20080761 Ver 1_Application_20080501

t 6
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
PO BOX 3279, ASHEVILLE, NC 28802
April 28, 2008
Mr. David Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers 080761
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006
u.
t}B t .L\r'°v'' i B
M yU7E o `•'""
Subject: Nationwide Permit #14
SR 1156, Sugar Camp Road
State Project No. 13C.057020 (DWQ Major Permit Fee $475)
Madison County, NC
Dear Mr. Baker:
I have enclosed a straight-line diagram with erosion control plan, a PCN application for
NWP #14, and a vicinity map relative to the proposed project on SR 1156 Sugar Camp
Road, Madison County, NC. The project permits must be obtained prior to July 1, 2008
to be eligible for funding.
Sugar Camp Road is currently a 12-14 feet wide gravel road. Division of Highways
plans to pave the road 18 feet wide and increase the typical section. Grading will be
heavy.
We propose to extend/replace 12 pipe culverts on UT's to Big Pine Creek and Sugarcamp
Branch, and Sugarcamp Branch. Total culvert extension will be 180 linear feet with a
temporary impervious dike for dewatering at each location during installation. In
addition, a 200 foot section of stream within an existing ditchline will be relocated into a
similar channel adjacent to the new roadway. A stream relocation plan will be submitted
prior to construction.
Existing channel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstream of the
culvert. The culvert will be placed below existing streambed elevation whenever
possible. Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with
the culvert extensions. Stormwater will be diverted through grass-lined ditches or
vegetated buffers prior to entering streams.
f #
Mr. David Baker
Page -2 SR 1-156, Madison County
April 28, 2008
No effect on federally listed species (threatened or endangered) or their habitats is
anticipated.
As a part of the 401 Certification process, a copy of the application will be forwarded to
the NC State Historic Preservation Office as required by Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a).
By copy of this letter, we request David McHenry, North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission Coordinator, to comment directly to the Corps concerning the permit
request.
By copy of this letter, we are asking Ed Ingle, Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer,
to comment on the above project. The UT's and Sugarcamp Branch are not classified as
trout. A buffer variance will not be required for the project.
By copy of this letter, I am forwarding four (4) copies of the application package to Brian
Wrenn, NC Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetland Unit and an additional copy to Mike
Parker, NC DWQ Asheville Regional Office for review and comment. Please charge the
application fee of $475.00 to WBS element # 13C.057020. Please forward comments
directly to the Corps with copy to Division 13 Environmental Officer.
Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. If you have any
questions or information needs, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
A. a
Roger D. Bryan
Division 13 Environmental Officer
Enclosures
cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E.
MK Calloway
Ed Ingle, CPESC
David McHenry
Brian Wrenn
Mike Parker
t t
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2-008076
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer
Mailing Address: NC Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 3279
Asheville NC 28802
Telephone Number: 828-251-6171 Fax Number: 828-251-6394
E-mail Address: rdbtyan(?
dot. state. nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) N/A
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SR 1156, Sugar Camp Road
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 13C.057020
