20080476 Ver 1_Application_20080314

s~~~
zA
~ ~
•o~,,,,;,,,,o
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
;...1 /
`~ ~
~~~r
~G' ~;r`~"RI~c Cc~
JSr~n,~~ Q~~ F ~
B~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DNISION OF HIGHWAYS LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 12, 2008
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Brad Shaver
NCDOT Coordinator
oso4~s
SUBJECT: Nationwide 23 Permit Application for the Replacement of Bridge No. 20 over Little Beaverdam
Creek on NC 903, Duplin County, B-4106, WBS # 3B.103111
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 20 over
Beaver Dam Creek on NC 903 in Duplin County. The contract for B-4106 will be implemented as a Division
Three-Purchase Order Contract {POC) project. The existing 3 span, 55-ft timber bridge with 24 ft of clear roadway
was built in 1950 and will be replaced with a longer bridge along the existing alignment. The proposed bridge will
be a 3 span, 95-ft prestressed concrete cored slab bridge with 42 ft of clear roadway.
The structure will include two -12 ft travel lanes with 9-ft offsets. Approach work will consist of
resurfacing and tying into the existing alignment for approximately 290 feet to the west and approximately 283 feet
to the north of the existing bridge. The roadway approaches and bridge grades will approximately match existing
elevations. Guardrail will be installed where warranted and as depicted on the plan sheet. Traffic will be detoured
along surrounding roads during construction.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
This project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin within USGS hydrologic unit 03030007 (subbasin 030622).
The proposed bridge replacement is located over the Little Beaverdam Creek {DWQ Index No. 18-74-26-1-1) Class
C Sw. Environmental Services Inc. delineated the wetlands on December 7, 2005. However, the U.S Army Corps
of Engineers did not verified the boundary due to jurisdictional litigation issues and therefore no Action ID # has
been assigned to this project. A total of 0.092 acres (4024-sq. ft.) of riverine wetland will be impacted by this
project associated with end bent protection and shoulder construction. There are no stream impacts on this project.
In addition, to further minimize impacts the bridge will be constructed using top construction methods and an off
site detour will be utilized during construction. Rip rap slope protection around the end bents is being proposed at a
2:1 slope to further minimize impacts. No permanent or temporary utility impacts are proposed with this project.
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
The existing deck and bridge railings are composed of concrete. The substructure is composed of timber bents and
caps. The Department will take every precautionary measure necessary to ensure that no components will be
124 Division Drive, Wilmington, NC 28401
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

dropped into waters of the United States. The bridge will be removed using top down methods and NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Based upon the letter from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Wilmington District dated September 1, 2004, it is
understood that the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Systems Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP), will assume responsibility for satisfying the Federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation
requirements for all NCDOT projects at a 2:1 ratio. It is also NCDOT's understanding that if the USACE District
Engineer determines that compensatory mitigation is required for any project, it will be submitted to EEP for
acceptance on a quarterly basis by the Department with a copy provided to the Wilmington District office for
verification and accounting purposes.
The Department has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible as
described above. Therefore, if required by USACE District Engineer, the remaining, unavoidable impacts to 0.092
acres of jurisdictional riverine wetlands will be offset by compensatory mitigation provided by the EEP program.
These impacts are proposed in a coastal plain small stream riverine wetland in the Cape Fear River Basin within
USGS hydrologic unit 03030007 (subbasin 030622).
NATURAL ANb HISTORIC RESOURCES
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Species with the federal classification of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened
are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The United States Fish and Wildlife Service lists three federally protected species far Duplin
County: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), and
American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana). A Natural Heritage GIS Database and field review for occurrences
and habitat for these species was conducted and a determination of "No Effect" for the listed species is
recommended.
HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservations Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 296 CFR Part 800, this project has been
reviewed and cleared for effects on historical and archeological resources.
REGULATORY APPROVAL
Section 404 Permit: NCDOT is requesting authorization under Nationwide 23 under the USACE Nationwide Permit
program (72 FR 11092; March 12, 2007).
