20081210 Ver 1_Application_20080808

11 do

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 1~9 ka
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY W. LYNDO TIP
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
August 4, 2008

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 081210
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890

ATTN: Mr. Richard Spencer
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Notification for Nationwide Permit 14 (Linear Road Project)
NCDENR 401 WQC 3404
Culvert Installation SR 1700 (Mercer Mill Road) Bladen County
State Project Number: 41168.
TIP Number: W-5002

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to relocate SR 1700

(Mercer Mill Road) from its' existing intersection with NC 87. The project is a proposed safety
improvement. Since NC 87 is a divided highway with a center crossover, there have been many
instances of vehicles being hit by oncoming vehicles after crossing over the median. The Division
6 Traffic Engineer determined that the crossover needed to be eliminated and a Michigan Left be
installed to reduce the side impact collisions.

SR 1700 in the south bound direction will be relocated 800 feet to the east of the existing
intersection crossing of NC 87. Vehicles along SR 1700 will be required to make a "right turn
only" onto NC 87. Once onto NC 87, the vehicles will travel approximately 800 feet so that they
make a left turn into a "Super Street" crossover. The design has a high success rate along NC 87.
It was utilized approximately 5 miles to the west of SR 1700 at the intersection of Peanut Plant
Road and NC 87. At that intersection, there was a high rate of accidents due to vehicles crossing
the median without properly viewing oncoming traffic. At the beginning, the local residents did
not care for the offsetting intersections, but, once installed there has been no complaints from the
local residents and the Bladen County Commissioners have endorsed the concept.

While reviewing this project in the field with Richard Spencer (COE) and Ken Averitte (DWQ), it
was asked why NCDOT didn't just close off the median crossover and force traffic to turn right
and travel to a crossover in the median. That way, there would be no need for the relocation and
impacts to jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Once the plans of the intersection of SR 1700 and
NC 87 were combined with the proposed plans for R-4903 (US 701 and NC 87 interchange), the
crossover in the westbound direction (which was designed at the minimum intersection
separation) took place within the limits of the ramps for the R-4903 project. Virtually, two safety

P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 -Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]

` projects would be in conflict. It was determined that the relocation alternative would best suit the
purpose of the project.

Total Project Impacts
Stream impacts =149 linear feet
Wetland Impacts = 0.15 acres

Construction of this project will require impacts to waters of the United States in the Cape Fear
River Basin. Crossings convey a UT to Browns Creek. (Class C Sw). The project is located
within the 03030005 HUC.

RESOURCE STATUS
In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as the result of the relocation of SR 1700
(Mercer Mill Road) in Bladen County. One Hundred forty-nine feet of stream impacts and 0.15
acres of wetland impacts are expected.

Permit Site #1- A wetland delineation revealed a swath of jurisdictional wetlands along the

roadway in the vicinity of station 25+30 to station 26+00. The wetland consists of a remnant
pond. Originally, when the area was reviewed, the breached embankment was not readily
identified. The wetlands were dominated by red maple, black willow with the floor dominated by
Asiatic day flowers. The culvert will be installed one (1) foot below the invert of the stream to
facilitate aquatic life movements and a one foot sill will be installed on the upstream end of the
culvert. The sill will be installed to reduce the potential for a head cut into the wetland area. The
UT to Browns Creek is intermittent with no flow observed during the majority of the growing
season. A culvert (102LF 48" RCP) will be installed, while there will be a 0.11 acre wetland
impact. A Nationwide Permit #14 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3404 are required for the project.

Permit Site #2 - The existing culvert conveys an UT to Browns Creek under NC 87... The
existing 24" RCP must be extended 30 feet to accommodate a flared turn lane. A Junction Box
will be installed to connect the existing 24" RCP to the proposed 30 LF 30" RCP. Since there is
a build-up of material along the control access fence along NC 87, there will be a 12 linear foot
clean-out of the stream to provide positive drainage. The total stream impact for Permit Site #2 is
47 linear feet and there will be 0.04 acre of wetland impact (Wetland Fill= 0.01 ac / Mechanized
clearing 0.03 ac). Again, a Nationwide Permit #14 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3404 are required for
the project.

Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or
Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2006, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service list
three federally protected species for Bladen County.

Federally Protected Species for Bladen County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T(S/A)

Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E
Rhus michauzii Michaux's sumac E

"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range).
T(S/A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened
Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its
Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
Are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the August 5, 2007
survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat
for each species identified.

REGULATORY APPROVALS

Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 14 / NCDENR 401
WQC 3404 as required by the above-described activities.

The National Register was reviewed in addition to conducting a field view of the project for
significant historic features.

The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses. Pipe sizes proposed are the minimum necessary to create a safe highway while

accommodating the 25-year design storm. By utilizing the erosion control measures, downstream
water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMP's will be utilized during
construction.

Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, marked county road map, quad
location map and photographs.

If you should have any questions, or, need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS at [phone].

F

rely,

James PWS
Division 6 Environmental Officer

ATTACHMENTS

Cc: Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Ken Averitte, Division of Water Quality (1 copy)
Greg Bums, P.E., Division Engineer

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05

USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)

I. Processing

1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification

2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP#14

3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?

4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?

5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?

H. Applicant Information

1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Greg Burns, P.E. / NCDOT / Acting Division Engineer
Mailing Address: Bog 1150

Fayetteville, NC 28302

Telephone Number: 910-437-2611 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address:gburnsna,dot.state.nc.us

2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: . James J. Rerko, PWS
Company Affiliation: NCDOT / Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: Box 1150
Fayetteville. NC 28302

Telephone Number: 910-437-0208 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address:_ iirerko(a,dot.state.nc.us

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information

Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.

1. Name of project: SR 1700 (Mercer Mill Road) & NC 87

2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): W-5002
State Project# 41168.1.1

3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):

4. Location
County: Bladen Nearest Town: Elizabethtown
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):Travel south I-95 to exit
46. Travel south on NC 87 towards Elizabethtown. Turn left onto SR 1700.

5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): Permit Site #1 34.6066°N 78.6022°W Permit
Site #2 34.6057°N 78.6023°W

6. Property size (acres): 2.2 acres

7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Browns Creek

8. River Basin: Cape Fear River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/map-a/.)

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:_ The proposed SR 1700 will be a 24 foot wide roadway
(100 ft ROW) throuA a mix of forested and agricultural uses

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: NCDOT
Proposes to relocated SR 1700 in order to reduce accidents that occur at the intersection
of SR 1700 and NC 87. Front end loaders will place fill material The 102LF 48" RCP
will be installed within the UT to Browns Creek "in the da"

11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To improve safety at the SR 1700 and NC 87
intersection..

IV. Prior Project History

If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Richard Spencer WOE) and Ken Averitte MWO) reviewed the
rp oiect 04/16/08

V. Future Project Plans

Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 8

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Install a 102LF 48" RCP within the
UT to Browns Creek while impacting 0.11 acres of jurisdictional wetlands Extend an
existing 24" RCP 30LF to accommodate intersection improvements impacting 0.04 ac of
jurisdictional wetlands.

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se aratel list impacts due to both structure and floodin .
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e. forested, marsh, 100 year Nearest impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no) (linear feet)
Permit site #1 Fill Forested No 0 0.10 ac
Permit site #1 Mechanized Clearing Forested No 0 0.01 ac
Permit site #2 Fill Forested No 0 0.01 ac
Permit site #2 Mechanized Clearing Forested No 0 0.03 ac

Total Wetland Impact (acres)

3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property0.15 acres

4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi ly length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
Permit Site#1 UT to Browns Culvert Intermittent 2 ft 102 0.0047
UT to Browns Culvert/ 2 ft
Permit Site #2 Creek Excavation Intermittent 47 0.0022

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 16 0.0069

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, floodin , drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Watee) Type of impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, impact
(indicate on ma) l
ocean, etc.) (acres)

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 8

N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U. S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres : 0.0069
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.15
Open Water Impact acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U. S. (acres) 0.1569
Total Stream Impact linear feet): 149 LF

7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.

