9. Public Comment summary Spreadsheet - Riverbend Final 4-22-16_

Name
Organ izati on/Affi I i
Date Received
How comment
Comment Summary
ation/Occupation
was submitted
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Bill Crowley
N/A
2/18/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Claudia MacDonald
N/A
2/18/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Conda Jones
N/A
2/18/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Eric Milholland
N/A
2/18/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Gayle Anstine
N/A
2/18/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Kate Fulbright
N/A
2/18/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Kathie Moyer
N/A
2/18/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Margaret Ocasio
N/A
2/18/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Gregory Austin
N/A
2/20/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Anita Stilley
N/A
2/24/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Eric Kalis
N/A
2/25/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Linda Williams
N/A
2/25/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.

Urge the state to uphold the high hazard rating that Duke Energy's Riverbend Steam Station
received. While the Riverbend plant cleanup is long overdue I was disappointed to learn that
Sheri Boone
N/A
2/25/16
Email
other communities across our state may not get a full cleanup. This is unacceptable. It is
imperative that Duke Energy remove its coal ash from leaking, unlined pits near communities
and families across North Carolina to safer dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater. Capping in place is not a cleanup plan.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jan Glenn
N/A
2/26/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Lenore Madeleine
N/A
2/26/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Martha Spencer
N/A
2/26/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Peter Crow
N/A
2/26/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Roan Brannon
N/A
2/26/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Nancy Gargis
N/A
2/29/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Oral - Public
Summary: Supports the high risk rating for Riverbend. Summary: Home value lowered by
Amy Brown
N/A
3/1/16
Meeting
HIRE. Summary: Tells children to make baths quick. Has been giving them water for years.
Concerned about health effects. Summary: Concerned about the offsite fill areas.
Brittany Cleveland
NC Sierra Club
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: supports the high risk rating for Riverbend.
Meeting
Mountain Island
Oral - Public
Summary: Is the water being filtered that is being decanted? Check river monitors north and
Chuck Myers
Lake Riverkeeper
3/1/16
Meeting
south of plant. Summary: what are the penalties or plans if Duke does not complete closure
by required deadline?
Deborah Baker
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: supports the high risk rating for Riverbend. Summary: spoke of health issues.
Meeting
Deborah Graham
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: remove ash and you remove the risk. Summary: Stop Duke from passing costs
Meeting
on to consumer.
Donna Leonard
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: concerned by ash impacts and wants Duke to do the right thing.
Meeting
Jeff Kaiser
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: no ash ponds are safe. Summary: Afraid of their water. Afraid to use pool.
Meeting
Afraid for women who have been giving water to children.
Jim Mitchum
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: supports the high risk rating for Riverbend.
Meeting
John Teague
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: home value lowered by HIRE.
Meeting
Kathy Sparrow
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: supports the high risk rating for Riverbend. Summary: Stop Duke from passing
Meeting
costs on to consumer. Summary: Dr. Vengosh study found arsenic in soil near Riverbend.
Oral - Public
Summary: dust is issue from trucking of coal ash to and from landfills. Summary:
Kerry Hutton
N/A
3/1/16
Meeting
concerned that all data is coming from Duke and wants to know if any outside entity has done
any work at the sites to verify. Summary: Claims to have seen illegal discharges to the river.
Mellisa Lefler
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: spoke of health issues. Summary: mentioned that Duke was dumping ash onsite
Meeting
in areas other than theponds?
Monica Embry
Green Peace
3/1/16
Oral - Public
Summary: supports the high risk rating for Riverbend. Summary: spoke of health issues.
Meeting
Catawba
Oral - Public
Summary: supports the high risk rating for Riverbend. Summary: ash trucks should be
Sam Perkins
Riverkeeper
3/1/16
Meeting
washed after dumping and covered going each way. Summary: wants to see Allen ranked
high. Summary: Collapse of dam would have huge impact in lake.
Oral - Public
Summary: supports the high risk rating for Riverbend. Summary: No liners or caps so they
Sarah Kellog
Applachian Voices
3/1/16
Meeting
don't have to deal with it again in the future. Summary: be aware of worker safety at the
sites.
Summary: Presented summary of Duke's Efforts at Riverbend. Began moving ash by truck in
Tim Gause
Duke Energy
3/1/16
Oral - Public
May 2015 to lined landfill in Homer, GA and Marshall Steam Station. Also moved ash to fully
Meeting and Written
lined structural fill in Chatham County. Built two mile railroad line to facilitate ash removal.
Currently removing ash from dry stacks near ponds. Then will move ash from ponds.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Debroah Winegar
N/A
3/2/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Abby Bailey
N/A
3/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Anne Jones
N/A
3/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Laura Hill
N/A
3/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Robert Schwartz
N/A
3/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Sharon Olson
N/A
3/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Stuart Mandel
N/A
3/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Tom McKay
N/A
3/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Amy Adams
N/A
3/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Judith Porter
N/A
3/5/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Lynn Mendes
N/A
3/14/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Wyman Whipple
N/A
3/20/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Carol Hoke
N/A
3/21/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
While I support the high -priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking
the ash to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined
landfills, but prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance
Oscar Reville
n/a
3/21/16
Email
from other communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy
shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is
committed to fully excavating its coal ash without increasing rates for its customers. Duke
Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility
to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Bradley Mefford
N/A
3/24/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
R. Worrell
N/A
3/24/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Pam Bloom
N/A
3/25/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Janet Smith
N/A
3/25/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
Martha
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Cunningham
N/A
3/25/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Leslie Poplawski
N/A
3/26/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Tom Alligood
N/A
3/29/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Sandra Tucker
N/A
4/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Rev. Scott Karns
Church
4/3/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
The NAMAB has been integrally involved in the review of groundwater assessment plans,
comprehensive site assessments, and corrective action plans, which have been submitted to
DEQ. Likewise, it has participated in the review of stability and engineering related
assessments and with the implementation of NAMAB-recommended health and
environmental assessments of risk. While licensed professionals are responsible for these
work products, the group is sufficiently aware of the site -specific conditions to which the
CAMA risk classification criteria are being applied. For example, licensed engineers and
geologists, with support from health and environmental risk assessors, have determined that
there is no imminent hazard. Those same professionals have determined that existing
conditions at these sites do not present a substantial likelihood that death, serious illness,
severe personal injury, or a substantial endangerment to health, property, or the environment
will occur. SEE EMAIL ATTACHMENT A risk classification of intermediate or high (for
instance high priority as prescribed in the case of Asheville, Dan River, Riverbend and Sutton)
by law requires excavation and re -disposal to a new location without a scientific basis, and
Dr. John L. Daniels,
National Ash
without consideration of broader immediate and life cycle impacts to communities and the
P.E.
Management
4/5/16
Email
environment. Excavation of coal ash is one method of addressing site's groundwater or
Advisory Board
stability concerns. However, based on holistic and life cycle considerations, it may not be a
safe, effective and sustainable alternative. Other alternatives either individually or in
combinations, such as capping, monitored natural attenuation, slurry cutoff walls, in -place
stabilization/fixation, pumping wells, permeable reactive barriers and volume reduction of
impounded ash through escalation of beneficial use, should be considered and compared on
an impoundment by impoundment basis to develop an effective, safe and sustainable
remedial strategy. The efficacy of these alternative methods increases with the amount of ash
in any given location, i.e., the larger the impoundment, the smarter we need to be. The
environmental and geotechnical remediation business is very mature and has evolved beyond
a "dig and haul" mentality as the best and most environmentally protective solution. The
