The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20080595 Ver 1_Merger Process Documentation_20040218v' February 16, 2004 Mr. Mike Bell ~ Wilmington Regulatory Field Office ~~~~ US Army Corps of Engineers ~®~/4~9 ~ ~oU~ Post Office Box 1000 Washington, NC 27889-1000 FEB ~ ~ ~ 200 Rummel, 4 'Klepper Reference: Bridge Replacement Project for the following ~'AT~~t~:l,• Dahl ~ SECT!®~ B-4504 in Edgecombe County . ~ i,r~ B-4538 in Halifax County 8-4540 In HalifaX COUnty William IC. Hellmann B-4560 in Johnston County David W. Wallace B-4567 in Lenoir County Stephen W. ICagay B-4587 in Nash County .R°benJ xarben B-4664 in Warren County (sent to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE) Stephen G. Zentz B-4665 in Warren County (sent to Mr.-Eric Alsmeyer, USACE) j. MichaelP°aer B-4671 in Wayne County Charles M. Easter, Jr. (NCDOT Contract No. A304264) John G. Mintiens Joseph A. Rornanowski, Jr. Dear Mr. Bell; Michael L. ICrupsaw jamesA. Zito Please find attached copies of each bridges' USGS map, aerial photograph (overlain with Geoffrey V.7Colberg the county soils layer and GPSed wetland and stream areas), COE wetland data forms, La's E.x~u DWQ wetland rating forms, USACE intermittent stream forms, and DWQ stream rating J. Tommy Pedcock, jr. Michael W. Myers forms. A copy of this information is being sent to Mr. John Hennessey at DWQ (and the Martin C. Rodgers Warren County information for 8-4664 and B-4665 to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE). This ICennethA Goan information will assist you in the verification of jurisdictional wetlands and s#reams. Also Richard J. Adams, Jr attached are the latitude/longitude coordinates and some general information on the John A. d'Epagnier referenced nine (9) bridge replacement projects. Barbara J. Hoage Christophcr F. Wright Owen L. Peery We will be contacting you soon to set up field reviews. A jurisdictional determination is Nancy R. Berger°n necessary to complete the Natural Resources Technical Report, currently due in March StuanA. Montgomery 200t}, David G. [/anscoy . Henry J. Bankard, Jr. Peter C. D'Adamo Very truly yOUI'S, James F. Ridenour, Jr. Robert J. Andryszak Raymond M Harbeson, Jr. R MMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP Thomas M. Heil B. Keith Skinner l I w >~,Z/~~/1'~f Th°masE.M°hle' (.Kevin Nunnery, Ph.D Karen B. Kahl Project Manager 5800 Faringdon Place Suite 105 Raleigh, North Carolina Att2chments 27609-3960 ESW/ Ph: 919-878-9560 CC: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDENR -DWQ Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE Fax: 919-790-8382 WES www.rkkengineers.com ESW KTN JTP DCW JDC F:\WORD\DOCUMENT\302-052\NRTR's - RK07\Corr\USACE-001.doc Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, UA Staunton, UA Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Allentown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC TIP Coun Stream Crossin SR Road Name Brid a No. NCDOT Divison River Basin Latitude (Westing) Longitude (Northing) B-4538 Halifax Conoconnara Swamp 1103 Old 125 25 4 Roanoke -77.561547 36.244499 8-4540 Halifax Little Fishin creek 1315 Williams Road 142 4 Tar-Pamlico -77.917456 36.298153 8-4587 Nash - C press creek 1316 Lake Ro ale Road 82 4 Tar-Pamlico -78.182824 35.938711 B-4664 Warren Smith creek 1206 Russel Union Road 25 5 Roanoke -78.252268 36.502069 B-4665 Warren Hawtree creek 1304 Cole Farm Road 36 5 Roanoke -78.120601 36.522981 8-4504 Ed ecombe Deep creek 1505 Dickens Road 52 4 Tar-Pamlico -77.475734 35.947789 8-4671 Wa ne Exum Mill Branch 1532 Black Bottom Road 35 4 Neuse -77.82979 35.475697 B-4560 Johnston Black creek 1331 Federal Aid Road 102 4 Neuse -78.532519 35.467725 8-4567 Lenoir Fork of Bear Creek 1501 Old Jason Road 69 2 Neuse -77.819573 35.344999 ,~ r B-4540 A ~ y r <... ~ . ~ . ti ~ fir,.-~ ' t--~y~ ~ ~(1'~,l L ' .. ~ . ' _ ~ ', ~ KALIF X r ` '``; 1 `~ t << _~ ~~~ ~"~~.. ~l '~ ° J, \-+ ~ ~i~ ; ~ ,; ;, f _ -. . ~ ~ , ,;~ ~ , , i ~ r (r ~ ----~ i ~ /' it i ~~ l ' `~ ~ }` ~ ~ --'~ i~ ~" ~ ,- ' ! ~t ~ • ~ A. ~ ~t•~. '~'/1-~~ ``' ! ~~~ ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~-yr~i~. t ~ ~ -r)r ~ t i l ~`l '~. ~ ~ . •~ i f ~', / r J ) ,r~, ~ ij~,\ ~ ~ {~ ~ ,~!l ' ~'~t. /,fn t 7~~ L ~J ~ ~ ~? I - h- '.\ t . tl ~ I !..-. I ~ ! ~ rl 'SfP,rf~! ~ ~~~~,~' f~ "~ \) ~ ,~ \t ,`{ j' r ; ~ "' in '`-~ l~. ' j i ' ( ~ J~ ~J }`v F '-~ ~ • r.l , ~~~ J.~r~~~ ~~ ~!