Section 401 Permit: NCDOT anticipates that the corresponding 401 General Certification # 3701 for Nationwide 23
will apply to this project. Therefore, in accordance with the Water Quality Certification 3701 we are hereby
providing DWQ with two copies of the application for review. Furthermore, the NCDOT will adhere to all general
conditions of the Water Quality Certification.
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact feel free to contact me at [phone].
Si?nce~rely, ~~ /
Mason Herndon
Division 3 DEO
cc: David Wainwright, DWQ Raleigh (2 copies)
124 Division Drive, Wilmington, NC 28401
PHONE: [phone] FAX: (9I0) 251-5727

s"`AAt~o~
.,,,.
e
.+,.
~a.w~
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART2VIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
June 16, 2006
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Calvin W. Leggett, P.E., Manager
Program Development Branch
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mike Summers, Project Manager
Bridge Maintenance Unit
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
1
~. rr ~ (' ~+ ~~
_ ~
.~~ivW ~ ~ 'lU~jn
i?II~iSI~`iJ 3 G~EI+ .
Federal Programmatic Categorical Exclusion for TIP No. B-4106, Bridge No. 20,
NC Highway 903 over Beaver Dam Creek in Duplin County
Attached are three copies of the subject report, including two copies for your files and one copy for
distribution to FHWA. No significant adverse environmental effects are expected as a result of the
project; therefore, no other distribution of the report is necessary.
Attachments
Cc: Ms. Debbie Barbour, PE, Director of Preconstruction
Mr. Art McMillan, PE, State Highway Engineer
Mr. C. B. Goode, Jr, PE, Office of Human Environment (3 copies)
Mr. Ellis Powell, Jr., PE, State Construction Engineer
Mr. H. Allen Pope, PE, Division Engineer, Division 3 (3 Copies)
Mr. Mason Herndon, Division Environmental Officer, Division 3
Ms. Amanda T. Glynn, Division Bridge Maintenance Engineer, Division 3
Mr. W. T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Project Development Unit Head
Mr. Lanny T. Wilson, BOT, Division 3
NC State Publications Clearinghouse (10 Copies)
Dr. Jeffrey Crow, SHPO, Dept of Cultural Resources
MAILING ADDRESS:
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE UNIT
1565 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1565
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
4809 BERYL ROAD
RALEIGH, NC

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No. B-4106
State Project No. 38345
Federal Project No. N/A
A. Proiect Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Duplin County Bridge No. 20 over Beaver Dam
Creek oh NC Highway 903 (Concord Church Road) east of its intersection with Old Camp
Road (SR 1100). (A vicinity map is included in the appendix). The existing bridge has a
total length of 55 feet. The replacement structure will be approximately 95 feet in length
providing a minimum 42' clear deck width. The bridge will include two 12-foot lanes and 9
foot offsets.
B. Purpose and Need:
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate that Bridge No. 20 has a sufficiency
rating of 25.4 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered
structurally deficient due to a structural appraisal of 4 out of 9 and a substructure condition
rating of 5 out of 9 according to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards and is
therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program.
Bridge No. 20 is a steel structure with a concrete deck, was constructed in 1950 and is
approaching the end of its useful life. The replacement of the bridge will result in safer and
more reliable traffic operations.
The project will be a replace in place with an off-site detour.
C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type I I improvements which apply to the project:
1. Modernization of a highway , by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing pavement (3R
and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes, including
safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane).
i. Slide Stabilization

j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing hazards and
flattening slopes
. k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
I. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit.
O Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour repair,
fender systems, and minor structural improvements
d Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill).
4. ransportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of right-
of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction
is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near a street with
adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary
facilities yJi iere of ily mir•~or amounts of additional land are required and there is
not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of passenger
shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) when located
in a commercial area or other high activity center in which there is adequate
street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction
is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no significant noise
impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land acquisition
loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and protective buying will be
permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited number of parcels. These types
of land acquisition qualify for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the
evaluation of alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction

projects, which may be required in the NEPA process. No project development
on such land may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil or
groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation guidelines.
D. Special Project Information: (Include Environmental Commitments and Permits
Required.)
