20080720 Ver 1_Application_20080421

4.~~
~ q~ ~~
~` ~~~
STATE of NORTH CAROLIlVA ~»~~~li~-
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ti
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
DIVISION 4
April 14, 2008
080720
Mr. William Wescott
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Cazolina 27889-1000
(Two Copies)
Mr. Robert Ridings
Wetlands/401 Unit
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
(Three Copies)
SUBJECT: Wilson County, Improvement of SR 1417 (Autumn Road)
WBS Element: ~~ 0`~~oLy
Deaz Sirs:
The North Carolina. Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to ave SR 1417
to bring the road into compliance with standard safety design specifications. This activity
will result in impact to two Unnamed Tributaries (iJT) to Cattail Swamp due to the
replacement and extension of two crosslines to facilitate travel lane and shoulder
widening. The NCDOT anticipates that the pipe replacement activities will be authorized
under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14. This application is also intended as request for
written authorization from the NC Division of Water Quality to replace the pipes under
General Water Quality Certificate # 3704. ~---
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

APPLICATION INFORMATION
Enclosed please find the Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Forrn and supporting
documentation for the above referenced project.
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3D(e) the following
information is being provided to facilitate payment of fees associated with the appropriate
Water Quality Certificate:
• Certificate being requested: #3704 (NWP 14)
• WBS Element: ~L, d `l $U Z~ f
• Amount of fee: $200
PROJECT INFORMATION
Road Name SR Number Pto~ect
miles Classification
Autumn Rd 1417 0.70 R~
River Basin: DWQ
ID
Water ~~' Designation
% New Impervious Surface
Tar-Pam Basin 2$-83-1-1 NSW, C
Buffer Rules Buffer Use Designation
Tar-Pamlico Allowable
Protected Species Present Mapped IIistotic Properties
No No
FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) currently list three federally protected species for
Wilson County (Table 1).
Table 1- Federally Protected Species of Wayne County
Federal Habitat Biological
Common Name Scientific Name Status Present Conclusion
Red-cockaded Picoides borealis E N No Effect
woodpecker
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon E N No Effect
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii E N No Effect
No element occurrences are listed on the NHP database within vne mile of the project
area. During the onsite visit, it was determined that there were no pine trees suitable for
RCW foraging or nesting are in, or adjacent to, the project azea. No Michaux's Sumac
was observed
No sites eligible for listing on the National Register occur within the area of potential
effect. This project will not affect listed or eligible historic properties.

MINIMLZATION INFORMATION
Impacts will be inim»ed by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the
protection of surface waters and wetlands, restrictions against the staging of equipment in
or adjacent to waters of the US, and coordination (including apre-construction meeting)
with the Division Environmental Officer.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Chad
Goggins at [phone]. Your time and effort are appreciated.
Respectfully yours,
f~~
R. E. Greene, 7r., PE
Division Engineer, Division 4

Office Use Only: Form version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 ~ ~ 8 0 7 2 0
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. ffthis notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. OwnerJApplicant Information
Name: R E. Greene,, Jr , P E, Division Engineer
Mailing Address: _ North Carolina Department of Tran~ortation/Division 4
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: (252L237-6164x3501 Fax Number:~2521234-6174
E-mail Address: rgreene ,dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agerrt has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Chad Goggins
Company Affiliation: Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: Division 4 - NCDOT
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: [phone]x3532 Fax Number: [phone] ,
E-mail Address:_ ccog 'nsna,dot.state.nc.us
updated i vtrzoos
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans aze
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SR 1417 paving project ..70 miles
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIl~:
4. Location
County:_Wilson Elm City USGS Quad Neazest Town: Elm city
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):. Right off of 301 N at Elm
City at first stop si¢n take a right SR 1417 is the first road to the left
r
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7951 ~1 77.8365 °W
6. Property size (acres,
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Cattail 5wamp~D~ ID' NSW, C 28-83-
1-1
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mapsl.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Rural wooded
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Updated 11!1/2005
Page 6 of 13

Road aradinQ draina~te base paving and erosion control as well as replacing 1 line of 38' X
24" RCP with one line of 50'X30" CMP as well as re lacing one line of 31' X 24" RCP with
one line of 50' X 24" CMP
Heave construction equipment (backhoe, excavator, dump truck, bulldozer, grader) will be
used
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:_ to bring dirt road into compliance with standard
safety design specifications.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules.
NIA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VL Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). $e sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: One crossline replacement will
involve 12 additional feet of impact to Waters of the US The second crossline replacement
will involve 19 additional feet of stream impact Also there are wetland impacts on this
Updated 1 t/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

side slopes which will require 0.089 acres of excavation in wetlands
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limite to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.

Wetland Impact
Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of

Site Number
Type of Impact
(e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no) (linear feet)

St. 13 +50 excavation of
roadside ditches Herbaceous within Utility
no
abutting
019
corridor .

St. 15+25 excavation of
roadside ditches Herbaceous within Utili
ty
no
abutting
006
corridor .
St. 16+75 excavation of
roadside ditches Herbaceous within Utility
no
abutting
015
comdor .

St. 34 to St. 36 excavation of
roadside ditches Herbaceous within Utility
no
abutting
019
corridor .

Total Wetland Impact (acres) .089
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
~'~ ~~
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im ct Impact
Length

(linear feet Area of
Impact

(acres)
St. 14+55 SwaCmp Pipe Upgrade Perennial 2 12 .0005
St. 34+6() ~ t0 ~~
S Pipe Upgrade Perennial 2 19 .0008

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 31 0.001
u~r~a t irtr~oos
Page 8 of 13

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
('indicate onn ma) Name of Watecbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond~~ c sound, bay, Area of
Impact
(acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U. S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act (acres : 0.001
Wetland Im act acres : 0.0$9
O en Water Im act (acres): 0
Total Im act to Waters of the U. S. acres .090
Total Stream Im act linear feet : 31
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ sbream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.);. ~t/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13

financial viability afthe project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Equipment sta~ing_and work
will be performed within the existing road footprint Strict enforcement of Best Management
Practices for sedimentation and erosion control, the protection of wetlands, and surface waters
will be enforced.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical wide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ wehsite far most current
version.).
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
None required wetland impacts less than 1/10 acre
u~t~t i vinous
Page 10 of 13