8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)

Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.SR 1700 will be relocated to
off-set it's intersection with NC 87 in order to provide a safe condition for the traveling
public. There has been a significant number of accidents at this location Permit Site #1
was designed at the very edge of the wetlands in the location of the pond breach Wetland
impacts were minimized and the culvert will reduce the potential for the UT to Browns
Creek to headcut into the wetland area.

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 8

VIII. Mitigation

DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.

If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).

1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation will be through the EEP (0.15 acre Riverine Wetlands)

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep net/pag;es/inlieureplace htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 8

Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)

1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?

2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No

3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification, for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.

1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Yes ? No

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.

Zone* Impact Required
(square feet) Multiplier
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
" Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or. 0260.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 8

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)

Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious levelAn Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
has been developed for this Proiect and the NCDOT will utilize standard BMP's

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)

Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)

Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ?

Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No ?

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)

Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:

XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):

It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

ki 05:'-_5_-,& - 4-, Applicant/Agent s Signature Date

(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 8

\ 1

/

AW

6 ~

A ,"s

6 / \

NORTH CAROLINA

d

NC 242 x F
pl _
( /Ci f
7
' El6ahe:Mmu ,[7 -
c'
y, 1
rI

'MERCE4, 'MILL ROAD
PROJEC'll?.- SIT

MLK DRIVLr !
PROJE& /SITE
(NO,IMPACTS)
' _
NC 242 /
`
..,SIC '87 BYPASS
2500' 0' 2500' 5000' 7500' \ G.
US 701 r
SCALE: r_ 5000'
A \ CD® JL
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN COUNTY
VICINITY
PROJECT: 41168.1.1 (W-5002)
MAP NC 87 AT SR 1145 (MARTIN
LUTHER KING DR) AND SR 1700
(MERCER MILL RD)
SHEET 1 OF 10

r r y r+l,M,1
and

!r fr~„r1'~w+'.J' r,i r +„~,~,"1-^",r1•..rT+~J"'J s.+,~6FP• L'-r .:.I f's _r

_ ~ e K - a T'nAY~ s_._ r f r *J Jr - • ''-4 7 V
rc~
r
_ .mot. w F' •'~-L •~.,ti ~.r" .ate`. -a 1, lY J--F r r
' ,?Jw.t~Y;" .r"rt :r 1 ~ } r r_,rh,..~ I ~'"1 y r f'.~I'.
r P
r-'~ , w ~„~„r14.~ 1 '~ti~ ~r a t, p F ' ~ +V ~ ~ p .r
° Y
try .°p.a~ r _,_.J ~ f,, j , e..4 • C
rw~~ A ~ rri t' ~ r' r f- i J -...IF ,r I.h 11 ~ ~f 4'~
:
ir' 11 1 r, r, O fie- 4~~ •.,kr~ L~
r
11 ~ r IJ
" ~L t ~ , r I 4
I L'~f ~ 'til "1 I ~ A ~ , t • ly ~ ~

r .
• e

ell

IL t ^ 1' - w? `i ' soli r' I ' rl 5+ •r ~,f °,~tJr r

s h. a7

4-- -.a-„r+.-~.~•r"~r'~+F7 "~r, ~ `~•'4 .1.1 i 11

250' 0' 250' 500' 750'
SCALE" r= 500'

A \ 'L/ D ® T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN COUNTY

SITE PLAN PROJECT. 41168.1.1 (W-5002)
NC 87 AT SR 1145 (MARTIN
LUTHER KING DR) AND SR 1700
(MERCER MILL RD)

