20080669 Ver 1_Application_20080410

c
^~ SfATEp
y~ W ° ~n
`...n
•~a...~•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~~ ~FRN
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 28, 2008
ATTENTION: Mr. William Wescott
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir,
D ~~/~
~~!~~~
r
o f qPR z ~ ~~`~ D
NR ~
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
O8O6b9
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 23 and 33, Section
401 Water Quality Certification, and Neuse Riparian Buffer
Authorization for the replacement of Bridge No. 35 over Nahunta Swamp
on SR 1532 (Lanetown Rd.); Wayne County; TIP Project B-4671; Federal
Aid Project No. BRZ-1532(3); State Project No. 8.2331701; Debit
$240.00 from WBS 33826.1.1.
Please find enclosed a site map, permit drawings, and half size plan sheets for the above
mentioned project. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this
project on May 19, 2006, and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are
available upon request. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge No. 35 over Nahunta Swamp on existing alignment, while
using anoff--site detour to maintain traffic during construction. Bridge No. 35 is
currently 151-feet long. The proposed structure will be a 165-foot, 3-span 21 inch deep
cored slab bridge with 29 feet 10 inches of clear deck width. The structure will provide
two ,11-foot travel lanes with 3.5-foot offsets. The roadway approaches will consist of
two 11-foot travel lanes with 4-foot grassed shoulders (shoulders will be 7-feet where
guardrail is included). Proposed permanent impacts include 0.03 acre to riverine
wetlands.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
General Description: This project is located in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic
Cataloging Unit 03020203) on Nahunta Swamp [DWQ Index # 27-86-14], which is a
Division of Water Quality Class "C Sw NSW" Water of the State. Two jurisdictional
wetlands adjacent to Nahunta Swam will be impacted in the project area.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-7I S-5$01 272$ CAPITAL BLVD
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS SUITE 240
1 S9$ MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE.' WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27699-1$98

Nahunta Swamp is not designated as a North Carolina Natural or Scenic River, or as a
national Wild and Scenic River. No designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW),
High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supply I (WS-I), or Water Supply II (WS-II) waters
occur within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Additionally, Nahunta Swamp is not
listed on the Fina12006 303(d) list of impaired waters due to sedimentation for the Neuse
River Basin, nor does it drain into any Section 303(d) waters within 1.0 mile of the
project study area.
Permanent Impacts: There is 0.03 acre of proposed impacts to riverine wetlands due to
roadway fill on this project.
Temporary Impacts: NCDOT anticipates 0.03 acre of temporary impacts to wetlands
within hand-clearing areas. These impacts involve the placement o temporary wetland
fill for the installation of erosion control measures. These include some or all of the
following: Temporary Silt Fence, Special Sediment Control Fence, and Temporary Rock
Silt Checks.
Hand-Clearing: There will be 0.12 acre of hand clearing in jurisdictional areas on this
project.
Utility Impacts: No impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur due to relocation of
utilities in the project area.
Bride Demolition: The superstructure for Bridge No. 35 is comprised of 8pre-stressed
concrete channels, with a substructure composed of concrete end bents and interior bent
caps on timber piles. Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal
will be followed to prevent any temporary fill from entering Waters of the United States.
Neuse River Buffer Rules
This project is located in the Neuse River Basin; therefore, the regulations pertaining to
the Neuse River Buffer Rules apply. There will be a total of 3,806 square feet (sgft) of
impacts to riparian buffers. This includes 1.779 sgft in Zone 1 and 2,027 in Zone 2 due to
the bridge crossing. According to the buffer rules, bridges are allowable. Uses designated
as allowable may proceed within the riparian buffer provided tit there are no practical
alternatives to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this rule. There are no
practicable alternatives to bridge replacement over Nahunta Swamp.
In-Stream Work Moratorium
According to the NC Wildlife Resources Commission, anadromous fish species are found
in this portion of Nahunta Swamp; therefore, NCDOT will strictly adhere to all stream-
crossing guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including an in-water work moratorium
between February 15 and June 15.
Avoidance and Minimization
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to
"Waters of the United States". Due to the presence of surface waters and wetlands within
B-4671 Permit Application
Page 2 of 4

the project area, avoidance of all impacts is not possible. The NCDOT is committed to
incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize
jurisdictional impacts. Minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project
design. These include:
• NCDOT is replacing Bridge No. 17 in place, with a spanning structure and utilizing
an off-site detour.
• The roadway grade was kept as close as possible to the existing, minimizing fill
height.
• Hand clearing will be utilized to reduce permanent wetland impacts.
• NCDOT will observe an in-stream construction moratorium from February 15 to June
15 and utilize Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage.
Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be utilized during demolition of the
existing bridge and construction of the new bridge.
Mitigation
Due to the minimal permanent wetland impacts proposed for this project, no
compensatory mitigation is proposed.
Federally Protected Species
As of January 31, 2008, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists one federally
protected species for Wayne County: red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). The
red-cockaded woodpecker is listed as endangered. There is no potential habitat in the
project area; therefore the biological conclusion is `No Effect'.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Included on the January 20081ist is the bald eagle, which was de-listed on August 8,
2007 and no longer requires a biological conclusion. However, the bald eagle is still
protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Suitable habitat in the form
of large, open water bodies that provide nesting and foraging habitat for the bald eagle is
not found within 660 feet of the project area. In addition, a search of the NC Natural
Heritage Program database (updated February 2008) did not reveal any records of the
bald eagle within one mile of the project area.
Project Schedule
The project has a scheduled let of October 21, 2008 with a review date of September 2,
2008.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal
Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR
771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide
Permit 23 (72 CFR; 11092-11198, March 12, 2007). We are also requesting the issuance
B-4671 Permit Application
Page 3 of 4

of a Nationwide Permit 33 for temporary fill due to the installation of erosion control
measures (72 CFR; 11092-11198, March 12, 2007).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification numbers 3701 and 3688
will apply to this project. All general conditions of the Water Quality Certification will be
met. NCDOT is providing five copies of this application to the NCDWQ for their review
and approval. Authorization to debit the $240 Permit Application Fee from WBS
Element 33826.1.1 is hereby given.
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization: NCDOT requests that the NC Division of
Water Quality review this application and issue a written approval for a Neuse Riparian
Buffer Authorization.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
http: //www.ncdot. ors/doh/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Amy James at
[phone].
Sincerely
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
W/attachment
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (5 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Ms. Jeanne Hardy, NCDMF
W/o attachment (see website for attachments)
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Scott McLendon, USAGE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Ms. Natalie Lockhart, Project Planning Engineer
Mr. Richard E. Greene, P.E. Div. 4 Engineer
Mr. Chad Goggins, Div. 4 Environmental Officer
B-4671 Permit Application
Page 4 of 4

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0$ 6 6 8
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
NWP 23 and 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:_ (,919) 733-9794
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge no. 35 over Nahunta Swamp on SR 1532
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4671
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Wayne Nearest Town: Goldsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): see vicinity map
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): -77.829765 °N 35.475447 °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Nahunta Swam
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The ,protect is located in a rural area consisting of low
density residential and forested areas as well as agricultural land.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
2 of 9

Bridge No. 35 will be replaced on the existing alignment with an offsite detour Heavy duty
excavation eauipment will be used such as trucks dozers cranes and other various
equipment necessary for roadway construction
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To replace a deteriorating bridge
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. This site was visited by USACE representative William Wescott on June
21, 2007 for a iurisdictional determination All wetlands were verified at this visit After the
Rapanos decision, JD forms were filled out for all wetlands and sent electronically to Mr
Wescott on October 22, 2007. No isolated wetlands or wetlands without a significant nexus
were identified. A tear sheet has not been received.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
3 of 9

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: 0.03 acre of permanent wetland and
0.03 acre of temporary wetland impacts resulting from fill are proposed for this project
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)

Site 1 Permanent Fill Forested Yes 80 0.03
Site 2 Permanent Fill Forested Yes 80 <0.01
Site 1 & 2 Temporary Fill Forested Yes 80 0.03

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.06
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 16 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0.0
4 of 9

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainase, bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) ..,
T e of Im act
~ P Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nreiect~
-
Stream Impact (acres): 1 J
p
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.06
Open Water Impact (acres): p
Total Impact to Waters' of the U.S. (acres) 0.06
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
5 of 9

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
• NCDOT is replacing Bridge No. 17 in place and utilizing an off-site detour.
• The roadway grade was kept as close as possible to the existing, minimizing fill height.
• Hand clearing will be utilized to reduce permanent wetland impacts.
• NCDOT will observe an in-stream construction moratorium from February 15 to June 15 and
utilize Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc. us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
6 of 9

1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Due to minimal permanent impacts, no mitigation is proposed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at h~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet: 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does. the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
7 of 9

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 1,779 3 (2 for Catawba) 0.0
2 2,027 1.5 0.0
Total 3,806 0.0
Gone i extends out sU teet perpendicular irom the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI. 3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within I SA
NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. All buffer impacts are considered allowable.
XII. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A
XIII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
8 of 9

XIV. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XVI. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
None
3• z~=~S
Applica(~t/~ent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
9 of 9

See Sr~et 1 A For Index of St~eis
V
V
W
O

~ stw 1214
, ~t058 x152 1530 8 121
~ ~ ~ 58
/
„~ 1525
.,
n ~-€
e° ~ 1253 1217
'11'1 wdb
~ - _ ._..~ ' .._
o ~ ~ ~.._ ,
as 1216
1
R° ~ i _
_

-

~l•\~~
~,Y_
~ 4 '~ 1 5
,15 15 _r 1218
;~ -
~~
-:
-~ ~
/~
F
~
>
~ 1220
6i~ any ~

~
-c Vase
533 ~
'~
~
~
c 15 '
~
°~ ~ ~ 1201 ~ 2~2 1251

` Rd. d04 MIII ~ 12t1
~ 1206 /' --~-.
' L .._ 1575 -- - i' ~p_ . ' 1205
_ ~
~ C
° 57 ~ ~~ 1212
~ 1556
8 i '~, {~' - ~ 12Q7
i .; a 1200 ~` " "
~~
__ I~ 1568 ~` f ~ ~\1209 1208
~
ne r~ 577 £ ~~ ,

.i' 3

~
Imo., _
--
-
I ..
/ 1205
+ ~ ~ 1139
~~.