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they aze will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (lineaz feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-ripazian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
lX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaVstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. Ali proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neese), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Tar Pam )? Yes ® No ^
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Ditches are typically kicked out 10 ft on each side of road so that would be:
Zone* Impact
( care feet) Multiplier Required
Miti tion
1 4687 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 2889 1.5
Total 7576
Gone 1 extends out 3t) feet perpendicular tiom the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
addifiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
NQt reauired less than 1/3 acre
XL Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If -percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
AlI appropriate best mans ement practices for sediment and erosion control will be
implemented.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Ts this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
upaatea rriri2oos
Page 12 of 13

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated firiure impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No ^
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This project is apart of the statewide secondary road paving program
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~ipplicant/Age t' Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

r: 1~ •
1 I F• 1 ~
1 Ir li.
I ~` c~~ -
i sb! ~
~` ~ !
/ ` ~ rJ
;.
~, ; ~. r__
p: ,~ -
,,
.~,
,r
/
i"
I ~r .~
;-
1
i 4! I' ~ M
': n _ .nll r' m
CINITY
~i
Ri
r~U
S
o, Q
`~G-
~~
~~
aor.r
~a"e in~co~ Z~i!t';
/ „~`/_ _ _ it ~+ --
Tf1 ~ - _
~~i~: ---_ __
1, \ 1
~ ^ Il 11
~y 11~ II
.1"- Y_ 111c InA7Nt` ROaDI
"5313 a+ia'
DATUM DESGRIPf10N
Nath~ Releralu la fhb poKd ~ ptam. prepred by R.R.
tkmrq
aM Wwcute~. Irc. dated 1uy 3. I??5.
i ne IorJlved coordinate sYStem lathe po1CCt a baxd upa I
M a15Vrled GOOrarY/e p>,r. I
ihr ekrallon datun la lllr.. po}ecl wr esUMnhtd w,tn the
dllkrerRUl kvNilq kan NCGS momamlel TAMeP. NAVD 98
a>faes uxd.
~~
1 ~~
;"
I},
II.
i
I
i
ffi
I
cn.q re.r:
x , r i....,.>r..
Oe
o-.s=mar _I_ _I_
__--_ _- _ _ .o ro~.~
Y .IY lrae•fr Swr
. inX 7oaee
nz:a..7n3
SR 1417 AUTUMN ROAD
16C aM• ?c `pl rtlBUCI
FND CON57FJ1CTION ~~CS'P
_..- r0' 15.52. i a F / /
~y- sR 111t roRlnc[RSwur Roam ~yL?
k 51[~ p?~
F s<~, 6563 ~~, !~ ~
_ :~,,
- ~ .: ,. 7wr ~ ~
•'~ G: f 'X07
- cmn~•r.. ~ /
~~ ~r.,a 5rr /
in.it ~~ Sr+r •Y.ea~Tf
•i i a27iA l•nN ~.?!O7'
o-~7~. wm r, r. wwee~
SHEET INDEX
3NCtt pt5•:RMIgN •rQ
I COY[R 5N[!n INOU n ILG[rC CY-I
a n..~wmrlte IaooTOal+sc cPa
3. PtaNa Rdll[-Z+•50h3l,50 tr~:
rua a rleDrll[ -35• SC 70 SOr W Q~
s cross xc7nrr 7s s
c cROSSx~lac as~c
~. caossxnalt a~
e rmw atut5a elA51W wmo. uu~uRC be

LENGTH OF ROADWAY PROJECT = 0.70 MILE
TOTAL LENGTt1 OF STATE PROJECT = 0.70 MILE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILSON COUNTY
LOCATION: SR 1417 FRONT SR 1419 TO SR l4l 8
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, BASE, PAVING
AND EROSION CONTROL
I
I
--~'--.
G ~' K
x. rtes mn
>K ~%7
t•7~0: cUu
DETAIL TITLE
DETAIL N0. I D I SCA;P SHEET REF.
vnN 3'nTnNJleR[~eR(NLMC ~~' ~,",
NC
!;n:[w.CJ ~ / wli: rIC p[yJJr: K'~
e3n:.::

CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
ROADS t RELATED ITEMS
Eage d PaYemeM _____
fox d FavemeM Fr~sed
Road CeMernK. ~~~
RIGHT OF WAY
RN1M d Way Mar/er Fmbrq p
RrgM dN'aY Cn54M -___-
RyM dWry A7aAtr Proposre 1
RqM d N'sy Plopoxl _
Are:daqunAwn ~ ____.~
STRUCTURES
P,+e (aIIrM Fantnq
Ppe GdveA Propoxd
UTILITIES
Fr~at. Fok
Oaerhead FkctrK
5~grul Pdc .. '"~ p
S~groi LqM _~
5grol Bea ...
lqM Pok. rL'J
Gy~ wNn ~
Fiber pptK Warniro p0~t : '
lekphaR'Bor m
idephone lme -T-
Cabk Bor ~
Sanitary Sewer -~-
Samtary Sewer Mamlok
BOUNDARIES t PROPEP.TIES
Gt7lnq Iron Plpe. c[•
0onua Faa . ~
70POGRAPHr
~~ Llrc -~
Fdl floe -F-f-
Dltcn left Propard. _
Dltcn RqM Propaxd -
top d Bali _ . ---------
WCL1MId5 _ -+ir~
EROSION CONTROL
Temporary 51R Feree _„~
Teaworsry Ract SWnnnR Dam Type-h .
Ppe IrJet 5eduacM Trap Type•A IPIST.A) Li Y
A aA
/J
~i
VEGETATION
Woodslne -
Sagkiree _
Tree Llrc Medge Lrc
Ewsn 15nrub
r 'r'te-r+~, ''rr
c~ ~ ~
iC

r
c
V
C
S
L~
rC. HARRIS, JR
BKINfEPJNG r
StatVFnNG. F.R.
21E Nlam 51rce1
WncVae. N C. 2A5r.+0
251.32'. 560' l01
252.?F 1.620[ h}
hern7~i'hehm_.rei
1~:1R p1L
OfAM1 M
c~l+e~
Jaw.
rNC Iwa
SGIt
NVII.
vrn:
INa w
CV- ~
~tf: I d 8

LEGEND
~
~
1,
. ~,..~..
ry.

P~ / / ~ ~ ~"c r ,
rm . e` ...R.w.,.
Nv ~ r,.T a

/
/ / i
~
r.. /
1
.