SHEET 2 OF 10

J
t0
t
O / .
N
WN
H
;Om
I ONO K W tI^
W ~ <W =-j
W
uNN JO
1 u0
In
MERCER Y~ ROaD rSRJ J N
-Y6-
47- ri
-sc
J - 3 F d l . ~t~d J
1 1
1 ` 1
Z
V '
~ e
Ln i W
1 1 IC) ? O
WN 1 BENSON. JN.. B.E. ~ ~ J
W _J
N-ca , O Ns
O~{ \
1 ` ? a
rN~ S ~Np
1 yONp 1 \ OY~W
1 ~NN
.-dW
t~iNN
0.11 AC WETLAND IMPACT
102 LF STREAM IMPACT
LEGEND
so, o• so* ao
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND tB.IB ACI
GENOTTIS ME (0.01 IZEO
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLAN VIEW BLADEN COUNTY
SITE I PROJECT- 4116&1.1 (W-6M)
NC 87 AT SR 1145 (MARTIN
LUTHER KING DR) AND SR 1700
(MERCER MILL RD)
SHEET 3 OF 10

m MATCH LINE STA. 22+50.00 -Y6-

F- D
STA. 22+00 TO STA. 24+00 -Y6- LT
::E: I SEE DETAIL B
cr) w rz ~ A
m D D
o~ Iar Z! z 3 CD
o •r
A
0-4 Rm 3 3 ii
1-3 c 1> ~ m
~y D D 1.
JUT E2 50 TO S A.24+50 -Y6- FIT A q
C SEE DETAIL B
/f 23
CL. 11 RIP-RAP
_
- - - - - 4 'R OUTLET C-i19N- \

w~ . - -.t~~ ,r Ate.
jq~
_
Z A b v

/yam / j
o~otp,
(A
r
M
o °~z t" ztn
/T
ECAA A
+00 z oll
to z 8 MATCH LINE STA. 28+50.00 -Y6-

1-20 RO OS D GRADE

100
EISIN GOUD

EE =9A
90 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

PROFILE NCI ®T
SITE 1 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN COUNTY
PROJECT. 41168.1.1 (W-5002)
NC 87 AT SR 1145 (MARTIN
LUTHER KING DR) AND SR 1700

®DENIRLAV IN (MERCER MILL RD)
SHEET 6 OF 10

I C STA. 25+58.9 -Y6-
I PROP. 48' RCP
C ELEV.=111.14
I SKEW=88.5'
I
w
cj- c i c° a
i
i
110
3•\`NORMp~I ~ 3:~~NpRM4C HEADWALL

ENDWALL

95 5
-2.87/ i LEV=97.15 AT I HIGH SILL
BED=96.60 PROP OUTLET I ENTRANCE

ELEV=95.60 PROP INLET STREAM
(BURIED I') ELEV=98.47 BED=99.47
80 I (BURIED I')

60 45 30 15 0 15 30 45

PROFILE ALONG STRUCTURE NCDOT
SITE I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN COUNTY
PROJECT: 41168.1.1 (W-5002)
NC 87 AT SR 1145 (MARTIN
LUTHER KING DR) AND SR 1700
(MERCER MILL RD)

SHEET 6 OF 10

k a,
it
16: 4 ,v ay. ' a n
~,ppp~ ~gyt
~ r
9-1
W~m W,
` F 3 _,9 •r YY
I'll V
IV-

y`• t +sz"i ; yr, 4 - - " r° f. r ~

. + !"cline of Proposed Roadway Permit Site 1
J a ~
1'~S~~x s ap a `I
WWI-

IL4

-Ow
. P..4
ire a ~ a ' dam,.

'MAN
m
a ~P'... "
2-2
; : Downstr4am Site #1 ~

J

MAT + -L -
~a ~ N
,J i s5E O /
° I J Q~
tij~< I V
<La
CC;~ I
/ I
<F-3W
-,A
coo „ ~ ~ I
W
~ O
F ~d
N AIERDER Y/LL ROAD ($R1700 M I
-y6-
7ra a:
W
J F•~ i
Q s ~ I N~ I
I I
W ~
7
3 N MATCH LINE STA.103+00.00 -L-
0
FFJ
0.04 AC WETLAND IMPACT
47 LF STREAM IMPACT JE~No
4A0<W
G~~VIN
LEGEND
s0• 0' s0' 100'
® DENOTES FILL Will IN
WETLAND W t&01 AC) mod
DENOTES MECHANIZED
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLAN VIEW BLADEN COUNTY
SITE 2 PROJECT: 4116&1.1 (W-5002)
NC 87 AT SR 1145 (MARTIN
LUTHER KING DR) AND SR 1700
(MERCER MILL RD)
SHEET 7 OF 10