157 1578
~ -
~.~ '
~I ll32
T'~1143
, ~
~ ~
Detour Route
VICINITY MAP
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNCIPAL BOUDARIES.
~~~ ll ~ ®~ 1V ®~~~ ~~llq®~Il~l
I~I~I~I®N ®~ ~[I~~][~~~Y~
WAY11tE .COU11tTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE 35 ON SR 1532 OVER
NAHUNTA SWAMP
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING
AND STRUCTURE
Nq`5

SITE 1 Z
_ __ __ _ _ _
'-L- $TA,:16~+•7.2;50• +L-. '-'-' -.-'~', "n ;----~ ---t=-STfS:;lf
.BEGIN. RIDGE . II ~j; ;,i~l ~ •ENR• BRII
,•~• ~~~1
- -~
E SR 1556
WAYNE NEMORlAL DR - --- - - - - --SYj-i53E-~.:'--'--•-.~ I I ~s_ - -- --- --_-
I • .
{ I L •
~••: •.~
-L- STA. 14+00.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4671 ' • ~ _ . • • ! • ' ' ° 1; ~'~ ~ • ' '
SITE 2
w
z
~~'
«,°
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~w
~~a
N~Z
}yam
~wW
~~~
~~~
8l (NW
~9U1W
~~~
~ww
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD IH
-_-- - --- --- - ---- ElIRENA
~•
-L- STA. 21 +00.00 END TIP PROJECT 8-4671
WETLAND/STREAM
IMPACTS
PRELIMINARY PLANS
°U N°t U~ Po° CON8IAURIUN
GRAPHIC SCALES

50 25 0 50 100 DESIGN DATA

ADT zoob = zz5
ADT 2030 = 500 PROJECT LENGTH PrepOred m tre Of(lce at:

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1808 HirOh Rid
e D
R
(
i
6 NC
27610 HYDRAULICS ENGINEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
~
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 8-0671 = 0.102 MILE,; g
~.,
a
e
g
, xo4r
°F N ~

p~S
DHV = 60 %
20°6 ST.9m)ARD SPEC7FICAIIONS ~
4
4. *p

50 25 0 50 100 D 10 % RIGHT OF WAY srcxnnr+E r~
s
~
T - 3 / LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-0671 = 0
031 MILES DATE: G.E. BREW. PE ,°
. PROJ£C7 FNGIYEER ROAD
IGN ,.
~~
V
55 DECEMBER 18.2007 ~~ yl
o'
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 l0 20 =
MPH
' TTST 1% DUAL 2%
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-0671 = 0.133 MILES
LETTING DATE:
LT. YOUNIS ° ~'
f TIII4
FUNCTIONAL CLASSICATION DECEMBER 16, 2008 PHOJEC7 DESIGN ENGIAEER
PROFILE (VERTICAL) RURAL LOCAL rE rF
sicxsruxE: srata mcewer nESrcx Excn~ffEx
H
U
O
U
Permit Dr~wir~ ~,

N PRO1ECf REFERENCE N0. SHEE7 N0.
'~ 8-4671 5
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
11 l l r V h11
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
DESIGN DISCHARG = 3550 CFS eM •rEC v 6272
DESIGN FREOUEN Y = 25 YRS ~L_ -e~- sr 21+4919 36 6'L£f7
N 63006 1250 E 23 36!7860
- RR sPrrr re easE a w~nvrN Rm HerRCH

BASE
SCHARGE
=
5680
CFS PR ELIDIIN
no Nat usa RY PL
~ ANS

BASE
EQUENC car
srROCn oN
= 10_0 YRS
BASE ELENA ION = 68.6 FT
OVERTO PING DIS NARGE _ -
355
0 CFS GL srA ~+ss -L-
_
__ 3 55' CORED 5 Cpl IDAL= 65~
OVERTO PING FR OUENCY= -25 YRS - FOR PL4N

OVERTO

PING E

NATION =

6
6
8

FT
9
SKEW S F LINE -L- SEE SHEET 4
_
. BE IN GRADE
TA.I4+ 0,00

FT
EL
V.6 .3 E D GRADE
_ - STA ! 0.00
DATE 0 SURVE = 4/13/07 EL .69.00
WS.ELE ATION PI 15+20. PI = f7+ p0 P1= 2 +00.00
AT DAT OF SU VEY = 5__8,4 ~ EL = 67.71' EL = 70 .
4 EL = 8.63'
VC =f80' VC=26 ' VC=l O'

TFMP CAUS AY UUSEWAY
EL= .49 EL 65.00
(11.1 00% (-10.6192

----
---
----
- --

-

-

-
-

-

~ - - --

---

-

-

-

-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---

--
-

-
(+10.3000 . ~ L15QU7. , , 1 sa No s sKEV~DI b/92% (+1037 0%

CLASS I
RIP RAP
~
1 I
TO TOP F OEAM ~ i i
I
I ~ ~ ~J I
NO WSE 8 WS
ON 73-07 =5R.0
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 2 3 24 25