~ x •,Rac.r
V •N: RrAM rtlr
! RaDW
~
i
~
{i
'
h
/
~1 .1
%~' i~ `%;
~
:° S.G. FIONER`i. Jr.
, R i.!('
%YJ
ry ~ MEIVIN SUM14ERlIN, 00RTNY G.
t1
H'Rt
I -- . vr~
u
~ -
~NC I/
•
/
/y' V
/ I
~_ j f~ /I/ 1 I 4
.
. ~
,W
rf1
I I CV.. C[wr u'tw nR
n. i
"
/f ~ f,(. / it 1
~Y~ ` .I// J~-,..I /
`/ / /~ l
I ~ /
1 S
r rcvcvr Ixae nm.~. rsar
I I
+t ., once I I 6\' •c.n vNK
R[-Af!trr'lLLri!rw
~~ ~ ~a o'u •ar
2
c
l
' ~
/
i/'
~
%,
~ I
I I I ` ] ~ yu ln•a~sv n•o;R
c ~
,u ~o,a
,i. r.ron _ ~
~~ Ic
~
~ rx .nacm lnc
+r-rR lc
v
Nr
'~
o.
'I./. 1 I
r' \
,
~
I
~'~
~/
l
.~;/ ' d/~1~1/. ;~--'1 t tl
/~ ``~`h 1!7 Y~ \ T 1KI 11,T
f /
~ .
1c L.
•. I
m
I I
S. ` I
-',.. ~ ~ ~
I I -__-__ ~f
I 1 I ~~ c"1 `'r• J ie:~ ~ ~~r,..: -~ `7e ^.~2 \I U1 `_.
I RMrCrAn.rl N!rlwriNFl rtOtnrSC II.drLn IY ~ ` - O Twlrr
\v .
.
KRY ^nvi~aa~t,r r+b RCJR
r.r~•

r
, lJ' l'/'.
an F l i
\:J'
cs
w rrc~n o / -- ~
~
/ Cl" l.P'~ ~l:-b"' V'l l,+' M, .,v V' 1W'%V+ lJV c..^~cCl° l.l+ ~/ V''k:~ ll' lr lt' V' ll;'~ ~,, J I I
~I^" \i.r~.=.• ~
~ r~L•
~J
"
•
~-- -
`
e
c"~ ~° ~r I.r ~ ~ - ~ j
-~-~~_ --t- '~ ~
~
"
_
7 ,
_
z
'~ .tn
-
T
Tn
--
_
- -
- -i
I / / ~'IF'a~L. -~~ _ I~
I. _ _ _-~s-~l ~4~Tryµ '--Vx F --r ----Y------•*-~-+±~_--1 ~a-~-~-.f~i-f_---M^-" ~,. \ .',n.• _
~, ^~d.~ J"/-/ _~,o :~ `--~`~`- ~a~,'d~_;aciX'~: ~ a>sr~T„ _~ j~.??.~~=^ „n ,r, .n~ ,~ ,''~- -r - - -- -~ ~--J- - - -,1- - ~-
~ ''' .///:l 1 ! ! ,iswR.\ y ~ Z~ s rat ~~ .', rtI ' (( ~` 1 \ i ' ' I
~ i.-.
..I
I
..,, .q
, r.:~..
f
n/r
~
~
~
\ ~'
~^ •
' + _ t3 ~, ~^ ~ '~ ~J ~,., `~, - -
'I.. } ~ , . r' ... II
f' ~
' . -~ ~ -~- - ; W
~ Z
~ ~ ~lAn or NOetn
CutxlNaoe°A~nleNrD!
T' .. / . /.
/!/ k..9
1
I
1, Ci I 7 Ir
~, ~ ~, +PC( -TRIK'AON~ 1
' I I
\
~
'
1
`\ yC}N=
`.--\ ~
, v~r~
t ~
~ •.~ \ ~ \.~ \• 1 \ 1 ~ I ~. r[rroc/1t+:v..
• \ \ ~~.. \,,F~,~ ` \ 1 1 SG. F,(YA'~PZ `Jr .Ii IC, OO pr
~'a^ ~ I
•~~\ F'
O. / i j
~
'
,~ •
7'r.Q II:~2rM1C Pltr ,-r D~4 I li ~
3u,3 ' !
1a :116 J
~,~
~!
U ir.4r.P06:ATKM1
/ ` :
iCa
! (~
/ (/ r . C I .Y_ ,r 1, ` InMNL` RO~DI
/
f
!
(1 ~
r
/ / ~'
' _.r.
~
~C 'I.
~ Y+,Y' \ f, \ 1 \` I a ~ w. w rm
I , ~ ~ ~,... , \ \ 1\ t \
! \ l
..
`
r' .
i2•c:V
c 21 M A:a, h I H

QQ
,
~
,dl cr f
grt 6 nntRStCIION
y
•. :
,
~! ! ! ,
1N6L3~
VC EEl 1 ~ I ,
\
~ \ P
,'
~ Y \ ,
l\1 t
I
I ~ I ~
t I
G
~ i
/
,
M w
t
l
t
l i
,' /'C'` ""`"~~"'°°"°""
~:L''IN4,T abl ~~ t 1 SR 1417 -- .AUTUMN ROAD
~'
• ^ ;!'{ ~.,~ \ 1
\ t f't 11 j 160' RM' PP,OPOSED 20 PAVEMENT PUBLIC) ,
l~ !
•% 1 I lu ~ I 1
~
BEFO
RE YOU DIG
r ~
W~~4`Y ~ A .....
North CarDllru One-Call Center, Inc.

.
<
~
Call 4
~ 6 hou^ Deiorc Yap Dq! I
c/
,
{.,
' ~
I-DO D-632-4949 ° i
SClNt 1 'r /~f IN[ (r

I .s
w-i... .a ir.c

r
VGRI. _ __ _
~- .
I I
J I I ~ EU . e l a ,M 76 I

' ~_ --~-_- I I
~
~
I
~ i ~•
e.D. - .I '
gip
~
~
I

i I ,; I
i r I ~ M.C. t1ARR15, JR
1 I - I
ENGINEERING /
~ I lGV POINT ltv ~ 117. ,,... E- P
SURV[11NG
A

_
r
I
M STI
rvlt
4
D
,..57.75
~ u2e4
2300
'
i
I

I
,°,
e:
~
'^
n ,
.
,
21E M,Ir 5lrut
Wmlank,N,C.2D590
.
.
4 .
I~ M1 _ 252321.560710)

_.
-

I
,rrc
I
c

a
~
m'
c
~
~' _

I
-- ::
n 252.°_21.620Dm
~clN,n„Ear¢roms.at

I
j
_ I
I
~, N
51R IXvrtO•'M[KI
-.
G n
n I r Y P.~t "I/wStP..
~- ~ _ ^
LL O

~ sip-,xw. NH
STATE OF NORTH
i ~ ~ ~ - ~-"~ -
~
nuaoxr
wRUKw ~ CAROLINA

1 c'
:I ~ _ DEPARTMENT OF
-~-~ -- ~ I ~~
~ ~ c ~ ,,P.
-
; ~ ~ I ~ ~ TRANSPORTATION
~ -
--
uI.I,4uµ-
I
~°
~`ac~ ~_~.r, ~
Iliri.nS~ _
- I 5R 1417 FROM SR
1419 TO $R 1418
_ --
~ --'- ____ I
~

__
I

-
!