~~ (~}~ ~~~ -~'~i_t i~`Z~ t ~~ ~ ! ~ _ '. ,~ ~~, ``.'`~ ter', Jl~~ ~;~~ :1 ~~ ,~ j ~ ~,~ t ::~~ _~`:~`` _~~ ~ . '~ .~ " 1`~ i! 1'.t1 .1 yr- ~ `. ~ ~~ ~~~`' .,,, / ~ ~ ~ {` ) 'f~ ~-\ ~ ~ ~, , ~ -- o-. ~ 'mil ~~~(f ll/" ~ ~ ,~ ~ ,~ `'1~. - ~..~._~;,\ ;' .' - ~., '` , ~ _ s~ ~ ~~ ~ `11 } ~''~ ,`, ``~-/-- J-• ter' ~-=' c f{ r '~ I ~ i1 ~ ~ ""-~ ~ \~ ~~r p..i"- .`~~~• l 1 1 ~,,~ 1 ~~~'t~I r(^ ifs ~---~4 \~~\ r~.'~.h;.. i r' f ~,.,~ ~~ ,~~.rl;~r / \~~~ .., ~i r 1 ~•• ~ L~~,.1 ~ ~ _ I ~ ~ _ ~ i t err ~~.' // ~ 11 ~,, ._1;~`f(" ' ~4G! ~/ J ` ~ ~{ti_:!e°,~p _ -%- ~'•~rY7,~'3 J ~am~; i - ~ ~ , . ~ ! a _ ~ ~ 1 1t~ ~ ( - ~ •"~,~~ mil /Y -'"'_ t } ' s , ~~, , 1f ~~ r - ~~ - .~~ ~.__-.,. ~, -, ~ a _~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~L ~tt I ~ ~ n p~ t ~.~t 57l, r,~. ~~ 1 !( Ji i ` `1 1` s -. .~ ` " i t ~.` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~` ` /~ 1 ~ f "~ r t f ' `i,. l; / % ~ t_o f } - -t i , __ _ ~^ C' it '` y.~ ti,.-,._J ;li; ,%/1~~`; ~~a1~~. ~ rS _ ~ ~1 ~.. ur 6S 7 8~adr~Ttgles, ster,'NC .. ~<a i `` ~/~ - ? `-"'~~-~ . ' ) ~`' ir:`~~ s •r~ Feet 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 .~ DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: B-4540 Project No: B-4540 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT Investigators: David Ward; Pete Stafford Date: 21-Jan-2004 County: Halifax State: North Carolina PIotID: 3 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: PFO Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID: Wetland B Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: (If needed, explain on the reverse side) VEGETATION (USFWS Reaion No. 2) Dominant Plant S ecies Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Liquidambarstyraciflua Tree FAC+ Juncus effusus Herb FACW+ Gum,Sweet Rush,Soft Acerrubium Tree FAC Lonicera japonica Herb FAC- Maple,Red Honeysuckle,Japanese Pinus taeda Tree FAC Pine,Loblolly Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: (excluding FAC-) 4/5 =80.00% FAC Neutral: 1 / 1 = 100.00% Numeric Index: 14/5 =2.80 Remarks: NvnRrn nrv NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches NO Water Marks YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines NO Sediment Deposits Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches NO Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test NO Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Page 1 of 2 WetForm"" ,_ ~ DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjectlSite: B-4540 Project No: B-4540 Date: 21-Jan-2004 ApplicantlOwner: NCDOT County: Halifax Investigators: David Ward; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina PIotID: 3 SnILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wedowee sandy loam Map Symbol: Web Drainage Class: well drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion? e? Yes No ed T M C fi ti Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludult yp rm app on ons Field Observa Profile Description Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc 0-10 A 2.5Y4/3 2.5Y5/6 Few Faint Loam 10-20 B 2.5Y4/2 10YR5/6 Few Faint Loam Hydric Soil Indicators: NO Histosol NO Concretions NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List YES Reducing Conditions UNK Listed on National Hydric Soils List YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WFTI ANr1 r)FTFRMINOTI(~N Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes U Wetland Hydrology Present? es No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Remarks: This borderline wetland area was flagged for USACE determination. The surficial A horizon (0-10") has a 3 chroma Page 2 of 2 WetForm"" .~T DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua ProjectlSite: B-4540 Project No: B-4540 Date: 21-Jan-2004 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Halifax Investigators: David Ward; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina PIotID: 4 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Dry Plain Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID: B-Upland Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: (If needed, explain on the reverse side) VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2) Dominant Plant S ecies(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ Lonicera japonica Vine FAC- Gum,Sweet Honeysuckle,Japanese Acer rubrum Tree FAC Polystichum acrostichoides Herb FAC Maple,Red Fern,Christmas