w
w
w
w
w
a
w
w
Z
a~
w
w
a
„
ww~
w„
~a
,~
nw
»w
»~
w~
»w
w~

w
w
w
w
a
Z
«ww
~~~
~~p
~~w
w~W
~~f
~~Q
viWZ
fwQ
~~~
~ww
ww~
~w~
~~~
P
0'
N

0 5 10

PROJ. REFERENCE N0.

SHEET NO,

m B-4671 X-1
1 0 1 0 l 0 1 0 1 0 l 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 l 0 1 0 1 0 l 0

---- -

---

---

---

----

----

----

- 3:1
_J ~_ ---

68 --

04 --~ 3:1
-
S.S. 64

620_'

---

15+ 0
00
SI E 1 . SI 2

AND WET ND
H
ND
LEARIN C EARIN

~.~ o.ozo 0.020 3

~-
-
--
- .~

15+ 0.00

3,, o_ozo o.azo 5
15
_ .
;1
~---

14 + 0.00

3' 0.020 0.020

-~
5.
.64.271 ----
----
---
14+ 0.00
-- ---
t

,

__
__-
---
---
----
13 + 0.00 --` -- ---- ,
PRELIM
UU MII' U NARY
POR CR LANS
CIION

1
0 1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
0
3
2
1 - -
1
0
0
0
D
0
0
1
0 1 0
1
0 1 Pe
0 ' D

CC~~ , ~.
~GppG~~~~,~~~T \ 73 ~ ~ 25g 58 ^~~
GGi.N. _~ ~ ,~

~ .. JL.- ~.~~ ~
WAYNE/GREENE COUNTY ~-'`~, '
~, ti .~ ` o~ ~ ,:
j
~ ` ~,,~ ~.. ~, fit,; ~ ~ ,, -'IY ~~'~'
..
,- . J
` ~~i
'iC. _
r
~' `~` ~~ ~ ~~ Lai, ;~ ~ ~ ~' ~ w r~ -
~,,~ ,
_ ~ ~ ~,
I i-~•f ~---~ ~ "TER 213
-~ ~
-_ _ ,~_ '~
t
r
+tt~
~~ ti',~?„
~~
gb r ~
ti ~ + ,
.~`~ ~~
~''C~l''' ~~1
~ 1~ ~,
. --,•~.
J ra . .
~ _ ~ ~ ~ 1
/,~ __i
,.
j,I) 1 Jf`~`'~,~lJ 1
ft ;~i- •`
'~; ,f V,11V1;
r ' ./
-~~ ~:;
. , `•.,.:~:.., r ,,~
.+~ ~ d C 11i' $3 `x,7,1` 1 ~ .~i_.. ., •.` r~~ \'~`
~ r ~ ~`~ ,~ ~ ~ r f ~~ti ~,• I ~ ~ Ifs
1. ` r'( ~, •• -- _ ~ l i ~.~ ' Val ~ i,
i 1 1 1 1 .r- -
WETLAND/STREAM IMPACTS
VICINITY MAP
N C. DBPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
D[ViS[ON OR HIGHWAYS
WAYNB COUNTY
PROJBCT:33826.1.1 tB•~671)
BRIDGB N0.35 OVER
NAHUNTA SWAMP
ON SR 1532
OF_ 2/x/08

0.03 acres of Temporary Fill in Wetlands in the Hand Clearing areas for erosion control measures.
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAYNE COUNTY
PROJECT: 33826.1.1 (B-46 71)
ATN Revised 3/31/05 SHEET March-08
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Site
No.

1

Station
(From/To)

14+00/16+48 -L- LT

Structure
Size /Type

BRIDGE
Permanent
Fillln
Wetlands
(ac
0.03
Temp.
Fillln
Wetlands
ac
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
ac) Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
ac
0
07
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
ft)
2 14+00/16+48
L
RT .
-
- BRIDGE <0.01 0.05

TOTALS: 0.03 0.12
Penr~i~ Dra~wNtiQ
Sheet Z~Of.r„~,.;~,r

~~®~~~T ll ®VV 1V ~~~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
P.O. BOX 10
1 CITY OF WILSON WILSON. NC 2789(
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAYNB COUNTY
PRO.1 BCT: 3386.1.1 l B-671)
BRIDGE NQ35 OVBR
NAHUNTA SWAMP ON SR 1532
SHEBT OF Z/x/08
Permit Drawinfl
er.m~ ~ of ,'~

9,
~ 22 1 59 25B ~
~ i 13 ~ =
SITE ,,, 1 ;
~ 581 9~3
111
~ 13 123
1 M ~
1 ,
ti 13 ~ 250 58 +1~
SE'E IMSET
~LQIN ~ ~ ~
0
~ 13 set
~, n1 1
1n 1
55 1
55
I~ M 1
WAYNE/GREENE COUNTY ~~~~~f~~ ~-' ` '
.39.5 ',(. t '.\~, \,~
is '~ '" '., ~, ... i " ~
.; ,~~.
•. i :
~ - f
_ , ._,,`_~...J~~l` ~ _
. -. f: ~----- ,. ~- _ -~
-~- -

;,
ir~I
BUFFER IMPACTS
VICINITY MAP
_~ J''~. ,
r~ ~~~f
~f
"` -' _ f, .
-.,,,f
cif `_
liti
,~
-~----- •
:,~. --
~.. _
., • ire ~,,'~~_ , ".. /~
II ~tL ~r4. ~ ~ ~ U ~, f 1 r 1~ ..._
N.C. DEPT.OR TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAYNE COUNTY
PRaECT: ssa~.i.l c6-~~i~
BRIDGE N0.35 OVER
NAHUNTA SWAMP
ON SR l53S
:T OF. 2/x/06
cr,~t ~ of ~

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT

SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE
/TYPE
STATION (FROM/TO) ROAD
CROSSING
BRIDGE PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(ft2) ZONE 2
(ft2) TOTAL
(ftz) ZONE 1
(ftZ) ZONE 2
(ft2) TOTAL
(ftz) ZONE 1
(ft2) ZONE 2
(ftz)

1 3 S an Bride 16+72-17+37 -L- LT & RT X 1779 2027 3806

TOTAL: 177s 2027 3806 0.0 0.0 0.0
Rev. May 2006
Buffer Drawing
Suet 2 of ~
r

W®I~I~I~AI)
(N®T T®
PROPOSED en~ni+r nrnv
ELEV=64.49
65.00 EN
FLOW -
(CLASS II RIP RAP)
QUANTITIES OF ESTIMATES
DETAIL
SCALE)
WORKPAD
' I' - CLASS I RIP RAP)
N.C. DBPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HiaHWAYB
VOLUME OF CLASS II RIP RAP= 253 yds3 WAYNB COUNTY
AREA OF CLASS II RIP RAP= 0.08 oc PRaBCr:asa~.I.t cB-~n>,
BRIDOB N0.35 OVBR
EStimote 360 Tons CIQSS II Rip Rap NAHUNTA SWAMP ON SR Ibt!
SHBBT OR - _~~~~
Buffer Drawing
Sheet~~i of _,~

~~®~~~ JL ll ®~V ~~~~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
CITY OF WILSON P.O. BOX 10
WILSON. NC 2789
Btrtfer Drawing
Sheet ~ of

4 ~
r
See Sleet 1-A For Index of Sleets
~~ ~~ ., , 1214
' fan . i0~e ¢ 152 1530 9
~ 1525 ~--€ ~~ po i 1253
~ . ~ u»an o
^ ~- 9 ...F.._.-i-
111 '
\~1
~ ~~ 1 at' ~ ~ 1 5
_.q..J 1 Ifi .I6
°a
_r.a~.. -k- ~~~
~ ~, gyp, as
`~,
BiJ ~ eddy v 633 °~ i~
4~ 15
~ ; ~ 1207
Rd. ~ MI6 nth 1211
~~'~ _ 1575 m - - i
_ ,
~~ r ~ ~ q ~ 15b6 ~ 1212
- N/< '.
I ~~
1218
1zz6
6 ~ ..,..
~~ ,205
c
f57~~ 1576 I\ ~ ~ w' -,..~., 1132 ,_-
~f ~ 13 ,, -~ ~ '~ ~ 1r42~ Jn43
Detour RDUte
VICINITI' JYL9P
ll ~TT~~~~ ®ll' 1V ®~~j ~ll~JTt ~T~~~T~®~~y~y ll1V
JLd~~~~~®~ ®ll llJl~~llJl YY ~ ll
WAYNE COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE 35 ON SR 1532 OVER
NAHUNTA SWAMP
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING
AND STRUCTURE
Nq\
~5
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNCIPAL BOUDARIES.
SITE 1
n
I
c
• ~ ------,-------- -_{=-Sfil5.-;18#3-7.:$0--y~',--: -,-------_-.-: -,--,
,BEGIN . RIDGE . F ~ ~ '~I~I ~ •ENR~ BRIDGE; ;
;I. ~I''
.. ..
., ..
.. ..
.. ..
..
.. ..
.. ..
- -- ---- --- •I~l~ ~~~' 1~. ~ -- - - -- - -- -- ------
- --- •
....
---
~`~.
---------- ------~------- --~ -_~_- -t-
~ SR 1556
WAYNE MEMORIAL DR. --'-:--,- ------- _
iSjP^ ' e ss
.. ~ _._ _.
' ' I~ I. ,
..
•, ., ..
..
-L- STA. 14+00.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT 8-4671 •'' 1; I ,'~•: •
., ., .,• ,
Z
~"
Yf ~
~~rq
~~~
~~r»
W ~"~
~~~
~~a
v~erZ
rw~
~~W
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
HW bi
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMTTS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
EUREKA
-L- STA. 21+00.00 END TIP PROJECT B-4b71
BUFFER
IMPACTS
PRELIMINARY PLANS
p0 NOI' V86 PWI NNpI'pVC110N
GRAPHIC SCALES

sa 2s o so iao DESIGN' DATA

ADT 2oob = z2s
ADT 2030 PROJECT I.EIITGTH r'~~dr6e m r>E orrr~6 or:

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS HYDRAULICS ENGrNEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
= 500 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 8-0671 = 0.102 MILES 1000 Birch Ridga Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 ``pF p°prq P'
PLANS DHV = 60 °~ NI°b STANDARD SPECIFIGITONS ~ p,

50 25 0 50 100
D = 10 % PE
smNArtme, ~
is
T = 3 % ' LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-0671 = 0
031 MILES ~GHT OF WAY DATE: G.E. BREW PE
.
~
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL V = 55 MPH . DECEMBER 18.2007 PROJEC7ENCA7ER ROAD`WG~EERSIGN R`rdf F,°~
(
l0 5 0 l0 20
' TTST 1°~ DUAL 2%
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-46II = 0.133 MILES
LETTING DATE:
LT. YOUNIS Tppp
FUNCTIONAL CLA551CATION DECEMBER 16, 2008 PROJECT DESIGN ENGIIYE6R
PROFILE (VERTICAL) RURAL LOCAL PE
Py
SIGNATURE. STATE MCRWAY DESIGN EXGA2'ER
Buffer Drawing
Sheet,,,~,,,of„~

1 / P
P
w
Z
w
ar
r
CITY OF WILSON
DB 1569 PG 537
OB 1605 PG 344
O
~`~~~~~ ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
~~~~~~~~ ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
~` ~~~~~
-BL-100 22+03.07 PINC
-L- POT 18+43.49
(15.69' LTJ
-L- STA.14+00.00 BEGIN T1P PROJECT 8-4671
-----------
k
k k
k I~p- ~ _
k
W
_______--~B-------
k
-------~°--l
k
k
k
k k k k k k
k k
k
k k l

k k I
k k k
k k k k k k k l
k k k
k k k
k k
k
k k k k k
k k k I
k k
k

k k

k k
k
k
k k

~ i
k k k k k
k k k k k k k k k k k k k woDps,
k k

k
k k k
k
k k k k
"
k k ~ ~!

k
k d

k k k
k

k k k k k k k k k k k

I
I
k li I IT 1
- N k
k k k
k k k
k k k -- +35 m
0', II ; ~~~
k k

k k k
k k k k
k E%.R/W ~ej

k
.
~ k ~'% I'~1NC. NW k
k k ~ r=~'
- - -~N°_ _ _
-
- -'~ -- k
_ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _~_INYERi-EE, P k k {- 3p
« W-L- R61 k
-L- +OOk ~ W00 5
.TO DRN
~ r
NG N2/W µ400D6
.. .. T
° - - -
~ ~, 4Z'
~ k
E :1 0
-
.. . . .. .. ..
°
'-
~ .. ,r.
P

-

------ _
9A' LMP
~ ---en
----
In d-GRAH95D-
N 10'01'32.2°W -
-
N -
I ~ --- N 12° 59' 44,9' W ,F -
_
T
G _ _,r _ _ _ _ _ _
k
R - - _
'k
~. NIN
RR
' ~~ 50--F ---F
.. ..
- F
E W000$- -W'IiH -WOOD NN l ~ 7
IN
/W N0005
,µ
k
k VE
W6E 03
w. ~
12 % I CONC
1111' k
E
k
k
--~~ ._ ..
k
µ k
.
~
k
~
~ k
k k
L- SI'Ab+IB
k
k _
L
k
/
/
k «00
.60
k
k REGIN 6RG 4o V
k
6 k I
/
k.
E%
k k
. /W If 40' k I -L- .4
k k k
r
k k k
k 50.40', .R/
k
k k
k
k
k k
k k m N
k
k
. 1
k k k
k
-L ~ PfM€ St 15+72
64 k
k
I
k k I. k k
k . k
k
k k k
~. k
k ~ = 0' 01' 07.3 (RTIk BEG N BRIDGE
k k k k k k
~ k k
k k k -L~ $r I6+725+/-
k k k
k k k
,
k k'
I ' k k
k k k BEGIN ,4PPR, SLkB
k
k k ,
k
k k wooD~` k k
k k
k -L- A /6+57.x, r- Waa6s
k k
I . k
k k
.__..W__.____w1y____ k WOOD
--.k-_.--
~ k
~t k
_
-e1e--- _~_wy_----
------- _-~_~J
---
U
Z --
d F

CITY OF WILSON m
DB 1564 PG 537 N
OB ]605 PG 344 CJ
~ u7
.r

W
I ul
-
O +
N
r~
~
_
N
+
w
a
w
~ I
~
U]
v N
-

C
w
~ m ~
~
~
~ ~

~ d J

W
(~ I
GLI
N` D
CITY OF WILSON
09 ISfi4 PG 537
DD 1605 PG 344
PROIECf REFERENCE N0. SNEET NO.
__ B_4671 4
WA' SHEET NO.

ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINff0. ___
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEE0.
PRELIMIN
W NOT U96 PO R% PLANS
CONNIAOC170N
FOR PROFILE OF LINE -L- SEE SHEET 5
END BR10GE O
-c- srara+~rs+/-
^---T,-

I _T,wrf __-

k _____--_
-.

k
~ - - - - _ - - . - _ - T
Rw
k
_ g_ - _ _ _
4
~
_ _ _ - - _ _ ,f _R
-__-
~ '~ -
-

__,r.-N
~--
-------
I k ~ k ENDrfAPP .SLAB k ~ ~
I I~ k k -L- 57A 18+52.5/- k k k
k k " k

1
k k l I
k

k k k
k
k
k
°` k k
k
k k k
k
k k
.~
}
I
If k
k k
k k k
k
k
k W
~
k
11 k
k k
k k k
k k k
k k k H J k
k k
k
1
k k k k
k k k
k k
k
k k ~~
O k
WOODS
~WREMO~ E%ImN k
~ k k
k k k k k
k k k
k k k
k k d1
0.PoDG k ~` -new k k k k k w k k k ~ ..

~ ~ k

\ ~
N-ne~_ ~ k
k k k
k k
k k ~ k
k k r to
k -1- «75 ~
_ ~- - - - ~ _ _ k
k
k '1` + pi
k
V

°
'
50'k
k
a
` __
-B>w- . _
---- _
-
~ -

' -nW k

k ~ I~

k k N-
I
M
-L- .2 49.14 E%. F/W _
% __~
k _`
~
k
k _
k - -
-
~~ _
k
_____
-__-_nB ~`_.~._____ k _+
k k 0177
k
'. 36.3'LET k k
~ k
k \
e---- B>r--- \
~ k
EVN62.~__ k
' k ~
k
k rt -- _ _____
T
k J
I

P
G+62
END S
k
V
~
~
~

_
k
~k
k /
~
~
V-
m
~
I I k
A
E TO EE %SE _-_
-
--k. ~_
- --~-
~ ~ ~
-n°~
-----
---A1°--~- -
-
--
--
°>r ~
.
.. .. WaO05
.E%ISTING R/W
I ~ E ~ N 9° 45' 27
T W . ..
,~
7 74 - --- .
_. ,.
- GRAD 750 ----------- ----- r ! 2
F
I ..
R ..
f ~ .. .. .. ..

S
____
- .. .. .. .. ..
6# k DDDS - - -
ISTING R/W w
w ~
k
k W k k W k
k

I
Po k
k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k
k k k N
TOP
OF ~ ~Em.I TON k
k k
k k
k k k k
k
TU0.E PA 41EM) m R' PJP RAP
~ k
k
k
k k
k k k W
k
k
' Y55. .FF k
+i5 k
-L' k
k k k
k
.
V k
k
k
k k
k
k
k
I
k k
50, EX. R/W
k
k
k k
k k
k
k
D~ I
k k
k
k k k
k k
k k k
k
c
2 I
I k
k
84 k
~t- RINC ta
19+37 k
k
k k k
k
k k
D k
I k .
.
k
k
~= 0' !6 30.4P (RTk k k
k k k k
k
k k

~ o ~ I k
k k
k k
k k
k
k k k
k
k k
k
WOODS
p
I ~ k

~ k
k k
k k k
k
k k k
k k
k
~ k
k
k k
/
, ~ °y k k
k
1___
~ k
k k k -L- POT Sta. 25~t499~ /
k
_______
___ _____!~ __
-L- STA 21+00.00 END TIP PROJECT 8-4671
CITY OF WILSUN
09 1564 PG 537
DD 1605 PG 349
O
BUffBf Qt1WlI1~
Sheet,~,of,~,

N
2.
0
K
m
w
W
W
w
w
W
w
Y>
k~~~~~~ ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
~~~~~~~~ ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
~` ~~~~~
CI1Y OF WILSON
UB 1564 PG 537
OB 1605 PG 344
O
-L- STA14+00.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT 8-4671
~ ~ ~--w--~ Re- ~ ~ _________~a_ ~____________~~a_ ~r
k N W It N b
IE W M µ If ~ IE W ~ µ K• '~ y
~ N w ~ W ~ ,~ ~ ~ i
W w '~ k ~ W N ~ k H k ~ I
~ N M ~ If W ~ ~, ~ If ~I-Yi,
M M ~ 1f ~ If ~ N If ~ If wODpS I
k k Ikt
~ ~ 6` W W ~ ~ H 'Ili
~ W IE k
~~*-N ~ ~ ~ W w ~ ~ ~ ~ N ,~ ^` ~ Ip I~
W k N j ~ b - +35 m i
k W & k W EX. R/W ~ 1;
~ N W M• y~NC.xW ~ ~ W /~ ~ ~ ~~ .
- ----- --- ~-_-~/ I
-- ------ ~ W -L- o -L- +~ '
y_ _ _ _ ... _ 'L- 00 R 92' ~ . [
~tije-p;w~--waevs-~'~ k• vEAr~e.a3~
W I XI'CONC.F
W
N IE k

W k W
H
In
~
~ W
k
4` W
~ 1n
W W
M
W It W
~
~` ~ M
~
k
N ~
b
w
~
~ ~ ~

~
µ
b

W

k
I
~
~
k o.
k
WOOOS`
~

U
_Z --
Q_ F-

CITY OF WILSON 1"7
DB 1564 PG 537 [V
OB Ifi06 PG 344 ~ l0

tP
+
~
O _ ~
N
I N
+
~ N
U1
P Q
m H
N
In ~
~ J
C7 ~
~____._
~ ~ . ..
r ~ aD « E
i ~ M L-S7A1E+wRa
p -l- +DO -L- +5 B ~ GW SRG
' W k k Sp ,4 ,R/
k~ w
W IE
w
>f µ -L'~P1N€ St 15+72.64 ~ '~ ~
~ µ ~ - D~ fit' ~7..I ! )k' B
~ ~ R k ~ -~
k
I ~ ~ ~ a/ ~ '~ BEGIN ,4PPR.
~ k µ -L- A 1~+57y
W M
k
waD ~` W W
- ~-~------------~`-a,w--- ------~` -~
GLI
Nqp 83
CITY OF WILSON
OB 1564 PG 537
DB ]605 PG 344
PROIECr REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
B_=4671 4
RM' SHEER NO,

IOADWAY DESIGN ___
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER

PRELIMIN RY PLANS
00 NOT U9R PO CON5IRULTON
FOR PROFILE OF LINE -L- SEE SHEET 5
END BRIDGE O
-L- STAIR+j75+/-
___T,_
l 1
I ~, rta~___________-~_rt~ ____
-nR ------~-----
H
~ w'END
?PP
SLAB '~ _______T_Ni
~___________,r-~
~ ~--~

-
-----

~ k ~
n~
r
H ~
'~
'
~
I I ~ N -L- sra la+szsa/- ~
,~ ~ ,~
~ w ~ ~ ,~
i
N M! I ~
~
W M
~ k W '~ N. W
~ N' k N -
IF
I I I W
b ~ ~ ~ ,K w.
W IE
~ N ~ ~ IE
H I-- J 1R
« H I~ ~ '~ N- W W W ~
'~ ~ L` w '~ µ H W
k ~
w H H ~ O
~ -
~ ~
~MIF1A0 N W k W 4` ~ IE w k N v.+
W W - ~~ ~
X` N ~ iD
`-
RRIDG w R, k k- ~ W
k ~ ~
H ~ k ~
W W. w
k-
W N ri
~
-L- +T5 ~ _ IE W.
~ ~ ~~+
N
w' '-~ ~ - ___ N
N +
L- .2 49.1 R ff
~ µ
---- -
n WO U7

~ _ ~-
,~ ff
N
- _ ~
I 62 ~
W w
~
~ ~
J
m ~ ~
~
-
~ H _ J
en- _ _-_
..CC~~11

I /V~l~

~ ~ . .~ .~ ~ -.. ..~. ~ .- ° .. .. ..

nl CI^ ACr 77 ~~ Nr
0
-- --- --
--_
- ---
--_-

-- 7/DS( Sfl15J2
G 50 - -- _-_

s - ~~ ~~ ~
-
4'IG IN ---
woods

~ N

W
k
if
~
µ W

~ µ A~ W

W k
S . W
~
r
~ ~
~'
R W k
p .1 TON
- R• N.
W
~ W
, ~
W ~ W,
W
IrEAV
S
~Ff IE "
AE ~ ~ W'
~ k
~
W
Y .
.
- vk-
- -L-
6`
H ---____
W
~ e Y
N' k It
~
It
50. E%. R/W W ~ N-
R k
N k ~. W W ~ k
~ ~
~ k w
If ~ '~
i ~" ~ ~t- RINC ia
19+37
84 µ ~ '~
~ N ~ ~. e

n ~
F ~ ~
.
.
N
0 = 0' 16 30
4'lRT~
~ ~
~
'~ "
~ '~ ~
w.

a ~
~
.
~ ~ ~
~
W ~ ~ ~
5 ~~
~ k• N
N H
~ ~ ~
~ ~' M IE
,
° i~ N
W
~ ~` N ~ '~ ~.
~ H
-L- POT Sta 25'~1499~
,
~
_~_a ,~
~
y__________IE___N~N__________!J _ ~
_ _________JS____eu-
_ ~
_______1•___ .
~ /
____/
_~o_
-C- STA 21+00.00 END TIP PROJECT 8-4671
CITY OF WILSON
DB 1564 PC 531
DB Ifi05 PG 344
O
Buffer Drawing
see ~ , oi; ~
-BL-100 22+03.07 PINC
-L- POT 18+43.49
(15.69' LTJ

P
P
PROJECT REFERENCE N0, SHEET N0.
~ ' B-4671 5
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGRVEER

DESIGN DISCHARG = 3550 CFS
DESIGN FREOUEN Y = 25 YRS '~~
PRELIMIN RY PLA
NS
BASE SCHARGE = 5680 CFS oo Nor osR croNSraurnaN
BASE REQUENC = 100 YRS
BASE ELENA ION = 68.6 FT
OVERTO PING DIS NARGE _ -
3550 CFS n sra ~+ss 1_
~
_
a ss
coRED In you= s'~ TOR
OVERTO PING FR OUENCY= -25 YRS
PLANS F LINE -L- SEE SHEET 4
s sREw
OVERTO PfNG E NATION = 66
8 FT
.
BE IN GRADE
TA.l4 0.00
= FT EL V.6 E GRADE
------- -L Ta 1 .Go
DATE SURVE = 9/13/07 L .00
------
W.S.ELE AT10N
P! 15+20. P! = 17+ 0
00 PI = 2 +00.00
.
AT DAT OF SU VEY = 5_8_.0 FT EL = 67.71' EL = 70 4' EL = 8b3'
VC = IBO' VC = 26 ' VC = 1 0'
TEMP GUS AY CAUSEWAY
Q. ,<9 El 65.00
(ll.l 00% (-1Ob192
---- --- ---- -- --- ---- -
f+J0.~000 . l f.1500% ---, - ,-- -1 2:1 N a sRtw~DJ .6192% !+)Q,37

I
CUSS AIP RAP i , i I
TO TOP F BERM ~ i i i
~ ~ ~J
i i i
NO WSE 6 WS
ON 1}.p7 =50.0
12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

w
w
w
w
a
w
Z
~~
°
~
«ww
~~~
~a
~a
na
>xr
vow
wa
aw
»wm
awu
aww
ww
Sheet ~ ai
Bu ~rE svz
-BL- 5T 21+48J4 36 6'LEFT
N 63006 J250 E 234 3617860
RR SP7K IN BASf 0 14'TWIN RN RBIRCH

