20080628 Ver 1_Application_20080404

~'.:. ,
qpk,
,I ~j ~~ ~~
~e yea {/~ '1~ ~''T C~ } C~ ~ ~ ~ .ff
~y-,~~.
~~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART'1V~NT OF T~ZANSPORTATION
~~ ~
a~
V ,h
X~
L ~
V~
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. Richard Spencer
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir,
LYNDO T~PETT
SECRETARY
080628.
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 23 and 33 and Section
401 Water Quality Certification for the Replacement of Bridge No. 8
over a canal on NC 210; Bladen County; TIP Project B-4029; Federal Aid
Project No. BRSTP-210(5); State Project No. 8.1421501; WBS 33396.1.1.
Please find enclosed a site map, permit drawings, and half size plan sheets for the above
mentioned project. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed for this project on April
1 1, 2006, and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge
No. 8 over an unnamed canal on the existing alignment, while using a temporary on-site
detour to the west of the existing 61-foot long bridge to maintain traffic during
construction. The proposed structure will be a 90-foot long bridge with a clear roadway
width of 32 feet, providing two 12-foot travel lanes with 4-foot offsets. The roadway
approaches will consist of two 12-foot travel lanes with 6-foot unpaved shoulders. There
are 32 linear feet of proposed permanent impacts to surface waters as well as 198 linear
feet (0.10 acre) of temporary surface water impacts and 0.07 acre of temporary riverine
wetland impacts.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
General Description: This project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin (Hydrologic
Cataloging Unit 03030006) over aman-made, unnamed diversion canal. Since the canal
is unnamed, it is not assigned a Stream Index Number by the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ); therefore Colly Creek (DWQ Index No. 18-68-17), of which the canal is a
tributary, is the main water body with potential for impact. Colly Creek is a DWQ Class
"C Sw" Water of the State. In addition to the canal, there are two jurisdictional wetlands
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
I S9H MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
March 18, 2008
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WIiBS/TE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
2728 CAPITAL BLVD
StJn'E 240
RALEIGH NC 27604

_, ,
~ ,
• The roadway grade was kept as close as possible to the existing, minimizing fill
height.
• Hand-clearing will be used in jurisdictional areas to reduce permanent impacts.
• A turbidity curtain will be used downstream (and upstream, as conditions warrant) of
the temporary pipe placement area in lieu of de-watering.
Mitigation
Due to the minimal permanent surface water impacts proposed for this project, no
compensatory mitigation is proposed.
Federally Protected Species
As of January 31, 2008, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists six federally
protected species for Bladen County. Table 1 lists the species and their federal status.
Table 1. Suedes under federal nrntectinn in RlariPn ('nnnty
Common Name Scientific Name Federal
Status Habitat Biological
Conclusion
American alli ator Alli ator mississi iensis T (S/A) Yes N/A
Red-cockaded wood ecker Picoides borealis E No No Effect
Shortnose stur eon Aci enser brevirostrum E No No Effect
American chaffseed Schwalbea americana E No No Effect
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia E No No Effect
Rou -leaved loosestrife Lysimachia as erulaefolia E Yes' No Effect
Bald and Golden eagle Protection Act
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is included in the environmental document for
this project and given a biological conclusion of `No Effect'. However, the Bald Eagle
was de-listed on August 8, 2007 and no longer requires a biological conclusion, though it
is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Suitable habitat in the
form of large, open water bodies that provide nesting and foraging habitat for the bald
eagle is not found within 660 feet of the project .area. In addition, a search of the NC
Natural Heritage Program database (updated February 2008) did not reveal any records of
the Bald Eagle within one mile of the project area.
Project Schedule
The project has a scheduled let of September 16, 2008 with a review date of July 29,
2008.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal
Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR
771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide
Permit 23 (72 CFR; 11092-11198, March 12, 2007). We are also requesting the issuance
B-4029 Permit Application
Page 3

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 8
~u any panicuiar uem is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 23 and 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required; check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J Thoroe PhD Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1548
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed anti dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
1 of 9

Bride No. 8 will be replaced on the existing alignment with an on-site detour Heaw duty
excavation egUipment will be used such as trucks dozers cranes and other various
equipment necessazv for roadway construction.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:_ To replace a deteriorating bridge
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion. of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed sepazately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts aze proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There is 0.01 acre (32 linear feet) of
proposed permanent surface water impacts on this project as well as 0 10 acre (,198 linear
feetl of temporary surface water impacts and 0 07 acre of temporary riverine wetland
impacts.
3 of 9

i
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred 'n ,flooding, draina e, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.11
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.07
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 230
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
5 of 9

9.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitiuation is proposed
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet: _0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
7 of 9

~ a
XIV. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (ISA NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XVI. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

3 ~ ~q~•o8
~ppli~nt/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
9 of 9

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size /Type
Permanent
Fillln
Wetlands
ac
Temp.
Fillln
Wetlands
ac
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
ac Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
ac
Permanent
SW
impacts
ac
Temp.
SW
impacts
ac Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
~ft Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
ft
Natural
Stream
Design
ft
1 13+50 -L- 42" PIPE 0.04 0.01 <0.01 32 16
2 DET- 42" CSP PIPE 0.07 0.02 85
3 19+50 -DET- 2 AT 72" CSP PIPE 0.08 97

TOTAL S: 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.10 32 198
10 SQ FT OF IMPACTS FOR PROPOSED PIERS
< 0.01 acres of Temporary Fill in Wetlands in the Hand Clearing area for erosion control measures.
\TN Revised 3/31/05
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN COUNTY
PROJECT: 33396.1.1 (B-4029)
Pemti~t Drawilnp
Sheet Z of / ~
1

~ 02i12i2008 09:15 NCDOT HYDRAULICS -~ 97155501 N0.377 D02
P~~P'ER~'Y
NAM[~S r~iND
PARCEL NO. NAMES (~R~'NERS
AgDAES~BS
ADDRESSBS
1 JAMES R. RUaKS 91J61 B. NC X10 HWY
ET UX YELLY, NC 2&18-0131
ETIiBL M, 19029 NC iS8
3
S~UIRBS [ELLY, NC 3B~J8
NCD~T
QIVISION OF HI~iH~AY$
lf.ApBN G~l1NTY
rROi1BC"1'c0iili.I.l1~~01~i' 1
CONR7pltfa-irANIdAPOWB
dRIDOB I~TO.a aN AiC 210
OVBIt IXVBt!!!ON CANAL
SNBBT aF 11/!A!
Permit Drawing
sti.sc .~3 . of

a
n
m
w
>s
a
Y
Z
~~
0
~b~
~a~,
~~~
~~W
~~a
~n~z
r~a¢
~,ww
a~~
«,a~
~,ww
~w~
ww~A
~w~
See Shaet 1-B For ConveniPonalSymbols ~~~ JL ~ ®~ 1~ ®~~ll7t ~171~®lla~1V 171 °~n°~"~` "~OQ6M6 ~ °T
•c• B-4029 ~
~
~ o 1[~t1r,{ 1flrggy A ~r
1f 1f tr ~T 1[
~1L~Jl~JL®LV ®ll' JLllJI'l7YJl YY C~ ll ~ ,~,
21U .a 33396.1.1 BRSTP-210 6 PE

b 33396.2.1 BRSTP-210 6 RM1N & UTIL

O ~ ,L~ ~{
BiJL 1Di1~ CO ~~~
PRO CT
LOCATION: BRIDGE N0.8 ON NC 2I0 OVER DIVERSON CANAL
R/W PLANS
TYPE OF WORIL GRADING, DRAINAGE
PAVING, f~ STRUCTURE
.q
r ,
CT
53 r
W ~
270
53

5
VICINITY MAP ~
ITHI S PROJECT IS NOT INCLUDED WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDA RIESI
~ 4 5
BEGIN TIP PRO ECT 8-4029 SITE 3 END TIP PRO F,CT 8-4029
4 S . 6+56.38 ~ T . 22+ 6.91
BEGA1 BRIDGE ~ END
g -L- FRIDGE
TA. 15+35.00
~
h I I
/
~~ ~

~ II ~
i~
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB I
ly,
2@
" CS II
~i
U STA.14+40.00 i I //
I I
/
~
SITE 2 I
~ /
APPROACH SLAB II ~i~
TA
1s+so
oo ~
.
.
~
/
,70 NC 5
N e ° TO fl0.4AN --~ _--
NC 210 265 BSI
C 90 715 B6T ~~ I --
-- ~--
_ II
1
~
~ I ~ ~ I
~ ~
~
-- -
SITE 1 I I I
I-
' ~ = i I I ~~ 1
- ill ~ ,_ ~~ ~ ~\1
I
~
~
~ ,
II S
I ~ = -
~
r ~
~11
i ! 1
V
~
l~
II ~
I 11
1
I
\~ ~
~
I \ \
` WETLANLYSTREAM
IMPACTS
NCDOT CONTACT :CATHY ROUSER, P.E.
ROADWAY DESIGN-ENGINEERING COORDINATION CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED PRELIMINARY PLANS
~• .
~ TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II °° "°""` `°" `""'"°~'°"
r `
v
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH Pre~red f° tfe Oftlce of:
rHe
THE LPA GROUP
f N
th C
ln HYDR,g[)L(CS ENGII~ER DMSION OF fiIGfIWRYS

STATE O
or
aro
o
a, p.a.
LPA F NORTH CAROLINA
50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2008 = 1083 _ _
GROUP =. 5000 Falls d Neuse Rd., Smote 304
TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
A°,rM

ADT 2028 = 1691
Length Roadway TIP Project 8-4029 = 0
288 Miles
:o~srum
,xn srEC~,Gnofa °
°
PLANS

50 25 0 50 1 DHV = 1D°k

° .
Length Structure TIP Project 8-4029 = 0.015 Miles , P~
s,cxA
00 D 60
k RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JEANNE K. RICHTER. P.E. ROADWAY DESIGN
'
T = 20°k ' Total Length TIP Project B-4029 = 0
303 Miles SEPTEMBER 21
2007 P"c'~`~ ~""'~" ENGINEER .
~

PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
V = 60 MPH . , ,
. ,,,.
O 1 5 0 10 20 R TT$T 15% DUAL 5% LETITNG DATE: PRJcODY~LCN POxs~x
FUNC.
RURAL MAIOR SEPTEMBER 16, 2008

PROFILE (VERTICAL) _
CLASS -COLLECTOR PE PE,
srcxNrux~ ware rncawnr nesrcN Pxcn~R

Penny Drawing
Sheet ~ ~...o.-

DETAIL I D TAI '
PI Sfa 15+21.02 SP JAL U DITCH PR FORM D RrgJR HOL
I Noi to Sc01e1 -L- STA. 15+83.50 LT.
= 46' 06.9' (LTJ Front
D = f 13' 41.T Natural A.>o {0c Dit~n nµ rWN
L = 469.66' crouna 3•i Q got slope
T = 235.03' d Nin, D= L5 Ft. Pipe or DHCh : maepiw ~t~
R = 4,664$8' Filter FODric Max. d= L0 Ft. oun°t
D5= 60 MPH e e
e(maxJ= .03 Tyve of liner= class 'e' Riv-Rav
FROM STA 1/+00.00 TO STA.lA+68.00 -l- LT. sa=. rret°rm°a
scu,r xae iPSw A= 4.0 Ft.
Y. O IRIp Pap in D= ,S Ft
.~.
a
1~ /' r r r r r r
I I r f N0005 r r r r r
((I I- r r r
I +1 © r r r
r r r
e l0 1 r r r r r
lc1 -~-,1r r * r r
ra ef4wi*y'c°.n W= S.0 Ft.
r SQUIRES, ETHEL M.
r * G= L0 Ft.
[i A-1
r
r ""'d„°'a
r I ~J']~ DU'Mnl PSAN O GPI
r I
'~ r I LInx:O°00 Rl' R~ R ~~ r tllfAt
* I J LO Fi. tack .Itk Fllta fmrlc 5/US
/ I
r/
r o
/ I N00

~ r
( *
r
r y. r
W
+
rl CM
f .. ~.
.. .. r g
.. .. .. .. .. r
r y. r /
r / -L.
AO.OD
I

._~
.-_
~ '~
~
r
.. .. .. .. ..
~t
r
r r r .4+1.00
..
' E%ISTPAV so.oD,ooDD
r
.. .. r..
w DD
I LT.
~
E~

e ~- -
-..
~
_ r r

.
r .~ E
_

SPIK
_ -
_ te - - _ _~_
a.-_ ~-
-
-

~~
-- _ _
xcaozs.~ _
_
T :~~: saa - ~
- ~ ------ --__

-
~ ~_
~ _ as
~
~~~
F
-
- ~
-BL---- ~~~~ P0.00' W -._----m
f
~s~ ~~ -~ ~ -- --
----- - --~-_
.. .

l .. .r
O _
. .T. ~- - - -- BL- -
r ~.f"7 Ryous, yN~
~ s r rMC
4;t~"
~~
-g-ow_-------_-, ~ Q
W~ 4 N
O
I
'. R00%S ET ~1~JAMES R. r r
y. ~ © ~` r
r r r * r I ---t ~-
~ r r r r
©r ~* -- C

~ r
~ r r i r E
r
1 r© r r r ° r °r r ~ Q
WOODS r ~ r r ~ ~ r r ~,
° ~ * ° r
~ / / N
~ +WW 0 r / ~' ~
S

©r r
°
* 0005
r I
°
t E%
LST
.
r~ '~ I
r
~ (r
O
* r I ~ Nooos
¢7 ..
1 r
r _ _ r
R
~
O 5 ET U%, ES A. Naaos
SM' 2 m

® DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER ~_
® BENOTES iEMPOAAAY J
IMPACTS IN SUflFACE WATER I

I
I
I
N
° I
hI
I w
I I
~
O
®OE~o ERRINGNO ~
I
SPECIAL COT DfTCH ~
LINED W/CIA55 'B'AIP RAP r+
I I 4f : N
STA 11+00 TO STA 11+6B-L- lT
SEF DETAIL tl

5BG pA~
ENO 0 APPR 5
-SFA 15
I I :LT
oa
PROJECT AEFERONCE NO. SHEET N0.
8-4029 4
Wk SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDMUMCS
ENGINEE0. ENGINEE0.
PRELIMINARY PLANS
00 NOT UWB CWTWTRVCI'ION
I {- +5 . ~
I {_ +54.00 112.OD' T
133.00' LT.
~E'
! {- +li
SITE 1 r sss
~ woods /
1
/r ~
k..PL-~
r ~t °~
r * r -DW2- I r woDDS . D' RR, 1' { e
r PI Sta 1®+45.64 r +!'f Sta !0+ 7.4 ~ * ~ ~~
Pl Sto 1Q+9614 9 5 P! Sta 10+4599 I r 5
JS = 60' 56 e08.1' (LTJ ~ = 56' !6' 6" fR7J ~ =E 55 4~' 231" (LTJ ~= 5T 20' 20.4' (RTJ ~ ~ r r ~~ ~0°'
D = !14' 35' 29b' r ~
D = 114' 35''Z9.6" r D = 114' ~5' 29.6" D = !!4' 35' 29.6" ~ r r
L = 5318' L = 4911' ° L = 52.19' L = 50.04' ~ r r r ` °~
T= 29.4!' T= 26.74' T= 28.76' T= 2734' I r r r
R = 50.00' R = 50.00' R = 50.00' R = 50.00' Ir r r
~ ' DS= N/A D5= N/A r r
- © DS= N/A DS= N/A r r s r
BM 1 ELEV. 122'
R/
-B SPIKE
-STA SET IN
18.43 3 8"PINE
0' LT
BENC MARK 115 LOC TED
7E OF THE P OJECT M((S.
BEGI TIP ROJEC B
-L- ta.6~5.38
STRU TURF
DESIGN REOUEN
DESIGN EIEV
BASE DI CHARGE
BEGI GRA E OVERTOP JNG F
-C- StO.II+ ~.~~ OVERTOP JNG E
_~- ~ E W
E

c. I , Vl
I ~
MTL
IW/WIE ST
4AiE-D LT
- ~J
1- +48. 1
Exlsr Rw
56
00' RT
~

/ C
SH .
.
P CUR/EO
..
lu ~
~
~ F
S
` O
!41.13 '~
- 'i _- - lp
I I I ~P o
£ TIGI
- F F _
I L 5 CUfiVED 'wo
\ J
4.0 i
` ~
. o~LT m E W
Z
\ , i ~ 5 'I' DP RAP
To TOP eERM J
W IR, PAY
(
$

~ 1
C r!
+
,
~ 7 N+,
5
0
' U
. .
5
0
° ~ Q
1 LI E ~
~ I
9 ~
I I ' - +6A.00
I.oa ar.
°_

DRAU !C DAT 8MW 2 LEV.26. 6'
N 263, 45.8062 E 2,218, 26.1657
= R/R S 1KE S IN ! " N
_ /A YRS -BL- TA 18+0 .38 368. 8 LT
V = 5.4 FT -L- S 14f32. 5 348.2 LT
_ /A CF5 -DET- STA 19+ 3.96 26 .36 LT
_ /A YRS
_ /A Fr
fGE = 1,200 CF5
NCY= 500 YRS
'nu = ~ ~r
CL STA i +95.0
BO' OAL 41' ORED SLAB
EL = 635' L =27.70 EL = 2 27'
VC=1 0' =100' VC=13
K=l4 =187 K=16 SITE 2
Os=6 mh =60m h Ds=60 mh

FEATHE
0 EXIS PROPO ED OVE Y PRO OSED G DE
0335%
+11 (+
___ ____ 1.5° OVERLAY .
- -- -- - - -r--- --i- -- (-1 .3017%
EX STING GR DE (-1 .0013% _.._.._..
-
- I

EXISTI
G GROU
D
a
~ ~
I
~
I
3.5'MIN
42" E UALIZER PIPE ~ N
Z II p

WEV~
~A 4-0506 i
N i 2:1 N
CLA55 RMAL
'I' PIP RAP
p =20.6 II TO 7 P OF BERM
p i ~ ISTRU AE PAY 1
W~ O ~ W TLLFYJBPNG
~ ~ ~ O +F 5 CY
2 p U Off, ISiR PA: PAY R
J ~ ~
~ ~
0] h 7
2
W ~
lit
b 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5 ~ (~

° w
P
BEGIN AoPq
-L- STA 14•~
6
^ea~~
`"~"~~
Ny
DETAIL I TO AI •7
SP IAA D DITCH PREFORMED SCOtL HALF
cNOt tc Scdel -L- STAJS+83.50 LT.
Y Froni
Naturol 3 A~\~{{g< SIOpB ~'J
Ground •/ 0 \
d Min. D= L5 Ft. Pipe or oem :`ro ~wi~da~i
Fllter Fabric MOX, d= L0 Ft. ourler
1 d
Type Df Liner= Class 'E' Aip-Rap
FRO
RM' 2 m PROJECT REFERB+CE N0. SHEET N0.
GLI 8-4029 4
W// SHEET N0,
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
® DENOTES IMPACTS IN ENGINEER ENGINEER
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES TEMPOflAAY ~ J
IMPACTS IN SIIAFACE NATEfl I
5
ICI ~ PRELIMIN RY PLANS
i I wo Nar use consmucnAU+
IQI W
® DENOTES HAND ~ I I ~ I
CLEARING
SPEOAl CIJT [XTCH ~ I I ~S : ~
UNED NVCIASS 'B' RIP RAP
STA 1/+00 TO STA-td+68-L-LTI~ ~ I 11171 IIII III 1
M STA 14+00.00 TO STA14+68.00 -L- LT. s Pratm.w e= 4.0 Ft.
x xa. ssxi
2 wl Bop m 0= L5 Ft.
_ e. I. ~ an...
8-L a SQUIRES, ETHEL M, f d Iry' W= 5.0 Ft.
I D = 0'!8'6.0° w '' . „,~,~
Y y.
I t M00p5 y ~ X :• r ~ ~ t 7 ~ ~6r+0' ~ Y ~ I NAD y~5 0, OR•mlm PseM a cra, e
~I4v. _ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + DS- ID6Rfs~i~ ~F ~ t ~ I J I.o Fi.mia~.Irn rn.rwFmrm~~ r rick sros
a _
3 - 1 t ~ .w / I 1- +90.0
I Y y. + ~' / F w0005 110.00'LT.
~ - .. ., ~ ~ x law sB.oB•LT. N Ems`
e ~_ a ~ E
l
-
E
__ ___
o -- -a _ -
R/R SPINE ~jf---=~-na`="'°--=~~~m- ~ O1-'- ~~-~< E
--- ~ ---- r_ ______--- ti
f
-T== -- ~--.~
- sR.ar m
-- __ -
..
~ ,-~~Q_-t-- - - - - -
t ~F
I
'. ROOKS ET
~1
7g
JA 5 R. ~t ~
y. E~ © `~ ~
X. / ~ ~
'E 'E T
I
/~
-
y
1T"" ~ '~ x ~ ~ ~ 111
~ a~
~ ~. + ~'~'L.
N ~ ~ r
©
BOOS ~.
~
a ~ ~
~ ~.
I
~ ~
0+
.E ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I.
~
'Y ~ I W0005
., 6 s t - - Y' ~ - r~
~ PI Sfa I®+4554 ~
d = 60' S6' 08J° 2T1
PI Sta !~+%14 ~
'
'
" ~l Sta 10+ 7.45 Pl Sto 10+45.99
9
59' 4
' 23
'
~ =
'
"
'
' 16
7~5
fRTI
~ = 56 ~
J
( 1
T
' p= 5T 20
IRT.
20.4
D = 114 35
295 D = 114' 35' P95° E D = 114
,45' 295" D = 114 35' 29
6"
L = 53Jq! L = 49.11' a L = 5219' ,
L = 50.04' l
T = 26.74' T = 28. T = 27.34'