Pinus taeda Tree FAC Pine,Loblolly Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: (excluding FAC-) 4/5 = 80.00% FAC Neutral: 0/0 = 0.00% Numeric Index: 15/5 = 3.00 Remarks: HYDROLOGY NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches NO Water Marks YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines NO Sediment Deposits Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches NO Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in•) NO Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test NO Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Upland Plot for Wetland B Page 1 of 2 WetForm`"' . ~»- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: B-4540 Project No: B-4540 Date: 21-Jan-2004 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Halifax Investigators: David Ward; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina PIotID: 4 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wedowee sandy loam Map Symbol: Web Drainage Class: well drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion? Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No Profile Description Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc 0-10 A 2.5Y4/4 N/A N/A N/A Clay loam 10-20 B 10YR5/4 7.5YR4/6 Few Faint Clay loam Hydric Soil Indicators: NO Histosol NO Concretions NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List NO Reducing Conditions UNK Listed on National Hydric Soils List NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Remarks: Upland Plot for Wetland B Page 2 of 2 WetForm"" s ~. t" DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: B-4540 Project No: B-4540 Date: 21-Jan-2004 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Halifax Investigators: David Ward; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina Plot ID: 5 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Floodplain PFO Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID: Wetland C Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: (If needed, explain on the reverse side) VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2) Dominant Plant Species(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Quercus phellos Tree FACW- Lonicera japonica Vine FAC- Oak,Willow Honeysuckle,Japanese Carpinus caroliniana Tree FAC Rubus betulifolius Herb FAC Hornbeam,American Blackberry Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC Vitis rotundifolia Vine FAC Privet,Chinese Grape,Muscadine Smilax rotundifolia Shrub FAC Greenbrier,Common Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: (excluding FAC-) 6/7 =85.71% FAC Neutral: 1 / 1 = 100.00% Numeric Index: 20/7 =2.86 Remarks: HYDROLOGY NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators N/A Aerial Photographs YES Inundated N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches YES Water Marks YES No Recorded Data NO Drift Lines NO Sediment Deposits Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: = 2 (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches YES Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test NO Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Page 1 of 2 WetForm"" ~ ~. R DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: B-4540 Project No: B-4540 Date: 21-Jan-2004 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Halifax Investigators: David Ward; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina PIotID: 5 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wehadkee loam Map Symbol: We Drainage Class: poorly drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion? Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquent Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No Profile Description Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc 0-20 A 10YR4/2 7.5YR4/6 Many Prominent Clay Hydric Soil Indicators: NO Histosol NO Concretions NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils NO Aquic Moisture Regime YES Listed on Local Hydric Soils List YES Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No Wetland Hydrology Present? es No Hydric Soils Present? es No Remarks: Page 2 of 2 WetForm`"' DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua Project/Site: B-4540 Project No: B-4540 Date: 21-Jan-2004 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Halifax Investigators: David Ward; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina PIotID: 6 