o a N a A ? p_ m a A - %
a. r
3 0 A °? G1 % o e y c m
o ;cr 3 Q' c o o°' V° o a• O
Q a
T
0 O O O c C O O 100 , O?
I 1 I 1 1 r 1 e
I i i 1 1 1 ? ? C p p 1 A N N
I 1 I I i I I I C d a. °` Q IT
7
I I i I I 1 1 _ I S I ° ??
I I 1 1 I I ; O '? T C
13
1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 p
1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 3 y I
I I I 1 I I I I I I I I A ? 1 I
I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I
I 1 I I I I I I I I I I S I 1 I I I
I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I p 1 1 I I I
I t I I I I I I I I I 1 :? 1 I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I I I 1 i i 1 I I
I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I
I I 1 1 I 1 7 1 1 1 I 1
? ? ? ? I I I 1 I I 1 7 1 1 1 I 1
I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 'a 1 I I I 1
' I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I 1
? I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1
1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1
1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I i I I I 1
I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I
r l ? 1 I 1 I I I i I I I
IQI° p ? t' ? ?? iii^I
.s s s poop10 =
1 oooooaono
o 0 0 0 64 o m
o ° a o v° o
-4 -1 -4 Er 0, g,
m 0 'o c? c o o
O'a _ 3 7 O O
o A a n
Q A ; A ? I I 1 I 1 1
{! I I I I I I
an tr j C Q. o p
c O d
I c I I I 1 1 I I
I w y I I I 1 1 1 1 I
H 1 H I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1
1 1 C I I I I I I t 1
C I ? I I I 1 I 1 I I 1
1 I m 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1
M 1 T 1 • I I I I I I I I
I I v I I 1 1 1 1 I I
1 • 1 I 1 i 1 I 1 I 1 1
1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I
V I I I
®)"oao
? 11 , I
I i ? l i l
a v v & j v v? v- 4 c C3
> > > a a M a o o 3 m Z
? ? 2° O. a oT A r O ° m
p_ °, m* 0 0o A C002
> C m
7 7 T rt p ° p < 7 C 3 ° 1 O
7 A
p 1 p I 1 I 1
n ID 3 0
n O O. O O
O O 7 ? 7 G O I I , 1 1
w ? 7 ' 1 I I I I i ; I
S a c
°• m C M C ~ I I 1 I 1 I I
C 7 a O ; 3 i ; ; i ; ; ; ;
I ;
° ` 7 a 0 I ? I I I I I I I I I
T ; I i ; 1 I ; i 1 1
rt ? ° ? T A a 7 I I I 1 I
3 0
I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I
Q ° -9 O I I I i I I r I I I I
O 7 ?C s S I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1
I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1
C 0.
VV I I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I
Q e I I 1 I I I i I I 1 1 I I I 1 I
° 7 O I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I O
°. I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I
° , i I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I r
I I 1 I I I ; I 1 1 I 1 1 ; I `?
p I I i i I I I 1 I I 1 i I cryarn'.
I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I
I ? ? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1
1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I 1 I I r I I I 1 I I i I
1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I
I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I i I I I I
I I I 1 i I I I I I I I I I 1 I I
? I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1
I
I
???? I ( ICI I,!
9 E ' i 0 5? so
???? ? } Illll
am M Y 7 T 7 T ds 7 7 T T W MM 70 N .'0 N
v * N
v° v° v° °o g v° A o v° v° s $_ _ n
O O O O n O n A O O n n a a O S °
o 0 0 0° A 3 m Lo 3 2R LO 0 S° O m o ; 0
3 3 3
a. 0.
/^1? QQw Q S S
0. Q V I T T S S O 1 1 I a a
7 ° p O d
0 2.
O ; ? ? I I I I 1
_ a ° •, ; i 1
a 3; a ; a I 1 I 1 I
Q ? ? ? ° a ?'•a a ? I 1 I 1 1 I
Q a .,' 1 I I I 1 I
I I I 7+ I I 1 I 1 I I I 1
T M O I i I T ? i I I I I I 1 i 1
M° pN •, I I i 1 I I I I I
I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I
0
O e m I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1
~ 3 3 I I 1 I 1 I ; I I I I 1 1 I
I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 i I
I I I I
? ? I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I
1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I
1 ; I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1
1 I ? I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 i I 1
I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1
III I I I +
IIIII I + g
o
o -?
as
s oov m a
a =
?L 3
? s o ? -w ou
o o s o 0 f
o s a $ .y o
o f t I l?? 0 0
O O 1
7 r , d 1 i I 4 ; I
r 0 ? 1 I ? 1 ? I ?
7 I 2 I I I 1 I I I
a O
I I I I 1 1 1 I 1
I I a 1 I I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 I I I I
C I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I
I I I 1 I I t 1 I I
m I I I I I I I I I I
.. I I I I I I 1 I I
I I I I I 1 1 1 ;
I I I I I I 1 1 I
I I I I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1
1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1
I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1
1 I I I 1 ; ; I I I I
1 1 I I 1 I I I I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
N N T° T '9 = 07 N
g a S° o a a o
O O 0 0 0 cn 10 10
d c a
S ? g X ; 2? m ? ?C
n p_ f 0 411- w
o U- x
C
I
I I I ? ? I I °
I 1 I 0 I I I
03
i
1 ;
1 I 1 ` I 1 a 1 y
1
I I 1 I 1 I m 1
1 I 1 I I 1 I 7 I
1 I 1 I 1 1 ? I
I I 1 I ? 1 i I
1 I I I I 1 1 ` I
I I I 1 I I 1 ` 1
1 I I I I I 1 p 1
1 I I 1 I I 1 1
1 I I I I I 1 ? 1
II
I I 'o'
? o
I m II
II
M c c c? v ?p CS N N v ?f o O ° o° o° ?? 7 7 v r? f g y
O_ 4' 4' ( n ap 47 7_ 7 O ?A ?• O O -) T N s
d -1 Cr 7 oao O N O 5Dg O j sd 7 a 7 a. O Oo a 7
7 7 C 7 O O C a O 7S O O. p? o? O N o_ O m?
LLL oo N N ° ° G a A' a 11 = 7
O a S `` ' S O O rn O.. N c O N C CSL c a O S
O VI D. O N N ' `Z O O O_ G7 47 ° ° `d ?` ? O
O 0 ° O I N T O N O A P Q T
01 02' ir
n "m'•' a W a' ° 1_
p o !G O i i ' °
r O _O O 7 K i ; ; O 7 O O O 1 I 1 7 r I I 1
I I - - ° 1 ? I 1 ° , a I I I 1 ° I I I ? ^ a 1 a ? ? 1 ° 7 ° I ? ? I
I ^ I 1 i I I 7 ? I I I I I I I A 1 1 I 1 a 1 I 1 I I
I ? I I I I I I I I ? 1 I I 1 N I I I A 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I r
I I 1 I I I I 1 I 7 ° 1 I I 1 I 1 I A ° H I 1 I 1 I 1 y I I I I I
C 1 C I I i p ? C I I I i I 1 1 I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I 1 a I I I 1
1 I I ; i 1 r ' ; ; I I
1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 ? 1 I I I 1 I 1
I I I 1 I I I 1 1 m 1 1 I I I 1 m I 1 I ° m I 1 I 1 1 1 I
, ° 1 I I I I I I r 1 I I I I I • I 1 I p 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 T 1 I I i I
I I I I I I I I t N I i I I I I ?^ I I I I ? 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I
I s 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 r I I 1 1 I
1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 C I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 H I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I
I d 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I
I p 1 I I 1 I I I 1 m I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I C I I 1 r I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1
I I I I I I I I 1 • I I I I I 1 1 I I I m I I I I I 1 I I I I r I I I
1 I r I I 1 I 1 I 1 ?? I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I
1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I ? I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1
1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1
I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1
I ? I ? I I
I ? I I I I I
I
m I I ? I ? I I I I
00116 a w G OO ® ® T I ®®© a 3 I
7o I ? ? I I I ? I I
I 1 I ( I
C)
0
z
m
Z
O
Z
D
r
5
z
CA
M
M
N
3?
DD
0
r
to
4
II `?
it ON
O? O

_rdy_typ dgn
s o
F -1
m
i >
o m
0
o m
iz
m m
m
m m
m m
r
O
A
m
m
C -1 co
C
C.)
N

m< m m lu ro D
K ' <
m
m ro o m
0 m x <
z v v v m
>
i= o = m m m z
O
>> > m N j o
?y < .i 0. 0
O
m O
°
°
m N
0
gi m m
O r? _
-+
m
o
o °
< c
m r
0
; m
m
m
4z
> j

In
r
m
O
Z
Z
O
V
III- > m
=III
HE
w
+?
O r
O N
m
oQ
o
DZ
°ov
0
0
V
=III
HE
=III
III
G
a
0
IN ? 4

?
(7 N

r ?, r
w N
rn m I ? w

O 1
m O
Z
rn
w
Z
0

?-•y
?J
0
-11
111111
III=
C
D m
o
N
OD r
?O N
m
oQ
D Z
Z
+p
o•
o p.
0
0

Q
bl
1? I N
rrl
(13?
C ?i
m
U
I -o
I rn
4
------------ --
Q
rr,
t-I m V)
a
Tin
10
Z ti
=11
HE
=III
III-

Q to C
v ? ?
to D y
o

? +
o .?
n
D
O r
N
Q
o n

Y 0
Z
N Z
+
Go 0
w N
0
b ? cQ
8W N

z : n

0

r
?i y ?
??
N
I
z
e
p m o? o? o o. o
o° 3 m g ° 3
a ; c ° 3 h
s' p 7
-0
I p S i m I W ? p Q
a ? `11
y
O I 1 3 r r ? `
I I i I I °
? I I I I
I I I I 1 1 rt
r i ; ; 1 O
' O I I I 7
? ° I ; I I I I I
1 a I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I 0 I I I 1 1 1 1
I I 1 1 I I I I
i * I 1 I I I I I
S r
I I 1 I I I I 1
I I I I ; i I I
I I I I I I
I I I 1 i 1 1 1
1 I 1 I I I I
1 I I I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I 1 ; I
I I I I I 1 I
I I I I I 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 I I
9T ? ? I I ml?
e ? I I
I T tl pA C N` N 'n tb
°os a 3 S c° C
a I
m o O ?. ? ; ? 3
I
0
I I 0
I I I I p ; 1 I 1
; 1 i i I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 i I I I I ;
O
I I ; I I I I I 1
; ' ; ; I I I I
r I I r I I
I I I I 1 I I 1
1 i I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I 1 1
I 1 I I r I I 1 1 ° O
1 I I I I I I 1 I 7
I I I 1 I I I I I
I 1 1 I I t I I I ^
I I I I I I I i 1 1
I I I 1 I i I 1 p
I I I 1 i I I I
1 I I I 1 i I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I ; I I I 1 i I I
I I I I i i I I
I 1 I I I I 1 1
I I I I I I ? I I I ?`,
I I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I I I
1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I
t I I 1 1 1 I I I
I I I 1 I I I I I I
so -0 0
? ? a ? a a ? C ? ? ? 70 n -1 n N al
m m O °°" n a a a m ? ? v m ? Z 7 C
T T x c 0, O O
7 7 p < o n C '9 7 ; O
O O Q 7 a? 7 7 G O 3 ? ? I O ' ? ; '
O O ? a N C ? j r I r I I r
° Z y I i I I 1 1 1 i ?I
a a C C I I I I I I
p ' a O I I I I I I I I I I
° 71 T
+ 0 J ° A ° 1
C p ; ? p 7 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I
I I I I I I I I I I 1
m "
I 1 I I I I I I I I 1
C S d p I I I r I I I I I I I
' VV r I I I I I I 1 I I I I r I I I
O_ C 07 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1
° 7 G. p O
C I I I I I I I 1 i I I 1 I I I I
p ' 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I
Q a I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I
I 1 i i I I I 1 i I I I 1 I
I ° I I 1 I I I I 1 r 1 I I ;
I ? 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I
1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I
I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I
I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I
I
II I
9 E ' 2 i g? sO
O x N N -p T T-0 w p v * T ? s W .7 70 N .'p tyN
O Co 7 7 < C a ? M a a C a T a O O O O O f? O 70 70 70 °
?. d m m p C C 3 0 ? Car
'O 'O 'O 7 O 'p 'O 'p S n? '°O w ?' y t? y 7
p a 0 O O O O O > > O O O O O O O 00 a 0 O 3 3 [T °'
O 3 a a m a a a a a n a a a a j en S 10 p
a. r N y O $' m m n O m m O O O O m O O 30 O m m p °
3 ; s a -'• n on. B- n T a a a Co- T a n a a? o_ a Z° ?U c Q.
N o
2 o a an Og a o N H c m n O O Lu :s M m m c . O
? ; O O
° y o o 0 0 0 = '
''VV ° c o o o a- 0 3 0 o m pm m s S O p c
i r r ; r r 3 S O O -TI O 'O y 3 3 3 3 O S y y d O p
0 9 o O O c o 0 0 0, o o v v o p_ 0 $, o'_ v m
a c a p n to N ; O O a a y t 00. 0. 0.
I r I 1 I C a O S O I s > > a::E°n::c- g O p O r r r r
d a I 7< 7< ; p a 7 D p p p `C ?C y ; i i r ;
5 ; r $ n i O a ° O M C O r C S O I I i i r
I i i r i r r r r r r 3 C r ` Q M O OO O ; ; r r
I I I I I I I 1 '0 I I I I i i ; ;
2n O ?
r I I ; I I I I I 1 I I n I I I r y T m mp
I r i I I I r I I I I I S r I I I I p O p ?i ; ; ; ?? ?? ; ; ; ; ;
I r I I I I I I I I I ° I r I I I I I I 1 v y r I r r I I I I r
I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I r I I I r T T O I I I S S I 1 I I I I I I I
I r I I I I I I I I i I I I I I r 3 ° p 7 I I 1 I I I I I I I r I
; 1 I 1 I I ; ; ; i I i p ; r ; ; i O 0 p I r r r r r r r r r r r r r
O T I I I I I 1 I I I r I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I r 3 r I I I r ? 3 3 I I r I I I r I I I I I I r
1 I I I I r r I I I I I I I I I r I I I I r I I I I I I I r I
I I I I I I I I I I 'O I I I I I I O O I r I I I I I I 1 I I I I I
; I r I I I I I I I I I I I i I I 7 7 ? I I I r I I I r I I I I I r
r I I I I I I I I I I I r r r I r I I y y I I r I I I I I I
r I r I I r I I I I I I t 1 1 r 1 I y r 1 I r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
I I I I I 1 I I I r I r I I I I I I C r i r 7 I r r r r r r r
I I r I I r I I I I r r I I I I I I I I I '? I I I I I I I I I r I I I I
I I r I I I I r I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I r I I I r I I I I r
I I I I I I I I ? I I I I I I 1 r r ? r
r l b I I I I I lil
I?ip i r I I I I ? 1 1 ,. I f? a
InI © I r ?° 'A I I m m m 1. D. I?O
I I ? ? I I 1 ? e
I lq ? ? ' I I I ( I I I I I I ? ?
g:a
O p 0 0 0 0 m O
° '0 0 0 0 Z
T o T
7 ?_ d 0 p O S
31
T m m o 0 0 0° o° o
CM O m s o S M a
o o o
O-a s, s,
° ; ° Q I I I I p ;
° n ° n
ff a
N n n p n p I I I I I I
n ? ° a ° ? ? r I 1 I I
I 1 1 I I 1
p C Q- p p I I I I I I
I C I 1 1 1 1 , I
I y N I 1 1 I I 1 1 1
I I 1 1 I I I 1 I
H ? H I C 1 1 I I I 1 I I
C I I I I I I I I I I
I I T 1 I I I I I 1 1
T 1 T 1 = 1 I I I I I I 1
1 1 I I I I I I I 1
I . r I I I I I 1 I I I 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I 1
V I I I
I
I
I I? I i I
X v v v -o O-u
o
a s ?
m a s o o > > P
m m
s s
go,
s o y f °
o ; o s ° ? ? .9 0
c p ? x' ? ? o 0 0
o' s
I I I
x I r l I
O I I ° I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I 1 ° I I I 1 1 1 I
N I I I I 1 I I 1 I I
C I I I 1 1 1 I I I I
I I 1 I I 1 I I I I
T
e I I I I I I I I I r
.? I I I I I I 1 1 1 I
I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I
I 1 1 1 1 I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I I I
? I I 1 I I I I I I I
1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1
1 I I I I I I r 1 I I
I I I I I I i 1 I I I
I I I I 1 1 I I I I
I
I
I
I I®m®o??o-•-
i
I
I
OOsaszC>.
Om m O
no. c y n a P o 0 1° Gj
f m° u I ? c y
7 7
°x 3 m S.
a
O
i ? C n 1 I
o S ; x x
os o n
o a c
I t ? I I °
O
I I 1 I 1 I - 1
0
O a ;
W
1 I I I 1 1 T I
I I 1 I I 1 1
;
Q.
I 1 I I I I I 1
I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I ? I
I I I I I I 1 p 1
I I I I I 1 I 1
I I I I 1 I I ? I
? II
O
© I I
II
o 97 -0 O a° N p ° 7 a 3: 7 a 7 a
Od°
O d x `c r& s a- O i FL N a C N N N O O 8 a /F? O
0 " a I I O N y = - C i i Y• ? I I v 91 -1 C CA a C. /YY??, i i VLF, o
a N G S N G 0 G l I O P G I I T C r
C O O o> ISM > a C) ; p O ;
1 a I a l p i I a 7 a ; I I
m T a W° o C o O C °" = o O p a
r I r
O O O 7 K i i I ; O° O O ; ; O ?_ O p
1 I p I I I I p ? N p i I I 'Q I I I
I I ? I I I I O I I I I I I I ± A o I O I I 1
I C I I I I I 7 r I I 1 I I I I A n I I 1 I
1 ? I I I I 1 I I I ° I I I I C I r 1 p ?_ C I I I 1 I
1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I
1 .? 1 1 I I 1 1 I I O I I I I I I T I I I ? ° T 1 I
I p I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I p 1 I I ; ;
I I I I I I I I I N I I 1 1 I I i 1 I 1 1 -3 I I I I 1
I s I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I
I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 N I I 1 I I 1 I
C
1
I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I ^ I 1 I I I I I
I map- I 1 I I I I I I T I I I I I I I I I I ` I r 1 I I 1 I
I I I I I I I I 1 • I I I I i I I I I I T 1 I I I I I 1
I 1 I I I I I I I I ?? I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I r I I 1 1 I I I I r 1 I ? I I I I I I I
I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I
I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
s ? o 0 0
C) m e
e ?' a o z
° I I
1 1 I I
I I I
° ? p 1 I I 1
I I I 1
I I I I I
? I 1 I I I
I i I I I I
I ? I I 1 I I
I C I 1 I I ;
I I I I I
T
I I I i I I
1 ?? I I I I
I I I 1 I I 1
I I I I I I I
I 1 I I 1 I I
1 I I I 1 1 I
I I I I 1 I I
I I I 1 1 I I
I I I 1 I I 1
I 1 1 I I I I
i
I
> I
C)
O
Z
M
Z
O
Z
D
r
5
z
N
M
M
N
DD
0
r
N
h
O+ O
C ?o
U1?
IA
C? ?