=
R = 50.00'
R = 1
R = 50.00'
fff___ ~ N/A D5= N/A DS= /A DS= N/A

BM I ELEV. L22'
R/
-8 SPIKE
- STA SET !N
+18.43 3 8" PINE
D' LT
1DE OF~ TNEKP~OJECT CI~MIT~.
BEGI TIP ROJ
L- ta.6+ 38
~Y
I~~i
56~IC
~ woods
/~ ~
~~ 4
-.-
F
Q Q r
-L- +TS.oD ~
'.may EpSf WW ~ +, ~,
C i
O .. ~ Y'R' -L- +39.00
R0. SET UX, ES A. woods I) ~ ~~ -LL` +5a. 5600
a ~ M0005 ' Ry,
I 1 •w \
~ ~ + ~
\ a ~ ~
1 ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~
I~ r ~
r.5 .E
~ ~ "d
BEGI GRA E
-L- Sta. U+ ~.~~
f`
LLl
F W
Z
W
W
W p
F ~ O
_ ~
SP
O
TBGI ~
I
• woo i 1
_rt
Z
~S 'I' AB' RAP J
TOP BERM
j PAY ~9,1)
Z
U
f~ Q
BMN 2 LEV.2
N 263, 45.806,
R/R S !KE SI
-BL- TA 18+
-L- S 14+3
-DE7- STA IS
8 LT
LT
.36 LT
~ ~ ~ ~si'1 ~~~y
STRU TURF YDRAU IC DAT
DESIGN REOUENC = /A YRS
DESIGN ELEVA ION = 5.4 FT
BASE Dl CHARGE _ /A CFS
BASE F OUENCY = /A YRS
BASE HW ELEVAT! N = /A FT
OVERTOP 1NG DISC ARGE = 1200 CFS
OVERTOP 1NG FRE UENCY= 500 YRS
OVERTOP 1NG ELEV TION = 7 ~
BO'(
EL = .35' L = 27.70 EL = 2 27'
VC=1 0' =100' VC=13
K = 14 = 187 K = 162 SITE 2
Ds=6 mh =60m h Ds=60 mh
FEATHE
TO EXIS PROPO ED OVE Y PRO OSED G E

1
5" OVERLAY +11.0335% (+J .
-
- -
--- .
-
_ ___ ____ .

EX

STING GR

DE

(-1

.0013%
-
--

._._.___
-

-
~

- _T - --
r-J
.30nz

EXISTI
G GROU
o
~ I
I
~ '
I _
3.5'MIN
42° E UALIZER PIPE " N "~
II N
P
- U
WE115 4-05-06 i
N 2:1
CLASS RMAl
'M AIP RAP
p =20.6 II TOT OF BERM
_ ~ ISTRU RE PAY )
~ ~ ~ RO FILL NG
~ ~ ~ O F
+ SCY
2 P U ~ I RE PAY fIF1q
~n Q
~ a
~ ~
m{ jl P
h
b 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 $h86t ~ Q( f

I

n SEE SHEETS 4-5 FOP -L- ALIGNMENT AND Pi?OFILE PRaECT RFFEEENCE NO. snEET No.
$-4029 2B
GLI _D~_ BMA 2m RM/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
PI Sta 19+26.88 ENGINEER ENGINEER
NAD 8~5 ~ = IE49'21.8'rRTJ
D = z 3a D7z'

i I p~ p I ~'
© ~ Y• DENOTES iEMPDAAfl7 L = 67237'
® FILL IN NETLANO T = 338.62'
® DENDTES iENPORARY R 2290D0'
INPACTS IN SURFACE NA1EA D5= 50 MPN
SITE 3 '
J

PRELIM[NA Y PLANS
DO NVi U56 PiR0. U
'
N
~
~
~ -DET- U7 CI
IO
©
~ ~
I I ~
6~ ~,
~ *
PI Sta 13+54
47 e(max1= .03 ~~I o
p
~ w
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ,
p = P44'24
2"(LTJ O hI
/
w
p / + y. y, ~ ~ ~' ~ .
4 =2'30' O72' SQUIRES, ETHEL U. I i ~ ~

I w t ~ ~ ~ a r T= 235.44' I I Q o
I
I +, / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r + ~ R ,~ 2,290.00' HEADwAn
J
I I
~ ~' ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x D5= 50 MPH p o
~ i ~ ~ ooos ~
t
w
~
~
~ ~
~ eWnax1=1.03 ws~'~w c9o' I 1
I
+
~
~
r ~
p ne_
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
I
' I
SITE 2
. a srA Iv+bo-DEr- I
I
~
~ C~
N
~~
~ ~
+
~
~ ~ a woods ~ ~
~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ i
,
E
~
~
~
~
Ie ~

x- t
/

T ~
I x~ ~. ~ ~
+ / woods I I t

. .. .. ~ t
~
/ i
hT T I/1
1 ~ x ~ ~ E ~ --- F _ W
-~ _ '--L_
t ~ ~. .. X
i' E E ~
._-
~~~_ - _~~~ w
_ -
--
-
~ . .~ .
a .~ ~ Ny
_. E-- ~-- _
~__-~- DET-

a wiw E o

o
--- s_a_ -u__
-
OR/R --_~'~-~s_~ °
SPINE - ~~.~°°r° °_ -~... ~-~-Vic...-~~E .-~-...---
_--__--~.-_~'=-~~.Y-~ ~~ --~-- o i O
O
_ nrzro zsesr
7'IP TO R/W ---__ ,x~
~n = - - -
~t-ca°
k ------=°-----=t° ~_ ° ..
°°
-- ... ~in~ni=~'L,.n+/Z.
_
~
. 6i1F1 GRADE I

~- T
N
a.oo•
---ey---------- W

__

- °°
-_--
~
C

°~~ f
--'- __ -.- _

\
^
BY--
+ w°a:„~s~--
~
O
~-----
------
N 652' ------ _
\
---
I
'~ ROOK$ E
T /X~JAUES R. Y• y. ~''~ ~ p~ 1 y. ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ I ---N'----~ ~ i ? " lhil
~
~ ~
t ~ ~ p ~
<
t ~ p Q~
troops t r
~ ~
p CI ~ ©~ a
~
~
~ ~ / '. E~ ~ ~i f.'\. ,.~~`~~ K
~ ~
\ ~',, lay
E ~
~ 2
Z
~
p ~
p~ ~
woods
~
©
~ i
©~
`t ~
~ \
p U
Y• >
~~ '~
X' ~~
~
I O ~w
a
{'X' I`
f '
tiQ
~.i
~ ~ ~ ~t ~ y. ~
~
~ I
+p g -DWIDET
~ - ROOKS ET UX, JAMES R. I ~' ~, F o I
/ ~
~ ~
~
~ Q
* ~?
~ iE'1SVa 10+45.63
'~ D ~ 60' S6' 08.1' (LTl
~
'
" PI Sia 10+9614

~ = 5616' 27b° (RTl
D =
'
'
' ~ ~ ooos a ~"~,

~ ~ ,,,~ ~ w
F
~ . I:
~
ooos ~
I

u,
~ p +E , ~ ~
~ D 7 114 35
29.6
' 114
35
29b
L = 49A' ~ a ~ ~ ~
.
J
l p

p
~
p Q L w 5318
° T = 29.41'
R = 50
00'
T = 26.74'
R = 50
00' ~ + ~
J ~ '~
+
,w
~ ~"~' ~~ E
;
a
. ~ ~
I I
p
© ~
~?,~ ~}
. . ~
~ `

BM* 2 LEV.26 6' - ET - I DET- 9 3299 1 D T-
. E V. = 2616' I = !0 6.3
~ 72" CSP R/R S !KE S IN !2" INE P = 9+q8 EL = 2 25'
-BL- TA 18+0 .38 368. B LT E = 25.69' VC = 6
DESIGN SCHARGE = 0 FS -L- S 14+32 5 348
2 LT V = 30 E D -DWlD - GR
- -D T- .
+ . 35 ! = 10+ ,2 - 1 DET- 1+39.56 35
DESIGN

BASE DI ELEVA

NARGE ON = 2

EG~N

ASE '
VC = 50
= A FS 8 r 2
•
8A E ~ OUENA RS DET- ta.l3f 4.34 +14161 ~ f+1 377 1604
71 N A
-
25 I -
-J -/~
25
OVERTOP 1NG DISC ARGE = A FS LEV
= 26
06 ~~

OVERTOP
ING FRE
ENCY=
A
RS . . XI T. P
OVERTOP 1NG ELEV TION = A T X T. P
15 15
PI = 16 00.00 10 11
EL = 5b7'
40 vC = oa
K= 7
Ds = m h SITE 3 PIMP Ci IN S TE 4
URFACE ATER
30 PR POSED DE TEMP FILL PR OSED G E TEMP IM ACT IN
SURFACE WATER

---
----
---
_-- _EXISTIN GRADE __
_
(-
1719%
(+10.3
00% ~
_ _ --\ ---- ~~ --- ---- J

20
IXISTI
G GROU
D _,, -- ~ 1
BM° 1 E
N 262
7 EV.31.22'
1421E
0
2
2!8
96
4783 EXISTING GROUND 42" EQUALIZE PIPETE 42" CS
^
,
R/R S .
KE SET ,
,
1N l8" P
E ie 15.86-D 2 @ 7 CSP ~ EL t7.

10
-
+ IN IN=20.3 TA 1 9+6 DET -

NOTE: B NCH MA K "! 1S LOCATE
OUTBID OF TH - PROJE T LIMIT .

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PQ~fl1~ pfBWb~Q
~~~

m I SEE SHEETS 4-5 FOR -L- ALIGNMENT AND P ROFILE PROJECT 0.EFE0.ANCE NO.
B-4029 SHEET N0.
28
GLI _
-DST BM• 2 m WN SHEET N0.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDAAU4C5
PI Sta 19+26.88 ENGINEE0. ENGINEER

D = 2' 30' 07.2'
'

~ ~ DENDTES TEMPORARY L - 672.37
® FILL IN NETLAND T = 338.62' ~`
SI
J
+
fl I~
t R = 2,290.00'
®oENOres'ieueofl~flr
INP1Cr5 IN SURFACE NAiEfl D5= 50 MPH i
PRELIMINA Y PLANS
„~ m xar oss POR
\
~ ~ rmu cnox
I I ~ x r
~ ~ w

~ -DET-
PI Sta 13+54
47 e(maxJ= .03 I,~

~
~

i
~
~
/
~ ~
~ .
4 = !1'44' 242' (LTJ O ~Q
~, © 1 ~.
1
i ~ ~ ~ ~
~ t ~ t
~~ ~ Q~ = 2.30' D72' SDUIRES, ETREL M.
=86923' I
I . ~
w
~~

I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
/ x ~

~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~

~ r
~ ~
.~ ~ ~ T=235.44'
R ~ 2290.00' ~ ~~

R w I

°
-s'y ~ ~ ~ ~ r D = 50 MPH / L
v
~
r"I'
l ~~ Waoos ~ ~ +
~ x x a axJ=1.03 s~rra °
t
h ~
_ ~ ~ '~
_~~ ~
*
~ A'
~ jjj~~~\\\ ~ ~
*
I
I I '~ SITE 2 -
STA 19 60-D ~
N