additional risk imposed by excavating and transporting ash from one location to another can
exceed the potential risk posed by leaving the ash in place. Risk drivers include the statistical
certainty of traffic fatalities and injuries, as tabulated by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. Likewise, excavation results in ecological disturbance, ongoing site releases
from ash disturbance for years and broader environmental impacts from resource use and
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Dr. Schwatz, MD
Medical Doctor
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
Jesse
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Boeckermann
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
William, Margaret
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Holcomb & Family
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
John Dimling
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Kenneth A Byrd
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Beth Stanberry
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
James Davidson
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
John O'Connor
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Stephanie Langston
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Nancy Khoury
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Rebecca Hurd
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Martin Hazeltine
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Robert Sondgerath
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
William Van Hine
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Mary Fields
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Barbara Cerridwen
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Kate Fleming
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Laura England
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Meg Morgan
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
James Schall
N/A
4/6/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Christi Dillon
N/A
4/7/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Melanie Porter
N/A
4/8/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Donald Dawson
N/A
4/8/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
James Stone
N/A
4/8/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jeff Hibbard
N/A
4/9/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Michaela Coleman
N/A
4/11/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Erica Gunnison
N/A
4/11/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Brian Sewell
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Matthew Wasson
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Adam Wells
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Allison Verling
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Lauren Essick
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Andy Myers
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Katie Harris
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Margie McDonald
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Amalie Duvall
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Elizabeth Payne
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jeffery Deal
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
Denise
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
DerGarabedian
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jeannie Yount
N/A
4/13/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Debbie Arnold
N/A
4/13/16
Email
Duke Power has made huge profits. Let THEM clean up their own mess at their own
expense'.'
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Rory Mcllmoil
N/A
4/14/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Linda Jamison
N/A
4/14/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
Brenda Wayne
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Wyatt
N/A
4/14/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Eliza Laubauch
N/A
4/14/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Herb Pomfrey
N/A
4/14/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Sue Crotts
N/A
4/14/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Eric Teagarden
N/A
4/14/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Scott Teagarden
N/A
4/15/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
Nicki Faircloth
N/A
4/15/16
Email
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost.
I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate ash, the company should continue
researching alternative storage options that will provide a permanent solution for coal ash
storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic liner.
Boron, manganese, and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above
standards in groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the
high -priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills
in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer
Molly Moore
N/A
4/15/16
Email
that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders,
not ratepayers, pay for the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully
excavating its coal ash without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this
mess, not North Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it
up but also to pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy
continues to excavate ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage
options that will provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it
with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Helen Livingston
N/A
4/15/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Abigail Huggins
N/A
4/15/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Andrew Huggins
N/A
4/15/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Dennis Huggins
N/A
4/15/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jan Huggins
N/A
4/15/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Rachel Minick
N/A
4/15/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Rachel Larson
N/A
4/16/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jeremy Sprinkle
N/A
4/16/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Karen Bearden
N/A
4/16/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Joe Bearden
N/A
4/16/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Edward Thompson
N/A
4/16/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Robert du Rivage
N/A
4/16/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Leah Smith
N/A
4/17/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Moni Hill
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Kevin Sewell
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Lori Gilcrist
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Burnitt Bealle
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Gordon Schuit
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Sabine Schoenbach
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Janet Tice
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Deja Lizer
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Stephen Wollentin
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Clark Goslee
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
David Henderson
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Eli Helbert
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
William and
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Barbara
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
Cunningham
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Randy Outland
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Margie Huggins
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Andrea Thompson
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Emily Willey
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jonathan Gach
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Karl DeKing
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Lynn Willis
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Barry Anderson
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Ken Goldsmith
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jim Stolz
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Ruth Miller
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jeanne Supin
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Vesta Burnett
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Jay Marlow
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Marilyn Constine
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Tarence Ray
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Sarah Kellogg
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Robert Phipps
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Sandy Forrest
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Davis Clark
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Les Short
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
Eula
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Apostolopoulos
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
David Walker
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Larry Smith -Black
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Duke's leaking coal ash impoundments across the state continue to threaten ground and
surface water.
State health officials advised communities close to Duke's facilities not to drink their well
water
because of harmful pollutants like vanadium and hexavalent chromium. No family should have
to
question the safety of their water. CONTAINS A PETITION SIGNED BY NUMEROUS
Adam Reaves
Southern Alliance
4/18/16
Email
PARTIES. SEE EMAIL ATTACHMENT I'm writing to urge you to rank every coal ash
for Clean Energy
impoundment in North Carolina as high or intermediate priority. Duke Energy should be
required to remove all of the coal ash at each of its 14 power plants sites to dry, lined storage
away from our waterways and groundwater, and from our most
vulnerable communities such as low-income communities or communities of color. DEQ's
rating process offers the best opportunity to properly deal with Duke's coal ash pollution and
ensure the health and safety of NC communities. Please ensure Duke's coal ash is moved to
lined, dry storage, away from our rivers and waterways and our most vulnerable communities.
CONTAINS A PETITION SIGNED BY NUMEROUS PARTIES. SEE EMAIL ATTACHMENT