1 I ' ?
-HUV-LV VO 17 C1
,roedway\prqj\u2826a rdy_typ dqn
y
rr,
_? =o
m
LL
Z L L
L
m W
x X $c X%-.
?
7p
C"' z
0 -4
> 4 '"
mmr
O

+ }
CA) Z
+ C
N

MATCH L
1NE _

'A'
m
c O tA n
=1
O
J
O O 0 0

00 00 A-
Z
N

= HE
P> PP Z -II I
w w
+ ???
+ III=
+ + =11
Ov
O L" OPm
O ?
f
!

O O p
?
O W , ir
?
-1O -?

rn
N
MATCH LINE 'A'

II
I
ni r
I
II
II
I
I
I
II
I
? II
(? II

II
O

0 j
l
z I ?
MATCH LINE rn
(A'A'

Z ?I
N C
0
I
I o Ln
I N
I
.?
II

MATCH LINE- A 'B
2
LI o

00 0,
vv
O a
N? C L?O
' ' rn XXm N
?D
p•
V ?mm
Nov
-
J0
O A , ,

N
Z

0 v

+
° V
r-

CA

>
P
n r
•
o
O
o
M
JWO
o:o
O'o Q O w` N M
H LINE 1

0 0
O ++
°o vii Z m
Z ,•
b!Q t
D 0
0 OOz

+ ? Z
w
+ ??
PPi

J
A
OOW
W
++
Z
O

=11
Lh0,•
o?m III-
II
I
°w!Q W =
III=

O
[?
0
O
f I-?
c , 7m
A m
W 7m
N c- m
N m
.+ v
N o
- 0
.+

w o
? m
m 1 c
O o
m n
m - __ - _ m
m f a >
o m m

m r
n m v Z
v
<
9 m
m m m m .. m
?
i o o ca
a a o n
m o o z
4 0
0 m
A > v
m m 99 C
.
.
y a m
m
a

?
l 1 1 ? Q:

r
----
-- FF)
? m
n

O ?

z U,
z
MATCH LINE IN
L
O
.
w

? vv

< DD
of
m L co)
(A-
+ +
Nf
w
o?
O m
=1 I =1 I ? ? n
i t 1=
= I 11=
= Z o
II
111= I
III
111=
° >
m

°CD
0+ O
Z
a
O
co) W W
A a
N Z
J W

v
O
zi
0
A O
rn

4
DC
-1mn
r
>
pz A
r
+ O (A
O rn MATCH LINE A'
o Z t„ ,
°oQ
-10

oz
z

O
a
? z w
C4 i r -?
Z 'O
14-0
O
.
to
in W
70
"? z D

CA)
_ =III
=I I I 111=
III- =III
111111 1117
IV ?
?N I:?

V

r

N a
V
m m
* m 'Y
?,
o N
.?.+ -
--
-

A- - -
--
- rR
O N o
y
z I V)
z
m
Z
O rn
N
v

N
n ?
-m? la I N C
I

c;, D m
o ?
+ y

? O N
O
p, Z
-? +
c 7-
o
? i N N
I I E,
=III 111-
111= =III
=111 III=

? ??

c

?
=III `
g
r ? rn i:
?z o
z ?E

r
mm ?
r? oadwa ?? roe\u2826a-rdy-tyP d9n
C m
r
m
m y
S ?
1 1
x
M m
?g
m m
M m
m
m
m
m
3E C -1 m W N

a
m
m
>?
zx

£
>

M 1

o<
°m !
i m
> 1

w
Z
m

IMC

-=i

=

M

s

z
n

o

m

N

m

V

m
j

m

o
m
m0

to
m
m
m
z

n

m
°
c
m

i

n
D
r
N
m
0
Z
Z
0
111111 y m
III= w?
00
o?
O y
m
OQ
yZ
O V
O
O
r?
v
0
N
=11
II IIiI
HE

C
D m
o
;o
? y
-rn
O!Q
O
D Z
w Z
+0
0•
O p.
O
O
4i
8 r-1 /--- I N
T v
rrl

N

C
I ? '?+ Rl
m ?, N
I - O
i ?

4
-- ------ ---- --,?
v i
R

I A

I m
m N

Q y C
(A
D m
o
+ n
0
o r
O y
on
D Z
N Z
CO
0
O
y
8? gq
?'s C
N Ll

??..' i D 1
z
0
94,
r
z
o N
?
-III
III-
=III
III
L
a
0
J

N
? V
Q

N
D
w fN
cn I ?,
m
r)
°
-- N
----
-- w--- r?

0 N
I Q
v
a0
Z m 6N
m
w
Z
o fN Q
a
17
rdy typ dqn
J

? I W
R
D

r- ??

z I
=
a s
f?
-0
/? lun
v O
?
O N
? m I
?
Z S
? v 6
666
Z
o w
1 w o
0

n
D
r
m
O
Z
Z
O
W
D
-',F1
W
r O
M m
O
S
m
s
A
9 m
m m
m co
m
C -4 (A A L W w c N

N C O 4
K > ?
M ? z
t?
IO a G

01 a z o r _ m
I i a w > -
z 1 n O to m
o m = v
m v
m v
m z

v m m 0 O .. m
e
9 p a o m w

1e
? n
m r g 0 ?. m m to
n
m
x m m
v
c
F_
m
i ?
-•i 1
C
N
m
N
m
9
O
z
z
O
O
N
+
O
C
O
O
N
D
N
o.,
°
°
°
°
IN
Ib '? W
m
0
y
a?
(7
m ?N m
c p

y

` Nm?
3i C
'o y

ao ?
o + [7
ti
. +AD
r
. o• o
° m
cn
0O
z
?p
V
z
-' 0,0
+
+ ao
Co o
o°
0
Q

N
O (rn M
Q ?
w N Na
mm
I

I ?
? I ? n a

I oo w

.1 - ----- --- -- --?

Oy

I rn
ti
m
o

?
? I
I
w
N
I
Z
m
I
w

D C
D m

ZJ?
_
? r
OD

ti O V
? O
O O r"
O y
o oh
-
II 11
I- III
111- y D z
D
H II
E =III
HE N
+ Z
+0
V
O W
° ?o
,

oc
0
o
i ?
N IV
6N?U` Q

m Iv'
O (a
C

W
z
m

I ?1
aI
I N
v

C? I I?
D
r I
z
?
I n
N cZi
p w
n A
v -- - ----- --- ---- F(7)
1-4
rn
Z oy
z rrl
,

I
O
i W

? N C
D m

+ ?-°
n
V r
O N
m
o Q
O
a z

+ z
0
O
14 ao
pl

or
C ^
?z
?r
of

049t?
4V ?J
Oh
M
I?
1
( A 991
91-
v J
2
C')

I?
0
m
I I I C? p „r om ?/ ?
k o
?? I I r I ia- Q: }/g
?? III I Ilo /71
I I I I ?' I a OR/- P/C S/o 141f
a ? I {,,??IX Q & O 4<63
?. ? I r. I W .. I 1 ] .ft'_ m 1 r
MATCHLINE -L- STA.57+00 SEE SHEET N0.7
ww
z
0
rn
1
m
rn
rt
i
rn
" g Q 1 1
?
ZZ) N
j"
€
?
o'l z A n
0
0

?
?r N zz
I
15 30
_qj\,2826.,06 p,h
N
pa
J
Rg} z AO
Lit
N
u
50
:0 -q I-op v
nn"uuv?
RN
n
nn"nuts
0D
1 Ilt?
?w tt'g b
f?
y

rr?rrr
OLA
4 -4
N
I
i
4 - O

>
ap as I r
n
a-4

Ncnto0a °
m >

p? 0 Im N 4.0
O O O L" O
n
r r r r r
;4 S
g
~ 05 MI,
g 10 U..

MATCHLINE -L- STA.46+00 SEE SHEET N0.5
15 37
q j\u2826-09det psh
MATCHLINE -SBDET - STA. 43+00 SEE SHEET NO.8
iook
S PS
0
II
// II I i III ?? t a? 45
?sx / , ? ? = I I I I I Ih I 11
11
/ ? ? ? ? ? I I I I I X x_X x--rT-
// ? /?? / N 1, ? dl j IdWJ 5 I Q? 1 1
11
? '+ ?I I I I I I ? ?? ? 11
I,
?? 1' I I j I I Il?lr ? I
i I III Is I yNN ,%a
?? ;' ?I?I? I I I ICI I l y ??0
?I I I ICI I I ??
1
,'' ? I I I I I II I + I V ?
i49 CM I° I I
1 ?' I $ 50
ti?'sw
I I u+ / ,$w
V ?
1 I III I .s
? II
II I I 1
11, III I III 1 _ I -DRff Atp,/ /s/o. 10+00. 0-
+ + III I I I II l S (? -L--/ 19511+9346 ((54.00'LTA
K1W
2 ?
li?? i i Ili I = ,??? ?, ' ' 8 0
11 II I I 1111 ? I -? Y' ; $? ?
i mi1 I _ ?? bz d w /
III I I III 4 2w' - °? 1 }° \\ O 2
II I I iIIPS r \\
/ ,/ 5 I w 1 1. ? I + ?
} III I X ; m S ?? \ 0 Rai
K C
III I I III I ? ? ? ? zz
m sta. ( I III r g m rn
1 1 ? ?I m rn rn
III I I III I -
: 12+%&
p
III I I I II ? - 55 ? o
o
III I I I ,? a ?
MATCHLINE -SBDET - STA. 55+00 SEE SHEET N0. l0 o 0
l%1
?o
z z o
11- o
Ir
z z _
0 Z
0
0 AU
1oa G-2008 15 52
dwa \ ro \
u2826a pfl
5
/28/99
A

O En

O a

O V

O COD

O w

O O
-,o

M
O

a
O

V
O

10
cc
O

4 A- - + It
A
V ?

i t,

e u
e e

A
OD

I ; LL

u u
ne
I I LL

+N
VrG7N

pad N Z
T Z x

Z
A
O Nm

ti -4 4 4 1 +
H! i
X1 0 0

N
H H +
O

4 4 1 1-4 -

L. . IL L

N
±H
M
:

IL I

I I

A N
W

IL L I
IL L I

A GJ
I it

er
A

ON
O•

+IF F

P
V P
ILL I' ll I 'll

rn
0- w
v rn

m i
11 I LL I

m

ft=j O

A
W N

-- --- - - - - ---
- -- - -- -
- -- -- -----
-- --
-- -
-
-

I
--- - - --

- a I
4 1 9 1

E
2
-1
1 4- 4+ 11 1 1
1 -

ff

J±
-

-
- . -

O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
1
3
0 z
0

U AU
roe U'L VUb I] JJ
dwe \ ro \
u2826e pfl
SO
to
O -0

O O
0.
O SO
14
O

O
- k
i W EHiiii
I w WFY't'I
z
0
ti
m
rn
rn
x
rn
A
0
18 RHifH
1-
1 N E
?Ai I -

w I I

11 II I l ilt
II II
i
y
rn

rn
rn

x
m

rrn
? -- --- --- ---- -
A a ?)

a0? +
In

111 I1FP1

P
N

- -- -- - - - -- -- ---
- -
- -- -- -- - - - -- --

-
I -- -- -- - - - - - --

w
P
I

V

N
Co

?o

P
O

P
r

rn
P
a R,
a

0

P
Co

g

II ? N ?
VNi
I
I
O
10
1,00 •O
O u II II ?

10
0 0 0 0 0
(I
W
I
3 i ?!
LA r\) x
of
0
o
Z
0
r
0- AUa due \8 5 33u2
6a pf I
82 5 28/9
9

W
O
Ate.
O

O
a
O
V
O 10

N
N
? . 0

r
O
O

AE E l l J QI E I

W -+

I

N

E M O T
M O R - + + - I

r
N
-
FH
+
N I
T TTFR IT EF
M R

7t C
O II
rn
N

rn - - - - -- - -- --- --
?
w
w

m -
N S I S T FO R N O w O
--- - -- E

I
A r`

---- -- --- ---

oil, II
U
a

`'I low
W n,

I O N I C

a

O V

-- -- -- --- -- - -

N .p
I

? ? - -
II II O

O

N

0

m m
m m
rn m

=
n
i m

? n
?
y
? N
o I t N it N a

u l it:
g
o
N C
N
4
?
t4 ? ? ' ? N A
g
? O
€ n
C C 11y ?
J
2 O

i

?
0 O
O O ?O
O ?O
O O
0 ? N

U,

W Ja W

N O

W ? 1

Izo

l
i
0-A
r roa
-I C-2008 15 33
d" \ ro \u2826a pfI
tt
5/28/99

O
'o

O

O

O CA)

O 10
th

O 10

O

O %0

O

O %o

O

O %o

O O %o

O 10

O

-
V M S
N O
f.s
L
it
H H H 1 ! + 11 1 11 1
H
H
!
1
11
1
11
-- 4 + 1 1 IL L I LL I.. .. I,

lilt - -- --- - -- -- -

po2

N
A
m
r li lt ]
I

m

S

1 1.
1 IL
L I L L -w:

1. li lt
I

M 11 11 1 11 11 T -- -- -
N O
N

l il t
C - 4 4-4 -

N G7
O%

Il ia

U4 4 : I l l" ILL. -

r

li lt I

r

I ' LL

-1
I. - L. I i t lil t
I

r
P

- - -- --- --- -- - - - --

V

- IL L 1.
lilt lit I
r
OD

?O

.. . lilt

N
O

-- -- - - - -- --
---
--
-- ---
--- ---
--- --
-
m

m
m

x

---- - --- --- -
N
N ?

qq

C D

+H +

::
w H ?

Z
1 4 tit

N A t?l? a zz
O 0 0 O O O O

a
u auu [uuo o" oj\'?
roe_d_ ay\pru2826a pf I
to I to l0 1,00 Lh C),- '14 cc
110 I IO 110
IO O
FFFRTFH+FH
r
I?
r
IN N
Il , q 1
..
,
r V w

H H H H

?

T
V
4 +
I 1 ?n r?