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN)
N/A
4. Location
County: Madison Nearest Town: Big Pine
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): SR 1156 is located off of
SR 1151 (Big Pine Road) (see map).
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum):
35.78821°N 82.78994°W
6. Property size (acres): 14.2-Acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Big Pine Creek/Sugarcamp Branch Class C)
8. River Basin: French
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is an existing gravel road. Surrounding properties
are forest, farmland, and very low density residential.
Page 2 of 9
r
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: We
propose to grade, drain, base, pave and install erosion control measures for SR 1156 Sugar
Camp Road. The equipment to be utilized includes an excavator, backhoe, and trucks.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: We propose to grade, drain, base, pave and install
erosion control measures for SR 1156. We propose to extend/replace 12 culverts on
jurisdictional streams(see proposed impact section) The additional pipe is necessary to
widen the road to the required typical section. A small impervious dike will be constructed
at each location for dewatering during pipe extension. Total culvert extensions will be 180
linear feet. The culvert will be installed to insure aquatic life passage within the streams. In
addition, a 200 foot section of stream within an existing ditchline will be relocated to a
similar channel
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No. no future plans.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: We propose to extend/replace 12 pipe
culverts on UT's to Big Pine Creek and Su ar?p Branch. Total culvert extension will be
150 linear feet.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres) N/A
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Impact (linear feet) (acmes)
Site 1 (12+80) UTI to Big
Pine pipe culvert Perennial 10 0.0011
l
Creek 5
'
Site 1 (12+80) UTI to Big Pine Temp. Dewatering Perennial 60 0.0069
Creek 5
'
Site 2 (20+80) UT to UTI to BPC Pipe culvert Perennial 10 0.0007
3,
Site 2 (20+80) UT to UTI to BPC Temp. Dewatering Perennial 3' 60 0.0041
Site 3 (74+00) UTI to Sugarcamp pipe culvert Perennial 1 10 0.0002
Branch
Page 4 of 9
Site 3 (74+00) UTl to Sugarcamp
Branch Temp. Dewateriing Perennial 1 50 0.0011
Site 4 (75+00) UT2 to Sugarcamp
Branch Pipe culvert Perennial 1 20 0.0005
Site 4 (75+00) UT2 to Sugarcamp
Branch Temp. Dewatering Perennial 1 > 50 0.0011
Site 5(75+55) UT') to Sugarcamp
Branch Pipe culvert Perennial 1 20 0.0005
Site 5 (75+55) UT3 to Sugarcamp
Branch Temp. Dewatering Perennial 1 50 0.0011
Site 6 (87+90) UT4 to Sugarcamp
Branch Pipe culvert Perennial 1 15 0.0003
Site 6
(87+90) UT4 to Sugarcamp
Branch Temp. Dewatering
Perennial
1'
55
0.0013
Site 7 (92+00) Sugarcamp Branch Pipe culvert Perennial 5' 10 0.0011
Site 7 (92+00) Sugarcamp Branch Temp. Dewatering Perennial 5' 60 0.0069
Site 8 (94+15) UT5 to Sugarcamp
Branch Pipe culvert Perennial 1 20 0.0005
Site 8 (94+15) UT5 to Sugarcamp
Branch Temp. Dewatering Perennial 1 50 0.0011
Site 9 (96+15) UT6 to Sugarcamp
Branch Pipe culvert Perennial 2' 20 0.0009
Site 9 (96+15) UT6 to Sugarcamp
Branch Temp. Dewatering Perennial 2> 50 0.0023
Site 10 (111+28) UT7 to Sugarcamp
Branch Pipe culvert Perennial
1' 20 0.0005
Site 10 (111 +28) UT7 to Sugarcamp
Branch Temp. Dewatering Perennial 1' 50 0.0011
Site It (115+18) UT8 to Sugarcamp
Branch pipe culvert Perennial
2' 15 0.0007
Site 11 (115+18) UT8 to Sugarcamp
Branch Temp. Dewatering Perennial 2' 50 0.0023
Site 12 (115+50) UT to UT8 to
Sugarcamp Branch Stream Relocation Perennial
1' 200 0.0046
Site 13 (131+85) Sugarcamp Branch Pipe culvert Perennial 3' 10 0.0007
Site 13 (131+85) Sugarcamp Branch Temp. Dewatering Perennial 3' 60 0.0041

