Public Comment Summary Spreadsheet - Dan River - Final 4-22-16

Organization/A
How comment was
Name
ffiliation/Occup
Date Received
submitted
Comment Summary
ation
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Norma Hopkins
N/A
2/18/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Carolyn Smith
N/A
2/18/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storacie away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Cathy Whitman
N/A
2/18/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Jill Green
N/A
2/18/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Teresa Page
N/A
2/18/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storacie away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
D. Watts
N/A
2/18/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Elizabeth Joyce
N/A
2/19/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Katherine Fox
N/A
2/19/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storacie away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Sarah Casey
N/A
2/19/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Rahni Sumler
N/A
2/19/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storacie away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Marijo Schaffer
N/A
2/19/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storacie away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Karen Tucker
N/A
2/20/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Margaret Trent
N/A
2/22/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storacie away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
Terry Woods
N/A
2/22/16
Email
lined storage away from waterways. I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan
River power plan. Even after the Dan River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened
by even larger leaking and unlined coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits
must be removed to safer dry, lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Scott Lawrence
N/A
2/25/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storacie away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Rebecca LaPrade
N/A
2/25/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
am glad a e coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Why do you keep
letting Duke -Energy run all over this state and allow them to try and get away with not cleaning up
their mess. We all know they kept their mouths shut hoping no one would ever notice they were
Richard Frohock
N/A
2/25/16
Email
poisoning our water and soil with their coal ash. I think if that leak had not happen in Eden on the
Dan River it would have been business as usual at Duke -Energy for them and they would have
continued not saying anything and kept poisoning us. Why does the state act like this is ok. What is
Duke -Energy going to do? Cut off our electricity to show us they can do what ever they please? It's
i
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. Even after the Dan
Janis Flowers
N/A
2/25/16
Email
River site is cleaned up, our community will remain threatened by even larger leaking and unlined
coal ash pits upstream. All of NC's polluting, unlined coal ash pits must be removed to safer dry,
lined storage away from waterways.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. I also ask that Duke
Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina,
SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash without increasing rates for its customers. Duke
Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to
properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. While I support the high -
Jan Glenn
N/A
2/26/16
Email
priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking its ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the ash is
stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which I define as at
least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the Dan River plant, the company
should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a permanent solution for
coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic liner.

I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. I also ask that Duke
Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina,
SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash without increasing rates for its customers. Duke
Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to
properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. While I support the high -
Peter Crow
N/A
2/26/16
Email
priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking its ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the ash is
stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which I define as at
least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the Dan River plant, the company
should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a permanent solution for
coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic liner.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. I also ask that Duke
Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina,
SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash without increasing rates for its customers. Duke
Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to
properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. While I support the high -
Joan Brannon
N/A
2/26/16
Email
priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking its ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the ash is
stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which I define as at
least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the Dan River plant, the company
should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a permanent solution for
coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic liner.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. I also ask that Duke
Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina,
SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash without increasing rates for its customers. Duke
Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to
properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. While I support the high -
Martha Spencer
N/A
2/26/16
Email
priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking its ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the ash is
stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which I define as at
least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the Dan River plant, the company
should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a permanent solution for
coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic liner.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. I also ask that Duke
Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina,
SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash without increasing rates for its customers. Duke
Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to
properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. While I support the high -
Lenore Madeleine
N/A
2/26/16
Email
priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking its ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the ash is
stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which I define as at
least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the Dan River plant, the company
should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a permanent solution for
coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic liner.
I am glad that the coal ash is being removed here at the Dan River power plan. I also ask that Duke
Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina,
SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash without increasing rates for its customers. Duke
Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it is not only the company's responsibility to
properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no matter the cost. While I support the high -
Nancy Gargis
N/A
2/29/16
Email
priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking its ash to landfills in other
communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but prefer that the ash is
stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other communities, which I define as at
least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the Dan River plant, the company
should continue researching alternative storage options that will provide a permanent solution for
coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic liner.
Davis Montgomery
Duke Energy
3/1/16
Oral - Public Meeting
Presented summary of Duke's Efforts at Dan River
John Wagner
N/A
3/1/16
Oral - Public Meeting
DEQ should monitor process. DEQ should be transparent. All sites should be high risk.
Robert L. Finch
NAACP
3/1/16
Oral - Public Meeting
Lee county does not want coal ash.
Problem starts with legislature in general. DEMLR works with fracking commission. Concerns with
Oral and Written
McCrory and lawsuits. The Other Risk Factors are not weighted the same as the others. Did not
Jess Epperson
N/A
3/1/16
Submission - Public
explain how the derived classification. CAMA did not explain how they combined nine criteria into
Meeting
three risk classifications. In the absence of rules, it is hard to identify the principles underlying the
classification decisions.
While support the ig -pnon y ra ing of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoici truCKing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Deborah Winegar
N/A
3/2/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i eWlrsuppo the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Amy Adams
N/A
3/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Abby Bailey
N/A
3/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Stuart Mandel
N/A
3/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Tom McKay
N/A
3/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Sharon Olson
N/A
3/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Laura Hill
N/A
3/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Robert Schwartz
N/A
3/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Anne Jones
N/A
3/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Judith Porter
N/A
3/5/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
My name is William Bryan and I was in attendance for the March 1 st Public Hearing in Eden, NC.
William Bryan
N/A
3/8/16
Email
While I was there, I understood that there would be a record of the audio available from the meeting.
was curious how to go about getting a copy of the audio from that meeting. Any information would
be hel ful and I thank you for your time.