~ a
~
~~~
~ ~ I ~ WWDS ~
I
} Y-
~ J 4- ~
o 8 8
a
\
~
~ Y~ &
~
V 1 / O

I i lLl
~
~ ~ ~' '~ ~ / wcaos i
~ ~ ~
~. " ~ 6 -E ~ f W

_ ~ ~ ~ E • W

R/R SP e
-~~ - .
---__ -_ ___ ___ _
~~---
--

J ~ •
--~-'~

E
E

E ~ - b DET-
N
F

o
p
IKE
-- ---_
a ---- -~rv
-
-
__
x o
-
-
- O
- -.te
__
-'-
'~'~~-~ NC.2/p ffi`BST -
~ _--
-___ __ m ~F~
-- 6 _
- ..f i ;, hG
Q N

_ __
_ Q
____ __
~ .. ~
~ __
- C
__________ ___ __ _ __
- - - - - - - - _
- ` -61 - ~
I
°
~ Q
0 - - -
and Hill-- - °~~-
_~ ~ ----- ~ -~. ' 21.0' E = i

Y\ '. RDDKS
~ ~ .l' ~ Y•
ET ~1f~,IA S R. +E ~. Q © ~
~
~
y ~ ~ _•_
l
~` 'E I
~

-11"'--~
60d0'

~

~ I

~I
p
~ F .. ~
YIV005 .E
'Y Q y~ © y
~ ~ L

~ ~ © C6
x y
©~
©
I
l /
<
~ I
~
5 ~ C
E
~
` J
~
~ a ~ ~ ~ x~ r
j E
01 C~ V
I a
~ ~

a Q ~} &
~ ~

~
~
~
-DWIDET
-
RDDKS ET U%. JAMES R. I A E ~ 1 ~

a
~ ~
~ *
~
.E
'
t0 10+45.3
'
'~
'
'
PI Sto !0+
~ = 5516' 27b' (RTJ
~ ooos a
~
~
s
+ ~
~
J
~ ~ _, 60
S6
J
(LTJ „
I
~ © ~ ~ ~
D =1 114' 35' 9.6" D = 114' 35' 29b"

' ~ a ~

~ ~ ~ cos

1 ©
© f~ L ~ 53J8'
~ ~ ° T = 29.4Y
R-50
~ L = 49.11
T = 26.74,
R=50.0 ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~
~ ~
`"~ . I ~ ~
~
Jf ~ Q~? ~ la ~ E ~
~ I I
~ c
I
x, \
i . ~ fl

BM° 2 LEV
26 ' 6' ~ ~~ - I DFT - 9 32
99 l 1J 1-
.
. .
@ 72° CSP R/R S 1KE SE 1N /2' !NE P = 9+48b EL = 2 25'
-BL- TA 18+0 .38 368. 8 LT E = 25b9' VC = 6

DESIGN D
SCHARGE
=
0
FS
-L- S
l4+32
5 3482
LT V = 30 E D -DWID -GRAD

-
- ET- .
+ $5 I = 1 + .2 - I DET- 1+3956 35
DESIGN ELEVA ON = 2

BASE Df
HARGE
=
A
EGlN
BADE C = 50
FS 8% ( 2J '
BASE FR OUENCY = A RS DET- ta.l3+ 4.34 I+)<}I61 ~ I+I ~~• 604
A HW T! = A T 25 J -~ 25
OVERTOP JNG DISC ARGE = A Fs

OVERTOP
!NG FRE
ENCY=
A
RS LEV. = 26.06 ~ ! OP
OVERTOP 1NG ELEV TION = A T X T P
15 15
PJ = r6 00.00 10 11
EL = 5.6T
40 vC = ~"
K= 7
Ds = 5 m h SfTE 3 EMP IMP CT IN S TE 4
URFACE ATER
3 PR POSED DE TEMP FILL PRO OSED G E TEMP IM ACT IN
SURFACE WATER

--
-

---
___
___
EXISTIN
GRADE
__
(-
nlg%
(+)O,3
00% _~
~ \
~ EXISTI G GROU D J ~ / ~
2
BM' 1 E EV.3122' 42" EQUALIZE PIPE

N 262,7
0.!421 E
2218,96
4783 EXISTING GROUND T P 42" CS
2 ~ 7
'CSP

R/R S
KE SET
IN 18" P
E to 15.86-D CL EL -17.

10
- -
+ IN IN=20.3 STA ~ +b Ei-
1

NOTE: B NCH MA K W1 IS LOCATE
OUTBID OF TH PROJE T L1MIT .

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .6

P
.~ ~
D 5 10 PROI. REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
N
m ~ B-4029 X-6
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 '
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

DET- 8+65 49
78. 4' LT
of of
WI
I WI
I
3J N Q~ d _ -
- .~
- -
---- .~
--

----

---- 3 - --
-~

~

ss.z
ssr
.z+sro
ss zasso I
I I 5 ~aR ` -- ---
----
--
--- ---- --- - --
I
14+
0.00
'

SIT Z SIT 1

IMPA IN SU FACE
-DET 18+ 5
86 IMPA 5IN WATE
. SURF CE WATE
5.53' L

P IMPA
IN
of TEMP IM CT IN

S
RFACE W
TER
WI of
wl
SURFACE
WATER
~, I
----

- 4J Ji }:I ~ T~ ¢~ ---
---

---

--~
ss.zmaz ss.zaere ss.vaz I
13 +
0.00 ss.

SIT Z
- ET- 1 +66. 6
70.8 ' LT
« TEMP FI L °ol

m
of
w IN W D l
I w
I
w g ~,~ N 0~ 3 31 _~,Q4~-- - Q 3i
w -- - - - -
- --- --- ---- I I ~~

a
~
z
-- ~
~-
i
2
5

I
`i
Ss 2A4 --- ---- --- --- -
---
---
--- --
- ---- --- ----
----
--

w~r
w~~
"~" ~ 13 + 0
00 ~
«~~
wew
~~~
rwa
~naz .
>w¢
v~ww
wwcn
ww~
waw
~~~
mw~
~w~

o

o

t

t

lD

l

0

0

0

o

a

1

-'

-

I

o

o

a

t

t

l

t

o

A
~ I a
e~...~
0
Id~I.I IN.~ Y ~ ~N9
DO NO USE FOR ONSTRU ON

. ~
"' 0 5 10 PROD. REFERENCE N0. SNEET N0.
m ~ B-4029 X-7
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

DET- 0+14 05
78 41' LT
of
WI of
W~

:I ~M~x
QLLN1 q
a ~~

3

d

----

-
J1

--
---
---- - r 3
I
- _

' --

I
3

I
s529~a ---- -- ---
---
----
--
----
---
----
--
~ 15 + 0.00 ~

SIT 3

TEMP MPACTI
SURF CE WATE

- ET- 1 + 64. 1 . - -

80.0 ' LT
a~
Q~OB

Jy

SS 19.915
55.1
471 i

15 +~

j0.00 - -- ---- ---- --- ---- -_

- ET- 1 + 15. 2
80.1 ' LT
p o~ of
a
p 5. 296/6
SS
f79 W~ W
pp

p -_ ___ ___-
__-_
--_-

V.~W

i 552BJ07

T-

-

-

--

-

---

---

---

p / ;

I -

--

---

----
---
----
--- --- - ---
----
---

--
p
w
q
Z Z 5 0

21 0

55 29307 70 5 27319
p~

pptl
pqp
ppM
14 +
0.00
ppp
oaf
~pQ
~
~w
~pw
pp~ r
pp~
ppp
wpp«
ppw

1 0

1 0

1 0

1

0 1 0

1 0

2

1
-

1

0

0

0

0

1

0 1 0

)

0 1

6 Q11~

RNLI INA Y P .DNS
DO NO USE FOR ON5TRU ON

1 ~
a
0
[~i
U
W
0

• y ~ [-11 1 ~ `~i' ~ N ®i `l ~ l l ~ , [ U ~ ~~ ~ ~ L \ [ 11 vin a~n woMx ~w~eas ea ~T
®I~I~I®N ~~ HI~~xI-I`VA~~ .c*~_ X4029
33396.1.1 BRSTP-21D 6 PE
33396.2.1 BRSTP-210 6 RrW 8 UTIL
BLADBII t COUNT Y
LOCATION: BRIDGE N0.8 OVER DIVERSON CANAL ON NC 210
R/tiV PLANS
TYPE OF WORD GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, ~ STRUCTURE
NAD ay95
4 ~
BEGIN TIP PRO ECTG END TIP PRO ACT B~1129
BE 1N BRIDGE
II II %~
- ~ I I II I I I /%/
- t 1 C ~ ~Z./~ II ~~~~
~%
~ II II ~%
/I~~
i
--~. ~
--
-_-_-~,,,~ MC 2~p 268 BSr
er 2v 263 Bsr ---'---____--
.._ :., .
--
_., _
\ I ~ I 111
II /
°~ 1
f ~ ~ -~ ~~I I - --- ~ ~ A1\
11 I I i ~ ~ ~
w
r- -~,,
NCDOT CONTACT :CATHY ROUSER, P.E.
~ l ROADWAY DESIGN-ENGINEERING COORDINATION

a
a
V
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
~ 50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2008 = 1083
°_ ADT 2028 = 1691
mN
~n PLANS DHV = 10 %
Qoc°v 5 25 0 50 100 D 60%
a
OU
za T = 20% '
*Q
r° PROFILE )HORIZONTAL) y = 60 MPH
o O
"m
'-o 1 5 0 l0 20 • TTST 15% DUAL 5%
°z ~ ~ V FUNC.
RURAL MAJOR
oa v PROFILE (VERTICAL) _
CLASS -COLLECTOR
N...,

(THIS PROJECT IS NOT INCLUDED WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIE51
PROJECT LENGTH
Length Roadway TIP Project B-4029 = 0.288 Miles
Length Structure TIP Project B-4029 = 0.015 Miles
Total Length TIP Project B-4029 = 0.303 Miles
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II
Prepxad to rm Orrroe a: HYDRAULICS 1£NGINEJ
THE ~ ~ THE LPA GROUP of Norlh Carding, p.a.
LPA Sp00 falls of Meuse Rd., Suite 304
GROUP Ems. Raleigh, Norlh Carolna 27609
rnaHSPOatanoN caxsulruas
uos sraaun srecmmarravs
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JEANNE K. RICHTER. P.E. ROADWAY DESIGN
SEPTEMBER 21 2007 Pawscr IDYGOi~" ENGINEER
LETTING DATE: IODY L COLE
Pgolacr nesrea axcn~g
PRELIMINARY PLANS
oo~~~~~
DMSION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
s
PE I ___ Pd
See Suet 1-A Foi Index or Sheets

e ~ `
Note: Not to Scale

*S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.•
State Line -•
County Line ---
Township Une ---
city Une --
Reservation Une -
Properly Une -
Existing Iron Pin
Property Comer
Properly Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line -x
Proposed Woven Wire Fenu
Proposed Chain Unk Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary - - -
Proposed WeNand Boundary
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.•
Gas Pump Vent or WG Tank Cap
Si
gn
W
ll
e
Small Mine
Foundation
Area Outline C
Cemetery
B
ildi
ng
u
h
S
l
c
oo
Ch
h
urc
Dam
HYDROLOGY.•
Stream or Bady of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
Spring
Wetland
Proposed lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
Fahe Sump
t
m
RAlLROADS.•
Standord Gauge

RR Signal Milepost
csy rawswacru~av
~
ncrosr ~s
switch D

RR Abandoned swncx
~- -»- ~- -
RR Dismantled --------
RIGHT OF WAY.•
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker ~
Existing Right of Way line -
Proposed Right of Way Line ~ ~~
Proposed Right of Way line with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way line with
Concrete or Granite Marker
Existing Control of Access - -;.~-
Proposed Control of Access ~ ~~~
Existing Easement line - -E--
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement- e
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement- -roe-
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement - -POE-
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement -rue -
ROADS AND REL9TED FEATZIRES.•
Existing Edge of Pavement --
Existing Curb -•
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut - - - ~ - - -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F---
Proposed Wheel Chair Ramp
Proposed Wheel Chair Ramp Curb Cut -
Curb Cut for future Wheel Chair Ramp - cr
Existing Metal Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail '
Existing Cable Guiderail "
Proposed Cable Guiderail "
Equality Symbol 0
Pavement Removal
I~EGETATlON.•
Single Tree -
Single Shrub -
Hedge
Woods Une -
Orchard
Vineyard
0
,~
4 0 Q Q
vmey°ra
EXISTING STRUCTURES.•
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert ~ax~
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - ~ caxc w.
MINOR:
Head and End Wcll ~ w
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge ~-~~~~
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or 18 ^~B
Paved Ditch Gutter -----
Storm Sewer Manhole ps
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES.•
POWER:
Existing Power Pole j
Proposed Power Pole b
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Une Tower
Power Transformer 0
U4i Power Cable Hand Hole p
H-Frame Pole
Recorded USG Power Une
Designated llG Power Line (S.U.E.')
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole t
Proposed Telephone Pole ~
Telephone Manhole pr
Telephone Booth p
Telephone Pedestal p
Telephone Cell Tower ~.,
l1f Telephone Cable Hand Hole
Recorded lLG Telephone Cable
Designated lVG Telephone Cable (S.U.E.')- - ---~----
Recorded USG Telephone Conduit ~~
Designated WG Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.'j- - - - -~"- - - -
Recorded USG Fiber Optia Cable ~ •^-
Designated WG Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.'r - - - -~ °°- - -
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter o
water valve
Water Hydrant
Recorded WG Water Line
Designated lLG Water line (S.U.E.")--- - - - -•- - - -
Above Ground Water Line ,ye .°,,.
N:
N Satellite Dish p
N Pedestal
N Tower
UG N Cable Hand Hole p
Recorded USG N Cable ~•
Designated WG N Coble (S.U.E.') - - - -~~- - - -
Recorded USG Fiber Optic Cable -~• ~°-
Designated U~G Fiber Optic Coble (S.U.E.'r - - - -~~ ~°- - -
GAS:
Gas Vabe ~
Gas Meter
Recorded lJK'i Gas line
Designated WG Gas line (S.U.E.") - - - -°- - - -
Above Ground Gas Line "" `°°
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sower Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout p
lYG Sanitary Sewer Une ,:
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer ,~c s°oHary sa.e~
Recorded SS Forced Main Line ,u-
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.') - - - - -,u_ _ _ _
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole ~
Utility Pole with Base ~
Utility Located Object o
Utility Traffic Signal Box m
Utility Unknown USG Line _>u„-
USG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil O
AEG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
USG Test Hole (S.U.E.') ~
Abandoned According to Utility Records - AATUR
End of Information E.O.I.
S°i°.~°9°E ~F NORTH C.~R~1LIN.~
IDIVI3I~N ~F HIGIHW.~~S
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
0
n
-.
-x-X-
e
e
9
-~^- - - -
-ae-
W-
~n-
0
0
s
0
w
5~

----~
____J
-is- -
-BZ1-
-BZ Z-

'
SURVEY C011lTROL SHEET 8-4029
BL
c ~i POINT DESC NORTH EAST ELEVATION L 6TATIOrv OFFSET
.

A
8
3
BL~3
262687.5861
2218918.5401
26.20 ... .
OUTSIDE PROJECT .. ... .......
LIMITS
~ 4 BL~4 263208.5308 2219005,9882 23.99 7.22,96 16.48 RT
N 5 BLS 263926.5512 2219095.2918 27,09 14.45.67 21.15 RT
6 BL~6 264861.1989 2219118. H52 30.74 OUTSIDE PROJECT LInlT6
1 GPS 84029-I 2656a5.0527 2219184.0852 30.48 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
c
m
v
u
m
P
N
B
O
D
0
u
r
v
a
0
P
"m
a
m
c
m
i
0
0
LL
a
0
u
BMI ELEVATION 31.22
N 262771 E 2218619
L STATION 6.56
5 4a• 03' 3a.3' w DIST 520.20
R/R SPIKE SET IN IB INCH PINE
BEGN CONSTRUCTION B-4029
8 BEGN TIP PROJECT 8-4029
-L- PC 6+56.38
BN• I -DET• PC a+y.03
LOCALIZED COORDINATES
N-263144.6265
E=2218981,0573
.- TO NC 53

NC OOT BASELINE STATION -BL-3 NC DOT BASELINE STATION -BL-4
POT 5+00.00 PING 11+07.27
LOCALIZED PROJECT C OORDINATES LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES
N=262607.5861 N=263208.5308
E=2218918.5401 E2219005.9882
ELEV.= 26.20' ELEV.= 23.99'
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY
N000T FOR ApNU1ENT 'T8 NE A'
rITH NAD (983195 SUTE PIANE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHING: 284257.4T94(ft) FASTING: 2249859.4242(ft)
THE AVERAGE COA431NED GRlO fACiOR USED ON THIS PROJECT
(GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.99993925
THE N. C. LAA~ERT GRID BEARING AND
LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM
"78 AEA" TO -L- STATION 6+56.38 IS
31.406.23' BEARING 5 55.38'17" r
ALL LINEAR OlNEN510NS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES
VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVO 8B
BN2 ELEVATION 26.46
N 263946 E 2218726
L STATION 14.32 3a8 LEFT
R/R SPIKE SET IN 12 INCH PINE
8
BIA• 2
END CONSTRUCTION 8-4029
END T~ PROJECT B-4029
-L- POT 22.56.9(=
-DET- PT 27+22.84
LOCALZED COOROB4ATE5
N-2644,6265 I
E=22189&.0513
NC DOT GPS STATION (8-4029-II
POT 35+52.38
LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES
N=265645.0527
E=2219184.0852
ELEV, = 30.48'
6
S
NC DOT GPS STATION IB-4029-2)
LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES
N=266139.4677
E=2219244.5477
ELEV. = 27,79'
T-
NC DOT BASELINE STATION -BL-S
PINC IB+30.83
LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES
N=263926.5512
E=2219095.2918
ELEV. = 27,09'
NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
TO NMY 41-~
r
NC DOT BASELINE STATION -BL-
PINC 27+65.75
LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATE
N=264861,1989
E=2219118.1452
ELEV.= 30.74'
NOTES:
1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING
PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT.•
HTTP~FYWW.NCDOT.ORGDOH/PRECONSTRUCT/HIGHWAY/LOCATION/PROJECT/
THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
89029 LS CONTROL 060912.7X7
SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT IF FURTHER
INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
® INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL
BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM.
NETWORX ESTABLISHED FROM EXISTING HARM MONUMENTATION
SEE GP5 CALIBRATION SHEET FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATE VALUES.

~ ¢

~ y
SEE SHEETS 4~ FOR -L- AL~IV~IENT AND PROFILE

tip BEGIN CONSTRUCTION ~N~ e-+~,y~'
-DET- PC STAJIt19.03 =
/h. -L- PC STA6t5638
r
w•~m ~~.
AOMWAY D61GN NYOUIMIC
ENGINFN 9+GINff1
1'
PRELIMINA Y PLANS
I~ no nm uk rai vcrwN
g~ ~' i
~~~ 'LIFT' POCSfn ~f55,q
01 f!( N~71I~
NeAOwAU ~'
t nQ i W
~ ~ n v. ,e i ~ _ R.?
~ 14 , 15 16 17 18 19 20

__ -

St TAI ttH
twr re sear
1
aw D r
YIN.O~lS it.
fAOM STA21 •1100 TO fTA.22 F22,90 -OEf_ RI,

~,~
0 _-
~~ ~~,~,~
~.~ _
_E
_~E TYV,
r r r -,~ GI_AU sso E~
NAD 8395
~.
~:
SEE SHEETS 4~ FOR -L- AUGN~IENT AND PROFILE
~c~ - r~ ~ra.ut~g =
- POT Sfa.22f569!
ww sN~T No,
ROADWAY DESIGN NTDRAULICS
~~ e+ciNSa
W NOT U!~ tOR

i ,
Group 46 Finel Dasign\84029\Roedwey\Proj\64029.rdy_psh03.dgn
C
v~
',~j C ~
~~
®~
z
O ®®
~ ~~
~~
~ ~n
C ~~
~ ~®
~ z
y ~
y

i~.
~- ~.
.....,..._`5.......
~~ ~
~Sb KhwAAS PI SIO KH#99
~ + 59' 2Tl'(LT! ~~ 5T80'2Ae~IRf `~
0 ~ NS~296' D ~ !~ A96 I
R~~ R~~50D~0'
~ N/A QS' N/A
e,.
.E _.
E
siECU~ cur arch
uNED vuclus 'e' ui RM
STA u.00 ro AA u.ee-~- Er
sEE oETUE n
-t-
_ a { N,Q6' 0 '
- rr^~~ ~ _l;zi ~ .87
^rYe+~~l~S-~ "g: -C-+50.00 5600'ET. _
'01 M ~m ,;<1s:oa RA
- r T h M ~
BEli1N RESU AdNG '~ PDC'Sa.lJ N~ r,dY1- Arshi.
el6• z m
~W =N~r ~.
ROADWAY DESIGN MlDMUl10
ENGNVFFN DVGNJEER

1'

PRELIMIN RY PLAN.
I W N07 UK CONITIIV[iN1N

y ' ~
sec rloM ENO a AiiR suu ro
-s- srA a+er u

112.00 lT.
l
E-•
hf_ `- ~ E ~
T
W ei
+ (n
56.00' Ei ^
OHNEO ,`ioo{+
f
O
F f - rI
rt
E
Sd.Q~.ITS W
`:; ' , 2
r :. ~ ,~ ~ 'I'IUi AA- ~
TO T01 qF BEAM
e \ ISiI, iAY R6AI T
`~ 1 ~ ssao~a ,,. Q
-t- srAN+a>vo ~ -
- - Rrl
,~- -• •--- -- -- --:.... __ ..._...---- --~- - 5..: ; , '', - +61.00
- ;
"`"" "' SEE SHEET 5 fOR DRIVEWAY PROFRES
--
~
B~•
BM• I ELEV
3I22' _ ~ STRUCTURE HYDRAUUC DATA 2 E(.EV.26.46
. R S~K.8062 E 22r8T261657
N 262T2oJ421 E 2218,967.4783 ` QES~P Q~l
A!iBE • hVSTAPoCAf. R/
E SET IN 12 P/NE
'' R/R SPIKE SET IN I8'PINE - - OESICN fIEEOUENGY ~ N/A YRS -BL- STA 18+04.38 368
68 LT
-BL- STA 6+18.43 320'CT - Iqy
MI' EIEYAT hT .
-L- STA 14+3225 34825 LT
BASE • N~
A~7IAAGE l~S -DET- STA /9+03.96 268.36 U
r
BASE fREalENCY + N/A YRS
NOTE: BfNCk NARK 9 !5 LOCATED
__
_
_
_ BASE Hw EIEVATrgM ~ N/A fT -
OUTSIDE OF THE PR OJECT UNITS. _ : _: _ ;. aERIgPPlAA3 - + ieao CFS
_ - - ~ :

~
a
ER/gPPlAI9 FAEGlI
5Q0
-
.
_ . . _ _ _ - 5t Il ~
~
aERrIOPP-NS EIEV
_, s

.. _
_ a
.. : ._
.. _.
._
EL ~
ffi39
-
EL ~
~1G'
EL - 8et~"
_ ~. ~' K~ 130'
_-:
K~~ . .

_
_. _ _lk ~bb _ .; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~

_
_ -

_

_.

_

_

r. _

_

_
f

_

_

_

.

_
_.

-
_....
...I.
.~ ..
_.. ..
..
_....
.__.
._.
...
.._._
.., ._. _

- -

,T,N
-
_. _ _ro « ..
. -. ~. .. .... . _. .. .. .._. - ,~. er. _ ..-

6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 13 14 1 5 16

^
4 {- ~ ~~
h
~qp 395
,° ,; BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-~0
F~ ~ BEGIN ,OVERLAY
,~
~, ~ , - ~ ,
i ~ N 4141b 26~W .,: .. ~., _
-_=.r ~~ _
...-~-- .. I _
r '--- --_
rcr~
PI SYa 7+~PAb
04P'48~2T1
D
s
A ~ IAA?'
TAI I
S DITCH
~NOe to seeiu front
;~ ~:
GfoUW
Wn.O= L5 it.
inter foeAe BDx. O= L0 it.
Typ• of Llner= CIO!• 9' Rlp•Rap
FROM STA. 14+D0.00 i0 STAI4+68.0 - lT.
y~2
-01 Of N~7fT~
NAD 395
osrDles
-L- srA.li.es.sa
Lr.

ilee~d
M .axe ~s~w~ia
l
_
>~ ew y B= 4.0 Ft.
w» ti o= Ls Ft.

e= EO ft.
MLsi~
I lwnOr •
le t/.111pi Mel 1
~ ~ ~-~+4om .....~...~
. ~ {_ +00,00 lll"' 65.00' lT. ; ~.
sane u. ~
,: R E~
-,
____ E ~. -
_ _~__ .-r..-~ _~ ---
--
yi:
I •- eau . nTn,n - • =inw u•T---- ~-
-
x
IIOORt ET Ip6JA1[S 6 ~ -
~ RR- n m,
~t wM
w
' ~ ~r~°Lsr~a+e5~'~i
~
< ~ ~

-t-
PlSto r5+81A2
~ ~ 5'~'069'(LT1
D ^ 11]R~41'
T ~ ~50~
R + ~'
~~ ~
~' - STA i5+B7 lT~ Ma >w O

,
Z
W ~ a N ~}
~~
t
~ E_
E
_~~
W E~
-+
59.00' lT
R _.
I
., ti - AT-1
,~~~r~-t_ - ____
RW SNfff NO.
l~~~L~- ~~ ROADWAY D61GN MYUMUUC
ENGYREEA BlWNffA
END OVERLAY > ~
-+-
~
''-
S
yy
5

PRELIMIN RY PLAN
m Nm un omvnwucrtoN
~,.,~
. " E-~,_
E
~ ..-...- __...- __
-~s~sc
_.
-•---- Rlai$r 4nar
_ , ~
o p
,__. ~
__ ____ irp-__ ____ r o-__-_~ _ ..T---
__- Tf, ~~_~ __ caoo PN PK"
.`\~f_
___ ,.,. ,., - h' __ _. _ _ _.
- _.. __ _ _
~ W ~ - _ - -TLS 4xn EIP~ _ _ _ _ _ \ 1 .
~.` "' -------- 'T
._- -
__. _, _ ~ ~ I-BL- 6 PNC 21+65.75 ~ ~ ,
- '~ - I, 1 V
~ ~- 1. I 1 i
__ _- ~
- -
i I ;% 1 , _
~ ~ E. ~ ~ ___ I ~1 ?
I ~ t .__ ~~ __ \ `.:
6EBIN OVERUV ~ `~1 ' I ~

~'~ - ~ ~
-
i
~
-----~ _ ~'
~' +~r
~ n-

~ +
~ ~
~ 1 ~

I
~ /
i:

~l ?~
V

~;rr ~
K

~ \~ ~
~ ~~
-~..~. -
._ a ~
_ I ~ I
I +r~ ~ I
~, _ . ~ 1
_ _. _-_ _ ._ _.._ ._ 1 ,
Mal
SEE SHEET 4 fOR -DWI- AND DW2- PUW VIEW
n
SEE SHEETS 2B EC FOR -DET- AiM1V,YENT ANO PROfKE
ll Li/1
:..-
r ~
~r EL + I;'93R
a
EL s ~'
.. _. n/.. .y. N..

l
T ... ...

._ ~~ _. _.

~

.~

_-

10 ~~

Approximate quantfiies only. Unclassified excavatbn, fine grading clearing and grubbing,
PROD. REFERENCE N0. SHEET No.
and removal Mexisting pavement will be paid for at the lump sum puce for "Grading. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Bd029 X.,
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NOTE: EMBANKMENT COLUMN DOES NOT INCLUDE BACKFILL FOR UNDERCUT CROSS.SECTION SUMMARY

~ Stations Uncl. Exc, Embt Stations Uncl. Exc. Embt Stations Uncl. Exc. Embt r -- -
__ -- .