The project study area was reviewed on December 7, 2005, one jurisdictional
wetland system and one jurisdictional stream occur with the project study area.
There are no documented elements of occurrence for federally listed
Threatened or Endangered species within the project study area.
Accidents -Between 6/1/02 and 5/31/05 three accidents occurred within 1,000
feet of Bridge #20. Two of the accidents occurred involved an animal and one
involved an accident with a fixed object (ditch). Offsite Detour -During the
10/24/05 site visit and scoping meeting, Division 3 representatives stated their
preference for an off-site detour.
The 2002 ADT was 2,100 by 2025 the ADT is anticipated to be 4,200.
A CoE Nationwide Permit will also be required for this project.
E. Threshold Criteria The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be
completed for Type II actions:
Ecological Yes No
1 Will the project have a substantial impact on any unique or ^ /
important natural resource? ~/
2 Does the project involve habitat here federally listed ~ /
endangered or threatened species may occur? ~/
3 Will the project affect anadromous fish? ^ /
4 If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of / ^
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than one- ~/

tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated?
5 Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service ^ /
lands? ~/
6 Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely ^ /
impacted by proposed construction activities? ~/
7 Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding
Water Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters ^
(HQW)?
8 Will the project require fill in waters of the United States in ^ /
any of the designated mountain trout counties? ~/
9 Does the project involve any known underground storage
t
k
UST'
h ^
/
an
s (
s) or
azardous materials sites? ~
Permits and Coordination Yes No
10 If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or an /
y ^
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)?
11 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
? ^
y
resources
12 Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? ^ /
13 Will the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway? ~l V
14 Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
h
? ^ /
/
c
anges ~
Social, Economic and Cultural Resources Yes No
15 Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
r
th
l
d
f ^ /
/
g
ow
or
an
use
or the area? ~

16 Will the project require the relocation of any family or

business? ^

17 Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or ^
low-income population?
18 If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the / ^
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? V
19 Will the project involve any changes in access control? ^ /
20 Will the project substantially alter the usefulness and/or ^ /
land use of adjacent property? ~/
21 Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent local ^ /
traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ~/
22 Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan /
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is, /
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)?
23 Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic ^ /
volumes? ~/
24 Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing / ^
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? V
25 If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing
facility) and will all construction proposed in association /
with the bridge replacement project be contained on the /
existing facility?
26 Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or ~ /
environmental grounds concerning the project? ~/
27 Is the project consistent with all Federal, State and local / ^
laws relating to the environmental aspects of the project? ~/
28 Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties /
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic ^ /
Places?
29 Will the project affect any archaeological remains which ^ /
are important to history or pre-history? ~/

30 Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl
refuges, historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in
Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act ^
of 1966)?
31 Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as
defined by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water ^
Conservation Act of 1965, as amended?
32 Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for ^
inclusion in the Natural System of Wild and Scenic Rivers?
F. Additional Documentation Reauired for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
(Discussion regarding all unfavorable responses in Part E should be provided
below. Additional supporting documentation may be attached, as necessary.)

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-4106
State Project No. 38345
~..
Federal Project No. N/A
Proiect Description: (Include project scope and location. Attach location map.)
Replacement Bridge No. 20 over Beaver Dam Creek on NC 903 (Concord Church
Road), approximately 0.5 miles east of its intersection with Old Camp Road (SR 1100)
in Duplin County, NC. The project will be a replace-in-place with an off-site detour.
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
TYPE II(A)
TYPE II(B)
Approved:
Date Iona L. Hauser, AICP
Senior Planner
Stewart Engineering, Inc.
Date Project Manager Bridge Maintenance Unit
For type II(B) projects only:
Date John F. Sullivan, III PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration

_ _
_ u , ,.
h _ X25 ~e_ _
q. ~' ~ , ~ - ,w- `~ ~ 7i ~ .
,, ,. ..
._ Y2`' ` B~( ~%,'s.•. / , wells ~ - ~ ~- N~ ~~
, ,
r : '~ ~ ,~ _~ /~ f ~7i u
~_f C/
r ,
~ _. i, ~
} _~
it
a
' ti.
~c -
~ :• ~ ,r i
- - -
r .-~ ..