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 1025' 0.0327
Page 5 of 9
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name Waterbody

(if ap
applicable) )
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0327
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0327
Total Temporary Stream Impact (linear feet): 645
Total Stream Relocation (linear feet) 200
Total Permanent Stream Impact (linear feet): 180
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Page 6 of 9
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The existing secondary
must be improved to meet current safety standards for paved roads The pipe culvert extensions
requested are the minimum necessary to establish an appropriate typical section for the roadway
Riparian vegetation will be established on disturbed areas associated with the project
construction.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 7 of 9
We do not feel that mitigation is warranted due to the minimal impacts of the pipe culvert
extension of small tributary streams. Additionally, paving of the roadway should eliminate
sedimentation from fines associated with gavel roadway and provide a vegetated shoulder to
buffer runoff.
If required, we propose to utilize the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) for the
mitigation requirements for the proposed impacts. NCDOT will be coordinating with the
EEP to obtain the appropriate mitigation credits if required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) - N/A
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 8 of 9
A 0
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
L Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; "Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The existing compacted gravel roadway acts as
an impervious surface. Paving of the roadway should eliminate sedimentation from fines
associated with gravel surface treatment The roadway surface will be 40% of right of way
acreage. Stormwater will be diverted through settling basins or grass lined buffers prior to
entering the streams.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 9 of 9
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
With retard to hazardous spill basins the road is not classified as an arterial route, therefore
hazardous spill basins are not required.
V Iif 240
U Applicant/Agent's Signature / DA/te
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 9
µ X?n>? ?'?..?"- ??,Ij' .!?"Mn'? ? ?( ?t jYyi j/?.*'wR'"? '.'4? 1? t ? Y ? ? •`y??l?.??e , ? j
, f E
,
y
+ 41
I -
? ? f.. ' T`• # ? ' ,f ? i u .' 1 ? , ? alt' k, ti 'Y?rJ
• ? y S ii
i
f
t
?t
3
. ,
a
/a ?;: ? __ " .-_ '_-.?""?'?? _. 5 -
1 .1 2 '. }
i?
`^ ,1T
jj
4 4 ?
` A
r
a
? r
f _. ?. f f f• {. t s tom/
f, C?
%
>;t ,t iq yY I `3, ? +yr .,` ? ,,". a 11 ? d? ` , ? ?^ -??"?? -_.J c v ,?/ .'?+ ? ? ,,? i_ ? ?1? { i? J' :;'ir -' r
of v° t` r. i i } + t ?s` y +iF,.
j ? f ?x F
Y p?
Val.
Name: SPRING CREEK
Date: 4/24/2008
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet
Location: 035.7843732° N 082.8000911 ° W
Caption: SR 1156 Sugarcamp Road
Madison County, NC
Figure 1. SR 1156, Site 1, Station 12+80, UT1 to Big Pine Creek, Madison County, NC.
Figure 2. SR 1156, Site 2, Station 20+80, UT to UT1 to Big Pine Creek, Madison County, NC.
Figure 3. SR 1156, Site 3, Station 74+00, UT1 to Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 4. SR 1156, Site 4, Station 75+00, UT2 to Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 5. SR 1156, Site 5, Station 75+55, UT3 to Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 6. SR 1156, Site 6, Station 87+90, UT4 to Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 7. SR 1156, Site 7, Station 92+00, Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 8. SR 1156, Site 8, Station 94+15, UT5 to Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 9. SR 1156, Site 9, Station 96+15, UT6 to Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 12. SR 1156, Site 12, Station 115+50, UT to UT8 to Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 13. SR 1156, Site 13, Station 131+85, Sugarcamp Branch, Madison County, NC.
Figure 14. SR 1156, Spring box on R/W at Station 74+50 (Non JD), Madison County, NC.

N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SECONDARY ROAD SURVEY
SUBJECT: SR 1156, Sugar Camp Rd.
LOCATION: From SR 1151 To E.O.M
WORK TYPE: Grade, Drain, Base & Pave
WORK ORDER: PRIORITY :
COUNTY: Madison TOWNSHIP: Walnut
DATE: 4-14-08 SCALE: 111=50'
NOTES: R/W 45'
LENGTH: 13,713' = 2.41 mi.
PREPARED BY:JSA/JPR/JMD

Page 1 of 1
PIPE DATA SR 1156, Sugar Cam Rd.
County:
Madison WORK ORDER :
STATION PRESENT
SIZE PROPOSED
SIZE NOTES
10+21 30'x18"CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe/ Ext_10'
11+25 20'x48" CMP Driveway Pipe
12+80 40'x72" CMP '50'x72" CMP Cross Pipe/ Ext. 10'
13+21 20'x15" CMP Driveway Pipe
15+13 30'x18"CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe/Ext. 10'
16+86 r 30'x18"CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe/Ext. 10'
2040 40'x42" CMP 45'x42" CMP Cross Pipe/ Ext. 10' tt' 7-
25+65 20'x15" CMP Driveway Pipe
26+07 20'x24"CMP Driveway Pipe
26+78 30'x18"CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe/ Ext. 10'
28+48 40'x06" CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe
28+88 50'x15"CMP Drive Pipe
33+10 20'x15"CMP Drive Pipe
36+59 25'x12"CMP 25'x15" CMP Drive Pipe
-41+30 25'x66"CMP 35'x66" CMP Cross Pipe
45+36 20'x18" CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe/ Ext.20'
56+86 40'x18"CMP Cross Pipe
`67+63 30'xl8"CMP 40'x18"CMP Cross Pipe/ Ext. 10'
„ 72+07 25'x24"RCP 35'x24" CMP Cross Pipe
72+17 45'x18"CMP Drive Pipe
74+00 30'x30" CPP 40'x30" CMP Cross Pipe ' Sa
75+00 30'x15" CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe S
75+55 20'x15" CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe ?-
80+55 20'x15" CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe
87+90 20'x18" CMP 35'x18" CMP
s
Cross Pipe/ Ext. 15' ?- (frIF
92+00 40'x66" CMP 50'x66" CMP Cross Pipe/ Ext_ 10' C/ ! S Rr ?'
92+11 20'x12" CMP 20'x15" CMP Drive Pipe
94+15 20'x18" CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe/ Ext. 20' LG
96+15 20'xl8" CMP 40'x24" CMP Cross Pipe s?
98+45 20'x15" CMP Drive Pipe
101+20 20'x15" CMP Drive Pipe
107+20 20'x15" CMP Drive Pipe
111+05 20'x15" CMP Drive Pipe
111+28 20'x15" CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe WIT S
111+36 20'x36" CMP Drive Pipe
115+18 25'x18" CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe
ls-rl y
`r5f S X?o
(.'2 CA
• Page 1 of 1
PIPE DATA SR 1156, Sugar Cam Rd.
County:
Madison WORK ORDER :
STATION PRESENT
SIZE PROPOSED
SIZE NOTES
117+50 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe
129+84 20'x18"CMP 40'x18" CMP Cross Pipe
131+27 20'x15" CW Driveway Pipe
131+85 40'x30"CMP 50'x30" CMP Cross Pipe/Ext. 10' C? 5a r K
81+25 20'xl5" CNT Driveway Pipe