P
~ P
W
m

m
V
W
0
a~
'1

., ~ 1214 O
d
ed„ 1 fi o2 ~ 11~C ~, _ 58
1b~6 8' ~ 1263 _ 121
111 , o ~__~ ~'-~
0 0 '~- ~ ' , 12m
~1~)
~' 164 I~ ,~ 1~
-s-~- - 1 1e e ~ r
~~ ~
~ ~/~' ~ ,~
16
~ 120 52 1261
yty 121 120e J ' -
1 76 ~~
~ I6a ,~ PRO C
~ 1~ I S 1207
' 11 t
~ ~ -~
I 11 2
6 q~
J ` -I~--
/' - 12e6
11
I~ ~ 1i ~~ ~ S ~ ~ fl~2 1141 ~~
Dotow Rarrte
VICINITY MAP
THIS PROJECT IS NOT Wf1~lV ANY MUNCD'AL BOUDARIES.
~A V' ~~J~®~ ®ll~ ~~`IJI fI J~ 1'~' S71 ll
WAYNE COUNTY
LOCATION; BRIDGE 35 ON SR 1532 OVER
NAHUNTA SWAMP
TYPE OF WOR& GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING
AND STRUCTURE
NAD 8395
4
-L- STA. 16+
C
t
T
L
-L- STA. 18+37.50 +~
END BRIDGE
1
~ -h I -L-
E SR 1556
WA1'N£ NEYORIAL OR, SR 153E ewr~ as
EuREKa ~
-L- STA. 14+00.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT 8-4671
See Shr=ef 9-A For Index of Sheets
D
b
i'1
can mm ~oua vnoao Ns ''~'' aTtlme~in
.c. ~-4671 1
can nau,n M.notMS ^onfs,
33836.1.1 BRZ-1534 3 PE
33826.4.1 BRI-1534 3 WW ~ UM

~ erg n~ ~ nn nn e-in rye ABA,r•/~T n a e~~
Q
~~
N ~tl
v ON
~p L&
o~
m M
00<
0 3~
N Q~
Z ~V
a ab
~;b
°_~ Ld
C
• ~ CLEARING ON TffiS PROJBCT SHALL BE PERAORMBD TO THB LLWTS ESTABLISIDID BY M8780D !Tl
r
`
V GRAPXIC SCALES

50 45 0 50 1 DESIGN DATA
ADT 200b = 225
ADT 2030 = 500 PROJECT LENGTH Prepared 1n tre OIIJce of;
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1000 Blxi R{d
17610
Dr
Ralet
A NC
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B~671= 0,102 MILES p
~
.,
,
PLANS
DHV = 60 %
mar an+lmyw uecn~celraws

E 50 25 0 50 too D 10 %
`
~NGTH STRUCTURE TIP RIGHT OP WAY DATE:
PE
G
E
BREW
y T = 3 % PROJECT B-4671= 0.031 MILES .
.
.r
~0~ "
iG,4 DECEMBER 1 B, 2007
PROFILE (HORIZONTAW
t0 5 0 10 30 V = 55 MPH
` TTST 1% DUAL 2%
TOTAL LENGTH ITP PROJECT B-4671= 0.133 MILES
LE77WG DAT&
I,T, YOUNIS
FUNCTIONAL CLASSICATION DECEMBER 16.2008 '"'~ ` °`~`'~"
PROFILE (VERTICAL) RURAL LOCAL

XYDRlfJLICS ENGD11B8R
ROADWAY DESIGN
BNGIlIBHR
PRELIMINARY PLANS
oa Nor uee rox roNSrxucraN
DNISIOX OP liIGNWAYS
STATE OA NOIRTX CAROLQIL!
o "~
~ C
a
4
f or ~

, ~
Note: Not to Scale
*S.U,Is; = Subsurface Utility Engixeeriug
i-----,
`-_--J
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY
l
St
U
o
e
ne
County Une -....-...._
------
Township Une -----
Cit
Li
y
ne --
Reservation Une - ~ - -
Properly Une
Fasting Iron Pin o
Propery Comer -~
Properly Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Une -x-x-x-
Proposed Woven Wire Fence - e
Proposed Chain Unk fence a
Proposed Sorbed Wiro Fence ~-
EasNng Wetland Boundary - - - -~~- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary ~~-
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary w-
Existing Endangered Plan Boundary rro-
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTUR&
Gas Pump Vent or U~G Tank Cap o
Sign o
Well o
Small Mina x
Foundation 0
Area Outline ~-]
Cemetery
Building - L -- ~
School
Church ~i
Dam
RYDROLOGY
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
srv;~„
Wetland
Propowd Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
Falw Sump
II~dR1I~I~N ~1F 1FgIG~IW.~~'~
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
is-...
-~i-
RAILR0.9DS.~
Standard Gauge
ciy ~nrsro~an
RR Signal Milepost o
wt~rosr u
Switch D
~r~~
RR Abandoned - ,- -~ T
RR DiamoMied ------
RIGXT OF WAY
Bowline Control Point 0
Fasting Right of Way Marker ~
Existing Right of Way Une - --
Propowd Right of Way Une - ~-~-
Propowd Right of Way Une with
Iron Pin and Cop Marker
Proposed Right of Woy Une with
Concrete or Granite Marker
Existing Control of Access - -;~ -
Propowd Control of Access ~_
Eaafing Eawment line - -E--
Proposed Temporary Consiruclion Easement- e
Proposed Temporary Drainage EawmeM- -~-
Proposed PermanentDroinage Easement- -roE-
Proposed PermonentUtilNy Easement -nre-
ROADS AND RBI.r4TED FF9TURBSr
Existing Edge of Pavement --
Existing Curb --
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut - - - ~ - - -
Proposed Slope Slakes Fill - - - F _ _ _
Proposed Wheel Chair Ramp
Proposed Wheel Chair Ramp Curb Cut -
Curb Cut for Future Wheel Chair Ramp - cFR
Existing Metal Guardrail
Propowd Guardrail
Existing Cable Guiderail "
Propowd Cable Guiderail ^
Equality Symbol ~
Pavement Removal
-~ 1- IrEGETATION,~
~- ~ - Single Tree {~
~~--- Single Shrub a
c~-.~ ~ Hedge ~.~.
~ Woods Une ~-
Orchard t? 4 4 4
Vineyard YIneYN°
EXISTING STRUCTURES.•
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
I/TILITIES•
POWER:
Footing Power Pole
Propowd Power Pole
Fasting Joint Uw Pole
Proposed Joint Uw Pole
Power Manhole
Power Une Tower
Power Transformer
U-G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
Recorded LtTi Power Une
Designated L4G Power Line (S.U.E.•~
WATER:
Water Manhole 0
Water Meter o
Water Valve
Water Hydrant $
Recorded U~G Water line
~o~ Dedgnated USG Water Une (S.U.E."}-- ----•----
~ ~~ ^~ ~ Above Ground Water Une .~~ ^°fK