I I I
D I

~
rl --- --

I ~

I

+
i !Kt T~'4+SC
bSlt MlE. c>.ryan
I , I i IM,rw M rm
cnrr m: >~
lOeNO. c^ ~•
I ~ I
- V ~ . ~ ~ C .~ ~
~ ~ ,CrI ~ J u
" iLL
P l n
4 - n V
~
~ G /, . 0, e 0 `,' 0, Y, _ .
-
~ ' ;
N ~
N
J
N r° n ~
~ N °:
N _ Ni n
_ 0, ~
N L I
r~ n'JIC. ~^
- - n.
- N
- _ - _
- _
- - _ _ _ _ _
- _ _
- - _ _ - - - L KIT
~~- i I I I I I I I I
I
1
I
i
~ I
~

'

~ ~

~ '

I

I I

~ ~ I I

' I

~

CP-2
.
I
~o.a,---`- Il+oo I~.OC Is-oe I..oO Is.oO 16.00 •'•W ~E-00 ~4.c0 s0acv 2,+0o a•w a•oo zsa00
~r 2 ~ 8

LEGEND
t ~ r . rrtt~ •a rel
~n •xl rua:
c c • - uc+f+~coc enawrn I
M •rR OM.
R • rM(! Ip!
we •.mn
•-[~~ n •invlwM1~
u -udrur

'v ~ • WtrM'+~

W . CMYLrC I(1IC rn
/// Q~f~rr Zo~l ~' y .iurdlt
.''. ~
T m . ,n +roun
r'
~ '
b • eru ~v.
G+' • Ott K
'+f . PthSNtl[
~4[~
~
.
1 .
eau rytl[ • x.+C rqt
1
: ~ tt
I 11

'I ~
m IK ~
~
.NCI IC\N(
1
/ `t et:lC • e+U d C'./! 7C e•U U:UC
~~,,,~0Q k.IMJ; 7 /
I ~Y~ tr•anc E'Ij
`
'

Y K
u
C
~'

~ / EPS, Jr.
_.L--. FION
a i„r. n .,,r, GEDRCf G JACFSON. Jr. \ p ''
' 1 BAP,BAP,A J. JACt$DN stt 3h" FI O
} G
~F ~` N IC2t.°O3.'
~
~
~ } ~ `~
N '
I
~~ r~a ~~lC-3-31.6~~I _ ~ I ~ ..

~
` . I
., R 53p 4bt
.. ~L
~
-
~ ~
` +
..
~
? ~' ~~-.-,.. ~ _`_
''~ Y t ~ ``
-
5Tf L,
'
--_ wL ~ ~
~ -
v - ~~ 1 r TdA R'ff rl ^ C34"Fie ~t ~ ~f ~ ~ - ~S ~: s~~'.-
P I ~ '`___~ 1 IRS 12C.!`. nuW M. 1' .\ _ C~~1 -
-~--'--
~-r ~
°
~
~
~
,n
~
- v/
W ~~ ~
f r.
/
~ ~~~ .- -~
_~~ : `'- -ti __~ _,.._~ ~ i ~.
~>>
-_'~
~
/ '
;
l /
-..,
~ - .. 1 '
c ,ua~ 1..
i oot r
>d' ~ - ~„
,~- ll~ V. - -_L/•~.. - ... , •. r.,Otxo ~ §Il*F`: / r . ~4.~e r ' 1 \ r' ~ J': I~ - ~ -
ll• ~ .. 1 i~ • r.;Je~. C 1 \ ar ~•. ` , J/'i+ . ~ ~;.~ e
r
T~~
``1
~l
/ c
~ Z
=
, Oexr:
STA7f OF NOP.Tn
CAgpLINt, DEPAP?MFAR pr
~
.
~,
--
_ _,;
'..
:'~
~ . -
1 _-~-~
~ x .~
~. trff~'F~'~`. ~r ..
l J %J ~ -1 Y I ~•. i ~",.c.
~` _- - -<_-' ~ ~ \\
'c
r~_ '/' 1 -.a~~~~ '~• ~.~~%~ - cR ,
`~~`^w:.:.t~__ `=_L-~_:.. W ~~_P •J L-.l`
" ~
•
`
•
~
`
-
y
IU- TW:S .P'Ji',A710N
~
!
: .
4 •~ -
.~1. F\C;~ ~ ~ ~ /~ r, a c+,cc'
_ A iv RCT n«. "-'-~~..~
~
~_ lJ~
~-
_
-
~
, Q
A ~0.K~~C'sk ~}~'JJII~ ./ ~ I
_~'~Yµ;ptG~ .y-7 \A.~„~ Tom- t'r.^': ~-•' ,--tS ~ `~ +,- I~
I
~
1
JJ
\
~ I
r
i
_ '-- b - I
-- ;. ,( i
50r:.Jr.
GED
GEGJAC
~)_t% :~..) ~ z~, ~! f\ 'j'`
i I IBARBaPJ~J JACFSDN
l •
'°-' -) ... I ~
., r
t
~`
,
~M( ~ ,
.
a
~
R,n
---
~_,wY-n.Yr ----- ~ v , -L _ jJ 1 l t~ a: .. c:
/-
.-pn !i / J / ; MgI.~S, IMCr WfIWe!RGMtC M pIP
1 ~'~ /
~ ~ .' [i ~y,
C Mf1rfT PC) . /~
L ~
'
'`
'
/
/S
'
'I '
•
;
~
13C.3
l l .v.3s,a.sv.z.nrn
•n.~.
!
.~Y
\ rtl
r.Y-Y
Y`.F{B!~IL,-. ~ ~ 4 .. 1'Y":+ 1 r o- I ~ 5U l5.Of ~DiI47+0017
e ^;.i.15G3 ~ . r ~ +Stf 33+0! • ~ 1 1( I t.;. r. 'C"'i:.
/
l
~
)~ S G. FEOWEP,S. Jr.
r5 t[EAk I
er s,u •er. F 310° •De• -- - _ ~ I I
~ 11 ,
B.FORE YOU DIG.....
A r i..ci i ~