S

w
^'
m
A
m m
m

L

E

A I IL L]
i

Lil
l - -- -- --- -- - - - -- -- -

P to
- - -- - - -- -- -- --

v
O

O ?

r A
- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - --

i + A f

I L L

N W P CD
A t
V N W A W 10 %o %0
P V O
O O 7i
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
I
n
y?yy
A f1? 0
M
0
Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 on US 52
in Winston-Salem
Forsyth County
Federal-Aid Project NHF-52(14)
State Project 8 1622802
WBS Element 34871 12
TIP Project U-2826A
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
N C DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

APPROVED
Date f egory J Thorpe, Ph D , Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
:3 ?l o ?or
Date John F Sullivan, III, P E
Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration (1~HWA)
Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 on US 52
in Winston-Salem
Forsyth County
Federal-Aid Protect NHF-52(14)
State Project 8 1622802
WBS Element 34871 12
TIP Project U-2826A
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Documentation prepared in the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
by
a?
Alethia F Raynor, P.E
Project Development Engineer
(" i t&A'01
J es A McLuus, Jr , P E
Project Development Unit Head
Robert P Hanson, P E
Assistant Branch Manager,
Protect Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
CA "
•
??••?;?;GIN? ?Q`l?`o?
N A F. 'Pt
q1110 It
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT COMMITMENTS IV
I DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION .. 1
A Project Purpose . 1
B General Description .. .. .. 1
C Cost Estimates. ... .. .. 1
II NEED FOR PROJECT ... 2
A Description of Existing Facility .. 2
1. Functional Classification 2
2. Roadway . .. 2
3 Existing Structures .3
4 Right of Way and Access Control . 3
5 Intersections 3
6 Railroad Crossings 3
7 Bicycle Accommodations/Sidewalks .. . 4
8 Utilities ........ 4
9 School Bus Data. .. ... .. ... 4
10. Airports 4
11 Traffic Volumes . . .. 4
12 Accident Record 5
13 Other Highway Projects in the Area 6
B Deficiencies of Existing Facility.... 6
C Benefits of Proposed Project .... 7
III PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ... .. 7
A Proposed Structures .. 7
B. Roadway . ........ . .7
C Right of Way and Access Control .... .... .. 8
D Design Speed/Design Exceptions ..... . . 8
E Intersections .. .. .. 8
F Signing 8
G Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Items .. .. .... 8
H. Bicycle Accommodations/Sidewalks. .. .. . .... . .. 9
I Degree of Utility Conflict ... . ... ... ...9
J. Maintenance of Traffic ................ .. ... . ..... 9
IV ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ... . . 9
A Bridge Typical Section Alternatives...... .. ... .. ... 9
B Detour and Ramp Closure Alternatives . .. 10
C "No-Build" Alternative .. ......... .. ... . .
... . .. .... ..... 12
V PROBABLE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION.. . 13
A Natural Resources .... ............... .......... . ............. ..... 13
• 1 Biotic Resources .....
a Terrestrial Communities ... ......... .............. . .......... .... .... .. 13
b Aquatic Communities ......... ........ . .... . ...... ..... .. . ...14
2 Water Resources.. ........ ......... ....
. . .... ...........
.
.... 15
i
a Physical Characteristics and Water Quality 15
b Summary of Anticipated Effects . 16
3 Waters of the U S . 17
a Surface Waters/Wetlands... .. 17
b Summary of Anticipated Impacts ... .. . ... ... 17
c Anticipated Permit Requirements.. ... 18
d. Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation ..... 18
4 Rare and Protected Species.. . .. .. .. .. 19
a Federally-Protected Species.. ..... ... 19
b. Federal Species of Concern. ... 20
B Cultural Resources ... 20
C Section 4(f) Resources . ... .. .. ... 21
D Community/Social Effects. ... ... 21
1. Neighborhoods/Communities ... 21
2 Relocation of Homes and Businesses . ....... 21
3 Minonty/Low-income Populations 22
E Land Use . ....... ..... .. .. 22
1. Existing Land Use and Zoning ... .. 22
2 Future Land Use ........ .. ... 23
F Smith Reynolds Airport.. ... .. ... .. .. 24
G Prune and Important Farmland.. ..... .. 24
H Flood Hazard Evaluation 25
I Traffic Noise Analysis ...... 25
J. Air Quality Analysis . . . ...... ... 25
K Hazardous Materials ....... ..... . 26
L. Geodetic Survey Markers ...... ... ..... .......... 28
M Indirect/Cumulative Effects ..... .... ... .... ... . .. 28
VI. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION .. .... ...... 28
A Citizens Informational Workshop .. 28
B Public Hearing ....... ... .
.
.. ...... ... .
.. 29
C Agency Coordination.. ... .. .......... . ... .... ... ........ 29
VII BASIS FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ...... 29
11
MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3A&3B
Figure 4A
Figure 4B
Figure 4C
Figure 4D
Figure 5
Figure 6
Protect Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph of Project
Studied Alternatives
2006 Average Daily Traffic Volumes without Proposed Project
2025 Average Daily Traffic Volumes without Proposed Project
2006 Average Daily Traffic Volumes with Proposed Project
2025 Average Daily Traffic Volumes with Proposed Project
Proposed Typical Section
Project Area Quad Map (water resources)
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Comments Received
Appendix B - Relocation Report
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1- Crash Data along Existing Facilities
Table 2 - Alternative Comparison . .
Table 3 - Estimated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities ..
Table 4 - Water Resources in Project Area ..
Table 5 - Estimated Impacts to Surface Waters. . . . .
Table 6 - Federally Protected Species for Forsyth County ...
Table 7 - RCRA Sites ' . .. .
Table 8 - UST Sites ... ......
Page
.. 5
12
.. 15
16
... 18
19
26
27
iii
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 on US 52
in Winston-Salem
Forsyth County
Federal-Aid Project NHF-52(14)
State Project 8 1622802
WBS Element 34871 12
TIP Project U-2826A
Division Nine
During construction of the project, the driveway to the Norfolk Southern Railway
Company rail yard office will be kept open at all tunes
During construction of the protect, the driveway to the Winston-Salem Rescue
Squad, located on Liberty Street, will be kept open at all tunes No equipment or
materials will be parked or placed in the rescue squad driveway at any time
Following construction of the protect, the Division Traffic Operations staff will
conduct a traffic signal study at the intersection of Liberty Street and 30th Street to
determine the feasibility of a signal at this location If warrants for a traffic signal are
met, a signal will be installed
Traffic Engineering and Safetv Systems Branch, Signing Section
The Signing Section of NCDOT will coordinate with the Smith Reynolds Airport
Director and Division Nine regarding directional signing to be provided along
northbound US 52 to direct motorists wishing to access northbound Liberty Street and the
Smith Reynolds Airport.
Design Services Unit, Special Design Section / Traffic Engineering and Safety
Systems Branch, Traffic Management Systems Section / Traffic Engineering and
Safety Systems Branch, Signing Section
A portion of US 52 within the project limits is within the approach path of a
runway of Smith Reynolds Airport Any signs or fixtures higher than 15 feet or any
lighted fixtures placed within tlus area could potentially conflict with the runway glide
path The above sections of NCDOT will coordinate with the Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Branch staff and the Airport regarding any type of raised
structure that may be constructed on US 52 between the 28 h Street/Indiana Avenue
entrance ramp and 500 feet north of Bridge Numbers 256 and 257
Categorical Exclusion - U-2826A
March, 2004
Page 1 of 2
IV
Roadway Design Unit / Geotechnical Unit
The proposed protect will require property from several sites containing
potentially hazardous materials A detailed investigation will be performed for all of the
properties prior to right of way acquisition in order to determine the extent of any
contamination
Proiect Development and Environmental Analysis Branch / Roadway Design Unit /
Programming and TIP Branch
Existing sidewalks along SR 2456 (Liberty Street) will be replaced as a part of the
proposed protect The City of Winston Salem has requested new sidewalk along the east
side of Liberty Street between 28`h Street and 30'' Street The City has not yet committed
to participate in the cost of the new sidewalk. NCDOT's Pedestrian Policy Guidelines
require municipalities to commit to participate in the cost of pedestrian facilities and
maintenance and liability responsibilities The Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch will continue to coordinate with the City of Winston Salem regarding
their commitment to pedestrian facilities along the project
Proiect Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Form 7460 will be completed and
submitted to the Southern Region office of the FAA prior to construction of the project
Proiect Development and Environmental Analysis Branch / Traffic Engineering and
Safety Systems Branch
Intersections within the project will be evaluated for the feasibility of crosswalks
and pedestrian signal heads The Project Development and Environmental Analysis
Branch will coordinate this effort
Categorical Exclusion - U-2826A
March, 2004
Page 2 of 2
v
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. Proiect Purpose
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace two deficient bridges, which
carry US 52 over SR 2456 (Liberty Street) and railroad tracks of the Norfolk Southern
Railway Company The replacement of these structures will result in safer and more
efficient traffic operations
B. General Description
The subject project involves the removal and replacement of Bridge Numbers 256
and 257 on US 52 in Winston-Salem These bridges carry US 52 over SR 2456 (Liberty
Street) and railroad tracks of the Norfolk Southern Railway Company A temporary
detour structure will be required to maintain traffic along US 52 during construction of
the new bridges In addition to the proposed bridge replacements, the project will also
involve the permanent closure of the exit ramp from northbound US 52 onto Liberty
Street, as well as improvements to the surrounding streets Several Intelligent
Transportation System (ITS) items, such as traffic cameras and a variable message sign,
will also be installed along US 52 within the existing right of way as a part of the project
The project area is shown on Figure 1
TIP Project U-2826A is included in the approved 2004-2010 North Carolina
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Right of way acquisition is scheduled for
fiscal year 2004 and construction is scheduled for fiscal year 2006
C. Cost Estimates
The cost estimate included in the TIP for the project is $12,800,000 Of this total,
$800,000 is allocated for right of way acquisition and $12,000,000 for construction
Current cost estimates are as follows
Construction $13,000,000
Right of Way Acquisition $ 601,500
TOTAL $13,601,500
II. NEED FOR PROJECT
A. Description of Existing Facility
1. Functional Classification
US 52 is classified as an Urban Principal Arterial in the North Carolina functional
classification system Liberty Street is classified as an Urban Collector
2. Roadway
US 52 is a primary north-south route through central Forsyth county The
existmg typical section is a four-lane divided highway with two 12-foot travel lanes in
each direction separated by a 16-foot median The outside paved shoulders are
approximately 10 feet The posted speed limit is 55 mph
A number of interchanges, many of which do not provide for all movements, are
located along US 52 through Winston-Salem Two partial interchanges exist within the
project lnnits At the two bridges to be replaced by this project, a single ramp provides
access from northbound US 52 onto northbound Liberty Street Approximately
1,800 feet south of the bridges, a partial interchange provides access from US 52 to
several surrounding streets A single ramp and loop allow northbound US 52 traffic to
access Cleveland Avenue and 25`h Street, respectively A ramp and loop also provide
access from 28th Street/Indiana Avenue and Cleveland Avenue to northbound US 52. A
single ramp provides access from southbound US 52 onto Liberty Street No access is
provided onto southbound US 52 at this location (the ramp onto southbound US 52 was
closed and removed under a previous TIP project).
Liberty Street passes beneath the subject bridges. Between 25`h and 28th Streets,
Liberty Street is a four-lane curb and gutter facility with two travel lanes in each
direction. North of 28a' Street, the typical section changes to one northbound lane and
two southbound lanes Beneath the bridges, the roadway width is approximately 41 feet
At the ramp merge, Liberty Street gains an additional northbound lane Thirtieth Street
intersects Liberty Street approximately 150 feet north of the exit ramp The posted speed
linnit along this portion of Liberty Street is 45 mph.
East of its intersection with Liberty Street, 28 h Street/Indiana Avenue crosses
beneath US 52 On the east side of US 52, 28 h Street makes a sharp turn to the south and
becomes Cleveland Avenue The entrance and exit ramps connecting this area to
northbound US 52 are located along tins section of Cleveland Avenue Cleveland
Avenue is a two-lane facility
2
3. Existing Structures
Bridge Number 256 carves two lanes of northbound US 52 traffic over Liberty
Street and the Norfolk Southern Railroad This bridge was constructed in 1964, and is
423 feet long It has a deck width of 33 5 feet, and a clear roadway width of 28 feet The
superstructure of the five span bridge is composed of a reinforced concrete deck and steel
I-beam girders The bents are either concrete posts on spread footings or concrete piles
The bridge currently has a sufficiency rating of 45 5 (out of 100 possible rating points)
Bridge Number 257 carves two lanes of southbound US 52 traffic This bridge
was also constructed in 1964, and is 387 feet long Bridge Number 257 has a deck width
of 33 5 feet, and a clear roadway width of 28 feet This five span bridge has a sufficiency
rating of 44 9 The bridge's deck is composed of reinforced concrete on steel I-beams
The substructure of this bridge is the same as Bridge Number 256
4. Right of Way and Access Control
Existing right of way along US 52 within the project limits ranges between 160
and 250 feet Access along US 52 is fully controlled
Approximately 60 feet of right of way exists along Liberty Street within the
project area There is no control of access along this roadway
5. Intersections
As discussed in Section II-A-2, a partial interchange on US 52 provides access to
25`' Street, 28`' Street/Indiana Avenue and Cleveland Avenue from US 52 northbound
and Liberty Street from US 52 southbound The exit and entrance ramps for northbound
US 52 are located on Cleveland Avenue Twenty-sixth Street also intersects Cleveland
Avenue, but is offset from the ramp terminals This intersection is not signalized
Both 28`h Street and 30a' Street have intersections with Liberty Street in the
project area Of these two, only the intersection of 28th Street and Liberty Street is
signalized
6. Railroad Crossings
Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 carry US 52 over the Norfolk Southern Railroad A
single mainline track and several sidetracks exist under the bridge Between two and
eight through freight trains, and approximately three switching trams pass under the
bridges per day
3
7. Bicycle Accommodations/Sidewalks
No sidewalks or bicycle accommodations exist along US 52
No exclusive bicycle lanes or bicycle accommodations exist along the studied
portion of Liberty Street A sidewalk, approximately four feet wide, runs along the east
side of Liberty Street under the bridges The sidewalk ends in the area of the Liberty
Street exit ramp from northbound US 52
8. Utilities
Sanitary sewer Imes, water Imes and telephone Imes are located along the east
side of Liberty Street in the project area Piedmont Natural Gas Imes are located along
the west side of Liberty Street Fiber optic Ines are located further away from Liberty
Street, on Norfolk Southern's property Telephone and power poles are located along
both sides of the street
Water and sewer Ines are located along 26th Street Gas Ines are located on the
north side of the street Water, sewer, gas and telephone Imes are located on the east side
of US 52, along the Piedmont Park property
9. School Bus Data
Hanes-Lowrance school is located on Indiana Avenue, dust west of Liberty Street
Within the project area, bus usage along US 52, Liberty Street and Cleveland Avenue is
approximately 80 buses per day
10. Airports
Smith Reynolds Airport is located on the east side of Liberty Street, just north of
the project area This airport primarily serves general aviation. The airport has two
runways Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 are located approximately 2,400 feet southwest
of runway 4, and are within the approach path for the runway Approximately 110
aircraft are based at the airport Smith Reynolds is the home of PACE Airlines, a charter
airline
11. Traffic Volumes
Anticipated traffic volumes for the project area were estimated for the years 2006
and 2025 considering both the existing ramp configuration and the proposed permanent
closure of the Liberty Street exit ramp Traffic volumes based on the existing ramp
configuration for the years 2006 and 2025 are shown on Figures 4A and 413. Traffic
4
volumes for the area based on the proposed permanent closure of the Liberty Street exit
ramp are shown on Figures 4C and 4D for the same two years
If no changes were made to the present ramp configuration, volumes along US 52
in the project area would range between 47,000 and 68,400 vehicles per day (vpd) for the
year 2025 Approximately 68,400 vpd would use US 52 in the area of the bridge
replacement Along Liberty Street, north of Cleveland Avenue/Indiana Avenue, volumes
are expected to range between 13,600 and 17,100 vpd
With the removal of the Liberty Street exit ramp, volumes along US 52 are
anticipated to range between 47,000 and 70,500 vpd for the year 2025 Approximately
70,500 vpd are anticipated to use US 52 in the area of the bridges Along Liberty Street,
volumes are expected to range between 14,800 and 19,900 vpd
Comparing these two scenarios (no-build and recommended build), traffic
volumes increase at the 25th Street/28t' Street ramp area and at the Akron Drive exit
Some increase in volumes also appears along Liberty Street and Akron Drive, however,
outside the project area anticipated traffic volumes vary only slightly North of Akron
Drive, volumes along US 52 do not change
12. Accident Record
Accident studies were conducted along existing facilities within the project area
for the time period between May 2000 and April 2003 Accident studies were conducted
along US 52 between the Liberty Street entrance ramp near New Hope Lane (formerly
18th Street) and Akron Drive Accident studies were also conducted along Liberty Street
from 25U' Street to Fairchild Road and along Cleveland Avenue from 18`h Street to
Indiana Avenue Table 1 below presents the results of these studies
Table 1
Crash Data alone Existine Facilities