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Dry Plain Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID: C Upland Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: (If needed, explain on the reverse side) VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2) Dominant Plant S ecies(Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC Vitis rotundifolia Vine FAC Privet,Chinese Grape,Muscadine Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC Liquidambarstyraciflua Shrub FAC+ Greenbrier,Common Gum,Sweet Lonicera japonica Vine FAC- Platanus occidentalis Shrub FACW- Honeysuckle,Japanese Sycamore,American Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: (excluding FAC-) 5/6 = 83.33% FAC Neutral: 1 / 1 = 100.00% Numeric Index: 17/6 = 2.83 Remarks: HYDROLOGY NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks NO Drift Lines NO Sediment Deposits Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches NO Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test NO Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: This is an Upland plot, no hydrologic indicators found. Page 1 of 2 WetForm"" DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: B-4540 Project No: B-4540 Date: 21-Jan-2004 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Halifax Investigators: David Ward; Pete Stafford State: North Carolina PIotID: 6 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wedowee sandy loam Map Symbol: WeB Drainage Class: well drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion? Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludult Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No Profile Description Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc 0-22 A 7.5YR4/4 N/A N/A N/A Loam Hydric Soil Indicators: NO Histosol NO Concretions NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils NO Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List NO Reducing Conditions UNK Listed on National Hydric Soils List NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Remarks: Page 2 of 2 WetForm``" w ~J~G~ ~ ~~ ~, ~r+ Wetland Rating Worksheet _. ,.;:. ~ ;.+ ~.. ~.,, ,,` ~ ~ ~,~ .. ~ ~~ Project Name ~ Y Nearest Road ~"° J' € r ' '~ ~ ~y ~~-`' County /~~~ ' "~ Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet) Name of Evaluator ~ Sc`) / ~ ~' ~ ,~ ~~ ~*-~ Date ~ ~ZI ~ ~ `/ Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/a mile upstream, upslope or • On pond or lake radius) • On perennial stream Forested/natural vegetation ~% • On intermittent stream Agricultural, urban/suburban ZS % • Within in erstream divide • Impervious surface ~ ~ % • // Other ~ ~ l{ Sl GEC clr~, ri a ~ ,~. Soil Series ~.. u ter-- / Dominant Vegetation • Predominantly organic -humus, muck or ~£°~ .its ~ ~ Peat ~- (2) ie orrunantl mineral -non-sandy / ~ ~ ~~' • Predominantly sandy ~ ~ (3) v ° '~'` ~ Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness S e topograph°y Semipermanently to permanently' flooded or inundated • Ditched or channelized ! ~~anally~lo9de inundated S ~a ~ 1 /'s o = i ~ ~=; • Total wetland width > 100 feet Intermittent) flooded or inundated ~ ` ' '~~`~` ~ ace water f • No evidence of floo m or sur Wetland Type (select one) Bottomland hardwood forest Headwater forest forest Wet flat_y~ Pocosin Bog forest R ATTN('.: Pine savanna Freshwater marsh Bog/fen Ephemeral wetland Carolina Bay // Other O/~A ~^ a y G ~,'~~,r ~- /_ Water storage X 4.00 = Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = O Pollutant removal X 5.00 = /b Wildlife habitat X 2.00 = Aquatic life value _~ X 4.00 = O Recreation/ Education ~_ X 1.00 = COMMENTS:.~f ~ 3oa ~ ~'~~f rra: c/D . ~ ~D v/°c, ~• S ~e Q~ of C8 /t-l . ~-7 ~ y ~a 't'° rt Sf~d ~ C 1 i ..1~ r _I f 1 9 ... A RATING VALUES: High=60 or higher Medium/High=50 to 59 Medium=40 to 49 Low=39 or lower ~~ ''^ !. ~1 OT l ll. KOS (J 99/1 C...F/S 4 % 2 L/ Jb..4t 1 V 4 Wetland Rating Worksheet Project Name 5 " yS' ~~(~ Nearest Road ~ ~ f ~ ~`' ~ ~ ~ ~fl 'r% ~t cl County_ ~~~ '~ `' ~ ~ Wetland Acreage Wetland Width (Feet) Name of Evaluator ~ S Gt) , U ~ ~ S Date_ i/Z ~ ~ ~ t~ Wetland Location Adjacent Land Use (within 1/a mile upstream, upslope or • 0 n pond or lake radius) __ • On perennial stream • Forested/natural vegetation ~% • On intermittent stream • Agricultural, urban suburban 2 ~% • Within interstream divide • Impervious surface S % • Other Soil Series ~~ n'`-- Dominant Vegetation /; L~ (1) ~ v ~ • Predominantly organic -humus, muck or , ; /On J o-0 Peat -. _,.