~°~" ~
k -3. 03 %~
----' ~r••a 1 +~ ~ North Cuolm3 One-0311
E33o3.xiz ~~ir,,.~„e.~ I ~r t
~
~
Center, Irc.

c
j!
J-. .. r.uez. ~ /
~ GI14L nao Blot Yp• D
nulw w•o ~ ~
!-8D0-632-4949
~ ~ a"`;
SR 1417 ^- AUTUMN ROAD q1 ~•'
'r.
-.
i~ ~~ 1, ':
~ ~
~,~
(60' PJ1N PROPOSED 2C PAVEMEM PU9LIC)
xur'
1•
+tlx.
~
`
r.50
WORK: r
^e rv•`'
1'.5'
yCet: vr~..u ..
I

I I
nWn npN'IUV- 13036 I I `
r,w,.,Nr, :Jf . zs,oF.o+
P.a S7P . 25,M.01
f..0 •
I ~090Di
I s 1 I I NI CU:v. 1
f.C - ~ 1.7 'L 16
,132
LOA' R
I Mrt ruv . I
ye
n.C. ttARR15. JR

I
VC
6 • I' ~
lOw ~
57A . 35 .
I •.37
ENGINEERINC• 1
~ SOP
I~YING
P
A

-
CILY• ILL.
S
i
I ,
.
.
.
m 0.•37-. I 21E Mnn Street
~ N
o f R. 13E ~ I w•tenir, N.L. 28590

`-'
-
~
° I 252.3£ 1.56C71d)
~ I r
u e''"r 152.321.620E Ifl
_-. ar.. i ~ u I ~ N hcn'^'@hrnt....net
O ~
- N
- ~ N
i
I
SnC RVClt~wer0
I .wa ,ex:rult c v+i' I
C
W
~

.

__-

~ 'we rqc
- - - I ---- I -- -- -_-- -- i ! ~ ~ '' +' ~ I - a i STATE OF NORTH
= L ~ ~ '
°~ ~ CAROLINA
~ ~~"" I
,, I I ~ :``- DEPARTIv1EMOF

-~~--
~
---- -_
--
TRANSPOP,TATION
-,~: s~
--
-----
---- ---- "
---- -- I 5R 1417 FROM SR

1
~
voscr
xlnana GUo 1419T0 SR 1418
i I I ~~nz ~Rr
~ I PUW 1 PROFILE
2;+,p TC 39+50

_ -- - -- ONptx@. rv
I a*.rer elm
neN7 n'~~+
i Dxe Ilr+.[ : nK
N < 1t M
~
IC
In
-
_ N
_
- rv
- _ ~
-
-
-
- _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
N:RI.
I ~ ~
I
I I ~ ~ ~ CP-3
I I I ~
`••OC ..^E+00 .: •OC _
:.b+00 25-W 30,00 31,OC 5i,L0' 35,00 3e,00 35.07 3f+~ i+00 3e+W 3°+0?

3
8
. 5 ngi
;~

/ BEFORC YDU DfG..... II
B / ~ North
GII 4b
~
~ Grdlru OnE•GC Censer, Inc.
r
H
6
1
r
D'
!
e
ac
a
oe
-
a
t
Q / ~
, ~ 1.8DD-652-4549
,5
~t 4
~
,~
NC /
` ~

c~ _
L 9
~' ~ !~~
I
'
`~ / ~
LEGEND

- GEORGC G. JALr,SpN. Jr.
. GAG:BAP
A J
lAasoN 7
\
i
+~!~1~
~ \ 'PO
~ \ •
~
: ~.. ~ ~~ o
~
~`
-
' .
.
or roro.h .s \
,
•'\ \1 .~, ~''
`Q~ r,
+r
~cv.rrt+eN «v. .a<x. x ~~ i~
<
•$' CNO CPN57R11CTgN r ~h`C~
1-eC1 .!.`.2 i. \ \>~ \ \ EDN'ARP B. PfiTM4N. Ur • ev„rrO~n
~ ~~~
L~.
F
I Itht2'lrwoxE .~. 5t ~~~f lBr.IDf,[PSVILLL WADI \ o~'. GLOP,!A F. PITTMAW
°' ,o~ '
~ .
` rc .•ialro nn.•xntr
r
m

~ 1'
D ' ~ ~
x N.~02G i3G03
[-4[p2.553e3 I
N
' 3.
6~ I
D
E r >\ ~~ "Nc~ x~nr a~
a ~, r
I
` c .,n
c,
-
U •t0.Tarw[+ew
m . lv o a. C~
u
t
-i~ .
N
Y
6
1
~
; .,
I .~, = \ a•rora•
\'\~, \N
w
r .
u -aNrcArr
i?
~,.,_ f \.. <. i
:. .. .
I .. . L
, o
vsa uultr~rv
r.Nxw nrr oox N: '~~, \~,~~ cr r...v. YY .,_~ ~
~1
'
/ ~ .uic d+r+ :
r, ~
~ I

Z 1 _I I I
~ T• r,
!-~_-- _ ..tea' ..
• -N.•s.yw - ^'r+- - nk -~
. • - -
• !
S-3 e!
A.<Trt3. \ \ .®
5G~ ~ t I , T /
~ . ~ ' SC R+.Y GG~ / r" I
i, a <
r' V
W
]< <Cr .rl ~ YK 'rrS
M".N4 ~,m'.,C ""
n .Iwr vrlK
Y ~