co~c "w N:
N Satellite Dish CC
~--------~ N Pedestal
^Ce N Tower
----- U~G N Coble Hand Hole
© Recorded USG N Coble ^"
r Designated lLG N Cable (S.U.E.•~ ----~~----
Recorded WG Fiber O
tic Cable T~ ~°-
p
Designated l1G Fiber OpticCabls (S.U.E.•J- -
----n r^---
b
B
H
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole +
Proposed Telephone Pole ~
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Booth 0
Telephone Pedestal D
Telephone Csll Tower ~,
USG Telephone Coble Hand Hole
Recorded USG Telephone Cable ^
Designated USG Telephone Cable (S.U.E.•)- ----^----
Recorded USG Telephone Conduit ~°
Designated lLG Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.•}- ----r"----
Recorded U'G Fiber Optics Cable "°-
Designated USG Fiber Opiia Cable (S.U.E."~
GAS:
Goa valve 0
Gaa Meter
Recorded USG Gas Une r
Designated USG Gas Une (S.U.E.q - - - -6- - - -
Above Ground Gas Une "" `°e
SANRARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout p
USG Sankary Sower Une ss
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer pit smitay Serer
Rewrded SS Forced Main Une ru
Designated SS Forced Main Una (S.U.E.•~ - ----~ss-___
MISCEUANEOUS:
Utility Pole ~
Utility Pole wHh Baw p
Utility located Object o
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U~G Une ,~,-
UG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
AEG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
USG Teat Hole (S.U.E.ry ~
Abandoned According to Utility Records - AATUR
End of Information E.0.1,

FINAL PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
PROP. APPROX. 11~" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SFS.bA,
C~ AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 197,6 LBB. PER BD. YD.
PROP, APPROX. 213" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE BFB.6A,
~Q AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.b LBB. PER 80. Y0. IN EACH OF TWO
LAYEAB~
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SFB.6A,
C$ AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBB, PER 80. YD. PER t" DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 111" IN DEPTH.
E1 PROP. APPAOx. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BABE COURSE, TYPE BP6.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 468 LBA. PER 80. YD.
PROP VAR. DEPTH A6PNAlT CONCRETE BABE COURSE TYPE B28,OB
EZ AT AH AVERAGE AATE OF 114 LBB. PEA 80. YD. PEM1 1" DEPTH. Tb
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LE88 THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN 613° IN DEPTH.
R SMOULDER BERN GUTTER
T EARTH WTERIAL.
U EXISTING PAVEBENT.
W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT.
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES AAE 1;1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHEgWIBE.
B,OB" Q1~"
TYPICAL SECTION ON STRUCTURE
~ -L- (SR 1532)
I ')0~_1M !rl a le OA.NW1Vl I
-1 ' 11' 11' ~_1
1 T
~ i
.OZ
-L- STA. 16+71.50+/- TO 18+37.50+~
~ -L- (SR 1532)
FIBR Ha
PRELIMINARY PLANS
W NOT U~ A(I CUNST$PCIfON
~ SURVEY
USE WITH TYPICAL SECTION N0.1
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0. t
c
m
a

R'6ET BIOCK
I
- Posy
-~
!- SHOUIDER IBIM GUTTBI
STANDARD 816.01
_DETAIL SHOWING SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
(SEE STD 846.021
SEf PLANS FOR LOCATIONS
-L- (SR 1532)
k STA 14+00.00 TO 14+50.00 TRANSITION
FROM EXISTING TO T.S.1
-tt STA 14+50.00 TO 16+00.00
-L- STA 19+00.00 TO 10+50.00
-lr STA 20+50.00 TO 21+00,00 TRANSITION
FROM T.S.1 TO E%ISTING
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0, 2
-L- STA 16+00.00 TO 16+72.50 +,~ {BEGIN BRIDGE)
-Ir STA 18+37.50 +~ {END BRIDGE) TO 19+Q0.00
Detail Showing Method of Wedging
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 1
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 2

oe:4z
~ro~\b4671_rdy_psh04.dgn
? I~ # i
I# # #~: I I ~ # I
I # # 4 j I I :I I # # I
# f # #
I # # # I $I I # # # I
°mo~~ I # # # ~ I I # # # #
ovo ~ # # ~` #. ? ~ # # # I
c~i n E ~ # # # I I # # #
a`uZ I # # # I I # # # ~
# I I #
GPS 64671-2 15+80.23 PINC I # # # # d I # ~` # # I
I# # #
-L- STA 12+21.53 (16.91' RT.) I# # # # ~ i I # # #
I # # # Z #I I# # # # I
k ~` I I I # # I
I # # # # ^: I ~ # We tlan # # I
~ # w~ I I ### a e I
I # a~ tGl I I I
I a # # : A ~. I I I # _ # # I
I ~ # # # ~` ~ # z # # I
# ~e tlond A ~ ~ # ~ : r # ~ # # #
I # # # I I ?g # # # I
I # #TI : # I
I# # r 'o• ~. o # # I
I# # II ~ # m I # # ~ # ~
#
~ # # q ~+ # 1 ~5 +°, # # # # #
I # 9 rs # ~ I ~ . # # I
I # L, + I ~ # I
I N # # ~ I # # I
I # # ~ g ^~ I ~ # # # i
I ~ # k # I
I ~
I ~ # # ~ ~T I I # # # # # I
n x # # . ~L .~ # ~ # I
1 # 8S ~ r a ° ~ ~ ~ # # I
o '~
I ~' ~ I ~ # # _ # #$ # I
. - "af ~2 ~ # I 1 # 1
I
# ~r # p ~
~
# ~, ri ~
~ i # ~ # I
# I
I #
~ #
I # 1 °,~ # 1 ~ # I
I p~ # I
I ~ - ~ I # I
#
# # I
I# ~
I # ~ I
I Q~ ~` # I ~, rl w # I I
ml ~ 1 # #
I# ~# 1 1 # I
I
I
I # 1
~
#

I # ~ ~
~ # I I^ ~
I
1 I# # # ~
I
~
I # ~~ # # # ~
. ~ j I I #
I #I k # # I #I
r~ l
I
I .
~# I
~ # # #I ~ I I #
# 1 1 O I
# ~ I
# # # # i
# # I I 1 f # #
I # I ~ ~ I
~~*~ ~ I
~
# I
i# # „
i # #,,
~ I I # +
~ ~
#
# # , I #
# # I I # # ,
~` #
I # I
# I ~
I ~
; ~ # #
I I

# # I
# # ~ ~ , #
~ # I 1 # #
I I I
# #I

#
# # # # #~ I I
I I
I # I I # # # I
~ # I
I# Wetland I
~ I 2I ~ I I # # #
# I I # ~
#
I
I # # #I
# # I
I
~ I
~ ~ ~ { Wehand I
I
I #
I# ~ # # I
I
Z I# I
I I ~# # C# I
I
# # # # I ~ ~ ~ I I # # # # # 1
I I #
#
I
~ # #
~
#
# # i

I ~

~ # # #
I ~1 I
I I I# # # I

# I
I # # # # # I I #~ k # # # # I
~ ~`
I # # #
# # I I
I I I I # #
~# I I # ~
# # I
#
I #
# ~
# ~ I I # # #
? I # I
~
I I
#
I ; # #
I # #
, ,
I ...I # #
l # # # I
I
~ I
I ~ # # ~ ,~ I # # { I
~
# # ~ I # ~
o~ # o00
I # #
I #
# p I< # #
D I
g
(
~ # # # t
# o I I #
o , # #
# # I
I `
b # ~
#
# A
w
N `^ I -BL-101 28+73.59 POT I

~`
I # #
#
x I
I-L- 25+13.96 # (16.09' LT.)
~ # I
x
s
Z
A
D
v
w
a
0
0
Zl
5
x

~~ ~ ~
I
~~ ~_
~> ~ ~

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No. B-4671
State Project No. 8.2331701
W.B.S. No. 33826.1.1
Federal Project No. BRZ-1532(3)
A. Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Wayne County Bridge No. 35 on
SR 1532 over Nahunta Swamp. Bridge No. 35 is 151 feet long. The replacement
structure will be a bridge approximately 165 to 170 feet long providing a
minimum 28 feet cleaz deck width. The bridge will include two 11-foot lanes and
a minimum of 3-foot offsets. The roadway grade of the new structure will be
approximately the same as the existing structure.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 275 feet from the south end of
the new bridge and 425 feet from the north end of the new bridge. The
approaches will be widened to include a 22-foot pavement width providing two
11-foot lanes. Four-foot grass shoulders will be provided on each side (7-foot
shoulders where guazdrail is included). The roadway will be designed as a Rural
Local Route with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction (see Figure 1).
B. Purpose and Need:
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate Bridge No. 35 has a
sufficiency rating of 46.9 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is
considered structurally deficient due to low structural evaluation of 2 out of 9
according to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standazds and therefore
eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program.
Components of both the concrete superstructure and timber substructure have
experienced an increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed
by maintenance activities. The posted weight limit on the bridge is 25 tons for
single vehicles and 28 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers. The bridge is
approaching the end of its useful life. Replacement of the bridge will result in
safer traffic operations.