-- DET (cu.yd.) (cu.yd) L (cu.yd.) (cu.yd) _
- - DET REM (cu. d.
_ - ---
- --- - -_ _
-
11+19.03 0
-- 0
-_ 11+00.00 D 0 g+g2.46 0 0 ~I -
--
11+50.00
0
0
11+50.00
30
14
9+00 00
0
0

-
_ ___ , 12+00.00
---- 0 0 12+00.00 43 21 9+50.00 12 D

- 12+50.00
_-_ 0 0 12+50.00 13 40 10+00.00 41 D
13+00.00 9
- _ 1 13+00.00 2 64 10+50.00 s7 0 -- -~ -
13+50.00 12 12 13+50.00 7 195 11+00.00 125 1
-- - -
-_

-- 14+00.00

- --- - 11 34 14+00.00 18 166 11+50.00 98 1
- -----

_ _ - 14+50.00

--- 10 44 14+50.00 _ 58 17 12+00.00 63 0
--- _ _. __

- _ 15+00.00
-- s

-- 55

- 14+55.00

_
- 7

-- 2

- - -
_ - 12+50.00 67 1
--- i
- -- 15+50.00
-- - 3 78 ------ - 13+00.00 _
90 - ----- '-- - - -- -- - ---------rt----

_ - - + ' 0

- 7 ~ 13+50A0 238 0
-- -

- - -- -
16+50.00
- -
7
_ 50 -
14+00.00
202
4 --- - ___
-',
~_

- - - -- - 17+00.00

-- 0 59 14+50.00 21 267
- i _ ---
t
- 17+50.00
- --- 0
_ 116
__ Stations UnCL Exc. Embt 15+00.00 332 263 ~ r

_
--- -
-_ 18+00.00
0 -
_- 385 --
L
(CU.yd.)
(cu.yd)
15+50.00
381
- - ~ -

- ---- - --

-
1 +50.00
0
-
354
16+00.00
113
0 - _ ----

+ 0.00
1a2
52
15+35.00
D
D
__
16+50.00
115
0 --

- - -
19+50.00
--
142
540
15+50.00
6
10
17+00.00
91
1 - --- -
20+00.00 0 649 16+00.00 17 48 17+50.00 74 4 ;
+50.00 D 223 16+50.00 15 51 18+00.00 _
5a 7 _
-fi - - -- --
21+00.00
0
- - --
198

__ -
17+00.00
8
32
18+50.00
39
7

_-__--_.--_;

21+50.00

0

127
-
17+50.00

0

i9

1g+00
00

67 _

- --

~- _ - _
--- -

_ 22+00.00

2

54

18+00
00

18

14 .

19+50
00 6

-_ -
-_ --- . . 72 4

- ---1 --- -_- -___
22+50.00
_28
tt
18+50.00
18
8
20+00.00
35
1 -- _
I ____- __ 23±00.00 52 1 18+60.00 0 0 20+50.00 n 1 ~ -- -'~
23+50
00 39
- -- -

--~ -- - -
.
3
--
-
20+99.37
0
0
i

-- - f - 24+00.00

-- 19 6
- -- _
-- -- - ---

- - --
- - --

- __-_-, __
_
25+00.00
s
11 -_ - - - -- _ - - -I -- -
-
_. _ -- --
--
---------
-
10 i

26+00.00
-- ~----
- ~ -
- -- _

- __ r -- •---- -
26+50.00
- -
0
---
0 --- --- _ -- - - ---. - -- - - ----- -- - -- - -- -- - ---- - - --=--- - -
r ----

- --- ~-
-----

7+00.00 -

~ -
--___

--~ -
_-

- -- -

-

-

- -__

--

---

__:_ . -_ ~ --'------

- -----i -- - - - - .-

7+22.84

0

0 -- - ----
-- -
--
-
-- --------~- ----L-

- ---_
~

-- - --
t -- -
I

- ---

I

;

- -

_
----

~

--

-

- -

-

-

-
- -

-

_
- I -
---

I ~ ~

-
~-
- ~ _

.-_
~
- -
-- -- ' - _ ~ ~ .~ - ~ ~ -- - -
---~ ~
-r - ~
T
-- --- --- - -
'
-- - ---
- -
t ~ - -- I--
- --
~ _-
- -- ~ - ~ - -' -- - Ir- --
- - i --- ~- - - -- -
i
-
-
I
I
-- __
- _ -- - - - --- -- . _ - _-
- - -~
--~ - _ ~
'

-t- - -~---- ~ - -
__- - - - --
- ----
',
~_
-
---- --
- -~ ~ --- -
- ~
- ~ - - --
- ~ i
_ i __
- -t ----
---
_
- - - ----- - - - --
--

-- -- -
j -
i -
~
,
---
_
_
_ ~
I -- ~ -
--- -~- _
--
a
- - -- _ ,
, _ __
r-
--~ -- =
;-
~ j
---
- - _
__- ~ ___ 1
-
-
_- _

--
-
- -
--~

-- ---- --
- -- 7--- - --- - _ +
_
- ~ -
_ 1--------
i -- - ,- - - ----- ~-- I ~ -~--
---- 1 -

- - ~
- - T
- - ~ ---- --- -- --
-
- - ' i
~- ~
- --
--

- _ -
- ~-_
~ ~

-

* - -_
---
- ~ F
~ - - - - ~ - - --

I i
~
`~
- I- -- -- i _ -- ---- -- - -----~ -. -
- - , - - ---
I, - - - - - f-_ ------ _ _ s _ -±- 1- - - - r
- - ----
i _ - -- ~ - I __ _ - ---

~i

~ ~ 1
~

--{
,
}

~
1
~,.~ ~
_.
~
_
-
t--
j
I
T;-

~

.
- ~ ,
'~ _..

-
~
r _.. ,
+~-~, ,

.
-r-`-h-:- -

~ - --~ -- ~
_ ~ }t r
~
'
~ t+~j ti~ ~YII.. +Fr+~-
f

_
+
r 1 _

c"
~
~O t'
~ . -
- I i rig F r~ i r
1 i ~. I
~
f t ~ i i f' rl
~ ~
4- I { ~ ~h
I ~-~~~ ~,. 4i l
~ -~ i
11 i ft
I ~~ ~ i
i ~'_~

~ ` ~ '~r r' ~ +_- C`' r , i Di li ~~~ '; ~ ,~; ~ ~: - r , ~ t' r~:i ~ , ,~ ~~{ I ~~' ~~i , ~ $-
~ ~ ~l ' r i • _
- t~
z
~ i
;
~ ,..
~ r;'
{ -
~ n
-i_ i.
$ t
~
I
~
'I
~ ~ l _
i tit _. I
, ; ~ ~, .il !, ~ ~ . i ~ ~ ~ ~,~! ~,
1
- - - rr

t'

NC 210
Bridge No. 8 Over a Canal
Bladen County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-210(6)
State Project No. 8.1421501
WBS No. 33396.1.1
TIP No. B-4029
Categorical Exclusion
United States Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
And
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Approved:
~~
D to regory J. Thorpe h.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
/~
Date ohn .Sullivan III, P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration

- NC 210
Bridge No. 8 Over a Canal
Bladen County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-210(6)
State Project No. 8.1421501
WBS No. 33396.1.1
TIP No. B-4029
Categorical Exclusion
Apri12006
Document Prepared by:
THE LPA GROUP OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A.
Richard B. Davis, P.E.
Project Manager
~~ ~~~ ~..Q~FESSIpjq~.i9 "~:
_~ SEAL l~
6944
s
~~~~Fj~,GrNE~q~~ ~~c,~~~:
~~. Q••.....~•~Q.•••`
'90' •
For the North Carolina Department of Transportation
Vincent ,
Project De opment Engineer

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
NC 210
Bridge No. 8 Over a Canal
Bladen County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-210(6)
State Project No. 8.1421501
WBS No. 33396.1.1
TIP No. B-4029
In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit #23 and #33 Conditions, the General
Nationwide Permit Conditions, Section 404 Conditions, Regional Conditions, State
Consistency Conditions, NCDOT's Guidelines for Best Management Practices (BMPs)
for the Protection of Surface Waters, the North Carolina Department of Transportation's
(NCDOT) Guidelines for Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and
Removal, General Certification Conditions, and Section 401 Conditions of Certification,
would all apply to the proposed bridge replacement project. There are no special
commitments associated with the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 8.
Categorical Exclusion Green Sheet
April 2006 Page 1 of 1

NC 210
Bridge No. 8 Over a Canal
Bladen County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-210(5)
State Project No. 8.1421501
WBS No. 33396.1.1
TIP No. B-4029
Table of Contents
Page Number
Project Commitments 1
Introduction 1
I. Purpose and Need Statement I
II. Existing Conditions 1
III. Alternatives 2
A. Project Description 2
B. Build Alternatives 3
C. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study 3
D. Preferred Alternative 4
IV. Estimated Costs 4
V. Natural Resources 5
A. Methodology 5
B. Physiography and Soil 6
C. Water Resources '7
1.0 Waters Impacted ~
2.0 Water Resource Characteristics ~

2.1 Best Usage Classification and Water
Quality 7
2.2 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring 8
2.3 North Carolina Index of Biotic Integrity 8
2.4 Section 303(d) Waters 8
2.5 Permitted Dischargers 8
2.6 Non-Point Source Discharges 8
3.0 Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Water
Resources 8
3.1 Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and
Removal 9
D. Biotic Resources 9
1.0 Plant Communities 10
1.1 Disturbed-Maintained Communities 10
1.2 Mesic Pine Flatwoods 10
1.3 Pine Plantation 10
1.4 Wetland Communities 11
2.0 Wildlife 11
2.1 Terrestrial Wildlife 11
3.0 Aquatic Community 12
3.1 Aquatic Wildlife 12
4.0 Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities 12
4.1 Terrestrial Communities 13
4.2 Wetland Communities 13
4.3 Aquatic Communities 15
E. Special Topics 16

1.0 Waters of the United States 16
1.1 Wetlands 16
1.2 Jurisdictional Streams 16
2.0 Permits and Certifications 16
2.1 Section 404 16
2.2 Water Quality Certification 16
3.0 Mitigation 17
F. Protected Species 1 g
1.0 Species Under Federal Protection 18
2.0 Federal Species of Concern 24
VI. Cultural Resources 26
A. Compliance Guidelines 26
B. Historic Architecture 26
C. Archaeology 26
VII. Section 4(f) Resources 26
VIII. Environmental Effects 27
IX. Public Involvement 29
X. Agency Comments 29
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Estimated Costs per Alternative 4
Table 2. Plant Communities Occurring within the B-4029 Study Area 13
Table 3. Jurisdictional Wetlands within the B-4029 Study Area 15

a
Table 4. Federally Listed Species for Bladen County, NC 18
Table 5. Federal Species of Concern (FSC) Listed for Bladen County,
NC 25

B-4029 Bridge Replacement
WBS No. 33396.1.1
Bladen County, NC
_ NC 210
Bridge No. 8 Over a Canal
Bladen County
Federal-Aid Project No. BRSTP-210(5)
State Project No. 8.1421501
WBS No. 33396.1.1
TIP No. B-4029
INTRODUCTION: The replacement of Bridge No. 8 is included in the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) 2006-2012 Transportation Improvement
Program and in the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement Program. The location is shown on
Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is classified
as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion".
I. PURPOSE AND NEED
The NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency
rating of 37.8 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered to be
structurally deficient. The replacement of this inadequate structure would result in safer
and more efficient traffic operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project is located in Bladen County on NC 210 approximately 1.0 mile north of the
junction of NC 53 (Figure 1). The surrounding land use in the study area consists of
forested areas, residential properties, industrial property (Squires Hardwood), and
wetlands.
Bridge No. 8 was constructed in 1966 and currently has a posted weight limit of 23 tons
for single vehicles and 27 tons for truck tractors with semi trailers (TTST). The overall
length of the two span bridge is 61.0 feet, with a bed to crown height of 10.0 feet. It has
a clear roadway width of 29.5 feet carrying two travel lanes. Bridge No. 8 has a
prestressed concrete channel superstructure supported by a substructure consisting of
timber piles with concrete caps.
In the vicinity of the bridge, NC 210 is a 22-foot, two-lane roadway with 2-foot paved
shoulders and a total shoulder width of eight feet. The existing bridge is in a horizontal
tangent and is skewed 90 degrees to the roadway. The north approach alignment has a
slight curve beginning at the end of the bridge and then becomes tangent. The south
approach alignment has a small 100-foot tangent section beginning at the end of the
bridge which transitions into a slight curve. Both approaches have good sight distances.
The north vertical grade falls away from the bridge with a sag located approximately 100
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
1

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
feet from the north end of the bridge. The south vertical grade also falls away from the
bridge with a sag located approximately 300 feet from the south end of the bridge.
The speed limit is posted at 55 miles per hour (mph), and NC 210 is classified as a Rural
Major Collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System.
The current (2006) traffic volume of 1000 vehicles per day (vpd) is expected to increase
to 1600 vpd by the year 2025. These volumes include 5 percent dual tired vehicles and
15 percent TTSTs.
No crashes were reported in the vicinity of the bridge during a recent three-year period.
There are no utilities attached directly to the structure; however, there are overhead
power lines along the east side of NC 210, and overhead telephone, cable, and fiber optic
lines along the west side of NC 210.
There are two school bus crossings of the bridge daily. In a letter dated March 24, 2003
(see letter in Appendix), Mr. Richard Dunham of the Bladen County Schools stated that
there are no suitable detours available if road closure were necessary.
The studied route does not contain any bicycle accommodations, nor is it a designated
bicycle route; therefore, no bicycle accommodations have been included as part of this
project.
A letter dated August 31, 2004 was sent to Bladen County Emergency Management
soliciting comments on the possible alternatives for the proposed bridge replacement. No
response was received regarding which alternative Emergency Management would
prefer.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
The proposed project would consist of replacing Bridge No.8 on NC 210 over an
unnamed canal, with a wider and safer structure that would lead to safer and more
efficient traffic operations.
Based on.a preliminary hydraulic analysis that was conducted in conjunction with a field
reconnaissance of the site, the proposed replacement structure for Bridge No. 8 would be
a 90-foot long bridge. The replacement bridge would provide a clear roadway width of
32 feet, carrying two 12-foot wide travel lanes with two 4-foot offsets (Figure 3B).
The roadway approaches would provide two 12-foot travel lanes with 6-foot unpaved
shoulders (Figure 3A). The roadway grade would be approximately the same as the
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
2

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
existing roadway. The design speed of the roadway approaches is 60 mph, with a posted
speed of 55 mph.
B. Build Alternatives
There were three Alternatives considered for the replacement of Bridge No. 8. These
Alternatives are outlined in detail below:
Alternative 1
Alternative 1 would replace the existing bridge with a new structure constructed in the
same location as the existing bridge (Figure 2A). Alternative 1 would utilize an on-site
detour on the east side of the existing bridge to maintain traffic during construction.
Permanent approach work would extend approximately 450 feet south of the bridge and
approximately 435 feet north of the bridge for a total length (including the bridge) of 975
feet. The detour structure would consist of two 84-inch diameter corrugated steel pipes
and would be located approximately 45 feet, centerline to centerline, east of the existing
bridge. The detour roadway would provide two 12-foot travel lanes with 2-foot paved
shoulders and a total shoulder width of 6 feet (Figure 3A). The total length of the
temporary detour is approximately 1,100 feet.
Alternative 2
Alternative 2 would replace the existing bridge with a new structure constructed in the
same location as the existing bridge (Figures 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D). Alternative 2 would
utilize an on-site detour on the west side of the existing bridge to maintain traffic during
construction. The permanent approach work would extend approximately 450 feet south
of the bridge and approximately 435 feet north of the bridge for a total length (including
the bridge) of 975 feet. The detour structure would consist of two 84-inch diameter
corrugated steel pipes and would be located 45 feet, centerline to centerline, west of the
existing bridge. The detour roadway would provide two 12-foot travel lanes with 2-foot
paved shoulders and a total shoulder width of 6 feet (Figure 3A). The total length of the
temporary detour is approximately 700 feet.
Alternative 3
Alternative 3 permanently realigns NC 210 approximately 45 feet centerline to centerline
west of the existing bridge, utilizing the existing bridge to detour traffic during
construction (Figure 2A). Approach work would extend approximately 1,300 feet south
of the bridge and approximately 1,300 feet north of the bridge for a total length of 2,600
feet.
C. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study
The "Do-Nothing" Alternative was eliminated from further study because the existing
bridge is considered functionally obsolete and structurally. deficient. Over time the
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
3

8-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
bridge would continue to deteriorate and would eventually need to be closed completely.
Due to daily traffic flow considerations and lack of a usable alternate route this
alternative is not an option.
The option of utilizing anoff-site detour to maintain traffic during construction was
considered (Figure 1). The off-site detour would utilize SR 1550 (Beatty's Bridge Road),
SR 1201 (Beatty's Bridge Road), and NC 11/53 as a detour route. This off-site detour is
approximately 21.6 miles long and crosses five bridges and one culvert. Bridge Numbers
43, 67, 83, and 85 are in Bladen County, and Bridge Number 8 is in Pender County.
None of these five bridges have posted weight limits. The secondary roads utilized by
this detour would require upgrading to handle the truck volume now using NC 210. With
an additional travel time of 22 minutes over the expected detour period of six to eight
months, the delay for this off-site detour is considered to be unacceptable under NCDOT
guidelines.
D. Preferred Alternative
Alternative 2, replacing the bridge in its existing location and using a temporary on-site
detour to the west was selected as the Preferred Alternative. Alternative 2 was selected in
order to minimize impacts to the adjacent timber business and natural resources. The
plan sheets for the Preferred Alternative are included in Figures 2B, 2C, and 2D.
IV.. ESTIMATED COSTS
Table 1. Estimated Costs per Alternative

ALT 1 ALT 2
(Preferred
Alternative)
ALT 3
Roadway A roaches $205,200 $280,450 $408,880
Proposed New Bridge $229,500 $229,500 $229,500
Tem orary Structure $60,000 $60,000 $0
Structure Removal $21,600 $21,600 $21,600
Misc. & Mobilization $138,700 $172,450 $52,020
En ' eerin & Contin encies $95,000 $111,000 $168,000
Total Construction Costs $750,000 $875,000 $1,350,000
Right of Way and Utilities $23,200 $18,650 $23,800
Total Pro'ect Cost $773,200 $893,650 $1,373,800
The estimated cost. of the project as shown in the 2006-2012 NCDOT Transportation
Improvement Program is $1,100,000 including $100,000 spent in prior years, $25,000 for
right-of--way, and $975,000 for construction.
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
4

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
A. Methodology
Published information and resources were collected prior to the field investigation.
Information sources used to prepare this report included the following:
• United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute quadrangle maps (Kelly, NC
1988)
• NCDOT aerial photograph of the project area (2000)
• Soil maps and descriptions of the soils found in the project area (Bladen County
Soil Survey, Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS] 1990)
• North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) basin-wide assessment
information (DWQ 2002)
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service (iJSFWS) list of protected and candidate
species (USFWS 2003)
• North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP 2004) files of rare species and
unique habitats
Water resources information was obtained from publications posted on the Internet by
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division
of Water Quality.
The USFWS provided a list of threatened and endangered species known to occur in
Bladen County on December 30, 2003 (updated March 14, 2006), prior to the field
investigation. Information concerning species under state protection was obtained from
the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats. NHP files were reviewed for
known locations of species on state or federal lists and locations of significant natural
areas on March 29, 2004.
A field investigation was conducted within the project study area by THE LPA GROUP
of North Carolina, p.a. (LPA) biologists on June 10, 2004. The project vicinity is an area
extending 0.5-mile from the study area. The study area for B-4029 extends approximately
1,100 feet north of the existing bridge and approximately 1,200 feet south of the existing
bridge (approximately 0.4 miles), and encompasses a 200-foot wide corridor centered
along the existing centerline of NC 210.
Water resources were identified, and their physical characteristics were recorded. For the
purposes of this study, a habitat assessment was performed within the project study area.
Plant communities and their associated wildlife were identified using a variety of
observation techniques, including active searching, visual observations, and identifying
characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, tracks, scats, and burrows). Terrestrial
community classifications generally follow Schafale and Weakley (1990), where
appropriate, and plant nomenclature follows Radford et al. (1968). Biotic communities
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
5

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.I.I
were mapped using sub-meter accuracy Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and
aerial photography of the project site. Vertebrate nomenclature follows Potter et al.
(1980), Martof et al. (1980), Rhode et al. (1994), the American Ornithologists' Union
(2001), and Webster et al. (1991).
Jurisdictional areas were identified using the three-parameter approach (hydrophytic
vegetation, hydric soils, wetland hydrology) established in the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The
boundaries of the jurisdictional areas were flagged and mapped in the field using sub-
meter accuracy GPS equipment. Jurisdictional wetland azeas were characterized
according to a classification scheme established by Cowardin et al. (1979).
B. Physiography and Soils
The project study azea is located within the Coastal Plain physiographic province of
North Carolina. The topography is characterized as nearly level to gently sloping.
Elevations range from approximately 25 to 30 feet above mean sea level (USGS 1988).
Surrounding land uses include agricultural, residential, commercial (a timber company),
and forested lands.
According to the Bladen County Soil Survey, the project study area is located within the
Wasda-Torhunta-Croatan soil association (MRCS 1990). Soil associations contain one or
more mapping units occupying a unique natural landscape. Mapping units are named for
the major soil series within the unit, but may contain minor inclusions of other soil series.
The soil survey describes Wasda-Torhunta-Croatan as nearly level, very poorly drained
soils that have a muck surface layer and a loamy subsoil or underlying material, or have a
loamy surface layer underlain by a loamy and sandy subsoil; rarely to frequently flooded.
These soils occur on broad flats, in depressions, and on low terraces in the eastern part of
the county.
There aze seven soil series mapped within the project study azea which include:
• Lynn Haven and Torhunta soils (Typic Haplaquods and Typic Humaquepts);
• Leon sand (Aeric Haplaquods), 0 to 3% slopes;
• Croatan muck (Terric Medisaprists), rarely flooded;
• Wasda muck (Histic Humaquepts);
• Croatan muck (Terric Medisaprists), frequently flooded;
• Centenary sand (Entic Haplohumods); and,
• Lakeland sand (Typic Quartzipsamments), 1 to 7% slopes.
Lynn Haven, Torhunta soils, Leon sand, Croatan muck (rarely flooded), Croatan muck
(frequently flooded), and Wasda muck are all listed as hydric soils for Bladen County by
the NRCS (1991). Centenary sand and Lakeland sand both have hydric inclusions of
Leon in lower positions.
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
6

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
_ WBS No. 33396.1.1
C. Water Resources
1.0 Waters Impacted
The project study area is located in the 03-06-20 sub-basin of the Cape Fear River Basin
(DWQ 2004a), and is part of the USGS hydrologic unit 03030006 (EPA 2004). The
project study area includes of one body of water, an unnamed, man-made canal.
According to USGS topographic maps the canal connects Colly Creek to Frenches Creek.
Since the canal is unnamed it is not assigned a Stream Index Number (SIN) by the North
Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality
(DWQ 2004b). Given that this canal connects to Colly Creek less than one mile from the
site, Colly Creek would be considered the water body that has the main potential to be
impacted. Colly Creek has been assigned the SIN 18-68-17 by DWQ (DWQ 2004b).
2.0 Water Resource Characteristics
The canal (unnamed tributary to Colly Creek) is a manmade canal that exhibits features
of perennial flow. At the time of field observations the flow was very slow over a
substrate with a very high organic content. The unnamed canal would provide a warm
water habitat. There was no scour observed at the bridge and water depth at the bridge is
estimated at three to four feet. The channel width of the man-made canal is
approximately 30 feet, with a bankfull width of approximately 35 feet. The banks are
- steep (near vertical in places) and are approximately four to six feet in height from the
bed to the top of the bank. The canal is very straight and the study area encompasses a
slow moving run approximately three to four feet deep. Because the canal is man-made,
it cannot be assigned to a particular Rosgen stream type (based on visual observations)
(SRI 2005).
2.1 Best Usage Classification and Water Quality
Colly Creek has been assigned a Best Usage Classification of C Sw (DWQ 2004b). The
C indicates fresh waters that support aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing,
wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. Secondary recreation would include,
wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with the water where such
activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental matter. There are no
restrictions on watershed development or types of discharges (DWQ 2004c). Point
source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted in these waters, pursuant to Rules
.0104 and.0211 of 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 2B; local programs
to control non-point source and stormwater discharge of pollution are required. The
supplemental classification "Sw" designation refers to Swamp Waters, which have low
velocities, low pH, and low dissolved oxygen (DWQ 2004c).
There are no Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), or
Sensitive Water Supply Watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) waters within three miles up or
downstream of the study area (DWQ 2004b). Colly Creek and the unnamed canal are
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
7

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
not listed as North Carolina Natural and Scenic Rivers, nor as National Wild and Scenic
Rivers (NPS 2004).
2.2 Macroinvertebrate Monitoring
There is a basinwide monitoring station approximately four miles southeast of the study
area on the Lyons Swamp Canal at NC 11 (DWQ 2000a). This site was sampled by
DWQ in Mazch of 1998 and received a rating of Fair (DWQ 2000a).
2.3 North Carolina Index of Biotic Integrity
There is a DWQ Fish Monitoring Station located approximately 20 miles northwest of
the study azea on Colly Creek at US 701 (DWQ 2000b). This site was sampled on May
19, 1998 by DWQ and received a rating of Good-Fair (DWQ 2000b).
2.4 Section 303(d) Waters
None of the water resources within the project study area are designated as biologically
impaired water bodies regulated under the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA)
§303(d) (DWQ 2002b).
2.5 Permitted Dischargers
There are no permitted discharges within afive-mile radius of the project area (DWQ
2000x).
2.6 Non-Point Source Discharges
LPA biologists reviewed aerial photography and conducted a limited visual observation
of potential non-point source (NPS) discharges located within and near the study azea.
Atmospheric deposition from passing vehicles and run off from a timber company facility
adjacent to the canal were identified as potential sources of NPS pollution near the
project study area.
3.0 Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
Short-term impacts to water quality such as sedimentation and turbidity may occur during
construction related activities. Impacts from sedimentation and erosion would be
minimized during construction by the use of a stringent erosion control schedule and by
the use of BMPs. The contractor would follow contract specifications pertaining to
erosion control measures as outlined in 23 CFR 650 Subpart B and Article 107-13
entitled "Control of Erosion, Siltation, and Pollution pursuant to NCDOT's Standard
Specifications for Roads and Structures." These measures include: the use of dikes,
berms, silt basins, and other containment measures to control runoff and the elimination
of construction staging areas in floodplains and adjacent waterways. Additional
measures that could be taken to avoid water quality impacts would include keeping heavy
Categorical Exclusion ~ April 2006
8

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
equipment out of the channel, keeping staging areas out of wetlands, and also keeping
live concrete out of the channel. After construction activities were completed, abandoned
approaches associated with the existing structure and/or temporary detours would be
removed and re-vegetated in accordance with NCDOT guidelines.
Other impacts to water quality that would be anticipated as a result of this project
include: changes in water temperature due to more exposure to sunlight (from the
removal of vegetation beside the canal), increased shade due to construction of new
structures, and changes in stormwater flows due to changes in the amount of impervious
surface adjacent to the channel. However, due to the limited amount of overall change in
the surrounding areas, impacts would be expected to be minimal and temporary in nature.
The Division of Water Quality, NCDENR, has not classified the waters of the Canal
(unnamed tributary to Colly Creek), but other water bodies that drain into Colly Creek
and including Colly Creek, have been classified as C Sw. Waters with the Best Usage
Classification of C Sw fall into the category of a Case III stream according to Best
Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal (BMP-BDRs). A Case III
stream has no special restrictions other than those outlined in the BMPs for Protection of
Surface Waters.
3.1 Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and Removal
Section 404-Z of NCDOT's Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures is labeled
Removal of Existing Structures. This section outlines restrictions and BMP-BDRs, as
well as guidelines for calculating maximum potential fill in the creek that would result
from demolition. These standards would be followed during the replacement of Bridge
No. 8.
There is the potential that the superstructure could be dropped into Waters of the United
States during the demolition and removal of Bridge No. 8. The superstructure consists of
prestressed concrete channels with a weather surface. The maximum (worst case)
potential fill resulting from demolition activities would be approximately 46 cubic yards.
D. Biotic Resources
Terrestrial and aquatic communities are included in the description of biotic resources.
Systems described in the following sections refer to the dominant flora and fauna
observed in each community during the field investigation. Descriptions of the terrestrial
systems are presented in the context of plant community classifications. These
classifications follow Schafale and Weakly (1990) where possible. Representative faunal
species that are likely to occur in these habitats (based on published range distributions)
are also cited. Scientific nomenclature and common names are used for the floral and
faunal species described. Subsequent references to the same species are by the common
name only. Fauna observed and/or heard (in the case of bird species) during field
investigations are denoted with an asterisk (*).
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
9

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
1.0 Plant Communities
Distribution and composition of plant communities throughout the project study area
reflect landscape-level variations in topography, soils, hydrology, and past and present
land use practices. The presence of NC 210, agriculture, development, and forestry
practices have resulted in the present vegetation patterns. Four terrestrial plant
communities occur within the study area: disturbed-maintained communities, mesic pine
flatwoods, pine plantation, and wetland communities. A description of each community
type follows.
1.1 Disturbed-Maintained Communities
Disturbed areas within the project study area have been combined into one general
community type, described as a "disturbed-maintained community". This community
includes types of habitat that have recently been or are currently impacted by human
disturbance including regularly maintained road shoulders and commercial property
(timber company). Photographs of these communities can be found in Appendix A. The
majority of these habitats are kept in aloes-growing or early successional state.
The road shoulder is dominated by passion flower (Passiflora incarnata), dog fennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), Solidago altissima, pokeweed (Phytolacca americana),
grasses, and plantain (Plantago sp.).
1.2 Mesic Pine Flatwoods
Mesic pine flatwoods are located throughout the Coastal Plain and Sandhills. Mesic pine
flatwoods occur on mesic (non-wetland) sites, either flat or with rolling coastal plain
sediments, neither excessively drained nor with a significant seasonal high water table.
This forest type is on the south side of the existing bridge and is divided by NC 210. It is
a relatively flat area that borders wetlands within the study area. The study area appears
to have been logged and ditched. Therefore, some upland areas appear to be relic
wetlands drained by ditching. The dominant tree species in the canopy of the upland
south of the existing bridge area includes: loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Ater
rubrum), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and persimmon (Diospyros virginiana).
Dominant understory/shrub species observed include winged sumac (Rhus copallina).
The dominant species observed in the herbaceous layer is bracken fern (Pteridium
aquilinum).
1.3 Pine Plantation
There is a large pine plantation located northwest of the existing bridge along NC 210.
The dominant tree species in the pine plantation is loblolly pine. The pine creates a dense
overstory, blocking sunlight and allowing a sparse or absent understory and herbaceous
layer. Understory species may include red maple, tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera),
and sweet gum. Woody vines such as poison ivy (Tozicodendron radicans) and green
• Categorical Exclusion April 2006
10

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
briar (Smilax sp.) may also be present. Additional species observed in the community
include reindeer moss (Cladonia sp.) and prickly pear cactus (Opuntia sp.).
1.4 Wetland Communities
Four wetland areas are present in the study area: Wetlands A, B, C, and D. All four
wetlands are floodplain wetlands, but ditching seems to be in the process of altering
hydrology. This is evident by the presence of man-made lateral ditches and strong
evidence of hydric soils. While these areas still display wetland characteristics, the
hydrology has been altered. Wetlands A, C, and D are predominately forested and no
evidence of inundation was observed.
The dominant tree species in the canopies of Wetland A, C, and D include: sweet gum,
water oak (Quercus nigra), red maple, and pond pine (Pinus serotina). Dominant
understory/shrub species observed include: sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana), blueberry
(Vaccinium sp.), and gallberry (Ilex sp.). The dominant species observed in the
herbaceous layer was cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea). The dominant woody vine
species observed in the study area was wild grape (Vitis sp.).
Wetland B also consists of some forested areas, but the majority of the wetland is in a
low growing open area (possibly a relic clear cut) with a very dense herbaceous/woody
vine layer dominated by green briar (Smilax glauca), red maple saplings, Virginia willow
(Itea virginica), sweet bay, sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), and cinnamon fern.
Wetlands in the study area cannot be given a Schafale and Weakly classification due to
the disturbance of vegetation and hydrology.
2.0 Wildlife
The study area was visually surveyed for signs of terrestrial and aquatic wildlife. Little
wildlife was observed during the field investigation. Fauna likely to occur in the study
area based on published ranges are also included.
2.1 Terrestrial Wildlife
Bird species observed or likely to occur in the study area include such species as
American robin (Turdus migratorius), rough-winged swallow* (Stelgidopteryx ruficollis)
(found nesting under bridge), blue gross beak* (Guiraca caerulea), yellow-billed
cuckoo* (Coccyzus americanus), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), Carolina
chickadee (Parus carolinensis), brown thrasher (Toxostoma rufum), catbird (Dumetella
carolinensis), rufous-sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), pileated woodpecker
(Dryocopus pileatus), yellow-bellied sapsucker (Sphyrapicus varius), blue jay
(Cyanocitta cristata), tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor), and golden crowned kinglet
(Regulus satrapa).
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
11

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
_ WBS No. 33396.1.1
Mammals observed or likely to occur within the study area include such species as
eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), opossum (Didelphis
virginiana), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), and
white-tailed deer* (Odocoileus virginianus).
Terrestrial reptiles observed or likely to occur in the study are include garter snake*
(Thamnophis sirtalis), green anole* (Anolis carolinensis), black rat snake (Elaphe
obsoleta), milk snake (Lampropeltis triangulum), common king snake (Lampropeltis
getulas), and Eastern box turtle (Terrapene Carolina).
Terrestrial amphibians likely to occur in the study area include such species as American
toad (Bufo americanus), Fowler's toad (Bufo woodhousei), mud salamander
(Pseudotriton montamus), northern cricket frog (Acris crepitans), and the four-toed
salamander (Hemidactylum scutatum).
3.0 Aquatic Community
The aquatic communities consist of organisms within the man-made canal. A visual
survey of the canal was conducted to document the aquatic communities. No aquatic
vegetation was observed in the canal during the field assessment. Vegetation found in
the wetland communities is described in Section 1.4.
3.1 Aquatic Wildlife
Fish species expected to occur in drainages within the project vicinity include mosquito
fish (Gambusia affinis), creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus), and the redbreast sunfish
(Lepomis auritus).
Aquatic reptiles observed or expected to occur in the study area include such species as
snapping turtle (Chelydra serpintina), yellowbelly slider (Trachemys scripta), mud
snake* (Farancia abacura), and banded water snake (Nerodia fasciata).
No aquatic amphibians were observed in the study area. Species expected to occur in the
study area include dwarf mudpuppy (Necturus punctatus), bull frog (Rana catesbeiana),
and pickerel frog (Rana palustris).
Suitable habitat exists in the study area to support wood duck (Aix sponsa), mallard (Anas
plaryrhynchos), and great blue heron* (Ardea herodias).
4.0 Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities
Impacts to terrestrial and aquatic communities associated with the replacement of the
existing bridge and related detours are discussed in the following sections.
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
12

~~
B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
4.1 Terrestrial Communities
Plant communities located within the study area total 10.57 acres (Table 2). These areas
are based on a 2,330-foot long study area with a width of approximately 200 feet, situated
on the centerline of existing NC 210.
Table 2. Terrestrial Communities Occurring within the B-4029 Studv Area
Plant Area
Communi (acres) Potential Im acts (acres)
ALT 1 ALT 2 (Preferred ALT 3
Alternative)
Perm. Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm. Temp.
Wetlands 1.51 0.03 0.10 0.03 0.13 0.16 No
Mesic Pine 1.70 No 0.21 No 0.03 0.03 No
Flatwoods
Pine 1.19 No No No 0.11 0.15 No
Plantation
Man 6.17 0.09 1.09 0.09 1.05 1.54 No
Dominated
Total 10.57 0.12 1.40 0.12 1.32 1.88 No
(acres '
Total for
ALT

(acres) 1.52 1.44 1.88
rerm. - rermanent impacts
Temp. -Temporary Impacts
Impacts to wildlife resulting from the proposed project would be minimal due to the
limited amount of habitat that would be impacted. Permanent impacts would be confined
to the existing road shoulders and minimal fill in the adjacent wetlands. Although some
loss of habitat immediately adjacent to existing road shoulders would result, these areas
are of limited value to wildlife that may utilize them.
4.2 Wetland Communities
Temporary impacts include those impacts that would result from the demolition of the
existing bridge and construction of the replacement bridge and/or temporary on site
detour (Table 3). Alternative 1 (temporary on-site detour to the west) would result in a
total of 0.10-acre of temporary impacts to Waters of the United States. The Preferred
Alternative, Alternative 2 (temporary on-site detour to the east) would result in a total of
0.13-acre of temporary impacts to Waters of the United States. Alternative 3
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
13

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
_ (realignment) would result in no temporary impacts to Waters of the United States.
There is also a jurisdictional ditch within the study area which provides a hydrologic
connection between otherwise isolated wetlands. This .ditch serves as a hydrologic
connection only, and does not exhibit wetland characteristics. Impacts to this ditch
would be minimal, and the ditch would be relocated to prevent permanent impacts from
construction. The moving of the ditch would maintain the hydrologic connection
between otherwise isolated wetlands. BMPs would be employed by the construction
contractor to first avoid and then minimize impacts to Waters of the United States.
Erosion and sedimentation would be controlled by implementation of a Sediment and
Erosion Control Plan during construction. Any areas of Waters of the United States that
are temporarily impacted would be restored to their original condition following
completion of the disturbance activity.
Permanent impacts to Waters of the United States are those impacts that occur in areas
within the construction limits where clearing would occur or areas would be permanently
filled or excavated (Table 3). Permanent impacts to water resources associated with the
replacement of the Bridge'No. 8 in its current location (Alternates 1 and 2 [Prefer: edJ)
would be limited to 0.03-acre. The realignment of the bridge to the west (Alternative 3)
would permanently impact 0.16-acre of water resources. Fill would be placed in
wetlands adjacent to the existing roadway for improvements to the bridge approaches.
The existing bridge is 60 feet long and sits on timber piles. The replacement structure is
a 90-foot long bridge.
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
14

B-4029 Bridge Replacement
_ WBS No. 33396.1.1
Table 3. Anticipated Impacts to Waters of the United States
Bladen County, NC
Jurisdictional
Areas ALT. 1 ALT. 2 (Preferred ALT. 3
Alternative)
Perm. Tem Perm. Tem Perm. Tem .
Wetland A 0.01 0.10 0.01 None None None
Wetland B None None None None 0.02 None
Wetland C None None None 0.01 0.04 None
Wetland D 0.02 None 0.'02 0.12 0.10 None
Total (acres) 0.03 0.10 0.03 0.13 0.16 None
Total
Wetland
0.13 0.16 0.16
Impacts
(acres)
Jury sdictional
Ditch Impacts None 0.02 None 0.03 0.04 None
(acres)
Stream
Impacts None None None None None None
(acres) '
Stream
Impacts None None None None None None
(linear feet)
Total Stream
Impacts No Impact No Impact No Impact
(linear feet)
Perm. -Permanent Impacts
Temp. -Temporary Impacts
4.3 Aquatic Communities
Permanent impacts to, water resources would be limited to 0.03-acre of fill material
placed in wetlands adjacent to the existing roadway for a temporary onsite detour, and
0.16-acre of fill for realignment. Fill would be placed in floodplain wetlands adjacent to
the existing roadway for improvements to the bridge approaches. Therefore, impacts to
aquatic communities would be minimal.
Temporary impacts to aquatic organisms could result from increased sedimentation
during construction. Aquatic invertebrates would likely drift downstream during
construction and recolonize the disturbed area once it has been stabilized. Sediments
have the potential to affect fish and other aquatic life in several ways, including the
clogging and abrading of gills and other respiratory surfaces, reducing the amount of
available habitat due to the filling of wetlands, and altering water chemistry. Increased
sedimentation may also cause decreased light penetration through an increase in turbidity.
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
15 '

B-4029 Bridge Reptacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
NCDOT's BMPs for the protection of surface waters would be enforced to reduce
impacts during demolition and construction phases.
E. Special Topics
1.0 Waters of the United States
1.1 Wetlands
Jurisdictional wetlands in the project study area are palustrine in nature, as defined in
Cowardin et al. (1979). Palustrine systems include all non-tidal wetlands dominated by
trees, shrubs, persistent emergents, emergent mosses and all wetlands where salinity due
to ocean-derived salts is below 0.5% (Cowardin et al. 1979). Wetlands A, C and D are
dominated by broad-leaved deciduous vegetation and are saturated, giving them a
Cowardin classification of PFO1B. Wetland B is dominated by low growing broad-
leaved deciduous vegetation and is saturated, giving it a Cowardin classification of PSS 1.
1.2 Jurisdictional Streams
An unnamed, man-made canal is located within the study area. This unnamed canal
exhibits a perennial flow, and by definition is classified as Waters of the United States.
Based on review of the USGS topographic map, the• soil survey, and an on-site GPS
survey there are approximately 2001ineaz feet~of canal within the project study corridor.
2.0 Permits and Certifications
The following federal permits, state permits, and certifications would be required prior to
beginning construction.
2.1 Section 404
In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the CWA (33 United States Code [USC]
1344), a permit would be required from the USACE for the dischazge of dredged or fill
material into Waters of the United States. Because of the project is being documented as
a Categorical Exclusion, it is expected that the project would qualify for a Nationwide
Permit 23, which applies to approved Categorical Exclusions. In addition, a Nationwide
Permit 33, which applies to temporary construction, access, and dewatering would be
required if temporary construction is required that is not described in the Categorical
Exclusion. The realignment of the road (Alternative 3) could require the use of
Nationwide Permit #14 for linear transportation projects.
2.2 Water Quality Certification
Section 401 of the CWA requires that the state issue or deny a Water Quality
Certification (WQC) for any federally permitted or licensed activity that may result in a
dischazge into Waters of the United States. Section 401 Certification allows surface
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
16

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of the construction or other land
manipulation. Issuance of a 401 Certification from the DWQ is a prerequisite to the
issuance of a Section 404 permit. If the general conditions of the corresponding WQC
will be met, written concurrence from the DWQ will not be required.
3.0 Mitigation
Mitigation has been defined in NEPA regulations to include efforts which: a) avoid; b)
minimize; c) rectify; d) reduce or eliminate; or e) compensate for adverse impacts to the
environment (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1508.20 [a-e]).
Federal Highway Administration policy stresses that all practicable measures should be
taken to avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands, which would be affected by federally
funded highway construction. A sequencing (step-down) procedure is recommended in
the event that avoidance is impossible. Mitigation employed outside of the highway
right-of--way must be reviewed and approved on a case-by-case basis.
Avoidance -Wetlands and Waters of the United States are present along both sides of
the proposed project. Because the project involves replacement of an existing structure,
it may not be possible to avoid all impacts to adjacent wetlands caused by improvements
to the existing bridge approaches and replacement of bridge piers. Impacts can be
avoided to streams and wetlands with the incorporation of an environmentally sensitive
design. Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters can be avoided by bridging the stream
channel, avoiding construction in the stream channel, and avoiding deposition of fill
material in the stream channel during construction. Wetland impacts can be avoided by
selecting an alignment, or temporary detour to avoid impacts when possible.
Minimization -Impacts to the adjacent wetlands would be minimized by using 3:1 fill
slopes through wetlands on temporary construction, and no lateral ditches would be
constructed in wetlands. Selecting an alignment or temporary detour that avoids
wetlands to the greatest extent possible can also be used to minimize wetland impacts.
The selection of Alternative 2 as the Preferred Alternative minimizes impacts due to
temporary construction. Stream impacts can be minimized by designing support
structures that avoid open water habitats whenever possible. Utilization of BMPs would
be required of the contractor to further minimize wetland impacts.
Compensatory mitigation -According to the conditions of the Nationwide Permit, the
USACE would determine if the impacts are minimal and would at the same time
determine if compensatory mitigation is required. Temporary impacts to Waters of the
United States would be considered permanent by the USACE until areas are restored to
their original condition. The restoration is subject to approval by the USACE. Per the
conditions of the Nationwide Permit, if the roadway is realigned, the abandoned bridge
approaches must be removed and area must be reestablished as wetland. Alternatives 1, 2
(Preferred), and 3 would impact approximately 0.1-acres or more of wetlands; therefore,
wetland mitigation may be required by the USACE if one of these three alternatives are
selected. None of the alternatives would impact streams in the project area; therefore,
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
17

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
stream mitigation would not be required. Final mitigation decision rests with the
USACE.
F. Protected Species
Rare and protected species listed for Bladen County, and potential impacts to these
species as a result of the proposed project are discussed in the following sections.
1.0 Species Under Federal Protection
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially
proposed (P) for such listing, are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Seven federally protected species are listed
for Bladen County (LISFWS database dated March 7, 2002, Bladen County List updated
March 14, 2006) (Table 4). Afield investigation for potential habitat was conducted
within the project study area by THE LPA GROUP of North Carolina, p.a. (LPA)
biologists on June 10, 2004. Approximately six hours were spent performing the
investigation, which included searching a 0.5-mile radius for red-cockaded woodpecker
cavities.
Table 4. Federally Protected Species Listed for Bladen County. NC
Common Name Scientific Name Status* Biological
Conclusion
Vertebrates
American alligator Alli ator mississi iensis T (S/A) Not Ap licable
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus T (PD) No Effect
Red-cockaded
woodpecker Picoides borealis E No Effect
Shortnose stur eon Acipenser brevirostrum E No Effect
Vascular Plants
Southern s icebush Lindera melissi olia E No Effect
Rough-leaved
loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia E No Effect
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana E No Effect
*E -Endangered, T(S/A) -Threatened due to similarity of appearance, T(PD) -Threatened, proposed
delisting
Source: IISFWS database dated March 7, 2002, updated March 14, 2006. Web Address: h : //~:c-
es. ~s. ov/es/cotrn r.html
American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis)
The American alligator is listed as Threatened due to its similarity in appearance to other
protected crocodilians. However, no other crocodilians occur within the state of North
Carolina. Adult males typically reach 13 to 15 feet in length, and females reach lengths
of just under 10 feet (FLMNH 2002).
Categorical Exclusion
April 2006
18

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
American alligators can be found in a variety of estuarine aquatic habitats including
swamp forests, mazshes, large streams, canals, ponds, and lakes (Martof et al. 1980).
Juveniles prey upon a wide variety of small invertebrates, particulazly insects, and small
fish and frogs. As they grow larger, their dietary range increases to include consequently
larger prey. Eventually, large adults can overcome nearly all aquatic and terrestrial prey
that comes within range, but their diet primarily consists of fish, turtles, relatively small
mammals, birds, and other reptiles including small alligators (FLMNH 2002).
Based on a review of NHP records, there are no documented occurrences of American
alligator within athree-mile radius of the project area.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: Not Applicable
Analysis Details -
Methodolo~y: Analysis of the possible presence of and potential impacts to the
American alligator was conducted through an evaluation of existing information,
and assessment of the habitat requirements. Additionally, the NHP element
occurrence database was consulted on March 29, 2004.
_ Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Adult bald eagles have a white head, white tail, and a large yellow bill, with the rest of its
plumage being dark in color. Immatures are dark with light splotching on the body,
- underwing coverts, flight feathers, and tail base. The bird averages 31 to 37 inches in
length with a 70 to 90 inch wingspan (NatureServe 2003b).
Breeding areas aze normally within 2.5 miles of coastal areas, bays, rivers, lakes, or other
bodies of water that can provide them with their main food sources; fish, waterfowl, and
seabirds (NatureServe 2003b). Manmade reservoirs provide an excellent habitat for bald
eagles (TPW 2004). The bald eagle preferably roosts in conifers or other sheltered sites
in the winter, and it will typically select large accessible trees for roosting areas.
However, in some ,areas it is common to see eagles roosting in both coniferous and
deciduous trees. Eagles avoid azeas with human activity nearby (boat traffic, pedestrians)
and development (buildings). Nest sites are usually in tall trees or on cliffs near water.
The bald eagle will nest in a variety of trees including, pines, spruce, firs, cottonwoods,
oaks, poplars, and beech. Ground nesting has been reported on the Aleutian Islands in
Alaska, in Canada's Northwest Territories, and in Ohio, Michigan, and Texas. Nests
located on cliffs and rock pinnacles have been reported historically in California, Kansas,
Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah, but currently are known to occur only in Alaska and
Arizona (NatureServe 2003b). Nests are usually re-used and enlazged every year. They
can reach 20 feet in diameter and weigh up to 4,000 pounds (FWS 1999).
Based on a review of NHP records, there are no documented occurrences of bald eagle
within athree-mile radius of the project study area.
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
19

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect
According to the NHP element occurrence database records, there are no known
occurrences of bald eagle in the project vicinity. There are no large open waters
near the project study area that could be used for nesting, or foraging habitat by
the bald eagle. The proposed project would have No Effect on this federally
threatened (proposed for delisting) species.
Analysis Details -
Methodology: Analysis of the possible presence of and potential impacts to the
bald eagle. was conducted through an evaluation of existing information, and
assessment of the habitat requirements. Additionally, the NHP element
occurrence database was consulted on March 29, 2004.
Red-cockaded woodpecker (RCVS (Picoides borealis)
The RCW is a cardinal sized seven to eight inch long, black and white woodpecker with a
black cap on its head. It has a ladder pattern on the back and large white cheeks, which
are unique among woodpeckers in its range (Audubon 2004). It is distinguished by two
red streaks on each side of the black cap, which are referred to as cockades. There are
normally only visible on adult males (NWF 2004).
Nesting habitat for the RCW is made up of large open pine stands (pine flatwoods and
pine dominated savannas) that are typically at least 80 years of age with little or no mid-
- story. Fires that occur as a result of lighting strikes often naturally maintain this habitat.
Foraging habitat is comprised of open pine or mixed pine/hardwood stands 30 years of
age or older (Henry 1989). Nests are typically constructed 33 to 43 feet off of the ground
in live pines that have been infected with red-heart disease. These nests can sometimes
take several years to construct and are often reused. The RCW constructs resin wells
below the opening to the nest to create a sticky coating on the bark of the tree; this
coating protects the nest from predators such as rat snakes. The sticky coating has a
shiny appearance, which allows the nest cavities to be easily seen from the ground. Red-
cockaded woodpeckers forage in a wide variety of pine species and especially favor areas
that contain large trees due to the large surface area of loose bark. They feed on adults,
larvae, and eggs of arthropods, especially ants and termites that they find by flaking bark
from the tree (Audubon 2004).
NHP records document two occurrences ofred-cockaded woodpecker within athree-mile
radius of the project study area. Red-cockaded woodpecker occurred approximately 1.25
miles north and less than 1.0 miles southeast. These occurrences are listed as historic by
the NHP, meaning that they occurred more than.20 years ago.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect
The NHP has documented RCW occurrences within the project vicinity, however
these occurrences were documented more than 20 years ago and the RCW has not
been documented since. There are no mature pine-dominated stands that could be
used for nesting, or foraging habitat by the red-cockaded woodpecker. Also, no
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
20

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
. WBS No. 333.96.1.1
cavity trees were observed within a 0.5-mile radius of the study area. Therefore,
the proposed project would have No Effect on this federally endangered species.
Analysis Details -
Methodology: Analysis of the possible presence of and potential impacts to the
red-cockaded woodpecker was conducted through an evaluation of existing
information, and assessment of the habitat requirements. Additionally, the NHP
element occurrence database was consulted on March 29, 2004.
Shorttnose Sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum)
The shortnose sturgeon is a large fish, which can weigh up to 50 pounds and reach
lengths of 43 inches (FishBase 2004). It has a heterocercal tail, short shovel-shaped
(bluntly V-shaped) snout (not upturned at tip), with large fleshy barbels. It has a ventral
mouth, with large bony scutes on the head, back, and sides (paler than adjacent skin).
The anal fin origin is beneath the dorsal fin origin. The color of the back is dark brown
to black, with light brown to yellow lower sides, and white a stomach (NatureServe
2003a).
The shortnose sturgeon inhabits rivers, lakes, estuaries (usually most abundant in
estuaries), and bays; occasionally enters the open sea (FishBase 2004), and will usually
stay within a few miles of land while at sea (NatureServe 2003a). The shortnose sturgeon
may spend most of the year in brackish or saltwater moving into freshwater to spawn
(FWS 2003d). These fishes reportedly prefer deep pools with soft substrates and
vegetated bottoms, but individuals may vary in preference for various water depths and
substrate types (NatureServe 2003a).
Based on a review of NHP records, there are no documented occurrences of Shortnose
Sturgeon within athree-mile radius of the project study area.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect
According to the NHP element occurrence database records, there are no known
occurrences of the shortnose sturgeon in the project vicinity. Brackish or salt
water used by the shortnose sturgeon for foraging is not present within the project
study area. Also, the deep freshwater pools utilized by the shortnose sturgeon for
spawning, are not present within the project study area. The proposed project
would have No Effect on this federally endangered species.
Analysis Details -
Methodolo~y: Analysis of the possible presence of and potential impacts to the
shortnose sturgeon was conducted through an evaluation of existing information,
and assessment of the habitat requirements. Additionally, the NHP element
occurrence database was consulted on March 29, 2004.
Southern Spicebush (Lindera melissifolia)
Southern spicebush is also known as pondberry and is a stoloniferous, deciduous,
aromatic shrub that can grow up to 13 feet tall. Southern spicebush usually occurs in
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
21

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
clones of numerous stems with erect or ascending shoots and few branches. The alternate
drooping leaves are subcordate with prominate venation and pubescence on the lower
surface (USDA 2004). The leaves smell like lemony-sassafras when crushed. Small pale
yellow flowers bloom in early spring before the leaves have developed, and the bright red
fruits often persist on the plants after the leaves have died in the Fall (NatureServe
2003c).
The species occurs in lowland habitats with hydric soils, that are usually flooded in
winter (USDA 2004). These lowland habitats include seasonally flooded wetlands, such
as floodplain hardwood forests, forested swales, along the margins of sinks, ponds, and
depressions in pinelands in coastal areas of the Carolinas (NatureServe 2003c). Southern
spicebush grows in shaded areas, but has been known to grow in full sun (FWS 2003b).
Based on a review of NHP records, there are no documented occurrences of southern
spicebush within athree-mile radius of the project area.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect
According to the NHP element occurrence database records, there are no known
occurrences of southern spicebush in the project vicinity. Due to ditching within
the project study area, the hydrology necessary to support southern spicebush is
not present within the project study area. The proposed project would have No
Effect on this federally endangered species.
Analysis Details -
Methodology: Analysis of the possible presence of and potential impacts 'to the
southern spicebush was conducted through an evaluation of existing information,
and assessment of the habitat requirements. Additionally, the NHP element
occurrence database was consulted on March 29, 2004.
Rough-leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
Rough-leaved loosestrife is an erect, rhizomatous, perennial herb that grows to one to two
feet in height, with whorls of three to four leaves that encircle the stem at intervals, below
a yellow inflorescence. Blooming occurs from mid-May through June. Fruiting occurs
from July to October (FWS 2003c).
Rough-leaved loosestrife generally occurs on acidic, moist to seasonally saturated sands
and on acidic, shallow,. organic soils overlaying sand. It also grows on shallow, poorly
drained, deep peat soils of low pocosins and Carolina bays (CTS Army 2003b). Rough-
leaved loosestrife occurs most often along the ecotone between longleaf pine uplands and
pond pine pocosins (areas of areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on a wet,
peaty, poorly drained soil) (FWS 2003c). Rough-leaved loosestrife has also been found in
ecotones between pocosins and longleaf pine savanna, longleaf pine flatwoods, sandhills
seeps, and pond and lake margins (LTS Army 2003b).
Based on a review of NHP records, there are no documented occurrences ofrough-leaved
loosestrife within athree-mile radius of the project area.
Categorical Exclusion Apri12006
22

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect
According to the NHP element occurrence database records, there are no known
occurrences of rough-leaved loosestrife in the project vicinity. There are no
Carolina bays or pocosins that could support rough-leaved loosestrife within the
project study area. The proposed project would have No Effect on this federally
endangered species.
Analysis Details -
Methodolo~y: Analysis of the possible presence of and potential impacts to the
rough-leaved loosestrife was conducted through an evaluation of existing
information, and assessment of the habitat requirements. Additionally, the NHP
element occurrence database was consulted on March 29, 2004.
American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana)
American chaffseed is a perennial herb with mostly unbranched stems, usually one to two
feet tall. Leaves are largest at the base of the plant and gradually diminish in size towards
the top of the stem. The two-lipped tubular flowers are yellow, suffused with purple.
American chaffseed blooms from April through June in the South and from June to late
July in the North (NatureServe 2003d). The leaves are alternate, lance shaped to elliptic,
stalkless, and are one to two inches in length. The fruits are long and narrow and
enclosed in a sac like structure, fruits mature from early summer in the south, to October
in the north (FWS 2003a). This species is parasitic on the roots of a wide variety of
woody and herbaceous plants (NatureServe 2003d).
American chaffseed typically grows in sandy (sandy peat, sandy loam), acidic, and
seasonally moist to dry soils. It is generally found in habitats described as open, moist
pine flatwoods, pine/wiregrass savannas, and ecotonal areas between peaty wetlands and
xeric sandy soils (US Army 2003a). All of these habitats were historically maintained by
human or lightning-caused wildfires. American chaffseed is dependent on factors such as
fire, mowing, or fluctuating water tables to maintain the crucial open to partly-open
conditions that it requires (FWS 2003a). These habitats are species-rich with grasses,
sedges, and savanna dicots being especially numerous ([JS Army 2003a). Natural
communities that could include American chaffseed are; open pine flatwoods, pitch pine
lowland forests, seepage bogs, palustrine pine savannahs, and other grass and sedge-
dominated plant communities (NatureServe 2003d).
Based on a review of NHP records, there are no documented occurrences of American
chaffseed within athree-mile radius of the project study area.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect
According to the NI-IP element occurrence database records, there are no known
occurrences of American chaffseed in the project vicinity. There are no open,
moist pine flatwoods, pine/wiregrass savannas, or ecotonal areas between peaty
wetlands and xeric sandy soils that could support American chaffseed present
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
23

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
within the project study area. The proposed project would have No Effect on this
federally endangered species.
Analysis Details -
Methodolo~y: Analysis of the possible presence of and potential impacts to the
American chaffseed was conducted through an evaluation of existing information,
and assessment of the habitat requirements. Additionally, the NHP element
occurrence database was consulted on March 29, 2004.
2.0 Federal Species of Concern
The March 14, 2006 FWS list for Bladen County also includes a category of species
designated as "Federal Species of Concern" (FSC). The FSC designation provides no
federal protection under the ESA for the species listed. The presence of potential suitable
habitat within the project study area has been evaluated for the following FSC species
listed for Bladen County shown in Table 5.
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
24

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
Table 5: Federal S ecies of Concern FSC) Listed for Bladen Coun , NC
Common Name Scientific Name State Status* Potential Habitat
Vertebrates
Rafinesque's big-eared
bat Corynorhinus rafinesquii T Yes
Southeastern m otis M otis austrori anus SC** Yes
Bachman's s arrow Aimo hila aestivalis SC No
American eel An ilia rostrata SC Yes
Black throated green
warbler Dendroica virens waynei SR Yes
Southern ho ose snake Heterodon simus SC~ Yes
Mimic lass lizard O hisaurus mimicus SC Yes
Broadtail madtom Noturus s . 1 Yes
Carolina o her frog Rana ca ito T No
Invertebrates
Atlantic i oe Fusconaia masoni E No
Yellow lampmussel Lam sills cariosa E No
Buchholz's dart moth A otis s . 1 nr buchholzi SR** No
Venus flytrap cutworm
moth Hemipachnobia subporphyrea SR No
Belle's sanddra on Pro om hus bellei SR No
Carter's noctuid moth S artini ha a carterge SR** No
Hessel's hairstreak Callo h rs hesseli # Yes
Verie ated clubtail Pro om hus bellei SR Yes
Vascular Plants
Savanna indigo-bush Amorpha georgiana var
con sa T Yes
Carolinas Teen wort As lenium heteroresiliens E No
Sandhills milk-vetch Astra alus michauxii T Yes
Cha man's sed a Carex cha manii # Yes
Venus flytra Dionaea musci ula SR-L, SC No
White wic Kalmia cuneata # No
Ponds ice Litsea aestivalis SR-T No
Bo kin's lobelia Lobelia bo kinii T No
Carolina bo mint Macbridea caroliniana T No
Carolina grass of
arnassus Parnassia caroliniana E No
Pineland lantain Planta o s arsiflora E Yes
Spiked Medusa
=Eulo hia Pteroglossaspis ecristata E Yes
Awned meadow beau Rhexia aristosa T No
Grassleaf arrowhead Sa ittaria weatherbana SR-T No
Spring-flowering
oldenrod Solidago verna SR-L No
Pickering's dawnflower Siylisma pickeringii ver
ickerin ii E** Yes
Carolina as hodel To ieldia labra #* No
E - Endangered, T -Threatened, SR -Significantly Rare, SC -Special Concern, SR-T -Rare throughout its
rauge, SR-L -Range is limited to NC and adjacent states, SR-P -Periphery of its range in NC
* - No longer tracked by NHP, ** -Occurs on NHP list but not on USFWS list, # -Not listed as a FSC on NHP
list, ^ -Obscure record, ~ -Historic record last observed over 50 ears a o
Categorical Exclusion Apri12006
25

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
NHP records were reviewed to determine the known locations of FSC within the project
vicinity. NHP records document four occurrences of FSC within athree-mile radius of
the project study area. The Venus flytrap occurred less than one mile north of the project
area, and is listed as historic by the NHP (occurrence greater than 20 years old). A
southern hognos~ snake occurred approximately one mile southeast of the project study
area, and is listed as obscure by the NHP (data of occurrence unknown). The Atlantic
pigtoe occurred twice, approximately three miles northeast and three miles north of the
project study area, and is listed as current by the NHP (occurred in the last 20 years). The
yellow lampmussel occurred approximately three miles northeast, and is listed as current
by the NHP.
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR
Part 800. Section 106 requires that for federally funded,
having effects on properties listed in or eligible for the
Places, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
comment.
B Historic Architecture
licensed, or permitted projects
National Register of Historic
be given the opportunity to
In a memorandum dated June 23, 2004 the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
concurred that no historic resources would be affected by the proposed project. A copy
of the memorandum is included in the Appendix.
C. Archaeology
The SHPO, in a memorandum dated June 23, 2004 states, "We have conducted a review
of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the
project." A copy of the SHPO memorandum is included in the Appendix.
VII. SECTION 4(fl RESOURCES
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended, states in part
"The Secretary may approve a transportation project or program requiring the use of
publicly owned land of a park, recreation area, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or land
of a historic site of national, state, or local significance (as determined by the Federal,
State, or local officials having jurisdiction over the park, recreation area, refuge, or site)
only if:
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
26

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
_ WBS No. 33396.1.1
(1) there is no prudent or feasible alternative to using that land; and
(2) the program or project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the park,
recreation area, wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or historic site resulting from such use."
No publicly owned parks or recreational facilities, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, or
historic sites of national, state, or local significance would be impacted as a result of
proposed project. The proposed project would not require right-of--way acquisition or
easement from any land protected under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation
Act of 1966.
VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have a positive affect on transportation and the surrounding
community. The replacement of the inadequate bridge would result in safer and more
efficient traffic operations.
_ This project is considered a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and
lack of substantial consequences.
- Replacement of Bridge No. 8 would not have a negative effect on the quality of the
human or the natural environment.
This project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No
change in current land use is expected to result from the project.
No adverse impact on families or the community is expected. Right-of--way acquisition
would be limited; no relocations are expected with the implementation of the proposed
alternative.
In compliance with Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations) a review was conducted to
determine whether minority or low-income populations would receive disproportionately
high and adverse human health and environmental impacts as a result of this project. The
investigation determined the project would not disproportionately impact any minority or
low-income populations.
No adverse effect to public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected
to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area. There would
be some inconvenience to local travel due to construction activities on NC 210.
The studied route does not contain any bicycle accommodations, nor is it a designated
bicycle route; therefore, no bicycle accommodations have been included as part of this
project.
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
27

w
B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
_ WBS No. 33396.1.1
This project has been coordinated with the United States Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). The Farmland Protection Policy Act
requires all federal agencies or their representatives to consider the potential impact to
prime farmland for all land acquisition and construction projects. Soils were identified
within a 0.5-mile radius of the project area, and checked to see if they were classified as
prime, unique, or have state or local importance. Four of the soils identified were on the
NRCS list, Important Farmlands of North Carolina, May 1998. Soils in which only
drained areas are considered prime farmland included, Wasda Muck (Wh), and Torhunta
Mucky Sandy Loam (Tr). Soils in which only drained areas are considered unique
farmland included, Leon Sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes (LeA), and Lynn Haven and
Torhunta soils (Ly). If Impacts to these soils occur as a result of the proposed project,
they~are expected to be limited in nature.
No adverse effects to air quality are anticipated from this project. This project is an air
quality "neutral" project; therefore, it is not required to be included in the regional
emissions analysis, and a project level CO analysis is not required.
T>le project is located in Bladen County, which has been determined to comply with the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The proposed project is located in an
attainment area; therefore, 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93 are not applicable. This project is not
anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment area.
If vegetation or wood debris are disposed of by open burning, it shall be done in
accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina
Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520 and the
1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the National Environmental Policy Act. This
evaluation completes the assessments for air quality, and no additional reports are
required.
Ambient noise levels. may increase during the construction of this project; however, this
increase would be only temporary and usually confined to daylight hours. There should
be no notable change in traffic volumes after the project is complete. Therefore, this
project would have no adverse effect on existing noise levels. Noise receptors in the
project area would not be impacted by this project. This evaluation completes the
assessment requirements for highway noise set forth in 23 CFR Part 722. No additional
reports are required.
A "Geo-Environmental Impact Evaluation" was conducted by the NCDOT at the project
site to identify any properties that may contain hazardous waste materials and result in
future environmental liability if acquired. These hazards include: underground storage
tanks (USTs), hazardous waste sites, regulated landfills, unregulated dumpsites, and any
other site or materials that are considered hazardous. Afield reconnaissance survey, a
file search of appropriate environmental agencies, and a Geographical Information
System (GIS) were used to identify any known problem sites along the proposed project
alignment. The field reconnaissance survey yielded no anticipated UST sites within the
Categorical Exclusion April 2006
28

B-4029 Bridge Replacement Bladen County, NC
WBS No. 33396.1.1
project area. A GIS analysis of the project corridor showed no regulated landfills, or
unregulated dumpsites were within the project limits. GIS analysis and field
reconnaissance found no potential RCRA or CERCLA sites within the project limits.
Based on field reconnaissance and a records search there should be no contamination
issues for the B-4029 project.
Bladen County is a participant in the Federal Flood Insurance Program. The bridge is not
within a Detailed Study Area. The new structure should be designed to match or lower
the existing 100-year storm elevation upstream of the roadway. Since the proposed
replacement for Bridge No. 8 would be a structure similar in waterway opening size, it is
not anticipated that it would have any significant adverse impact on ,the existing
floodplain and floodway, and would not raise the floodplain levels. The Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIIZM) for the
project study area is attached.
Based on the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial or long-term
environmental impacts would result from the replacement of Bridge No. 8.
IX. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Newsletters describing the proposed bridge replacement project were sent to local
- residents. The newsletters give the public an opportunity to comment on the possible
alternatives for the proposed bridge replacement. A copy of the newsletter is included in
the Appendix. No comments were received.
X. AGENCY COMMENTS
Comments on the proposed project were requested from federal, state, and local agencies.
Several agencies have commented upon the proposed bridge alignment. These comments
have been considered during the environmental and design process and are included in
the Appendix.
Categorical Exclusion April 21106
29

FIGURES

~ ~ f
~~.
~ ; \
/ ~ ! ~ t
.\ J
~~ ' `
~J ~ ~.~
.1 J
.L.. r- ~.
ii '~
SR ~
,'~
'~
~~ `
`~
~~ ~
. ~,.
~~
_ `_~
.~.'
``~„~,o
~' i
\`~C
'C_ ~~ 'fy
04?~

~.
~;
,1 ~..
:~ l i /
` „ ~.
c'. I

J 8~idge No. 8 I
~. ~ -
N~ Studied Off-Site Detour
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Branch
NC 210
Bladen ~ Replace Bridge No. 8 Over Canal
County, NC w E Bladen County
s B-4029
0 5,280
Feet PROJECT VICINITY MAP Figure 1

r ~K'
~.~ s
~ ~
~ ~a c,
~w ~ '
s:
3"
K i~
' n
< "~o:~~
_ }~'N
iTt~ ~,. r~
«~.
a
+,~..
3r r
f"}
~ ~w
~~
=~.
'~3>
,~i
~'~

~~,,, .~,.~» ~.~~.....,.~ M..,s .~..,...__ ,, r.~,
'`,~ ~;.
:, .,
~ ,~~ t'
K
,...
~ ~ ~ 1 ~~
. ,~ ~ ~ , ..
t
2
t M ~ {~
~ ,~r ~ 'T~ -'

1
i~~ ~ ~

~ ~

mo

3 ~
~
` ~
~(/ ~}Y~~4~~ I
I''
a 4a ~
~ _ -~,
~ ~ 'i.
r
e y ~ "
£ ,~, ~......:~
~~ ~M`
99 ytr«
i ~' ~
a ~~ ~ 1 ': ~N V ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~

~
~ ~
.~
~ `
'
I
f! WR.

„ ~
~~~
~ M
V
~ tl~
S
s, ~, '
{
1M
1~y}~`tt j.:. x~
I`~Y' f
t1 `=t p 3
hS
N y
t ~ ~"
~. ;
~' , ~~~
~,
~~ .
Sx
x
r
{ '
~~.. ~ !~ i
~ f4 d"=~ ~
~~' ~ ~~
k ~
f
~~~ ~ ~°
~.' ,
~ ~~~ ~`
~~ ~ ~~
~~~ ~~ ~"
~'fr"'- ~""~":.:: ~ y;+''= v .~m~:» r ~-~F: ~ ,c^~c"..:."~~' - .e~ f fie.;....
a
;~ ~~; r
~ ~~. r ~~
6.
.# _ , o
._~ _ ,
_ ~, ~ ~
{ -
r ,» ~ ~~' ,
fir-' '~`: rr; .~t. r " F ~' y, i'~;''.
~y . ~:a
.., `vii'"' * .L ~~ `~-.:'rM 3 } ~, 4 ': ~. r ~ ~fy ' 't'"~ "!''t7 k~'.
~ irk.,,; `-? ~ .X'~ ~~, r;~` ~.~ ~~:
~ ~,' .j'°
t ~ .
~ ,., .y~ ~~
;~ S 4 j.. $`~x gg
,.p x 1eFP '~ ~.s .;. ~ 4 ~~
~~~;
r ~ ~.. ~ ^3? 3ih 1q~m, r
z >ti '~~ a sX " w
s
,~ ~
`~ ~ 1 ~ kf_
~~ _ ~~.
y U ~ - ~ - ~' + ~ ~f
.~ .......~.-„„- ~ t F~ ~
i ` `
~ ~ ~ ~ ~:
E a
w. _ ¢
3 + i it ~
~R r
~~ :~~ ~ h
~~ x wT
~ ~ ~ r
~ ~~ , ;,~.
.~ k ~ , ~~
F. a
_~
"~ ~ ,_, r~ r = ~ a~
f
~., ~E: ;;
4 ~ _ .._ ._ _ ....

n ~ '~1_
~~~;
f
~, " ~ ~. I
s u~
_
~~
"~ ,~ ~'
~t ~ ~ a -~:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ I
.t i` ,' ,~D~ y~~
. ~~^ c ? lyh ~g
.~«
•.~ :P~ ~ ~~~t ~ r i~~....
'"(: s ~
~~ ~
;~ ~ "~~.F
•~
~'.
.~