C.
r
- -~ ,
J
.e prJE
~ _
I . u',r vMN

~ ..
~~'. -a>r •a
~ \ ~ ~. rr..c c I
'ir~F
' •c ~ ~~.~`r~S
.Sar
I t"
R
w i
C
p

I
~~ ~ 5~` .. ~t, ~, I I
~ •... •'
U'
~~ ~ C `~",5 u
• z
\ ,
I I
in
t 4 r
, \\\~ ~ ' , ~ r'I f I
I 1 ~~ \~~~ ~ I r T;NJVO~ anyl::R
_
' "\; •
~~~~
'/
r
I
M ~
,(+C~I 1C5,n O
1.4'Tl
Crlr C
_~, F
-
~

I i4
r :/
D
NZ1Ll°.<75 `~~ A
[ 3^i 3 f9°5 ~ ~. ~\ ~ I <„
-
`
`
•±I
I
.\
~.
aM+S~ ` 'oar r• \~\1 ~., r ;,~`~
.• RLE<f, //
~ ,
~
~
~ Jr NDRTn

U3iSINP DEPA?f MfNT pr
\
muroty, ;xrtr.,wn<r.~aouuc wprOn
3..OC--1M1 <2.OC Rt ` ~! rr ~
S1a3s.OC.S <2.OOll ~
l .. • <. -
~\
~r r ~ ~
`
N 927 162; ,7. ~ ! , n o: ~ ~^ ~~ Cr G'
• I
vs / v~ ~y~, .
~~
~~ ir~
[4 .its enP ~~ F '~\,~`` ~,\,4~~ 1`Y~ ., .. r:\ I
~ BANSeDFJ•11DIJ

1
.r
r50N
~ M .
~ ^ `
.•..
`~
I
'e
'
!/
\\'~
.`a\~
I
C•EORC•EG.JAC
.Jr, -
c 6AR,BARA J. JACr50N
a oeo. n..a ,., ... I
~sv+<
.. ~`
~~ ~
,
,. ~
~ I , \
I--- ~
v
I ~ N•7Y.E212f /`/'~ ~ \•'~\
NTn+6 I \~f,
~`~~~\~\`~,.. `\
I DAYRDrBU
! / •,.r\
n
I
I
.
e { rf ~ :•~i::
5R 1417 ~ AUTUMN ROAD
0' PAVEMENT PUBLIC)
' I -~ -_ I \~~~a
I MICnA[t w
BJN ING r sr[R,It~ L- I --
. - ` ` ~ •~r.
5~[
RhV PP,OPOSED 2
160 .
.
I
BUNTING
I
1 R n:. Ir.en ~ •.,
SLAIt `k
e'
~~ ~
r10tr:: 'SR ~
.
e,:a.'~
ven I w,..A .x

5--- I
II
---f ~
I

~ k I

I I I ~
I I

~
I
I i I

I

I I
I
I
N I`i I I I N.C. HARRIS, JR.

per vc

I

! I

fNGINf.RINb 1

j

I

r,

~ - ~ -

I
I
'

I

I SURVEnNG. F.A.

2!E Man 5treel
I 8 ~ ~ I wrnerv4e. N.e 2es5o

I 252.32! 5607101
+ N n ~ 2.2.321 620P AI
_
L
u I i k!urtr,(irrJUm,.net

n
} r<OrOYL RK

~
0

fi srtt uxlm.rNl

____ b
C.??
____
__ ly
---~'
~ i NN5rp.
~ - t I I I i I j STATE OF NORTIi
I _ _
- i - i CAROLINA
I

-
Cdr",/
~- ~

I I DEPARTIdENT OF

TRANSPORTATIOIJ
I ~ ~ ~ I I SR 1417 fROM SR

I
I

I 1419 TO SR 14IB
-~"
I
I
I 39+50050 00
-
_ _ - i
~lNI G41C u..+xr
I I i I I i I I
~ MANN pr nu
I I
I CMTI b 'a!,'.
I JOC ND. I''i'<
I DNC Naga 0. ~ ~ 3.VK•
I
~ ~ ~ v P ~ .n I ~ I I , ~
, ~ .~
rot
. r
~ ~ N ~ ~ k ~ _ _~ I I !
a.
_
~ - I ~
I ~ o w Nc

j
I
I
~
I I
CP-4
--- 4;,.a ...a ,:•o0 4;.oc ...DO •s•DO 4c.a c.oo 4r,.oD ~•a w•a
•
-t' 4 [, 8

`ti ,9 ~,.
edar Grove (~ ~ ~ ••~' . ~, ~ ,, ~ `~ ,-.. .
~~ - -- - _~' .~ ~.„ `. art r .~'`"• )elf rt
.~=~ /_ - l
_~.
=: ~- ~ ~~ --- -9.36:
,ter „ . -
V~ I •.i • { ' b~ ~~ ~ ~ '• ~ ~~ ;~ -1.66
~• . ~~ t
. . ~ ~ - ., r _ . ,
i~.
',_ ~ a
_ !.l~ .! J
0
~=,~ Impact Sites , I; i ai ~~: r~' '` '~~ 1 _ _ _
~ '"tom--.,._._..~~ , - ,~ 1 r~ ~-~ _I , ___
~~ _ '..-~ d _- ,r__ ~_ ~ SR 1417 Paving '~ '•~ ~,'~
~- ,~
~~ i~
f
~~ 1
~•.
{/r' `
~,,..,-fir __.-__._--1L~ l; •"~.. .', ,4_ _.. ._._.. ~~ _ ~-"7 I
-, !1\\ f
~ ° ~ I I' fjr
419 I ~.ti: • .~ ti , o~'
._~ I
- --^-` .,.r-~ U
Scale: 1:48000 NCDOT
Topographic Map
Div. 4 USGS Elm City (NC) Fi
Drawn by: Goggins }~°'"°•~"`•q:~ To o Ma g: 1
P P
~, ~ 35.7951°N, 77.8365°W SR 1417
Date: Apri19, 2008
~~or w~
Project #: SR 1417 Paving

scale: l:s0oo° NCDOT
Soil Survey Map
~y~ Div. 4
DTdWII ln'. R,11AfTM G,4
Chad Goggins ~' ~ SR 1417
* R
Date:4/14/2008 ` ~~
~r01 RAN 7~,,~ q~} j(
r1 V,W~ 7F.
Figure

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1887 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site; SR 1417 navino Date: 3/15/07
Applicant /Owner: NCDOT Division 4 County: it on
Investigator: Cogains State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ^ No ® Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ® No ^ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ^ No ® Plat ID: sample point 1
(explain on reverse if needed) wetland
Area has been clear cut for Utility Easement
VEGETATION
[>wninaM Plarrt Sg_eeies Indicator Stra umt pominant PIaM Species ~gdicator Stratum
1. Sambucus canadensis FACW- Shrub 9.
2. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 10.
3. Juncus spp. FACW grass 11.
4. Rosa palustris OBL shrub 12.
5. 13.
6 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, ar FAC excluding FAC-). 100°r6
Remarks: Hydroohytic criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
^ Aeriat Photographs Primary Indicators:
^ Other ^ Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ sediment Deposits
® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surtace Water: na (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit• 5 (in,) ®Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 72"
®Water~tained Leaves
^ Local Soil survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 1 (in.
) ^FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: HYdroloav criterion is met.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Aycock Series (Aycock sandy Loam) Drainage Class: well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Conifrm Mapped Type? Yes ^ No
~Ig Descriction:
Depth Matrix Colors Motile Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inchesi Horizon (Mansell Moistl (Mansell Moist) Abundance/ConUast Structure. etc.
00=3 A 10vr 4/1 clay loam
55=7 A~ 10 r /1 7 5Y 5/6 many/arominent cla am
$± R 10v~ 7/2 OYR 5 6 many/distjnct flay loa,r~

r
/
/
Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histosol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
p Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aqufc Moisture Regirns ^ Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
^ t3leyed or Low-Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: eets F3
WETLAND DETERMINATION PHOTO !USGS ! NRCS

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ^
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ^
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ^
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ^
Remarks: USGS Elm City
35.7951 N 77.8349

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: SR 1417 aavino oroiect Date: 4/14/07
Applicant /Owner: NCDOT Division 4 County: Wilson
Investigator: Coagins State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ves ^ No ® Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situationj? ves ® Wo ^ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? ves ^ No ® Plot ID: sample point 2
(explain on reverse if needed) upland
Area has been clear cut as Utility easement
VEGETATION
Do~i~apt Plant Species Ind" or Stratmn Dominant Plate Scecies Indicator Stratum
1. 9.
2. Rubus cuneifo/us UPL vine 10.
3. Liquidambar styracitlua FAC+ tree 11.
4. Andropogon virginicus FACU grass 12.
5. Lonicera japonica FAC- vine 13.
6 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC ). 25%
Remarks: HvdrophYtic criterion is not met.
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
^ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
^ Other ^ inundated
^ Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
^ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surtace Water: na (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 (in.) ^ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
^ Water-Stained Leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
De th to Saturated Soil: >i8 in.
p ( ~ ^FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ~drology criterion is not met.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Goldsboro Series (GoA sandy Loam) Drainage Class: mod. well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ^ No
Profiriutlon•
Depth ~ Matrix Colors
the Horizon (Mansell ois~j
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Man
ll M
i
tl Ab
se
o
s
undance/Contrast Structure, etc.
!~ A 1 r 2 clav loam
Z-1~ ~ 10vr 5/g

Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histosol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
^ Suifidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
^ Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
^ Gteyed or Low-Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: does not meet F3
WETLAND DETERMINATION PHOTO /USGS /MRCS
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ^ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ^ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ^ No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ^ No
Remarks: USGS Elm City
35.7951 N 77.8352

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: SR 1417 paving Date: 4/14/07
Applicant /Owner: NCDOT Division 4 County: ikon
Investigator: Coagins State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ^ No ® Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ® luo ^ Transact ID•
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ^ No ® Plot ID: sample point 3
(explain on reverse if needed) wetland
Area bas been cleaz cut for Utility Easement
VEGETATION
DomitleM Plant Specl'es Indicator Stratum Qpmi~aM PIaM ies ~cator Stratum
1. Senrbucus canadensis FACW- Shrub 9.
2. Anus serrulafa FACW Shrub 10.
3. Juncus spp. FACW grass 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6 #4,
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks: Hydroahvt ic criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