While I support the ig -pnori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Lynn Mendes
N/A
3/14/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Wyman Whipple
N/A
3/20/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Carol Hoke
N/A
3/21 /16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Oscar Revilla
N/A
3/21 /16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Diane Pfundstein
N/A
3/24/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Bradley Mefford
N/A
3/24/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
R. Worrell
N/A
3/24/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Palm Bloom
N/A
3/25/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the Ig -prlorl y rating oIs site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc Ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Janet Smith
N/A
3/25/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe Ig -pnorl y rating oIs site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc Ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Martha Cunningham
N/A
3/25/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the Ig -prlorl y rating oIs site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc Ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Leslie Poplawski
N/A
3/26/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the Ig -prlorl y rating o7Is site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc Ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Sandra Tucker
N/A
4/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the Ig -prlorl y rating oIs site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc Ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Rev. Scott Karns
N/A
4/3/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
e NAWALas been integrally involved in the review of groundwater assessment pans,
comprehensive site assessments, and corrective action plans, which have been submitted to DEQ.
Likewise, it has participated in the review of stability and engineering related assessments and with
the implementation of NAMAB-recommended health and environmental assessments of risk. While
licensed professionals are responsible for these work products, the group is sufficiently aware of the
site -specific conditions to which the CAMA risk classification criteria are being applied. For example,
licensed engineers and geologists, with support from health and environmental risk assessors, have
determined that there is no imminent hazard. Those same professionals have determined that
existing conditions at these sites do not present a substantial likelihood that death, serious illness,
severe personal injury, or a substantial endangerment to health, property, or the environment will
occur. SEE EMAIL ATTACHMENT A risk classification of intermediate or high (for instance high
priority as prescribed in the case of Asheville, Dan River, Riverbend and Sutton) by law requires
excavation and re -disposal to a new location without a scientific basis, and without consideration of
broader immediate and life cycle impacts to communities and the environment. Excavation of coal
Dr. John L. Daniels,
National Ash
ash is one method of addressing site's groundwater or stability concerns. However, based on holistic
P.E.
Management
4/5/16
Email
and life cycle considerations, it may not be a safe, effective and sustainable alternative. Other
Advisory Board
alternatives either individually or in combinations, such as capping, monitored natural attenuation,
slurry cutoff walls, in -place stabilization/fixation, pumping wells, permeable reactive barriers and
volume reduction of impounded ash through escalation of beneficial use, should be considered and
compared on an impoundment by impoundment basis to develop an effective, safe and sustainable
remedial strategy. The efficacy of these alternative methods increases with the amount of ash in any
given location, i.e., the larger the impoundment, the smarter we need to be. The environmental and
geotechnical remediation business is very mature and has evolved beyond a "dig and haul" mentality
as the best and most environmentally protective solution. The additional risk imposed by excavating
and transporting ash from one location to another can exceed the potential risk posed by leaving the
ash in place. Risk drivers include the statistical certainty of traffic fatalities and injuries, as tabulated
by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Likewise, excavation results in ecological
disturbance, ongoing site releases from ash disturbance for years and broader environmental
impacts from resource use and emissions, as noted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). These risks and impacts should be calculated and considered before embarking on the mass
mnvamant of tanc of milli nc of tnnc of matarinl CFF FNAAII ATTA(.l-1KAFI�IT AAnranvar nnnrccciva
while suppo a Ig -prlorl y ra Ingo Is site, encourage u e Energy to avoid ruc Ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Dr. Schwartz, MD
Medical Doctor
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
mattar tha rnct