_ ,,
\ ~ ~ e
.~ _•.-. ,
r- ~ -
,_." ~ _ ~ ~ u -~~u
1129 ~ ~ ,~ 1'
s_ Oy ~ Pond 4'. Lr.+! . ~ OF ..f ~
. ~. M . : ~ ` t~ _
~,
- _
' ,
i
f ~ ~ .r _- _
'~~ ~. 1 rho9 .. ~ . ~ t ~ ~° R~ ~ ~ mss, r y~.
~ o'.
B GE 0 , N~ ~ -
r ~ ; __ ,~ _ ~ . _ p~~_ '~' ~' _ _ 34.82645 N Q~~ ' r, ~ ~° o ° `W .
~ .r~ Q~ -- ~~ ~ ~ .~r~ a' •1993.
n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .,
,~, ~ ~ 19s ~ - ~ -,~ -.~~ ~` _ ~' 78.15144 S - ~ ;, •
,. _ ::
. ~; ~. -
_ ..
- - -
~__ ~, . _,
•
~. - e
~r N~, '. - as ~~ ~Y .p _ ~ ~ ,~
_ n
•
{ I t
111 a
-- _
,~
r' ~ ,. C~ ~ - ~ -
aY -Cem ~`~ ~
l- t ~ , t$ ~~`~
.. r. ~ -
~- -.~ ~ L
,, - _
_, ,.
r / , ~\ ~!~
~ i
• r ~ .
- P 8=' ~ ~
~~ R
~~ - -~ ,~.
i ~, _~ Q_,
-~-' , '-.
a ~ _ 722 ' _- ; Cj. ~.. ,`~ir
i ~J ti
1,, ~ ~~ ~~
Y1 ~~ .~ ,
,~
t
11 ~ s _
`~/ J , i
r. .~ r ~ , -
a ~ ~ ,. -" s - Y~
~_.
~ _. i
i . I ,' j ~.~' -- ,
M
_ 4
` `..." ' `~_`~/ , .-- - ~tb 1126
_..
__-
w i~
_ -
_ ~
l
_._ - _ ~ -.
"'~. ~ r
~ --_
1
•
_ rr ~ ~ ~ ,
_..:
.. i (. _
~~
i ,
i
1, S < I
,- ~1
,_ ., f i -
- • - - -
~ ~ ~ ~I
- ~ ~ ~ ~-
ty C~ _ ~~
-.
_. ~ ~
__-
_~' -.~
`•
_. _ ~ ~ - .. - ` 1121 ~' t .,
-
;,
~~ 110,
_ -u
Copyright (C) 1997, MapteCh, Inc.

,,
111 T
~}
~'t11~~
1118 .~
tit$
$.7
~ ~
F~
,.,,
1t2Q `' ~ 1
1_ .1 ~,~ M1r 1121
.,'" s.
1 .~ ~; ~~
~ `°~' 11ot ~'~
i1
~~ ~ 1ttf2
_. 11
~~
~~ ~ i
1128 +,~
1127
1133
11ti2
~12E1 iiCtB ~~~ ~. +~n
8-4106 t12€i
Duplin County
Bridge # 20
NC 903 over Beaverdam
Creek
~1STEWART
ENGINEERING, INC.
Iona L. Hauser, AICP
~ J [phone]
e ~i N

3
~, ~ `.
~` " ~ #~
a~a~
e~
- .` ~ ~,. 1139
t1i

'"""°"°°" Corf[Illtl
~Y
1134 ~? 1a35
'r
1135 ~~31~ t1~i
x„~

I,
'~SiiitiN ii}Tc~c~'~ iANBGAi~ r_
,,
EIP ~`
~.
.~ ~ ~ , ', ao ~,
,,, F ~
_ _r
.. /f~~1 ~-1 l
:::.~ .~~
~~ S P III--~
~ SLOPE TAKE LINE
~ ~ ~ EST. 35 TONS
~ ~ CLASS ' I I' RIP RAP
~ EST. 35 SQ. YD.
SITE 1 v SC~~E 201 FILTER .FABRIC
,. .
BI-B
~o ~t

i~ .