^ Aeriaf Photographs Primary Indicators:
^ Other ^ Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ^ water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surtace Water: na (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit• 12 (in.) ^ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
®Waber-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: 1 (in.) ^ Local Soil Survey Data
^FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hvdrolocly criterion is met.

.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Tomotiey (Tt Sandy loam) Drainage Class: poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No [] similar to
Profile Descnotion~
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) ~oriz~C ri (Munsell Moisdi IMunsell Moist) AIzi1~a_nce/Contrast St lure, etc.
.,~4 A 10yr 6/2 and
44=8 A2 10 r 5/ 10Y 5/6 man /v distinct Sand I
8+ B 0 r 4/ 10YR 4/8 few/distinct cla oa
Hydric Soil Indicators:
~ Histosol
^ Histic Epipedon
^ Sultidic Odor
-----~-~Cquic lOfo~sture tteg(me __
® Reducing Conditions
^ Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors
Remarks: M ets F3
!7 Concretions
^ High Organic Content in Surtace Layer in Sandy Soila
^ Oceanic Streaking in Sandy Soils____ _____ __ ___
^ Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ^
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No ^
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ^
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yss ® No ^
Remarks: USGS Elm City
35.7951 N 77.8415

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: SR 1417 navina Droied Date: 4/14/07
Applicant /Owner: NCDOT Division 4 County: ikon
Investigator: CoAains State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ^ No ® Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ~ (Yo ^ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ^ No ® Plot ID: sample point t
(explain on reverse if needed) upland
Area has been clear cut as Utility easement
VEGETATION
t)arninant Plat Species nd' or tratum ~pminarrt Plant Species Indic~,or Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 8.
2. Rubus cuneifolus UPL vine 10.
3. l~quidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11.
4. Liriodendron tubpifera FAC
- . tree 12.
5Bieir
~A~ -cfrass __.- - 't3-_---- - --
6 14.
7• 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 80%
Remarks: Hydroahvtic criterion is met
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
^ Aeriat Photographs Primary Indicators:
^ Other ^ Inundated
^ Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
^ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surtace Water: na (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 (in.) ^ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
^ Water-,Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) ^ Locaf Soil Survey Data
^ FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hvdroloav criterion is not met

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This foam should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFO M~ITION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
StateNC County/parish borough: Wilson City: Elm City
Center coordinates of site (laUlong in degrce decimal format): Lat. 35.7951° N, Long. 77.8365° E.
Universal Transverse Mercator.
Name of neatest waterbody: Cattial Swamp
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic re~urce flows: Tar River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HC1C): 03010107
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
^ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
^ Office (Desk) Determiruation. Date:
^ Field Determination Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMIMIARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA 5ECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Pick List "navigable waters of the U.S."within Rivets and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
^ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate err foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S."within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required
1. Waters of the U:S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
^ TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
^ Relatively permanent watersZ (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that Aow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
^ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 1001inear feel: 3 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 2 + acres.
c Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 198'f DelineatYon Manaal
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Nan-regulated waters/wetlands (check if appticable):~
^ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within flue review area and detetmi~d to be not jurisdictional
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be suppoRed by completing the appropriate sections in Section ID below.
2 For purposes of this form, an 12P W is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies wW auert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section ItIIAi snd Section III.l)1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA.1 and 2
and Section IILD.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
8 CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIDUTARY (THA,T IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summaries information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for judsdiction established under RapaQOahave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tribatariea that typically Bow year-round ar have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional lI'the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennisn flow, skip to Section 1xLl) 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILD 4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant news evaluation. Corps districts and
regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant news between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a signiflcant news finding is not required as a matter of law.
Hthe waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting sn RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant news with a TNW. Ifthe tributary has adjacent wetlands, the signiflcant neaus evaluation must
consider the Mbutary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This signiflcant neaus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request i9
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Sectfon lll.B.l for
the tributary, Section IILB.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section IILB.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant neaus exists is determined in Section 17LC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick .List
Drainage area: 55 acres
Average atmual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
^ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 1` tributaries before entering TNW.
Project webers are 2-S river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1(or lets) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 2-S aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1(or lesaj aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flaw route to TNW : UT to cattial Swamp Cattial Swamp flows into Town Creek which flows into Tar River.,
Tributary stream order, if known: 1 ~ order stream.
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the grid
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows itrto 1NW.

(b) Gen 1 Tribu Charac 'sties check all that 1
Tributary is: Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
^ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 3 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate con sition (check all that apply):
^ Silts Sands ^ Concrete
^ Cobbles ^ Gravel ^ Muck
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetation. Type/% cover;
^ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: farily stable little flow.
Presence of run/rifl':le/pool complexes. Explain: no very little flow.
Tributary geometry: Menrtdelting
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seuonral ttoty
Estimate average numbea of flow events in review area/year: 6-1U
Describe flow regime:
Other infarmafion on duration and volume:
--_.__---.___--Surface flow is: Confined Char~cteristics`_.-~--
Subsurface flow: IInknawn. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other} test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
^ OHW1V16 (check all indicators that apply};
^ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ^
® changes in the character of soil ^
^ shelving ^
® vegetation nnatted down, bent, or absent ^
^ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
^ sediment deposition