~ , } ~
r
P1
n
ASSIAIEp 60'EquT R/W
~-_ f
a
i ° ~~
p p £;F7
~ © ~? £~ ~
p ©.~ ~ ~ © p
II ~ I I
X29 i ~ ~~ i
b II ~ t
'" I I ~ ~ I PI ~0 219596
I I © ~ ~= Xf28'391fRf1
II D=
~T ~fRf1 I I ~i L = 11521'8'583'
P1 Sio M+8906 En J I`
~= 1f41'42B1LT1 ci ~ _ I I ~. R =
M D = 62f 583'
L =18528" ~ I I ~ d ax~ ~ FT/fT
~ = 929T' a I I £7~ ` e = OA4 FT/FT
I I Q ~ ~`2 84'
o(~moxh AFT/fT II
~- '_ - O
' i
' I
~ +
~._.
_. - ~ ~- '--_... N
. __... N
~ • A
- - -° _- -_- ____ cRAU aw Q
~ __ J
- _~
,~ ~ © I I ~ _
I ©~
~-
I I © £} b
? . 111 I I I ~ © E'3
II
~? II o©Q £' p
QII p~ ~ fl© ~ ~~
pll ©p ~ ~-
© © © I I ~ ~ ©© ~~ ~ ~
p ;+ti~,. ~ ©i i ©,~ I I CS
PI ='11+80.00 } PI = 12+50.00 PI = 13+00.00 PI = t4+50.00 PI =`15+50.00
EL = 26.44' EL = 26.16' EL =26.20`'" EL = 26:80` EL = 26.25'
K = 89 K = 104 K = 156 , _ K = '105.. K = 101
VC = 50' VC = 50` VC = 50` YC = 100' VC = 100'
a
0
u
PI = zo+oa.
EL = 28.25'
K = 318
YC = 300'
la y - ~