~~ j

1 1
,~
,~
~~
2-A
,~
0
~::.~.::. ,.:.
~I ::,. .:.:::::.::::: a
I ~O
\~/
~. ..
-.----
:
N
~N yF
~ ~i'~
6; i
~1
iY. i is
i
71 ~ ~.~
..~. `i!!!Fin:
~--- ~A T I I
lili'~ n~iP iwn~~lil i%
uF 1 :
_L-~ -°'
_ ~: ~-
SL
- T - i-- -. - ,`/ -
- -b~ -

DI
1
............:::::::::::::::::::::::::..1.;.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..:.::...
...............:::..
{u~pi34ili'i:
N •4i- .. iii M:. iyR'~
~' F.
I ~i,,mli ~ FI ,~ ~ dl~:u~ u y,~;
`1:900~i ~ Fi::v'?f '~' ~
r
)P~ 7
F'.
r r r u u ~+ u.
\,_., ~"'
_ ; '\
`-
M
N +
TAKE LI N E
SITE 2
SCQ~E 2101

Imaact Summa
WETLAND IMPACT S S URFAC E WATE R IMPACT S
Site Station (From/To) Structure Size/Type Fill In Temp. Fill Removal Mechanized Fill In Fill in Temp. Existing Natural
No. Wetlands In of Fill in Clearing SW SW Fill In Channel Stream
(ac)" Wetlands Wetlands (Method III) (Natural) (Pond) SW (ac) Impacted Design (ft)
ac c ac
1-LT 10+65 to 12+02 LT Shoulder construction 0.029 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1-RT 10+64 to 12+23 RT Shoulder construction 0.033 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2-LT 8+84 to 9+82 LT Shoulder construction 0.015
2-RT 8+45 to 9+83 RT Shoulder construction 0.015
TOTALS: 0.092 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site 1 LT -1255 sq. ft NCDOT
Site 1 RT - 1430 sq. ft DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Site 2 LT - 674 sq. ft. DUPLIN COUNTY
Site 2 RT - 665 sq. ft. WBS ELEMENT NO. 38.103111
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE20
NC 903 OVER BEAVERDAM CREEK
SHEET OF DATE 3/5/08

,a ~nvnvan C1111AWIEYY
,
i
i
i i i
i i
i i i
~ ~ ~
i i i
~~~
~ ~ ~
~~
i i i
~ ~ ~
i i i
i i i
~~

BEG. STA.
END STA.
IENGTH' SAU TYPE III GRAD
TYPE 350
ND. N0.
7+49 ~ RIGHT 9+76 -Lr RIGHT 744' 1 1
8 9 -L- LEFT 9+76 -1. LEFT 131' 1 i
10 73 -1. RIGHT 12+54 -L- AIGHf 181' 1 1
1 +73 -~ LEER 12+90 -Ir LEFT 219` i 1

~ - nv¢: ~sn~m mGwDES GRAD TTPE 950 AND SAU TYPE III.
~ RUIZ
PAGE I8
~ ~ ,y\~~o
~~
~~
e.