Roadway 5/004/03
Number of
Crashes 5/004/03
Number of
Fatal Crashes Total Crash Rate#
for Studied
Section 1999-2001
Statewide
Crash Rate"
US 52 255 0 271 23 179 23*
Liberty Street 80 0 681 52 482 86**
Cleveland Avenue 70 0 1013 43 N/A
Trash rates per 100 million vehicle miles
*Statewide crash rate for urban four-lane divided US routes (with full control of access)
**Statewide crash rate for urban four-lane undivided secondary routes
Cleveland Avenue is not a state-maintained facility, therefore, comparative statewide
crash rates are not available
5
The crashes along US 52 resulted in over one million dollars of property damage
The largest number of crashes along the studied portion of US 52 were rear-end type
collisions due to slowing or stopping
13. Other Highway Projects in the Area
TIP Project U-2826B is a $15 million project to improve safety and relieve traffic
congestion on US 52 between the I-40 Bypass and the proposed Western Loop
Interchange in Winston-Salem The subject project (U-2826A) is located within the
limits of project U-2826B
The exact scope of Project U-2826B has not been determined, but a study to
determine the most cost-effective locations for safety improvements is underway The
project may include the permanent closure of some on and off ramps to US 52, the use of
highway shoulders as travel lanes, and the installation of cameras and other devices to
provide motorists with information about traffic congestion and crashes A decision on
the scope of proposed improvements is anticipated in the Spring of 2004 Right of way
acquisition is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2005 and construction is scheduled in
fiscal year 2007
TIP Project B-4746 proposes to replace Bridge Number 229 on SR 2264 (Akron
Drive) over railroad tracks owned by the Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Right of
way acquisition is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2008 and construction is scheduled to
begin in fiscal year 2010
B. Deficiencies of Existing Facility
Bridge Number 256 has a sufficiency rating of 45 5, and is considered both
structurally deficient and functionally obsolete Bridge Number 257 has a sufficiency
rating of 44 9 and is also considered structurally deficient and functionally obsolete
According to federal guidelines, these bridges warrant replacement.
As mentioned in Section II-A-2, a number of ramps and interchanges are located
along US 52 in the project area. Just south of the two bridges to be replaced by this
project, a single exit ramp provides access from northbound US 52 onto northbound
Liberty Street. Currently, the weaving distance on US 52 between the 28th StreevIndiana
Avenue entrance ramp onto northbound US 52 and the Liberty Street exit ramp is
approximately 610 feet. The rmnunum recommended weaving distance along an urban
freeway is 1,600 feet In 2025, this weaving segment is anticipated to operate at level of
service (LOS) E
The vertical alignment along US 52 does not meet a 60 MPH design speed As
part of the bridge replacement project, the vertical alignment on US 52 in the project area
will be adjusted to meet a 60 MPH design speed. In order to meet this standard on US 52
6
and meet other design standards for ramps, the location of the Liberty Street exit ramp
(on US 52) would need to shift south of its present location This lessens the weaving
distance on US 52 between the 28 h Street/Indiana Avenue entrance ramp and the Liberty
Street exit ramp Therefore, making these improvements along US 52 and retaining both
the entrance and exit ramps in this area are not feasible
C. Benefits of Proposed Proiect
The proposed project will replace two obsolete bridges with wider structures
which can accommodate possible future widening The project will also improve safety
and traffic operations along US 52 in the vicinity of the bridges by eliminating an
existing weave section between two ramps By removing the Liberty Street exit ramp, a
longer acceleration lane on US 52 for the 28th Street/Indiana Avenue entrance ramp can
be accommodated In 2025 with the proposed improvements, this on-ramp is anticipated
to operate at level of service C
III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A. Proposed Structures
Bridge numbers 256 and 257 will be replaced at their existing location with new
dual structures (Figure 2) Each of the new structures will have a clear roadway width of
approximately 52 feet This width will accommodate three 12-foot lanes (two travel
lanes and acceleration or deceleration lanes for interchange), 6-foot inside and 10-foot
outside shoulders (Figure 5) The structure carrying northbound traffic will be
approximately 450 feet in length The second structure, which will carry southbound
traffic, will be approximately 400 feet in length
B. Roadway
On US 52, the existing four-lane divided typical section will be maintained
There will be approximately 900 feet of new approach work to the south and
approximately 2,000 feet of new approach work to the north of the two bridges This
approach work includes some modifications to the vertical grade on US 52 in order to
meet a 60 MPH design speed
In addition to the proposed bridge replacements, the project will also involve the
permanent closure of the exit ramp from northbound US 52 to Liberty Street In addition,
a second northbound lane will be added to Liberty Street between 28 h Street and the
existing four-lane section on Liberty Street in order to accommodate airport and
neighborhood traffic Improvements will be made at some intersections within the
protect limits More details regarding locations and recommendations are provided in
Section III-E
7
C. Right of Way and Access Control
A variable amount of right of way will be required for the project Along the east
side of Liberty Street, up to approximately 25 feet of additional right of way may be
acquired for the proposed improvements New right of way acquisition will also be
required along US 52 South of the bridges, additional right of way will be required
along the west side of US 52 North of the bridges, additional right of way will be'
required along both sides of US 52 Temporary construction easements will be required
along much of the protect, as well
The existing full control of access along US 52 will be maintained No changes to
the access control along Liberty Street are recommended
D. Design Speed/Design Exceptions
A 60 MPH design speed is proposed for portions of the project on US 52 No
design exceptions are anticipated for this project
E. Intersections
As part of the proposed project, improvements will be made to the existing
250' Street/28`h Street interchange The loop providing direct access from 28th Street onto
northbound US 52 will be removed This movement will continue to be accommodated,
however, traffic will use the ramp from Cleveland Avenue onto northbound US 52 As
part of the improvements, 26`h Street will be realigned to intersect Cleveland Avenue
across from the US 52 ramps It is likely this new intersection will be signalized A
traffic signal study will be conducted at the intersection of Liberty Street and 30th Street
following construction of the project in order to determine the feasibility of a signal at
that location
F. Signing
Directional signing will be provided along northbound US 52 to direct motorists
wishing to access northbound Liberty Street and the Smith Reynolds Airport
G. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Items
As part of the proposed project, several Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)
items will be installed and connected to the existing system along US 52 Six video
cameras will be mounted on poles within the existing right of way in order to provide
coverage of US 52 in the vicinity of the project In addition, one dynamic message sign
will also be installed along northbound US 52, south of the project area Fiber optic cable
and other hardware required for communication and image transmission will also be
installed
H. Bicycle Accommodations/Sidewalks
Existing sidewalks removed in order to construct this project will be replaced by
NCDOT at no cost to the City of Winston Salem The City has requested new sidewalk
along the east side of Liberty Street between 28 h Street and 30th Street The City has not
yet conumtted to participate in the cost of the new sidewalk NCDOT's Pedestrian
Policy Guidelines requires municipalities to commit to participate in the cost of
pedestrian facilities and maintenance and liability responsibilities The Project
Development and Environmental Analysis Branch will continue to coordinate with the
City of Winston Salem regarding their commitment to pedestrian facilities along the
project
1. Degree of Utility Conflict
Based on the location of utilities in the project area, it is anticipated power poles
along Liberty Street will need to be relocated Due to the realignment of 26`, Street,
conflicts with the gas line in the area may occur, as well
J. Maintenance of Traffic
Two lanes of traffic will be maintained in both directions on US 52 during
construction of the project A temporary detour, including a temporary detour bridge,
will be constructed on the west side of US 52 in order to maintain traffic during
construction of the new bridges (Figure 2) The detour will be removed following
construction Temporary lane closures may be required at times along US 52 or on some
of the surrounding streets, but these closures will not be permitted during peak hours
IV. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. Bridge Typical Section Alternatives
The subject protect proposes to replace Bridge Nos 256 and 257 with new
structures that have a clear roadway width of approximately 52 feet Structures with a
clear roadway width of approximately 40 feet were also considered This width would
accommodate two 12-foot travel lanes and 4-foot inside and 12-foot outside shoulders.
This width would also allow three 11-foot travel lanes to be configured, but would only
be acceptable for use on a part-tune basis It was determined the bridges need to have
9
sufficient width to accommodate three twelve-foot travel lanes, with shoulders This
provides the most flexibility in accommodating future typical sections along US 52
Rehabilitating Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 was not considered a viable
alternative due to their poor condition
B. Detour and Ramp Closure Alternatives
Traffic Maintenance Alternatives
The following traffic maintenance alternatives were considered for the project
off-site detour, phased construction (no detour), realignment of US 52, and temporary
detour structure
An off-site detour was not considered feasible due to the volume of traffic on
US 52 Phasing construction without a detour was also not a feasible alternative This
type of traffic maintenance would require reducing traffic to one lane in each direction,
which is not feasible considering the large volumes of traffic on US 52 Constructing one
of the structures on new alignment was not found to be a feasible alternative Criteria for
the recommended design speed cannot be met on new alignment without impacting the
structures on US 52 located to the north or the south of the subject bridges Therefore,
building one of the permanent structures on new alignment was eliminated from
consideration
A temporary detour (including temporary structure) will be required to maintain
traffic along US 52 during construction of the new bridges The temporary detour will
not meet a 60 MPH design speed; however, tlus is acceptable for temporary use Two
alternatives were considered for the proposed detour, an east-side detour and a west-side
detour
Ramp Closure Alternatives
Two ramp closure alternatives were considered for the project These alternatives
were developed after it was determined the bridge replacement project would lessen the
weaving distance between the 28th Street/Indiana Avenue entrance ramp onto northbound
US 52 and the Liberty Street exit ramp. Because of the close space between these two
ramps, it was determined either the 28th Street/Indiana Avenue entrance ramp or the
Liberty Street exit ramp should be permanently closed in order to eliminate the weaving
problem at this location
With the Liberty Street ramp closure alternative, improvements will be made to
the existing 25th Street/28t' Street interchange and 261' Street will be realigned to intersect
with 28h Street across from the ramps In addition, a second northbound lane will be
added to Liberty Street between 28th Street and the existing four-lane section in order to
help accommodate airport and neighborhood traffic
10
With the 28th Street/Indiana Avenue entrance ramp closure alternative,
appropriate signing will be installed to direct traffic to use the existing on-ramps onto
northbound US 52 from other locations
Project Alternative Comparison
Based on the detour and ramp closure alternatives described above, the following
project alternatives were studied
• Alternative 1 - East-side temporary detour, Liberty Street exit ramp closure
• Alternative 2 - East-side temporary detour, 28th Street/Indiana Avenue entrance ramp
closure
• Alternative 3 - West-side temporary detour, Liberty Street exit ramp closure
• Alternative 4 - West-side temporary detour, 28`h Street/Indiana Avenue entrance
ramp closure
Alternatives 1 and 2 are shown on Figure 3A Alternatives 3 and 4 are shown on
Figure 3B
Liberty Street Issues
Retaining the Liberty Street exit ramp provides a more direct connection to
Liberty Street than using the 25`' Street/28 h Street exit and the connecting streets
However, retaining the Liberty Street exit requires the removal of the US 52 northbound
entrance ramp from 28th Street/Indiana Avenue. Traffic would then be directed to use the
entrance ramps located at New Hope Lane (formerly 18th Street) or Akron Drive This
could result in additional traffic traveling in the surrounding residential neighborhoods
In addition, retaining the Liberty Street exit ramp provides two off-ramps in the same
area while removing the only US 52 entrance ramp that services the immediate area A
retaining wall would be constructed adjacent to the exit ramp, in order to limit
encroachment on the Piedmont Park public housing complex This results in additional
construction cost associated with Alternatives 2 and 4
Permanently removing the Liberty Street exit ramp results in a slightly more
circuitous route for northbound Liberty Street traffic However, removal of this ramp
helps to reduce safety conflicts at the ramp terminal and 30th Street As mentioned in
Section II-A-2, 30'h Street intersects Liberty Street approximately 150 feet north of the
exit ramp The present configuration results in a short distance for weaving movements
In this area, seven crashes occurred in the three-year time period between May 2000 and
April 2003 Therefore, removing the Liberty Street exit helps to eliminate safety
conflicts
11
Temporary Detour Issues
Constructing the temporary detour on the east-side would require the construction
of a retaining wall adjacent to Piedmont Park to limit encroachment on the property This
results in additional construction cost associated with Alternatives 1 and 2 Constructing
the temporary detour on the east-side would also result in greater impacts to two streams
This detour would also require cutting trees, which currently screen a recycling industry
from US 52 The west-side detour requires temporary easement acquisition from some of
the businesses that line Liberty Street The railroad favors the west-side detour, since it
appears to be the least disruptive to their property and operations
Alternatives Summary
One business will be relocated as a result of the proposed project, regardless of
the alternative chosen This is a result of the new approach work associated with the
bridge replacements, which does not change with the different alternatives Impacts to
terrestrial communities also remain the same with each alternative Alternatives 2 and 4
do have less of an impact on streams in the project area when compared to Alternative 3
(recommended alternative) This is due mainly to the impacts to a stream associated with
the realignment of 20h Street. With this realignment, the street moves east and closer to
the stream Therefore, total avoidance of impacts to the stream is not possible
Alternative 3 is the least expensive when compared to the other "build" alternatives
Table 2 compares the four alternatives, measuring approximate impacts within the
proposed right of way
Table 2
Alternative Comparison
Description Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Recommended Alternative 4
Residential Relocatees 0 0 0 0
Business Relocatees 1 1 1 1
Stream Impacts 350 feet 150 feet 230 feet 30 feet
Construction Cost $14,900,000 $13,800,000 $13,000,000 $13,200,000
Right of Way Cost $621,500 $579,500 $601,500 $563,500
Total Cost $15,521,500 $14,379,500 $13,601,500 $13,763,500
C. "No-Build" Alternative
The "no-build" alternative would not incur construction costs and would avoid
impacts to the natural environment, homes and businesses However, the "no-build"
alternative is not practical, eventually requiring the bridges to be closed to traffic,
increasing travel tune and inconvemence for roadway users As a result, this alternative
was eliminated from consideration
12
V. PROBABLE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED
ACTION
A. Natural Resources
1. Biotic Resources
Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems Descriptions of the
terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community classifications
(Schafale and Weakley 1990) Dominant plants and animals likely to occur in each
community are described and discussed
a. Terrestrial Communities
Three biotic communities, maintained roadside, piedmont mixed hardwood forest,
and piedmont bottomland forest, exist within the project study area and may be impacted
by the subject project Each of these communities is described below
Maintained Roadside Community
The maintained roadside community consists of the highly maintained shoulders
and some less intensively managed areas that grade into the surrounding natural
communities Significant soil disturbance and compaction, along with frequent mowing
or herbicide application, keep this community in an early successional state
Dominant plants in the heavily maintained portions of the roadside community
include fescue and plantain In the areas that receive less maintenance, more diverse
communities develop This community is populated by Japanese honeysuckle, foxtail
grass, common ragweed, and kudzu Trees present in this community include willow
oak, red cedar, red maple, Chinese privet, and American elm
Piedmont Mixed Hardwood Forest Community
Dominant plants in the Piedmont mixed hardwood forest community include
sourwood, red maple, blackberry, red mulberry, tulip poplar, greenbrier, black cherry,
and Japanese honeysuckle One small area within this community is largely dominated
by short leaf pine
Piedmont Bottomland Forest Community
A small Piedmont bottomland forest community exists on the northern end of the
project near an unnamed tributary (UT4) to Brushy Fork This community is a wetland
Species observed in this community include tulip poplar, red maple, netted chainfem,
silkly dogwood, greenbrier, and Chinese privet
13
Wildlife
Wildlife found in these communities is limited and consists primarily of wide-
ranging, adaptable species, which are well suited to coexistence with human
development Mammals common to disturbed edge areas include eastern cottontail
rabbit, beaver, Virguma opossum, raccoon, white-tailed deer, and gray squirrel The most
common reptiles found in such habitats are eastern box turtle and predators such as black
racer and eastern garter snake These species are likely to be found searching for small
mammals such as the southeastern shrew, white footed mouse, and hispid cotton rat
Birds likely to frequent such habitats include common crow, Carolina chickadee,
domestic pigeon, Carolina wren, American robin, mourning dove, and European starling
b. Aquatic Communities
Two aquatic community types, piedmont perennial streams and piedmont
intermittent streams, are located in the project study area. Physical characteristics of the
surface waters and condition of the water influence the faunal composition of the aquatic
communities Perennial streams support an assemblage of fauna that require a constant
source of flowing water Intermittent streams support fauna that inhabits streams that do
not flow constantly, but may have areas of standing water
Amplubians and reptiles commonly observed in and adjacent to small sized
perennial streams in urban areas may include northern water snake, northern cricket frog
and green frog Brushy Fork is too small to be of fishing significance Brushy Fork has
no habitat for game fish
Construction of the proposed project will have various impacts on the biotic
resources described Any construction related activities in or near these resources have
the potential to impact biological functions
Terrestrial Impacts
Project construction will result in clearing and degradation of portions of these
communities Estimated impacts are derived based on the total project length The entire
nght-of-way for each alternative minus the existing road surface was used for this
calculation The entire nght-of-way will probably not be impacted, therefore, actual
impacts to the communities may be less
14
Table 3
Estimated impacts to terrestrial communities
Community type Alternative 1
acres Alternative 2
acres Alternative 3*
acres Alternative 4
acres
Maintained Roadside 15 15 15 15 16 87 16 87
Piedmont Mixed
Hardwood Forest 5 74 5 74 4 02 4 02
Piedmont Bottomland
Forest <0 1 <0 1 <0 1 <0 1
Total 20.99 20.99 20.99 20.99
*Recommended
Flora and fauna occurring in these communities are generally common throughout
North Carolina because of their adaptability to wide ranging environmental factors
Moreover, a roadside shoulder community will be re-established after construction
Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities should repopulate areas suitable
for the species following project completion As a result, it is unlikely that existing
species will be displaced significantly from the project study area following construction
However, to minimize the temporary effects of project construction, all cleared areas
along the roadways will be revegetated with native or non-invasive species promptly after
project completion to minimize erosion and the loss of wildlife habitat
Aquatic Impacts
Aquatic communities are sensitive to any changes in the environment Any action
that affects water quality can have an adverse impact on aquatic organisms Although
most of the disturbance caused by project construction will be temporary, some impacts
will be long term or irreversible Installation or modification of instream structures can
permanently affect many physical stream parameters
2. Water Resources
a. Physical Characteristics and Water Quality
Four unnamed tributaries (UT) to Brushy Fork exist within the study area for the
proposed project. Waters in the project vicinity are part of the Yadkm-Pee Dee River
Basin Three of the four tributaries (UT1, UT2, and UT3) are classified as intermittent
streams UT4 to Brushy Fork is a perenmal stream UT I is located dust east of 261'
Street and appears to run parallel to the street UT2, UT3, and UT4 are all located on the
east side of US 52, north of the Norfolk Southern rail yard Figure 6 shows the location
of each surface water Descriptions of the tributaries are provided in the following table.
15
Table 4
Water Resources in Project Area
Name Classification Avg. depth Avg. width Substrate Flow
UT I Intermittent 0.0 in 10 ft silt none
UT2 Intermittent 0 0 in 1.0 ft silt none
UT3 Intermittent 00M 2 0 ft silt none
UT4 Perennial 2 0 in 4 0 ft sand, silt slow
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) The classification of Brushy Fork [DWQ Index No. 12-94-12-6,
(3/1/77)] and its unnamed tributaries is C Class C freshwaters are protected for
secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life propagation and survival, and wildlife
No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW), or Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-II) occur within one mile of the project
study area
Water Quality
The DWQ has initiated a whole basm approach to water quality management for
the 17 river basins within the state Prior to the implementation of the basinwide
approach to water quality management, the Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
assessed water quality by sampling for benthic macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed
monitoring sites throughout the state There are no biological monitoring sites located
within the project vicinity
Point source refers to discharges that enter surface water through a pipe, ditch, or
other defined points of discharge Point source dischargers located throughout North
Carolina are permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) program There are no permitted dischargers located within one mile upstream
of the project study area
Non-point source refers to runoff that enters surface waters through storm water
flow or a non-defined point of discharge In the project area, land development,
construction, roads, and parking lots may serve as sources for various forms of nonpoint
source pollutants.
b. Summary of Anticipated Effects
Impacts to four unnamed tributaries to Brushy Fork may occur as a result of
project construction. As stated in the previous section, UT4 is the only perennial stream
within the project area It is unlikely that UT4 will be directly impacted by project
construction.
16
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters
• Increased silt loading and sedimentation from erosion of disturbed soils
• Changes in light incidence, water clarity, and water temperature due to increased
sediment load and riparian vegetation removal
• Alteration of stream discharge due to silt loading and changes in surface or ground
water drainage patterns
• Increased potential for release of toxic compounds such as fuel and oil from
construction equipment and other vehicles
Precautions will be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study
area NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMP) for the Protection of Surface Waters
will be strictly enforced throughout the construction stage of the project
3. Waters of the U.S.
Surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands fall under the broad category of
"waters of the United States," as defined under 33 CFR 328 3(a) Any action that
proposes to place fill material into these areas falls under the j unsdiction of the U S
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33
US C 1344)
a. Surface Waters/Wetlands
As discussed in Section V-A-2-a, four surface waters exist within the project area
and are considered jurisdictional
As mentioned in Section V-A-1-a, a bottomland forest wetland exists within the
project area The soil in this community has a hue of 7 5 YR, a value of 3, and a chroma
of 1 Hydrologic indicators included saturation and inundation in some portions of the
wetland
b. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Estimated impacts to four unnamed tributaries to Brushy Fork may occur as a