SR H56SuGRA CAAAP RD. +76
? I .
• 5 STREAM
F -
S=BkJ L
-i
36F
P. ZpY( t00 ESA BUFF ?)te
Soi D i ' ?2'f D
LA LIZ., Cmc-,
I 4MT EXtI(I
GA " I
Ty-C A Ca ` l0? Sell ANT.
3YZz //
T.?PE 3 ItJ . ?.
ECG 3gPN
,??? Ke. w `ea ^ Gnc?so,?+ _
BOAR
?O Savoy- Sf s ? ?
, SC . ?i ?nl
4,?r ID ?td,1
i
'Lill
PKaP. 7p 1 14,9 `cp
i o GR DRS 3aF-
•
j t
12 bi
^1kEarn
Tv P6 A CNAC ?as?N
Zx Z' TYPE
? 8 BAs ltd
i 51-
^fi?./ 30 18' CARP
- - 10
-I - - -
9 9
cR 1 IS I SK 1151 Bi PtKlE RD.
PG. L
T' 15 Y
O
T+IS ?/.
I
?jl? 10
•
\?I
?I
•
?19
io
?I
•
??? 4 10
Y
_3 •
Tvf E A C4EC.K •
15 YZ 13
0
•
•
TYFE A CHECK ? ?I
BF,sitJ
30
51y ` r .?
TypE 3 BcsiV
I?
5 STREAM
C
II",
Ln
' S
I
N_
f?4?zt_y 1 ?l
(;OtAso-1
3q?
Ip,
Ex 4.
i
5' STREAm
?3a X I8'? CtitP
Ex r . la'
I
PG..
• is JACKIE l.. E JOAN C . rnvERS
rr?''I 1v/' cjw ?? 9 161) S T'wW OAKS DQiVE
W
?1G
KELI`q R. f NOVENA W. 3uCl<.NER DELAND, FL,, 32720
137 MA,'BEPAY DR • ® • I ?KRN 3 'a9. M P. 6O
8B?y _
AsNEviLLE , N. C. . 2 O
DP . 23 2 P. 4 $ ?? _ ~ Z 1yt55
f `' tss -
'y odd
?S° 'X J g
cmp
' is P
1 y qSaV\j
00 i i
--
I
i I 2 i3
„ ?,
_ i. O
•
'171
it f
-
G-o LpSON rA,',s Ly 1-LC \Vul
3 y?/ ?? s
cl c.
, 2 2
s,'te 2--
TvPE A COECI< gc61i1
i5 ?z X 3' T/FE F- ?asi?1 Q -f SO
3 STRE y
r
' u
PAP
B ,/ ran
3
' 4sTREAm
•
to