~ ~
~ ~ . a~e\
I I I ~ V
i ~ NC ST
i ~ i ~9 ~\~
i
i i ~,
O • ~y
~y ~ \,y~
i i i
~ i ~ BYO ~F4k ~0~ ,
Fe~~F\
i i i
i i i
i i i
i i i
i i i
i i i
i i ~
i i i
i i i
i i i
i i i
i ~ i
i i i
ii
ii
ii
,i
,i
,i
ii
ii
ii
~~
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
~~
~~
~~
~~
ii
~~
~~
~i
ii
~~
~~
N

~\
EIP 7.7' FROM R/W
EIP 3.7' FROM R/W^ ,~, ~~ `
~.v•'-
RETAIN 24'
EXIST, UTILITY POLE
WOODS
PARCEL
~' PROPERTY OWN9P5 NAME TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE E
ACREAGE
EASEMENT
EASEMENT (POE)
1 DAVID 6 BETTY F, BYRD ,1R 3.857 3,378 SF 112 SF
2 NORMAN E R TERESA A. HATCHELL 3,027 1,869 SF
9 E MARYIN JOHNSON 1091 7,273 SF
4 LEWIS EDWARD !r CELESTINE M, WILLIAMS 1,499 527 SF
-L-
PI Sto 8+05.33 P! Sta 14t47J2
D = 3P 24' 55.3" (LTJ p = 2!8' 30.6' (LTJ
0 = 8'2r 5!7" = r!5' 48.3"
L = 375.59' ~ _ l82J2'
T = !92.64' = 91.37'
R = 685A0' • = 4,535,00'
woods
UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)

\STA, 6+6a.0~ BEGIN
. ~ TRENCH
+1a
~~ ~S \ STAKE
DAVID BYRD, JR, AND
WIFE, BETTY F, BYRD
DEED BOOK 833, PAGE 849
O~

m
X
V
SITE I-LT
E +7S
~0 XIST, UTILITY POLE
~ END SBG
GRAD TYPE 350 + +
~ END FOPS
m a BEGIN S
Rw
i
` EIP o g BI-B Y
GRAD TYPE 350 -S ', h 5,
EIP 1.5' FROM R/W \ ~ ` _,~,
~ +50 Eti1_;~j~- I~ ~ ~~ _
/y 42` RT
6\ SLOPE' AKE UNE SAU TYPE III-'! +77 RY
~ EST. 35 TONS J 45' RT
\ ~ ~ SITE 2-RT E~ ER FABRIC'
WORK POINT 1 ~,,
1 -L- POC 9+73.00 ro
WORK POINT 2
-L- POT 10+01.19
~BjM\ _ ~ O
NORMAN E. HATCHELL AND N a9•ao'zl' E
WIFE, TERESA A, HATCHELL la.oa'
DEED BOOK 1222, PAGE 312
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE LOf.ALPED COGIDN4TE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THLS P ROJECT
G BASED ONTHE BTATEPIANE000RDIHATESESTABLLSIIED BY
OTHERS FOR MONUMENT'GPS•1'
VRTN NAD 1B83R001 STATE PIAiIE GRID 000RdNATES OF
NORTHING: ~3,0J80B(Q FASTING: 2,263,~G.02(iq
1FE AVERAGE COMBINED GPoD FACTOR USED ON THS PROJECT
(GF',DUNDTOGRID)IS O.SBBBF530
THEN,C. Wi1BEATGRIDBEARWOAND
LOCALQED HOPoZONTAI GROUND DRiTANCE FROM
"GPS•1' 704: STATION 5+DD G 881.11 FEET®S7T'OP1281'E
ALL UNEAR DMENSRk15 ARE LOCNUffD HORD:ONTAl DISTANGES
vEx11CAL DATUM us®Is Haw eB
TOTES:
DENOTES GEOTECHNICAL BORING HOLE LOCATIONS
1.THI5 STRUCTURE HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FHWA'S TECHNICAL
ADVISORY 75140,20 (SCOUR AT BRIDGES),
2. THE EXISTING BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE SHALL BE REMOVED BY SAWING ANDroR
NON•SHATTERING METHODS SUCH THAT DIXRIS WILL NOi FALL INTO THE WATER
S. PILES FOR END BENT N0,1 AND END BEM N0.2 SHALL BE DRIVEN TO A
MINIMUM BEARING CAPACITY OF 45 TONS EACH.
4, WHEN DRIVING PILES, THE MAXIMUM BLOW COUNT SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED,
5. PILES FOR BENT N0.1 AND BENT N0, 2 SNAIL BE DRIVEN TO AN ELEVATION NO
HIGHER THAN 51.6 FEET AND SATISFY A BEARING CAPACITY OF 4S TONS EACH.