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2

PROTEC
T
R
E
f
G
ENCE N0. SNQT N0. '.,
~
~
/
~
I
~
B NLJ 1
RAY SNEET N0.
IOADWAY DESIGN NYDRAWCS
ENGMEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLE PLANS
0o xm os ROR • ACWE><110N
PRELIMIN
ro Nm ~ Y PLANS
lbNT1A0LTDEi

REVISIONS
' \~p jio 0\N \ r dge Croup 46\84029\pro \b4029_rdy_elt2_pah2.dgn 8/17/99

I
0
22+~
STA
'
CH LINE
N . T
~
MA
~ .~, , ~ _ , „ ~

I
'
.~ II I
.
tl I
/ ~ ~
.. .

pNODJ~~ I ~
II
.I•

r.; O. •
Q ~
~.
,
N ~ \ tiY I
m
~
W ~ ~
~
~(
~ ~N
I
I
,
I
~
4~ ~
1
\
x
I
1 ~ I
i \ - ' _ - - ' -
_
~
I
.. _, ••
~
1
x I •. ~
~

\
_
..
..
1 I ~ ~ w s~
r`
-
•
I
~
oD~
a~
4
'. M N8,
II I '"'
\;
I ~. 1X
46
g
.
\
I
•
~
,---
1
II h •. ,~
~
~~+
A 1
~
~
I
t
~
~
~
~
~
~ \~~
~
~ ~ i
~
: r 1
~ n :. . ur !

o ~
\
I
~ 1 I . ~
I
N O,
•~> I
~\ ZJ
•
(h I
I I I I ~\
\
I \
\\
_ I
/
I
~
I I I \
\
~
I \
I
I \\
•
~ I I \
~
I I
~
~
~ I
I
•. \~

~ \
\
~
~
\
.-..
_. - - ~ \
.....
'

'

..
-.. ..

•

..
- -

..
:
..

~ ~
t
'
~ N
r " 7
,
l it
~ - '
. -
.

..-
_
- -
\ `II ~
:

~ .
.
-.. ...- - ... . ... ~ I .
+
:._ :
.,...
-
. -

-

... -

' .'- ..-':.-: ~ i

I
it ~ ~
... . ~
. ::. .-
~ t
.- .. .- ..- .... 1 a
. '. - ....
. . _
..
_ ...
...
....
.._
-
-- - I 6^
._ - _.. .. -
•• .. I
t
I ; m
.. .. -...- .. _ ~ ::. ..- _.: ..a:- ~
I i I
... ._ .. .... .,. - -. .. . ..
_ .. _ . .- _ . . .. . .....
. .
~ _
~_ _. .... I
--
I

~
_ ..
-.
.-
... -
.. .. .
.-
.-
-.
-.. ..
t
II
i

t

I
..
I
.
I

-. ~ I
_ _ I

- I I II ;
- .. .. .. ...
i i i
i

u !-

..
... .

.

.:..

.:~.-,
~

.

-

.

.

...

.

.... 8~ m~ `~~ ~
.... .. , . ... . ..... .. ...
..
. m

i
. .. :.. ..
0
'
~ '
d
~
~~ ~ m
C
m
N
n
~' ~' N

Group
Ilol,
r
N i~ 'r~ `~ fm- `
14
11•.11
>:II
,~
,':i, ~l iV'...I

~
~
:
~l.r
~ ~.~

.~

r
G>

~,:~.... . ~~f
II
II
'
, II,
If .
y
.~'.I
.'~, ~,~,
V
;
ID~~EO
.
.
W
~!
"~:
5
p
,` :Ci
r
A

ffl
r- ~
ee
...
IL-
v u :u
REVISIONS
~~u-O~~
uupNU~
~~~~g~
~~$yb~

1
~ -L-
I
12' ' 12'
1 - 0' 12'- 'MIN. 11'+ I 11'+f- 12'- 0' MIN. 6' 10'- 0'
9' wG0. , 9' wGR
7q
vyure ~ P NT
P g
1'~
oars
DuGINAI GROUND ~ ~ L.OB _
1:/ ~ ~ d'1
d I
/ .02 .02 ~
- - - - - -'f - - - - - C
X08 ~ g
~ ~
1
d:l 1~ ! """"
°o'"r
ORIGINAL GROUND
;l 1.
4
Y d,
•~
..e,.d
na. GRADE TO THIS LINE ,
3 ~,~...

TYPICAL SECTION NO.
1 :<«.
-D ET-
I
7' 6' 12' 6'
9' wGR 9' wGR
2' I 2'
FDPS I GRADE FDPS
ORIGINAL .06
?'~ 3'~ / .02 .02 ~ .08
GROUND ~ •~ ORIGINAL
GROUND
GRADE TO 7H15 LINE
North Carolina Dspartm~nt of Transportation
TYPICAL SECTION NO 2 ProIMDswlopm~nfOnd
. \ EnwonrlwntalAnalysis Branch

N.C. 210
Replace Bridge No. 8 Over Canal
Bladen County
B-d029
NOT TO SCALE Figure 3A

4' 12' L
'~- 12' 4'
GRADE
POINT
TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTION
North Carolina DepaAmsnt of TronsportaNon
ProjsR Developmsnf and
Environmental Arwlysis Branch
N.C. 210
Replace Bridge No. 8 Over Canal
Bladen County
8-4029
NOT TO SCALE Figure 36 I~

-~i
~ ~ ~.~ ti t ~~~~ r ~~~
._~ ~.
y ~= ~.
~ sa
A
~' ~ ~i ~.
z
~~ .i~
M
H ~;
'~~H
~. ~ ~~
r ~' z r ~.'
u } , S ~._ ;
ia'i ~ .; ~- ..c
«r, r -
n'~~ ~ .: w
..- ..
:..
®~
E~~ ~
~ECiB'E ~f7U#~°t
®C~ ?~ 210

~ ~
.T .~.

r
~ L. st r. ~~ Mp .3 ~~ .~1Y' r ~, 4

I

; k _.a ......
..~.. :.
_. - .T .
::- -
_.
,~ .
~~'~
~
~~ ~`
,~. _ •,
,
~'~` . E'
.~

1 i 1 r: r~ ~ Y ~ F e

^
"
amr
1
1..,~,
1 Y`r.. t
. ~.~ _ -,
~~ ~~k ~ ~
r ~ e ,a 1 ~ 1
m~ ~ ~~ » ~ k
~A
~ ~ ~ ~
ter ""-
~'Yy a ...;.
__-,_yw„E _ ;r.~
..
ti-
.,
. ~ ~ .~_.., ~c~ ~ :,
f3` r . _._
..~ ,~~~ ~
~~
__ - ~ .~ :.
~~ ~,
~ s
r«s .
6k 4 ,
~: rt
7
~~~
+r f ~T:'~..(.
,. r
4..:. yc„
~..,~.~,r ~ ~
~ ~~ ~i ia"~t~ ~ ~+ "~" a~ ', ~
4~ W
'~S c~-
~. }
;p.~ k i ~ ,
' ~ t

~~.