C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the
project:
1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guazdrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazards and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
.grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
O Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe pazking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.

6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of--way or for joint or limited use of
right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and .
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.
Special Project Information:
Estimated Costs:
Total Construction $ 750,000
Right of Way 6000
Total $ 756,000

Estimated Traffic:
Current - 225 vpd
Yeaz 2030 - 500 vpd
TTST - 1%
Dual - 2%
Accidents: Traffic Engineering has evaluated a recent three yeaz period and
found no accidents occurring in the vicinity of the project
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 35 is constructed entirely of timber and concrete
and should be possible to remove with no resulting debris being dropped in
Nahunta Swamp based on standazd demolition practices.
Alternatives Discussion:
No Build -The no build alternative would result in eventually closing the
road which is unacceptable given the volume of traffic served by SR 1532.
Rehabilitation -The bridge was constructed in 1961 and the timber
materials within the bridge are reaching the end of their useful life.
Rehabilitation would require replacing the timber components which
...would constitute effectively replacing the bridge.
. Offsite Detour -Bridge No. 35 will be replaced on the existing
alignment. Traffic will be detoured offsite (see Figure 1) during the
construction period. NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite .Detours
for Bridge Replacement Projects considers multiple project variables
beginning with the additional time traveled by the average road user
resulting from the offsite detour. The offsite detour for this project would
include SR 1616, SR 1058 (Greene County), and SR 1201 (Greene
County). The majority of traffic on the road is through traffic. The detour
for the average road user would result in 8 minutes additional travel time
(3.5 miles additional travel). Up to a 4 month duration of construction is
expected on this project.
Based on the Guidelines, the criteria above indicate that on the basis of
delay alone the detour is acceptable. Wayne County Emergency Services
along with Wayne County Schools Transportation have also indicated that
the detour is acceptable. NCDOT Division 4 has indicated the condition of
all roads, bridges and intersections on the offsite detour are acceptable
without improvement and concurs with the use of the detour.
Onsite Detour - An onsite detour was not evaluated due to the presence
of an acceptable offsite detour.
4

Staged Construction -Staged construction was not considered because
of the availability of an acceptable offsite detour.
New Alignment -Given that the alignment for SR 1532 is acceptable, a
new alignment was not considered as an alternative.
Other Agency Comments:
The N.C. Wildlife Resource Commission and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in
standardized letters provided a request that they prefer any replacement structure
to be a spanning structure.
The Rail Division had no special concerns for this project.
Public Involvement:
A letter was sent by the Location & Surveys Unit to all property owners affected
directly by this project. Property owners were invited to comment. No comments
have been received to date.
5

w
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II
actions
ECOLOGICAL YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any

unique or important natural resource? ^
X
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur?
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? ^
X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures

to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? ^
X
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands?
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely

impacted by proposed construction activities? ^
X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water

Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? ^
X
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? ^ X
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage

tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites? ^
X
PERMITS AND COORDINATION YES NO
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any

"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)? ^
X
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act

resources? ^
X
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? ^
X

(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway? X
6

(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel

changes? ^
X
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO
(15} Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area? X
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or

business? ^
X
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or

low-income population? ^
X
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the

amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? ^
X
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control?
X

(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property? X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ^ X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,

therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? ^
X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic

volumes? ^
X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing

roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? ^
X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the

bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? ^
X
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project? X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws ^
relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? X
7

(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are ^
important to history or pre-history? X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? ~ X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act ^
of 1965, as amended? X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? ^ X
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
Response to Question 2: Habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker is present in Nahunta
Swamp. A Biological Conclusion of "No Effect" was
,determined for this endangered species.
Response to Question 3: NCDOT will follow all stream crossing guidelines for
anadromous fish passage, including an in-water work
moratorium from February 15 to June 15.

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-4671
State Project No. 8.2331701
W.B.S. No. 33826.1.1
Federal Project No. BRZ-1532(3)
Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Wayne County Bridge No. 35 on
SR 1532 over Nahunta Swamp. Bridge No. 35 is 151 feet long. The replacement
structure will be a bridge approximately 165 feet long providing a minimum 28
feet clear deck width. The bridge will include two 11-foot lanes and a minimum
of 3-foot offsets. The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately
the same as the existing structure.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 275 feet from the southeat end
of the new bridge and 425 feet from the northwest end of the new bridge. The
approaches will be widened to include a 22-foot pavement width providing two
11-foot lanes. Four-foot grass shoulders will be provided on each side (7-foot
shoulders where guardrail is included). The roadway will be designed as a Rural
Local Route with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction (see Figure I ).
CateQOrical Exclusion Action Classification•
TYPE II(A)
X TYPE II(B)
Approved:
Date Bridge Proje t Development it Head
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
~' r8-v~
Date
~ L y,16r2~
Pr ect Planning Group Leader
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
For Type II(B) projects only:
S- I9~,C
Date
John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration

PROJECT COMMITMENTS:
Wayne County
Bridge No. 35 on SR 1532
Over Nahunta Swamp
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1532(3)
State Project No. 8.2331701
W.B.S. No. 33826.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4671
Division 4 Construction Engineer, Structure Design Unit, Roadway Design Unit,
Roadside Environmental-Anadromous fish moratorium
Anadromous fish species aze found in this portion of Nahunta Swamp. NCDOT will
follow all stream crossing guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including an in-water
work moratorium from February 15 to June 15.
Bridge Demolition-
There is no anticipated temporazy fill associated with the demolition of Bridge No. 35.
Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 1
May 2006

Studied Offsite Detour
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BL
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH

WAY~TE COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO.35 oN SR 1532
OVER NAA.LJNTA SWAMP
B-4671
Figure 1

k .. .
,. .. ,
~e
' ~ ".
~~ , E'
$„
.j ., f
.r i
i
T.
' ~
a n g ~ iR ~
. il ~,- yL-
~ ~ i
J
` ~ `
g Y.f ~ f .
W ., f
< i;
aP r
i Fr
- ~~, ~ , ~ a s .. t
~,~ fi i t, ~'` .n t. r
x ~ ,i ~'
'. ~ s.,x', >-
} ~ W~
~ y~ 1 ~ ~;
2 q ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i {~ , . ~ ".
! 1 a ~r v
»~
T
r
r ~
{, x ~ N t y ~ ~..
c'~ " ~.r
~..
'-
~.
#' r~
s .,
- r - ;~ ~ $ ~. s. ~
_, _u • ~ M,r ,,, , x'
.. ~ .
'~
e t~ o- ~
..
,~
~?~i v`„ ~ . n' ~'
.~~ ..
..
~~ ~~
~, ~ ~ ,,
s
___ _
~..~.-~
d ., , _ .
S„ ~
t r h 4
~ la^' ~ a
}`,~ ~w
-a~~Xa ,
~~
~ nt
4
a 9
" ~ tt
i
1. r ~' , ,.'.i
+ ~
f
- • w. ~ .~ ~
«
~r~ ~ p
Y! ' ~ r r
.. nr- ..
t wl
. `_ ~, Y
w
< ,~ ,
< . ..
,1. ' a ~ - ~', ~ c ... .;~
- ~ wya
,~
i
R 4 p ~'
. .
~ ~ h c~ ~
~. ~~•3r' :~;
';,.
. ~ ~ h, r y`
~ +,
~t
~ .,
;. ~ ~ ,~ ,
s w ,- , .; ~, wr
,~
-. _. '- -
T~ ~.
k ~. ~ r _~ ~ s ~ • ""•" ~, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
MF z ~ ~'~` ., „~ "„ ~ ~, ~, ~' ~ OP TRANSPORTATION
a~Y ~' '`~;_' s~ ~ «F.` DPJlSION OF HIGHWAYS
;r~ .~ y ~+~' `' PROJECT D E
,1~, ''~ ~w~ ~ ?~ 4 EV LOPMENT AND
>1s ~'~~;. ~, ~' fir. tF~ ," ° ~' t~ r ~ ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
,r:. 7~ ~ ~ ~, ~r,' a. ~ ~
,,
~, :, ~~ '' ; ~dVAYNE COUNTY
,,t REPL~Cf ~R
`a.;~, ~.; ~ ~ ~' ~. - DGE N0. 35 ON SR 153
~',
~` ~«w ~ ~ s OVE NAHUNTA S~J P
~ ~ r 6~~
~ .~ ~
Cp .4 ~y
v
,
4 ~~'~~ C " `nom. ~ ~ ~ '~V~,., . 1 3 140 @O b
.
,
A in ~ y aa..... ~.. m.v+~ie.+..m... .,. W. ..smru... - --.....
a , : .,. !.. ~ tt .. ,1~~.~~