result of project construction Impacts to a small bottomland hardwood wetland may also
occur as a result of project construction Impacts to the wetland, based on project length,
are estimated to be less than 0 1 acre for each alternate Estimated impacts to surface
waters are based on feet of stream within the proposed right of way Estimated impacts
for each alternate are provided in Table 5
17
Table 5
Estimated Impacts to Surface Waters"
Surface Water Alternative 1
feet Alternative 2
feet Alternative 3*
feet Alternative 4
feet
UT1 200 0 200 0
UT2 75 75 15 15
UT3 75 75 15 15
UT4 0 0 0 0
Total 350 150 230 30
"Impacts to the wetland located in the project area are estimated to be less than 0 1 acre
for each alternative
*Recommended
c. Anticipated Permit Requirements
A Nationwide Permit 23 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (23) is likely to be applicable
for the crossings of the unnamed tributaries to Brushy Fork A North Carolina Division
of Water Quality General Certification (Water Quality Certification No 3107) will likely
be required for the project
d. Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation
The COE has adopted through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) a
wetland mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and
sequencing The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological
and physical integrity of Waters of the United States, specifically wetlands Mitigation of
wetland impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include avoiding impacts (to
wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and
compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508 20). Each of these three aspects (avoidance,
minimization, and compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially
Avoidance
The proposed project involves the replacement of two existing bridges along a
freeway Total avoidance of impacts to water resources in the project area is not feasible
Impacts to UT1 are a result of the realignment of 26th Street to intersect Cleveland
Avenue across from the US 52 ramps With this realignment, the street moves east and
closer to the stream Total avoidance of impacts to UT1 is not possible. Impacts to the
other tributaries will likely result from pipe installation and/or the lengthening of existing
pipes
18
Minimization
As mentioned in Section V-A-2-a, UT2, UT3 UT4 and the wetland are located to
the east of US 52 The recommended alternative will construct the temporary detour on
the west side of US 52 This helps to minimize impacts to these tributaries In the areas
of these water resources, the steepest side slopes practicable will be used in order to
further minimize impacts Implementation of NCDOT's Best Management Practices
(BMPs) will also help reduce project impacts on the water resources.
Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to
Waters of the United States have been avoided and mtngntzed to the maximum extent
practicable
Estimated impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are anticipated to be less than
0 1 acre Compensatory mitigation will not likely be required for these impacts
However, final permit/mitigation decisions rest with the COE and DWQ Written
approval of the final mitigation plan is required from the DWQ prior to the issuance of a
401 Certification
4. Rare and Protected Species
a. Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended As of
January 29, 2003, there are three federally-protected species listed for Forsyth County
(Table 6)
Table 6
Federally Protected Species for Forsyth County
BIOLOGICAL
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS HABITAT? CONCLUSION
Clemmys Bog turtle T S/A N/A N/A
muhlenber ti
Ptcoides borealis Red-cockaded E No No Effect
woodpecker
Cardamine Small-anthered E No No Effect
mtcranthera bittercress
E -Endangered, a species that is likely to become extinct throughout all or a sigmficant portion of its range
T S/A -a species that is Threatened due to similarity of appearance with other raze species that
are listed for protection
*- Historic record- obscure and incidental record
19
The bog turtle is listed as Threatened due to similarity of appearance to other rare
species that are listed for protection These species are not biologically endangered or
threatened and are not subject to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act Therefore, a
survey is not required
No habitat for either the small-anthered bittercress or red-cockaded woodpecker
were found during field surveys conducted for the project on November 13, 2001 Due to
the amount of time that has passed since the field surveys, the biological conclusions for
these species were reviewed in December 2003 and were found to still be valid In
addition, a review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on
December 3, 2003 indicated no known occurrence of either species within one mile of the
project area The protect will have "No Effect" on either of these federally-protected
species
b. Federal Species of Concern
Brook floater (Alasmidonta varicosa) is listed as a Federal Species of Concern
(FSC) for Forsyth County. Federal Species of Concern are not afforded federal
protection under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject to any of its provisions,
including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or
Endangered Organisms which are listed as Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern
by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) list of Rare Plant and Animal
Species are afforded state protection under the NC State Endangered Species Act and the
NC Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979. The Brook floater is listed as
Endangered in the NC NHP database (database update May 2003)
B. Cultural Resources
The proposed protect is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended Correspondence from the State Historic
Preservation Office (HPO), dated August 10, 2000 (see Appendix A), stated that they are
aware of "no properties of architectural, lustoric, or archaeological significance which
would be affected by the project." No archaeology survey was conducted in connection
with this project
A survey of lustoric arcltectural resources was performed for the area of
potential effect (APE) for the protect, including locations where ITS items may be
installed No properties were found to be less than fifty years of age and meeting
eligibility Criterion G for listing in the National Register Seven properties over fifty
years of age were identified within the APE and were reviewed by HPO, NCDOT and the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). It was determined these properties are not
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places A copy of the concurrence form is
included in Appendix A The project will not affect any properties listed on or eligible
for the National Register of Historic Places
20
C. Section 4(f) Resources
Section 4(f) of the U S Department of Transportation Act of 1966 specifies that
publicly owned land from a public park, recreation area, wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or
land of a historic site of national, state, or local significance may be used for federal
projects only if there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of the land and the
project includes all possible planning to muumize harm to 4(f) lands resulting from such
use
No resources protected by Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966, as amended,
were identified within the project area
D. Community/Social Effects
1. Neighborhoods/Communities
Residential development in the project area is predominantly located east of
US 52 Piedmont Park is a public housing community in the project area that was built in
the 1950s It is located north of 26 h Street, south of 29 h Street and east of US 52
Piedmont Park has approximately 240 residential housing units, a community building
and a daycare facility The community is accessed from either 29`x' Street or 26 h Street
The Northeast Winston neighborhood is located south of 20h Street and east of
US 52 Most of the homes in the area were constructed prior to World War II The area
from 21" Street to 26`h Street, US 52 to Bowen Park was certified as the Northeast
Winston #3 Urban Redevelopment Area in October 1999 A small portion of this area,
from US 52 to Cleveland Avenue, was certified as "blighted" Currently, there is not a
redevelopment plan for this area
A separate portion of the neighborhood, Northeast Winston #2, is currently part of
a redevelopment project by the City This area is located south of Northeast Winston #3,
between US 52 and Cleveland Avenue, and 21" Street and Bethlehem (formerly 19th
Street) Some structures in the area have been acquired and cleared, new streets and
homes will be constructed
2. Relocation of Homes and Businesses
The proposed project will require the relocation of one business The relocation
program for the project will be conducted in accordance with the Federal Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law
91-646), and/or the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS-133-5 through 133-
18) The NCDOT relocation program is designed to provide assistance to displaced
persons in relocating to a replacement site in which to live or do business Appendix B
21
contains additional information regarding NCDOT relocation programs and includes
copies of the relocation reports prepared for the project
3. Minority/Low-income Populations
Executive Order 12898 requires that each federal agency, to the greatest extent
allowed by law, administer and implement its programs, policies, and activities that affect
human health or the environment so as to identify and avoid "disproportionately high and
adverse" effects on minority and low-income populations
A citizens informational workshop was held on April 30, 2001 The workshop
was advertised in local newspapers and newsletters were mailed to property owners along
the project Information about the workshop was provided to staff of the Piedmont Park
community center Transportation to the workshop was also made available on a request
basis In addition to the workshop, numerous meetings were held with City staff and
officials to discuss the proposed project The major concerns expressed included
mamtauung access from Liberty Street to Piedmont Park and minimizing impacts to the
neighborhood.
With the proposed project, access from Liberty Street onto 30th Street will
continue to be provided The recommended alternative (Alternative 3) also minimizes
impacts to the Piedmont Park property Retaining the Liberty Street exit ramp
(Alternatives 2 and 4) would require construction of a permanent retaining wall along the
edge of the highway and Piedmont Park property The recommended alternative does not
require this construction
The proposed project will require the relocation of one business. This business is
not minonty-owned Based on project studies, this project is being implemented in
accordance with Executive Order 12898
E. Land Use
1. Existing Land Use and Zoning
The project area is highly urbanized, surrounded by a mix of developments In
the project area, residential development is primarily located on the east side of US 52.
Generally, the area located south of East 31St Street and east of US 52 is zoned residential
but vanes in density level
A number of businesses, including convenience stores and an automobile parts
store, are located along Liberty Street in the project area The area immediately
surrounding Liberty Street, south of Cleveland Avenue/Indiana Avenue, is zoned general
business. A Norfolk Southern Railroad switching yard is also located on the west side of
22
Liberty Street, north of US 52 Smith Reynolds Airport is located on the east side of
Liberty Street, north of 30th Street The area encompassing both the rail yard and the
airport is zoned general industrial The location of the rescue squad, near the intersection
of 30a' Street and Liberty Street, is zoned institutional public
2. Future Land Use
The current comprehensive plan, the Legacy Development Guide, is a general
long-range guide for growth and development in Forsyth County and its eight
municipalities The Legacy guide was adopted in 2001 Neither Forsyth County nor the
City of Winston-Salem has any other official land use plans or maps
The project area is shown within the Municipal Services Area on the Legacy's
Growth Management Plan Map More specifically, the land use area is classified as the
Urban Neighborhood Growth Management Area As outlined in the Legacy, the goals
for this area include encouraging quality infill development, neighborhood and
community services, historic preservation and rehabilitation and reuse of existing
structures
In addition to the Legacy plan, the US 52 Corridor Land Use and Transportation
Plan makes recommendations for land use in the project area The plan focuses on the
portion of US 52 from I-40 to the proposed location of the Northern Beltway near Rural
Hall Road In the area of the bridge replacement, the Plan recommends shifting the
US 52 alignment to the west of its current location and relocating Liberty Street to the
east of US 52 Some of the land use types recommended are different than present
zoning In the area of 26`h Street and Cleveland Avenue, mixed-use neighborhood land
use is recommended The area north of 29 h Street, presently zoned residential, is
recommended to change to industrial land use in order to accommodate the proposed
Airport Business Park
An Airport Business Park is proposed for the area south of Smith Reynolds
Airport, north of 26 h Street and east of Liberty Street The site is approximately
65 acres The master plan for the proposed Business Park depicts 12 buildings on the site
that could provide a total of 320,000 square feet of office, research, warehouse or
commercial space Some changes in zoning may be required to accommodate the
different uses proposed for the site The plan also shows 26a' Street serving as a collector
street through the property. Site acquisition for the Business Park is currently underway
(Infrastructure development will take place once a developer has been selected )
The Liberty Street Master Plan was adopted by the Board of Aldermen for the
City of Winston Salem in July 1997 This plan includes recommendations for the Liberty
Street Corridor in six vision areas transportation, economic development, land use and
zoning, safety, design and appearance, and sense of community The subject project is
considered to be located in the North and North Central segments of Liberty Street The
recommended land use for these areas closely corresponds with existing uses
Commercial and industrial uses are recommended in the vicinity of the airport Local
23
service businesses, such as hardware stores and automotive repair stores would continue
in the areas south of 29th Street Other improvements recommended for these areas
include sidewalks and pedestrian facilities, and vegetative screens and landscaping that
would screen parking and storage areas and contribute to unifying the entire Liberty
Street Corridor
F. Smith Reynolds Airport
As mentioned in Section II-A-10, the proposed project is located within the
approach path for runway 4 of the Smith Reynolds Airport As part of the proposed
project, US 52 will be raised in the vicinity of the new bridges in order to meet a 60 MPH
design speed and vertical clearance requirements over the railroad It is anticipated the
required FAA clearance will be met based on the approach slope (20 1) currently used for
the runway However, the airport's master plan recommends permitting the use of a
flatter approach slope (34 1) in the future Based on the current design, there are
proposed roadway elevations within the project that will not meet the clearance
requirements if the approach slope was lowered Lowering the proposed roadway is not
feasible due to vertical clearance requirements over the railroad and the proposed design
speed for the project
Construction within the approach path of the runway requires additional
coordination and approval from the FAA The Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch (NCDOT) will ensure proper coordination takes place
G. Prime and Important Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 requires all federal agencies or their
representatives to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on
prime and important farmland soils Land which has been previously developed or
planned for development by the local governing body is exempt from the requirements of
the Act.
North Carolina Executive Order Number 96 requires all state agencies to consider
the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on prune farmland soils, as
designated by the US Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Land which is
planned or zoned for urban development is not subject to the same level of preservation
afforded other rural, agricultural areas
Zoning in the project area includes residential, business and industrial. In
addition, none of the soil types classified as prune farmland soils exist in the project area.
24
H. Flood Hazard Evaluation
The City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County are participants in the National
Flood Insurance Regular Program There are no major stream crossings within the
project limits; therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project will not adversely affect
floodplains in the project area
1. Traffic Noise Analysis
The subject project does not propose additional through lanes on US 52 or any
change in speed limit Therefore, the project will not increase traffic volumes and the
project's change in noise levels will not be significant However, due to the
recommended closure of the Liberty Street exit ramp, trafficxatterns in the surrounding
street network will change The proposed realignment of 26 Street with Cleveland
Avenue moves the roadway away from the closer residences With the shift and with
traffic speeds low in this type of urban setting, noise levels are not expected to
significantly increase
"No-build" traffic volumes for the year 2025 were compared with projected
volumes for the same year based on the closure of the Liberty Street exit ramp
(recommended improvements) Along Liberty Street, north of 28 h Street/Indiana
Avenue, the volumes increased approximately 8 8 percent On Akron Drive, just east of
the US 52 northbound exit ramp, traffic volumes are projected to increase approximately
8 3 percent If traffic were to double on the existing street network, noise levels would
only increase approximately 3 dBA When real-life noises are heard, it is barely possible
to detect noise level changes of 2 to 3 dBA Therefore, noise levels are not expected to
significantly increase along Liberty Street or Akron Drive as a result of the proposed
ramp closure It is anticipated the project's impact on the noise environment in the
project area will not be significant
J. Air Ouality Analysis
The project is located within Forsyth County, which is within the Greensboro-
Winston-Salem-High Point nonattainment area for ozone (03) and the Winston-Salem
nonattainment area for carbon monoxide (CO) as defined by the EPA The 1990 Clean
Air Act Amendments (CAAA) designated these areas as "moderate" nonattamment areas
for 03 and CO However, due to unproved monitoring data, these areas were
redesignated as "maintenance" for 03 on November 7, 1993 and for CO on November 8,
1994 Section 176(c) of the CAAA requires that transportation plans, programs and
projects conform to the intent of the state air quality implementation plan (SIP) The
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Urban Area 2025 Long-Range Transportation Plan
(LRTP) and the 2002-2008 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
have been determined to conform to the intent of the SIP The USDOT air quality
25
conformity approval of the LRTP and the MTIP was May 28, 2002 The current
conformity determination is consistent with the final conformity rule found in 40 CFR
Parts 51 and 93 There have been no significant changes in the project's design concept
or scope, as used in the confonmty analyses
The Liberty Street and Indiana Avenue intersection was selected to analyze air
quality impacts of the proposed project The "worst-case" predicted 1-hour CO
concentrations for the evaluation build years of 2005, 2010 and 2025 are 6 1, 6 1 and 6 5
ppm, respectively. Comparison to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) indicates no violation of these standards Hence, the project's impact on air
quality will not be significant
If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance
with applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in
compliance with 15 NCAC 2D 0520
K. Hazardous Materials
A database search was conducted to identify potential sites containing hazardous
material within the project area The search did not reveal any regulated landfills or
CERCLA sites in the area of proposed improvements
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) database identified
several sites within the project area that generate hazardous waste as defined by the Act
Information about these sites is listed in the following table
Table 7
RCRA Sites
Site Address
Arm Reserve AMSA 120 G 3301-1 N Glenn Avenue
Trader Publishing Winston PLT 3001 N Liberty Street
Winston Body Repairs, Inc 2610 N. Liberty Street
A search for underground storage tanks (USTs) was also included in the database
review The following table lists both regulated USTs in the project area, as well as,
reported leaking UST incidents tracked by the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
26
Table 8
UST sites
Site Address
Brenner Iron & Metal - Waste
Management* 3301 Glenn Avenue
Norfolk and Western Railway
Com an* 3000 Liberty Street
Davco Co oration* 3001 Liberty Street
Kin Property, James and Bessie* 2713 Liberty Street
Waste Management of the Piedmont 3303 N Glenn Avenue
Waste Management 3301 Glenn Avenue
Suburban Propane Just north of the intersection of Liberty
Street and 30th Street
Liberty North Fire Station 2995 N Liberty Street
RJR Flight Operations 2901 N Liberty Street
Flynn Amoco Service (now Dick
Kelly's Trucks 2821 N Liberty Street
Kns 's Food Mart 2609 N Liberty Street
Brenner Iron & Metal Com an 3415 Glenn Avenue
*Reported leaking UST incidents at site
The Hazardous Substance Disposal (HSDS) list contains locations of uncontrolled
and unregulated hazardous waste sites The database search listed one site, IMC, within
the project area
In addition to this database search, the NCDOT Geotechmcal Unit performed a
field reconnaissance survey for the project area Two other sites were identified as
possible UST sites
The first site is a vacant lot located in the northeast comer of the intersection of
25'' Street and Liberty Street Existing concrete pads may have been former pump
islands The property does not appear to be under remediation A sign on the property
indicates that a gas station is planned for the location
Liberty Street Sports Bar is located on the east side of Liberty Street, dust north of
Dick Kelly's Trucks The history of the business is unknown, but the building resembles
a gas station The property does not appear to be under remediation at this time
The proposed project will acquire right of way along the east side of Liberty
Street, north of Indiana Avenue and along both sides of US 52 A detailed investigation
will be performed prior to right of way acquisition
27
L. Geodetic Survey Markers
If it is determined the project will impact any geodetic survey markers in the area,
the NC Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to construction in order to allow resetting
of monuments
M. Indirect/Cumulative Effects
Permanently removing the Liberty Street exit ramp results in a slightly more
circuitous route for northbound Liberty Street traffic However, with the close proximity
of the 25`h Street/28t' Street exit ramp to the area, it is unlikely that trips into and out of
the surrounding neighborhoods will be significantly impacted
It is anticipated the removal of the exit ramp will result in increased traffic
volumes in the 25th Street/28`h Street ramp area and at the Akron Drive exit On US 52,
volumes increased north of the (removed) Liberty Street exit However, north of the
Akron Drive exit, volumes along US 52 remained essentially the same with and without
the Liberty Street exit Comparing the "no-build" and the recommended "build"
alternative, it appears that traffic volumes are shifting to other exit ramps in the area, but
are not changing significantly along US 52
Based on the urban landscape in the project area, it is unlikely that the proposed
project will result in changes in existing land use
VI. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Citizens Informational Workshop
A citizens informational workshop for the project was held on April 30, 2001
The workshop was advertised in local newspapers and newsletters were mailed to
property owners along the project Transportation to the workshop was made available
on a request basis Aerial photographs showing the two temporary detour alternatives
and the two ramp closure alternatives (see Section IV-B) were displayed at the meeting.
Informational handouts were made available to workshop participants
Twenty-three persons registered at the meeting Two written comments were
received; both recommended closing the Liberty Street/Airport exit ramp
Three point workshops were held for this project and Projects U-2826B and
U-2925 on October 20 and 21, 2003 A total of approximately 60 persons attended these
three meetings A few attendees expressed concern about the closing of the Liberty
Street exit ramp and its unpact on trucking industries located along north Liberty Street
A few people expressed their support for closing the exit ramp.
28
B. Public Hearin
A public hearing will be held following approval of this document The public
hearing will allow the public to view more detailed information than previously available
at the citizens informational workshop and will provide a forum for public comments
C. Agency Coordination
Comments regarding the proposed project were requested from various federal,
state and local agencies Copies of the comments received are included in Appendix A
An asterisk indicates comments were received from that agency
U S Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
U S Department of the Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service
*N C Department of Cultural Resources
N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and
Recreation
*N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality
N C Department of Public Instruction - School Planning
*N C Wildlife Resources Commission
Forsyth County
*City of Winston-Salem
*Norfolk Southern Railroad Corporation
VII. BASIS FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Based on the studies performed for the proposed project, it is concluded the
project will not result in significant social, economic, or environmental impacts, and the
categorical exclusion classification, as defined in 40 CFR 1508.4 and 23 CFR 771 117, is
appropriate
29