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jesse Boeckermann
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
William, Margaret
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Holcomb & Family
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
John Dimling
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Kenneth A. Byrd
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Beth Stanberry
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
James Davidson
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
John O'Connor
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Stephanie Langston
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Douglas Treado
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Nancy Khoury
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Rebecca Hurd
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Martin Hazeltine
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Robert Sondgerath
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
William Van Hine
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Mary Fields
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Barbara Cerridwen
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Kate Fleming
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Laura England
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Meg Morgan
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
James Schall
N/A
4/6/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Christi Dillon
N/A
4/7/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Melanie Porter
N/A
4/8/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Donald Dawson
N/A
4/8/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
James Stone
N/A
4/8/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jeff Hibbard
N/A
4/9/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Michaela Coleman
N/A
4/11 /16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Erica Gunnison
N/A
4/11 /16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Brian Sewell
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Matthew Wasson
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Adam Wells
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Allison Verling
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Lauren Essick
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Andy Myers
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Katie Harris
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Margie McDonald
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Amalie Duvall
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Elizabeth Payne
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jeffery Deal
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Denise
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
DerGarabedian
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jeannie Yount
N/A
4/13/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
Debbie Arnold
N/A
4/13/16
Email
Clean it all up. Unacceptable otherwise!!

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Rory Mcllmoil
N/A
4/14/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Linda Jamison
N/A
4/14/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Brenda Wayne Wyatt
N/A
4/14/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Eliza Labauch
N/A
4/14/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Herb Pomfrey
N/A
4/14/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Sue Crotts
N/A
4/14/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Eric Teagarden
N/A
4/14/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Scott Teagarden
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Nicki Faircloth
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Molly Moore
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Helen Livingston
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Abigail Huggins
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Andrew Huggins
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Dennis Huggins
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jan Huggins
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Rachel Minick
N/A
4/15/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

Summary: No community should be low risk. No coal ash should be capped in place. Summary:
Duke and their shareholders should pay for cleanup not ratepayers. Summary: The public should
have access to all plans made for excavation and movement of the ash, including details about the
transportation of the ash via trucks or rail. Both the local community, communities along the
DeAnna Hedgepeth
N/A
4/15/2016
USPS Mail
transport route, and those near the final proposed storage location should have opportunities for
input on Duke's plans for permanent safe storage of the coal ash. Summary: Duke should research
storage options that provide better long-term solutions than lined landfills; favoring those that reuse
coal ash or fully encapsulate the ash above ground with a more permanent barrier than a synthetic
liner. Summary: Duke should invest in renewable energy such as solar and wind and move away
from coal and natural gas.
While I support e ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid rue ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Rachel Larson
N/A
4/16/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
matter tha rnct
While I support the ig -priory rating ot this site, I encourage UuKe Energy to avoid rue ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jeremy Sprinkle
N/A
4/16/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
arrr)M
Mi e Shp
upporl the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid rue ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Karen Bearden
N/A
4/16/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
Mi e shp uppo a ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid rue ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Joe Bearden
N/A
4/16/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e sarbin uppo a ig -priory rating of triis site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid rue ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Edward Thompson
N/A
4/16/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
Ptbp
i e suppo a ig -priory rating of triis site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid rue ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Laurie Lamoreaux
N/A
4/16/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
Mi e shp uppo a ig -priory rating of triis site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid rue ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Robert du Rivage
N/A
4/16/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Leah Smilth
N/A
4/17/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Moni Hill
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Kevin Sewell
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating Mhis site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Lori Gilcrist
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Burnitt Beallq
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Gordon Schuit
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Sabine Schoenbach
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Janet Tice
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Deja Lizer
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Stephen Wollentin
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Clark Goslee
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating Mhis site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Frank Dietch
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
David Henderson
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Eli Helbert
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
William & Barbara
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Cunningham
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Randy Outland
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Margie Huggins
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Andrea Thompson
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Emily Willey
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Johnathan Gach
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Karl DeKing
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Lynn Willis
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Barry Anderson
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Ken Goldsmith
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jim Stolz
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Ruth Miller
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jeanne Supin
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Vesta Burnnett
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Jay Marlow
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Marilyn Constine
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Tarence Ray
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the H ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Sarah Kellogg
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage IJUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Robert Phipps
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage IJUKe Energy to avold truCKIng its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Sandy Forrest
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage IJUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Davis Clark
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage IJUKe Energy to avoici truCKIng its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Les Short
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage IJUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Eula Apostolopoulos
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage IJUKe Energy to avold truCKIng its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
David Walker
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage IJUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Larry Smith -Black
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
water.
State health officials advised communities close to Duke's facilities not to drink their well water
because of harmful pollutants like vanadium and hexavalent chromium. No family should have to
question the safety of their water. CONTAINS A PETITION SIGNED BY NUMEROUS PARTIES.
Southern
SEE EMAIL ATTACHMENT I'm writing to urge you to rank every coal ash impoundment in North
Adam Reaves
Alliance for
4/18/16
Email
Carolina as high or intermediate priority. Duke Energy should be required to remove all of the coal
Clean Energy
ash at each of its 14 power plants sites to dry, lined storage away from our waterways and
groundwater, and from our most
vulnerable communities such as low-income communities or communities of color. DEQ's rating
process offers the best opportunity to properly deal with Duke's coal ash pollution and ensure the
health and safety of NC communities. Please ensure Duke's coal ash is moved to lined, dry storage,
away from our rivers and waterways and our most vulnerable communities. CONTAINS A PETITION