3
9
T
I? (LDO?. 50'? is"CMP
T/Pe P, CNECK
i 8'?, 3o'Y 3.3 Tv PE 6 SA:fl
REp .
?? z is cM?' •? 40? 1?''CtiiP
•
'BELLY R E NoveNA w, auC-Kt4CR
13 7 ry) A\/ Wkl D R .
3
i\SKVILLS N.C . Za?04 ml
D6. 232 P. `qa O
4- 7
J ACk 16 L , f, JOAN C MYE.RS
• "oq5 wlm OAkS D2ivE
2 DCLAND FIR. 3Z-720
t2 p8 . 252 P. 6C)
0
?S
,• 3
? `? 2 --o x 18'' C nA P
V i2 ?xT to,
I
? ' ST2EArn -
IZ'MTL C i
Io' GR Gk .
3
cY
5%-W 1
.I I•
ISE
t
I•,
Zo x Z4 " CHAP
10 •
Pane. ao y Is CniP
I o ' C, G PL RK .
I
•
2 ?.
14 •

TYF6 A CNfC
II'xZx3' •
TYPE B BAST"
•
•
`3 4
II m tom!,
I I:
•
I ? I ?' GATE
SOIL DK.
Z STREAM
i r 3 Z-OP 20,X i5 "?
=+ ?Z
i
i
'u,
I
O
kELL`/ R ° UOVENA w
S7 mAyB?kk'l DR,
hSHCVILLE IJ.C, 28
D6. 23Z P. 'Na

I

3
K • q
T -r2 0 '/, p`. 5
? J FUCK iE L i IOAtI C , rt.tV?RS
Ilo?? Tt?IN OgKS D21vE
• DE LAND TI 11 . 3Z-72o
-P e. 252_ P. Lo
O
io I•
•
LLI
•
•
I?
20
Add so r i` cw
7
?G

'PG. b
•
ACkIE L ( JOfkN C . MgGRS
aS Twi N OAKS 7,kIJG
DE L,p,wD FIA . 32-720
Dg. 252 P. 14

0
?I I
w
3
it I
• o
w
I
i •
I I? IL,
• ?? ? i T S?x12''?r?F
i _ REP, ?s x is' ?r??F
I
• I I D GP, DR.
? x; 4S ?
?I
?ait 3
T ?.I
3
S
70
t
I ''

O
L' IIMG PICMGIn -4--
KELLy R Nl()VENA W . 8UCkuE2
137 ?IAyQ?QRY DR'IvE
ASNEvILLE NC Z880y
'DB . 23Z P. '7H8
D© I?8 P- ' --
ZZ
ct
sNANATIE 71'oP?Ri
3 1 8TH AV45,
O N y) NV 100 1 L{
D8 . Zr b P. x,13
7
y?+Zo 35Bu? ?I I I I
1 UZ+Zo ------
---- -- --- ---
--- - -- •

J
I 3
}
?
I
TVPE A C Lck

j 8"7-"3' TYw s BRSTN
?2
?
`
'
5
x la(n C(
A[
Ex i . l o'
y 1?cKiE l f ?oat`I C. nnyCRs
12 (l 7WIM OAkS DQIVE

4 -JELAUD FAA. 3Z-770
38. ML P. co

3 ?
P4
I S
N

I V' DL
+
T3??
E I
Iq
TI 13
I?
I?
l
4,
P6. 8
TtZo?l.
kEL! Y R F NUVGMA W. BUCVJE/Z
,3? m?vaE?rzv ?RivE
F,?'PGvJILLE rJ. C. ZBSUy
-D9. Ul P.
l48
0
+20 l
to SUFI
vl?I
M'
i
?n
3
(g

?z ?. •
sNaima,TiE TI. wA RI
V 31 8Tf RUE,
• tiY, Nv i oU iy
D8. ?(', F . (0l 3
•
O
I?
•
II •
'll V
7
•
I
•
•
e?
s a
TYPE A CWC(k
3o x L x 3 TYPE Q 6AS1N
20 x I8 `RCMP
C XT, 20'
9 b?
ton

II
1
5
r 3
i
06110 / ICMGKOW
k LLy k ? NOVENA kJ eucj<jjGR
137 MaYeePAY DPIVE
ASNEViLLE ti,C 28804
-?)6 . 23Z P. -)H8
CC, EE? ?. 4-0?
t,?.
20,
i
?l
it
O
ShtKIMAT IE TAI JP,
31 8TH AUE
n,v) ?jv 10014
8, Z6, P. (0!3
ICI
-a ?