__- - -- _._ (2) ~ d minan mineral -non-sandy • Predominantly sandy ~~ (3) Gi'~-~~ /~%^ ~.. Hydraulic Factors Flooding and Wetness • teep topo a by • Semi _ezmar~nl~l3~ tc~p~rmanently flooded or inundated • Ditched or channelized • easonally flooded or inundate • Total wetland width > 100 feet Intermittently floo e or inundated • No evidence of floodin or surface water Wetland T_y_pe~CP~P[ 1 n Bottomland hardwood forest Headwater fore Swamp forest Wet flat Pocosin Bog forest RATINCr_ Pine savanna Freshwater marsh Bog/fen Ephemeral wetland ~' Carolina Bay V ~^T Water storage X 4.00 = (~ Q Bank/Shoreline stabilization X 4.00 = Pollutant removal X 5.00 = ~ /, Wildlife habitat X 2.00 = Aquatic life value 2 X 4.00 = Recreation/ Education ~_ X 1.00 = I RATING VALUES: High=60 or higher Medium/H.igh=50 to 59 Medium=40 to 49 Low=39 or lower ,~ Y4 COMMENTS: -l..a~'~t ,~O o~ .-,~4a~ `~ o. ~~a ~~ co,~rt ~i L 2 u~c = aG l~ s ~s W~~~-t 30 0 _ .~ ~ 0 `~O . 2.='~ o rG(~/' Z ~ g~° Cs1tJ~ ~l ~~c~ "~e P o. _ ~-~ anofd -loot! ~ C.aJ fP ~a'f'lur..~an ~ ~ d.~ev ~ ~o -90 °~TT- v - w ~~~ 3 D ~~ ~~O ~~0 ~c~Il..r = 2. ~~(~5~~ r ... 4 C ~ j i :v~~~..~ s :,5~ e,. ~~" ~,~ -- - ~ INTERMITTENT CHANNEL ~.;_: .,~ E? - ~~ ~ f_ f L? EVALUATION FORM ACTION ID APPLICANT NAME ~~-~ y / DATE ~ ~ ( I ~~1~ PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.'e'',~culvert, re/lo~cation/, etc.) ~C ~ ~~~ ~/~ G~ q~ WATERBODY/RIVERBASIN ! ~~ `~ i °^'~"'`~ 9 ~~' RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS ~ "r"t ~''> COUNTY/CITY ~~~ 1~~~" P SP NP Observation Comments or Description Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present "" a'A Benthic Macro Invertebrates ~ Amphibians PresentBreeding - > ,,.~ ..4 ,~- y ., ~, Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function) ~ Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others) /6i CC-a~~'L ..~ ~ Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) " w`r Riffle/Poo1 Structure ~' Stable Streambanks Channel Substrate (i.e. avel, cobble, rock, coazse sand) ~,/~ Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) ^"~~"1, Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure ~,,r'" Flow in Channel Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue) Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June throu h Se tJ Seeps/Groundwater Dischazge (June through Sept.) Adjacent Floodplain Present ~- Wrack Material or Drift Lines Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y ~~:-" Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? N Approx. Drainage Area: ~nniunnniuainllllunllll///ll/llllllllllllll/lllllll/lllll/lllllll/llll//l/llllll/ll/l/lll//lll/ll/ll/l/l/lllllllllllllllllll//l//l/l/ll/llll/lllllll//ll/lll//l/l/ll/l/1/l/l/lll/lllllllllllll/ll/llll/lllllll/llll Determination: Perennial Channel (stop) 8 Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel) Ditch Through Upland (no jd) Evaluator's Signature: (if other than C.O.E. project manager) iiiiil/ll/llllllll/ll/lllllllllllllllll/ll/llllllllllllllllllllllllllll/llllll/lllll/ll/lllll/llll/llllll/l//l/ll/llll/ll1/ll/l/lll/l//llllllllll/l/lllllllll/ll/ll//1/(llll/ll/l/lllllll/llllllllll/lllllllllllllll/lll/llllll P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98 N~UWQ .Stream ~lassifcaton Form Project Name: ~j , '~S 1 v River Basin: ~~ f _~q,,,, (,~ ~~, ~~~, County: ~1 f f y ~i ~ _.~ Evaluator: f _SCJ DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: ~,,~ l L Latitude: Signature: ~~sG„~, C.lc~.(~ Date: ~/?il J o ~ USGS QUAD: ~r, ~ Longitude: Location/Directions: *PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used* Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number PerLine~ I. Geomor holo Absent Weak Mo ate Stron 1~ Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? ,_ 0 1 2 3 2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed 5) Is There An Active (Or Relic) 9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 (*NOTE.• If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*) 10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated ,,~_~~ PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: II. Hydrolo~y Absent Weak Moderate Strom 1) Is There A Groundwater ___ PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: III. PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)