??r{ 5 K-11,H,j 0New
,jJ?Tt I Crrel
Sunleyvdk
Be hems i41Ytric
F H
E
tn• Ptsltt 7 ; ?? e
Pclin

$
d
762 oba' a a
pw2e•w, ?eie a
rev a ,Y 2204
r

*tr use a
t2ee . ? ?
?
mrth Reynolds /UrporC
?
O 204 MaaY• g a \?pr r!
O \\ t7 \

01 g K w..

? O
4
34ft St

a

aa,t `

? ssa
a

55

?t
2zne a \ •? 9e %

2M a \ \ ` 52 BRIDGE NO 258

Y

zM

a
7
'?
?
tiMlrN?
A- 319
IF
`? BRIDGE NO 257
IWwrlowmnce t t E a ?, as

°I
d
a i
1?
E
ZM
0. mwft
&h \ of
3
g ,?
j(
274
a
d
y
4L 7 7
U' I Ydew p
y ' Yl
1? a
W I2O A E 2T ? Q$
1
a

Im-
a L a

7

8

Y >

ti I

#2450

E'

Ln ?
Bot
a 4
W a E 3M a 7< / 1/
? E 7M a l 2M a

E

2M

a ? g 5 E 1346 SL

2M
\
a

241h

a
E II yd E 7}e a E \
LN a yp 0.

f

r ae 9
at
< D•et
a E f ?1 E mtl at E `
22.d a
22ne a
E ?Z/e a l/ 62 E i 21 t E ttt a ` 4
r ? a
7 E 2M a \ ! /
!
!¦ / /7 E IM a iM a ?SdL \ -
I ,- Im SL
E ,71Y
a l?
Q
my • ?
? i
?
t E ,7T
/
rem ? q
E iM 1} I
? g
I A
3 / E 7M
a 7 2450 D
A Dr tM
E ?
710 // r
feel
E 0.
0.
ip
t P
E ,lei 0. !1 1Q
p
G 0 < Q
I
i
g Crwred
a
'
F
a E 172 0.
12
8L FEET <
g
0
? 400 800 12001600 E IM a
t
a
Her $
\ _
t 0
/ 200 400 °e1n
,
Sd'
M
E
_,aY METERS p
4 ? LZ M '
- 0.
? yy
46
^>a _a. M fi p t { M Y? y.r ?_ -.
# 1 1.: a xti
L- T
yr ? m o o ? ? 1 ,?, .
m
is 3 3 p ? v ------ -
r
c s3 c a
?z m !
: ffY a CSY (? ' ( ??1 ? __
yr
1
j
I y ?
k€a
tnro O r
t(J+z 2
C1 to t1
O hr ro A f ; . - °?
:2z 0
CD ° 7 Q ? i`r.y , ?r ; .z t 1
rn

t a ? r.
? k

C, IV

j 3 i c
µ

f.

I

J

Y?

1

e
, r

p
r a

.:? ? .rte

"J

".$ • * }

r

M a
V)
m
rrD
-'1
m
X
D
V '
Pg
s
R WO i^ « 3
7
, ( ik 4 ? < k p G? ti
z e
n e>
E
it . . _.. ti!?

;
w may ? t. 1 ?:.?
ro '

H
J .

x
1
r k

m

-
co
CTS

P ^3 {^ I
L i i ? R Y A^t
i
.t + C to i
r
ex C f ? ? ..
1)
t
r
8 7
4 "
K>
J ? L tz

y ?
? [
r a
I

,

I
i

i?
L
-

q 7

W
?vl

YxaY t rt* .
'
.

A
t

t

J l /t

err , ?yz.'- jr

a ? f

i
I

. - i C'A

x'
g -.
S
g 2 600 A S
53800 17 600
C4
l5 Al
3 600 8
215 • ?o
20 300 6300
60
10 (43) 13600
o
1 o -IT-). 50
(54) 3 1 8 ?
2,600
n /
O
Qc° 30
50
TIP PROJECT U-2826A
2006 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT
NOT TO SCALE
0000 =ADT (vpd)
DHV Fac =Design Hourly Volume (%) at K30
K30 =30th highest hourly volume as (%) of ADT
D =Directional Flow (%)
-0 =Direction of D
am/pm =am or pm peak
(0,0) Trucks (Dual, TTST)
pm
10 0 60
(DHV) (4'3) (D)
(Trucks)
Zo
rJ?
J J,
O
71 000
,\o
"I V
tt""00
2 900
10*60
(z)
t 10 900
100y 1 400
1 400
y
5400
400
0
3700
I ,
15 600
68 200//
61

r
\d??a
Ile
N 26th Street <'
25th Street 6 0
50 *n- 10
$ (21)
G? v
O
Figure 4A

0 g? v
2?DWi?e pp? e
c? y 47 000 23 200 pR` \0
so
$ ?o
4 400
275, o
26 100
0 60 17 400 ?
so00
1 Q?

to ? so
( 0
3 700 y,IT
h /
6? v
O
?p
68400
0
i
n°
t?l
3 500
10-ET-1- 60
(2,1)
?* M1 1
/ 13 600
,600y 1700
tl 600
6 800
600
°?.Y57
4 800 0
1911
l
^O
65 200
TIP PROJECT U-2826A
2026 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
WITHOUT PROPOSED PROJECT
NOT TO SCALE
0000 =ADT (vpd)
DHV Fac =Design Hourly Volume (%) at K30
K30 =30th highest hourly volume as (%) of ADT
D =Directional Flow (%)
-? =Direction of D
am/pm =am or pm peak
(00) Trucks (Dual, TTST)
pm
10 --? 60
(4,3)
(DHV)
(D)
(Trucks)

1
lo??a'q?'e
26th Street F
700
25th Street 4'
50 ?Dm- 10
$ (2,1)
4C
0
Figure 4B
0
a? 53 800
3 600
21409
20 300
60 13800 a I?r
10 0
?o
10 -M* 50 a\
(5,4) 31
2,600
0
€n
0
S
260, -NS
19
No
tP ?SAI
.8
100
?P
V?
?n 10
so
TIP PROJECT U-2826A
2006 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
WITH PROPOSED PROJECT
NOT TO SCALE
0000 =ADT (Vpd)
DHV Fac =Design Hourly Volume (%) at K30
K30 =30th highest hourty volume as (%) of ADT
D =Directional Flow (%)
0 =Dlrecbon of D
arnipm =am or pm peak
(010) Trucks (Dual TTST)
Pm
10 60
(4'3)
(DHV)
(D)
(Trucks)
?O
J ?
72 800
10)? 60 4
(2,1)
0
^o
11 700
T 11 700
100y 1 400
1400
5 400
400
G? v
3600
ry
41
" 900
67 700 //
60
?I
r
re
1 26th Street F
25th Street F
50 4LM 10
$ (21)
Ea? `?
0
Figure 4C
a
0 2? Vi 'a
°
n I 47 25 100
000
Ep ?S 4l
4 400
273
?o 10 100
25900 ?
- ? _
0
m
60 n aoo -
10 (43)
J
$1o
?o /
l0 Pmt SO
3 ?
(54)
/
3 700 ?, ? "t7 4?
r /
6? v
O
50 l4})
TIP PROJECT U-2826A
2025 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
WITH PROPOSED PROJECT
NOT TO SCALE
0000 =ADT (vpd)
DHV Fac =Design Hourly Volume (%) at K30
K30 =30th highest hourly volume as (%) of ADT
D =Directional Flow (%)
-? =Direction of D
am/pm =am or pm peak
(00) Trucks (Dual, TTST)
pm
10 --- 0 60
(4,3)
(DHV)
(D)
(Trucks)
?0\
-ro
\\ 70 500
10?60
(21)
O
^O
?? / 14 800
T 14 800
600y 1700
1 600
y
6800
600
0
4 v
0
4600
I ry,
o
19 900
64 '701/1
56

1
a,q ve
26th Street F
*-
8000
25th Street F
so 10
$ (21)
Elv
O
Figure 4D
TIP Project U-2826A
Proposed Typical Section for Bridge Replacement on US 52
52 FEET
10 FT * 12 FT 12 FT 12 FT 6 FT
Southbound Structure

6 FT 12 FT 12 FT * 12 FT 10 FT
Northbound Structure
* Acceleration or deceleration lane for interchange located south of the bridges
Proposed Typical Section for Liberty Street
48 FT
« • ?. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
t OF TRANSPORTATION
a PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
?....« ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
Bndge Numbers 256 and 257
on US 52 In Winston-Salem
Forsyth County
TIP Protect U-2826A
Proposed Typical Section Figure 5
52 FEET
STATE
I? r
S? r
•,W 4W?•
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L S Brook, Administrator
James B Hunt Jr, Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J Crow, Director
June 28, 2000
MEMORANDUM
TO Alethia Raynor
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
NCDOT
FROM David Brook (--
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
RE US 52-Replace Bridge Nos 256 and 257 in Winston Salem, Forsyth County,
Tip No U-2826A
Thank you for your memorandum of May 15 2000, concerning the above project
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties of architectural, historic, or
archaeological significance which would be affected by the project Therefore, we have no comment
on the project as currently proposed
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified
at 36 CFR Part 800
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration If you have questions concerning the above
comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763
DB scb
Location Mailing-Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N Blount St Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center Raletch NC 2 7699-46 1 7 (919) 7314763 733-8653
kRCHAEOLOCI 1121 N Blount St Raleieh NC 4619 Mail SLrN1L Center Raleigh NC 2 7690-46 1 9 [phone] 71' 2671
RFCTORATION ill N Blount 'ii kilt-eh NC 1h1', kind Crn it C-i- P.,1-h NC 27A00_AAi2 10101 -ia^_ Ace^ 21, eons

STATE ,
n
sr 1r
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L S Brook, Administrator
James B Hunt Jr, Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J Crow, Director
August 10, 2000
MEMORANDUM
To William D Gilmore, P E, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
From David Brook M?rUO4&&ILI
Deputy State Histo Preservation Officer
Re US 52, Replace Bridge Numbers 256 and 257 in Winston-Salem, Forsyth
County, Federal Aid Project No NBF-52 (14), State Project No 8 1622802,
TIP Project No U-2826A, ER 00-7611
Thank you for your letter of May 25, 2000, concerning the above project
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties of
architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would be affected by the
project Therefore, we have no comment on the project as currently proposed
The above c.inim:nts are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Fhstonc
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Fhstonc Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration If you have questions concerning
the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review
Coordinator, at 919/733-4763
DB kgc
ADMINISTRATION
ARCHAEOLOGI
RECTORATION
Location
5,07 N Blount St Raleigh NC
4'1 IN Blount St Raleigh NC
1, N Blount St Raleieh NC
Mailing-Address
4617 Mail Sen ice Center Raleigh NC 77609-4617
4619 Mail Sen icL Center Raleieh NC 77699-4619
4613 Mail Sen icc Center Raleieh NC 27699-461',
Telephone/Fax
[phone] 733-8653
[phone] - 71, 2671
(9191 731-6547 71?-4ROI
0
Fe de rul .l id #
TIP # U-2$Z&A Cotnity f g!iEit"
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Project Description
On 3/11 C trepresentatives of the
ET-North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
orth Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
reviewed the subject project at
? Sc ing meeting
2191-Storic architectural resources photograph review session/consultation
7 Other
All parties present agreed
there are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects
there are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Cntena Consideration G
within the project's area of potential effects
there are properties over fifty years old within the project's Area of Potential Effects (APE), but based
on the histoncal information available and the photographs of each property, the property identified
as (List Attached) is considered not eligible for the National Register and no further evaluation of it
is necessary
there are no National Register-listed properties within the project's area of potential effects
all properties greater than 50 years of age located in the APE have been considered at this consultation,
and based upon the above concurrence, all compliance for historic architecture with Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project
Signed
Representative, NCDOT

3/1/Z'3,0
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency
State Historic Preservation Officer
Date
If a surve% report is prepared a final copy of this form and the attached list will he included
Y
Federal .ltd 9NHF-32(14) TIP :.[,-2826A County Forsyth
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Project Description Replacement of Brides 256 and 257 on US 52 in Winston-Salem Expansion of study area
On October 18, 2001 representatives of the
[[]? North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
? Other
Reviewed the subject project at
? Scoping meeting
Historic architectural resources photograph review session consultation
? Other
All parties present agreed
? There are no properties over fifty vears old within the project's area of potential effects
There are no properties less than fifrv years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G within the
project's area of potential effects
There are properties over fifty years old within the projecr s Area of Potential Effects (APE) but based on the
historical information available and the photographs of :ach propem the property identified as (List Attached) is
considered not eligible for the National Register and no rurther evaluation of it is necessan L t 13t G? pt E,
? There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project s area of potential effects
? All properties greater than 30 years of age located in the APE have been considered at this consultation and based
upon the above concurrence, all compliance for historic architecture %N ith Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project
? There are no historic properties affected by this project (Attach am notes or documents as needed)
Signed
lo- t -v
Representative NCDOT Date
/ljA F /c
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date

i ?uCcg?Ve41 1=7 LZ/[,-kJ6--- tri-ra - cJi
Representative HPO Date
",,.Q
Y14,6_4
State Histonc Preservation Officer
Date

r-,V-C:'L
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
James B Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T Stevens, Director
_
CEI
p`
?
?