?
F
/ - ?I
i L7 ,
i
? ? \I TYPE A CNECk BASIN

I5? ?
i 3'( 3' TYPE B 13t,7N
;G
18
i
i

W
77.
Geer b. oc4 l A
1 o r-tJ PJ - ?ale't h AC U6
D9. 3-, ,- P.lf y
(D
O
(Y11C4{P?EL ? cNERR.Yasherry?,.;???
S u? cv?cdnja ?2c?. _
/Y? osVo II ) /VC. X953
-1)6. 30y F6. 11,33
W
I•
a
59
i
' i•
I
•
I.
S?
ILI
TYPE A CHECK
3 x 3 TYPE 13 BA51
• 51o+ 7o
•
i
+ -71
I
`HPIrAATiE TIWPfc'f
31 ?,Trt AVE .
? D W1 Ny IOOILI
D8. 2(06 P. ( 13

O
c V5L`! N WGR LEy "ESTATE'
C/O NIMA W . NENDERSanJ
350 VJOP L Ey RD. MPA5HALL) 1J . C Z8753
Da Go P. CJo
T

O
*0
7y;
I?
v
W
E
4-
i
I
I
i
i
•
c?
•
•
i ?
3 6f%'??
•
Gill
I ? , 3.i
I•
Eo ?
I'MCNAEL T CHERRY
Q
U4 F6. 03:s
P6 /t
x /2

I 1- 3 */.
+b;
m
E T. to ?I
I
O
wEL`/N WORLEY "ESTATE
CIO "JP, lJ. HEA1bCRSON
3So WORLCY 0D. /,RRSN,ALL I.JC. 2E753
T-31
Tr
I
it
v

?• i

Ni

I
1
JO v, r

I I TYr?E A eNECk ¢ASiN
,
z x t TvDE 6 f ASr4
i

n
7x Z x L' TYPE g 9A5TQ
TYPE A CtiKK
C(1 i C H AE L -T
CHFRRy

DE. 364 PC^ . 1 33
i W I

I O
•
I +
I i
I
I?
6 W
T ^ IoY.
10 '/.
-71
I
5
zox is'c'?+P
?P. ?yo x ?8' aliP
5<6
(D EsA 8UFF6AS
F sD ' ? 8ox(N?N?g
b'•i,j TYPE 6 P-Psw
BAsitJ
i t J •

I. '/' F 1 JI' /.?. J
\ I

?- / ?x2y2 TYPE Li ?p.Sl
w
?
r i TYPE A CHECK 3A5iN
?
1
n ?J?X )4 v..? + L

35
j A

111t Zo •

I I ? I
R
CL'E?yrl ??O?,cy ESTATE' I•
Chi NINA W. HEWEPsON
i
X50 WOPUCY PD. MA RSNA'1. A1C. 23'753 •
? 8 . pp P . CU I ?,
* 3
I
?

I
EYT l o '
Pt A CNC-GK BASIN
G' 2 I<2 TYGE B WIN ? Lfr 00
I
MICHAEL J CHgPkY
5 she?? 13e??e?-*"
O
DR. 04 P6. X33
P6
pv?
i
.
n
r
!J
7c
7
STEVE A, f CANDICE RICE
i
15 06 SUGAR CAMP 6R .
i
g YhARSmQ . C . Z1;753
D8. i?? P6. s?o
t ' •
i
r
77? 3
?,? 7 b' E.S ? •
• -R, + 35
I ?
s4z site-5
MI CHREL T C-HCRRy r G 7SfSs
+ Sheray
DB. ?04 nc,. 133 ?Y Tv DE C ?isirJ foo ESQ s?FFE25 be, '0xIB'
RE?: qo K 18` cvp
?-
(?c 'Y Z' TYK a BAstM 7?1 O o
TM R CHECL 3A56
2C11k15 CM14

i
I
,TEVE A. i CgtiDiCE RfCE
Isas iuGAR CAMP QJZ,
MAPSHALI N. 2s7S3
DB. 1?( ?A, 590
O
X14 ?/,
•
•
i
g O
T
•
•
? I S
'rl
-I •
i ?zop, 2v+.r
8 6--- loa Esq BuFFEQ
?Zo xis" CMP
EP. 40' x 18 CM
I S i fJG ?p /V- JV
TY A CHECK WinJ
0 2' TYPE- 8 WM
I ii
(.. ) =