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Philip Marschall
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Andrew Payne
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Carol Dugger
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Karen Horton
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
Braethun Bharathae
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Lane
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Robert Coffin
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Chole Crabtree
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Dot Griffith
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Kelly Arnold
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Elizabeth Goyer
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Linda Kellogg
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Joseph Phillips
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Darcy Jones
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Charlie Kelly
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Molly Clay
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Ricki Draper
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Nina Rajagopalan
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Tom Patterson
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Emma A
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Terry Kellogg
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Attached is a report on the impact of the coal ash ponds on low-income and communities of
Libbie Weimer
Research Assistant
4/18/16
Email
color, as well as cumulative impacts from nearby emitting facilities. Low-income communities
Duke Univeristy
more likely to be burdened by environmental hazards, and the state is not doing enough to
take environmental justice concerns into account. SEE EMAIL ATTACHMENT

Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Sheila Maphet
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Mary Washburn
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
David Bellard
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Amelia Cline
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
Caroline Armijo
N/A
4/18/16
Email
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.

Kevin Oshnock
N/A
4/18/16
Email
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Alex Benz
N/A
4/18/16
Email
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Leigh Rhodes
N/A
4/18/16
Email
Seeps and leaks from the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site flow into Mountain Island Lake,
the drinking water reservoir for North Carolina's largest city, Charlotte. Boron, manganese,
and other harmful pollutants have been detected at levels well above standards in
groundwater near the coal ash pits at the Riverbend site. While I support the high -priority
rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking the ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the
ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which
I define as at least 3 miles. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for
the cost of cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North
Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to
pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. I believe that as Duke Energy continues to excavate
ash, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a
permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner.
Harry Sideris
Duke Energy
4/18/16
USPS Mail
Summary: Duke supplied a massive report on all of their sites for consideration. SEE
SCANNED DOCUMENT