~ ^
^ other (list~
^ Discontinuous OHWM.~ Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
Q High Tide Line indicated by: []
^ oil or scum line along shore objects
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
^ Physical markings/characteristics
^ tidal gauges
^ other' (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
the presence of litter and debris
deshuction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ survey to available datum;
^ physical markings;
^ vegetation lineslchanges in vegetation types.
Characterizz tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality, general watershed characteristics, etc.),
Explain: Watercolor clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricuttura( practices). When; there is a break in the OH WM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), rho agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that aPP1Y)~
^ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environtnentally~ensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatidwildlife diversity. Explain fmdmgs:
2. Characteristcs of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characterstics•
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:fiinge wetland abutting non RPW.
Wetland quality. Explain:low clear cut by utility company
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Xntectnittent tlioror. Explain:
Surface flow is: ConRned
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c)
Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. ) xplain: .
^ Separated by berm/barriea. Explain:
(d) Proximity_{Relationshipl to 'TNW
Project wetlands are ~=S river miles from 1T3W.
Project waters are 2-S aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List;
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500=year or gscater floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., watercolor is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: water color clear herbacous wetland .
Identify specific pollutants, if ]mown:
(w) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian butler. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:herbacous.
^ Habitat for.
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other enviromnentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic%vildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetlands} being considered in the cumulative analysis: ]Q"I~k Lit
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts7,{Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (~ Size (itt act+es)
Stimmatize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERbIINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristles and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any weNands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chendcal, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a signfficant news exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Consideratioas when evaluating significant news indade, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and fi+egnency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its prozimity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all Its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g, between a
tributary and fts adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW} SlmilaNy, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the RaPaws Guidance and
discussed in the Instractional Guidebook Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to catty pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or floodwaters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lif c e support functions fur fist, and
--------- -- es, suc as n
spawning, or resting young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downsheam foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or ln-own to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant news findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus Endings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows direcdy or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: 1st order a~ named stream on Soil Solvay. Flows into Catail Swamp which
flows into Town Greek
3. Significant aeaus findings far wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: .
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSJWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
TIiAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide site estimates in review area;
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that IIow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
[~ Tributaries of T1WVs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Q Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) ate
jurisdictional. Data s<ipportitig this conclusion is provided at Sectiest III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seascatally:

~.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tnbutary waters: 401irtear feet 2+/-width (ft).
~] Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or Indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an ItPW, but flows directly ar indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IlI.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 601inear feet3 width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut 1ZPW and thus aze jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow yeaz-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an 12PW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW;
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 1+ acres.
- 5. ~etlamisadjarenrt6but-irot~ectiy A ub~`ng an RPW tF~a~$ow~irectly or~n~ erec~iy into T1VWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusions is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
~ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundmet of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
^ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "wate:rs of the U.S.," or
(~ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
^ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED (I1~ITERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, TAE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLl'):to
which aze or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recxeatianal or other purposes.
^ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
^ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
^ C)ther factors. Explain:
asst Footnote # 3.
v To complete the analysis refer to the key is Section IIl.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
1° Prior to asserting or declining CWA jarisdicHon based solely on this category, Corps I)latricts win elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review cot°sistemt with the process described is the Corps/EPA Menrorondwnr R~gording CWA Art JwisdicAion FoQowing Ropanoa.

t.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
^ Okherncn-wetland waters: acres,
^ Wetlands:
acres.
F. NON~IURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT AppLy):
^ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
^ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
^ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a fmding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: .
[~ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
[] Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, str~ean-s): lirrear feet width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resourcecee:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
- -a-5rrdiag is required€o~)unsdieriorr(check all thatapplyj: --------__ --_-- --___ -_
^ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, st'<eams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check alt that apply -checked items shall be included incase file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/deliaeation report.
^ Oflice does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Gores navigable waters' study:
^ U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NHD data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUG maps.
^ U. S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: .
^ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
^ State/l:,ocal wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/F1RM maps: .
100-year Flood lain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ~ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ^ Other (Name & Date):
^ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter. .
Appticable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
^ Othea information (please specify):
Identify type(s) of waters:
$ ADDITIONAL COMIVIENTS TO SUPPORT JD: Only identified wetlands with in project limits Did not delineate extent of wetlands
beyond project area. .