12
Ty' ?
Q
W
r
11
_ ? I S
o G? 'DR .z
ST
Cfl REAI/
?7f qo
i
y/. zo x 15 CNA
ExT. 15' -
8 XZ X2 TYPE S EA?IN
,.'k TJCE A C 1-{EUc 9ASi M 5 TR E AM
i A CHKr SkSIQ
x 3'"3 TYFE B &ASTN

•
O
14 /.
I$
s
11
IT
3
I`
8
II
STEVE A c cgmblCE RICE
I505 SU6A.R CAMP OR,
MARSHALL , Aj.[ . 2'3753
P. Sao
WET DITCH
P6.16
pro
}?? II. ® ,aMES L , suCKNER
' 17 85 Su-GAR CRM.P AD .
T ?' 8 O TnARShkLL) 28?53
94+Sp S. Zc3 P. 3?$ DB Zot P.
WA
00' ESA BUFFER
792xZ ?I? W
'. I Site ?
TvpF CNc(r
IOC AlhTL
rE STREAM f
10 SOIL DR 20,x Is cmp
/ q Fxr Z0'
BA RN
-LA I I S STREAM
? I
TEvl P E CPNGIC,r_ 21c6 3
;SAS SUGAR Camp E,2. C' • q 3
MP,kSNA LL KI , C 28 7S3
?-- loo EsA BUFFER
S,fe 7
20 , ;Z''CP.tp Rlouc
REP INE DWaLL
® ? _ _ ?j 2 foU
?o'= I5''crcF i 10? Gp,
'r
Z12, TYPE 5 y .. 1
?,ARKI
T,/ PE A CWY< z 19 Z?.
7x I wire
40 x(?b C?aP
w/ Roc K r U-V LL
o' / w
Ex-r.
ILA v
?ql
5' sra?Arn I ;?
3
I•
a
` Ia I

I•
3 .
n
?
9I
? ? I • 12
I I
I
`I -
?ArnES QucKNEQ t
1 85 ?uGAK CPMP (ZD. to SOIL D2
'YYIARSHALL 1.1. L 2??5 S - - - I
-D8. 2o3 P. Sis ??
DA. 2c2 P. 7u4 Q
?9 8 I
N
vc • I
2r yr,-e?l?
? I

ID y 3 y 3 1YFE 3 RA?iAJ 1
-F/PE A FOKr BF5in1 ; [ L

REMOVE
BARN
RN
Pkop, . &',i 15 C 6A P
0
T
L/ IoC *=:A eU-=FR
'OiL Da
Zo'Y ?B " CMP RuSTV
? rZEP. yo? 2`1 CMP
tl0/ ? 9 S ` I•
?, _ 1 7 8 I 3' STREAM
40 -Is"cMP

P& .

I?y
558 w
(2)

I'l" I IS
3
cl
3l
m
110
N
J
- II J
l0 G/Z(R, I

I
I
b

3
to
N
O
7Z5 CAWP RD.
IMP.RSHALL NC 28753
DB . Zo3 Q. 395
D8. ZU2 P.17yy
(?STREFIrt
' SOIL DR.
1
i2
0
12
II
PG.
P6.:
.j
WADE MASSEy
10 • O
? .
4320 ?lro pIUE <.D.
TnARSHAL.L, M.( . 2S-7s_?
18 • 193 P. Z07
W • 1 I0q+00
loq+ou • ° 'Z
o$
JAMES L . QUckMGP, I 3 (, STR> Alin
?G5 ?cAP Carp P, f)
TnaRSNALL N.i 2S?S?
DE, 202. P-. 355
?p z?i P.??ly ?.,P 3
Yo x IS rtoN /
N O
10 SOIL. DR / I 1
o
1
U
• i2
V1 I
3
•I I .
ty /I 12
T
f' ' I ?3rC i FI
I
I
k
II
? V
xl
i Ili I _
I
O
(?'r 2'r Z1 -, c z EFS 1
Tife A. CrKx $q5

REV 4o x1?"CrnF_
?yZ?3 Tycc_
T/FE A O?'6( ; ZA.si u I d. i I l

PzoP.