1
MAP BOOK II, PAGE 231
6. PILES SHALL ~ DRIVEN CONTINUOUSLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS BECTION 450-8 TO THE E511MATED IENGTH SHOWN ON THE
PLANS (OR PAST MINIMUM TIP 9fVATIONI UNlll THE LOAD G OBTAINED. IF LOAD 15
STILL NOT OBTAINED AT THIS POINf,THE CONTRACTOR MAY SUSPEND DRIVING
AND ALLOW THE PILE TO SET BEFORE RESUMING PILE DRMNG. WHEN DUMNG
IS RESUMED, THE HAMMER SHALL BE WARM AND OPERATED A SUFFICIENT NUMBER
OF BLOWS TO OVERCOME THE FRICTION FORCE (MIN.10 BLOWSi BEFORE FINAL
BEARING IS CHECKED
7, THE SCOUR CRRICAI. ELEVATIONS FOR BENT N0,1 AND BENT N0, 2 ARE
ELEVATION 64,6 FEET. THE SCOUR CRRICAL ELEVATIONS ARE FOR USE BY
MAINTENANCE FORCES TO MONITOR POSSIBLE SCOUR PROBLEMS DURING THE
UFE OF THE STRUCTURE,
i--SAU TYPE III
SL
WORK POINT 4
-L- POT 10+72,50
'OINT 3 SITE 4-RT
10+46.31 O
3
E. MARVIN JOHNSON
DEED BOOK 948, PAGE 273
a
I ESL 35 TONS
CLASS 'll' RIP RAP EST.1 TON 0
ESL 35 SQ. YD. CLASS 'B' RIP AAP y~~
RLTER FABRIC IXT. 4 SQ, YD.
flLTER FABRIC ~. • ~'
41'Lr SITE 3-LT 41~ ' / ii
RIDGE °20 +50 + +
3 SPANS 40' LT 36' 6
WOODEN 9
IINGWALLS VV T- EYPE III + 2 1J
~ E ro W
WI
8.92'
12' ~~q2-A ~ -
1
12' g II ~ ~ o ~ s
8,92' 1 t€ez ~
k C~ .kTiiTri.-,n-Wl _
m
rn
x
V
P
DRAINAGE SUMMARY
~j DROP INLE( (STD, 840,14 J: 84D.15J
i0P ELEV. 84.40
INVERT EIEV. 80.60
O OUTLET 12'-12' RCP
INVERT ELEV. 80.45
UNE
.~
. ~~, ~
• d ~°
n
.~
F
R ANTITY OF RIP RAP TO BE PAID FOR WILL BE THE ACN
0 OF EACH CLASS OF WP RAP WHICH HAS BEEN INCO I
CO AND ACCEPTED WORK, THE RIP AAP WILL BE
G GHED IN TRUCKS ON CERTIFIED PLATFORM SCALES OI
IFIE WEIGHING DEVICES. THE QUANTITY OF RIP RAP WILL BE
AT 1FIE CONTRACT UNR PRKE PER TON,
N RIP RAP, CLASS 'll' (2'-0' THICp
BENT N0,1 3S TONS
. BENT N0. T 28 TONS
63 TONS
_.. 1 ..... ....
nz
~s0~ ~'rCnfta ~y d
,,!ip R i0~6.~',
SBG-SHOULDER BEAM GUTTER
FOPS=HILL DEPTH PAVED SHOULDER
GRAD-cuARDRaL ANCHOR uNTr
SAU'STRUCiURE ANCHOR UNR
DI.DROP INLET
IICP~RENFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
HASH JOHNSON AND J
SONS FARMS, INC. !
DEED BOOK 593, PAGE 105 ,
S /" ~ /
\ \~

UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
~ IAPPROXIMATE LOCATION)
EXIST. UTILITY POLE +
W
END CONSTRUCTION o .~°
,,.,- -L- STA. 13+40,00 ~ :°
'
END BORE P O
~
BEGIN TRENCH ! 2
_ END SBG WOODS I
BEGIN FOPS +15
+3 + GRAD TYPE 350
M
90.
--____ o
-- o
N 74'19' 54.3' E
u.. C.. ..
F----- ----'
~---
. ., 15i~M
~ Ns, `"-
RAU TYPE 3!s I + RW
>I
/ WOODS
i
i ,'
~ / ~ ~
W~e\ ~ ~~~
i O
LEWIS EDWARD WILLIAM$ AND
WIFE, CELESTINE M, WILLIAMS
INTO DEED BOOK II33, PAGE 572
BY