.,~' ~F T~
`~. ~~~..~ -~ ~AG I9 284
~~,.,,~•
~ D1V(SiON OF
North Carolina eart;:nent of Cultural esourees ~ vF rife Ys ~~;
Smote Historic Preservation ®ffice oN F O~E~4 ,~~
Peer I3. 9aeedbrck, Adenenisna(or °yT/{ A ~''
iviichaei F. Easley, Governor Office of Archiv~i (story
LisDeth C. Evans, $ecretarv Division of Historical [tesources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook Director
august 12,'004
IvIEIVIOR~~NDL 1~I
TO: Gregory Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental 3nalvsis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways
FROM: Petez B. Sandbeck ~.~PQ-'~.a'~beC'
SUBJECT: 2004 Bridge Projects, including B-549?, B--1408, B-4409, B--1-10, B-44-1~6,
B-4466, B4469, B-4518, B-4545, B-45 i3, B-4631, B-4423; B--1424; B--E~54;
B-4520; B-4538; B-4540; B-4548, B--15-19, B-4567, B-4578, B--648, B--166•,
B-4665, B-4504, B-4560, B-4587, B-4618, B-4644, B-=1G~19, B--1651, B--E658,
B-4671, B-3624, B-3819, B- 391 1 B-•104, B-4552, B-4613, B-=1646, 8-4675
B-3169, B-3606, B-3802, B-38u3, B-3804, B-4523, B-=1524, 8-4525, B-4.526,
ylulti-county, ER 04-128C-ER 04-1330
a
~~
On Julv 28, 2004, Sarah ~IcBnde, our preservation specialist for transportation projects, met with the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning the above
projects. We reported on our available information on historic architectural and archaeological surreys and
resources along with our recommendations. NCDOT provided project descriptions, area photographs, and
aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based on our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the meeting, eve have included our
comments for each bridge project on a spreadsheet artached to this letter. These comments are provided for
each project as proposed.
If an archaeological survey is requested on the spreadsheet, a separate memorandum from the Office of State
archaeology, explaining whether a general survey is required or if the survey is predicated upon an off-site
detour or new location, is attached.
Having provided this information, eve look forward to receipt of either a Categorical Exclusion or
En-,rironmental l~ssessment which indicates how NCDO'T' addressed our comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section lOG Of the National Historic Preservation _1ct and the
_-~dvisory Council I)n f fistoric Preservation's Regulanons for Cotnpliance with Section lOG codified at 3G CFR
Part 800.
Lneaeeon Nlaiiing Ae6drrss Telephone/F•rs
\DMtNFSTRATION 507 V 131uunt Sercc~. lialcieh N(' ~iGl7 Mail Sen•~cc Ccnecr. Rafci~h N(' '764'1.461 i i91')i733J7G3/733-8653
RF:STO[2A'flpN ; I S N 131unnt Street. K:elci¢h N(' dGl7 Maul Serwcc Center. Ralemh NC ?7644-IG17 i9171i3i-G 547/715-4801
StIRVF:}' & I°i..WNINC `IS V I)luunt Street. Ralc~eh, Nc' ibl- Vi:ul Srn:ce Caner. Itoleich Nl' "644-.7617 191717'}_ryi45/7 ~ 5~1fU1

Thanl~ you for your cooperation and considerations. if ~-ou have any- yue~nons concerning the abo~-e
comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earle~~, em-ironmental rerie~v coordinator, at 919/733--+7G3. In all
future communication concerning this project, please cite t:~se abof-e referenced eracking number.
P~S:w
A ttachmeats
1 Spreadsheet
16 Memos
cc: Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT
Mary Pope Farr

. ,`
1 ~
2
7
~ 1 8-,492 580056 McDOVVEL i 3 1362 i Hanccck I Yes r,o
'Rcy / 8-4408 030265 ANSON 10 1961 I Hancock ! No i No
:/toy 8-4409 030308 ANSON 10 1922 I Hancock No I No
a8 -4410 030307 ANSON I 10 1931. I Hancock Yes No
~,y i3o 8-4448 100227 I BUNCOMBE 13 1956 Hancock No No
~ B~466 210004 CLAY ; 14 1952 Hancodr No No
boy / B-4469 220219 ( CLEVELAND ! 12 ~ 1952 1 Hancock I No I ~Vo
~~cy ~$ 8-4518 350110 GASTON 12 1962 I Hancock No ~ No
~~ ~ 8-4545 1 440072 I HENDERSON 14 1963 Hancock No I No
~~ I B-4573 ! 540183 LINCOLN 12 1965 I Hancock I No No
~ ~ B-4631 800526 IRUTHERFORD 13 1970 I Hancock No No
c,~Lj B-4423 1 060067 IBEAUFORT 2 1965 I Ca s No No
~~ l3.i~ 8-4424 060068 . BEAUFORT 2 ~ 1966 Ca s No No
~y 8-4.454 150043I CARTERET ! 2 ~ 1963 I Ca s Na No
8-4520 360032 ( GATES ; 1 1952 Ca s Yes No
E~ 38 410025 I HALIFAX ~ 4 1965 Ca No I No
C I Y Yes
~.,z~ 1a$ B-4540 410142 (HALIFAX ~ 4 1962 a
I es
30 8-4548 450002 HERTFORD 1 ~ 1960 I Ca s I No Yes
~~ 3fj 8~5~49 450042 HERTFORD ~ 1 ~ 1960 Ca s Yes I Yes
~y B-4567 1 530069 LENOIR I 2 1971 I Ca s I Yes Yes
~,~
. -4578 570008 MARTIN 1 1974 I Ca s i No Na
~ar.~ 13 648 880017 ITYRRELL i 1 1977 Ca s i No ! No
~'~ i317 8664 920025 !WARREN 5 1957 ? Ca s ! Yes I Yes
~°~ i B-4665 920036 iWARREN 5 1955 ': Ca No ' Yes
04 1 320052 ; EDGECOMBE 4 1964 :Johnson ! No Yes
J
h Y Yes
~ B-4560 500102 IJOHNSTON 4 1956 nson !
o
I es
~1 ~9 B-4587 1630082 jNASH 4 1961 !Johnson No i .Yes
B-4618 i 770445 I ROBESON 6 1955 ;Johnson Yes No
8-4644 830057 I STANLY 10 1961 I Johnson I No No
' B-4649 890377 UNION ! 10 1962 i Johnson i No i No
N ~ No
i3 B-4651 890251 UNION ! 10 1957 !Johnson : o
c;~cy 3 658 ! 910345 I WAKE ; 5 1960 ~ Johnson ° No No
cpc~ ~ B-4671 1950035 IWAYNE I 4 1961 ! Johnson ~ No Yes
~~ 624 130190 ICALDWELL 11 1981 I Pi kin No I No
~
~I 3819 ! 130184 !CALDWELL 11 1962 Pi kin i No i No
,
~yf 3911 i 850038 ISURRY ~ 11 .1923 ~ Pi kin I Yes No
8-4404 10001.02 IALAMANCE 7 1968 Pi kin Yes i No
31~ B-4552 !480100 IIREDELL 12 1963 Pi kin ~ Yes ! No
~ N ~ Yes
613 i 750415 RANDOLPH 8 1959 Pi kin o
1~ B-4646 1850132 ISURRY ; 11 1962 Pi kin I Yes No
i! 8-4675 1960034 WILKES i 11 1960 Pi kin i No ~ No
i~931 B-3169 1310158 ;DURHAM I 5 1960 Williams I Yes I No
f3o B-3606 i X0070 (ASHE 11 1963 ' Williams I Yes No
a B-3802 !040229 ;ASHE ~ ]1 1960 ~ Williams : No No
/ B-3803 ! 040334 !ASHE 11 1966 ! Williams ~ Yes No
a B-3804 1040296 'ASHE 11 1964 'Williams ; Yes No
tai B~4523 380164 GRANVILLE 5 1955 i Williams ; No Yes
~-~} 13 8-4524 380193 IGRANVILLE i 5 1956 ~ Williams ; No Yes
~~ ~g B~525 380133 IGRANVILLE i 5 1960. ~ Williams I No ~ Yes
~l.j B-4526 1380200 IGRANVILLE 5 1957 ~ Williams I No Yes

- -.,... _,,. c~r~oo~s~Pc

~ "~'Y6 4
~d y.ae~
~p
.~ aww ~~
north Carolina Department of Cultural esources
State Historic Preservation Offace
1'ctcr B. Sandbeck, hdministtamr
Tviiehacl I+. l~:aelcy, Govcmor
I,isbcth (;. fivans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, I~cputy tiecrctary
May 2, 2006
MEMORANDUM
Office of Archives and {iiswry
Division of I iistotical Resources
David Hrook, Director
TO: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation f
FROM: Peter Sandbeck lam' !~
SUBJECT: Archaeological Potential of the Replacement of Bridge 35 on SR 1532 over Exum Mill
Branch, B-4671, Wayne County, ER 04-1313
Thank you for your letter of April 12, 2006, transmitting the archaeological reconnaissance survey and
literature search for the above project.
The report author noted that no significant cultural resources were discovered within the Area of Potential
Effect (APE) during the archaeological survey and that no further archaeological investigations are necessary
and/or warranted. We concur with this recommendation.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and considerations. If you have any questions concerning the above
comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919.733.4763. In all
future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount titrcct, 1(alcigh NC 4617 Mail ticn•icc (;enter, Italci~h NC 37(9'14(,17 (919)73.;-4763/733Rh53
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount titrcct, Raln};h NC 4617 Mail ticnicc (:enter, Ralcti~h NC 27(,99-4h17 019)733-6547/71 S4R01
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh, NC 4(,17 Mail ticrviee (:enter,l(aingh NC 27(,9e14617 [phone]/71 S4ri01