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Philip Marschall
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Andrew Payne
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Carol Dugger
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating Mhis site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Karen Horton
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Braethun Bharathae-
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Lane
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Robert Coffin
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Chole Crabtree
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the h ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Dot Griffith
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Kelly Arnold
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Elizabeth Goyer
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Linda Kellogg
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Joseph Phillips
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Darcy Jones
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Charlie Kelly
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Molly Clay
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
i e suppo the H ig -prior y ra ing o is si e, encourage UU Ke Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Ricki Draper
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Nina Rajagopalan
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avold truCKIng its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Tom Patterson
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Emma A
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoici truCKIng its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Terry Kellogg
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
Attached is a report on the impact of the coal ash ponds on low-income and communities of color, as
Libbie Weimer
N/A
4/18/16
Email
well as cumulative impacts from nearby emitting facilities. Low-income communities more likely to be
burdened by environmental hazards, and the state is not doing enough to take environmental justice
concerns into account. SEE EMAIL ATTACHMENT
While I support the high -priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid trucking its ash
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
Sheila Maphet
N/A
4/18/16
Email
matter the cost. While I support the high -priority rating of this site, I encourage Duke Energy to avoid
trucking its ash to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined
landfills, but prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
matter the cost.
While 1 support the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Mary Washburn
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of tnis site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
David Bellard
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no

While I support the ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Amelia Cline
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priori y rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avold truCKIng its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Caroline Armijo
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Kevin Oshnock
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating o7This site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoici truCKIng its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Alex Benz
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppo the ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avoid ruc ing its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
John Freeze
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
While I suppothe ig -priory rating of this site, I encourage UUKe Energy to avold truCKIng its as
to landfills in other communities. I support safe reuse of the ash and storing it in lined landfills, but
prefer that the ash is stored on Duke Energy's property, or at a safe distance from other
communities, which I define as at least 3 miles. As Duke Energy continues to excavate ash at the
Dan River plant, the company should continue researching alternative storage options that will
Leigh Rhodes
N/A
4/18/16
Email
provide a permanent solution for coal ash storage which fully encapsulates it with a more permanent
barrier than a synthetic liner. I also ask that Duke Energy shareholders, not ratepayers, pay for the
cost of coal ash cleanup. In South Carolina, SCE&G is committed to fully excavating its coal ash
without increasing rates for its customers. Duke Energy made this mess, not North Carolinians, and it
is not only the company's responsibility to properly clean it up but also to pay for that cleanup, no
Harry Sideris
Duke Energy
4/18/16
USPS Mail
Summary: Duke supplied a massive report on all of their sites for consideration. SEE SCANNED
DOCUMENT