June 8, 2000 x
,x
JUN 1
z-0
s 2P00
'°
MEMORANDUM ?
o ?,?,^
"?, ',Ars
°
;`?
Yom'
TO William D Gilmore, P.E, Manager, NCDOT ?,
?
r
'^? „'?£??;?k, y" `,-'r
Project Development & Environmental Analysis ?? n ?? 4` "`?
THROUGH John R Dorney
FROM Cynthia F Van Der Wiele, NC Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT Scoping comments on the proposed improvements to US 52-Replace
Bridge Nos 256 and 257 in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, State Project
No 8 1622802, TIP U-2826A
In reply to your correspondence dated May 25, 2000 in which you requested comments
for the referenced project, preliminary analysis of the project reveals no potential for
direct impacts to perennial streams or junsdictional wetlands in the project area. Peters
Creek is noted to be adjacent to the project site and has a water quality classification of C
However, in the event that the project scope is amended, the Division of Water Quality
requests that NCDOT send notification of any proposed impacts to wetlands and streams
with corresponding mapping
The NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on your project If you
have any questions, please call me at 733 5715
CVDW/cvdw
pc Eric Alsmeyer, Corps of Engineers
Mark Cantrell, USFWS
David Cox, NCWRC
File Copy
Central Files
1621 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO William D Gilmore, PE, Manager
NCDO T Project Deveiopmerit and Ern ,,rornmental _ nalysis Branch
DATE October 10, 19999
FROM Ron Linville ?
North Carolin a Wildlife Resources Commission
SUBJECT Review of Scoping Sheets for Bridge Replacements Nos 256 and 257 in
Winston-Salem, US 52, TIP U-2826A
DATE October 10, 1999
This correspondence responds to a request by your office for our review and comments
on the scoping sheets for the subject project
Biological staff of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have given a
cursory review to the scoping sheets for the subject project and have not identified any special
concerns regarding this project It is recommended that a site evaluation determine if there are
any culverted streams and drainages associated with the existing bridge If possible, when the
new structure is built, storm water runoff from the bridge should not be released directly into
streams or surface waters as highway runoff will carry petroleum products, debris, and other
pollutants NCDOT Best Management Practices (BMI's) should be utahzed for sto m water
controls during and after construction for detention and filtration as much as practicable in order
to minimize pollutant loads to surface waters and in order to reduce or minimize stream bank
destabilization to downstream riparian areas
As these bridges are in a very urban setting, some of the review issues listed below may
not be entirely appropriate However, the listed items may be useful in your planning processes
In order for biological staff of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission to provide a
meaningful review, the environmental document prepared for projects such as this should
include the following minimal information
1) Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area, including a listing of
federally or state designated threatened, endangered, or special concern amoral and plant
species Contact is the Mr Steven Hall of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(919/733-7701)
2
2) Description of waters and/or wetlands affected by the project
3) Project map identifying wetland areas Identification of wetlands may be accomplished
through coordination with the U S Army Corps of Engineers If the Corps is not
consulted, the person delineating any wetlands should be identified and criteria listed
4) Description of project activities that will occur within wetlands, such as fill or channel
alteration Acreage of wetlands impacted by alternative project designs should be listed
Project sponsors should indicate whether the Corps has been contacted to determine the
need for a 404 Permit under the Clean Water Act Contact is Mr Steve Lund at 704/271-
4857
5) Description of project site and non-wetland vegetative communities
6) The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of
wildlife habitat
7) Any measures proposed to avoid or reduce impacts of the project or to mitigate for
unavoidable habitat losses
8) A list of document preparers that shows each individual's professional background and
qualifications
If necessary, a formal scoping response outluing our informational needs for preparation
of the environmental document will be provided upon request through the State Clearinghouse I
hope this helps with your planning process Thank you for the opportunity to provide a
prelnmmanly comment on this upcoming project If you have any questions regarding these
comments, please contact me at 336-769-9453

U-2826A Norfolk Southern Preferred Alternate
I.)
Subject. U-2826A Norfolk Southern Preferred Alternate
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15 57 40 -0400
From. "Laura E Sutton PE" <lsutton@dot state nc us>
Organization- North Carolina Department of Transportation
To: "Alethia F Raynor" <afraynor@dot state nc us>
CC: Allen Raynor <araynor@dot state nc us>
Ms Raynor
The find the response from -Norfolk Southern concerning their preferred alternate for the temporary
bridge alignment if you have any questions, please contact me at 250-4060
Laura Sutton
Subject: RE Winston-Salem - Replacement of Bridge Nos 256 and 257 on US 52
over Norfolk Southern Railroad MP R-124 0 State project 8 1622802 (U- 2826A)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09 29 33 -0400
From: "Decker, Phil, N " <PM Decker@nscorp com>
To: "'Allen Raynor"' <araynor@dot state nc us>
CC: Dave Wyatt <tdwyatt@nscorp com>,
"R M Girolami PE" <rgirolami@dot state nc us>,
"Laura E Sutton PE" <lsutton@dot state nc us>,
John Frye <jfrye@dot state nc us>,
"Grigsby, Kevin L " <Kevin Gngsby@nscorp com>Allen-Dave Wyatt and I visited the site a while back
As you may know, the "l SBKMTLBUS" shown on the plan just east of the US-52 structures is our yard office
Continuous access to this office is a must The area between the office and the bridges is used as parking, with
access from Liberty St We are inclined to favor the plan with the proposed detour structure constructed west of
the existing bridges, since this plan appears to be the least disruptive to our property and operations The
driveway into the office must remain or be otherwise provided for As for whether the the ramp from US-52 to
Liberty St should remain open, I have no feeling for how useful its existance is to our personnel It appears to
enter Liberty St too far east to provide convienient access to our facility You do have the fire station right there
and I'm sure they've become accustomed to it being there -Phil Decker
From: Allen Raynor [mailto aravnor0dot state nc usl
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8.27 AM
To: Phil Decker
Cc: Dave Wyatt, R M Girolami PE, Laura E Sutton PE, John Frye
Subject: Winston-Salem - Replacement of Bridge Nos 256 and 257 on US 52 over Norfolk Southern Railroad
MP R-124.0 State project 8 1622802 (U-2826A)
Phil,
Reference is made to Mr Tim Rountree's letter of August 28, 2001 We are in the
planning stage for this project and request that Norfolk Southern provide us with input as
to the temporary bridge alignment alternate that would least impact Norfolk Southern rail
operations The above referenced letter was sent with four plan sheets showing different
alignment alternates I would be happy to arrange an on-site meeting if you feel it would
be appropriate Please notify me if you need additional copies of the plan sheets Please
note that the referenced letter authorizes the Norfolk Southern Corporation to incur costs
to be reimbursed by the Department We will send our standard letter agreement in the
near future We look forward to vour comments
Sincerely,
R A (Allen) Raynor. Jr. PE
111'
?)) a, ri

SEa I.3 Pool
l A`?g\
Development
Department
September 10, 2001
Mr William Gilmore, PE, Manager C
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
i5Y"o lvl ul Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 () I
WJ
Winstonsft
City of Winsm-salcm
PO Box 2511
Winsmn-Salem NC 27102
Td 336 727-8040
Fax [phone]
RE: US 52-- REPLACE BRIDGE NUMBERS 256 AND 257 OVER LIBERTY STREET
AND THE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD--TIP PROJECT NO. U -_2826A
Dear Mr Gilmore
Let me again thank you for allowing us to participate in the discussions leading up to a
decision regarding the bridge replacements and ramp closure on US 52 at Liberty Street I had
previously noted some concerns regarding this project, and the fact that a mayor redevelopment
project had not been considered as part of the State's study
We recently held a follow-up meeting with your staff and the critical elements of the
redevelopment project had been incorporated into the revised study Under this proposal, two
alternatives were identified for ramp closure to address weaving problems in the area Alternative
1 recommended removing the Liberty Street off-ramp and Alternative 2 recommended removing the
28'hStreet on-ramp
Given bofficilternatl v cs V e, -.d pins and coati; alid the long-lei n implications of '[11 . dewsicn,
we felt that additional discussion was necessary at the local level We now have had additional
discussion and reached a consensus regarding an acceptable alternative While from a development
standpoint, Alternative 2 would be the preferred alternative, we also recognize the critical factors
that make Alternative 1 more feasible from the State's viewpoint This being the case, the City is
willing to accept Alternative 1 given the following stipulations
1) Installation of a signal at the intersection of 28'h Street/Indiana Avenue and the US 52 on-
ramp/off-ramp
2) Addition of an additional northbound lane on Liberty Street north of 28" Street/Indiana
Avenue

3) Adequate directional signage and lighting in the area including pedestrian lighting along 28`h
Street/Indiana Avenue and Liberty Street between 28`h Street/Indiana Avenue and 30`h Street
4) Realignment of 26`h Street with the US 52 on-ramp/off-ramp
5) Improvement of the pedestrian treatments at the intersections of 25`h Street/Liberty Street and
28`h Street/Indiana Avenue/Liberty Street including crosswalks, pedestrian traffic signals, and
sidewalks on Liberty Street between 286 -Street/Indiana Avenue and 30`h Street
6) Noise reduction treatment for the residential properties located in the area bound by US 52
on the west, 25`h Street on the south, and Indiana Avenue on the north and east
7) Installation of a traffic signal at 30`h Street and Liberty Street, if warranted
8) Improvements at the intersection of Liberty Street and Indiana Avenue to enhance visibility
through the intersection
9) Elimination of the loop from the US 52 northbound exit to 250 Street
In addition to these items, most of which were discussed during our August 29, 2001 meeting
with Ms Alethia Raynor and other NCDOT representatives, the State should also contact the three
property owners for the residents in #6 above to ascertain their interest in selling these properties
If a consensus is reached among these individuals, these properties should be acquired and the noise
treatments should be foregone At that time, Ms Raynor advised that all of these items discussed
appeared reasonable and acceptable requests which could be incorporated into the project at the
State's expense Upon your review of this information, please advise if your opinion on any of these
requests differs from Ms Raynor's
I am available to further discuss this matter and may be reached at 336-727-8040 regarding any
questions, comments, or concerns
Sincerely,
Derwick L Paige
Development Director
cc Alderman Vivian Burke
Alderman Joycelyn Johnson
Bryce A Stuart, City Manager
Tom Griffin, Assistant City Manager/Public Works
Greg Turner, Department of Transportation Director
Paul Norby, City-County Planning Director
Pat Ivey, NCDOT Division Nine
Edwin Cox, Smith Reynolds Airport Director

CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (

PO BOX 2511 - WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27102-2511 M0
336-727-2707 - fax [phone] '
June 15, 2001
Mr William Gilmore, PE, Manager SUN ) 9
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
?ECElV O
JUN 18 2001
1 Ys
Apµ%
SUBJECT US 52 Blldgc,, ReplacemCUa over Libertyy Stre,_t cuiu NuliOik Soutneln Rallruad
( J-2826A)
Dear Mr Gilmore
Thank you for providing us an opportunity to participate in the planning for the replacement of
the US 52 bridges over North Liberty Street and the Norfolk Southern Railroad line in northern
Winston-Salem We attended the March 26th meeting at the Division Nine office, the April 16tH
Meeting with Winston-Salem Alderman Joycelyn Johnson at the Smith-Reynolds Airport, and
the April 30`h Public Officials meeting and Citizens Informational Workshop After attending
those meetings and studying the hand-out materials and maps of the area, we have a few
comments to share with ) ou
1) The replacement bridges over Liberty Street and the Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks
must have sufficient width to accommodate adding at least one more through travel lane
in each direction plus enough width for breakdown lanes This work should be
coordinated with TIP Project U-2826B which proposes to widen US 52 from Business
Interstate 40 (US 421) north to Patterson Avenue to three (3) lanes in each direction
2) The new bridges must have support structures that allow for sufficient horizontal
clearance for the future widening of Liberty Street to a five (5) lane cross-section with a
sidewalk on the east side of the street As you have learned during this study process, the
Liberty Street Corridor Improvement Protect is very important to our citizens
3) The construction of the temporary detour bridge should be built on the west side of US 52
because it will have less of a negative impact on the overall community Generally
speakitig, the acquisition of a few businesses is less disruptive than relocating several
families
4) The issue of permanently closing one or more of the entrance or exit ramps for US 52 in
the study area is very difficult We believe that access for the adjoining businesses and
neighborhoods should be provided at the 25th/28th Street interchange, and, therefore,
improvements should be made to the entrance and exit ramps The northbound on-ramp
to US 52 is very important for the area and should be reconstructed to provide an
adequate area for merging This may mean that the northbound Liberty Street off-ramp
will have to be modified or eliminated If this off-ramp is eliminated, then Liberty Street
should be widened to a five (5) lane cross-section from 281 Street to at least Fairchild
Drive, and possible to the Smith Reynolds airport terminal driveways Redesign of the
25th/28th Street interchange should include safer and easier turns to get to 25`' Street
An adequate deceleration lane and off-ramp for southbound US 52 at the 25th/28th Street
interchange is also badly needed and must be included in this project
5) The bridge over 25" Street should be widened to provide three (3) northbound travel
lanes and a deceleration lane The bridge over 28'' Street should be widened to provide
for three (3) northbound travel lanes and an acceleration/entrance lane
6) We also support the realignment of 26`h Street to the ramp termini of the 25th/28th Street
interchange We recommend that the homes on 26th Street from Cleveland Avenue to
Claremont Avenue be acquired as part of the realignment of 26'h Street In the future, 26th
Street could be extended to the northeast to provide additional access for the planned
Brookwood Business Park south of the airport
7) Adequate lighting is needed for the project area, particularly for the 25th/28th Street
interchange
Please let me knov, if you hove any qae_--*Ions 07 need any ade--on l Info--mat,on.
Sincerely,
G.-IZEI? Eli Lem frocc- 4t?e•+T M-&KwAJwY
Brent McKinney
Director of Transportation
PC Alderman Vivian Burke
Alderman Joycelyn Johnson
Bryce A Stuart, City Manager
Tom Griffin, Public Works
Ron Graham, Forsyth County
Derwick Paige, Development Office
Paul Norby, City-County Planning Board
Ed Cox, Smith Reynolds Airport
US 52 Bridge Replacement files
GE
6C
rn MAY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ?oyFoj K?c-v'V
PO BOX 2511 - WINSTON-SALEM, OX OR 74&33O CAROLINA 27102-2511 T?VirLO ?c 5Q?
336
ANA
May 14, 2001
Mr William Gilmore, P E
Manager
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Mr Gilmore
Let me thank you for the several meetings your department has held in Winston-Salem regarding the replacement
of bridges 256 and 257 on US 52 over Liberty Street and the Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks On behalf of our
citizens, elected officials, and the Department of Transportation staff, I thank you for the interest and effort you
have put forward to assure that the process is open and all concerns are taken into consideration
I know there are many environmental impacts and social issues that you will be taking into consideration during
this study I offer my support and encourage you to look carefully at the noise impacts to residences along the US
52 Corridor
In addition to several alternative designs for the 25th/28th Streets interchange that you will be studying, I would
like for you to also look at the feasibility of providing future access to the Anport Business Park via 26t' Street
If you would look at this alternative and advise me of the initial issues, perhaps we can work with your department
to mediate the negative impacts
Again, I want to thank you for involving our elected officials, citizens, and the Department of Transportation staff
in this planning process We look forward to working with you to address all of our concerns for a successful
project
Sincerely,
e
Brent McKinney
Director of Transportation
BM jb
CC Alderman Vivian Burke, Northeast Ward
Alderman Joycelyn Johnson, East Ward
Alderman Robert Nortlungton, Jr, West Ward
Bryce A Stuart, City Manager
Tom Griffin Assistant Cit-, Manager

