19970972 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20070606

Wetland Mitigation Monitoring Report Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
March 29, 2007: Version 1.1
Evaluator's Name(s):___,LYyA;0-1L_ J Date of Office Review: U - 2 C' L l
1
Report Prepared by: Ec -, Date of Report: S 2,1 V
Monitoring Report for Year:
1. Office Review Infor ation:
DWQ 401 Nymber:
Site Name(--
County(ies):C a vAStrr-?
Basin & Subbasin:
Nearest Stream WQ :
v1r) 11c`Am

c_ Mitigator: EEP Private Mit. Bank Other
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: - 1 . to-1 cA c?
Stream: ti 2-8 b C, '
Buffer:
Project Type & Size: JA U V = (X t wu S r eL « c?C
tik/ ?' C
Location on Site: C1-2CC,. ' >- l C ' t- 2 D
Goal(s ) o itigation (wend type(s) & details): Project History: JVCr(C
Event Date C(
.W(? ec.n--,, Ltc_?Crl 7C??
-E l s S
C 1

Monitoring Clock Start Date:
`??
Approved Mitigation plan available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No *Add significant project-related events that occurred
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No this year: construction, planting, grading, etc.''
II. Success Criteria Evaluation:
¦ Note dominant species & other success-related information in the appropriate sections.
¦ Assess trends over time (i.e. compare with previous years' results) and correlate between
hydrology, vegetation, and soils.
• Verify presence of site maps detailing different wetland types, problem areas, monitoring and photo
point locations.
)L_
11nS
't c C-f
l
t CA .>
LO 1 - U36?> ?F 1 Lu L l - L -v- 1!L 12-4-0
l vt
?
d% I
HY ROL GY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
SC_-} 141. L_l_aCi 5- 12 J_L-k- r h-) () ("(9.
1
CCYtC?it - j Scc hi?e? G?c-ICt r cis { h c, - Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches for appropriate
% of growing season
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
based on mitigation plan? Yes No
based on wetland type? Yes No Max period of inundation/saturation:
met for entire project Yes No (n-_L4gdays = qq-LW/o of growing season
Monitoring wells: _ Comparison with reference wetland (esp.
functioning properly? Yes No during years with abnormal precipitation)
data in tabular & graphic form? Yes No
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. excessive water, upland plant species, etc.):
Page 1 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Monitoring Report Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Vv tC-h (t

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:

Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
Indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species (per report)
Kl ff C -Q-( Species Story TPA or % cover
- (Y"ea-kl C ?'_6Z r t l eI, Z.l?(? C Y u
-? cam, a c_. S ?QVC?r? C 7??u fYt?
Sampling date s): --Vp_Vkn 3"- -C) )
(-?C `mil C©vil? L? o rY1C??C
IVlonitoring report indicates sucs . No L'"fir( C C ?`j
based ? XCC
on community composition? c 's No
t?based on TPA and/or % cover? ?es No D ((-J +
Supplemental planting this year? Yes Jo
Planting date(s):
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No Average trees per acre for project:
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), % cover, and control measures):
C`.?1?? S e ?ri le-} + M'kc ' p!44-co -M C22s L? cc C 12 cr he. C?? ce p t ?-
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc): C7 2-)
'D
P. f?
2 3?
/`.i J• .? 1 .A 1 4 I,?n i
1 t i1 4 cr l_U_
WA - Appro ed uccess Criteria: NC M etland ype onSi ;
_ Coastal
Riverine
nitoring rep rt indicates success? Yes No _ Riparian
j Non-riparian (wetter)
Atta NC M analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List an r maining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
ITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the mitigation plan, the site is: successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for any lack of success for this site:
I ,? c c ?cs_ c -rt 7 b ? l c?? L
G ,,_c _C(+7 - (cc
W-W4, -kt-- \ _k -* L?
Additional Comments (e.g. DWQ follow-u actions, recommendations, a c.):
r? (La , ?5i? L UId?D C IV ?1Y) k'r (= ? z?- - a-, ?-
Schedule Site Visit? es I No
C'( ?- oc_Lle?
Page 2 of 2