~ ~~~ ~ ~
~ ~~
~~'' ~,° ~ iii ~
~,,
~F {.., ~,..

~, ~,, ~
,.

'
~
'
`
~
:,
t,
~
~
,~

~
.
. .
q
w
~
,_
.
.r
: :~`~
~{~
C F '^. .~' .
yi

~~
krr
t SF
B R~`F~ti~ ~
e

m,~ °~° ~
~~:~
~~a: '
.. ~~ ..

I
~ o ~
~~~~:
~~ ~. :.
n~~' « .'t~- ~ .. e. ., << ~.i
~~ r" i
~ Cv~
~+ r~ r t
i ~lfic.S~ r ~~• 1, ~ ~ j"~. ~~,
`f
~, ~ r
t
M.
a
,C~l
`~'c"3
~~ ~'i~
B?f3~C6t'!C„~
~3St~"~c"331'i '~
~~~~ @C,~ {:c'lC'N~~

•;~
~....
Q ANIIOI(IMATE KALE IN FEET:
2000 0 1000
~"'
t

..

'•\ ~~ Flttt NAiAtO IOINItAtr MAF

BLADEN COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
UNINC. AREAS
r~oE is of a
IEEE MAF INOEK FOR FROEE NOT -IIMITED-
Z
._.1
\~
1 EFFECTIVE DATE:
JANUARY 20. /07ls
``
~1..,_` Brid a N;d: S
~ a CONVERTED BY LETTER
iEFFECTIVE 911189

~ 1~
COMMUNIt1f_PANEL NUMBER
"
~~~.. 970293 X10 A
._~-
..- ~
. ,a.
~~.~
.1 AID YIIMAN oPwl~
FEDERAL INWROMINISTRATION
This is an ofAciai copy d a portion of the above referenced hood map. k
was extracted using F-MIT On-Line. This map does nd reflect changes

t or amendmems which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
itle dock. For the latest product information about National Flood tnsuranee
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.mse.fema.gov
Figure 5

APPENDIX

NCDOT
T.I.P. B-4029
Newsletter
Volume I, Issue I
Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 8
over a Canal on NC 210
This newsletter is published by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation to provide information on the
status of the proposed replacement of the bridge over an
unnamed Canal on NC 210 illustrated in the vicinity map to
the right. The proposed project is needed to improve safety
due to the deteriorated condition of the existing bridge.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The acquisition of right-of--way is scheduled for federal fiscal
year (FFY) 2006, with construction in FFY 2007.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION C :~K._ A~~"`~_ ~ ~~~~ ~~ . ~~~".
Three (3) alternatives have been studied for the proposed bridge replacement project. Alternative 1 proposes
to replace the bridge in its existing location. Altemative 1 would maintain traffic with an on-site detour on the
downstream (east) side of the bridge during construction. Alternative 2 also proposes to replace the bridge in
its existing location. Altemative 2 would maintain traffic with an on-site detour on the upstream (west) side of
the bridge during construction. Alternative 3 proposes to realign NC 210 and construct a new bridge on the
upstream (west) side of the existing bridge. Altemative 3 would utilize the existing bridge to maintain traffic
during construction. Please see the figures shown on the .back of this newsletter. Altemative 2 has been
recommended as the preferred alternative because it minimizes impacts to existing development and the
environment.
NCDOT WELCOMES CITIZEN INPUT
Public involvement is an important part of the planning process. The North Carolina Department of
Transportation is committed to ensuring all issues of concern to the public are addressed and considered
before any final decisions are made. If you have any questions or comments concerning the project, please
feel free to contact the study team members below:
Mr. Vincent J. Rhea, PE
Project Manager
NCDOT-PDEA
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
[phone] ext. 261
vrhea,~dot.state.nc.us
Mr. Richard Davis
Project Manager
The LPA GROUP. of North Carolina, P.A.
4904 Professional Ct., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
rdavis Ipagroup.com

°' "'~ NCDOT
T.LP. 8-4029
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development 8~ Environmental Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Postal Customer
n= u
u. , n y~%
u - n ,~ .
n, n ~~~~ p
n•' ~%
RY
NC 230
1 '~Ty~-
-ail f~ '• ~ --- ` l7 ~~ ' \l\
II " v ~ `C
8-4029 Alternative 1
II-
u ,~ ~ ~a
~~ ; ~ /i
~I . ,,
.,,
~ I :.CTJi-
~...? ~ y -
. :n _ ~.~ l ~ \\
0
B~-4029 ~~~ Alternative 2
~ ~.
ii . + ii 9.g~
n • ~i ~~ d
III. -i
Kl'~~--
v
B-4.029 ~~ ~ Alternative 3

•.~.
. ~~~~
United States Department of the Interior:: ~~,
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ,~~a ~~~, ~+~1
Raleigh Field OEtice s':v ~ .
Post Office Box 33736
Raleigh, North Carolina 876363726. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~-'•~rr
~~
.~ l
F~~ ~~~^.
,.. , . ,:..._ , . ~ December 30 2003..: .. .~~. , ~ ~,
;~:~='
Gregory J: Tlio~pe; Ph.D.
- North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,- NC 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
. This letter is in response to your request for comments from.the U.S: Fish and Wildlife-Service
(Service) on the potential environmental.impacts of the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 8 on
NC 210 over an unnamed canal, Bladen County, North Carolina (TIP No. B-4029). These
_ ..comments provide scoping information in accordance witll provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (16 U.S.C: 66.1-667d) and section 7 of the Endangered~Species Act (ESA of
-1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
For bridge replacement projects; the Service recommends the following general, conservation
measures. to avoid or minimize environmental impacts to fish and. wildlife resources:
1: Wetland, forest and designated riparian buffer.impacts should be avoided and min;mi~ed
to the maximum extent practical;
2. If unavoidable wetland impacts.are proposed, every effort should be made to identify
compensatory mitigation sites in advance: Project planning should include a detailed
compensatory,mitigatiQn plan for offsetting unavoidable~wetland~impacts. 'Opportunities
to :protect mitigation areas ut:perp~tuity via conservation easements, land.trusfs: or by '~ ` ,
,.
other meansshould:be'explored at the-outset, ,~ _ .
3. ~ Ofd site detours should Abe used rather than constructiion of temporary;. on=site -bridges..
For projects requiring an on=site~detour in wetlands cs>: open water, sueh'detours.should be
aligned.along~the side of:the existing structure which has the least arid%r least quality of
fish and wildlife: habitat.: Ati-.the completion of construction; the detour. area should be
entirely removed and the impacted areas be .planted withappropriate vegetation, including
trees if.necessary;.
4+ Wherever appropriate, construction insensitive areas~sllould occur outside fish spawning
and migratory bird nesting seasons: ~ In waterways that xnay serve ~as travel comdors for

its -
- • / ~ ~ • -
- fish, in-water work should be avoided during moratorium periods associated with
migration, spawning and sensitive pre-adult life stages. -The general moratorium period
_ for anadromous fish is February 15 -June 30;
5. New bridges should be long enough to allow for sufficient wildlife passage along stream
.. _.
comdors;
6. Best Management Practices (BMP) for Protection of Surface Waters should be
. implemented;
7. Bridge designs should include provisions for roadbed and deck drainage to flow through a
vegetated buffer prior to reaching the affected stream. This buffer should be large enough.
to alleviate any potential effects from run-off of storm water and pollutants;
8. The bridge designs should not alter the natural stream and stream-bank morphology or
impede fish passage. To the extent possible; piers and bents should beplaced outside the
bank-full width of the stream;
9. Bridges and approaches should be designed to avoid any fill that. will result in damming
or constriction of the channel or flood plain. If spanning the flood plain is, not feasible,
culverts should be installed in the flood plain portion of the approach to restore. some of
- the hydrological functions of the flood plain and reduce high velocities of flood waters
.within the affected area.
There are five federally protected species listed for Bladen County: the shortnose sturgeon
(Acipenser brevirostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), American chaffseed
(Schwalbea americana), southern spicebush.(Lindera melissifolia)-and rough-leaved loosestrife
~(Lysimachia asperulaefolia). The North Cazolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNfiP) database
indicates two occurrences of the red-cockaded woodpecker from.the 1970s approximately 0.8
miles and 1.3 miles, respectively, from the proposed project site:' Although~the.NCNHP does.not
indicate any known occurrences of the other species near the project vicinity; use of the NCNHP .
data should not be,substituted for actual field surveys if suitable habitat actors near the project
site. The .NC;;NHP database only indicates. the presence: of known occurrences, of federally:
_ .; 'protected species and.does not necessanlymean'.that such species are not".present. ~tinay smiply
`mean tlat:the`area„has not been surveyed, Info nation about the habitats.in which these:.species
-=: are o$en found-,is.provided:on'.outveb ite, http://endar~~,ered.fv~is.gov/ . If suitable habitat ;~- . .
= occurs within the ~pr©ject vicinity forany of the listed species,aurveys should be conducted to
_ ~ . - determine presence or absence of tH@ species. ,:All survey docunentation.m~st include survey:
~' methodologies'and results: ~, - .. ~ . `:.
We reserve. the right to review any.federal permits that may be rec}uired for this project; at.the
public notice stage. Therefore, it is,importanttliat resource.agency coordination occur early in - .
ahe' planning process in order toresolve any conflicts. that may arise and minimise delays in
project implementation:; In addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the
environmental documentation forahis protect include. the following in sufficient detail to

1 1 ~'~ ' ..
~ ~
. ~ facilitate a.thorough review of the action:
1. A clearly defined and detailed purpose and need for the proposed project;
2. A description of the proposed action with an analysis of all alternatives being considered,
including the "no action" alternative;
3. A description of the fish and wildlife resources, and their habitats, within the project
impact area that maybe directly or indirectly affected;
4. The extent and acreage of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, that are to be impacted
by filling, dredging; clearing, ditching, or draining.. Acres of wetland impact should be
differentiated by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the National
Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Wetland boundaries should be determined by using the 1987
Corps of E~ineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U.5. Army Corps of
Engineers; .
5. The anticipated environmental: impacts, both temporary and permanent, that would be
likely to occur as a direct result of the proposed project. -The assessment should also
include the extent to which the proposed project would result in secondary impacts to
natural resources, and how this and similar projects contribute to cumulative adverse
effects;
_ 6. Design features and construction techniques which would be employed to avoid or
minimise the fragmentation or direct loss of wildlife habitat. and waters of the US;
7. If unavoidable wetland impacts aze proposed, project planning. should include a detailed.
compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting the unavoidable impacts.
The Service appreciates the opportwuty to comment on this project. Please continue to advise us
during the progression of the planning process, including your official determination of the
~~ impacts of this project. If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact Mr. .
Gary Jordan, at (910.856-4520, ext. 32.
_ ~ _.
Sincerely,:
?~ .
;• .
..Garland B. Pazdue, Ph.D.
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: Richazd Spencer, USAGE, Wilmington, NC .
David.Franklin, USACE, Wilmington, NC
BethBaznes, NCDVYQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Chris 1Vlilitscher, USEPA, Raleigh; NC .

®l~or~h CarolinaWildl~fe I~esourCes Coanmissio~
Charles R Fullwood, Executive Director .
MEMORANDUM
T0: Vincent J. Rhea .
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch,. NCDOT
FROM:.. Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program ~-
DATE: February 5, 2004
' SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements in Johnston, Moore, Montgomery, Brunswick,
- Bladen, Cumberland, Scotland, and Columbus counties. TIP Nos. B-4165, B-
4207, B-4204, B-4030, B-4029, B-4092, B-4274, B-4080, and B-4.078.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following.preliminary comments on the subject pioject. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
_ -; (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as.amended;.16
U.S.C. 661-667d). ;
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not.block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into. the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
' ~ 4. If possible, bridge supports (bents} should not be placed in the stream.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries ~ 1.721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
'I'elenhone: (9191 733-3633 ext. 231 ~ Fax: [phone]

fridge Memo
2 February 5, 2004
5. I~temporary access roads or detours are constructed;-they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimises disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
- steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect.trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an .individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Hal
Bain should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species maybe.
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
': 10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events. .
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to~prevent excavation in flowing water.
14: Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to mimmi~e sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:

Bridge Memo
February 5, 2004
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage., Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or neaz stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design),- These should be
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40-SO.lineaz feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
. remain dry dux7ng normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
' , water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
- disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure. is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimise the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
. native tree .species. ]f the azea reclaimed was previously wetlands,~NCDOT should restore the
azea to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-4165, Johnston County, Bridge No. 89 over Sassarixa Swamp on SR 1162. We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
2. B-4207, Moore County, Bridge No. 43 over McLendons Creek on NC 22-24-27. We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. McLendons Creek contains habitat
suitable for the federally endangered Cape Feaz shiner, a survey should be conducted to
determine the presence or absence of this species. Standard recommendations apply.

. t3ridge Merno 4 February 5,.2004
3. B-42Q4, Montgomery County, Bridge No. 28 over Rock Creek on NC 109. We
recommend.replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
4. B-4030, Brunswick County, Bridge No. 9.over Bear Branch on NC 103. We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
5. B=4029, Bladen County, Bridge No. 8 over canal on NC 210. We .recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
6. B-4092, Cumberland County, Bridge No. 80 over Little Rockfish Creek on SR 1108. We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. A significant fishery for sunfish exists at
this site,"therefore we request in in-water work moratorium for sunfish from April 1 to
June 30.. Standard recommendations apply.
7. B-4274, Scotland County, Bridge No. 14 over Big Shoe Heel Creek on NC 144. We
recommend. replacing this bridge with a bridge. A significant fishery for sunfish exists at
this site, therefore we request in in-water work moratorium for sunfish from April 1 to
June 30. Standard reconunendations apply.
8. B-4080, Columbus County, Bridge No. 148 over Pine Log Swamp on SR 1437. We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
9. B-4078, Columbus County, Bridge No. 10 over Waccamaw River Overflow on NC 130.
We recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
NCDOT should routinely minimise adverse impacts to fish and~wildlife resources in the
vicinity of bridge replacements. Restoring previously disturbed floodplain benches should
narrow and deepen streams previously widened and shallowed during initial bridge installation.
NCDOT should install and maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the
project and prevent wet concrete from contacting water in or entering into these streams.
Replacement of bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box
culverts, is recommended in most cases: Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks and reduce habitat fragmentation.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
~_ replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects. .
Cc: Gary Jordan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh

NCDE~R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Parks and Recreation
Ytichael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Philip K. McKnelly, Director
MEMORANDUM
T0: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Bridge Replacement Unit
Department of Transportation
FROM: Brian Strong, Environmental Review Coordinator /> ~~
DENR, Division of Parks and Recreation
DATE: September 6, 2002
SUBJECT: Review of Department of Transportation Bridge Replacement Projects
The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit comments prepared by the Division of
Parks and Recreation (Division) on a number of proposed bridge replacement projects. These
proiects were received from iVlr. William T. Goodwin (dated Apri124, 2002) and John Williams
(received June ?5, ?002).
Prior to discussing individual comments on specific projects I would like to make one
general comment. A number of projects are listed as replacement of bridges with culverts. The
Di~~~~ion would like to express concern with this type of replacement. As you know, culverts are
oftei, Beset by a number of persistent problems associated with their installation and
maintenance. Culverts are frequently the focus of restoration projects as either culvert removal
or .mitigation efforts designed to remediate their destabilizing influence. Since culverts are often
us. ~: ~~~ lieu of bridges as a cost savings alternative, the proper design of the culvert is~ often not.
Fay ~ ~~red~into the cost of the project. Impacts of improper design and installation include the
an~~le of insertion (too high or too low), sizing of culverts, culvert placement (too low or too
= hi~r;~), and lack of culvert maintenance resulting in degradation.of streams. In addition, culvert
a~,i:~i~en insufficiently designed to handle fish passage due to inadequate depth of water at time
of passage, inappropriate water velocity, inadequate resting places above and helow the stream
structure, and• physical obstructions to passage. Culverts have been identified as one of the
greatest sources of stream morphology change in the United States. In general, the Division
recommends that bridges be used in all instances where practical.
Enclosure l presents the bridge replacement projects were potential environmental
impacts were identified. The majority of the impacts. involve impacts to significant natural
heritage areas, rare plant and animal species. Other impacts include proximity to state trails,
state parks, and natural heritage aquatic habitats.Enclosure ?~ presents the accompanying maps
discussed in Enclosure 1. ,
Please let me know if there is any further information you need or if you have any
questions regarding the enclosed material, my telephone number is [phone].
[61 ~ ~[sil Szrvice Center. Rslei,h. V'or:h Carolina ? ~ 6~)9- l6I

4,
Bridge Replacement Project Potential Impact
Granville. County ;.:... ; . ,. Impacts_to,SNHA: Tar River
Replace Bridge No:,84 on SR 1141 over Tar
River
B-4124 C1
Pitt County - Impacts to rare fish and mussels
Replace Bridge No. 98 on SR 140? over
Conetoe Creek ~ `•
4234 ~~`\
B
~
Y
-
(
~
Y,
Vance County Impacts to SNHA: State significance, rare
Replace Bridge No. 3 on SR 1107 over Ruin mollusks and plants
. Creek
B-42-98 lip 5 ~ -
Jones'County Impacts to rare amphibian, crustaceans
Replace Bridge No. 7 on SR 1129 over Big
Chinquapin Branch
B-4169 ~ ~,``' ~ .
,~,
Wilson County - Impacts to SNHA: Regional significance, rare
Replace Bridge No. 52 on SR 1131 over mollusks, raze amphibian, care crustacean
Turkey Creek
B-4327
Alleghany County ~ Impacts to SNHA: Regional ~ignific'ance, raze
Replace Bridge No. 39 on SR .l 193 over the plant, bog turtle, potential addition to State
Little River ~~ Pazk System
B-4008, "~ ~,~
Bladea County Impacts potential State Park expansion site .
Replace Bridge No. 8 on NC 210 over Canal

Ihi.'r .
B-4029 ~ `~
~~:),.,
-Chowan County . Impacts to SNHA: Regional significance, rare
Replace Bridge No. 13 on SR 1226 over plants
DiNard Creek ~ -
B.-4073 - C .
Cumberland County Impacts to rare fish species ~ .
Replace Bridge No. 80 on SR 1108 over
Little Rocl~fis~._~.reeky-.~Iti9.L._-.~..:.,,,~:~C~
Davie County ~ Impacts to State Trail: Yadkin River trail
Replace Bridge No. 21 on NC 801 over
Carter Creek 4~~
B-410~t - -

:~
a.
4~"""`D
~d ~' ~
~' ~~.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
].isbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffi~ey J. Crow, Deptrty Secretary
June 23, 2004
MEMORANDUM
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Dim~tor
TO: Gregory J. Thorpe
Prujec~t Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook (( ~~~~ t
F~~
SUBJECT: Bridge No. 8 on NC 210 over Canal, B-4029, Bladen County, ER03-3640
Thank you for your letter of December 15, 2003, concerning the above project.
E~
~" Pn(16
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 3G CFR
Part 800.
'T'hank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinatoi_, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
cc: Richard Davis; LPA Group
Mary Pope Furr
.~
w
I,or~tloa Mal
~MB`IISTRATJON 507 N. Blount Srroet, Raleigh NC 46177 Mn1' Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 (9119 733-4631133-8653
RBSfORATION S15 N. Blount Sheet, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Caua Raleigh NC 27699-4613
[phone]/115-4801
SL>RVHY d•-PLANNING 515 N. Blount Snit, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Swiee Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4618 [phone]x/15-4801

4
,~
•
' BRUCE DICKERSON, CHAIRMAN
DAVID L. EDGE, VICE CHAIItMAN
PAMELA A. BENTON
ROGER CARROLL ',,,
BLADEN COUNTY SCHOOLS
Post Office Box 37
Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337
Telephone [phone] -Fax [phone]
BYRON R. LAWSON, ED. D., SUPERINTENDENT
JOHN CLARK, III
EUGENIA A. CROSS
BERLDJE P. GRAHAM
ESTHER S. McNEILL
VINSTON ROZiER
March 24, 2003
Memorandum
To: Davis Moore
From: Richard Dunham
~, Re: Replacement df fridge #8
R
At the present time we have two (2) crossings per day. No suitable detours
offer a solution to road closure. .
1
i