2o'- IS Crop •
.,.
•
I?
t '
i
i

WP.DE, mASSEY
11324 BIG PINE k- .
rnP.RZHA.t.L., \J.c• Z8153
_DB. 193 P . zo7
/0
p o ESA ZUPFER
f) 2

K ,
i

I
x•
i HI
x

?r I18+?15
J
?_ 3 I I)
7 r 1 3 r'/ g E1? %Aj
i YPF A CHECK ei, IN
WADE r/AASSEy
Te',ARSHP.LL, N. C . 2`753
P. Zo7
51+e 12-/0
:>x 1 _57f j,,Ca
KZI jl Cci+I'dh
bYZ *L
SSA,
2STREAM
25'X Ig COP
REP.
4o' ,x 113"CMP
s /0
I?
I
• ? !Vr
II ? ?
I,g+ `f5 .--
100. ESA "uk
CYIDE MASSEV
C?U E I S EEN H I C k5
W9 NERM IIAGE RD
SAIJF-OPD, N.C• Z7330
D8. 5o P. 327
0
X.
T
'Wf
CLV DE fWI SEY
CIo E iLEEN H IC KS
I??? NERrni7A6E RD
??1?FoRD, N,C. Z1330
?R. 50 P. 32-7
/I
,d
W
I
14
i?
I I i
i
I ,I
I
i
I ?
? j.
•i I
i
i
I ?
tH* ',o
t
•
Yi
i
I
? (IC
v:
i
i
I
Q f

(,xZfZ TYPE B ? I
t3ns1N
TrvE A cNECk 6As("N
I
Levy -+ F?-Xe pLA', kSl4Ae
/YIWSVO( I\I(. ?87s7 i 3 I I
<=iVJ IZ
i
JIE
11
yI I I
2,',e 19"UUP BAD
l?
?wlPs A ?UE?2
??3e s????w>p RA-
?prS?a11
397
!Z +q3 3sev-) k
20 , 1c Cra.P EPA
REp.
2s ' IS" CMG
I
' I
I
i
I'
7 J ?'
I„ v
I
J
v?
I S
I
C[ I
IT_
CL,/C) MASS r-_y
CIO E'IL GGF d NICKS
1b19 ?-1E2ro*17AGe PD.
SANFCIZG, N.CC 27330
DP. 50 P. 327
F 1
I
T t2 -/.
w spit JCS
I
I I'
I I1
P6

? ' % y 11
Massey ? SVc? ?
RAt POW /''l ut S h a << ? /V.G r2-$ 75-3
3
O
?--?! Sc8'J1 rz15 E.I1P.O? 3?+1$ 556
I
1-- 2 S i REP?I1n
Levyy ?abP? IS rte L Su? e I 3
\ m 10
I-3
. 1?•3raT,?PE 6 BaS(?U
? T/PE A Cl%ECIC QhS;N .. r3 ? fgs
2e' 9ollr1E I.T. 12
_? 40 x 30
lp
EXT.
DouB;E GATE
SHED l z GK . Tu \I 3 SiREA.f?
SLR RN LI, ? T
• , to
3
t I .
I?o+ss R
IO'SoiL DR.
3 c rwies
h A POO e
" 2
3.2 1 20q, 39 7
to

IZ' GaTE
+lZ Io SOiL tP
c,Roun„
? II
I
I I.
137 + 13 ENC o r PRo.;.
4' caTE
ar?es? e sSey
? Lf/ ?? S
?I
3
+IZ '/,

yell
PooT6eit,)G6
2 sTRE AM
SUCV?`1G ?n SN 14-u-?5?{
/S
To
\ s AL-,
i
%
i p)
? ? l0e
?+ I 1 `
fT ff' ]0 ? /'? ? x,
"\
r )
J
\
32-
NOT SFUNGS -'7 '3'9 la =-a0 a
. • - ror. sfa - -
s.xca.,. .
/ 11 % L
Pte'
73 AZ?
J 1$72
"Cl
.. \ 11]7 ..49
l
frfo \
/• I ) -7 Y J
• IB
o/• ti \ I /
1 71
4 `..
"Is ? I / 1 199 \ . 5 ?r
- n Ipq
Na ~ '0
T 3.,
VV C? I_5 I56 T33 l\
ln \/
. 9 / 66
N _.
NAEMON DEN I159 ` UDUFE t fly - S•
MANAGE?ENT
I]i ) 6'. V v
AREA
fr u
O / -''\•\_? ) ./ - /?? ? rte,. ` .?-
> 29 a
\' _ro q?•
07 1
.00
G r / J\ 1011
'I190 .I ..
SW3
?ErSE1S GAP ?. \ I \ -
I
1100
v
A