IA,n?
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM MAY 4
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PO BOX 2511 • WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27102-2511
336-727-8040 • fax [phone]
/`-tGEIV?0
May 9, 2001
Mr William Gilmore, PE, Manager i MAY 11 2001
North Carolina Department of Transportation -? a
Z??p DIVISION OF Q
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch HtGHINAIfs a
1548 Mall Service Center
°?Y ?T D PiA` ,?,?
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 ?FNIALNP;??
RE: US 52-- REPLACE BRIDGE NUMBERS 256 AND 257 OVER LIBERTY STREET
AND THE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD-TIP PROJECT NO. U-2826A
Dear Mr Gilmore
First, let me thank you for the opportunity to attend the formal briefing session recently held
at City Hall South to discuss the US 52 Bridge Replacements over Liberty Street I see this project
as having a tremendous impact on the future development of this area, hence, it is imperative that
I repeat the concerns that I previously raised Enclosed you will find the NCDOT Comment Sheet
as well as other documentation regarding the ongoing redevelopment efforts in the area
As you will see from this information, the City of Winston-Salem is truly committed to the
revitalization of the Liberty Street corridor and surrounding areas Through the various
redevelopment programs, more than $10 6 million City and federal funds already have been allocated
to the revitalization of the corridor Much of this effort centers around Smith Reynolds Airport I
believe that to eliminate direct interstate access to this facility and the surrounding area would have
a detrimental effect on these efforts
But, it is just not the City that is seeking to revitalize this area, it is the entire community
Forsyth County currently is constructing a new General Maintenance Facility along Liberty Street
This facility will generate hundreds of new trips per day In addition, their future plans envision the
construction of a new vehicle maintenance facility on Liberty Street
Besides the public investment occurring in the area, the private and non-profit sectors also
are actively involved in revitalizmg the area In the last six (6) months, four (4) businesses between
the 2900 block of North Liberty Street and the 3300 block of North Liberty Street have participated
in the City's Building Improvement Program Participation in this program requires a significant
matching investment and commitment by these small business owners Two community-based,
non-profit organizations, Pangaea Development Corporation and Northeast Winston Development
r,
r
Corporation, also are actively involved in the redevelopment efforts of the corridor All of these
organizations could be adversely affected by the NCDOT decision
Upon your review of this information, I hope that you will give careful consideration to these
concerns prior to making your final decision regarding the temporary and permanent closure of the
Liberty Street ramp I am available to further discuss this matter and maybe reached at 336-727-
8040 regarding any questions, comments, or concerns
Sincerely,
il"rL ?"I. 9
Derwick L Paige
Development Director
cc Alderman Vivian Burke
Alderman Joycelyn Johnson
Alderman Robert Northington
Bryce A Stuart, City Manager
Graham Pervner, County Manager
Brent McKinney, Department of Transportation Director
Paul Norby, City-County Planning Director
Edwin Cox, Smith Reynolds Airport Director
enclosures
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS
It is the policy of NCDOT to ensure comparable replacement housing will be
available prior to construction of state and federally-assisted projects Furthermore, the
North Carolina Board of Transportation has the following three programs to minimize the
inconvenience of relocation
• Relocation Assistance
• Relocation Moving Payments
• Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement
As part of the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT staff will be
available to assist displacees with information such as availability and prices of homes,
apartments, or businesses for sale or rent and financing or other housing programs The
Relocation Moving Payments Program, in general, provides for payment of actual
moving expenses encountered in relocation Where displacement will force an owner or
tenant to purchase or rent property of higher cost or to lose a favorable financing
arrangement (in case of ownership), the Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or
Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to $22,500 to owners who are eligible and
qualify and up to $5,250 to tenants who are eligible and qualify
The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted in accordance
with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), and/or the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act
(GS-133-5 through 133-18) The program is designed to provide assistance to displaced
persons in relocating to a replacement site in which to live or do business At least one
relocation officer is assigned to each highway project for this purpose
The relocation officer will determine the needs of displaced families, individuals,
businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operations for relocation assistance
advisory services without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin The
NCDOT will schedule its work to allow ample time, prior to displacement, for
negotiations and possession of replacement housing which meets decent, safe, and
sanitary standards The displacees are given at least a 90-day written notice after
NCDOT purchases the property Relocation of displaced persons will be offered in areas
not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and commercial facilities Rent
and sale prices of replacement property will be within the financial means of the families
and individuals displaced and will be reasonably accessible to their places of
employment The relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced businesses, non-
profit organizations, and farm operations in searching for and moving to replacement
property
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced will receive an
explanation regarding all available options, such as (1) purchase of replacement housing,
(2) rental of replacement housing, either private or public, or (3) moving existing owner-
occupant housing to another site (if possible) The relocation officer will also supply
information concerning other state and federal programs offering assistance to displaced
persons and will provide other advisory services as needed in order to minimize
hardships to displaced persons in adjusting to a new location
The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate the displacee
for the costs of moving personal property from homes, businesses, non-profit
organizations, and farm operations acquired for a highway project Under the
Replacement Program for Owners, NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental
purchase payments for replacement dwellings such as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals,
and other closing costs and, if applicable, make a payment for any increased interest
expenses for replacement dwellings Reimbursement to owner-occupants for
replacement housing payments, increased interest payments, and incidental purchase
expenses may not exceed $22,500 (combined total), except under the Last Resort
Housing provision
A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not to exceed $5,250, to
rent a replacement dwelling or to make a down payment, including incidental expenses,
on the purchase of a replacement dwelling The down payment is based upon what the
state determines is required when the rent supplement exceeds $5,250.
It is a policy of the state that no person will be displaced by the NCDOT's state of
federally-assisted construction projects unless and until comparable replacement housing
has been offered or provided for each displacee within a reasonable period of tune prior
to displacement. No relocation payment received will be considered as income for the
purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of determu ing
eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person for assistance under the Social
Security Act or any other federal law
Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable replacement housing is
not available, or when it is unavailable within the displacee's financial means, and the
replacement payment exceeds the federal/state legal limitation. The purpose of the
program is to allow broad latitudes in methods of implementation by the state so that
decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing can be provided It is not felt that this
program will be necessary on the project, since there appear to be adequate opportunities
for relocation within the area.
I?-- RELOCATION REPORT
i
s--
MIE.I.S. L._-1 CORRIDOR F-JDESIGN
Nurtla Cdruimnd Ik.partmew of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
PROJECT 8.1622802 COUN rY FORSYTH Alternate 1 Of 4 Alternate
ID NO U-2826 A F A PROJECT NHF-52(14) (NORTHBOUND DETOUR, NO RAMP (EAST SIDE)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT US 52- Replace Bridge Nos. 256 and 257 over Liberty Street (SR 2456) and the
Norfolk Southern Railroad
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Dlsplacee Owner Tenant Total MlnontY 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA
Businesses 0 1 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale' For R ent
Non-Profit U 0 0 U 0-20m 0 $ 0-150 0 0-20m 0 so-ISO 0
ANSWER ALL QUESTTONS 20-40m 0 150-250 0 20-40m 0 150-250 0
Ye. No Explain all 'YES' mmvers 40-70m 0 Z50-400 0 40-70m 0 250-400 0
X 1 Will special relocation services be necessary9 70-100m 0 400-000 0 70-100m 0 400-600 0
X 2 Will schools or churches be affected bN 100 up 0 600 up 0 100 ur 0 600 w 0
displacement' TOTAL 0 0 0 0
X 3 Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond by Number)
pm1ect'
X 4 Will anv business be displaced9 If so #3 General business services will still be available.
indicate sue type estimated number of #4. Carquest- 1SBLg. Bus.(4,000+- sq.ft.) - 4 full time and
emplovees minorities etc 2 part time employees
X 5 Will relocation cause a housing shortage,
6 Source for available housing (list)
X 7 Will additional housing programs be needed? #11, 12 & 13. Questions are non-applicable -plans show
X 8 Should Last Resort Housing be considered only businesses are being affected.
X 9 Are there large disabled elderly, etc #14 Winston-Salem Journal, Internet, and various local
families' real estate companies.
X 10 Will public housing he needed for pmJect'
NA 11 Is public housing available'
NA 12 Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing Comment:
- available during relocation period) There is one billboard in the proposed right of way;
NA 13 Will there be a problem of housing within approximate cost to move: $15,000.00 to $20,000.00
financial means9
X 14 Are suitable business sites a%adable am
- source)
15 Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATIONS 12 /!7 oYt
--
lne Barr and Heather Fulghum 9-19-01 `?
(

Relocation Agent Date ved
APPm by Date
Form 15 4 Revised 02195 d
Original & 1 Copy State Relocation Agent
2 Copy Area Relocation Office
r`?RELLOCATION REPORT
El E I.S. R CORRIDOR [--I DESIGN
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
PROJECT 8.1622802 COUNTY FORSYT14 Alternate 2 of 4 Alternate
I D NO U-2826 A I- A PROJECT NHF-52(14) (NORTHBOUND DETOUR, WITH RAMP (EAST SIDE)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT US 52- Replace Bridge Nos. 256 and 257 over Liberty Street (SR 2456) and the
-'; Norfolk Southern Railroad .
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Drsplacee Owner Tenant Total Minonty 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA
Businesses 0 1 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 owners Tenants For Sale For R ent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20m 0 $0-150 0 0-20M 0 $0-150 0
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 0 20-40m 0 150-250 0
Yes No Erplarn all 'YES' mu-w ers 40-70m 0 250-400 0 40-70M 0 25G-400 0
X 1 Will special relocation services be tiecessary' 70-100M 0 400-600 0 70-100M 0 400-600 0
X 2 Will schools or churches be affected b) 100 up 0 600 up 0 100 up 0 600 UP 0
displacement I TOTAL 0 0 0 0
X 3 Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond by Number)
protect'
X 4 Will any business be dicplaced? If co, #3. General business services will still be available.
indicate size type estimated number of #4. Carquest- 1SBLK Bus. (4,000+- sq.ft.) - 4 full time and
emplovees minonues, etc 2 part time employees.
X 5 Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6 Source for available housmo- (list)
X 7 Will additional housing programs be needed? #11, 12 & 13. Questions are non-applicable -plans show
X 8 Should Last Resort Housing be considered? only businesses are being affected.
X 9 Are there large disabled elderly etc #14 Winston-Salem Journal, Internet, and various local
families' real estate companies.
X 10 Will public housing he needed for proJecP
NA 11 Is public housing available'?
NA 12 Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing Comment:
available during relocation penodl There is one billboard in the proposed right of way;
NA 13 Will there be a problem of housing within approximate cost to move: $15,000.00 to $20,000.00
financial means?
X 14 Arc suitable business sties available (list
source)
15 Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATIONS 12
r
01 i
Y
Kris Barr and Heather Fulshum 9-19-01
Relocation Agent Date Approved by Date
Form 15 4 Revised 02195 d Original & 1 Copy State Relocation Agent
2 Copy Area Relocation Ollicx
• !_ 1. ='y_t _ _ - t t U i I c 1 UI I h I OH
RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
OA A J EIS CORRIDOR [:]DESIGN
PROJECT 8,1622802 couNTY FORSnH Alternate 3 of 4 Alternate
ID NO U-2826 A F A PROJECT NHF-52(14) (SOUTHBOUND DETOUR, NO RAMP (WEST SIDE)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT US S3- Replace Badge Nos. 2S6 and 257 over Liberty Street (SR 2456) and the
Norfolk Southern Railroad
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
I Type of
Dispiacee
Owner
Tenant Total
Minority
0-15M
15-25M
25-35M
35.50M
50 UP
Res-dl.nt,al 0 0 0 o NA NA NA NA NA
15usinessea 0 1 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELUNG AVAILABLE
f -arms 0 0 ! 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
! Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 aZOW 0 $ also 0 amp 0. $0-1 Q
ANSWERALL QUESTIONS 2Q-40m 0 150-250 3 2040" 0 1b4230 !r
Ye_ No Explain am OYES" cnswem 40-70" 0 25400 0 44.70" 0 250.4W C
X vYII special relocation services be necessary? 70-1DOM 0 404.600 Q 70-10x3" 0 400600 Q
2 Will schools or churches be affected by 100 up 0 600 up 0 100 uo 0 Soo UP Q
- , 01splaoement7 TOTAL 0 0 ``???ri? 0 NoW LE G

X
3 vVill business services still be available after
REMARK
S (an R
nnd b mt mLmr I
1 4 Will any business be displace-d" Ii so, #3, General business services will still be arca;latsle.
Indicate s'ze, type estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc. #4 Carquest-1SBLK. Bus.(4,000*- sq.fQ - 4 full time and
2 part time employees.
X 5 Well relocation cause a housing shortage?
a !,
X 6 Source for available housing (list)
r' Will additional housing programs be needed?
#11 12 813. Questions are non-applicable -plans show
X
s X 8 Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
9 Are there large, disabled elderly, etc only businesses are being affeeW.
#14. Winston-Salem Journal. intsm4 and various local
1 "'
x

1 famllias?
10 Will public housing be needed for pro)ect? real estate companies

I
INA 1, Is public housing available)
( ihtfi j t

Fe„ I 12 is e, felt there will be adequate DSS housing
available during relocation period)
13 Will there be a problem of housing within Comment
There are three billboards in the proposed right of way;
approximate cost to move- $15,000.00 to $20.000.00 each.
financial means?
14 Are suitable business sites available (list
i

I source)
15 Number months estimated to complete
RzLxAnON? 12 REVISED due to the concrets slab behind the liberty
Butcher Shop shown in the Right of Way, will not affect
the business operation, therefore, they will not be a
displaces.
T
t
e
Kris Barr and Heather Fulahum 9-11-02
Fart 15 4 Rev5W 02!95 d Onainai 8 1 Copy igcet W Agent
2 Copy Area Reloaabon Olrxe

III RE OCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RFLUCAMN OFFICE
E I S El CORRIDOR ? DESIGN
PROJECT 8.1622802 COUNT'Y' FORSYTH Alternate d of 4 Aft-rnate
r C No U-2826 A F A PROJECT NHF-52(14) (SOUTHBOUND DETOUR, WITH RAMP (WEST SIDE)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT US 63- Replace Bridge Nos 256 and 257 over Liberty Street (SR 2456) and the
Norfolk Southern Railroad
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
' Type of '
Qisolacee Owne,
Tenant
Total
Minority
Residential 0
Businesses 0 0
1 D
arns i C 0 0
Non-profit 0 0 0
ANSWER ALL QUEST] ONS
Ye, no Explain all `)'ES" answers
7C 1 Will speoal relocation services be necessary
r X 2 Will schoo's o' Cnurcres bE a+tetted by
' o:spiacemem''
. 3 Will business semces stub re available after

X 4 Wily any business be displaced? If so
indicate size type, estimated number of
employees minorities etc
X 5 VVill relocation cause a housing shortage?
t: Source for available ho?ising (list)

?. X 17 Will additional housing programs be needed'
8 S`:ould Last Resort Housing be considered)
X 9 Are there large disabled, eloerly, etc
'
X -r ?t, l e57
10 VV,iI publ:c housing be neWed for project?
I ;tF i 11 Is public housing available;
12 Is it felt there will be adenuate DSS housirg
available dunrg relocation penod)
Nk 13 Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means
E X i 14 Are suitable business sites available (list

s source)

15 Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? , 1 Z
i
Kris Ba,. and Heather Fulahum 9-11-02
0-15M 15-2510 25-35M I 3r50M 50 UP
0
0 NA NA
VALUE OF DWELLING NA NA NA
OSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
0 Owners Tena nts For Sale For Rent
0 0-20M 0 $0-1501 0 0-20M p s also Q
24-40" p 1W250 0 20.40M p 1.'s 0
40-70m p 250-ao0 Q 401-701A p; 2W4W I p
70400m 0 40moo 0 70-100M 0 ?-
100 uv I 0 600 up 0 'Op uP p ?, 600 up
TOTA1 0 4 3
REMARK S Res and by Numbs
113 General business services will stlil be available'.
*4. Carquest-1SSLK. Sus.(4,000+- sq.ft.) - 4 Will Lane and
2 part time employees
#111, 12 &, 13. Questions are nonappllcable -plans show
only businesses are being affected.
#14 Winston-Salem .Journal, Internet, and various !o: a!
real estate companies.
Uornment:
There are three billboards in the proposed right of way'
approximate cost to move: $15,000.00 to $20,000.00 each
REVISED due to the concrete slab behind the Liberty
Butcher Shop shown In the Right of Wray, will not affect
the business operationktherefoee, they will not be a
displacele,
_f/1 -C
orrr 15 4 Revt M 0.2..'95 a
1 ;,,W Stabs Rel=W= Agent
2 Copy Arm RaitaCaQlort Office
i
T
t
c