MAT t -L -
R O 4-
yN
~
/ I

~o I _
%
s,
r .
La cc Ix
Q
p
~ -
N yERCER,MI pp o ~ I i
d -
W • 6
J of
I7 ~ I 1

W G

Z; MATCH LINE STA.103 t00A0 -L-
0
H HJ
0.04 AC WETLAND IMPACT in<
47 LF STREAM IMPACT yho
O%O-quj
~La
~ . 1AV1
LEGEND
So, w so* IN.
® DENOTES FILL IN
YE TLANO (0,01 AC)
DENOTES
NCI®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLAN VIEW BLADEN COUNTY
SITE 2 PROJECT: 41168.1.1 (W-SM)
NG 87 AT SR 1145 (MARTIN
LUTHER KING DR) AND SR 1700
(MERCER MILL RD)
SHEET 8 OF 10

t y.
~ yq~ g 0 4 Po . ti k e :a yq •t ~ ~ to .ni5,„ar
r 4 rr
list,
~y r+
''u ryiYs y e', 'e:;
e d
VV
~ . • •s - ~ a'~~ 4'°,,: 4h."4 ,IF ~a.. ~ Y`M i 'b .j` b •'3, .;r~.~.
~6L_ fix
kr,
r J~ l y' ~a ~ 't t y, ~p~ ~u _ y~~•` q ap~4~.'., q~ cJ!',

41
' lP r. yyr~,,,,,ii~4 f `i1. '&(;"~,J4• '2 .e`' ..f N 3 -+T~'t4 t" H +r

y l s .771"I'l-+i k ' Yr
d A ! :k
i mayy.
i e
v

"
_ J at ffi
w of dam"'•'i i x
~ r - ~ rrq do & , ~ ~ ~ t~~+,F-i ""§l y,Vti ~ i - '~.L'~a
~i` ~':.r i ~ r' k 5a ~ 'J ~+~~4 a,t~ a Ord
all
t
Wru~ !q
. ti6'~" . t ~ y~,n~ ~ e , ,i Iiat,~ E 'k tT ISE
f
S +
Zoo!
IA I
Ito!
t YP' gka 'I c SSygA
'f}~ L, .1a Rfi p
. s

. T ~f ;q.~y`~,aeY 'n• eh"4~' r le

a tit y ~3~ u:~ ~ .a ~ a ~ ' • 4',~ ~

mid)
'~e~',•' `1 f ~R ~ 4~ N ~+K 4t 71
E.q,~ . F,111M• d" "C ? ~'.f~
• aR

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES

PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES

10 B.E. BENSON, JR PROPERTIES P.O. BOX 1250
LUMBERTON, NC 28359-1250.

11 PAUL-GEORGE-JESSIE INMAN P.O. BOX 2738
ELIZABETHTOWN, NC 28337-2738#

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION

NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN COUNTY
PROJECT: 41168.1.1 (W-5002)
NC 87 AT SR 1145 (MARTIN
LUTHER KING DR) AND SR 1700
ADDRESS OBTAINED FROM BLADEN COUNTY GIS (MERCER MILL RD)
WEBSITE (http/%oladen.connectgis.com) ON 3-20-2008.
SHEET 9 OF 10

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Temp. Fill Excavation Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands In Wetlands In Wetlands (Method III) Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (LF (LF (LF)
1 25+60 -Y6- 48" RCP 0.11 0.01 102
2 105+25 -L- 30" RCP 0.01 0.03 47

TOTALS: 0.12 0 0 0.04 0 0 0 149 0 0

NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

BLADEN COUNTY
PROJECT 41168. 1.1 (W-5002)
Form Revised 3/31/05 SHEET 10 OF 10